FCC Web Documents citing 15.105

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2673A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2673A1.pdf
  • 10, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. (``Multi-Tech'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.105(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Multi-Tech's marketing of a radio frequency device without including the required consumer disclosure in the user manual. BACKGROUND Multi-Tech is a manufacturer of communications and device networking products that provide voice and data services over internet protocol networks. One of its products, the CallFinder(R) Global System for Mobile Communications (``GSM'')
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.pdf
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Enhanced Vision Systems, Inc. (``Enhanced Vision''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Enhanced Vision for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing of Class B Digital Devices, specifically, vision assistance products for the legally blind. The Bureau and Enhanced Vision have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1468A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1468A1.pdf
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Marshall Amplification PLC (``Marshall'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand two hundred dollars ($7,200) for its apparent willful and repeated violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803(a)(2) and 15.105(b) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Marshall's marketing of a Class B digital audio radio frequency device in the United States without providing mandatory disclosures to consumers in the device's user manual. II. BACKGROUND 2. On July 12, 2010, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau issued a letter of inquiry to Marshall in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.pdf
  • 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. (``PreSonus''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding PreSonus's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class B digital audio radio frequency devices. The Bureau and PreSonus have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-270A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-270A1.pdf
  • Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and American Music and Sound (AMS). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into AMS's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class A digital audio radio frequency devices. The Bureau and AMS have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-360A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-360A1.pdf
  • In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and ETI Sound Systems, Inc. (ETI). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into ETI's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of digital radio frequency devices, including guitar amplifiers, CD/MP3 players, and active speaker systems. The Bureau and ETI have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.pdf
  • verification procedure, Class B digital devices must be tested and verified as compliant with the Commission's conducted emission and radiated emission limits set forth in Sections 15.107 and 15.109 of the Rules. Additionally, Class B digital devices must be labeled as specified in Section 15.19(a)(3) of the Rules, and its user instruction manuals must include the information detailed in Section 15.105(b) of the Rules. Finally, imported Class B digital devices are subject to mandatory Custom declaration (FCC Form 740) filing requirements. On February 16, 2006, the Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a $1,000,000 forfeiture against Behringer for its apparent willful and repeated violation of the equipment marketing restrictions and related requirements. Specifically, the NAL found
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.txt
  • actually Class B digital devices and therefore must comply with the more stringent emission limits applicable to such devices. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(D). 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(h). 47 C.F.R. � 15(i). See 47 C.F.R. � 15.19. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.105. 47 C.F.R. � 2.955. 47 C.F.R. � 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3544 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3544 �@��� �@��� # $ * + W ` - � � � � � � � � h h9q kd{ kd� $ � 0 � 0 4 � � ������������������������������������������������������������������������ ������������������������������������������������������������������������ ���������������������������������� �� (R)V
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4118A1.txt
  • therefore, importation into the United States was in violation of the Commission's rules. Moreover, the complaint alleged that the Talknet USB Headset does not bear a FCC certification or verification label in violation of Section 15.19 of the Rules. Finally, the complaint alleged that the Talknet manual does not contain an FCC Part 15 statement as is required by Section 15.105(b) of the Rules. On August 27, 2003, the Enforcement Bureau sent Datel a letter of inquiry (``LOI''). In its initial response dated September 10, 2003, Datel stated that it was solely a distributor of the Talknet USB Headset, and that it did not manufacture or design the device, although it did import and market the device in the United States.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4118A1_Erratum.doc
  • therefore, importation into the United States was in violation of the Commission's rules. Moreover, the complaint alleged that the Talknet USB Headset does not bear a FCC certification or verification label in violation of Section 15.19 of the Rules. Finally, the complaint alleged that the Talknet manual does not contain an FCC Part 15 statement as is required by Section 15.105(b) of the Rules. On August 27, 2003, the Enforcement Bureau sent Datel a letter of inquiry (``LOI''). In its initial response dated September 10, 2003, Datel stated that it was solely a distributor of the Talknet USB Headset, and that it did not manufacture or design the device, although it did import and market the device in the United States.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-42A1.txt
  • adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and St. Louis Music, Inc. (``SLM''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau into whether SLM's manufacture, importation, marketing and sale of certain Class B digital audio devices violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act'') and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19 and 15.105(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The Enforcement Bureau and SLM have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist with respect to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1413A1.txt
  • 300, 400, 410, 433, 450, 450B, and 485. Other Devices: Model 202-1 Sip & Puff; Model 200-00 Repeater; Model 923 Receiver; Model 924 Receiver; Model PB 5000 PERS Buddy; Model 650 Medtime with RF Transmitter; Medtime; Model 200-10 HW Smoke Detector; and Model 200-14 RF Smoke Detector. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 2.925, 15.19, 15.101, 15.105(b), 15.107, 15.109, 15.201, 15.207, 15.231, 68.201, and 68.354. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. Parts 2, 15, and 68. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, FCC, to Howard M. Siegel, President, AMAC (Nov. 17, 2004). Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2673A1.txt
