FCC Web Documents citing 15.21

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.pdf
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Enhanced Vision Systems, Inc. (``Enhanced Vision''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Enhanced Vision for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing of Class B Digital Devices, specifically, vision assistance products for the legally blind. The Bureau and Enhanced Vision have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-270A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-270A1.pdf
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and American Music and Sound (AMS). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into AMS's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class A digital audio radio frequency devices. The Bureau and AMS have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-360A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-360A1.pdf
  • Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and ETI Sound Systems, Inc. (ETI). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into ETI's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of digital radio frequency devices, including guitar amplifiers, CD/MP3 players, and active speaker systems. The Bureau and ETI have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.pdf
  • see also 47 C.F.R. 1.80(d). NAL Response at 25. 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a). 47 C.F.R. § 2.902. 47 C.F.R. § 2.909(b). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.901-2.1093. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.101-15.123. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.952. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.955. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.956. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.954, 15.19 and 15.21. 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a); see also Behringer USA, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd 1820, 1825 ¶ 15 (2006), forfeiture ordered, 22 FCC Rcd 10451 (2007) (``Behringer'') (forfeiture paid). See Communications Act Amendments of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-234, 92 Stat. 33 (1978). S. Rep. No. 95-580, at 1 (1977). Id. at 2, 6. See 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • regarding an unresolved complaint of excess epfd interference. 13 If an administration acknowledges responsibility for causing the excess epfd interference pursuant to No. 10b) above, but fails to reduce immediately emissions of the interfering system as required: a) It should have an additional 10 days to take the necessary action to correct the excess epfd interference situation pursuant to No. S15.21 of the Radio Regulations. b) If, after the 10-day period, the administration responsible for the interference has still not reduced emissions of the interfering system as required, the Bureau should: ­If the procedure of Article S11 has not been completed for the frequency assignments of the non-geostationary satellite system in the fixed-satellite service in question, publish a remark in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1084A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1084A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1084A1.txt
  • of the Rules, an intentional radiator, such as the remote control device, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to marketing in the United States. Additionally, an intentional radiator must be labeled as specified in Sections 2.925 and 15.19(a) of the Rules, and the accompanying user or instruction manual must contain the information specified in Section 15.21 of the Rules. Oneida apparently violated the above requirements by marketing dust collection equipment with the installed remote control device, and by selling the add-on remote control device separately -- prior to certification. If, after receipt of this citation, Oneida violates the above equipment requirements set forth in the Communications Act or the Commission's Rules in any manner described herein,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.txt
  • Public Affairs Minutes Provided - Three-Way Group Fixed Effects Model PA1: Controlled for Market & Network Variable Coefficient Std. Error p-value TotPop1000s -0.41 *** 0.13 0.002 PopPercentBlack 225.78 *** 47.82 0.000 PopPercentHisp -47.25 ** 24.09 0.050 DMAPerCapitaIncome -0.01 0.01 0.398 UnrelatedStationsinDMACount 85.47 *** 17.29 0.000 UnrelatedStationsinDMAPubAffMin -0.31 *** 0.01 0.000 ParentStationsCount -0.04 0.48 0.930 ParentRevenueMillions -0.04 ** 0.02 0.024 OtherCoOwnedStationsinDMACount 15.21 19.56 0.437 OtherCoOwnStationsinDMAPubAffMin -0.13 *** 0.02 0.000 Local Marketing Agreement 13.92 21.59 0.519 MultiNetworkAffil -6.52 33.11 0.844 Locally Owned 19.26 13.67 0.159 O and O Big Four 21.52 34.40 0.532 TV-Radio Crossowned 47.12 *** 13.80 0.001 TV-Newspaper Crossowned -44.45 36.47 0.223 NonCommercial 48.95 52.14 0.348 VHF Channel 4.81 12.92 0.710 Dummy2003 -32.44 ** 14.69 0.027 Dummy2004 154.46 *** 23.83 0.000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • -0.0106 (1.00) (1.71) (0.20) (0.94) (1.75) Marginal Effect of Number of Stations 0.4048* -0.0055 0.0090 -1.0161* -0.0003* (13.68) (0.89) (0.32) (2.17) (6.41) 0.9200 -1.0313 -8.3112 6.3044 0.0202 (0.13) (-0.69) (-1.22) (0.05) (1.58) 1.5265 0.0698 0.2358 38.6374 0.0016 (0.93) (0.22) (0.16) (1.53) (0.56) 0.0004 0.0000 0.0000 -0.0069 0.0000* (1.73) (-0.62) (-0.16) (-1.79) (2.70) 0.0008* 0.0000 -0.0002 0.0743* 0.0000 (2.65) (0.75) (0.73) (15.21) (0.75) 0.0003* 0.0000 -0.0001 -0.0020 0.0000 (3.05) (0.77) (1.32) (1.45) (1.94) Midwest 0.4822 0.0611 0.5200 1.4759 0.0016* (1.06) (0.60) (1.12) (0.21) (2.01) South 0.0672 0.0248 0.4219 5.4628 0.0002 (0.14) (0.24) (0.90) (0.75) (0.29) West 0.0697 0.1009 0.6713 20.6726* -0.0007 (0.13) (0.88) (1.29) (2.61) (-0.71) Number of Retail Establishments 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000* (0.56) (1.00) (-0.03) (-0.06) (-2.58) Percent White
