FCC Web Documents citing 15.249

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.pdf
  • EB-09-SE-133 Dear Mr. Olin: This is an official CITATION issued to Costco Warehouse Corporation (``Costco''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.pdf
  • EB-09-SE-134 Dear Mr. Dach: This is an official CITATION issued to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (``Wal-Mart''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands. Subsequently,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.pdf
  • Mr. Hsia: This is an official CITATION, issued to Team Research, Inc. (``Team Research'') pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing a non-compliant radio frequency device, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2''), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands. On
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.pdf
  • site at www.securitymaninc.com. The staff observed that SecurityMan was marketing the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera. Subsequently, Enforcement Bureau staff purchased a SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, and forwarded it to the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') Laboratory for testing. The OET Laboratory's tests demonstrated that the SecurityMan SM-302T does not comply with the radiated emission limits specified in sections 15.249(d) and 15.209 of the rules. As part of the investigation, the Enforcement Bureau sent a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') to SecurityMan on March 18, 2010. In your April 14, 2010 response to the LOI, you admit that SecurityMan imports and distributes the SecurityMan SM-302T (factory model AT202-900) in the United States. You indicated, however, that SecurityMan ``does not engineer and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.txt
  • Ex Parte Comments at 45. Id. at 54. Id. at 58. Id. Review of Part 15 and Other Parts of the Commission's Rules, ET Docket 01-278, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 16 FCC Rcd 18205, 18207 ¶ 6 (2001). Id. Id. Id. at ¶ 34. See Allocation Report and Order at 18234 ¶ 28. See also 47 C.F.R. 15.245, 15.247, and 15.249. See Allocation Report and Order at 18234 ¶ 28. Id. at 18235 ¶ 30. BBA NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd 5206, 5218-5219 ¶ 17. Id. 47 U.S.C. §307(e)(1). Licensing by rule is also authorized in the aviation radio service and in the maritime radio service. See 47 U.S.C. §307(e)(1). 47 U.S.C. §307(e)(3). 47 C.F.R. § 95.401(a). BBA NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1705A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1705A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1705A1.txt
  • a device for MPH Industries, Inc., (MPH). Section 15.205(b) limits the spurious emissions in a restricted band (i.e., spectrum above 38.6 GHz) to the values in Section 15.209 i.e., 500 uV/m at 3m. Because the second and third harmonics of the device exceed that value, SWS requests a waiver to permit certification of the devices under the limits in Section 15.249 for the second and third harmonics. SWS notes that the MPH device is a Part 15 intentional radiator that transmits data in the 24.1 GHz band, pursuant to Section 15.249. Its sole purpose is to send traffic safety alerts to a receiver in a moving car. Messages can include information on road hazards, accidents, construction, emergency vehicles, slow-moving equipment, oversize
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.txt
  • operation. Conducted limits. Radiated emission limits; general requirements. Cordless telephones. Operation in the band 525-1705 kHz. 15.229 Operation in the band 40.66-40.70 MHz. Operation in the bands 72.0-73.0 MHz, 74.6-74.8 MHz, and 75.2-76.0 MHz. Operation within the bands 902-928 MHz, 2435-2465 MHz, 5785-5815 MHz, 10500-10550 MHz, and 14075-14175 MHz. Operation within the bands 902-928 MHz, 2400-2483.5 MHz, and 5725-5850 GHz. 15.249 Operations within the bands 902-928 MHz, 2400-2483.5 MHz, 5725-2875 MHz, and 24.0-24.25 GHz. TITLE 47 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS [TELECOMMUNICATION.] PART 76 MULTICHANNEL VIDEO AND CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE SUBPART A - GENERAL Brief Description: The rules and regulations set forth in this section provide for the certification of cable television systems and for their operation in conformity with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1289A1.txt
  • DECLARES REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC. REQUEST FOR A WAIVER OF PART 15 TO BE A "PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSE" PROCEEDING FOR EX PARTE PURPOSES ET Docket No. 05-183 Comments Date: June 6, 2005 Reply Comments Date: June 21, 2005 On April 22, 2005, Remington Arms Company, Inc., Law Enforcement Technologies Division, (``Remington'') filed a request for waiver of Sections 15.245(b), 15.247(b)(3), 15.247(e), and 15.249(a) of the Commission's rules in order to permit the authorization, importation and operation of its video and audio surveillance system known as the Remington Eyeball R1. The Remington Eyeball R1 is a unique system that provides live video and audio surveillance over the 2400-2483.5 MHz band using analog modulation. Remington requests a waiver of the emission limits in Section 15.245(b),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3339A1.txt
