FCC Web Documents citing 11.34

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1717A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1717A1.pdf
  • (``EAS tone''); message; and Preamble and EAS End of Message (``EOM'') Codes. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.31(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 11.32, 11.33. The functions of the EAS encoder and decoder may be combined into a single unit referred to as an Encoder/Decoder provided that the unit complies with all specifications in Part 11 of the Commission's Rules. See 47.C.F.R. § 11.34(c). 47 C.F.R. § 11.32(a). 47 C.F.R. § 11.32(a)(9)(v). 47 C.F.R. § 11.61(a). The Emergency Alert System 2007 AM and FM Handbook (``EAS Operating Handbook'') can be found at www.fcc.gov/pshs/eas/easamfm.pdf. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.61(a)(1), EAS Operating Handbook at 29. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.51(b); also 47 C.F.R. § 11.11(a), note 6 to Analog and Digital Broadcast Stations (``Effective January 1998,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-109A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-109A1.pdf
  • uses a four-part message: (1) preamble and EAS header codes (these codes contain information regarding the identity of the sender, the type of emergency, its location and valid time period of the alert); (2) audio attention signal; (3) message; and (4) preamble and EAS end of message codes. 47 C.F.R. § 11.31(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 11.32, 11.33. 47 C.F.R. § 11.34(c). EAS equipment also provides a means to automatically interrupt regular programming and is capable of providing warnings in the primary language that is used by the station or cable system. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 11.33(a)(4), 11.51(k)(1), 11.54. A CAP-formatted alert may include fields for message type, scope, event information, event certainty, sender, geographic scope, and expiration, among others. CAP-formatted messages
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-11A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-11A1.pdf
  • Satellite (DBS) services, Satellite Digital Audio Radio Service (SDARS), and other participating entities. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.1. See 47 C.F.R. Part 11. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.21. All broadcast stations and cable systems have EAS designations that describe their functions within EAS. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.18. 47 C.F.R. § 11.31. 47 C.F.R. §§ 11.32, 11.33. 47 C.F.R. § 11.34(c). EAS equipment also provides a means to automatically interrupt regular programming and is capable of providing warnings in the primary language that is used by the station or cable system. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 11.33(a)(4), 11.51(k)(1), 11.54. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.54 (EAS operation during a national level emergency). See 47 C.F.R. § 11.54. Id. The State Relay Network is
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-191A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-191A1.pdf
  • Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS) Seeking Waivers of Section 101.1011 of the Commission's Rules and Extensions of Time to Construct and Demonstrate Substantial Service, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd. 5894, 5905 ¶ 24 (2008) (granting a limited extension of time to permit licensees to continue to build out their licenses). (last visited Oct. 29, 2010). See 47 C.F.R. § 11.34. One commenter to the Part 11 PN noted: ``since FEMA is not adopting the Implementation Guide, they are likewise not testing in their Conformance Lab for equipment adherence to this Implementation Guide. It would seem then, since non-adherence could result in lack of detection of duplicate messages in the Commission's legacy EAS network, that the FCC should then require equipment
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-12A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-12A1.pdf
  • NSBA states that the Commission should ``require all encoder/decoder manufacturers to officially certify that their equipment performs each of the required steps to receive, record, and rebroadcast an EAS message and more specifically, an EAN. We do not agree. TFT correctly notes that the ``Commission already has rules in place for handling of EAN Event code messages.'' Pursuant to section 11.34 of our rules, all EAS equipment must be certified to ``show the capability of the equipment to meet the requirements of this part.'' For purposes of national testing, which for the vast majority of EAS participants, for the foreseeable future, will continue to involve receipt and transmission of a SAME-formatted EAN, we agree with TFT that requiring manufacturers to recertify
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.pdf
  • changes necessary? What are their potential costs and benefits? How could any requirements we might consider with respect to amending section 11.54 be tailored to impose the least amount of burden on those affected? To the extent feasible, what explicit performance objectives should we specify to facilitate monitoring the success of any potential course of action? EAS Equipment Certification Section 11.34 of the Part 11 rules requires EAS encoders and decoders to be certified in accordance with the equipment authorization procedures set forth in Part 2, subpart J, of the Commission's rules. Among other things, certification under Part 2 requires device testing to demonstrate compliance with the applicable specifications set forth in the Part 11 rules. Telecommunications Certification Bodies (TCBs) typically
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • EAS protocol for emergency event codes and EAS equipment requirements. Need: Establishing quality and compatibility standards for EAS equipment will ensure technological interoperability and result in delivery of responsive, robust, and redundant emergency messaging. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154 (i) and (o), 303(r), 544(g) and 606. Section Number and Title: 11.31 EAS Protocol. 11.32 EAS Encoder. 11.33 EAS Decoder. 11.34 Acceptability of the Equipment. 11.35 Equipment operational readiness. SUBPART C -- ORGANIZATION Brief Description: These rules describe participation standards and acceptable uses of EAS for all participating entities. The rules also set message priorities from the Presidential level down to the state and local levels. Need: By setting participation standards and acceptable uses, these rules ensure the integrity of EAS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1717A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1717A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1717A1.txt
