FCC Web Documents citing 9.12

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2009 01 01

• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau to report to future competent world radiocommunication conferences on the results of the implementation of the administrative due diligence procedure. ANNEX 1 TO RESOLUTION 49 (REV.WRC-0712) 1 Any satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) shall be subject to these procedures. 2 Any request for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4 of Appendices 30 and 30A that involve the addition of new frequencies or orbit positions or for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau to report to future competent world radiocommunication conferences on the results of the implementation of the administrative due diligence procedure. ANNEX 1 TO RESOLUTION 49 (REV.WRC-0712) 1 Any satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) shall be subject to these procedures. 2 Any request for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4 of Appendices 30 and 30A that involve the addition of new frequencies or orbit positions or for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2_Rcd.pdf
  • of harmful interference that may be caused to or by assignments recorded with a favourable finding under Nos. 11.36 and 11.37 or 11.38, or recorded in application of No. 11.41, or published under Nos. 9.38 or 9.58 but not yet notified, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying administration states that the procedure for coordination under Nos. 9.7,9.7A,9.7B,9.11, 9.12,9.12A,9.13 or 9.14, could not be successfully completed (see also No. 9.65);14 or (WRC-2000) 11.33 d) with respect to the probability of harmful interference that may be caused to or by other assignments recorded with a favourable finding in application of Nos. 11.36 and11.37 or 11.38 or in application of No. 11.41, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
  • 8. 26 "HSPA to LTE-Advanced: 3GPP Broadband Evolution to IMT-Advanced (4G)," Rysavy Research/3G Americas, September 2009. 27 Round-trip latencies do not include public Internet latencies. Illustrative latencies for 2G/3G/4G networks; latencies for two networks using the same technology can vary depending on network configuration, infra- structure vendor optimizations, etc. 28 CITI BROADBAND REPORT AT 8. 29 See, for example, Figure 9.12 in "LTE for UMTS - OFD- MA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access," Harri Holma and Antti Toskala (Eds); and "LS on LTE performance verification work" at http://www.3gpp.org/FTP/tsg_ran/ WG1_RL1/TSGR1_49/Docs/ R1-072580.zip. 30 In terms of cell radius, this gain translates to nearly a three-fold improvement in coverage. 31 See also Clearwire Ex-Parte filing, "Mobile broadband link budget example ­ for FCC", GN
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau to report to future competent world radiocommunication conferences on the results of the implementation of the administrative due diligence procedure. ANNEX 1 TO RESOLUTION 49 (REV.WRC-0712) 1 Any satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) shall be subject to these procedures. 2 Any request for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4 of Appendices 30 and 30A that involve the addition of new frequencies or orbit positions or for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2_Rcd.pdf
  • of harmful interference that may be caused to or by assignments recorded with a favourable finding under Nos. 11.36 and 11.37 or 11.38, or recorded in application of No. 11.41, or published under Nos. 9.38 or 9.58 but not yet notified, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying administration states that the procedure for coordination under Nos. 9.7,9.7A,9.7B,9.11, 9.12,9.12A,9.13 or 9.14, could not be successfully completed (see also No. 9.65);14 or (WRC-2000) 11.33 d) with respect to the probability of harmful interference that may be caused to or by other assignments recorded with a favourable finding in application of Nos. 11.36 and11.37 or 11.38 or in application of No. 11.41, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
  • 8. 26 "HSPA to LTE-Advanced: 3GPP Broadband Evolution to IMT-Advanced (4G)," Rysavy Research/3G Americas, September 2009. 27 Round-trip latencies do not include public Internet latencies. Illustrative latencies for 2G/3G/4G networks; latencies for two networks using the same technology can vary depending on network configuration, infra- structure vendor optimizations, etc. 28 CITI BROADBAND REPORT AT 8. 29 See, for example, Figure 9.12 in "LTE for UMTS - OFD- MA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access," Harri Holma and Antti Toskala (Eds); and "LS on LTE performance verification work" at http://www.3gpp.org/FTP/tsg_ran/ WG1_RL1/TSGR1_49/Docs/ R1-072580.zip. 30 In terms of cell radius, this gain translates to nearly a three-fold improvement in coverage. 31 See also Clearwire Ex-Parte filing, "Mobile broadband link budget example ­ for FCC", GN
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau to report to future competent world radiocommunication conferences on the results of the implementation of the administrative due diligence procedure. ANNEX 1 TO RESOLUTION 49 (REV.WRC-0712) 1 Any satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) shall be subject to these procedures. 2 Any request for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4 of Appendices 30 and 30A that involve the addition of new frequencies or orbit positions or for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2_Rcd.pdf
  • of harmful interference that may be caused to or by assignments recorded with a favourable finding under Nos. 11.36 and 11.37 or 11.38, or recorded in application of No. 11.41, or published under Nos. 9.38 or 9.58 but not yet notified, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying administration states that the procedure for coordination under Nos. 9.7,9.7A,9.7B,9.11, 9.12,9.12A,9.13 or 9.14, could not be successfully completed (see also No. 9.65);14 or (WRC-2000) 11.33 d) with respect to the probability of harmful interference that may be caused to or by other assignments recorded with a favourable finding in application of Nos. 11.36 and11.37 or 11.38 or in application of No. 11.41, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
  • 8. 26 "HSPA to LTE-Advanced: 3GPP Broadband Evolution to IMT-Advanced (4G)," Rysavy Research/3G Americas, September 2009. 27 Round-trip latencies do not include public Internet latencies. Illustrative latencies for 2G/3G/4G networks; latencies for two networks using the same technology can vary depending on network configuration, infra- structure vendor optimizations, etc. 28 CITI BROADBAND REPORT AT 8. 29 See, for example, Figure 9.12 in "LTE for UMTS - OFD- MA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access," Harri Holma and Antti Toskala (Eds); and "LS on LTE performance verification work" at http://www.3gpp.org/FTP/tsg_ran/ WG1_RL1/TSGR1_49/Docs/ R1-072580.zip. 30 In terms of cell radius, this gain translates to nearly a three-fold improvement in coverage. 31 See also Clearwire Ex-Parte filing, "Mobile broadband link budget example ­ for FCC", GN
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau to report to future competent world radiocommunication conferences on the results of the implementation of the administrative due diligence procedure. ANNEX 1 TO RESOLUTION 49 (REV.WRC-0712) 1 Any satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) shall be subject to these procedures. 2 Any request for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4 of Appendices 30 and 30A that involve the addition of new frequencies or orbit positions or for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2_Rcd.pdf
  • of harmful interference that may be caused to or by assignments recorded with a favourable finding under Nos. 11.36 and 11.37 or 11.38, or recorded in application of No. 11.41, or published under Nos. 9.38 or 9.58 but not yet notified, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying administration states that the procedure for coordination under Nos. 9.7,9.7A,9.7B,9.11, 9.12,9.12A,9.13 or 9.14, could not be successfully completed (see also No. 9.65);14 or (WRC-2000) 11.33 d) with respect to the probability of harmful interference that may be caused to or by other assignments recorded with a favourable finding in application of Nos. 11.36 and11.37 or 11.38 or in application of No. 11.41, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
