FCC Web Documents citing 6.16

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4721A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4721A1.pdf
  • Mile Hi Cable Partners. Salsgiver's Other Facial Challenges to the Pole Attachment Agreement Are Denied. Salsgiver's remaining claims are denied. Contrary to Salsgiver's allegations, we find that sections 2.1, 5.2.1, 5.3, 6.1, 6.4, 6.7, 9.1, 9.2, and 9.5 of the Pole Attachment Agreement are not facially unlawful. As to its claims regarding sections 2.6, 3.2, 5.11, 5.5.4, 6.2, 6.6, and 6.16 of the Pole Attachment Agreement, Salsgiver has failed to meet its burden of proving the facts necessary to show that those provisions would be unlawful, as applied. Salsgiver has also failed to meet its burden of proving that NPTC has imposed unlawful make-ready charges. Finally, we deny as moot Salsgiver's claim that NPTC violated 47 C.F.R. � 1.1403(b) by failing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-108A1.txt
  • paras. 81-99 (2000) (NRO Second Report and Order). See 47 C.F.R. � 52.15(k). . Depending on the circumstances, a ``for cause'' audit may consist of some, none, or all of the audit procedures contained in the NRO Audit Program. See 47 C.F.R. � 52.15(k)(2); see also American Inst. of Certified Pub. Accountants, Attestation Standards: Revision and Recodification at �� 6.01, 6.16 (Jan. 2001). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). See Numbering Audit Program at Line No. 5. See Numbering Audit Program at Line No. 10. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1412A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1412A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1412A2.txt
  • March and September. 809 Codes 8.0 Semi-annual; status monthly. Biannually in March and September. Numbering Resource Utilization Form 3.2, 6.0, 6.1.5, 8.0, 8.2.2 Semi-annual on February and August 1st. Code Relief Planning Report to NANC 5.1.5 Quarterly. Reserved. Reserved. Status of Pending Relief Plans 5.1.9 Monthly, to FCC/NANC. Contact List Maintenance 4.4, 6.1.2, 7.7 Quarterly. Reserved. Reserved. NANP/NPA Exhaust Analysis 6.16, 7.18.1 Contingent upon material impact and semiannually. NPA/NANP Life Impact 6.1.8 Contingent, within 30 days of receipt of the updated NRUF Report. Reports to Regulatory Authorities 6.1.9, 8.2.2 Contingent, within 10 days of request following 30 days after the NRUF reporting deadline. NRUF Anomalies 6.1.11, 6.3.3, 8.2.1 Contingent, in case of unresolveable anomalies, to State Regulatory Commissions or FCC. Also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • have the assignment entered into the List, indicating the final characteristics of the frequency assignment together with the names of the administrations with which agreement has been reached. For this purpose, it shall send to the Bureau the information specified in Appendix 4. In submitting the notice, the administration may request the Bureau to examine the notice simultaneously under � 6.16 (entry into the List) and � 8.8, 8.9 (notification). 6.15. If the information received by the Bureau under � 6.14 is found to be incomplete, the Bureau shall immediately seek from the administration concerned any clarification required and information not provided. 6.16. Upon receipt of a complete (Appendix 4) notice relating to the proposed assignment under � 6.14, the Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • -0.0023 138 CPM, AM Drive 3.79 (0.45) -0.57*(3.74) 11.21 (0.47) -2.98 (-0.47) -0.0003 (-0.40) 0.2400 138 CPM, Evening 2.60 (0.25) -0.66*(3.50) 30.12 (1.01) -0.53 (-0.07) 0.0002 (0.17) 0.2688 138 CPM, Average 3.27 (0.39) -0.58*(3.79) 15.82 (0.66) -1.07 (-0.17) 0.0000 (0.03) 0.2544 138 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 6.26 (0.39) -0.64*(2.01) -0.73 (-0.02) -17.13 (-1.41) 0.0001 (0.05) 0.7997 133 CPP, Evening 6.16 (0.35) -0.37 (1.08) 6.31 (0.12) -5.54 (-0.42) -0.0002 (-0.11) 0.6959 133 CPP, Average 4.69 (0.32) -0.44 (1.49) 0.30 (0.01) -10.95 (-0.99) 0.0005 (0.30) 0.8153 133 CPM, AM Drive 0.87 (0.11) -0.38*(2.46) 8.03 (0.35) -3.06 (-0.51) -0.0004 (-0.50) 0.4279 133 CPM, Evening -5.00 (0.48) -0.46*(2.25) 6.86 (0.23) 0.73 (0.09) -0.0003 (-0.27) 0.3657 133 CPM, Average -1.75 (0.23) -0.36*(2.36) 7.93 (0.36) -0.54
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4721A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4721A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4721A1.txt
  • Mile Hi Cable Partners. Salsgiver's Other Facial Challenges to the Pole Attachment Agreement Are Denied. Salsgiver's remaining claims are denied. Contrary to Salsgiver's allegations, we find that sections 2.1, 5.2.1, 5.3, 6.1, 6.4, 6.7, 9.1, 9.2, and 9.5 of the Pole Attachment Agreement are not facially unlawful. As to its claims regarding sections 2.6, 3.2, 5.11, 5.5.4, 6.2, 6.6, and 6.16 of the Pole Attachment Agreement, Salsgiver has failed to meet its burden of proving the facts necessary to show that those provisions would be unlawful, as applied. Salsgiver has also failed to meet its burden of proving that NPTC has imposed unlawful make-ready charges. Finally, we deny as moot Salsgiver's claim that NPTC violated 47 C.F.R. � 1.1403(b) by failing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • Existing ANI, new ANI, and new assignments within five business days; status monthly. Biannually in March and September. Numbering Resource Utilization Form 3.2, 6.0, 6.1.5, 8.0, 8.2.2 Semi-annually on February and August 1st. Code Relief Planning Report to NANC 5.1.5 Quarterly. Status of Pending Relief Plans 5.1.9 Monthly, to FCC/NANC. Contact List Maintenance 4.4, 6.1.2, 7.7 Quarterly. NANP/NPA Exhaust Analysis 6.16, 7.18.1 Contingent upon material impact and annually. NPA/NANP Life Impact 6.1.8 Contingent, within 30 days of receipt of the updated NRUF Report. Reports to Regulatory Authorities 6.1.9, 8.2.2 Contingent, within ten days of request following 30 days after the NRUF reporting deadline. NRUF Anomalies 6.1.11, 6.3.3, 8.2.1 Contingent, in case of unresolveable anomalies, to State Regulatory Commissions or FCC. Also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.txt
  • List Maintenance\cell 4.4, 6.1.2, 7.7\cell Quarterly.\cell }\pard\plain \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 { \rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \trowd \irow15\irowband15\ltrrow\ts11\trqc\trgaph108\trleft-108\trbrdrt\brdrs\b rdrw10 \trbrdrl\brdrs\brdrw10 \trbrdrb\brdrs\brdrw10 \trbrdrr\brdrs\brdrw10 \trbrdrh\brdrs\brdrw10 \trbrdrv\brdrs\brdrw10 \trftsWidth1\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpa ddfb3\trpaddfr3\tblind0\tblindtype3 \clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrl\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrb\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrr\brdrs\brdrw10 \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth3708\clshdrawnil \cellx3600\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrl\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrb\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrr\brdrs\brdrw10 \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth1800\clshdrawnil \cellx5400\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrl\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrb\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrr\brdrs\brdrw10 \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth3240\clshdrawnil \cellx8640\row \ltrrow}\pard\plain \ltrpar\s24\ql \li0\ri0\sb20\sa20\sl240\slmult0 \widctlpar\intbl\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin 0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20 NANP/NPA Exhaust Analysis\cell 6.16, 7.18.1 \cell Contingent upon material impact and annually.\cell }\pard\plain \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\intbl\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \trowd \irow16\irowband16\ltrrow\ts11\trqc\trgaph108\trleft-108\trbrdrt\brdrs\b rdrw10 \trbrdrl\brdrs\brdrw10 \trbrdrb\brdrs\brdrw10 \trbrdrr\brdrs\brdrw10 \trbrdrh \brdrs\brdrw10 \trbrdrv\brdrs\brdrw10 \trftsWidth1\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpa ddfb3\trpaddfr3\tblind0\tblindtype3 \clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrl\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrb\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrr\brdrs\brdrw10 \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth3708\clshdrawnil \cellx3600\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrl\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrb\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrr\brdrs\brdrw10 \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth1800\clshdrawnil \cellx5400\clvertalt\clbrdrt\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrl\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrb\brdrs\brdrw10 \clbrdrr\brdrs\brdrw10 \cltxlrtb\clftsWidth3\clwWidth3240\clshdrawnil \cellx8640\row \ltrrow}\pard\plain \ltrpar\s24\ql \li0\ri0\sb20\sa20\sl240\slmult0 \widctlpar\intbl\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin 0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20 NPA/NANP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.txt