  • (``EAS tone''); message; and Preamble and EAS End of Message (``EOM'') Codes. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.31(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 11.32, 11.33. The functions of the EAS encoder and decoder may be combined into a single unit referred to as an Encoder/Decoder provided that the unit complies with all specifications in Part 11 of the Commission's Rules. See 47.C.F.R. § 11.34(c). 47 C.F.R. § 11.32(a). 47 C.F.R. § 11.32(a)(9)(v). 47 C.F.R. § 11.61(a). The Emergency Alert System 2007 AM and FM Handbook (``EAS Operating Handbook'') can be found at www.fcc.gov/pshs/eas/easamfm.pdf. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.61(a)(1), EAS Operating Handbook at 29. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.51(b); also 47 C.F.R. § 11.11(a), note 6 to Analog and Digital Broadcast Stations (``Effective January 1998,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 13.01 13.38 11.63 10.32 9.91 10.22 14.56 4 Ameritech Operating Companies 5/ 13.00 12.79 14.80 13.39 16.78 18.27 18.22 22.59 28.93 29.71 5 Nevada Bell 5/ 12.98 14.51 17.44 17.92 17.31 17.75 19.47 16.02 19.26 22.07 6 Pacific Bell 5/ 11.85 12.68 12.89 14.93 15.76 17.68 11.98 16.50 21.01 19.30 7 Southern New England Telephone Company 5/ 8.56 12.90 11.52 11.34 11.58 11.64 12.70 10.99 12.12 23.91 Verizon Companies 6/ 8 Bell Atlantic dba Verizon Communications 7/ 13.66 13.36 (Former Bell Atlantic Companies) Bell Atlantic 12.83 12.50 14.01 14.00 13.74 11.24 14.73 13.88 Bell Atlantic (NYNEX) 8/ 12.50 12.55 11.79 12.12 15.23 13.72 11.40 New England Telephone and Telegraph Co. 8.54 New York Telephone 9.82 (Former GTE Companies) 9/ 10/ 11/
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.06 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.04 Michigan 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.15 0.01 0.12 0.66 Minnesota 0.75 0.02 0.00 0.22 0.83 0.12 0.56 2.50 Mississippi 0.81 0.00 5.67 0.11 0.28 0.74 0.14 7.75 Missouri 1.00 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.50 0.34 0.17 2.13 Montana 4.05 0.03 2.69 0.81 2.08 0.18 1.51 11.34 Nebraska 1.27 0.08 0.38 0.19 0.97 0.46 0.96 4.31 Nevada 0.38 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.24 0.62 0.44 1.72 New Hampshire 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.25 0.20 0.60 1.21 New Jersey 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 New Mexico 1.71 0.01 0.00 0.28 0.71 0.66 0.85 4.23 New York 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.10 0.11 0.34 North Carolina
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.06 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.04 Michigan 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.15 0.01 0.12 0.66 Minnesota 0.75 0.02 0.00 0.22 0.83 0.12 0.56 2.50 Mississippi 0.81 0.00 5.67 0.11 0.28 0.74 0.14 7.75 Missouri 1.00 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.50 0.34 0.17 2.13 Montana 4.05 0.03 2.69 0.81 2.08 0.18 1.51 11.34 Nebraska 1.27 0.08 0.38 0.19 0.97 0.46 0.96 4.31 Nevada 0.38 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.24 0.62 0.44 1.72 New Hampshire 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.25 0.20 0.60 1.21 New Jersey 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 New Mexico 1.71 0.01 0.00 0.28 0.71 0.66 0.85 4.23 New York 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.10 0.11 0.34 North Carolina
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • -5.07 0.75 -5.78 -12.19 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.85 1.23 -0.38 -3.63 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA 31.12 -0.80 32.18 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 18.87 -0.35 19.28 22.49 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM 4.58 0.49 4.07 3.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -0.97 -0.01 -0.95 -11.34 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 0.02 -3.01 3.12 0.00 COLORADO TOTAL -4.88 -3.70 -1.23 -7.81 461835 C SUNFLOWER TELEPHONE CO.,INC. - CO -10.60 -3.45 -7.40 -15.87 462178 C AGATE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE ASSOC. 25.61 -6.29 34.04 34.20 462181 C BIJOU TEL COOPERATIVE ASSOC. INC -2.61 -1.11 -1.52 -7.15 462182 C BLANCA TELEPHONE CO. 1.57 2.03 -0.46 -0.72 462184 C DELTA COUNTY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • -5.07 0.75 -5.78 -12.19 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.85 1.23 -0.38 -3.63 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA 31.12 -0.80 32.18 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 18.87 -0.35 19.28 22.49 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM 4.58 0.49 4.07 3.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -0.97 -0.01 -0.95 -11.34 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 0.02 -3.01 3.12 0.00 COLORADO TOTAL -4.88 -3.70 -1.23 -7.81 461835 C SUNFLOWER TELEPHONE CO.,INC. - CO -10.60 -3.45 -7.40 -15.87 462178 C AGATE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE ASSOC. 25.61 -6.29 34.04 34.20 462181 C BIJOU TEL COOPERATIVE ASSOC. INC -2.61 -1.11 -1.52 -7.15 462182 C BLANCA TELEPHONE CO. 1.57 2.03 -0.46 -0.72 462184 C DELTA COUNTY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • -1.36 -6.16 5.12 -6.43 AMERICAN SAMOA -7.66 0.77 -8.37 -100.00 ARIZONA -3.49 -6.12 2.80 -22.84 ARKANSAS -2.44 -4.27 1.91 2.72 CALIFORNIA 4.49 -3.17 7.90 -19.54 COLORADO -1.60 -5.08 3.66 5.80 CONNECTICUT -9.87 -6.42 -3.68 0.00 DELAWARE 6.43 -2.86 9.57 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 10.44 -3.08 13.94 0.00 FLORIDA 1.75 -4.65 6.71 14.08 GEORGIA -2.28 -4.23 2.04 -9.08 GUAM -14.00 -3.00 -11.34 -71.88 HAWAII -3.37 -4.94 1.65 6.27 IDAHO 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • -1.36 -6.16 5.12 -6.43 AMERICAN SAMOA -7.66 0.77 -8.37 -100.00 ARIZONA -3.49 -6.12 2.80 -22.84 ARKANSAS -2.44 -4.27 1.91 2.72 CALIFORNIA 4.49 -3.17 7.90 -19.54 COLORADO -1.60 -5.08 3.66 5.80 CONNECTICUT -9.87 -6.42 -3.68 0.00 DELAWARE 6.43 -2.86 9.57 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 10.44 -3.08 13.94 0.00 FLORIDA 1.75 -4.65 6.71 14.08 GEORGIA -2.28 -4.23 2.04 -9.08 GUAM -14.00 -3.00 -11.34 -71.88 HAWAII -3.37 -4.94 1.65 6.27 IDAHO 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284926A1.txt
