FCC Web Documents citing 15.209

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Audio Direct is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Buy.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a $25,000
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Audio Discounters is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Ambient Weather is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Chumbo.com is marketing the RMR-C450 device. The Division staff observed that Chumbo.com was not marketing the RMR-S201 device at that time. The Division staff also observed
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that CompSource, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Cybergiftcenter.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Dealznet.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a $25,000
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. TheElectronicCompany.com and observed that TheElectronicCompany.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. Focuscamera.com and observed that Focus Camera, Inc. is marketing the RMR-C450 device. The Division staff observed that Focus Camera, Inc. was not marketing the RMR-S201 device at that time.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Fadfusion is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a $25,000
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. DSMiller.com and observed that DSMiller.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.pdf
  • 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices (``jammers''). background The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information, through several informal complaints, alleging that RMR was manufacturing and marketing unauthorized police radar jammers in the United States. The Division's investigation indicates that
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Auto-Radar-Detectors.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices in the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Best Radar Detectors, were marketing police radar jamming devices
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.pdf
  • in Section 15.3(o) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o). In addition, the OET Laboratory's tests indicated that the RMR-C450 device produced a radiated emission at 11.23 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.205, and that this radiated emission substantially exceeds the radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.209. The OET Laboratory also concluded that the RMR-C450 device was improperly certified. In this regard, the OET Laboratory noted that the grant of certification issued for the RMR-C450 device indicates that the device was tested as an ``unintentional radiator.'' As explained above, however, the OET Laboratory found that the device is an intentional
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Global Trade Group, Inc., were marketing police radar jamming
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Hoeffener International, were marketing police radar jamming devices in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.pdf
  • in Section 15.3(o) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o). In addition, the OET Laboratory's tests indicated that the RMR-C450 device produced a radiated emission at 11.23 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.205, and that this radiated emission substantially exceeds the radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.209. The OET Laboratory also concluded that the RMR-C450 device was improperly certified. In this regard, the OET Laboratory noted that the grant of certification issued for the RMR-C450 device indicates that the device was tested as an ``unintentional radiator.'' As explained above, however, the OET Laboratory found that the device is an intentional
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radarjammers.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices in the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.pdf
  • in Section 15.3(o) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o). In addition, the OET Laboratory's tests indicated that the RMR-C450 device produced a radiated emission at 11.23 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.205, and that this radiated emission substantially exceeds the radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.209. The OET Laboratory also concluded that the RMR-C450 device was improperly certified. In this regard, the OET Laboratory noted that the grant of certification issued for the RMR-C450 device indicates that the device was tested as an ``unintentional radiator.'' As explained above, however, the OET Laboratory found that the device is an intentional
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Overseas Best Buy, Inc. dba 110220volts.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. shopperschoice.com and observed that ShoppersChoice.com, LLC is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. shopila.com and observed that Shopila Corporation is marketing the RMR-C450 device. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a $25,000
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.pdf
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Gain Saver is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3599A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3599A1.pdf
  • August 14, 2007 Released: August 16, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) against Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices. On January 31, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $25,000 to RMR. RMR has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on the information before
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-808A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-808A1.pdf
  • Identifier CFXPT-1. On July 28, 2006, the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') Laboratory requested a sample unit of CSI's PT-1 Petlocator transmitter, which CSI promptly provided. Thereafter, on October 3, 2006, the Bureau by letter advised CSI that testing conducted by OET indicated that the sample unit substantially exceeded radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified by Section 15.209 of the Rules and did not comply with the periodic operation limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules, and requested further information with respect to the sale and marketing of the device. CSI promptly provided all information requested on October 10, 2006. On November 22, 2006, the Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division released a Notice of Apparent Liability for
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1626A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1626A1.pdf
  • No. EB-08-SE-695 Dear Mr. Cleveland: This is an official CITATION, issued to Hobby Lobby International, Inc. (``HLI'') pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.209, and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 1.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.pdf
  • File No. EB-09-SE-133 Dear Mr. Olin: This is an official CITATION issued to Costco Warehouse Corporation (``Costco''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.pdf
  • File No. EB-09-SE-134 Dear Mr. Dach: This is an official CITATION issued to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (``Wal-Mart''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.pdf
  • EB-09-SE-136 Dear Mr. Hsia: This is an official CITATION, issued to Team Research, Inc. (``Team Research'') pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing a non-compliant radio frequency device, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2''), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2306A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2306A1.pdf
  • Enforcement Bureau (October 14, 2008). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997) (``Forfeiture Policy Statement''), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(E). 47 U.S.C. � 301. 47 C.F.R. �� 15.209, 15.201(b). Pursuant to the Table of Allocations, the 267-322 MHz Band is allocated solely for Federal Government Use. 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.pdf
  • www.securitymaninc.com. The staff observed that SecurityMan was marketing the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera. Subsequently, Enforcement Bureau staff purchased a SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, and forwarded it to the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') Laboratory for testing. The OET Laboratory's tests demonstrated that the SecurityMan SM-302T does not comply with the radiated emission limits specified in sections 15.249(d) and 15.209 of the rules. As part of the investigation, the Enforcement Bureau sent a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') to SecurityMan on March 18, 2010. In your April 14, 2010 response to the LOI, you admit that SecurityMan imports and distributes the SecurityMan SM-302T (factory model AT202-900) in the United States. You indicated, however, that SecurityMan ``does not engineer and design inside
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.txt
  • The average emission limits shall be calculated, based on the measured peak levels, over the actual time period during which transmission occurs. (c) Limits on spurious emissions: (1) The power density of any emissions outside the band being used band shall consist solely of spurious emissions. (2) Radiated emissions below 40 GHz shall not exceed the general limits in Sec. 15.209. (3) Between 40 GHz and 200 GHz, the level of these emissions shall not exceed 90 pW/cm2 at a distance of 3 meters. (4) The levels of the spurious emissions shall not exceed the level of the fundamental emission. (i) The total peak transmitter output power shall not exceed 500 mW. (ii) Fundamental emissions must be contained within the frequency
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-20A1.pdf
  • Information Administration 30SeeAMF petition at 15. 31SeeAMF petition at 11 et seq. 32AMF also explains that, although Parts 15 and 18 of the Commission's rules permit wireless medical devices to operate using various frequencies on an unlicensed basis, the technical restrictions under those rules prevent deployment of higher-power, wideband MMN devices. Specifically, according to AMF, the emission limits under Sections 15.209(a) and 18.305(b) of the Commission's rules are too stringent for wideband MMNS systems, which require higher power levels. Additionally, AMF says that although Section 18.305(a) permits industrial, scientific, and medical equipment to operate at unlimited emission levels on certain frequencies, these frequencies are located below41 MHz and above 900 MHz, which it argues are outside the preferred range of spectrum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1705A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1705A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1705A1.txt
  • Systems, L.C. , Files Request for Waiver of Section 15.205(b) On October 26, 2000, Safety Warning Systems, L.C., (SWS) requested a waiver of Section 15.205(b) of the Commission's rules to permit certification of a device for MPH Industries, Inc., (MPH). Section 15.205(b) limits the spurious emissions in a restricted band (i.e., spectrum above 38.6 GHz) to the values in Section 15.209 i.e., 500 uV/m at 3m. Because the second and third harmonics of the device exceed that value, SWS requests a waiver to permit certification of the devices under the limits in Section 15.249 for the second and third harmonics. SWS notes that the MPH device is a Part 15 intentional radiator that transmits data in the 24.1 GHz band, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2818A1.txt
  • General Rules and Regulations � 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 � Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization 9 Fifties Communications, San Juan, PR. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (10/15/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 � Radio Frequency Devices � 47 C.F.R. � 15.5 � General Conditions of Operation Eric P. Knudsen, Vancouver, WA. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 15.209 (Radiated Emission Limits; General Requirements) and 15.245 (Operation Within the Bands 902- 928 MHz, 2435-2465 MHz, 5785-5815 MHz, 10500-10550 MHz, and 24075-24175 MHz. Portland, OR Resident Agent Office (10/1/01).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2818A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2818A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2818A2.txt
  • Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 - Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization Fifties Communications, San Juan, PR. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (10/15/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices 47 C.F.R. � 15.5 - General Conditions of Operation Eric P. Knudsen, Vancouver, WA. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 15.209 (Radiated Emission Limits; General Requirements) and 15.245 (Operation Within the Bands 902-928 MHz, 2435-2465 MHz, 5785-5815 MHz, 10500-10550 MHz, and 24075-24175 MHz. Portland, OR Resident Agent Office (10/1/01). A � $ B �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1658A1.txt
  • of Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc., Mala Geoscience, Inc., and Sensors & Software, Inc. These parties manufacture GPRs and, according to the petition, account for over 95 percent of the GPRs sold in the U.S. The GPRIC requests for reconsideration will be addressed in a separate order dealing with several petitions for reconsideration and their associated comments. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.209. See Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 843 (D.C. Cir. 1977); Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n. v. FPC, 259 F.2d 921 (D.C. Cir. 1958). See Order at para. 5. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1658 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1658 - - F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2786A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2786A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2786A2.txt
  • operating with an unobstructed signal propagation path at a separation distance of two meters. Under these assumptions, the link budget for indoor UWB applications is: Parameter Value Receiver Susceptibility Mask (dBm/MHz) (Broadband Noise) -117.5 GPS Antenna Gain in Direction of RFI Source (dBi) 0 Propagation Loss (dB) (Minimum Distance Separation (meters)) 42.2 (2) Noise-Like RFI Emission Limit (dBm/MHz) -75.3 47 C.F.R.�15.209 Emission Limit (dBm/MHz) -41.3 Additional Attenuation Required (dB) 34.0 Thus, the average emission limit applicable indoor UWB devices in the 960-1610 MHz frequency range is an equivalent isotropic radiated power (EIRP) of -75.3 dBm/MHz. This limit is applicable in the 960-1610 MHz band to the following UWB applications: Indoor UWB Applications (Section 15.517), Handheld UWB Applications (Section 15.519), and Vehicular
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2850A1.txt
  • the device that could affect the device's RF characteristics. The test report must clearly state the specific frequencies or range of frequencies over which the transmitter is intended to operate. Test results must show that the transmitter operates only on the intended frequencies and is incapable of operating in the restricted frequency bands, as required by 47 CFR 15.205 and 15.209. If the device is designed to learn over a range of frequencies, the test report must include measurements that verify that the device does not exceed the field strength limits set forth in Section 15.231 with a source transmitter or equivalent signal generator operating on a low, medium and high frequency within the intended range (see Section 15.31(m)). The test
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3105A1.txt
  • the Los Angeles Office conducted an investigation at California Speedway. Using a FCC Mobile Digital Direction Finding vehicle and direction finding techniques, the agents detected radio transmissions on frequency 104.7 MHz from a location in the middle of the grounds of California Speedway. Field strength measurements revealed that the radio emissions exceeded the levels allowed for non-licensed operation under Sections 15.209(a) and 15.239(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The measured field strength was 63,500 �V/m or 254 times that permitted by the rules. California Speedway argues that the facts cited in the NAL do not support the conclusion that it engaged in unlicensed operation. It argues that the NAL cites only that California Speedway's equipment exceeded permissible emission limits. Although, according
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1080A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1080A1.txt
  • that all emissions associated with digital circuitry used to generate ultra-wideband (UWB) emissions are required to meet the radiated emission limits provided in Subpart F of Part 15 of the Commission's rules for UWB transmitters. Section 15.521(c) of the Commission's rules states that emissions from digital circuitry contained within a UWB transmitter are subject to the limits specified in Section 15.209 if those emissions are not intended to be radiated from the transmitter's antenna. The requesting parties assert that the language in Section 15.521(c) is ambiguous because the regulation identifies any emission that is not intended to be radiated from the antenna as a digital emission. To remove this ambiguity, they request that the Commission declare that all digital emissions associated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2631A1.txt
  • \b\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\sl227\slmult0\nowidctlpar\tx-720\hyphpar0\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap 0 {\b\fs24\insrsid5994681 REQUEST FOR A WAIVER OF PART 15 FOR AN ULTRA-WIDEBAND SYSTEM TO BE A "PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSE" PROCEEDING}{\b\fs24\insrsid5246250 }{ \b\fs24\insrsid5994681 FOR }{\b\i\fs24\insrsid5994681 EX PARTE}{\b\fs24\insrsid5994681 PURPOSES \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl227\slmult0\nowidctlpar\tx-720\hyphpar0\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap 0 {\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 \par \tab On }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5246250 July 18}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 , }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5246250 2003}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 , }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5246250 Vista Controls, a Curtiss-Wright Company, filed a request for waiver of }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid2950185 Sections 15.209, 15.511 and 15.521 of the Commission\rquote s }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 rules in order to permit the authorization, importation and operation of }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5246250 its}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 ultra-wideband }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5246250 (\'93UWB\'94) surveillance }{ \fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 system}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid15600796 known as QUPID}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 . \par \par \tab The}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid15600796 QUPID}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5246250 surveillance}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 systems }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5246250 currently are employed by the U.S. A}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid15600796 ir Force and by the Air National Guard to provide an advance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2955A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2955A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2955A1.txt
  • Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Request for Waiver of Part 15 from Vista Controls for Its Cupid UWB Surveillance System ) ) ) ) Adopted: September 25, 2003 Released: September 26, 2003 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: 1. On July 18, 2003, Vista Controls, a Curtiss-Wright Company, filed a request for waiver of Sections 15.209, 15.511 and 15.521 of the Comission's rules to permit it to obtain authorization for, and to market, its ultra-wideband (``UWB'') surveillance system know as QUPID. This petition was placed on notice for public comment on August 11, 2003, DA 03-2631. Comments were due by September 10, 2003, and replies were due by September 25, 2003. 2. On September 24, 2003,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2904A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2904A1.txt
  • FM broadcast stations that have been required by the Commission to change frequencies. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.501. Operation of a non-licensed, low-powered transmitter on frequency 87.9 MHz is restricted to periodic operation, which is generally used for the transmission of control signals, such as those used with alarm systems, garage door openers and remote switches. See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.209, 15.231. Because operation on frequency 87.9 MHz must be limited in duration, continuous operation is not permitted. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2904A1_Erratum.doc
  • FM broadcast stations that have been required by the Commission to change frequencies. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.501. Operation of a non-licensed, low-powered transmitter on frequency 87.9 MHz is restricted to periodic operation, which is generally used for the transmission of control signals, such as those used with alarm systems, garage door openers and remote switches. See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.209, 15.231. Because operation on frequency 87.9 MHz must be limited in duration, continuous operation is not permitted. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3038A1.txt
  • 24.25 GHz through 30 GHz, taking 6 microseconds per sweep. The masts rotate around a subject over a 2 second interval. SafeView requests a waiver of Section 15.31(c) which requires swept frequency systems to be measured with the emission sweep stopped. When measured in this fashion, SafeView indicates that the equipment will comply with the average emission limits in Section 15.209. Safeview also requests a waiver of the peak emission limit in Section 15.35(b). The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3039A1.txt
  • such as highways, railroad beds and runways to detect flaws in those structures. Wavebounce states that a waiver of the regulations is necessary to permit its GPRs, which are situated at least 12 inches above the test surface, to be pulled at highway speeds. Wavebounce believes that these GPRs must operate above 960 MHz at the levels specified in Section 15.209 of the Commission's rules to be viable. Wavebounce agrees to limit production and sale within the U.S. of such GPRs to no greater than 25 units per year. It also agrees that the GPRs should be registered with the Commission, pursuant to Section 15.525, and that the GPRs should not be operated within 500 meters of a major airport without
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3262A1.txt
  • test broad or lengthy surfaces such as highways, railroad beds and runways to detect flaws in those structures. GSSI states that a waiver of the regulations is necessary to permit its GPRs to be pulled at highway speeds. GSSI indicates that these GPRs must operate at center frequencies of 1 GHz and 2 GHz at the levels specified in Section 15.209 of the Commission's rules. GSSI agrees to limit production and sale within the U.S. of such GPRs to no greater than 100 units per year. It also agrees that the GPRs should be registered with the Commission, pursuant to Section 15.525, and that the GPRs should not be operated within 500 meters of a major airport without advance coordination. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1442A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1442A1.txt
  • the transmitter demonstrates compliance with the peak conducted power limits. If the transmitter complies with the conducted power limits based on the use of RMS averaging over a time interval, as permitted under paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the attenuation required under this paragraph shall be 30 dB instead of 20 dB. Attenuation below the general limits specified in Sec. 15.209(a) is not required. In addition, radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands, as defined in Sec. 15.205(a), must also comply with the radiated emission limits specified in Sec. 15.209(a) (see Sec. 15.205(c)). Furthermore, in accepting the grant of an equipment authorization, AboCom warranted that: each unit of equipment marketed under such grant and bearing the identification specified in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1589A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1589A1.txt