  • AND TECHNOLOGY DECLARES OCTATRON, INC. AND CHANG INDUSTRY, INC. REQUEST FOR A WAIVER OF PART 15 TO BE A "PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSE" PROCEEDING FOR EX PARTE PURPOSES ET Docket No. 05-356 Comments Date: January 30, 2006 Reply Comments Date: February 14, 2006 On November 28, 2005, Octatron, Inc. and Chang Industry, Inc. filed a request for waiver of Sections 15.245(b), 15.247(e), and 15.249(a) of the Commission's rules in order to permit the authorization, importation and operation of its video and audio surveillance systems known as the ``Dragon Egg System'' and as the ``Pole Camera System.'' The petitioners' surveillance systems provide live video and audio surveillance over the 902-928 MHz band using analog modulation. The petitioners request a waiver of the emission limits in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.txt
  • EB-09-SE-133 Dear Mr. Olin: This is an official CITATION issued to Costco Warehouse Corporation (``Costco''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.txt
  • EB-09-SE-134 Dear Mr. Dach: This is an official CITATION issued to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (``Wal-Mart''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands. Subsequently,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.txt
  • Mr. Hsia: This is an official CITATION, issued to Team Research, Inc. (``Team Research'') pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing a non-compliant radio frequency device, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2''), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands. On
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-453A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Octatron, Inc. and Chang Industry, Inc. Request for Waiver of the Part 15 Regulations ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 05-356 ORDER Adopted: March 17, 2010 Released: March 22, 2010 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: By this Order, we dismiss without prejudice a request for waiver of Sections 15.249 and 15.247 of the rules filed by Octatron, Inc. and Chang Industry, Inc. (``Octatron/Chang'') to permit the certification and subsequent marketing of their analog video and audio surveillance systems known as the Dragon Egg System and the Pole Camera System (hereinafter, collectively, the ``surveillance systems''). Octatron/Chang request that the Commission waive these rules to allow their surveillance systems to operate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2011A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2011A1.txt
  • dates listed in these sections have passed, and these sections contain no regulatory requirements that would necessitate their retention. Thus, they are without legal effect and are obsolete. We are also deleting two provisions in Part 15 that reference these obsolete sections: 1) the note in Section 15.31(l) which references the receiver transition rule in Section 15.37(b); and 2) Section 15.249(f) which references the transition provision in Section 15.37(d). We are deleting the introductory text to Section 15.37. This text was intended as a preface to the transition provisions in paragraphs (a) and (b) because it relates to the authorization, manufacture and importation of equipment that complies with the Part 15 rules in effect prior to June 23, 1989. It is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.txt
  • site at www.securitymaninc.com. The staff observed that SecurityMan was marketing the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera. Subsequently, Enforcement Bureau staff purchased a SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, and forwarded it to the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') Laboratory for testing. The OET Laboratory's tests demonstrated that the SecurityMan SM-302T does not comply with the radiated emission limits specified in sections 15.249(d) and 15.209 of the rules. As part of the investigation, the Enforcement Bureau sent a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') to SecurityMan on March 18, 2010. In your April 14, 2010 response to the LOI, you admit that SecurityMan imports and distributes the SecurityMan SM-302T (factory model AT202-900) in the United States. You indicated, however, that SecurityMan ``does not engineer and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-839A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-839A1.txt
