FCC Web Documents citing 15.323

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-861A1.txt
  • by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. § 15.3 (o). 47 C.F.R. § 15.201. A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031 - 2.1060 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(c). See Part 15, Subpart D of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.301- 15.323. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(g). Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Clear-Com Communications Systems (October 24, 2005). Letter from Chris Exelby, Managing Director, Vitec Group Communications, to Thomas D. Fitz-Gibbon, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (November 25, 2005). Letter from Christopher D. Imlay, Esq. to Kathryn S. Berthot and Thomas D. Fitz-Gibbon, Spectrum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-123A1.txt
  • and Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 6589 (1993), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 1943 (1994). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, RM-7140, RM-7175, RM-7618, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4957 (1994). See id. at 4990-91, ¶¶ 84-87. See also 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.301 - 15.323. The Commission subsequently designated the Unlicensed PCS Ad Hoc Committee for 2 GHz Microwave Transition and Management (``UTAM'') to coordinate relocation in the 1910-1930 MHz band. See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 7955 (1995). See First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.txt
  • to amateur services for either primary or secondary use. See Letter from Steve B. Sharkey, Motorola to Secretary, FCC, July 18, 2001. This letter referenced both this docket on advanced wireless services and ET Docket No. 00-221, which proposed Fixed and Mobile allocations for the 2385-2390 MHz band. WINForum seeks a modification to the spectrum etiquette requirements in 47 CFR §15.323 and certain technical rules (e.g., 47 CFR §§ 15.319 (peak power), 15.321 (frequency stability)) in conjunction with its proposed use of the 1910-1920 MHz band. WINForum seeks modifications to these technical rules for operations in the 2390-2400 MHz band: 47 CFR §§ 15.319 (peak power), 15.321 (frequency stability), 15.323 (spectrum etiquette). The frequencies 1980-2010 MHz and 2170-2200 MHz are allocated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.txt
  • Also, the emission mask of paragraph (c)(1) specifies that attenuations of greater than 80 dB is not required. See Establishment of Policies Procedures for the use of digital modulation techniques in microwave radio and proposed amendments to Parts 2 and 24, Gen. Docket No. 19311, Report and Order, FCC 74-985, 39 FR 35658 (October 10, 1974). 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.321(d), 15.323(d) and 24.238(b). See also, Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communicating Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Third Memorandum and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. 6908 (1994). 47 C.F.R. § 101.141(b). 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.201 and 2.202 describe the symbols used to describe emission designators. For example, the emission designator 15M0F9W describes an emission with a 15 megahertz necessary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.txt
  • at pg. 8. Sprint PCS comments of 4/6/01 at pg. 2. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.231. Unlicensed PCS transmitters operate in the bands 1910-1930 MHz and 2390-2400 MHz. The exemption from the restricted bands only affects the limits for some of the unwanted emissions. The unwanted emissions are required to comply with the limits in 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.321(d) and 15.323(d), as appropriate. See 47 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). See First Report and Order in GEN Docket No. 87-389, 4 FCC Rcd. 3493 (1989). See Manual of Regulations and Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, January 2000, at Sections 7.8 and 7.9. The operation in non-government bands of UWB devices that are not in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-134A1.txt
  • wide array of mobile and ancillary fixed communication services to individuals and businesses. * * * * * (i) [Reserved] * * * * * 8. Section 15.319 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: § 15.319 General technical requirements. (a) The 1920-1930 MHz band is limited to use by isochronous devices under the requirements of § 15.323. * * * * * 9. Section 15.321 is removed. § 15.321 Specific requirements for asynchronous devices operating in the 1910-1920 MHz band. PART 27 - MISCELLANEOUS WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 10. The authority citation for Part 27 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 154, 301, 302, 303, 307, 309, 332, 336, and 337, unless otherwise noted. 11. Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.txt