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1916A1.txt
  • pursuant to Section 0.283 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Nancy Murphy Associate Chief, Media Bureau ATTACHMENT A ALL COMMUNITIES Communities CUID(S) Dorchester County SC0320 Lincolnville SC0371 North Charleston SC0394, SC0570 Ridgeville SC0534 Summerville SC0150 ATTACHMENT B ``COMPETING PROVIDER'' COMMUNITIES - GRANTED 2000 Estimated Census DBS Communities CUID CPR* Household Subscribers+ Dorchester County SC0320 23.29 34,079 8083 Lincolnville SC0371 15.21 347 53 * CPR = Percent of competitive DBS penetration rate. + See Petition (in these Attachments, numbers of DBS subscribers are rounded off) ATTACHMENT C ``COMPETING PROVIDER'' COMMUNITIES - DENIED 2000 Estimated Time-Warner Census DBS Communities CUID(S) Subscribership+ CPR* Households Subscribers+ Ridgeville SC0534 152.34% 47.68% 214 102 Summerville SC0150 98.52% 17.59% 10,391 1827 + See Petition (in these Attachments,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.txt
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Enhanced Vision Systems, Inc. (``Enhanced Vision''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Enhanced Vision for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing of Class B Digital Devices, specifically, vision assistance products for the legally blind. The Bureau and Enhanced Vision have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2011A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2011A1.txt
  • and marketed after September 27, 2002 shall comply with the regulations specified in this part. Radar detectors manufactured or imported prior to January 27, 2003 may be labeled with the information required by §§ 2.925 and 15.19(a) of this chapter on the individual equipment carton rather than on the device, and are exempt from complying with the requirements of § 15.21. (e) U-NII equipment operating in the 5.25-5.35 GHz band for which applications for certification are filed on or after July 20, 2006 shall comply with the DFS and TPC requirements specified in §15.407. U-NII equipment operating in the 5.25-5.35 GHz band that are imported or marketed on or after July 20, 2007 shall comply with the DFS and TPC requirements
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
  • Basic service price 124 14.80 0.41 Family package price 124 32.39 0.41 Basic service channels 124 26.6 0.8 Family package channels 120 40.6 0.8 All Effective Competition Communities Basic service price 182 15.75 0.18 Family package price 185 33.39 0.26 Basic service channels 186 30.6 0.6 Family package channels 174 44.4 0.6 Second operator subgroup (all) Basic service price 32 15.21 0.27 Family package price 33 33.91 0.36 Basic service channels 34 29.7 0.7 Family package channels 34 43.7 0.7 Second operator subgroup (incumbents) Basic service price 31 15.20 0.27 Family package price 31 34.01 0.36 Basic service channels 31 29.8 0.7 Family package channels 31 43.8 0.7 Second operator subgroup (rivals) Basic service price 1 17.50 0.00 Family package price
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A3.txt
  • 24.37 81603.55 84510.07 26652.8827626.9228798.5429801.14 21.44 20.72 54443.16 57177.83 21067.0122066.9123437.5826216.34 28.61 28.29 293826.39 311083.76 24155.0824640.5026355.6927793.20 24.74 24.64 72910.61 74938.19 18711.1019082.3820469.0120997.56 21.27 22.27 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-732 51787.06 52848.12 18832.6719469.9821053.3621436.79 16.85 17.21 142068.17 155305.17 33011.4633535.0935364.9738376.33 29.28 28.70 27060.54 27992.28 21730.1021912.4124392.0525181.97 18.84 18.43 180474.34 188681.64 16299.4716951.6117919.4918763.46 20.78 20.98 85326.52 88978.35 26000.4127712.3429790.7030841.72 28.80 29.39 17904.81 19284.68 15439.5915903.2116162.5017434.84 15.20 14.34 17915.65 18388.93 16944.2716801.9717919.2418412.87 15.97 15.21 11713.70 12340.42 11575.9211738.6012085.9412802.59 16.28 16.08 14366.57 14960.48 10757.1911128.7011433.8012025.14 15.79 16.44 17277.23 17956.83 10639.2910768.7011298.2111816.03 16.51 17.43 15970.06 16771.76 11325.9611491.2711875.4212531.20 16.34 16.87 10639.00 11311.49 33747.7034926.5735019.7636301.31 30.77 32.06 175315.33 193371.24 36434.2738577.7941146.1144382.76 32299.98 34655.37 25243.2026360.8228330.8329708.85 25.47 24.97 143015.44 158715.87 40509.2143037.8345828.0049747.95 31.48 32.80 1739784.251840069.62 27411.1828144.0429517.1430990.49 14.69 15.38 141497.08 148963.91 30312.2531031.4232548.2734033.33 11.89 12.62 4281.59 4454.05 32444.5533169.6434417.9535518.72 11.52 12.17 47852.76 51473.09 27929.3328658.6729740.6931992.72 17.17 16.87 365714.70 387481.24 36133.3136954.9238454.5940388.29
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-270A1.txt
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and American Music and Sound (AMS). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into AMS's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class A digital audio radio frequency devices. The Bureau and AMS have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-360A1.txt
  • Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and ETI Sound Systems, Inc. (ETI). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into ETI's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of digital radio frequency devices, including guitar amplifiers, CD/MP3 players, and active speaker systems. The Bureau and ETI have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 21.93 - Louisiana 7.18 - 7.90 - 8.06 - 19.98 - 19.29 - 19.82 - Maine 8.98 6.91 9.73 6.91 9.89 6.89 22.31 22.38 22.24 22.40 22.21 22.41 Maryland 8.84 - 9.22 - 9.22 - 23.86 - 24.00 - 24.00 - Massachusetts 8.99 10.08 9.71 7.09 9.92 7.25 6.75 - 6.75 - 6.79 - Michigan 8.00 14.66 8.25 15.17 8.29 15.21 20.81 11.00 21.93 11.00 20.64 11.00 Minnesota 6.85 6.70 7.50 7.90 7.95 9.19 11.61 11.18 12.18 42.63 12.10 37.64 Mississippi 8.84 - 9.52 - 9.75 - 21.45 - 20.50 - 21.53 - Missouri 7.03 4.94 7.49 2.79 7.72 2.54 17.93 10.00 18.29 21.00 17.38 - Montana 8.81 8.66 9.51 10.78 9.80 11.77 15.05 18.17 15.74 17.06 13.23 15.75 Nebraska 8.71
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 21.93 - Louisiana 7.18 - 7.90 - 8.06 - 19.98 - 19.29 - 19.82 - Maine 8.98 6.91 9.73 6.91 9.89 6.89 22.31 22.38 22.24 22.40 22.21 22.41 Maryland 8.84 - 9.22 - 9.22 - 23.86 - 24.00 - 24.00 - Massachusetts 8.99 10.08 9.71 7.09 9.92 7.25 6.75 - 6.75 - 6.79 - Michigan 8.00 14.66 8.25 15.17 8.29 15.21 20.81 11.00 21.93 11.00 20.64 11.00 Minnesota 6.85 6.70 7.50 7.90 7.95 9.19 11.61 11.18 12.18 42.63 12.10 37.64 Mississippi 8.84 - 9.52 - 9.75 - 21.45 - 20.50 - 21.53 - Missouri 7.03 4.94 7.49 2.79 7.72 2.54 17.93 10.00 18.29 21.00 17.38 - Montana 8.81 8.66 9.51 10.78 9.80 11.77 15.05 18.17 15.74 17.06 13.23 15.75 Nebraska 8.71
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • A CITIZENS TEL. CORP.-WARREN 10.88 -2.80 14.08 158.87 320753 C CLAY CTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 8.44 -0.62 9.11 INFINITE 320756 A CRAIGVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 13.41 0.43 12.93 175.97 320759 C DAVIESS-MARTIN CTY. RURAL TEL. DBA RTC COMM. 3.38 -1.40 4.85 4.71 320771 A GEETINGSVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 11.63 -2.51 14.50 64.14 320772 C VERIZON NORTH INC.-IN 12.08 -2.72 15.21 0.00 320775 C HANCOCK RURAL TEL. CORP. DBA HANCOCK TELECOM 1.98 1.88 0.10 -8.01 320776 C COMM. CORP. OF INDIANA 0.60 -5.50 6.46 5.73 320777 A HOME TEL. CO. OF PITTSBORO, INC. 5.57 0.80 4.73 0.00 320778 A HOME TEL. CO., INC. 7.29 -1.85 9.31 0.00 320779 C VERIZON NORTH INC.-IN (CONTEL) 11.34 -1.34 12.86 0.00 320783 C LIGONIER TEL.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 21.93 - 21.42 - Louisiana 7.90 - 8.06 - 7.71 20.54 19.29 - 19.82 - 19.91 - Maine 9.73 6.91 9.89 6.88 9.88 6.91 22.16 22.40 22.12 22.41 21.87 22.44 Maryland 9.22 - 9.22 - 9.17 - 24.00 - 24.00 - 24.00 - Massachusetts 9.71 7.09 9.92 7.25 9.89 8.00 6.75 - 6.79 - 6.76 - Michigan 8.25 15.17 8.26 15.21 8.28 15.27 21.93 11.00 20.64 11.00 20.50 11.03 Minnesota 7.50 7.90 7.95 9.19 7.76 9.81 12.18 31.79 12.10 31.80 18.76 21.91 Mississippi 9.52 - 9.76 - 9.68 20.83 20.50 - 21.49 - 22.53 18.00 Missouri 7.49 2.79 7.72 2.54 8.58 2.83 18.29 21.00 17.38 - 17.93 - Montana 9.51 10.78 9.80 11.77 9.65 16.16 15.71 16.99 13.21 15.65 12.80 16.10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 21.93 - 21.42 - Louisiana 7.90 - 8.06 - 7.71 20.54 19.29 - 19.82 - 19.91 - Maine 9.73 6.91 9.89 6.88 9.88 6.91 22.16 22.40 22.12 22.41 21.87 22.44 Maryland 9.22 - 9.22 - 9.17 - 24.00 - 24.00 - 24.00 - Massachusetts 9.71 7.09 9.92 7.25 9.89 8.00 6.75 - 6.79 - 6.76 - Michigan 8.25 15.17 8.26 15.21 8.28 15.27 21.93 11.00 20.64 11.00 20.50 11.03 Minnesota 7.50 7.90 7.95 9.19 7.76 9.81 12.18 31.79 12.10 31.80 18.76 21.91 Mississippi 9.52 - 9.76 - 9.68 20.83 20.50 - 21.49 - 22.53 18.00 Missouri 7.49 2.79 7.72 2.54 8.58 2.83 18.29 21.00 17.38 - 17.93 - Montana 9.51 10.78 9.80 11.77 9.65 16.16 15.71 16.99 13.21 15.65 12.80 16.10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 14.264 13.07 64 Iowa Telecom Systems Service Group 19.14 20.16 23.975 20.474 18.45 65 Micronesian Telecommunications Corp. 37.67 43.526733.91 32.75 21.83 23.58 29.24 34.45 66 Valor New Mexico #1164 28.25 22.966 18.45 16.86 11.45 20.67 67 Valor New Mexico #1193 17.77 21.166 20.41 15.88 8.39 13.35 68 Valor Oklahoma 19.38 15.296 8.69 9.31 11.65 11.22 69 Valor Texas 18.08 13.476 15.21 10.66 5.70 5.24 Maximum Rate of Return 71.84% 68.80%59.89%54.09% 53.67% 47.67% 43.42% 48.69% Minimum Rate of Return (33.60) (9.44) (17.50) (5.17) 0.86 (11.23) (9.93) (25.83) Weighted Arithmetic Mean 23.48 20.44 18.06 17.69 19.62 18.04 18.50 15.60 Standard Deviation 9.13 9.00 8.63 5.69 5.80 5.17 5.96 3.96 * The interstate rates of return reported by carriers on the FCC Form 492A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 21.93 - 21.42 - 20.03 - Louisiana 8.06 - 7.72 20.54 8.07 10.00 19.82 - 19.91 - 20.30 - Maine 9.89 6.88 9.88 6.91 9.89 8.95 22.12 22.41 21.87 22.44 21.69 22.39 Maryland 9.22 - 9.17 - 9.16 - 24.00 - 24.00 - 24.00 - Massachusetts 9.92 7.25 9.89 8.00 9.90 8.00 6.79 - 6.76 - 6.77 - Michigan 8.26 15.21 8.28 15.27 8.04 14.86 20.64 11.00 20.50 11.03 26.20 11.00 Minnesota 7.95 9.19 7.76 9.62 8.07 10.22 12.02 22.15 18.85 39.81 20.07 20.33 Mississippi 9.76 - 9.68 20.83 9.76 24.65 21.49 - 22.56 18.00 21.60 18.00 Missouri 7.72 2.54 8.59 2.57 9.18 3.29 17.35 - 17.92 - 17.76 10.00 Montana 9.80 11.77 9.65 16.16 10.13 19.65 13.21 15.65 12.80 16.10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 21.93 - 21.42 - 20.03 - Louisiana 8.06 - 7.72 20.54 8.07 10.00 19.82 - 19.91 - 20.30 - Maine 9.89 6.88 9.88 6.91 9.89 8.95 22.12 22.41 21.87 22.44 21.69 22.39 Maryland 9.22 - 9.17 - 9.16 - 24.00 - 24.00 - 24.00 - Massachusetts 9.92 7.25 9.89 8.00 9.90 8.00 6.79 - 6.76 - 6.77 - Michigan 8.26 15.21 8.28 15.27 8.04 14.86 20.64 11.00 20.50 11.03 26.20 11.00 Minnesota 7.95 9.19 7.76 9.62 8.07 10.22 12.02 22.15 18.85 39.81 20.07 20.33 Mississippi 9.76 - 9.68 20.83 9.76 24.65 21.49 - 22.56 18.00 21.60 18.00 Missouri 7.72 2.54 8.59 2.57 9.18 3.29 17.35 - 17.92 - 17.76 10.00 Montana 9.80 11.77 9.65 16.16 10.13 19.65 13.21 15.65 12.80 16.10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 14.74 158.22 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 2.09 0.50 1.57 -1.11 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. -0.36 -1.35 1.00 -7.95 442086 C HILL COUNTRY TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. 