  • equipment authorization database and Starkey's Internet site reveals that Starkey is currently marketing a device authorized under Section 15.247 - known as the SURFLink Media Device - that interconnects with and transmits digitally modulated audio signals to hearing aids from several media sources, including televisions, radios, and MP3 players. Starkey is also marketing three devices that are authorized under Section 15.249 - known as the WiSeries RIC (Receiver-in-Canal), for wireless communications between hearing aids, the SurfLink Programmer, for wireless hearing aid programming, and the SurfLink Remote Control, for wireless control of hearing aid settings (i.e., on/off; volume). See Starkey July 22, 2022 Amended Request for Waiver at 7; Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Ex Parte filing, submitted August 26, 2011, at 2. (continued....)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.txt
  • Eliminated Part 2, Subpart N, FCC procedure for testing Class A, B and S Emergency Position Indicating Radiobeacons (EPIRBs). 2.1501-2.1517 2/1/12 Eliminated rules listing the dates by which intentional radiators, unintentional radiators, radio receivers and equipment operating in the 902-905 MHz band had to comply with the rules adopted in the 1989 revision to Part 15. 15.37(a) 15.37(b) 15.37(c) 15.37(d) 15.249(f) 2/1/12 Eliminated rule specifying dates by which cordless telephones must comply with the requirements of § 15.214(d). Manufacture of cordless telephones that did not comply with these requirements had to cease on or before September 11, 1991. 15.37(e) 2/1/12 Required scanning receivers manufactured or imported after April 26, 1994 to comply with the provisions of § 15.121(a)(1). Effectively superseded by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.txt
  • 15.205. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.205 paragraphs (d) and (e). See 47 C.F.R. § 15.209. The limit above 38.6 GHz is 500 (V/m measured at a distance of 3 meters. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.205 and 15.209. A harmonic emission is one that occurs at a multiple of a frequency generated in a device. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.245 and 15.249. On October 26, 2000 Safety Warning Systems, L.C. filed a request on behalf of MPH Industries, Inc. to waive of the restricted band limits for the harmonics from a device that will operate at 24 GHz under Section 15.249. That request was put on public notice July 16, 2001. See Public Notice Safety Warning Systems, L.C., Files Request for Waiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-357A1.txt
  • of interference, Part 15 transmitters are generally restricted to very low signal levels. Part 15 transmitters operating in the 24.0 - 24.25 GHz band are currently limited to a field strength of 250 mV/m. 3. This proceeding was initiated in response to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by Sierra Digital Communications, Inc. ("Sierra"). Sierra requested that the Commission amend Section 15.249 of the rules to permit fixed point-to-point operations in the 24.00 - 24.25 GHz band at a field strength of 2500 mV/m. To limit the potential for interference from such operations, Sierra also proposed that devices operating at this higher limit be required to use antennas with gains of at least 33 dBi. It further asked the Commission to permit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-136A1.txt
  • telecommunication. Typical ISM applications are the production of physical, biological, or chemical effects such as heating, ionization of gases, mechanical vibrations, hair removal and acceleration of charged particles. See also 47 C.F.R. §18.107. See 47 C.F.R. §2.106 footnote S5.282. See 47 C.F.R. §15.247(b)(1), which permits higher-powered operations in this frequency band for spread spectrum transmitters. See 47 C.F.R. §§15.24 and 15.249. The Federal-Government allocation was used, to a limited extent, by the military for radar testing systems such as target scattering and enemy radar simulators. See NTIA, Spectrum Reallocation Final Report, NTIA Special Publication 95-32 (rel. Feb. 1995). See OBRA-93, § 6001(a) (codified at 47 U.S.C. § 923(a)-(b)). In doing so, NTIA took note of the Congressional requirement that amateur operations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-211A1.txt
  • comments at 3-4, Cobra comments at 5, and RADAR comments at 5. See RADAR ex parte submission dated June 11, 2002. See RADAR comments at 6-7 and RADAR reply comments at 8. See memorandum of test results by the Commission's Laboratory dated June 25, 2002. See PanAmSat/SIA ex parte submission dated April 16, 2002 at 17-20. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.249, which permits 50,000 µV/m at 3 meters for transmitters operating in the 5.8 GHz ISM band. See also 47 C.F.R. § 15.109 and 15.209, which permit a spurious emission level of 500 µV/m at 3 meters from most Part 15 devices. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.5 and 15.101(b). Section 302(a) of the Communications Act states that, ``The Commission may, consistent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-238A1.txt
