FCC Web Documents citing 15.205

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Audio Direct is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Buy.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Audio Discounters is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Ambient Weather is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.pdf
  • Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Chumbo.com is marketing the RMR-C450 device. The Division staff observed that Chumbo.com was not marketing the RMR-S201 device at that time. The Division staff
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that CompSource, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Cybergiftcenter.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Dealznet.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. TheElectronicCompany.com and observed that TheElectronicCompany.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.pdf
  • Berkowitz: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. Focuscamera.com and observed that Focus Camera, Inc. is marketing the RMR-C450 device. The Division staff observed that Focus Camera, Inc. was not marketing the RMR-S201 device at
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Fadfusion is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. DSMiller.com and observed that DSMiller.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.pdf
  • January 31, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices (``jammers''). background The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information, through several informal complaints, alleging that RMR was manufacturing and marketing unauthorized police radar jammers in the United States. The Division's investigation
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Auto-Radar-Detectors.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Best Radar Detectors, were marketing police radar
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.pdf
  • an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. , and observed that Electronic Retail Solutions, Inc. was marketing the RMR-S201 (also known as the Phazer II) and the RMR-C450 devices. On September 1, 2005, the Division issued a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Global Trade Group, Inc., were marketing police
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Hoeffener International, were marketing police radar jamming
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.pdf
  • an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radar Detectors Direct, were marketing police radar jamming devices in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radarjammers.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.pdf
  • an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including The Twister Group, Inc., were marketing police radar jamming devices
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Overseas Best Buy, Inc. dba 110220volts.com is marketing the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. shopperschoice.com and observed that ShoppersChoice.com, LLC is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.pdf
  • Sir/Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. shopila.com and observed that Shopila Corporation is marketing the RMR-C450 device. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.pdf
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Gain Saver is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3599A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3599A1.pdf
  • ORDER Adopted: August 14, 2007 Released: August 16, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) against Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices. On January 31, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $25,000 to RMR. RMR has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3974A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3974A1.pdf
  • for marketing in the United States certain wireless cameras and wireless camera converters, specifically, 10 Watt, 1.2 GHz Cantek Wireless Camera and Camera Converter Transmitter Receivers (``1.2 GHz wireless camera transmitter receivers''), that are not eligible to receive a grant of equipment certification, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communication Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 6, 2007, staff in the Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') visited the internet store for Surveillance-Video products, www.surveillance-video.com (``Surveillance-Video online store''). The Surveillance-Video online store listed the 1.2
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4874A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4874A1.pdf
  • Dear Mr. Melo: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), to BRD Security Products, Inc. d/b/a Spybase.com (``BRD'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 9, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``the Division'') initiated an investigation into whether BRD is marketing in the United
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1196A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1196A1.pdf
  • EB-08-SE-202 Dear Mr. Bassler: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), to David Steele Enterprises, Inc. (``David Steele'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry (``LOI'') dated May 15, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether David Steele is marketing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1202A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1202A1.pdf
  • #12 Reseda, California 91335-6164 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-203 Dear Mr. Henry: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205(a), and for failing to fully respond to Enforcement Bureau directives to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated May 16, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-155A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-155A1.pdf
  • and Mr. Bollaro: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), to Garden State Investigations and Security (``Garden State'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 2, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether Garden State is marketing in the United
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.pdf
  • Vladimir Reznik, Owner RangeVideo Re: File No. EB-08-SE-182 Dear Mr. Reznik: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. § 2.803 and 15.205(a), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol, in violation of Section 1.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2051A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2051A1.pdf
  • with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the U.S. However, it does not appear that devices such as the GPS Counter Track, and the GPS Counter Track Portable, are capable of receiving a grant of certification. The devices operate in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Moreover, the purpose of GPS jammers is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 333, which states that ``[n]o person shall willfully or maliciously
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.pdf
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find Iftron Technologies, Inc. (``Iftron'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of five thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violation involves Iftron's marketing of an audio/video transmitter that operates on a restricted frequency and therefore is not eligible for a grant of equipment certification. II. BACKGROUND The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') received information that Iftron was marketing audio/video transmitters that are capable of operating on a restricted frequency, 2.468 GHz.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1697A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1697A1.pdf
  • Suite 155 Spokane, WA 99218 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-602 Dear Mr. O'Harvey: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to The Spy Store, Inc. (``Spy Store'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 2.1203 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.pdf
  • San Jose, CA 95124-5548 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-692 Dear Mr. Hirsch: This is an official CITATION issued to Future Hobbies pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In response to a complaint alleging that Future Hobbies was marketing unauthorized audio/video transmitters that are capable of operating on restricted frequencies in the 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz frequency bands, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.pdf
  • 33327 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-099 Dear Mr. Roshberg: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Creativewirelesssav.com d/b/a/ Creative Audio, Inc. (``Creative Audio'') for marketing in the United States radiofrequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry (``LOI'') dated August 22, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether Creative Audio was marketing in the United States six uncertified
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.pdf
  • 10901-3834 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-142 Dear Mr. Lee: This is an official CITATION, issued to SCS Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Spy Camera Specialists, Inc. (``Spy Camera''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') received a complaint alleging that Spy Camera was marketing unauthorized wireless video transmitters that operate in the 1.08, 1.12, 1.16 and 1.2 GHz bands.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2240A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2240A1.pdf
  • for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' Jammer devices, however, cannot be certified or authorized because the main purpose of jammer devices is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Communications Act. Moreover, GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, these devices cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore cannot be marketed in the United States. and to solicit customers worldwide. Accordingly, we find that Jammer World has violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Section 2.803 of the Rules by marketing in the United States radio frequency devices that are not eligible
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2295A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2295A1.pdf
  • for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' Jammer devices, however, cannot be certified or authorized because the main purpose of jammer devices is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Communications Act. Moreover, GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, these devices cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore cannot be marketed in the United States. , and to solicit customers worldwide. Accordingly, we find that Everbuying.com has violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Section 2.803 of the Rules by marketing in the United States radio frequency devices that are not eligible
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.pdf
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to New Generation Hobbies (``New Generation'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules (``Rules'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'' or ``FCC''). New Generation should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.pdf
  • the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Sound Around Inc. (``Sound Around'') for marketing in the United States radiofrequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules (``Rules'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission''), and for marketing wireless microphones that are capable of operating in the 700 MHz band (698-806 MHz) in violation of section 74.851(g) of the Rules. Sound Around should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct, including removing from display (including online display)
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1312A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1312A1.pdf
  • the U-NII rules (47 C.F.R. §§ 15.401-15.407) because Sling operated them as U-NII devices on U-NII frequencies. Sling was also operating on the frequency 5745 MHz, a frequency for which the Rocket M5 is certified. Operation pursuant to section 15.247 of the Rules, however, must comply with the applicable power limits specified therein. 47 C.F.R. § 15.247. 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). See email from Aaron Tuttle, TDWR & Meteorological Support, FAA, to Miami Office, dated February 22, 2011. According to the collocation agreement, the Rocket M5s employed Ubiquiti Airmax 5G-19-120 sector antennas with a gain of 19 dBi (18.6 dBi according to the Airmax specifications). The antennas photographed by the agents of the Miami Office on January 5, 2011 appeared to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.pdf
  • the company for marketing jammers designed to interfere with cellular and ``PCS'' utilized by St. Lucie County, Florida Sheriff's Office); Everybuying.com, Citation, DA 10-2295 (Enf. Bur. Dec. 6, 2010) (citing the company for marketing both cell phone signal and Global Positioning System (``GPS'') signal blocker devices, and noting that GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules); Jammerworld.com, Citation, DA 10-2240, 2010 WL 4808497 (Enf. Bur. Nov. 26, 2010) (citing the company for marketing a device that jams signals in the Cell Phone Band (845-975 MHz), PCS Band (1800-1996 MHz), and GPS L1 frequency 1575.42 MHz); Victor McCormack, phonejammer.com, Citation, DA 10-1975 (Enf. Bur. Oct. 14, 2010) (citing the company for misrepresentations made during
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-247A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-247A1.pdf
  • the company for marketing jammers designed to interfere with cellular and ``PCS'' utilized by St. Lucie County, Florida Sheriff's Office); Everybuying.com, Citation, DA 10-2295 (Enf. Bur. Dec. 6, 2010) (citing the company for marketing both cell phone signal and Global Positioning System (``GPS'') signal blocker devices, and noting that GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules); Jammerworld.com, Citation, DA 10-2240, 2010 WL 4808497(Enf. Bur. Nov. 26, 2010) (citing the company for marketing a device that jams signals in the Cell Phone Band (845-975 MHz), PCS Band (1800-1996 MHz), and GPS L1 frequency 1575.42 MHz); Victor McCormack, phonejammer.com, Citation, DA 10-1975, (Enf. Bur. Oct. 14, 2010) (citing the company for misrepresentations made during the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-248A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-248A1.pdf
  • 2011 Released: February 9, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to DealExtreme for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), and for failing to respond to Enforcement Bureau Letters of Inquiry (``LOIs'') directing DealExtreme to provide certain information and documents. DealExtreme should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. In addition, you must to respond to the Enforcement Bureau's June 12, 2009 LOI within thirty (30) days
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-98A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-98A1.pdf
  • for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' Jammer devices, however, cannot be certified or authorized because the main purpose of jammer devices is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Communications Act. Moreover, GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, these devices cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore cannot be marketed in the United States. New Century shipped and sold to an Enforcement Bureau agent in the United States a cell and GPS jammer device, the Mini GPJ, that Jammer World offered for sale on its web site. Accordingly, we find that New
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-112A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-112A1.pdf
  • for Forfeiture shall be sent by both Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular mail to Robens Cheriza at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven DeSena Resident Agent Miami Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 301. The frequency 119.1 MHz lies within the 108-121.94 MHz band and is listed as a restricted band in Section 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). urposes of section 312, and for any other relevant section of the act (e.g., section 503) . . . . As defined[,] . . . `willful' means that the licensee knew that he was doing the act in question, regardless of whether there was an intent to violate the law. `Repeated' means
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.txt
  • 89-553, Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 10 FCC Rcd 6884, 6908 (1995). For further discussion concerning unlicensed operation in the 2500-2690 MHz band, including discussion of the current rules relating to unlicensed operation in these bands, see Section III.E.6, infra. See 47 C.F.R. Part 15. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.5. 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. Spectrum Policy Report at 40. 47 C.F.R. § 21.924(c). 47 C.F.R. § 21.925(b). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 90.663, 101.525(a), 101.1009. See paras. 62 -65 supra, regarding geographic area licensing for unassigned ITFS spectrum. 47 C.F.R. § 21.932(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 21.925(c)(4), 21.932(c). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 101.1331 (MAS): Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-3A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-3A1.pdf
  • specifically Global Positioning Satellite (``GPS'') signal re-radiator kits, which are not authorized and not eligible for authorization by the Commission because the devices operate in restricted frequency bands. We further find that, in marketing these GPS signal re-radiator kits, San Jose willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For San Jose's violations, we impose a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000). II. BACKGROUND Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-107A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-107A1.pdf
  • we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Commission and San Jose Technology, Inc. (formerly known as San Jose Navigation, Inc.) (collectively ``San Jose''). The Consent Decree terminates the Commission's enforcement proceeding regarding San Jose's compliance with the equipment requirements set forth in Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules. The Commission and San Jose have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the enforcement proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the available facts related to this matter, we conclude that there are no substantial or material questions of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1705A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1705A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1705A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ‰ Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 DA 01-1705 July 16, 2001 Safety Warning Systems, L.C. , Files Request for Waiver of Section 15.205(b) On October 26, 2000, Safety Warning Systems, L.C., (SWS) requested a waiver of Section 15.205(b) of the Commission's rules to permit certification of a device for MPH Industries, Inc., (MPH). Section 15.205(b) limits the spurious emissions in a restricted band (i.e., spectrum above 38.6 GHz) to the values in Section 15.209 i.e., 500 uV/m at 3m. Because the second and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2850A1.txt
  • of the FCC Rules (47 CFR Part 15). A significant number of the applications for certification of ``Learned Mode'' or ``Trainable'' transmitters have been incomplete or incorrect. For example, applicants did not properly specify the range of operating frequencies. In some cases the devices were found to be capable of transmitting in restricted frequency bands in violation of 47 CFR 15.205, which could potentially cause interference to radio services used for public safety. Applicants often did not determine the duty cycle properly, or apply it correctly when calculating the maximum field strength. The following guidance is provided to ensure that future applications for certification of such equipment are complete and correct: The application for certification must include a complete description of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.txt
  • section 0.111(a)(17) of the Commission's rules, we revoke the above-captioned equipment authorizations held by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. (``Tung Shih'') for its learned mode remote control devices (``learned mode transmitters''). We conclude, based upon the evidence described herein, that the learned mode transmitters manufactured by Tung Shih have the capability to transmit impermissibly on restricted frequencies specified in section 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules. We further conclude that Tung Shih's learned mode transmitters also have the capability to transmit impermissibly on frequencies that are not authorized by their equipment authorizations. II. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2005, the Commission released an Order to Show Cause designating this case for hearing. The OSC specified the following issues: To determine whether the LRT-1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1029A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1029A1.txt
  • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech GPS Antenna Booster, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech GPS Antenna Booster operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech GPS Antenna Booster apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Wal-Mart has violated Section 302(b) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1030A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1030A1.txt
  • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that GPS Outfitters has violated Section 302(b) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1031A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1031A1.txt
  • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Dick's has violated Section 302(b) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1033A1.txt
  • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Fogdog has violated Section 302(b) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1034A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1034A1.txt
  • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Tweeter has violated Section 302(b) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1035A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1035A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1035A1.txt
  • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Sports Authority has violated Section 302(b) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1036A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1036A1.txt
  • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Sport Chalet has violated Section 302(b) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1037A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1037A1.txt
  • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that the GPS Store has violated Section 302(b)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1107A1.txt
  • in this chapter. Pursuant to Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the GPS re-radiating devices, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing. Moreover, the GPS re-radiating devices operate in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the GPS re-radiating devices apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Dallas has violated Section 302(b) of the Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1155A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas operate in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Furthermore, Gilsson admits in its letter of March 26,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-191A1.txt
  • learned mode remote control transmitter devices (``learned mode transmitters''), FCC ID Nos. MMORC0196M and MMORMC575, should be revoked. Devices manufactured by Tung Shih under those FCC ID numbers apparently have the capability to transmit on frequencies that are not authorized by their equipment certifications. In addition, these devices apparently have the capability to transmit on restricted frequencies specified in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND Learned mode or ``trainable'' transmitters are typically sold as universal replacements or duplicates for garage door openers, keyless entry systems, security alarms, remote switches and similar types of radio controlled devices. These transmitters are designed to recognize and replicate the operating frequency, duty cycle and coding scheme of the targeted radio system. As intentional radiators,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2998A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2998A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2998A1.txt
  • 22312-2707 Re: File No. EB-04-SE-362 Dear Sir or Madame: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing a radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated January 11, 2005, (Letter of Inquiry) the Spectrum Enforcement Division (SED) of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau informed Navtech Seminars and GPS Supply (Navtech) that it had initiated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3142A1.txt
  • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-3142 December 5, 2005 OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SEEKS COMMENT ON RESPIRONICS, INC PETITION FOR WAIVER OF PART 15 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES FOR UNLICENSED DEVICES ET Docket No. 05-331 Comment Date: January 4, 2006 Reply Comment Date: January 19, 2006 On October 28, 2005 Respironics, Inc. (Respironics) filed a request for waiver of Section 15.205(a) of the FCC's Radio Frequency Devices rules (Part 15) in order to permit the continued marketing and operation of its ActiReader devices until those devices are redesigned to comply with the Commission's rules. Respironics manufactures a biomedical measuring device designed to be worn on the wrist by a patient/subject. The device collects activity data used to study sleep/wake patterns, sleep
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1442A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1442A1.txt
  • limits based on the use of RMS averaging over a time interval, as permitted under paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the attenuation required under this paragraph shall be 30 dB instead of 20 dB. Attenuation below the general limits specified in Sec. 15.209(a) is not required. In addition, radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands, as defined in Sec. 15.205(a), must also comply with the radiated emission limits specified in Sec. 15.209(a) (see Sec. 15.205(c)). Furthermore, in accepting the grant of an equipment authorization, AboCom warranted that: each unit of equipment marketed under such grant and bearing the identification specified in the grant will conform to the unit that was measured and that the data (design and rated operational characteristics)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2019A1.txt
  • as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain wireless cameras, specifically, 10 Watt 1.2 GHz Wireless Camera Video AV Transmitter Receivers (``1.2 GHz wireless cameras''), that are not eligible to receive a grant of equipment certification, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On August 30, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that LightObject d/b/a Actionbuy Trading Co. (``LightObject'') was marketing on eBay wireless cameras
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2316A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Þ Þ Þ Ä Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Respironics, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation Requests for Waiver of Section 15.205 of the Commission's Rules to Permit the marketing and operation of certain medical communications devices that operate in the 90-110 kHz band ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 05-331 ORDER Adopted: November 16, 2006 Released: November 16, 2006 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: INTRODUCTION 1. By this action, we grant the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2475A1.txt
  • PARTE PURPOSES AND REQUESTS COMMENTS ET Docket No. 06-216 RM-11352 Comments Date: January 5, 2007 Reply Comments Date: January 22, 2007 On November 7, 2006, Siemens Milltronics Process Instruments Inc., (Siemens) filed a request for waiver of the spurious emissions only requirement of Part 15 of the Commission's rules to permit certification of a tank level probing radar (TLPR). Section 15.205(a) limits emissions in the 78-79 GHz band to spurious emissions only. Siemens' request would permit certification of a frequency modulated continuous wave RF carrier (FMCW) tank level probing radar (TLPR) in the band 78-79 GHz for use in closed metal and reinforced concrete material storage tanks under the provisions of Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's rules. Bench testing and in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Audio Direct is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Buy.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Audio Discounters is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Ambient Weather is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.txt
  • Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Chumbo.com is marketing the RMR-C450 device. The Division staff observed that Chumbo.com was not marketing the RMR-S201 device at that time. The Division staff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that CompSource, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Cybergiftcenter.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Dealznet.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. TheElectronicCompany.com and observed that TheElectronicCompany.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.txt
  • Berkowitz: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. Focuscamera.com and observed that Focus Camera, Inc. is marketing the RMR-C450 device. The Division staff observed that Focus Camera, Inc. was not marketing the RMR-S201 device at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Fadfusion is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. DSMiller.com and observed that DSMiller.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-198A1.txt
  • (P) dB, whichever is the lesser attenuation, at 3 MHz and beyond from the channel edge. See, for example, 47 C.F.R. § 74.936(f). Emissions from such consumer devices that appear outside of the 2400-2483.5 MHz band can range from as high as -14 dBW to as low as -41.3 dBm EIRP, depending on the frequency band. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.205 and 15.247(d). The distance of the separation zone shall be measured from the antenna in every direction in which the QUPID system is intended to detect a target. We note that this separation distance also satisfies the separation distance requested by the Council. This conclusion is based on previous Commission evaluation and conclusions regarding potential harmful interference from UWB operations.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2518A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2518A1.txt
  • PROCEEDING FOR EX PARTE PURPOSES AND REQUESTS COMMENTS ET Docket No. 07-96 Comments Date: July 12, 2007 Reply Comments Date: July 27, 2007 On April 30, 2007, Ohmart Vega Corp. (Ohmart) filed a request for waiver of the spurious emissions only requirement of Part 15 of the Commission's rules to permit certification of a tank level probing radar (TLPR). Section 15.205(a) limits emissions in the 77-81 GHz band to spurious emissions only. Ohmart's request would permit certification of a TLPR using either frequency modulated continuous wave RF carrier (FMCW) or short pulses of RF energy in the 77-81 GHz frequency band for use in closed storage tanks. Bench testing and in situ measurements of emissions outside the tank would be required
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.txt
  • January 31, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices (``jammers''). background The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information, through several informal complaints, alleging that RMR was manufacturing and marketing unauthorized police radar jammers in the United States. The Division's investigation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Auto-Radar-Detectors.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Best Radar Detectors, were marketing police radar
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.txt
  • an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. , and observed that Electronic Retail Solutions, Inc. was marketing the RMR-S201 (also known as the Phazer II) and the RMR-C450 devices. On September 1, 2005, the Division issued a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Global Trade Group, Inc., were marketing police
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Hoeffener International, were marketing police radar jamming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.txt
  • an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radar Detectors Direct, were marketing police radar jamming devices in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radarjammers.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.txt
  • an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including The Twister Group, Inc., were marketing police radar jamming devices
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3160A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Respironics, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation Requests for Waiver of Section 15.205 of the Commission's Rules to Permit the Marketing and Operation of Certain Medical Communications Devices that Operate in the 90-110 kHz Band ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 05-331 ORDER Adopted: July 11, 2007 Released: July 11, 2007 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: INTRODUCTION By this action, we grant in part
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Overseas Best Buy, Inc. dba 110220volts.com is marketing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. shopperschoice.com and observed that ShoppersChoice.com, LLC is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.txt
  • Sir/Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. shopila.com and observed that Shopila Corporation is marketing the RMR-C450 device. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.txt
  • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Gain Saver is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3599A1.txt
  • ORDER Adopted: August 14, 2007 Released: August 16, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) against Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices. On January 31, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $25,000 to RMR. RMR has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3974A1.txt
  • for marketing in the United States certain wireless cameras and wireless camera converters, specifically, 10 Watt, 1.2 GHz Cantek Wireless Camera and Camera Converter Transmitter Receivers (``1.2 GHz wireless camera transmitter receivers''), that are not eligible to receive a grant of equipment certification, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communication Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 6, 2007, staff in the Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') visited the internet store for Surveillance-Video products, www.surveillance-video.com (``Surveillance-Video online store''). The Surveillance-Video online store listed the 1.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4874A1.txt
  • Dear Mr. Melo: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), to BRD Security Products, Inc. d/b/a Spybase.com (``BRD'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 9, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``the Division'') initiated an investigation into whether BRD is marketing in the United
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5095A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5095A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5095A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit @z $ Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Respironics, Inc. Request for Waiver of Section 15.205 of the Commission's Rules to Permit the Marketing and Operation of Certain Medical Communications Devices that Operate in the 90-110 KHz Band ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 05-331 ORDER Adopted: December 26, 2007 Released: December 26, 2007 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: By this order, we grant the Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1196A1.txt
  • EB-08-SE-202 Dear Mr. Bassler: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), to David Steele Enterprises, Inc. (``David Steele'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry (``LOI'') dated May 15, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether David Steele is marketing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1202A1.txt
  • #12 Reseda, California 91335-6164 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-203 Dear Mr. Henry: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205(a), and for failing to fully respond to Enforcement Bureau directives to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated May 16, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-155A1.txt
  • and Mr. Bollaro: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), to Garden State Investigations and Security (``Garden State'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 2, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether Garden State is marketing in the United
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.txt
  • Vladimir Reznik, Owner RangeVideo Re: File No. EB-08-SE-182 Dear Mr. Reznik: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. § 2.803 and 15.205(a), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol, in violation of Section 1.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2051A1.txt
  • with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the U.S. However, it does not appear that devices such as the GPS Counter Track, and the GPS Counter Track Portable, are capable of receiving a grant of certification. The devices operate in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Moreover, the purpose of GPS jammers is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 333, which states that ``[n]o person shall willfully or maliciously
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.txt
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find Iftron Technologies, Inc. (``Iftron'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of five thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violation involves Iftron's marketing of an audio/video transmitter that operates on a restricted frequency and therefore is not eligible for a grant of equipment certification. II. BACKGROUND The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') received information that Iftron was marketing audio/video transmitters that are capable of operating on a restricted frequency, 2.468 GHz.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1527A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ² ² ² $ Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the matter of Respironics, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation Requests for Waiver of Section 15.205 of the Commission's Rules to Permit the Marketing and Operation of Certain Medical Communications Devices that Operate in the 90-110 kHz band ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 05-331 ORDER Adopted: July 13, 2009 Released: July 14, 2009 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: Introduction By this order, we grant a request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1697A1.txt
  • Suite 155 Spokane, WA 99218 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-602 Dear Mr. O'Harvey: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to The Spy Store, Inc. (``Spy Store'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 2.1203 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.txt
  • San Jose, CA 95124-5548 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-692 Dear Mr. Hirsch: This is an official CITATION issued to Future Hobbies pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In response to a complaint alleging that Future Hobbies was marketing unauthorized audio/video transmitters that are capable of operating on restricted frequencies in the 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz frequency bands, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.txt
  • 33327 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-099 Dear Mr. Roshberg: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Creativewirelesssav.com d/b/a/ Creative Audio, Inc. (``Creative Audio'') for marketing in the United States radiofrequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry (``LOI'') dated August 22, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether Creative Audio was marketing in the United States six uncertified
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.txt
  • 10901-3834 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-142 Dear Mr. Lee: This is an official CITATION, issued to SCS Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Spy Camera Specialists, Inc. (``Spy Camera''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') received a complaint alleging that Spy Camera was marketing unauthorized wireless video transmitters that operate in the 1.08, 1.12, 1.16 and 1.2 GHz bands.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1744A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1744A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1744A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ² ² ² Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Respironics, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation Requests for Waiver of Section 15.205 of the Commission's Rules to Permit the Marketing and Operation of Certain Medical Communications Devices that Operate in the 90-110 kHz band ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 05-331 ORDER Adopted: September 15, 2010 Released: September 15, 2010 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: Introduction By this Order, we grant a request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2240A1.txt
  • for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' Jammer devices, however, cannot be certified or authorized because the main purpose of jammer devices is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Communications Act. Moreover, GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, these devices cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore cannot be marketed in the United States. and to solicit customers worldwide. Accordingly, we find that Jammer World has violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Section 2.803 of the Rules by marketing in the United States radio frequency devices that are not eligible
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2295A1.txt
  • for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' Jammer devices, however, cannot be certified or authorized because the main purpose of jammer devices is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Communications Act. Moreover, GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, these devices cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore cannot be marketed in the United States. , and to solicit customers worldwide. Accordingly, we find that Everbuying.com has violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Section 2.803 of the Rules by marketing in the United States radio frequency devices that are not eligible
