FCC Web Documents citing 15.204

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2290A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2290A1.pdf
  • 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and RF Linx Corporation (``RF Linx''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against RF Linx for possible violations of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), regarding RF Linx's marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. The Bureau and RF Linx have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-885A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-885A1.pdf
  • Released: May 20, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Luxul Wireless, Inc. (``Luxul''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Luxul's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') pertaining to the marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. The Bureau and Luxul have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-42A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-42A1.pdf
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') and Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking''). The Consent Decree settles an enforcement proceeding against Hawking regarding Hawking's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's rules in connection with its marketing of certain external radio frequency power amplifiers. The Bureau and Hawking have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.pdf
  • March 28, 2007 Released: April 2, 2007 By the Commission: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. background Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-25A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-25A1.pdf
  • FRN # 0012065009 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 27, 2009 Released: March 31, 2009 By the Commission: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) to Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. 2. On April 2, 2007, the Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $50,000 to Hawking.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1644A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1644A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1644A1.txt
  • violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization) and 2.815 (External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers). Tampa, FL District Office (5/9/01). White Diamond Communications, Inc., San Juan, PR. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (5/14/01). Cell-Station, Inc., Oldsmar, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (5/22/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices 47 C.F.R. � 15.204 - External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers and Antenna Modifications Netbeam, Inc., Golden, Colorado. Denver, CO District Office (5/21/01). # % b d � � $ B $ % c d $ % c d �� �� � �� �� �� ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-929A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-929A1.txt
  • Office (3/22/02). Magnum Communications Inc., WTMB/WBOG-FM/WXYM-FM, Tomah, WI. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 17.4(g) (Posting of Antenna Structure Registration Number). Saint Paul, MN Resident Agent Office (3/26/02). Crestview Broadcasting Co., Inc., Crestview, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (3/21/02). Crestview Broadcasting Co., Inc., Crestview, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (3/21/02). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices 47 C.F.R. � 15.204 - External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers and Antenna Modifications Sting Communications, Lebanon, PA. Philadelphia, PA District Office (3/14/02). 47 C.F.R. Part 17 - Construction, Marking & Lighting of Antenna Structures 47 C.F.R. � 17.4(a) - Antenna Structure Registration Shenadoah Valley Electric Cooperative, KIA495, Mount Crawford, VA. Columbia, MD District Office (3/12/02). 47 C.F.R. � 17.4(g) - Posting of Antenna Structure
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2843A1.txt
  • FCC ID#s KNY-DGR-115, KNY-205-108213, KNY-1931852313419 and KNY21161341911919 that does not comply with the terms of these equipment authorizations. In support of this assertion, MDS made numerous specific allegations with respect to equipment marketed under each of the four FCC Identifiers. MDS also alleged that Freewave is marketing non-compliant and unauthorized bilateral amplifiers to the general public in violation of Section 15.204(a) of the Rules. On June 20, 2002, Freewave filed a motion to dismiss MDS's request. In its motion, Freewave asserted that the allegations raised by MDS are without merit. Subsequently, the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology referred the matter to the Enforcement Bureau for investigation. On June 10, 2004, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau issued a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1701A1.txt
  • 22, 2005 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking''), apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-two thousand dollars ($22,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The alleged violations involve marketing external radiofrequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(a) of the Rules. background On December 9 and 14, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received complaints alleging that Hawking was illegally marketing the Hawking Model HSB1 (``HSB1'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1436A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1436A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1436A1.txt
  • Court City of Industry, CA 91745 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-018 Dear Mr. Ho: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, external radio frequency power amplifiers, in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On August 2, 2005, staff from the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``SED'') of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau visited the internet web site store for OvisLink products, http://store.ovislink.com (``OvisLink online store''). The OvisLink online store listed several models