  • 8. 26 "HSPA to LTE-Advanced: 3GPP Broadband Evolution to IMT-Advanced (4G)," Rysavy Research/3G Americas, September 2009. 27 Round-trip latencies do not include public Internet latencies. Illustrative latencies for 2G/3G/4G networks; latencies for two networks using the same technology can vary depending on network configuration, infra- structure vendor optimizations, etc. 28 CITI BROADBAND REPORT AT 8. 29 See, for example, Figure 9.12 in "LTE for UMTS - OFD- MA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access," Harri Holma and Antti Toskala (Eds); and "LS on LTE performance verification work" at http://www.3gpp.org/FTP/tsg_ran/ WG1_RL1/TSGR1_49/Docs/ R1-072580.zip. 30 In terms of cell radius, this gain translates to nearly a three-fold improvement in coverage. 31 See also Clearwire Ex-Parte filing, "Mobile broadband link budget example ­ for FCC", GN
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau to report to future competent world radiocommunication conferences on the results of the implementation of the administrative due diligence procedure. ANNEX 1 TO RESOLUTION 49 (REV.WRC-0712) 1 Any satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) shall be subject to these procedures. 2 Any request for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4 of Appendices 30 and 30A that involve the addition of new frequencies or orbit positions or for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • not apply. The provisions of No. 21.18 shall apply. (WRC-07) 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply; however, in the case of radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) networks and systems, Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall only apply to transmitting space stations. In accordance with No. 5.329A, for systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) in the bands 1215-1300 MHz and 1559-1610 MHz, the provisions of Nos. 9.7, 9.12, 9.12A and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275830A1.txt
  • 159 3,439 4.62 267 2,375 11.24 Nevada 409 5,407 7.56 890 2,474 35.97 New Hampshire 754 4,854 15.53 331 1,667 19.86 New Jersey 3,967 29,393 13.50 2,705 10,313 26.23 New Mexico 187 2,964 6.31 461 2,002 23.03 New York 7,075 47,985 14.74 8,032 20,896 38.44 North Carolina 2,245 21,230 10.57 1,981 10,961 18.07 North Dakota 47 1,166 4.03 58 636 9.12 Northern Marianas 0 0 NM 0 0 NM Ohio 3,092 29,379 10.52 2,138 14,121 15.14 Oklahoma 589 9,981 5.90 854 4,440 19.23 Oregon 700 8,159 8.58 981 3,775 25.99 Pennsylvania 5,147 37,834 13.60 3,717 12,585 29.54 Puerto Rico 101 2,148 4.70 538 3,520 15.28 Rhode Island 375 3,624 10.35 279 1,076 25.93 South Carolina 850 8,350 10.18 879 5,091 17.27
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276876A1.txt
  • Up Rates Rates Rates Rates New Mexico Alamogordo Qwest 24.37 5.97 34.70 8.33 New York Binghamton Verizon 32.48 14.94 63.06 5.73 New York Buffalo Verizon 35.71 17.76 64.51 5.86 New York Massena Verizon 30.65 13.20 62.71 5.70 New York New York City Verizon 34.00 15.29 64.53 5.87 New York Ogdensburg Verizon 31.46 13.55 64.36 5.85 New York Rochester Frontier 22.29 9.12 33.32 10.00 North Carolina Raleigh BellSouth 26.59 11.09 45.74 22.88 North Carolina Rockingham BellSouth 24.89 9.39 45.74 22.88 Ohio Canton AT&T 22.52 8.03 38.69 0.00 Ohio Cincinnati Cincinnati Bell 23.55 10.37 25.70 0.00 Ohio Cleveland AT&T 22.83 8.14 39.24 0.00 Ohio Columbus AT&T 22.57 8.05 38.78 0.00 Ohio Toledo AT&T 22.67 8.09 38.96 0.00 Oregon Corvallis Qwest 22.71 7.38 18.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-57A1.txt
  • 4.02 1.02 3.69 1.09 3.79 1.05 3.55 PO-1-03-6020Address Validation - EDI 4.58 7.68 4.83 6.45 4.04 6.09 4.05 6.15 4.02 6.06 PO-1-03-6030Address Validation - CORBA 4.58 4.83 4.83 5.69 4.04 5.48 4.05 5.93 4.02 3.04 PO-1-03-6050Address Validation - Web GUI 4.58 7.04 4.83 7.51 4.04 6.66 4.05 7.06 4.02 6.41 PO-1-04-6020Product & Service Availability - EDI 10.02 NA 10.93 NA 9.12 NA 9.07 NA 9.07 NA PO-1-04-6030Product & Service Availability - CORBA 10.02 NA 10.93 NA 9.12 NA 9.07 NA 9.07 NA PO-1-04-6050Product & Service Availability - Web GUI 10.0218.3310.9318.13 9.12 18.02 9.07 16.42 9.07 18.2 PO-1-05-6020Telephone Number Availability & Reservation - EDI 5.64 9.48 5.92 NA 4.94 9.76 4.97 8.23 4.96 8.15 1,3 PO-1-05-6030Telephone Number Availability & Reservation - CORBA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
  • 8. 26 "HSPA to LTE-Advanced: 3GPP Broadband Evolution to IMT-Advanced (4G)," Rysavy Research/3G Americas, September 2009. 27 Round-trip latencies do not include public Internet latencies. Illustrative latencies for 2G/3G/4G networks; latencies for two networks using the same technology can vary depending on network configuration, infra- structure vendor optimizations, etc. 28 CITI BROADBAND REPORT AT 8. 29 See, for example, Figure 9.12 in "LTE for UMTS - OFD- MA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access," Harri Holma and Antti Toskala (Eds); and "LS on LTE performance verification work" at http://www.3gpp.org/FTP/tsg_ran/ WG1_RL1/TSGR1_49/Docs/ R1-072580.zip. 30 In terms of cell radius, this gain translates to nearly a three-fold improvement in coverage. 31 See also Clearwire Ex-Parte filing, "Mobile broadband link budget example ­ for FCC", GN
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau to report to future competent world radiocommunication conferences on the results of the implementation of the administrative due diligence procedure. ANNEX 1 TO RESOLUTION 49 (REV.WRC-0712) 1 Any satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) shall be subject to these procedures. 2 Any request for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4 of Appendices 30 and 30A that involve the addition of new frequencies or orbit positions or for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2_Rcd.pdf
  • of harmful interference that may be caused to or by assignments recorded with a favourable finding under Nos. 11.36 and 11.37 or 11.38, or recorded in application of No. 11.41, or published under Nos. 9.38 or 9.58 but not yet notified, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying administration states that the procedure for coordination under Nos. 9.7,9.7A,9.7B,9.11, 9.12,9.12A,9.13 or 9.14, could not be successfully completed (see also No. 9.65);14 or (WRC-2000) 11.33 d) with respect to the probability of harmful interference that may be caused to or by other assignments recorded with a favourable finding in application of Nos. 11.36 and11.37 or 11.38 or in application of No. 11.41, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • not apply. The provisions of No. 21.18 shall apply. (WRC-07) 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply; however, in the case of radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) networks and systems, Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall only apply to transmitting space stations. In accordance with No. 5.329A, for systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) in the bands 1215-1300 MHz and 1559-1610 MHz, the provisions of Nos. 9.7, 9.12, 9.12A and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
  • 8. 26 "HSPA to LTE-Advanced: 3GPP Broadband Evolution to IMT-Advanced (4G)," Rysavy Research/3G Americas, September 2009. 27 Round-trip latencies do not include public Internet latencies. Illustrative latencies for 2G/3G/4G networks; latencies for two networks using the same technology can vary depending on network configuration, infra- structure vendor optimizations, etc. 28 CITI BROADBAND REPORT AT 8. 29 See, for example, Figure 9.12 in "LTE for UMTS - OFD- MA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access," Harri Holma and Antti Toskala (Eds); and "LS on LTE performance verification work" at http://www.3gpp.org/FTP/tsg_ran/ WG1_RL1/TSGR1_49/Docs/ R1-072580.zip. 30 In terms of cell radius, this gain translates to nearly a three-fold improvement in coverage. 31 See also Clearwire Ex-Parte filing, "Mobile broadband link budget example ­ for FCC", GN
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau to report to future competent world radiocommunication conferences on the results of the implementation of the administrative due diligence procedure. ANNEX 1 TO RESOLUTION 49 (REV.WRC-0712) 1 Any satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) shall be subject to these procedures. 2 Any request for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4 of Appendices 30 and 30A that involve the addition of new frequencies or orbit positions or for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2_Rcd.pdf
