FCC Web Documents citing 22.303

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-334A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-334A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-334A1.txt
  • mistakenly think that the Commission has increased the permitted power. We seek comment on this tentative conclusion. If parties disagree with this tentative conclusion, they should provide specific examples of how the benefits of such a harmonization outweigh the inevitable costs and potentially greater confusion among the public from such a conversion in the rules. Part 22 Transmitter Identification Section 22.303 of the Commission's rules provides, inter alia, that ``[t]he station call sign must be clearly and legibly marked on or near every transmitting facility, other than mobile transmitters, of the station.'' In the 2002 biennial review proceeding, CTIA and the Rural Cellular Association (RCA) recommend that the Commission eliminate this requirement in the interest of commercial wireless regulatory parity, since
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2.txt
  • Edits Order the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau modified or eliminated certain Part 22 rules pertaining to competitive bidding to conform with the general competitive bidding rules set forth in Part 1 of the Commission's rules. Comments CTIA urges the Commission to adhere to a policy of regulatory parity and eliminate unnecessary regulatory burdens imposed upon cellular service providers. CTIA cites sections 22.303 (requiring cellular providers to mark every transmitting facility with a station call sign) and 22.367 (imposing a vertical polarization requirement on cellular licensees) as examples of obligations that are imposed on cellular licensees but not on other CMRS providers. RCA also urges the Commission to eliminate the section 22.303 requirement that cellular carriers post the station call sign at every
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2_Erratum.doc
  • Edits Order the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau modified or eliminated certain Part 22 rules pertaining to competitive bidding to conform with the general competitive bidding rules set forth in Part 1 of the Commission's rules. Comments CTIA urges the Commission to adhere to a policy of regulatory parity and eliminate unnecessary regulatory burdens imposed upon cellular service providers. CTIA cites sections 22.303 (requiring cellular providers to mark every transmitting facility with a station call sign) and 22.367 (imposing a vertical polarization requirement on cellular licensees) as examples of obligations that are imposed on cellular licensees but not on other CMRS providers. RCA also urges the Commission to eliminate the section 22.303 requirement that cellular carriers post the station call sign at every
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-334A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-334A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-334A1.txt
  • mistakenly think that the Commission has increased the permitted power. We seek comment on this tentative conclusion. If parties disagree with this tentative conclusion, they should provide specific examples of how the benefits of such a harmonization outweigh the inevitable costs and potentially greater confusion among the public from such a conversion in the rules. Part 22 Transmitter Identification Section 22.303 of the Commission's rules provides, inter alia, that ``[t]he station call sign must be clearly and legibly marked on or near every transmitting facility, other than mobile transmitters, of the station.'' In the 2002 biennial review proceeding, CTIA and the Rural Cellular Association (RCA) recommend that the Commission eliminate this requirement in the interest of commercial wireless regulatory parity, since
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.txt
  • accident investigations. Maritel Comments (PR 92-257) at 13. See 47 C.F.R. § 87.109; see also Review of Part 87 of the Commission's Rules Concerning the Aviation Radio Service, Report and Order, WT Docket No. 01-289, 18 FCC Rcd 21432 (2003). VPC Second R&O, 12 FCC Rcd at 16979, ¶ 57. Maritel Comments (PR 92-257) at 13. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 22.303, 90.437. See Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act - Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services, Second Report and Order, GN Docket No. 93-252, 9 FCC Rcd 1411, 1448, ¶ 83 (1994) (CMRS 2nd R&O), recon. dismissed in part and denied in part, 15 FCC Rcd 5231 (2000); see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 20.9(a)(5), 80.3(f). Although all public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1.txt
  • coordinators, manufacturers, and others in the wireless industry. Moreover, because an EIRP limit is always a larger number than the equivalent ERP limit, we believe that restating all ERP limits as EIRP limits could likely cause some entities (e.g., licensees, frequency coordinators, etc.) to mistakenly think that the Commission has increased the permitted power. Part 22 Transmitter Identification Background. Section 22.303 of the Commission's rules provides, inter alia, that ``[t]he station call sign must be clearly and legibly marked on or near every transmitting facility, other than mobile transmitters, of the station.'' In the 2002 biennial review proceeding, CTIA and the Rural Cellular Association (RCA) recommended that the Commission eliminate this requirement in the interest of commercial wireless regulatory parity, since
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1_Erratum.doc
  • coordinators, manufacturers, and others in the wireless industry. Moreover, because an EIRP limit is always a larger number than the equivalent ERP limit, we believe that restating all ERP limits as EIRP limits could likely cause some entities (e.g., licensees, frequency coordinators, etc.) to mistakenly think that the Commission has increased the permitted power. Part 22 Transmitter Identification Background. Section 22.303 of the Commission's rules provides, inter alia, that ``[t]he station call sign must be clearly and legibly marked on or near every transmitting facility, other than mobile transmitters, of the station.'' In the 2002 biennial review proceeding, CTIA and the Rural Cellular Association (RCA) recommended that the Commission eliminate this requirement in the interest of commercial wireless regulatory parity, since
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/pagebp_g.pdf
  • to stations in the Offshore Radiotelephone Service. (i) Provision of information upon request. Upon request by the FCC, licensees must supply administrative or technical information concerning the additional transmitters. At the time transmitters are added pursuant to this section, licensees must make a record of the pertinent technical and administrative information so that such information is readily available. See § 22.303. § 22.201 Scope of competitive bidding rules. Sections 22.201 through 22.227, inclusive (and, unless otherwise specified in this part, the procedures set forth in part 1, subpart Q, of this chapter), apply only to competitive bidding ("auction") procedures for authorizations as follows: (a) Paging geographic area authorizations issued pursuant to this part or to part 90 of this chapter. (b)