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-853A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-853A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-853A1.txt
  • 2006 Released: April 17, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand six hundred dollars ($17,600) to Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The violations involve marketing external radiofrequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of its equipment authorization and the prohibition against the marketing of such devices. background On December 9 and 14, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received complaints alleging that Hawking was illegally marketing the Hawking Model HSB1 (``HSB1'') external
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-668A1.txt
  • Disadvantages The requirements impose some regulatory costs on equipment manufacturers and the required approvals may slow market entry slightly. Recent Efforts The Part 15 rules are continually revised to address evolving technology. Comments The Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) filed a comment to the August 10, 2006 Public Notice, in which it recommended a change to sections 15.109(g)(1), 15.19(b)(3), and 15.204 of the Commission's Rules, which pertain, respectively, to compliance testing, FCC logo placement, and antenna certification. ITI's proposed change to section 15.109(g)(1) was opposed by Committee C63 (C63) of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and its proposed change to section 15.204 was opposed by Itron, Inc. (Itron). Recommendation Although we find merit in one aspect of ITI's comments, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2290A1.txt
  • 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and RF Linx Corporation (``RF Linx''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against RF Linx for possible violations of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), regarding RF Linx's marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. The Bureau and RF Linx have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-885A1.txt
  • Released: May 20, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Luxul Wireless, Inc. (``Luxul''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Luxul's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') pertaining to the marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. The Bureau and Luxul have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-42A1.txt
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') and Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking''). The Consent Decree settles an enforcement proceeding against Hawking regarding Hawking's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's rules in connection with its marketing of certain external radio frequency power amplifiers. The Bureau and Hawking have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271066A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271066A1.pdf
  • ) ) File No.: EB-07-ST-022 Aspeedynet ) 2623-A Euclid Ave ) Citation No.: C20073298002 Wenatchee, WA 98801 ) CITATION Released: February 26, 2007 By the District Director, Seattle District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Aspeedynet for violation of Sections 15.5(b), 15.204(a), and 15.204(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Seattle Office revealed that on February 6, 2007, Aspeedynet was operating three co-located Tranzeo Digital Transmission Systems located near the White Heron Cellars winery overlooking the Crescent Bar area. Section 15.204(b) of the Rules states ``[a] transmission system consisting of an intentional radiator, an external radiator, an external
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280123A1.pdf
  • EB-07-LA-399 Exxon Mobil Corporation ) . ) Citation No.: C20083290005 Irving, Texas ) CITATION Released: January 31, 2008 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Exxon Mobil Corporation (``Exxon Mobil'') for violation of Sections 15.5(b), 15.204(a), and 15.204(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). On January 18, 2008, while responding to a complaint of interference from Sprint Nextel, an investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that Exxon Mobil was operating an 802.11b wireless access point with an auxiliary 802.11 b/g bi-directional amplifier from its retail fuel sales station at 2702 W. First Street, Santa
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290776A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290776A1.pdf
  • with all applicable regulations in the subpart. 47 C.F.R. � 15.1(b). All intentional radiators, such as your U-NII device, operating pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC's rules must be certified for use as a Part 15 device. 47 C.F.R. � 15.201(b). An intentional radiator may be operated only with the antenna with which it is authorized. 47 C.F.R. � 15.204(c) Nonlicensed operation of a U-NII device is also subject to the condition that it must not cause harmful interference and, if harmful interference occurs, operation of the device must cease. See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.5, 15.405. Harmful interference is defined as ``[a]ny emission, radiation or induction that endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety services
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.txt
  • this subpart, a hand held device is a portable device, such as a lap top computer or a PDA, that is primarily hand held while being operated and that does not employ a fixed infrastructure. Section 15.505 Cross reference. (a) Except where specifically stated otherwise within this subpart, the provisions of Subparts A and B and of Sections 15.201 through 15.204 and Section 15.207 of Subpart C of this part apply to unlicensed UWB intentional radiators. The provisions of Sections 15.35(c) and 15.205 do not apply to devices operated under this subpart. The provisions of Footnote US 246 to the Table of Frequency Allocations contained in Section 2.106 of this chapter does not apply to devices operated under this subpart. (b)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.txt
