FCC Web Documents citing 22.813
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-522A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-522A1.txt
- the captioned air- ground application.1 For the reasons discussed below, we deny the petition. 2. . Pursuant to Public Notice, dated March 29, 1995, Lawco's above-referenced application was amended to request authority to operate new air-ground facilities on 454.875 MHz at Bear Creek Township, Pennsylvania. On February 10, 1998, the Branch dismissed Lawco's application for failure to comply with section 22.813(a) of the Commission's rules.2 Section 22.813(a) provides that the minimum separation between co-channel air-ground stations is 621 miles when the antenna for the nearest co-channel transmitter is located in Canada.3 The Branch noted that coordination efforts with the Canadian government revealed that Lawco's proposed facility would cause potential harmful interference to the Ottawa, Ontario - Montreal, Quebec channel assignment on
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1380A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1380A1.txt
- the Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. On April 25, 2000, Skytel Communications, Inc. (``Skytel'') filed the above-captioned application. On May 19, 2000, Stratophone, LLC (``Stratophone'') filed a request to dismiss the application on the ground that the proposed transmitter is within 800 kilometers (497 miles) of Stratophone's existing transmitter in violation of section 22.813(a) of the Commission's rules. Subsequently, on May 23, 2000, Skytel withdrew its application, rendering Stratophone's request moot. 2. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 309(d) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 309(d), and section 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.331, the request to dismiss filed by Stratophone, LLC
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1381A1.txt
- Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ò Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In re Request of ) ) SKYTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ) File No. 0000116431 ) To Waive Section 22.813(a) of ) The Commission's Rules ) ORDER Adopted: June 8, 2001 Released: June 11, 2001 By the Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. On April 25, 2000, Skytel Communications, Inc. (``Skytel'') filed an application to operate in the Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service on the 454.975 MHz channel at South New Bern, North Carolina. Stratophone, LLC
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2218A1.txt
- on June 2, 2000 to dismiss Stratophone's above-captioned application to operate in the Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service on 454.750 MHz at Three Lakes, Wisconsin. 2. LTAB dismissed Stratophone's application on the ground that the proposed transmitter location was within 800 kilometers (497 miles) of station KNLW627, formerly licensed to LMR International, Inc. (LMR) at Sugar Camp, Wisconsin, in violation of section 22.813(a) of the Commission's rules. Prior to the dismissal of Stratophone's application, Stratophone's application and the above-captioned application filed by Skytel Communications, Inc. (Skytel) on January 14, 2000 for 454.750 MHz were mutually exclusive because Stratophone's application was filed within thirty days of the date on which Skytel's application was listed in a Public Notice as accepted for filing. Following the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3417A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3417A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3417A1.txt
- that it has not, and would not, cause harmful interference to other licensees operating in the area, and that there would be no adverse impact to other licensees because no other licenses may be granted on the subject frequencies near any of the NYC airports due to the distance separation requirements imposed by the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 22.813. Metro Telecom states that it has held an experimental authorization to operate on these frequencies for almost two and one-half years without causing interference to any general aviation air-ground system. Interested parties may file comments on the Waiver Request on or before January 10, 2003. Parties interested in submitting reply comments must do so on or before January 24, 2003.
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2380A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2380A1.txt
- which proposes to use seven frequencies at three fixed locations, is clearly distinguishable from the hundreds of frequencies and sites proposed in Schlumberger Technology Corp. We also agree with Metro Telecom that the eight Air-Mobile frequencies that are affected by the above-captioned application are not available for assignment to new Air-Ground service applicants in the New York City area. Section 22.813 of the Commission's Rules requires that co-channel Air-Ground stations be separated by ``at least 800 kilometers (497 miles).'' Given that incumbent Air-Ground stations are licensed on the eight frequencies affected by the captioned application at locations less than 497 miles from New York City, no new Air-Ground stations can be authorized to operate near the areas proposed in the above-captioned
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1254A1.txt
- also ask the Commission to waive the 12-month construction period requirement of section 22.815 to allow an extended build-out period of 24 months for their planned nationwide network. For the reasons stated below, we grant Petitioners' Waiver Request to the extent described herein, with certain specified conditions. In addition, as explained further below, we waive on our own motion subsection 22.813(a), to the extent described herein, and subsection 22.813(b) with a condition. BACKGROUND The Commission has allocated 12 communication channel pairs in the 454.700-454.975 MHz and 459.700-459.975 MHz bands for general aviation air-ground use. The Commission's Universal Licensing System (``ULS'') database shows that, as of July 1, 2010, there are 60 active general aviation air-ground licenses/call signs. Of these, 45 are
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1254A1_Rcd.pdf
- area.7Petitioners also ask the Commission to waive the 12-month construction period requirement of section 22.815 to allow an extended build-out period of 24 months for their planned nationwide network. For the reasons stated below, we grant Petitioners' Waiver Request to the extent described herein, with certain specified conditions. In addition, as explained further below, we waive on our own motion8subsection 22.813(a),9to the extent described herein, and subsection 22.813(b)10with a condition. I. BACKGROUND 2. The Commission has allocated 12 communication channel pairs in the 454.700-454.975 MHz and 459.700-459.975 MHz bands for general aviation air-ground use.11The Commission's Universal Licensing System ("ULS") database shows that, as of July 1, 2010, there are 60 active general aviation air-ground licenses/call signs. Of these, 45 are held
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298965A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298965A1.txt
- for these frequency bands is divided into eight geographical regions. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.619 for a definition of the eight regions and a list of which channels are allocated to the U.S. for each region. 10. Air-ground radiotelephone service stations must provide 1000 km (621 mi) distance separation to the nearest co-channel Canadian ground station. See 47 C.F.R. § 22.813. 11. Air-ground radiotelephone service stations located within 885 km (550 mi) of the border but beyond 8 km (5 mi) of any location listed in 47 C.F.R. § 22.859 must be coordinated. 12. Coordination criteria are based on frequency, location, and altitude. 13. VHF Maritime Public Correspondence - See 47 C.F.R. § 80.57 for the Canada/U.S.A. channeling arrangement. 14. Coordinate