FCC Web Documents citing 22.935

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.txt
  • not propose to revise or eliminate rules pertaining to cellular comparative renewal proceedings, with the possible exception of Section 22.943(c). Although the Commission is required to resolve mutually exclusive applications for initial cellular licenses through competitive bidding, competing applications filed against an existing cellular licensee's renewal application may need to be resolved through a comparative renewal proceeding pursuant to Section 22.935 of the Commission's rules. A comparative hearing is held among all qualified mutually exclusive applicants if the existing licensee fails to make a showing entitling it to a renewal expectancy, which would require the competing applications to be denied. As a result, we propose to retain the financial demonstration requirement only as it relates to cellular renewal proceedings, specifically Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2.txt
  • and n.7. Id. at 7. 47 C.F.R. § 22.919. CTIA Petition at 21. 47 C.F.R. § 22.941. See Cellular Biennial Review First Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 18401. See generally Lucent Comments. Id. at 1-2. Id. at 2-3. Id. at 3. Dobson et al. Comments at 2. CTIA Petition at 22-23; CTIA Further Comments at 6. 47 C.F.R. § 22.935. CTIA Petition at 22. In the Matter of Amendment of Part 22 of the Commission's Rules to Provide for Filing and Processing of Applications for Unserved Areas in the Cellular Service and to Modify Other Cellular Rules, CC Docket No. 90-6, Second Report and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 2449 (1992). 47 C.F.R. Part 22, subpart I. Service is provided by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2_Erratum.doc
  • and n.7. Id. at 7. 47 C.F.R. § 22.919. CTIA Petition at 21. 47 C.F.R. § 22.941. See Cellular Biennial Review First Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 18401. See generally Lucent Comments. Id. at 1-2. Id. at 2-3. Id. at 3. Dobson et al. Comments at 2. CTIA Petition at 22-23; CTIA Further Comments at 6. 47 C.F.R. § 22.935. CTIA Petition at 22. In the Matter of Amendment of Part 22 of the Commission's Rules to Provide for Filing and Processing of Applications for Unserved Areas in the Cellular Service and to Modify Other Cellular Rules, CC Docket No. 90-6, Second Report and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 2449 (1992). 47 C.F.R. Part 22, subpart I. Service is provided by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1313A1.txt
  • KNKA668 (``KCL Renewal Application''). The KCL Renewal Application was placed on Public Notice on April 22, 2009. On May 22, 2009, Tisdale Telephone Company, LLC filed a competing application against the KCL Renewal Application (File No. 0003848206) (``TTC Competing Application''). The KCL Renewal Application and the TTC Competing Application constitute a Renewal Filing Group pursuant to sections 22.131(b)(1), 22.131(c)(4)(i), and 22.935(c) of our rules. In addition, consistent with section 22.935(a) of our rules, we notify KCL that it must file a renewal expectancy showing (electronically via our Universal Licensing System (``ULS'')) within 60 days of the date of this Public Notice, or no later than August 10, 2009. Petitions to deny any of the mutually exclusive applications must be filed no
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1313A1_Rcd.pdf
  • license, call sign KNKA668 ("KCL Renewal Application").1The KCL Renewal Application was placed on Public Notice on April 22, 2009.2On May 22, 2009, Tisdale Telephone Company, LLC filed a competing application against the KCL Renewal Application (File No. 0003848206) ("TTC Competing Application").3The KCL Renewal Application and the TTC Competing Application constitute a Renewal Filing Group pursuant to sections 22.131(b)(1), 22.131(c)(4)(i), and 22.935(c) of ourrules. In addition, consistent with section22.935(a) of our rules, we notify KCL that it must file a renewal expectancy showing (electronically via our Universal Licensing System ("ULS")) within 60 days of the date of this Public Notice, or no later than August 10, 2009. Petitions to deny any of the mutually exclusive applications must be filed no later than
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208420A1.txt
  • Only C Countywide S Statewide N Nationwide including HI,AK,US Territories T Citywide O Other - Narrative U Continental US Page 127 Page 128 INFORMATIVE: File No. 0000230425, above, is a competing application filed against cellular renewal application File No. 0000212826, Public Notice Report Number 629 "Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Site-by Site Accepted for Filing," September 6, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. § 22.935.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-456A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-456A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-456A2.txt
  • of the Commission's rules as Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP), as it is now required under in Part 24. TIA believes it is confusing to have different measures of power units in Part 22 and Part 24. CTIA in its comments notes that Section 24.16 which covers renewal procedures for PCS licenses needs to be harmonized with 47 C.F.R. §§ 22.935-22-940, governing the content of renewal and competing applications for cellular licenses as well as a two-step process for resolving renewal challenges. Recommendation In addition to keeping the initial recommendation, staff, in response to comments, recommend the initiation of a proceeding to bring cellular, PCS, and the General Wireless Communications Service technical and operational rules under Parts 22, 24, and 27
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.txt