  • excessive data rates or over-modulation. The modular transmitter must have its own power supply regulation. This is intended to ensure that the module will comply with Part 15 requirements regardless of the design of the power supplying circuitry in the device into which the module is installed. The modular transmitter must comply with the antenna requirements of Section 15.203 and 15.204(c). The antenna must either be permanently attached or employ a ``unique'' antenna coupler (at all connections between the module and the antenna, including the cable). Any antenna used with the module must be approved with the module, either at the time of initial authorization or through a Class II permissive change. The ``professional installation'' provision of Section 15.203 may not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-165A1.txt
  • with commenters regarding the need to make modifications to Part 15 to permit the use of a variety of replacement antennas. A change in this requirement will enable greater design flexibility for manufacturers and allow consumers ease of replacement. Although we proposed to modify Section 15.203 to implement the modifications, we believe that the changes are better suited for Section 15.204. Accordingly, we modify Section 15.204 to permit intentional radiators to be authorized with multiple antennas of similar in and out-of-band gain and radiation pattern. Compliance testing for the intentional radiator must be performed using the highest gain antenna that will be used with the device. The manufacturer must supply a list of other acceptable antennas in the literature delivered to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-104A1.txt
  • to express the emission limits as EIRPs as alternatives to the existing power density standards. Comments are also requested on whether we should continue to specify measurements using the existing power density limits as an alternative to measurements using the proposed EIRP limits or if we should delete the power density limits in favor of EIRP limits. Antenna Substitution. Section 15.204(c)(4) of the rules allows intentional radiators to be marketed and used with any antenna that is of the same type and of equal or less directional gain as the antenna authorized with the equipment. We note that the comments contained considerable discussion regarding the Commission's emission limits for the 60 GHz band and their relationship to the RF exposure guidelines
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.txt
  • March 28, 2007 Released: April 2, 2007 By the Commission: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. background Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-56A1.txt
  • excessive data rates or over-modulation. The modular transmitter must have its own power supply regulation. This is intended to ensure that the module will comply with Part 15 requirements regardless of the design of the power supplying circuitry in the device into which the module is installed. The modular transmitter must comply with the antenna requirements of Section 15.203 and 15.204(c). The antenna must either be permanently attached or employ a ``unique'' antenna coupler (at all connections between the module and the antenna, including the cable). Any antenna used with the module must be approved with the module, either at the time of initial authorization or through a Class II permissive change. The ``professional installation'' provision of Section 15.203 may not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.txt
  • antenna used with fixed devices shall be located outdoors at least 10 meters above the ground. The antenna system shall be capable of receiving signals of protected services equally in all directions. The transmit antenna used with fixed devices may not be more than 30 meters above the ground. (3) For both Fixed and personal/portable TVBDs, the provisions of Section 15.204(c)(4) do not apply to the receive antenna used for spectrum sensing. (c) Undesirable emission limits for TVBDs are as follows: (1) In the 6 MHz channels adjacent to the operating channel, emissions from TVBD devices shall be at least 55 dB below the highest average power in the band. (2) The above emission measurements shall be performed using a minimum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-25A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-25A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-25A1.txt
  • FRN # 0012065009 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 27, 2009 Released: March 31, 2009 By the Commission: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) to Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. 2. On April 2, 2007, the Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $50,000 to Hawking.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-174A1.txt
  • at sites where the height above average terrain (HAAT) at ground level is more than 76 meters. The ground level HAAT is to be calculated by the TV bands database that the device contacts for available channels using computational software employing the methodology in section 73.684(d) of this chapter.(3) For personal/portable TVBDs operating under � 15.717, the provisions of � 15.204(c)(4) do not apply to an antenna used for transmission and reception/spectrum sensing. (4) For personal/portable TVBDs operating under � 15.717 that incorporate a separate sensing antenna, compliance testing shall be performed using the lowest gain antenna for each type of antenna to be certified. (c) Emission limits for TVBDs. (1) In the television channels immediately adjacent to the channel in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2843A1.html
