FCC Web Documents citing 22.165

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-402A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-402A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-402A1.txt
  • Section III.A.2(b)(ii), above. In this particular proceeding, we intend to consider only those proposals directly related to our goal of promoting secondary markets. Proposals of general applicability concerning revisions to technical rules will be addressed in separate proceedings, such as in our biennial review proceedings. See, e.g., Biennial Review Part 90 Refarming Proceeding. 47 C.F.R. � 24.236. 47 C.F.R. � 22.165. See Amendment of Parts 1, 21 and 74 To Enable Multipoint Distribution Service and Instructional Television Fixed Service Licensees to Engage in Fixed Two-Way Transmissions; Request for Declaratory Ruling on the Use of Digital Modulation by Multipoint Distribution Service and Instructional Television Fixed Service Stations, MM Docket No. 97-217, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 19112 (1998) (MDS/ITFS Two-Way Order).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-359A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-359A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-359A1.txt
  • AAR Reply Comments at 4. See id. at 5-6. Id. at 6. Id. See id. at 5. See id. at 3. See, e.g., Amendment of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, Fourth Report and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, FCC 00-370, � 36 (rel. Nov. 16, 2000); 47 C.F.R. � 22.507(c). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 22.165(a)-(c), 80.371(c)(4), 101.1009(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1307. 47 C.F.R. � 1.924. 47 C.F.R. � 17.4. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-359 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-359 � � �@��� @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� $ � % '
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-411A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-411A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-411A1.txt
  • � 1.925(b)(3)(ii). Shell Reply at 3-4. See License Communications Services, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 23781, 23791 � 21 (1998). Shell Reply Comments at 4. We also note that Westel is authorized to expand its system by locating base transmitters anywhere within 50 miles, and mobile transmitters within 80 miles, of Houston, Texas. See 47 C.F.R. �� 22.165, 22.651, 22.653, and 22.657. Although Shell's proposed site is located within a 50-mile radius of Houston, Texas, we do not address the issue of whether Westel's potential ability to expand its system would justify denying Shell's waiver request. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-411 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-411 ! " � � F � F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2115A1.txt
  • of 2003. Wayne, citing Section 22.352(e)(6) of the Commission's rules, argues that because Contact belatedly notified the Commission of its relocation of KNLW614 and KNLW615, Contact's co-channel spectrum reverted to Wayne. Wayne misinterprets Section 22.352(e)(6), however, which provides that ``[n]o protection is provided against interference to the service of any additional or modified transmitter operating pursuant to �� 1.929 or 22.165, unless and until the licensee modifies its authorization using FCC Form 601.'' While under Section 22.352(e)(6) Contact may not have been entitled to interference protection from Wayne until its modification application was approved on March 15, 2004, its spectrum did not revert to Wayne. Monitoring Evidence. Wayne retained ESP Wireless Technologies (ESP) to monitor KNLW614 and KNLW615. Robert Barcal (Barcal),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228052A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228052A1.txt
  • the Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: This Erratum corrects errors in the Report and Order in WT Docket No. 01-108, FCC 02-229, released September 24, 2002, and the Second Report and Order in WT Docket No. 01-108, FCC 02-247, released September 24, 2002. In Appendix A of the Report and Order, FCC 02-229, the reference in section 22.165(e) to section 22.953(a)(5)(i) through (iii) should read section 22.953(a)(1) through (3). In Appendix A of the Second Report and Order, FCC 02-247, section 22.901(b)(1) is corrected to read as follows: (1) Maintain the capability to provide compatible analog service (``AMPS'') to cellular telephones designed in conformance with the specifications contained in �� 1 and 2 of the standard document ANSI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304361A1.pdf
  • Los Angeles Office located the signal to a signal booster installed in your residence in Los Angeles, California. On November 18, 2010, agents from this office met with Alma Saraci, who acknowledged to the Los Angeles agents the operation of the signal booster. AT&T has a license to provide cellular communications on 831 MHz in the Los Angeles area. Section 22.165 of the Commission's Rules, which applies to public mobile service licensees like AT&T, provides that ``[A] licensee may operate additional transmitters at additional locations on the same channel or channel block as its existing system without obtaining prior Commission approval...'' In response to an inquiry from a Los Angeles agent, AT&T reported that it did not provide you authorization to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-370A1.txt
