FCC Web Documents citing 22.567

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1448A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1448A1.pdf
  • technically feasible without causing harmful interference to other spectrum users entitled to protection from such interference under the Commission's regulations. Wyoming submitted an engineering analysis report stating that its proposed operation will not cause harmful interference to incumbent site-based and geographic area-based co-channel licensees. Specifically, Wyoming performed a contour analysis with respect to co-channel incumbent licensees as directed by Section 22.567(a)(1). Wyoming provided contour plots to demonstrate that the interfering contours for the eleven base station transmitters covered in this application do not overlap any service contours of co-channel incumbent licensees. We have verified Wyoming's findings and find that its proposed operations would not cause harmful interference to incumbent co-channel licensees. However, we note that Section 22.567(a)(2) also requires either a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2803A1.txt
  • we continue to believe that TNDOT has met that threshold requirement. In its Petition, TNDOT asserts that its new engineering analysis shows that it satisfies Section 337(c)(1)(B) because it allegedly demonstrates that ``the requested use is technically feasible without causing harmful interference to other spectrum users entitled to protection from such interference under the Commission's regulations.'' In that connection, Section 22.567 of the Commission's rules describes the means used to determine whether a proposed operation would cause interference to other facilities. Here, TNDOT proposes operation on the frequency pair 152.780/158.040 MHz at two sites: Arlington (Shelby County), Tennessee and Johnson City (Washington County), Tennessee. At the Johnson City site, our review of the coordinates shows that the coordinates offered by TNDOT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-990A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-990A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-990A1.txt
  • channels to paging operations. The specific frequencies that TNDOT proposes to use are 157.950 MHz, 157.980 MHz, 158.080 MHz. Request at 1. 47 C.F.R. § 22.561. The frequencies may also be assigned to base or fixed transmitters if the paired base frequency is assigned to base transmitters in the same area operated by the same licensee. Id.; 47 C.F.R. § 22.567(h). Flexible Allocation of Frequencies in the Domestic Public Land Mobile Service for Paging and Other Services, First Report and Order, CC Docket No. 87-120, 4 FCC Rcd 1576, 1576 ¶¶ 3-4 (1989). Request at 2-3. Id. at 2. Id. at 1. Id. at 1-2. See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Request for Waiver by State of Tennessee, Department of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-411A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-411A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-411A1.txt
  • Westel that Shell's proposed operations would cause harmful interference to Westel's Station WXR977 in and around Houston, Texas. Shell's amended application reduces the proposed transmitter power from 25 to 15 watts effective radiated power (ERP) and decreases the proposed antenna height from 49 to 15 meters. Moreover, the revised engineering analysis was performed using the interference criteria specified in Section 22.567 of the Commission's Rules. On July 2, 2001, Westel filed supplemental comments opposing Shell's revised proposal. discussion Shell states that a reliable telecommunications system at its Deer Park facility is essential to the safety of Shell's employees and the people who live near the plant. The Deer Park plant is Shell's largest facility in the United States where crude oil
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1198A1.txt
  • the Public Mobile Services. Specifically, the Commission designated the frequencies requested herein for one-way or two-way mobile paging. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau's Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division (Division) placed the Commonwealth's waiver request on public notice on July 22, 2005. We received no comments or reply comments. On August 2, 2005, the Division returned the Commonwealth's application because Section 22.567 of the Commission's Rules requires a demonstration of interference protection to co-channel Station KNKJ255, Flattop, West Virginia on frequency 152.66 MHz. On September 15, 2005, the Commonwealth amended its application with an engineering analysis to demonstrate interference protection to Station KNKJ255. On February 2, 2006, the Division returned the Commonwealth's application again with respect to its request for a waiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1448A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1448A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1448A1.txt
  • technically feasible without causing harmful interference to other spectrum users entitled to protection from such interference under the Commission's regulations. Wyoming submitted an engineering analysis report stating that its proposed operation will not cause harmful interference to incumbent site-based and geographic area-based co-channel licensees. Specifically, Wyoming performed a contour analysis with respect to co-channel incumbent licensees as directed by Section 22.567(a)(1). Wyoming provided contour plots to demonstrate that the interfering contours for the eleven base station transmitters covered in this application do not overlap any service contours of co-channel incumbent licensees. We have verified Wyoming's findings and find that its proposed operations would not cause harmful interference to incumbent co-channel licensees. However, we note that Section 22.567(a)(2) also requires either a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.txt
  • AMTA Comments at 6-7; Blooston Comments at 8-9; Joint Commenters Comments at 5; NYSE&GC Reply Comments at 12-13. Joint Commenters Comments at 5. Id. We note that, while we are eliminating Sections 22.577 and 22.565(g) of the rules, operations on the mobile designated frequencies are subject to the power limitations in Section 22.565(a) and the channel assignment criteria in Section 22.567(h) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 22.591. Notice, 18 FCC Rcd at 8405 ¶63. The Section 22.591 table incorrectly specifies eight microwave channel center frequencies. That table should reflect that there are 398 microwave channel center frequencies. See Revision of Part 22 of the Commission's Rules Governing the Public Mobile Services, Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 6513, 6632 (1994).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1_Erratum.doc
  • AMTA Comments at 6-7; Blooston Comments at 8-9; Joint Commenters Comments at 5; NYSE&GC Reply Comments at 12-13. Joint Commenters Comments at 5. Id. We note that, while we are eliminating Sections 22.577 and 22.565(g) of the rules, operations on the mobile designated frequencies are subject to the power limitations in Section 22.565(a) and the channel assignment criteria in Section 22.567(h) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 22.591. Notice, 18 FCC Rcd at 8405 ¶63. The Section 22.591 table incorrectly specifies eight microwave channel center frequencies. That table should reflect that there are 398 microwave channel center frequencies. See Revision of Part 22 of the Commission's Rules Governing the Public Mobile Services, Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 6513, 6632 (1994).