  • we are granting SafeView a waiver of Section 15.31(c) of the rules in order to permit the measurement of the SafeScout device's average radiated emissions with the frequency sweep active (rather than with the sweep stopped, as the rule requires). Under this condition, the average radiated emissions of the SafeScout device shall not exceed the emissions limits specified in Section 15.209(a) when measured according to the procedures specified herein. Additionally, we are waiving the requirement of Section 15.35(b), which specifies a limit on peak emissions from unlicensed devices of 20 dB above the corresponding maximum average emission limit specified in Section 15.209. Under this condition, the radiated peak power shall not exceed a level that is 41 dB above the average
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1649A1.txt
  • TO BE A "PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSE" PROCEEDING FOR EX PARTE PURPOSES AND REQUESTS COMMENTS ET Docket No. 06-161 Comments Date: September 18, 2006 Reply Comments Date: October 3, 2006 On June 23, 2006, The Rail Network Inc. (``TRN'') filed a request for a waiver of Part 15 of the Commission's rules to permit an increase in the emission level permitted under Section 15.209 for unlicensed operation in the 88-108 MHz FM broadcast band. TRN's system would provide information to passengers in mass transit rail cars. The audio would be distributed using up to seven channels in the FM broadcast band. Section 15.209 permits operation within the 88-108 MHz band at an emission limit of 150 uV/m, as measured at 3 meters. TRN requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2350A1.txt
  • amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve CSI's marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States that do not comply with the radiated emission limits set forth in Section 15.209 of the Rules and the periodic operation limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND CSI manufactures and markets the PT-1 ``Petlocator'' transmitter, which is used to track pets, children and model airplanes. Transmitters and other intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2475A1.txt
  • of a tank level probing radar (TLPR). Section 15.205(a) limits emissions in the 78-79 GHz band to spurious emissions only. Siemens' request would permit certification of a frequency modulated continuous wave RF carrier (FMCW) tank level probing radar (TLPR) in the band 78-79 GHz for use in closed metal and reinforced concrete material storage tanks under the provisions of Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's rules. Bench testing and in situ measurements of emissions outside the tank would be required in order to determine compliance with the general emissions limits in Section 15.209(a). Concurrently with this request, Siemens filed a Petition for Rulemaking requesting that the Commission establish rules in Part 15 for wideband TLPRs that would occupy the band from 77
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Audio Direct is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Buy.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a $25,000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Audio Discounters is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Ambient Weather is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Chumbo.com is marketing the RMR-C450 device. The Division staff observed that Chumbo.com was not marketing the RMR-S201 device at that time. The Division staff also observed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that CompSource, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Cybergiftcenter.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Dealznet.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a $25,000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. TheElectronicCompany.com and observed that TheElectronicCompany.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. Focuscamera.com and observed that Focus Camera, Inc. is marketing the RMR-C450 device. The Division staff observed that Focus Camera, Inc. was not marketing the RMR-S201 device at that time.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Fadfusion is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a $25,000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. DSMiller.com and observed that DSMiller.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-198A1.txt
  • the limits on emissions across the 960-10600 MHz frequency range may be decreased to provide additional interference protection to the authorized radio services, as noted by CWCEC in its further supplemental filing. As with existing UWB surveillance system transmitters, we are requiring that radiated emissions at or below 960 MHz shall not exceed the emission levels in 47 C.F.R. � 15.209. For all other frequencies, we will require that the RMS average EIRP, as determined using a 1 MHz resolution bandwidth, not exceed the following: Frequency in MHz EIRP in dBm 960-1160 1160-1500 1500-1610 1610-1710 1710-1755 1755-1900 1900-1990 1990-2115 2115-2600 2600-2700 2700-3650 3650-4000 4000-10600 Above 10600 -45 -47 -52 -47 -44 -47 -35 -24 -20 -30 -26.3 -40 -41.3 -51.3 We
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2518A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2518A1.txt
  • request would permit certification of a TLPR using either frequency modulated continuous wave RF carrier (FMCW) or short pulses of RF energy in the 77-81 GHz frequency band for use in closed storage tanks. Bench testing and in situ measurements of emissions outside the tank would be required in order to determine compliance with the general emissions limits in Section 15.209(a). In order to develop a complete record on the issues presented by the waiver and petition for rulemaking the proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-281A1.txt
  • basis and require the operators to coordinate licensing with Part 74 Broadcast Auxiliary frequency coordinators. In the alternative, Telex suggests that its equipment be treated as a tunnel radio system under Section 15.211 of the Commission's Rules, and condition grant of the waiver on RF emissions at the boundary of the nuclear power facilities not exceeding the limits in Section 15.209 of the Commission's Rules. Discussion. As set forth below, Telex has presented no new evidence or specific, factual support to justify a blanket or conditional waiver of the Commission's rules. We therefore affirm the Order and deny the petition. The Order correctly concluded that Telex did not meet the Commission's standards for a waiver. The Commission will waive a rule
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.txt
  • 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices (``jammers''). background The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information, through several informal complaints, alleging that RMR was manufacturing and marketing unauthorized police radar jammers in the United States. The Division's investigation indicates that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Auto-Radar-Detectors.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Best Radar Detectors, were marketing police radar jamming devices
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.txt
  • in Section 15.3(o) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o). In addition, the OET Laboratory's tests indicated that the RMR-C450 device produced a radiated emission at 11.23 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.205, and that this radiated emission substantially exceeds the radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.209. The OET Laboratory also concluded that the RMR-C450 device was improperly certified. In this regard, the OET Laboratory noted that the grant of certification issued for the RMR-C450 device indicates that the device was tested as an ``unintentional radiator.'' As explained above, however, the OET Laboratory found that the device is an intentional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Global Trade Group, Inc., were marketing police radar jamming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Hoeffener International, were marketing police radar jamming devices in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.txt
  • in Section 15.3(o) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o). In addition, the OET Laboratory's tests indicated that the RMR-C450 device produced a radiated emission at 11.23 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.205, and that this radiated emission substantially exceeds the radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.209. The OET Laboratory also concluded that the RMR-C450 device was improperly certified. In this regard, the OET Laboratory noted that the grant of certification issued for the RMR-C450 device indicates that the device was tested as an ``unintentional radiator.'' As explained above, however, the OET Laboratory found that the device is an intentional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radarjammers.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.txt
  • in Section 15.3(o) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o). In addition, the OET Laboratory's tests indicated that the RMR-C450 device produced a radiated emission at 11.23 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.205, and that this radiated emission substantially exceeds the radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.209. The OET Laboratory also concluded that the RMR-C450 device was improperly certified. In this regard, the OET Laboratory noted that the grant of certification issued for the RMR-C450 device indicates that the device was tested as an ``unintentional radiator.'' As explained above, however, the OET Laboratory found that the device is an intentional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Overseas Best Buy, Inc. dba 110220volts.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. shopperschoice.com and observed that ShoppersChoice.com, LLC is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. shopila.com and observed that Shopila Corporation is marketing the RMR-C450 device. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a $25,000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.txt
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Gain Saver is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3599A1.txt
  • August 14, 2007 Released: August 16, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) against Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices. On January 31, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $25,000 to RMR. RMR has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on the information before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4266A1.txt
  • amended to read as described by Section 204(a) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ( the ``1996 Act'') , Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See Implementation of Sections 204(a) and 204(c) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Broadcast License Renewal Procedures), Order, 11 FCC Rcd 6363 (1996). 47 U.S.C. �� 309(k)(2), 309(k)(3). See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.207, 15.209, 15.219, and 15.221, which permits unlicensed transmission in the AM broadcast band of 0.05 watts. See also Permitted Forms of Low Power Broadcast Operation, Public Notice, Mimeo No. 14089 (Jul. 24, 2001). See Morgan County Industries, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability, 21 FCC Rcd 13712, 13714 (MB 2006) (unsupported allegation failed to present a substantial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-808A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-808A1.txt
  • Identifier CFXPT-1. On July 28, 2006, the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') Laboratory requested a sample unit of CSI's PT-1 Petlocator transmitter, which CSI promptly provided. Thereafter, on October 3, 2006, the Bureau by letter advised CSI that testing conducted by OET indicated that the sample unit substantially exceeded radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified by Section 15.209 of the Rules and did not comply with the periodic operation limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules, and requested further information with respect to the sale and marketing of the device. CSI promptly provided all information requested on October 10, 2006. On November 22, 2006, the Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division released a Notice of Apparent Liability for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
  • emission limits for intentional radiators for which no other requirements identified in this part. Need: The limits specified in this section cover emission from intentional radiators which are not explicitly identified in other rule parts and form the technical basis for other technical requirements. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, 304, 307, 336, and 544a. Section Number and Title: 15.209 Radiated emission limits; general requirements. PART 22-PUBLIC MOBILE SERVICES SUBPART B-LICENSING REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES Brief Description: The part 22 rules state the conditions under which radio stations may be licensed and used in the Paging and Rural, Air-Ground, Cellular and Offshore Radiotelephone Services. Subpart B sets forth the rules governing the use of competitive bidding to resolve mutually exclusive applications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1626A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1626A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1626A1.txt
  • No. EB-08-SE-695 Dear Mr. Cleveland: This is an official CITATION, issued to Hobby Lobby International, Inc. (``HLI'') pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.209, and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 1.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.txt
  • File No. EB-09-SE-133 Dear Mr. Olin: This is an official CITATION issued to Costco Warehouse Corporation (``Costco''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.txt
  • File No. EB-09-SE-134 Dear Mr. Dach: This is an official CITATION issued to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (``Wal-Mart''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1966A1.txt
  • the measurement of the SafeScout device's average radiated emissions with the frequency sweep active (rather than with the sweep stopped, as Section 15.31(c) of the rules requires.) In addition, the Commission waived the requirement of Section 15.35(b), which specifies a limit on peak emissions from unlicensed devices of 20 dB above the corresponding maximum average emission limit specified in Section 15.209. In the Order, the Commission also placed specific operational and marketing conditions on the SafeScout device to ensure that licensed users currently operating in the 24.25-30.00 GHz and adjacent frequency bands are not subject to harmful interference. The Commission also limited the number of installations allowed under the waiver to one hundred in the first year following the effective date
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2425A1.txt
  • with the Commission's Part 18 Rules for ISM equipment. You further indicate that the Controller transmits a communications signal to the implanted device via the external antenna on the same frequency as the power transmission (either separately or simultaneously, as noted supra) and that the level of the communications signal exceeds the limit for unlicensed intentional radiators contained in Section 15.209 of the Commission's Rules. Specifically, Section 15.209 limits the emissions of unlicensed intentional radiators operating within the 1.705-30 MHz band to a field strength of 30 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at a measurement distance of 30 meters (-45.7 dBm). The Maestro external RC model device operates with communications emissions of approximately 63.3 uV/m at 30 meters (-39.2 dBm) and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.txt
  • EB-09-SE-136 Dear Mr. Hsia: This is an official CITATION, issued to Team Research, Inc. (``Team Research'') pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing a non-compliant radio frequency device, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2''), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-128A1.txt
  • 16.2-17.7 GHz and 23.12-29.0 GHz. LPRs are downward-looking radar devices that use short pulses of radio frequency (``RF'') energy to measure the level of materials in enclosed storage tanks and at outdoor sites. Ohmart/VEGA requests that the Commission permit certification of LPR devices under Section 15.252. Ohmart/VEGA states that its devices will comply with the average power limits in Section 15.209, but will exceed the peak power limits in Section 15.35(b) of the rules. It also submits proposed measurement procedures for both open-air and in-tank compliance testing of its LPR devices with applicable requirements of Part 15. The Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') is reviewing Ohmart/VEGA's waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-229A1.txt
  • measurement of radio frequency emissions from the ProVision 100 with the frequency sweeping active (as in its normal operation), rather than with the sweep disabled, as prescribed by Section 15.31(c) of the rules; it also waived the requirement for a limit on peak emissions from unlicensed devices of 20 dB above the corresponding maximum average emission limit specified in Section 15.209. The Order placed several conditions on the waiver, including limiting the number of systems permitted to be installed to 100 during the first year of the waiver, and 200 during the second year. In September 2009, OET modified the waiver to allow an additional 2-year period, i.e., until August 3, 2010, for sale of the 300 units permitted under the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2306A1.txt
  • Enforcement Bureau (October 14, 2008). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997) (``Forfeiture Policy Statement''), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(E). 47 U.S.C. � 301. 47 C.F.R. �� 15.209, 15.201(b). Pursuant to the Table of Allocations, the 267-322 MHz Band is allocated solely for Federal Government Use. 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1207A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1207A1.txt
  • units that can be installed. OET first waived certain Part 15 rules for this device in 2006. By Order, OET permitted the measurement of radio frequency emissions from the ProVision 100 with the frequency sweeping active (as in its normal operation), rather than with the sweep disabled, as prescribed by Section 15.31(c) of the rules. It also waived the Section 15.209 peak emissions limit of 20 dB above the corresponding maximum average emission limit and instead implemented a 41 dB limit with corresponding changes to the measurement procedure. The Order placed several conditions on the waiver, including allowing only 100 systems to be installed during the first year of the waiver and 200 during the second year. In September 2009, OET
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1213A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1213A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1213A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 8 8 8 � 8 8 \ � DA 11-1213 Released: July 20, 2011 OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY DECLARES THE SECOND SIGHT MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF RULE SECTION 15.209(A) TO BE A ``PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSE'' PROCEEDING FOR EX PARTE PURPOSES AND REQUESTS COMMENT ET Docket No. 11-123 Comment Date: August 19, 2011 Reply Comment Date: September 2, 2011 On May 27, 2011, Second Sight Medical Products, Inc. (Second Sight) filed a request for waiver of Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's rules to allow the marketing and operation of its retinal prosthesis
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1951A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1951A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1951A1.txt
  • 2011 DA 11-1951 Ms. Cheryl A. Tritt Mr. Phuong Pham Counsel for Second Sight Medical Products, Inc. 2300 N Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20037 Re: ET Docket No. 11-123 Dear Ms. Tritt and Mr. Pham: The Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) is granting the request of Second Sight Medical Products, Inc. (Second Sight) for waiver of Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's rules to allow it to obtain FCC certification for and market its Argus IITM Retinal Prosthesis System (Argus II). In your letter filed May 27, 2011, you state the Argus II is a medical implant system designed to treat profoundly blind people suffering from advanced retinal degenerative diseases such as Retinitis Pigmentosa. You state that the system
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.txt
  • www.securitymaninc.com. The staff observed that SecurityMan was marketing the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera. Subsequently, Enforcement Bureau staff purchased a SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, and forwarded it to the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') Laboratory for testing. The OET Laboratory's tests demonstrated that the SecurityMan SM-302T does not comply with the radiated emission limits specified in sections 15.249(d) and 15.209 of the rules. As part of the investigation, the Enforcement Bureau sent a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') to SecurityMan on March 18, 2010. In your April 14, 2010 response to the LOI, you admit that SecurityMan imports and distributes the SecurityMan SM-302T (factory model AT202-900) in the United States. You indicated, however, that SecurityMan ``does not engineer and design inside
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-461A1.txt
  • unintentional radiators, such as computers and radio receivers, that intentionally generate but do not intentionally emit radiofrequency energy, and 2) intentional radiators, such as wireless networking equipment, cordless telephones and garage door openers, that intentionally generate and emit radio frequency energy, either by radiation or induction. Operation of intentional radiators is permitted either under the low levels specified in Section 15.209 or at higher levels in specific frequency bands under other provisions in Part 15. Some frequency bands are designated as restricted to protect certain radio services from interference, such as those services that involve protection of safety-of-life or that are dependent on very low received signal levels, such as satellite downlinks or radio astronomy. These ``restricted bands'' are specified in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-41A1.txt
  • Robert Bosch, GmbH'' (Bosch Comments), filed March 02, 2011, ET Docket No. 10-167. See Annan Comments at p. 2; USGPSIC Comments at p. 2. CWCI states that, absent a waiver of the UWB rules, its device would be treated under the FCC rules as a narrowband system and would have to comply with the general radiated emission limits in Section 15.209 and the restricted band requirements in Section 15.205. CWCI claims that, because of its very wideband design, its device would not comply with either rule, See CWCI Waiver Request at p. 4. When the Commission first adopted UWB rules, it limited GPR operations to below 960 MHz and between 3.1 to 10.6 GHz, to avoid co-frequency operation in the bands
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238053A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238053A1.pdf
  • the Commission's Rules allows operation of certain very low power devices without issuance of an individual license provided the devices meet equipment authorization requirements and the strict radiation limits of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.1, et seq. The device operated by Accessory far exceeded the allowed radiation limits for such low-power non-licensed devices. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.209. See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.201(b), 15.209, and 15.5. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238293A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238293A1.pdf
  • Brockway freely admitted to operating an unlicensed station on 101.9 MHz. After the interview, Commission agents hand-delivered an Unlicensed Warning Letter to Mr. Brockway. The agents requested to inspect the radio station, and Mr. Brockway refused and continued transmitting on 101.9 MHz. Field strength measurements revealed that Mr. Brockway's radio emission exceeded the level allowed for non-licensed operation under Sections 15.209(a) and 15.239(b) of the Rules. The measured field strength at the edge of the property was 1,084(V/m, or over 130 times that expected for a legally operating Part 15 device capable of producing a maximum field of 250(V/m at 3 meters from the device. On January 25, 2001, Commission agents returned to Kalispell, Montana, monitored, observed continuing transmission on 101.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238317A1.txt
  • we are correcting the effective date of the rules adopted in this proceeding. Specifically, the effective date is changed from 120 days after publication in the Federal Register to 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. In paragraph 19 of Appendix A of the Order, we are correcting Section 15.225(d) to read ``the general radiated emission limits in � 15.209,'' rather than ``30 microvolts/meter at 30 meters.'' This action is taken pursuant to authority contained in Sections 0.31(i) and 0.241(a) of the Commission's regulations, 47 C.F.R �� 0.31(i) and 0.241(a). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Edmond J. Thomas Chief Office of Engineering and Technology (continued....) Federal Communication Commission �@��� �@��� �@��� �@��� h" � � � Y Z � ... � !