  • the interference contour of the system as a whole. See Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act, Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 9 FCC Rcd 2863, 2873-74 (1994). Second Further Notice, 12 FCC Rcd at 17006. RegioNet Comments at 5, Reply Comments at 4-5; PSI Comments at 3; Watercom Comments at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 22.165(d)(1), (g); see also Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate Future Development of SMR Systems in the 800 MHz Frequency Band, Second Report and Order, PR Docket No. 93-144, 12 FCC Rcd 19079, 19096-98 (1997) (800 MHz SMR Second Report and Order). The two organizations are the American Radio Relay League, Inc., and Interactive Systems, Inc. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-402A1.pdf
  • Section III.A.2(b)(ii), above. In this particular proceeding, we intend to consider only those proposals directly related to our goal of promoting secondary markets. Proposals of general applicability concerning revisions to technical rules will be addressed in separate proceedings, such as in our biennial review proceedings. See, e.g., Biennial Review Part 90 Refarming Proceeding. 47 C.F.R. � 24.236. 47 C.F.R. � 22.165. See Amendment of Parts 1, 21 and 74 To Enable Multipoint Distribution Service and Instructional Television Fixed Service Licensees to Engage in Fixed Two-Way Transmissions; Request for Declaratory Ruling on the Use of Digital Modulation by Multipoint Distribution Service and Instructional Television Fixed Service Stations, MM Docket No. 97-217, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 19112 (1998) (MDS/ITFS Two-Way Order).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-229A1.txt
  • modifications to the cellular unserved licensing process in the form of a petition for rule making, which would facilitate the development of a full record with respect to this matter. CGSA Expansion Notifications. Background. Dobson seeks to have removed the requirement that licensees notify the Commission of each CGSA expansion for markets within the initial five-year construction period. Currently, section 22.165(e) requires licensees to notify the Commission within 15 days of expanding their CGSAs, even during the initial five-year construction period. As discussed supra, cellular licensees are free to construct facilities anywhere within their markets without the possibility of competing applications during the initial construction period. Dobson recommends that we simply require the licensee to file a system information update at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-109A1.txt
  • Section 1.1307(a)(4) of the Rules and what efforts it made to determine whether the Chateau de Mores, the de Mores Packing Plant, the Theodore Roosevelt Maltese Cross Cabin and the Peaceful Valley Ranch are listed, or are eligible for listing, in the NRHP. Western submitted a response to the second LOI on February 3, 2003. Western indicates that under Section 22.165(c) of the Rules, a licensee may operate ``additional transmitters at additional locations on the same channel or channel block as its existing system'' without prior Commission approval if certain conditions are met. Western contends that although its five year build out period in the McKenzie RSA expired before construction of the Medora Tower, the service area boundary of that site
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-270A1.txt
  • this revised rule in assessing whether, and the amount in which, a forfeiture is appropriate in the event of future rule violations. Western Wireless Corporation and WWC Holding Co., Inc., 18 FCC Rcd 10319 (2003). 47 U.S.C. � 301. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1307. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1308 and 1.1311. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1312; see also 47 C.F.R. � 22.165(c). 16 U.S.C. �� 470-470w. In particular, Section 106 of the NHPA requires Federal agencies, such as the Commission ``prior to the issuance of any license ... [to] take into account the effect of the undertaking on any district, site, building, structure or object that [qualifies as a Historic Property].'' 16 U.S.C. � 470f. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1307(a)(4). The Commission recently
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1.txt
  • for Part 22 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 154, 222, 303, 309 and 332. Section 22.303 is amended to read as follows: � 22.303 Retention of station authorizations; identifying transmitters. The current authorization for each station, together with current administrative and technical information concerning modifications to facilities pursuant to � 1.929 and added facilities pursuant to � 22.165 must be retained as a permanent part of the station records. A clearly legible photocopy of the authorization must be available at each regularly attended control point of the station, or in lieu of this photocopy, licensees may instead make available at each regularly attended control point the address or location where the licensee's current authorization and other records may
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1_Erratum.doc