2.32 -0.48 2.81 0.59 442090 C ALENCO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. -7.45 -2.10 -5.46 -9.87 442091 C ETS TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 10.74 13.59 -2.51 4.03 442093 C INDUSTRY TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.21 -0.58 15.88 33.91 442097 C WINDSTREAM COMMUNICATIONS KERRVILLE, L.P. (KERRVILLE) -26.01 -12.84 -15.12 0.00 442101 C CENTURYTEL OF LAKE DALLAS, INC. -5.05 -5.06 0.01 -15.80 442103 C LA WARD TELEPHONE EXCHANGE INC. 0.19 -5.19 5.67 1.10 442104 C LAKE LIVINGSTON TEL. CO. 3.87 -5.07 9.41 5.70 442105 C LIPAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.63 -0.58 8.26 10.16 442107 A LIVINGSTON TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 11.6 9 28.2510 22.966 18.45 16.86 11.45 20.67 65 Valor Telecom of TX d/b/a Windstream Com S/W New Mexico #1193 5.54 9 17.7710 21.166 20.41 15.88 8.39 13.35 66 Valor Telecom of TX d/b/a Windstream Com S/W Oklahoma -1.34 9 19.3810 15.296 8.69 9.31 11.65 11.22 67 Valor Telecom of TX d/b/a Windstream Com S/W Texas -1.13 9 18.0810 13.476 15.21 10.66 5.70 5.24 Maximum Rate of Return 64.24% 71.95% 68.80% 59.89% 54.09% 53.67% 47.67% 43.42% 48.69% Minimum Rate of Return (1.59) (33.59) (9.44) (17.50) (5.17) 0.86 (11.23) (9.93) (25.83) Weighted Arithmetic Mean 23.48 20.44 20.44 18.06 17.69 19.62 18.04 18.50 15.60 Standard Deviation 9.13 9.00 9.00 8.63 5.69 5.80 5.17 5.96 3.96 1 For years 1991 - 1997, see Industry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • -4.06 -5.83 1.88 -5.47 270424 C CENTURYTEL OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA, LLC -8.33 -14.03 6.62 -0.32 270425 C CAMERON TEL. CO.-LA 20.33 7.73 11.69 23.79 270426 C CAMPTI-PLEASANT HILL TEL. CO. -3.30 -1.36 -1.97 -6.68 270427 C CENTURYTEL OF CHATHAM, LLC -0.23 -1.97 1.77 -0.92 270428 A DELCAMBRE TEL. CO. -13.05 -16.70 4.38 0.38 270429 C EAST ASCENSION TELEPHONE COMPANY, LLC 15.21 -5.12 21.43 33.24 270430 C ELIZABETH TEL. CO., INC. 10.47 -3.14 14.05 15.41 270431 C CENTURYTEL OF NORTHWEST LA, INC. -4.92 -5.73 0.86 -8.00 270432 C KAPLAN TEL. CO. -0.54 -1.91 1.39 -2.48 270433 C LAFOURCHE TELEPHONE COMPANY, L.L.C. -3.88 -5.78 2.01 -6.44 270434 C CENTURYTEL OF EVANGELINE, LLC -7.13 -4.55 -2.70 -12.14 270435 C NORTHEAST LOUISIANA TEL. CO., INC.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • -4.06 -5.83 1.88 -5.47 270424 C CENTURYTEL OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA, LLC -8.33 -14.03 6.62 -0.32 270425 C CAMERON TEL. CO.-LA 20.33 7.73 11.69 23.79 270426 C CAMPTI-PLEASANT HILL TEL. CO. -3.30 -1.36 -1.97 -6.68 270427 C CENTURYTEL OF CHATHAM, LLC -0.23 -1.97 1.77 -0.92 270428 A DELCAMBRE TEL. CO. -13.05 -16.70 4.38 0.38 270429 C EAST ASCENSION TELEPHONE COMPANY, LLC 15.21 -5.12 21.43 33.24 270430 C ELIZABETH TEL. CO., INC. 10.47 -3.14 14.05 15.41 270431 C CENTURYTEL OF NORTHWEST LA, INC. -4.92 -5.73 0.86 -8.00 270432 C KAPLAN TEL. CO. -0.54 -1.91 1.39 -2.48 270433 C LAFOURCHE TELEPHONE COMPANY, L.L.C. -3.88 -5.78 2.01 -6.44 270434 C CENTURYTEL OF EVANGELINE, LLC -7.13 -4.55 -2.70 -12.14 270435 C NORTHEAST LOUISIANA TEL. CO., INC.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 3.20 -7.36 11.40 0.87 CONNECTICUT 3.46 -7.81 12.22 0.00 DELAWARE 6.73 -9.55 18.01 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 0.73 -7.65 9.08 0.00 FLORIDA -6.19 -8.60 2.63 5.93 GEORGIA -6.23 -7.00 0.83 -22.31 GUAM 1.25 -1.02 2.29 -71.60 HAWAII -1.82 -7.49 6.13 -0.82 IDAHO 19.19 -6.02 26.83 -3.81 ILLINOIS 1.09 -7.16 8.89 -7.06 INDIANA 3.44 -7.06 11.30 16.06 IOWA 5.63 -6.51 12.98 -15.21 KANSAS 2.67 -7.36 10.83 4.43 KENTUCKY -7.72 -7.93 0.22 -5.85 LOUISIANA -8.38 -5.36 -3.19 -8.19 MAINE -1.30 -7.54 6.74 -25.32 MARYLAND -1.31 -7.32 6.48 57.59 MASSACHUSETTS -3.47 -8.12 5.05 101.01 MICHIGAN -1.82 -11.30 10.69 4.47 MINNESOTA 0.84 -6.86 8.26 -7.68 MISSISSIPPI -4.91 -6.15 1.33 -10.29 MISSOURI 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 MONTANA 2.09 -7.10 9.89 9.14 NEBRASKA -2.26 -5.56 3.50 -1.33
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 3.20 -7.36 11.40 0.87 CONNECTICUT 3.46 -7.81 12.22 0.00 DELAWARE 6.73 -9.55 18.01 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 0.73 -7.65 9.08 0.00 FLORIDA -6.19 -8.60 2.63 5.93 GEORGIA -6.23 -7.00 0.83 -22.31 GUAM 1.25 -1.02 2.29 -71.60 HAWAII -1.82 -7.49 6.13 -0.82 IDAHO 19.19 -6.02 26.83 -3.81 ILLINOIS 1.09 -7.16 8.89 -7.06 INDIANA 3.44 -7.06 11.30 16.06 IOWA 5.63 -6.51 12.98 -15.21 KANSAS 2.67 -7.36 10.83 4.43 KENTUCKY -7.72 -7.93 0.22 -5.85 LOUISIANA -8.38 -5.36 -3.19 -8.19 MAINE -1.30 -7.54 6.74 -25.32 MARYLAND -1.31 -7.32 6.48 57.59 MASSACHUSETTS -3.47 -8.12 5.05 101.01 MICHIGAN -1.82 -11.30 10.69 4.47 MINNESOTA 0.84 -6.86 8.26 -7.68 MISSISSIPPI -4.91 -6.15 1.33 -10.29 MISSOURI 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 MONTANA 2.09 -7.10 9.89 9.14 NEBRASKA -2.26 -5.56 3.50 -1.33
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 13.07 62 Iowa Telecom Systems Service Group 17.19 15.20 19.1410 20.16 23.975 20.474 18.45 63 Micronesian Telecommunications Corp. 51.51 51.05 45.48 43.52 43.526733.91 32.75 21.83 23.58 Windstream 64 Georgia Properties 25.88 65 Oklahoma Properties 41.37 66 Texas Windstream, Inc 19.51 67 Valor Oklahoma 17.69 30.33 (1.34)9 19.3810 15.296 8.69 9.31 11.65 11.22 68 Valor Texas 28.12 24.03 (1.13)9 18.0810 13.476 15.21 10.66 5.70 5.24 60 Valor New Mexico #1 30.73 22.84 11.609 28.2510 22.966 18.45 16.86 11.45 20.67 70 Valor New Mexico #2 25.72 21.64 5.549 17.7710 21.166 20.41 15.88 8.39 13.35 71 Windstream Alabama, LLC 31.19 72 Windstream Arkansas, LLC 24.61 73 Windstream Concord, Inc 39.50 74 Windstream Florida, Inc 29.08 75 Windstream Kentucky East, LLC Lexington 99.56 61.07 30.159