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.txt
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to New Generation Hobbies (``New Generation'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules (``Rules'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'' or ``FCC''). New Generation should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.txt
  • the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Sound Around Inc. (``Sound Around'') for marketing in the United States radiofrequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules (``Rules'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission''), and for marketing wireless microphones that are capable of operating in the 700 MHz band (698-806 MHz) in violation of section 74.851(g) of the Rules. Sound Around should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct, including removing from display (including online display)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1312A1.txt
  • the U-NII rules (47 C.F.R. §§ 15.401-15.407) because Sling operated them as U-NII devices on U-NII frequencies. Sling was also operating on the frequency 5745 MHz, a frequency for which the Rocket M5 is certified. Operation pursuant to section 15.247 of the Rules, however, must comply with the applicable power limits specified therein. 47 C.F.R. § 15.247. 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). See email from Aaron Tuttle, TDWR & Meteorological Support, FAA, to Miami Office, dated February 22, 2011. According to the collocation agreement, the Rocket M5s employed Ubiquiti Airmax 5G-19-120 sector antennas with a gain of 19 dBi (18.6 dBi according to the Airmax specifications). The antennas photographed by the agents of the Miami Office on January 5, 2011 appeared to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1427A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ² ² ² Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Boston Scientific Corporation Request for Waiver of Section 15.205 of the Commission's Rules to Permit the Marketing and Operation of Certain Medical Communications Devices that Operate in the 90-110 kHz band ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 05-331 ORDER Adopted: August 22, 2011 Released: August 23, 2011 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: Introduction By this Order, we grant a request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.txt
  • the company for marketing jammers designed to interfere with cellular and ``PCS'' utilized by St. Lucie County, Florida Sheriff's Office); Everybuying.com, Citation, DA 10-2295 (Enf. Bur. Dec. 6, 2010) (citing the company for marketing both cell phone signal and Global Positioning System (``GPS'') signal blocker devices, and noting that GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules); Jammerworld.com, Citation, DA 10-2240, 2010 WL 4808497 (Enf. Bur. Nov. 26, 2010) (citing the company for marketing a device that jams signals in the Cell Phone Band (845-975 MHz), PCS Band (1800-1996 MHz), and GPS L1 frequency 1575.42 MHz); Victor McCormack, phonejammer.com, Citation, DA 10-1975 (Enf. Bur. Oct. 14, 2010) (citing the company for misrepresentations made during
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-247A1.txt
  • the company for marketing jammers designed to interfere with cellular and ``PCS'' utilized by St. Lucie County, Florida Sheriff's Office); Everybuying.com, Citation, DA 10-2295 (Enf. Bur. Dec. 6, 2010) (citing the company for marketing both cell phone signal and Global Positioning System (``GPS'') signal blocker devices, and noting that GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules); Jammerworld.com, Citation, DA 10-2240, 2010 WL 4808497(Enf. Bur. Nov. 26, 2010) (citing the company for marketing a device that jams signals in the Cell Phone Band (845-975 MHz), PCS Band (1800-1996 MHz), and GPS L1 frequency 1575.42 MHz); Victor McCormack, phonejammer.com, Citation, DA 10-1975, (Enf. Bur. Oct. 14, 2010) (citing the company for misrepresentations made during the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-248A1.txt
  • 2011 Released: February 9, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to DealExtreme for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), and for failing to respond to Enforcement Bureau Letters of Inquiry (``LOIs'') directing DealExtreme to provide certain information and documents. DealExtreme should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. In addition, you must to respond to the Enforcement Bureau's June 12, 2009 LOI within thirty (30) days
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-461A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Bluechiip Ltd. Tracking Solutions Request for Waiver of Section 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Adopted: March 9, 2011 Released: March 9, 2011 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: INTRODUCTION By this action, we grant a waiver of restricted band prohibitions contained in Section 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules to bluechiip Ltd. Tracking Solutions (``bluechiip'') to allow operation of an inductive tracking device
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-98A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-98A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-98A1.txt
  • for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' Jammer devices, however, cannot be certified or authorized because the main purpose of jammer devices is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Communications Act. Moreover, GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, these devices cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore cannot be marketed in the United States. New Century shipped and sold to an Enforcement Bureau agent in the United States a cell and GPS jammer device, the Mini GPJ, that Jammer World offered for sale on its web site. Accordingly, we find that New
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-112A1.txt
  • for Forfeiture shall be sent by both Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular mail to Robens Cheriza at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven DeSena Resident Agent Miami Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 301. The frequency 119.1 MHz lies within the 108-121.94 MHz band and is listed as a restricted band in Section 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). urposes of section 312, and for any other relevant section of the act (e.g., section 503) . . . . As defined[,] . . . `willful' means that the licensee knew that he was doing the act in question, regardless of whether there was an intent to violate the law. `Repeated' means
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-41A1.txt
  • GPR users; instead it will allow UWB users access to one additional tool that facilitates increased efficiencies and safety in maintaining our transportation infrastructure. Finally, we note that this waiver is based on the specific technical and operational characteristics of the 3d-Radar and does not change our rules and existing prohibition regarding the intentional transmissions in restricted bands in Section 15.205. For these reasons, we disagree with the USGPSIC that this waiver is inconsistent with our conservative approach to UWB devices. We also find that there is a legitimate public interest justification for this waiver. The 3d-Radar device is a new tool for evaluating and improving road and railroad infrastructure and will aid public safety. We disagree with Annan that a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266575A1.pdf
  • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.1 et seq. Your operation as a fundamental carrier on 121.500 MHz does not comply with Part 15 of the Commission's rule. Section 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules permits only spurious emissions in the frequency band 108-121.94 MHz. Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. § 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269176A1.pdf
  • is properly identified and labeled ...'' Pursuant to Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b), intentional radiators must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. 4. The 1.2 GHz wireless video systems operate within the restricted frequency band 960 MHz to 1.240 GHz listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Operation on 1.2 GHz is specifically restricted to aeronautical navigation and the Enforcement Bureau has received complaints from the Federal Aviation Administration (``FAA'') concerning 1.2 GHz transmitters that cause harmful interference to the FAA's Tactical Air Navigation System. Because 1.2 GHz is a restricted frequency, wireless video transmitters operating on 1.2 GHz cannot
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269802A1.pdf
  • chapter and is properly identified and labeled...'' Pursuant to Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b), intentional radiators must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. The 1.2 GHz wireless video systems operate within the restricted frequency band 960 MHz to 1.240 GHz listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Operation on 1.2 GHz is specifically restricted to aeronautical navigation and the Enforcement Bureau has received complaints from the Federal Aviation Administration (``FAA'') concerning 1.2 GHz transmitters that cause harmful interference to the FAA's Tactical Air Navigation System. Because 1.2 GHz is a restricted frequency, wireless video transmitters operating on 1.2 GHz cannot
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269882A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269882A1.pdf
  • that copies of this Citation shall be sent by First Class U.S. Mail and Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested to Ditec Digital Systems at its address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William R. Zears, Jr. District Director, San Diego District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5). 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(b)(3). 47 U.S.C. §§ 401, 501, 503, 510. 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 403. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5). See Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). See 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission > H J K e i n } £ ¤
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270427A1.txt
  • date of public notice of the petitions in the Federal Register. See Section 1.4(b) (1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b) (1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------- Subject: In the Matter of Boston Scientific Corporation (ET Docket No. 05-331) Petition for Waiver of Section 15.205 of the Commission's Rules Filed By: -Terry G. Mahn, for Fish & Richardson, P.C., on behalf of Boston Scientific Corporation, 12/18/2006 Subject: In the Matter of Unlicensed Operation in the TV Broadcast Bands (ET Docket No. 04-186) Additional Spectrum for Unlicensed Devices Below 900 MHz and in the 3 GHz Band (ET Docket No. 02-380) Filed By: -Harold Feld, on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277599A1.pdf
  • Your ELTs were not located in an aircraft. Licenses for ELT test stations will only be granted to applicants to train personnel in the operation and location of ELTs, or for testing related to the manufacture or design of ELTs. 47 C.F.R. § 87.473(b). You are an aircraft parts distributor, not an ELT testing or manufacturing facility. 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. h h h h h h h h h r s ¦ § ¨ (c) h h h h h NLÿ‰PNG -Þ„äù Tüo ü´hjD‹ 5/Ô8ãÎb0Ù�Ø#~⇂{ì-(c)BM8Ö- ±´ßÀM''à; æzFØœ'ç%Ë'Np­½ ÍÉ#´sbØ�``ܪ­GðG €Î7zö&=¼6›Zw^`í ôQ|Ìd"\½-ÿk ü †bXê"(c):2¶Lðj3 2#D~¢Í#Ý3 %''õl êT£¦P õ¦8(+ M(c)...ÓtmeÙ ý^ T9 h-=Yí Ÿôã5nT_³...çâñ8ð¥�f¢">T ‡� ~(R)ô´àÇõÆåoÄÉ[gØ)V vÆwà@òÆ jÝ•§9 ¸ WAð
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279718A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279718A1.txt
    • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit °Áê Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Respironics, Inc. Request for Waiver of Section 15.205 of the Commission's Rules to Permit the Marketing and Operation of Certain Medical Communications Devices that Operate in the 90-110 KHz Band ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 05-331 ERRATUM Released: January 28, 2008 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: On December 26, 2007, the Office of Engineering and Technology released an
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280706A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280706A1.pdf
    • Inc. ) ) Citation No.: C200832900009 Los Angeles, CA 90022 ) CITATION Released: February 29, 2008 By the Acting Interim District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to King Taco Restaurants, Inc., for violation of Sections 15.5(b) and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). On February 14, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office received a complaint that a signal was causing interference to station KB97260, operating on frequencies from 2458 to 2492 MHz. On February 19, 2008, an agent from the Los Angeles Office investigated the interference report and located the interfering signals emanating from a cluster of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282166A1.pdf
    • act, means the commission or omission of such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day.'' 47 U.S.C. § 301. 156.7-156.9 MHz is a restricted band for purposes of Part 15 of the Rules. Thus, under no circumstances may non-licensed Part 15 devices operate on this band. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). 47 C.F.R. § 80.13(a). 47 U.S.C. § 325(a). 47 C.F.R. § 80.334. 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. §1.80. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2)(E). 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311, 47 U.S.C. §§ 301, 325. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ~  $ F M ¹ ¼ ½
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298353A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298353A1.pdf
    • prohibited. Persons operating or using radio transmitters must be licensed or authorized by the FCC, pursuant to Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. GPS jammers are intentional radiators and operate in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. The purpose of GPS jammers is to block or interfere with radio communications that are conveying navigation information. Such use is prohibited by Section 333 of the Act, which states that ``[n]o person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under this Act
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299884A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299884A1.pdf
    • agents. Persons operating or using radio transmitters must be licensed or authorized by the FCC, pursuant to Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. GPS Jammers are intentional radiators and operate in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. The purpose of GPS Jammers is to block or interfere with radio communications that are conveying navigation information. Such use is prohibited by Section 333 of the Act, which states that ``[n]o person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under this Act
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301509A1.txt
    • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit H & : Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Respironics, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation Requests for Waiver of Section 15.205 of the Commission's Rules to Permit the Marketing and Operation of Certain Medical Communications Devices that Operate in the 90-110 kHz band ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 05-331 ERRATUM Released: September 16, 2010 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: On September 15, 2010, the Commission released an Order, DA 10-1744, in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-163A1.pdf
    • are requested on whether such an attenuation level is necessary, or whether additional attenuation below 2 GHz is possible or necessary. We also seek comment on whether the proposed reduction in the emission levels should apply to all emissions below 2 GHz or only to emissions below 2 GHz that fall within the restricted bands shown in 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. Comments also are requested on whether UWB devices other than GPRs, and possibly through-wall imaging systems, should be permitted to operate below 2 GHz provided they comply with these reduced emission levels. Commenting parties should address any additional changes to the technical standards or to the operational parameters of UWB transmitters that could be employed to facilitate the operation of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-158A1.txt
    • shall be at least 20 dB below that in the 100 kHz bandwidth within the band that contains the highest level of the desired power, based on either an RF conducted or a radiated measurement. Attenuation below the general limits specified in §15.209(a) is not required. In addition, radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands, as defined in § 15.205(a), must also comply with the radiated emission limits specified in § 15.209(a) (see § 15.205(c)). (d) For direct sequence spread spectrum and digitally modulated systems, the peak power spectral density conducted from the intentional radiator to the antenna shall not be greater than 8 dBm in any 3 kHz band during any time interval of continuous transmission. (e) For the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.txt
    • 30 meters. Section 15.209 further requires that any emissions appearing outside of the 13.56 MHz band must not exceed the general radiated emissions limit of 30 µV/m measured at a distance of 30 meters. The 13.56 MHz band is located near the 13.36-13.41 MHz radio astronomy band, which is designated as a restricted band of operation under Part 15. Section 15.205 of the Commission's rules permits only spurious emissions in designated restricted frequency bands. The National Council for Information Technology Standardization Technical Committee B10 (``NCITS B10'') filed a petition for rulemaking requesting that the Commission amend Section 15.225 to harmonize the rules with the standards for RFID devices used in Europe and Australia. It argues that harmonizing the rules would permit
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-357A1.txt
    • rules, whichever is the lesser attenuation. 15. Finally, we will address harmonic emissions. Section 15.209 set the limit for out-of-band emissions of Part 15 devices, which is 500 uV/m at 3 meters. Harmonic emissions from transmitters operating under Section 15.249 are permitted at different levels, generally higher, than other out-of-band emissions, and those limits are specified in that section. Section 15.205(b), however, provides that the Section 15.209 limits shall not be exceeded in the restricted bands. All of the harmonics of the 24 GHz transmitters at issue here fall into the restricted band above 38.6 GHz, and thus must observe the 15.209 limits, rather than the less restrictive 15.249 limits. The Commission is considering in a separate proceeding, the possibility of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-151A1.txt
    • shall be at least 20 dB below that in the 100 kHz bandwidth within the band that contains the highest level of the desired power, based on either an RF conducted or a radiated measurement. Attenuation below the general limits specified in §15.209(a) is not required. In addition, radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands, as defined in § 15.205(a), must also comply with the radiated emission limits specified in § 15.209(a) (see § 15.205(c)). (d) For digitally modulated systems, the peak power spectral density conducted from the intentional radiator to the antenna shall not be greater than 8 dBm in any 3 kHz band during any time interval of continuous transmission. (e) Reserved (f) For the purposes of this
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.txt
    • which specify measurements on each conductor with respect to ground, a common-mode measurement. Furthermore, there is no evidence in the record of problems with the current methods, nor did ARRL provide substantiated data on the subject. Accordingly, we decline to modify our current rules with regard to test methods on conducted emissions at the present time. Restricted bands. Currently, Section 15.205 of the rules prohibits intentional radiators from emitting any RF signals, other than spurious emissions, within certain designated ``restricted'' bands. In its comments, the ARRL requests that we amend Section 15.205 to indicate that spurious emissions do not include out-of-band emissions that are located within 250 percent of the necessary bandwidth. ARRL also requests that the prohibition against operating within
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-328A1.txt
    • 47 C.F.R. § 15.207 and 209. Specific frequency bands are designated as restricted bands in Part 15 to protect certain sensitive radio services from interference, such as those that protect safety of life or those that use very low received levels, such as satellite downlinks or radio astronomy. Only spurious emissions are permitted in restricted bands. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.209, 15.231, 15.241 and 15.242. Effective October 16, 2002, equipment authorizations will no longer be granted for medical telemetry transmitters that operate in the TV broadcast bands. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.37(i). ``Spectrum Policy Task Force Seeks Public Comment on Issues Related to Commission's Spectrum Policies,'' Public Notice, ET Docket No. 02-135 (rel. June 6, 2002).
