FCC Web Documents citing 15.120

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-842A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-842A1.pdf
  • Released: April 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Philips Consumer Electronics North America (``Philips''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Philips for possible violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. The Bureau and Philips have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-843A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-843A1.pdf
  • April 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Panasonic Corporation of North America (``Panasonic''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Panasonic for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), regarding the manufacture in the United States and interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems, and for possible violations of section 15.117(i)(1)(iv) of the Rules, regarding the importation and interstate shipment, after
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-844A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-844A1.pdf
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics, USA (collectively, ``LGE''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against LGE for possible violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. The Bureau and LGE have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-845A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-845A1.pdf
  • entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and SANYO TV International Corporation d/b/a/ SANYO Manufacturing Company (``SMC'') and SANYO Fisher Company (``SFC''), a division of SANYO North America Corporation (collectively, ``SANYO''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against SANYO for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), regarding the manufacture in the United States and interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. The Bureau and SANYO have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-846A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-846A1.pdf
  • 9, 2008 Released: April 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Vizio, Inc. (``Vizio''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Vizio for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules, regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. The Bureau and Vizio have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-847A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-847A1.pdf
  • 9, 2008 Released: April 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Audiovox Corporation (``Audiovox''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Audiovox for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules), regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. The Bureau and Audiovox have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-848A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-848A1.pdf
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Westinghouse Digital Electronics, LLC (``Westinghouse Digital Electronics''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Westinghouse Digital for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules, regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. The Bureau and Westinghouse Digital Electronics have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1645A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1645A1.pdf
  • 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Pinnacle Systems, Inc. (``Pinnacle''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Pinnacle for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act'') 47 U.S.C. § 330(c) and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. § 15.120(d)(2), regarding the interstate shipment, after January 30, 2008, of personal computer digital television tuners that do not comply with V-Chip technology requirements. The Bureau and Pinnacle have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1961A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1961A1.pdf
  • 2010 Released: October 14, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and VisionTek Products, LLC (``VisionTek''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against VisionTek for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act''), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding the interstate shipment, after January 30, 2008, of personal computer digital television tuners that do not comply with V-Chip technology requirements. The Bureau and VisionTek have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-191A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-191A1.pdf
  • 2007 By the Commission: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Funai Corporation, Inc. (``Funai'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven million, seven hundred forty-five thousand, six hundred eight-seven dollars ($7,745,687) for its willful and repeated violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act''), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve Funai's interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules requiring that such receivers have the capability to receive program rating descriptors and block programs from viewing when the program rating meets pre-determined user requirements and to respond to changes in the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-110A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-110A1.pdf
  • 9, 2008 Released: April 10, 2008 By the Commission: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Polaroid Corporation (``Polaroid'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven hundred seventy five thousand dollars ($775,000) for its willful and repeated violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act''), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve Polaroid's interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules requiring that such receivers have the capability to respond to changes in the content advisory rating system. background Sections 303(x) and 330(c) of the Act were added by the Telecommunications Act of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-111A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-111A1.pdf
  • the Commission: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Proview Technology, Inc. (``PTI'') and Proview Technology (Shenzhen), Ltd. (``PTS'') (collectively, ``Proview'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) for their willful and repeated violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act''), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve Proview's interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules requiring that such receivers have the capability to respond to changes in the content advisory rating system. background Sections 303(x) and 330(c) of the Act were added by the Telecommunications Act of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-163A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-163A1.pdf