  • 10, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. (``Multi-Tech'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.105(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Multi-Tech's marketing of a radio frequency device without including the required consumer disclosure in the user manual. BACKGROUND Multi-Tech is a manufacturer of communications and device networking products that provide voice and data services over internet protocol networks. One of its products, the CallFinder(R) Global System for Mobile Communications (``GSM'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.txt
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Enhanced Vision Systems, Inc. (``Enhanced Vision''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Enhanced Vision for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing of Class B Digital Devices, specifically, vision assistance products for the legally blind. The Bureau and Enhanced Vision have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1468A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1468A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1468A1.txt
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Marshall Amplification PLC (``Marshall'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand two hundred dollars ($7,200) for its apparent willful and repeated violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803(a)(2) and 15.105(b) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Marshall's marketing of a Class B digital audio radio frequency device in the United States without providing mandatory disclosures to consumers in the device's user manual. II. BACKGROUND 2. On July 12, 2010, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau issued a letter of inquiry to Marshall in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.txt
  • 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. (``PreSonus''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding PreSonus's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class B digital audio radio frequency devices. The Bureau and PreSonus have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-270A1.txt
  • Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and American Music and Sound (AMS). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into AMS's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class A digital audio radio frequency devices. The Bureau and AMS have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-360A1.txt
  • In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and ETI Sound Systems, Inc. (ETI). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into ETI's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of digital radio frequency devices, including guitar amplifiers, CD/MP3 players, and active speaker systems. The Bureau and ETI have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.txt
  • it is found to comply. Information to the User Manufacturers are required to supply certain information to the users of products operating under Part 15 of the rules. Section 15.21 requires the instruction manual for all Part 15 devices to contain a statement that unauthorized modifications to a device could void the user's authority to operate it. In addition, Section 15.105 requires the manual for a digital device to include a warning of the potential for interference to other devices and a list of some steps that could possibly eliminate the interference. The rules originally envisioned that this information would be included in a paper instruction manual. As manufacturers have moved to provide more of their manuals electronically, the Commission has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.txt
  • Copies of ANSI C63.17-1998 and C63.4-2001 may be inspected at the following locations: (1) Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Office of Engineering and Technology (room 7-B144), Washington, DC 20554, (2) Federal Communications Commission Laboratory, 7435 Oakland Mills Road, Columbia, MD 21046, or (3) Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. Section 15.105 is amended by adding a new paragraph (e) � 15.105 Information to the user. * * * * * (e) In cases where the manual is provided only in a form other than paper, such as on a computer disk or over the Internet, the information required by this section may be included in the manual in that alternative form,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.txt
  • capability of reading the disk or is used with equipment that is capable of reading the disk. Warning statements may be provided in a manual on the Internet only when the manual is provided solely over the Internet and the equipment will be used with Internet access. These rule changes applied to information statements required by Sections 15.21, 15.27(a) and 15.105(e) of the rules. In their petitions, Cisco and ITI note that the rule changes adopted in the Second Report and Order that allow information statements to be supplied in alternative forms do not apply to the compliance information statements that are required by Section 2.1077 to be supplied with equipment authorized under the DoC procedure. Cisco states that the omission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-282A1.txt
  • will be kept on file and made available to the Commission upon request. III. Each shipment of home recording studios will be sampled by Samson to assure that 1) the devices are uniquely identified, pursuant to Section 2.954 of the Rules; 2) bear the statement required by Section 15.19(a)(3); and 3) include in their manuals the statement required by Section 15.105(b). IV. Any shipment found not to be in compliance with these requirements will be not be offered for sale by Samson or further shipped by or to Samson, until any necessary corrections have been made. V. The Compliance Program, set forth above, will be under the direct supervision of Samson's President, Mr. Scott Goodman, or, in the event Mr. Goodman
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.txt
  • the verification procedure prior to marketing. Specifically, Class B digital devices must be tested and verified as compliant with the conducted emission limits and radiated emission limits set forth in Sections 15.107 and 15.109 of the Rules, must be labeled as specified in Section 15.19(a)(3) of the Rules, and must comply with the user manual requirements set forth in Section 15.105(b) of the Rules. Additionally, if such devices are imported into the United States, the importer must submit a declaration to Customs (on FCC Form 740, or electronically, where electronic filing is available) indicating that the devices meet one of the conditions for entry into the United States. In March 2004, the Bureau received a complaint alleging that Behringer was marketing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.txt
  • verification procedure, Class B digital devices must be tested and verified as compliant with the Commission's conducted emission and radiated emission limits set forth in Sections 15.107 and 15.109 of the Rules. Additionally, Class B digital devices must be labeled as specified in Section 15.19(a)(3) of the Rules, and its user instruction manuals must include the information detailed in Section 15.105(b) of the Rules. Finally, imported Class B digital devices are subject to mandatory Custom declaration (FCC Form 740) filing requirements. On February 16, 2006, the Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a $1,000,000 forfeiture against Behringer for its apparent willful and repeated violation of the equipment marketing restrictions and related requirements. Specifically, the NAL found