  • 1,153 6,225 18.52 603 2,875 20.97 Vermont 242 3,270 7.40 232 697 33.29 Virgin Islands 0 0 NM 0 0 NM Virginia 2,016 17,520 11.51 2,689 9,741 27.60 Washington 1,539 16,785 9.17 1,835 7,481 24.53 West Virginia 409 2,957 13.83 406 2,028 20.02 Wisconsin 1,025 11,626 8.82 895 7,192 12.44 Wyoming 98 1,094 8.96 32 748 4.28 Totals 86,317 761,446 11.34 100,501 379,009 26.52 Source: Pooling data provided by NeuStar. 1 Includes only those thousands-blocks in rate centers with pooling. NM - Not meaningful. 27 Table 9 Increased Utilization and Telephone Numbers Saved due to Thousands-Block Pooling as of December 31, 2007 Numbers Numbers NeededUtilization hadIncreased Utilization Numbers Assigned Total Percenthad Whole NXXs Whole NXXs of Thousands-blocks Saved Due Carrier Type
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • Later Year* HAWAII TOTAL -1.82 -7.49 6.13 -0.82 623021 C SANDWICH ISLES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 0.10 21.74 -17.78 -0.82 623100 C HAWAIIAN TELCOM, INC. -2.07 -7.56 5.94 0.00 IDAHO TOTAL 19.19 -6.02 26.83 -3.81 472213 C ALBION TEL. CO. D/B/A ATC COMMUNICATIONS 1.41 0.83 0.57 -3.18 472215 C CAMBRIDGE TEL. CO.,INC.-ID 5.72 -0.44 6.19 6.81 472218 C CUSTER TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 11.34 1.09 10.14 13.21 472220 C FILER MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 8.30 -0.30 8.62 15.75 472221 C FARMERS MUTUAL TEL CO LTD. - ID -6.69 -5.23 -1.54 0.00 472222 C FREMONT TELCOM CO. -4.50 1.27 -5.70 -16.02 472223 C CENTURYTEL OF THE GEM STATE, INC.-ID 3.18 -2.87 6.23 3.75 472225 C CENTURYTEL OF IDAHO, INC. -6.26 -3.16 -3.20 -17.11 472226
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • Later Year* HAWAII TOTAL -1.82 -7.49 6.13 -0.82 623021 C SANDWICH ISLES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 0.10 21.74 -17.78 -0.82 623100 C HAWAIIAN TELCOM, INC. -2.07 -7.56 5.94 0.00 IDAHO TOTAL 19.19 -6.02 26.83 -3.81 472213 C ALBION TEL. CO. D/B/A ATC COMMUNICATIONS 1.41 0.83 0.57 -3.18 472215 C CAMBRIDGE TEL. CO.,INC.-ID 5.72 -0.44 6.19 6.81 472218 C CUSTER TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 11.34 1.09 10.14 13.21 472220 C FILER MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 8.30 -0.30 8.62 15.75 472221 C FARMERS MUTUAL TEL CO LTD. - ID -6.69 -5.23 -1.54 0.00 472222 C FREMONT TELCOM CO. -4.50 1.27 -5.70 -16.02 472223 C CENTURYTEL OF THE GEM STATE, INC.-ID 3.18 -2.87 6.23 3.75 472225 C CENTURYTEL OF IDAHO, INC. -6.26 -3.16 -3.20 -17.11 472226
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • CITIZENS HAMMOND NY -13.36 -3.24 -10.45 -40.05 150084 C TACONIC TEL CORP -4.73 -10.74 6.73 0.00 150085 C CROWN POINT TEL CORP -6.58 -2.34 -4.34 -19.23 150088 C DELHI TEL CO -9.14 -6.85 -2.46 -44.84 150089 C DEPOSIT TEL CO 3.19 -5.95 9.72 0.00 150091 C DUNKIRK & FREDONIA 2.17 -6.53 9.31 0.00 150092 C EDWARDS TEL CO 3.22 -7.29 11.34 12.97 150093 C EMPIRE TEL CORP -9.82 -4.91 -5.17 0.00 150095 C FISHERS ISLAND TEL -3.48 -1.47 -2.04 0.00 150097 C GERMANTOWN TEL CO -1.73 -4.21 2.59 0.00 150099 C HANCOCK TEL CO -6.99 -4.82 -2.29 -100.00 150100 C FRONTIER COMM OF NY -9.54 -8.50 -1.13 0.00 150104 C MARGARETVILLE TEL CO -6.80 -7.06 0.28 0.00 150105 C MIDDLEBURGH TEL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • CITIZENS HAMMOND NY -13.36 -3.24 -10.45 -40.05 150084 C TACONIC TEL CORP -4.73 -10.74 6.73 0.00 150085 C CROWN POINT TEL CORP -6.58 -2.34 -4.34 -19.23 150088 C DELHI TEL CO -9.14 -6.85 -2.46 -44.84 150089 C DEPOSIT TEL CO 3.19 -5.95 9.72 0.00 150091 C DUNKIRK & FREDONIA 2.17 -6.53 9.31 0.00 150092 C EDWARDS TEL CO 3.22 -7.29 11.34 12.97 150093 C EMPIRE TEL CORP -9.82 -4.91 -5.17 0.00 150095 C FISHERS ISLAND TEL -3.48 -1.47 -2.04 0.00 150097 C GERMANTOWN TEL CO -1.73 -4.21 2.59 0.00 150099 C HANCOCK TEL CO -6.99 -4.82 -2.29 -100.00 150100 C FRONTIER COMM OF NY -9.54 -8.50 -1.13 0.00 150104 C MARGARETVILLE TEL CO -6.80 -7.06 0.28 0.00 150105 C MIDDLEBURGH TEL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-88A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-88A1.txt
  • NAB Comments at 4. 47 C.F.R. § 11.31(f). NWS Petition at 7. NWS indicates that the special ``SS'' codes for marine areas would be used in conjunction with special ``CCC'' codes. The special ``CCC'' codes have not yet been designated. SBE Petition at 8. NWS Petition at 1, 3-4. SBE Comments at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. § 11.31(d). 47 C.F.R. § 11.34; see also 47 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1043. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 11.51(l), 11.52(e)(2) and 11.61(a)(1)(v). SBE Petition at 3. NAB Comments at 3; Fox Comments at 1-2. Id. at 6. Id. NWS Petition at 1; NWS Letter at 3-4. 47 C.F.R. § 11.33(a)(4) and (a)(5). Id. at 10-11. Id. Id. at 11. See 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-64A1.txt
  • capability for EAS messages containing header codes for state and local events. Broadcast stations, cable systems and wireless cable systems which replace their decoders after February 1, 2004 must install decoders that provide a means to permit the selective display and logging of EAS messages containing header codes for state and local EAS events. * * * * * Section 11.34 is amended by adding new paragraphs (f) and (g) to read as follows: § 11.34 Acceptability of the equipment. * * * * * (f) Modifications to existing authorized EAS decoders, encoders or combined units necessary to implement the new EAS codes specified in § 11.31 and to implement the selective displaying and logging feature specified in § 11.33(a)(4) will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-46A1.txt
  • a Waiver of Section 11.11(a) of the Commission's Rules, EB-03-TS-101, Order, 18 FCC Rcd 20099, DA 03-3060 (Enforcement Bur. 2003), Request of Youngsville Television Corporation for a Waiver of Section 11.11(a) of the Commission's Rules, EB-02-TS-266, Order, 18 FCC Rcd 20096, DA-30-3059 (Enforcement Bur. 2003). Public Notice No. 2589 (December 18, 2002). 47 U.S.C. § 11.11(a). Id. 47 C.F.R. § 11.34; see also 47 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 13 FCC Rcd 11322, 11326 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.48. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.200, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). In addition, the NPRM and IRFA (or summaries thereof) will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.txt
  • 46.1 47.9 50.1 52.0 56.2 59.2 --- 67.3 70.1 6.3% Annual Change ** --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 4.2% --- Price per channel 0.600 0.620 0.640 0.650 0.650 0.650 0.661 --- 0.657 0.665 0.4% Annual Change ** --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 1.2% --- Competitive Group Basic service --- --- 10.69 11.12 11.34 11.95 12.43 13.70 14.25 14.58 5.0% Annual Change ** --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 4.0% 2.3% --- Expanded basic --- --- 14.11 15.00 16.44 17.41 19.23 21.36 22.61 23.59 8.6% Annual Change ** --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 5.9% 4.3% --- Programming --- --- 24.80 26.12 27.78 29.59 31.66 35.06 36.86 38.17 7.1% Annual