  • By the Commission: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') and Funai Corporation, Inc. (``Funai''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') by the Commission against Funai for possible violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act''), Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding Funai's apparent interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules regarding program blocking technology requirements for televisions receivers, and Section 1.17 of the Rules regarding Funai's apparent inaccurate statements to the Commission. The Commission and Funai have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3848A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3848A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3848A1.txt
  • Cable ready consumer electronics equipment. * * * * * (b) Cable ready consumer electronics equipment shall be capable of receiving all NTSC or similar video channels on channels 1 through 125 of the channel allocation plan set forth in EIA IS-132: ``Cable Television Channel Identification Plan'' (incorporated by reference, see § 15.38). * * * * * 4. § 15.120 is amended by revising paragraph (d)(1) to read as follows: § 15.120 Program blocking technology requirements for television receivers. * * * * * (d) * * * (1) Analog television receivers will receive program ratings transmitted pursuant to EIA-744: ``Transport of Content Advisory Information Using Extended Data Service (XDS)'' (incorporated by reference, see § 15.38) and EIA-608: ``Recommended Practice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-842A1.txt
  • Released: April 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Philips Consumer Electronics North America (``Philips''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Philips for possible violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. The Bureau and Philips have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-843A1.txt
  • April 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Panasonic Corporation of North America (``Panasonic''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Panasonic for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), regarding the manufacture in the United States and interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems, and for possible violations of section 15.117(i)(1)(iv) of the Rules, regarding the importation and interstate shipment, after
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-844A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-844A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-844A1.txt
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics, USA (collectively, ``LGE''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against LGE for possible violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. The Bureau and LGE have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-845A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-845A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-845A1.txt
  • entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and SANYO TV International Corporation d/b/a/ SANYO Manufacturing Company (``SMC'') and SANYO Fisher Company (``SFC''), a division of SANYO North America Corporation (collectively, ``SANYO''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against SANYO for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), regarding the manufacture in the United States and interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. The Bureau and SANYO have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-846A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-846A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-846A1.txt
  • 9, 2008 Released: April 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Vizio, Inc. (``Vizio''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Vizio for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules, regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. The Bureau and Vizio have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-847A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-847A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-847A1.txt
  • 9, 2008 Released: April 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Audiovox Corporation (``Audiovox''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Audiovox for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules), regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. The Bureau and Audiovox have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-848A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-848A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-848A1.txt
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Westinghouse Digital Electronics, LLC (``Westinghouse Digital Electronics''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Westinghouse Digital for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules, regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. The Bureau and Westinghouse Digital Electronics have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1645A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1645A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1645A1.txt
  • 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Pinnacle Systems, Inc. (``Pinnacle''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Pinnacle for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act'') 47 U.S.C. § 330(c) and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. § 15.120(d)(2), regarding the interstate shipment, after January 30, 2008, of personal computer digital television tuners that do not comply with V-Chip technology requirements. The Bureau and Pinnacle have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1961A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1961A1.txt
  • 2010 Released: October 14, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and VisionTek Products, LLC (``VisionTek''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against VisionTek for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act''), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding the interstate shipment, after January 30, 2008, of personal computer digital television tuners that do not comply with V-Chip technology requirements. The Bureau and VisionTek have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2011A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2011A1.txt