  • of harmful interference that may be caused to or by assignments recorded with a favourable finding under Nos. 11.36 and 11.37 or 11.38, or recorded in application of No. 11.41, or published under Nos. 9.38 or 9.58 but not yet notified, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying administration states that the procedure for coordination under Nos. 9.7,9.7A,9.7B,9.11, 9.12,9.12A,9.13 or 9.14, could not be successfully completed (see also No. 9.65);14 or (WRC-2000) 11.33 d) with respect to the probability of harmful interference that may be caused to or by other assignments recorded with a favourable finding in application of Nos. 11.36 and11.37 or 11.38 or in application of No. 11.41, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • not apply. The provisions of No. 21.18 shall apply. (WRC-07) 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply; however, in the case of radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) networks and systems, Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall only apply to transmitting space stations. In accordance with No. 5.329A, for systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) in the bands 1215-1300 MHz and 1559-1610 MHz, the provisions of Nos. 9.7, 9.12, 9.12A and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
  • 8. 26 "HSPA to LTE-Advanced: 3GPP Broadband Evolution to IMT-Advanced (4G)," Rysavy Research/3G Americas, September 2009. 27 Round-trip latencies do not include public Internet latencies. Illustrative latencies for 2G/3G/4G networks; latencies for two networks using the same technology can vary depending on network configuration, infra- structure vendor optimizations, etc. 28 CITI BROADBAND REPORT AT 8. 29 See, for example, Figure 9.12 in "LTE for UMTS - OFD- MA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access," Harri Holma and Antti Toskala (Eds); and "LS on LTE performance verification work" at http://www.3gpp.org/FTP/tsg_ran/ WG1_RL1/TSGR1_49/Docs/ R1-072580.zip. 30 In terms of cell radius, this gain translates to nearly a three-fold improvement in coverage. 31 See also Clearwire Ex-Parte filing, "Mobile broadband link budget example ­ for FCC", GN
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau to report to future competent world radiocommunication conferences on the results of the implementation of the administrative due diligence procedure. ANNEX 1 TO RESOLUTION 49 (REV.WRC-0712) 1 Any satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) shall be subject to these procedures. 2 Any request for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4 of Appendices 30 and 30A that involve the addition of new frequencies or orbit positions or for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2_Rcd.pdf
  • of harmful interference that may be caused to or by assignments recorded with a favourable finding under Nos. 11.36 and 11.37 or 11.38, or recorded in application of No. 11.41, or published under Nos. 9.38 or 9.58 but not yet notified, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying administration states that the procedure for coordination under Nos. 9.7,9.7A,9.7B,9.11, 9.12,9.12A,9.13 or 9.14, could not be successfully completed (see also No. 9.65);14 or (WRC-2000) 11.33 d) with respect to the probability of harmful interference that may be caused to or by other assignments recorded with a favourable finding in application of Nos. 11.36 and11.37 or 11.38 or in application of No. 11.41, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • not apply. The provisions of No. 21.18 shall apply. (WRC-07) 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply; however, in the case of radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) networks and systems, Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall only apply to transmitting space stations. In accordance with No. 5.329A, for systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) in the bands 1215-1300 MHz and 1559-1610 MHz, the provisions of Nos. 9.7, 9.12, 9.12A and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
  • 8. 26 "HSPA to LTE-Advanced: 3GPP Broadband Evolution to IMT-Advanced (4G)," Rysavy Research/3G Americas, September 2009. 27 Round-trip latencies do not include public Internet latencies. Illustrative latencies for 2G/3G/4G networks; latencies for two networks using the same technology can vary depending on network configuration, infra- structure vendor optimizations, etc. 28 CITI BROADBAND REPORT AT 8. 29 See, for example, Figure 9.12 in "LTE for UMTS - OFD- MA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access," Harri Holma and Antti Toskala (Eds); and "LS on LTE performance verification work" at http://www.3gpp.org/FTP/tsg_ran/ WG1_RL1/TSGR1_49/Docs/ R1-072580.zip. 30 In terms of cell radius, this gain translates to nearly a three-fold improvement in coverage. 31 See also Clearwire Ex-Parte filing, "Mobile broadband link budget example ­ for FCC", GN
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau to report to future competent world radiocommunication conferences on the results of the implementation of the administrative due diligence procedure. ANNEX 1 TO RESOLUTION 49 (REV.WRC-0712) 1 Any satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) shall be subject to these procedures. 2 Any request for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4 of Appendices 30 and 30A that involve the addition of new frequencies or orbit positions or for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2_Rcd.pdf
  • of harmful interference that may be caused to or by assignments recorded with a favourable finding under Nos. 11.36 and 11.37 or 11.38, or recorded in application of No. 11.41, or published under Nos. 9.38 or 9.58 but not yet notified, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying administration states that the procedure for coordination under Nos. 9.7,9.7A,9.7B,9.11, 9.12,9.12A,9.13 or 9.14, could not be successfully completed (see also No. 9.65);14 or (WRC-2000) 11.33 d) with respect to the probability of harmful interference that may be caused to or by other assignments recorded with a favourable finding in application of Nos. 11.36 and11.37 or 11.38 or in application of No. 11.41, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • not apply. The provisions of No. 21.18 shall apply. (WRC-07) 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply; however, in the case of radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) networks and systems, Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall only apply to transmitting space stations. In accordance with No. 5.329A, for systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) in the bands 1215-1300 MHz and 1559-1610 MHz, the provisions of Nos. 9.7, 9.12, 9.12A and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
  • 8. 26 "HSPA to LTE-Advanced: 3GPP Broadband Evolution to IMT-Advanced (4G)," Rysavy Research/3G Americas, September 2009. 27 Round-trip latencies do not include public Internet latencies. Illustrative latencies for 2G/3G/4G networks; latencies for two networks using the same technology can vary depending on network configuration, infra- structure vendor optimizations, etc. 28 CITI BROADBAND REPORT AT 8. 29 See, for example, Figure 9.12 in "LTE for UMTS - OFD- MA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access," Harri Holma and Antti Toskala (Eds); and "LS on LTE performance verification work" at http://www.3gpp.org/FTP/tsg_ran/ WG1_RL1/TSGR1_49/Docs/ R1-072580.zip. 30 In terms of cell radius, this gain translates to nearly a three-fold improvement in coverage. 31 See also Clearwire Ex-Parte filing, "Mobile broadband link budget example ­ for FCC", GN
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.txt
  • \af0\afs24\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 9.11 Staff Support\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof SEQ SectionNumber _Toc280005097 \\* ARABIC }}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 9}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof -} {\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof PAGEREF _Toc280005097 \\h }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof {\*\datafield 08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b02000000080000000e0000005f0054006f0063 003200380030003000300035003000390037000000}}}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 1}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof \par 9.12 Office Facilities\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof SEQ SectionNumber _Toc280005098 \\* ARABIC }}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 9}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof -}{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof PAGEREF _Toc280005098 \\h }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof {\*\datafield 08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b02000000080000000e0000005f0054006f0063 003200380030003000300035003000390038000000}} }{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 1}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof \par 9.13 Audit Results\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau to report to future competent world radiocommunication conferences on the results of the implementation of the administrative due diligence procedure. ANNEX 1 TO RESOLUTION 49 (REV.WRC-0712) 1 Any satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) shall be subject to these procedures. 2 Any request for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4 of Appendices 30 and 30A that involve the addition of new frequencies or orbit positions or for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2_Rcd.pdf