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.txt
    • are ample provisions to operate such devices outside of the restricted bands. We also do not believe that there is any justification for reducing the minimum bandwidth to 200 MHz, as sought by MSSI. One of the major regulations being addressed in this proceeding is the operation of Part 15 devices in the restricted bands described in 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. We are amending the rules in this Report and Order to permit UWB devices to emit in certain restricted bands because the bandwidths employed by those systems are so wide that they have difficulty finding spectrum to operate without transmitting in one or more of the restricted bands. We do not find a similar difficulty finding 200 MHz of contiguous
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.txt
    • carrier current systems, devices operated under the provisions of §§ 15.211, 15.213, and 15.221, and devices operating below 490 kHz in which all emissions are at least 40 dB below the limits in § 15.209 shall be verified pursuant to the procedures in Subpart J of part 2 of this chapter prior to marketing. * * * * * Section 15.205 is amended by adding new paragraphs (d)(6) and (d)(7). § 15.205 Restricted bands of operation. * * * * * (d) * * * (7) Devices operated pursuant to § 15.225 are exempt from complying with this section for the 13.36-13.41 MHz band only. (8) Devices operated in the 24.075-24.175 GHz band under § 15.245 are exempt from complying with
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.txt
    • the GLONASS system. Big LEO Memorandum Opinion & Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 12865, ¶14. The Commission also established a plan for protecting RAS. Big LEO Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 5976-83, ¶¶ 100-121. 47 C.F.R. § 15.247 (permitting frequency hopping and direct sequence spread spectrum intentional radiators, including for the 2400-2483.5 MHz band, meeting enumerated criteria). See id. § 15.205. > (last visited, Jan. 6, 2002) (describing services). See supra § III(D) (clarifying that Iridium will be permitted to operate ATC in the 1621.35-1626.5 MHz band and Globalstar will be permitted to operate ATC in 1610-1615.5 MHz and 2492.5-2498 MHz Big LEO MSS bands prior to completion of this rulemaking and subject to the ATC authorization procedures that we adopt
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1_Erratum.doc
    • the GLONASS system. Big LEO Memorandum Opinion & Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 12865, ¶14. The Commission also established a plan for protecting RAS. Big LEO Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 5976-83, ¶¶ 100-121. 47 C.F.R. § 15.247 (permitting frequency hopping and direct sequence spread spectrum intentional radiators, including for the 2400-2483.5 MHz band, meeting enumerated criteria). See id. § 15.205. > (last visited, Jan. 6, 2002) (describing services). See supra § III(D) (clarifying that Iridium will be permitted to operate ATC in the 1621.35-1626.5 MHz band and Globalstar will be permitted to operate ATC in 1610-1615.5 MHz and 2492.5-2498 MHz Big LEO MSS bands prior to completion of this rulemaking and subject to the ATC authorization procedures that we adopt
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.txt
    • (WISPs) have expressed a desire for more flexibility in the Part 15 equipment authorization rules so that they can mix and match the components of a radio transmission system without the need to obtain an equipment authorization for every combination. The rules generally require equipment authorization for a complete device, including the radio transmitter and a specific antenna. Further, Section 15.205 prohibits marketing of external radio frequency amplifiers, except as part of a complete transmission system consisting of an intentional radiator, external radio frequency amplifier and antenna. The system may only be used in the configuration that was authorized. WISPs assert that they often experience difficulty in tailoring their radio transmission systems to meet particular needs due to the lack of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.txt
    • limits specified in paragraph (d) of this section as part of their application. Technical information showing the basis for this statement must be submitted to the Commission upon request. * * * * * PART 15 - RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICES The authority citation continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302, 303, 304, 307, 336 and 544A Section 15.205 is revised by amending paragraph (d)(4) to read as follows: § 15.205 Restricted bands of operation. * * * * * (d) * * * * * * * * (4) Any equipment operated under the provisions § 15.253, § 15.255 or § 15.257. * * * * * Section 15.215 is revised by amending paragraphs (a) and (c) to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.txt
    • which allows a receiver with the corresponding code to hear the desired signal. There are many variations of TDMA and CDMA systems in use. See generally Scott Seidel, Robert Breinig, Robert Berezdivin, Adaptive Air Interface Waveform for Flexibility and Performance in Commercial Wireless Communications Systems, presentation to the World Wireless Research Forum, March 8, 2002. . See 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. Unlicensed devices may not intentionally transmit in these bands. See Task Force Report at 58. See generally Rural NPRM at 7, para. 10. Rural NPRM at 27, para. 50. See generally Rural NPRM at 7, para. 10. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.247. The spread spectrum rules allow operation in the bands 902-928 MHz, 2400-2483.5 MHz and 5725-5850 MHz. See 47
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.txt
    • using a CISPR quasi-peak detector whereas emissions above 960 MHz are measured using an RMS detector. In the R&O, the Commission concluded that it was necessary to establish a minimum UWB bandwidth to prevent narrowband Part 15 devices from operating under the UWB standards, as such operation would allow them to transmit in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. R&O, supra, at para. 30-32. The restricted bands are bands allocated for the operation of radio services used for safety-of-life applications or radio services that, by the nature of their operation, require the reception of very low signal levels. There are sufficient spaces between the restricted bands to permit the operation of narrowband Part 15 systems. Accordingly, unlike UWB devices,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.txt
    • 89-553, Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 10 FCC Rcd 6884, 6908 (1995). For further discussion concerning unlicensed operation in the 2500-2690 MHz band, including discussion of the current rules relating to unlicensed operation in these bands, see Section III.E.6, infra. See 47 C.F.R. Part 15. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.5. 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. Spectrum Policy Report at 40. 47 C.F.R. § 21.924(c). 47 C.F.R. § 21.925(b). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 90.663, 101.525(a), 101.1009. See paras. 62 -65 supra, regarding geographic area licensing for unassigned ITFS spectrum. 47 C.F.R. § 21.932(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 21.925(c)(4), 21.932(c). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 101.1331 (MAS): Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4_Erratum.doc
    • 89-553, Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 10 FCC Rcd 6884, 6908 (1995). For further discussion concerning unlicensed operation in the 2500-2690 MHz band, including discussion of the current rules relating to unlicensed operation in these bands, see Section III.E.6, infra. See 47 C.F.R. Part 15. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.5. 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. Spectrum Policy Report at 40. 47 C.F.R. § 21.924(c). 47 C.F.R. § 21.925(b). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 90.663, 101.525(a), 101.1009. See paras. 62 -65 supra, regarding geographic area licensing for unassigned ITFS spectrum. 47 C.F.R. § 21.932(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 21.925(c)(4), 21.932(c). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 101.1331 (MAS): Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-99A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-99A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-99A1.txt
    • Atheros Comments at 8-9. Id. at 9. See Motorola Reply Comments at 4. PSWN Comments at 3. See, e.g., PSWN Comments at 6: APCO Reply Comments at 6. See LMS Wireless Late-Filed Ex Parte Reply Comments at 6; Atheros Communications, Inc. (Atheros) Comments at 5-6. See Atheros Comments at 3. See 47 CFR § 15.247. We note, however, that Section 15.205 does not permit Part 15 operations in the band 4.5-5.15 GHz. , infra. Further, we do not believe that prohibiting unlicensed Part 15 commercial operations in this band will have a deleterious effect on innovation and access to spectrum in the Part 15 context. Our belief is premised on the notion that it is likely that unlicensed Part 15 commercial
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-100A1.txt
    • unlicensed devices and their geographic orientation to FSS earth stations. We are not persuaded by SIA's argument because, as explained below, we believe that it is feasible to develop operating rules for unlicensed devices in a manner that should address the in-band interference concerns raised by SIA. Accordingly, in order to accommodate new unlicensed use, we propose to revise Section 15.205(a) by removing the restricted designation from the 3650-3700 MHz portion of the currently restricted 3600-4400 MHz band. Adjacent Band Emissions. In proposing to remove the restricted status of the 3650-3700 MHz band, we also recognize that it would be adjacent to frequency bands that will continue to be restricted. Therefore, in order to maintain the same degree of protection for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-113A1.txt
    • that it creates. See 47 C.F.R. Part 15. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.5. As defined in Section 2.1(c) of the Commission's rules and the international radio regulations, harmful interference is ``interference which ... seriously degrades, obstructs, of repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with these [international] Radio Regulations. (RR).'' See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1(c). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.205 and 15.209. Remote control and medical telemetry devices are the only unlicensed transmitters that are currently permitted to operate in the TV bands. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.231, 15.241 and 15.242. See 47 C.F.R. § 73.603(a). Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact upon the Existing Television Broadcast Service, MM Docket 87-268, Sixth Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 14588 (1997).
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.txt
    • believe that the issue of high-power unlicensed operation can and should be considered in the broader context of other proceedings addressing unlicensed operation. Therefore, we decline to permit unlicensed operations in the band except as indicated above and to the extent already permitted by Part 15 of our Rules. However, we will lift the restriction on unlicensed operation in Section 15.205 of our Rules and permit low-power unlicensed devices to operate on frequencies 2655-2690 MHz under our current Part 15 rules. Given the existence of licensed services in this frequency band, and given the ability of licensed operation to co-exist with unlicensed operations in the 2500-2655 MHz band, we see no reason to maintain this restriction in this band. RF Safety
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-165A1.txt
    • that any replacement antenna used with a device will not cause emissions to exceed authorized levels. Furthermore, the requirement that U-NII band devices incorporate a non-standard connector which couples only to the transmitter with which it is authorized will provide assurance that unauthorized antennas will not be used with the devices. 3. Flexible Equipment Authorization for Radio Transmission Systems Section 15.205 of the rules prohibits marketing of external radio frequency amplifiers, except as part of a complete transmission system consisting of an intentional radiator, external radio frequency amplifier and antenna. In the Notice, we proposed to allow marketing of separate radio frequency power amplifiers on a limited basis. We proposed to restrict such marketing to amplifiers that are only capable of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.txt
    • manufacturer of low-power opportunistic devices for use of the licensed spectrum on a non-interfering basis. Although several commenters contended that opportunistic use should not occur in licensed bands without the consent of the licensee, see note 233 supra, we note that the Commission will generally continue to consider the benefits of Part 15 access on a band-by-band basis. Under sections 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's rules, unlicensed devices are permitted to operate at very low power levels in all bands except certain specified restricted bands. 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.205, 15.209. Spectrum Policy Task Force Report at 57. Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.249. See generally Cognitive Radio NPRM, 18 FCC Rcd at 26888-26889 ¶¶ 77-80. Consistent with our discussion of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.txt
    • UWB emission. Imaging systems consist of GPRs, wall imaging systems, through-wall imaging systems, surveillance systems, and medical imaging systems. The operation of Government radio stations is regulated by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), while operation of stations by private industry, by state and local governments and by the public is regulated by the FCC. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. The restricted bands are frequency bands employed for safety of life applications and for use by radio services that must function, as a nature or their operation, using extremely low received signal levels. The latter systems may be passive, such as radio astronomy, or active, such as satellite down links and wildlife tracking systems. Unlicensed devices generally are not allowed
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-98A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-98A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-98A1.txt
    • 1-2. See Savi comments at 3-5. See Savi comments at 6-8. See OSCO comments at 1, Genie comments at 1, Chamberlain comments at 3 and Ademco comments at 3. Remote control door openers may operate on any frequency above 70 MHz except in certain designated restricted bands. They may operate anywhere within the 425-435 MHz band. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.205 and 15.231. See OSCO comments at 1. See Genie comments at 1. See Chamberlain comments at 4-7. See ARRL comments at 11. See ARRL comments at 12. See ARRL comments at 13. See ARRL comments at 15-16. See ARRL comments at 17. See ARRL comments at 4. See ARRL comments at 7. See letter from NTIA to the Chief, Office
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-136A1.txt
    • that the re-radiator system could interfere with accurate E-911 location reporting. See USGPSIC Reply Comments, July 26, 2004. In ``spoofing,'' the signal generated by a GPS re-radiator could cause an active GPS receiver to lock onto a signal that appears legitimate but is not, and create signal position, velocity and timing errors. 47 C.F.R. § 15.211(a). See 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. See WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 05-136 Federal Communications Commission FCC 05-136 �@ˆþÿ �@ˆþÿ �@ˆþÿ À Ë . : ; ¿ À Ê Ë Ï í ÿ hØ hØ � F E � š€ � š€ � š€ € š€ € ˜€ a Ø ­
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.txt
    • Mobile Satellite Service (MSS) in the United States and is a restricted band under Part 15 of the rules. Unlicensed devices are not permitted to transmit in that band in the United States to prevent interference to the MSS, while in other countries unlicensed operation is permitted in all or part of the 2483.5-2500 MHz band. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.205, 15.247, 15.249 and 25.202. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.915(a)(1). See Notice at 26895. Id. See Wi-Fi Alliance comments at 7, ITI comments at 10, Cisco comments at 15 and Dell comments at 5. See Wi-Fi Alliance comments at 7. The IEEE 802.11 Task Group d (TGd) developed IEEE Std 802.11d-2001, which is an amendment to IEEE Std 802.11, 1999 Edition.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-58A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-58A1.txt
    • C.F.R. §§ 15.501-15.525. Imaging systems consist of GPRs, wall imaging systems, through-wall imaging systems, surveillance systems, and medical imaging systems. The operation of Federal Government radio stations is regulated by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (``NTIA''), while operation of stations by commercial entities, state and local governments, and the general public is regulated by the Commission. 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. 47 C.F.R. § 15.5. These analyses and tests are filed in the record for the UWB proceeding in ET Docket No. 98-153. See, for example, NTIA Special Publication 01-43, Assessment of Compatibility between Ultrawideband Devices and Selected Federal Systems, January 2001; NTIA Special Publication 01-45, Assessment of Compatibility between Ultrawideband (UWB) Systems and Global Positioning System (GPS) Receivers, February 2001;
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-103A1.txt
    • its inductive coupling technique. Part 15 of our rules restricts radiation from unlicensed devices in certain frequency bands ("restricted bands") to spurious emissions only. The 90-110 kHz band is included among the restricted bands in order to protect incumbent the Loran-C operations. Guidant states that it is unclear how induction devices fit under the Commission's restricted band prohibition of Section 15.205. While acknowledging that its devices produce RF energy in the 90-110 KHz band, Guidant also argues that these emissions could be considered spurious under our rules. In that regard, Guidant argues that its devices rely upon the magnetic pulses rather than the RF energy produced in order to function. Furthermore, Guidant argues that since the RF energy produced by its
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-156A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-156A1.txt
    • devices. Intentional radiators operating in the frequency bands 76-88 MHz, 174-216 MHz, 470-608 MHz and 614-698 MHz. § 15.705 Cross reference. (a) The provisions of Subparts A, B, and C of this part apply to unlicensed TV band devices, except where specific provisions are contained in subpart H. Manufacturers should note that this includes the provisions of Sections 15.203 and 15.205. (b) The requirements of subpart H apply only to the radio transmitter contained in the TV band device. Other aspects of the operation of a TV band device may be subject to requirements contained elsewhere in this chapter. In particular, a TV band device that includes digital circuitry not directly associated with the radio transmitter also is subject to the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.txt
    • of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture amount of seventy five thousand dollars ($75,000) against San Jose Navigation, Inc. (``San Jose'') for its marketing of intentional radiating equipment, Global Positioning Satellite (``GPS'') signal re-radiator kits, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The GPS re-radiator kits are not Commission authorized and are not eligible for such authorization, because they operate in restricted frequency bands allocated for authorized safety-of-life operations. II. BACKGROUND Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment that emits radio
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-3A1.txt
    • specifically Global Positioning Satellite (``GPS'') signal re-radiator kits, which are not authorized and not eligible for authorization by the Commission because the devices operate in restricted frequency bands. We further find that, in marketing these GPS signal re-radiator kits, San Jose willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For San Jose's violations, we impose a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000). II. BACKGROUND Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.txt
    • Policies and procedures for operation in the TV Bands,'' prepared by the IEEE 802.22 Working Group of the LAN/MAN Standards Committee, November 2006. We note, however, that the IEEE 802.22 plan does not provide for fixed devices to communicate with personal/portable devices on a master/client basis. See 47 C.F.R. Part 15. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.5. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.205 and 15.209. Section 15.205 sets forth the restricted bands for operation where unlicensed intentional radiators are not allowed to operate. Section 15.209 provides the general radiated emission limits that apply to intentional radiators, including limits on their out-of-band emissions. Remote control and medical telemetry devices are the only unlicensed transmitters that are currently permitted to operate in the TV bands.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-107A1.txt
    • we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Commission and San Jose Technology, Inc. (formerly known as San Jose Navigation, Inc.) (collectively ``San Jose''). The Consent Decree terminates the Commission's enforcement proceeding regarding San Jose's compliance with the equipment requirements set forth in Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules. The Commission and San Jose have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the enforcement proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the available facts related to this matter, we conclude that there are no substantial or material questions of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-13A1.txt
    • that in granting a waiver, an agency must explain why deviation from the general rule better serves the public interest than would strict adherence to the rule). We note that the Commission's rules allow unlicensed devices to operate in any frequency band except for those few bands where such operations are specifically not permitted under the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). The 24.25-30 GHz band is not a restricted band, and thus is available for use by unlicensed devices. We further note that, although not required to under the applicable waiver standard, OET described in the Order the unique characteristics of the technology at issue here and why compliance with the rules was not feasible. Order at ¶¶ 2-4. The device
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-14A1.txt
    • the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Part 15 of the Commission's Rules To Establish Regulations for Tank Level Probing Radars in the Frequency Band 77-81 GHz Siemens Milltronics Process Instruments Inc. Request for Waiver for Tank Level Probing Radars under Part 15 of the Commission's Rules Ohmart/VEGA Corp., Request for Waiver of Section 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules to Permit Certification and Immediate Marketing of a Tank Level Probing Radar Operating in the Frequency Band 77-81 GHz ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 10-23 RM-11352 ET Docket No. 06-216 ET Docket No. 07-96 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING AND ORDER Adopted: January
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-151A1.txt