  • ID#s KNY-DGR- 115, KNY-205-108213, KNY-1931852313419 and KNY21161341911919 that does not comply with the terms of these equipment authorizations. In support of this assertion, MDS made numerous specific allegations with respect to equipment marketed under each of the four FCC Identifiers. MDS also alleged that Freewave is marketing non-compliant and unauthorized bilateral amplifiers to the general public in violation of Section 15.204(a) of the Rules.2 4. On June 20, 2002, Freewave filed a motion to dismiss MDS's request. In its motion, Freewave asserted that the allegations raised by MDS are without merit. 5. Subsequently, the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology referred the matter to the Enforcement Bureau for investigation. On June 10, 2004, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1701A1.html
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking''), apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-two thousand dollars ($22,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The alleged violations involve marketing external radiofrequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(a) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. On December 9 and 14, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received complaints alleging that Hawking was illegally marketing the Hawking Model
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1436A1.html
  • Court City of Industry, CA 91745 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-018 Dear Mr. Ho: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, external radio frequency power amplifiers, in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On August 2, 2005, staff from the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("SED") of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau visited the internet web site store for OvisLink products, http://store.ovislink.com ("OvisLink online store"). The OvisLink online store listed several models
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-853A1.html
  • April 17, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand six hundred dollars ($17,600) to Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The violations involve marketing external radiofrequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of its equipment authorization and the prohibition against the marketing of such devices. II. background 2. On December 9 and 14, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") received complaints alleging that Hawking was illegally marketing the Hawking Model HSB1
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-45A1.html
  • 2007 Released: April 2, 2007 By the Commission: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. II. background 2. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/FCC-09-25A1.html
  • # 0012065009 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 27, 2009 Released: March 31, 2009 By the Commission: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) to Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. 2. On April 2, 2007, the Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $50,000 to Hawking.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2290A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and RF Linx Corporation ("RF Linx"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against RF Linx for possible violations of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), regarding RF Linx's marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. 2. The Bureau and RF Linx have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-885A1.html
  • May 20, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Luxul Wireless, Inc. ("Luxul"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Luxul's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules") pertaining to the marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. 2. The Bureau and Luxul have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-42A1.html
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") and Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking"). The Consent Decree settles an enforcement proceeding against Hawking regarding Hawking's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's rules in connection with its marketing of certain external radio frequency power amplifiers. 2. The Bureau and Hawking have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-02-929A1.html
  • (3/22/02). * Magnum Communications Inc., WTMB/WBOG-FM/WXYM-FM, Tomah, WI. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 17.4(g) (Posting of Antenna Structure Registration Number). Saint Paul, MN Resident Agent Office (3/26/02). * Crestview Broadcasting Co., Inc., Crestview, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (3/21/02). * Crestview Broadcasting Co., Inc., Crestview, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (3/21/02). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 Radio Frequency Devices * 47 C.F.R. 15.204 External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers and Antenna Modifications * Sting Communications, Lebanon, PA. Philadelphia, PA District Office (3/14/02). 47 C.F.R. Part 17 Construction, Marking & Lighting of Antenna Structures * 47 C.F.R. 17.4(a) Antenna Structure Registration * Shenadoah Valley Electric Cooperative, KIA495, Mount Crawford, VA. Columbia, MD District Office (3/12/02). * 47 C.F.R. 17.4(g) Posting of Antenna Structure Registration Numbers
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011644.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011644.html
  • violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization) and 2.815 (External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers). Tampa, FL District Office (5/9/01). White Diamond Communications, Inc., San Juan, PR. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (5/14/01). Cell-Station, Inc., Oldsmar, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (5/22/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices 47 C.F.R. � 15.204 - External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers and Antenna Modifications Netbeam, Inc., Golden, Colorado. Denver, CO District Office (5/21/01). 2 4 ^ ` � ' � � $ 3 4 _ ` � � ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/2004broadbandforum/comments/YDI_externalamps.pdf