  • of harmful interference that may be caused to or by assignments recorded with a favourable finding under Nos. 11.36 and 11.37 or 11.38, or recorded in application of No. 11.41, or published under Nos. 9.38 or 9.58 but not yet notified, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying administration states that the procedure for coordination under Nos. 9.7,9.7A,9.7B,9.11, 9.12,9.12A,9.13 or 9.14, could not be successfully completed (see also No. 9.65);14 or (WRC-2000) 11.33 d) with respect to the probability of harmful interference that may be caused to or by other assignments recorded with a favourable finding in application of Nos. 11.36 and11.37 or 11.38 or in application of No. 11.41, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • not apply. The provisions of No. 21.18 shall apply. (WRC-07) 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply; however, in the case of radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) networks and systems, Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall only apply to transmitting space stations. In accordance with No. 5.329A, for systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) in the bands 1215-1300 MHz and 1559-1610 MHz, the provisions of Nos. 9.7, 9.12, 9.12A and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • -100.00 220365 C GLENWOOD TEL CO 1.83 -9.30 12.27 5.11 220368 C HART TEL CO -19.55 -6.56 -13.91 -76.20 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMM -14.82 -5.44 -9.92 -46.36 220371 C KNOLOGY - VALLEY 2.99 -12.02 17.06 0.00 220375 C NELSON-BALL GROUND -6.28 -3.78 -2.59 -61.58 220376 C PEMBROKE TEL CO 14.71 -5.62 21.54 37.41 220377 C PINELAND TEL COOP 4.02 -4.67 9.12 5.25 220378 C PLANTERS RURAL COOP 16.25 -7.79 26.08 44.20 220379 C PLANT TEL. CO. -7.26 -7.89 0.68 -24.77 220380 A PROGRESSIVE RURAL 0.61 -4.60 5.47 -33.86 220381 C PUBLIC SERVICE TEL 0.48 -6.16 7.08 -0.47 220382 C RINGGOLD TEL CO -4.49 -7.84 3.64 -34.02 220386 C WINDSTREAM STANDARD -10.57 -2.19 -8.57 0.00 220387 A FRONTIER GEORGIA LLC 3.72 -6.89
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • -100.00 220365 C GLENWOOD TEL CO 1.83 -9.30 12.27 5.11 220368 C HART TEL CO -19.55 -6.56 -13.91 -76.20 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMM -14.82 -5.44 -9.92 -46.36 220371 C KNOLOGY - VALLEY 2.99 -12.02 17.06 0.00 220375 C NELSON-BALL GROUND -6.28 -3.78 -2.59 -61.58 220376 C PEMBROKE TEL CO 14.71 -5.62 21.54 37.41 220377 C PINELAND TEL COOP 4.02 -4.67 9.12 5.25 220378 C PLANTERS RURAL COOP 16.25 -7.79 26.08 44.20 220379 C PLANT TEL. CO. -7.26 -7.89 0.68 -24.77 220380 A PROGRESSIVE RURAL 0.61 -4.60 5.47 -33.86 220381 C PUBLIC SERVICE TEL 0.48 -6.16 7.08 -0.47 220382 C RINGGOLD TEL CO -4.49 -7.84 3.64 -34.02 220386 C WINDSTREAM STANDARD -10.57 -2.19 -8.57 0.00 220387 A FRONTIER GEORGIA LLC 3.72 -6.89
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
  • 8. 26 "HSPA to LTE-Advanced: 3GPP Broadband Evolution to IMT-Advanced (4G)," Rysavy Research/3G Americas, September 2009. 27 Round-trip latencies do not include public Internet latencies. Illustrative latencies for 2G/3G/4G networks; latencies for two networks using the same technology can vary depending on network configuration, infra- structure vendor optimizations, etc. 28 CITI BROADBAND REPORT AT 8. 29 See, for example, Figure 9.12 in "LTE for UMTS - OFD- MA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access," Harri Holma and Antti Toskala (Eds); and "LS on LTE performance verification work" at http://www.3gpp.org/FTP/tsg_ran/ WG1_RL1/TSGR1_49/Docs/ R1-072580.zip. 30 In terms of cell radius, this gain translates to nearly a three-fold improvement in coverage. 31 See also Clearwire Ex-Parte filing, "Mobile broadband link budget example ­ for FCC", GN
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.txt
  • \af0\afs24\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 9.11 Staff Support\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof SEQ SectionNumber _Toc280005097 \\* ARABIC }}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 9}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof -} {\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof PAGEREF _Toc280005097 \\h }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof {\*\datafield 08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b02000000080000000e0000005f0054006f0063 003200380030003000300035003000390037000000}}}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 1}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof \par 9.12 Office Facilities\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof SEQ SectionNumber _Toc280005098 \\* ARABIC }}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 9}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof -}{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof PAGEREF _Toc280005098 \\h }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof {\*\datafield 08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b02000000080000000e0000005f0054006f0063 003200380030003000300035003000390038000000}} }{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 1}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof \par 9.13 Audit Results\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau to report to future competent world radiocommunication conferences on the results of the implementation of the administrative due diligence procedure. ANNEX 1 TO RESOLUTION 49 (REV.WRC-0712) 1 Any satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) shall be subject to these procedures. 2 Any request for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4 of Appendices 30 and 30A that involve the addition of new frequencies or orbit positions or for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2_Rcd.pdf
  • of harmful interference that may be caused to or by assignments recorded with a favourable finding under Nos. 11.36 and 11.37 or 11.38, or recorded in application of No. 11.41, or published under Nos. 9.38 or 9.58 but not yet notified, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying administration states that the procedure for coordination under Nos. 9.7,9.7A,9.7B,9.11, 9.12,9.12A,9.13 or 9.14, could not be successfully completed (see also No. 9.65);14 or (WRC-2000) 11.33 d) with respect to the probability of harmful interference that may be caused to or by other assignments recorded with a favourable finding in application of Nos. 11.36 and11.37 or 11.38 or in application of No. 11.41, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • not apply. The provisions of No. 21.18 shall apply. (WRC-07) 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply; however, in the case of radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) networks and systems, Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall only apply to transmitting space stations. In accordance with No. 5.329A, for systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) in the bands 1215-1300 MHz and 1559-1610 MHz, the provisions of Nos. 9.7, 9.12, 9.12A and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • -100.00 220365 C GLENWOOD TEL CO 1.83 -9.30 12.27 5.11 220368 C HART TEL CO -19.55 -6.56 -13.91 -76.20 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMM -14.82 -5.44 -9.92 -46.36 220371 C KNOLOGY - VALLEY 2.99 -12.02 17.06 0.00 220375 C NELSON-BALL GROUND -6.28 -3.78 -2.59 -61.58 220376 C PEMBROKE TEL CO 14.71 -5.62 21.54 37.41 220377 C PINELAND TEL COOP 4.02 -4.67 9.12 5.25 220378 C PLANTERS RURAL COOP 16.25 -7.79 26.08 44.20 220379 C PLANT TEL. CO. -7.26 -7.89 0.68 -24.77 220380 A PROGRESSIVE RURAL 0.61 -4.60 5.47 -33.86 220381 C PUBLIC SERVICE TEL 0.48 -6.16 7.08 -0.47 220382 C RINGGOLD TEL CO -4.49 -7.84 3.64 -34.02 220386 C WINDSTREAM STANDARD -10.57 -2.19 -8.57 0.00 220387 A FRONTIER GEORGIA LLC 3.72 -6.89