  • and Title: 6.3 Definitions. SUBPART C-OBLIGATIONS-WHAT MUST COVERED ENTITIES DO? Brief Description, Need and Legal Basis: See Subpart A above. Section Number and Title: 6.5 General Obligations. 6.7 Product design, development and evaluation. 6.9 Information pass through. 6.11 Information, documentation, and training. SUBPART D-ENFORCEMENT Brief Description, Need and Legal Basis: See Subpart A above. Section Number and Title: 6.15 Generally. 6.16 Informal or formal complaints. 6.17 Informal complaints; form and content. 6.18 Procedure; designation of agents for service. 6.19 Answers to informal complaints. 6.20 Review and disposition of informal complaints. 6.21 Formal complaints, applicability of 1.720 through 1.736 of this chapter. 6.22 Formal complaints based on unsatisfied informal complaints. 6.23 Actions by the Commission on its own motion. PART 7-ACCESS TO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-121A2_Rcd.pdf
  • 6,104 112 74 58 10 10,159 10,280 15.38 600.28 6,428.10 1,595.13 0.55 0.07 1.31 581.31 2.90 NH 2,628 111 65 10 5 13,677 1,299 1.89 232.46 1,760.36 71.98 1.07 6.13 0.00 186.96 4.75 NJ 15 3322 38 5 0.00 0.00 10.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 NM 21,179 146 84 32 8 39,838 39,191 47.32 2,811.93 44,163.47 3,634.68 6.31 6.16 0.21 2,982.89 180.79 NV 11,368 67 44 15 7 7,185 48,185 0.00 1,363.47 38,322.48 7,325.42 20.09 18.92 16.42 229.91 0.33 NY 11,920 473 236 44 16 77,271 6,967 10.02 878.79 6,747.51 704.34 5.19 2.43 0.00 1,012.80 14.74 OH 10,440 332 161 40 18 95,918 2,950 0.01 1,038.37 5,920.80 107.09 0.51 2.06 2.70 465.77 42.58 OK 5,738 171 116 54 15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/02 0.15 0.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.17 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.10 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.16 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.4 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State ................................................................................................ Table 6.6 Penetration by State - Changes ............................................................................... Table 6.2 Penetration by State - Changes - Map .....................................................................Chart 6.3 Penetration by State - Comparison by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.txt
  • 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.17 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.10 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.16 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.4 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State ................................................................................................ Table 6.6 Penetration by State - Changes ............................................................................... Table 6.2 Penetration by State - Changes - Map .....................................................................Chart 6.3 Penetration by State - Comparison by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • INC.-NC (CONTEL) 19.49 -1.10 20.82 433.89 230510 C WILKES TEL. MEMB. CORP. 8.74 1.98 6.62 11.39 230511 A YADKIN VALLEY TEL. MEMB. CORP. 3.56 -1.12 4.73 0.00 235193 C SOUTHERN BELL-NC -0.87 -3.50 2.74 0.00 NORTH DAKOTA Total 2.50 -4.00 6.77 2.12 381447 C NORTH DAKOTA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.66 -2.43 5.21 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. -0.09 -1.15 1.07 -6.16 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 9.93 0.00 9.93 18.95 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 5.53 -0.68 6.25 7.03 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 3.74 -1.58 5.40 5.01 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 2.24 -2.37 4.71 2.62 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 1.56 -0.72 2.29 -4.65 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 222.78 0.67 220.60 0.00 381614 A POLAR
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
  • be called?" If the answer to the first question is "yes," the household is counted as having a telephone "in unit." If the answer to either the first or second question is "yes," the household is counted as having a telephone "available." The "in unit" data and the "available" data are reported in Tables 6.6 through 6.10 and 6.12 through 6.16, and Charts 6.1 and 6.8. All of the remaining tables and charts of this section just report the "in unit" data. Although the survey is conducted every month, not all questions are asked every month. The telephone questions are asked once every four months: in the month that a household is first included in the sample and in the month
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 # 06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics .................................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
  • Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics .................................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • 3.34 392 North Dakota 169,862 5,285 77,093 6.50 7.00 8.84 22 0.22 26 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 3,407,340 280,811 1,451,695 5.68 5.71 6.25 360 3.63 426 Oklahoma 1,038,926 90,735 439,127 5.52 5.40 6.04 106 1.07 126 Oregon 1,163,078 107,475 399,290 6.54 7.02 7.79 138 1.39 163 Pennsylvania 4,065,755 542,253 1,570,514 6.15 6.16 6.77 468 4.71 553 Puerto Rico 910,682 0 123,874 6.25 0.00 9.20 82 0.83 97 Rhode Island 239,328 23,473 115,805 6.44 6.44 6.44 29 0.29 35 South Carolina 1,339,890 73,282 462,482 6.47 6.93 7.78 153 1.54 181 South Dakota 157,621 7,044 111,224 6.50 6.60 7.73 23 0.23 27 Tennessee 1,851,563 148,521 576,671 6.42 6.87 7.37 206 2.07 244 Texas 5,529,465
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • CO. -0.31 -1.46 1.17 -7.36 401699 C DECATUR TELEPHONE CO INC- ARKANSAS -0.65 -3.72 3.19 -18.00 401702 C SOUTH ARKANSAS TEL. CO.,INC. 17.55 -3.43 21.73 37.38 401704 C LAVACA TELEPHONE-AR 5.60 -6.38 12.80 259.91 401705 C CENTURYTEL OF ARKANSAS, INC. 0.82 -2.55 3.46 0.16 401709 C MADISON COUNTY TEL. CO. INC. 9.27 1.46 7.70 22.98 401710 A MAGAZINE TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.16 -1.47 7.74 18.97 401711 C CENTURYTEL OF MOUNTAIN HOME, INC. -1.42 -0.92 -0.51 -9.16 401712 A MOUNTAIN VIEW TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.20 -0.69 6.93 19.13 401713 C NORTHERN ARKANSAS TEL. CO.,INC. -4.95 -1.03 -3.96 -11.51 401718 C PRAIRIE GROVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 4.12 -0.78 4.94 5.21 401720 C CENTURYTEL OF REDFIELD, INC. 2.19 0.10 2.09 -0.27 401721 C RICE BELT TEL. CO.,INC.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.txt
  • NORTH DAKOTA 1.9% 1.7% OHIO 1.9% 1.7% OKLAHOMA 3.5% 3.2% OREGON 3.1% 2.7% PENNSYLVANIA 1.4% 1.3% RHODE ISLAND 3.3% 3.3% SOUTH CAROLINA 3.6% 3.4% SOUTH DAKOTA 4.0% 3.8% TENNESSEE 2.9% 2.6% TEXAS 1.8% 1.6% UTAH 2.7% 2.5% VERMONT 3.5% 3.0% VIRGINIA 3.5% 3.3% WASHINGTON 2.3% 2.1% WEST VIRGINIA 3.3% 2.8% WISCONSIN 2.7% 2.5% WYOMING 2.7% 2.5% 6 - 69 Table 6.16 Critical Values for Determining Significant Differences by Income In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable TOTAL 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% 0.3% 1.6% 1.5% 1.7% 1.6% UNDER $5,000 4.0% 3.7% 4.4% 4.1% 7.9% 7.4% 10.0% 9.8% $5,000 - $7,499 3.0% 2.9% 3.3% 3.1% 7.5% 7.3% 9.1% 8.5% $7,500 - $9,999 2.4% 2.2% 2.6% 2.5% 7.4% 6.4% 8.4% 8.3% $10,000 - $12,499
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics .................................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State - Households ......................................................................... Table 6.9 Penetration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
  • Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics .................................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State - Households ......................................................................... Table 6.9 Penetration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • WYOMING 131,362,415 273,429 480.43 12,597,819 1.126 GRAND TOTAL 46,933,482,209 157,041,487 298.86 1,118,484,749 100.000 Source: National Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund 2006 Submission of 2005 Study Results (September 29, 2006) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2004 to 2005 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA 0.71 -3.53 4.40 -9.22 ALASKA -1.36 -6.16 5.12 -6.43 AMERICAN SAMOA -7.66 0.77 -8.37 -100.00 ARIZONA -3.49 -6.12 2.80 -22.84 ARKANSAS -2.44 -4.27 1.91 2.72 CALIFORNIA 4.49 -3.17 7.90 -19.54 COLORADO -1.60 -5.08 3.66 5.80 CONNECTICUT -9.87 -6.42 -3.68 0.00 DELAWARE 6.43 -2.86 9.57 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 10.44 -3.08 13.94 0.00 FLORIDA 1.75 -4.65 6.71 14.08 GEORGIA -2.28 -4.23 2.04 -9.08 GUAM -14.00 -3.00 -11.34 -71.88
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A6.txt
  • 17.53 13,734,821 13.45 4,173,374 4.09 Iowa 478,319 14,121,735 29.52 9,926,128 20.75 4,195,607 8.77 Kansas 469,136 15,496,037 33.03 12,482,186 26.61 3,013,851 6.42 Kentucky 674,796 32,676,796 48.42 21,115,189 31.29 11,561,607 17.13 Louisiana 724,281 45,934,410 63.42 33,259,601 45.92 12,674,809 17.50 Maine 198,820 7,229,367 36.36 5,498,009 27.65 1,731,358 8.71 Maryland 865,561 22,886,322 26.44 11,737,266 13.56 11,149,056 12.88 Massachusetts 975,574 25,596,372 26.24 19,588,812 20.08 6,007,560 6.16 Michigan 1,750,919 50,058,036 28.59 31,544,755 18.02 18,513,281 10.57 Minnesota 838,503 22,261,610 26.55 18,168,086 21.67 4,093,524 4.88 Mississippi 495,376 43,585,179 87.98 30,532,332 61.63 13,052,847 26.35 Missouri 905,449 37,083,747 40.96 30,341,565 33.51 6,742,182 7.45 Montana 146,705 4,563,508 31.11 3,615,196 24.64 948,312 6.46 Nebraska 285,761 7,637,028 26.73 6,604,573 23.11 1,032,455 3.61 Nevada 400,083 4,037,790 10.09 2,942,708 7.36 1,095,082 2.74 New Hampshire 206,852 2,287,184