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/AEP__10_09_21_5186.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/AEP__10_09_21_5186.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/AM_In10_09_21_5187.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/AM_In10_09_21_5187.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem with your water pump and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the water pump and make necessary corrections within a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Alleg09_10_19_5115.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Alleg09_10_19_5115.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Alleg10_09_21_5188.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Alleg10_09_21_5188.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Alleg11_03_15_5212.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Alleg11_03_15_5212.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Allia09_07_17_5102.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Allia09_07_17_5102.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). We recognize that Alliant has worked continuously with the licensee since the Commission contacted you in 2004 to encourage you to correct the problem. The complainant, however, has advised the Commission that the problem has continued and is seeking further assistance from Alliant in resolving this matter. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Appal09_05_14_5086.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Appal09_05_14_5086.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Aqua_12_04_10_5304.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Aqua_12_04_10_5304.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of this type of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Austi09_05_11_5066.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Austi09_05_11_5066.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Avist11_09_30_5267.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Avist11_09_30_5267.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainants have attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Baby_11_09_30_5268.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Baby_11_09_30_5268.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/CA_Do12_04_10_5305.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/CA_Do12_04_10_5305.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/CDEC_10_03_08_5141.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/CDEC_10_03_08_5141.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Cente09_05_14_5087.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Cente09_05_14_5087.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Centr11_03_15_5213.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Centr11_03_15_5213.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Chick11_03_15_5214.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Chick11_03_15_5214.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/City_10_09_21_5189.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/City_10_09_21_5189.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Colvi11_03_15_5216.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Colvi11_03_15_5216.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by these devices and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/ComEd09_05_18_5090.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/ComEd09_05_18_5090.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/ComEd10_09_21_5190.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/ComEd10_09_21_5190.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Compu12_04_10_5306.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Compu12_04_10_5306.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Conti12_04_10_5307.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Conti12_04_10_5307.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/DaVin12_04_10_5308.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/DaVin12_04_10_5308.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Door_10_09_21_5191.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Door_10_09_21_5191.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Duke_11_09_30_5270.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Duke_11_09_30_5270.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Elect11_03_15_5218.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Elect11_03_15_5218.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem with your electric fence and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the electric fence charger and make necessary corrections within
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Elect11_09_30_5272.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Elect11_09_30_5272.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem by working with you and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Enter10_06_03_5183.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Enter10_06_03_5183.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Enter11_03_15_5219.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Enter11_03_15_5219.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Ether11_03_15_5220.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Ether11_03_15_5220.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem with your Ethernet adapter and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by these devices and make necessary corrections within a reasonable
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/FPL_-12_04_10_5309.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/FPL_-12_04_10_5309.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Fence10_09_21_5192.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Fence10_09_21_5192.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem with your electric fence and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the electric fence charger and make necessary corrections within
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Flori09_10_19_5120.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Flori09_10_19_5120.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Front11_09_30_5273.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Front11_09_30_5273.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process going so far as to have FCC field agents come into his area on multiple occasions to help locate and resolve the problem. To date the interference still continues and neither company has been able to adequately locate and resolve the interference. As a result, the matter
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Golde11_09_30_5274.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Golde11_09_30_5274.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Goodn10_03_08_5142.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Goodn10_03_08_5142.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem through the ARRL and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Grow_11_09_30_5275.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Grow_11_09_30_5275.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/HELCO10_03_08_5143.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/HELCO10_03_08_5143.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Heati11_03_15_5221.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Heati11_03_15_5221.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by these devices and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Holy_09_07_17_5103.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Holy_09_07_17_5103.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Jay_C09_10_19_5121.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Jay_C09_10_19_5121.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. In most cases