  • emission limits for CB receivers. See 62 F.C.C. 2d 623, 625, 626, 628 (1976). See memorandum of test results by the Commission's Laboratory dated June 25, 2002. The limit for other unintentional radiators is 500 µV/m at 3 meters. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.109. Unlicensed transmitters in the 2.400-2.4835 and 5.725-5.875 GHz bands under the provisions of 47 C.F.R. § 15.249 are limited to 50,000 µV/m at 3 meters. See 79 F.C.C. 2d 28. See 79 F.C.C. 2d 67. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.31(a)(6). See 47 U.S.C. § 302(d). See also Report and Order in ET Docket No. 93-1, 8 FCC Rcd. 2911 (1993) and Report and Order in ET Docket No. 98-76, 14 FCC Rcd. 5390 (1999). See RADAR petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.txt
  • Ex Parte Comments at 45. Id. at 54. Id. at 58. Id. Review of Part 15 and Other Parts of the Commission's Rules, ET Docket 01-278, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 16 FCC Rcd 18205, 18207 ¶ 6 (2001). Id. Id. Id. at ¶ 34. See Allocation Report and Order at 18234 ¶ 28. See also 47 C.F.R. 15.245, 15.247, and 15.249. See Allocation Report and Order at 18234 ¶ 28. Id. at 18235 ¶ 30. BBA NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd 5206, 5218-5219 ¶ 17. Id. 47 U.S.C. §307(e)(1). Licensing by rule is also authorized in the aviation radio service and in the maritime radio service. See 47 U.S.C. §307(e)(1). 47 U.S.C. §307(e)(3). 47 C.F.R. § 95.401(a). BBA NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-328A1.txt
  • a specific distance, which is a function of both the transmitter output power and the transmit antenna gain. These field strength limits correspond to relatively low transmitter output powers. For example, a non-spread spectrum transmitter in the 902-928 MHz band has a field strength limit of 50 millivolts per meter at a distance of 3 meters. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.249. A power of only 152 microwatts into a dipole antenna is required to generate this field strength. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.247. See also Second Report and Order in ET Docket No. 99-231, 17 FCC Rcd. 10755 (2002). See 47 C.F.R. § 15.207 and 209. Specific frequency bands are designated as restricted bands in Part 15 to protect certain sensitive
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.txt
  • as ``[a] wave in which, at every point, the amplitude of each sinusoidal component is a decreasing function of time.'' TDC comments at pg. 44. USGPSIC comments at pg. 47-48. Interlogix comments at pg. 4-5 and reply comments at pg. 2. We note that Interlogix redesigned its equipment in order to be certified under the provisions of 47 C.F.R. § 15.249. Bosch comments at pg. 5 and reply comments at pg. 5. TDC comments at pg. 44-45. Valeo comments at pg. 4; SARA ex parte filing of 11/14/01. Delphi comments at pg. 17-18; SARA ex parte filing of 11/14/01. The ``ISM'' bands refer to the frequency bands under 47 C.F.R. § 18.301, e.g., the bands on which operation is permitted under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-105A1.txt
  • so, NTIA took note of the Congressional requirement that amateur operations were to be minimally disrupted by the reallocations. See NTIA Spectrum Reallocation Final Report, NTIA Special Report 95-32, February 1995, at 4-30. See 47 C.F.R. §2.106 footnote G123. See 47 C.F.R. §15.247(b)(1), which permits higher-powered operations in this frequency band for spread spectrum transmitters. See 47 C.F.R. §§15.24 and 15.249. See Policy Statement, ``Principles for Reallocation of Spectrum to Encourage the Development of Telecommunications Technologies for the New Millennium'', FCC 99-354, 14 FCC Rcd 19868 (1999). See Petition for Rule Making, RM-9949, Public Notice (rel. Aug. 30, 2000) Report No. 2433. See 47 C.F.R. §2.106, footnote 5.150. See Comments of ARRL at para 22. See Comments of AMSAT at para
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.txt
  • The Commission also stated in the Notice that restricting the entire band above 38.6 GHz makes compliance more difficult to achieve for certain devices because they must comply with tighter harmonic limits than would otherwise apply if the band were not restricted. For example, the limit on harmonic emissions from a transmitter operating in the 24.0-24.25 GHz band under Section 15.249 of the rules is 2500 µV/m at 3 meters. However, because the harmonics from a device operating in this band fall in the designated restricted band above 38.6 GHz, they must actually comply with a tighter limit of 500 µV/m at 3 meters. This conflict arose as a result of a 1995 rule change that required spurious emissions from transmitters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-175A1.txt
  • Order is sufficiently low to allow their operation under Part 15. ITI argues that, unlike the 24.0 - 24.05 GHz band, which is designated primarily for amateur satellite operation, the 24.05 - 24.25 GHz band is shared with Radio Location Services, Earth Satellite Services, Part 90 Private Land Mobile devices, Part 18 Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM) equipment, and Part 15.249 radio devices. ITI notes that the systems authorized in the Report and Order for unlicensed operation under Part 15 in this frequency range are highly directional point-to-point systems. Consequently, ITI argues that, even operating at 2500 mV/m using narrow beam directional antennas, these line-of-sight systems, should not pose any undue or significant threat to licensed amateur operation. Opponents also uniformly