  • 12. See Retlif comments at 2 and ACI comments at 2. See IBM comments at 4. See IBM comments at 5. See also 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.207 and 15.209. See IBM comments at 5. See Notice at p. 18217-18218. See Cobra comments at 5-6 and Uniden comments at 5. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.225(c), 15.229(d), 15.233(g), 15.253(e), 15.255(f), 15.321(e) and 15.323(f). See Notice at p. 18218. Id. See CEA comments at 6, Cisco comments at 10, IBM comments at 4, Motorola comments at 4 and TIA comments at 7. See CEA comments at 7, Cisco comments at 11, ITI comments at 6, Motorola comments at 4 and TIA comments at 8. See Cisco comments at 11. See ITI comments at 6.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-16A1.txt
  • are defined as those ``that transmit at a regular interval, typified by time-division voice systems.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 15.303(a)-(d). Specific requirements for the operation of asynchronous devices in the 1910-1920 MHz band are codified at 47 C.F.R. § 15.321 and specific requirements for the operation of isochronous devices in the 1920-1930 MHz band are codified at 47 C.F.R. § 15.323. The purpose of the monitoring requirement is to allow systems that use different air interfaces to coexist harmoniously in the same band. The rules require asynchronous devices to monitor the spectrum that its transmission is intended to occupy for at least 50 microseconds prior to initiating a transmission with a monitoring threshold not more than 32 dB above the thermal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.txt
  • the Commission's Rules Regarding Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, Notice of Proposed Rule Making in ET Docket No. 03-137, 18 FCC Rcd 13187 (2003). See Notice of Proposed Rule Making in ET Docket 03-122, 18 FCC Rcd. 11581 (2003). See 47 C.F.R. Part 15, Subpart D - Unlicensed Personal Communications Service Devices. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.319, 15.321 and 15.323. 47 C.F.R. § 15.321(c)(1) - (7). 47 C.F.R. § 15.7. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1204(3)(ii) and 2.1204(4)(ii). Id. HP comments at footnote 7. See Revision of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules Relating to the Marketing and Authorization of Radio Frequency Devices, Memorandum Opinion and Order in ET Docket No. 94-45, 13 FCC Rcd. 12928 (1998). See the E-Government Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.txt
  • Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 18 FCC Rcd 20604 (2003). As discussed below, such telephones must include an automatic channel selection mechanism to prevent operation on occupied channels. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.233(b)(2)(i). We note that with advancements in technology, cordless telephones now generally operate in higher frequency bands. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.321 and 15.323. See U-NII R&O. . . See Notice of Inquiry in ET Docket No. 00-47, 15 FCC Rcd 5930 (2000). See Notice of Proposed Rule Making in ET Docket No. 00-47, 15 FCC Rcd 24442 (2000). See First Report and Order in ET Docket No. 00-47, 16 FCC Rcd 17373 (2001). The SPTF sought comment to identify and evaluate possible spectrum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-165A1.txt
  • A: Proposed Rule Changes, § 15.247(a)(1). CEA comments at 7-8. IEEE 802 comments at para 19. Wi-Fi Alliance at para 14. Matsushita comments at 5-6; Motorola comments at 3. ITI comments at 6. Pegasus comments at 2. Itron at 3-5. See 47 C.F.R. Part 15, Subpart D - Unlicensed Personal Communications Service Devices. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.319, 15.321 and 15.323. 47 C.F.R. § 15.321(c)(1) - (7). Pegasus comments at 3. Pegasus states that an etiquette would be useful for toll WISPs in new unlicensed spectrum. It states that the WISPs would presumably be able to afford the more complex equipment needed to implement a spectrum etiquette. Intel comments at 5. See Itron comments at 8. See Microsoft comments at 5,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.txt
  • systems operating in the same band, the Commission adopted rules requiring UPCS devices to monitor the spectrum prior to transmitting. Specific requirements for the operation of asynchronous devices in the 1910-1920 MHz band are codified at 47 C.F.R. § 15.321 and specific requirements for the operation of isochronous devices in the 1920-1930 MHz band are codified at 47 C.F.R. § 15.323. See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 7955 (1995). UTAM is the Commission's frequency coordinator for UPCS devices in the 1910-1930 MHz band. The UPCS band relocation policies are codified at 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.69-101.81. AWS Third NPRM, 18 FCC Rcd 2223 ¶
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1_Erratum.doc
  • systems operating in the same band, the Commission adopted rules requiring UPCS devices to monitor the spectrum prior to transmitting. Specific requirements for the operation of asynchronous devices in the 1910-1920 MHz band are codified at 47 C.F.R. § 15.321 and specific requirements for the operation of isochronous devices in the 1920-1930 MHz band are codified at 47 C.F.R. § 15.323. See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 7955 (1995). UTAM is the Commission's frequency coordinator for UPCS devices in the 1910-1930 MHz band. The UPCS band relocation policies are codified at 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.69-101.81. AWS Third NPRM, 18 FCC Rcd 2223 ¶