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Light10_09_21_5194.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Light10_09_21_5194.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Light11_03_15_5222.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Light11_03_15_5222.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Light12_04_10_5310.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Light12_04_10_5310.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Mason11_09_30_5277.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Mason11_09_30_5277.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Met-E10_09_21_5195.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Met-E10_09_21_5195.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Middl11_09_30_5278.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Middl11_09_30_5278.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Mount11_03_15_5223.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Mount11_03_15_5223.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Myrtl09_10_19_5124.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Myrtl09_10_19_5124.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/NY_ma09_10_19_5126.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/NY_ma09_10_19_5126.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your client should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. The June
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Neigh10_09_21_5196.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Neigh10_09_21_5196.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/North09_07_01_5097.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/North09_07_01_5097.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/North10_03_08_5144.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/North10_03_08_5144.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/OGE_-09_05_11_5071.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/OGE_-09_05_11_5071.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Omaha11_09_30_5279.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Omaha11_09_30_5279.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Orego11_03_15_5225.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Orego11_03_15_5225.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem through the ARRL and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PA_ne12_04_10_5311.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PA_ne12_04_10_5311.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PG&E_10_09_21_5197.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PG&E_10_09_21_5197.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainants have attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-09_05_11_5072.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-09_05_11_5072.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-10_09_21_5198.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-10_09_21_5198.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-10_09_21_5199.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-10_09_21_5199.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-11_03_15_5226.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-11_03_15_5226.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGand09_05_14_5089.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGand09_05_14_5089.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PPL_E10_03_08_5145.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PPL_E10_03_08_5145.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Pelle11_03_15_5231.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Pelle11_03_15_5231.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by these devices and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Pemis10_06_03_5184.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Pemis10_06_03_5184.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Pool_11_09_30_5280.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Pool_11_09_30_5280.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Progr09_07_17_5105.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Progr09_07_17_5105.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/RFI-N10_09_21_5200.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/RFI-N10_09_21_5200.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem through the ARRL and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/RFI-N10_09_21_5201.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/RFI-N10_09_21_5201.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Raton09_10_19_5130.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Raton09_10_19_5130.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SCPUD10_06_03_5185.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SCPUD10_06_03_5185.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SMUD_10_03_08_5146.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SMUD_10_03_08_5146.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SSVEC09_05_11_5074.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SSVEC09_05_11_5074.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Sacre11_03_15_5236.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Sacre11_03_15_5236.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainants have attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/San_D11_09_30_5282.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/San_D11_09_30_5282.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Scann10_03_23_5166.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Scann10_03_23_5166.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem through the ARRL and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SoCal11_09_30_5283.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SoCal11_09_30_5283.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Still12_04_10_5312.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Still12_04_10_5312.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Washi12_04_10_5313.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Washi12_04_10_5313.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Wells09_07_01_5100.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Wells09_07_01_5100.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Westa09_07_01_5099.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Westa09_07_01_5099.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Wisco11_03_15_5239.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Wisco11_03_15_5239.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem through the ARRL and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/X-Box12_04_10_5314.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/X-Box12_04_10_5314.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission has confidence that most people are able to resolve these issues voluntarily, the Commission wants to make you aware that this
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/XcelA09_05_11_5075.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/XcelA09_05_11_5075.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). We recognize that as of last fall, Xcel had believed the matter to be resolved. The complainants, however, have advised the Commission that the problem has returned and are seeking further assistance from Xcel in resolving this matter. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/XcelB09_05_11_5076.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/XcelB09_05_11_5076.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/city_11_09_30_5284.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/city_11_09_30_5284.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/plasm12_04_10_5315.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/plasm12_04_10_5315.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/play_12_04_10_5316.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/play_12_04_10_5316.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3544A1.html
  • Class B digital devices and therefore must comply with the more stringent emission limits applicable to such devices. 20 47 U.S.C. 503(b). 21 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(2)(D). 22 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999). 23 47 C.F.R. 1.80. 24 47 C.F.R. 15.3(h). 25 47 C.F.R. 15(i). 26 See 47 C.F.R. 15.19. 27 See 47 C.F.R. 15.105. 28 47 C.F.R. 2.955. 29 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80. 30 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1914. References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-03-4118A1.html
