FCC Web Documents citing 6.17

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3203A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3203A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3203A2.txt
  • 295 394350.6 2951963 24572.4 1051353.6 1051353.6 CO DENVER KCNC-TV 47903 4 100. 373 394351.0 35 1000. 373 394351.0 2957505 25912.6 1051354.0 1051354.0 CO DENVER KTVD 68581 20 5000. 341 394350.6 19 1000. 295 394350.6 2959445 24971.7 1051353.6 1051353.6 CO DENVER KPXC-TV 68695 59 5000. 356 394024.0 43 145. 356.0 394024 2700515 17371.2 10513 3.0 1051303 CO DURANGO KREZ-TV 48589 6 6.17 110 371546.0 15 46. 90 371546.0 91580 8746.6 1075358.0 1075358.0 CO FORT COLLINS KFCT 125 22 1860. 256 403832.0 21 1000. 233 403832.0 1228918 25378.9 10449 5.0 10449 5.0 CO GLENWOOD SPRINGS KREG-TV 70578 3 67.6 771 3925 5.0 23 399.7 771 3925 7.0 105825 24307.8 10722 1.0 10722 6.0 CO GRAND JUNCTION KRMJ 14042 18 186. 883 390314.0 17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A2.txt
  • DENVER KUBD-DT 68695 59 5000. 00356 0394024.0 43 145. 356.0 394024 2682102 16538.8 2700515 17371.2 010513 3.0 1051303 CO DENVER KUSA-TV 23074 09 316. 00358 0394350.6 16 1000. 00318 0394350.6 2903248 21725.1 2975358 25828.1 01051353.6 01051353.6 CO DENVER KWGN-TV 35883 02 100. 00319 0394359.0 34 1000. 00318 0394358.0 3064814 31198.3 2981633 26818.3 01051412.0 010514 8.0 CO DURANGO KREZ-TV 48589 06 6.17 00110 0371546.0 15 46. 00090 0371546.0 83435 9116.0 91580 8794.6 01075358.0 01075358.0 CO FORT COLLINS KFCT 125 22 1860. 00256 0403832.0 21 1000. 00233 0403832.0 571980 13786.3 1234362 25390.9 010449 5.0 010449 5.0 CO GLENWOOD SPRINGS KREG-DT 70578 03 67.6 00771 03925 5.0 23 879. 771.0 392505 124215 30998.3 110634 26213.5 010722 1.0 1072201 CO GRAND JUNCTION KFQX-DT 31597 04
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A3.txt
  • DENVER KRMT 20476 41 2240.0 344. 40 74.8 344.0 2457428 12030.0 2466572 12170.0 CO DENVER KTVD 68581 20 5000.0 383. 19 248. 383.0 2685429 18629.5 2780822 19746.7 CO DENVER KUSA-TV 23074 09 316.00 280. 16 1000 280.0 2892505 23501.6 2957280 25500.3 CO DENVER KWGN-TV 35883 02 100.00 319. 34 1000 319.0 3064814 31198.3 2982226 28344.3 CO DURANGO KREZ-TV 48589 06 6.17 110. 15 50.0 110.0 88323 9288.3 87922 8523.3 CO FORT COLLINS KFCT 125 22 1860.0 256. 21 50.0 256.0 572032 13898.2 566616 14002.2 CO GLENWOOD SPRINGS KREG-TV 70578 03 67.60 771. 23 879. 771.0 127657 31163.2 106663 26230.0 CO GRAND JUNCTION KFQX 31597 04 10.70 422. 15 71.5 422.0 135926 13795.5 131368 12647.9 CO GRAND JUNCTION KJCT 52593 08 120.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the proposed assignment under § 6.14, the Bureau shall determine whether the this Appendix 4 submission is identical to the initial notice. If this is the case, the submission under § 6.14 will be treated as specified in § 6.20. However, if, in seeking agreement, an administration modifies its initial notice, the Bureau shall conduct the examination described in § 6.17 through § 6.19. 6.17. The Bureau shall examine the Appendix 4 information received under § 6.14 with respect to its conformity to the Table of Frequency Allocations and the other provisions of these Regulations, except those provisions relating to conformity with the fixed-satellite service Plan. 6.18. When the examination of all or parts of the § 6.14 submission with respect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-672A1.txt
  • People with Disabilities (AAPD) stating that rules covering complaints against manufacturers pursuant to section 255 were not being followed in practice. AAPD asserted that although section 255 complaints were allowed to be filed telephonically, in practice Commission telephone operators taking calls from the public were not routinely taking complaints telephonically. AAPD noted that the informal complaint procedures found in section 6.17 permit the filing of complaints by any reasonable means, such as letter, fax, and telephone (voice/TRS/TTY). AAPD asserts that this was intended to permit persons with disabilities who use alternative formats to be able to access the FCC's informal complaint process the same way that persons without disabilities can easily access the FCC. Recommendation The staff does not recommend changes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2628A1.pdf
  • survey of its shareholders (as of April 30, 2008). The results of that survey, combined with information from EchoStar's share registry, indicates that approximately 1.33 percent of its equity and 0.23 percent of its voting interests are held by foreign investors, including non-WTO investment that is less than 0.10 percent for both equity and voting interests. SOLA, which holds approximately 6.17 percent and 7.58 percent of TerreStar Corp.'s voting and equity interests, is an investment fund that is organized and has its world headquarters in the Cayman Islands, which is also its tax jurisdiction. SOLA's investment decisions are directed by Solus Alternative Asset Management LP (``Solus Asset Management''), which is organized in the United States. The general partner of Solus Asset
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2628A1_Rcd.pdf
  • survey of its shareholders (as of April 30, 2008). The results of that survey, combined with information from EchoStar's share registry,indicates that approximately 1.33 percent of its equity and 0.23 percent of its voting interests are held by foreign investors, including non-WTO investment that is less than 0.10 percent for both equity and voting interests.61 21. SOLA, which holds approximately 6.17 percent and 7.58 percent of TerreStar Corp.'s voting and equity interests, is an investment fund that is organized and has its world headquarters in the Cayman Islands, which is also its tax jurisdiction.62SOLA's investment decisions are directedby Solus Alternative Asset Management LP ("Solus Asset Management"), which is organized in the United (Continued from previous page) public interest considerations outweigh that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.txt
  • C-OBLIGATIONS-WHAT MUST COVERED ENTITIES DO? Brief Description, Need and Legal Basis: See Subpart A above. Section Number and Title: 6.5 General Obligations. 6.7 Product design, development and evaluation. 6.9 Information pass through. 6.11 Information, documentation, and training. SUBPART D-ENFORCEMENT Brief Description, Need and Legal Basis: See Subpart A above. Section Number and Title: 6.15 Generally. 6.16 Informal or formal complaints. 6.17 Informal complaints; form and content. 6.18 Procedure; designation of agents for service. 6.19 Answers to informal complaints. 6.20 Review and disposition of informal complaints. 6.21 Formal complaints, applicability of 1.720 through 1.736 of this chapter. 6.22 Formal complaints based on unsatisfied informal complaints. 6.23 Actions by the Commission on its own motion. PART 7-ACCESS TO VOICEMAIL AND INTERACTIVE MENU SERVICES
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour Measure 2005 2.31 2.80 3.03 (45) (30) (24) 2007 2.05 2.76 2.71 (45) (38) (46) 2009 1.50 1.81 2.07 * (56) (48) (63) Miscellaneous Format Market Measure 2005 3.03 2.51 1.34 (8) (5) (6) 2007 4.54 6.17 4.32 (35) (25) (41) 2009 3.94 4.27 3.43 (51) (44) (79) Contour Measure 2005 1.52 1.77 4.43 (8) (6) (5) 2007 3.46 5.44 * 5.64 * (34) (27) (40) 2009 2.68 3.33 4.75 * (47) (49) (78) * - difference between the category mean and the mean of the No LPFM category is statistically different from zero using a two-sided
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243941A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243941A1.txt
  • Minneapolis-St. Paul Tampa Cleveland Miami Phoenix Denver Sacramento Pittsburgh 0.5 0.1 a -1 19 'E.L -125 'E.L 6' 0.45 m 34.0 dBi 12.2 GHz BO-1 21 3 EIRP Topo with Mispointlng (L. Station Keeping (7 WW) 54.06 50.45 52.59 54.16 52.00 53.08 53.31 54.32 52.72 55.15 54.08 52.00 52.22 54.67 53.26 54.29 51.18 51.67 52.00 54.10 5180 6.21 5.83 5.82 6.17 5.75 6.11 5.85 5.66 5.98 6.12 6.03 5.95 6.00 5.88 5.98 6.20 6.09 6.15 5.87 Req. Single Entry CII (dB) 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 New Entrant Max. ElRP WW) 53.82 50.95 52.59 53.96 52.42 52.76 53.64 54.17 52.63 55.24 54.43 52.18 52 25 54.70
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.15 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.7 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.17 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.10 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.16 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.4 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.txt
  • Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.15 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.7 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.17 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.10 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.16 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.4 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 2,696,308 1.78 1,165 347 1,223 368 Arkansas 1,129,545 0.75 488 145 512 154 California 19,487,575 12.87 8,420 2,509 8,841 2,661 Colorado 2,545,363 1.68 1,100 328 1,155 348 Connecticut 1,841,459 1.22 796 237 835 251 Delaware 439,078 0.29 190 57 199 60 District of Columbia 568,132 0.38 245 73 258 78 Florida 9,335,203 6.17 4,034 1,202 4,235 1,274 Georgia 4,905,695 3.24 2,120 632 2,226 670 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 743,149 0.49 321 96 337 101 Idaho 612,336 0.40 265 79 278 84 Illinois 6,676,022 4.41 2,885 859 3,029 911 Indiana 2,629,874 1.74 1,136 339 1,193 359 Iowa 1,354,511 0.89 585 174 614 185 Kansas 1,158,283 0.76 500 149 525 158
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 1.45 5.25 10.00 7.98 5.25 13.50 10.89 New Hampshire 8.20 8.25 8.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.20 8.25 8.20 8.20 8.25 8.20 New Jersey 7.38 8.06 8.05 0.00 3.46 3.43 0.00 1.73 1.71 7.38 9.79 9.77 7.38 13.25 13.20 New Mexico 7.91 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 3.29 0.00 1.75 1.65 7.91 10.00 9.89 7.91 13.50 13.18 New York 6.17 8.25 8.09 0.00 3.50 3.30 0.00 1.75 1.65 6.17 10.00 9.73 6.17 13.50 13.03 North Carolina 7.83 8.25 8.08 3.50 3.50 3.49 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.58 10.00 9.83 13.08 13.50 13.32 North Dakota 3.50 8.25 8.00 0.00 3.50 1.86 0.00 1.75 0.93 3.50 10.00 8.93 3.50 13.50 10.79 N. Marianna Islands 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • -3.25 4.69 -3.03 Nebraska 3.80 -6.66 11.22 22.63 Nevada -0.46 -2.42 2.01 -0.65 New Hampshire 4.36 -3.52 8.17 7.35 New Jersey 4.86 -4.54 9.84 0.00 New Mexico 1.20 -2.32 3.60 4.99 New York 2.06 -4.62 7.00 -7.98 North Carolina -0.41 -3.16 2.84 25.11 North Dakota 2.50 -4.00 6.77 2.12 Northern Mariana Islands -16.96 8.29 -23.31 0.00 Ohio -0.32 -3.37 3.16 6.17 Oklahoma -5.30 -5.50 0.21 12.10 Oregon 0.96 -3.80 4.95 -7.72 Pennsylvania 2.82 -4.11 7.23 38.82 Puerto Rico -8.77 -3.65 -5.31 -28.31 Rhode Island -1.04 -7.74 7.26 0.00 South Carolina 1.54 -2.54 4.18 -4.90 South Dakota 4.90 -6.06 11.66 28.10 Tennessee 0.36 -2.60 3.04 -9.42 Texas -6.69 -5.60 -1.16 4.67 Utah -3.62 -2.22 -1.43 -4.52 Vermont 6.73 -1.77 8.66 17.01 Virgin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
  • months. All of the changes are below the threshold of statistical significance. Once a year, in March, the CPS supplements its survey with additional questions, which include detailed information about income, and augments its sample with about 2,500 additional Hispanic households. Starting in 2001, the sample was further augmented with about 20,000 service. 5 Tables 6.3 through 6.5, 6.11, and 6.17 of this section are derived from these raw data files. 6 The determination of the statistical significance of a change over time is discussed below. The critical value is dependent on the sizes of the samples from which the change is computed and by the confidence level, which is 95% here. 6 - 4 additional households with children.7 The more
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265170A1.txt
  • 257 2,920 8.80 178 830 21.45 District of Columbia 146 3,962 3.69 286 1,100 26.00 Florida 2,853 41,725 6.84 3,606 20,782 17.35 Georgia 855 22,184 3.85 1,210 10,286 11.76 Guam 0 0 NM 0 0 NM Hawaii 54 3,042 1.78 171 1,313 13.02 Idaho 111 2,901 3.83 156 1,515 10.30 Illinois 4,376 35,105 12.47 2,512 15,798 15.90 Indiana 885 14,332 6.17 802 7,092 11.31 Iowa 187 4,297 4.35 353 3,336 10.58 Kansas 343 7,831 4.38 349 2,897 12.05 Kentucky 336 9,735 3.45 549 4,846 11.33 Louisiana 535 11,461 4.67 823 5,492 14.99 Maine 254 2,167 11.72 211 1,269 16.63 Maryland 1,302 16,734 7.78 1,225 5,670 21.60 Massachusetts 2,240 26,355 8.50 1,490 7,314 20.37 Michigan 1,993 26,557 7.50 1,692 13,006 13.01 Minnesota
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • ­ ILEC Quarterly Total ..............................................Table 8.2 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC Total - Chart ..................................................Chart 8.1 Non-Operating Items - Total ................................................................................... Table 11.10 Other Operating Income or Losses ......................................................................... Table 11.8 Penetration - Households ........................................................................................ Chart 6.1 Penetration - Individual Adults ............................................................................... Chart 6.8 Penetration by Household Size ............................................................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Household Size - Critical Values ....................................................Table 6.17 Penetration by Household Size - Chart ................................................................ Chart 6.5 Penetration by Householder's Age .......................................................................... Table 6.12 Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
  • ­ ILEC Quarterly Total ..............................................Table 8.2 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC Total - Chart ..................................................Chart 8.1 Non-Operating Items - Total ................................................................................... Table 11.10 Other Operating Income or Losses ......................................................................... Table 11.8 Penetration - Households ........................................................................................ Chart 6.1 Penetration - Individual Adults ............................................................................... Chart 6.8 Penetration by Household Size ............................................................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Household Size - Critical Values ....................................................Table 6.17 Penetration by Household Size - Chart ................................................................ Chart 6.5 Penetration by Householder's Age .......................................................................... Table 6.12 Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 3.50 1.54 0.00 1.75 0.77 6.65 10.00 7.92 6.65 13.50 9.46 Mississippi 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.35 0.00 1.75 1.67 8.25 10.00 9.92 8.25 13.50 13.27 Missouri 6.50 8.25 8.04 0.00 1.16 0.77 0.00 0.58 0.39 6.50 8.83 8.43 6.50 9.99 9.20 Montana 8.23 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 2.93 0.00 1.75 1.47 8.23 10.00 9.70 8.23 13.50 12.64 Nebraska 6.17 8.25 7.05 0.00 3.50 3.44 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.17 10.00 8.77 6.17 13.50 12.21 Nevada 5.55 8.25 6.15 0.00 3.50 2.95 0.00 1.75 1.47 5.55 10.00 7.63 5.55 13.50 10.57 New Hampshire 8.13 8.25 8.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.13 8.25 8.14 8.13 8.25 8.14 New Jersey 7.02 8.25 8.00 0.00 3.46 3.43 0.00 1.73 1.72 7.02 9.98
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • -3.92 9.36 18.83 351108 A BARNES CITY COOP. TEL. CO. 10.92 1.07 9.75 23.62 351110 C BERNARD TEL. CO., INC. -4.89 -5.44 0.59 -7.33 351112 A BREDA TEL. COOP. 7.87 -0.80 8.74 20.66 351113 A BROOKLYN MUTUAL TEL. CO. 13.24 -4.40 18.46 1,012.59 351114 A THE BURT TEL. CO. 5.34 -3.08 8.69 19.19 351115 A BUTLER-BREMER MUT. TEL. CO. -1.35 -6.17 5.14 1.88 351118 A CASCADE COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY 1.06 -6.26 7.81 17.92 351119 A CASEY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 8.36 0.62 7.69 19.97 351121 A CENTER JUNCTION TEL. CO., INC. 8.67 -1.32 10.13 21.45 351125 A CENTRAL SCOTT TEL. 17.19 -7.69 26.96 INFINITE 351126 A CENTURYTEL OF CHESTER, INC. 6.38 -3.70 10.47 18.99 351127 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF IOWA, INC. 21.48 -4.41
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.txt
