FCC Web Documents citing 22.537

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2915A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2915A1.txt
  • public safety needs, do not meet the necessary level of security, do not adequately provide ``back-up'' reliability, and tend to have coverage holes in rural and other remote areas. Request at 3-4. See also Sacramento, 15 FCC Rcd at 12605 ¶ 13. See, e.g., South Bay, 13 FCC Rcd at 23796 ¶ 34. Request at 8 citing 47 C.F.R. § 22.537(f), and Attachment D. Section 22.537(f) establishes the interfering contour for 931 MHz paging systems. The interfering contour is a circle centered on the coordinates of the transmitting antenna with a radius that varies depending on the antenna height above average terrain (HAAT) and the effective radiated power (ERP). Monroe's captioned application proposes transmitters operating at a maximum ERP of 1000
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • in paragraphs (k)(1) and (k)(2) of this section, or alternatively, the substantial service requirement in paragraph (k)(3) of this section, may result in automatic termination or non-renewal of a paging geographic area license. For the purpose of this paragraph, to "cover" area means to include geographic area within the composite of the service contour(s) determined by the methods of §§ 22.537 or 22.567, as appropriate for the particular channel involved. Licensees may determine the population of geographic areas included within their service contours using either the 1990 census or the 2000 census, but not both. (1) No later than three years after the initial grant of a paging geographic area authorization, the licensee must construct or otherwise acquire and operate sufficient
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc970059.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc970059.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc970059.wp
  • to meet the above coverage requirements, the geographic area license will be terminated and subject to auction. The licensee may retain any sites that were authorized, constructed, and operating at the time the geographic area license was granted. For co-channel interference protection (with respect to incumbent licensees) we will use the fixed distances in Tables E-1 and E-2 in Section 22.537 of the Commission's rules for the exclusive 929 MHz and 931 MHz channels. The formulas for determining the service and interference contours for the remaining CCP channels will not be changed. All pending mutually exclusive applications for paging licenses filed with the Commission on or before the adoption date of this Order will be dismissed. All non-mutually exclusive applications filed
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc990098.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc990098.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc990098.wp
  • continuing to resolve pending petitions that might result in grants of applications. We also note that for purposes of 153 due diligence we intend to release, prior to auction, a list of site-specific applications and petitions pending at that time. Accordingly, we amend section 503(i) to clarify that geographic area licensees must provide co-channel interference protection in accordance with sections 22.537 or 22.567, as appropriate for the channel involved, to all authorized co-channel facilities of exclusive licensees within the paging geographic area.154 39. Petitioners also contend that system-wide licenses should include areas where an incumbent's interference contours do not overlap, but where no other licensee could place a transmitter because of interference rules. We conclude that a system-wide license is merely
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/pagebp_g.pdf
  • and the government of Canada or Mexico. See § 22.169. (3) The paging geographic area licensee or another licensee of a system within the paging geographic area applies to assign its authorization or for FCC consent to a transfer of control. (h) Adjacent geographic area coordination required. Before constructing a facility for which the interfering contour (as defined in § 22.537 or § 22.567 of this part, as appropriate for the channel involved) would extend into another paging geographic area, a paging geographic area licensee must obtain the consent of the relevant co-channel paging geographic area licensee, if any, into whose area the interfering contour would extend. Licensees are expected to cooperate fully and in good faith attempt to resolve potential
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • in paragraphs (k)(1) and (k)(2) of this section, or alternatively, the substantial service requirement in paragraph (k)(3) of this section, may result in automatic termination or non-renewal of a paging geographic area license. For the purpose of this paragraph, to "cover" area means to include geographic area within the composite of the service contour(s) determined by the methods of §§ 22.537 or 22.567, as appropriate for the particular channel involved. Licensees may determine the population of geographic areas included within their service contours using either the 1990 census or the 2000 census, but not both. (1) No later than three years after the initial grant of a paging geographic area authorization, the licensee must construct or otherwise acquire and operate sufficient
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/97-1245.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/97-1245.html
  • with adjacent stations. See 47 C.F.R. § 22.529 (1996); id. § 22.559. Once an applicant filed, the FCC reviewed each site-specific appli-cation preliminarily for formal compliance and issued public notice of acceptance of filing. See id. § 22.120. Generally, if an applicant's proposed service would overlap and interfere with an incumbent licensee's transmission, the application was denied. See id. § 22.537(a). When mutually exclusive site-specific applications were filed, a single applicant was selected by lottery. See id. § 22.131(c)(1). In the challenged rulemaking the FCC replaced the site-specific licensing process with a scheme of geographic licenses. The new scheme authorizes a licensee to operate a transmitter anywhere within the licensed geographic area without notice to the FCC of the transmitter's operation