  • therefore, importation into the United States was in violation of the Commission's rules. Moreover, the complaint alleged that the Talknet USB Headset does not bear a FCC certification or verification label in violation of Section 15.19 of the Rules.6 Finally, the complaint alleged that the Talknet manual does not contain an FCC Part 15 statement as is required by Section 15.105(b) of the Rules.7 On August 27, 2003, the Enforcement Bureau sent Datel a letter of inquiry (``LOI''). 4. In its initial response dated September 10, 2003, Datel stated that it was solely a distributor of the Talknet USB Headset, and that it did not manufacture or design the device, although it did import and market the device in the United
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-282A1.html
  • will be kept on file and made available to the Commission upon request. III. Each shipment of home recording studios will be sampled by Samson to assure that 1) the devices are uniquely identified, pursuant to Section 2.954 of the Rules; 2) bear the statement required by Section 15.19(a)(3); and 3) include in their manuals the statement required by Section 15.105(b). IV. Any shipment found not to be in compliance with these requirements will be not be offered for sale by Samson or further shipped by or to Samson, until any necessary corrections have been made. V. The Compliance Program, set forth above, will be under the direct supervision of Samson's President, Mr. Scott Goodman, or, in the event Mr. Goodman
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-42A1.html
  • adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and St. Louis Music, Inc. (``SLM''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau into whether SLM's manufacture, importation, marketing and sale of certain Class B digital audio devices violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act'')1 and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19 and 15.105(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 2. The Enforcement Bureau and SLM have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1413A1.html
  • 300, 400, 410, 433, 450, 450B, and 485. Other Devices: Model 202-1 Sip & Puff; Model 200-00 Repeater; Model 923 Receiver; Model 924 Receiver; Model PB 5000 PERS Buddy; Model 650 Medtime with RF Transmitter; Medtime; Model 200-10 HW Smoke Detector; and Model 200-14 RF Smoke Detector. 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 2.925, 15.19, 15.101, 15.105(b), 15.107, 15.109, 15.201, 15.207, 15.231, 68.201, and 68.354. 47 U.S.C. S 154(i). 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. Parts 2, 15, and 68. 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, FCC, to Howard M. Siegel, President, AMAC (Nov. 17, 2004). Federal Communications Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
  • the verification procedure prior to marketing. Specifically, Class B digital devices must be tested and verified as compliant with the conducted emission limits and radiated emission limits set forth in Sections 15.107 and 15.109 of the Rules,8 must be labeled as specified in Section 15.19(a)(3) of the Rules,9 and must comply with the user manual requirements set forth in Section 15.105(b) of the Rules.10 Additionally, if such devices are imported into the United States, the importer must submit a declaration to Customs (on FCC Form 740, or electronically, where electronic filing is available) indicating that the devices meet one of the conditions for entry into the United States.11 4. In March 2004, the Bureau received a complaint alleging that Behringer was
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-100A1.html
  • verification procedure, Class B digital devices must be tested and verified as compliant with the Commission's conducted emission and radiated emission limits set forth in Sections 15.107 and 15.109 of the Rules. Additionally, Class B digital devices must be labeled as specified in Section 15.19(a)(3) of the Rules, and its user instruction manuals must include the information detailed in Section 15.105(b) of the Rules. Finally, imported Class B digital devices are subject to mandatory Custom declaration (FCC Form 740) filing requirements. 4. On February 16, 2006, the Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") proposing a $1,000,000 forfeiture against Behringer for its apparent willful and repeated violation of the equipment marketing restrictions and related requirements. 5. Specifically, the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2673A1.html
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. ("Multi-Tech") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.105(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Multi-Tech's marketing of a radio frequency device without including the required consumer disclosure in the user manual. II. BACKGROUND 2. Multi-Tech is a manufacturer of communications and device networking products that provide voice and data services over internet protocol networks. One of its products, the CallFinder(R) Global System for Mobile
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-521A1.html
  • Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Enhanced Vision Systems, Inc. ("Enhanced Vision"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Enhanced Vision for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing of Class B Digital Devices, specifically, vision assistance products for the legally blind. 2. The Bureau and Enhanced Vision have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1468A1.html
  • Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Marshall Amplification PLC ("Marshall") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand two hundred dollars ($7,200) for its apparent willful and repeated violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803(a)(2) and 15.105(b) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Marshall's marketing of a Class B digital audio radio frequency device in the United States without providing mandatory disclosures to consumers in the device's user manual. II. BACKGROUND 2. On July 12, 2010, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau issued a letter of inquiry to Marshall in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-754A1.html
  • 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. ("PreSonus"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding PreSonus's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class B digital audio radio frequency devices. 2. The Bureau and PreSonus have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-270A1.html
  • Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and American Music and Sound (AMS). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into AMS's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class A digital audio radio frequency devices. 2. The Bureau and AMS have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-360A1.html
  • In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and ETI Sound Systems, Inc. (ETI). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into ETI's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of digital radio frequency devices, including guitar amplifiers, CD/MP3 players, and active speaker systems. 2. The Bureau and ETI have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/AEP__10_09_21_5186.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/AEP__10_09_21_5186.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/AM_In10_09_21_5187.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/AM_In10_09_21_5187.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem with your water pump and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the water pump and make necessary corrections within a
