FCC Web Documents citing 22.972

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-203A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-203A1.pdf
  • length in the 800 MHz rebanding orders. See 800 MHz Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 15021-15045 ¶¶ 88 -141; 800 MHz Supplemental Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 25136-25143 ¶¶ 37-50; 800 MHz MO&O, 20 FCC Rcd at 16037- 16040 ¶¶ 50-58. It codified the procedures for measuring and resolving interference in the rules. See 47 C.F.R §§ 22.970, 22.972, 90.672-90.674. The determination of interference is based upon measurements made pursuant to very specific procedures. See 800 MHz Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 15025-15031 ¶¶ 95-108. Neither of the Commonwealth's reports addresses the Commission's threshold interference criteria, let alone shows that they have been or will be exceeded. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 90.674(a)(2)-(3). See, e.g., 800 MHz SMR
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-203A1.txt
  • length in the 800 MHz rebanding orders. See 800 MHz Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 15021-15045 ¶¶ 88 -141; 800 MHz Supplemental Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 25136-25143 ¶¶ 37-50; 800 MHz MO&O, 20 FCC Rcd at 16037- 16040 ¶¶ 50-58. It codified the procedures for measuring and resolving interference in the rules. See 47 C.F.R §§ 22.970, 22.972, 90.672-90.674. The determination of interference is based upon measurements made pursuant to very specific procedures. See 800 MHz Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 15025-15031 ¶¶ 95-108. Neither of the Commonwealth's reports addresses the Commission's threshold interference criteria, let alone shows that they have been or will be exceeded. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 90.674(a)(2)-(3). See, e.g., 800 MHz SMR
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268444A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268444A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268444A1.txt
  • designated Commission official. Prior to the authorized official making a determination that a clear and imminent danger exists, the associated written statement must be served by hand-delivery or receipted fax on the applicable offending licensee, with a copy transmitted by the fastest available means to the Washington, DC office of the Commission's Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau. 28. Section 22.972 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(3)(v) to read as follows: § 22.972 Interference resolution procedures. * * * * * (c) * * * (3) * * * (v) Has been approved by the Chief of the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau or other designated Commission official. Prior to the authorized official making a determination that a clear and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.txt
  • 90 licensee in the 800 MHz band, as defined in § 22.970 of this chapter, shall be strictly accountable to abate the interference, with full cooperation and utmost diligence, in the shortest time practicable. Interfering licensees shall consider all feasible interference abatement measures, including, but not limited to, the remedies specified in the interference resolution procedures set forth in § 22.972 of this chapter. This strict responsibility obligation applies to all forms of interference, including out-of-band emissions and intermodulation. (b) Joint and Several Responsibility. If two or more licensees knowingly or unknowingly, directly or indirectly, cause or contribute to causing unacceptable interference to a non-cellular Part 90 licensee in the 800 MHz band, as defined in § 22.970 of this chapter,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1_Erratum.doc
  • 90 licensee in the 800 MHz band, as defined in § 22.970 of this chapter, shall be strictly accountable to abate the interference, with full cooperation and utmost diligence, in the shortest time practicable. Interfering licensees shall consider all feasible interference abatement measures, including, but not limited to, the remedies specified in the interference resolution procedures set forth in § 22.972 of this chapter. This strict responsibility obligation applies to all forms of interference, including out-of-band emissions and intermodulation. (b) Joint and Several Responsibility. If two or more licensees knowingly or unknowingly, directly or indirectly, cause or contribute to causing unacceptable interference to a non-cellular Part 90 licensee in the 800 MHz band, as defined in § 22.970 of this chapter,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.txt
  • may receive initial notification of interference from non-cellular Part 90 licensees in the 800 MHz band pursuant to § 90.674(a) of this chapter. (1) Commercial aviation air-ground system licensees shall join with Part 90 ESMR licensees and Cellular Radiotelephone Service licensees in utilizing an electronic means of receiving the initial notification described in § 90.674(a) of this chapter. See § 22.972. (2) Commercial aviation air-ground system licensees must respond to the initial notification described in § 90.674(a) of this chapter as soon as possible and no later than 24 hours after receipt of notification from a Part 90 public safety/CII licensee. This response time may be extended to 48 hours after receipt from other Part 90 non-cellular licensees provided affected communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1_Erratum.doc
  • may receive initial notification of interference from non-cellular Part 90 licensees in the 800 MHz band pursuant to § 90.674(a) of this chapter. (1) Commercial aviation air-ground system licensees shall join with Part 90 ESMR licensees and Cellular Radiotelephone Service licensees in utilizing an electronic means of receiving the initial notification described in § 90.674(a) of this chapter. See § 22.972. (2) Commercial aviation air-ground system licensees must respond to the initial notification described in § 90.674(a) of this chapter as soon as possible and no later than 24 hours after receipt of notification from a Part 90 public safety/CII licensee. This response time may be extended to 48 hours after receipt from other Part 90 non-cellular licensees provided affected communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1.txt
  • in identifying and abating unacceptable interference. In sum, we will not burden interfered-with parties with information collection requirements as a prerequisite to abating interference to what oftentimes are mission critical communications. However, in response to a request from CTIA, we will extend from thirty days to sixty days (after the effective date of the rules), the deadline established in Sections 22.972(a)(2) and 90.674(a)(2) for cellular and ESMR carriers to establish a common, unified electronic means for initial notification of interference incidents. We believe this extension will allow the industry time to develop a single interface, as well as create standard processes and protocols for response, including initial meetings, testing, and documentation. We acknowledge that a case could arise in which a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1_Erratum.doc
  • in identifying and abating unacceptable interference. In sum, we will not burden interfered-with parties with information collection requirements as a prerequisite to abating interference to what oftentimes are mission critical communications. However, in response to a request from CTIA, we will extend from thirty days to sixty days (after the effective date of the rules), the deadline established in Sections 22.972(a)(2) and 90.674(a)(2) for cellular and ESMR carriers to establish a common, unified electronic means for initial notification of interference incidents. We believe this extension will allow the industry time to develop a single interface, as well as create standard processes and protocols for response, including initial meetings, testing, and documentation. We acknowledge that a case could arise in which a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-174A1_Erratum.pdf
  • (a) Definition. Except as provided in 47 C.F.R. §90.617(k), unacceptable interference to non-cellular Part 90 licensees in the 800 MHz band from cellular radiotelephone or Part 90 ­ 800 MHz cellular systems will be deemed to occur when the below conditions are met: * * * * * 162. In paragraph (a) of Section 22.971 the cross reference to Section 22.972 is replaced with a cross reference to 22.972(c). § 22.971 Obligation to abate unacceptable interference. (a) Strict Responsibility. Any licensee who, knowingly or unknowingly, directly or indirectly, causes or contributes to causing unacceptable interference to a non- cellular Part 90 licensee in the 800 MHz band, as defined in § 22.970 of this chapter, shall be strictly accountable to abate