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 310725 A SAND CREEK TEL CO 0.00 -4.55 4.76 -54.20 310726 C SHIAWASSEE TEL CO -4.35 -3.88 -0.48 -73.08 310728 C SPRINGPORT TEL CO -8.78 -13.91 5.96 -14.68 310732 C UPPER PENINSULA TEL -10.06 -4.42 -5.90 -26.03 310734 C WALDRON TEL CO -2.88 -2.13 -0.76 -10.49 310735 A WESTPHALIA TEL CO 0.07 -4.62 4.91 -49.18 310737 C WINN TEL CO -15.21 -8.36 -7.48 -47.24 310738 C WOLVERINE TEL CO -4.35 -4.21 -0.15 0.00 313033 C FRONTIER MIDSTATE-MI -1.53 -14.44 15.09 0.00 TOTAL MINNESOTA -3.87 -10.22 7.08 2.64 361123 C CITIZENS-FRONTIER-MN -5.40 -4.58 -0.86 0.00 361337 C WINNEBAGO COOP-MN -5.98 -3.17 -2.90 -21.92 361346 C ACE TEL ASSN-MN -0.54 -2.62 2.13 -34.52 361347 A ALBANY MUTUAL ASSN 2.91 -0.92 3.87 -78.86 361348
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 310725 A SAND CREEK TEL CO 0.00 -4.55 4.76 -54.20 310726 C SHIAWASSEE TEL CO -4.35 -3.88 -0.48 -73.08 310728 C SPRINGPORT TEL CO -8.78 -13.91 5.96 -14.68 310732 C UPPER PENINSULA TEL -10.06 -4.42 -5.90 -26.03 310734 C WALDRON TEL CO -2.88 -2.13 -0.76 -10.49 310735 A WESTPHALIA TEL CO 0.07 -4.62 4.91 -49.18 310737 C WINN TEL CO -15.21 -8.36 -7.48 -47.24 310738 C WOLVERINE TEL CO -4.35 -4.21 -0.15 0.00 313033 C FRONTIER MIDSTATE-MI -1.53 -14.44 15.09 0.00 TOTAL MINNESOTA -3.87 -10.22 7.08 2.64 361123 C CITIZENS-FRONTIER-MN -5.40 -4.58 -0.86 0.00 361337 C WINNEBAGO COOP-MN -5.98 -3.17 -2.90 -21.92 361346 C ACE TEL ASSN-MN -0.54 -2.62 2.13 -34.52 361347 A ALBANY MUTUAL ASSN 2.91 -0.92 3.87 -78.86 361348
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • para. 333. Using the carrier-to-carrier numbers provided with the application, the four month (September through December 2000) average for competitive LECs was 12.1 percent, compared to 2.1 percent for Verizon's retail ``special services'' provisioning. See PR-4-01 (Provisioning of POTS/Special Services - Missed Appointments). Specifically, the competitive LEC missed appointment rates for September through December 2000 were 10.71 percent, 2.76 percent, 15.21 percent, and 21.25 percent, respectively. Verizon's performance for its own retail special services for the same period was 2.78 percent, 1.90 percent, 1.43 percent, and 2.04 percent, respectively. Letter from Dolores A. May, Executive Director Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission (March 29, 2001) (Verizon March 29 Ex Parte Letter) at 1; Verizon Massachusetts I
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.txt
  • requires the manufacturer to have the equipment tested and to retain certain information on file. No application filing is required for verification and the equipment may be sold as soon as it is found to comply. Information to the User Manufacturers are required to supply certain information to the users of products operating under Part 15 of the rules. Section 15.21 requires the instruction manual for all Part 15 devices to contain a statement that unauthorized modifications to a device could void the user's authority to operate it. In addition, Section 15.105 requires the manual for a digital device to include a warning of the potential for interference to other devices and a list of some steps that could possibly eliminate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-211A1.txt
  • Federal Register] shall comply with the regulations specified in this part. Radar detectors manufactured or imported prior to [180 days from publication in Federal Register] may be labeled with the information required by §§ 2.925 and 15.19(a) of this chapter on the individual equipment carton rather than on the device, and are exempt from complying with the requirements of § 15.21. Section 15.101, paragraph (a) is amended by adding a new entry to the table following the entry for ``Scanning receiver'', and by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: § 15.101 Equipment authorization of unintentional radiators. (a) * * * Type of device Equipment authorization required * * * Radar detector............................................. Certification. * * * (b) Only those receivers that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.txt
  • 303, 304, 307 and 544A. Section 15.19 is amended by replacing the graphics in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (b)(1)(ii) with the following graphics. § 15.19 Labeling requirements. * * * * * (b)(1)(i) * * * Trade name Model number (b)(1)(ii)* * * Trade name Model number Assembled from tested components Complete system not tested * * * * * Section 15.21 is amended by adding the following sentence to the end of the Section: § 15.21 Information to user. * * * * * In cases where the manual is provided only in a form other than paper, such as on a computer disk or over the Internet, the information required by this section may be included in the manual in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.txt
  • either has the capability of reading the disk or is used with equipment that is capable of reading the disk. Warning statements may be provided in a manual on the Internet only when the manual is provided solely over the Internet and the equipment will be used with Internet access. These rule changes applied to information statements required by Sections 15.21, 15.27(a) and 15.105(e) of the rules. In their petitions, Cisco and ITI note that the rule changes adopted in the Second Report and Order that allow information statements to be supplied in alternative forms do not apply to the compliance information statements that are required by Section 2.1077 to be supplied with equipment authorized under the DoC procedure. Cisco states