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238350A1.pdf
  • California Speedway at 9300 Cherry Avenue in Fontana, California. Using a FCC Mobile Digital Direction Finding vehicle and direction finding techniques, the agents detected radio transmissions on the frequency 104.7 MHz from a location in the middle of the grounds of California Speedway. Field strength measurements revealed that the radio emissions exceeded the level allowed for non-licensed operation under Sections 15.209(a) and 15.239(b) of the FCC Rules. The measured field strength was 63,500 (V/m, or 254 times that permitted by the rules. DISCUSSION Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions of any license, or willfully fails to comply with any of the provisions of the Act or of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244167A1.pdf
  • on frequency 87.9 MHz is restricted to periodic operation and is generally used for the transmission of a control signal such as those used with alarm systems, garage door openers, remote switches, etc. Because operation on this frequency must be limited in duration, continuous operation of a non-licensed, low-powered transmitter is not permitted on 87.9 MHz. See 47 C.F.R. ( 15.209 and 15.231. The term ``repeated,'' when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, ``means the commission or omission of such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day.'' 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(2). Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246123A1.pdf
  • Section 15.219(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.219(b), specifies that the total length of the transmission line, antenna and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed 3 meters. The station's transmission line and antenna was over 9 meters. Emissions from a Part 15 transmitter, operating between 490-1705 kHz, are limited in accordance with a formula provided in Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a). Applying the formula, emissions on 660 kHz are limited to 36 �V/m at thirty meters. The measured field strength of the station's signal exceeded the permissible level by 2500 times. Section 15.239(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.239(b), provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 88-108 MHz band is permitted only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246336A1.pdf
  • � 301. Section 15.239 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.239, provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 88-108 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmissions does not exceed 250 �V/m at three meters. Measurements showed that the field strength of the station's signal exceeded the permissible level for a non-licensed low-power radio transmitter. Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a), provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 30-88 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmissions does not exceed 100 �V/m at three meters. Measurements showed that the field strength of the station's signal exceeded the permissible level for a non-licensed low-power radio transmitter by 24,672 times. Section 312(f)(1)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249191A1.pdf
  • File No. EB-04-PO-003 ) Chino, California ) Citation No. C20043292003 CITATION Released: June 24, 2004 By the Resident Agent, Portland Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to FLECO Corporation (``FLECO'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the FCC's Portland Office revealed that on August 5, 2003, FLECO Corporation sold two handheld wireless microphones, model WR-422-U, to the Club Works Sound and Lighting, 3385 Hawthorne Avenue, NE, Salem, Oregon (Invoice Number 425379). These wireless microphones subsequently were sold to and used by The Oasis restaurant and caused interference to amateur
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249276A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249276A1.pdf
  • Oregon ) Citation No. C20043292004 CITATION Released: June 28, 2004 By the Resident Agent, Portland Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to the Club Works Sound and Lighting (``Club Works'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the FCC's Portland Office revealed that on August 5, 2003, the Club Works Sound and Lighting bought two handheld wireless microphones, model WR-422-U, from FLECO Corporation (Invoice Number 425379). These wireless microphones subsequently were sold to and used by The Oasis restaurant and caused interference to amateur radio station WA7ABU on the frequency
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254043A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254043A1.pdf
  • punishable by fine or imprisonment. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Stephen P. Lee Resident Agent Houston Office Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5) 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b) Id. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a)(1), 2.803(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. �301 See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq Id. 47 C.F.R. � 15.5(b) 47 U.S.C. � 333 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3) 47 C.F.R. � 15.209 See Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. � 552a(e)(3) 18 U.S.C. � 1001 o p q r � � � q s �� � � � � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254544A1.pdf
  • or omission of such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day." 47 U.S.C. � 301. The field agents detected the signal from Silva's transmission over five miles from the location of his radio apparatus. This would indicate that the radio transmitting device used by Silva is not compliant with Section 15.209(a) of the Rules. 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a). Part 15 devices, which are non-licensed, low power devices, typically have a range of less than one mile. 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. �1.80. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(D). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(D); 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(4); see also Forfeiture Policy Statement, 12 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260037A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260037A1.pdf
  • using or operating at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. Your operation on frequency 1650 kHz was measured at 7,400 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 122 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 14.5 �V/m at 30 meters established in 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260406A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260406A1.pdf
  • basis for the claim by reference to the financial documentation submitted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this NAL shall be sent by regular mail and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Sylvane Simon at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis V. Loria District Director Boston Office Northeastern Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 301 Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's rules authorizes operation of low power radio equipment without a license if the strength of the signal does not exceed the maximum signal strength at a specified distance. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a). The measurements showed that the field strength of the station's signal exceeded the permissible level for a non-licensed low-power radio transmitter. Since the June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261747A1.pdf
  • in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1700 kHz was measured at 27,000�V/m at 35 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.118 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 30 meters for non-licensed devices operating on frequencies between 490 kHz and 1705 kHz. See 47 C.F.R. 15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263484A1.pdf
  • for the claim by reference to the financial documentation submitted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this NAL shall be sent by regular mail and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Jean Harold Marius at his record of address. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis V. Loria District Director Boston Office Northeastern Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 301 Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's rules authorizes operation of low power radio equipment without a license if the strength of the signal does not exceed the maximum signal strength at a specified distance. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a). The measurements showed that the field strength of the station's signal exceeded the permissible level for a non-licensed low-power radio transmitter. 47 U.S.C. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264273A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264273A1.pdf
  • financial documentation submitted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular mail, to Gary Toussaint at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis Loria District Director, Boston Office Northeast Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 301 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). Section 15.209(a) of the Rules authorizes operation of low power radio equipment without a license if the strength of the signal does not exceed the maximum signal strength at a specified distance. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a). The measurements taken on August 10, 2005 showed that the field strength of the station's signal was 79,332 times the permissible level for a non-licensed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269874A1.pdf
  • of the Rules. According to the equipment's specifications, it operates at power levels far in excess of the general radiated emission limit specified in Part 15. Also according to the equipment's specifications, users cannot alter the equipment's power settings. Therefore, based on the information available to us, Neptuno operated its intentional transmitters at power levels greater than allowed in Section 15.209 of the Rules. Because Neptuno failed to comply with the conditions set forth in Part 15 of the Rules, it was not authorized to operate its transmitters without a license. According to information in the Commission's database, Neptuno holds no authorization to transmit in the U-NII band. Based on the evidence and technical information before us, we find that Neptuno
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275720A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275720A1.pdf
  • service operating in accordance with this chapter.'' Section 15.3(n) defines an incidental radiator as ``[a] device that generates radio frequency energy during the course of its operation although the device is not intentionally designed to generate or emit radio frequency energy.'' Lubbock Power & Light's electrical distribution system is an incidental radiator and violates Section 15.5(b) of the Rules. Section 15.209 sets the general radiated emission limits for intentional radiators. The limit for the band 30 to 88 MHz is 100 micro-volts per meter measured at 3 meters. The attached list of strong electrical arcing points appears to exceed the value allowed even for intentional radiators. Violations of the Act or the Commission's Rules may subject the violator to substantial monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275721A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275721A1.pdf
  • radio communication service operating in accordance with this chapter.'' Section 15.3(n) defines an incidental radiator as ``[a] device that generates radio frequency energy during the course of its operation although the device is not intentionally designed to generate or emit radio frequency energy.'' Xcel Energy's electrical distribution system is an incidental radiator and violates Section 15.5(b) of the Rules. Section 15.209 sets the general radiated emission limits for intentional radiators. The limit for the band 30 to 88 MHz is 100 micro-volts per meter measured at 3 meters. The attached list of strong electrical arcing points appears to exceed the value allowed even for intentional radiators. Violations of the Act or the Commission's Rules may subject the violator to substantial monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277833A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277833A1.pdf
  • P. Lee Resident Agent Houston Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 301. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). At either power setting, use of the ICOM radio as manufactured, would exceed Part 15 limits. Moreover, the ICOM radio did not bear a label that it complies with Part 15 of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.19. Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting between 216-960 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 200 �V/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. 15.209. Devices compliant with Part 15 typically have a range of less than one mile. See 47 C.F.R. � 90.20(c)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 90.20(a). Section 312(f)(1) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278979A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278979A1.pdf
  • operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1700 kHz was measured at 168.8 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 265 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.12 �V/m at 30 meters for non-licensed devices set out in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.209. Further, the station's operation did not comply with the alternative operating requirements for stations operating in the band 510-1705 kHz that are set out in Section 15.219 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.219. Specifically, the agents measured the input power to the final radio frequency stage and found it to be 1200
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279229A1.pdf
  • using or operating at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. Your operation on frequency 1620 kHz was measured at 65,000 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 100 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 14.8 �V/m at 30 meters established in 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282597A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282597A1.pdf
  • View, California 94040 ) CITATION Released: May 27, 2008 By the District Director, San Francisco District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to New Tung Kee Noodle House No 4, Inc., (``New Tung Kee'') a/k/a Luu Noodle Restaurant, for violation of Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's Rules. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's San Francisco Office revealed that on February 26, 2008, New Tung Kee operated a ``Pokky'' Point of Sale (``POS'') transmitting device on 433.92 MHz. The Pokky POS transmitting device was not labeled, as required by Section 15.19(a) of the Rules, and a review of the Commission's databases revealed that the device
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284465A1.pdf
  • certain transmitters using or operating at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. Your operation on frequency 1500 kHz was measured at 30,000 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 30 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 16 �V/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules. Additionally, this station failed to comply with the other sections applicable to the operation of AM band transmitters in Part 15. Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292675A1.pdf
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294572A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294572A1.pdf
  • a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1620 kHz was measured at 4000 microvolts per meter (�V/m ) at 137 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.8 �V/m (24,000/1620) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a)). In addition, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states ``the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed approximately 3 meters.'' During the inspection on October 20, 2009, the agent observed that the vertical whip antenna used by the station was approximately 3 meters long, however, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294719A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294719A1.pdf
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295051A1.pdf
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295060A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295060A1.pdf
  • level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1120 kHz was measured at 134,000 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 232 meters which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 21.43 �V/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules. Thus, the station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization or providing services and facilities incidental to the operation of an unlicensed radio transmitter constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295062A1.pdf
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1590 kHz was measured at 35,000 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 30 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 15.1 �V/m (24,000/1590) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a)). In addition, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states ``the total length of the transmission line, antenna and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed 3 meters.'' During the inspection on November 19, 2009, the agents observed that the total length of the transmission line and the antenna used by the station extended over
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295194A1.pdf
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295641A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295641A1.pdf
  • level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1580 kHz was measured at 350,000 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 46 meters which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 15.19 �V/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules. Thus, the station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization or providing services and facilities incidental to the operation of an unlicensed radio transmitter constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295836A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295836A1.pdf
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1610 kHz was measured at 350 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 75 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.9 �V/m (24,000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules. (See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a)). Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band, is found in 47 C.F.R. � 15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states: ``the total length of the transmission line, antenna and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed 3 meters.'' (See 47 C.F.R. �15.219(b)). During the inspection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296473A1.pdf
  • the mixer, adding the FM chirp [audio signal] to mix up the signal and using the antenna, reflect back this new signal to the radar gun." The 26 Commission explained: "By definition if an FM chirp generator is mixed with an incoming signal and sent to an antenna, then it is . . . an intentional radiator subject to Section 15.209." The agency concluded that the device "is an 27 [unlicensed] intentional radiator" and "was designed to intentionally interfere with a licensed radio service and is thus in violation of Section 15.5 of our Case: 09-50683 Document: 00511032404 Page: 7 Date Filed: 02/22/2010 No. 09-50683 R. at 465. 28 See R. at 309 & 316. 29 See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(1)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296585A1.pdf
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297432A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297432A1.pdf
  • operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1640 kHz was measured at 73,800 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 30 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.6 �V/m at 30 meters for non-licensed devices set out in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.209. Further, the station's operation did not comply with the alternative operating requirements for stations operating in the band 510-1705 kHz that are set out in Section 15.219 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.219. Specifically, the agents measured the field strength of 19,700 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 30 meters with the 20
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297434A1.pdf
  • established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1620 kHz was measured at 1400 microvolts per meter (�V/m ) at 30 meters from the base of the water reservoir tower, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.8 �V/m (24,000/1620) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a)). Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band is found in 47 C.F.R. 15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states ``the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed approximately 3 meters.'' See 47 C.F.R. 15.219(b). During the inspection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297435A1.pdf
  • established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1620 kHz was measured at 1400 microvolts per meter (�V/m ) at 30 meters from the base of the water reservoir tower, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.8 �V/m (24,000/1620) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a)). Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band is found in 47 C.F.R. 15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states ``the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed approximately 3 meters.'' See 47 C.F.R. 15.219(b). During the inspection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299119A1.pdf
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301193A1.pdf
  • seq. Your operation on frequency 1710 kHz was measured at 8,000 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at approximately 580 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 100 �V/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.223(a) for operation on 1710 kHz, 47 C.F.R. � 15.223(a), as well as the general unlicensed limit of 30 �V/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) for operation on 1710 kHz. 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a). You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator of this illegal operation to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary forfeitures, in rem arrest action against the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301194A1.pdf
  • seq. Your operation on frequency 1710 kHz was measured at 14,000 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at approximately 50 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 100 �V/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.223(a) for operation on 1710 kHz, 47 C.F.R. � 15.223(a), as well as the general unlicensed limit of 30 �V/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) for operation on 1710 kHz. 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a). You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator of this illegal operation to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary forfeitures, in rem arrest action against the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301328A1.pdf
  • seq. Your operation on frequency 1710 kHz was measured at 1,200 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at approximately 320 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 100 �V/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.223(a) for operation on 1710 kHz, 47 C.F.R. � 15.223(a), as well as the general unlicensed limit of 30 �V/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) for operation on 1710 kHz. 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a). You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator of this illegal operation to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary forfeitures, in rem arrest action against the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301555A1.pdf
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301931A1.pdf
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1640 kHz was measured at 14,500 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 62 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.6 �V/m (24,000/1640) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a)). Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band is found in 47 C.F.R. �15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states ``the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed approximately 3 meters.'' (See 47 C.F.R. �15.219(b).) During the inspection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302462A1.pdf
  • or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1640 kHz was measured at 3,600 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 84.1 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.6 �V/m (24000/1640) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a)). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. The field strength of the signal on frequency 98.5 MHz was measured at 6,968 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 106.3 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 250�V/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices. Thus, this station is operating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305522A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305522A1.pdf
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306481A1.pdf
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1610 KHz was measured at 1,900 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 130 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.9 �V/m (24,000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a)). Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band is found in 47 C.F.R. �15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states ``the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed approximately 3 meters.'' (See 47 C.F.R. �15.219(b).) During the investigation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306483A1.pdf
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1610 KHz was measured at 1,200 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 430 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.9 �V/m (24,000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a)). Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band is found in 47 C.F.R. �15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states ``the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed approximately 3 meters.'' (See 47 C.F.R. �15.219(b).) During the investigation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308327A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308327A1.pdf
  • level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. In addition, the field strength of the signal on frequency 1650 kHz was measured at 550 microvolts per meter (�V/m ) at 353 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.5 �V/m (24,000/1650) at 30 meters established in section 15.209(a) of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a)). Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band, is found in 47 C.F.R. �15.219. Specifically, section 15.219(b) of the Rules states ``the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed approximately 3 meters.'' During the inspection on May 15, 2011,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308328A1.pdf
  • that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1620 kHz (1146 Rice Street) was measured at 470 microvolts per meter (�V/m ) at 1243 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.8 �V/m (24,000/1620) at 30 meters established in section 15.209(a) of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a)). Similarly, the field strength of the signal on 1630 kHz (399 East Maryland Avenue) was measured at 450 �V/m at 599 meters, which also exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.7 �V/m at 30 meters. Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band, is found in 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308562A1.pdf
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 6815 kHz and 6960.6 kHz exceeds the maximum permitted established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a)) given the distance the signal could be received in radio direction finding vehicles and FCC fixed High Frequency receiving sites. Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309211A1.pdf
  • et seq. Your operation on frequency 1620 kHz was measured at 900 microvolt per meter (�V/m) at 1132 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 100 �V/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.223(a) for operation on 1620 kHz, 47 C.F.R. � 15.223(a), as well as the general unlicensed limit of 30 �V/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) for operation on 1620 kHz. 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a). You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the owner of this illegal operation to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309212A1.pdf