  • that the provisions of the section would apply as of June 30, 1997. Because that date has passed, and because the statute of limitations in the Communications Act precludes any enforcement action for activities taking place before that date, that note provides unnecessary information that does not affect the substance of the rules or otherwise have any legal effect. Section 15.120 is revised by removing the transition dates from paragraphs (b) and (d)(2). This section requires that TV receivers incorporate the capability for users to block programming based on rating information transmitted with the program. Paragraph (b) states that TV receivers must meet the program blocking requirements in paragraphs (c), (d) and (e) of this section effective January 1, 2000. Paragraph
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279327A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279327A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279327A1.txt
  • v-chip technology be included in all digital television receivers with integrated 4:3 displays measuring at least 13 inches diagonally. Similar to our requirements for closed caption capabilities in digital television receivers, the rules will also be applicable to DTV tuners which are sold without an associated display device. ``193. The Commission, however, did not make the corresponding revisions to section 15.120(b) as codified in the CFR to reflect these changes. We now make this adjustment to the codified rule to reflect the revision adopted in 2004. We also correct the rule reference to ``diameter,'' which should have been ``measured diagonally'' in the rules to conform with the description adopted in the V-Chip Order (Technical Requirements to Enable Blocking of Video Programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.txt
  • to indicate that the Commission will not use certain sections of this procedure for determining the compliance of equipment. Also, we are proposing that the rules reflect the Commission's longstanding practice to use loop antennas rather than rod antennas for low frequency measurements. Section 15.118 Cable ready consumer electronics equipment. We are proposing to correct the Commission's mailing address. Section 15.120 Program blocking technology requirements for television receivers. We are proposing to correct the Commission's mailing address. Section 15.255 Operation in the band 59.0-64.0 GHz. We are proposing to correct the wording in paragraph (b)(5) from ``emission limits'' to ``emission levels''. Section 18.103 Organization and applicability of the rules. We are proposing to delete this section because it duplicates the table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.txt
  • of the proposed changes: Section 15.31 Measurement standards: remove references to measurement procedures that are no longer used, correct the Commission's mailing address, update the reference to reflect the new ANSI C63.4-2001 measurement procedure and clarify the type of antenna used for radiated measurements below 30 MHz. Section 15.118 Cable ready consumer electronics equipment: correct the Commission's mailing address. Section 15.120 Program blocking technology requirements for television receivers: correct the Commission's mailing address. Section 15.255 Operation in the band 59.0-64.0 GHz: correct the wording in paragraph (b)(5) from ``emission limits'' to ``emission levels''. CEA, IBM, Motorola and TIA support these proposals to update and correct the rules. ITI and Cisco support referencing the C63.4-2001 measurement procedure in place of the C63.4-1992
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-225A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-225A1.txt
  • C63.4-1992: ``Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise Emissions from Low-Voltage Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz,'' 1992, IBR approved for §15.31, except for sections 5.7, 9 and 14. (7) EIA IS-132: ``Cable Television Channel Identification Plan,'' 1994, IBR approved for §15.118. (8) EIA-608: ``Recommended Practice for Line 21 Data Service,'' 1994, IBR approved for §15.120. (9) EIA-744: ``Transport of Content Advisory Information Using Extended Data Service (XDS),'' 1997, IBR approved for §15.120. (10) EIA-708-B: ``Digital Television (DTV) Closed Captioning,'' 1999, IBR approved for §15.122. (11) Third Edition of the International Special Committee on Radio Interference (CISPR), Pub. 22, ``Information Technology Equipment - Radio Disturbance Characteristics - Limits and Methods of Measurement,'' 1997, IBR approved for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-8A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-8A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-8A1.txt
  • if we do not adopt the ATSC A/65A terrestrial broadcast standard as it pertains to provision of v-chip program rating information, should we require carriage of this information in the program stream which is currently optional under ATSC A/65A? We note that CEA has filed a petition for rulemaking asking the Commission to incorporate standards EIA-766 and EIA-708-B into Section 15.120 of our rules in order to establish uniformity for v-chip compliance in digital receivers. We seek comment on CEA's proposal, including the adoption of particular standards that are necessary and appropriate, and the timing of any such mandate. The PSIP also carries the Rating Region Table (``RRT''), which describes the content advisory rating system being used. Use of the RRT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-175A1.txt
  • also id. 7-10. Id. at 10. , at § II.D.1. , at 26. , § II.D.1 (listing and explaining criteria in general) and Appendix B (setting forth ``Scene Evaluation Form'' programming reviewers used to evaluate portrayals of violence). , at 11, 30. See also American Academy of Pediatrics, Media Violence, 108 Pediatrics 1222, 1222-23 (2001). . ; 47 C.F.R. § 15.120(b). Dale Kunkel, et. al.., Rating The TV Ratings: One Year Out, An Assessment of the Television Industry's Use of V-Chip Ratings, (A Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation Report) (September 1998). See id. at 2. Kaiser Family Foundation, Parents & the V-Chip 2001: A Kaiser Family Foundation Survey (2001) 1-2. Id. at 1. The most popular reasons parents gave for not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-192A1.txt