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • -100.00 220365 C GLENWOOD TEL CO 1.83 -9.30 12.27 5.11 220368 C HART TEL CO -19.55 -6.56 -13.91 -76.20 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMM -14.82 -5.44 -9.92 -46.36 220371 C KNOLOGY - VALLEY 2.99 -12.02 17.06 0.00 220375 C NELSON-BALL GROUND -6.28 -3.78 -2.59 -61.58 220376 C PEMBROKE TEL CO 14.71 -5.62 21.54 37.41 220377 C PINELAND TEL COOP 4.02 -4.67 9.12 5.25 220378 C PLANTERS RURAL COOP 16.25 -7.79 26.08 44.20 220379 C PLANT TEL. CO. -7.26 -7.89 0.68 -24.77 220380 A PROGRESSIVE RURAL 0.61 -4.60 5.47 -33.86 220381 C PUBLIC SERVICE TEL 0.48 -6.16 7.08 -0.47 220382 C RINGGOLD TEL CO -4.49 -7.84 3.64 -34.02 220386 C WINDSTREAM STANDARD -10.57 -2.19 -8.57 0.00 220387 A FRONTIER GEORGIA LLC 3.72 -6.89
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
  • 8. 26 "HSPA to LTE-Advanced: 3GPP Broadband Evolution to IMT-Advanced (4G)," Rysavy Research/3G Americas, September 2009. 27 Round-trip latencies do not include public Internet latencies. Illustrative latencies for 2G/3G/4G networks; latencies for two networks using the same technology can vary depending on network configuration, infra- structure vendor optimizations, etc. 28 CITI BROADBAND REPORT AT 8. 29 See, for example, Figure 9.12 in "LTE for UMTS - OFD- MA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access," Harri Holma and Antti Toskala (Eds); and "LS on LTE performance verification work" at http://www.3gpp.org/FTP/tsg_ran/ WG1_RL1/TSGR1_49/Docs/ R1-072580.zip. 30 In terms of cell radius, this gain translates to nearly a three-fold improvement in coverage. 31 See also Clearwire Ex-Parte filing, "Mobile broadband link budget example ­ for FCC", GN
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • limits were based and adversely impact the GSO FSS and BSS networks to be protected. The number of non-GSO FSS systems that can share co-frequency in the 14/11 and 30/20 GHz bands will be limited. The more homogenous the non-GSO FSS system constellation parameters, the greater the number of systems that will be able to share co-frequency. Coordination under No. S9.12 effectively places the obligation for implementing mitigation techniques on the later systems to be filed with the BR. Misapplication could reduce the number of competing non-GSO FSS systems, make coordination between non-GSO systems more difficult, or lead to differing regulatory effects for non-GSO FSS systems which meet the limits and those which misapply the limits and should be avoided in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • the radionavigation-satellite service in the band 1164-1215 MHz shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation service. The operate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-Earth) is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. S9.12, S9.12A, and S9.13. The provisions of Nos. S21.18 also apply. Reasons: 1. The suppression of the first sentence of No. S5.328A is a consequence of the modification proposed in USA/xx/1 above. The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) (see proposal USA/xx/4 below) and associated Radio Regulations (see proposal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • interference to, nor claim protection from, stations of the aeronautical-radionavigation serviceoperate in accordance with the provisions of Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) 605 (WRC-2000) and shall not claim protection from stations in the aeronautical-radionavigation service. No. 5.43A does not apply. Use of the band 1 164-1 215 MHz by the radionavigation-satellite service is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A, and 9.13. The provisions of No. 21.18 apply. Reasons: The suppression of the second and modification of the third sentence reflect the incorporation into new Resolution RNSS (WRC-03) and associated Radio Regulations (see below) of the mechanisms for ensuring the protection of ARNS against harmful interference from RNSS (space-to-Earth) systems. By making non-geostationary (non-GSO) RNSS systems subject to Article
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • broadcasting-satellite service (sound) is subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2630-2655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • subject to Resolution 539 (WRC-2000). USA/xx/2 MOD 5.418A In certain Region 3 countries listed in No. 5.418, use of the band 2 630-2 655 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 2 June 2000, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 2 June 2000, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • Peru (see No. 5.489) and to the FSS; d) that protection of the BSS in Regions 1 and 3 from the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 7 and Annex 4 of Appendix 30; e) that protection of the FSS in Region 2 from the FSS in that Region is assured either by Article 9 (Nos. 9.7 or 9.12) or Article 22; f) that protection of terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from non-geostationary- satellite (non-GSO) systems in the FSS in Region 2 is assured by Article 21; g) that there is a need to protect terrestrial services in Regions 1, 2 and 3 from GSO networks in the FSS in Region 2; h) that this Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • administrative due diligence and reports have been made to WRC-2000, WRC-03, and the Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakesh 2002). Administrative due diligence, in its current form, consists in disclosure of data on the implementation of a satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) as well as to any such satellite network not yet recorded in the Master International Frequency Register by 22 November 1997. The due diligence information include the name of the spacecraft manufacturer; the contractual date of delivery and the number of satellites procured; and the name of the launch vehicle provider and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • equal rights: No. 9.15 states, ``...in respect of terrestrial stations in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services..'' No. 9.17 states, ``...allocated with equal rights to space and terrestrial services....''. No. 9.17A states, ``.....in frequency bands allocated with equal rights to space radiocommunication services in both directions of transmission...'' No. 9.11A applies ``the provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16'' and the Rule of Procedure (RoP) on No. 9.11A specify that the procedure of No. 9.11A is applicable to, ``...satellite services having allocations with equal rights...''. Additionally, while there is no text in the RR or in the RoP on No. 9.7 it doesn't appear that administrations responsible for a geostationary-satellite networks should have to coordinate if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the existing radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) (space-to-Earth) allocations in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz, along with footnote 5.329A. WRC-03 added footnote 5.328B, which applied coordination between two non-GSO RNSS systems and between non-GSO and GSO RNSS systems in the bands 1 164-1 300 MHz, 1 559-1 610 MHz and 5 010-5 030 MHz under Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 after 1 January 2005, without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). Coordination between GSO RNSS systems in the same bands (space-to-Earth and space-to-space) is covered by No. 9.7, again without specifying direction (i.e., space-to-Earth or space-to-space). No. 9.11A applies the coordination provisions of Nos. 9.12 to 9.16 where the requirement to coordinate is included in a footnote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • include the following: Compliance with industry guidelines Compliance with regulatory directives Conflict of Interest Neutrality NANPA operations and financial viability Record verification Facilities Security Enterprise Services 9.11 Staff Support The NANPA shall provide the FCC or its designee access during normal business hours to the NANPA's staff and books, records, and supporting documentation relating to the NANPA function being audited. 9.12 Office Facilities The NANPA shall provide office space, office furnishings, telephone and facsimile service, utilities, office-related equipment, and duplicating services that auditors may require to perform audits. 9.13 Audit Results The NANPA shall make audit results available to the public in a limited manner that protects any confidential information. The NANC shall receive a detailed summary of the audit results