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-191A1.txt
  • * * * * * (b) Attention Signal. EAS Decoders shall have detection and activation circuitry that will demute a receiver upon detection of the two audio tones of 853 Hz and 960 Hz. To prevent false responses, decoders designed to use the two tones for receiver demuting shall comply with the following: * * * * * Amend § 11.34 by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows: § 11.34 Acceptability of the equipment. * * * * * (e) Waiver requests of the Certification requirements for EAS Encoders or EAS Decoders which are constructed for use by an EAS Participant, but are not offered for sale will be considered on an individual basis in accordance with part 1, subpart
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-191A1_Erratum.doc
  • * * * * * (b) Attention Signal. EAS Decoders shall have detection and activation circuitry that will demute a receiver upon detection of the two audio tones of 853 Hz and 960 Hz. To prevent false responses, decoders designed to use the two tones for receiver demuting shall comply with the following: * * * * * Amend § 11.34 by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows: § 11.34 Acceptability of the equipment. * * * * * (e) Waiver requests of the Certification requirements for EAS Encoders or EAS Decoders which are constructed for use by an EAS Participant, but are not offered for sale will be considered on an individual basis in accordance with part 1, subpart
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-109A1.txt
  • uses a four-part message: (1) preamble and EAS header codes (these codes contain information regarding the identity of the sender, the type of emergency, its location and valid time period of the alert); (2) audio attention signal; (3) message; and (4) preamble and EAS end of message codes. 47 C.F.R. § 11.31(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 11.32, 11.33. 47 C.F.R. § 11.34(c). EAS equipment also provides a means to automatically interrupt regular programming and is capable of providing warnings in the primary language that is used by the station or cable system. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 11.33(a)(4), 11.51(k)(1), 11.54. A CAP-formatted alert may include fields for message type, scope, event information, event certainty, sender, geographic scope, and expiration, among others. CAP-formatted messages
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-11A1.txt
  • Satellite (DBS) services, Satellite Digital Audio Radio Service (SDARS), and other participating entities. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.1. See 47 C.F.R. Part 11. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.21. All broadcast stations and cable systems have EAS designations that describe their functions within EAS. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.18. 47 C.F.R. § 11.31. 47 C.F.R. §§ 11.32, 11.33. 47 C.F.R. § 11.34(c). EAS equipment also provides a means to automatically interrupt regular programming and is capable of providing warnings in the primary language that is used by the station or cable system. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 11.33(a)(4), 11.51(k)(1), 11.54. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.54 (EAS operation during a national level emergency). See 47 C.F.R. § 11.54. Id. The State Relay Network is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-191A1.txt
  • Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS) Seeking Waivers of Section 101.1011 of the Commission's Rules and Extensions of Time to Construct and Demonstrate Substantial Service, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd. 5894, 5905 ¶ 24 (2008) (granting a limited extension of time to permit licensees to continue to build out their licenses). (last visited Oct. 29, 2010). See 47 C.F.R. § 11.34. One commenter to the Part 11 PN noted: ``since FEMA is not adopting the Implementation Guide, they are likewise not testing in their Conformance Lab for equipment adherence to this Implementation Guide. It would seem then, since non-adherence could result in lack of detection of duplicate messages in the Commission's legacy EAS network, that the FCC should then require equipment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-12A1.txt
  • NSBA states that the Commission should ``require all encoder/decoder manufacturers to officially certify that their equipment performs each of the required steps to receive, record, and rebroadcast an EAS message and more specifically, an EAN. We do not agree. TFT correctly notes that the ``Commission already has rules in place for handling of EAN Event code messages.'' Pursuant to section 11.34 of our rules, all EAS equipment must be certified to ``show the capability of the equipment to meet the requirements of this part.'' For purposes of national testing, which for the vast majority of EAS participants, for the foreseeable future, will continue to involve receipt and transmission of a SAME-formatted EAN, we agree with TFT that requiring manufacturers to recertify
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-136A1.txt
  • they satisfy the Commission's 2007 CAP-related requirements. Although we intend to address these issues in our subsequent order, we note that, based on the record, it appears that some EAS Participants may have purchased such equipment. We remind EAS Participants that equipment that meets the definition of an encoder or a decoder under our rules must be certified under Section 11.34 of the Commission's current rules. In addition, equipment used to receive CAP-formatted EAS alerts must, at a minimum, comply with the CAP requirements the Commission adopted in the Second Report and Order. While we do not decide today whether intermediary devices comply with these requirements, it is unclear whether any equipment that does not meet these current baseline requirements will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.txt