  • for Part 22 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 154, 222, 303, 309 and 332. Section 22.303 is amended to read as follows: � 22.303 Retention of station authorizations; identifying transmitters. The current authorization for each station, together with current administrative and technical information concerning modifications to facilities pursuant to � 1.929 and added facilities pursuant to � 22.165 must be retained as a permanent part of the station records. A clearly legible photocopy of the authorization must be available at each regularly attended control point of the station, or in lieu of this photocopy, licensees may instead make available at each regularly attended control point the address or location where the licensee's current authorization and other records may
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-53A1.txt
  • to Commission staff). See MOA. The Town of Fries and Grayson County Board of Supervisors signed the MOA as concurring parties. See Section 110(k) Letter. Id. at 2. Id. Id. Id. at 3. See Consent Decree at 1. Id. at 3, �13. Id. at 3, �14. See Consent Order at 1, �3. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.929(a)(4), 1.1307(a)(4), 1.1308(a), 1.1312(a), 22.165(c). Previously, on February 23, 2007 the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau had granted USCC Special Temporary Authority (STA) to operate from the site pending the completion of environmental review, in order to prevent the loss of service due to other technical changes in USCC's system. The STA was extended August 9, 2007, and January 25, 2008. See Public Notice, Report 2960, Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-53A1_Rcd.pdf
  • contends the FFFITS petition should be dismissed for failure to meet procedural requirements ofSection 1.939 of the Commission's rules.44Specifically, USCC argues, the petition does not offer substantial evidence, supported by affidavit, that FFFITS is an interested party in 36 Id. at 3, �13. 37Id. at 3, �14. 38 SeeConsent Orderat 1, �3. 39 See47 C.F.R. �� 1.929(a)(4), 1.1307(a)(4), 1.1308(a), 1.1312(a), 22.165(c). Previously, on February 23, 2007 the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau had granted USCC Special Temporary Authority (STA) to operate from the site pending the completion of environmental review, in order to prevent the loss of service due to other technical changes in USCC's system. The STA was extended August 9, 2007, and January 25, 2008. 40 SeePublic Notice, Report 2960, Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.txt
  • The size and scope of the experiment are subject to limitations as the Commission shall establish on a case-by-case basis. If the Commission subsequently determines that a market trial is not so limited, the trial shall be immediately terminated. The Authority section of Part 22 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 222, 303, 309, and 332. Section 22.165 is amended by revising paragraph (d)(2) to read as follows: � 22.165 Additional transmitters for existing systems. * * * * * (d) * * * (2) Additional transmitters in the 43 MHz frequency range operate under experimental authority pursuant to Part 5 of this chapter. * * * * * Section 22.377 is revised by removing and reserving paragraph
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1_Rcd.pdf
  • for initial authorization, a 30-day notice and cut-off filing group is used. * * * * * (d)* * * (2)* * * (iv)Any application to expand the CGSA of a cellular system (as defined in � 22.911) in a CMA Block that has not been included in an auction under � 22.985. * * * * * Amend Section 22.165 by revising paragraph(e) to read as follows: �22.165Additional transmitters for existing systems. * * * * * (e) Cellular Radiotelephone Service. (1) In a CMA Block that has not been included in an auction under � 22.985, the service area boundaries of the additional transmitters, as calculated by the method set forth in section 22.911(a), must remain within the CGSA;
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • which specific transmitters it applies. Additional notifications must be filed if and when other transmitters become operational. If the licensee no longer intends to construct or operate the remaining authorized transmitters, the notification should so state. .......................(3) This section does not require licensees to notify the Commission of facilities added or modified pursuant to the provisions of sections 22.163 and 22.165 of the Commission's rules. It applies only to facilities specifically listed in authorizations for which a construction or coverage period is provided. Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-25 C-35 (e) Requests for extension of time. Licensees may request to extend a construction period or coverage period by filing FCC Form 601. The request must be filed before the expiration of the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00402.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00402.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00402.txt
  • Section III.A.2(b)(ii), above. In this particular proceeding, we intend to consider only those proposals directly related to our goal of promoting secondary markets. Proposals of general applicability concerning revisions to technical rules will be addressed in separate proceedings, such as in our biennial review proceedings. See, e.g., Biennial Review Part 90 Refarming Proceeding. 47 C.F.R. � 24.236. 47 C.F.R. � 22.165. See Amendment of Parts 1, 21 and 74 To Enable Multipoint Distribution Service and Instructional Television Fixed Service Licensees to Engage in Fixed Two-Way Transmissions; Request for Declaratory Ruling on the Use of Digital Modulation by Multipoint Distribution Service and Instructional Television Fixed Service Stations, MM Docket No. 97-217, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 19112 (1998) (MDS/ITFS Two-Way Order).