    • C.F.R. §§ 15.501-15.525. The restricted bands are frequency bands employed by radio services that are used for safety-related purposes or that must function, as a nature of their operation, using extremely low received signal levels. These latter systems may be passive, such as radio astronomy, or active, such as satellite down links and wildlife tracking systems. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. There is sufficient spectrum between restricted bands to allow for the operation of non-UWB devices without incursion into the restricted frequency bands. See First R&O at paras. 30-32 for additional discussion on this issue. These analyses and tests are filed in the record for the UWB proceeding in ET Docket No. 98-153. See, e.g., NTIA Special Publication 01-43, Assessment of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.txt
    • certifications that we should require for such institutions? Additionally, if commenters believe we should incorporate a broader range of institutions, what criteria should we use for selection, and how does that more effectively balance the interests at stake here? To be effective, the authorization must allow for experimentation within the largest range of frequencies practical. As an initial matter, Section 15.205(a) of our rules lists ``restricted bands'' that typically host sensitive or vital operations and that warrant special attention to prevent possible harmful interference. Because it would not be appropriate to include these frequencies in a research program experimental radio license, we propose that the license not allow experiments on frequencies that are listed in Section 15.205(a). We recognize that Section
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-198A1.txt
    • (``700 MHz Band Second Report and Order''). Google had sought clarification generally as to whether such dynamic spectrum management techniques are permissible in the commercial 700 MHz band. See id. Id. at 15378-15380 ¶¶ 241-248. See, e.g., Google Comments at 11. Currently, unlicensed operations are now allowed in some portions of the spectrum above 38.6 GHz. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. Section 25.131(b) of the Commission's Rules permits registration of receive-only earth stations operating in the fixed-satellite service operating with U.S.-licensed satellites in order to protect them from interference from terrestrial microwave stations in bands shared co-equally with the fixed service. However, there are several satellite bands which are not shared with the fixed service and registration is not permitted. Since
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.txt
    • technical characteristics of the service, the lack of safeguards in our rules to promote safe secondary operations, and the operations with which WMTS shares spectrum. Id. For example, WMTS operates on a primary basis and MedRadio operates on a secondary basis. For recent examples of unlicensed wireless medical devices see, for example, Boston Scientific Corp., Request for Waiver of Section 15.205 of the Commission's Rules to Permit the Marketing and Operation of Certain Medical Communications Devices that Operate in the 90-110 kHz band, ET Dkt. No. 05-331, Order, DA 11-1427, 26 FCC Rcd 11405 (2011) (waiver of Part 15 rule to allow marketing and unlicensed operation of implanted cardiac devices in restricted bands); Letter to Mitchell Lazarus from Julius P. Knapp,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.txt
    • adopted the Notice and Order in this proceeding in response to: (1) a Petition for Rulemaking from Siemens Milltronics Process Instruments Inc. (Siemens) requesting that the Commission amend its rules to allow TLPR devices to operate in the ``restricted'' 77-81 GHz frequency band inside steel or concrete tank enclosures; (2) a concurrent request for waiver, also by Siemens, of Section 15.205(a) to allow TLPR operation in the 78-79 GHz frequency band, subject to certain conditions; and (3) a similar request for waiver by Ohmart/VEGA Corporation (Ohmart/VEGA) to allow TLPR operation in the 77-81 GHz band. The Notice and Order proposed to modify Part 15 of the rules to allow the 77-81 GHz frequency band to be used on an unlicensed basis
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-208A1.pdf
    • within these designated frequency bands is limited to specific applications. The sensitive bands referenced here are bands employed by radio services that must function, as a nature of their operation, using extremely low received signal levels. These systems may be passive, such as radio astronomy, or active, such as satellite down links and wildlife tracking systems. See 47 CFR § 15.205. See 47 CFR § 15.209(a). See 47 CFR §§ 15.31-15.35. eparated by 1/T where T is the time, in seconds, of the pulse spacing. Fundamental emissions consist of the carrier and modulation products but exclude unwanted emissions. In other words, the fundamental emission is equivalent to the necessary bandwidth. The necessary bandwidth is defined and calculated in 47 CFR §
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.txt
    • shall be at least 20 dB below that in the 100 kHz bandwidth within the band that contains the highest level of the desired power, based on either an RF conducted or a radiated measurement. Attenuation below the general limits specified in §15.209(a) is not required. In addition, radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands, as defined in § 15.205(a), must also comply with the radiated emission limits specified in § 15.209(a) (see § 15.205(c)). (d) For direct sequence spread spectrum and digitally modulated systems, the peak power spectral density conducted from the intentional radiator to the antenna shall not be greater than 8 dBm in any 3 kHz band during any time interval of continuous transmission. (e) For the
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1014A1.html
    • 0.111(a)(17) of the Commission's rules,1 we revoke the above- captioned equipment authorizations held by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. (``Tung Shih'') for its learned mode remote control devices (``learned mode transmitters''). We conclude, based upon the evidence described herein, that the learned mode transmitters manufactured by Tung Shih have the capability to transmit impermissibly on restricted frequencies specified in section 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules.2 We further conclude that Tung Shih's learned mode transmitters also have the capability to transmit impermissibly on frequencies that are not authorized by their equipment authorizations. II. BACKGROUND 2. On January 31, 2005, the Commission released an Order to Show Cause designating this case for hearing.3 The OSC specified the following issues: (a) To determine whether
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1029A1.html
    • Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech GPS Antenna Booster, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech GPS Antenna Booster operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions3 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech GPS Antenna Booster apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Wal-Mart has violated Section 302(b) of the Act
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1030A1.html
    • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions2 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that GPS Outfitters has violated Section 302(b) of the
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1031A1.html
    • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions1 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Dick's has violated Section 302(b) of the Act
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1033A1.html
    • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions1 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Fogdog has violated Section 302(b) of the Act
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1034A1.html
    • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions1 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Tweeter has violated Section 302(b) of the Act
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1035A1.html
    • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions1 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Sports Authority has violated Section 302(b) of the
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1036A1.html
    • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions1 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Sport Chalet has violated Section 302(b) of the
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1037A1.html
    • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions1 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that the GPS Store has violated Section 302(b) of
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1107A1.html
    • in this chapter. Pursuant to Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the GPS re- radiating devices, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing. Moreover, the GPS re-radiating devices operate in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions2 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the GPS re- radiating devices apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Dallas has violated Section 302(b) of the Act
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1155A1.html
    • Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas operate in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions4 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Furthermore, Gilsson admits in its letter of March 26, 2005
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-191A1.html
    • learned mode remote control transmitter devices (``learned mode transmitters''), FCC ID Nos. MMORC0196M and MMORMC575, should be revoked. Devices manufactured by Tung Shih under those FCC ID numbers apparently have the capability to transmit on frequencies that are not authorized by their equipment certifications. In addition, these devices apparently have the capability to transmit on restricted frequencies specified in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules.2 II. BACKGROUND 2. Learned mode or ``trainable'' transmitters are typically sold as universal replacements or duplicates for garage door openers, keyless entry systems, security alarms, remote switches and similar types of radio controlled devices. These transmitters are designed to recognize and replicate the operating frequency, duty cycle and coding scheme of the targeted radio system.3 3. As
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2998A1.html
    • VA 22312-2707 Re: File No. EB-04-SE- 362 Dear Sir or Madame: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing a radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated January 11, 2005,1 (Letter of Inquiry) the Spectrum Enforcement Division (SED) of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau informed Navtech Seminars and GPS Supply (Navtech) that it had initiated an
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1442A1.html
    • limits based on the use of RMS averaging over a time interval, as permitted under paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the attenuation required under this paragraph shall be 30 dB instead of 20 dB. Attenuation below the general limits specified in Sec. 15.209(a) is not required. In addition, radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands, as defined in Sec. 15.205(a), must also comply with the radiated emission limits specified in Sec. 15.209(a) (see Sec. 15.205(c)). 7. Furthermore, in accepting the grant of an equipment authorization, AboCom warranted that: each unit of equipment marketed under such grant and bearing the identification specified in the grant will conform to the unit that was measured and that the data (design and rated operational
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2019A1.html
    • as amended ("Communications Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain wireless cameras, specifically, 10 Watt 1.2 GHz Wireless Camera Video AV Transmitter Receivers ("1.2 GHz wireless cameras"), that are not eligible to receive a grant of equipment certification, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On August 30, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that LightObject d/b/a Actionbuy Trading Co. ("LightObject") was marketing on eBay wireless cameras
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-30A1.html
    • of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture amount of seventy five thousand dollars ($75,000) against San Jose Navigation, Inc. ("San Jose") for its marketing of intentional radiating equipment, Global Positioning Satellite ("GPS") signal re-radiator kits, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The GPS re-radiator kits are not Commission authorized and are not eligible for such authorization, because they operate in restricted frequency bands allocated for authorized safety-of-life operations. II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment that emits
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1673A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Audio Direct is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1674A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Buy.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices.
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1675A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Audio Discounters is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1676A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Ambient Weather is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1754A1.html
    • Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Chumbo.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices.
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1756A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that CompSource, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1757A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Cybergiftcenter.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1758A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Dealznet.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices.
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1763A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that TheElectronicCompany.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices.
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1764A1.html
    • Berkowitz: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Focus Camera, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1766A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Fadfusion is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices.
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1767A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that DSMiller.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices.
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-299A1.html
    • 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices ("jammers"). II. background 2. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information, through several informal complaints, alleging that RMR was manufacturing and marketing unauthorized police radar jammers in the United States. The
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-304A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Auto-Radar-Detectors.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-307A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Best Radar Detectors, were marketing police radar
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-308A1.html
    • an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Electronic Retail Solutions, Inc., were marketing police radar jamming devices
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-309A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Global Trade Group, Inc., were marketing police
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-310A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Hoeffener International, were marketing police radar jamming
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-311A1.html
    • an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radar Detectors Direct, were marketing police radar jamming devices in
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-312A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radarjammers.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-313A1.html
    • an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including The Twister Group, Inc., were marketing police radar jamming devices
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3266A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Overseas Best Buy, Inc. dba 110220volts.com is marketing the
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3270A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3392A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that ShoppersChoice.com, LLC is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3393A1.html
    • Sir/Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Shopila Corporation is marketing the RMR-C450 device. On July
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3483A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Gain Saver is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3599A1.html
    • Adopted: August 14, 2007 Released: August 16, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) against Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices. 2. On January 31, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $25,000 to RMR. RMR has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3974A1.html
    • for marketing in the United States certain wireless cameras and wireless camera converters, specifically, 10 Watt, 1.2 GHz Cantek Wireless Camera and Camera Converter Transmitter Receivers ("1.2 GHz wireless camera transmitter receivers"), that are not eligible to receive a grant of equipment certification, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communication Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 6, 2007, staff in the Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") visited the internet store for Surveillance-Video products, www.surveillance-video.com ("Surveillance-Video online store"). The Surveillance-Video online store listed the 1.2
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4874A1.html
    • Dear Mr. Melo: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), to BRD Security Products, Inc. d/b/a Spybase.com ("BRD") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 9, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("the Division") initiated an investigation into whether BRD is marketing in the United
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-3A1.html
    • specifically Global Positioning Satellite ("GPS") signal re-radiator kits, which are not authorized and not eligible for authorization by the Commission because the devices operate in restricted frequency bands. We further find that, in marketing these GPS signal re-radiator kits, San Jose willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For San Jose's violations, we impose a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that "[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1196A1.html
    • EB-08-SE-202 Dear Mr. Bassler: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), to David Steele Enterprises, Inc. ("David Steele") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry ("LOI") dated May 15, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("Division") initiated an investigation into whether David Steele is marketing
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1202A1.html
    • #12 Reseda, California 91335-6164 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-203 Dear Mr. Henry: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a), and for failing to fully respond to Enforcement Bureau directives to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated May 16, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-155A1.html
    • and Mr. Bollaro: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), to Garden State Investigations and Security ("Garden State") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 2, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("Division") initiated an investigation into whether Garden State is marketing in the United
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1685A1.html
    • Vladimir Reznik, Owner RangeVideo Re: File No. EB-08-SE-182 Dear Mr. Reznik: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803 and 15.205(a), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol, in violation of Section 1.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2051A1.html
    • with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the U.S. However, it does not appear that devices such as the GPS Counter Track, and the GPS Counter Track Portable, are capable of receiving a grant of certification. The devices operate in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Moreover, the purpose of GPS jammers is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 333, which states that "[n]o person shall willfully or maliciously
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1428A1.html
    • Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find Iftron Technologies, Inc. ("Iftron") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of five thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violation involves Iftron's marketing of an audio/video transmitter that operates on a restricted frequency and therefore is not eligible for a grant of equipment certification. II. BACKGROUND 1. The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") received information that Iftron was marketing audio/video transmitters that are capable of operating on a restricted frequency, 2.468
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1697A1.html
    • Suite 155 Spokane, WA 99218 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-602 Dear Mr. O'Harvey: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to The Spy Store, Inc. ("Spy Store") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 2.1203 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1772A1.html
    • San Jose, CA 95124-5548 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-692 Dear Mr. Hirsch: This is an official CITATION issued to Future Hobbies pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In response to a complaint alleging that Future Hobbies was marketing unauthorized audio/video transmitters that are capable of operating on restricted frequencies in the 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz frequency bands, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2506A1.html
    • 33327 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-099 Dear Mr. Roshberg: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Creativewirelesssav.com d/b/a/ Creative Audio, Inc. ("Creative Audio") for marketing in the United States radiofrequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry ("LOI") dated August 22, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("Division") initiated an investigation into whether Creative Audio was marketing in the United States six uncertified
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-09-2623A1.html
    • 10901-3834 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-142 Dear Mr. Lee: This is an official CITATION, issued to SCS Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Spy Camera Specialists, Inc. ("Spy Camera"), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau ("Division") received a complaint alleging that Spy Camera was marketing unauthorized wireless video transmitters that operate in the 1.08, 1.12, 1.16 and 1.2 GHz bands.
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2240A1.html
    • the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 7. Jammer devices, however, cannot be certified or authorized because the main purpose of jammer devices is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Communications Act. Moreover, GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, these devices cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore cannot be marketed in the United States. 8. Jammer World advertised on its web site a cell and GPS jammer device, the Handheld GPS and Cell Phone Jammer Mini GPJ, which was subsequently sold and shipped to an Enforcement Bureau agent in the United States.