  • changes necessary? What are their potential costs and benefits? How could any requirements we might consider with respect to amending section 11.54 be tailored to impose the least amount of burden on those affected? To the extent feasible, what explicit performance objectives should we specify to facilitate monitoring the success of any potential course of action? EAS Equipment Certification Section 11.34 of the Part 11 rules requires EAS encoders and decoders to be certified in accordance with the equipment authorization procedures set forth in Part 2, subpart J, of the Commission's rules. Among other things, certification under Part 2 requires device testing to demonstrate compliance with the applicable specifications set forth in the Part 11 rules. Telecommunications Certification Bodies (TCBs) typically
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.txt
  • we therefore defer these issues at this time. With respect to NAB's contention that the Part 11 rules should be clarified to make equipment manufacturers solely responsible for compliance with the ECIG Implementation Guide as part of the equipment certification process, we do not believe such action is necessary because manufacturers already are prohibited from marketing non-compliant equipment. Specifically, section 11.34 of the Commission's rules requires that the data submitted for certification of encoders and decoders ``show the capability of the equipment to meet the requirements of [Part 11].'' This data necessarily includes compliance with the ECIG Implementation Guide, conformance with which we are mandating in section 11.56. Further, section 2.803 generally prohibits the marketing of equipment subject to certification that
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • date, such data may explain that any differences in the average installation intervals between [the BOC] and the other carrier are not due to discriminatory conduct on the part of [the BOC].'' Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20633. The average completed interval for competing carriers in July was 15.00 days, and the interval for Bell Atlantic customers was 11.34 days. See Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Decl. Attach. D at 93 (metric PR-2-07 - DS1 for July 1999). For August, DS1 loops were provisioned to competing carriers in, on average, 24.13 days and to Bell Atlantic customers in 8.07 days. Id. at 105 (metric PR-2-07 - DS1 for August 1999). In June, Bell Atlantic missed 2.94 percent of installation appointments for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • 3140 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total 20.94 15.55 18.83 14.77 17.12 13.13 18.31 10.71 16.74 11.92 MR-4-02- 3144 Mean Time To Repair ­ Loop Trouble - Platform - Bus. 14.28 13.49 13.54 13.99 12.01 11.72 13.09 11.11 12.18 11.29 MR-4-02- 3145 Mean Time To Repair ­ Loop Trouble - Platform - Res. 23.23 24.67 20.63 19.03 19.03 17.85 20.01 11.34 18.74 17.03 MR-4-03- 3144 Mean Time To Repair ­ Central Office Trouble - Bus. 11.4 9.31 10.21 10.93 9.15 10.82 8.69 8.44 6.78 7.23 MR-4-03- 3145 Mean Time To Repair ­ Central Office Trouble - Res. 12.37 21.3 12.73 13.73 10.83 12.82 10.53 11.29 9.03 6.67 a,d,e MR-4-04- 3140 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 69.5 86.38 73.81 84.35
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01088.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01088.html
  • NAB Comments at 4. 47 C.F.R. § 11.31(f). NWS Petition at 7. NWS indicates that the special ``SS'' codes for marine areas would be used in conjunction with special ``CCC'' codes. The special ``CCC'' codes have not yet been designated. SBE Petition at 8. NWS Petition at 1, 3-4. SBE Comments at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. § 11.31(d). 47 C.F.R. § 11.34; see also 47 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1043. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 11.51(l), 11.52(e)(2) and 11.61(a)(1)(v). SBE Petition at 3. NAB Comments at 3; Fox Comments at 1-2. Id. at 6. Id. NWS Petition at 1; NWS Letter at 3-4. 47 C.F.R. § 11.33(a)(4) and (a)(5). Id. at 10-11. Id. Id. at 11. See 47
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-64A1.html
  • for EAS messages containing header codes for state and local events. Broadcast stations, cable systems and wireless cable systems which replace their decoders after February 1, 2004 must install decoders that provide a means to permit the selective display and logging of EAS messages containing header codes for state and local EAS events. * * * * * 96. Section 11.34 is amended by adding new paragraphs (f) and (g) to read as follows: 11.34 Acceptability of the equipment. * * * * * (f) Modifications to existing authorized EAS decoders, encoders or combined units necessary to implement the new EAS codes specified in 11.31 and to implement the selective displaying and logging feature specified in 11.33(a)(4) will be considered Class
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/FCC-05-191A1.html
  • * * * * * (b) Attention Signal. EAS Decoders shall have detection and activation circuitry that will demute a receiver upon detection of the two audio tones of 853 Hz and 960 Hz. To prevent false responses, decoders designed to use the two tones for receiver demuting shall comply with the following: * * * * * 10. Amend 11.34 by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows: 11.34 Acceptability of the equipment. * * * * * (e) Waiver requests of the Certification requirements for EAS Encoders or EAS Decoders which are constructed for use by an EAS Participant, but are not offered for sale will be considered on an individual basis in accordance with part 1, subpart G,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1717A1.html
  • ("EAS tone"); message; and Preamble and EAS End of Message ("EOM") Codes. See 47 C.F.R. S: 11.31(a). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 11.32, 11.33. The functions of the EAS encoder and decoder may be combined into a single unit referred to as an Encoder/Decoder provided that the unit complies with all specifications in Part 11 of the Commission's Rules. See 47.C.F.R. S: 11.34(c). 47 C.F.R. S: 11.32(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 11.32(a)(9)(v). 47 C.F.R. S: 11.61(a). The Emergency Alert System 2007 AM and FM Handbook ("EAS Operating Handbook") can be found at www.fcc.gov/pshs/eas/easamfm.pdf. See 47 C.F.R. S: 11.61(a)(1), EAS Operating Handbook at 29. See 47 C.F.R. S: 11.51(b); also 47 C.F.R. S: 11.11(a), note 6 to Analog and Digital Broadcast Stations ("Effective January 1998,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/bc-chklsts/EB18LPFM06_2008.pdf