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.txt
  • \af0\afs24\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 9.11 Staff Support\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof SEQ SectionNumber _Toc280005097 \\* ARABIC }}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 9}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof -} {\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof PAGEREF _Toc280005097 \\h }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof {\*\datafield 08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b02000000080000000e0000005f0054006f0063 003200380030003000300035003000390037000000}}}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 1}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof \par 9.12 Office Facilities\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof SEQ SectionNumber _Toc280005098 \\* ARABIC }}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 9}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof -}{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof PAGEREF _Toc280005098 \\h }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof {\*\datafield 08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b02000000080000000e0000005f0054006f0063 003200380030003000300035003000390038000000}} }{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 1}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof \par 9.13 Audit Results\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau to report to future competent world radiocommunication conferences on the results of the implementation of the administrative due diligence procedure. ANNEX 1 TO RESOLUTION 49 (REV.WRC-0712) 1 Any satellite network or satellite system of the fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service or broadcasting-satellite service with frequency assignments that are subject to coordination under Nos. 9.7, 9.11, 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13 and Resolution 33 (Rev.WRC-03) shall be subject to these procedures. 2 Any request for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4 of Appendices 30 and 30A that involve the addition of new frequencies or orbit positions or for modifications of the Region 2 Plan under the relevant provisions of Article 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2_Rcd.pdf
  • of harmful interference that may be caused to or by assignments recorded with a favourable finding under Nos. 11.36 and 11.37 or 11.38, or recorded in application of No. 11.41, or published under Nos. 9.38 or 9.58 but not yet notified, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying administration states that the procedure for coordination under Nos. 9.7,9.7A,9.7B,9.11, 9.12,9.12A,9.13 or 9.14, could not be successfully completed (see also No. 9.65);14 or (WRC-2000) 11.33 d) with respect to the probability of harmful interference that may be caused to or by other assignments recorded with a favourable finding in application of Nos. 11.36 and11.37 or 11.38 or in application of No. 11.41, as appropriate, for those cases for which the notifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • not apply. The provisions of No. 21.18 shall apply. (WRC-07) 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply; however, in the case of radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) networks and systems, Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall only apply to transmitting space stations. In accordance with No. 5.329A, for systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) in the bands 1215-1300 MHz and 1559-1610 MHz, the provisions of Nos. 9.7, 9.12, 9.12A and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation of -124.85 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus the Tweener eirp is reduced by 1.74 dB, covonding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station hm 45 to 52 centimeters. Ifthe interference hm all Tweeners results in an adjacent satellite C/I = 28.9 dB, then the CNR is reduced hm 9.17 to 9.12 dB, a 0.05 dB degradation (the allowance for rain in this link is 3.7 dB). This corresponds to a PFD limitation, for the above example, of -128.09 dBW/m2/MHz. Thus, the Tweener eirp is reduced by 4.5 dB, corresponding to an increase in the size of the subscriber earth station from 45 centimeters to 75 centimeten. A-4 Differences in ekp performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 18.44 - Texas 8.53 7.20 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 18.83 19.55 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 Utah 9.02 7.36 9.89 7.69 9.94 7.50 12.28 19.23 12.40 18.03 13.09 21.00 Vermont 8.98 - 9.72 - 9.85 - 14.25 - 14.22 - 14.15 - Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - Virginia 8.81 - 9.24 - 9.12 - 16.85 - 18.63 - 18.73 - Washington 8.82 22.59 8.85 22.88 8.84 23.06 14.75 12.85 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 West Virginia 7.91 - 8.99 - 9.54 - 15.81 - 19.71 - 18.85 - Wisconsin 7.55 9.39 7.83 9.65 7.61 10.07 26.53 - 32.28 52.00 26.67 20.50 Wyoming 9.00 22.06 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 18.33 18.76 19.25 22.45 24.25 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 491164 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NM, LLC #1 -7.23 -2.27 -5.08 0.00 491193 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW MEXICO, LLC#2 -3.20 -0.93 -2.29 0.00 491231 C MESCALERO APACHE TELECOM, INC. 8.29 -0.71 9.06 9.29 492066 C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC.-NM 10.36 11.75 -1.25 9.24 492176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-NM 86.17 -0.98 88.01 133.65 492259 C BACA VALLEY TEL. CO. 9.12 -0.47 9.63 11.86 492262 C E.N.M.R. TEL COOP. INC.-NM -3.69 -0.81 -2.90 -25.41 492263 C LA JICARITA RURAL TEL. COOP. INC. 0.27 -0.09 0.35 -2.26 492264 C LEACO RURAL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.30 -3.29 3.71 0.13 492265 C TULAROSA BASIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 5.77 -2.18 8.13 10.40 492268 C WESTERN NEW MEXICO TEL. CO., INC. 4.06 0.11 3.94 3.89 492270
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington 8.85 22.88 8.86 23.06 8.84 23.28 17.17 14.93 19.02 41.10 18.32 27.28 West Virginia 8.99 - 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 19.71 - 19.14 - 18.44 - Wisconsin 7.83 9.65 7.62 10.07 7.86 12.92 32.28 52.00 26.70 20.50 25.14 15.00 Wyoming 9.76 22.21 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 19.25 22.45 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75 6.73 12.55 351294 A SCRANTON TEL. CO. 2.29 -6.01 8.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 260 Citizens 6.12 6.41 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,617 129 419 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 194 11 40 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 8,725 1,232 3,137 SBC 4.95 4.84 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 4,367 14,659 Sprint 5.75 5.69 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 5,211 587 1,603 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.77 355 49 84 Verizon 6.31 6.34 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.07 28,071 4,686 13,832 Price-cap Carriers 5.85 5.83 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 83,296 12,694 39,243 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,844 NA 2,123 All Price-caps Carriers and NECA 5.92 5.83 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 93,140 12,694 41,366 * Data reflect only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09 - Washington 8.85 23.06 8.80 23.29 8.84 23.56 19.02 41.10 18.46 27.30 18.64 30.22 West Virginia 9.54 - 9.61 16.58 9.63 - 19.14 - 18.44 - 18.46 - Wisconsin 7.62 10.07 7.86 13.12 7.84 19.94 26.64 20.50 25.14 12.92 24.06 12.51 Wyoming 8.93 21.46 9.91 19.83 9.96 19.05 24.26 79.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • COMPANY 1.10 -4.63 6.01 4.76 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • C DELL TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. - TX 18.26 -2.61 21.43 21.60 442068 C EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. -1.35 -3.36 2.08 -3.37 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.99 -5.49 3.70 -1.42 442070 C ETEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC. 3.32 -2.29 5.74 6.39 442071 C FIVE AREA TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. -3.67 -3.38 -0.31 -16.44 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND CO. -9.12 -0.55 -8.63 -54.93 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 28.54 28.57 -0.02 28.40 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.60 -7.44 -3.42 -14.19 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX 1.22 -6.01 7.70 26.61 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 3.80 2.29 1.48 0.80 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. 