FCC Web Documents citing 15.102

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-728A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-728A1.pdf
  • 27, 2008) (``NAL Response''). 47 U.S.C. § 503(b). 47 C.F.R. § 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999) (``Forfeiture Policy Statement''). 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2)(E). 47 U.S.C. § 301. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.102(a). See 47 C.F.R. § 25.121(e). 47 U.S.C. § 312(f)(1). The legislative history of Section 312(f)(1) of the Act clarifies that this definition of willful applies to both Sections 312 and 503(b) of the Act, H.R. Rep. No. 97-765, 97th Cong. 2d Sess. 51 (1982), and the Commission has so interpreted the term in the Section 503(b) context. See Southern California
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • eliminate the need for manufacturers to obtain FCC approval before marketing new personal computer products and thus allow such products to reach the marketplace more quickly. These rules all align the FCC's equipment authorization requirements for personal computers with those used in other parts of the world. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302, 303, 304, 307. Section Number and Title: 15.102 CPU boards and power supplies used in personal computers. PART 17 - CONSTRUCTION, MARKING AND LIGHTING OF ANTENNA STRUCTURES SUBPART A - GENERAL INFORMATION Brief Description: The purpose of these rules is to establish procedures for antenna registration and to set standards for consideration of proposed antenna structures. The rules establish the responsibilities of antenna structure owners, licensees and permittees
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2497A1.txt
  • which must comply with the specified technical standards prior to use, such device also complies with all applicable administrative (including verification of the equipment or authorization under a Declaration of Conformity, where required), technical, labeling and identification requirements specified in this chapter. Pursuant to Section 15.101 of the Rules, a DOC must accompany all Class B personal computers. Furthermore, Section 15.102(b)(4) requires that computer systems that are assembled from authorized component parts must themselves be authorized under a DoC. iBuypower does not dispute that it marketed its completed computer systems featuring the AMD Athlon-64 and Athlon-64 X2 processors prior to obtaining a DoC. Accordingly, we find that iBuypower apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(2)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-728A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-728A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-728A1.txt
  • 27, 2008) (``NAL Response''). 47 U.S.C. § 503(b). 47 C.F.R. § 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999) (``Forfeiture Policy Statement''). 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2)(E). 47 U.S.C. § 301. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.102(a). See 47 C.F.R. § 25.121(e). 47 U.S.C. § 312(f)(1). The legislative history of Section 312(f)(1) of the Act clarifies that this definition of willful applies to both Sections 312 and 503(b) of the Act, H.R. Rep. No. 97-765, 97th Cong. 2d Sess. 51 (1982), and the Commission has so interpreted the term in the Section 503(b) context. See Southern California
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2497A1.html
  • which must comply with the specified technical standards prior to use, such device also complies with all applicable administrative (including verification of the equipment or authorization under a Declaration of Conformity, where required), technical, labeling and identification requirements specified in this chapter. Pursuant to Section 15.101 of the Rules, a DOC must accompany all Class B personal computers. Furthermore, Section 15.102(b)(4) requires that computer systems that are assembled from authorized component parts must themselves be authorized under a DoC. iBuypower does not dispute that it marketed its completed computer systems featuring the AMD Athlon-64 and Athlon-64 X2 processors prior to obtaining a DoC. Accordingly, we find that iBuypower apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(2)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-728A1.html
  • 27, 2008) ("NAL Response"). 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999) ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"). 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E). 47 U.S.C. S: 301. See 47 C.F.R. S: 15.102(a). See 47 C.F.R. S: 25.121(e). 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(1). The legislative history of Section 312(f)(1) of the Act clarifies that this definition of willful applies to both Sections 312 and 503(b) of the Act, H.R. Rep. No. 97-765, 97th Cong. 2d Sess. 51 (1982), and the Commission has so interpreted the term in the Section 503(b) context. See Southern California
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2497A1.html
  • which must comply with the specified technical standards prior to use, such device also complies with all applicable administrative (including verification of the equipment or authorization under a Declaration of Conformity, where required), technical, labeling and identification requirements specified in this chapter. Pursuant to Section 15.101 of the Rules, a DOC must accompany all Class B personal computers. Furthermore, Section 15.102(b)(4) requires that computer systems that are assembled from authorized component parts must themselves be authorized under a DoC. iBuypower does not dispute that it marketed its completed computer systems featuring the AMD Athlon-64 and Athlon-64 X2 processors prior to obtaining a DoC. Accordingly, we find that iBuypower apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(2)
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-728A1.html
  • 27, 2008) ("NAL Response"). 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999) ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"). 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E). 47 U.S.C. S: 301. See 47 C.F.R. S: 15.102(a). See 47 C.F.R. S: 25.121(e). 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(1). The legislative history of Section 312(f)(1) of the Act clarifies that this definition of willful applies to both Sections 312 and 503(b) of the Act, H.R. Rep. No. 97-765, 97th Cong. 2d Sess. 51 (1982), and the Commission has so interpreted the term in the Section 503(b) context. See Southern California
• http://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/E&UWGFinalReport.doc http://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/E&UWGFinalReport.pdf
  • out systems to serve areas with broadband service as they often have to tailor their antenna selection to the specific service area and antenna location sites. In 1996, the Commission faced a similar issue with personal computers in which a system approach was creating unreasonable burdens in market that had moved towards ``mix and match'' subsystems and it adopted Section 15.102, giving personal computer manufacturers more flexibility than other unintentional emitter makers. It appears timely now to propose an analogous rule change for the specific case of WISPs and to allow them to select antennas and cables provided they verify that the overall system meets applicable equivalent isotropically radiated power (e.i.r.p.) limits. Experimental Licenses Background Section 303(g) of the Communications Act