  • B and a radio from Vendor C. They do some power/loss/gain computations and figure their EIRP and summarize that since it does not exceed the power limitations set forth in the FCC's rule, their system is compliant. This is not true. Compliance with FCC transmit power limitations does not equal compliance with FCC regulations. According to another FCC rule, Part 15.204, which governs the use of amplifiers and external antennas, you cannot use an amplifier with a Part 15 device - unless it is part of an FCC-certified system. Part 15.204 states: (a) Except as otherwise described in paragraph (b) of this section, no person shall use, manufacture, sell or lease, offer for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2000/da000705.doc
  • with the EUT. The exception is in those cases where the EUT must be professionally installed. In order to demonstrate that professional installation is required, the following three points must be addressed: (a) the application (or intended use) of the EUT, (b) the installation requirements of the EUT, and (c) the method by which the EUT will be marketed. Section 15.204: Section 15.207: If the unit is designed to be connected to the public utility power line, the voltage conducted back onto the AC power line must be measured, in order to demonstrate compliance with the limit specified in this Section. See ANSI C63.4-1992 for the proper set up and procedures. Section 15.247(a): Describe how the EUT meets the definition of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2000/da001407.doc
  • excessive data rates or over-modulation. The modular transmitter must have its own power supply regulation. This is intended to ensure that the module will comply with Part 15 requirements regardless of the design of the power supplying circuitry in the device into which the module is installed. The modular transmitter must comply with the antenna requirements of Section 15.203 and 15.204(c). The antenna must either be permanently attached or employ a ``unique'' antenna coupler (at all connections between the module and the antenna, including the cable). Any antenna used with the module must be approved with the module, either at the time of initial authorization or through a Class II permissive change. The ``professional installation'' provision of Section 15.203 may not
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2006/dd060713.html
  • petition for reconsideration filed by Jhony Desinor as untimely. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 07/11/2006 by MO&O. (DA No. 06-1437). EB [10]DA-06-1437A1.doc [11]DA-06-1437A1.pdf [12]DA-06-1437A1.txt OVISLINK TECHNOLOGIES, CORP. Issued an Official Citation for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, external radio frequency power amplifiers, in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.204(d) of the Rules. Action by: Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 06-1436). EB [13]DA-06-1436A1.doc [14]DA-06-1436A1.pdf [15]DA-06-1436A1.txt CENTURY COMMUNICATIONS OF FL, INC. Granted the application for Open Video System certification. Action by: Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 07/12/2006 by MO&O. (DA No. 06-1417). MB [16]DA-06-1417A1.doc [17]DA-06-1417A1.pdf [18]DA-06-1417A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED JULY 12,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-271066A1.html
  • ) File No.: EB-07-ST-022 Aspeedynet ) 2623-A Euclid Ave ) Citation No.: C20073298002 Wenatchee, WA 98801 ) CITATION Released: February 26, 2007 By the District Director, Seattle District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Aspeedynet for violation of Sections 15.5(b), 15.204(a), and 15.204(b) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Seattle Office revealed that on February 6, 2007, Aspeedynet was operating three co-located Tranzeo Digital Transmission Systems located near the White Heron Cellars winery overlooking the Crescent Bar area. 3. Section 15.204(b) of the Rules states "[a] transmission system consisting of an intentional radiator, an external radiator,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-280123A1.html
  • Exxon Mobil Corporation ) . ) Citation No.: C20083290005 Irving, Texas ) CITATION Released: January 31, 2008 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Exxon Mobil Corporation ("Exxon Mobil") for violation of Sections 15.5(b), 15.204(a), and 15.204(b) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. On January 18, 2008, while responding to a complaint of interference from Sprint Nextel, an investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that Exxon Mobil was operating an 802.11b wireless access point with an auxiliary 802.11 b/g bi-directional amplifier from its retail fuel sales station at 2702 W. First Street,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-290776A1.html
  • with all applicable regulations in the subpart. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.1(b). All intentional radiators, such as your U-NII device, operating pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC's rules must be certified for use as a Part 15 device. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.201(b). An intentional radiator may be operated only with the antenna with which it is authorized. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.204(c) Nonlicensed operation of a U-NII device is also subject to the condition that it must not cause harmful interference and, if harmful interference occurs, operation of the device must cease. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.5, 15.405. Harmful interference is defined as "[a]ny emission, radiation or induction that endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety services
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2843A1.html