  • not propose to revise or eliminate rules pertaining to cellular comparative renewal proceedings, with the possible exception of Section 22.943(c). Although the Commission is required to resolve mutually exclusive applications for initial cellular licenses through competitive bidding, competing applications filed against an existing cellular licensee's renewal application may need to be resolved through a comparative renewal proceeding pursuant to Section 22.935 of the Commission's rules. A comparative hearing is held among all qualified mutually exclusive applicants if the existing licensee fails to make a showing entitling it to a renewal expectancy, which would require the competing applications to be denied. As a result, we propose to retain the financial demonstration requirement only as it relates to cellular renewal proceedings, specifically Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-229A1.txt
  • The technical information submitted by cellular licensees regarding their cell sites may be used by other licensees who wish to coordinate frequency usage along market borders or wish to seek contract extensions into a neighboring market. The Commission's staff also may use this information to analyze market conditions and service availability. Verizon Comments at 31. Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 22.935. CTIA Comments at 18. Qualcomm Comments at 8-9. Section 22.913(a) establishes the maximum effective radiated power of base transmitters and cellular repeaters. 47 C.F.R. § 22.913(a). Qualcomm Comments at 8-9. We also decline to address Ericsson's proposal regarding TIA's distribution of ESNs as beyond the scope of this proceeding. The Commission ceased assigning or maintaining a list of manufacturer codes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-166A1.txt
  • means service that is sound, favorable, and substantially above a level of mediocre service that would barely warrant renewal. See e.g. 47 C.F.R. §§ 22.503(k)(3), 27.14, 90.685(b), 95.381, 101.527(a), 101.1011(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.17, 101.527, 101.1011. See CTIA Comments at 5, Sprint Reply Comments at 23. OPASTCO/RTG Comments at 4-5. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.949. See e.g. 47 C.F.R. §§ 22.935(a), 22.940(a)(2). At a minimum, this showing must include (a) a description of the licensee's current service in terms of geographic coverage and population served as well as the system's ability to accommodate roamers; (b) an explanation of the licensee's record of expansion, including a timetable for any planned construction of new cell sites; (c) a description of the licensee's investment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-86A1.txt
  • filing of an extension request will automatically extend the discontinuance period a minimum of the latter of an additional 30 days or the date upon which the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau acts on the request. PART 22-PUBLIC MOBILE SERVICES The authority citation for Part 22 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 154, 222, 303, 309 and 332. Remove Section 22.935. Remove Section 22.936. Remove Section 22.939. Remove Section 22.940. Remove Section 22.943. PART 24-PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES The authority citation for Part 24 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 154, 301, 302, 303, 309 and 332. Remove Section 24.16. PART 27-MISCELLANEOUS WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES The authority citation for Part 27 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 154,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-86A1_Rcd.pdf
  • applications.12The rules require an administrative law judge (ALJ) to conduct a threshold hearing to determine whether a cellular renewal applicant is entitled to a renewal expectancy.13 847 C.F.R. § 1.949(a). 9Id.Specifically, renewal applications "must be filed no later than the expiration date of the authorization," but "no sooner than 90 days prior to expiration." Id. 10Id. 11Id. 12See47 C.F.R. §§ 22.935-22.940. 13A renewal expectancy is awarded if the ALJ finds that the renewal applicant has provided substantial service, and substantially complied with the Commission's rules, policies, and the Communications Act. See47 C.F.R. (continued....) 6999 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-86 If the ALJ determines that the applicant is entitled to a renewal expectancy and is otherwise basically qualified, the license is renewed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • form numbers to reflect ULS forms). 22.929(a), (b) Application requirements for the Cellular 22.929(a), (b) Radiotelephone Service -- Administrative information (change form numbers to reflect ULS forms). 22.929(b)(1) Application requirements for the Cellular 22.929(b)(1) Radiotelephone Service -- Location description (NAD83 instead of NAD27). 22.929(b)(2) Application requirements for the Cellular No new rule Radiotelephone Service -- Antenna manufacturer (eliminate antenna information). 22.935 Procedures for comparative renewal proceedings (change 22.935 to allow electronic filing of renewal expectancy via ULS). 22.936 Dismissal of applications in cellular renewal proceedings 22.936 (change to allow electronic filing of request for approval of dismissal via ULS). 22.941(b), (c) System identification numbers (change form numbers to 22.941(b), (c) reflect ULS forms). 22.944 Transfers of interests in applications (move to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • form numbers to reflect ULS forms). 22.929(a), (b) Application requirements for the Cellular 22.929(a), (b) Radiotelephone Service -- Administrative information (change form numbers to reflect ULS forms). 22.929(b)(1) Application requirements for the Cellular 22.929(b)(1) Radiotelephone Service -- Location description (NAD83 instead of NAD27). 22.929(b)(2) Application requirements for the Cellular No new rule Radiotelephone Service -- Antenna manufacturer (eliminate antenna information). 22.935 Procedures for comparative renewal proceedings (change 22.935 to allow electronic filing of renewal expectancy via ULS). 22.936 Dismissal of applications in cellular renewal proceedings 22.936 (change to allow electronic filing of request for approval of dismissal via ULS). 22.941(b), (c) System identification numbers (change form numbers to 22.941(b), (c) reflect ULS forms). 22.944 Transfers of interests in applications (move to