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-219A1.txt
  • * * * (b) All systems of less than 2.5 MHz emission bandwidth shall start searching for an available spectrum window within 3 MHz of the band edge at 2390 or 2400 MHz while systems of more than 2.5 MHz emission bandwidth will first occupy the center half of the band. * * * * * * * * Section 15.323 is amended by revising title, removing and reserving paragraph (b), and modifying paragraphs (a), (c), (c)(5), (c)(11), and (d) to read as follows: § 15.323 Specific requirements for devices operating in the 1920-1930 MHz sub-band. (a) Operation shall be contained within the 1920-1930 MHz band. The emission bandwidth shall be less then 2.5 MHz. The power level shall be as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.txt
  • such a policy change is appropriate in light of our Herculean work on public safety spectrum use in the 700 and 800 MHz bands over the past couple of years, I very much appreciate the value in having a discussion on the technical aspects of interruptible spectrum leasing. For these reasons, I enthusiastically support this item. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.323 and 15.407(h). , News Release dated November 19, 2004. See First Report and Order in ET Docket No. 00-47, 16 FCC Rcd 17373,17377 (2001). We always retain the right to request and examine any component (whether software or hardware) of a specific radio system when needed for certification under Commission rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1. Radios with cognitive capabilities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-103A1.txt
  • See, e.g., Alfred E. Mann Foundation at http://www.aemf.org/index.html. ; http://www.vivometrics.com/site/system.html. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 95.631 (``Emission Types''). 47 C.F.R. § 95.631 (h) 47 C.F.R. § 15.5. See WMTS Order, 15 FCC Rcd 11206, at para 6. Id. at para 3. 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.37(i), 90.203(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. § 95.1101-1129. FCC Part 15, Subpart D, 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.301 through 15.323. We note, however, that some researchers and practitioners continue to debate whether concerns about interference in settings such as hospitals, for example, from devices like pagers and cell phones, have been overestimated. See No hazard to hospitals? Fear that cell phones cause failure of vital machines in medical facilities is a myth, says author of new study, Newsday.com, Health/Science, by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-117A1.txt
  • 5, 2002 entitled ``Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules Governing the Location and Monitoring Service to Provide Greater Flexibility'', RM-10403, Havens has submitted numerous filings, including comments dated May 15, 2002 and reply comments dated June 3, 2002. See 47 C.F.R. Part 15, Subpart D - Unlicensed Personal Communications Service Devices. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.319, 15.321 and 15.323. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.321(c)(1) - (7). See Cellnet petition at footnote 1. See Notice at 18923. Cellnet refers to continuous transmissions as having zero duty cycle, although such transmissions are more commonly referred to as having a duty cycle of 100%. 47 C.F.R. § 1.429 (d). 47 C.F.R. § 1.429 (c). See Cellnet letter dated March 28, 2006. Cellnet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-77A1.txt
  • that promotes digital cordless radio technology for short-distance voice and data applications. The current rules prevent UPCS devices from accessing channels where a certain level of radio noise is detected, even though those channels remain usable. The proposed rule changes would adjust the radio noise level at which a channel would be deemed usable. We specifically propose to revise Section 15.323 of our Rules to increase the least-interfered channel threshold that a UPCS device must monitor to determine whether there is a channel available on which to transmit (henceforth referred to as the least-interfered channel access method). We also propose to reduce from 40 to 20 channels the number of duplex system access channels that a UPCS device must monitor and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-33A1.txt
  • them consistent with previous Commission decisions affecting these rules. Specifically, we are removing the definition in Section 15.303(i) that was applicable when asynchronous and isochronous operations were in separate sub-bands; amending Section 15.319 to specifically state that both asynchronous and isochronous operations are permitted in the 1920-1930 MHz band, consistent with the decision in the AWS Sixth R&O; revising Section 15.323 to correct a typographical error in the second sentence of paragraph (a); and correcting paragraphs (d) and (e) to reference ``bands'' instead of ``sub-bands.'' In addition, we are amending Sections 15.31(a)(2) and 15.38(b)(12) of the rules to reference the latest version of the ANSI C63.17-2006 standard by which UPCS devices must be measured for compliance with the requirements in Part