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • (k)(1) and (k)(2) of this section, or alternatively, the substantial service requirement in paragraph (k)(3) of this section, may result in automatic termination or non-renewal of a paging geographic area license. For the purpose of this paragraph, to "cover" area means to include geographic area within the composite of the service contour(s) determined by the methods of §§ 22.537 or 22.567, as appropriate for the particular channel involved. Licensees may determine the population of geographic areas included within their service contours using either the 1990 census or the 2000 census, but not both. (1) No later than three years after the initial grant of a paging geographic area authorization, the licensee must construct or otherwise acquire and operate sufficient facilities to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc970059.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc970059.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc970059.wp
  • additional site-by-site applications will be accepted (with the exception of applications filed pursuant to Sections 22.369 and 90.177, applications filed for coordination with Mexico and Canada, and applications required under Section 1.1301 et seq.) The Bureau will also release a Public Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-59 See 47 C.F.R. § 22.351. 20 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 22.3, 22.105, 22.123(e), and 22.567. 21 Part 22 defines applications as mutually exclusive if (1) more than one application is pending, and (2) the grant 22 of one application would preclude the grant of the other(s) under applicable Commission rules. 47 C.F.R. § 22.131. See Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, PP Docket No. 93-253, 23 Second Report and Order,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc990098.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc990098.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc990098.wp
  • resolve pending petitions that might result in grants of applications. We also note that for purposes of 153 due diligence we intend to release, prior to auction, a list of site-specific applications and petitions pending at that time. Accordingly, we amend section 503(i) to clarify that geographic area licensees must provide co-channel interference protection in accordance with sections 22.537 or 22.567, as appropriate for the channel involved, to all authorized co-channel facilities of exclusive licensees within the paging geographic area.154 39. Petitioners also contend that system-wide licenses should include areas where an incumbent's interference contours do not overlap, but where no other licensee could place a transmitter because of interference rules. We conclude that a system-wide license is merely a consolidation
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/pagebp_g.pdf
  • protected station. The antenna center of radiation height above average terrain must be the highest antenna center of radiation height of any transmitter in the group in the direction of the protected station. The channel of the group is assumed to be the same as that of the protected station (co-channel), and studies must be made in accordance with § 22.567. § 22.165 Additional transmitters for existing systems. A licensee may operate additional transmitters at additional locations on the same channel or channel block as its existing system without obtaining prior Commission approval provided: (a) International coordination. The locations and/or technical parameters of the additional transmitters are such that individual coordination of the channel assignment(s) with a foreign administration, under applicable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • (k)(1) and (k)(2) of this section, or alternatively, the substantial service requirement in paragraph (k)(3) of this section, may result in automatic termination or non-renewal of a paging geographic area license. For the purpose of this paragraph, to "cover" area means to include geographic area within the composite of the service contour(s) determined by the methods of §§ 22.537 or 22.567, as appropriate for the particular channel involved. Licensees may determine the population of geographic areas included within their service contours using either the 1990 census or the 2000 census, but not both. (1) No later than three years after the initial grant of a paging geographic area authorization, the licensee must construct or otherwise acquire and operate sufficient facilities to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000990.doc
  • channels to paging operations. The specific frequencies that TNDOT proposes to use are 157.950 MHz, 157.980 MHz, 158.080 MHz. Request at 1. 47 C.F.R. § 22.561. The frequencies may also be assigned to base or fixed transmitters if the paired base frequency is assigned to base transmitters in the same area operated by the same licensee. Id.; 47 C.F.R. § 22.567(h). Flexible Allocation of Frequencies in the Domestic Public Land Mobile Service for Paging and Other Services, First Report and Order, CC Docket No. 87-120, 4 FCC Rcd 1576, 1576 ¶¶ 3-4 (1989). Request at 2-3. Id. at 2. Id. at 1. Id. at 1-2. See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Request for Waiver by State of Tennessee, Department of