0.64 -3.79 4.60 6.68 442086 C HILL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -8.12 13.90 10.41 280462 C MOUND BAYOU TEL. & COMM., INC. 28.63 -4.93 35.31 239.61 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -5.84 -2.84 -3.09 -9.10 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. -2.75 -5.91 3.36 -22.12 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -5.67 -4.66 -1.07 -12.15 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -5.64 -6.28 0.68 -37.13 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.61 -9.12 2.77 -27.87 MISSOURI TOTAL 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.52 -5.05 11.13 27.77 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 1.22 -4.82 6.34 12.76 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -19.54 -4.88 -15.41 -50.32 421472 C FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS MISSOURI, INC. -8.19 -2.64 -5.70 -22.51 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO -13.74 -3.51 -10.60 -47.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • -100.00 220365 C GLENWOOD TEL CO 1.83 -9.30 12.27 5.11 220368 C HART TEL CO -19.55 -6.56 -13.91 -76.20 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMM -14.82 -5.44 -9.92 -46.36 220371 C KNOLOGY - VALLEY 2.99 -12.02 17.06 0.00 220375 C NELSON-BALL GROUND -6.28 -3.78 -2.59 -61.58 220376 C PEMBROKE TEL CO 14.71 -5.62 21.54 37.41 220377 C PINELAND TEL COOP 4.02 -4.67 9.12 5.25 220378 C PLANTERS RURAL COOP 16.25 -7.79 26.08 44.20 220379 C PLANT TEL. CO. -7.26 -7.89 0.68 -24.77 220380 A PROGRESSIVE RURAL 0.61 -4.60 5.47 -33.86 220381 C PUBLIC SERVICE TEL 0.48 -6.16 7.08 -0.47 220382 C RINGGOLD TEL CO -4.49 -7.84 3.64 -34.02 220386 C WINDSTREAM STANDARD -10.57 -2.19 -8.57 0.00 220387 A FRONTIER GEORGIA LLC 3.72 -6.89
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • -100.00 220365 C GLENWOOD TEL CO 1.83 -9.30 12.27 5.11 220368 C HART TEL CO -19.55 -6.56 -13.91 -76.20 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMM -14.82 -5.44 -9.92 -46.36 220371 C KNOLOGY - VALLEY 2.99 -12.02 17.06 0.00 220375 C NELSON-BALL GROUND -6.28 -3.78 -2.59 -61.58 220376 C PEMBROKE TEL CO 14.71 -5.62 21.54 37.41 220377 C PINELAND TEL COOP 4.02 -4.67 9.12 5.25 220378 C PLANTERS RURAL COOP 16.25 -7.79 26.08 44.20 220379 C PLANT TEL. CO. -7.26 -7.89 0.68 -24.77 220380 A PROGRESSIVE RURAL 0.61 -4.60 5.47 -33.86 220381 C PUBLIC SERVICE TEL 0.48 -6.16 7.08 -0.47 220382 C RINGGOLD TEL CO -4.49 -7.84 3.64 -34.02 220386 C WINDSTREAM STANDARD -10.57 -2.19 -8.57 0.00 220387 A FRONTIER GEORGIA LLC 3.72 -6.89
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • EELs - Voice Grade 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 10.00 tbd 0.00 tbd 0.00 tbdab e 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing 2.01 2.22 2.48 2.09 2.65 1.88 2.61 1.59 2.08 1.87 16 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 6.24 n/a 5.51 n/a 6.09 n/a 5.10 n/a 5.39 8.00 16 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 9.12 5.09 8.15 9.28 9.48 6.15 10.5411.35 11.7612.21 16 UNE Platform Special Port/8db and 5.5db Loop 50.00 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • accordance with international aeronautical standards. * * * * * 5.328B The use of the bands 1164-1300 MHz, 1559-1610 MHz and 5010-5030 MHz by systems and networks in the radionavigation-satellite service for which complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, is received by the Radiocommunication Bureau after 1 January 2005 is subject to the application of the provisions of Nos. 9.12, 9.12A and 9.13. Resolution 610 (WRC-03) shall also apply. * * * * * UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES * * * * * US31 The frequencies 122.700, 122.725, 122.750, 122.800, 122.950, 122.975, 123.000, 123.050 and 123.075 MHz may be assigned to aeronautical advisory stations. In addition, at landing areas having a part-time or no airdrome control tower or FAA flight
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the Regions 1 and 3 Plan in Appendix 30. 5.487A Additional allocation: in Region 1, the band 11.7-12.5 GHz, in Region 2, the band 12.2-12.7 GHz and, in Region 3, the band 11.7-12.2 GHz, are also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis, limited to non-geostationary systems and subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.418AB In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.418AA, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • system, for angles of arrival greater than 35°. 5.417B In Korea (Rep. of) and Japan, use of the band 2605-2630 MHz by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the broadcasting-satellite service (sound), pursuant to No. 5.417A, for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, has been received after 4 July 2003, is subject to the application of the provisions of No. 9.12A, in respect of geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received after 4 July 2003, and No. 22.2 does not apply. No. 22.2 shall continue to apply with respect to geostationary-satellite networks for which complete Appendix 4 coordination information, or notification information, is considered to have been received before 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • use of the band 17.3-17.8 GHz in Region 2 by feeder links for the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 12.2-12.7 GHz, see Article 11. The use of the bands 17.3-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Regions 1 and 3 and 17.8-18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) in Region 2 by non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.12 for coordination with other non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service. Non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service shall not claim protection from geostationary-satellite networks in the fixed-satellite service operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations, irrespective of the dates of receipt by the Bureau of the complete coordination or notification information, as appropriate, for the non-geostationary-satellite systems in the fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
  • 8. 26 "HSPA to LTE-Advanced: 3GPP Broadband Evolution to IMT-Advanced (4G)," Rysavy Research/3G Americas, September 2009. 27 Round-trip latencies do not include public Internet latencies. Illustrative latencies for 2G/3G/4G networks; latencies for two networks using the same technology can vary depending on network configuration, infra- structure vendor optimizations, etc. 28 CITI BROADBAND REPORT AT 8. 29 See, for example, Figure 9.12 in "LTE for UMTS - OFD- MA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access," Harri Holma and Antti Toskala (Eds); and "LS on LTE performance verification work" at http://www.3gpp.org/FTP/tsg_ran/ WG1_RL1/TSGR1_49/Docs/ R1-072580.zip. 30 In terms of cell radius, this gain translates to nearly a three-fold improvement in coverage. 31 See also Clearwire Ex-Parte filing, "Mobile broadband link budget example ­ for FCC", GN
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM.167 73. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2004 Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 13.29%12.35%17.08% - - - 13.47% 1ACS of Anchorage 19.12 12.54 15.48 32.96% (115.83)% 44.20%37.92 2Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Company 10.31 12.35 (8.85) 40.29 9.12 3ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 11.37 12.54 5.40 11.02 8,149.68 10.80 11.05 4ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 13.36 12.54 11.75 7.64 1,701.98 24.52 18.16 5ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.09 12.54 (0.39) 8.22 263.58 6.86 7.69 6ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 13.48 12.54 17.47 9.32 7,704.57 10.63 10.72 7ALLTEL Georgia Properties 9.92 12.54 3.34 9.14 1,459.96 11.79 10.51 8ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 7.79 12.54 1.03 10.12 0.00 11.76 10.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Long Distance Toll Providers......................................................................................................9-13 Chart 9.2 Market Shares of Three Largest Long Distance Toll Providers Including ILECs, CLECs and Wireless Carriers...............................