FCC Web Documents citing 15.237

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-831A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-831A1.pdf
  • FL 32807 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-1094 Dear Mr. Stammel: This is an official CITATION, issued to ProLingo pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing in the United States a radio frequency device, specifically, the Listentech LT700 transmitter, in a manner inconsistent with the terms of its authorization and the requirements of Section 15.237 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.237 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In response to a complaint alleging that ProLingo was marketing, as a component of its simultaneous language interpretation systems, certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-831A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-831A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-831A1.txt
  • FL 32807 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-1094 Dear Mr. Stammel: This is an official CITATION, issued to ProLingo pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing in the United States a radio frequency device, specifically, the Listentech LT700 transmitter, in a manner inconsistent with the terms of its authorization and the requirements of Section 15.237 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.237 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In response to a complaint alleging that ProLingo was marketing, as a component of its simultaneous language interpretation systems, certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.txt
  • used only by and for handicapped persons. In 2009, the Commission issued a citation to ProLingo, a provider of simultaneous interpretation equipment and services, for marketing, as a component of its simultaneous language interpretation systems, transmitters operating on frequencies in the 72-76 MHz bands. ProLingo was found to have violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.237 of the Commission's rules. Williams Sound appears to seek approval by declaratory ruling to conduct substantially the same activity that we found to violate our rules. Furthermore, we reject Williams Sound's assertion that the inability to understand a foreign language can be considered a handicap, which thereby justifies permitting auditory assistance devices that operate in the 72-76 MHz bands to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-831A1.html
  • FL 32807 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-1094 Dear Mr. Stammel: This is an official CITATION, issued to ProLingo pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing in the United States a radio frequency device, specifically, the Listentech LT700 transmitter, in a manner inconsistent with the terms of its authorization and the requirements of Section 15.237 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.237 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In response to a complaint alleging that ProLingo was marketing, as a component of its simultaneous language interpretation systems, certain
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd090417.html
  • MINIMUM OPENING BIDS, UPFRONT PAYMENTS, AND OTHER PROCEDURES FOR AUCTION 79. (DA No. 09-810). (Dkt No 09-21). WTB [19]DA-09-810A1.xls [20]DA-09-810A2.doc [21]DA-09-810A1.pdf [22]DA-09-810A2.pdf [23]DA-09-810A1.txt [24]DA-09-810A2.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PROLINGO. Issued an official Citation to ProLingo for marketing in the U.S. a radio frequency device in a manner inconsistent with the terms of its authorization and the requirements of Section 15.237 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 09-831). EB [25]DA-09-831A1.doc [26]DA-09-831A1.pdf [27]DA-09-831A1.txt NOTICE OF DISMISSAL. Dismissed an application filed by V-Point Networks, LLC on July 29, 2008 for an International Section 214 Authorization to provide resale services in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(2) of the Commission's rules. Action by: Chief, Policy Division, International
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-831A1.html
  • FL 32807 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-1094 Dear Mr. Stammel: This is an official CITATION, issued to ProLingo pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing in the United States a radio frequency device, specifically, the Listentech LT700 transmitter, in a manner inconsistent with the terms of its authorization and the requirements of Section 15.237 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.237 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In response to a complaint alleging that ProLingo was marketing, as a component of its simultaneous language interpretation systems, certain