  • 302, 303, 304, 307, 336, and 544A. 2. Section 15.38, paragraph (b) is amended by adding subsections (13) and (14) as follows: § 15.38 Incorporations by reference. (b) (13) EIA-766-A: ``U.S. and Canadian Region Rating Tables (RRT) and Content Advisory Descriptors for Transport of Content Advisory Information using ATSC A/65-A Program and System Information Protocol (PSIP),'' 2001, IBR approved for §15.120. * * * * * 3. Section 15.120, paragraph (c) subsection (2) is amended by revising it to read as follows: §15.120 Program blocking technology requirements for television receivers. (c) Transmission Format. (2) Digital television program rating information shall be transmitted in digital television signals in accordance with § 73.682(d) of this chapter. * * * * * 4. Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.txt
  • the PCS bands at a higher level than that allowed from UWB devices and within the cellular bands at the same level as that allowed from UWB devices. 47 C.F.R. § 15.231 allows operation within the PCS and cellular frequency bands at considerably higher emission levels than those produced by UWB devices. Prior to June 23, 1989, 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.120, 15.122, 15.181-15.187, and 15.201-15.215 permitted unlicensed operation within the PCS and cellular bands at the higher power levels currently permitted under 47 C.F.R. § 15.231. The term ``exclusivity'' as used in the case refers to ``geographic exclusivity and protection from interference.'' See [AirCell] at 963-64. MO&O, supra, at para. 74. MO&O, supra, at para. 124-131. SIA petition of 5/22/03 at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-68A1.txt
  • shipped in interstate commerce with a picture screen of thirteen inches or larger must be equipped with a ``V-chip'' system that can be programmed to block violent, sexual, or other programming that parents do not wish their children to view. Technical Requirements to Enable Blocking of Video Programming Based on Program Ratings, 13 FCC Rcd 11248 (1998); 47 C.F.R. § 15.120(b). Out of a total universe of 280 million sets in U.S. households, see Nielsen Media Research U.S. TV Household Estimates, 2003-04, about 119 million sets in use are equipped with V-chips. Broadcasting & Cable TVFAX, TV Watch ``Exposes'' V-chip Critics, July 8, 2005, at 2. See Forfeiture Order at ¶ 34 n.117 (citing broadcaster's statements in 2004 that ``less than
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-191A1.txt
  • 2007 By the Commission: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Funai Corporation, Inc. (``Funai'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven million, seven hundred forty-five thousand, six hundred eight-seven dollars ($7,745,687) for its willful and repeated violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act''), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve Funai's interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules requiring that such receivers have the capability to receive program rating descriptors and block programs from viewing when the program rating meets pre-determined user requirements and to respond to changes in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-228A1.txt
  • the 4:3 aspect ratio that measures 13' [sic] diagonally across the picture viewing area.'' Accordingly, we shall correct Section 15.117(i)(2) by striking the inappropriate language. V-Chip Requirements: We also take this opportunity to conform the V-Chip rule codified in the Code of Federal Regulations to the modification of that rule adopted in the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order. Section 15.120(b) of the Commission's rules requires that all TV broadcast receivers with picture screens 13 inches or larger in diameter comply with the V-Chip requirements. The codified rule provides: 15.120 Program blocking technology requirements for television receivers. ***** (b) Effective January 1, 2000, all TV broadcast receivers as defined in section 15.3(w) of this chapter, including personal computer systems meeting that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-50A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-50A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-50A1.txt
  • 512 U.S. at 666 (``Congress is not obligated, when enacting its statutes, to make a record of the type that an administrative agency or a court does to accommodate judicial review.''). See infra Section IV. 47 U.S.C. § 303(x). See Technical Requirements to Enable Blocking of Video Programming Based on Program Ratings, 13 FCC Rcd 11248 (1998); 47 C.F.R. § 15.120(b). See Knowledge Networks SRI, Home Technology Monitor Survey, Spring 2004; Nielsen Media Research U.S. TV Household Estimates, 2003-04. See Broadcasting & Cable TVFAX, TV Watch ``Exposes'' V-chip Critics at 2 (July 8, 2005). See Parents, Media and Public Policy: A Kaiser Family Foundation Survey (Fall 2004). The survey asked parents about their concerns regarding media content, their children's exposure to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-110A1.txt
  • 9, 2008 Released: April 10, 2008 By the Commission: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Polaroid Corporation (``Polaroid'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven hundred seventy five thousand dollars ($775,000) for its willful and repeated violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act''), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve Polaroid's interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules requiring that such receivers have the capability to respond to changes in the content advisory rating system. background Sections 303(x) and 330(c) of the Act were added by the Telecommunications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-111A1.txt
  • the Commission: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Proview Technology, Inc. (``PTI'') and Proview Technology (Shenzhen), Ltd. (``PTS'') (collectively, ``Proview'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) for their willful and repeated violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act''), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve Proview's interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules requiring that such receivers have the capability to respond to changes in the content advisory rating system. background Sections 303(x) and 330(c) of the Act were added by the Telecommunications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-163A1.txt
  • By the Commission: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') and Funai Corporation, Inc. (``Funai''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') by the Commission against Funai for possible violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act''), Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding Funai's apparent interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules regarding program blocking technology requirements for televisions receivers, and Section 1.17 of the Rules regarding Funai's apparent inaccurate statements to the Commission. The Commission and Funai have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-14A1.txt