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Alleg09_10_19_5115.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Alleg09_10_19_5115.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Alleg10_09_21_5188.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Alleg10_09_21_5188.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Alleg11_03_15_5212.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Alleg11_03_15_5212.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Allia09_07_17_5102.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Allia09_07_17_5102.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). We recognize that Alliant has worked continuously with the licensee since the Commission contacted you in 2004 to encourage you to correct the problem. The complainant, however, has advised the Commission that the problem has continued and is seeking further assistance from Alliant in resolving this matter. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Appal09_05_14_5086.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Appal09_05_14_5086.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Aqua_12_04_10_5304.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Aqua_12_04_10_5304.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of this type of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Austi09_05_11_5066.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Austi09_05_11_5066.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Avist11_09_30_5267.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Avist11_09_30_5267.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainants have attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Baby_11_09_30_5268.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Baby_11_09_30_5268.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/CA_Do12_04_10_5305.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/CA_Do12_04_10_5305.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/CDEC_10_03_08_5141.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/CDEC_10_03_08_5141.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Cente09_05_14_5087.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Cente09_05_14_5087.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Centr11_03_15_5213.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Centr11_03_15_5213.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Chick11_03_15_5214.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Chick11_03_15_5214.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/City_10_09_21_5189.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/City_10_09_21_5189.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Colvi11_03_15_5216.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Colvi11_03_15_5216.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by these devices and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/ComEd09_05_18_5090.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/ComEd09_05_18_5090.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/ComEd10_09_21_5190.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/ComEd10_09_21_5190.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Compu12_04_10_5306.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Compu12_04_10_5306.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Conti12_04_10_5307.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Conti12_04_10_5307.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/DaVin12_04_10_5308.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/DaVin12_04_10_5308.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Door_10_09_21_5191.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Door_10_09_21_5191.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Duke_11_09_30_5270.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Duke_11_09_30_5270.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Elect11_03_15_5218.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Elect11_03_15_5218.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem with your electric fence and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the electric fence charger and make necessary corrections within
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Elect11_09_30_5272.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Elect11_09_30_5272.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem by working with you and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Enter10_06_03_5183.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Enter10_06_03_5183.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Enter11_03_15_5219.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Enter11_03_15_5219.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Ether11_03_15_5220.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Ether11_03_15_5220.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem with your Ethernet adapter and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by these devices and make necessary corrections within a reasonable
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/FPL_-12_04_10_5309.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/FPL_-12_04_10_5309.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Fence10_09_21_5192.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Fence10_09_21_5192.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem with your electric fence and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the electric fence charger and make necessary corrections within
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Flori09_10_19_5120.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Flori09_10_19_5120.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Front11_09_30_5273.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Front11_09_30_5273.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process going so far as to have FCC field agents come into his area on multiple occasions to help locate and resolve the problem. To date the interference still continues and neither company has been able to adequately locate and resolve the interference. As a result, the matter
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Golde11_09_30_5274.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Golde11_09_30_5274.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Goodn10_03_08_5142.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Goodn10_03_08_5142.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem through the ARRL and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Grow_11_09_30_5275.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Grow_11_09_30_5275.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/HELCO10_03_08_5143.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/HELCO10_03_08_5143.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Heati11_03_15_5221.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Heati11_03_15_5221.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by these devices and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Holy_09_07_17_5103.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Holy_09_07_17_5103.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Jay_C09_10_19_5121.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Jay_C09_10_19_5121.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. In most cases