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Chart 9.3 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Chart 9.4 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-16 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service.........................................................9-18 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-20 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs Reporting to the Commission.............................................................................10-4 Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Chart 11.1 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-5 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Long Distance Carriers and Local Exchange Carriers............9-11 Table 9.7 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - Long Distance Carriers Only.......................................................................................................9-12 Table 9.8 Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers.....................................................................................................9-13 Table 9.9 Residential Market Shares...................................................................................9-14 Table 9.10 Residential Market Share by Region: 2002........................................................9-15 Table 9.11 Regional Bell Operating Companies' Applications To Provide In-Region InterLATA Service........................................................9-17 Table 9.12 Section 271 Approvals.........................................................................................9-19 Minutes................................................................................................................10-1 Table 10.1 Dial Equipment Minutes......................................................................................10-3 Table 10.2 Line Usage per Day.............................................................................................10-4 Table 10.3 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 Chart 10.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes....................................................................10-5 iii Mobile Wireless Service.....................................................................................11-1 Table 11.1 Measures of Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers........................................11-3 Table 11.2 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers............................................................11-4 Table 11.3 Mobile Wireless Telephone Service: Industry Survey Results.........................11-5 Table 11.4 Distribution of Residential Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 288 Citizens 5.73 6.42 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.63 1,658 180 511 Iowa Telecomm 6.00 7.00 9.10 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 224 17 46 Qwest 5.73 6.29 6.84 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 10,228 1,873 4,720 SBC 4.93 4.86 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,560 6,781 17,506 Sprint 5.50 5.82 7.27 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 5,316 847 1,829 Valor 6.00 7.00 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.07 2.13 339 55 92 Verizon 5.96 6.38 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.14 33,123 6,690 15,982 Price Caps 5.58 5.88 6.33 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.08 97,308 19,040 47,243 NECA 6.00 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 11,510 NA 2,066 All Price Caps and NECA $5.62 $5.88 $6.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.08 108,818 19,040 49,309 * N/A: not available
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1.36 173 Delaware 321,037 58,769 161,056 5.50 6.42 6.54 38 0.36 46 Dist. of Columbia 220,044 46,163 577,063 3.82 3.82 3.82 39 0.36 46 Florida 6,548,380 1,075,953 2,548,165 5.50 6.99 8.18 773 7.20 918 Georgia 2,631,495 375,538 1,249,893 5.50 6.98 8.09 326 3.04 388 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 411,463 58,359 198,221 5.50 7.00 9.12 54 0.50 64 Idaho 465,660 54,241 194,445 5.50 6.52 7.93 53 0.50 64 Illinois 3,715,662 652,124 2,355,500 4.62 4.78 5.16 389 3.63 462 Indiana 2,219,190 240,207 942,922 5.34 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 0.0 137.3 0.0 NA: Not available Table 9.3 (b) Switch Downtime Causes Other Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Installations: Residential 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 Other Mandatory Payments 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Monthly Access Lines** (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineResidentialNon-PrimaryMultilineCentrexResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline and ResidentialBusiness and ResidentialBusiness and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.58 4.10 -6.41 -15.45 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.35 0.00 6.35 32.84 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 12.31 -2.87 15.62 24.24 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 35.71 2.49 32.42 51.12 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.49 2.05 -0.55 -6.40 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 8.24 5.25 2.84 9.12 472416 C GTE NORTHWEST INC. - ID -3.49 3.19 -6.47 -36.48 3 - 194 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IDAHO (CONT.) 472423 C INLAND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 7.52 3.81 3.58 19.44 3 - 187 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* GEORGIA (CONT.) 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 9.12 9.03 0.08 12.73 220362 C FRONTIER COMM. OF FAIRMOUNT, INC. 33.88 4.11 28.59 71.96 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 13.17 3.35 9.50 INFINITE 220365 A GLENWOOD TEL. CO. 12.28 2.29 9.76 285.70 220368 C HART TEL. CO. 2.68 1.17 1.49 25.90 220369 C COMSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.28 5.70 -7.55 -12.47 220371 C INTERSTATE TEL. CO. 6.98 5.28 1.61 0.00 220375
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • we find that the single-entry and aggregate EPFD limits we are adopting also define the level of acceptable interference from a NGSO FSS system into a GSO FSS system under our rules, as proposed in the NPRM. Further, we note that WRC-2000 modified footnotes S5.441 and S5.484A to indicate that NGSO FSS applications are subject to standard ITU coordination under S9.12 with other NGSO FSS systems. These footnotes also state that NGSO FSS systems shall not claim protection from GSO systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations and that NGSO FSS systems shall operate in such a way that any unacceptable interference that may occur during their operations shall be rapidly eliminated. We find that the modifications to footnotes
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12 $ 10.78 $ 12.44 $ Subscribers 50.0% 9.99 $ 13.98 $ 17.98 $ 21.98 $ 25.97 $ 29.97 $ On-Line 80.0% 15.83 $ 22.16 $ 28.50 $ 34.83 $ 41.16 $ 47.50 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • PARENT SECTION 9.01. Best Efforts.........................................91 SECTION 9.02. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement.............92 SECTION 9.03. Public Announcements................................93 SECTION 9.04. Further Assurances...................................93 SECTION 9.05. Access to Information.................................94 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iv SECTION 9.06. Tax-free Transactions.................................94 SECTION 9.07. Affiliates...........................................94 SECTION 9.08. Governance and Other Matters.........................95 SECTION 9.09. Notices of Certain Events..............................95 SECTION 9.10. Section 16 Matters...................................96 SECTION 9.11. Director and Officer Liability...........................96 SECTION 9.12. Listing of Stock......................................97 SECTION 9.13. Employee Matters....................................98 SECTION 9.14. Employment Agreements..............................100 SECTION 9.15. Interim Finance Committee...........................100 SECTION 9.16. TOPRS............................................101 SECTION 9.17. Consideration......................................102 SECTION 9.18. QUIPS............................................102 SECTION 9.19. Index Stock........................................105 SECTION 9.20. Use of Name and Logo...............................105 SECTION 9.21. Exchange Agreement.................................106 SECTION 9.22. Significant Excepted Transactions......................107 SECTION 9.23. Comcast's AT&T Stock...............................108 ARTICLE 10 CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS SECTION 10.01. Conditions to