  • normal duty stations, can be alerted immediately when EAS messages are received. Only one EAS decoder is required for combined facilities operating from one common location, such as a co-owned and co-located AM and FM studio. All decoder devices are to be certified by the Commission in accordance with Part 2 Subpart J of the Commission's rules. [See 11.31, 11.33, 11.34, 11.35 and 11.52] 27. CERTIFIED EQUIPMENT: Does the station use only certified EAS equipment at each location utilized for EAS monitoring? [See 11.34] 28. EQUIPMENT STATUS: Is the required EAS decoding/receiving equipment currently installed and in operational condition? [See 11.35] 29. INSTANTANEOUS ALERT RECEPTION: For manually operated EAS decoding equipment, is the decoder installed in a way that enables broadcast
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Comments/access_reform/samples/MCICOM.htm
  • raising the productivity factor to 15.2%. Revenue changes subsequent to 1996 are due solely to the higher productivity factor. Table III-2: Existing Price Cap Baskets v TELRIC Baskets Interstate Switched Access Revenues A B C Year Revenue ($Billion) Revenue Reduction ($Billion) Percent Change in PCI 1996 21.50 1997 16.57 4.93 22.93 1998 14.65 1.92 11.59 1999 12.91 1.74 11.88 2000 11.34 1.57 12.16 2001 9.92 1.42 12.52 Column "C" shows the annual change in the PCI required each year to bring existing price cap rates down to economic cost. Table III-2 shows the amount PCI's would have to be reduced each year in order bring the rates of each price cap service to the average economic cost of price cap LECs.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • date, such data may explain that any differences in the average installation intervals between [the BOC] and the other carrier are not due to discriminatory conduct on the part of [the BOC].'' Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20633. The average completed interval for competing carriers in July was 15.00 days, and the interval for Bell Atlantic customers was 11.34 days. See Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Decl. Attach. D at 93 (metric PR-2-07 - DS1 for July 1999). For August, DS1 loops were provisioned to competing carriers in, on average, 24.13 days and to Bell Atlantic customers in 8.07 days. Id. at 105 (metric PR-2-07 - DS1 for August 1999). In June, Bell Atlantic missed 2.94 percent of installation appointments for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • Mexico Alamogordo Qwest 21.09 13.03 0.15 31.99 4.75 New York Binghamton Verizon 29.54 18.03 0.11 61.53 2.35 New York Buffalo Verizon 33.55 18.03 0.11 62.57 2.35 New York Massena Verizon 26.07 17.87 0.11 61.18 2.35 New York New York City Verizon 29.60 18.08 0.11 62.47 2.35 New York Ogdensburg Verizon 26.78 18.36 0.11 62.83 2.35 New York Rochester Frontier 19.57 11.34 0.08 33.32 North Carolina Raleigh BellSouth 20.40 45.32 4.75 North Carolina Rockingham BellSouth 20.30 45.32 4.75 Ohio Canton SBC 20.75 15.25 0.08 36.50 3.95 Ohio Cincinnati Broadwing 24.21 15.81 0.15 25.70 4.00 Ohio Cleveland SBC 20.75 15.25 0.08 36.50 3.95 Ohio Columbus SBC 20.75 15.25 0.08 36.50 3.95 Ohio Toledo SBC 20.75 15.25 0.08 36.50 3.95 Oregon Corvallis Qwest 22.14
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 22.42 6.79 41.50 22.52 Texas Brownsville SBC 23.01 4.72 40.70 19.18 Texas Corpus Christi SBC 28.20 3.63 40.70 19.18 Texas Dallas SBC 29.74 10.48 40.70 19.18 Texas Fort Worth SBC 27.74 6.89 40.70 19.18 Texas Houston SBC 22.29 5.72 40.70 19.18 Texas San Antonio SBC 20.01 4.73 40.70 19.18 Utah Logan Qwest 22.63 5.90 25.00 13.34 Virginia Richmond Verizon 28.90 11.34 38.50 19.25 Virginia Smithfield Verizon 33.86 9.78 40.00 20.00 Washington Everett Verizon 24.75 6.06 43.25 21.63 Washington Seattle Qwest 22.01 9.61 31.00 16.49 West Virginia Huntington Verizon 29.69 18.78 42.00 0.00 Wisconsin Milwaukee SBC 35.56 26.54 51.90 0.00 Wisconsin Racine SBC 35.54 26.52 51.90 0.00 1 Rates are for flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 calls elsewhere.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror00.pdf
  • 9.91 10.32 11.63 13.38 13.01 12.91 11.80 10.75 4 Ameritech Operating Companies 29.71 28.93 22.59 18.22 18.27 16.78 13.39 14.80 12.79 13.00 5 Nevada Bell 22.07 19.26 16.02 19.47 17.75 17.31 17.92 17.44 14.51 12.98 6 Pacific Bell 19.30 21.01 16.50 11.98 17.68 15.76 14.93 12.89 12.68 11.85 7 Southern New England Telephone Company 23.91 12.12 10.99 12.70 11.64 11.58 11.34 11.52 12.90 8.56 Verizon Companies 8 Bell Atlantic dba Verizon Communications 13.36 13.66 (Former Bell Atlantic Companies) Bell Atlantic 13.88 14.73 11.24 13.74 14.00 14.01 12.50 12.83 Bell Atlantic (NYNEX) 11.40 13.72 15.23 12.12 11.79 12.55 12.50 New England Telephone and Telegraph Co. 8.54 New York Telephone 9.82 (Former GTE Companies) 9 GTE South Inc. (Kentucky - COKY) 32.50 9.55
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • 6.17 39Rock Hill Telephone Company 14.88 12.57 23.23 16.30 0.00 6.79 14.14 40Surewest Telephone 1 15.59 12.19 16.98 13.74 0.00 27.84 23.43 41Telephone Utilities Exchange Carrier Assoc. 17.91 11.25 53.69 42TXU Communications Telephone Company, Inc. 15.11 8.97 31.78 28.27 0.00 24.45 24.70 43Utelco, Inc. 44Virgin Islands Telephone Corporation 15.88 10.96 43.04 5.71 (271.38) 55.66 23.46 45Warwick Valley Telephone Company 13.05 11.34 11.66 14.60 0.00 14.13 14.58 46Yates City Telephone Company 1.17 12.35 163.11 (41.25) 137.30 (29.08) 1 Formerly known as Roseville Telephone Company. Maximum Rate of Return 29.48%12.95%168.35%302.78% 9,587.82%137.30%37.92% Minimum Rate of Return 1.17 1.44 (8.85) (41.25) (2,646.38) 1.11 (29.08) Weighted Arithmetic Mean 13.20 11.84 16.96 11.04 (32.20) 12.17 11.53 Standard Deviation 3.60 1.27 16.24 8.54 672.56 10.74 7.37
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 15.65 7.96 12.64 15.87 11.24 10SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO.-ALABAMA 13.16 12.11 13.90 11.07 (10.49) 17.68 14.52 11SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO.-KENTUCKY 12.66 12.38 11.78 11.63 9.44 14.85 13.47 12SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO.-LOUISIANA 10.86 12.17 7.10 10.37 5.71 9.33 9.77 13SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO.-MISSISSIPPI 12.50 12.62 8.98 8.58 16.70 17.14 13.66 14SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO.-TENNESSEE 11.59 12.34 11.34 11.86 (85.80) 11.19 10.64 15SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.-FL 11.57 12.11 5.87 11.97 (20.18) 14.23 12.67 16SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.-GA 11.98 12.14 9.38 14.05 (8.18) 13.52 13.57 17SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.-NC 13.42 12.45 13.25 8.97 25.49 20.76 15.19 18SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.-SC 12.12 12.35 10.01 9.73 (125.36) 18.15 12.71 19NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror97.pdf
