FCC Web Documents citing 15.510

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2376A1.txt
  • Robert Bosch, Gmbh Request For A Waiver Of Part 15 Ultra-Wideband Rules For A Through-Wall Imaging Device To Be A ``Permit-But-Disclose'' Proceeding For Ex Parte Purposes And Requests Comments ET Docket No. 10-253 Comment Date: January 18, 2011 Reply Comment Date: February 1, 2011 On November 15, 2010, Robert Bosch, GmbH (``Bosch'') filed a request for a waiver of Sections 15.510(b) and/or 15.503(h) or (i) of the Commission's rules to permit the marketing, sale and operation of its ultra-wideband (UWB) imaging device (``imaging device'') known as the ``Wallscanner D-tect 150 Professional.'' Bosch states that this imaging device is for use by skilled professional workers in the building and construction trades, such as building inspection professionals and structural engineers, for detection of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-899A1.txt
  • located on the other side of an opaque structure such as a wall or ... [including] products such as ``stud locators'' that are designed to locate objects behind ... walls that ... [do not] absorb the transmitted signal.'' Bosch notes that, if its imaging device were classified as a ``through-wall imaging system,'' its intended use would not comply with Section 15.510(b) which restricts the use of such systems to law enforcement, emergency rescue of fire-fighting organizations that are under the authority of a local or state government. In its waiver request, Bosch contends that allowing operation of its wallscanner imaging device would substantially enhance, expedite and improve construction, inspection, and maintenance of buildings and transportation infrastructure in the United States and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.txt
  • emission occurs, fM, is above 960 MHz, there is a limit on the peak level of the emissions contained within a 50 MHz bandwidth centered on fM. That limit is 0 dBm EIRP. It is acceptable to employ a different resolution bandwidth, and a correspondingly different peak emission limit, following the procedures described in Section 15.521. 3. A new Section 15.510 is added to read as follows: Section 15.510 Technical requirements for through-wall imaging systems. (a) The UWB bandwidth of an imaging system operating under the provisions of this section must be below 960 MHz or the center frequency, fC, and the frequency at which the highest radiated emission occurs, fM, must be contained between 1990 MHz and 10600 MHz. (b)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.txt
  • level measured on the spectrum analyzer in order to compensate for the analyzer's inability to respond fast enough to reflect the true peak power, i.e., the spectrum analyzer does not have sufficient bandwidth to measure all of the energy in the pulsed signal. See 1st R&O, supra, at para. 214-220 for additional discussion on this issue. 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.509(f), 15.510(d)(5). 15.511(e), 15.513(f), 15.515(f), 15.517(e), and 15.519(e). See, also, 47 C.F.R. § 15.521(g) for measurements employing a bandwidth narrower than 50 MHz. There is no requirement for equipment operating below 960 MHz to measure peak emission levels since emissions below that frequency are based on measurements employing a quasi-peak detector function. There also is no requirement to apply a pulse desensitization
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.txt
  • and peak main-beam limits) is more stringent than the -41.3 dBm limit in Section 15.209; however, we still propose to harmonize with Europe on the derived main-beam limits for this frequency range. We note also that in our rules, the limits at these frequencies for some UWB devices are also more stringent than Section 15.209. See e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.510(c)(4) and 15.515(d). Higher frequencies have more associated propagation losses. For example, there are approximately 58 dB of free space path loss at 3 meters for a 6 GHz signal versus 80 dB for an 80 GHz signal. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.250(d)(1), 15.252(b)(1) & (2), 15.509(d), 15.510(d)(3), 15.511(c), 15.513(d), 15.515(d), 15.517(c), and 15.519(c). Notice and Order, 25 FCC Rcd. 601,