  • ID#s KNY-DGR- 115, KNY-205-108213, KNY-1931852313419 and KNY21161341911919 that does not comply with the terms of these equipment authorizations. In support of this assertion, MDS made numerous specific allegations with respect to equipment marketed under each of the four FCC Identifiers. MDS also alleged that Freewave is marketing non-compliant and unauthorized bilateral amplifiers to the general public in violation of Section 15.204(a) of the Rules.2 4. On June 20, 2002, Freewave filed a motion to dismiss MDS's request. In its motion, Freewave asserted that the allegations raised by MDS are without merit. 5. Subsequently, the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology referred the matter to the Enforcement Bureau for investigation. On June 10, 2004, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1701A1.html
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking''), apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-two thousand dollars ($22,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The alleged violations involve marketing external radiofrequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(a) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. On December 9 and 14, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received complaints alleging that Hawking was illegally marketing the Hawking Model
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1436A1.html
  • Court City of Industry, CA 91745 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-018 Dear Mr. Ho: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, external radio frequency power amplifiers, in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On August 2, 2005, staff from the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("SED") of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau visited the internet web site store for OvisLink products, http://store.ovislink.com ("OvisLink online store"). The OvisLink online store listed several models
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-853A1.html
  • April 17, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand six hundred dollars ($17,600) to Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The violations involve marketing external radiofrequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of its equipment authorization and the prohibition against the marketing of such devices. II. background 2. On December 9 and 14, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") received complaints alleging that Hawking was illegally marketing the Hawking Model HSB1
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-45A1.html
  • 2007 Released: April 2, 2007 By the Commission: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. II. background 2. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/FCC-09-25A1.html
  • # 0012065009 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 27, 2009 Released: March 31, 2009 By the Commission: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) to Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. 2. On April 2, 2007, the Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $50,000 to Hawking.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2290A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and RF Linx Corporation ("RF Linx"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against RF Linx for possible violations of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), regarding RF Linx's marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. 2. The Bureau and RF Linx have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-885A1.html
  • May 20, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Luxul Wireless, Inc. ("Luxul"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Luxul's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules") pertaining to the marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. 2. The Bureau and Luxul have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-42A1.html
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") and Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking"). The Consent Decree settles an enforcement proceeding against Hawking regarding Hawking's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's rules in connection with its marketing of certain external radio frequency power amplifiers. 2. The Bureau and Hawking have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-02-929A1.html
  • (3/22/02). * Magnum Communications Inc., WTMB/WBOG-FM/WXYM-FM, Tomah, WI. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 17.4(g) (Posting of Antenna Structure Registration Number). Saint Paul, MN Resident Agent Office (3/26/02). * Crestview Broadcasting Co., Inc., Crestview, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (3/21/02). * Crestview Broadcasting Co., Inc., Crestview, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (3/21/02). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 Radio Frequency Devices * 47 C.F.R. 15.204 External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers and Antenna Modifications * Sting Communications, Lebanon, PA. Philadelphia, PA District Office (3/14/02). 47 C.F.R. Part 17 Construction, Marking & Lighting of Antenna Structures * 47 C.F.R. 17.4(a) Antenna Structure Registration * Shenadoah Valley Electric Cooperative, KIA495, Mount Crawford, VA. Columbia, MD District Office (3/12/02). * 47 C.F.R. 17.4(g) Posting of Antenna Structure Registration Numbers
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011644.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011644.html
  • violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization) and 2.815 (External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers). Tampa, FL District Office (5/9/01). White Diamond Communications, Inc., San Juan, PR. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (5/14/01). Cell-Station, Inc., Oldsmar, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (5/22/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices 47 C.F.R. � 15.204 - External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers and Antenna Modifications Netbeam, Inc., Golden, Colorado. Denver, CO District Office (5/21/01). 2 4 ^ ` � ' � � $ 3 4 _ ` � � ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e