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.txt
  • to amateur services for either primary or secondary use. See Letter from Steve B. Sharkey, Motorola to Secretary, FCC, July 18, 2001. This letter referenced both this docket on advanced wireless services and ET Docket No. 00-221, which proposed Fixed and Mobile allocations for the 2385-2390 MHz band. WINForum seeks a modification to the spectrum etiquette requirements in 47 CFR §15.323 and certain technical rules (e.g., 47 CFR §§ 15.319 (peak power), 15.321 (frequency stability)) in conjunction with its proposed use of the 1910-1920 MHz band. WINForum seeks modifications to these technical rules for operations in the 2390-2400 MHz band: 47 CFR §§ 15.319 (peak power), 15.321 (frequency stability), 15.323 (spectrum etiquette). The frequencies 1980-2010 MHz and 2170-2200 MHz are allocated
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-861A1.html
  • by radiation or induction." 47 C.F.R. S 15.3 (o). 47 C.F.R. S 15.201. A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. SS 2.1031 - 2.1060 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(c). See Part 15, Subpart D of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. SS 15.301- 15.323. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(g). Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Clear-Com Communications Systems (October 24, 2005). Letter from Chris Exelby, Managing Director, Vitec Group Communications, to Thomas D. Fitz-Gibbon, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (November 25, 2005). Letter from Christopher D. Imlay, Esq. to Kathryn S. Berthot and Thomas D. Fitz-Gibbon, Spectrum
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.txt
  • to amateur services for either primary or secondary use. See Letter from Steve B. Sharkey, Motorola to Secretary, FCC, July 18, 2001. This letter referenced both this docket on advanced wireless services and ET Docket No. 00-221, which proposed Fixed and Mobile allocations for the 2385-2390 MHz band. WINForum seeks a modification to the spectrum etiquette requirements in 47 CFR §15.323 and certain technical rules (e.g., 47 CFR §§ 15.319 (peak power), 15.321 (frequency stability)) in conjunction with its proposed use of the 1910-1920 MHz band. WINForum seeks modifications to these technical rules for operations in the 2390-2400 MHz band: 47 CFR §§ 15.319 (peak power), 15.321 (frequency stability), 15.323 (spectrum etiquette). The frequencies 1980-2010 MHz and 2170-2200 MHz are allocated
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00123.doc
  • and Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 6589 (1993), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 1943 (1994). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, RM-7140, RM-7175, RM-7618, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4957 (1994). See id. at 4990-91, ¶¶ 84-87. See also 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.301 - 15.323. The Commission subsequently designated the Unlicensed PCS Ad Hoc Committee for 2 GHz Microwave Transition and Management (``UTAM'') to coordinate relocation in the 1910-1930 MHz band. See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 7955 (1995). See First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-861A1.html
  • by radiation or induction." 47 C.F.R. S 15.3 (o). 47 C.F.R. S 15.201. A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. SS 2.1031 - 2.1060 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(c). See Part 15, Subpart D of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. SS 15.301- 15.323. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(g). Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Clear-Com Communications Systems (October 24, 2005). Letter from Chris Exelby, Managing Director, Vitec Group Communications, to Thomas D. Fitz-Gibbon, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (November 25, 2005). Letter from Christopher D. Imlay, Esq. to Kathryn S. Berthot and Thomas D. Fitz-Gibbon, Spectrum
• http://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/E&UWGFinalReport.doc http://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/E&UWGFinalReport.pdf
  • GHz portion, the HiperLAN2 upper band stretches from 5.470-5.725 GHz. The 57-64 GHz band is not shown in the chart. It is a relatively recently authorized band and is in an area of the spectrum with great technological challenges. Two models were authorized in this band in 2000 and three models have been authorized so far in 2002. See §§15.321, 15.323. Some parties have stated that the specific nature of this protocol is one reason why this service has met with little commercial success. The IEEE Task Group is looking at adaptive power control, adaptive frequency hopping and other collaborative approaches to reduce interference. The FCC's Technological Advisory Committee has observed, `` Until [noise floor] information is organized and analyzed, the