  • percent of households with children 8 to 18 have a video game console. See Roberts and Foehr, Trends in Media Use, supra n. 7. Id. Id. Id. Id. 47 U.S.C. § 303(x). Id. (added by Section 551of the 1996 Act). See Technical Requirements to Enable Blocking of Video Programming Based on Program Ratings, 13 FCC Rcd 11248 (1998). Currently, Section 15.120(b) of the Commission's rules requires that, as of January 1, 2000, all television receivers with a picture screen of 13 inches or larger or with displays in the 16:9 aspect ratio that are 7.8 inches or greater in height, as well as all DTV tuners, manufactured in the U.S. or shipped in interstate commerce must be equipped with a V-chip.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-69A1.txt
  • Periodic Report and Order, the Commission stated that ``[w]e generally believe that the ability to modify the current content advisory system is beneficial'' and that ``to ensure the ability to modify the content advisory system, receivers must be able to process newer RRT version numbers or use new rating region codes as suggested by ATSC.'' The Commission also revised Section 15.120(d)(2) to, among other things, state that ``[d]igital television receivers shall be able to respond to changes in the content advisory system.'' Subsequent to the adoption of the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, the ATSC reserved rating region code 0x05 (RRT 5) for an unspecified alternative U.S. rating system or systems. Because the Commission has required that most television receivers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.txt
  • for Digital Television Receivers, Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 16788, 16807, ¶ 56 (2000); Wireless E911 Location Accuracy Requirements, Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 20105, 20112 ¶ 17 (2007), voluntarily vacated, Rural Cellular Ass'n v. FCC, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19889 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 17, 2008)); ITI Comments at 19 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 15.119(a); 47 C.F.R. § 15.120(a); 47 C.F.R. § 15.122(a)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 15.117(i)(1)(i)-(iii)); CEA Ex Parte in CG Docket No. 10-213 at 2 (citing Technical Requirements to Enable Blocking of Video Programming based on Program Ratings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11248, 11257 ¶ 23 (1998); Implementation of Section 304 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 14775, 14803
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.wp
  • 4. CEMA 5. John B. Livingstone 6. The Industry 7. OKTV 8. People for the American Way Action Fund 9. Philips 10. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press 11. Soundview 12. Thomson 13. University of Wisconsin - Madison __________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX C A. Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 15, is amended as follows: A new Section 15.120 is added to read as follows: Section 15.120 Program blocking technology requirements for television receivers. (a) Effective July 1, 1999, manufacturers of television broadcast receivers as defined in Section 15.3(w) of this chapter, including personal computer systems meeting that definition, must ensure that one-half of their product models with picture screens 33 cm (13 in) or larger in diameter shipped
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-68A1.html
  • shipped in interstate commerce with a picture screen of thirteen inches or larger must be equipped with a "V-chip" system that can be programmed to block violent, sexual, or other programming that parents do not wish their children to view. Technical Requirements to Enable Blocking of Video Programming Based on Program Ratings, 13 FCC Rcd 11248 (1998); 47 C.F.R. S 15.120(b). Out of a total universe of 280 million sets in U.S. households, see Nielsen Media Research U.S. TV Household Estimates, 2003-04, about 119 million sets in use are equipped with V-chips. Broadcasting & Cable TVFAX, TV Watch "Exposes" V-chip Critics, July 8, 2005, at 2. See Forfeiture Order at P 34 n.117 (citing broadcaster's statements in 2004 that "less than
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-191A1.html
  • the Commission: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Funai Corporation, Inc. ("Funai") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven million, seven hundred forty-five thousand, six hundred eight-seven dollars ($7,745,687) for its willful and repeated violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, ("Act"), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve Funai's interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules requiring that such receivers have the capability to receive program rating descriptors and block programs from viewing when the program rating meets pre-determined user requirements and to respond to changes in the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-842A1.html
  • April 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Philips Consumer Electronics North America ("Philips"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Philips for possible violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. 2. The Bureau and Philips have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-843A1.html
  • 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Panasonic Corporation of North America ("Panasonic"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Panasonic for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), regarding the manufacture in the United States and interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems, and for possible violations of section 15.117(i)(1)(iv) of the Rules, regarding the importation and interstate shipment, after
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-844A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics, USA (collectively, "LGE"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against LGE for possible violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. 2. The Bureau and LGE have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-845A1.html
  • entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and SANYO TV International Corporation d/b/a/ SANYO Manufacturing Company ("SMC") and SANYO Fisher Company ("SFC"), a division of SANYO North America Corporation (collectively, "SANYO"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against SANYO for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), regarding the manufacture in the United States and interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. 2. The Bureau and SANYO have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-846A1.html