  • TELECOMMUNICATIONS COS. (TARIFF 2) 23/ 13.19 13.58 72 FRONTIER TELEPHONE OF ROCHESTER, INC. 24/ 25/ 13.19 10.20 11.87 12.02 11.63 12.11 11.82 73 FRONTIER TIER 2 CONCURRING COMPANIES 25/ 31.93 26.91 19.32 17.69 16.42 74 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF MINNESOTA & IOWA 25/ 26/ 28.26 23.71 21.90 19.65 14.99 13.65 13.71 75 SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 24/ 12.70 11.64 11.58 11.34 11.52 12.90 8.56 MAXIMUM RATE OF RETURN 48.86% 42.53% 47.29% 32.60% 22.33% 17.72% 17.27% MINIMUM RATE OF RETURN (28.51) (24.03) (16.99) (15.37) 7.05 8.51 8.54 WEIGHTED ARITHMETIC MEAN 15.64 15.15 14.02 13.58 13.12 12.42 11.78 STANDARD DEVIATION 4.09 3.64 3.03 2.59 1.76 0.96 1.49 INTERSTATE RATE OF RETURN SUMMARY YEARS 1991 THROUGH 1997 PRICE CAP COMPANIES FINAL REPORTS FOR 1991,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror98.pdf
  • BELLSOUTH TELEPHONE COMPANIES 20.80 17.91 16.40 15.78 15.92 13.68 12.80 12.62 SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 3/ 5 SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.54 10.32 11.63 13.38 13.01 12.91 11.80 10.75 6 NEVADA BELL 12.30 19.47 17.75 17.31 17.92 17.44 14.51 12.98 7 PACIFIC BELL 14.22 11.98 17.68 15.76 14.93 12.89 12.68 11.85 8 SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 10.99 12.70 11.64 11.58 11.34 11.52 12.90 8.56 9 U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 16.54 15.41 13.64 12.00 12.40 13.62 12.41 12.40 GTE 4/ 5/ 10 GTE SOUTH INC. (KENTUCKY - COKY) 6/ 7.52 6.62 4.49 4.79 5.56 11 GTE SOUTH INC. (N. CAROLINA - CONC) 6/ 14.47 16.63 11.98 14.16 10.75 12 GTE SOUTH INC. (S. CAROLINA - COSC) 6/ 27.74 25.09 17.40 12.32 9.77
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror99.pdf
  • 9.91 10.32 11.63 13.38 13.01 12.91 11.80 10.75 5 Ameritech Operating Companies 5/ 28.93 22.59 18.22 18.27 16.78 13.39 14.80 12.79 13.00 6 Nevada Bell 5/ 18.99 16.02 19.47 17.75 17.31 17.92 17.44 14.51 12.98 7 Pacific Bell 5/ 20.87 16.50 11.98 17.68 15.76 14.93 12.89 12.68 11.85 8 Southern New England Telephone Company 5/ 12.12 10.99 12.70 11.64 11.58 11.34 11.52 12.90 8.56 9 U S WEST Communications, Inc. 6/ 19.09 16.56 15.41 13.64 12.00 12.40 13.62 12.41 12.40 GTE 7/ 8/ 9/ 10 GTE South Inc. (Kentucky - COKY) 10/ 9.65 5.97 6.62 4.49 4.79 5.56 11 GTE South Inc. (N. Carolina - CONC) 10/ 19.90 12.78 16.63 11.98 14.16 10.75 GTE South Inc. (S. Carolina - COSC) 10/
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 20.80 17.91 16.40 15.78 15.92 13.68 12.80 12.62 SBC Communications, Inc. 4/ 5 Southwestern Bell Telephone Company 5/ 9.91 10.32 11.63 13.38 13.01 12.91 11.80 10.75 6 Nevada Bell 5/ 16.02 19.47 17.75 17.31 17.92 17.44 14.51 12.98 7 Pacific Bell 5/ 15.48 11.98 17.68 15.76 14.93 12.89 12.68 11.85 8 Southern New England Telephone Company 10.99 12.70 11.64 11.58 11.34 11.52 12.90 8.56 9 U S WEST Communications, Inc. 6/ 16.53 15.41 13.64 12.00 12.40 13.62 12.41 12.40 GTE 7/ 8/ 9/ 10 GTE South Inc. (Kentucky - COKY) 10/ 5.81 6.62 4.49 4.79 5.56 11 GTE South Inc. (N. Carolina - CONC) 10/ 12.56 16.63 11.98 14.16 10.75 12 GTE South Inc. (S. Carolina - COSC) 10/ 26.22 25.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • TELECOMMUNICATIONS COS. (TARIFF 2) 23/ 13.19 13.58 72 FRONTIER TELEPHONE OF ROCHESTER, INC. 24/ 25/ 13.19 10.20 11.87 12.02 11.63 12.11 11.82 73 FRONTIER TIER 2 CONCURRING COMPANIES 25/ 31.93 26.91 19.32 17.69 16.42 74 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF MINNESOTA & IOWA 25/ 26/ 28.26 23.71 21.90 19.65 14.99 13.65 13.71 75 SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 24/ 12.70 11.64 11.58 11.34 11.52 12.90 8.56 MAXIMUM RATE OF RETURN 48.86% 42.53% 47.29% 32.60% 22.33% 17.72% 17.27% MINIMUM RATE OF RETURN (28.51) (24.03) (16.99) (15.37) 7.05 8.51 8.54 WEIGHTED ARITHMETIC MEAN 15.64 15.15 14.02 13.58 13.12 12.42 11.78 STANDARD DEVIATION 4.09 3.64 3.03 2.59 1.76 0.96 1.49 15 - 4 NOTES FOR TABLE 15.1. 1/ AT&T COMMUNICATIONS FILED INDIVIDUAL REPORTS FOR 1991 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 9.91 10.32 11.63 13.38 13.01 12.91 11.80 10.75 5 Ameritech Operating Companies 5/ 28.93 22.59 18.22 18.27 16.78 13.39 14.80 12.79 13.00 6 Nevada Bell 5/ 18.99 16.02 19.47 17.75 17.31 17.92 17.44 14.51 12.98 7 Pacific Bell 5/ 20.87 16.50 11.98 17.68 15.76 14.93 12.89 12.68 11.85 8 Southern New England Telephone Company 5/ 12.12 10.99 12.70 11.64 11.58 11.34 11.52 12.90 8.56 9 U S WEST Communications, Inc. 6/ 19.09 16.56 15.41 13.64 12.00 12.40 13.62 12.41 12.40 GTE 7/ 8/ 9/ 10 GTE South Inc. (Kentucky - COKY) 10/ 9.65 5.97 6.62 4.49 4.79 5.56 11 GTE South Inc. (N. Carolina - CONC) 10/ 19.90 12.78 16.63 11.98 14.16 10.75 GTE South Inc. (S. Carolina - COSC) 10/
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • TELECOMMUNICATIONS COS. (TARIFF 2) 23/ 13.19 13.58 72 FRONTIER TELEPHONE OF ROCHESTER, INC. 24/ 25/ 13.19 10.20 11.87 12.02 11.63 12.11 11.82 73 FRONTIER TIER 2 CONCURRING COMPANIES 25/ 31.93 26.91 19.32 17.69 16.42 74 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF MINNESOTA & IOWA 25/ 26/ 28.26 23.71 21.90 19.65 14.99 13.65 13.71 75 SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 24/ 12.70 11.64 11.58 11.34 11.52 12.90 8.56 MAXIMUM RATE OF RETURN 48.86% 42.53% 47.29% 32.60% 22.33% 17.72% 17.27% MINIMUM RATE OF RETURN (28.51) (24.03) (16.99) (15.37) 7.05 8.51 8.54 WEIGHTED ARITHMETIC MEAN 15.64 15.15 14.02 13.58 13.12 12.42 11.78 STANDARD DEVIATION 4.09 3.64 3.03 2.59 1.76 0.96 1.49 77 NOTES FOR TABLE 14.1. 1/ AT&T COMMUNICATIONS FILED INDIVIDUAL REPORTS FOR 1991 - 1994 NINETY
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 20.80 17.91 16.40 15.78 15.92 13.68 12.80 12.62 SBC Communications, Inc. 4/ 5 Southwestern Bell Telephone Company 5/ 9.91 10.32 11.63 13.38 13.01 12.91 11.80 10.75 6 Nevada Bell 5/ 16.02 19.47 17.75 17.31 17.92 17.44 14.51 12.98 7 Pacific Bell 5/ 15.48 11.98 17.68 15.76 14.93 12.89 12.68 11.85 8 Southern New England Telephone Company 10.99 12.70 11.64 11.58 11.34 11.52 12.90 8.56 9 U S WEST Communications, Inc. 6/ 16.53 15.41 13.64 12.00 12.40 13.62 12.41 12.40 GTE 7/ 8/ 9/ 10 GTE South Inc. (Kentucky - COKY) 10/ 5.81 6.62 4.49 4.79 5.56 11 GTE South Inc. (N. Carolina - CONC) 10/ 12.56 16.63 11.98 14.16 10.75 12 GTE South Inc. (S. Carolina - COSC) 10/ 26.22 25.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 13.01 13.38 11.63 10.32 9.91 10.22 14.56 4 Ameritech Operating Companies 5/ 13.00 12.79 14.80 13.39 16.78 18.27 18.22 22.59 28.93 29.71 5 Nevada Bell 5/ 12.98 14.51 17.44 17.92 17.31 17.75 19.47 16.02 19.26 22.07 6 Pacific Bell 5/ 11.85 12.68 12.89 14.93 15.76 17.68 11.98 16.50 21.01 19.30 7 Southern New England Telephone Company 5/ 8.56 12.90 11.52 11.34 11.58 11.64 12.70 10.99 12.12 23.91 Verizon Companies 6/ 8 Bell Atlantic dba Verizon Communications 7/ 13.66 13.36 (Former Bell Atlantic Companies) Bell Atlantic 12.83 12.50 14.01 14.00 13.74 11.24 14.73 13.88 Bell Atlantic (NYNEX) 8/ 12.50 12.55 11.79 12.12 15.23 13.72 11.40 New England Telephone and Telegraph Co. 8.54 New York Telephone 9.82 (Former GTE Companies) 9/ 10/ 11/