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.txt
  • NORTH DAKOTA 1.9% 1.7% OHIO 1.9% 1.7% OKLAHOMA 3.5% 3.2% OREGON 3.1% 2.7% PENNSYLVANIA 1.4% 1.3% RHODE ISLAND 3.3% 3.2% SOUTH CAROLINA 3.6% 3.4% SOUTH DAKOTA 4.0% 3.8% TENNESSEE 2.9% 2.6% TEXAS 1.8% 1.6% UTAH 2.7% 2.5% VERMONT 3.5% 3.0% VIRGINIA 3.5% 3.3% WASHINGTON 2.3% 2.1% WEST VIRGINIA 3.3% 2.8% WISCONSIN 2.7% 2.5% WYOMING 2.8% 2.5% 6 - 78 Table 6.16 Critical Values for Determining Significant Differences by Income In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable TOTAL 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% 0.3% 1.6% 1.5% 1.7% 1.6% UNDER $5,000 4.0% 3.7% 4.4% 4.1% 7.9% 7.5% 10.1% 9.8% $5,000 - $7,499 3.0% 2.9% 3.3% 3.1% 7.4% 7.3% 9.0% 8.4% $7,500 - $9,999 2.4% 2.2% 2.6% 2.5% 7.4% 6.4% 8.4% 8.3% $10,000 - $12,499
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 38.57 28.75 49.30 0.00 1 Rates are for flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 calls elsewhere. Rates are subject to revision. State and Taxes Table 1.8 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas Average Rate Median Rate 1 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service 2 $35.17 $34.27 Federal and State Subscriber Line Charges 6.16 6.50 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 7.35 6.38 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $48.67 $47.25 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-Rate Service 56 Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 2 $18.59 $18.53 Federal and State Subscriber Line Charges 5.57 5.68 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 5.07 4.29 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $29.23 $28.50 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics .................................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State - Households ......................................................................... Table 6.9 Penetration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
  • Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics .................................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State - Households ......................................................................... Table 6.9 Penetration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • SOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA TEL. CO. 0.29 -4.23 4.72 6.77 432029 C TERRAL TEL. CO. -1.94 2.17 -4.02 -2.62 432030 C TOTAH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 2.83 -1.94 4.86 4.57 432032 C VALLIANT TELEPHONE COMPANY -6.30 -4.31 -2.08 -14.08 432034 C WYANDOTTE TELEPHONE COMPANY -0.19 -5.81 5.97 5.57 432141 A SANTA ROSA TELEPHONE COOP. INC. 3.98 0.00 3.98 5.39 435215 C SOUTHWESTERN BELL-OKLAHOMA 1.10 -6.16 7.74 0.00 TOTAL OREGON -6.12 -6.57 0.48 8.40 532226 C MIDVALE TEL. EXCH. INC. - OR -20.23 -3.08 -17.69 -32.57 532359 C BEAVER CREEK COOPERATIVE TEL. CO. -2.55 -0.55 -2.01 -14.99 532361 C CENTURYTEL OF OREGON, INC. -0.44 -4.94 4.73 3.76 532362 C CANBY TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION 3.56 -1.67 5.32 0.00 532363 C CLEAR CREEK MUTUAL TELEPHONE CO. -19.13 -3.31 -16.36
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A8.pdf
  • NORTH DAKOTA 5.6% 5.1% OHIO 3.9% 3.8% OKLAHOMA 5.5% 5.3% OREGON 5.1% 4.9% PENNSYLVANIA 3.4% 3.6% RHODE ISLAND 5.0% 4.9% SOUTH CAROLINA 5.1% 6.1% SOUTH DAKOTA 4.9% 4.9% TENNESSEE 6.3% 5.4% TEXAS 3.1% 3.3% UTAH 5.4% 5.7% VERMONT 4.8% 5.0% VIRGINIA 4.4% 4.4% WASHINGTON 5.6% 7.9% WEST VIRGINIA 4.9% 5.5% WISCONSIN 4.7% 4.4% WYOMING 4.6% 4.4% 6 - 78 Table 6.16 Critical Values for Determining Significant Differences by Income In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable TOTAL 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.8% 2.2% 2.0% 2.3% 2.4% UNDER $5,000 8.8% 7.9% 10.5% 9.8% 14.9% 15.2% 21.9% 21.7% $5,000 - $7,499 8.1% 7.0% 10.1% 9.0% 16.3% 16.2% 19.3% 17.7% $7,500 - $9,999 8.8% 8.5% 10.2% 10.0% 18.5% 17.6% 23.0% 23.9% $10,000 - $12,499
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • $42.29 $42.57 $41.64 $41.80 $41.81 $41.67 $41.27 $41.21 $41.80 $42.43 $41.95 $41.96 $43.49 $43.75 $45.32 $48.17 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $33.04 $33.29 $34.12 $34.06 $34.85 $34.39 $34.45 $34.42 $34.68 $34.39 $33.73 $33.45 $32.02 $32.92 $33.17 $34.20 34.19 $34.56 $35.17 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.50 4.35 4.77 5.77 6.03 6.01 6.03 6.16 6.16 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 4 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.39 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 5.98 8.16 7.91 7.53 7.77 7.68 7.35 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $43.71 $44.07 $44.91 $44.94 $45.81
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289173A1.txt
  • 16.28 9,983 23,916 41.74 North Carolina 2,469 20,501 12.04 2,539 11,840 21.44 North Dakota 50 1,357 3.68 88 774 11.37 Northern Marianas 0 0 NM 0 0 NM Ohio 3,393 28,994 11.70 3,017 14,837 20.33 Oklahoma 751 8,019 9.37 1,230 4,702 26.16 Oregon 894 8,015 11.15 1,241 4,253 29.18 Pennsylvania 5,328 35,542 14.99 4,800 14,175 33.86 Puerto Rico 209 3,392 6.16 664 3,749 17.71 Rhode Island 283 3,782 7.48 342 1,182 28.93 South Carolina 1,037 8,534 12.15 1,189 5,676 20.95 South Dakota 61 1,199 5.09 114 982 11.61 Tennessee 1,718 13,258 12.96 1,750 8,100 21.60 Texas 5,689 53,899 10.55 10,533 29,769 35.38 Utah 1,233 6,255 19.71 646 2,906 22.23 Vermont 256 3,271 7.83 253 719 35.19 Virgin Islands 0 0 NM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics .................................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State - Households ......................................................................... Table 6.9 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
  • Age - Chart ........................................................... Chart 6.6 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - Chart ........................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.20 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.6 Penetration by Selected Characteristics .................................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State - Households ......................................................................... Table 6.9 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • MISSOURI -7.66 -2.12 -5.66 -20.58 421888 C GRAND RIVER MUTUAL TEL CORP - MO -2.58 -1.65 -0.94 -10.63 421890 C GREEN HILLS TELEPHONE CORP. -2.90 -1.67 -1.25 -6.18 421893 A CHOCTAW TELEPHONE COMPANY -9.03 -7.42 -1.74 -33.46 421900 A KLM TEL. CO. -14.23 -1.57 -12.86 -48.88 421901 C KINGDOM TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.37 1.42 -0.06 -8.49 421908 C LE-RU TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.16 -0.30 6.48 6.62 421912 C MCDONALD COUNTY TELEPHONE CO. 5.60 -7.60 14.28 13.37 421914 C MARK TWAIN RURAL TELEPHONE CO. -1.80 -3.17 1.42 -5.13 421917 C MID-MISSOURI TELEPHONE CO. 3.86 -3.84 8.01 5.55 421920 C MILLER TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO -2.03 -3.47 1.49 -7.01 421927 C NEW FLORENCE TELEPHONE CO. -9.54 -7.21 -2.52 -14.26 421928 C NEW LONDON TEL. CO.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.txt
  • NORTH DAKOTA 5.6% 5.1% OHIO 3.9% 3.8% OKLAHOMA 5.5% 5.3% OREGON 5.1% 4.9% PENNSYLVANIA 3.4% 3.6% RHODE ISLAND 5.0% 4.9% SOUTH CAROLINA 5.1% 6.1% SOUTH DAKOTA 4.9% 4.9% TENNESSEE 6.3% 5.4% TEXAS 3.1% 3.3% UTAH 5.4% 5.7% VERMONT 4.8% 5.0% VIRGINIA 4.4% 4.4% WASHINGTON 5.6% 7.9% WEST VIRGINIA 4.9% 5.5% WISCONSIN 4.7% 4.4% WYOMING 4.6% 4.4% 6 - 80 Table 6.16 Critical Values for Determining Significant Differences by Income In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable TOTAL 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.8% 2.2% 2.0% 2.3% 2.4% UNDER $5,000 8.8% 7.9% 10.5% 9.8% 14.9% 15.2% 21.9% 21.7% $5,000 - $7,499 8.1% 7.0% 10.1% 9.0% 16.3% 16.2% 19.3% 17.7% $7,500 - $9,999 8.8% 8.5% 10.2% 10.0% 18.5% 17.6% 23.0% 23.9% $10,000 - $12,499
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.txt
  • 4.87 4.99 4.97 5.03 5.04 5.45 5.47 5.55 5.67 5.83 5.88 5.87 Total Monthly Charge $41.80 $41.81 $41.67 $41.27 $41.21 $41.80 $42.43 $41.95 $41.96 $43.49 $43.75 $45.32 $48.17 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $34.45 $34.42 $34.68 $34.39 $33.73 $33.45 $32.02 $32.92 $33.17 $34.20 $34.19 $34.56 $35.17 Subscriber Line Charges 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.50 4.35 4.77 5.77 6.03 6.01 6.03 6.16 6.16 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 2 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.39 2 2 2 2 2 2 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 5.98 8.16 7.91 7.53 7.77 7.68 7.35 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $44.71 $44.47 $44.39 $44.07 $43.20 $43.90 $43.15 $46.85 $47.12 $47.74 $47.99 $48.39 $48.67 Number of Sample Cities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • Penetration by Householder's Age .......................................................................... Table 6.12 Penetration by Householder's Age - 2009 - Chart ..................................................Chart 6.6 Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - 2009 - Chart .................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation - Sample Sizes .................Table 6.20 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - 2009 - Chart .................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.txt
  • Penetration by Householder's Age .......................................................................... Table 6.12 Penetration by Householder's Age - 2009 - Chart ..................................................Chart 6.6 Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ...............................................Table 6.18 Penetration by Income ............................................................................................ Table 6.10 Penetration by Income - 2009 - Chart .................................................................... Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.16 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.14 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation - Sample Sizes .................Table 6.20 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status - 2009 - Chart .................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.19 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A4.txt
  • 0.00 1.75 1.69 8.25 10.00 9.94 8.25 13.50 13.31 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.32 0.00 3.50 3.45 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.50 10.00 9.05 6.50 13.50 12.49 Montana 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.79 0.00 1.75 1.40 8.25 10.00 9.65 8.25 13.50 12.44 Nebraska 5.97 8.25 7.01 0.00 3.50 3.39 0.00 1.75 1.69 5.97 10.00 8.70 5.97 13.50 12.09 Nevada 5.45 8.25 6.16 0.00 3.50 1.87 0.00 1.75 0.94 5.45 10.00 7.09 5.45 13.50 8.96 New Hampshire 8.00 8.25 8.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 8.25 8.03 8.00 8.25 8.03 New Jersey 7.02 8.25 8.03 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 0.00 7.02 10.00 8.03 7.02 13.50 11.51 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.31 0.00 1.75 1.65 8.25 10.00 9.90
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 17.06 0.00 220375 C NELSON-BALL GROUND -6.28 -3.78 -2.59 -61.58 220376 C PEMBROKE TEL CO 14.71 -5.62 21.54 37.41 220377 C PINELAND TEL COOP 4.02 -4.67 9.12 5.25 220378 C PLANTERS RURAL COOP 16.25 -7.79 26.08 44.20 220379 C PLANT TEL. CO. -7.26 -7.89 0.68 -24.77 220380 A PROGRESSIVE RURAL 0.61 -4.60 5.47 -33.86 220381 C PUBLIC SERVICE TEL 0.48 -6.16 7.08 -0.47 220382 C RINGGOLD TEL CO -4.49 -7.84 3.64 -34.02 220386 C WINDSTREAM STANDARD -10.57 -2.19 -8.57 0.00 220387 A FRONTIER GEORGIA LLC 3.72 -6.89 11.39 0.00 220389 A TRENTON TEL CO -10.21 -12.57 2.70 0.00 220392 C WAVERLY HALL, LLC 4.24 -5.00 9.72 6.08 220394 C WILKES TEL & ELC CO 14.63 -5.26 20.99 INFINITE 220395 A WINDSTREAM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.txt
  • NORTH DAKOTA 5.6% 5.1% OHIO 3.9% 3.8% OKLAHOMA 5.5% 5.3% OREGON 5.1% 4.9% PENNSYLVANIA 3.4% 3.6% RHODE ISLAND 5.0% 4.9% SOUTH CAROLINA 5.1% 6.1% SOUTH DAKOTA 4.9% 4.9% TENNESSEE 6.3% 5.4% TEXAS 3.1% 3.3% UTAH 5.4% 5.7% VERMONT 4.8% 5.0% VIRGINIA 4.4% 4.4% WASHINGTON 5.6% 7.9% WEST VIRGINIA 4.9% 5.5% WISCONSIN 4.7% 4.4% WYOMING 4.6% 4.4% 6 - 85 Table 6.16 Critical Values for Determining Significant Differences by Income In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable TOTAL 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.8% 2.2% 2.0% 2.3% 2.4% UNDER $5,000 8.8% 7.9% 10.5% 9.8% 14.9% 15.2% 21.9% 21.7% $5,000 - $7,499 8.1% 7.0% 10.1% 9.0% 16.3% 16.2% 19.3% 17.7% $7,500 - $9,999 8.8% 8.5% 10.2% 10.0% 18.5% 17.6% 23.0% 23.9% $10,000 - $12,499
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-8A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-8A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-8A1.txt
  • 1999). See EIA-708-B, � 4.5 (Dec. 1999); ATSC A/65A, � 6.7.3 Caption Service Descriptor (May 31, 2000). EIA-708-B, � 4.5.4 (Dec. 1999). DTV Closed Captioning Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 16801, � 36. Section 15.122 also specifies requirements for decoders relying on PSIP data to implement closed captioning. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.122(c)(2). ATSC A/65A, � 6.7 Core Descriptors, Table 6.16, (May 31, 2000). Id. Although the Communications Act requires all television receivers be equipped with technological features (v-chip) to enable program blocking when program rating information is sent by a broadcaster, we have refrained from promulgating regulations requiring delivery of the codes necessary for operation of the v-chip based upon the voluntary assumption of this responsibility by video program distributors.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.txt
  • to act described in paragraph (a) of this section. * * * * * * Part 6 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: The authority citation for Part 6 reads as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 151-154, 251, 255, 303(r), 617, 618. The Federal Communications Commission amends Part 6 by revising �� 6.15 and 6.16 as follows. � 6.15 Generally. (a) All manufacturers of telecommunications equipment or customer premises equipment and all providers of telecommunications services, as defined under this subpart are subject to the enforcement provisions specified in the Act and the Commission's rules. (b) For purposes of 6.15 through 6.23, the term ``manufacturers'' shall denote manufacturers of telecommunications equipment or customer premises equipment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.txt
  • of the product. In developing training programs, covered entities are encouraged to consider topics on accessibility requirements, means of communicating with individuals with disabilities, commonly used adaptive technology, designing for accessibility, and solutions for accessibility and compatibility. 47 C.F.R. � 6.11. See also 47 C.F.R. � 7.11. 47 C.F.R. � 6.9; see also 47 C.F.R. � 7.9. 47 C.F.R. �� 6.16-6.20. Section 255 Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 6468, � 126. . See Rehabilitation Act at Section 508(a)(1)(A). . . . Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Seek Comment on Accessible Mobile Phone Options for People Who Are Blind, Deaf-Blind, or Have Low Vision, CG Docket No. 10-145, DA 10-1324, Public Notice, 25 FCC Rcd 9228
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.wp
  • must comply with these rules? 6.1 Who must comply with these rules? Subpart B -- Definitions 6.3 Definitions Subpart C -- Obligations - What must covered entities do? 6.5 General Obligations of Manufacturers 6.7 General Obligations Service Providers 6.9 Product Design , Development and Evaluation 6.11 Information Pass through 6.13 Information, Documentation and Training Subpart D -- Enforcement 6.15 Generally 6.16 Informal or formal complaints 6.17 Informal complaints; form and content 6.18 Procedure; designation of agents for service 6.19 Answers to informal complaints 6.20 Review and disposition of informal complaints 6.21 Formal Complaints, applicability of Sections 1.720 - 1.736 of the rules 6.22 Formal complaints based on unsatisfied informal complaints 6.23 Actions by the Commission on its on motion Authority: 47
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • that Bell Atlantic's performance in providing ``order acknowledgments'' for orders placed over the EDI interface declined in September. AT&T Crafton/Connolly Aff. at para. 257. We note, however, that we have never required the provision of acknowledgements for the purposes of satisfying section 271. On average, for June, July, August, and September Bell Atlantic returned order confirmation notices in 8.48, 8.84, 6.16, and 6.46 hours, respectively, and order rejection notices in 16.28, 12.63, 8.12, and 6.20 hours, respectively. These averages were calculated by Commission staff from the Carrier-to-Carrier data provided by Bell Atlantic. Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Decl. Attach. D at 78, 90, 102 (metrics OR-1 and OR-2); Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Reply Decl. Attach. C at 7 (same); Bell Atlantic Dec. 17, 1999
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.txt
  • 1.4 hours for EDI orders. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measurement No. 6 (``Average Time to Return FOC (Hours) - Mechanized'') (Residence and Simple Business) (LEX) at 271-No. 6a, and (EDI) at 271-No. 6c. We note that, considering the loop and UNE-P orders together, this performance is several hours faster than the average performance reported by Bell Atlantic (8.48, 8.84, 6.16 and 6.46 hours for loops and UNE-P combined in June to September, 1999). Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 4037, para. 164, n.506. In the Bell Atlantic New York Order, we concluded that ``Bell Atlantic's ability to process nearly all competing carrier UNE orders in under 24 hours, and a majority of such orders within two hours
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • C-18 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Full Name VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C MR-4 � Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01- 2200 Mean Time To Repair � Total 6.9 7.87 7.76 7.01 MR-4-01- 2216 Mean Time To Repair � Total - Non DS0 & DS0 6.528.01 5.77 6.116.45 6.16 MR-4-01- 2217 Mean Time To Repair � Total - DS1 & DS3 6.996.67 6.68 4.315.99 8.02 MR-4-04- 2200 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 97.82 98.67 97.44 97.4 MR-4-04- 2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.9995.12 98.07 10097.85 95.56 MR-4-04- 2217 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - DS1 & DS3
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4721A1.html
  • Cable Partners. 1. Salsgiver's Other Facial Challenges to the Pole Attachment Agreement Are Denied. 29. Salsgiver's remaining claims are denied. Contrary to Salsgiver's allegations, we find that sections 2.1, 5.2.1, 5.3, 6.1, 6.4, 6.7, 9.1, 9.2, and 9.5 of the Pole Attachment Agreement are not facially unlawful. As to its claims regarding sections 2.6, 3.2, 5.11, 5.5.4, 6.2, 6.6, and 6.16 of the Pole Attachment Agreement, Salsgiver has failed to meet its burden of proving the facts necessary to show that those provisions would be unlawful, as applied. Salsgiver has also failed to meet its burden of proving that NPTC has imposed unlawful make-ready charges. Finally, we deny as moot Salsgiver's claim that NPTC violated 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1403(b) by failing
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • (5) (6) (7) (8) MSA White Pop ( 1) 0.0086 0.0085 0.0116 0.0085 0.0136 0.0095 0.0059 0.0093 (5.68)** (5.06)** (2.57)* (4.91)** (3.63)** (2.44)* (3.30)** (2.26)* MSA Black Pop ( 2) 0.0025 -0.0004 0.0156 -0.0005 0.0133 0.0264 0.0106 0.0259 (0.32) (0.05) (0.74) (0.06) (0.71) (1.32) (1.18) (1.22) Zip Black Fr. -0.1367 -0.1120 -0.0931 -0.1990 -0.1556 -0.0942 -0.1068 -0.1014 (19.45)** (15.44)** (5.91)** (6.16)** (9.82)** (6.00)** (15.11)** (0.91) Zip Black Fr.* White Pop ( 1- 1) -0.0426 -0.0419 -0.0712 -0.0397 -0.0687 -0.0726 -0.0397 -0.0665 (6.11)** (5.95)** (3.58)** (4.54)** (3.17)** (3.44)** (5.81)** (2.34)* Zip Black Fr.* Black Pop ( 2- 2) 0.1505 0.1221 0.1724 0.1172 0.2258 0.1791 0.1075 0.1755 (4.99)** (4.05)** (1.84) (3.18)** (2.21)* (1.80) (3.70)** (1.24) MSA Median Inc. (000) 0.002 -0.0009 (2.04)* (1.97)*
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-c.pdf
  • Listening Data in both Years 1993 1997 Stations 25.33 28.01 Black-Targeted 3.53 4.26 Black-Owned 1.60 1.36 Non-Black AQH Listening 16.71 15.67 Black AQH Listening 18.51 18.14 Formats 13.48 17.25 Owners 21.60 16.45 HHI 1040.87 1995.44 Non-Black Population 1235.61 1262.79 Black Population 236.33 245.34 3. 31 Markets with Hispanic Listening Data in both Years 1993 1997 Stations 31.65 33.90 Black-Targeted 4.39 6.16 Black-Owned 0.97 1.39 Non-Hispanic AQH Listening 16.83 15.96 Hispanic AQH Listening 18.18 17.71 Formats 14.94 18.65 Owners 26.65 20.52 HHI 806.38 1578.67 35 Non-Hispanic Population 1824.05 1827.58 Hispanic Population 443.26 503.75 36 Table 3: Direct Evidence of Preference Externalities, 1997 All Listening Non- Black Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hispanic Listening All Listening Non- Black Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc99136.pdf
  • Radiofone 2.19 5.22 7.41 34 106.98 38 7.41 34 Pocket Comm. 7.33 7.33 35 109.89 37 7.33 35 Magnacom (PK) 1.77 5.47 7.23 36 81.17 43 7.23 36 McLeod, Inc. 7.15 7.15 37 71.47 46 7.15 37 Puerto Rico Telephone (9) 3.52 3.52 7.04 38 123.27 35 3.52 46 Vanguard Cellular 6.80 6.80 39 170.11 30 6.80 38 Chase Telecom 6.16 6.16 40 184.89 27 6.16 39 American Cellular 5.17 5.17 41 129.35 33 5.17 40 Clearcomm 5.12 5.12 42 76.78 45 5.12 41 Poka Lambro (PK) 0.06 1.34 3.29 4.69 43 54.58 49 4.69 42 DCC PCS (PK) 4.49 4.49 44 44.85 51 4.49 43 Texas Utilities 4.10 4.10 45 122.98 36 4.10 44 Commnet (SEC) 3.88 3.88 46 97.00
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=66
  • Auction No. 66 will offer 1,122 licenses: 36 Regional Economic Area Grouping (REAG) licenses, 352 Economic Area (EA) licenses, and 734 Cellular Market Area (CMA) licenses. Qualified Bidders: 168 Rounds Completed: 16 Bidding Days: 5 Results for Round 16 Gross Revenue: $8,663,769,900.00 - Dollar Change: 547579000.00 - % Change: 6.75 Net Revenue: $8,480,318,200.00 - Dollar Change: 491773700.00 - % Change: 6.16 New Bids: 220 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 7 Licenses with PWBs*: 662 FCC Held Licenses: 460 Eligible Bidders: 146 (of 168 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=66T ue, 15 Aug 2006 21:20:03 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 66 will offer 1,122 licenses: 36 Regional Economic Area Grouping (REAG) licenses, 352 Economic
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=85
  • FCC Held Permits: 13 Eligible Bidders: 24 (of 27 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=85T hu, 06 Nov 2008 20:50:01 GMT Summary Permits: 43 construction permits for LPTV and TV translator digital companion channels Qualified Bidders: 27 Rounds Completed: 10 Bidding Days: 2 Results for Round 10 Gross Revenue: $74,050.00 - Dollar Change: $4,300.00 - % Change: 6.16 Net Revenue: $58,490.00 - Dollar Change: $1,220.00 - % Change: 2.13 New Bids: 5 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 0 Permits with PWBs*: 30 FCC Held Permits: 13 Eligible Bidders: 24 (of 27 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=85T hu, 06 Nov 2008 22:05:01 GMT Summary Permits: 43 construction permits for LPTV
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.wp
  • must comply with these rules? 6.1 Who must comply with these rules? Subpart B -- Definitions 6.3 Definitions Subpart C -- Obligations - What must covered entities do? 6.5 General Obligations of Manufacturers 6.7 General Obligations Service Providers 6.9 Product Design , Development and Evaluation 6.11 Information Pass through 6.13 Information, Documentation and Training Subpart D -- Enforcement 6.15 Generally 6.16 Informal or formal complaints 6.17 Informal complaints; form and content 6.18 Procedure; designation of agents for service 6.19 Answers to informal complaints 6.20 Review and disposition of informal complaints 6.21 Formal Complaints, applicability of Sections 1.720 - 1.736 of the rules 6.22 Formal complaints based on unsatisfied informal complaints 6.23 Actions by the Commission on its on motion Authority: 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • that Bell Atlantic's performance in providing ``order acknowledgments'' for orders placed over the EDI interface declined in September. AT&T Crafton/Connolly Aff. at para. 257. We note, however, that we have never required the provision of acknowledgements for the purposes of satisfying section 271. On average, for June, July, August, and September Bell Atlantic returned order confirmation notices in 8.48, 8.84, 6.16, and 6.46 hours, respectively, and order rejection notices in 16.28, 12.63, 8.12, and 6.20 hours, respectively. These averages were calculated by Commission staff from the Carrier-to-Carrier data provided by Bell Atlantic. Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Decl. Attach. D at 78, 90, 102 (metrics OR-1 and OR-2); Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Reply Decl. Attach. C at 7 (same); Bell Atlantic Dec. 17, 1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00056.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00056.txt
  • Comments at 14. NAD/CAN Comments at 23. 47 U.S.C. � 225(g). Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(5). Notice, 13 FCC Rcd at 14217. See, e.g., the Federation Comments at 5-6; NAD/CAN Comments at 23-24; NVRC Comments at 4; SHHH Comments at 11; COR Reply Comments at 14. 47 U.S.C. � 225. See 47 C.F.R. � 6.16. We note that in administering our rules pertaining to informal complaints against common carriers under section 208 of the Act, Commission staff works cooperatively with consumers and companies to promote meaningful solutions to problems raised by consumers and to address underlying compliance concerns. In addition, the staff routinely meets with consumer groups and company representatives to evaluate the effectiveness of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00200.doc
  • form at least 60 days prior to the provider's last day of service, in order to ensure minimum disruptions to customers' calls. Id. TRS Order at para. 82. Sprint has stated that it collects customer profile information using automated processes to provide more efficient relay service. Sprint Reply at 5 - 6. See 47 U.S.C. � 255; 47 C.F.R. � 6.16. Of course, parties desiring a more formal adjudication of a TRS complaint have the option of filing a ``formal'' complaint in the manner specified in the amended rules in the first instance. � ... � � � ... � ` � ... � ` � � � � �_� kn � dc`\, Gs �_� Gs � kn
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.txt
  • 1.4 hours for EDI orders. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measurement No. 6 (``Average Time to Return FOC (Hours) - Mechanized'') (Residence and Simple Business) (LEX) at 271-No. 6a, and (EDI) at 271-No. 6c. We note that, considering the loop and UNE-P orders together, this performance is several hours faster than the average performance reported by Bell Atlantic (8.48, 8.84, 6.16 and 6.46 hours for loops and UNE-P combined in June to September, 1999). Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 4037, para. 164, n.506. In the Bell Atlantic New York Order, we concluded that ``Bell Atlantic's ability to process nearly all competing carrier UNE orders in under 24 hours, and a majority of such orders within two hours
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.81 6.11 5.95 5.82 5.77 Total Monthly Charge $49.89 $49.44 $48.84 $49.08 $49.78 $49.04 $49.54 $49.00 $49.22 $49.56 $50.12 $49.45 $49.43 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33 $44.71 $45.05 $43.78 $42.86 $44.03 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.02 6.16 6.17 6.10 6.63 7.06 7.70 7.87 7.44 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 2.25 2.15 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.13 1.07 0.96 0.60 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.41 Taxes, including 911 and other Charges 6.77 6.73 6.70 6.83 6.96 6.96 7.16 7.16 7.17 7.79 7.14 7.19 7.28 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $59.51 $59.32 $58.48 $58.64 $59.60 $59.14 $59.70 $59.55 $59.11 $60.39 $59.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • Other Charges 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.81 6.11 5.95 5.82 6.65 6.67 Total Monthly Charge $49.89 $49.44 $48.84 $49.08 $49.78 $49.04 $49.54 $49.00 $49.22 $49.56 $50.12 $49.45 $51.22 $49.94 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33 $44.71 $45.05 $43.78 $42.86 $43.90 $43.41 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.02 6.16 6.17 6.10 6.63 7.06 7.70 7.87 7.46 6.99 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 2.25 2.15 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.13 1.07 0.96 0.60 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.40 0.30 Taxes, including 911 and other Charges 6.77 6.73 6.70 6.83 6.96 6.96 7.16 7.16 7.17 7.79 7.14 7.19 7.84 8.35 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $59.51 $59.32 $58.48 $58.64 $59.60 $59.14 $59.70 $59.55
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • Touch-tone 2.65 2.49 1.94 1.82 1.75 1.22 1.02 Tax including 911 charges 5.18 5.21 5.12 5.28 5.36 5.35 5.49 Total monthly charge 49.89 49.49 48.94 49.15 49.66 49.03 48.66 # cities offering Unlimited Service 59 56 54 54 54 53 53 Unlimited Service base rate 44.84 44.80 44.40 44.49 44.61 44.96 43.55 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.01 6.16 6.17 Extra for Touch-tone 2.25 2.15 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.13 1.11 Tax including 911 charges 6.77 6.68 6.65 6.78 6.92 6.86 6.92 Total monthly charge 59.51 59.31 58.47 58.63 59.30 59.11 57.75 # cities offering Measured Service 77 77 78 78 78 81 81 Measured Service base rate 20.38 20.55 19.93 19.49 19.56 19.89 20.35 Cost of 200 5-minute business-day
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 5.73 Extra for Touch-tone 2.65 2.49 1.94 1.82 1.67 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.47 Taxes including 911 Charges 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.82 Total Monthly Charge 49.89 49.44 48.84 49.08 49.78 49.04 49.54 49.00 49.62 Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33 $45.52 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.02 6.16 6.17 6.10 6.59 Extra for Touch-tone 2.25 2.15 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.13 1.07 0.96 0.65 Taxes including 911 Charges 6.77 6.73 6.70 6.83 6.96 6.96 7.16 7.16 7.26 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service 59.51 59.32 58.48 58.64 59.60 59.14 59.70 59.55 60.02 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-rate Service 59 56 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 Monthly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • Extra for Touch-tone 2.65 2.49 1.94 1.82 1.67 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.41 0.33 Other 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.81 6.11 Total Monthly Charge 49.89 49.44 48.84 49.08 49.78 49.04 49.54 49.00 49.22 49.56 Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33 $44.71 $45.05 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.02 6.16 6.17 6.10 6.63 7.06 Extra for Touch-tone 2.25 2.15 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.13 1.07 0.96 0.60 0.49 Other 6.77 6.73 6.70 6.83 6.96 6.96 7.16 7.16 7.17 7.79 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service 59.51 59.32 58.48 58.64 59.60 59.14 59.70 59.55 59.11 60.39 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-rate Service 59 56 54 54 54 53 53 53 53
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • TELEPHONE SYSTEM - MIDWEST GROUP 13.90 12.09 10.98 17.95 54.49 18.54 18.20 81ALLTEL ILLINOIS, INC. 11.94 12.86 5.18 10.81 14.33 11.79 82ANCHORAGE TELEPHONE UTILITY 12.62 11.78 9.31 13.88 62.30 8.07 13.84 83AYSHIRE FARMERS MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.76 12.07 (7.66) 4.96 21.81 7.81 84BACA VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.96 12.08 13.83 9.85 17.90 11.62 85BAY SPRINGS TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 2/ 11.92 12.39 6.16 11.24 10.95 11.13 86BOURBEUSE TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.35 12.11 68.34 21.63 21.63 87CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.07 12.61 12.78 14.55 53.75 18.33 16.46 88CITIZENS TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.19 4.95 70.24 15.56 12.05 14.43 89EAST ASCENSION TELEPHONE CO. 10.96 12.30 5.19 17.73 (0.12) 9.59 90EL PASO TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.92 12.07 12.02 21.84 19.53 21.47 91ELKHART TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.61 11.32 7.92 19.98 6.86 14.92
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • 75 KENTUCKY 6.49 6.44 6.43 93 1.14 93 LOUISIANA 6.49 0.00 6.45 121 1.48 122 MAINE 5.96 0.00 5.97 35 0.43 35 MARYLAND 5.76 0.00 5.76 177 2.16 177 MASSACHUSETTS 5.96 0.00 5.96 211 2.58 212 MICHIGAN 4.92 6.55 5.15 287 3.52 288 MINNESOTA 5.41 6.14 5.58 146 1.79 147 MISSISSIPPI 6.49 7.46 6.46 64 0.79 65 MISSOURI 5.99 6.86 6.16 156 1.91 157 MONTANA 6.76 6.77 6.53 26 0.32 26 NEBRASKA 6.31 5.58 6.01 50 0.61 50 NEVADA 5.47 4.84 5.04 58 0.71 58 NEW HAMPSHIRE 5.96 0.00 5.96 40 0.50 41 NEW JERSEY 5.46 6.19 5.48 306 3.75 307 NEW MEXICO 6.92 6.10 6.79 48 0.59 48 NEW YORK 5.96 5.97 5.96 586 7.17 588 NORTH CAROLINA 6.49 6.18
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/0006/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 SOURCE: INDUSTRY ANALYSIS DIVISION, MONITORING REPORT AND ACCESS TARIFF FILINGS. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 Source: Industry Analysis Division,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 SOURCE: FEDERAL-STATE JOINT BOARD MONITORING REPORT, MAY 1997, FILINGS MADE EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1997, JANUARY 1, 1998, AND JULY 1, 1998, AND ARMIS 43-01 REPORTS FILED AT THE COMMISSION. * This table shows average rates (weighted
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/014/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/02 0.15 0.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 26.60 80.56 391680A C SULLY BUTTES TELEPHONE COOP. INC. (QWEST) Exchanges acquired from 391680 QWEST CORP-SD 391682 A TRI-COUNTY TELCOM, INC. 0.99 -2.37 3.43 -0.28 391684 A UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.56 -0.11 12.68 80.44 391685 C VALLEY TELECOMM. COOP. ASSN.,INC. 12.81 -1.24 14.22 22.98 391686 C VIVIAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.94 -6.04 9.56 14.39 391688 A WESTERN TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.26 0.09 6.16 12.56 391689 C WEST RIVER COOPERATIVE TEL. CO. 2.95 -0.30 3.25 1.82 395145 C QWEST CORPORATION - SD (+391680A) -3.36 -5.78 2.56 0.00 TOTAL: TENNESSEE 3.74 -2.56 6.46 10.41 290280 C ARDMORE TEL. CO., INC. 16.75 1.21 15.35 66.93 290552 C CENTURYTEL OF ADAMSVILLE, INC. 1.08 -1.12 2.23 -0.52 290553 A BEN LOMAND RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.01 0.63 13.30
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-6.pdf
  • be called?" If the answer to the first question is "yes," the household is counted as having a telephone "in unit." If the answer to either the first or second question is "yes," the household is counted as having a telephone "available." The "in unit" data and the "available" data are reported in Tables 6.6 through 6.10 and 6.12 through 6.16, and Charts 6.1 and 6.8. All of the remaining tables and charts of this section just report the "in unit" data. Although the survey is conducted every month, not all questions are asked every month. The telephone questions are asked once every four months: in the month that a household is first included in the sample and in the month
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • Other Charges 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.81 6.11 5.95 5.82 6.65 6.67 Total Monthly Charge 49.89 49.44 48.84 49.08 49.78 49.04 49.54 49.00 49.22 49.56 50.12 49.43 51.22 49.94 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33 $44.71 $45.05 $43.78 $42.86 $43.90 $43.41 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.02 6.16 6.17 6.10 6.63 7.06 7.70 7.87 7.46 6.99 Extra for Touch-Tone 2.25 2.15 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.13 1.07 0.96 0.60 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.40 0.30 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 6.77 6.73 6.70 6.83 6.96 6.96 7.16 7.16 7.17 7.79 7.14 7.19 7.84 8.35 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service 59.51 59.32 58.48 58.64 59.60 59.14 59.70 59.55 59.11 60.39
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
  • Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .............................................. Table 6.17 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.10 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.4 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State ................................................................................................ Table 6.6 Penetration by State - Changes ............................................................................... Table 6.2 Penetration by State - Changes - Map .....................................................................Chart 6.3 Penetration by State - Comparison by Level of Lifeline Assistance ................... Table
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • COLORADO 10.80 8.92 1.73 9.72 462190 C HAXTUN TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.91 -3.53 6.68 4.43 462192 C BIG SANDY TELECOM, INC. 2.55 -1.28 3.89 2.29 462193 C NUCLA-NATURITA TEL. CO. 3.13 0.62 2.50 -0.05 462194 C NUNN TEL. COMPANY 7.95 6.03 1.80 6.83 462195 C SOUTH PARK TELEPHONE COMPANY 26.84 12.41 12.84 27.84 462196 C PEETZ COOP. TEL. CO. -6.96 -0.86 -6.16 -15.33 462197 C PHILLIPS COUNTY TEL. CO. 6.11 -1.69 7.94 13.90 462198 A PINE DRIVE TEL. CO. 10.10 0.11 9.98 47.68 462199 C PLAINS COOPERATIVE TEL. ASSOC. INC. 8.35 -1.56 10.06 11.25 462201 C RICO TEL. CO. -14.36 11.83 -23.42 -51.44 462202 C ROGGEN TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE CO. 4.59 -1.81 6.52 5.68 462203 C THE RYE TELEPHONE CO. INC. 7.88 11.83
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-4.pdf
  • 1,646,764 12.86 1,219,593 9.53 Tennessee 928,000 23,880,306 25.73 14,995,784 16.16 8,884,522 9.57 Texas 4,259,823 264,717,245 62.14 177,084,287 41.57 87,632,958 20.57 Utah 489,072 7,471,621 15.28 5,762,070 11.78 1,709,551 3.50 Vermont 99,978 1,668,603 16.69 1,075,474 10.76 593,129 5.93 Virgin Islands 18,333 1,088,559 59.38 714,038 38.95 374,520 20.43 Virginia 1,177,229 25,992,185 22.08 19,360,431 16.45 6,631,755 5.63 Washington 1,014,798 18,338,634 18.07 12,091,284 11.91 6,247,351 6.16 West Virginia 282,455 8,142,023 28.83 4,776,986 16.91 3,365,037 11.91 Wisconsin 881,231 31,790,344 36.07 26,027,928 29.54 5,762,416 6.54 Wyoming 88,116 2,837,981 32.21 1,881,965 21.36 956,015 10.85 Totals 48,876,386 $2,195,719,369 $44.92 $1,345,787,219 $27.53 $849,932,150 $17.39 Source: Raw funding data provided by the Universal Service Administrative Company, rollups performed by Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, FCC. Activity through May 6,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-6.pdf
  • be called?" If the answer to the first question is "yes," the household is counted as having a telephone "in unit." If the answer to either the first or second question is "yes," the household is counted as having a telephone "available." The "in unit" data and the "available" data are reported in Tables 6.6 through 6.10 and 6.12 through 6.16, and Charts 6.1 and 6.8. All of the remaining tables and charts of this section just report the "in unit" data. Although the survey is conducted every month, not all questions are asked every month. The telephone questions are asked once every four months: in the month that a household is first 3 For more information, see the report Industry
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-intro.pdf
  • for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .................................................Table 6.17 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.13 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.10 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.4 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State ................................................................................................ Table 6.6 Penetration by State - Changes ............................................................................... Table 6.2 Penetration by State - Changes - Map .....................................................................Chart 6.3 Penetration by State - Comparison by Level of Lifeline Assistance ................... Table
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
  • 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 *The weighted average national charges are calculated from the charges of price cap companies and companies in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool and excludes companies filing under rate of return or optional incentive rules. The carriers covered comprise approximately 95% of the industry total. Weights for calculating nationwide averages are based on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-0.pdf
  • ......................................Table 4.4 State Code Reference .............................................................................................Table 8.2 Study Area Waiver Limitations � USF � Applied in 2000 .................................Table 3.4 Study Area Waiver Limitations � USF � Ended in 2000 ..................................Table 3.3 Subscribership � Effect of Do Not Disconnect Policies in Place for 60 Months ........Table 6.15 Subscribership � Effect of Do Not Disconnect Policies in Place for 120 Months ......Table 6.16 Subscribership - United States ................................................................................Table 6.1 4 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ...................................................................Table 9.2 Index of Tables and Charts Switch Downtime Causes .......................................................................................Table 9.3 Switching Systems ..................................................................................................Table 10.1 Taxes - Federal Income ...........................................................................................Table 11.11 Taxes - Total Other .................................................................................................Table 11.12 Telecommunications Revenue - by Type of Carrier ...............................................Table 1.1 Transmission Systems .............................................................................................Table 10.2 Universal Service Fund by State ..............................................................................Table 3.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-6.pdf
  • policy. In such a state, the above household would have an 89.6% probability of having a telephone. As reported in the third column, after 60 months, the same household would have a 94.0% probability of having a telephone. Thus, the household's probability of being phoneless would be reduced 26.8% after a DND policy had been instituted for 60 months. Table 6.16 shows the same scenarios as Table 6.15, except that the rightmost column (Number of months DND Rule in Effect) has been set to 120 months, to estimate the impact of a DND policy that has been in effect for ten years.10 It shows that a household with the characteristics of the average phoneless household, and located in a state with
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28� 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 SOURCE: INDUSTRY ANALYSIS DIVISION, TRENDS IN TELEPHONE SERVICE AND ACCESS TARIFF FILINGS. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Reference ...............................................................................................Table 8.13 Study Area Waiver Limitations - HCL - Applied to 2000 .............................. Table 3.4 Study Area Waiver Limitations - HCL - Ended in 2000 ............................... Table 3.3 Subscribership - Effect of Do Not Disconnect Policies in Place for 60 Months ..... Table 6.15 Subscribership - Effect of Do Not Disconnect Policies in Place for 120 Months ... Table 6.16 Subscribership - United States ................................................................................Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes .......................................................................................Table 9.3 Switching Systems ..................................................................................................Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................Table 11.11 Telecommunications Revenue - by Service .......................................................Table 1.2 Telecommunications Revenue - by Type of Carrier ............................................. Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenue - Total .............................................................Table 1.1 Transmission Systems .............................................................................................Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Fund Factors
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • ...........................................................................Chart 6.4 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .............................................. Table 6.17 Penetration by Income - Critical Values .................................................................Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status ..........................................................................Table 6.10 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 4 Index of Tables and Charts Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.4 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State ................................................................................................Table 6.6 Penetration by State - Changes ...............................................................................Table 6.2 Penetration by State - Changes - Map .....................................................................Chart 6.3 Penetration by State - Comparison by Level of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................... Chart 6.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation ....................................... Table 6.11 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes .............................................. Table 6.17 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 6.13 Penetration by Labor Force Status .......................................................................... Table 6.10 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ............................................... Table 6.16 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Chart ..........................................................Chart 6.7 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Level .................................................. Table 6.4 Penetration by Lifeline Assistance Status .................................................. Table 6.3 Penetration by State ................................................................................................ Table 6.6 Penetration by State - Changes ............................................................................... Table 6.2 Penetration by State - Changes - Map .....................................................................Chart 6.3 Penetration by State - Comparison by Level of Lifeline Assistance ................... Table
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • RI SOUTH CAROLINA 86.1 34.7 51.4 47.7 3.8 (0.25) (0.23) (0.06) (0.54) 4.3 SC SOUTH DAKOTA (0.3) 4.2 (4.5) (4.0) (0.5) (1.02) (0.73) (0.49) (2.24) 1.8 SD TENNESSEE 166.6 54.5 112.1 98.5 13.6 (0.20) 0.06 (0.19) (0.32) 13.9 TN TEXAS 514.9 355.8 159.0 122.2 36.8 (0.71) (0.56) 0.53 (0.74) 37.6 TX UTAH 54.9 17.8 37.2 26.2 11.0 2.77 2.00 1.39 6.16 4.8 UT VERMONT 15.3 3.3 12.0 9.0 3.0 0.45 0.13 0.05 0.63 2.4 VT VIRGINIA 413.2 290.5 122.7 95.2 27.5 2.98 (0.35) 1.49 4.11 23.4 VA WASHINGTON 172.2 110.0 62.2 52.0 10.2 (2.74) (1.05) (0.05) (3.85) 14.0 WA WEST VIRGINIA 52.2 41.4 10.8 7.0 3.8 0.35 (0.00) 0.09 0.44 3.3 WV WISCONSIN 105.1 51.9 53.3 42.7 10.6 1.10 (0.05) 0.24
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99136.pdf
  • Radiofone 2.19 5.22 7.41 34 106.98 38 7.41 34 Pocket Comm. 7.33 7.33 35 109.89 37 7.33 35 Magnacom (PK) 1.77 5.47 7.23 36 81.17 43 7.23 36 McLeod, Inc. 7.15 7.15 37 71.47 46 7.15 37 Puerto Rico Telephone (9) 3.52 3.52 7.04 38 123.27 35 3.52 46 Vanguard Cellular 6.80 6.80 39 170.11 30 6.80 38 Chase Telecom 6.16 6.16 40 184.89 27 6.16 39 American Cellular 5.17 5.17 41 129.35 33 5.17 40 Clearcomm 5.12 5.12 42 76.78 45 5.12 41 Poka Lambro (PK) 0.06 1.34 3.29 4.69 43 54.58 49 4.69 42 DCC PCS (PK) 4.49 4.49 44 44.85 51 4.49 43 Texas Utilities 4.10 4.10 45 122.98 36 4.10 44 Commnet (SEC) 3.88 3.88 46 97.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • C-18 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Full Name VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C MR-4 � Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01- 2200 Mean Time To Repair � Total 6.9 7.87 7.76 7.01 MR-4-01- 2216 Mean Time To Repair � Total - Non DS0 & DS0 6.528.01 5.77 6.116.45 6.16 MR-4-01- 2217 Mean Time To Repair � Total - DS1 & DS3 6.996.67 6.68 4.315.99 8.02 MR-4-04- 2200 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 97.82 98.67 97.44 97.4 MR-4-04- 2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.9995.12 98.07 10097.85 95.56 MR-4-04- 2217 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - DS1 & DS3
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4721A1.html
  • Cable Partners. 1. Salsgiver's Other Facial Challenges to the Pole Attachment Agreement Are Denied. 29. Salsgiver's remaining claims are denied. Contrary to Salsgiver's allegations, we find that sections 2.1, 5.2.1, 5.3, 6.1, 6.4, 6.7, 9.1, 9.2, and 9.5 of the Pole Attachment Agreement are not facially unlawful. As to its claims regarding sections 2.6, 3.2, 5.11, 5.5.4, 6.2, 6.6, and 6.16 of the Pole Attachment Agreement, Salsgiver has failed to meet its burden of proving the facts necessary to show that those provisions would be unlawful, as applied. Salsgiver has also failed to meet its burden of proving that NPTC has imposed unlawful make-ready charges. Finally, we deny as moot Salsgiver's claim that NPTC violated 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1403(b) by failing
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/circuit.pdf
  • 652% 25 22 24 7China 1,501 422 4 1,927 1,073 3.56 4.27 19.59 16% 40% 21% 73% 26 28 28 3Israel 1,082 843 1 1,926 266 1.28 1.77 4.48 26% 74% 43% -9% 27 23 20 6Colombia 1,137 739 9 1,885 376 1.54 3.11 4.56 -3% 95% 20% -17% 28 27 19 9Russia 1,266 533 22 1,821 451 2.38 3.53 6.16 20% 79% 35% -18% 29 29 30 6Argentina 773 1,012 1 1,786 626 0.76 1.34 3.59 11% 95% 47% 1% 30 30 n.a. 10Maritime - Atlantic 0 1,137 630 1,767 0 0.00 0.00 n.a. 0% 0% 55% 0% Top 30 international Points Circuits156,147175,379 7,005338,531 85,912 0.89 1.26 4.37 27% 79% 50% 27% Total for all International Points 182,357185,972 9,754378,083 96,448
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • (5) (6) (7) (8) MSA White Pop ( 1) 0.0086 0.0085 0.0116 0.0085 0.0136 0.0095 0.0059 0.0093 (5.68)** (5.06)** (2.57)* (4.91)** (3.63)** (2.44)* (3.30)** (2.26)* MSA Black Pop ( 2) 0.0025 -0.0004 0.0156 -0.0005 0.0133 0.0264 0.0106 0.0259 (0.32) (0.05) (0.74) (0.06) (0.71) (1.32) (1.18) (1.22) Zip Black Fr. -0.1367 -0.1120 -0.0931 -0.1990 -0.1556 -0.0942 -0.1068 -0.1014 (19.45)** (15.44)** (5.91)** (6.16)** (9.82)** (6.00)** (15.11)** (0.91) Zip Black Fr.* White Pop ( 1- 1) -0.0426 -0.0419 -0.0712 -0.0397 -0.0687 -0.0726 -0.0397 -0.0665 (6.11)** (5.95)** (3.58)** (4.54)** (3.17)** (3.44)** (5.81)** (2.34)* Zip Black Fr.* Black Pop ( 2- 2) 0.1505 0.1221 0.1724 0.1172 0.2258 0.1791 0.1075 0.1755 (4.99)** (4.05)** (1.84) (3.18)** (2.21)* (1.80) (3.70)** (1.24) MSA Median Inc. (000) 0.002 -0.0009 (2.04)* (1.97)*
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-c.pdf
  • Listening Data in both Years 1993 1997 Stations 25.33 28.01 Black-Targeted 3.53 4.26 Black-Owned 1.60 1.36 Non-Black AQH Listening 16.71 15.67 Black AQH Listening 18.51 18.14 Formats 13.48 17.25 Owners 21.60 16.45 HHI 1040.87 1995.44 Non-Black Population 1235.61 1262.79 Black Population 236.33 245.34 3. 31 Markets with Hispanic Listening Data in both Years 1993 1997 Stations 31.65 33.90 Black-Targeted 4.39 6.16 Black-Owned 0.97 1.39 Non-Hispanic AQH Listening 16.83 15.96 Hispanic AQH Listening 18.18 17.71 Formats 14.94 18.65 Owners 26.65 20.52 HHI 806.38 1578.67 35 Non-Hispanic Population 1824.05 1827.58 Hispanic Population 443.26 503.75 36 Table 3: Direct Evidence of Preference Externalities, 1997 All Listening Non- Black Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hispanic Listening All Listening Non- Black Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_mergeragreement.pdf
  • 6.05. Capitalization.......................................57 SECTION 6.06. AT&T Broadband and AT&T Broadband Subsidiaries.......59 SECTION 6.07. SEC Filings.........................................60 SECTION 6.08. Financial Statements..................................61 SECTION 6.09. Information Supplied.................................61 SECTION 6.10. Absence of Certain Changes............................62 SECTION 6.11. No Undisclosed Material Liabilities......................62 SECTION 6.12. Compliance with Laws and Court Orders.................63 SECTION 6.13. Litigation...........................................63 SECTION 6.14. Finders' Fees.......................................63 SECTION 6.15. Opinion of Financial Advisor...........................64 PAGE (NY) 05726/135/MA/bid.contract.wpd iii SECTION 6.16. Taxes..............................................64 SECTION 6.17. Tax Opinions........................................65 SECTION 6.18. Employee Benefit Plans and Labor Matters................65 SECTION 6.19. Environmental Matters................................67 SECTION 6.20. Intellectual Property..................................68 SECTION 6.21. Contracts...........................................69 SECTION 6.22. AT&T Shareholder Vote...............................70 SECTION 6.23. Antitakeover Statutes.................................70 SECTION 6.24. Comcast Securities...................................70 SECTION 6.25. TWE; At Home......................................70 SECTION 6.26. Intercompany Transactions............................72 SECTION 6.27. Sufficiency of Transferred Assets........................72 SECTION 6.28. Investments.........................................73 ARTICLE 7 COVENANTS OF COMCAST