  • 2008 Released: April 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Vizio, Inc. ("Vizio"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Vizio for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules, regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. 2. The Bureau and Vizio have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-847A1.html
  • 2008 Released: April 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Audiovox Corporation ("Audiovox"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Audiovox for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules), regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. 2. The Bureau and Audiovox have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-848A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Westinghouse Digital Electronics, LLC ("Westinghouse Digital Electronics"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Westinghouse Digital for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules, regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. 2. The Bureau and Westinghouse Digital Electronics have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-110A1.html
  • Released: April 10, 2008 By the Commission: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Polaroid Corporation ("Polaroid") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven hundred seventy five thousand dollars ($775,000) for its willful and repeated violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, ("Act"), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve Polaroid's interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules requiring that such receivers have the capability to respond to changes in the content advisory rating system. II. background 2. Sections 303(x) and 330(c) of the Act were added by the Telecommunications
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-111A1.html
  • I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Proview Technology, Inc. ("PTI") and Proview Technology (Shenzhen), Ltd. ("PTS") (collectively, "Proview") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) for their willful and repeated violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, ("Act"), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve Proview's interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules requiring that such receivers have the capability to respond to changes in the content advisory rating system. II. background 2. Sections 303(x) and 330(c) of the Act were added by the Telecommunications
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-163A1.html
  • the Commission: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") and Funai Corporation, Inc. ("Funai"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") by the Commission against Funai for possible violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, ("Act"), Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), regarding Funai's apparent interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules regarding program blocking technology requirements for televisions receivers, and Section 1.17 of the Rules regarding Funai's apparent inaccurate statements to the Commission. 2. The Commission and Funai have negotiated the terms of the Consent
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1645A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Pinnacle Systems, Inc. ("Pinnacle"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Pinnacle for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the "Act") 47 U.S.C. S: 330(c) and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S: 15.120(d)(2), regarding the interstate shipment, after January 30, 2008, of personal computer digital television tuners that do not comply with V-Chip technology requirements. 2. The Bureau and Pinnacle have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1961A1.html
  • Released: October 14, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and VisionTek Products, LLC ("VisionTek"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against VisionTek for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the "Act"), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), regarding the interstate shipment, after January 30, 2008, of personal computer digital television tuners that do not comply with V-Chip technology requirements. 2. The Bureau and VisionTek have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.wp
  • 4. CEMA 5. John B. Livingstone 6. The Industry 7. OKTV 8. People for the American Way Action Fund 9. Philips 10. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press 11. Soundview 12. Thomson 13. University of Wisconsin - Madison __________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX C A. Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 15, is amended as follows: A new Section 15.120 is added to read as follows: Section 15.120 Program blocking technology requirements for television receivers. (a) Effective July 1, 1999, manufacturers of television broadcast receivers as defined in Section 15.3(w) of this chapter, including personal computer systems meeting that definition, must ensure that one-half of their product models with picture screens 33 cm (13 in) or larger in diameter shipped
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080410.html
  • May 12, 2008; Oppositions Due: May 22, 2008; and Replies Due: May 30, 2008. WTB. Contact: Erin McGrath at (202) 418-2042 or Susan Singer at (202) 418-1340 [19]DA-08-851A1.doc [20]DA-08-851A1.pdf [21]DA-08-851A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- AUDIOVOX CORPORATION. Adopted a Consent Decree that terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Audiovox violated 47 U.S.C. Section 330(c) and 47 C.F.R. Section 15.120(d)(2). Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 04/09/2008 by ORDER. (DA No. 08-847). EB [22]DA-08-847A1.doc [23]DA-08-847A1.pdf [24]DA-08-847A1.txt PHILIPS CONSUMER ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA. Adopted a Consent Decree and terminated an investigation into Philips' compliance with the V-Chip technology requirements of Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 04/09/2008 by ORDER. (DA No. 08-842). EB [25]DA-08-842A1.doc [26]DA-08-842A1.pdf [27]DA-08-842A1.txt PANASONIC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080411.html