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • -2.45 -0.14 -2.31 0.00 150107 C NEWPORT TEL. CO.,INC. -4.86 3.37 -7.96 -39.79 150108 C NICHOLVILLE TEL. CO.,INC. -2.72 1.85 -4.48 -10.57 150109 C ALLTEL NEW YORK INC.-JAMESTOWN -2.38 1.44 -3.76 0.00 150110 C OGDEN TELEPHONE COMPANY - NY 0.78 1.16 -0.37 0.00 150111 C ONEIDA COUNTY RURAL TEL. CO. -13.64 6.48 -18.89 -41.17 150112 A ONTARIO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 11.34 -1.91 13.51 0.00 150113 C ALLTEL NY INC.-RED JACKET 1.30 0.54 0.76 0.00 150114 C ORISKANY FALLS TEL. CORP. -8.71 1.37 -9.94 0.00 150116 C PATTERSONVILLE TEL. CO.-NY -2.23 -0.89 -1.36 -18.58 150118 C PORT BYRON TEL. CO. -6.10 -0.03 -6.07 -28.91 150121 C FRONTIER TELEPHONE OF ROCHESTER, INC. 1.64 -23.87 33.51 0.00 150122 C FRONTIER COMM. OF SENECA GORHAM,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • Support Percentage Changes from 2001 to 2002 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* INDIANA Cont. 320809 A COMM. CORP. OF SOUTHERN INDIANA 7.76 -1.84 9.78 35.39 320813 A PULASKI-WHITE RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 5.16 -5.55 11.34 58.34 320815 A>CROCHESTER TEL. CO., INC. 6.46 -0.75 7.27 46.98 320816 A S & W TEL. CO., INC. 8.02 -0.53 8.59 25.43 320818 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.76 -1.30 10.18 0.00 320819 C SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 16.56 -4.70 22.32 76.17 320825 C SUNMAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION 18.36 0.00 18.36 44.14 320826 A SWAYZEE TEL. CO., INC. 12.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • COMPANY 7.63 -0.32 7.98 102.86 361439 A MINNESOTA VALLEY TEL. CO. INC. 17.26 2.05 14.90 134.32 361440 A CANNON VALLEY TELECOM, INC. 9.30 0.74 8.49 102.52 361442 C NEW ULM TELECOM, INC. 44.70 4.52 38.44 0.00 361443 A LORETEL SYSTEMS, INC. 12.70 0.32 12.34 INFINITE 361445 C CENTURYTEL OF MINNESOTA, INC. -0.79 1.17 -1.94 0.00 361448 A OSAKIS TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.34 1.99 9.17 INFINITE 361450 A PARK REGION MUTUAL TEL. CO. 9.80 0.59 9.16 163.88 361451 C PAUL BUNYAN RURAL TEL. COOP. 10.75 0.00 10.75 64.78 3 - 195 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • 3140 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total 20.94 15.55 18.83 14.77 17.12 13.13 18.31 10.71 16.74 11.92 MR-4-02- 3144 Mean Time To Repair ­ Loop Trouble - Platform - Bus. 14.28 13.49 13.54 13.99 12.01 11.72 13.09 11.11 12.18 11.29 MR-4-02- 3145 Mean Time To Repair ­ Loop Trouble - Platform - Res. 23.23 24.67 20.63 19.03 19.03 17.85 20.01 11.34 18.74 17.03 MR-4-03- 3144 Mean Time To Repair ­ Central Office Trouble - Bus. 11.4 9.31 10.21 10.93 9.15 10.82 8.69 8.44 6.78 7.23 MR-4-03- 3145 Mean Time To Repair ­ Central Office Trouble - Res. 12.37 21.3 12.73 13.73 10.83 12.82 10.53 11.29 9.03 6.67 a,d,e MR-4-04- 3140 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 69.5 86.38 73.81 84.35
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01088.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01088.html
  • NAB Comments at 4. 47 C.F.R. § 11.31(f). NWS Petition at 7. NWS indicates that the special ``SS'' codes for marine areas would be used in conjunction with special ``CCC'' codes. The special ``CCC'' codes have not yet been designated. SBE Petition at 8. NWS Petition at 1, 3-4. SBE Comments at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. § 11.31(d). 47 C.F.R. § 11.34; see also 47 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1043. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 11.51(l), 11.52(e)(2) and 11.61(a)(1)(v). SBE Petition at 3. NAB Comments at 3; Fox Comments at 1-2. Id. at 6. Id. NWS Petition at 1; NWS Letter at 3-4. 47 C.F.R. § 11.33(a)(4) and (a)(5). Id. at 10-11. Id. Id. at 11. See 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-64A1.html
  • for EAS messages containing header codes for state and local events. Broadcast stations, cable systems and wireless cable systems which replace their decoders after February 1, 2004 must install decoders that provide a means to permit the selective display and logging of EAS messages containing header codes for state and local EAS events. * * * * * 96. Section 11.34 is amended by adding new paragraphs (f) and (g) to read as follows: 11.34 Acceptability of the equipment. * * * * * (f) Modifications to existing authorized EAS decoders, encoders or combined units necessary to implement the new EAS codes specified in 11.31 and to implement the selective displaying and logging feature specified in 11.33(a)(4) will be considered Class
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/FCC-05-191A1.html
  • * * * * * (b) Attention Signal. EAS Decoders shall have detection and activation circuitry that will demute a receiver upon detection of the two audio tones of 853 Hz and 960 Hz. To prevent false responses, decoders designed to use the two tones for receiver demuting shall comply with the following: * * * * * 10. Amend 11.34 by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows: 11.34 Acceptability of the equipment. * * * * * (e) Waiver requests of the Certification requirements for EAS Encoders or EAS Decoders which are constructed for use by an EAS Participant, but are not offered for sale will be considered on an individual basis in accordance with part 1, subpart G,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1717A1.html
  • ("EAS tone"); message; and Preamble and EAS End of Message ("EOM") Codes. See 47 C.F.R. S: 11.31(a). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 11.32, 11.33. The functions of the EAS encoder and decoder may be combined into a single unit referred to as an Encoder/Decoder provided that the unit complies with all specifications in Part 11 of the Commission's Rules. See 47.C.F.R. S: 11.34(c). 47 C.F.R. S: 11.32(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 11.32(a)(9)(v). 47 C.F.R. S: 11.61(a). The Emergency Alert System 2007 AM and FM Handbook ("EAS Operating Handbook") can be found at www.fcc.gov/pshs/eas/easamfm.pdf. See 47 C.F.R. S: 11.61(a)(1), EAS Operating Handbook at 29. See 47 C.F.R. S: 11.51(b); also 47 C.F.R. S: 11.11(a), note 6 to Analog and Digital Broadcast Stations ("Effective January 1998,