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2295A1.html
    • the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 7. Jammer devices, however, cannot be certified or authorized because the main purpose of jammer devices is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Communications Act. Moreover, GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, these devices cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore cannot be marketed in the United States. 8. Everbuying.com advertised on its web site a Mini Cigarette Lighter Anti-Tracker GPS Jammer Blocker device, which was subsequently sold and shipped to an Enforcement Bureau agent in the United States. Everbuying.com continues to offer jammer devices for
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/FCC-09-107A1.html
    • we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Commission and San Jose Technology, Inc. (formerly known as San Jose Navigation, Inc.) (collectively "San Jose"). The Consent Decree terminates the Commission's enforcement proceeding regarding San Jose's compliance with the equipment requirements set forth in Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules. 2. The Commission and San Jose have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the enforcement proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the available facts related to this matter, we conclude that there are no substantial or material
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1164A1.html
    • Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to New Generation Hobbies ("New Generation") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules ("Rules") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission" or "FCC"). 2. New Generation should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment,
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1165A1.html
    • Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Sound Around Inc. ("Sound Around") for marketing in the United States radiofrequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules ("Rules") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission"), and for marketing wireless microphones that are capable of operating in the 700 MHz band (698-806 MHz) in violation of section 74.851(g) of the Rules. 2. Sound Around should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct, including removing from display (including online
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1312A1.html
    • the U-NII rules (47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.401-15.407) because Sling operated them as U-NII devices on U-NII frequencies. Sling was also operating on the frequency 5745 MHz, a frequency for which the Rocket M5 is certified. Operation pursuant to section 15.247 of the Rules, however, must comply with the applicable power limits specified therein. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.247. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.205(a). See email from Aaron Tuttle, TDWR & Meteorological Support, FAA, to Miami Office, dated February 22, 2011. According to the collocation agreement, the Rocket M5s employed Ubiquiti Airmax 5G-19-120 sector antennas with a gain of 19 dBi (18.6 dBi according to the Airmax specifications). The antennas photographed by the agents of the Miami Office on January 5, 2011 appeared to
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
    • the company for marketing jammers designed to interfere with cellular and "PCS" utilized by St. Lucie County, Florida Sheriff's Office); Everybuying.com, Citation, DA 10-2295 (Enf. Bur. Dec. 6, 2010) (citing the company for marketing both cell phone signal and Global Positioning System ("GPS") signal blocker devices, and noting that GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules); Jammerworld.com, Citation, DA 10-2240, 2010 WL 4808497 (Enf. Bur. Nov. 26, 2010) (citing the company for marketing a device that jams signals in the Cell Phone Band (845-975 MHz), PCS Band (1800-1996 MHz), and GPS L1 frequency 1575.42 MHz); Victor McCormack, phonejammer.com, Citation, DA 10-1975 (Enf. Bur. Oct. 14, 2010) (citing the company for misrepresentations made during
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-247A1.html
    • the company for marketing jammers designed to interfere with cellular and "PCS" utilized by St. Lucie County, Florida Sheriff's Office); Everybuying.com, Citation, DA 10-2295 (Enf. Bur. Dec. 6, 2010) (citing the company for marketing both cell phone signal and Global Positioning System ("GPS") signal blocker devices, and noting that GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules); Jammerworld.com, Citation, DA 10-2240, 2010 WL 4808497(Enf. Bur. Nov. 26, 2010) (citing the company for marketing a device that jams signals in the Cell Phone Band (845-975 MHz), PCS Band (1800-1996 MHz), and GPS L1 frequency 1575.42 MHz); Victor McCormack, phonejammer.com, Citation, DA 10-1975, (Enf. Bur. Oct. 14, 2010) (citing the company for misrepresentations made during the
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-248A1.html
    • February 9, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to DealExtreme for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), and for failing to respond to Enforcement Bureau Letters of Inquiry ("LOIs") directing DealExtreme to provide certain information and documents. 2. DealExtreme should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. In addition, you must to respond to the Enforcement Bureau's June 12, 2009 LOI within thirty (30)
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-98A1.html
    • the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 7. Jammer devices, however, cannot be certified or authorized because the main purpose of jammer devices is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Communications Act. Moreover, GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, these devices cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore cannot be marketed in the United States. 8. New Century shipped and sold to an Enforcement Bureau agent in the United States a cell and GPS jammer device, the Mini GPJ, that Jammer World offered for sale on its web site. Accordingly, we find that
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-112A1.html
    • for Forfeiture shall be sent by both Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular mail to Robens Cheriza at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven DeSena Resident Agent Miami Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S: 301. The frequency 119.1 MHz lies within the 108-121.94 MHz band and is listed as a restricted band in Section 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.205(a). Part 15 of the Rules sets out the conditions and technical requirements under which certain radio transmission devices may be used without a license. In relevant part, Section 15.239 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 88-108 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/presentations/austin2008/SESSION%20II%20-%20Repasi%20-%20RuralBroadbandPresentation-License%20Exempt_090908.pdf
    • not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Communications Commission 2 Part 15: Operational Part 15: Operational Requirements Requirements Part 15 provides for operation of low power radio transmitters without a license Operating conditions: ·May not cause harmful interference ·Must accept any interference received Part 15 minimizes likelihood of interference by: ·Limiting operation to certain non-restricted frequency bands (Ref. Section 15.205) ·Limiting power to relatively very low levels ·Requiring equipment approval to ensure compliance 3 Part 15: Technical Requirements Part 15: Technical Requirements On most frequencies, operation is limited to < 100 mW; duty cycle applies in some cases Three (ISM) bands allow 1 W transmitter power: ­902-928 MHz ­2400-2483 MHz ­5725 ­5875 MHz ·Power reduction for antenna gain > 6
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/presentations/phoenix2008/Session2Repasi.pdf
    • not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Communications Commission 2 Part 15: Operational Part 15: Operational Requirements Requirements Part 15 provides for operation of low power radio transmitters without a license Operating conditions: ·May not cause harmful interference ·Must accept any interference received Part 15 minimizes likelihood of interference by: ·Limiting operation to certain non-restricted frequency bands (Ref. Section 15.205) ·Limiting power to relatively very low levels ·Requiring equipment approval to ensure compliance 3 Part 15: Technical Requirements Part 15: Technical Requirements On most frequencies, operation is limited to < 100 mW; duty cycle applies in some cases Three (ISM) bands allow 1 W transmitter power: ­902-928 MHz ­2400-2483 MHz ­5725 ­5875 MHz ·Power reduction for antenna gain > 6
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/presentations/saginaw2008/SAGINAW%20-%20Panel%20II%20-%20Repasi%20-%20License%20Exempt%20Spectrum.pdf
    • radio transmitters without a license Operating conditions: ·May not cause harmful interference ·Must accept any interference received Part 15 minimizes likelihood of interference by: ·Permit operation in non-restricted frequency bands ·Limiting power to very low levels ·Requiring equipment approval to ensure compliance 3 Technical Requirements Technical Requirements Almost any spectrum can be used except certain restricted frequency bands (Ref. Section 15.205) On most frequencies, operation is limited to < 100 mW; duty cycle applies in some cases Three (ISM) bands allow 1 W transmitter power: ­902-928 MHz ­2400-2483 MHz ­5725 ­5875 MHz ·Power reduction for antenna gain > 6 dB 4 More Spectrum Made Available More Spectrum Made Available for Unlicensed Operation for Unlicensed Operation 50 mW Indoor Use Only 250
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00163.doc
    • are requested on whether such an attenuation level is necessary, or whether additional attenuation below 2 GHz is possible or necessary. We also seek comment on whether the proposed reduction in the emission levels should apply to all emissions below 2 GHz or only to emissions below 2 GHz that fall within the restricted bands shown in 47 C.F.R. § 15.205. Comments also are requested on whether UWB devices other than GPRs, and possibly through-wall imaging systems, should be permitted to operate below 2 GHz provided they comply with these reduced emission levels. Commenting parties should address any additional changes to the technical standards or to the operational parameters of UWB transmitters that could be employed to facilitate the operation of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.txt
    • shall be at least 20 dB below that in the 100 kHz bandwidth within the band that contains the highest level of the desired power, based on either an RF conducted or a radiated measurement. Attenuation below the general limits specified in §15.209(a) is not required. In addition, radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands, as defined in § 15.205(a), must also comply with the radiated emission limits specified in § 15.209(a) (see § 15.205(c)). (d) For direct sequence spread spectrum and digitally modulated systems, the peak power spectral density conducted from the intentional radiator to the antenna shall not be greater than 8 dBm in any 3 kHz band during any time interval of continuous transmission. (e) For the
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00029.doc
    • U.S. Radar, Time Domain and Zircon on January 28, 1998, February 2, 1998, and April 14, 1998, respectively. The U.S. Radar and Time Domain waiver petitions were placed on public notice as ``permit but disclose'' proceedings for ex parte purposes on February 6, 1998. The Zircon waiver petition was placed on public notice May 18, 1998. See 47 CFR Sections 15.205 and 15.209. The restricted bands are frequency bands allocated for safety-related purposes or bands that are employed by radio services that must function, as a nature of their operation, using extremely low received signal levels. These latter systems may be passive, such as radio astronomy, or active, such as satellite down links and wildlife tracking systems. Eleven comments were filed
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2000/da000705.doc
    • peak Trace = max hold Allow the trace to stabilize. Set the marker on the peak of any spurious emission recorded. The level displayed must comply with the limit specified in this Section. Submit these plots. Spurious Radiated Emissions This test is required for any spurious emission or modulation product that falls in a Restricted Band, as defined in Section 15.205. It must be performed with the highest gain of each type of antenna proposed for use with the EUT. Use the following spectrum analyzer settings: Span = wide enough to fully capture the emission being measured RBW = 1 MHz for f ( 1 GHz, 100 kHz for f < 1 GHz VBW ( RBW Sweep = auto Detector function
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2001/dd010716.html
    • Released: 07/16/2001. FM BOOSTER APPLICATIONS READY AND AVAILABLE FOR PROCESSING. MMB [18]DOC-214377A1.doc [19]DOC-214377A1.pdf [20]DOC-214377A1.txt Report No: 435 Released: 07/16/2001. INSTRUCTIONAL TELEVISION FIXED SERVICE AND MULTIPOINT DISTRIBUTION SERVICE ACTIONS. MMB [21]DOC-214358A1.pdf [22]DOC-214358A1.txt Report No: 434 Released: 07/16/2001. INSTRUCTIONAL TELEVISION FIXED SERVICE AND MULTIPOINT DISTRIBUTION SERVICE APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING. MMB [23]DOC-214357A1.pdf [24]DOC-214357A1.txt Released: 07/16/2001. SAFETY WARNING SYSTEMS, L.C. WAIVER REQUEST SEC. 15.205(B). (DA No. 01-1705). OET. Contact: Nancy Walls at (202) 418-2454 [25]DA-01-1705A1.doc [26]DA-01-1705A1.pdf [27]DA-01-1705A1.txt Released: 07/16/2001. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS AND POST-REPLY COMMENT PERIOD FILINGS IN PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSE PROCEEDINGS. OMD. Contact: Barbara Lowe at (202) 418-0310 [28]DOC-214469A1.doc Released: 07/16/2001. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT TO ASSIGN C BLOCK BROADBAND PCS LICENSES. (DA No. 01-1708). WTB. Contact: Rita Cookmeyer or Yolanda Lee at (202)
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2006/dd061117.html
    • Granted continuing satellite request and assignment for KVLY-TV, Fargo, KFYR-TV, Bismarck, KMOT(TV), Minot, KQCD-TV, Dickinson and KUMV-TV, Williston, ND from North Dakota Television License Sub., LLC to Hoak Media of Dakota License, LLC. Action by: Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 06-2310). MB [49]DA-06-2310A1.doc [50]DA-06-2310A1.pdf [51]DA-06-2310A1.txt RESPIRONICS, INC. AND BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION REQUESTS FOR WAIVER OF SECTION 15.205 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES TO PERMIT THE MARKETING AND OPERATION OF CERTAIN MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES THAT OPERATE IN THE 90-110 KHZ BAND. Granted the Requests for Waiver of Sec. 15.205 of the Commission's rules. (Dkt No. 05-331). Action by: Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology. Adopted: 11/16/2006 by ORDER. (DA No. 06-2316). OET [52]DA-06-2316A1.doc [53]DA-06-2316A1.pdf [54]DA-06-2316A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2322A1.pdf 2.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070419.html
    • 302(b) and Sections 2.803,15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-1758). EB [22]DA-07-1758A1.doc [23]DA-07-1758A1.pdf [24]DA-07-1758A1.txt CHUMBO CORPORATION. Issued an Official Citation to Chumbo Corporation for marketing a police radar jamming device, the RMR-450 device from Rocky Mountain Radar in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-1754). EB [25]DA-07-1754A1.doc [26]DA-07-1754A1.pdf [27]DA-07-1754A1.txt COMPSOURCE, INC. Issued an Official Citation to CompSource, Inc. for marketing police radar jamming devices, RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070420.html
    • in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, Sections 2.803,15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-1764). EB [33]DA-07-1764A1.doc [34]DA-07-1764A1.pdf [35]DA-07-1764A1.txt THE ELECTRONICCOMPANY.COM. Issued an Official Citation to The ElectricCompany.com for marketing police radar jamming devices in the U.S. in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-1763). EB [36]DA-07-1763A1.doc [37]DA-07-1763A1.pdf [38]DA-07-1763A1.txt FM TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS, MEETEETSE, WY, ET AL. Issued an Order to Show Cause directed at Idaho Wireless Corporation, licensee of Station KZBQ(FM), Channel 229C, Pocatello, Idaho. (Dkt No. 05-243 , RM-11363). Action by: Assistant Chief, Audio Division,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070718.html
    • carrier. Action by: Deputy Chief, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau. Adopted: 07/12/2007 by ORDER. (DA No. 07-3278). CGB [67]DA-07-3278A1.doc [68]DA-07-3278A1.pdf [69]DA-07-3278A1.txt OVERSEAS BEST BUY, INC. DBA 110220VOLTS.COM. Issued an Official Citation to Overseas Best Buy, Inc. dba 110220volts.com for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, radar jammers, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-3266). EB [70]DA-07-3266A1.doc [71]DA-07-3266A1.pdf [72]DA-07-3266A1.txt DTV TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. Denied the Petition for Rule Making. Action by: Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 07/13/2007 by R&O. (DA No. 07-3246). MB [73]DA-07-3246A1.doc [74]DA-07-3246A1.pdf [75]DA-07-3246A1.txt KCCP TRUST D/B/A TIME WARNER CABLE. Granted effective
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070719.html
    • 07-144). Comments Due: 08/02/2007. Reply Comments Due: 08/09/2007. WCB. Contact: Tracey Wilson-Parker at (202) 418-1394, or Jodie May at (202) 418-0913 [10]DA-07-3315A1.doc [11]DA-07-3315A1.pdf [12]DA-07-3315A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- UNBEATABLESALE.COM, INC. Issued an Official Citation to Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, radar jammers, in the U.S. in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-3270). EB [13]DA-07-3270A1.doc [14]DA-07-3270A1.pdf [15]DA-07-3270A1.txt MEDIACOM ILLINOIS AND MEDIACOM CALIFORNIA. Granted the petitions for a determination of effective competition filed by Mediacom Illinois LLC and Mediacom California LLC. Action by: Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 07/16/2007 by MO&O. (DA No. 07-3254).