  • All of the changes are below the threshold of statistical significance. December 2004, CPS changed its telephone question to the wording given above. It is possible that some of the drop in the penetration rate between November 2004 and March 2005 is for households who had a phone, but did not have service. 5 Tables 6.3 through 6.5, 6.11, and 6.17 of this section are derived from these raw data files. 6 The determination of the statistical significance of a change over time is discussed below. The critical value is dependent on the sizes of the samples from which the change is computed and by the confidence level, which is 95% here. 6 - 4 Once a year, in March, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 13.36 13.66 (Former Bell Atlantic Companies) Bell Atlantic 13.88 Bell Atlantic (NYNEX) 11.40 New England Telephone and Telegraph Co. New York Telephone 9 Verizon California Inc. (California - GTCA) 28.91 34.99 29.17 28.50 28.48 25.87 22.01 17.19 10 Verizon California Inc. (California - COCA) 26.02 36.93 30.64 28.22 29.80 28.74 28.28 22.71 11 Verizon California Inc. (Arizona - COAZ) 32.00 6.17 2.05 6.99 13.25 10.9 15.57 13.80 12 Verizon California Inc. (Nevada - CONV) 28.08 28.79 28.51 24.08 26.66 28.82 20.57 24.01 13 Verizon Florida Inc. (Florida - GTFL) 32.57 28.96 24.46 22.03 29.23 21.90 18.93 14.58 14 Verizon North Inc. (COPA + COQS = COPT) 39.10 32.886 40.74 43.61 39.71 41.05 39.58 45.97 15 Verizon North Inc. (Illinois - COIL)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • ­ ILEC Quarterly Total ..............................................Table 8.2 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC Total - Chart ..................................................Chart 8.1 Non-Operating Items - Total ................................................................................... Table 11.10 Other Operating Income or Losses ......................................................................... Table 11.8 Penetration - Households ........................................................................................ Chart 6.1 Penetration - Individual Adults ............................................................................... Chart 6.8 Penetration by Household Size ............................................................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Household Size - Critical Values ....................................................Table 6.17 Penetration by Household Size - Chart ................................................................ Chart 6.5 Penetration by Householder's Age .......................................................................... Table 6.12 Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Income - Adjusted for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
  • ­ ILEC Quarterly Total ..............................................Table 8.2 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC Total - Chart ..................................................Chart 8.1 Non-Operating Items - Total ................................................................................... Table 11.10 Other Operating Income or Losses ......................................................................... Table 11.8 Penetration - Households ........................................................................................ Chart 6.1 Penetration - Individual Adults ............................................................................... Chart 6.8 Penetration by Household Size ............................................................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Household Size - Critical Values ....................................................Table 6.17 Penetration by Household Size - Chart ................................................................ Chart 6.5 Penetration by Householder's Age .......................................................................... Table 6.12 Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Income - Adjusted for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • 7.05 200 2.12 243 Texas 5,445,861 712,218 2,793,989 5.56 5.61 6.21 619 6.54 751 Utah 562,978 60,050 268,646 6.32 6.32 6.56 68 0.72 83 Vermont 228,633 16,326 92,605 6.42 6.40 6.85 26 0.28 32 Virginia 2,117,694 225,999 1,195,243 6.20 6.27 6.75 271 2.87 329 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 1,877,742 212,216 757,030 6.07 6.17 6.99 216 2.28 262 West Virginia 640,711 21,656 162,401 6.50 7.00 8.46 68 0.72 83 Wisconsin 1,507,675 97,443 754,393 5.66 5.41 6.55 168 1.77 204 Wyoming 145,336 7,780 91,117 6.50 7.00 9.20 22 0.23 27 Total 3/ 78,620,196 9,949,280 40,943,292 $5.97 $5.83 $6.38 $9,468 100.00%$11,544 Note: Figures may not add due to rounding. NA - Not Applicable. 1/ Excludes additional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 0.00 1.75 1.64 6.50 10.00 9.89 6.50 13.50 13.18 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.41 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 6.50 10.00 9.16 6.50 13.50 12.65 Montana 8.24 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.94 0.00 1.75 1.47 8.24 10.00 9.71 8.24 13.50 12.65 Nebraska 6.10 8.25 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.43 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.10 10.00 8.79 6.10 13.50 12.22 Nevada 5.54 8.25 6.17 0.00 3.50 1.95 0.00 1.75 0.97 5.54 10.00 7.14 5.54 13.50 9.09 New Hampshire 8.15 8.25 8.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.15 8.25 8.16 8.15 8.25 8.16 New Jersey 7.08 8.25 8.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.08 8.25 8.02 7.08 8.25 8.02 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.33 0.00 1.75 1.66 8.25 10.00 9.91
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • TEL. COOP., INC. 1.29 -0.40 1.69 -1.18 260402 C WINDSTREAM KENTUCKY WEST, INC. (ALLTEL) 2.95 -3.72 6.92 0.00 260406 C FOOTHILLS RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 27.26 1.24 25.70 96.87 260408 A GEARHEART COMM. DBA COALFIELDS TEL. CO. 0.04 -1.18 1.24 -50.70 260411 C LESLIE COUNTY TEL. CO., INC. -8.72 0.45 -9.13 -39.71 260412 A LEWISPORT TEL. CO., INC. -2.08 -6.17 4.35 5.34 260413 C LOGAN TEL. COOP., INC. -0.63 -3.00 2.44 -1.54 260414 A MOUNTAIN RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. -0.21 -1.22 1.02 -67.56 260415 C PEOPLES RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP. 0.04 -1.57 1.63 -1.95 260417 A SALEM TEL. CO. 0.07 -1.41 1.50 -38.53 260418 C SOUTH CENTRAL RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. -0.14 -2.17 2.07 -2.05 260419 A THACKER/GRIGSBY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.txt
  • However, after accounting for this, there has been no significant systematic seasonal variation. Once a year, in March, the CPS supplements its survey with additional questions, which include detailed information about income, and augments its sample with about 2,500 additional Hispanic households. Starting in 2001, the sample was further augmented with about 20,000 5 Tables 6.3 through 6.5, 6.11, and 6.17 of this section are derived from these raw data files. 6 The determination of the statistical significance of a change over time is discussed below. The critical value is dependent on the sizes of the samples from which the change is computed and by the confidence level, which is 95% here. 6 - 4 additional households with children.7 The more
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • FCC Tariff No. 1 & No. 11) 16.61 18.37 11.24 8.00 11.95 12.93 13.36 13.66 (Former Bell Atlantic Companies) Bell Atlantic 13.88 Bell Atlantic (NYNEX) 11.40 New England Telephone and Telegraph Co. New York Telephone 9 Verizon California Inc. (California - GTCA) 32.33 27.89 34.99 29.17 28.50 28.48 25.87 22.01 17.19 11 Verizon California Inc. (Arizona - COAZ) 19.58 26.11 6.17 2.05 6.99 13.25 10.9 15.57 13.80 10 Verizon California Inc. (California - COCA) 54.16 40.93 36.93 30.64 28.22 29.80 28.74 28.28 22.71 12 Verizon California Inc. (Nevada - CONV) 40.44 27.98 28.79 28.51 24.08 26.66 28.82 20.57 24.01 13 Verizon Florida Inc. (Florida - GTFL) 31.76 32.25 28.96 24.46 22.03 29.23 21.90 18.93 14.58 14 Verizon North Inc. (COPA +
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • ­ ILEC Quarterly Total ..............................................Table 8.2 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC Total - Chart ..................................................Chart 8.1 Non-Operating Items - Total ................................................................................... Table 11.10 Other Operating Income or Losses ......................................................................... Table 11.8 Penetration - Households ........................................................................................ Chart 6.1 Penetration - Individual Adults ............................................................................... Chart 6.8 Penetration by Household Size ............................................................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Household Size - Critical Values ....................................................Table 6.17 Penetration by Household Size - Chart ................................................................ Chart 6.5 Penetration by Householder's Age .......................................................................... Table 6.12 Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
  • ­ ILEC Quarterly Total ..............................................Table 8.2 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC Total - Chart ..................................................Chart 8.1 Non-Operating Items - Total ................................................................................... Table 11.10 Other Operating Income or Losses ......................................................................... Table 11.8 Penetration - Households ........................................................................................ Chart 6.1 Penetration - Individual Adults ............................................................................... Chart 6.8 Penetration by Household Size ............................................................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Household Size - Critical Values ....................................................Table 6.17 Penetration by Household Size - Chart ................................................................ Chart 6.5 Penetration by Householder's Age .......................................................................... Table 6.12 Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • 7.17 194 2.16 240 Texas 5,289,089 621,353 2,727,225 5.56 5.61 6.22 598 6.66 738 Utah 537,724 51,074 269,063 6.32 6.32 6.56 66 0.73 81 Vermont 224,168 14,662 87,362 6.41 6.40 6.84 26 0.28 32 Virginia 2,005,400 187,124 1,172,010 6.18 6.25 6.74 258 2.87 318 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 1,714,982 174,846 733,505 6.07 6.17 6.98 199 2.22 246 West Virginia 607,826 17,935 149,894 6.50 7.00 8.46 64 0.71 79 Wisconsin 1,412,679 79,533 734,913 5.66 5.42 6.55 159 1.77 196 Wyoming 132,285 6,569 92,419 6.50 7.00 9.20 21 0.23 26 Total 3/ 74,455,093 8,579,603 39,803,989 $5.97 $5.81 $6.39 $8,980 100.00%$11,144 Note: Figures may not add due to rounding. NA - Not Applicable. 1/ Excludes additional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment ILLINOIS (CONT.) 341088 C WABASH TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. 2.97 1.82 1.13 1.02 341091 C WOODHULL TELEPHONE COMPANY -10.23 -6.17 -4.33 -37.60 341092 A STELLE TEL. CO. -12.97 -18.00 6.13 -10.03 341093 C YATES CITY TEL. CO. -9.39 -6.00 -3.60 -25.91 341183 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF IL DBA FRONTIER COMM OF IL -4.88 -6.12 1.33 0.00 343035 C VERIZON SOUTH INC.-IL (ALLTEL) -4.63 -9.41 5.27 0.00 345070 C ILLINOIS BELL TEL. CO. -1.00 -6.98 6.43 0.00 TOTAL INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A8.pdf
  • However, after accounting for this, there has been no significant systematic seasonal variation. Once a year, in March, the CPS supplements its survey with additional questions, which include detailed information about income, and augments its sample with about 2,500 additional Hispanic households. Starting in 2001, the sample was further augmented with about 20,000 5 Tables 6.3 through 6.5, 6.11, and 6.17 of this section are derived from these raw data files. 6 The determination of the statistical significance of a change over time is discussed below. The critical value is dependent on the sizes of the samples from which the change is computed and by the confidence level, which is 95% here. 6 - 4 additional households with children.7 The more
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILECs by Tier .......................................................... Table 8.1 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC Quarterly Total ..............................................Table 8.2 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC Total - Chart ..................................................Chart 8.1 Penetration - Households ........................................................................................ Chart 6.1 Penetration - Individual Adults ............................................................................... Chart 6.8 Penetration by Household Size ............................................................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Household Size - Critical Values ....................................................Table 6.17 Penetration by Household Size - Chart ................................................................ Chart 6.5 Penetration by Householder's Age .......................................................................... Table 6.12 Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
  • Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILECs by Tier .......................................................... Table 8.1 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC Quarterly Total ..............................................Table 8.2 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC Total - Chart ..................................................Chart 8.1 Penetration - Households ........................................................................................ Chart 6.1 Penetration - Individual Adults ............................................................................... Chart 6.8 Penetration by Household Size ............................................................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Household Size - Critical Values ....................................................Table 6.17 Penetration by Household Size - Chart ................................................................ Chart 6.5 Penetration by Householder's Age .......................................................................... Table 6.12 Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 7.29 181 2.17 223 Texas 4,794,610 565,052 2,697,160 5.55 5.61 6.21 559 6.68 686 Utah 497,009 44,318 266,065 6.32 6.32 6.56 62 0.74 76 Vermont 206,660 12,680 82,462 6.41 6.39 6.83 24 0.28 29 Virginia 1,899,654 159,626 1,127,202 6.18 6.23 6.73 244 2.92 299 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 1,442,646 140,557 692,108 6.07 6.17 6.97 173 2.07 213 West Virginia 573,186 15,388 138,768 6.50 7.00 8.46 60 0.72 74 Wisconsin 1,284,594 65,551 699,893 5.65 5.42 6.53 146 1.75 180 Wyoming 115,099 5,716 90,831 6.50 7.00 9.20 19 0.23 24 Total 3/ 68,666,585 7,593,057 38,219,924 $5.95 $5.81 $6.38 $8,358 100.00%$10,323 Note: Figures may not add due to rounding. NA - Not Applicable. 1/ Excludes additional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2006 to 2007 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* KANSAS (CONT.) 411809 C MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 17.17 -4.02 22.08 25.57 411814 C PEOPLES TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC 4.95 -1.15 6.17 5.31 411817 C PIONEER TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION INC. 0.06 -3.23 3.40 -2.56 411818 C CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC- KS 7.74 -4.03 12.26 17.99 411820 C RAINBOW TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOC., INC. 3.15 -1.41 4.63 2.87 411826 C RURAL TEL. SERVICE CO.,INC. 1.37 -3.78 5.35 1.35 411826A C RURAL TEL. SERVICE CO.,INC. 208.86 -4.37 222.97 INFINITE 411827 C S & T TEL. COOP. ASSN.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.txt
  • However, after accounting for this, there has been no significant systematic seasonal variation. Once a year, in March, the CPS supplements its survey with additional questions, which include detailed information about income, and augments its sample with about 2,500 additional Hispanic households. Starting in 2001, the sample was further augmented with about 20,000 5 Tables 6.3 through 6.5, 6.11, and 6.17 of this section are derived from these raw data files. 6 The determination of the statistical significance of a change over time is discussed below. The critical value is dependent on the sizes of the samples from which the change is computed and by the confidence level, which is 95% here. 6 - 4 additional households with children.7 The more
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 49 0 24 América Móvil 6.50 6.50 9.20 0.00 0.00 687 1 172 AT&T 5.48 5.26 5.40 0.00 0.00 34,451 4,099 18,699 CenturyTel 5.67 5.47 7.17 0.05 0.06 4,934 348 1,694 Cincinnati Bell 5.28 5.28 5.28 0.00 0.00 466 31 259 Consolidated 6.50 6.50 9.20 0.00 0.00 136 6 55 FairPoint 6.23 6.23 6.23 0.00 0.00 835 54 320 Frontier 6.17 6.53 9.20 3.87 0.74 1,288 58 436 Hawaiian Telecom 6.50 7.00 8.15 0.00 0.00 365 35 90 Iowa Telecom 5.89 5.89 8.09 0.00 0.00 155 5 43 Pacific Telecom Inc. 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.71 0.11 11 0 4 Qwest 5.99 6.20 6.38 0.00 0.00 6,619 636 2,731 Verizon 6.27 6.29 6.76 0.45 0.06 20,585 2,388 10,959 Windstream 6.29 6.46 7.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 49 0 24 América Móvil 6.50 6.50 9.20 0.00 0.00 687 1 172 AT&T 5.47 5.26 5.41 0.00 0.00 31,552 3,570 17,938 CenturyTel 5.67 5.47 7.17 0.05 0.06 4,934 348 1,694 Cincinnati Bell 5.28 5.28 5.28 0.00 0.00 466 31 259 Consolidated 6.50 6.50 9.20 0.00 0.00 136 6 55 FairPoint 6.23 6.23 6.23 0.00 0.00 835 54 320 Frontier 6.17 6.53 9.20 3.87 0.74 1,288 58 436 Hawaiin Telecom 6.50 7.00 8.15 0.00 0.00 365 35 90 Iowa Telecom 5.89 5.89 8.09 0.00 0.00 155 5 43 Pacific Telecom Inc. 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.71 0.11 11 0 4 Qwest 5.99 6.20 6.38 0.00 0.00 6,619 636 2,731 Verizon 6.27 6.29 6.76 0.45 0.06 20,585 2,388 10,959 Windstream 6.29 6.46 7.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC Quarterly Total ..............................................Table 8.2 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILECs by Tier .......................................................... Table 8.1 Penetration - Civilian Noninstitutionalized Adults.................................................... Chart 6.8 Penetration - Households ........................................................................................ Chart 6.1 Penetration by Household Size ............................................................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Household Size - 2009 - Chart .......................................................Chart 6.5 Penetration by Household Size - Critical Values ................................................... Table 6.17 Penetration by Householder's Age .......................................................................... Table 6.12 Penetration by Householder's Age - 2009 - Chart ..................................................Chart 6.6 Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - 2009 - Chart .................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.txt
  • Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC Quarterly Total ..............................................Table 8.2 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILECs by Tier .......................................................... Table 8.1 Penetration - Civilian Noninstitutionalized Adults.................................................... Chart 6.8 Penetration - Households ........................................................................................ Chart 6.1 Penetration by Household Size ............................................................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Household Size - 2009 - Chart .......................................................Chart 6.5 Penetration by Household Size - Critical Values ................................................... Table 6.17 Penetration by Householder's Age .......................................................................... Table 6.12 Penetration by Householder's Age - 2009 - Chart ..................................................Chart 6.6 Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - 2009 - Chart .................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • A ALLENDALE TEL CO -7.56 -6.36 -1.28 0.00 310671 C CENTURYTEL MW-MI -4.87 -6.20 1.42 -32.98 310672 C COMM CORP OF MI -5.69 -4.69 -1.05 -100.00 310675 A BARAGA TEL CO 0.06 -4.08 4.31 -71.62 310676 A BARRY COUNTY TEL CO -1.12 -3.14 2.09 -100.00 310677 C ISLAND TEL CO -0.62 -1.19 0.58 0.00 310678 A BLANCHARD TEL. CO. -2.26 -6.17 4.16 -92.03 310679 C BLOOMINGDALE TEL CO -26.05 -4.91 -22.23 -57.64 310682 C FRONTIER-MICHIGAN -5.15 -7.88 2.95 0.00 310683 C CARR TEL CO 3.16 -7.45 11.47 14.51 310685 C CHATHAM TEL CO - MI -4.98 -4.65 -0.34 -37.96 310688 A CLIMAX TEL CO -2.80 -6.72 4.20 -93.66 310689 C CENTURYTEL-UPPER MI -1.60 -5.21 3.80 -15.33 310691 C DEERFIELD FARMERS 9.27
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.txt
  • However, after accounting for this, there has been no significant systematic seasonal variation. Once a year, in March, the CPS supplements its survey with additional questions, which include detailed information about income, and augments its sample with about 2,500 additional Hispanic households. Starting in 2001, the sample was further augmented with about 20,000 5 Tables 6.3 through 6.5, 6.11, and 6.17 of this section are derived from these raw data files. 6 The determination of the statistical significance of a change over time is discussed below. The critical value is dependent on the sizes of the samples from which the change is computed and by the confidence level, which is 95% here. 6 - 4 additional households with children.7 The more
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • Centrex ACS $6.50 NA $9.07 $0.00 $0.00 77 0 69 AT&T 5.48 5.17 5.31 0.00 0.00 24,284 2,404 15,238 América Móvil 6.50 6.50 9.20 0.00 0.00 582 1 154 CenturyLink 5.80 5.82 6.44 0.00 0.00 9,619 651 3,875 Cincinnati Bell 5.27 5.27 5.27 0.00 0.00 376 21 240 Consolidated 6.50 6.50 9.20 0.00 0.00 81 4 35 FairPoint 6.16 6.14 6.17 0.00 0.00 650 51 191 Frontier 6.38 6.88 9.05 1.61 0.23 3,754 163 1,290 Hawaiian Telecom 6.50 7.00 8.15 0.00 0.00 302 24 85 Innovative 6.50 NA 9.15 0.00 0.00 40 0 16 PTI Pacifica Inc. 6.50 7.00 9.20 1.14 1.14 8 0 6 Verizon 6.19 6.14 6.40 0.24 0.04 14,115 1,519 7,850 Windstream 6.33 6.55 7.99 0.26 0.20 1,786
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 5.01 5.13 4.52 4.56 4.30 4.38 4.31 3.00 4.19a e 7 Resale Centrex no field work 1.00 2.87 3.20 3.09 2.69 1.45 1.42 1.58 1.08 1.68 7 Resale ISDN BRI field work 9.56 14.33 9.88 7.00 9.45 8.76 9.24a cde 7 Resale ISDN BRI no field work 2.99 15.00 3.19 4.81 2.46 1.88abcde 7 Resale PBX field work 8.68 7.18 6.17 7.99 1.33 6.58abcde 7 Resale PBX no field work 7.58 6.36 4.65 5.99 1.00 5.04abcde 7 Resale Residential POTS field work 0.76 1.59 0.73 1.59 0.83 1.51 0.80 1.67 0.68 1.44 7 Resale Residential POTS no field work 0.16 0.54 0.13 0.65 0.14 0.62 0.10 0.74 0.07 0.69 7 Resale VGPL/DS0 field work 13.04 6.0010.20 3.0012.92 10.67 9.87abcde 7 UNE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • >= DS1/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (hours) 82.12 32.58 134.39 34.84 119.68 43.98 128.70 38.86 164.60 57.80 Average Completion Notice Interval - Non-Mechanized B.2.22.2.1.1Local Interoffice Transport/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (hours) 16.46 B.2.22.3.1.1Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (hours) 14.64 16.49 22.49 20.09 23.82 B.2.22.3.1.2Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/TN (hours) 4.18 9.31 8.10 6.78 8.64 B.2.22.3.1.3Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Switch Based Orders/TN (hours) 2.04 7.56 4.38 4.97 6.17 B.2.22.3.1.4Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/TN (hours) 11.69 14.06 17.18 12.98 13.45 B.2.22.3.2.1Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (hours) 17.24 40.73 17.92 2,4,5 B.2.22.3.2.2Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/TN (hours) 14.00 27.10 1,4 C - 36 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.txt
  • 100 100 OR-1-19-5020 % On Time Resp. - Request for Inbound Augment Trunks (<= 192 Forecasted Trunks) 100 100 100 100 100 1,2,3,4 OR-1-19-5030 % On Time Resp. - Request for Inbound Augment Trunks (> 192 Forecasted Trunks) NA 100 100 NA 100 2,3 OR-2 - Reject Timeliness OR-2-11-5000 Average Trunk ASR Reject Time (<= 192 Forecasted Trunks) 2.5 2.43 6.17 21 1,2,3,4,5 OR-2-12-5000 % On Time Trunk ASR Reject (<= 192 Forecasted Trunks) 100 85.7 83.33 50 100 1,2,3,4,5 Provisioning PR-1 - Average Interval Offered PR-1-09-5020 Av. Interval Offered - Total (<= 192 Forecasted Trunks) 21 15.5 71 58 57 22.67 18 34.5 23 18.8 1,2,3,4,5 PR-1-09-5030 Av. Interval Offered - Total (> 192 & Unforecasted Trunks) 26 27.5 35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.txt
  • used intensively in the public interest will be furthered by requiring that each point-to-point link have a minimum payload capacity (megabits/second (Mbits/s) for a given bandwidth). We agree with the WCS Coalition that the capacity requirements in section 101.141(b) of our rules-which require for nominal bandwidths of 1.25, 2.5, 3.75 and 5 megahertz, a minimum payload capacity of 3.08 Mbits/s, 6.17 Mbits/s, 12.30 Mbits/s, and 18.5 Mbits/s, respectively-may require more construction than would be necessary to ensure meaningful deployment in certain markets. Rather, we believe that the less stringent payload requirement specified in section 101.141(a) of the rules is sufficient to ensure that the valuable WCS spectrum is used efficiently and intensively, while affording licensees ample flexibility to design fixed systems,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1_Rcd.pdf
  • is used intensively in the public interest will be furthered by requiring that each point-to-point link have a minimum payload capacity (megabits/second (Mbits/s) for a given bandwidth). We agree with the WCS Coalition that the capacity requirements in section 101.141(b) of our rules-which require for nominal bandwidths of 1.25, 2.5, 3.75 and 5 megahertz, a minimumpayload capacity of 3.08 Mbits/s, 6.17 Mbits/s, 12.30Mbits/s, and 18.5 Mbits/s, respectively-may require more construction than would be necessary to ensure meaningful deployment in certain markets.502Rather, we believe that the less stringent payload requirement specified in section 101.141(a) of the rules503is sufficient to ensure that the valuable WCS spectrum is used efficiently and intensively, while affording licensees ample flexibility to 498In a fixed point-to-point system deployment,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.txt
  • providers of telecommunications services, as defined under this subpart are subject to the enforcement provisions specified in the Act and the Commission's rules. (b) For purposes of 6.15 through 6.23, the term ``manufacturers'' shall denote manufacturers of telecommunications equipment or customer premises equipment and the term ``providers'' shall denote providers of telecommunications services. § 6.16 Informal or formal complaints Sections 6.17 through 6.23 of this subpart shall sunset on October 8, 2013. On October 8, 2013, any person may file either a formal or informal complaint against a manufacturer or provider alleging violations of Section 255 or this Part subject to the enforcement requirements set forth in §§ 14.30 through 14.52 of this chapter. Part 7 of Title 47 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.txt
  • implications in enforcement proceedings wherein covered entities may be called upon to refute claims of noncompliance. See Enforcement Section infra Section VI.C. 47 U.S.C. § 618(a). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 6.15 to 6.23. Formal complaints may be filed in the form and manner prescribed under Sections 1.720 - 1.736 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 6.21. 47 C.F.R. § 6.17(a), (b)(1)-(7). An informal complaint must include (1) the name and address of the complainant; (2) the name and address of the manufacturer or provider against whom the complaint is made; (3) a full description of the telecommunications equipment, CPE or telecommunications service about which the complaint is made; (4) the date(s) on which the complainant purchased or used the telecommunications
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.wp
  • 6.1 Who must comply with these rules? Subpart B -- Definitions 6.3 Definitions Subpart C -- Obligations - What must covered entities do? 6.5 General Obligations of Manufacturers 6.7 General Obligations Service Providers 6.9 Product Design , Development and Evaluation 6.11 Information Pass through 6.13 Information, Documentation and Training Subpart D -- Enforcement 6.15 Generally 6.16 Informal or formal complaints 6.17 Informal complaints; form and content 6.18 Procedure; designation of agents for service 6.19 Answers to informal complaints 6.20 Review and disposition of informal complaints 6.21 Formal Complaints, applicability of Sections 1.720 - 1.736 of the rules 6.22 Formal complaints based on unsatisfied informal complaints 6.23 Actions by the Commission on its on motion Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j) 208, 255
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • 2.71 1.42 2.98 PO-1-02-6020 Due Date Availability ­ EDI 0.09 NA 0.07 NA 0.07 NA 0.06 NA 0.06 NA PO-1-02-6030 Due Date Availability ­ CORBA 0.09 NA 0.07 NA 0.07 NA 0.06 NA 0.06 NA PO-1-02-6050 Due Date Availability - Web GUI 0.09 2.26 0.07 2.12 0.07 2.21 0.06 2.41 0.06 2.19 PO-1-03-6020 Address Validation ­ EDI 4.34 3.8 4.07 6.17 3.85 8.68 3.67 10.21 3.85 NA a,b,c,d PO-1-03-6030 Address Validation ­ CORBA 4.34 3.76 4.07 2.97 3.85 2.86 3.67 3.62 3.85 2.45 PO-1-03-6050 Address Validation - Web GUI 4.34 5.04 4.07 4.89 3.85 4.84 3.67 5.23 3.85 4.59 PO-1-04-6020 Product & Service Availability ­ EDI 10.07 NA 9.02 NA 8.48 NA 8.2 NA 8.5 NA PO-1-04-6030 Product & Service Availability
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/element8.doc
  • The sweep frequency of a RADAR indicator is determined by what parameter? A. Carrier frequency. B. Pulse width. C. Duty cycle. D. Pulse repetition frequency. Answer Key: 8-1A1: A 8-1A2: B 8-1A3: A 8-1A4: C 8-1A5: B 8-1A6: D Key Topic 2 - Distance and Time 8-2A1 A radio wave will travel a distance of three nautical miles in: A. 6.17 microseconds. B. 37.0 microseconds. C. 22.76 microseconds. D. 18.51 microseconds. 8-2A2 One RADAR mile is how many microseconds? A. 6.2 B. 528.0 C. 12.34 D. 0.186 8-2A3 RADAR range is measured by the constant: A. 150 meters per microsecond. B. 150 yards per microsecond. C. 300 yards per microsecond. D. 18.6 miles per microsecond. 8-2A4 If a target is 5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.wp
  • 6.1 Who must comply with these rules? Subpart B -- Definitions 6.3 Definitions Subpart C -- Obligations - What must covered entities do? 6.5 General Obligations of Manufacturers 6.7 General Obligations Service Providers 6.9 Product Design , Development and Evaluation 6.11 Information Pass through 6.13 Information, Documentation and Training Subpart D -- Enforcement 6.15 Generally 6.16 Informal or formal complaints 6.17 Informal complaints; form and content 6.18 Procedure; designation of agents for service 6.19 Answers to informal complaints 6.20 Review and disposition of informal complaints 6.21 Formal Complaints, applicability of Sections 1.720 - 1.736 of the rules 6.22 Formal complaints based on unsatisfied informal complaints 6.23 Actions by the Commission on its on motion Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j) 208, 255
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • >= DS1/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (hours) 82.12 32.58 134.39 34.84 119.68 43.98 128.70 38.86 164.60 57.80 Average Completion Notice Interval - Non-Mechanized B.2.22.2.1.1Local Interoffice Transport/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (hours) 16.46 B.2.22.3.1.1Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (hours) 14.64 16.49 22.49 20.09 23.82 B.2.22.3.1.2Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/TN (hours) 4.18 9.31 8.10 6.78 8.64 B.2.22.3.1.3Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Switch Based Orders/TN (hours) 2.04 7.56 4.38 4.97 6.17 B.2.22.3.1.4Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/TN (hours) 11.69 14.06 17.18 12.98 13.45 B.2.22.3.2.1Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (hours) 17.24 40.73 17.92 2,4,5 B.2.22.3.2.2Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/TN (hours) 14.00 27.10 1,4 C - 36 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 911 and Other Charges 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.81 6.11 5.95 5.82 5.77 Total Monthly Charge $49.89 $49.44 $48.84 $49.08 $49.78 $49.04 $49.54 $49.00 $49.22 $49.56 $50.12 $49.45 $49.43 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33 $44.71 $45.05 $43.78 $42.86 $44.03 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.02 6.16 6.17 6.10 6.63 7.06 7.70 7.87 7.44 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 2.25 2.15 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.13 1.07 0.96 0.60 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.41 Taxes, including 911 and other Charges 6.77 6.73 6.70 6.83 6.96 6.96 7.16 7.16 7.17 7.79 7.14 7.19 7.28 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $59.51 $59.32 $58.48 $58.64 $59.60 $59.14 $59.70 $59.55 $59.11 $60.39 $59. 10
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • Charges 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.81 6.11 5.95 5.82 6.65 6.67 Total Monthly Charge $49.89 $49.44 $48.84 $49.08 $49.78 $49.04 $49.54 $49.00 $49.22 $49.56 $50.12 $49.45 $51.22 $49.94 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33 $44.71 $45.05 $43.78 $42.86 $43.90 $43.41 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.02 6.16 6.17 6.10 6.63 7.06 7.70 7.87 7.46 6.99 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 2.25 2.15 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.13 1.07 0.96 0.60 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.40 0.30 Taxes, including 911 and other Charges 6.77 6.73 6.70 6.83 6.96 6.96 7.16 7.16 7.17 7.79 7.14 7.19 7.84 8.35 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $59.51 $59.32 $58.48 $58.64 $59.60 $59.14 $59.70 $59.55 $59.11
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 2.65 2.49 1.94 1.82 1.75 1.22 1.02 Tax including 911 charges 5.18 5.21 5.12 5.28 5.36 5.35 5.49 Total monthly charge 49.89 49.49 48.94 49.15 49.66 49.03 48.66 # cities offering Unlimited Service 59 56 54 54 54 53 53 Unlimited Service base rate 44.84 44.80 44.40 44.49 44.61 44.96 43.55 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.01 6.16 6.17 Extra for Touch-tone 2.25 2.15 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.13 1.11 Tax including 911 charges 6.77 6.68 6.65 6.78 6.92 6.86 6.92 Total monthly charge 59.51 59.31 58.47 58.63 59.30 59.11 57.75 # cities offering Measured Service 77 77 78 78 78 81 81 Measured Service base rate 20.38 20.55 19.93 19.49 19.56 19.89 20.35 Cost of 200 5-minute business-day calls
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Extra for Touch-tone 2.65 2.49 1.94 1.82 1.67 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.47 Taxes including 911 Charges 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.82 Total Monthly Charge 49.89 49.44 48.84 49.08 49.78 49.04 49.54 49.00 49.62 Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33 $45.52 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.02 6.16 6.17 6.10 6.59 Extra for Touch-tone 2.25 2.15 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.13 1.07 0.96 0.65 Taxes including 911 Charges 6.77 6.73 6.70 6.83 6.96 6.96 7.16 7.16 7.26 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service 59.51 59.32 58.48 58.64 59.60 59.14 59.70 59.55 60.02 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-rate Service 59 56 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 Monthly Charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • Average Rate Median Rate Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $45.05 $49.20 Federal and State Subscriber Line Charges 12.06 9.00 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 0.49 0.00 Other 7.79 9.17 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service 65.39 70.37 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-rate Service 54 - Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $20.41 $17.95 Federal and State Subscriber Line Charges 6.17 6.15 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 0.27 0.00 Other 4.03 4.94 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 30.88 27.80 Cost of a 5-minute Daytime Call 9.21˘ 8.00˘ Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 80 - Basic Connection Charge for Three Lines $156.18 $156.75 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 0.67 0.00 Other 9.97 9.80 Total Connection Charge for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 8.86 26Fort Bend Telephone Co. dba TXU Communications 12.38 12.65 15.54 13.01 4.70 11.01 27Fort Mill Telephone Company 13.80 11.92 21.93 3.91 49.78 18.83 28Gallatin River Communications, LLC 13.64 11.31 9.58 24.56 15.09 22.17 29Gulf Telephone Company 13.31 11.39 15.73 11.68 17.13 15.16 30Hargray Telephone Company 9.23 14.30 6.94 (0.03) 9.25 5.09 31Home Telephone Company, Inc 9.63 11.77 14.97 (0.21) 6.17 0.91 32Horry Telephone Cooperative, Inc 10.83 11.80 14.90 9.39 6.68 7.77 33Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company 23.60 9.37 10.77 6.80 30.67 23.49 34Lancaster Telephone Company 8.97 12.10 (1.64) 8.74 1.23 7.58 35Moultrie Independent Telephone Company (13.34) 13.35 (36.72) (27.70) 71.70 (3.17) 36Odin Telephone Exchange, Inc. 17.25 67.94 1.26 39.19 5.84 37Puerto Rico Telephone Company 9.67 8.59 54.33 16.14 (52.54) 5.54 7.98
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • 33Horry Telephone Cooperative, Inc 11.01 11.25 25.52 8.41 0.00 3.67 4.40 34Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company 14.15 12.26 11.61 302.78 31.89 32.45 35Lancaster Telephone Company 14.14 12.58 5.74 25.00 0.00 40.68 27.55 36Moultrie Independent Telephone Company 5.59 12.93 (5.73) 10.28 9.85 10.24 37Odin Telephone Exchange, Inc. 11.50 43.69 (5.70) 11.25 (3.79) 38Puerto Rico Telephone Company 10.55 12.35 10.71 3.91 214.88 6.29 6.17 39Rock Hill Telephone Company 14.88 12.57 23.23 16.30 0.00 6.79 14.14 40Surewest Telephone 1 15.59 12.19 16.98 13.74 0.00 27.84 23.43 41Telephone Utilities Exchange Carrier Assoc. 17.91 11.25 53.69 42TXU Communications Telephone Company, Inc. 15.11 8.97 31.78 28.27 0.00 24.45 24.70 43Utelco, Inc. 44Virgin Islands Telephone Corporation 15.88 10.96 43.04 5.71 (271.38) 55.66 23.46 45Warwick Valley Telephone Company 13.05 11.34
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 15 499 543 1.02 561 12 573 PENNSYLVANIA 1,727 140 1,867 1,969 3.69 2,032 44 2,076 RHODE ISLAND 180 15 196 196 0.37 202 4 206 SOUTH CAROLINA 580 48 627 839 1.57 866 19 885 SOUTH DAKOTA 82 (4) 78 101 0.19 104 2 106 TENNESSEE 887 99 985 1,123 2.10 1,159 25 1,184 TEXAS 2,971 122 3,093 3,295 6.17 3,400 73 3,473 UTAH 246 26 272 285 0.53 294 6 300 VERMONT 77 9 86 102 0.19 105 2 107 VIRGINIA 1,185 95 1,280 1,314 2.46 1,356 29 1,385 WASHINGTON 820 52 872 957 1.79 987 21 1,008 WEST VIRGINIA 294 7 301 360 0.67 372 8 380 WISCONSIN 677 43 720 884 1.66 913 20 932 WYOMING 64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • Group Long Distance, Inc. 60 5.0 12.00 2 Network Utilization 23 2.0 11.50 3 ATN/Advanced Telecom Network 22 2.0 11.00 3 Long Distance Services 22 2.0 11.00 3 Vista Group International 400 37.5 10.67 2 National Accounts Long Distance 20 2.0 10.00 3 US Republic Communications 256 37.5 6.83 3 Telcam 33 5.0 6.60 2 International Telecommunications Corp. 108 17.5 6.17 2 Winstar Gateway Network 29 5.0 5.80 2 Uni-Tel Communications 26 5.0 5.20 2 L.D. Services, Inc. 180 37.5 4.80 2 3 - 7 TABLE 3.5 SLAMMING COMPLAINTS: INDICES FOR IXCs SERVED 40 OR MORE - CONTINUED (January 1, 1999 Through June 30, 1999) RevenueSlammingRevenue SlammingFigure UsedComplaintSource Carrier Complaints(millions) Index Code* USN Communications 65 $17.5 3.71 2 North American Telephone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 1.45 5.25 10.00 7.98 5.25 13.50 10.89 New Hampshire 8.20 8.25 8.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.20 8.25 8.20 8.20 8.25 8.20 New Jersey 7.38 8.06 8.05 0.00 3.46 3.43 0.00 1.73 1.71 7.38 9.79 9.77 7.38 13.25 13.20 New Mexico 7.91 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 3.29 0.00 1.75 1.65 7.91 10.00 9.89 7.91 13.50 13.18 New York 6.17 8.25 8.09 0.00 3.50 3.30 0.00 1.75 1.65 6.17 10.00 9.73 6.17 13.50 13.03 North Carolina 7.83 8.25 8.08 3.50 3.50 3.49 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.58 10.00 9.83 13.08 13.50 13.32 North Dakota 3.50 8.25 8.00 0.00 3.50 1.86 0.00 1.75 0.93 3.50 10.00 8.93 3.50 13.50 10.79 N. Marianna Islands 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-6.pdf
  • include detailed information about income, and augments its sample with about 3,000 additional Hispanic households.7 Starting in 2001, the sample was further augmented with about 20,000 additional households with children.8 The more detailed information from the March surveys makes it possible to adjust the income categories for inflation, and therefore make the purchasing 5 Tables 6.3 through 6.5, 6.11, and 6.17 of this section are derived from these raw data files. 6 The determination of the statistical significance of a change over time is discussed below. The critical value is dependent on the sizes of the samples from which the change is computed and by the confidence level, which is 95% here. 7 The responses from these additional households are not
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • Charges 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.81 6.11 5.95 5.82 6.65 6.67 Total Monthly Charge 49.89 49.44 48.84 49.08 49.78 49.04 49.54 49.00 49.22 49.56 50.12 49.43 51.22 49.94 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33 $44.71 $45.05 $43.78 $42.86 $43.90 $43.41 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.02 6.16 6.17 6.10 6.63 7.06 7.70 7.87 7.46 6.99 Extra for Touch-Tone 2.25 2.15 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.13 1.07 0.96 0.60 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.40 0.30 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 6.77 6.73 6.70 6.83 6.96 6.96 7.16 7.16 7.17 7.79 7.14 7.19 7.84 8.35 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service 59.51 59.32 58.48 58.64 59.60 59.14 59.70 59.55 59.11 60.39 59.10
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
  • - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.15 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.7 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .............................................. Table 6.17 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.10 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.4 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State ................................................................................................ Table 6.6 Penetration
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-2.pdf
  • 1.49 5.25 10.00 7.96 5.25 13.50 10.95 New Hampshire 8.20 8.25 8.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.20 8.25 8.20 8.20 8.25 8.20 New Jersey 7.38 8.06 8.05 0.00 3.44 3.41 0.00 1.72 1.70 7.38 9.78 9.76 7.38 13.22 13.17 New Mexico 7.92 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 3.31 0.00 1.75 1.65 7.92 10.00 9.89 7.92 13.50 13.20 New York 6.17 8.25 8.09 0.00 3.50 3.30 0.00 1.75 1.65 6.17 10.00 9.74 6.17 13.50 13.04 North Carolina 7.83 8.25 8.09 3.50 3.50 3.49 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.58 10.00 9.83 13.08 13.50 13.33 North Dakota 5.25 8.25 8.00 0.00 3.50 1.93 0.00 1.75 0.96 5.25 10.00 8.96 5.25 13.50 10.89 N. Marianna Islands 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 5.50 482241 C HOT SPRINGS TEL. CO. 1.62 -1.13 2.78 0.31 482242 C INTERBEL TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 13.28 0.43 12.79 15.90 482244 C LINCOLN TEL. CO. INC. 0.08 4.19 -3.94 -100.00 482246 C MID-RIVERS TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 3.16 0.00 3.15 2.35 482247 C NEMONT TELEPHONE COOP.- MONTANA -5.57 -0.04 -5.53 -20.56 482248 C NORTHERN TEL. COOP INC.- MT 4.08 -1.97 6.17 5.05 482249 C CENTURYTEL OF MONTANA, INC. 1.34 -1.79 3.18 -8.08 482250 C PROJECT TEL. CO. 17.97 -1.67 19.97 37.38 482251 C RANGE TEL. COOP INC.-MT -1.09 0.62 -1.70 -9.32 482252 A RONAN TEL. CO. 7.58 -5.50 13.84 0.00 482254 C SOUTHERN MONTANA TEL. CO. 6.68 2.85 3.73 6.23 482255 3-RIVERS TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 2.72 0.65 2.06 0.66 482257 C
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-6.pdf
  • with children.7 The more detailed information from the March surveys makes it possible to adjust the income categories for inflation, and therefore make the purchasing power within each category stable over time. In the July and November surveys, only broad income categories are reported. (These are the categories that appear in Table 6.7.) 5 Tables 6.3 through 6.5, 6.11, and 6.17 of this section are derived from these raw data files. 6 The determination of the statistical significance of a change over time is discussed below. The critical value is dependent on the sizes of the samples from which the change is computed and by the confidence level, which is 95% here. 7 The responses from the additional Hispanic households and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-intro.pdf
  • Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.15 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.7 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.17 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.13 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.10 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.4 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 1.00 0.85 0.41 0.33 0.27 Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.81 6.11 5.95 Total Monthly Charge 49.89 49.44 48.84 49.08 49.78 49.04 49.54 49.00 49.22 49.56 50.09 Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33 $44.71 $45.05 $43.87 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.02 6.16 6.17 6.10 6.63 7.06 7.38 Extra for Touch-tone 2.25 2.15 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.13 1.07 0.96 0.60 0.49 0.47 Taxes, including 911 and other Charges 6.77 6.73 6.70 6.83 6.96 6.96 7.16 7.16 7.17 7.79 7.17 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service 59.51 59.32 58.48 58.64 59.60 59.14 59.70 59.55 59.11 60.39 58.90 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-rate Service 59
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • by Householder's Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.15 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ...........................................................Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................Table 6.7 Penetration by Income - Chart ...........................................................................Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .............................................. Table 6.17 Penetration by Income - Critical Values .................................................................Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status ..........................................................................Table 6.10 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.4 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.15 Penetration by Householder's Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.7 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .............................................. Table 6.17 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.10 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.4 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State ................................................................................................ Table 6.6 Penetration
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 24.2 45.4 134.0 0.222HI Idaho 202.2 4.27 197.9 28.9 169.0 73.8 28.5 62.7 164.9 4.027ID Illinois 1,300.8 3.42 1,297.4 215.3 1,082.1 441.2 162.3 478.6 1,082.1 0.003IL Indiana 725.9 2.54 723.4 156.2 567.2 278.1 73.1 216.0 567.2 0.012IN Iowa 252.0 5.79 246.2 46.7 199.5 64.8 37.2 90.4 192.4 7.139IA Kansas 314.5 314.5 47.5 267.0 98.6 34.2 134.2 267.0 KS Kentucky 456.1 6.17 449.9 76.2 373.7 180.6 55.4 129.9 365.9 7.839KY Louisiana 461.6 10.97 450.7 60.7 390.0 190.1 54.9 132.7 377.7 12.279LA Maine 180.7 2.72 178.0 29.5 148.6 58.4 24.7 65.5 148.6 ME Maryland 773.8 12.72 761.1 143.9 617.2 277.1 75.8 263.8 616.7 0.551MD Massachusetts 962.8 13.51 949.3 108.3 840.9 364.6 105.8 370.4 840.9 MA Michigan 1,278.1 3.75 1,274.3 373.4 901.0 417.1 109.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • 2.71 1.42 2.98 PO-1-02-6020 Due Date Availability ­ EDI 0.09 NA 0.07 NA 0.07 NA 0.06 NA 0.06 NA PO-1-02-6030 Due Date Availability ­ CORBA 0.09 NA 0.07 NA 0.07 NA 0.06 NA 0.06 NA PO-1-02-6050 Due Date Availability - Web GUI 0.09 2.26 0.07 2.12 0.07 2.21 0.06 2.41 0.06 2.19 PO-1-03-6020 Address Validation ­ EDI 4.34 3.8 4.07 6.17 3.85 8.68 3.67 10.21 3.85 NA a,b,c,d PO-1-03-6030 Address Validation ­ CORBA 4.34 3.76 4.07 2.97 3.85 2.86 3.67 3.62 3.85 2.45 PO-1-03-6050 Address Validation - Web GUI 4.34 5.04 4.07 4.89 3.85 4.84 3.67 5.23 3.85 4.59 PO-1-04-6020 Product & Service Availability ­ EDI 10.07 NA 9.02 NA 8.48 NA 8.2 NA 8.5 NA PO-1-04-6030 Product & Service Availability
• http://www.fcc.gov/dtv/markets/maps_report2/Albuquerque-Santa_Fe_NM.pdf
  • CO-5 NM-3 UT-2 A6 D15 2008 Hammett & Edison, Inc. 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 MI 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 KM Station KREZ-TV ˇ Analog Channel 6, DTV Channel 15 ˇ Durango, CO Expected Change In Coverage: Licensed Operation Licensed (solid): 46.0 kW ERP at 90 m HAAT, Network: CBS vs. Analog (dashed): 6.17 kW ERP at 110 m HAAT, Network: CBS Market: Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM Coverage gained after DTV transition (no symbol)No change in coverage Coverage lost after DTV transition KREZ-TV Licensed Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM KREZ-TV Population Receiving Analog Service.................69,008 Population Receiving Digital Service..................67,294 The following statistics pertain only to the area outside the analog service contour: Analog Population Losing Service.............................88 Population Gaining
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour Measure 2005 2.31 2.80 3.03 (45) (30) (24) 2007 2.05 2.76 2.71 (45) (38) (46) 2009 1.50 1.81 2.07 * (56) (48) (63) Miscellaneous Format Market Measure 2005 3.03 2.51 1.34 (8) (5) (6) 2007 4.54 6.17 4.32 (35) (25) (41) 2009 3.94 4.27 3.43 (51) (44) (79) Contour Measure 2005 1.52 1.77 4.43 (8) (6) (5) 2007 3.46 5.44 * 5.64 * (34) (27) (40) 2009 2.68 3.33 4.75 * (47) (49) (78) * - difference between the category mean and the mean of the No LPFM category is statistically different from zero using a two-sided
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour Measure 2005 2.31 2.80 3.03 (45) (30) (24) 2007 2.05 2.76 2.71 (45) (38) (46) 2009 1.50 1.81 2.07 * (56) (48) (63) Miscellaneous Format Market Measure 2005 3.03 2.51 1.34 (8) (5) (6) 2007 4.54 6.17 4.32 (35) (25) (41) 2009 3.94 4.27 3.43 (51) (44) (79) Contour Measure 2005 1.52 1.77 4.43 (8) (6) (5) 2007 3.46 5.44 * 5.64 * (34) (27) (40) 2009 2.68 3.33 4.75 * (47) (49) (78) * -difference between the category mean and the mean of the No LPFM category is statistically different from zero usinga two-sided unpaired t-test
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4.pdf
  • VHF Channel 153.22 *** 15.25 -2.73 4.47 Dummy2003 117.27 *** 23.04 -9.52 15.39 Dummy2004 170.18 *** 51.02 54.83 ** 22.27 Dummy2005 205.42 *** 78.39 28.97 28.77 ABC 913.40 *** 54.97 32.61 *** 7.47 CBS 866.59 *** 54.80 21.93 *** 6.26 PBS 372.46 *** 42.09 130.84 * 67.38 NBC 809.12 *** 44.81 35.34 *** 8.50 FOX 322.66 *** 25.79 27.00 *** 6.17 IND 169.06 *** 31.48 64.31 *** 19.59 WB 82.41 *** 19.86 4.42 5.74 REL 23.67 26.27 27.09 26.10 UPN 13.30 21.60 1.16 5.21 UNI 502.54 *** 33.76 -7.32 14.12 PAX 119.78 *** 18.27 14.35 13.23 PUB 522.69 *** 110.99 367.73 ** 173.52 TBN 17.16 16.10 -14.02 13.98 INS 8.53 73.51 9.09 24.79 TEL 378.66 *** 27.67 8.46 11.72 AZT 328.46
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • 6.06. AT&T Broadband and AT&T Broadband Subsidiaries.......59 SECTION 6.07. SEC Filings.........................................60 SECTION 6.08. Financial Statements..................................61 SECTION 6.09. Information Supplied.................................61 SECTION 6.10. Absence of Certain Changes............................62 SECTION 6.11. No Undisclosed Material Liabilities......................62 SECTION 6.12. Compliance with Laws and Court Orders.................63 SECTION 6.13. Litigation...........................................63 SECTION 6.14. Finders' Fees.......................................63 SECTION 6.15. Opinion of Financial Advisor...........................64 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iii SECTION 6.16. Taxes..............................................64 SECTION 6.17. Tax Opinions........................................65 SECTION 6.18. Employee Benefit Plans and Labor Matters................65 SECTION 6.19. Environmental Matters................................67 SECTION 6.20. Intellectual Property..................................68 SECTION 6.21. Contracts...........................................69 SECTION 6.22. AT&T Shareholder Vote...............................70 SECTION 6.23. Antitakeover Statutes.................................70 SECTION 6.24. Comcast Securities...................................70 SECTION 6.25. TWE; At Home......................................70 SECTION 6.26. Intercompany Transactions............................72 SECTION 6.27. Sufficiency of Transferred Assets........................72 SECTION 6.28. Investments.........................................73 ARTICLE 7 COVENANTS OF COMCAST SECTION 7.01. Comcast