  • technology requirements. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 04/09/2008 by ORDER. (DA No. 08-844). EB [27]DA-08-844A1.doc [28]DA-08-844A1.pdf [29]DA-08-844A1.txt SANYO TV INTERNATIONAL CORPROATION D/B/A SANYO MANUFACTURING COMPANY AND SANY FISHER COMPANY, A DIVISION OF SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION. Adopted a Consent Decree terminating an investigation of possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules regarding V-Chip technology. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 04/09/2008 by ORDER. (DA No. 08-845). EB [30]DA-08-845A1.doc [31]DA-08-845A1.pdf [32]DA-08-845A1.txt COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC. Granted the Petition. Action by: Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 04/10/2008 by MO&O. (DA No. 08-856). MB [33]DA-08-856A1.doc [34]DA-08-856A1.pdf [35]DA-08-856A1.txt TRACFONE WIRELESS, INC. The FCC Conditionally Designates Tracfone as an
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd090730.html
  • ORDER. (DA No. 09-1647). CGB [45]DA-09-1647A1.doc [46]DA-09-1647A1.pdf [47]DA-09-1647A1.txt TCO NETWORK, INC. Cancelled proposed forfeiture in the amount of $20,000 against TCO Network, Inc. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 07/29/2009 by ORDER. (DA No. 09-1618). EB [48]DA-09-1618A1.doc [49]DA-09-1618A1.pdf [50]DA-09-1618A1.txt PINNACLE SYSTEMS, INC. Adopted a consent decree terminating an investigation into whether Pinnacle violated section 330(c) of the Act and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 07/28/2009 by ORDER. (DA No. 09-1645). Contact Holly Berland [51]DA-09-1645A1.doc [52]DA-09-1645A1.pdf [53]DA-09-1645A1.txt CLEARCOM, INC. Adopted a Consent Decree in this proceeding. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 07/28/2009 by Consent Decree. (DA No. 09-1586). EB [54]DA-09-1586A1.doc [55]DA-09-1586A1.pdf [56]DA-09-1586A1.txt ASTAC LONG DISTANCE. Adopted a Consent Decree in this proceeding. Action by: Chief,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-68A1.html
  • shipped in interstate commerce with a picture screen of thirteen inches or larger must be equipped with a "V-chip" system that can be programmed to block violent, sexual, or other programming that parents do not wish their children to view. Technical Requirements to Enable Blocking of Video Programming Based on Program Ratings, 13 FCC Rcd 11248 (1998); 47 C.F.R. S 15.120(b). Out of a total universe of 280 million sets in U.S. households, see Nielsen Media Research U.S. TV Household Estimates, 2003-04, about 119 million sets in use are equipped with V-chips. Broadcasting & Cable TVFAX, TV Watch "Exposes" V-chip Critics, July 8, 2005, at 2. See Forfeiture Order at P 34 n.117 (citing broadcaster's statements in 2004 that "less than
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-191A1.html
  • the Commission: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Funai Corporation, Inc. ("Funai") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven million, seven hundred forty-five thousand, six hundred eight-seven dollars ($7,745,687) for its willful and repeated violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, ("Act"), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve Funai's interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules requiring that such receivers have the capability to receive program rating descriptors and block programs from viewing when the program rating meets pre-determined user requirements and to respond to changes in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-842A1.html
  • April 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Philips Consumer Electronics North America ("Philips"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Philips for possible violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. 2. The Bureau and Philips have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-843A1.html
  • 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Panasonic Corporation of North America ("Panasonic"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Panasonic for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), regarding the manufacture in the United States and interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems, and for possible violations of section 15.117(i)(1)(iv) of the Rules, regarding the importation and interstate shipment, after
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-844A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics, USA (collectively, "LGE"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against LGE for possible violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. 2. The Bureau and LGE have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-845A1.html
  • entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and SANYO TV International Corporation d/b/a/ SANYO Manufacturing Company ("SMC") and SANYO Fisher Company ("SFC"), a division of SANYO North America Corporation (collectively, "SANYO"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against SANYO for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), regarding the manufacture in the United States and interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. 2. The Bureau and SANYO have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-846A1.html
  • 2008 Released: April 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Vizio, Inc. ("Vizio"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Vizio for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules, regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. 2. The Bureau and Vizio have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-847A1.html
  • 2008 Released: April 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Audiovox Corporation ("Audiovox"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Audiovox for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules), regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. 2. The Bureau and Audiovox have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-848A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Westinghouse Digital Electronics, LLC ("Westinghouse Digital Electronics"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Westinghouse Digital for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's rules, regarding the interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the V-Chip technology requirements because they lack the ability to adapt to new rating systems. 2. The Bureau and Westinghouse Digital Electronics have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1961A1.html
  • Released: October 14, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and VisionTek Products, LLC ("VisionTek"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against VisionTek for possible violations of section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the "Act"), and section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), regarding the interstate shipment, after January 30, 2008, of personal computer digital television tuners that do not comply with V-Chip technology requirements. 2. The Bureau and VisionTek have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing