FCC Web Documents citing 6.20
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1557A1.txt
- following attributable equity and voting interests in GLP: Interest Holder Equity Interests (%) Voting Interests (%) Loral Space 40.24 56.05 GTL 42.45 42.45 DACOM Corporation 00.14 00.14 Hyundai Corporation 00.28 00.28 Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. 01.94 01.94 San Giorgio S.p.A. 00.92 00.92 TeleSat Limited 01.42 01.42 Vodafone Satellite Service, Ltd. 03.20 03.78 TE.SA.M 03.20 03.78 Daimler-Chrysler Aerospace 01.85 06.88 AXA 02.49 06.20 Alenia ESpace 00.47 01.73 Home Market Determination for GLP's Foreign Investors As discussed above, there is a rebuttable presumption that foreign investment by entities having their ``home markets'' in WTO Member countries raises no competitive concerns. After calculating the amount of attributable, indirect foreign equity and voting interests, we determine whether these foreign interests properly are ascribed to individuals or
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A3.txt
- 1000 512.0 6670392 37024.7 6746640 36659.3 CA SAN FRANCISCO KTSF 37511 26 2510.0 421. 27 95.2 421.0 5514800 14580.5 5751447 15749.7 CA SAN JOSE KICU-TV 34564 36 4070.0 686. 52 251. 686.0 5637343 14445.2 5881264 15751.1 CA SAN JOSE KKPX 22644 65 3090.0 812. 41 79.2 812.0 4852331 15665.1 5000471 16876.6 CA SAN JOSE KNTV 35280 11 79.40 844. 12 6.20 844.0 5515305 29451.7 5781160 31704.6 CA SAN JOSE KSTS 64987 48 4370.0 631. 49 195. 631.0 5338540 12994.2 5497014 14475.3 CA SAN JOSE KTEH 35663 54 661.00 585. 50 50.0 585.0 4809067 7475.2 4823501 7700.9 CA SAN LUIS OBISPO KSBY 19654 06 100.00 543. 15 1000 543.0 482162 41684.3 444260 40249.9 CA SAN LUIS OBISPO KTAS 12930 33 60.30 440.
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
- the administration concerned any clarification required and information not provided. 6.16. Upon receipt of a complete (Appendix 4) notice relating to the proposed assignment under § 6.14, the Bureau shall determine whether the this Appendix 4 submission is identical to the initial notice. If this is the case, the submission under § 6.14 will be treated as specified in § 6.20. However, if, in seeking agreement, an administration modifies its initial notice, the Bureau shall conduct the examination described in § 6.17 through § 6.19. 6.17. The Bureau shall examine the Appendix 4 information received under § 6.14 with respect to its conformity to the Table of Frequency Allocations and the other provisions of these Regulations, except those provisions relating to
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-448A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-448A2.txt
- (mV/m) 1 0.26 11/13/06 1520 475 2 0.50 11/13/06 1525 190 3 0.75 11/13/06 1254 135 4 1.00 11/13/06 1257 125 5 1.27 11/13/06 1301 100 6 1.50 11/13/06 1304 74.0 7 1.79 11/13/06 1308 50.0 8 2.21 11/13/06 1312 25.0 9 2.77 11/13/06 1314 25.0 10 4.00 11/13/06 1317 14.0 11 6.00 11/13/06 1321 8.20 12 7.02 11/13/06 1325 6.20 13 9.00 11/13/06 1328 3.50 14 11.50 11/13/06 1332 2.10 15 13.00 11/13/06 1335 1.60 16 14.20 11/13/06 1338 1.30 Figure 3 Sheet 4 of 7 Valcom AM Broadcast Antenna (85 foot with Valcosphere) Operating Frequency: 1390 kHz 160 Degree Radial Point Distance Time Field Strength Desig. (km) Date (local) (mV/m) 1 0.25 11/1/06 1506 410 2 0.50 11/1/06 1509
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.txt
- Title: 6.5 General Obligations. 6.7 Product design, development and evaluation. 6.9 Information pass through. 6.11 Information, documentation, and training. SUBPART D-ENFORCEMENT Brief Description, Need and Legal Basis: See Subpart A above. Section Number and Title: 6.15 Generally. 6.16 Informal or formal complaints. 6.17 Informal complaints; form and content. 6.18 Procedure; designation of agents for service. 6.19 Answers to informal complaints. 6.20 Review and disposition of informal complaints. 6.21 Formal complaints, applicability of 1.720 through 1.736 of this chapter. 6.22 Formal complaints based on unsatisfied informal complaints. 6.23 Actions by the Commission on its own motion. PART 7-ACCESS TO VOICEMAIL AND INTERACTIVE MENU SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT BY PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES SUBPART A-SCOPE-WHO MUST COMPLY WITH THESE RULES? Brief Description: Part 7 of
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
- 1986 3,917 482 3,891 0.99 8.07 390 42 175 1987 4,480 570 4,559 1.02 8.00 360 35 191 1988 5,190 687 5,507 1.06 8.02 310 30 194 1989 6,109 835 6,517 1.07 7.80 243 27 208 1990 7,215 984 7,626 1.06 7.75 196 24 201 1991 8,986 1,371 9,096 1.01 6.63 200 15 303 $23 1992 10,156 1,643 10,179 1.00 6.20 155 16 313 24 1993 11,393 1,926 11,353 1.00 5.89 135 12 365 23 1994 13,393 2,313 12,255 0.92 5.30 123 12 432 55 1995 15,837 2,821 13,990 0.88 4.96 119 6 432 55 1996 19,119 3,485 14,079 0.74 4.04 119 5 649 26 1997 22,611 4,233 15,135 0.67 3.58 110 4 840 36 1998 24,026 4,439 14,154 0.59 3.19
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225742A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225742A1.txt
- 7 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) REMOTE 8 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) REMOTE 9 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) Application for Authority Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY-IHETS E920219 SES-LIC-20020815-01362E Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service This application is a request to reinstate the expired Ku-band Satellite Earth Station license. Page 13 of 24 39 ° 46 ' 6.20 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 IUPUI INDIANAPOLIS CAMPUS, MARION, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 86 ° 10 ' 25.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: RADIATION SYS. INC. 1 7 meters ANTENNA ID: 700KS 80.30 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 25M0F8F 80.30 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 4M00G7F ANALOG VIDEO 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 25M0F8F DIGITAL VIDEO 11700.0000 - 12200.0000
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227172A1.txt
- Gulf Link Communications, Inc. WCTV LICENSEE CORP. WCTV LICENSEE CORP. E880015 SES-ASG-20021001-01701E Application for Authority 10/08/2002 - 10/08/2017 Date Effective: 10/08/2002 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY-IHETS E920219 SES-LIC-20020815-01362E Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service This application is a request to reinstate the expired Ku-band Satellite Earth Station license. 39 ° 46 ' 6.20 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 IUPUI INDIANAPOLIS CAMPUS, MARION, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 86 ° 10 ' 25.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: RADIATION SYS. INC. 1 7 meters ANTENNA ID: 700KS 80.30 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 25M0F8F 73.90 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 4M00G7F ANALOG VIDEO 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 25M0F8F DIGITAL VIDEO 11700.0000 - 12200.0000
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243941A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243941A1.txt
- -1 19 'E.L -125 'E.L 6' 0.45 m 34.0 dBi 12.2 GHz BO-1 21 3 EIRP Topo with Mispointlng (L. Station Keeping (7 WW) 54.06 50.45 52.59 54.16 52.00 53.08 53.31 54.32 52.72 55.15 54.08 52.00 52.22 54.67 53.26 54.29 51.18 51.67 52.00 54.10 5180 6.21 5.83 5.82 6.17 5.75 6.11 5.85 5.66 5.98 6.12 6.03 5.95 6.00 5.88 5.98 6.20 6.09 6.15 5.87 Req. Single Entry CII (dB) 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 New Entrant Max. ElRP WW) 53.82 50.95 52.59 53.96 52.42 52.76 53.64 54.17 52.63 55.24 54.43 52.18 52 25 54.70 83.17 54.38 51.67 51.95 52.40 53.99 Table 2 : 6' spacing analysis
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245292A1.txt
- ANTENNA SYSTEMS 1 3.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 3.8 METER PF 0.00 dBW DIGITAL AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 10M3G7W 0.00 dBW DIGITAL BROADCAST AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 30K0F1D Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) DAVIDSON COLLEGE E040145 SES-REG-20040312-00372E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Registration Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 35 ° 30 ' 6.20 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 215 N. MAIN STREET (WDAV-FM), MECKLENBURG, DAVIDSON, NC 80 ° 50 ' 54.80 " W LONG. LOCATION: PRODELIN CORPORATION 1 3.7 meters ANTENNA ID: 136-750 0.00 dBW DIGITAL BROADCAST AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 30K0F1D 0.00 dBW DIGITAL AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 10M3G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT)
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246524A1.txt
- PF 0.00 dBW DIGITAL AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 10M3G7W 0.00 dBW DIGITAL BROADCAST AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 30K0F1D Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) DAVIDSON COLLEGE E040145 SES-REG-20040312-00372E Date Effective: 04/27/2004 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 03/12/2004 - 03/12/2019 Registration Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 35 ° 30 ' 6.20 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 215 N. MAIN STREET (WDAV-FM), MECKLENBURG, DAVIDSON, NC 80 ° 50 ' 54.80 " W LONG. LOCATION: PRODELIN CORPORATION 1 3.7 meters ANTENNA ID: 136-750 0.00 dBW DIGITAL BROADCAST AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 30K0F1D Page 13 of 15 0.00 dBW DIGITAL AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 10M3G7W Points of Communication: 1
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
- 7.87 118 1.13 140 Louisiana 1,387,322 154,053 548,411 6.25 7.00 7.62 167 1.60 198 Maine 446,308 35,703 160,985 6.23 6.43 7.13 50 0.48 59 Maryland 1,832,011 345,209 1,027,670 5.65 5.65 5.65 217 2.08 257 Massachusetts 2,035,084 285,472 1,067,862 6.22 6.43 6.68 259 2.49 308 Michigan 2,527,940 197,379 1,583,070 5.48 5.56 5.97 293 2.80 347 Minnesota 1,581,339 144,846 682,315 5.30 5.22 6.20 160 1.54 190 Mississippi 814,970 54,933 296,356 6.25 7.00 7.61 93 0.89 110 Missouri 1,953,586 190,534 772,852 5.51 5.57 6.30 200 1.92 237 Montana 346,833 21,857 141,523 6.25 7.00 9.20 43 0.42 52 Nebraska 455,686 28,678 266,720 5.34 5.26 6.20 51 0.49 60 Nevada 796,389 105,710 396,494 4.60 4.59 5.47 76 0.73 90 New Hampshire 491,737 55,863 161,847 6.22 6.43
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
- 7.87 118 1.13 140 Louisiana 1,387,322 154,053 548,411 6.25 7.00 7.62 167 1.60 198 Maine 446,308 35,703 160,985 6.23 6.43 7.13 50 0.48 59 Maryland 1,832,011 345,209 1,027,670 5.65 5.65 5.65 217 2.08 257 Massachusetts 2,035,084 285,472 1,067,862 6.22 6.43 6.68 259 2.49 308 Michigan 2,527,940 197,379 1,583,070 5.48 5.56 5.97 293 2.80 347 Minnesota 1,581,339 144,846 682,315 5.30 5.22 6.20 160 1.54 190 Mississippi 814,970 54,933 296,356 6.25 7.00 7.61 93 0.89 110 Missouri 1,953,586 190,534 772,852 5.51 5.57 6.30 200 1.92 237 Montana 346,833 21,857 141,523 6.25 7.00 9.20 43 0.42 52 Nebraska 455,686 28,678 266,720 5.34 5.26 6.20 51 0.49 60 Nevada 796,389 105,710 396,494 4.60 4.59 5.47 76 0.73 90 New Hampshire 491,737 55,863 161,847 6.22 6.43
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
- 3.50 3.19 0.00 1.75 1.60 5.27 10.00 8.80 5.27 13.50 11.99 Utah 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.50 13.50 13.50 Vermont 8.20 8.25 8.21 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.95 10.00 9.96 13.45 13.50 13.46 Virginia 7.16 8.25 7.62 1.76 3.50 3.36 0.88 1.75 1.68 8.04 10.00 9.30 9.80 13.50 12.66 Washington 6.20 8.25 7.93 0.00 3.50 1.90 0.00 1.75 0.95 6.20 10.00 8.88 6.20 13.50 10.78 West Virginia 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.64 0.00 1.75 1.32 8.25 10.00 9.57 8.25 13.50 12.20 Wisconsin 6.82 8.25 7.24 0.00 3.50 1.23 0.00 1.75 0.61 6.82 10.00 7.85 6.82 13.50 9.08 Wyoming 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
- TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. 1.08 -1.74 2.87 -4.05 442072 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF FORT BEND (FORT BEND) 10.17 -2.53 13.03 57.42 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 19.75 -2.70 23.08 20.88 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -5.03 -2.53 -2.57 -7.95 442080 C GTE-SW DBA VERIZON SW INC.-TX -4.06 -3.17 -0.92 0.00 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL CO-OP. INC. 7.20 0.94 6.20 10.59 442084 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS INC. -1.32 -2.66 1.37 -8.01 442086 C HILL COUNTRY TELEPHONE CO-OP. INC. 6.99 1.31 5.60 10.37 442090 C ALENCO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 5.40 -0.09 5.50 5.70 442091 C ETS TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 3.49 17.06 -11.60 -9.96 442093 C INDUSTRY TELEPHONE COMPANY -0.23 -1.47 1.26 -4.18 442097 C KERRVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY -6.81 -0.52 -6.33
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265170A1.txt
- 2005 ILECs and CLECs Cellular/PCS Pooled Thousands-Total Thousands-Percent of total blocksPooled Thousands-Total Thousands-Percent of total blocks State blocks blocks reported1 that are pooled blocks blocks reported1 that are pooled Alabama 308 9,846 3.13 685 6,319 10.84 Alaska 0 0 NM 8 10 80.00 Arizona 610 11,614 5.25 956 5,737 16.66 Arkansas 359 5,203 6.90 180 3,636 4.95 California 6,313 101,829 6.20 8,244 37,195 22.16 Colorado 569 12,319 4.62 464 4,989 9.30 Connecticut 728 10,880 6.69 658 3,233 20.35 Delaware 257 2,920 8.80 178 830 21.45 District of Columbia 146 3,962 3.69 286 1,100 26.00 Florida 2,853 41,725 6.84 3,606 20,782 17.35 Georgia 855 22,184 3.85 1,210 10,286 11.76 Guam 0 0 NM 0 0 NM Hawaii 54 3,042 1.78 171 1,313
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268594A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268594A1.txt
- 350KG7W Digital Voice and Data 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 700KG7W Points of Communication: STH2 - PERMITTED LIST - () STH2 - PERMITTED LIST - () E970010 SES-RWL-20061113-01998E Date Effective: 11/20/2006 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 12/20/2006 - 12/20/2021 Renewal NorthStar Studios, Inc. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, International Fixed Satellite Service 36 ° 14 ' 6.20 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 3201 NORTH DICKERSON ROAD, NASHVILLE, TN 86 ° 45 ' 20.40 " W LONG. LOCATION: VERTEX 1 9 meters ANTENNA ID: 9.0 KPC 82.50 dBW ANALOG 5850.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F8W 82.50 dBW ANALOG 5850.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3W 82.50 dBW DIGITAL 5850.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7W 82.50 dBW DIGITAL 5850.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
- Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
- Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
- LLC 5.22 -5.01 10.78 50.00 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA 1.68 0.34 1.33 -9.81 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. -3.96 -2.94 -1.05 -19.80 250305 C MON-CRE TEL. COOP. INC. -3.68 -4.16 0.51 -6.08 250306 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF ALABAMA, LLC -3.68 -1.85 -1.86 -23.11 250307 C MOUNDVILLE TEL. CO. -1.07 -7.90 7.41 2.24 250308 C NEW HOPE TEL. COOP., INC.-AL -6.20 -2.37 -3.93 -15.55 250311 A OAKMAN TEL. CO., INC. 1.69 -4.36 6.33 8.83 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 1.98 -2.03 4.09 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 7.46 -1.62 9.22 17.66 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 21.80 0.11 21.67 43.91 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.75 -1.13 8.98 10.45 250317 C ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 10.16 -0.99 11.26 39.26
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.txt
- and the first eight tables present summaries of the available information. Tables 6.9 through 6.14 present more detailed information. In Tables 6.9 through 6.13, only the annual averages are included for the years 1984 through 2003. March, July, and November data for those years are available in previous Monitoring Reports in CC Docket Nos. 87-339 or 98-202. Tables 6.15 through 6.20 provide information necessary to determine the statistical significance of changes in the penetration rates over time. Table 6.1 summarizes the CPS telephone penetration data for the United States, combining information on the number of households with the penetration rates. Chart 6.1 graphically depicts the nationwide penetration rates for households over time using annual average CPS data. Table 6.2 shows the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
- Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics .................................................................. Table 6.3
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
- Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics .................................................................. Table 6.3
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
- 6.72 7.55 146 1.54 177 South Dakota 142,090 5,715 106,557 6.46 6.43 7.63 21 0.22 26 Tennessee 1,836,933 129,636 583,256 6.38 6.61 7.05 200 2.12 243 Texas 5,445,861 712,218 2,793,989 5.56 5.61 6.21 619 6.54 751 Utah 562,978 60,050 268,646 6.32 6.32 6.56 68 0.72 83 Vermont 228,633 16,326 92,605 6.42 6.40 6.85 26 0.28 32 Virginia 2,117,694 225,999 1,195,243 6.20 6.27 6.75 271 2.87 329 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 1,877,742 212,216 757,030 6.07 6.17 6.99 216 2.28 262 West Virginia 640,711 21,656 162,401 6.50 7.00 8.46 68 0.72 83 Wisconsin 1,507,675 97,443 754,393 5.66 5.41 6.55 168 1.77 204 Wyoming 145,336 7,780 91,117 6.50 7.00 9.20 22 0.23 27 Total 3/ 78,620,196
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
- 165 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* TOTAL HAWAII -3.37 -4.94 1.65 6.27 623021 C SANDWICH ISLES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 6.65 13.70 -6.20 6.27 623100 C HAWAIIAN TELCOM, INC. -4.16 -4.97 0.85 0.00 TOTAL IDAHO 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 472213 C ALBION TEL. CO. D/B/A ATC COMMUNICATIONS 24.52 0.08 24.42 44.78 472215 C CAMBRIDGE TEL. CO.,INC.-ID -8.10 1.32 -9.30 -25.87 472218 C CUSTER TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 0.92 -0.18 1.10 0.08 472220 C FILER MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID -3.86 -2.50 -1.39 -19.49 472221
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.txt
- and the first eight tables present summaries of the available information. Tables 6.9 through 6.14 present more detailed information. In Tables 6.9 through 6.13, only the annual averages are included for the years 1984 through 2003. March, July, and November data for those years are available in previous Monitoring Reports in CC Docket Nos. 87-339 or 98-202. Tables 6.15 through 6.20 provide information necessary to determine the statistical significance of changes in the penetration rates over time. Table 6.1 summarizes the CPS telephone penetration data for the United States, combining information on the number of households with the penetration rates. Chart 6.1 graphically depicts the nationwide penetration rates for households over time using annual average CPS data. Table 6.2 shows the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
- Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics .................................................................. Table 6.3
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
- Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics .................................................................. Table 6.3
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
- 1.48 -1.28 2.79 1.06 351202 A HOSPERS TEL. EXCHANGE, INC. -0.08 0.27 -0.35 -17.78 351203 A HUBBARD COOP. TEL. ASSN. 1.00 1.26 -0.25 -17.01 351205 A HUXLEY COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -3.37 -3.70 0.34 -18.25 351206 A IAMO TEL. CO.-IA 1.37 -3.16 4.67 3.56 351209 A INTERSTATE 35 TEL. CO. DBA INTERSTATE COMM. 0.79 -2.26 3.12 1.15 351212 A JEFFERSON TEL. CO.-IA 6.20 -1.97 8.33 0.00 351213 A JORDAN SOLDIER VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.87 -0.59 3.48 3.72 351213A A JORDAN SOLDIER VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.79 -3.62 4.58 3.10 351214 C KALONA COOP. TEL. CO. 0.16 0.67 -0.50 -8.04 351217 A KEYSTONE FRMS. COOP. TEL. CO. 4.36 1.15 3.18 4.70 351220 A LA PORTE CITY TEL. CO. -3.53 -4.12 0.61 -17.58 351222 A LA
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A8.pdf
- and the first eight tables present summaries of the available information. Tables 6.9 through 6.14 present more detailed information. In Tables 6.9 through 6.13, only the annual averages are included for the years 1984 through 2005. March, July, and November data for those years are available in previous Monitoring Reports in CC Docket Nos. 87-339 or 98-202. Tables 6.15 through 6.20 provide information necessary to determine the statistical significance of changes in the penetration rates over time. Table 6.1 summarizes the CPS telephone penetration data for the United States, combining information on the number of households with the penetration rates. Chart 6.1 graphically depicts the nationwide penetration rates for households over time using annual average CPS data. Table 6.2 shows the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
- Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics .................................................................. Table 6.3
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
- Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics .................................................................. Table 6.3
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.txt
- and the first eight tables present summaries of the available information. Tables 6.9 through 6.14 present more detailed information. In Tables 6.9 through 6.13, only the annual averages are included for the years 1984 through 2006. March, July, and November data for those years are available in previous Monitoring Reports in CC Docket Nos. 87-339 or 98-202. Tables 6.15 through 6.20 provide information necessary to determine the statistical significance of changes in the penetration rates over time. Table 6.1 summarizes the CPS telephone penetration data for the United States, combining information on the number of households with the penetration rates. Chart 6.1 graphically depicts the nationwide penetration rates for households over time using annual average CPS data. Table 6.2 shows the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
- 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.05 07/01/05 06/30/06 5.92 6.26 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.04 07/01/06 06/30/07 5.91 6.27 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 07/01/07 06/30/08 5.93 6.30 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.05 07/01/08 06/30/09 5.90 6.27 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.05 07/01/09 06/30/10 5.86 6.20 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 2 Prior to 1/01/1998, carriers did not charge separate subscriber line charge (SLC) rates for primary and non-primary residential lines. Therefore, the residential and single-line business average SLCs reported prior to 1/01/1998 include all residential SLC charges. The average residential and single-line business SLC rate as of 1/01/98 excludes non-primary residential SLCs.
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
- Consolidated 6.50 6.50 9.20 0.00 0.00 136 6 55 FairPoint 6.23 6.23 6.23 0.00 0.00 835 54 320 Frontier 6.17 6.53 9.20 3.87 0.74 1,288 58 436 Hawaiin Telecom 6.50 7.00 8.15 0.00 0.00 365 35 90 Iowa Telecom 5.89 5.89 8.09 0.00 0.00 155 5 43 Pacific Telecom Inc. 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.71 0.11 11 0 4 Qwest 5.99 6.20 6.38 0.00 0.00 6,619 636 2,731 Verizon 6.27 6.29 6.76 0.45 0.06 20,585 2,388 10,959 Windstream 6.29 6.46 7.50 0.12 1.32 1,523 224 534 Price Caps 5.83 5.75 6.11 0.19 0.04 69,205 7,358 35,260 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 4,788 NA 1,213 Price Caps and NECA $5.88 $5.75 $6.21 $0.18 $0.04 73,993 7,358 36,472 NA - Not Applicable. Source:
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
- Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - 2009 - Chart .................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation - Sample Sizes .................Table 6.20 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - 2009 - Chart .................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level - by State..........................................Table 6.8 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics ..................................................................
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.txt
- Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - 2009 - Chart .................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation - Sample Sizes .................Table 6.20 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - 2009 - Chart .................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level - by State..........................................Table 6.8 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics ..................................................................
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
- 472230 C POTLATCH TEL CO INC -10.56 -4.97 -5.88 -100.00 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL -4.51 -7.57 3.31 -27.01 472232 C DIRECT COMM-ROCKLAND -2.59 -6.46 4.13 -5.09 472233 C RURAL TEL CO - ID -5.60 -1.12 -4.53 -8.74 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL- ID -11.79 -14.87 3.62 -13.52 472416 C FRONTIER NW-ID -4.36 -9.10 5.22 0.00 472423 C INLAND TEL-ID -6.20 -1.39 -4.88 -13.46 474427 C CITIZENS-FRONTIER-ID -2.36 -6.51 4.44 -23.09 475103 C QWEST CORP-ID -4.40 -10.57 6.89 0.00 475162 C QWEST CORP-IDAHO -3.04 -8.10 5.51 0.00 TOTAL ILLINOIS -3.38 -9.19 6.41 -7.10 340976 A ADAMS TEL COOP 16.54 -4.09 21.50 68.54 340978 C ALHAMBRA-GRANTFORK 6.76 -3.60 10.75 101.32 340983 A CAMBRIDGE TEL CO -IL 2.68 -6.60 9.94 17.52 340984 C
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A6.txt
- 57.76 66,509,581 47.48 14,391,787 10.27 Guam 32,319 910,238 28.16 339,750 10.51 570,489 17.65 Hawaii 904,565 3,353,126 3.71 1,883,453 2.08 1,469,673 1.62 Idaho 248,698 5,954,061 23.94 4,901,385 19.71 1,052,675 4.23 Illinois 2,137,471 87,958,223 41.15 54,102,352 25.31 33,855,871 15.84 Indiana 1,081,431 30,487,820 28.19 25,605,805 23.68 4,882,015 4.51 Iowa 615,378 12,445,226 20.22 10,237,010 16.64 2,208,217 3.59 Kansas 571,856 18,274,043 31.96 14,731,218 25.76 3,542,825 6.20 Kentucky 586,562 33,922,543 57.83 28,653,573 48.85 5,268,971 8.98 Louisiana 821,622 41,843,051 50.93 34,537,026 42.04 7,306,025 8.89 Maine 850,686 8,391,018 9.86 5,069,091 5.96 3,321,927 3.90 Maryland 883,842 13,161,990 14.89 10,692,621 12.10 2,469,368 2.79 Massachusetts 216,521 30,985,772 143.11 21,987,513 101.55 8,998,259 41.56 Michigan 1,720,564 51,212,694 29.77 40,185,323 23.36 11,027,371 6.41 Minnesota 872,905 23,262,151 26.65 18,025,749 20.65 5,236,401 6.00 Mississippi 571,840 35,365,184 61.84
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.txt
- and the first eight tables present summaries of the available information. Tables 6.9 through 6.14 present more detailed information. In Tables 6.9 through 6.13, only the annual averages are included for the years 1984 through 2006. March, July, and November data for those years are available in previous Monitoring Reports in CC Docket Nos. 87-339 or 98-202. Tables 6.15 through 6.20 provide information necessary to determine the statistical significance of changes in the penetration rates over time. Table 6.1 summarizes the CPS telephone penetration data for the United States, combining information on the number of households with the penetration rates. Chart 6.1 graphically depicts the nationwide penetration rates for households over time using annual average CPS data. Table 6.2 shows the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
- Business Centrex ACS $6.50 NA $9.17 $0.00 $0.00 86 0 72 AT&T 5.48 5.24 5.40 0.00 0.00 27,857 2,937 16,616 América Móvil 6.50 6.50 9.20 0.00 0.00 627 1 175 CenturyLink 5.75 5.53 6.93 0.02 0.01 4,934 297 1,721 Cincinnati Bell 5.28 5.28 5.28 0.00 0.00 417 26 251 Consolidated 6.50 6.50 9.20 0.00 0.00 120 6 53 FairPoint 6.21 6.20 6.23 0.00 0.00 727 91 248 Frontier 6.39 6.89 8.83 1.79 0.25 4,207 205 1,407 Hawaiin Telecom 6.50 7.00 8.15 0.00 0.00 307 27 73 Innovative 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 0.00 43 0 16 Pacific Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.10 0.01 9 0 6 Qwest 5.97 6.09 6.29 0.00 0.00 5,854 519 2,514 Verizon 6.21 6.18 6.48 0.28 0.05 15,955
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
- 3.1 Household Telephone Penetration by Income, 1997-2011 Table 6.6 Deleted Table 6.7 Report Table 3.8 Comparison of Penetration Rates by Level of Lifeline Assistance Table 6.8 Report Table 3.9 Comparison of Penetration Rates and Level of Lifeline Assistance for States Tables 6.9 - 6.13 Deleted Table 6.14 Report Table 3.10 Household Penetration by State and Income, 2011 Tables 6.15 - 6.20Deleted Table 7.1 Report Table 4.1 Long-Term Changes for Various Price Indices Chart 7.1 Report Chart 4.1 CPI All Goods and Services and CPI Telephone Services, 1960-2010 Table 7.2 Report Table 4.2 Annual Changes in CPI Telephone Service and All Items Indices Chart 7.2 Report Chart 4.2 Annual Changes in CPI All Goods and Services and CPI Telephone Services Table 7.3
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312721A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312721A1.txt
- assignments are for administrative purposes only and do not in any way prejudice Commission action. E110167 SES-AMD-20120214-00171 E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Amendment COMCAST OF HOUSTON, LLC Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service This AMD is associated with a Pending Receive-Only Earth Station Registration file number SES-REG-20111107-01336, and was filed for supplement information requested. 29 ° 51 ' 6.20 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 8400 WEST TIDWELL (Hub, Remote1, etc), HARRIS, HOUSTON, TX 95 ° 31 ' 13.70 " W LONG. LOCATION: HUGHES 1 6 meters ANTENNA ID: 6.0 METER VIDEO AND DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F8W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E970117 SES-LIC-20120210-00163 E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Application for Authority
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313416A1.txt
- of 17 1 - ECHOSTAR 12 - (61.35 W.L.) 1 - ECHOSTAR 14 - (119 W.L.) 1 - ECHOSTAR 15 - (61.55 W.L.) 1 - ECHOSTAR 7 - (119 W.L.) E110167 SES-AMD-20120214-00171 E Date Effective: 04/02/2012 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority Amendment COMCAST OF HOUSTON, LLC Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service 29 ° 51 ' 6.20 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 8400 WEST TIDWELL (Hub, Remote1, etc), HARRIS, HOUSTON, TX 95 ° 31 ' 13.70 " W LONG. LOCATION: HUGHES 1 6 meters ANTENNA ID: 6.0 METER VIDEO AND DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F8W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E890129 SES-ASG-20120120-00083 E Date Effective: 04/03/2012 TO: No. of Station(s) listed:4 VIDEOCOM
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
- - Dispatch (1-5 Lines) - Bus. 5.72 5.90 6.07 5.75 5.28 5.25 3.66 4.71 1n PR-2-01 Avg. Int. Completed - Total No Dispatch - Residence 0.70 1.95 0.86 1.72 0.78 1.56 0.74 1.36 PR-2-03 Avg. Int. Completed - Dispatch (1-5 Lines) - Res. 7.25 6.97 7.99 6.78 8.84 9.46 7.58 8.93 3n PR-4-02 Average Delay Days - Total 6.10 9.10 6.20 8.34 6.10 7.54 6.13 5.28 3n PR-4-04 % Missed Appointment - Verizon - Dispatch 14.58 9.10 13.91 8.38 14.54 7.80 12.86 0.00 PR-4-05 % Missed Appointment - Verizon - No Dispatch 0.08 0.04 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.04 0.09 0.02 PR-6-01 % Installation Troubles reported within 30 Days 4.28 2.19 4.28 2.27 4.27 2.67 5.02 2.30 PR-6-02 % Installation Troubles reported
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
- CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Tennessee Performance Metric Data Resale - Provisioning Order Completion Interval A.2.1.1.1.1Residence/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 5.39 4.71 5.58 4.59 5.93 5.12 5.85 5.10 6.05 5.13 A.2.1.1.1.2Residence/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/TN (days) 0.86 0.63 0.87 0.59 0.89 0.61 0.86 0.64 1.07 0.66 A.2.1.1.2.1Residence/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 7.62 6.50 5.00 5.77 5.92 6.20 2 A.2.1.2.1.1Business/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 3.58 3.47 5.13 5.56 4.90 4.14 6.43 2.85 5.47 4.74 A.2.1.2.1.2Business/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/TN (days) 1.53 0.98 1.15 1.03 1.18 0.62 1.57 0.70 1.27 0.57 A.2.1.2.2.1Business/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 12.42 22.92 11.47 8.00 13.76 11.99 3 A.2.1.2.2.2Business/>=10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/TN (days) 0.73 0.33 1.42 0.33 A.2.1.3.1.1Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 22.19 7.25 23.09 23.30 26.36 8.44 30.07 7.00 1,4,5 A.2.1.3.1.2Design
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-71A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-71A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-71A1.txt
- at 2. On July 31, 2001, the Commission's detariffing order became effective. The order provided that carriers are no longer permitted to file tariffs related to consumer domestic long distance services. MCI FCC Tariff No. 1, 18.12 at Section 3 stated, ``The Directory Assistance operator will search for up to two numbers per call.'' Similarly, AT&T F.C.C. Tariff No. 1, §6.20.2.A stated, ``Up to two requests for listings within the area code dialed may be made on each call to Directory Assistance.'' Himmelman Petition at 2-3; Oh Petition at 2-3. Himmelman Petition at 3-4; Oh Petition at 4. MCI Answer at 3; AT&T Opposition at 10. 47 U.S.C. § 415(b). Section 201(b) of the Act states, in pertinent part, that ``[a]ll
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.txt
- basis in law for imposing a standing requirement); Words+ and Compusult Comments at 35 (opposing any standing requirement). 47 U.S.C. § 618(a)(1)-(4). Accessibility NPRM, 26 FCC Rcd at 3183, ¶ 136. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.617 - 1.619 (informal complaints against common carriers); 47 C.F.R. § 1.719 (informal complaints regarding unauthorized changes in subscriber carrier selections); 47 C.F.R. §§ 6.17 - 6.20, 7.17 - 7.20 (informal disabilities complaints under Section 255); 47 C.F.R. §§ 68.417 - 68.420 (informal complaints regarding hearing aid compatibility). 47 U.S.C. § 618(a)(8) (``Nothing in the Commission's rules or this Act shall be construed to preclude a person who files a complaint and a manufacturer or provider from resolving a formal or informal complaint prior to the Commission's
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.txt
- taken or proposes to take to satisfy the complaint; (3) advise the complainant and the Commission of the nature of the defense(s) claimed; (4) respond specifically to all material allegations of the complainant; and (5) provide any other information or materials specified by the Commission as relevant to its consideration of the complaint. 47 C.F.R. § 7.19. 47 C.F.R. § 6.20(a). In all other cases, the Commission must inform the parties of its review and disposition of a complaint filed. 47 C.F.R. § 6.20(b). If unsatisfied with the defendant's response and Commission staff decision to terminate the complaint, the complainant can file a formal complaint. 47 C.F.R. §§ 6.20(b), 6.22. 47 C.F.R. § 6.20(c). 47 C.F.R. § 6.20(d). 47 C.F.R. §
- http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.wp
- What must covered entities do? 6.5 General Obligations of Manufacturers 6.7 General Obligations Service Providers 6.9 Product Design , Development and Evaluation 6.11 Information Pass through 6.13 Information, Documentation and Training Subpart D -- Enforcement 6.15 Generally 6.16 Informal or formal complaints 6.17 Informal complaints; form and content 6.18 Procedure; designation of agents for service 6.19 Answers to informal complaints 6.20 Review and disposition of informal complaints 6.21 Formal Complaints, applicability of Sections 1.720 - 1.736 of the rules 6.22 Formal complaints based on unsatisfied informal complaints 6.23 Actions by the Commission on its on motion Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j) 208, 255 Subpart A -- Scope - Who must comply with these rules? 6.1 The rules in this part apply
- http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
- interface declined in September. AT&T Crafton/Connolly Aff. at para. 257. We note, however, that we have never required the provision of acknowledgements for the purposes of satisfying section 271. On average, for June, July, August, and September Bell Atlantic returned order confirmation notices in 8.48, 8.84, 6.16, and 6.46 hours, respectively, and order rejection notices in 16.28, 12.63, 8.12, and 6.20 hours, respectively. These averages were calculated by Commission staff from the Carrier-to-Carrier data provided by Bell Atlantic. Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Decl. Attach. D at 78, 90, 102 (metrics OR-1 and OR-2); Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Reply Decl. Attach. C at 7 (same); Bell Atlantic Dec. 17, 1999 Ex Parte Letter correcting September data, Attach at 2. New York Commission Dec. 7
- http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-71A1.html
- 10 On July 31, 2001, the Commission's detariffing order became effective. The order provided that carriers are no longer permitted to file tariffs related to consumer domestic long distance services. 11 MCI FCC Tariff No. 1, 18.12 at Section 3 stated, ``The Directory Assistance operator will search for up to two numbers per call.'' Similarly, AT&T F.C.C. Tariff No. 1, 6.20.2.A stated, ``Up to two requests for listings within the area code dialed may be made on each call to Directory Assistance.'' 12 Himmelman Petition at 2-3; Oh Petition at 2-3. 13 Himmelman Petition at 3-4; Oh Petition at 4. 14 MCI Answer at 3; AT&T Opposition at 10. 15 47 U.S.C. 415(b). 16 Section 201(b) of the Act states, in
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=70
- 114 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=70T ue, 13 Mar 2007 21:05:10 GMT Summary Permits: 120 construction permits in the FM broadcast service Qualified Bidders: 114 Rounds Completed: 11 Bidding Days: 4 Results for Round 11 Gross Revenue: $12,582,500.00 - Dollar Change: $831,800.00 - % Change: 7.08 Net Revenue: $10,992,345.00 - Dollar Change: $641,650.00 - % Change: 6.20 New Bids: 71 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 3 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 4 Permits with PWBs*: 94 FCC Held Permits: 26 Eligible Bidders: 97 (of 114 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=70M on, 12 Mar 2007 15:05:01 GMT Summary Permits: 120 construction permits in the FM broadcast service Qualified Bidders: 114 Rounds Completed: 12 Bidding Days:
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97159.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97159.txt
- AT&T Reply at 38-40. AT&T updated its results to include data BLS released between the time AT&T filed its reply and its comments. Compare AT&T Reply at 38-40 with AT&T Comments at 29. 70 AT&T 1997 Reply, App. G at 31-32. AT&T's calculations would yield a total company TFP-based X-Factor, including the input price differential but excluding a CPD, of 6.20 percent. Id. 21 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-159 9.4 percent, which is composed of an estimated TFP growth of 6.0 percent for interstate services, and an input price differential of 3.4 percent.71 Ad Hoc states that adopting all its recommendations except its interstate/intrastate adjustment results in an X-Factor of 6.6 percent.72 38. Ad Hoc submitted its models in the proprietary
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.wp
- What must covered entities do? 6.5 General Obligations of Manufacturers 6.7 General Obligations Service Providers 6.9 Product Design , Development and Evaluation 6.11 Information Pass through 6.13 Information, Documentation and Training Subpart D -- Enforcement 6.15 Generally 6.16 Informal or formal complaints 6.17 Informal complaints; form and content 6.18 Procedure; designation of agents for service 6.19 Answers to informal complaints 6.20 Review and disposition of informal complaints 6.21 Formal Complaints, applicability of Sections 1.720 - 1.736 of the rules 6.22 Formal complaints based on unsatisfied informal complaints 6.23 Actions by the Commission on its on motion Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j) 208, 255 Subpart A -- Scope - Who must comply with these rules? 6.1 The rules in this part apply
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
- interface declined in September. AT&T Crafton/Connolly Aff. at para. 257. We note, however, that we have never required the provision of acknowledgements for the purposes of satisfying section 271. On average, for June, July, August, and September Bell Atlantic returned order confirmation notices in 8.48, 8.84, 6.16, and 6.46 hours, respectively, and order rejection notices in 16.28, 12.63, 8.12, and 6.20 hours, respectively. These averages were calculated by Commission staff from the Carrier-to-Carrier data provided by Bell Atlantic. Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Decl. Attach. D at 78, 90, 102 (metrics OR-1 and OR-2); Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Reply Decl. Attach. C at 7 (same); Bell Atlantic Dec. 17, 1999 Ex Parte Letter correcting September data, Attach at 2. New York Commission Dec. 7
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
- CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Tennessee Performance Metric Data Resale - Provisioning Order Completion Interval A.2.1.1.1.1Residence/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 5.39 4.71 5.58 4.59 5.93 5.12 5.85 5.10 6.05 5.13 A.2.1.1.1.2Residence/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/TN (days) 0.86 0.63 0.87 0.59 0.89 0.61 0.86 0.64 1.07 0.66 A.2.1.1.2.1Residence/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 7.62 6.50 5.00 5.77 5.92 6.20 2 A.2.1.2.1.1Business/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 3.58 3.47 5.13 5.56 4.90 4.14 6.43 2.85 5.47 4.74 A.2.1.2.1.2Business/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/TN (days) 1.53 0.98 1.15 1.03 1.18 0.62 1.57 0.70 1.27 0.57 A.2.1.2.2.1Business/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 12.42 22.92 11.47 8.00 13.76 11.99 3 A.2.1.2.2.2Business/>=10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/TN (days) 0.73 0.33 1.42 0.33 A.2.1.3.1.1Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 22.19 7.25 23.09 23.30 26.36 8.44 30.07 7.00 1,4,5 A.2.1.3.1.2Design
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
- 0.00 5.96 40 0.50 41 NEW JERSEY 5.46 6.19 5.48 306 3.75 307 NEW MEXICO 6.92 6.10 6.79 48 0.59 48 NEW YORK 5.96 5.97 5.96 586 7.17 588 NORTH CAROLINA 6.49 6.18 6.31 230 2.81 231 NORTH DAKOTA 5.89 0.00 5.93 20 0.24 20 OHIO 5.00 5.94 5.38 322 3.94 324 OKLAHOMA 5.99 6.59 6.03 91 1.12 92 OREGON 6.20 5.87 6.09 101 1.24 102 PENNSYLVANIA 5.65 5.68 5.69 389 4.76 390 RHODE ISLAND 5.96 0.00 5.96 31 0.38 31 SOUTH CAROLINA 6.49 6.35 6.37 107 1.31 107 SOUTH DAKOTA 5.58 0.00 5.72 20 0.25 20 TENNESSEE 6.49 6.28 6.42 161 1.97 162 TEXAS 5.99 6.37 6.06 566 6.93 569 UTAH 6.22 6.78 6.22 57 0.69 57 VERMONT 5.96 0.00
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
- 1,372 5 1,471 74.77 Texas 4,773 7.25 4,571 16 4,900 249.13 Utah 395 0.60 379 1 406 20.64 Vermont 158 0.24 152 1 163 8.27 Virginia 1,647 2.50 1,577 5 1,691 85.96 Washington 1,209 1.84 1,158 4 1,241 63.12 West Virginia 441 0.67 422 1 453 23.01 Wisconsin 1,157 1.76 1,108 4 1,187 60.37 Wyoming 119 0.18 114 0 122 6.20 United States 65,366 99.30 62,595 216 67,1033411.81 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Northern Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Puerto Rico 464 0.70 444 2 476 24.19 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Grand Total 1/ $65,830 100.00%$63,253 $219 $67,8093,447.89 NA - Not Applicable. Note: Incumbent local exchange revenues exclude SLC. Figures may not
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
- 1986 3,917 482 3,891 0.99 8.07 390 42 175 1987 4,480 570 4,559 1.02 8.00 360 35 191 1988 5,190 687 5,507 1.06 8.02 310 30 194 1989 6,109 835 6,517 1.07 7.80 243 27 208 1990 7,215 984 7,626 1.06 7.75 196 24 201 1991 8,986 1,371 9,096 1.01 6.63 200 15 303 $23 1992 10,156 1,643 10,179 1.00 6.20 155 16 313 24 1993 11,393 1,926 11,353 1.00 5.89 135 12 365 23 1994 13,393 2,313 12,255 0.92 5.30 123 12 432 55 1995 15,837 2,821 13,990 0.88 4.96 119 6 432 55 1996 19,119 3,485 14,079 0.74 4.04 119 5 649 26 1997 22,611 4,233 15,135 0.67 3.58 110 4 840 36 1998 24,369 4,547 14,320 0.59 3.15
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
- 1986 3,917 482 3,891 0.99 8.07 390 42 175 1987 4,480 570 4,559 1.02 8.00 360 35 191 1988 5,190 687 5,507 1.06 8.02 310 30 194 1989 6,109 835 6,517 1.07 7.80 243 27 208 1990 7,215 984 7,626 1.06 7.75 196 24 201 1991 8,986 1,371 9,096 1.01 6.63 200 15 303 $23 1992 10,156 1,643 10,179 1.00 6.20 155 16 313 24 1993 11,393 1,926 11,353 1.00 5.89 135 12 365 23 1994 13,393 2,313 12,255 0.92 5.30 123 12 432 55 1995 15,837 2,821 13,990 0.88 4.96 119 6 432 55 1996 19,119 3,485 14,079 0.74 4.04 119 5 649 26 1997 22,611 4,233 15,135 0.67 3.58 110 4 840 36 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
- 1986 3,917 482 3,891 0.99 8.07 390 42 175 1987 4,480 570 4,559 1.02 8.00 360 35 191 1988 5,190 687 5,507 1.06 8.02 310 30 194 1989 6,109 835 6,517 1.07 7.80 243 27 208 1990 7,215 984 7,626 1.06 7.75 196 24 201 1991 8,986 1,371 9,096 1.01 6.63 200 15 303 $23 1992 10,156 1,643 10,179 1.00 6.20 155 16 313 24 1993 11,393 1,926 11,353 1.00 5.89 135 12 365 23 1994 13,393 2,313 12,255 0.92 5.30 123 12 432 55 1995 15,837 2,821 13,990 0.88 4.96 119 6 432 55 1996 19,119 3,485 14,079 0.74 4.04 119 5 649 26 1997 22,611 4,233 15,135 0.67 3.58 110 4 840 36 1998 24,026 4,439 14,154 0.59 3.19
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
- 1986 3,917 482 3,891 0.99 8.07 390 42 175 1987 4,480 570 4,559 1.02 8.00 360 35 191 1988 5,190 687 5,507 1.06 8.02 310 30 194 1989 6,109 835 6,517 1.07 7.80 243 27 208 1990 7,215 984 7,626 1.06 7.75 196 24 201 1991 8,986 1,371 9,096 1.01 6.63 200 15 303 $23 1992 10,156 1,643 10,179 1.00 6.20 155 16 313 24 1993 11,393 1,926 11,353 1.00 5.89 135 12 365 23 1994 13,393 2,313 12,255 0.92 5.30 123 12 432 55 1995 15,837 2,821 13,990 0.88 4.96 119 6 432 55 1996 19,119 3,485 14,079 0.74 4.04 119 5 649 26 TABLE 7.2 INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE SERVICE SETTLEMENTS (Revenue amounts shown in millions) Average per Minute SettlementSettlement Net
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
- 1986 3,917 482 3,891 0.99 8.07 390 42 175 1987 4,480 570 4,559 1.02 8.00 360 35 191 1988 5,190 687 5,507 1.06 8.02 310 30 194 1989 6,109 835 6,517 1.07 7.80 243 27 208 1990 7,215 984 7,626 1.06 7.75 196 24 201 1991 8,986 1,371 9,096 1.01 6.63 200 15 303 $23 1992 10,156 1,643 10,179 1.00 6.20 155 16 313 24 1993 11,393 1,926 11,353 1.00 5.89 135 12 365 23 1994 13,393 2,313 12,255 0.92 5.30 123 12 432 55 1995 15,837 2,821 13,990 0.88 4.96 119 6 432 55 1996 19,119 3,485 14,079 0.74 4.04 119 5 649 26 1997 22,611 4,233 15,135 0.67 3.58 110 4 840 36 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
- 3.50 3.19 0.00 1.75 1.60 5.27 10.00 8.80 5.27 13.50 11.99 Utah 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.50 13.50 13.50 Vermont 8.20 8.25 8.21 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.95 10.00 9.96 13.45 13.50 13.46 Virginia 7.16 8.25 7.62 1.76 3.50 3.36 0.88 1.75 1.68 8.04 10.00 9.30 9.80 13.50 12.66 Washington 6.20 8.25 7.93 0.00 3.50 1.90 0.00 1.75 0.95 6.20 10.00 8.88 6.20 13.50 10.78 West Virginia 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.64 0.00 1.75 1.32 8.25 10.00 9.57 8.25 13.50 12.20 Wisconsin 6.82 8.25 7.24 0.00 3.50 1.23 0.00 1.75 0.61 6.82 10.00 7.85 6.82 13.50 9.08 Wyoming 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
- 1986 3,917 482 3,891 0.99 8.07 390 42 175 1987 4,480 570 4,559 1.02 8.00 360 35 191 1988 5,190 687 5,507 1.06 8.02 310 30 194 1989 6,109 835 6,517 1.07 7.80 243 27 208 1990 7,215 984 7,626 1.06 7.75 196 24 201 1991 8,986 1,371 9,096 1.01 6.63 200 15 303 $23 1992 10,156 1,643 10,179 1.00 6.20 155 16 313 24 1993 11,393 1,926 11,353 1.00 5.89 135 12 365 23 1994 13,393 2,313 12,255 0.92 5.30 123 12 432 55 1995 15,837 2,821 13,990 0.88 4.96 119 6 432 55 1996 19,119 3,485 14,079 0.74 4.04 119 5 649 26 1997 22,611 4,233 15,135 0.67 3.58 110 4 840 36 1998 24,026 4,439 14,154 0.59 3.19
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
- QUINCY TEL. CO.-GA DIV. 6.74 3.65 2.99 5.02 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -2.66 2.65 -5.18 -17.35 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 12.10 5.73 6.02 18.17 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. 8.80 7.19 1.50 4.95 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 11.88 7.03 4.53 13.59 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA -4.34 1.98 -6.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. -8.71 1.71 -10.24 -97.40 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -0.51 0.00 -0.50 -7.30 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. 15.61 3.46 11.75 60.80 220357 C ALLTEL GEORGIA, INC. -0.36 1.26 -1.60 -12.96 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 12.12 3.64 8.19 18.77 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 8.04 1.91 6.02 10.38 220362 C FRONTIER
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-9.pdf
- 11.85 6.30 8.87 9.20 8.16 7.69 NA Large Business 7.33 NA 10.69 5.55 6.44 1.84 2.73 4.79 NA Repairs:Residential 14.60 9.30 14.57 7.25 9.63 15.96 14.62 12.36 NA Small Business 8.49 11.82 12.81 5.61 6.76 11.89 9.53 9.05 NA Large Business 6.67 NA 11.67 4.08 5.90 4.39 2.98 4.42 NA Business Office: Residential 12.26 3.63 13.23 5.96 8.88 6.78 5.71 6.20 NA Small Business 14.26 7.09 12.48 5.79 7.67 7.67 8.73 9.04 NA Large Business 9.00 NA 10.99 5.88 6.67 2.21 6.86 5.73 NA NA: Not available Table 9.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Percent of Customers Dissatisfied Company Comparision - 2002 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 8 Company BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
- 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00 9.20 42 0.39 50 Nebraska 525,597 38,234 290,398 5.12 5.50 6.47 57 0.53 68 Nevada 797,545 117,861 396,956 4.31 4.73 5.51 74 0.69 88 New Hampshire 507,334 64,597 180,210 5.50 6.42 7.62 55 0.51 65 New Jersey 2,983,302 1,153,075 1,896,440 5.49 6.20 6.29 425 3.97 505 New Mexico 598,725 78,730 280,360 5.50 7.00 9.20 77 0.72 92 New York 5,339,133 1,068,516 3,046,391 5.47 6.37 7.62 711 6.63 845 North Carolina 3,198,629 337,037 1,155,234 5.46 6.65 7.96 347 3.24 412 North Dakota 217,225 9,007 93,386 5.50 6.99 8.84 25 0.23 30 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
- MN 14,323 14,668 (361) (2.52) BellSouth - Mississippi MS (26,747) (26,844) 97 (0.36) SBC - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 42,009 42,109 (100) (0.24) Sprint - United Telephone Company of Missouri MO 2,660 2,692 (32) (1.20) Qwest - Montana MT (4,935) (4,872) (71) 1.44 Aliant Telecommunications - Nebraska NE (54) (40) (14) 25.93 Qwest - Nebraska NE (1,403) (1,303) (87) 6.20 Sprint - Centel of Nevada NV (1,168) (898) (270) 23.12 Verizon - Contel Nevada NV (132) (83) (49) 37.12 SBC - Nevada Bell NV 217 250 (32) (14.75) Verizon - New England - New Hampshire NH 48 206 (158) (329.17) Verizon - New Jersey NJ 53,135 54,521 (1,386) (2.61) Sprint - United Telephone Company of New Jersey NJ (524) (404)
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
- ASSOCIATION INC. -0.74 -5.21 4.71 -0.25 411818 C CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC- KS 11.62 1.38 10.09 25.89 411820 C RAINBOW TEL COOPERATIVE ASSN INC. 17.91 -1.95 20.25 23.71 411826 C RURAL TEL. SERVICE CO.,INC. 8.39 -4.64 13.67 13.34 411827 C S & T TEL. COOP. ASSN. 23.68 -7.01 33.01 33.32 411829 C S & A TEL. CO.,INC. 3.40 -7.73 12.06 6.20 411831 C SOUTH CENTRAL TEL. ASSN. INC.-KS -17.81 -0.15 -17.69 -23.10 411833 C SOUTHERN KANSAS TEL. CO.,INC. 5.47 -0.84 6.36 6.21 411835 C SUNFLOWER TEL. CO.,INC. -2.57 -2.67 0.10 -5.39 411839 C TRI-COUNTY TEL. ASSN. INC.-KS 0.24 -1.38 1.64 -54.34 3 - 178 Table 3.31 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 2001 to 2002 by Study Area Study Area Code
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
- 2.34 Total 11.5813.3514.5416.1316.6616.5717.5317.7918.6618.7018.9419.0719.5019.58 Lowest Generally Available Monthly Rate 5.37 5.62 5.75 5.96 5.81 5.67 5.67 5.68 6.18 6.22 6.43 6.47 6.68 7.06 Subscriber Line Charges * 0.00 0.00 1.01 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 Taxes, including 911 charges 0.56 0.58 0.70 0.84 0.94 0.91 1.03 1.15 1.28 1.31 1.45 1.50 1.56 1.62 Total 5.93 6.20 7.46 8.84 9.41 9.2510.2310.3811.0211.0811.4311.5211.7812.22 Connection Charge 35.0143.7144.3245.6344.0442.9442.7143.0642.0041.5241.3841.2640.9141.08 Taxes 1.75 2.19 2.22 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.24 2.32 2.19 2.18 2.21 2.27 2.42 2.35 Total 36.7645.9046.5447.9146.2445.0544.9545.3844.1943.7043.5943.5343.3343.42 * Includes both Federal and State subscriber line charges. $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Monthly Service Charge Subscriber Line Charges Taxes, including
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
- 1995 Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied Company AmeritechBell AtlanticBellSouth NYNEX Pacific SBC US West GTE Overall:Residential 1.24 7.51 1.39 17.12 10.82 6.75 5 7.34 Small Business 2.29 8.03 4.05 18.79 11.28 6.92 7.19 12.23 Large Business 8.35 11.19 5.38 17.9 8.41 2.92 8.33 4.18 Installations: Residential 3.60 5.90 6.27 13.46 7.75 4.80 4.08 7.34 Small Business 9.62 8.33 4.07 22.55 9.13 6.20 11.05 12.23 Large Business 7.18 13.61 NA 22.22 9.37 7.57 13.90 4.18 Repairs:Residential 8.63 12.21 10.87 22.52 17.06 8.18 10.82 10.76 Small Business 11.79 10.72 4.49 20.13 14.95 7.28 15.22 11.96 Large Business 9.22 19.05 NA 25.95 14.00 9.54 13.63 4.74 Business Office: Residential 4.89 4.55 5.88 12.46 9.31 7.26 5.68 2.60 Small Business 5.91 5.12 3.62 12.92 10.15 7.31
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
- 361448 A OSAKIS TELEPHONE COMPANY 4.07 3.82 0.24 0.00 361450 A PARK REGION MUTUAL TEL. CO. 8.76 3.46 5.12 44.84 361451 C PAUL BUNYAN RURAL TEL. COOP. 9.95 3.16 6.58 30.14 361453 C PEOPLES TELEPHONE COMPANY - MN 8.52 5.10 3.26 9.81 361454 C PINE ISLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.17 3.83 2.26 8.11 361456 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO OF MINN 1.91 6.20 -4.04 -100.00 361472 A REDWOOD COUNTY TEL. CO. 18.70 11.18 6.76 62.77 361474 A ROTHSAY TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. 13.76 3.86 9.53 71.97 361475 A RUNESTONE TEL. ASSN. 12.94 2.43 10.26 73.09 361476 A SACRED HEART TEL. CO. 13.77 3.73 9.68 72.35 361479 A SCOTT RICE TEL. CO. 20.36 9.31 10.11 0.00 361482 A SHERBURNE COUNTY RURAL TEL. CO. 16.01 9.98
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
- NEHALEM TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH -2.90 -0.44 -2.47 0.00 532388 C NORTH STATE TELEPHONE COMPANY - OR -11.94 0.35 -12.26 -75.34 532389 C OREGON TELEPHONE CORPORATION -6.32 0.63 -6.90 -15.89 532390 C OREGON-IDAHO UTILITIES, INC. 1.09 -0.95 2.06 1.86 532391 A PEOPLES TELEPHONE CO. - OR 15.02 3.36 11.28 INFINITE 532392 C PINE TELEPHONE SYSTEM INC. - OR 4.23 3.67 0.54 6.20 532393 C PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE 4.81 3.35 1.41 11.20 532396 A ST. PAUL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 10.68 2.42 8.07 117.17 532397 C SCIO MUTUAL TEL. ASSOCIATION 9.65 -1.15 10.93 19.91 532399 A STAYTON COOP. TEL CO 7.93 6.05 1.77 0.00 532400 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO OF THE NW - OR -6.13 0.69 -6.77 0.00 532404 C ASOTIN TELEPHONE COMPANY -
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual01.pdf
- Customers Dissatisfied Installations: Residential 11.15 6.38 15.48 8.52 7.99 5.11 4.51 4.92 Small Business 9.36 14.72 14.68 8.48 10.38 10.68 8.97 7.44 Large Business 7.99 NA 17.88 9.01 6.74 4.93 6.64 4.79 Repairs: Residential 17.59 9.95 19.22 9.95 11.67 13.84 13.03 12.21 Small Business 9.91 9.85 15.72 6.86 8.42 11.79 10.95 10.24 Large Business 6.97 NA 18.22 5.76 6.22 7.08 6.20 6.43 Business Office: Residential 13.20 3.22 15.59 8.05 8.40 7.41 6.19 7.99 Small Business 12.95 6.68 15.72 7.14 9.38 9.45 9.94 9.33 Large Business 7.73 NA 20.99 10.15 8.41 4.49 8.89 10.13 * Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications. Table 1(d) Company Comparision 2001 Customer Perception Surveys 18 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual02.pdf
- Small Business 9.58 15.93 11.85 6.30 8.87 9.20 8.16 7.69 Large Business 7.33 9.80 10.69 5.55 6.44 1.84 2.73 4.79 Repairs: Residential 14.60 9.30 14.57 7.25 9.63 15.96 14.62 12.36 Small Business 8.49 11.82 12.81 5.61 6.76 11.89 9.53 9.05 Large Business 6.67 9.00 11.67 4.08 5.90 4.39 2.98 4.42 Business Office: Residential 12.26 3.63 13.23 5.96 8.88 6.78 5.71 6.20 Small Business 14.26 7.09 12.48 5.79 7.67 7.67 8.73 9.04 Large Business 9.00 3.80 10.99 5.88 6.67 2.21 6.86 5.73 * Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications. (Qwest Large Business data is available only as a company composite, not by study area.) Table 4 Company Comparision 2002 Customer Perception Surveys 18 BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC Verizon
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
- 10.2 (0.40) (0.40)NV New Hampshire 52.5 52.5 52.5 (0.00) (0.00)NH New Jersey 490.8 490.8 488.1 2.67 0.738 1.390 2.129 0.54NJ New Mexico 17.5 0.001 17.5 17.5 0.01 0.01NM New York 221.4 221.4 214.0 7.41 0.037 0.020 0.011 0.068 7.34NY North Carolina 76.9 (0.400) 77.3 76.4 0.93 0.93NC North Dakota 7.0 0.310 6.7 5.3 1.39 1.39ND Ohio 152.2 (6.829) 159.0 152.8 6.20 0.288 0.004 0.292 5.91OH Oklahoma 60.6 60.6 60.4 0.16 0.16OK Oregon 55.8 1.225 54.6 47.3 7.29 7.29OR Pennsylvania 321.0 321.0 305.7 15.34 1.021 1.961 2.983 12.36PA Rhode Island 31.7 31.7 31.8 (0.00) (0.00)RI South Carolina 48.9 48.9 47.7 1.23 1.23SC South Dakota 12.1 0.007 12.0 12.0 0.03 0.03SD Tennessee 59.3 59.3 57.3 2.06 2.06TN Texas 246.2 246.2 244.2 1.98 1.98TX
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
- 5.03 3.68 9.63% 35. GTE SOUTH INC. 23.37% 76.63% 6.44 4.42 9.13% 36. GTE SOUTHWEST INC. 36.11% 63.89% 5.74 4.08 7.61% 37. THE LINCOLN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. 21.59% 78.41% 7.56 5.07 15.56% 38. PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE CO. 0.05% 99.95% 209.43 155.40 12.12% 39. ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORPORATION 17.60% 82.40% 12.31 8.15 10.93% SPRINT CORPORATION: 40. CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 27.99% 72.01% 6.20 5.33 10.95% 41. CENTRAL TELEPHONE CO. OF FLORIDA 28.25% 71.75% 4.21 3.08 8.79% 42. CENTRAL TELEPHONE CO. OF ILLINOIS 39.31% 60.69% 6.44 4.37 12.16% 43. CENTRAL TELEPHONE CO. OF VIRGINIA 32.18% 67.82% 4.72 3.40 8.59% 44. CAROLINA TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. 32.17% 67.83% 6.94 4.75 12.66% 45. UNITED TELEPHONE-SOUTHEAST, INC. 39.06% 60.94% 4.89 3.64 10.71% 46. UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
- TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 33.59% 66.41% 7.81 5.30 11.42% SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC. 16NEVADA BELL 27.58% 72.42% 3.75 2.83 9.14% 17PACIFIC BELL 45.82% 54.18% 1.76 1.64 5.81% 18SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO. 41.63% 58.37% 5.03 3.69 8.73% 19U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 38.98% 61.02% 4.61 3.23 7.20% 20CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE CO. 33.19% 66.81% 7.10 4.94 10.89% 21THE SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE CO. 34.68% 65.32% 6.20 4.27 9.09% 22ALIANT COMMUNICATIONS CO. 19.99% 80.01% 14.65 9.31 13.75% ALLTEL CORPORATION: 23ALLTEL GEORGIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. 37.05% 62.95% 7.24 5.00 11.36% 24ALLTEL PENNSYLVANIA, INC. 32.11% 67.89% 7.66 5.67 12.84% 25THE WESTERN RESERVE TELEPHONE CO. 39.39% 60.61% 6.89 4.99 13.42% 26CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. OF NEW YORK, INC. 87.32% 12.68% 24.69 18.57 2.09% 27COMMONWEALTH TELEPHONE CO. 44.83% 55.17% 6.78 4.41 14.01% 152
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/scard97.pdf
- Equal Net Corporation 8.72 530 61 Excel Telecommunications, Inc. 0.18 200 1,091 Future Telephone Communications 1.02 111 109 Great Lakes Telecommunications Corporation 1.53 167 109 Heartline Communications, Inc. 8.72 951 109 Home Owners Long Distance 1.27 138 109 Integrated Tele Services 1.28 139 109 L.D. Services, Inc. 2.38 259 109 LDM Systems Inc. 8.59 245 29 Long Distance Services (Virginia) 6.20 676 109 Matrix Telecom 1.08 118 109 National Accounts Long Distance, Inc. 2.83 309 109 Nationwide Long Distance, Inc. 3.17 345 109 Network Service Center 1.58 172 109 Quest Communications 1.83 200 109 The Furst Group 3.07 335 109 Trans National Telephone 2.14 233 109 Winstar Gateway Network 28.26 961 34 Weighted Ratio: Carriers and Resellers 0.16 Billing Agents Billing
- http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-71A1.html
- 10 On July 31, 2001, the Commission's detariffing order became effective. The order provided that carriers are no longer permitted to file tariffs related to consumer domestic long distance services. 11 MCI FCC Tariff No. 1, 18.12 at Section 3 stated, ``The Directory Assistance operator will search for up to two numbers per call.'' Similarly, AT&T F.C.C. Tariff No. 1, 6.20.2.A stated, ``Up to two requests for listings within the area code dialed may be made on each call to Directory Assistance.'' 12 Himmelman Petition at 2-3; Oh Petition at 2-3. 13 Himmelman Petition at 3-4; Oh Petition at 4. 14 MCI Answer at 3; AT&T Opposition at 10. 15 47 U.S.C. 415(b). 16 Section 201(b) of the Act states, in
- http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
- 6.09. Information Supplied.................................61 SECTION 6.10. Absence of Certain Changes............................62 SECTION 6.11. No Undisclosed Material Liabilities......................62 SECTION 6.12. Compliance with Laws and Court Orders.................63 SECTION 6.13. Litigation...........................................63 SECTION 6.14. Finders' Fees.......................................63 SECTION 6.15. Opinion of Financial Advisor...........................64 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iii SECTION 6.16. Taxes..............................................64 SECTION 6.17. Tax Opinions........................................65 SECTION 6.18. Employee Benefit Plans and Labor Matters................65 SECTION 6.19. Environmental Matters................................67 SECTION 6.20. Intellectual Property..................................68 SECTION 6.21. Contracts...........................................69 SECTION 6.22. AT&T Shareholder Vote...............................70 SECTION 6.23. Antitakeover Statutes.................................70 SECTION 6.24. Comcast Securities...................................70 SECTION 6.25. TWE; At Home......................................70 SECTION 6.26. Intercompany Transactions............................72 SECTION 6.27. Sufficiency of Transferred Assets........................72 SECTION 6.28. Investments.........................................73 ARTICLE 7 COVENANTS OF COMCAST SECTION 7.01. Comcast Interim Operations............................73 SECTION 7.02. Comcast Shareholders' Meeting; Proxy Material...........77 SECTION 7.03. Voting Agreement....................................78 ARTICLE 8 COVENANTS