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.txt
  • see also 47 C.F.R. 1.80(d). NAL Response at 25. 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a). 47 C.F.R. § 2.902. 47 C.F.R. § 2.909(b). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.901-2.1093. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.101-15.123. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.952. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.955. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.956. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.954, 15.19 and 15.21. 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a); see also Behringer USA, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd 1820, 1825 ¶ 15 (2006), forfeiture ordered, 22 FCC Rcd 10451 (2007) (``Behringer'') (forfeiture paid). See Communications Act Amendments of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-234, 92 Stat. 33 (1978). S. Rep. No. 95-580, at 1 (1977). Id. at 2, 6. See 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.txt
  • and 614-806 MHz. In the Report and Order, however, we are revising Section 74.802(a) of the rules to provide that frequency band 614-698 MHz, and not 614-806 MHz, will be available for operations under Part 74, Subpart H of the rules. See infra Appendix B. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 74.851, 15.201(b), 2.925 and 2.803. Id. § 15.19(a)(3). See id. § 15.21. In the Report and Order, we are adopting marketing and labeling requirements designed to prevent the continued sale and distribution of low power auxiliary devices, including wireless microphones, that operate in the 700 MHz Band. See supra Report and Order, Section III.B. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.507, 2.909 (rule concerning marketing of ultra-wideband (UWB) equipment; rule defining ``responsible party'' with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1084A1.html
  • of the Rules, an intentional radiator, such as the remote control device, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to marketing in the United States. Additionally, an intentional radiator must be labeled as specified in Sections 2.925 and 15.19(a) of the Rules, and the accompanying user or instruction manual must contain the information specified in Section 15.21 of the Rules. Oneida apparently violated the above requirements by marketing dust collection equipment with the installed remote control device, and by selling the add-on remote control device separately -- prior to certification. If, after receipt of this citation, Oneida violates the above equipment requirements set forth in the Communications Act or the Commission's Rules in any manner described herein,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-109A1.html
  • see also 47 C.F.R. 1.80(d). NAL Response at 25. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.101(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.902. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.909(b). See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.901-2.1093. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. S: 15.101(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.101-15.123. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.952. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.955. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.956. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.954, 15.19 and 15.21. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.101(a); see also Behringer USA, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd 1820, 1825 P: 15 (2006), forfeiture ordered, 22 FCC Rcd 10451 (2007) ("Behringer") (forfeiture paid). See Communications Act Amendments of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-234, 92 Stat. 33 (1978). S. Rep. No. 95-580, at 1 (1977). Id. at 2, 6. See 47
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-521A1.html
  • Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Enhanced Vision Systems, Inc. ("Enhanced Vision"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Enhanced Vision for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing of Class B Digital Devices, specifically, vision assistance products for the legally blind. 2. The Bureau and Enhanced Vision have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-270A1.html
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and American Music and Sound (AMS). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into AMS's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class A digital audio radio frequency devices. 2. The Bureau and AMS have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-360A1.html
  • Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and ETI Sound Systems, Inc. (ETI). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into ETI's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of digital radio frequency devices, including guitar amplifiers, CD/MP3 players, and active speaker systems. 2. The Bureau and ETI have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=65