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-109A1.html
  • Section 1.1307(a)(4) of the Rules and what efforts it made to determine whether the Chateau de Mores, the de Mores Packing Plant, the Theodore Roosevelt Maltese Cross Cabin and the Peaceful Valley Ranch are listed, or are eligible for listing, in the NRHP.28 Western submitted a response to the second LOI on February 3, 2003.29 Western indicates that under Section 22.165(c) of the Rules, a licensee may operate ``additional transmitters at additional locations on the same channel or channel block as its existing system'' without prior Commission approval if certain conditions are met. 10. Western contends that although its five year build out period in the McKenzie RSA expired before construction of the Medora Tower, the service area boundary of that
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-270A1.html
  • consider the existence of this revised rule in assessing whether, and the amount in which, a forfeiture is appropriate in the event of future rule violations. _________________________ 1Western Wireless Corporation and WWC Holding Co., Inc., 18 FCC Rcd 10319 (2003). 247 U.S.C. 301. 347 C.F.R. 1.1307. 4See 47 C.F.R. 1.1308 and 1.1311. 5See 47 C.F.R. 1.1312; see also 47 C.F.R. 22.165(c). 616 U.S.C. 470-470w. In particular, Section 106 of the NHPA requires Federal agencies, such as the Commission ``prior to the issuance of any license ... [to] take into account the effect of the undertaking on any district, site, building, structure or object that [qualifies as a Historic Property].'' 16 U.S.C. 470f. 747 C.F.R. 1.1307(a)(4). The Commission recently amended its rules
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc980151.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc980151.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc980151.wp
  • at sea. 26. We also conclude that the geographic license will constitute a blanket authorization for both base stations and land units. However, geographic area licensees will be required to individually license any base station that requires an Environmental Assessment pursuant to Section 1.1307 of the Commission's Rules or international Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-151 See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 22.165, 101.1009(a). 82 See 47 C.F.R. � 90.173(n). 83 See 47 C.F.R. � 90.687. 84 MariTEL Petition at 5. 85 See Orion Petition to Deny at 3-4 (filed Sept. 9, 1997). 86 47 C.F.R. � 80.123(b). 87 47 C.F.R. � 80.57. 88 12 coordination, or would affect the radio frequency quiet zones described in Section 80.21 of the Commission's Rules. This
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc970059.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc970059.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc970059.wp
  • hearing. In this event, the result of the hearing disposes all of the applications in the filing group. * * * * * (d) * * * (2) * * * Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-59 4 (v) Any "short-form" application (filed on FCC Form 175) requesting a new paging geographic area authorization. * * * * * 9. Section 22.165 is amended by revising paragraph (d)(1) to read as follows: � 22.165 Additional transmitters for existing systems. * * * * * (d) * * * (1) The interfering contours of the additional transmitter(s) must be totally encompassed by the composite interfering contour of the existing station (or stations under common control of the applicant) on the same channel, except
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/pagebp_g.pdf
  • The antenna center of radiation height above average terrain must be the highest antenna center of radiation height of any transmitter in the group in the direction of the protected station. The channel of the group is assumed to be the same as that of the protected station (co-channel), and studies must be made in accordance with � 22.567. � 22.165 Additional transmitters for existing systems. A licensee may operate additional transmitters at additional locations on the same channel or channel block as its existing system without obtaining prior Commission approval provided: (a) International coordination. The locations and/or technical parameters of the additional transmitters are such that individual coordination of the channel assignment(s) with a foreign administration, under applicable international agreements
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/fc000159.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/fc000159.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/fc000159.txt
  • into the instant proceeding comments submitted in the paging docket regarding the issue of coverage requirements for nationwide paging licensees. Id. at 10097-98, �� 125-126; see supra note 69. We note that our analysis underestimates the number of transmitters constructed by nationwide paging licensees because licensees are not required to notify the Commission of each site in their systems. Section 22.165 permits a licensee to construct additional transmitters under certain conditions without notifying the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 22.165. Therefore, once a nationwide licensee had constructed and notified the Commission regarding a sufficient number of sites to obtain nationwide exclusivity, it was not required to notify the Commission of subsequent construction. Although many licensees continued to file notifications with the Commission
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/filing_errors.pdf
  • match registration Missing antenna gain Missing transmitter output power Missing antenna azimuth (in direction of maximum gain) Missing antenna beam width (if not omni-directional) Wrong file number or location number referenced (when notifying of construction/service to subscribers) Files wrong schedules of Form 600 or 601 Missing points of communication for control stations Missing confirmation of contract agreements (cellular) pursuant to 22.165(e) Cellular Geographic Service Area not depicted on maps pursuant to 22.953 Missing NEPA statements where required by 1.311 (e.g., missing building permit for flood plain, historical siting, etc.) ASSIGNMENTS AND TRANSFERS Missing or lump sum population information (partitioning and disaggregation) Missing coordinates (latitude/longitude) for undefined areas (partitioning) Missing public interest statement or narrative where required by Rules Missing Form 430