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.txt
  • cognitive radio technology could help ensure that devices limit their higher power operation to only rural areas. Devices such as transmitters used by WISPs and wireless LANs often operate under the Part 15 spread spectrum rules in Section 15.247. In addition, any type of operation (e.g., cordless phones, wireless cameras, fleet management devices) is permitted in certain bands under Section 15.249. The power limits currently permitted vary depending on the frequency band and in some cases the signal characteristics, such as the number of hopping channels for spread spectrum devices. Discussion Permitting unlicensed devices to operate at higher power levels in rural areas could help provide improved access to spectrum in those areas by permitting greater transmission range and therefore greater
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.txt
  • will generally continue to consider the benefits of Part 15 access on a band-by-band basis. Under sections 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's rules, unlicensed devices are permitted to operate at very low power levels in all bands except certain specified restricted bands. 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.205, 15.209. Spectrum Policy Task Force Report at 57. Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.249. See generally Cognitive Radio NPRM, 18 FCC Rcd at 26888-26889 ¶¶ 77-80. Consistent with our discussion of dynamic leasing arrangements, the general ability of a licensee to deploy a private commons model is not intended to, and does not, overturn rights under Part 15, as it exists or as amended, to operate in a band or limit the Commission's ability
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.txt
  • ratio to represent the peak power in a 50 MHz bandwidth when RBW is less than or equal to 0.45 PRF (non-dithered) and when RBW is less than or equal to 2.0 PRF (dithered). 47 C.F.R. § 15.515. Non-UWB vehicular radar systems are permitted to operate under 47 C.F.R. § 15.245 in the 24.075-24.175 GHz band, under 47 C.F.R. § 15.249 in the 24.0-24.25 GHz band, or under 47 C.F.R. § 15.209 in the 24.0-31.2 GHz band. 47 C.F.R. § 15.503 defines a UWB transmitter as an intentional radiator that, at any point in time, has a fractional bandwidth equal to or greater than 0.2 or has a UWB bandwidth equal to or greater than 500 MHz, regardless of the fractional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-98A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-98A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-98A1.txt
  • radar sites from interference by requiring grantees of an equipment authorization for a 433 MHz RFID device to register their location and inform purchasers where the devices may or may not be used. I'm excited by the prospects for improved inventory control, lower costs, and increased homeland security that this technology promises to bring. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.225 and 15.249. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.231. See Notice of Proposed Rule Making and Order in ET Docket No. 01-278, (``Notice''), 16 FCC Rcd 18205 (2001). See The 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review Report and Federal Communications Commission Biennial Regulatory Review 2000 Updated Staff Report (``Updated Staff Report''), FCC 00-456, dated January 17, 2001. See National Council for Information Technology Standardization Technical Committee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-194A1.txt
  • potentially hazardous location to obtain real time images of, and sound from, the surrounding area. It is intended for counter-terrorism and law enforcement operations in urban terrain applications as well as in police activities requiring observation and surveillance. The unlicensed operation of a transmitter employing analog modulation in the 2450 MHz band normally is subject to the requirements of Section 15.249 of the Commission's regulations. Operation under Section 15.249 is limited to a maximum average fundamental emission level of 50 mV/m and a peak level of 500 mV/m, both as measured at 3 meters. These emission levels are equivalent to equivalent isotropically radiated powers (``EIRP'') of approximately 750 uW, average, and 75 mW, peak. Section 15.247 permits the operation of wideband
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.txt
  • Service (MSS) in the United States and is a restricted band under Part 15 of the rules. Unlicensed devices are not permitted to transmit in that band in the United States to prevent interference to the MSS, while in other countries unlicensed operation is permitted in all or part of the 2483.5-2500 MHz band. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.205, 15.247, 15.249 and 25.202. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.915(a)(1). See Notice at 26895. Id. See Wi-Fi Alliance comments at 7, ITI comments at 10, Cisco comments at 15 and Dell comments at 5. See Wi-Fi Alliance comments at 7. The IEEE 802.11 Task Group d (TGd) developed IEEE Std 802.11d-2001, which is an amendment to IEEE Std 802.11, 1999 Edition. The 802.11d