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070726.html
    • OMD. Contact: Jason Brown at (202) 418-0310 [10]DOC-275523A1.pdf [11]DOC-275523A1.txt Released: 07/26/2007. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS AND POST-REPLY COMMENT PERIOD FILING IN PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSURE PROCEEDINGS (2 OF 2). OMD. Contact: Jason Brown at (202) 418-0310 [12]DOC-275524A1.pdf [13]DOC-275524A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SHOPILA CORPORATION. Issued an Official Citation to Shopila Corporation for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-3393). EB [14]DA-07-3393A1.doc [15]DA-07-3393A1.pdf [16]DA-07-3393A1.txt SHOPPERSCHOICE.COM, LLC. Issued an Official Citation to ShoopersChoice.com, LLC for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070802.html
    • complaint regarding the unauthorized change of subscriber's telecommunications carrier. Action by: Deputy Chief, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau. Adopted: 07/31/2007 by ORDER. (DA No. 07-3499). CGB [17]DA-07-3499A1.doc [18]DA-07-3499A1.pdf [19]DA-07-3499A1.txt GAIN SAVER. Issued an Official Citation to Gain Saver for marketing police radar jamming devices in the U.S. in violation of Sections 302(b) of the Act, Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-3483). EB [20]DA-07-3483A1.doc [21]DA-07-3483A1.pdf [22]DA-07-3483A1.txt UNION-CAROLINA BROADCASTING CO., INC. Denied the petition for reconsideration. Action by: Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-3503). MB [23]DA-07-3503A1.doc [24]DA-07-3503A1.pdf [25]DA-07-3503A1.txt LEON F. PETTERSEN. Granted in part and denied in part Petition for Reconsideration,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd071226.html
    • at (202) 418-7400, TTY: (202) 418-0484 [18]DA-07-5092A1.doc [19]DA-07-5092A1.pdf [20]DA-07-5092A1.txt Released: 12/26/2007. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON RONAN TELEPHONE COMPANY REQUEST FOR TWO ADDITIONAL YEARS TO MEET TRIBAL LANDS BIDDING CREDIT CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENT. (DA No. 07-5094). (Dkt No 06-231). Comments Due: 01/10/2008. Reply Comments Due: 01/17/2008. WTB [21]DA-07-5094A1.doc [22]DA-07-5094A1.pdf [23]DA-07-5094A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SECTION 15.205 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES TO PERMIT THE MARKETING AND OPERATION OF CERTAIN MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES THAT OPERATE IN THE 90-110 KHZ BAND. Granted the Request for Extension of Waiver filed by Respironics, Inc., on October 2, 2007, to permit the manufacture, marketing and operation of Respironics' ActiReader devices for and additional period of time. (Dkt No. 05-331). Action by: Chief,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080128.html
    • EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS AND POST-REPLY COMMENT PERIOD FILING IN PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSURE PROCEEDINGS. OMD. Contact: Jason Lewis at (202) 418-0310 [11]DOC-279720A1.pdf [12]DOC-279720A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- GARDEN STATE INVESTIGATIONS AND SECURITY. Issued a Citation to Garden State Investigations and Security for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States violating section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rule. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 08-155). EB [13]DA-08-155A1.doc [14]DA-08-155A1.pdf [15]DA-08-155A1.txt ERRATUM - RESPIRONICS, INC. Issued Erratum correcting DA 07-5095 released on December 26, 2007. (Dkt No. 05-331). Action by: Office of Engineering and Technoloogy by ERRATUM. (DA No. 08-166). OET [16]DOC-279718A1.doc [17]DOC-279718A1.pdf [18]DOC-279718A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED JANUARY
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080523.html
    • Contact: Jason Lewis at (202) 418-0310 [8]DOC-282349A1.pdf [9]DOC-282349A1.txt Report No: CWS-08-55 Released: 05/23/2008. ANTENNA STRUCTURE REGISTRATION SERVICE INFORMATION. WTB [10]DOC-282366A1.pdf [11]DOC-282366A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- DAVID STEELE ENTERPRISES. Issued an Official Citation to David Steele Enterprises for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 08-1196). EB [12]DA-08-1196A1.doc [13]DA-08-1196A1.pdf [14]DA-08-1196A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED MAY 22, 2008, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 100: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PUBLIC NOTICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Released: 05/22/2008. ENHANCED SECURITY FEATURES IN CORES. OMD [15]DOC-282338A1.doc [16]DOC-282338A1.pdf [17]DOC-282338A1.txt Released: 05/22/2008.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080527.html
    • No. 08-1195). (Dkt No 08-57). WCB. Contact: Tracey Wilson-Parker at (202) 418-1394 or Jodie May at (202) 418-0913 [13]DA-08-1195A1.doc [14]DA-08-1195A1.pdf [15]DA-08-1195A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- DPL SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT. Issued an Official Citation to DPL Surveillance Equipment for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 08-1202). EB [16]DA-08-1202A1.doc [17]DA-08-1202A1.pdf [18]DA-08-1202A1.txt SAGE BROADCASTING CORPORATION, KXVA(TV), ABILENE, TEXAS. Admonished Sage Broadcasting Corporation for the admitted violation of Section 73.3526 of the Commission's Rules described in KXVA(TV)'s renewal application. Action by: Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 08-1206). MB
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080721.html
    • COMMITTEES TO HOLD 700 MHZ REGIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY PLANNING AND 800 MHZ NPSPAC REGIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY PLANNING MEETINGS. (DA No. 08-1701). (Dkt No 91-228). PSHSB [18]DA-08-1701A1.doc [19]DA-08-1701A1.pdf [20]DA-08-1701A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- RANGEVIDEO. Issued Official Citation to Rangevideo for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the US in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Rules, and for importing RF devices without filing FCC Form 740. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 08-1685). EB [21]DA-08-1685A1.doc [22]DA-08-1685A1.pdf [23]DA-08-1685A1.txt POST-TRANSITION DTV TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS, 47 C.F.R. SECTION 73.622(I), HENDERSONVILLE, TENNESSEE. Proposed substituting DTV Channel 51 for DTV Channel 33 for Station WPGD-DT. (Dkt No. RM-11460, 08-128). Action by: Chief,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd090714.html
    • Petition for Rulemaking to substitute channel 12 for digital channel 19 by request of Petitioner and terminated the proceeding. (Dkt No. 08-153 RM-11477 ). Action by: Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 07/13/2009 by ORDER. (DA No. 09-1532). MB [14]DA-09-1532A1.doc [15]DA-09-1532A1.pdf [16]DA-09-1532A1.txt RESPIRONICS, INC. AND BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. WAIVER REQUEST (ET DOCKET NO. 05-331). Granted Request for Waiver of Section 15.205 of the Commission's Rules to Permit the Marketing and Operation of Certain Medical Communications Devices that Operate in the 90-110 kHz band. (Dkt No. 05-331 ). Action by: Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology. Adopted: 07/13/2009 by ORDER. (DA No. 09-1527). OET [17]DA-09-1527A1.doc [18]DA-09-1527A1.pdf [19]DA-09-1527A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED JULY 13, 2009, DID NOT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2010/dd100916.html
    • CMMR [64]DOC-301499A1.doc [65]DOC-301499A1.pdf [66]DOC-301499A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- DATA TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS. Dismissed the application as defective without prejudice to refiling. Action by: Chief, Satellite Engineering Branch, Satellite Division, International Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 10-1747). IB [67]DA-10-1747A1.doc [68]DA-10-1747A1.pdf [69]DA-10-1747A1.txt RESPIRONICS, INC. AND BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION. Granted the request by Boston Scientific Corporation to extend the existing waiver of Section 15.205 of FCC rules for its Contak Renewal TR, Cognis, and Teligen cardiac devices. (Dkt No. 05-331 ). Action by: Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology. Adopted: 09/15/2010 by ORDER. (DA No. 10-1744). OET [70]DA-10-1744A1.doc [71]DA-10-1744A1.pdf [72]DA-10-1744A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301504A1.doc 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301504A1.pdf 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301504A1.txt 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301484A1.pdf 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301484A2.txt 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301483A1.pdf 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301483A2.txt 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301497A1.pdf 9. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301497A1.txt 10. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301498A1.pdf 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301498A1.txt 12.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd110706.html
    • FACTO TRANSFER LEASE APPLICATIONS, AND DESIGNATED ENTITY REPORTABLE ELIGIBILITY EVENT APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING. PSHSB [50]DOC-308236A1.pdf [51]DOC-308236A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- NEW GENERATION HOBBIES. Issued an Official Citation to New Generation Hobbies for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Act and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Rules. Action by: Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 07/01/2011 by LETTER. (DA No. 11-1164). EB [52]DA-11-1164A1.doc [53]DA-11-1164A1.pdf [54]DA-11-1164A1.txt ANNUAL CPNI CERTIFICATION. Determined that no forfeiture penalties should be imposed on the companies listed in the Appendix. Action by: Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 07/06/2011 by ORDER. (DA No. 11-1142). EB [55]DA-11-1142A1.doc [56]DA-11-1142A1.pdf [57]DA-11-1142A1.txt
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd110823.html
    • 11-1442). MB [19]DA-11-1442A1.doc [20]DA-11-1442A1.pdf [21]DA-11-1442A1.txt PROMOTING DIVERSIFICATION IN THE BROADCASTING SERVICES. Extended the deadline to file Biennial Form 323 until December 1, 2011. (Dkt No. 07-294 ). Action by: Chief, Media Bureau. Adopted: 08/23/2011 by ORDER. (DA No. 11-1445). MB [22]DA-11-1445A1.doc [23]DA-11-1445A1.pdf [24]DA-11-1445A1.txt BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION. Granted the request by Boston Scientific Corporation to extend the existing waiver of Section 15.205 of the rules for its Contak Renewal TR, Cognis, and Teligen cardiac devices. (Dkt No. 05-331 ). Action by: Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology. Adopted: 08/22/2011 by ORDER. (DA No. 11-1427). OET [25]DA-11-1427A1.doc [26]DA-11-1427A1.pdf [27]DA-11-1427A1.txt WECOM, INC./MICRONET COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Granted the Withdrawal Request. Action by: Deputy Chief, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 11-1448). WTB [28]DA-11-1448A1.doc
  • http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/040614/EmergingTechnologySubcommittee-recommendation.doc
    • secure FCC spectrum licenses. Increase the amount of spectrum that is set aside for unlicensed use (e.g., adopt the proposal contained in the FCC's recent 3650-3700 MHz NPRM and make such spectrum available for unlicensed use) and increase the power levels at which users can operate on an unlicensed, non-harmful interference basis in all frequency bands not subject to section 15.205 (``restricted bands'') of the FCC's rules. Create a ``fast-track'' equipment certification process that establishes criteria for expedited review of equipment certification requests. The FCC offers parties the ability to operate on spectrum on an experimental basis through its Experimental Licensing program. The following recommendation is intended to make that program more useful to businesses that need significant lead time to
  • http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/adopted-recommendations/spectrum_and_access.pdf
    • secure FCC spectrum licenses. Increase the amount of spectrum that is set aside for unlicensed use (e.g., adopt the proposal contained in the FCC's recent 3650-3700 MHz NPRM and make such spectrum available for unlicensed use) and increase the power levels at which users can operate on an unlicensed, non-harmful interference basis in all frequency bands not subject to section 15.205 ("restricted bands") of the FCC's rules. Create a "fast-track" equipment certification process that establishes criteria for expedited review of equipment certification requests. The FCC offers parties the ability to operate on spectrum on an experimental basis through its Experimental Licensing program. The following recommendation is intended to make that program more useful to businesses that need significant lead time to
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-266575A1.html
    • only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. SS 15.1 et seq. Your operation as a fundamental carrier on 121.500 MHz does not comply with Part 15 of the Commission's rule. Section 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules permits only spurious emissions in the frequency band 108-121.94 MHz. Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269176A1.html
    • is properly identified and labeled ..." Pursuant to Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.201(b), intentional radiators must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. 4. The 1.2 GHz wireless video systems operate within the restricted frequency band 960 MHz to 1.240 GHz listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.205(a). Operation on 1.2 GHz is specifically restricted to aeronautical navigation and the Enforcement Bureau has received complaints from the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") concerning 1.2 GHz transmitters that cause harmful interference to the FAA's Tactical Air Navigation System. Because 1.2 GHz is a restricted frequency, wireless video transmitters operating on 1.2 GHz cannot
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269802A1.html
    • and is properly identified and labeled..." Pursuant to Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.201(b), intentional radiators must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. 4. The 1.2 GHz wireless video systems operate within the restricted frequency band 960 MHz to 1.240 GHz listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.205(a). Operation on 1.2 GHz is specifically restricted to aeronautical navigation and the Enforcement Bureau has received complaints from the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") concerning 1.2 GHz transmitters that cause harmful interference to the FAA's Tactical Air Navigation System. Because 1.2 GHz is a restricted frequency, wireless video transmitters operating on 1.2 GHz cannot
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269882A1.html
    • that copies of this Citation shall be sent by First Class U.S. Mail and Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested to Ditec Digital Systems at its address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William R. Zears, Jr. District Director, San Diego District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5). 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. S 15.205. 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). 47 U.S.C. SS 401, 501, 503, 510. 47 U.S.C. SS 154(i), 154(j), 403. 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5). See Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. S 552a(e)(3). See 18 U.S.C. S 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269882A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269882A1.doc
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-277599A1.html
    • Your ELTs were not located in an aircraft. Licenses for ELT test stations will only be granted to applicants to train personnel in the operation and location of ELTs, or for testing related to the manufacture or design of ELTs. 47 C.F.R. S: 87.473(b). You are an aircraft parts distributor, not an ELT testing or manufacturing facility. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.205. References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277599A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277599A1.doc
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-280706A1.html
    • ) ) Citation No.: C200832900009 Los Angeles, CA 90022 ) CITATION Released: February 29, 2008 By the Acting Interim District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to King Taco Restaurants, Inc., for violation of Sections 15.5(b) and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. On February 14, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office received a complaint that a signal was causing interference to station KB97260, operating on frequencies from 2458 to 2492 MHz. On February 19, 2008, an agent from the Los Angeles Office investigated the interference report and located the interfering signals emanating from a cluster
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-282166A1.html
    • act, means the commission or omission of such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day." 47 U.S.C. S: 301. 156.7-156.9 MHz is a restricted band for purposes of Part 15 of the Rules. Thus, under no circumstances may non-licensed Part 15 devices operate on this band. See 47 C.F.R. S: 15.205(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 80.13(a). 47 U.S.C. S: 325(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 80.334. 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S:1.80. 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311, 47 U.S.C. S:S: 301, 325. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission 4 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282166A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282166A1.doc
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-298353A1.html
    • prohibited. Persons operating or using radio transmitters must be licensed or authorized by the FCC, pursuant to Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. GPS jammers are intentional radiators and operate in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. The purpose of GPS jammers is to block or interfere with radio communications that are conveying navigation information. Such use is prohibited by Section 333 of the Act, which states that "[n]o person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under this Act
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299884A1.html
    • agents. Persons operating or using radio transmitters must be licensed or authorized by the FCC, pursuant to Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. GPS Jammers are intentional radiators and operate in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. The purpose of GPS Jammers is to block or interfere with radio communications that are conveying navigation information. Such use is prohibited by Section 333 of the Act, which states that "[n]o person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under this Act
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1014A1.html
    • 0.111(a)(17) of the Commission's rules,1 we revoke the above- captioned equipment authorizations held by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. (``Tung Shih'') for its learned mode remote control devices (``learned mode transmitters''). We conclude, based upon the evidence described herein, that the learned mode transmitters manufactured by Tung Shih have the capability to transmit impermissibly on restricted frequencies specified in section 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules.2 We further conclude that Tung Shih's learned mode transmitters also have the capability to transmit impermissibly on frequencies that are not authorized by their equipment authorizations. II. BACKGROUND 2. On January 31, 2005, the Commission released an Order to Show Cause designating this case for hearing.3 The OSC specified the following issues: (a) To determine whether
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1029A1.html
    • Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech GPS Antenna Booster, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech GPS Antenna Booster operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions3 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech GPS Antenna Booster apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Wal-Mart has violated Section 302(b) of the Act
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1030A1.html
    • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions2 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that GPS Outfitters has violated Section 302(b) of the
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1031A1.html
    • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions1 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Dick's has violated Section 302(b) of the Act
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1033A1.html
    • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions1 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Fogdog has violated Section 302(b) of the Act
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1034A1.html
    • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions1 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Tweeter has violated Section 302(b) of the Act
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1035A1.html
    • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions1 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Sports Authority has violated Section 302(b) of the
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1036A1.html
    • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions1 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Sport Chalet has violated Section 302(b) of the
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1037A1.html