  • 2006 19:55:00 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 65 will offer nationwide commercial licenses in the 800 MHz band in the three alternative band configurations. Licenses in only one of these mutually incompatible band configurations will be awarded. Qualified Bidders: 9 Rounds Completed: 14 Bidding Days: 3 Results for Round 14 Gross Revenue: $11,556,000.00 - Dollar Change: 1526000.00 - % Change: 15.21 Net Revenue: $8,667,000.00 - Dollar Change: -1295750.00 - % Change: -13.01 New Bids: 9 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 0 Licenses with PWBs*: 2 FCC Held Licenses: 0 Eligible Bidders: 8 (of 9 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=65T ue, 16 May 2006 20:45:01 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 65 will offer
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • para. 333. Using the carrier-to-carrier numbers provided with the application, the four month (September through December 2000) average for competitive LECs was 12.1 percent, compared to 2.1 percent for Verizon's retail ``special services'' provisioning. See PR-4-01 (Provisioning of POTS/Special Services - Missed Appointments). Specifically, the competitive LEC missed appointment rates for September through December 2000 were 10.71 percent, 2.76 percent, 15.21 percent, and 21.25 percent, respectively. Verizon's performance for its own retail special services for the same period was 2.78 percent, 1.90 percent, 1.43 percent, and 2.04 percent, respectively. Letter from Dolores A. May, Executive Director Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission (March 29, 2001) (Verizon March 29 Ex Parte Letter) at 1; Verizon Massachusetts I
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 17.97 0.09 55.00 2.35 New York New York City Verizon 31.67 19.11 0.09 55.00 2.35 New York Ogdensburg Verizon 29.42 18.46 0.09 55.00 2.35 New York Rochester Frontier 20.44 13.23 0.08 33.32 3.95 North Carolina Raleigh BellSouth 23.32 42.75 5.50 North Carolina Rockingham BellSouth 22.15 42.75 5.50 Ohio Canton SBC 22.14 16.30 0.08 36.50 4.95 Ohio Cincinnati Cincinnati Bell 23.61 15.21 0.15 25.70 5.95 Ohio Cleveland SBC 22.45 16.52 0.08 36.50 4.95 Ohio Columbus SBC 22.19 16.33 0.08 36.50 4.95 Ohio Toledo SBC 22.29 16.41 0.08 36.50 4.95 Oregon Corvallis Qwest 22.67 15.45 0.15 16.50 4.75 Oregon Portland Qwest 22.66 15.44 0.15 16.50 4.75 Pennsylvania Allentown Verizon 22.10 17.46 0.07 40.00 3.45 Pennsylvania Ellwood City Verizon 22.53 17.90 0.07 40.00 3.45
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • 31.93 61 Frontier Communications of Minnesota & Iowa 32.16 31.15 25.24 33.16 35.40 29.28 28.26 62 Iowa Telecom Service Group 17.58 14.264 13.07 63 Iowa Telecom Systems Service Group 23.97 20.474 18.45 64 Valor New Mexico #1164 18.45 16.86 11.45 20.67 65 Valor New Mexico #1193 20.41 15.88 8.39 13.35 66 Valor Oklahoma 8.69 9.31 11.65 11.22 67 Valor Texas 15.21 10.66 5.70 5.24 Maximum Rate of Return 59.89% 54.09% 53.67% 47.67% 43.42% 47.21% 48.69% Minimum Rate of Return (17.50) (5.17) 0.86 (11.23) (9.93) (6.85) (25.83) Weighted Arithmetic Mean 18.06 17.69 19.62 18.04 18.50 16.52 15.60 Standard Deviation 8.63 5.69 5.80 5.17 5.96 5.13 3.96 * The interstate rates of return reported by carriers on the FCC Form 492A may not
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • (380.49) 14.60 11.68 44CONTEL OF SOUTH DAKOTA 10.96 12.09 5.85 7.79 18.29 8.52 45CONTEL OF TEXAS, INC. 11.99 12.09 7.62 4.36 50.96 38.10 12.18 46CONTEL OF THE SOUTH, INC. - ALABAMA 12.40 12.09 16.56 12.63 (128.57) 11.75 12.22 47CONTEL OF THE SOUTH, INC. - GEORGIA 12.17 12.09 5.08 17.18 (332.64) 7.29 13.77 48CONTEL OF VERMONT 13.48 12.09 24.16 12.54 25.19 15.21 49CONTEL OF VIRGINIA, INC. 13.90 12.09 15.66 12.25 231.36 24.86 16.21 50CONTEL OF WEST VIRGINIA 13.16 12.09 20.69 13.11 (104.20) 17.41 14.37 51KANSAS STATE TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.97 12.09 6.57 21.56 7.32 26.81 22.14 52GTE ALASKA 12.02 12.07 3.63 13.64 8.18 13.39 53GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED 9.55 12.10 (0.41) 10.03 (78.94) 7.15 8.35 54GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED 11.87 12.12 10.89 13.02 (7.52) 8.91
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 31.93 61 Frontier Communications of Minnesota & Iowa 32.16 31.15 25.24 33.16 35.40 29.28 28.26 62 Iowa Telecom Service Group 17.58 14.264 13.07 63 Iowa Telecom Systems Service Group 23.97 20.474 18.45 64 Valor New Mexico #1164 18.45 16.86 11.45 20.67 65 Valor New Mexico #1193 20.41 15.88 8.39 13.35 66 Valor Oklahoma 8.69 9.31 11.65 11.22 67 Valor Texas 15.21 10.66 5.70 5.24 Maximum Rate of Return 59.89%54.09% 53.67% 47.67% 43.42% 47.21% 48.69% Minimum Rate of Return (17.50) (5.17) 0.86 (11.23) (9.93) (6.85) (25.83) Weighted Arithmetic Mean 18.06 17.69 19.62 18.04 18.50 16.52 15.60 Standard Deviation 8.63 5.69 5.80 5.17 5.96 5.13 3.96 * The interstate rates of return reported by carriers on the FCC Form 492A may not necessarily
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 31.93 61 Frontier Communications of Minnesota & Iowa 32.16 31.15 25.24 33.16 35.40 29.28 28.26 62 Iowa Telecom Service Group 17.58 14.264 13.07 63 Iowa Telecom Systems Service Group 23.97 20.474 18.45 64 Valor New Mexico #1164 18.45 16.86 11.45 20.67 65 Valor New Mexico #1193 20.41 15.88 8.39 13.35 66 Valor Oklahoma 8.69 9.31 11.65 11.22 67 Valor Texas 15.21 10.66 5.70 5.24 Maximum Rate of Return 59.89%54.09% 53.67% 47.67% 43.42% 47.21% 48.69% Minimum Rate of Return (17.50) (5.17) 0.86 (11.23) (9.93) (6.85) (25.83) Weighted Arithmetic Mean 18.06 17.69 19.62 18.04 18.50 16.52 15.60 Standard Deviation 8.63 5.69 5.80 5.17 5.96 5.13 3.96 * The interstate rates of return reported by carriers on the FCC Form 492A may not necessarily