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-117A1.txt
  • requirements in the unlicensed bands, e.g., a ``spectrum etiquette,'' particularly in the 915 MHz band. We are, however, seeking comment on its recommendations for a spectrum etiquette in a Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making (Further NPRM) in this proceeding. Specifically, the Further NPRM seeks comment on a specific spectrum etiquette for unlicensed transmitters that operate under Sections 15.247 and 15.249 of the rules in the 915 MHz band. II. BACKGROUND Part 15 of the Commission's rules governs the operation of unlicensed radiofrequency devices, including the technical requirements for their use. As a general condition of operation, Part 15 devices may not cause harmful interference to authorized radio services and must accept any interference that they receive. Examples of common Part
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.txt
  • at the head-worn microphone. Each system shall use a unique user code meeting the specifications outlined in section 15.214(d) to ensure that the specific CB operator only controls the CB transmitter. The associated transmitter shall be limited 1 mW (0.001 watt) final collector current. The transmitter shall be designed to meet or exceed the specifications of Part 15, specifically including 15.249. Id. at 4-5. Id. at 1-2. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. § 95.419(c)). Id. Id. at 5-6. Id. at 8-10. Id. at 5-6. Id. at 2, 8-10. Id. at 8. Id. Id. at 9-10. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.35. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.227, 15.229, 15.235, 15.249. See www.bluetooth.com for further information. 47 C.F.R. § 95.416. 47 C.F.R. § 95.183(a)(14). 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1_Rcd.pdf
  • present at the head-worn microphone. Each system shall use a unique user code meeting the specifications outlined in section 15.214(d) to ensure that the specific CB operator only controls the CB transmitter. The associated transmitter shallbe limited 1 mW (0.001 watt) final collector current. The transmitter shall be designed to meet or exceed the specifications of Part 15, specifically including 15.249. 118Id. at 4-5. 119Id. at 1-2. 120Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. § 95.419(c)). 121Id. 122Id. at 5-6. 7670 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-106 these devices, and that competition among manufacturers would provide the public with greater choices and lower prices for this technology, if manufacturers other than the CB transmitter manufacturer may obtain equipment authorization.123Omnitronics also states that CB transmitter manufacturers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.txt
  • telephone network and private and commercial wireless systems and networks to prevent Wireless Audio Devices from being used for applications such as wireless headsets for use with cellular phones, cordless phones and similar devices. Devices that transmit data or operate as telephones can operate under the Part 15 TV band device rules or other rule parts, e.g., Section 15.247 or 15.249. We seek comment on our definition and the proposals. In particular we seek comment on whether our proposed definition of Wireless Audio Devices is overly broad and could enable a proliferation of devices in the TV bands that already have suitable provisions to operate in other bands. If so, we seek comment on whether we should specifically limit the applicability
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-305A1.pdf
  • in this band with a permitted average field strength of 500 millivolts/meter at a distance of 3 meters (75 mW EIRP). Additionally, Section 15.247 of our Rules permits unlicensed spread spectrum communications devices to operate in the 5.725-5.850 GHz band with a maximum peak transmitter output power of 1 watt with antenna gain of up to 6 dBi. Finally, Section 15.249 permits unlicensed communications devices to operate in the 5.725-5.875 GHz band with a maximum average field strength of 50 millivolts/meter at a distance of 3 meters (0.8 mW EIRP). Amtech Systems Division of Intermec Technologies Corporation ("Amtech") states that unlicensed use should be part of the DSRC scheme whether or not it is part of the 5.85-5.925 GHz allocation. Amtech
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1998/fcc98119.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1998/fcc98119.wp
  • and equipment affordability. For example, a Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-119 75 See 47 C.F.R. § 2.995. (Frequency stability to be measured with ambient temperature variation of -30E to +50E Centigrade and with variation of primary supply voltage of 85-115% of nominal value.) 76 See 47 C.F.R. § 15.245(b). 77 See 47 C.F.R. § 15.247(b). 78 See 47 C.F.R. § 15.249(a). 21 proposed DSRC channelization plan could provide for a few wideband channels for certain purposes, such as backscatter automatic toll collection, and reserve a number of narrowband channels for active transponder DSRC services or other services with smaller data throughput requirements. We request comment on whether provision for different channel bandwidths for different data requirements or technologies would significantly effect