    • 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna operates in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions1 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that the GPS Store has violated Section 302(b) of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1107A1.html
    • in this chapter. Pursuant to Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the GPS re- radiating devices, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing. Moreover, the GPS re-radiating devices operate in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions2 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the GPS re- radiating devices apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Accordingly, it appears that Dallas has violated Section 302(b) of the Act
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1155A1.html
    • Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201(b), intentional radiators, such as the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas, must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas operate in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions4 in the restricted frequency bands. Thus, the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment certification. Furthermore, Gilsson admits in its letter of March 26, 2005
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-191A1.html
    • learned mode remote control transmitter devices (``learned mode transmitters''), FCC ID Nos. MMORC0196M and MMORMC575, should be revoked. Devices manufactured by Tung Shih under those FCC ID numbers apparently have the capability to transmit on frequencies that are not authorized by their equipment certifications. In addition, these devices apparently have the capability to transmit on restricted frequencies specified in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules.2 II. BACKGROUND 2. Learned mode or ``trainable'' transmitters are typically sold as universal replacements or duplicates for garage door openers, keyless entry systems, security alarms, remote switches and similar types of radio controlled devices. These transmitters are designed to recognize and replicate the operating frequency, duty cycle and coding scheme of the targeted radio system.3 3. As
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2998A1.html
    • VA 22312-2707 Re: File No. EB-04-SE- 362 Dear Sir or Madame: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing a radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated January 11, 2005,1 (Letter of Inquiry) the Spectrum Enforcement Division (SED) of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau informed Navtech Seminars and GPS Supply (Navtech) that it had initiated an
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1442A1.html
    • limits based on the use of RMS averaging over a time interval, as permitted under paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the attenuation required under this paragraph shall be 30 dB instead of 20 dB. Attenuation below the general limits specified in Sec. 15.209(a) is not required. In addition, radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands, as defined in Sec. 15.205(a), must also comply with the radiated emission limits specified in Sec. 15.209(a) (see Sec. 15.205(c)). 7. Furthermore, in accepting the grant of an equipment authorization, AboCom warranted that: each unit of equipment marketed under such grant and bearing the identification specified in the grant will conform to the unit that was measured and that the data (design and rated operational
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2019A1.html
    • as amended ("Communications Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain wireless cameras, specifically, 10 Watt 1.2 GHz Wireless Camera Video AV Transmitter Receivers ("1.2 GHz wireless cameras"), that are not eligible to receive a grant of equipment certification, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On August 30, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that LightObject d/b/a Actionbuy Trading Co. ("LightObject") was marketing on eBay wireless cameras
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-30A1.html
    • of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture amount of seventy five thousand dollars ($75,000) against San Jose Navigation, Inc. ("San Jose") for its marketing of intentional radiating equipment, Global Positioning Satellite ("GPS") signal re-radiator kits, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The GPS re-radiator kits are not Commission authorized and are not eligible for such authorization, because they operate in restricted frequency bands allocated for authorized safety-of-life operations. II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment that emits
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1673A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Audio Direct is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1674A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Buy.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1675A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Audio Discounters is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1676A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Ambient Weather is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1754A1.html
    • Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Chumbo.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1756A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that CompSource, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1757A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Cybergiftcenter.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1758A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Dealznet.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1763A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that TheElectronicCompany.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1764A1.html
    • Berkowitz: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Focus Camera, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1766A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Fadfusion is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1767A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that DSMiller.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450 devices.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-299A1.html
    • 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices ("jammers"). II. background 2. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information, through several informal complaints, alleging that RMR was manufacturing and marketing unauthorized police radar jammers in the United States. The
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-304A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Auto-Radar-Detectors.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-307A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Best Radar Detectors, were marketing police radar
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-308A1.html
    • an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Electronic Retail Solutions, Inc., were marketing police radar jamming devices
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-309A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Global Trade Group, Inc., were marketing police
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-310A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Hoeffener International, were marketing police radar jamming
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-311A1.html
    • an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radar Detectors Direct, were marketing police radar jamming devices in
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-312A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radarjammers.com, were marketing police radar jamming devices
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-313A1.html
    • an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including The Twister Group, Inc., were marketing police radar jamming devices
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3266A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Overseas Best Buy, Inc. dba 110220volts.com is marketing the
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3270A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3392A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that ShoppersChoice.com, LLC is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3393A1.html
    • Sir/Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Shopila Corporation is marketing the RMR-C450 device. On July
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3483A1.html
    • is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Gain Saver is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3599A1.html
    • Adopted: August 14, 2007 Released: August 16, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) against Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices. 2. On January 31, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $25,000 to RMR. RMR has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3974A1.html
    • for marketing in the United States certain wireless cameras and wireless camera converters, specifically, 10 Watt, 1.2 GHz Cantek Wireless Camera and Camera Converter Transmitter Receivers ("1.2 GHz wireless camera transmitter receivers"), that are not eligible to receive a grant of equipment certification, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communication Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 6, 2007, staff in the Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") visited the internet store for Surveillance-Video products, www.surveillance-video.com ("Surveillance-Video online store"). The Surveillance-Video online store listed the 1.2
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4874A1.html
    • Dear Mr. Melo: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), to BRD Security Products, Inc. d/b/a Spybase.com ("BRD") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 9, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("the Division") initiated an investigation into whether BRD is marketing in the United
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-3A1.html
    • specifically Global Positioning Satellite ("GPS") signal re-radiator kits, which are not authorized and not eligible for authorization by the Commission because the devices operate in restricted frequency bands. We further find that, in marketing these GPS signal re-radiator kits, San Jose willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For San Jose's violations, we impose a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that "[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1196A1.html
    • EB-08-SE-202 Dear Mr. Bassler: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), to David Steele Enterprises, Inc. ("David Steele") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry ("LOI") dated May 15, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("Division") initiated an investigation into whether David Steele is marketing
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1202A1.html
    • #12 Reseda, California 91335-6164 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-203 Dear Mr. Henry: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a), and for failing to fully respond to Enforcement Bureau directives to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated May 16, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-155A1.html
    • and Mr. Bollaro: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), to Garden State Investigations and Security ("Garden State") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 2, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("Division") initiated an investigation into whether Garden State is marketing in the United
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1685A1.html
    • Vladimir Reznik, Owner RangeVideo Re: File No. EB-08-SE-182 Dear Mr. Reznik: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803 and 15.205(a), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol, in violation of Section 1.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2051A1.html
    • with the FCC's certification procedures prior to the initiation of marketing in the U.S. However, it does not appear that devices such as the GPS Counter Track, and the GPS Counter Track Portable, are capable of receiving a grant of certification. The devices operate in frequency bands used for GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Moreover, the purpose of GPS jammers is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 333, which states that "[n]o person shall willfully or maliciously
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1697A1.html
    • Suite 155 Spokane, WA 99218 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-602 Dear Mr. O'Harvey: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to The Spy Store, Inc. ("Spy Store") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 2.1203 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-09-2623A1.html
    • 10901-3834 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-142 Dear Mr. Lee: This is an official CITATION, issued to SCS Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Spy Camera Specialists, Inc. ("Spy Camera"), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau ("Division") received a complaint alleging that Spy Camera was marketing unauthorized wireless video transmitters that operate in the 1.08, 1.12, 1.16 and 1.2 GHz bands.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2240A1.html
    • the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 7. Jammer devices, however, cannot be certified or authorized because the main purpose of jammer devices is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Communications Act. Moreover, GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, these devices cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore cannot be marketed in the United States. 8. Jammer World advertised on its web site a cell and GPS jammer device, the Handheld GPS and Cell Phone Jammer Mini GPJ, which was subsequently sold and shipped to an Enforcement Bureau agent in the United States.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2295A1.html
    • the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 7. Jammer devices, however, cannot be certified or authorized because the main purpose of jammer devices is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Communications Act. Moreover, GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, these devices cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore cannot be marketed in the United States. 8. Everbuying.com advertised on its web site a Mini Cigarette Lighter Anti-Tracker GPS Jammer Blocker device, which was subsequently sold and shipped to an Enforcement Bureau agent in the United States. Everbuying.com continues to offer jammer devices for
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/FCC-09-107A1.html
    • we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Commission and San Jose Technology, Inc. (formerly known as San Jose Navigation, Inc.) (collectively "San Jose"). The Consent Decree terminates the Commission's enforcement proceeding regarding San Jose's compliance with the equipment requirements set forth in Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules. 2. The Commission and San Jose have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the enforcement proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the available facts related to this matter, we conclude that there are no substantial or material
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1164A1.html
    • Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to New Generation Hobbies ("New Generation") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules ("Rules") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission" or "FCC"). 2. New Generation should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1165A1.html
    • Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Sound Around Inc. ("Sound Around") for marketing in the United States radiofrequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules ("Rules") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission"), and for marketing wireless microphones that are capable of operating in the 700 MHz band (698-806 MHz) in violation of section 74.851(g) of the Rules. 2. Sound Around should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct, including removing from display (including online
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1312A1.html
    • the U-NII rules (47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.401-15.407) because Sling operated them as U-NII devices on U-NII frequencies. Sling was also operating on the frequency 5745 MHz, a frequency for which the Rocket M5 is certified. Operation pursuant to section 15.247 of the Rules, however, must comply with the applicable power limits specified therein. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.247. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.205(a). See email from Aaron Tuttle, TDWR & Meteorological Support, FAA, to Miami Office, dated February 22, 2011. According to the collocation agreement, the Rocket M5s employed Ubiquiti Airmax 5G-19-120 sector antennas with a gain of 19 dBi (18.6 dBi according to the Airmax specifications). The antennas photographed by the agents of the Miami Office on January 5, 2011 appeared to
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
    • the company for marketing jammers designed to interfere with cellular and "PCS" utilized by St. Lucie County, Florida Sheriff's Office); Everybuying.com, Citation, DA 10-2295 (Enf. Bur. Dec. 6, 2010) (citing the company for marketing both cell phone signal and Global Positioning System ("GPS") signal blocker devices, and noting that GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules); Jammerworld.com, Citation, DA 10-2240, 2010 WL 4808497 (Enf. Bur. Nov. 26, 2010) (citing the company for marketing a device that jams signals in the Cell Phone Band (845-975 MHz), PCS Band (1800-1996 MHz), and GPS L1 frequency 1575.42 MHz); Victor McCormack, phonejammer.com, Citation, DA 10-1975 (Enf. Bur. Oct. 14, 2010) (citing the company for misrepresentations made during
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-247A1.html
    • the company for marketing jammers designed to interfere with cellular and "PCS" utilized by St. Lucie County, Florida Sheriff's Office); Everybuying.com, Citation, DA 10-2295 (Enf. Bur. Dec. 6, 2010) (citing the company for marketing both cell phone signal and Global Positioning System ("GPS") signal blocker devices, and noting that GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules); Jammerworld.com, Citation, DA 10-2240, 2010 WL 4808497(Enf. Bur. Nov. 26, 2010) (citing the company for marketing a device that jams signals in the Cell Phone Band (845-975 MHz), PCS Band (1800-1996 MHz), and GPS L1 frequency 1575.42 MHz); Victor McCormack, phonejammer.com, Citation, DA 10-1975, (Enf. Bur. Oct. 14, 2010) (citing the company for misrepresentations made during the
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-248A1.html
    • February 9, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to DealExtreme for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), and for failing to respond to Enforcement Bureau Letters of Inquiry ("LOIs") directing DealExtreme to provide certain information and documents. 2. DealExtreme should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. In addition, you must to respond to the Enforcement Bureau's June 12, 2009 LOI within thirty (30)
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-98A1.html
    • the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 7. Jammer devices, however, cannot be certified or authorized because the main purpose of jammer devices is to block or interfere with radio communications. Such use is clearly prohibited by Section 333 of the Communications Act. Moreover, GPS signal blockers operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, these devices cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and therefore cannot be marketed in the United States. 8. New Century shipped and sold to an Enforcement Bureau agent in the United States a cell and GPS jammer device, the Mini GPJ, that Jammer World offered for sale on its web site. Accordingly, we find that
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-112A1.html
    • for Forfeiture shall be sent by both Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular mail to Robens Cheriza at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven DeSena Resident Agent Miami Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S: 301. The frequency 119.1 MHz lies within the 108-121.94 MHz band and is listed as a restricted band in Section 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.205(a). Part 15 of the Rules sets out the conditions and technical requirements under which certain radio transmission devices may be used without a license. In relevant part, Section 15.239 of the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 88-108 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does
  • http://www.fcc.gov/oet/projects/rural/Welcome.html
    • monitors, garage door openers, cordless telephones, computer networking equipment, and inventory control systems. Unlicensed transmitters are permitted to operate on almost any frequency, provided they operate at very low power levels and meet relatively tight emission limits in order to avoid interference to licensed radio services. The devices are not permitted to operate in designated restricted bands identified in [24]Section 15.205, and are generally prohibited from operating in the TV broadcast bands. In order to highlight the importance of unlicensed devices to the American lifestyle and economy, the Commissions Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis (OSP) and Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) released OSP Working Paper No. 39, [25]Unlicensed and Unshackled: A Joint OSP-OET White Paper on Unlicensed Devices