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 5.22 0.77 4.42 0.00 230478 A ELLERBE TEL. CO. 13.99 0.57 13.35 0.00 230479 C VERIZON SOUTH INC.-NC 0.55 -1.74 2.34 0.00 230483 C LEXCOM TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 -4.74 16.71 35.20 230485 A MEBTEL, INC. 9.53 2.53 6.83 0.00 230491 A NORTH STATE TEL. CO.-NC DBA NORTH STATE COMM. 4.37 -1.04 5.46 0.00 230494 A PINEVILLE TEL. CO. 10.96 -3.69 15.21 INFINITE 230495 A RANDOLPH TEL. CO. 9.64 0.02 9.62 0.00 230496 A RANDOLPH TEL. MEMBERSHIP CORP. 15.17 2.06 12.84 740.21 230497 A PIEDMONT TEL. MEMBERSHIP CORP. 14.63 1.46 12.98 INFINITE 230498 C SALUDA MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. 4.24 0.76 3.45 3.11 230500 A SERVICE TEL. CO. 14.47 1.17 13.14 164.82 230501 A SKYLINE TEL. MEMBERSHIP CORP. 18.92 5.89 12.31 0.00 230502
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 11.98 249.88 421934 C ORCHARD FARM TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.93 0.36 1.56 -6.25 421935 C OREGON FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO. -3.46 1.47 -4.86 -15.83 421936 A PEACE VALLEY TELEPHONE CO. 6.18 -0.97 7.21 17.70 421942 A ROCK PORT TEL. CO. 10.53 1.13 9.30 34.69 421945 A SENECA TEL. CO. 9.08 -2.68 12.09 INFINITE 421949 C STEELVILLE TEL. EXCH. INC. 14.56 -0.56 15.21 21.95 3 - 182 Table 3.31 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 2001 to 2002 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* MISSOURI Cont. 421951 C STOUTLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY -3.03 8.15 -10.34 -15.98 421957 C UNITED
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • CORP. 9.18 3.49 5.50 0.00 150085 C CROWN POINT TEL. CORP. 1.67 1.92 -0.24 0.41 150088 A DELHI TELEPHONE COMPANY 10.46 5.41 4.79 0.00 150089 C DEPOSIT TELEPHONE CO. INC. -9.02 6.87 -14.87 -100.00 150091 C DUNKIRK AND FREDONIA TEL. CO. 12.79 6.62 5.79 0.00 150092 C EDWARDS TELEPHONE CO. INC. -33.57 3.06 -35.54 -51.03 150093 C EMPIRE TELEPHONE CORP-NY 15.21 3.53 11.28 387.67 150095 C THE FISHERS ISLAND TEL. CO. 5.97 4.88 1.04 0.00 150097 C GERMANTOWN TEL. CO., INC. 4.67 7.77 -2.88 0.63 150099 C HANCOCK TEL. CO.-NY 2.91 -0.52 3.45 9.99 150100 C FRONTIER COMM. OF NY, INC. 3.19 10.03 -6.22 0.00 150104 C MARGARETVILLE TEL. CO.,INC. 14.59 2.61 11.68 100.79 150105 C MIDDLEBURGH TELEPHONE CO. 8.29 6.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • (3.59) 5.2 IA KANSAS 133.1 67.4 65.7 58.0 7.7 0.14 0.08 0.21 0.43 7.3 KS KENTUCKY 107.5 50.7 56.7 46.6 10.2 1.05 0.10 0.49 1.63 8.6 KY LOUISIANA 126.1 58.2 67.9 59.1 8.8 (0.27) (0.08) 0.05 (0.30) 9.1 LA MAINE 39.8 11.9 27.9 19.8 8.1 1.05 0.37 0.31 1.73 6.4 ME MARYLAND 236.3 115.8 120.5 74.1 46.4 6.91 3.16 5.15 15.21 31.2 MD MASSACHUSETTS 306.4 100.9 205.5 150.5 55.0 7.36 4.71 5.70 17.77 37.3 MA MICHIGAN 293.2 232.3 60.9 40.8 20.2 (1.79) 0.43 0.23 (1.12) 21.3 MI MINNESOTA 80.3 59.3 21.0 13.5 7.5 (0.22) (0.33) 0.05 (0.50) 8.0 MN MISSISSIPPI 51.8 26.3 25.5 18.2 7.3 0.11 0.05 0.07 0.23 7.1 MS MISSOURI 315.6 259.5 56.1 38.9 17.2 0.39 (0.38) 0.28 0.30
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1084A1.html
  • of the Rules, an intentional radiator, such as the remote control device, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to marketing in the United States. Additionally, an intentional radiator must be labeled as specified in Sections 2.925 and 15.19(a) of the Rules, and the accompanying user or instruction manual must contain the information specified in Section 15.21 of the Rules. Oneida apparently violated the above requirements by marketing dust collection equipment with the installed remote control device, and by selling the add-on remote control device separately -- prior to certification. If, after receipt of this citation, Oneida violates the above equipment requirements set forth in the Communications Act or the Commission's Rules in any manner described herein,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-521A1.html
  • Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Enhanced Vision Systems, Inc. ("Enhanced Vision"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Enhanced Vision for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing of Class B Digital Devices, specifically, vision assistance products for the legally blind. 2. The Bureau and Enhanced Vision have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-270A1.html
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and American Music and Sound (AMS). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into AMS's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class A digital audio radio frequency devices. 2. The Bureau and AMS have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-360A1.html
  • Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and ETI Sound Systems, Inc. (ETI). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into ETI's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of digital radio frequency devices, including guitar amplifiers, CD/MP3 players, and active speaker systems. 2. The Bureau and ETI have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4.pdf
  • I.8R Analysis of Public Affairs Minutes Provided - Three-Way Group Fixed Effects Model PA1: Controlled for Market & Network Variable Coefficient Robust Std. Error p-value TotPop1000s -0.41 0.61 0.509 PopPercentBlack 225.78 146.35 0.124 PopPercentHisp -47.25 75.34 0.531 DMAPerCapitaIncome -0.01 0.02 0.697 UnrelatedStationsinDMACount 85.47 63.38 0.179 UnrelatedStationsinDMAPubAffMin -0.31 *** 0.08 0.000 ParentStationsCount -0.04 0.73 0.954 ParentRevenueMillions -0.04 ** 0.02 0.039 OtherCoOwnedStationsinDMACount 15.21 67.36 0.822 OtherCoOwnStationsinDMAPubAffMin -0.13 0.10 0.206 Local Marketing Agreement 13.92 19.08 0.467 MultiNetworkAffil -6.52 22.62 0.774 Locally Owned 19.26 28.87 0.505 O and O Big Four 21.52 28.87 0.457 TV-Radio Crossowned 47.12 36.91 0.203 TV-Newspaper Crossowned -44.45 49.82 0.373 NonCommercial 48.95 147.33 0.740 VHF Channel 4.81 13.65 0.725 Dummy2003 -32.44 44.86 0.470 Dummy2004 154.46 ** 62.48 0.014 Dummy2005 77.01 82.14