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00211.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00211.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00211.txt
  • compatible. We will consider the Itron and LMCC petitions in a future comprehensive proceeding to allocate the remaining government transfer spectrum in the 1390-1400 MHz and 1427-1435 MHz bands. at para. 25. comments at 32. reply comments at 13. Medical telemetry equipment can operate in certain ISM bands under Part 15 of the rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.247 and 15.249. reply comments at 13. . (e)(1) and (3). at para. 28. . comments at 33. reply comments at 12-13. comments at 1-2. comments at 2. reply comments at 2. comments at 13. comments at 16. comments at 9. comments at 16, CDRH comments at 4, and Vitalcom comments at 13. comments at 1. comments at 36, IIT comments at 4,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1823A1.html
  • EB-09-SE-133 Dear Mr. Olin: This is an official CITATION issued to Costco Warehouse Corporation ("Costco"), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera ("Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1824A1.html
  • EB-09-SE-134 Dear Mr. Dach: This is an official CITATION issued to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart"), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera ("Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands. Subsequently,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2426A1.html
  • Mr. Hsia: This is an official CITATION, issued to Team Research, Inc. ("Team Research") pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing a non-compliant radio frequency device, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera ("Astak CM-918T2"), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands. On
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-408A1.html
  • site at www.securitymaninc.com. The staff observed that SecurityMan was marketing the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera. Subsequently, Enforcement Bureau staff purchased a SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, and forwarded it to the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") Laboratory for testing. The OET Laboratory's tests demonstrated that the SecurityMan SM-302T does not comply with the radiated emission limits specified in sections 15.249(d) and 15.209 of the rules. As part of the investigation, the Enforcement Bureau sent a letter of inquiry ("LOI") to SecurityMan on March 18, 2010. 4. In your April 14, 2010 response to the LOI, you admit that SecurityMan imports and distributes the SecurityMan SM-302T (factory model AT202-900) in the United States. You indicated, however, that SecurityMan "does not engineer
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/fc950041.pdf
  • signals -obsolete and unusable anywhere in the 902-928 MHz band.75 Multilateration LMS commenters argue that operation of some Part 15 devices is likely to cause harmful interference to LMS systems. Examples of potential interference sources identified by multilateration operators include anti-shoplifting field disturbance sensors that operate under Section 15.245 of the rules and certain video links that operate under Section 15.249 of the rule~.`~ Multilateration parties also contend that harmful interference is likely to be caused by Part 15 devices that either transmit continuous signals or transmit from antennas placed at relatively high out-of-doors elevations.On the other hand, multilateration proponents do not believe that interference is likely to be received from any other type of Part 15 operations? 33.Commenters have suggested
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/lmsbp_g.pdf
  • signals -obsolete and unusable anywhere in the 902-928 MHz band.75 Multilateration LMS commenters argue that operation of some Part 15 devices is likely to cause harmful interference to LMS systems. Examples of potential interference sources identified by multilateration operators include anti-shoplifting field disturbance sensors that operate under Section 15.245 of the rules and certain video links that operate under Section 15.249 of the rule~.`~ Multilateration parties also contend that harmful interference is likely to be caused by Part 15 devices that either transmit continuous signals or transmit from antennas placed at relatively high out-of-doors elevations.On the other hand, multilateration proponents do not believe that interference is likely to be received from any other type of Part 15 operations? 33.Commenters have suggested
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1998/fcc98119.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1998/fcc98119.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1998/fcc98119.wp
  • and equipment affordability. For example, a Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-119 75 See 47 C.F.R. § 2.995. (Frequency stability to be measured with ambient temperature variation of -30E to +50E Centigrade and with variation of primary supply voltage of 85-115% of nominal value.) 76 See 47 C.F.R. § 15.245(b). 77 See 47 C.F.R. § 15.247(b). 78 See 47 C.F.R. § 15.249(a). 21 proposed DSRC channelization plan could provide for a few wideband channels for certain purposes, such as backscatter automatic toll collection, and reserve a number of narrowband channels for active transponder DSRC services or other services with smaller data throughput requirements. We request comment on whether provision for different channel bandwidths for different data requirements or technologies would significantly effect
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00211.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00211.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00211.txt
  • compatible. We will consider the Itron and LMCC petitions in a future comprehensive proceeding to allocate the remaining government transfer spectrum in the 1390-1400 MHz and 1427-1435 MHz bands. at para. 25. comments at 32. reply comments at 13. Medical telemetry equipment can operate in certain ISM bands under Part 15 of the rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.247 and 15.249. reply comments at 13. . (e)(1) and (3). at para. 28. . comments at 33. reply comments at 12-13. comments at 1-2. comments at 2. reply comments at 2. comments at 13. comments at 16. comments at 9. comments at 16, CDRH comments at 4, and Vitalcom comments at 13. comments at 1. comments at 36, IIT comments at 4,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2000/da000705.doc
  • In an effort to compensate for this problem, we have developed the following technique for determining band-edge compliance. STEP 1) Perform an in-band field strength measurement of the fundamental emission using the RBW and detector function required by C63.4 and our Rules for the frequency being measured. For example, for a device operating in the 902-928 MHz band under Section 15.249, use a 120 kHz RBW with a CISPR QP detector (a peak detector with 100 kHz RBW may alternatively be used). For transmitters operating above 1 GHz, use a 1 MHz RBW, a 1 MHz VBW, and a peak detector (as required by Section 15.35). Repeat the measurement with an average detector (i.e., 1 MHz RBW with 10 Hz VBW).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1997/dd971211.html
  • December 10, 1997. CABLE TELEVISION RELAY SERVICE APPLICATIONS. Report No: D-961. Released: December 10, 1997. MASS MEDIA MULTIPOINT DISTRIBUTION SERVICE APPLICATIONS. Internet URL: [11]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md 971210.pdf Report No: D-961-A. Released: December 10, 1997. ACTIONS TAKEN ON MASS MEDIA BUREAU MULTIPOINT DISTRIBUTION SERVICE APPLICATIONS. Internet URL: [12]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md 971210.pdf Released: December 10, 1997. OET DECLARES SIERRA DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. WAIVER REQUEST OF PART 15.249 A "PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSE" PROCEEDING FOR EX PARTE PURPOSES. (DA No. 97-2585). Contact: Neal McNeil at (202) 418-2408. Internet URL: [13]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/19 97/da972585.txt Released: December 10, 1997. OET DECLARES EDAP TECHNOMED, INC. WAIVER REQUEST OF PART 18 RADIATED EMISSION LIMITS A "PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSE" PROCEECING FOR EX PARTE PURPOSES. (DA No. 97-2556). Contact: Anthony Serafini at (202) 418-2456. Internet URL: [14]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/19 97/da972556.txt Released: December 10,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1824A1.html
  • EB-09-SE-134 Dear Mr. Dach: This is an official CITATION issued to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart"), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera ("Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands. Subsequently,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-408A1.html
  • site at www.securitymaninc.com. The staff observed that SecurityMan was marketing the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera. Subsequently, Enforcement Bureau staff purchased a SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, and forwarded it to the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") Laboratory for testing. The OET Laboratory's tests demonstrated that the SecurityMan SM-302T does not comply with the radiated emission limits specified in sections 15.249(d) and 15.209 of the rules. As part of the investigation, the Enforcement Bureau sent a letter of inquiry ("LOI") to SecurityMan on March 18, 2010. 4. In your April 14, 2010 response to the LOI, you admit that SecurityMan imports and distributes the SecurityMan SM-302T (factory model AT202-900) in the United States. You indicated, however, that SecurityMan "does not engineer