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Light10_09_21_5194.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Light10_09_21_5194.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Light11_03_15_5222.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Light11_03_15_5222.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Light12_04_10_5310.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Light12_04_10_5310.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Mason11_09_30_5277.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Mason11_09_30_5277.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Met-E10_09_21_5195.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Met-E10_09_21_5195.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Middl11_09_30_5278.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Middl11_09_30_5278.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Mount11_03_15_5223.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Mount11_03_15_5223.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Myrtl09_10_19_5124.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Myrtl09_10_19_5124.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/NY_ma09_10_19_5126.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/NY_ma09_10_19_5126.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your client should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. The June
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Neigh10_09_21_5196.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Neigh10_09_21_5196.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/North09_07_01_5097.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/North09_07_01_5097.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/North10_03_08_5144.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/North10_03_08_5144.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/OGE_-09_05_11_5071.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/OGE_-09_05_11_5071.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Omaha11_09_30_5279.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Omaha11_09_30_5279.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Orego11_03_15_5225.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Orego11_03_15_5225.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem through the ARRL and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PA_ne12_04_10_5311.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PA_ne12_04_10_5311.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PG&E_10_09_21_5197.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PG&E_10_09_21_5197.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainants have attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-09_05_11_5072.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-09_05_11_5072.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-10_09_21_5198.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-10_09_21_5198.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-10_09_21_5199.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-10_09_21_5199.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-11_03_15_5226.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGE_-11_03_15_5226.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGand09_05_14_5089.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PGand09_05_14_5089.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PPL_E10_03_08_5145.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/PPL_E10_03_08_5145.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Pelle11_03_15_5231.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Pelle11_03_15_5231.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by these devices and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Pemis10_06_03_5184.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Pemis10_06_03_5184.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Pool_11_09_30_5280.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Pool_11_09_30_5280.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Progr09_07_17_5105.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Progr09_07_17_5105.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/RFI-N10_09_21_5200.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/RFI-N10_09_21_5200.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem through the ARRL and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/RFI-N10_09_21_5201.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/RFI-N10_09_21_5201.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Raton09_10_19_5130.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Raton09_10_19_5130.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SCPUD10_06_03_5185.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SCPUD10_06_03_5185.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SMUD_10_03_08_5146.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SMUD_10_03_08_5146.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SSVEC09_05_11_5074.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SSVEC09_05_11_5074.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Sacre11_03_15_5236.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Sacre11_03_15_5236.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainants have attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/San_D11_09_30_5282.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/San_D11_09_30_5282.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Scann10_03_23_5166.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Scann10_03_23_5166.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem through the ARRL and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SoCal11_09_30_5283.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/SoCal11_09_30_5283.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Still12_04_10_5312.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Still12_04_10_5312.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Washi12_04_10_5313.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Washi12_04_10_5313.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Wells09_07_01_5100.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Wells09_07_01_5100.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Westa09_07_01_5099.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Westa09_07_01_5099.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Wisco11_03_15_5239.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Wisco11_03_15_5239.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem through the ARRL and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/X-Box12_04_10_5314.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/X-Box12_04_10_5314.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission has confidence that most people are able to resolve these issues voluntarily, the Commission wants to make you aware that this
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/XcelA09_05_11_5075.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/XcelA09_05_11_5075.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). We recognize that as of last fall, Xcel had believed the matter to be resolved. The complainants, however, have advised the Commission that the problem has returned and are seeking further assistance from Xcel in resolving this matter. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/XcelB09_05_11_5076.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/XcelB09_05_11_5076.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/city_11_09_30_5284.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/city_11_09_30_5284.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/plasm12_04_10_5315.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/plasm12_04_10_5315.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/play_12_04_10_5316.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/play_12_04_10_5316.pdf
  • cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)). The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to resolve this problem and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The Commission prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of equipment assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that you should resolve the interference caused by the device and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time. While the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3544A1.html