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1610 kHz was measured at 2,730 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 145 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.9 �V/m (24,000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (see 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a)). Another exception for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band is found in 47 C.F.R. � 15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states ``the total length of the transmission line, antenna and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed 3 meters'' (see 47 C.F.R. � 15.219(b)). The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309312A1.pdf
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1620 kHz was measured at 900 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 1132 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.8 �V/m (24,000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (see 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a)). You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the owner of this illegal operation to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309805A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309805A1.pdf
  • seq. Your operation on frequency 87.9 MHz was measured at 71,400 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 120 meters. This exceeds the general radiated emission limit of 100 �V/m at 3 meters established under Part 15. In addition, Part 15 restricts the mode of operation on particular frequency bands and does not permit broadcast operations on 87.9 MHz. 47 C.F.R. � 15.209. Thus, this station is operating in violation of Part 15 of the Commission's rules, and 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator of this illegal operation to severe penalties, including, but not limited
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312911A1.pdf
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1680 kHz was measured at 15,900 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 60 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.3 �V/m (24,000/1680) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (see 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a)). On February 29, 2012, agents from this office revisited your Fullerton location. The agents determined that your transmitter was still operating on frequency 1680 KHz, but with no modulation. The field strength of the signal was measured at 17,900 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 60 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313358A1.pdf
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1680 kHz was measured at 17,900 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 60 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.3 �V/m (24000/1680) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (see 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(a)). Another exception for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band is found in 47 C.F.R. � 15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states ``the total length of the transmission line, antenna and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed 3 meters'' (see 47 C.F.R. � 15.219(b)). During
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314322A1.pdf
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. �15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-163A1.pdf
  • Second, we believe that there are a broad variety of potential applications for UWB technology, each of which has unique spectrum attributes and requirements. Third, we note that the various regions of the spectrum have different propagation characteristics. As Arthur D. Little, Inc. points out, for example, an UWB signal operating at the general emission limits in 47 C.F.R. � 15.209 would fall below a victim receiver's thermal noise at a distance of 40 meters at 500 MHz, and at a distance of 10 meters at 5 GHz. We have developed a number of alternative proposals based on these considerations. We observe that GPRs must operate at frequencies in the region below 2 GHz in order to obtain the penetration depth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-82A1.txt
  • March 9, 2000 By the Commission: 1. In this order, we affirm a $5,000 forfeiture assessed against Edwin Valentin by the former Compliance and Information Bureau for operating an unlicensed FM radio station on frequency 106.3 MHz in Pontiac, Michigan, in contravention of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 301, and Sections 15.209 and 15.239 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 15.209 and 15.239. 2. In 1997, the Commission's Detroit Field Office investigated complaints that an unlicensed FM radio station was broadcasting on 106.3 MHz in the Detroit, Michigan area, and eventually determined that Rev. Edwin Valentin was operating the unlicensed radio station. On December 10, 1997, the Detroit Field Office
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-158A1.txt
  • or digitally modulated intentional radiator is operating, the radio frequency power than is produced by the intentional radiator shall be at least 20 dB below that in the 100 kHz bandwidth within the band that contains the highest level of the desired power, based on either an RF conducted or a radiated measurement. Attenuation below the general limits specified in �15.209(a) is not required. In addition, radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands, as defined in � 15.205(a), must also comply with the radiated emission limits specified in � 15.209(a) (see � 15.205(c)). (d) For direct sequence spread spectrum and digitally modulated systems, the peak power spectral density conducted from the intentional radiator to the antenna shall not be greater
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.txt
  • operation under Part 15. Frequency bands are designated as restricted to protect certain sensitive radio services, such as those that protect safety-of-life or those that use very low received levels, such as satellite downlinks or radio astronomy. With certain exceptions, Part 15 permits only spurious emissions in restricted frequency bands, and the emissions must comply with the limits in Section 15.209. These limits are lower than the out-of-band emission limits permitted by some other rule sections in Part 15. For this reason, compliance with the rules may be more difficult to achieve for devices that produce harmonic emissions above 38.6 GHz, including field disturbance sensors operating in the 10.5 and 24 GHz bands and other transmitters operating in the 24 GHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-357A1.txt
  • the DEMS (24.25 - 24.45 GHz) both of which are susceptible to interference from relatively low-level signals. Additionally, we are requiring, under Section 15.249, that the field strength of emissions outside of the 24.05 - 24.25 GHz band, except for harmonics, be attenuated by at least 50 dB below the fundamental or to the general emissions limits contained in Section 15.209 of the Commission's rules, whichever is the lesser attenuation. 15. Finally, we will address harmonic emissions. Section 15.209 set the limit for out-of-band emissions of Part 15 devices, which is 500 uV/m at 3 meters. Harmonic emissions from transmitters operating under Section 15.249 are permitted at different levels, generally higher, than other out-of-band emissions, and those limits are specified in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-136A1.txt
  • ten Federal Government assignments for coast stations communicating with ships at sea and several fixed service sites in this band. In addition, the LF spectrum is used by unlicensed devices. These systems do not have any allocation status, but are authorized to operate under our Part 15 Rules on an unprotected, non-interference basis with respect to all other users. Section 15.209 permits operation of authorized systems with field strengths of up to 4.9 microvolts/meter in the 9-490 kHz band. Additionally, Section 15.217 permits use of the 160-190 kHz band for general unlicensed operations limited to one watt total input power to the final radio frequency stage (exclusive of filament or heater power) with the length of the transmission line, antenna and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-151A1.txt
  • or digitally modulated intentional radiator is operating, the radio frequency power than is produced by the intentional radiator shall be at least 20 dB below that in the 100 kHz bandwidth within the band that contains the highest level of the desired power, based on either an RF conducted or a radiated measurement. Attenuation below the general limits specified in �15.209(a) is not required. In addition, radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands, as defined in � 15.205(a), must also comply with the radiated emission limits specified in � 15.209(a) (see � 15.205(c)). (d) For digitally modulated systems, the peak power spectral density conducted from the intentional radiator to the antenna shall not be greater than 8 dBm in any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.txt
  • tighter limits shall apply at the boundary between two frequency ranges. See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.107, 15.207 and 18.307 for the conducted emission limits. The regulations also specify radiated emission limits to protect against interference to radio services operating above 30 MHz. In certain cases, the rules specify limits on radiated emissions below 30 MHz. See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.109(e), 15.209(a) and 18.305. See 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review - Conducted Emission Limits Below 30 MHz for Equipment Regulated under Parts 15 and 18 of the Commission's Rules, ET Docket No. 98-80, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 14 FCC Rcd 18180 (1999). A carrier current system is defined as a system, or part of a system, that transmits radio frequency energy by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.txt
  • The average emission limits shall be calculated, based on the measured peak levels, over the actual time period during which transmission occurs. (c) Limits on spurious emissions: (1) The power density of any emissions outside the band being used band shall consist solely of spurious emissions. (2) Radiated emissions below 40 GHz shall not exceed the general limits in Sec. 15.209. (3) Between 40 GHz and 200 GHz, the level of these emissions shall not exceed 90 pW/cm2 at a distance of 3 meters. (4) The levels of the spurious emissions shall not exceed the level of the fundamental emission. (i) The total peak transmitter output power shall not exceed 500 mW. (ii) Fundamental emissions must be contained within the frequency
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-211A1.txt
  • at 6-7 and RADAR reply comments at 8. See memorandum of test results by the Commission's Laboratory dated June 25, 2002. See PanAmSat/SIA ex parte submission dated April 16, 2002 at 17-20. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.249, which permits 50,000 �V/m at 3 meters for transmitters operating in the 5.8 GHz ISM band. See also 47 C.F.R. � 15.109 and 15.209, which permit a spurious emission level of 500 �V/m at 3 meters from most Part 15 devices. See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.5 and 15.101(b). Section 302(a) of the Communications Act states that, ``The Commission may, consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity, make reasonable regulations...governing the interference potential of devices which in their operation are capable of emitting radio
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-328A1.txt
  • 209. Specific frequency bands are designated as restricted bands in Part 15 to protect certain sensitive radio services from interference, such as those that protect safety of life or those that use very low received levels, such as satellite downlinks or radio astronomy. Only spurious emissions are permitted in restricted bands. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.205. See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.209, 15.231, 15.241 and 15.242. Effective October 16, 2002, equipment authorizations will no longer be granted for medical telemetry transmitters that operate in the TV broadcast bands. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.37(i). ``Spectrum Policy Task Force Seeks Public Comment on Issues Related to Commission's Spectrum Policies,'' Public Notice, ET Docket No. 02-135 (rel. June 6, 2002). ``Spectrum Policy Task Force Announces
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.txt
  • to businesses and consumers. They argue that licensing UWB devices would be impractical and unwieldy and would increase costs to consumers. Valeo Electronics supports unlicensed operations for UWB but also suggests that higher-powered UWB use should be permitted with individual licensing or under product-specific waivers. Similarly, Zircon, while supporting unlicensed operation for UWB devices complying with the 47 C.F.R. � 15.209 emission limits, indicated that UWB devices that comply with the limits for Class A digital devices should be minimally encumbered by any licensing requirements. In general, the commenting parties associated with authorized radio services are opposed to authorization of UWB technology in their frequency bands of operation or suggest that UWB only be allowed on a licensed basis. For example,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-100A1.txt
  • dormitory or other locations on the electric power lines. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.221. See e.g., X-10 products for home automation at , and products conforming to ANSI/EIA-600.31-97 Power Line Physical Layer and Medium Specification (CEBus Standard). See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.3(f) & (t), 15.5, 15.31(d), (f), (g) & (h), 15.33(b)(2), 15.107(a)-(c), 15.109(a), (b), (e) & (g), 15.113, 15.201(a), 15.207(c), 15.209(a) and 15.221. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(f). See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.3(z) and 15.3(o), respectively. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(t). A carrier current system operated by an electric utility to control the utility's electrical grid is defined as a power line carrier system in the rules. Power line carrier systems are only subject to 47 C.F.R. � 15.113. For example,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-105A1.txt
  • ten Federal Government assignments for coast stations communicating with ships at sea, and several Federal Government fixed service sites in this band. In addition, unlicensed devices use the LF spectrum. These systems do not have any allocation status, but are authorized to operate under our Part 15 rules on an unprotected, non-interference basis with respect to all other users. Section 15.209 permits operation of authorized unlicensed systems with field strengths of up to 4.9 microvolts/meter in the 9-490 kHz band. Additionally, Section 15.217 permits use of the 160-190 kHz band for general unlicensed operations limited to one watt total input power to the final radio frequency stage (exclusive of filament or heater power) with the length of the transmission line, antenna
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.txt
  • 38.6 GHz Specific frequency bands are designated as restricted bands in Part 15 to protect certain sensitive radio services from interference, such as those that protect safety-of-life or those that use very low received levels, such as satellite downlinks or radio astronomy. Only spurious emissions are permitted in restricted bands, and such emissions must comply with the limits in Section 15.209. The entire frequency range above 38.6 GHz is a restricted band, although there is an exception that permits transmitters to operate in the 46.7-46.9 GHz, 76-77 GHz and 57-64 GHz bands. At the time this frequency range above 38.6 GHz was designated as a restricted band, there was no requirement in our rules to make measurements above 40 GHz because
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.txt
  • spectrum occupancy characteristics. For example, a Section 15.247 device operating in the 5.7 GHz band is required to limit peak power spectral density to 8 dBm in any 3 kHz band, which equates to 33 dBm in any 1 MHz band. Unwanted emissions from such a device are not required to be attenuated to the general emission limits of Section 15.209. Conversely, the same device, if authorized pursuant to the U-NII rules, would be required to limit its power spectral density to 17 dBm in any 1 MHz band and to limit unwanted emissions to the levels specified in Section 15.209. Realizing that a device may occupy the same spectrum band differently depending upon the rule section under which it is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.txt
  • (3) The average emission limits shall be calculated based on the measured peak levels, over the actual time period during which transmission occurs. (d) Limits on spurious emissions: (1) The power density of any emissions outside the band being used shall consist solely of spurious emissions. (2) Radiated emissions below 40 GHz shall not exceed the general limits in � 15.209. (3) Between 40 GHz and 200 GHz, the level of these emissions shall not exceed 90 pW/cm2 at a distance of 3 meters. (4) The levels of the spurious emissions shall not exceed the level of the fundamental emission. (e) The total peak transmitter output power shall not exceed 500 mW. (f) Fundamental emissions must be contained within the frequency
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-289A1.txt
  • station complex consisting of multiple interconnecting earth station antennas supporting the communication routing and switching functions of a non-geostationary satellite orbit fixed-satellite service (NGSO FSS) system as a whole. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.201. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 74.636. Typically, BAS and CARS stations operate with EIRPs 10 to 15 dB below the maximum permissible limits. 7 C.F.R. � 15.209. The limit specified for frequencies above 960 MHz is 500 uV/m and is measured at 3 meters using a 1 MHz resolution bandwidth. This is equivalent to an EIRP of -41.25 dBm/MHz. It also is possible to operate intermittent unlicensed systems at slightly higher power levels under 47 C.F.R. � 15.231, which allows periodic use above 70 MHz. The 126.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-28A1.txt
  • also noted that requiring the emissions from this associated digital circuitry to comply with some of the reduced levels adopted for UWB devices may make production infeasible. Accordingly, the Commission adopted rules to permit the emissions from digital circuitry used to enable operation of an UWB device to operate at the Part 15 general emission limits in 47 C.F.R. � 15.209 provided that it can be clearly demonstrated that those emissions are due solely to emissions from the digital circuitry and are not intended to be radiated from the UWB device's antenna. III. DISCUSSION The Petitioners claim that the emissions below 3.1 GHz from the Time Domain transmitter exceed the limits permitted under the regulations. The petitioners contend that only digital
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.txt
  • be eliminated for cognitive devices without adversely affecting spectrum sharing? We also seek comment on whether we should exempt devices operating under the control of a master controller from complying with DFS or other requirements. We further seek comment on whether higher power operation should be permitted for devices operating under any other sections in Part 15. For example, Section 15.209 allows operation at a low level in almost any frequency band other than the TV bands and certain designated restricted bands. Should higher power operation be allowed under that section? We seek comment on whether the increased levels we are proposing are sufficient to be of benefit to WISPs, wireless LANs or other unlicensed operations in areas with limited spectrum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.txt
  • denied. Finally, MSSI is correct that the spectrum charts that were included in the press package along with the News Release of February 14, 2002, announcing the adoption of the R&O unintentionally did not reflect the emission limits below 960 MHz. The UWB emission limits below 960 MHz are the Part 15 general emission limits contained in 47 C.F.R. � 15.209, as correctly stated in 47 C.F.R. �� 15.509(d), 15.511(d), 15.513(d), 15.515(d), 15.517(c), and 15.519(c). Accordingly, no change to our regulations is required to implement this clarification. Vehicular radar systems in the 22-29 GHz band The UWB regulations permit the operation of vehicular radar systems in the 22-29 GHz band. UWB vehicular radar systems are required to operate at all times
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-100A1.txt
  • � 2.1. Spurious emission are defined as emissions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission or information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products. See SIA comments at 4. Id. at 4-7. See 47 C.F. R. � 15.209(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 15.247. See IEEE 802.18 Comments at 10. See Cognitive Radio Notice at �� 68 - 80. Id. at 14-21. Id. at 18. This separation distance is based on the unlicensed device antenna being directly coupled to the receive antenna of the earth station. Other assumptions include a 5 degree elevation angle, free space path loss, an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-113A1.txt
  • in any 100 kHz bandwidth outside the frequency band in which the unlicensed device operates be at least 20 dB below that in the 100 kHz bandwidth within the band that contains the highest level of the desired power. Consistent with the current rules, we also propose to not require attenuation of emissions below the general limits specified in Section 15.209(a). To reduce the likelihood of harmful interference to licensed services on adjacent channels or outside the TV bands, we further propose to require that emissions outside the TV channel(s) where an unlicensed device operates comply with the general limits in Section 15.209(a). This is consistent with the out-of-band emission requirements for certain other Part 15 intentional radiators. We seek comment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-165A1.txt
  • the transmitter demonstrates compliance with the peak conducted power limits. If the transmitter complies with the conducted power limits based on the use of RMS averaging over a time interval, as permitted under paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the attenuation required under this paragraph shall be 30 dB instead of 20 dB. Attenuation below the general limits specified in Section 15.209(a) is not required. In addition, radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands, as defined in Section 15.205(a), must also comply with the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.209(a) (see Section 15.205(c)). (e) For digitally modulated systems, the power spectral density conducted from the intentional radiator to the antenna shall not be greater than 8 dBm in any 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.txt
  • parties operating at the same power level and under similar technical parameters as the licensee, or they could promote such use at lower power levels. We also emphasize that neither scenario would affect unlicensed operations to the extent they are permitted in that particular licensed band pursuant to Commission rules under Part 15. For example, as set forth in section 15.209 of the Commission's rules and augmented on a band-by-band basis, Part 15 users (e.g., Ultra-Wide Band operators) can operate pursuant to applicable technical and operational rules whether or not opportunistic use or other advanced technologies are employed or authorized by the licensee. We would also expect that new and innovative radiofrequency devices would be agile enough to function on an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.txt
  • context where the system architecture is a line source radiator that creates a situation in which the unshielded power lines act as efficient radiators throughout neighborhoods. It states that based on information from the NTIA Phase 1 Study and several additional studies, copies of which it attached to its comments, Access BPL, operated at the current Section 15.109 and Section 15.209 field strengths, will create substantial interference to nearby Amateur radio stations, whether fixed or mobile. The ARRL argues that lower permissible field strengths are necessary to protect mobile radio stations. It suggests that an acceptable radiated emission limit for Access BPL to protect typical amateur mobile stations is 0 dB�V/m, measured at an antenna 10 meters from the power line.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.txt
  • i.e., they use a resolution bandwidth that is not greater than 10 percent of the minimum -10 dB bandwidth. Comments were requested on this proposal. Comments also were requested on the alternative proposal presented by MSSI, namely the rules should be amended to permit devices operating above 1000 MHz under the Part 15 general emission standards in 47 C.F.R. � 15.209 to comply with a peak emission limit of 5000 uV/m at 3 meters based on a measurement using a peak detector, a 1 MHz resolution bandwidth and a video bandwidth of no less than 1 MHz. The Commission requested comments on any changes to the interference potential of wideband Part 15 devices that may occur as a result of these
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-29A1.txt
  • designed to conduct their radio frequency emissions via connecting wires or cables and that operate in the frequency range of 9 kHz to 30 MHz, including devices that deliver the radio frequency energy to transducers, such as ultrasonic devices not covered under Part 18 of this Chapter, shall comply with the radiated emission limits for intentional radiators provided in Section 15.209 for the frequency range of 9 kHz to 30 MHz. As an alternative, carrier current systems used as unintentional radiators and operating in the frequency range of 525 kHz to 1705 kHz may comply with the radiated emission limits provided in Section 15.221(a). At frequencies above 30 MHz, the limits in paragraph (a), (b) or (i) of this Section, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-71A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-71A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-71A1.txt
  • Federal Government fixed service sites in this band. There are no non-Federal Government assignments in the Commission's database for this frequency band. In addition, unlicensed devices use the LF spectrum. These systems do not have any allocation status, but are authorized to operate under our Part 15 rules on an unprotected, non-interference basis with respect to all other users. Section 15.209 generally permits unlicensed operation at power limits of 4.9 microvolts/meter. Further, Section 15.113 specifically permits Power Line Carrier (PLC) systems to operate on power transmission lines for communications important to the reliability and security of electric service to the public in the 9-490 kHz band. In this regard, utility companies have generally come to rely on PLC systems to support
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-98A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-98A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-98A1.txt
  • systems operating in the 425-435 MHz band. The proposed rule would allow RFID tags to transmit data at the higher level normally permitted for control signals, with an average field strength of 11,000 �V/m and a peak field strength of 110,000 �V/m measured at a distance of 3 meters. Out-of-band emissions would have to meet the current limit in Section 15.209. The Commission proposed to limit transmissions to 120 seconds with at least a 10 second silent period between transmissions, and to permit retransmissions in case of data errors. It also proposed to allow powered tags and readers to be approved either separately or under a single application, as proposed in the Notice for RFID devices operating in the 13.56 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-136A1.txt
  • dBm. GPS Networking requests that the Commission modify its rules so that its equipment may be classified as a tunnel radio system under Section 15.211 of our rules. Such a classification would permit operation within a building at any power level provided the signal outside of the building does not exceed the general emission limits specified in 47 C.F.R. � 15.209 of our rules. GPS Networking states that it could add a ``kill'' switch to deactivate its booster station, or could employ ``hooding'' or shielding, when an outside opening is present. In its opposition to GPS Networking's petition, NTIA notes that several federal agencies have shown interest in using GPS re-radiating devices for testing and experiments at facilities typically under the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-58A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-58A1.txt
  • measurements and analysis submitted by Qualcomm in its comments of March 5, 2001; the analyses submitted by the Satellite Industry Association in several of its comments; and multiple others. 1st R&O, supra, at para. 2. For example, UWB communications systems that are designed to operate outdoors are restricted to hand-held devices and fixed outdoor infrastructures are prohibited. 47 C.F.R. � 15.209. 47 C.F.R. � 15.31(c). This rule paragraph references only swept frequency devices. In addition, the Commission normally would apply a similar requirement to average emission measurements for transmitters employing step function or frequency hopping modulation techniques due to the lack of appropriate test procedures and the lack of interference studies regarding these modulation types. However, the Commission, in the 2nd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • no harmful interference is caused and that interference must be accepted that may be caused by the operation of an authorized radio station, by another intentional or unintentional radiator, by industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) equipment, or by an incidental radiator. 47 C.F.R. � 15.5(b). The Commission permits unlicensed operations in the band 25.25-27.5 GHz under the provisions of Section 15.209 (Emissions from an intentional radiator shall not exceed 500 microvolts per meter at a measurement distance of 3 meters) and Section 15.231 (periodic operations). 47 C.F.R. � 15.209, 15.231. The Global Positioning System (GPS) is authorized under the Federal RNSS allocation. These satellites allow anyone with a GPS receiver to determine their precise longitude, latitude, altitude, and time anywhere on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-103A1.txt
  • Parts 87 and 90 respectively. Guidant petition at 5. Guidant further states that their medical devices produce radiated emissions in the 90-110 kHz band as a `by-product' of the inductive coupling technique employed to communicate with the devices. However, Guidant further states that the level of emissions from these inductive implants is typically 50-90 dB below the limits of Section 15.209. See Guidant petition generally. Guidant petition at 5. We note that we would seek the concurrence of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) before any action, such as those suggested in this paragraph, that would impact a restricted band allocated for Federal Government use. See para 8, supra. Request for Extension of Waiver, December 12, 2005. See, e.g., Alfred
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-113A1.txt
  • (2004). A carrier current system is defined as a system, or part of a system, that transmits radio frequency energy by conduction over an electric power line to a receiver also connected to the same power line. See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.3(f) and (t), 15.5, 15.31(d), (f), (g) and (h), 15.33(b)(2), 15.107(a)-(c), 15.109(a), (b), (e) and (g), 15.113, 15.201(a), 15.207(c), 15.209(a) and 15.221. Campus radio systems have been operating for over fifty years in the United States at many universities as unlicensed broadcast radio stations in the AM Broadcast band. Initially, the receiver and signal source were attached to the same electric power line. With the advent of the transistor radio, receivers are able to pick up enough signal for adequate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-156A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-156A1.txt
  • applications? We also invite comment as to whether the applications would be different if the Commission were to provide for TV band devices on a licensed basis instead of an unlicensed basis. Out of Band Emission Limits. The Commission proposed to require that emissions from an unlicensed device outside that device's channel of operation comply with the limits in Section 15.209 of the rules. These are the same limits that apply to most intentional radiators operating under Part 15 of the rules, and at frequencies above 30 MHz are the same as the limits that apply to most unintentional radiators, including computers and radio and TV receivers. Motorola, NAB, and MSTV argue that these emission limits are inadequate to protect against
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-46A1.txt
  • which are anticipated to operate in urban areas where ISM devices are heavily used. The BRS Petitioners propose that the Commission require that all ISM devices operating in the 2496-2500 MHz band and marketed after December 31, 2006, adhere to emissions limits of 500 microvolts/meter, measured at three meters, consistent with the emissions limits for unlicensed intentional radiators under Section 15.209 of the Commission's rules. WCA explains that, although this approach is less than ideal for BRS operators, it provides BRS licensees with the assurance that interference from ISM equipment should not worsen in that band. The BRS Petitioners, in subsequent ex parte communications, have set forth a proposal to expand the out-of-band emissions limits set forth in Section 18.305 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-215A1.txt
  • has also recently submitted pleadings that also refer to its emission limit proposal as a ``PFD limit''. See Written Ex Parte, September 19, 2007, at pp. 7-8 and Annex 2. We note, however, that the proposal by Sirius is not a PFD limit, but is actually a received power limit (similar to the limits on incidental radiator emissions in Section 15.209 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.209). Notwithstanding this, a final rule incorporating Sirius's basic idea could be expressed as an equivalent PFD or electric field strength limit. Assuming a 0 dBi measurement antenna (as Sirius does), the -44 dBm received power limit is equivalent to a PFD limit of -45.3 dBW/m� or a field strength limit of 100.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.txt
  • we are not specifying the technical parameters for transmit power control, we will require applicants for certification to describe a device's transmit power control feature mechanism in the application. Out-Of-Band Emissions Limits In the First R&O/Further Notice, the Commission proposed to require that emissions from an unlicensed device outside that device's channel of operation comply with the limits in Section 15.209 of the rules. These are the same out-of-band limits that apply to most intentional radiators operating under Part 15 of the rules, and at frequencies above 30 MHz are also the same as the limits that apply to most unintentional radiators, including computers and radio and TV receivers. However, the Commission recognized the concerns of some parties that these emission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-263A1.txt
  • Transmitter (ELT) or the maritime equivalent Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon (EPIRB) operating in the 406 - 406.1 MHz band. The EPIRB/ELT signal is detected by the receiver on the spacecraft and data is transmitted back to a Local User Terminal. Below 960 MHz, the unlicensed operation of a UWB transmitter is subject to the general emissions limits of Section 15.209 of the rules. At the present time, only UWB ground penetrating radars (GPR) and certain UWB wall and through-wall imaging devices are allowed to have their fundamental emissions on frequencies below 960 MHz. The rules do not allow operation of fixed UWB surveillance systems below 960 MHz. Section 15.511(a) of the rules specifies technical and operational standards for fixed UWB
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-50A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-50A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-50A1.txt
  • Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See also In the Matter of Creation of a Low Power Radio Service, Second Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 8029, 8033 (2001). See Casa Opposition at Exhibit 1. Casa states that the ``whole city'' involved was Central Falls, which is one mile in diameter. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 15.209, 15.219, and 15.221; Public Notice, ``Permitted Forms of Low Power Broadcast Operation,'' Mimeo No. 14089 (July 14, 1991); OET Bulletin No. 63, ``Understanding the FCC Regulations for Low-Power, Non-Licensed Transmitters'' (Feb. 1996). Section 15.219 permits operation of an unlicensed 100-milliwatt AM transmitter on a secondary, non-interfering basis, provided that the total length of the antenna and ground lead does not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-20A1.txt
  • See AMF petition at 15. See AMF petition at 11 et seq. AMF also explains that, although Parts 15 and 18 of the Commission's rules permit wireless medical devices to operate using various frequencies on an unlicensed basis, the technical restrictions under those rules prevent deployment of higher-power, wideband MMN devices. Specifically, according to AMF, the emission limits under Sections 15.209(a) and 18.305(b) of the Commission's rules are too stringent for wideband MMNS systems, which require higher power levels. Additionally, AMF says that although Section 18.305(a) permits industrial, scientific, and medical equipment to operate at unlimited emission levels on certain frequencies, these frequencies are located below 41 MHz and above 900 MHz, which it argues are outside the preferred range of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-23A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-23A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-23A1.txt
  • approach, wing band devices would be burdened with more stringent limits on radiation into the core band as compared to core band devices. We find no compelling reason to place wing band devices on such an unequal footing with core band devices, particularly if such a limit were to be set below the existing general emission limits contained in Section 15.209 as suggested by Medtronic. Manufacturers must design core band devices under the assumption that RF energy will be encountered in the core band from the in-band and spurious emissions of other authorized services as well as emissions from a wide variety of unlicensed electronic devices, (e.g., personal computers, CD players, etc). Medical implant devices that are designed to operate in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-60A1.txt
  • becomes available and the opportunity provided by the Court's remand of the extrapolation factor for explanation, we are reviewing our decision on that factor in light of the NTIA Phase 2 and Brazil studies and the site-specific option suggested by the IEEE P1775/D2 work. Our goal is to provide BPL measurement procedures that will adequately ensure compliance with the Section 15.209 emissions standard for emissions at or below 30 MHz without placing unfair or undue compliance burdens on equipment manufacturers and users. In conducting this review, we advise interested parties that at this point we continue to believe that our decision to apply the existing 40 dB per decade distance attenuation extrapolation factor in the rules for Access BPL operations, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-13A1.txt
  • SafeView ProVision 100 device. In the Order, OET permitted measurement of the ProVision 100 device's average radiated emissions with the frequency sweep active, rather than stopped, as Section 15.31(c) of the rules requires. In addition, OET waived the Section 15.35(b) limit on peak emissions from unlicensed devices of 20 dB above the corresponding maximum average emission limit specified in Section 15.209. ProVision 100 devices therefore may emit a total radiated peak power level up to 41 dB above the maximum permitted average power when measured as specified in the Order. In the Order, OET also placed specific operational and marketing conditions on the ProVision 100 device to ensure that licensed users operating in the 24.25-30.00 GHz and adjacent frequency bands are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-14A1.txt
  • December 6, 2006. Ohmart/VEGA and Krohne America, Inc. (Krohne) filed comments that generally supported Siemens petition. Krohne suggests that the Commission should consider allowing TLPR devices to operate in a larger portion of the spectrum, i.e., 75-85 GHz band, to harmonize with European rules for such devices. Concurrent with its rulemaking petition, Siemens filed a request for waiver of Section 15.209(a) to allow TLPR operation in the 78-79 GHz frequency band, subject to certain conditions. Ohmart/VEGA and Krohne filed in support of the Siemens' request. Subsequently, Ohmart/VEGA also filed a request for waiver of Section 15.209(a) to allow TLPR operation in the 77-81 GHz band, subject to certain conditions. Endress+Hauser filed in support of the Ohmart/VEGA waiver request and asked that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.txt
  • unauthorized users of low power auxiliary stations, including wireless microphones, to operate on an unlicensed basis under Part 15 pursuant to certain specified technical requirements, in the 700 MHz Band until June 12, 2010 and in the core TV bands until the effective date of Commission action taken in response to the Further Notice. Accordingly, we waive Sections 15.201(b) and 15.209(a) of our Part 15 technical rules. These waivers will permit entities that operate wireless microphones in the 700 MHz Band without the required license to continue those operations subject to the band clearing mechanisms that we adopt in this Report and Order, and permit them to relocate their operations to the core TV bands on the same Part 15 unlicensed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-174A1.txt
  • kHz with an average detector. A narrower resolution bandwidth may be employed near the band edge, when necessary, provided the measured energy is integrated to show the total power over 100 kHz. (3) At frequencies beyond the television channels immediately adjacent to the channel in which the TVBD is operating, the radiated emissions from TVBDs shall meet the requirements of �15.209. * * * * * 7. Section 15.711 is amended by revising the section heading and introductory text and by revising paragraphs (a) through (f) to read as follows: � 15.711 Interference avoidance methods. Except as provided in � 15.717, television channel availability for a TVBD is determined based on the geo-location and database access method described in paragraphs (a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.txt
  • Counsel, and Secretary, Sirius, and James S. Blitz, Vice President and Regulatory Counsel, XM Radio Inc., to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC (dated Sept. 19, 2007) at 7-8 and Annex 2. In the 2007 Notice, however, the Commission explained that the ground-level emission limit is actually a received power limit (similar to the limits on incidental radiator emissions in Section 15.209 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.209). The Commission explained further that a rule incorporating Sirius' basic idea could be expressed as an equivalent power flux density (PFD) or electric field strength limit. Assuming a 0 decibel over isotropic (dBi) measurement antenna (as Sirius does), the -44 dBm received power limit is equivalent to a PFD limit of -45.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Counsel, and Secretary, Sirius, and James S. Blitz, Vice President and Regulatory Counsel, XM Radio Inc., to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC (dated Sept. 19, 2007) at 7-8 and Annex 2. In the 2007 Notice, however, the Commission explained that the ground-level emission limit is actually a received power limit (similar to the limits on incidental radiator emissions in Section 15.209 of the Commission's Rules, 47C.F.R.� 15.209). The Commission explained further that a rule incorporating Sirius' basic idea could be expressed as an equivalent power flux density (PFD) or electric field strength limit. Assuming a 0 decibel over isotropic (dBi) measurement antenna (as Sirius does), the -44dBmreceived power limit is equivalent to a PFD limit of -45.3dBW/m� or a field strength
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.txt
  • it declined to propose any specific changes, it sought comment on what actions it might take to reduce noise in the VHF TV bands. We note that the allowed out-of-band emissions limit of 1,500 �V/m at 3 meters for auditory assistance devices that operate in the 72-76 MHz bands is 15 times higher (23.5 dB more power) than the Section 15.209 emissions limit of 100 �V/m at 3 meters that applies to most other Part 15 devices' emissions in the 72-76 MHz and adjacent bands. It is also 18 times higher (25 dB more power) than the out-of-band emissions limit that applies to Part 15 personal/portable TV bands devices that operate in bands adjacent to occupied TV channels, which corresponds to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-160A1.txt
  • BPL systems to protect licensed services. Measurement Distance Extrapolation Issues The Extrapolation Factor Overview. In the BPL Order, the Commission set forth guidelines for measurement of the emissions from Access BPL systems. These guidelines, inter alia, specify that emissions from Access BPL devices operating below 30 MHz are to be measured for compliance with the radiated emissions limits in Section 15.209 of the rules. Those limits are based on measurements made at 30-meters horizontal (lateral) distance from the device under test. However, for practical reasons associated with measurement in the field, the Access BPL measurement guidelines recommend that measurements should normally be performed at a horizontal separation distance of 10 meters from the overhead power line, and they also indicate that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.txt
  • P. Knapp, Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology, DA 09-2425, 24 FCC Rcd 13795 (2009) (waiver of Part 15 emission limits to permit the marketing and unlicensed operation of an implanted device in the 6.78 MHz band used for treating gastro-intestinal disorders); Office of Engineering and Technology Declares the Second Sight Medical Products Inc. Request for Waiver of Rule Section 15.209(a) to be a ``Permit-but-Disclose'' Proceeding for Ex Parte Purposes and Request Comment, ET Docket 11-123, Public Notice, 26 FCC Rcd 10286 (2011) (pending waiver for a retina prosthesis system for unlicensed operation under Part 15). AMF 8/15/11 ex parte at 3. See also ARRL Comments at 12 (describing how the implants are designed to ``function in such a way as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1.txt
  • 78-81 GHz frequency band. The FOD detection radar most closely resembles vehicular radars permitted under Section 15.253 of our Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.253, so we will use the out-of-band emissions mask applicable to those vehicular radars for the purposes of this waiver. Specifically, radiated emissions below 40 GHz shall not exceed the general Part 15 emission limits in Section 15.209 of our Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.209, and radiated emissions outside the operating band and between 40 GHz and 200 GHz shall not exceed 600 pW/cm2 at a distance of three meters from the exterior surface of the radiating structure. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.253(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 90.175(j)(6). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 5 U.S.C. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 78-81 GHz frequency band. The FOD detection radar most closely resembles vehicular radars permitted under Section 15.253 of our Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.253, so we will use the out-of-band emissions mask applicable to those vehicular radars for the purposes of this waiver. Specifically, radiated emissions below 40 GHz shall not exceed the general Part 15 emission limits in Section 15.209 of our Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.209, and radiated emissions outside the operating band and between 40 GHz and 200 GHz shall not exceed 600 pW/cm2at a distance of three meters from the exterior surface of the radiating structure. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.253(c). 35See 47 C.F.R. � 90.175(j)(6). 17481 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-185 coordinate license applications with the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.txt
  • in this section shall not exceed 279 �W /cm2 at a distance of 3 meters from the exterior surface of the radiating structure. (c) The power density of any emissions outside the operating band shall consist solely of spurious emissions and shall not exceed the following: (1) Radiated emissions below 40 GHz shall not exceed the general limits in � 15.209. (2) Radiated emissions outside the operating band and between 40 GHz and 200 GHz shall not exceed the following: (i) For field disturbance sensors operating in the band 46.7-46.9 GHz: 2 pW/cm� at a distance of 3 meters from the exterior surface of the radiating structure. (ii) For field disturbance sensors operating in the band 76-77 GHz: 600 pW/cm� at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.txt
  • much lower for pulsed LPR emissions. LPR devices do not establish communications networks, and there is minimal likelihood that two or more devices will emit simultaneously within close proximity of one another. Most LPR devices on the U.S. market currently operate on an unlicensed basis at 6 GHz, 24 GHz, or 26 GHz under the general emission limits in Section 15.209 of the Commission's rules. LPR users select an LPR based on its frequency bands of operation according to the type of substance being measured and the installation. For example, LPR devices operating in the 6 GHz frequency range are often used for applications where the substance to be measured has high contamination or severe foaming characteristics; because the dust or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-36A1.txt
  • the operating channel of a TV bands device, the Commission required that these emissions be at least 55 dB below the highest emission in the operating channel, with both the in-band and out-of-band emissions measured with a 100 kHz bandwidth. Emissions that are more than one channel removed from the operating channel must comply with the limits specified in Section 15.209 of the rules. These field strength limits, measured at a distance of 3 meters, are 100 microvolts per meter (30-88 MHz), 150 microvolts per meter (88-216 MHz), 200 microvolts per meter (216-960 MHz), and 500 microvolts per meter (above 960 MHz). In the Second MO&O, the Commission modified the limits for emissions that fall in TV channels adjacent to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-208A1.pdf
  • operating conditions under Part 15 are that the operator must accept whatever interference is received and must correct whatever interference is caused. Should harmful interference occur, the operator is required to immediately correct the interference problem, even if correction of the problem requires ceasing operation of the system causing the interference. See 47 CFR � 15.5. See 47 CFR � 15.209. See 47 CFR �� 15.215-15.407. In some cases, operation at the higher emission levels within these designated frequency bands is limited to specific applications. The sensitive bands referenced here are bands employed by radio services that must function, as a nature of their operation, using extremely low received signal levels. These systems may be passive, such as radio astronomy, or
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.txt
  • or digitally modulated intentional radiator is operating, the radio frequency power than is produced by the intentional radiator shall be at least 20 dB below that in the 100 kHz bandwidth within the band that contains the highest level of the desired power, based on either an RF conducted or a radiated measurement. Attenuation below the general limits specified in �15.209(a) is not required. In addition, radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands, as defined in � 15.205(a), must also comply with the radiated emission limits specified in � 15.209(a) (see � 15.205(c)). (d) For direct sequence spread spectrum and digitally modulated systems, the peak power spectral density conducted from the intentional radiator to the antenna shall not be greater
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-280705A1.html
  • a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular mail, to Michael H. Glass at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Leroy Hall District Director New Orleans Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S:S: 11.35, 73.1745(a); 47 U.S.C. S: 301. 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b). Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 216-960 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 200 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209. On January 15, 2008, the measurements indicated that the signals were 4,044 times greater, than the maximum permissible level for a non-licensed Part 15 transmitter. Section
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3105A1.html
  • the Los Angeles Office conducted an investigation at California Speedway. Using a FCC Mobile Digital Direction Finding vehicle and direction finding techniques, the agents detected radio transmissions on frequency 104.7 MHz from a location in the middle of the grounds of California Speedway. Field strength measurements revealed that the radio emissions exceeded the levels allowed for non-licensed operation under Sections 15.209(a) and 15.239(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').6 The measured field strength was 63,500 V/m or 254 times that permitted by the rules. 7. California Speedway argues that the facts cited in the NAL do not support the conclusion that it engaged in unlicensed operation.7 It argues that the NAL cites only that California Speedway's equipment exceeded permissible emission limits.8 Although,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2904A1.html
  • noncommercial educational FM broadcast stations that have been required by the Commission to change frequencies. See 47 C.F.R. 73.501. 5Operation of a non-licensed, low-powered transmitter on frequency 87.9 MHz is restricted to periodic operation, which is generally used for the transmission of control signals, such as those used with alarm systems, garage door openers and remote switches. See 47 C.F.R. 15.209, 15.231. Because operation on frequency 87.9 MHz must be limited in duration, continuous operation is not permitted. 6Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1442A1.html
  • the transmitter demonstrates compliance with the peak conducted power limits. If the transmitter complies with the conducted power limits based on the use of RMS averaging over a time interval, as permitted under paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the attenuation required under this paragraph shall be 30 dB instead of 20 dB. Attenuation below the general limits specified in Sec. 15.209(a) is not required. In addition, radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands, as defined in Sec. 15.205(a), must also comply with the radiated emission limits specified in Sec. 15.209(a) (see Sec. 15.205(c)). 7. Furthermore, in accepting the grant of an equipment authorization, AboCom warranted that: each unit of equipment marketed under such grant and bearing the identification specified in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2350A1.html
  • amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve CSI's marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States that do not comply with the radiated emission limits set forth in Section 15.209 of the Rules and the periodic operation limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. CSI manufactures and markets the PT-1 "Petlocator" transmitter, which is used to track pets, children and model airplanes. Transmitters and other intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1486A1.html
  • Operations, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1A625, Washington, D.C. 20554. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by First Class and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Parker Construction, Inc. at its address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis P. Carlton Regional Director, South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S 301. Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 88-216 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 150 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S 15.209. Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200732700008 (Enf. Bur., Tampa Office, January 24, 2007) ("NAL"). 47 U.S.C. S 503(b). 47 C.F.R. S 1.80. 47
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1673A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Audio Direct is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1674A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Buy.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On March
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1675A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Audio Discounters is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1676A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Ambient Weather is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1754A1.html
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Chumbo.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On April
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1756A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that CompSource, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1757A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Cybergiftcenter.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1758A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Dealznet.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On April
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1763A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that TheElectronicCompany.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On April
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1764A1.html
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Focus Camera, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 device. On
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1766A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Fadfusion is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On April
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1767A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that DSMiller.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On April
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-299A1.html
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices ("jammers"). II. background 2. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information, through several informal complaints, alleging that RMR was manufacturing and marketing unauthorized police radar jammers in the United States. The Division's investigation
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-304A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Auto-Radar-Detectors.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices in the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-307A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Best Radar Detectors, were marketing police radar jamming devices
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-308A1.html
  • in Section 15.3(o) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(o). In addition, the OET Laboratory's tests indicated that the RMR-C450 device produced a radiated emission at 11.23 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.205, and that this radiated emission substantially exceeds the radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.209. The OET Laboratory also concluded that the RMR-C450 device was improperly certified. In this regard, the OET Laboratory noted that the grant of certification issued for the RMR-C450 device indicates that the device was tested as an "unintentional radiator." As explained above, however, the OET Laboratory found that the device is an intentional
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-309A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Global Trade Group, Inc., were marketing police radar jamming
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-310A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Hoeffener International, were marketing police radar jamming devices in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-311A1.html
  • in Section 15.3(o) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(o). In addition, the OET Laboratory's tests indicated that the RMR-C450 device produced a radiated emission at 11.23 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.205, and that this radiated emission substantially exceeds the radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.209. The OET Laboratory also concluded that the RMR-C450 device was improperly certified. In this regard, the OET Laboratory noted that the grant of certification issued for the RMR-C450 device indicates that the device was tested as an "unintentional radiator." As explained above, however, the OET Laboratory found that the device is an intentional
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-312A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radarjammers.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices in the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-313A1.html
  • in Section 15.3(o) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(o). In addition, the OET Laboratory's tests indicated that the RMR-C450 device produced a radiated emission at 11.23 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.205, and that this radiated emission substantially exceeds the radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.209. The OET Laboratory also concluded that the RMR-C450 device was improperly certified. In this regard, the OET Laboratory noted that the grant of certification issued for the RMR-C450 device indicates that the device was tested as an "unintentional radiator." As explained above, however, the OET Laboratory found that the device is an intentional
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3266A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Overseas Best Buy, Inc. dba 110220volts.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3270A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3392A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that ShoppersChoice.com, LLC is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3393A1.html
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Shopila Corporation is marketing the RMR-C450 device. On July 12, 2007,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3483A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Gain Saver is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3599A1.html
  • 14, 2007 Released: August 16, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) against Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices. 2. On January 31, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $25,000 to RMR. RMR has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on the information
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-808A1.html
  • CFXPT-1. 2. On July 28, 2006, the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") Laboratory requested a sample unit of CSI's PT-1 Petlocator transmitter, which CSI promptly provided. Thereafter, on October 3, 2006, the Bureau by letter advised CSI that testing conducted by OET indicated that the sample unit substantially exceeded radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified by Section 15.209 of the Rules and did not comply with the periodic operation limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules, and requested further information with respect to the sale and marketing of the device. CSI promptly provided all information requested on October 10, 2006. 3. On November 22, 2006, the Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division released a Notice of Apparent Liability
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2516A1.html
  • copy of this Order shall be sent by First Class and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Dale Lloyd Allred at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis P. Carlton Regional Director, South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C S:S: 301, 333. The interfering transmissions were brief microphone key "clicks" immediately followed by a series of DTMF tones. Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 88-216 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 150 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209. Mr. Allred's transmissions triggered Dalton Communications' repeater, which was located 3.7 miles away from the TCC Shop. Devices compliant with Part 15 typically have a range
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1626A1.html
  • No. EB-08-SE-695 Dear Mr. Cleveland: This is an official CITATION, issued to Hobby Lobby International, Inc. ("HLI") pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.209, and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 1.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1823A1.html
  • File No. EB-09-SE-133 Dear Mr. Olin: This is an official CITATION issued to Costco Warehouse Corporation ("Costco"), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera ("Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1824A1.html
  • File No. EB-09-SE-134 Dear Mr. Dach: This is an official CITATION issued to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart"), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera ("Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2426A1.html
  • EB-09-SE-136 Dear Mr. Hsia: This is an official CITATION, issued to Team Research, Inc. ("Team Research") pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing a non-compliant radio frequency device, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera ("Astak CM-918T2"), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2306A1.html
  • (Enf. Bur., Miami Office, rel. April 19, 2007) (proposing $10,000 forfeiture); Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200832600001 (Enf. Bur., Miami Office, rel. September 25, 2008) (proposing $20,000 forfeiture). 47 U.S.C. S: 301. On December 27, 2006 and January 11, 2007, agents observed a Yagi-type antenna mounted at the roof level in the back of the residence. Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting between 216-960 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 200 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209. Devices compliant with Part 15 typically have a range of less than one mile. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.106. NAL, NAL/Acct. No. 200732600001 (Enf. Bur., Miami Office, rel.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1756A1.html
  • 18, 2008). Section 15.239 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 88 to 108 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 250 mV/m at three meters. See 47 C.F.R. S: 15.239. Fundamental emissions from intentional radiators are not permitted in the band 76 to 88 MHz. See 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a). On April 28, 2009, the measurements indicated that the signal was more than 4,000 times greater than the maximum permissible level for a non-licensed Part 15 transmitter in the 88 to 108 MHz band and more than 10,000 times greater than the maximum permissible level in the 76 to 88 MHz band. On April 29, 2009, the measurements indicated that
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-408A1.html
  • www.securitymaninc.com. The staff observed that SecurityMan was marketing the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera. Subsequently, Enforcement Bureau staff purchased a SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, and forwarded it to the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") Laboratory for testing. The OET Laboratory's tests demonstrated that the SecurityMan SM-302T does not comply with the radiated emission limits specified in sections 15.249(d) and 15.209 of the rules. As part of the investigation, the Enforcement Bureau sent a letter of inquiry ("LOI") to SecurityMan on March 18, 2010. 4. In your April 14, 2010 response to the LOI, you admit that SecurityMan imports and distributes the SecurityMan SM-302T (factory model AT202-900) in the United States. You indicated, however, that SecurityMan "does not engineer and design
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-475A1.html
  • Requested, and regular mail, to Arthur Lee Young at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Douglas Miller District Director Atlanta Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S:S: 301, 303(n). Part 15 of the Rules sets out the conditions and technical requirements under which certain radio transmission devices may be used without a license. In relevant part, Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 30-88 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 100 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209. In addition, our records show that, in 2004, we informed Mr. Young that his unlicensed broadcast operation was in violation of the Act and, thereby, ordered
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc0082.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc0082.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc0082.txt
  • March 9, 2000 By the Commission: 1. In this order, we affirm a $5,000 forfeiture assessed against Edwin Valentin by the former Compliance and Information Bureau for operating an unlicensed FM radio station on frequency 106.3 MHz in Pontiac, Michigan, in contravention of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 301, and Sections 15.209 and 15.239 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 15.209 and 15.239. 2. In 1997, the Commission's Detroit Field Office investigated complaints that an unlicensed FM radio station was broadcasting on 106.3 MHz in the Detroit, Michigan area, and eventually determined that Rev. Edwin Valentin was operating the unlicensed radio station. On December 10, 1997, the Detroit Field Office
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012818.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012818.pdf
  • Allocation and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations * 47 C.F.R. 2.803 Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization * Fifties Communications, San Juan, PR. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (10/15/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 Radio Frequency Devices * 47 C.F.R. 15.5 General Conditions of Operation * Eric P. Knudsen, Vancouver, WA. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. 15.209 (Radiated Emission Limits; General Requirements) and 15.245 (Operation Within the Bands 902-928 MHz, 2435-2465 MHz, 5785-5815 MHz, 10500-10550 MHz, and 24075-24175 MHz. Portland, OR Resident Agent Office (10/1/01). References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012818.pdf 2. http://www.fcc.gov/ 3. ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/fc020152.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/fc020152.txt
  • shall have practical utility. 629 This limit on the field strength radiated by telemetry operations will apply at the location of any healthcare facility employing WMTS equipment in the 1395-1400 MHz band. Healthcare facilities are defined in 47 C.F.R � 95.1103(b). 630 Joint Agreement at 3-4. 631 Id. 632 See 47 C.F.R. �� 27.53(a)(4) and 90.210(m). 633 47 C.F.R. � 15.209(d). 634 See Pub. L. No. 104-13. Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-152 79 � The accuracy of the Commission's burden estimates. � Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected. � Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/fcc00082.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/fcc00082.txt
  • March 9, 2000 By the Commission: 1. In this order, we affirm a $5,000 forfeiture assessed against Edwin Valentin by the former Compliance and Information Bureau for operating an unlicensed FM radio station on frequency 106.3 MHz in Pontiac, Michigan, in contravention of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 301, and Sections 15.209 and 15.239 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 15.209 and 15.239. 2. In 1997, the Commission's Detroit Field Office investigated complaints that an unlicensed FM radio station was broadcasting on 106.3 MHz in the Detroit, Michigan area, and eventually determined that Rev. Edwin Valentin was operating the unlicensed radio station. On December 10, 1997, the Detroit Field Office
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00163.doc
  • Second, we believe that there are a broad variety of potential applications for UWB technology, each of which has unique spectrum attributes and requirements. Third, we note that the various regions of the spectrum have different propagation characteristics. As Arthur D. Little, Inc. points out, for example, an UWB signal operating at the general emission limits in 47 C.F.R. � 15.209 would fall below a victim receiver's thermal noise at a distance of 40 meters at 500 MHz, and at a distance of 10 meters at 5 GHz. We have developed a number of alternative proposals based on these considerations. We observe that GPRs must operate at frequencies in the region below 2 GHz in order to obtain the penetration depth
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.txt
  • or digitally modulated intentional radiator is operating, the radio frequency power than is produced by the intentional radiator shall be at least 20 dB below that in the 100 kHz bandwidth within the band that contains the highest level of the desired power, based on either an RF conducted or a radiated measurement. Attenuation below the general limits specified in �15.209(a) is not required. In addition, radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands, as defined in � 15.205(a), must also comply with the radiated emission limits specified in � 15.209(a) (see � 15.205(c)). (d) For direct sequence spread spectrum and digitally modulated systems, the peak power spectral density conducted from the intentional radiator to the antenna shall not be greater
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00029.doc
  • Time Domain and Zircon on January 28, 1998, February 2, 1998, and April 14, 1998, respectively. The U.S. Radar and Time Domain waiver petitions were placed on public notice as ``permit but disclose'' proceedings for ex parte purposes on February 6, 1998. The Zircon waiver petition was placed on public notice May 18, 1998. See 47 CFR Sections 15.205 and 15.209. The restricted bands are frequency bands allocated for safety-related purposes or bands that are employed by radio services that must function, as a nature of their operation, using extremely low received signal levels. These latter systems may be passive, such as radio astronomy, or active, such as satellite down links and wildlife tracking systems. Eleven comments were filed in response
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2000/da000705.doc
  • the emission, after being corrected by the antenna factor, cable loss, pre-amp gain, etc., is the peak field strength, which must comply with the limit specified in Section 15.35(b). Submit this data. Now set the VBW to 10 Hz, while maintaining all of the other instrument settings. This peak level, once corrected, must comply with the limit specified in Section 15.209. If the dwell time per channel of the hopping signal is less than 100 ms, then the reading obtained with the 10 Hz VBW may be further adjusted by a ``duty cycle correction factor'', derived from 20log(dwell time/100 ms), in an effort to demonstrate compliance with the 15.209 limit. Submit this data. If the emission on which a radiated measurement
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1998/dd980312.html
  • No: DS-1821. Released: March 11, 1998. SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INFORMATION - RE: SATELLITE RADIO APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING. Internet URL: [11]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/pnin80 57.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- EDWIN VALENTIN D/B/A MUSICAL RADIO - PONTIAC, MI. Ordered that Edwin Valentin is liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $5,000 for violating Section 301 of the Communications Act and Sections 15.209 and 15.239 of the Commission's rules by operating an unauthorized radio transmitting facility. Action by Bureau Chief. by Notice of Forfeiture. (DA No. 98-487). CIB Internet URL: [12]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Notices/da980487.txt * * * * * The following items are corrections from previous Daily Digests. Falcon Classic Cable Order (DA 98-486), released March 11 and listed on March 11 Daily Digest should have
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070419.html
  • Products, Inc. for marketing unauthorized RF devices and illegal importation of RF devices. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-1753). EB [19]DA-07-1753A1.doc [20]DA-07-1753A1.pdf [21]DA-07-1753A1.txt DEALZNET.COM. Issued an Official Citation to Dealznet.com for marketing police radar jamming devices, RMR-201 and RMR-C450 manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar in violation of Section 302(b) and Sections 2.803,15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-1758). EB [22]DA-07-1758A1.doc [23]DA-07-1758A1.pdf [24]DA-07-1758A1.txt CHUMBO CORPORATION. Issued an Official Citation to Chumbo Corporation for marketing a police radar jamming device, the RMR-450 device from Rocky Mountain Radar in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070420.html
  • a $11,200 forfeiture against Vitec Group Communications Limited for marketing unauthorized RF devices in the United States. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 04/18/2007 by MO&O. (DA No. 07-1760). EB [24]DA-07-1760A1.doc [25]DA-07-1760A1.pdf [26]DA-07-1760A1.txt FADFUSION. Issued an Official Citation to Fadfusion for marketing police radar jamming devices in the U.S. in violation of Sections 302(b) of the Act, Sections 2.803,15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-1766). EB [27]DA-07-1766A1.doc [28]DA-07-1766A1.pdf [29]DA-07-1766A1.txt DSMILLER.COM. Issued an Official Citation to DSMiller.com for marketing police radar jamming devices in the U.S. in violation of Sections 302(b) of the Act, Sections 2.803,15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070622.html
  • Bureau. Adopted: 06/14/2007 by NALF. (DA No. 07-2374). MB [37]DA-07-2374A1.doc [38]DA-07-2374A1.pdf [39]DA-07-2374A1.txt MODIFICATION OF PARTS 2 AND 15 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES FOR UNLICENSED DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT APPROVAL. Dismissed the Petitions for Reconsideration. (Dkt No. 03-201). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 06/19/2007 by MO&O. (FCC No. 07-117). OET [40]FCC-07-117A1.doc [41]FCC-07-117A1.pdf [42]FCC-07-117A1.txt THE RAIL NEWORK, INC. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SECTION 15.209 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Dismissed the Petition for Waiver. (Dkt No. 06-161). Action by: Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology by LETTER. (DA No. 07-2734). OET [43]DA-07-2734A1.pdf [44]DA-07-2734A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED JUNE 21, 2007, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 119: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SUNSHINE NOTICE ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- FCC TO HOLD OPEN MEETING THURSDAY, JUNE 28,2007 IN PORTLAND, MAINE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070718.html
  • by: Deputy Chief, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau. Adopted: 07/12/2007 by ORDER. (DA No. 07-3278). CGB [67]DA-07-3278A1.doc [68]DA-07-3278A1.pdf [69]DA-07-3278A1.txt OVERSEAS BEST BUY, INC. DBA 110220VOLTS.COM. Issued an Official Citation to Overseas Best Buy, Inc. dba 110220volts.com for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, radar jammers, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-3266). EB [70]DA-07-3266A1.doc [71]DA-07-3266A1.pdf [72]DA-07-3266A1.txt DTV TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. Denied the Petition for Rule Making. Action by: Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 07/13/2007 by R&O. (DA No. 07-3246). MB [73]DA-07-3246A1.doc [74]DA-07-3246A1.pdf [75]DA-07-3246A1.txt KCCP TRUST D/B/A TIME WARNER CABLE. Granted effective competition petition
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070719.html
  • Due: 08/02/2007. Reply Comments Due: 08/09/2007. WCB. Contact: Tracey Wilson-Parker at (202) 418-1394, or Jodie May at (202) 418-0913 [10]DA-07-3315A1.doc [11]DA-07-3315A1.pdf [12]DA-07-3315A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- UNBEATABLESALE.COM, INC. Issued an Official Citation to Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, radar jammers, in the U.S. in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-3270). EB [13]DA-07-3270A1.doc [14]DA-07-3270A1.pdf [15]DA-07-3270A1.txt MEDIACOM ILLINOIS AND MEDIACOM CALIFORNIA. Granted the petitions for a determination of effective competition filed by Mediacom Illinois LLC and Mediacom California LLC. Action by: Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 07/16/2007 by MO&O. (DA No. 07-3254). MB [16]DA-07-3254A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070726.html
  • Jason Brown at (202) 418-0310 [10]DOC-275523A1.pdf [11]DOC-275523A1.txt Released: 07/26/2007. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS AND POST-REPLY COMMENT PERIOD FILING IN PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSURE PROCEEDINGS (2 OF 2). OMD. Contact: Jason Brown at (202) 418-0310 [12]DOC-275524A1.pdf [13]DOC-275524A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SHOPILA CORPORATION. Issued an Official Citation to Shopila Corporation for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-3393). EB [14]DA-07-3393A1.doc [15]DA-07-3393A1.pdf [16]DA-07-3393A1.txt SHOPPERSCHOICE.COM, LLC. Issued an Official Citation to ShoopersChoice.com, LLC for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070802.html
  • the unauthorized change of subscriber's telecommunications carrier. Action by: Deputy Chief, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau. Adopted: 07/31/2007 by ORDER. (DA No. 07-3499). CGB [17]DA-07-3499A1.doc [18]DA-07-3499A1.pdf [19]DA-07-3499A1.txt GAIN SAVER. Issued an Official Citation to Gain Saver for marketing police radar jamming devices in the U.S. in violation of Sections 302(b) of the Act, Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-3483). EB [20]DA-07-3483A1.doc [21]DA-07-3483A1.pdf [22]DA-07-3483A1.txt UNION-CAROLINA BROADCASTING CO., INC. Denied the petition for reconsideration. Action by: Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-3503). MB [23]DA-07-3503A1.doc [24]DA-07-3503A1.pdf [25]DA-07-3503A1.txt LEON F. PETTERSEN. Granted in part and denied in part Petition for Reconsideration, deemed filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd091120.html
  • 09-2455). MB [42]DA-09-2455A1.doc [43]DA-09-2455A1.pdf [44]DA-09-2455A1.txt AMENDMENT OF SECTION 73.622(I), POST-TRANSITION TABLE OF DTV ALLOTMENTS, TELEVISION BROADCAST STATIONS, FORT MYERS, FL. Channel substitution for station WINK-TV from channel 9 to 50. (Dkt No. 09-170 RM-11567 ). Action by: Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 11/19/2009 by R&O. (DA No. 09-2456). MB [45]DA-09-2456A1.doc [46]DA-09-2456A1.pdf [47]DA-09-2456A1.txt ENTEROMEDICS, INC. Waived the requirements of Section 15.209 to allow EntroMedics to obtain certification for and market its Maestro RC and RF models of implantable medical devices. Action by: Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology. Adopted: 11/20/2009 by LETTER. (DA No. 09-2425). OET [48]DA-09-2425A1.doc [49]DA-09-2425A1.pdf [50]DA-09-2425A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED NOVEMBER 19, 2009, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 228: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd110720.html
  • TELEVISION RELAY SERVICE (CARS) APPLICATIONS RE: ACTIONS ON PENDING APPLICATIONS. MB . Contact: (202) 418-7000 [9]DOC-308468A1.pdf [10]DOC-308468A1.txt Report No: 1875 Released: 07/20/2011. CABLE TELEVISION RELAY SERVICE (CARS) APPLICATIONS RE: APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING. MB . Contact: (202) 418-7000 [11]DOC-308472A1.pdf [12]DOC-308472A1.txt Released: 07/20/2011. OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY DECLARES THE SECOND SIGHT MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF RULE SECTION 15.209(A) TO BE A "PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSE" PROCEEDING FOR EX PARTE PURPOSES AND REQUESTS COMMENT. (DA No. 11-1213). (Dkt No 11-123 ). Comments Due: 08/19/2011. Reply Comments Due: 09/02/2011. OET . Contact: Aole Wilkins at (202) 418- 2406. News Media Contact: Bruce Romano at (202) 418-2124 [13]DA-11-1213A1.doc [14]DA-11-1213A1.pdf [15]DA-11-1213A1.txt Released: 07/20/2011. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS AND POST-REPLY COMMENT PERIOD FILING IN PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSURE PROCEEDINGS. OMD
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd111201.html
  • TO DISCONTINUE DOMESTIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES. (DA No. 11-1959). (Dkt No 11-194 ). Comments Due: 12/15/2011. WCB . Contact: Rodney McDonald at (202) 418-7513; Rodney.Mcdonald@fcc.gov; Carmell Weathers at (202) 418-2325; Email: Carmell.Weathers@fcc.gov, TTY: (202) 418-0484 [32]DA-11-1959A1.doc [33]DA-11-1959A1.pdf [34]DA-11-1959A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SECOND SIGHT MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. Granted the request of Second Sight Medical Products, Inc. for waiver of Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's rules to allow it to obtain FCC certification for and market its Argus II TM Retinal Prosthesis System. (Dkt No. 11-123 ). Action by: Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology by LETTER. (DA No. 11-1951). OET [35]DA-11-1951A1.doc [36]DA-11-1951A1.pdf [37]DA-11-1951A1.txt AMENDMENT OF PARTS 2 AND 95 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SPECTRUM FOR THE MEDICAL DEVICE
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2002/DOC-238053A1.html
  • 15 of the Commission's Rules allows operation of certain very low power devices without issuance of an individual license provided the devices meet equipment authorization requirements and the strict radiation limits of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. 15.1, et seq. The device operated by Accessory far exceeded the allowed radiation limits for such low-power non-licensed devices. See 47 C.F.R. 15.209. 3 See 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), 15.209, and 15.5. 4 Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2002/DOC-238293A1.html
  • Brockway freely admitted to operating an unlicensed station on 101.9 MHz. After the interview, Commission agents hand-delivered an Unlicensed Warning Letter to Mr. Brockway. The agents requested to inspect the radio station, and Mr. Brockway refused and continued transmitting on 101.9 MHz. Field strength measurements revealed that Mr. Brockway's radio emission exceeded the level allowed for non-licensed operation under Sections 15.209(a) and 15.239(b) of the Rules.3 The measured field strength at the edge of the property was 1,084mV/m, or over 130 times that expected for a legally operating Part 15 device capable of producing a maximum field of 250mV/m at 3 meters from the device. 4. On January 25, 2001, Commission agents returned to Kalispell, Montana, monitored, observed continuing transmission on
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2002/DOC-238350A1.html
  • California Speedway at 9300 Cherry Avenue in Fontana, California. Using a FCC Mobile Digital Direction Finding vehicle and direction finding techniques, the agents detected radio transmissions on the frequency 104.7 MHz from a location in the middle of the grounds of California Speedway. Field strength measurements revealed that the radio emissions exceeded the level allowed for non-licensed operation under Sections 15.209(a) and 15.239(b) of the FCC Rules.3 The measured field strength was 63,500 mV/m, or 254 times that permitted by the rules. III. DISCUSSION 6. Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions of any license, or willfully fails to comply with any of the provisions of the Act
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-244167A1.html
  • frequency 87.9 MHz is restricted to periodic operation and is generally used for the transmission of a control signal such as those used with alarm systems, garage door openers, remote switches, etc. Because operation on this frequency must be limited in duration, continuous operation of a non- licensed, low-powered transmitter is not permitted on 87.9 MHz. See 47 C.F.R. ' 15.209 and 15.231. 5 The term ``repeated,'' when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, ``means the commission or omission of such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day.'' 47 U.S.C. 312(f)(2). 6 Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-246123A1.html
  • Section 15.219(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.219(b), specifies that the total length of the transmission line, antenna and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed 3 meters. The station's transmission line and antenna was over 9 meters. 7 Emissions from a Part 15 transmitter, operating between 490-1705 kHz, are limited in accordance with a formula provided in Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.209(a). Applying the formula, emissions on 660 kHz are limited to 36 V/m at thirty meters. The measured field strength of the station's signal exceeded the permissible level by 2500 times. 8 Section 15.239(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.239(b), provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 88-108 MHz band is permitted only if
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-246336A1.html
  • 2 Section 15.239 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.239, provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 88- 108 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmissions does not exceed 250 V/m at three meters. Measurements showed that the field strength of the station's signal exceeded the permissible level for a non-licensed low-power radio transmitter. 3 Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.209(a), provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 30-88 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmissions does not exceed 100 V/m at three meters. Measurements showed that the field strength of the station's signal exceeded the permissible level for a non-licensed low-power radio transmitter by 24,672 times. 4 Section 312(f)(1)
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-249191A1.html
  • No. EB-04-PO- 003 ) Chino, California ) Citation No. C20043292003 CITATION Released: June 24, 2004 By the Resident Agent, Portland Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'')1, to FLECO Corporation (``FLECO'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). 2 Investigation by the FCC's Portland Office revealed that on August 5, 2003, FLECO Corporation sold two handheld wireless microphones, model WR-422-U, to the Club Works Sound and Lighting, 3385 Hawthorne Avenue, NE, Salem, Oregon (Invoice Number 425379). These wireless microphones subsequently were sold to and used by The Oasis restaurant and caused interference to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-249276A1.html
  • Oregon ) Citation No. C20043292004 CITATION Released: June 28, 2004 By the Resident Agent, Portland Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'')1, to the Club Works Sound and Lighting (``Club Works'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). 2 Investigation by the FCC's Portland Office revealed that on August 5, 2003, the Club Works Sound and Lighting bought two handheld wireless microphones, model WR-422-U, from FLECO Corporation (Invoice Number 425379). These wireless microphones subsequently were sold to and used by The Oasis restaurant and caused interference to amateur radio station WA7ABU on the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-254043A1.html
  • or imprisonment.12 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Stephen P. Lee Resident Agent Houston Office Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5) 2 47 U.S.C. 302a(b) 3 Id. See also 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1), 2.803(a)(2). 4 47 U.S.C. 301 5 See 47 C.F.R. 15.1 et seq 6 Id. 7 47 C.F.R. 15.5(b) 8 47 U.S.C. 333 9 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3) 10 47 C.F.R. 15.209 11 See Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(3) 12 18 U.S.C. 1001 References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254043A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254043A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-254544A1.html
  • commission or omission of such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day." 1547 U.S.C. 301. 16The field agents detected the signal from Silva's transmission over five miles from the location of his radio apparatus. This would indicate that the radio transmitting device used by Silva is not compliant with Section 15.209(a) of the Rules. 47 C.F.R. 15.209(a). Part 15 devices, which are non-licensed, low power devices, typically have a range of less than one mile. 1712 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. 1.80. 1847 U.S.C. 503(b)(2)(D). 1947 U.S.C. 503(b)(2)(D); 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(4); see also Forfeiture Policy Statement, 12 FCC Rcd at 17100 - 01.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260037A1.html
  • certain transmitters using or operating at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.1 et seq. Your operation on frequency 1650 kHz was measured at 7,400 microvolts per meter (V/m) at 122 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 14.5 V/m at 30 meters established in 47 C.F.R. 15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending radio
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260406A1.html
  • for the claim by reference to the financial documentation submitted. 16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this NAL shall be sent by regular mail and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Sylvane Simon at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis V. Loria District Director Boston Office Northeastern Region Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 301 2Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's rules authorizes operation of low power radio equipment without a license if the strength of the signal does not exceed the maximum signal strength at a specified distance. See 47 C.F.R. 15.209(a). The measurements showed that the field strength of the station's signal exceeded the permissible level for a non-licensed low-power radio transmitter. 3Since the June 24,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-261747A1.html
  • in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1700 kHz was measured at 27,000V/m at 35 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.118 microvolts per meter (V/m) at 30 meters for non- licensed devices operating on frequencies between 490 kHz and 1705 kHz. See 47 C.F.R. 15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending radio
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-263484A1.html
  • the claim by reference to the financial documentation submitted. 16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this NAL shall be sent by regular mail and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Jean Harold Marius at his record of address. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis V. Loria District Director Boston Office Northeastern Region Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 301 2Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's rules authorizes operation of low power radio equipment without a license if the strength of the signal does not exceed the maximum signal strength at a specified distance. See 47 C.F.R. 15.209(a). The measurements showed that the field strength of the station's signal exceeded the permissible level for a non-licensed low-power radio transmitter. 347 U.S.C. 301. 4Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-264273A1.html
  • D.C. 20554. 17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular mail, to Gary Toussaint at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis Loria District Director, Boston Office Northeast Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S 301 47 U.S.C. S 503(b). Section 15.209(a) of the Rules authorizes operation of low power radio equipment without a license if the strength of the signal does not exceed the maximum signal strength at a specified distance. See 47 C.F.R. S 15.209(a). The measurements taken on August 10, 2005 showed that the field strength of the station's signal was 79,332 times the permissible level for a non-licensed
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-266879A1.html
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular mail, to Shawn Deroux at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Daniel W. Noel District Director New York Office Northeast Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. SS 301, 303(n). 47 U.S.C. S 503(b). Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 30-88 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 100 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S 15.209. Measurements showed that the field strength of the station's signal exceeded the permissible level for a non-licensed Part 15 transmitter. Deroux initially identified himself as Shawn
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269874A1.html
  • of the Rules. According to the equipment's specifications, it operates at power levels far in excess of the general radiated emission limit specified in Part 15. Also according to the equipment's specifications, users cannot alter the equipment's power settings. Therefore, based on the information available to us, Neptuno operated its intentional transmitters at power levels greater than allowed in Section 15.209 of the Rules. Because Neptuno failed to comply with the conditions set forth in Part 15 of the Rules, it was not authorized to operate its transmitters without a license. According to information in the Commission's database, Neptuno holds no authorization to transmit in the U-NII band. 11. Based on the evidence and technical information before us, we find that
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269876A1.html
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular mail, to Parker Construction, Inc. at its address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Ralph M. Barlow District Director Tampa Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S 301. 47 U.S.C. S 503(b). Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 88-216 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 150 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S 15.209. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-273578A1.html
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested and regular mail, to Eliandro B. Ramos at 10 Hobson Street, Danbury, CT, 06810. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis Loria District Director Boston Office Northeast Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S 301. 47 U.S.C. S 503(b). Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting between 216-960 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 200 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S 15.209. Devices compliant with Part 15 typically have a range of less than one mile. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.106. 47 C.F.R. S 2.106, Federal Government Footnote G27.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-273681A1.html
  • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be hand delivered to Adilson Alves de Almeida at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus D. Stevens Resident Agent Miami Field Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S 301. 47 U.S.C. S 503(b). Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting between 216-960 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 200 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S 15.209. Devices compliant with Part 15 typically have a range of less than one mile. 47 C.F.R. S 2.106. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 312(f)(1),
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-275720A1.html
  • operating in accordance with this chapter." Section 15.3(n) defines an incidental radiator as "[a] device that generates radio frequency energy during the course of its operation although the device is not intentionally designed to generate or emit radio frequency energy." Lubbock Power & Light's electrical distribution system is an incidental radiator and violates Section 15.5(b) of the Rules. 4. Section 15.209 sets the general radiated emission limits for intentional radiators. The limit for the band 30 to 88 MHz is 100 micro-volts per meter measured at 3 meters. The attached list of strong electrical arcing points appears to exceed the value allowed even for intentional radiators. 5. Violations of the Act or the Commission's Rules may subject the violator to substantial
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-275721A1.html
  • communication service operating in accordance with this chapter." Section 15.3(n) defines an incidental radiator as "[a] device that generates radio frequency energy during the course of its operation although the device is not intentionally designed to generate or emit radio frequency energy." Xcel Energy's electrical distribution system is an incidental radiator and violates Section 15.5(b) of the Rules. 4. Section 15.209 sets the general radiated emission limits for intentional radiators. The limit for the band 30 to 88 MHz is 100 micro-volts per meter measured at 3 meters. The attached list of strong electrical arcing points appears to exceed the value allowed even for intentional radiators. 5. Violations of the Act or the Commission's Rules may subject the violator to substantial
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-277833A1.html
  • P. Lee Resident Agent Houston Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S 301. 47 U.S.C. S 503(b). At either power setting, use of the ICOM radio as manufactured, would exceed Part 15 limits. Moreover, the ICOM radio did not bear a label that it complies with Part 15 of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. S 15.19. Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting between 216-960 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 200 uV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. 15.209. Devices compliant with Part 15 typically have a range of less than one mile. See 47 C.F.R. S 90.20(c)(3). See 47 C.F.R. S 90.20(a). Section 312(f)(1) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-278979A1.html
  • operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1700 kHz was measured at 168.8 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 265 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.12 uV/m at 30 meters for non-licensed devices set out in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209. Further, the station's operation did not comply with the alternative operating requirements for stations operating in the band 510-1705 kHz that are set out in Section 15.219 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.219. Specifically, the agents measured the input power to the final radio frequency stage and found it to be 1200
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-279229A1.html
  • using or operating at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. Your operation on frequency 1620 kHz was measured at 65,000 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 100 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 14.8 uV/m at 30 meters established in 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-280559A1.html
  • Regulatory Review - Amendment of Part 97 of the Commission's Amateur Service Rules, 13 FCC Rcd 15798 (1998). 47 C.F.R. S: 97.103(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 97.301. See 47 C.F.R. S: 97.303, citing Sections 2.105, 2.106 of the Rules. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.106. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.106, Federal Government Footnote G27. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.106, Federal Government Footnote G100. Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 216-960 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 200 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209. Devices compliant with Part 15 typically have a range of less than one mile and are certified for use by the FCC for power levels less
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-280705A1.html
  • a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular mail, to Michael H. Glass at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Leroy Hall District Director New Orleans Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S:S: 11.35, 73.1745(a); 47 U.S.C. S: 301. 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b). Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 216-960 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 200 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209. On January 15, 2008, the measurements indicated that the signals were 4,044 times greater, than the maximum permissible level for a non-licensed Part 15 transmitter. Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-282597A1.html
  • California 94040 ) CITATION Released: May 27, 2008 By the District Director, San Francisco District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to New Tung Kee Noodle House No 4, Inc., ("New Tung Kee") a/k/a Luu Noodle Restaurant, for violation of Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's Rules. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's San Francisco Office revealed that on February 26, 2008, New Tung Kee operated a "Pokky" Point of Sale ("POS") transmitting device on 433.92 MHz. The Pokky POS transmitting device was not labeled, as required by Section 15.19(a) of the Rules, and a review of the Commission's databases revealed that the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-284465A1.html
  • certain transmitters using or operating at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. Your operation on frequency 1500 kHz was measured at 30,000 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 30 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 16 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules. Additionally, this station failed to comply with the other sections applicable to the operation of AM band transmitters in Part 15. Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-286430A1.html
  • shall be sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular mail, to Dale Lloyd Allred at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Douglas G. Miller Atlanta Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C S:S: 301, 333. 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b). The interfering transmissions were brief microphone key "clicks" immediately followed by a series of DTMF tones. Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 88-216 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 150 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209. Mr. Allred's transmissions triggered Dalton Communications' repeater, which was located 3.7 miles away from the TCC Shop. Devices compliant with Part 15 typically have a range
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-286483A1.html
  • for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. Your operation on frequency 1500 kHz was measured at 49,500 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 1,763 meters. This exceeds the allowable limit of 16 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules. Additionally, this station failed to comply with the other sections applicable to the operation of AM band transmitters in Part 15. Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-286663A1.html
  • power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1610 kHz was measured at 35,000 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 252 meters. This exceeds the allowable limit of 15 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules. Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-286665A1.html
  • 87.90 MHz at this location in Greeley, CO. Radio stations must be licensed by the FCC pursuant to 47 U.S.C. S: 301. The only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.209. The field strength of the signal on frequency 87.90 MHz was measured at 47,572 microvolt per meter (uV/m) at 3 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 100 uV/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices. Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-292675A1.html
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-293307A1.html
  • Office, August 18, 2008). Section 15.239 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 88 to 108 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 250 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.239. Fundamental emissions from intentional radiators are not permitted in the band 76 to 88 MHz. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a). On April 28, 2009, the measurements indicated that the signal was more than 4,000 times greater than the maximum permissible level for a non-licensed Part 15 transmitter in the 88 to 108 MHz band and more than 10,000 times greater than the maximum permissible level in the 76 to 88 MHz band. On April 29, 2009, the measurements indicated that
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-294572A1.html
  • a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1620 kHz was measured at 4000 microvolts per meter (uV/m ) at 137 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.8 uV/m (24,000/1620) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a)). In addition, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states "the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed approximately 3 meters." During the inspection on October 20, 2009, the agent observed that the vertical whip antenna used by the station was approximately 3 meters long, however, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-294719A1.html
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295051A1.html
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295060A1.html
  • level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1120 kHz was measured at 134,000 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 232 meters which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 21.43 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules. Thus, the station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization or providing services and facilities incidental to the operation of an unlicensed radio transmitter constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295062A1.html
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1590 kHz was measured at 35,000 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 30 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 15.1 uV/m (24,000/1590) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a)). In addition, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states "the total length of the transmission line, antenna and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed 3 meters." During the inspection on November 19, 2009, the agents observed that the total length of the transmission line and the antenna used by the station extended over
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295194A1.html
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295641A1.html
  • level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1580 kHz was measured at 350,000 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 46 meters which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 15.19 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules. Thus, the station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization or providing services and facilities incidental to the operation of an unlicensed radio transmitter constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295836A1.html
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1610 kHz was measured at 350 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 75 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.9 uV/m (24,000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules. (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a)). Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band, is found in 47 C.F.R. S: 15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states: "the total length of the transmission line, antenna and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed 3 meters." (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.219(b)). During the inspection
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296585A1.html
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-297432A1.html
  • operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1640 kHz was measured at 73,800 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 30 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.6 uV/m at 30 meters for non-licensed devices set out in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209. Further, the station's operation did not comply with the alternative operating requirements for stations operating in the band 510-1705 kHz that are set out in Section 15.219 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.219. Specifically, the agents measured the field strength of 19,700 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 30 meters with the 20
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-297434A1.html
  • established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1620 kHz was measured at 1400 microvolts per meter (uV/m ) at 30 meters from the base of the water reservoir tower, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.8 uV/m (24,000/1620) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a)). Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band is found in 47 C.F.R. 15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states "the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed approximately 3 meters." See 47 C.F.R. 15.219(b). During the inspection
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-297435A1.html
  • established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1620 kHz was measured at 1400 microvolts per meter (uV/m ) at 30 meters from the base of the water reservoir tower, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.8 uV/m (24,000/1620) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a)). Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band is found in 47 C.F.R. 15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states "the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed approximately 3 meters." See 47 C.F.R. 15.219(b). During the inspection
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299119A1.html
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301193A1.html
  • seq. Your operation on frequency 1710 kHz was measured at 8,000 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at approximately 580 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 100 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.223(a) for operation on 1710 kHz, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.223(a), as well as the general unlicensed limit of 30 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) for operation on 1710 kHz. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a). You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator of this illegal operation to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary forfeitures, in rem arrest action against the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301194A1.html
  • seq. Your operation on frequency 1710 kHz was measured at 14,000 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at approximately 50 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 100 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.223(a) for operation on 1710 kHz, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.223(a), as well as the general unlicensed limit of 30 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) for operation on 1710 kHz. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a). You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator of this illegal operation to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary forfeitures, in rem arrest action against the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301328A1.html
  • seq. Your operation on frequency 1710 kHz was measured at 1,200 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at approximately 320 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 100 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.223(a) for operation on 1710 kHz, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.223(a), as well as the general unlicensed limit of 30 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) for operation on 1710 kHz. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a). You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator of this illegal operation to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary forfeitures, in rem arrest action against the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301555A1.html
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301930A1.html
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1610 kHz was measured at 6,800 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 126 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.9 uV/m (24,000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a)). Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band is found in 47 C.F.R. S:15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states "the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed approximately 3 meters." (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.219(b).) During the inspection
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301931A1.html
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1640 kHz was measured at 14,500 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 62 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.6 uV/m (24,000/1640) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a)). Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band is found in 47 C.F.R. S:15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states "the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed approximately 3 meters." (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.219(b).) During the inspection
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302462A1.html
  • or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1640 kHz was measured at 3,600 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 84.1 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.6 uV/m (24000/1640) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a)). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. The field strength of the signal on frequency 98.5 MHz was measured at 6,968 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 106.3 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 250uV/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices. Thus, this station is operating
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-305522A1.html
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-306481A1.html
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1610 KHz was measured at 1,900 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 130 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.9 uV/m (24,000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a)). Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band is found in 47 C.F.R. S:15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states "the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed approximately 3 meters." (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.219(b).) During the investigation
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-306483A1.html
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1610 KHz was measured at 1,200 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 430 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.9 uV/m (24,000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a)). Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band is found in 47 C.F.R. S:15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states "the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed approximately 3 meters." (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.219(b).) During the investigation
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308327A1.html
  • level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. In addition, the field strength of the signal on frequency 1650 kHz was measured at 550 microvolts per meter (uV/m ) at 353 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.5 uV/m (24,000/1650) at 30 meters established in section 15.209(a) of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a)). Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band, is found in 47 C.F.R. S:15.219. Specifically, section 15.219(b) of the Rules states "the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed approximately 3 meters." During the inspection on May 15, 2011,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308328A1.html
  • that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1620 kHz (1146 Rice Street) was measured at 470 microvolts per meter (uV/m ) at 1243 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.8 uV/m (24,000/1620) at 30 meters established in section 15.209(a) of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a)). Similarly, the field strength of the signal on 1630 kHz (399 East Maryland Avenue) was measured at 450 uV/m at 599 meters, which also exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.7 uV/m at 30 meters. Another exception, for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band, is found in 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308562A1.html
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 6815 kHz and 6960.6 kHz exceeds the maximum permitted established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a)) given the distance the signal could be received in radio direction finding vehicles and FCC fixed High Frequency receiving sites. Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309211A1.html
  • et seq. Your operation on frequency 1620 kHz was measured at 900 microvolt per meter (uV/m) at 1132 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 100 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.223(a) for operation on 1620 kHz, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.223(a), as well as the general unlicensed limit of 30 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) for operation on 1620 kHz. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a). You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the owner of this illegal operation to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309212A1.html
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1610 kHz was measured at 2,730 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 145 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.9 uV/m (24,000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (see 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a)). Another exception for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band is found in 47 C.F.R. S: 15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states "the total length of the transmission line, antenna and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed 3 meters" (see 47 C.F.R. S: 15.219(b)). The
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309312A1.html
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1620 kHz was measured at 900 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 1132 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.8 uV/m (24,000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (see 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a)). You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the owner of this illegal operation to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309805A1.html
  • seq. Your operation on frequency 87.9 MHz was measured at 71,400 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 120 meters. This exceeds the general radiated emission limit of 100 uV/m at 3 meters established under Part 15. In addition, Part 15 restricts the mode of operation on particular frequency bands and does not permit broadcast operations on 87.9 MHz. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209. Thus, this station is operating in violation of Part 15 of the Commission's rules, and 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator of this illegal operation to severe penalties, including, but not limited
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312911A1.html
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1680 kHz was measured at 15,900 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 60 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.3 uV/m (24,000/1680) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (see 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a)). On February 29, 2012, agents from this office revisited your Fullerton location. The agents determined that your transmitter was still operating on frequency 1680 KHz, but with no modulation. The field strength of the signal was measured at 17,900 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 60 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313358A1.html
  • at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 1680 kHz was measured at 17,900 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 60 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.3 uV/m (24000/1680) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (see 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a)). Another exception for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705 kHz band is found in 47 C.F.R. S: 15.219. Specifically, Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states "the total length of the transmission line, antenna and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed 3 meters" (see 47 C.F.R. S: 15.219(b)). During
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-314322A1.html
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. Operation of a broadcast station on 87.9 MHz, however, is not authorized at any field strength level. See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a). Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3105A1.html
  • the Los Angeles Office conducted an investigation at California Speedway. Using a FCC Mobile Digital Direction Finding vehicle and direction finding techniques, the agents detected radio transmissions on frequency 104.7 MHz from a location in the middle of the grounds of California Speedway. Field strength measurements revealed that the radio emissions exceeded the levels allowed for non-licensed operation under Sections 15.209(a) and 15.239(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').6 The measured field strength was 63,500 V/m or 254 times that permitted by the rules. 7. California Speedway argues that the facts cited in the NAL do not support the conclusion that it engaged in unlicensed operation.7 It argues that the NAL cites only that California Speedway's equipment exceeded permissible emission limits.8 Although,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2904A1.html
  • noncommercial educational FM broadcast stations that have been required by the Commission to change frequencies. See 47 C.F.R. 73.501. 5Operation of a non-licensed, low-powered transmitter on frequency 87.9 MHz is restricted to periodic operation, which is generally used for the transmission of control signals, such as those used with alarm systems, garage door openers and remote switches. See 47 C.F.R. 15.209, 15.231. Because operation on frequency 87.9 MHz must be limited in duration, continuous operation is not permitted. 6Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1442A1.html
  • the transmitter demonstrates compliance with the peak conducted power limits. If the transmitter complies with the conducted power limits based on the use of RMS averaging over a time interval, as permitted under paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the attenuation required under this paragraph shall be 30 dB instead of 20 dB. Attenuation below the general limits specified in Sec. 15.209(a) is not required. In addition, radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands, as defined in Sec. 15.205(a), must also comply with the radiated emission limits specified in Sec. 15.209(a) (see Sec. 15.205(c)). 7. Furthermore, in accepting the grant of an equipment authorization, AboCom warranted that: each unit of equipment marketed under such grant and bearing the identification specified in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2350A1.html
  • amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve CSI's marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States that do not comply with the radiated emission limits set forth in Section 15.209 of the Rules and the periodic operation limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. CSI manufactures and markets the PT-1 "Petlocator" transmitter, which is used to track pets, children and model airplanes. Transmitters and other intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1486A1.html
  • Operations, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1A625, Washington, D.C. 20554. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by First Class and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Parker Construction, Inc. at its address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis P. Carlton Regional Director, South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S 301. Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 88-216 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 150 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S 15.209. Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200732700008 (Enf. Bur., Tampa Office, January 24, 2007) ("NAL"). 47 U.S.C. S 503(b). 47 C.F.R. S 1.80. 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1673A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Audio Direct is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1674A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Buy.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On March
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1675A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Audio Discounters is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1676A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Ambient Weather is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1754A1.html
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Chumbo.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On April
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1756A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that CompSource, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1757A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Cybergiftcenter.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1758A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Dealznet.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On April
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1763A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that TheElectronicCompany.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On April
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1764A1.html
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Focus Camera, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 device. On
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1766A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Fadfusion is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On April
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1767A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that DSMiller.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On April
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-299A1.html
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices ("jammers"). II. background 2. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information, through several informal complaints, alleging that RMR was manufacturing and marketing unauthorized police radar jammers in the United States. The Division's investigation
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-304A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Auto-Radar-Detectors.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-307A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Best Radar Detectors, were marketing police radar jamming devices
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-308A1.html
  • in Section 15.3(o) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(o). In addition, the OET Laboratory's tests indicated that the RMR-C450 device produced a radiated emission at 11.23 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.205, and that this radiated emission substantially exceeds the radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.209. The OET Laboratory also concluded that the RMR-C450 device was improperly certified. In this regard, the OET Laboratory noted that the grant of certification issued for the RMR-C450 device indicates that the device was tested as an "unintentional radiator." As explained above, however, the OET Laboratory found that the device is an intentional
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-309A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Global Trade Group, Inc., were marketing police radar jamming
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-310A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Hoeffener International, were marketing police radar jamming devices in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-311A1.html
  • in Section 15.3(o) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(o). In addition, the OET Laboratory's tests indicated that the RMR-C450 device produced a radiated emission at 11.23 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.205, and that this radiated emission substantially exceeds the radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.209. The OET Laboratory also concluded that the RMR-C450 device was improperly certified. In this regard, the OET Laboratory noted that the grant of certification issued for the RMR-C450 device indicates that the device was tested as an "unintentional radiator." As explained above, however, the OET Laboratory found that the device is an intentional
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-312A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radarjammers.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-313A1.html
  • in Section 15.3(o) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(o). In addition, the OET Laboratory's tests indicated that the RMR-C450 device produced a radiated emission at 11.23 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.205, and that this radiated emission substantially exceeds the radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.209. The OET Laboratory also concluded that the RMR-C450 device was improperly certified. In this regard, the OET Laboratory noted that the grant of certification issued for the RMR-C450 device indicates that the device was tested as an "unintentional radiator." As explained above, however, the OET Laboratory found that the device is an intentional
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3266A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Overseas Best Buy, Inc. dba 110220volts.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3270A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3392A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that ShoppersChoice.com, LLC is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3393A1.html
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Shopila Corporation is marketing the RMR-C450 device. On July 12, 2007,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3483A1.html
  • official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Gain Saver is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices. On
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3599A1.html
  • 14, 2007 Released: August 16, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) against Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices. 2. On January 31, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $25,000 to RMR. RMR has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on the information
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-808A1.html
  • CFXPT-1. 2. On July 28, 2006, the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") Laboratory requested a sample unit of CSI's PT-1 Petlocator transmitter, which CSI promptly provided. Thereafter, on October 3, 2006, the Bureau by letter advised CSI that testing conducted by OET indicated that the sample unit substantially exceeded radiated emission limits for intentional radiators specified by Section 15.209 of the Rules and did not comply with the periodic operation limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules, and requested further information with respect to the sale and marketing of the device. CSI promptly provided all information requested on October 10, 2006. 3. On November 22, 2006, the Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division released a Notice of Apparent Liability
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2516A1.html
  • copy of this Order shall be sent by First Class and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Dale Lloyd Allred at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis P. Carlton Regional Director, South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C S:S: 301, 333. The interfering transmissions were brief microphone key "clicks" immediately followed by a series of DTMF tones. Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 88-216 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 150 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209. Mr. Allred's transmissions triggered Dalton Communications' repeater, which was located 3.7 miles away from the TCC Shop. Devices compliant with Part 15 typically have a range
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1824A1.html
  • File No. EB-09-SE-134 Dear Mr. Dach: This is an official CITATION issued to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart"), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera ("Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2306A1.html
  • (Enf. Bur., Miami Office, rel. April 19, 2007) (proposing $10,000 forfeiture); Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200832600001 (Enf. Bur., Miami Office, rel. September 25, 2008) (proposing $20,000 forfeiture). 47 U.S.C. S: 301. On December 27, 2006 and January 11, 2007, agents observed a Yagi-type antenna mounted at the roof level in the back of the residence. Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting between 216-960 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 200 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209. Devices compliant with Part 15 typically have a range of less than one mile. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.106. NAL, NAL/Acct. No. 200732600001 (Enf. Bur., Miami Office, rel.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1756A1.html
  • 18, 2008). Section 15.239 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 88 to 108 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 250 mV/m at three meters. See 47 C.F.R. S: 15.239. Fundamental emissions from intentional radiators are not permitted in the band 76 to 88 MHz. See 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a). On April 28, 2009, the measurements indicated that the signal was more than 4,000 times greater than the maximum permissible level for a non-licensed Part 15 transmitter in the 88 to 108 MHz band and more than 10,000 times greater than the maximum permissible level in the 76 to 88 MHz band. On April 29, 2009, the measurements indicated that
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-408A1.html
  • www.securitymaninc.com. The staff observed that SecurityMan was marketing the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera. Subsequently, Enforcement Bureau staff purchased a SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, and forwarded it to the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") Laboratory for testing. The OET Laboratory's tests demonstrated that the SecurityMan SM-302T does not comply with the radiated emission limits specified in sections 15.249(d) and 15.209 of the rules. As part of the investigation, the Enforcement Bureau sent a letter of inquiry ("LOI") to SecurityMan on March 18, 2010. 4. In your April 14, 2010 response to the LOI, you admit that SecurityMan imports and distributes the SecurityMan SM-302T (factory model AT202-900) in the United States. You indicated, however, that SecurityMan "does not engineer and design
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-475A1.html
  • Requested, and regular mail, to Arthur Lee Young at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Douglas Miller District Director Atlanta Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S:S: 301, 303(n). Part 15 of the Rules sets out the conditions and technical requirements under which certain radio transmission devices may be used without a license. In relevant part, Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 30-88 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 100 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209. In addition, our records show that, in 2004, we informed Mr. Young that his unlicensed broadcast operation was in violation of the Act and, thereby, ordered
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc0082.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc0082.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc0082.txt
  • March 9, 2000 By the Commission: 1. In this order, we affirm a $5,000 forfeiture assessed against Edwin Valentin by the former Compliance and Information Bureau for operating an unlicensed FM radio station on frequency 106.3 MHz in Pontiac, Michigan, in contravention of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 301, and Sections 15.209 and 15.239 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 15.209 and 15.239. 2. In 1997, the Commission's Detroit Field Office investigated complaints that an unlicensed FM radio station was broadcasting on 106.3 MHz in the Detroit, Michigan area, and eventually determined that Rev. Edwin Valentin was operating the unlicensed radio station. On December 10, 1997, the Detroit Field Office
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4266A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4266A1.pdf
  • amended to read as described by Section 204(a) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ( the ``1996 Act'') , Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See Implementation of Sections 204(a) and 204(c) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Broadcast License Renewal Procedures), Order, 11 FCC Rcd 6363 (1996). 47 U.S.C. �� 309(k)(2), 309(k)(3). See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.207, 15.209, 15.219, and 15.221, which permits unlicensed transmission in the AM broadcast band of 0.05 watts. See also Permitted Forms of Low Power Broadcast Operation, Public Notice, Mimeo No. 14089 (Jul. 24, 2001). See Morgan County Industries, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability, 21 FCC Rcd 13712, 13714 (MB 2006) (unsupported allegation failed to present a substantial
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-50A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-50A1.pdf
  • Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See also In the Matter of Creation of a Low Power Radio Service, Second Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 8029, 8033 (2001). See Casa Opposition at Exhibit 1. Casa states that the ``whole city'' involved was Central Falls, which is one mile in diameter. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 15.209, 15.219, and 15.221; Public Notice, ``Permitted Forms of Low Power Broadcast Operation,'' Mimeo No. 14089 (July 14, 1991); OET Bulletin No. 63, ``Understanding the FCC Regulations for Low-Power, Non-Licensed Transmitters'' (Feb. 1996). Section 15.219 permits operation of an unlicensed 100-milliwatt AM transmitter on a secondary, non-interfering basis, provided that the total length of the antenna and ground lead does not
• http://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/0801fcc.pdf
  • 4 send us. People wonder if we read the comments, 5 but we actually do. And, for example, 6 Nokiapart15.org, Mutual Data Services and IEEE 802 7 all made the basic point that more spectrum is 8 needed for unlicensed devices, presumably spectrum 9 like the ISM bands where unlicensed devices have a 10 preferred frame of reference. 11 Section 15.209, which has been on the 12 books since 1989, actually allows unlicensed 13 devices sort of almost everywhere below 40 14 gigahertz, with the exception of specifically 15 enumerated bands. But I assume what most people 16 were talking about in their comments were bands 17 like the ISM band, or bands like the UNII band, 18 where unlicensed things
• http://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/E&UWGFinalReport.doc http://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/E&UWGFinalReport.pdf
  • protocols have generally kept place with technology. This is different than the way FCC selected and continues to maintain protocols in unlicensed PCS. The UEWG believes that there may be advantages in creating a regulatory framework where wireless protocols can evolve with changing technology without the delays associated with APA rulemakings. Noise Floor/Aggregation While the general emissions standards of Section 15.209 have been in the Commission's rules since 1989, the ultra wideband rulemaking refocused attention on the issue of whether unlicensed devices are raising the apparent noise floor to other users of the spectrum and either limiting their range or raising the cost of infrastructure to serve a given communication market. There appears to be no available data in the United