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • which specific transmitters it applies. Additional notifications must be filed if and when other transmitters become operational. If the licensee no longer intends to construct or operate the remaining authorized transmitters, the notification should so state. .......................(3) This section does not require licensees to notify the Commission of facilities added or modified pursuant to the provisions of sections 22.163 and 22.165 of the Commission's rules. It applies only to facilities specifically listed in authorizations for which a construction or coverage period is provided. Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-25 C-35 (e) Requests for extension of time. Licensees may request to extend a construction period or coverage period by filing FCC Form 601. The request must be filed before the expiration of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00402.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00402.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00402.txt
  • Section III.A.2(b)(ii), above. In this particular proceeding, we intend to consider only those proposals directly related to our goal of promoting secondary markets. Proposals of general applicability concerning revisions to technical rules will be addressed in separate proceedings, such as in our biennial review proceedings. See, e.g., Biennial Review Part 90 Refarming Proceeding. 47 C.F.R. � 24.236. 47 C.F.R. � 22.165. See Amendment of Parts 1, 21 and 74 To Enable Multipoint Distribution Service and Instructional Television Fixed Service Licensees to Engage in Fixed Two-Way Transmissions; Request for Declaratory Ruling on the Use of Digital Modulation by Multipoint Distribution Service and Instructional Television Fixed Service Stations, MM Docket No. 97-217, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 19112 (1998) (MDS/ITFS Two-Way Order).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00159.doc
  • into the instant proceeding comments submitted in the paging docket regarding the issue of coverage requirements for nationwide paging licensees. Id. at 10097-98, �� 125-126; see supra note 69. We note that our analysis underestimates the number of transmitters constructed by nationwide paging licensees because licensees are not required to notify the Commission of each site in their systems. Section 22.165 permits a licensee to construct additional transmitters under certain conditions without notifying the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 22.165. Therefore, once a nationwide licensee had constructed and notified the Commission regarding a sufficient number of sites to obtain nationwide exclusivity, it was not required to notify the Commission of subsequent construction. Although many licensees continued to file notifications with the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-304361A1.html
  • Los Angeles Office located the signal to a signal booster installed in your residence in Los Angeles, California. On November 18, 2010, agents from this office met with Alma Saraci, who acknowledged to the Los Angeles agents the operation of the signal booster. AT&T has a license to provide cellular communications on 831 MHz in the Los Angeles area. Section 22.165 of the Commission's Rules, which applies to public mobile service licensees like AT&T, provides that "[A] licensee may operate additional transmitters at additional locations on the same channel or channel block as its existing system without obtaining prior Commission approval..." In response to an inquiry from a Los Angeles agent, AT&T reported that it did not provide you authorization to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-109A1.html
  • Section 1.1307(a)(4) of the Rules and what efforts it made to determine whether the Chateau de Mores, the de Mores Packing Plant, the Theodore Roosevelt Maltese Cross Cabin and the Peaceful Valley Ranch are listed, or are eligible for listing, in the NRHP.28 Western submitted a response to the second LOI on February 3, 2003.29 Western indicates that under Section 22.165(c) of the Rules, a licensee may operate ``additional transmitters at additional locations on the same channel or channel block as its existing system'' without prior Commission approval if certain conditions are met. 10. Western contends that although its five year build out period in the McKenzie RSA expired before construction of the Medora Tower, the service area boundary of that
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-270A1.html
  • consider the existence of this revised rule in assessing whether, and the amount in which, a forfeiture is appropriate in the event of future rule violations. _________________________ 1Western Wireless Corporation and WWC Holding Co., Inc., 18 FCC Rcd 10319 (2003). 247 U.S.C. 301. 347 C.F.R. 1.1307. 4See 47 C.F.R. 1.1308 and 1.1311. 5See 47 C.F.R. 1.1312; see also 47 C.F.R. 22.165(c). 616 U.S.C. 470-470w. In particular, Section 106 of the NHPA requires Federal agencies, such as the Commission ``prior to the issuance of any license ... [to] take into account the effect of the undertaking on any district, site, building, structure or object that [qualifies as a Historic Property].'' 16 U.S.C. 470f. 747 C.F.R. 1.1307(a)(4). The Commission recently amended its rules
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-109A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-109A1.pdf
  • Section 1.1307(a)(4) of the Rules and what efforts it made to determine whether the Chateau de Mores, the de Mores Packing Plant, the Theodore Roosevelt Maltese Cross Cabin and the Peaceful Valley Ranch are listed, or are eligible for listing, in the NRHP. Western submitted a response to the second LOI on February 3, 2003. Western indicates that under Section 22.165(c) of the Rules, a licensee may operate ``additional transmitters at additional locations on the same channel or channel block as its existing system'' without prior Commission approval if certain conditions are met. Western contends that although its five year build out period in the McKenzie RSA expired before construction of the Medora Tower, the service area boundary of that site