  • Class B digital devices and therefore must comply with the more stringent emission limits applicable to such devices. 20 47 U.S.C. 503(b). 21 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(2)(D). 22 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999). 23 47 C.F.R. 1.80. 24 47 C.F.R. 15.3(h). 25 47 C.F.R. 15(i). 26 See 47 C.F.R. 15.19. 27 See 47 C.F.R. 15.105. 28 47 C.F.R. 2.955. 29 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80. 30 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1914. References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-03-4118A1.html
  • therefore, importation into the United States was in violation of the Commission's rules. Moreover, the complaint alleged that the Talknet USB Headset does not bear a FCC certification or verification label in violation of Section 15.19 of the Rules.6 Finally, the complaint alleged that the Talknet manual does not contain an FCC Part 15 statement as is required by Section 15.105(b) of the Rules.7 On August 27, 2003, the Enforcement Bureau sent Datel a letter of inquiry (``LOI''). 4. In its initial response dated September 10, 2003, Datel stated that it was solely a distributor of the Talknet USB Headset, and that it did not manufacture or design the device, although it did import and market the device in the United
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-282A1.html
  • will be kept on file and made available to the Commission upon request. III. Each shipment of home recording studios will be sampled by Samson to assure that 1) the devices are uniquely identified, pursuant to Section 2.954 of the Rules; 2) bear the statement required by Section 15.19(a)(3); and 3) include in their manuals the statement required by Section 15.105(b). IV. Any shipment found not to be in compliance with these requirements will be not be offered for sale by Samson or further shipped by or to Samson, until any necessary corrections have been made. V. The Compliance Program, set forth above, will be under the direct supervision of Samson's President, Mr. Scott Goodman, or, in the event Mr. Goodman
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-42A1.html
  • adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and St. Louis Music, Inc. (``SLM''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau into whether SLM's manufacture, importation, marketing and sale of certain Class B digital audio devices violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act'')1 and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19 and 15.105(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 2. The Enforcement Bureau and SLM have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist with
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1413A1.html
  • 300, 400, 410, 433, 450, 450B, and 485. Other Devices: Model 202-1 Sip & Puff; Model 200-00 Repeater; Model 923 Receiver; Model 924 Receiver; Model PB 5000 PERS Buddy; Model 650 Medtime with RF Transmitter; Medtime; Model 200-10 HW Smoke Detector; and Model 200-14 RF Smoke Detector. 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 2.925, 15.19, 15.101, 15.105(b), 15.107, 15.109, 15.201, 15.207, 15.231, 68.201, and 68.354. 47 U.S.C. S 154(i). 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. Parts 2, 15, and 68. 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, FCC, to Howard M. Siegel, President, AMAC (Nov. 17, 2004). Federal Communications Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
  • the verification procedure prior to marketing. Specifically, Class B digital devices must be tested and verified as compliant with the conducted emission limits and radiated emission limits set forth in Sections 15.107 and 15.109 of the Rules,8 must be labeled as specified in Section 15.19(a)(3) of the Rules,9 and must comply with the user manual requirements set forth in Section 15.105(b) of the Rules.10 Additionally, if such devices are imported into the United States, the importer must submit a declaration to Customs (on FCC Form 740, or electronically, where electronic filing is available) indicating that the devices meet one of the conditions for entry into the United States.11 4. In March 2004, the Bureau received a complaint alleging that Behringer was
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-100A1.html
  • verification procedure, Class B digital devices must be tested and verified as compliant with the Commission's conducted emission and radiated emission limits set forth in Sections 15.107 and 15.109 of the Rules. Additionally, Class B digital devices must be labeled as specified in Section 15.19(a)(3) of the Rules, and its user instruction manuals must include the information detailed in Section 15.105(b) of the Rules. Finally, imported Class B digital devices are subject to mandatory Custom declaration (FCC Form 740) filing requirements. 4. On February 16, 2006, the Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") proposing a $1,000,000 forfeiture against Behringer for its apparent willful and repeated violation of the equipment marketing restrictions and related requirements. 5. Specifically, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2673A1.html
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. ("Multi-Tech") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.105(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Multi-Tech's marketing of a radio frequency device without including the required consumer disclosure in the user manual. II. BACKGROUND 2. Multi-Tech is a manufacturer of communications and device networking products that provide voice and data services over internet protocol networks. One of its products, the CallFinder(R) Global System for Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-521A1.html
  • Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Enhanced Vision Systems, Inc. ("Enhanced Vision"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Enhanced Vision for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing of Class B Digital Devices, specifically, vision assistance products for the legally blind. 2. The Bureau and Enhanced Vision have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1468A1.html
  • Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Marshall Amplification PLC ("Marshall") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand two hundred dollars ($7,200) for its apparent willful and repeated violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803(a)(2) and 15.105(b) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Marshall's marketing of a Class B digital audio radio frequency device in the United States without providing mandatory disclosures to consumers in the device's user manual. II. BACKGROUND 2. On July 12, 2010, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau issued a letter of inquiry to Marshall in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-754A1.html
  • 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. ("PreSonus"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding PreSonus's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class B digital audio radio frequency devices. 2. The Bureau and PreSonus have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-270A1.html
  • Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and American Music and Sound (AMS). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into AMS's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class A digital audio radio frequency devices. 2. The Bureau and AMS have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-360A1.html
  • In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and ETI Sound Systems, Inc. (ETI). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into ETI's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of digital radio frequency devices, including guitar amplifiers, CD/MP3 players, and active speaker systems. 2. The Bureau and ETI have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree