FCC Web Documents citing 5.84

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2009 01 01

• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/openAttachment.do?link=DA-07-3470A6.pdf
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.txt
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/antenna/index.htm?job=uls_transaction&page=daily
  • KB [185]Fri (02-28-09) 9.18 KB [186]Sat (03-01-09) 6.93 KB License Records [187]Sun (03-02-09) 0.92 KB [188]Mon (03-03-09) 4.15 KB [189]Tue (02-25-09) 11.5 KB [190]Wed (02-26-09) 12.58 KB [191]Thu (02-27-09) 8.09 KB [192]Fri (02-28-09) 8.76 KB [193]Sat (03-01-09) 6.47 KB General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) Application Records [194]Sun (03-02-09) 0.16 KB [195]Mon (03-03-09) 0.16 KB [196]Tue (02-25-09) 13.72 KB [197]Wed (02-26-09) 5.84 KB [198]Thu (02-27-09) 4.51 KB [199]Fri (02-28-09) 6.24 KB [200]Sat (03-01-09) 7.58 KB License Records [201]Sun (03-02-09) 0.16 KB [202]Mon (03-03-09) 38.07 KB [203]Tue (02-25-09) 9.7 KB [204]Wed (02-26-09) 4.5 KB [205]Thu (02-27-09) 3.41 KB [206]Fri (02-28-09) 4.91 KB [207]Sat (03-01-09) 46.21 KB Land Mobile - Private Application Records [208]Sun (03-02-09) 0.16 KB [209]Mon (03-03-09) 81.85 KB [210]Tue (02-25-09) 134.95
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?&job=transaction&page=daily
  • KB [192]Fri (02-28-09) 9.18 KB [193]Sat (03-01-09) 6.93 KB License Records [194]Sun (03-02-09) 0.92 KB [195]Mon (03-03-09) 4.15 KB [196]Tue (02-25-09) 11.5 KB [197]Wed (02-26-09) 12.58 KB [198]Thu (02-27-09) 8.09 KB [199]Fri (02-28-09) 8.76 KB [200]Sat (03-01-09) 6.47 KB General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) Application Records [201]Sun (03-02-09) 0.16 KB [202]Mon (03-03-09) 0.16 KB [203]Tue (02-25-09) 13.72 KB [204]Wed (02-26-09) 5.84 KB [205]Thu (02-27-09) 4.51 KB [206]Fri (02-28-09) 6.24 KB [207]Sat (03-01-09) 7.58 KB License Records [208]Sun (03-02-09) 0.16 KB [209]Mon (03-03-09) 38.07 KB [210]Tue (02-25-09) 9.7 KB [211]Wed (02-26-09) 4.5 KB [212]Thu (02-27-09) 3.41 KB [213]Fri (02-28-09) 4.91 KB [214]Sat (03-01-09) 46.21 KB Land Mobile - Private Application Records [215]Sun (03-02-09) 0.16 KB [216]Mon (03-03-09) 81.85 KB [217]Tue (02-25-09) 134.95
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=transaction&page=daily
  • KB [192]Fri (02-28-09) 9.18 KB [193]Sat (03-01-09) 6.93 KB License Records [194]Sun (03-02-09) 0.92 KB [195]Mon (03-03-09) 4.15 KB [196]Tue (02-25-09) 11.5 KB [197]Wed (02-26-09) 12.58 KB [198]Thu (02-27-09) 8.09 KB [199]Fri (02-28-09) 8.76 KB [200]Sat (03-01-09) 6.47 KB General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) Application Records [201]Sun (03-02-09) 0.16 KB [202]Mon (03-03-09) 0.16 KB [203]Tue (02-25-09) 13.72 KB [204]Wed (02-26-09) 5.84 KB [205]Thu (02-27-09) 4.51 KB [206]Fri (02-28-09) 6.24 KB [207]Sat (03-01-09) 7.58 KB License Records [208]Sun (03-02-09) 0.16 KB [209]Mon (03-03-09) 38.07 KB [210]Tue (02-25-09) 9.7 KB [211]Wed (02-26-09) 4.5 KB [212]Thu (02-27-09) 3.41 KB [213]Fri (02-28-09) 4.91 KB [214]Sat (03-01-09) 46.21 KB Land Mobile - Private Application Records [215]Sun (03-02-09) 0.16 KB [216]Mon (03-03-09) 81.85 KB [217]Tue (02-25-09) 134.95
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/weeklypn.htm?job=transaction&page=daily
  • KB [192]Fri (02-28-09) 9.18 KB [193]Sat (03-01-09) 6.93 KB License Records [194]Sun (03-02-09) 0.92 KB [195]Mon (03-03-09) 4.15 KB [196]Tue (02-25-09) 11.5 KB [197]Wed (02-26-09) 12.58 KB [198]Thu (02-27-09) 8.09 KB [199]Fri (02-28-09) 8.76 KB [200]Sat (03-01-09) 6.47 KB General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) Application Records [201]Sun (03-02-09) 0.16 KB [202]Mon (03-03-09) 0.16 KB [203]Tue (02-25-09) 13.72 KB [204]Wed (02-26-09) 5.84 KB [205]Thu (02-27-09) 4.51 KB [206]Fri (02-28-09) 6.24 KB [207]Sat (03-01-09) 7.58 KB License Records [208]Sun (03-02-09) 0.16 KB [209]Mon (03-03-09) 38.07 KB [210]Tue (02-25-09) 9.7 KB [211]Wed (02-26-09) 4.5 KB [212]Thu (02-27-09) 3.41 KB [213]Fri (02-28-09) 4.91 KB [214]Sat (03-01-09) 46.21 KB Land Mobile - Private Application Records [215]Sun (03-02-09) 0.16 KB [216]Mon (03-03-09) 81.85 KB [217]Tue (02-25-09) 134.95
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.wp
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743b.pdf
  • 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) S5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Maritime (80) S5.81 471 510-525 MOBILE S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) S5.72 S5.81 525-535 BROADCASTING S5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION S5.81 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/openAttachment.do?link=DA-07-3470A6.pdf
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.txt
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.wp
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743b.pdf
  • 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) S5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Maritime (80) S5.81 471 510-525 MOBILE S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) S5.72 S5.81 525-535 BROADCASTING S5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION S5.81 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/openAttachment.do?link=DA-07-3470A6.pdf
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.txt
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/antenna/index.htm?job=uls_transaction&page=daily
  • fields in the database tables - ([133]xls) * SQL for the table definitions - ([134]text - Updated 11/06/2003) * Meanings of codes for the code data elements in the tables - ([135]pdf, [136]Word) Assignments and Transfers Application Records [137]Sun (05-04-09) 0.16 KB [138]Mon (04-28-09) 0.16 KB [139]Tue (04-29-09) 17.77 KB [140]Wed (04-30-09) 16.53 KB [141]Thu (05-01-09) 41.63 KB [142]Fri (05-02-09) 5.84 KB [143]Sat (05-03-09) 6.95 KB BRS & EBS (Formerly known as MDS/ITFS) Application Records [144]Sun (05-04-09) 0.16 KB [145]Mon (04-28-09) 0.16 KB [146]Tue (04-29-09) 0.16 KB [147]Wed (04-30-09) 0.16 KB [148]Thu (05-01-09) 0.16 KB [149]Fri (05-02-09) 0.16 KB [150]Sat (05-03-09) 0.16 KB License Records [151]Sun (05-04-09) 0.16 KB [152]Mon (04-28-09) 13.72 KB [153]Tue (04-29-09) 15.98 KB [154]Wed (04-30-09) 2.4 KB
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?&job=transaction&page=daily
  • fields in the database tables - ([140]xls) * SQL for the table definitions - ([141]text - Updated 11/06/2003) * Meanings of codes for the code data elements in the tables - ([142]pdf, [143]Word) Assignments and Transfers Application Records [144]Sun (05-04-09) 0.16 KB [145]Mon (04-28-09) 0.16 KB [146]Tue (04-29-09) 17.77 KB [147]Wed (04-30-09) 16.53 KB [148]Thu (05-01-09) 41.63 KB [149]Fri (05-02-09) 5.84 KB [150]Sat (05-03-09) 6.95 KB BRS & EBS (Formerly known as MDS/ITFS) Application Records [151]Sun (05-04-09) 0.16 KB [152]Mon (04-28-09) 0.16 KB [153]Tue (04-29-09) 0.16 KB [154]Wed (04-30-09) 0.16 KB [155]Thu (05-01-09) 0.16 KB [156]Fri (05-02-09) 0.16 KB [157]Sat (05-03-09) 0.16 KB License Records [158]Sun (05-04-09) 0.16 KB [159]Mon (04-28-09) 13.72 KB [160]Tue (04-29-09) 15.98 KB [161]Wed (04-30-09) 2.4 KB
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=transaction&page=daily
  • fields in the database tables - ([140]xls) * SQL for the table definitions - ([141]text - Updated 11/06/2003) * Meanings of codes for the code data elements in the tables - ([142]pdf, [143]Word) Assignments and Transfers Application Records [144]Sun (05-04-09) 0.16 KB [145]Mon (04-28-09) 0.16 KB [146]Tue (04-29-09) 17.77 KB [147]Wed (04-30-09) 16.53 KB [148]Thu (05-01-09) 41.63 KB [149]Fri (05-02-09) 5.84 KB [150]Sat (05-03-09) 6.95 KB BRS & EBS (Formerly known as MDS/ITFS) Application Records [151]Sun (05-04-09) 0.16 KB [152]Mon (04-28-09) 0.16 KB [153]Tue (04-29-09) 0.16 KB [154]Wed (04-30-09) 0.16 KB [155]Thu (05-01-09) 0.16 KB [156]Fri (05-02-09) 0.16 KB [157]Sat (05-03-09) 0.16 KB License Records [158]Sun (05-04-09) 0.16 KB [159]Mon (04-28-09) 13.72 KB [160]Tue (04-29-09) 15.98 KB [161]Wed (04-30-09) 2.4 KB
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/weeklypn.htm?job=transaction&page=daily
  • fields in the database tables - ([140]xls) * SQL for the table definitions - ([141]text - Updated 11/06/2003) * Meanings of codes for the code data elements in the tables - ([142]pdf, [143]Word) Assignments and Transfers Application Records [144]Sun (05-04-09) 0.16 KB [145]Mon (04-28-09) 0.16 KB [146]Tue (04-29-09) 17.77 KB [147]Wed (04-30-09) 16.53 KB [148]Thu (05-01-09) 41.63 KB [149]Fri (05-02-09) 5.84 KB [150]Sat (05-03-09) 6.95 KB BRS & EBS (Formerly known as MDS/ITFS) Application Records [151]Sun (05-04-09) 0.16 KB [152]Mon (04-28-09) 0.16 KB [153]Tue (04-29-09) 0.16 KB [154]Wed (04-30-09) 0.16 KB [155]Thu (05-01-09) 0.16 KB [156]Fri (05-02-09) 0.16 KB [157]Sat (05-03-09) 0.16 KB License Records [158]Sun (05-04-09) 0.16 KB [159]Mon (04-28-09) 13.72 KB [160]Tue (04-29-09) 15.98 KB [161]Wed (04-30-09) 2.4 KB
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.wp
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743b.pdf
  • 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) S5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Maritime (80) S5.81 471 510-525 MOBILE S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) S5.72 S5.81 525-535 BROADCASTING S5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION S5.81 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.txt
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/antenna/index.htm?job=uls_transaction&page=daily
  • - FRC Application Records [172]Sun (06-01-09) 0.16 KB [173]Mon (06-02-09) 1.33 KB [174]Tue (06-03-09) 16.9 KB [175]Wed (05-28-09) 11.44 KB [176]Thu (05-29-09) 5.35 KB [177]Fri (05-30-09) 13.49 KB [178]Sat (05-31-09) 7.59 KB License Records [179]Sun (06-01-09) 0.79 KB [180]Mon (06-02-09) 1.73 KB [181]Tue (06-03-09) 13.63 KB [182]Wed (05-28-09) 15.7 KB [183]Thu (05-29-09) 5.53 KB [184]Fri (05-30-09) 12.43 KB [185]Sat (05-31-09) 5.84 KB General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) Application Records [186]Sun (06-01-09) 0.16 KB [187]Mon (06-02-09) 0.16 KB [188]Tue (06-03-09) 9.72 KB [189]Wed (05-28-09) 13.1 KB [190]Thu (05-29-09) 5.51 KB [191]Fri (05-30-09) 5.47 KB [192]Sat (05-31-09) 6.05 KB License Records [193]Sun (06-01-09) 0.16 KB [194]Mon (06-02-09) 31.06 KB [195]Tue (06-03-09) 6.34 KB [196]Wed (05-28-09) 9.2 KB [197]Thu (05-29-09) 4.67 KB [198]Fri (05-30-09)
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?&job=transaction&page=daily
  • - FRC Application Records [179]Sun (06-01-09) 0.16 KB [180]Mon (06-02-09) 1.33 KB [181]Tue (06-03-09) 16.9 KB [182]Wed (05-28-09) 11.44 KB [183]Thu (05-29-09) 5.35 KB [184]Fri (05-30-09) 13.49 KB [185]Sat (05-31-09) 7.59 KB License Records [186]Sun (06-01-09) 0.79 KB [187]Mon (06-02-09) 1.73 KB [188]Tue (06-03-09) 13.63 KB [189]Wed (05-28-09) 15.7 KB [190]Thu (05-29-09) 5.53 KB [191]Fri (05-30-09) 12.43 KB [192]Sat (05-31-09) 5.84 KB General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) Application Records [193]Sun (06-01-09) 0.16 KB [194]Mon (06-02-09) 0.16 KB [195]Tue (06-03-09) 9.72 KB [196]Wed (05-28-09) 13.1 KB [197]Thu (05-29-09) 5.51 KB [198]Fri (05-30-09) 5.47 KB [199]Sat (05-31-09) 6.05 KB License Records [200]Sun (06-01-09) 0.16 KB [201]Mon (06-02-09) 31.06 KB [202]Tue (06-03-09) 6.34 KB [203]Wed (05-28-09) 9.2 KB [204]Thu (05-29-09) 4.67 KB [205]Fri (05-30-09)
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=transaction&page=daily
  • - FRC Application Records [179]Sun (06-01-09) 0.16 KB [180]Mon (06-02-09) 1.33 KB [181]Tue (06-03-09) 16.9 KB [182]Wed (05-28-09) 11.44 KB [183]Thu (05-29-09) 5.35 KB [184]Fri (05-30-09) 13.49 KB [185]Sat (05-31-09) 7.59 KB License Records [186]Sun (06-01-09) 0.79 KB [187]Mon (06-02-09) 1.73 KB [188]Tue (06-03-09) 13.63 KB [189]Wed (05-28-09) 15.7 KB [190]Thu (05-29-09) 5.53 KB [191]Fri (05-30-09) 12.43 KB [192]Sat (05-31-09) 5.84 KB General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) Application Records [193]Sun (06-01-09) 0.16 KB [194]Mon (06-02-09) 0.16 KB [195]Tue (06-03-09) 9.72 KB [196]Wed (05-28-09) 13.1 KB [197]Thu (05-29-09) 5.51 KB [198]Fri (05-30-09) 5.47 KB [199]Sat (05-31-09) 6.05 KB License Records [200]Sun (06-01-09) 0.16 KB [201]Mon (06-02-09) 31.06 KB [202]Tue (06-03-09) 6.34 KB [203]Wed (05-28-09) 9.2 KB [204]Thu (05-29-09) 4.67 KB [205]Fri (05-30-09)
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/weeklypn.htm?job=transaction&page=daily
  • - FRC Application Records [179]Sun (06-01-09) 0.16 KB [180]Mon (06-02-09) 1.33 KB [181]Tue (06-03-09) 16.9 KB [182]Wed (05-28-09) 11.44 KB [183]Thu (05-29-09) 5.35 KB [184]Fri (05-30-09) 13.49 KB [185]Sat (05-31-09) 7.59 KB License Records [186]Sun (06-01-09) 0.79 KB [187]Mon (06-02-09) 1.73 KB [188]Tue (06-03-09) 13.63 KB [189]Wed (05-28-09) 15.7 KB [190]Thu (05-29-09) 5.53 KB [191]Fri (05-30-09) 12.43 KB [192]Sat (05-31-09) 5.84 KB General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) Application Records [193]Sun (06-01-09) 0.16 KB [194]Mon (06-02-09) 0.16 KB [195]Tue (06-03-09) 9.72 KB [196]Wed (05-28-09) 13.1 KB [197]Thu (05-29-09) 5.51 KB [198]Fri (05-30-09) 5.47 KB [199]Sat (05-31-09) 6.05 KB License Records [200]Sun (06-01-09) 0.16 KB [201]Mon (06-02-09) 31.06 KB [202]Tue (06-03-09) 6.34 KB [203]Wed (05-28-09) 9.2 KB [204]Thu (05-29-09) 4.67 KB [205]Fri (05-30-09)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.wp
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743b.pdf
  • 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) S5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Maritime (80) S5.81 471 510-525 MOBILE S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) S5.72 S5.81 525-535 BROADCASTING S5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION S5.81 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.txt
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.wp
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743b.pdf
  • 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) S5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Maritime (80) S5.81 471 510-525 MOBILE S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) S5.72 S5.81 525-535 BROADCASTING S5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION S5.81 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.txt
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.wp
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743b.pdf
  • 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) S5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Maritime (80) S5.81 471 510-525 MOBILE S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) S5.72 S5.81 525-535 BROADCASTING S5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION S5.81 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.txt
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.wp
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743b.pdf
  • 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) S5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Maritime (80) S5.81 471 510-525 MOBILE S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) S5.72 S5.81 525-535 BROADCASTING S5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION S5.81 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.txt
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched- with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.txt
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched- with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.txt
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched- with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched- with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched- with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 4 MOD USA/AI 1.10/1 495-1 800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 4 MOD USA/AI 1.10/1 495-1 800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3_Rcd.pdf
  • primary allocation to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 2185 MODUSA/AI 1.10/1 495-1800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/antenna/index.htm?job=uls_transaction&page=daily
  • KB [125]Fri (05-01-10) 18.35 KB [126]Sat (05-02-10) 0.16 KB Registration Records [127]Sun (05-03-10) 1.36 KB [128]Mon (05-04-10) 17.53 KB [129]Tue (04-28-10) 29.46 KB [130]Wed (04-29-10) 20.78 KB [131]Thu (04-30-10) 22.49 KB [132]Fri (05-01-10) 26.95 KB [133]Sat (05-02-10) 14.05 KB FAA Determination Records [134]Sun (05-03-10) 0.16 KB [135]Mon (05-04-10) 0.78 KB [136]Tue (04-28-10) 5.69 KB [137]Wed (04-29-10) 6.25 KB [138]Thu (04-30-10) 5.84 KB [139]Fri (05-01-10) 5.32 KB [140]Sat (05-02-10) 6.19 KB * Introduction to the ASR public access database files - ([141]pdf, [142]Word) * Definitions of the data fields in the database tables - ([143]xls) * SQL for the table definitions - ([144]text - Updated 11/06/2003) * Meanings of codes for the code data elements in the tables - ([145]pdf, [146]Word) Assignments
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?&job=transaction&page=daily
  • KB [134]Fri (05-01-10) 18.35 KB [135]Sat (05-02-10) 0.16 KB Registration Records [136]Sun (05-03-10) 1.36 KB [137]Mon (05-04-10) 17.53 KB [138]Tue (04-28-10) 29.46 KB [139]Wed (04-29-10) 20.78 KB [140]Thu (04-30-10) 22.49 KB [141]Fri (05-01-10) 26.95 KB [142]Sat (05-02-10) 14.05 KB FAA Determination Records [143]Sun (05-03-10) 0.16 KB [144]Mon (05-04-10) 0.78 KB [145]Tue (04-28-10) 5.69 KB [146]Wed (04-29-10) 6.25 KB [147]Thu (04-30-10) 5.84 KB [148]Fri (05-01-10) 5.32 KB [149]Sat (05-02-10) 6.19 KB * Introduction to the ASR public access database files - ([150]pdf, [151]Word) * Definitions of the data fields in the database tables - ([152]xls) * SQL for the table definitions - ([153]text - Updated 11/06/2003) * Meanings of codes for the code data elements in the tables - ([154]pdf, [155]Word) Assignments
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=transaction&page=daily
  • KB [134]Fri (05-01-10) 18.35 KB [135]Sat (05-02-10) 0.16 KB Registration Records [136]Sun (05-03-10) 1.36 KB [137]Mon (05-04-10) 17.53 KB [138]Tue (04-28-10) 29.46 KB [139]Wed (04-29-10) 20.78 KB [140]Thu (04-30-10) 22.49 KB [141]Fri (05-01-10) 26.95 KB [142]Sat (05-02-10) 14.05 KB FAA Determination Records [143]Sun (05-03-10) 0.16 KB [144]Mon (05-04-10) 0.78 KB [145]Tue (04-28-10) 5.69 KB [146]Wed (04-29-10) 6.25 KB [147]Thu (04-30-10) 5.84 KB [148]Fri (05-01-10) 5.32 KB [149]Sat (05-02-10) 6.19 KB * Introduction to the ASR public access database files - ([150]pdf, [151]Word) * Definitions of the data fields in the database tables - ([152]xls) * SQL for the table definitions - ([153]text - Updated 11/06/2003) * Meanings of codes for the code data elements in the tables - ([154]pdf, [155]Word) Assignments
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/weeklypn.htm?job=transaction&page=daily
  • KB [134]Fri (05-01-10) 18.35 KB [135]Sat (05-02-10) 0.16 KB Registration Records [136]Sun (05-03-10) 1.36 KB [137]Mon (05-04-10) 17.53 KB [138]Tue (04-28-10) 29.46 KB [139]Wed (04-29-10) 20.78 KB [140]Thu (04-30-10) 22.49 KB [141]Fri (05-01-10) 26.95 KB [142]Sat (05-02-10) 14.05 KB FAA Determination Records [143]Sun (05-03-10) 0.16 KB [144]Mon (05-04-10) 0.78 KB [145]Tue (04-28-10) 5.69 KB [146]Wed (04-29-10) 6.25 KB [147]Thu (04-30-10) 5.84 KB [148]Fri (05-01-10) 5.32 KB [149]Sat (05-02-10) 6.19 KB * Introduction to the ASR public access database files - ([150]pdf, [151]Word) * Definitions of the data fields in the database tables - ([152]xls) * SQL for the table definitions - ([153]text - Updated 11/06/2003) * Meanings of codes for the code data elements in the tables - ([154]pdf, [155]Word) Assignments
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/case-studies/Hurricane-Ike-Harris%20County-120109.pdf
  • 6 9/14/2008 12 21262 5.91 98.4% 12 10 9/13/2008 9 32898 9.14 91.4% 13 6 9/14/2008 20 10461 2.91 48.4% 14 10 9/13/2008 18 26514 7.37 73.7% 15 11 9/13/2008 12 33765 9.38 85.3% 16 7 9/13/2008 19 7539 2.09 29.9% 17 8 9/14/2008 15 11433 3.18 39.7% 18 14 9/15/2008 9 31780 8.83 63.1% 19 14 9/16/2008 11 21023 5.84 41.7% 20 4 9/13/2008 14 5253 1.46 36.5% 21 4 9/13/2008 21 2524 0.70 17.5% 22 11 9/13/2008 8 34942 9.71 88.2% 23 11 9/11/2008 9 27056 7.52 68.3% 24 6 9/13/2008 8 7193 2.00 33.3% 25 The usage in erlang is the air seconds divided by 3600 seconds. 26 Site utilization is the usage in erlang divided by number
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 4 MOD USA/AI 1.10/1 495-1 800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3_Rcd.pdf
  • primary allocation to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 2185 MODUSA/AI 1.10/1 495-1800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/case-studies/Hurricane-Ike-Harris%20County-120109.pdf
  • 6 9/14/2008 12 21262 5.91 98.4% 12 10 9/13/2008 9 32898 9.14 91.4% 13 6 9/14/2008 20 10461 2.91 48.4% 14 10 9/13/2008 18 26514 7.37 73.7% 15 11 9/13/2008 12 33765 9.38 85.3% 16 7 9/13/2008 19 7539 2.09 29.9% 17 8 9/14/2008 15 11433 3.18 39.7% 18 14 9/15/2008 9 31780 8.83 63.1% 19 14 9/16/2008 11 21023 5.84 41.7% 20 4 9/13/2008 14 5253 1.46 36.5% 21 4 9/13/2008 21 2524 0.70 17.5% 22 11 9/13/2008 8 34942 9.71 88.2% 23 11 9/11/2008 9 27056 7.52 68.3% 24 6 9/13/2008 8 7193 2.00 33.3% 25 The usage in erlang is the air seconds divided by 3600 seconds. 26 Site utilization is the usage in erlang divided by number
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 4 MOD USA/AI 1.10/1 495-1 800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3_Rcd.pdf
  • primary allocation to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 2185 MODUSA/AI 1.10/1 495-1800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/case-studies/Hurricane-Ike-Harris%20County-120109.pdf
  • 6 9/14/2008 12 21262 5.91 98.4% 12 10 9/13/2008 9 32898 9.14 91.4% 13 6 9/14/2008 20 10461 2.91 48.4% 14 10 9/13/2008 18 26514 7.37 73.7% 15 11 9/13/2008 12 33765 9.38 85.3% 16 7 9/13/2008 19 7539 2.09 29.9% 17 8 9/14/2008 15 11433 3.18 39.7% 18 14 9/15/2008 9 31780 8.83 63.1% 19 14 9/16/2008 11 21023 5.84 41.7% 20 4 9/13/2008 14 5253 1.46 36.5% 21 4 9/13/2008 21 2524 0.70 17.5% 22 11 9/13/2008 8 34942 9.71 88.2% 23 11 9/11/2008 9 27056 7.52 68.3% 24 6 9/13/2008 8 7193 2.00 33.3% 25 The usage in erlang is the air seconds divided by 3600 seconds. 26 Site utilization is the usage in erlang divided by number
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 4 MOD USA/AI 1.10/1 495-1 800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3_Rcd.pdf
  • primary allocation to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 2185 MODUSA/AI 1.10/1 495-1800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/case-studies/Hurricane-Ike-Harris%20County-120109.pdf
  • 6 9/14/2008 12 21262 5.91 98.4% 12 10 9/13/2008 9 32898 9.14 91.4% 13 6 9/14/2008 20 10461 2.91 48.4% 14 10 9/13/2008 18 26514 7.37 73.7% 15 11 9/13/2008 12 33765 9.38 85.3% 16 7 9/13/2008 19 7539 2.09 29.9% 17 8 9/14/2008 15 11433 3.18 39.7% 18 14 9/15/2008 9 31780 8.83 63.1% 19 14 9/16/2008 11 21023 5.84 41.7% 20 4 9/13/2008 14 5253 1.46 36.5% 21 4 9/13/2008 21 2524 0.70 17.5% 22 11 9/13/2008 8 34942 9.71 88.2% 23 11 9/11/2008 9 27056 7.52 68.3% 24 6 9/13/2008 8 7193 2.00 33.3% 25 The usage in erlang is the air seconds divided by 3600 seconds. 26 Site utilization is the usage in erlang divided by number
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.doc ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/Orders/2005/et04-139.pdf
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 4 MOD USA/AI 1.10/1 495-1 800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • effective in the United States, the Commission must adopt them in a future rulemaking proceeding. WRC-07 modifications to the remaining 14 international footnotes are minor in nature, and require no further action on our part beyond updating the text of these footnotes to reflect the text now specified in the ITU Radio Regulations. Specifically, nine of the modified international footnotes (5.84, 5.108, 5.111, 5.115, 5.130, 5.145, 5.200, 5.256, and 5.266) involve the deletion of a reference to Appendix 13 of the ITU Radio Regulations, which WRC-07 suppressed, and five of the modified international footnotes (5.79A, 5.82, 5.134, 5.287, and 5.328A) involve updates and the removal of expired information. Updates to U.S. Table and Domestic Footnotes Below 30 MHz Fixed Use of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276876A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71 $42.80 $42.92 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-260A1.txt
  • B.3.3.7.2 Line Sharing/Non-Dispatch/NC(hours) 3.48 2.54 2.77 1.71 4.25 7.86 1.81 7.50 1,2,3,4 B.3.3.8.1 2W Analog Loop Design/Dispatch/NC(hours) 15.02 4.31 16.33 4.27 16.54 3.74 18.25 3.79 B.3.3.8.2 2W Analog Loop Design/Non-Dispatch/NC(hours) 15.02 1.84 16.33 1.94 16.54 2.64 18.25 2.78 B.3.3.9.1 2W Analog Loop Non-Design/Dispatch/NC(hours) 15.06 3.30 16.37 0.00 16.63 0.00 18.33 8.33 4 B.3.3.9.2 2W Analog Loop Non-Design/Non- Dispatch/NC(hours) 5.03 0.55 5.84 20.00 6.22 0.00 6.96 0.00 1,2 B.3.3.10.1 Other Design/Dispatch/NC(hours) 4.38 2.28 5.08 0.00 4.30 0.00 5.17 0.00 1 B.3.3.10.2 Other Design/Non-Dispatch/NC(hours) 2.27 0.00 2.30 0.00 2.17 0.00 2.29 0.00 B.3.3.11.1 Other Non-Design/Dispatch/NC(hours) 15.02 19.04 16.33 4.50 16.54 17.00 18.25 28.001,2,3,4 B.3.3.11.2 Other Non-Design/Non-Dispatch/NC(hours) 4.68 2.67 5.47 2.00 5.70 1.75 6.48 11.001,2,3,4 % Repeat Troubles within 30 Days [M&R-4] B.3.4.2.1 Local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.txt
  • 0.21 0.34 0.32 0.72 0.31 0.21 0.36 0.28 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.32 0.39 0.27 0.45 0.42 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 5.7 3.72 5.08 5.68 4.52 9.58 6.43 4.38 6.64 5.12 4,5 MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 5.25 9.24 5.84NA 7.69NA 6.37 2.88 5.89 5.451,4,5 B-13 Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC NEW HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-262 Metric Number Notes February March April May June MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 97.01 100 98.78 100 100 100 97.96 100 97.3 100 4,5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-57A1.txt
  • MR-3-01-3342% Missed Repair Appointment - Loop 41.92 4.35 30.91 5.88 23.86 4.62 38.99 7.55 45.39 6.67 MR-3-02-3342% Missed Repair Appointment - Central Office 17.65 0 6.76 0 11.2911.1119.05 0 23.38 0 4,5 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-02-3342Mean Time To Repair - Loop Trouble 55.1918.3164.0921.7476.0920.3946.53 23.6 45.2626.08 MR-4-03-3342Mean Time To Repair - Central Office Trouble 19.04 3.1 24.62 8.9 26.7217.9822.47 5.84 24.43 8.41 4,5 MR-4-07-3342% Out of Service > 12 Hours 79.0353.7579.5963.3384.3669.0984.0468.5277.1165.85 MR-4-08-3342% Out of Service > 24 Hours 56.9918.7561.7326.6771.56 20 55.8527.7851.8131.71 MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01-3342% Repeat Reports within 30 Days 36.1721.3638.4919.4835.5218.9233.78 9.84 43 18.75 2-Wire xDSL Line Sharing - Maintenance MR-2 - Trouble Report Rate MR-2-02-3343Network Trouble Report Rate - Loop 0.19 0.1 0.19 0.18 0.23 0.12 0.18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.wp
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743b.pdf
  • 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) S5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE S5.79 Maritime (80) S5.81 471 510-525 MOBILE S5.79A S5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) S5.72 S5.81 525-535 BROADCASTING S5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION S5.81 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/case-studies/Hurricane-Ike-Harris%20County-120109.pdf
  • 6 9/14/2008 12 21262 5.91 98.4% 12 10 9/13/2008 9 32898 9.14 91.4% 13 6 9/14/2008 20 10461 2.91 48.4% 14 10 9/13/2008 18 26514 7.37 73.7% 15 11 9/13/2008 12 33765 9.38 85.3% 16 7 9/13/2008 19 7539 2.09 29.9% 17 8 9/14/2008 15 11433 3.18 39.7% 18 14 9/15/2008 9 31780 8.83 63.1% 19 14 9/16/2008 11 21023 5.84 41.7% 20 4 9/13/2008 14 5253 1.46 36.5% 21 4 9/13/2008 21 2524 0.70 17.5% 22 11 9/13/2008 8 34942 9.71 88.2% 23 11 9/11/2008 9 27056 7.52 68.3% 24 6 9/13/2008 8 7193 2.00 33.3% 25 The usage in erlang is the air seconds divided by 3600 seconds. 26 Site utilization is the usage in erlang divided by number
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 4 MOD USA/AI 1.10/1 495-1 800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3_Rcd.pdf
  • primary allocation to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 2185 MODUSA/AI 1.10/1 495-1800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • effective in the United States, the Commission must adopt them in a future rulemaking proceeding. WRC-07 modifications to the remaining 14 international footnotes are minor in nature, and require no further action on our part beyond updating the text of these footnotes to reflect the text now specified in the ITU Radio Regulations. Specifically, nine of the modified international footnotes (5.84, 5.108, 5.111, 5.115, 5.130, 5.145, 5.200, 5.256, and 5.266) involve the deletion of a reference to Appendix 13 of the ITU Radio Regulations, which WRC-07 suppressed, and five of the modified international footnotes (5.79A, 5.82, 5.134, 5.287, and 5.328A) involve updates and the removal of expired information. Updates to U.S. Table and Domestic Footnotes Below 30 MHz Fixed Use of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched- with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/case-studies/Hurricane-Ike-Harris%20County-120109.pdf
  • 6 9/14/2008 12 21262 5.91 98.4% 12 10 9/13/2008 9 32898 9.14 91.4% 13 6 9/14/2008 20 10461 2.91 48.4% 14 10 9/13/2008 18 26514 7.37 73.7% 15 11 9/13/2008 12 33765 9.38 85.3% 16 7 9/13/2008 19 7539 2.09 29.9% 17 8 9/14/2008 15 11433 3.18 39.7% 18 14 9/15/2008 9 31780 8.83 63.1% 19 14 9/16/2008 11 21023 5.84 41.7% 20 4 9/13/2008 14 5253 1.46 36.5% 21 4 9/13/2008 21 2524 0.70 17.5% 22 11 9/13/2008 8 34942 9.71 88.2% 23 11 9/11/2008 9 27056 7.52 68.3% 24 6 9/13/2008 8 7193 2.00 33.3% 25 The usage in erlang is the air seconds divided by 3600 seconds. 26 Site utilization is the usage in erlang divided by number
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 4 MOD USA/AI 1.10/1 495-1 800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3_Rcd.pdf
  • primary allocation to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 2185 MODUSA/AI 1.10/1 495-1800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • effective in the United States, the Commission must adopt them in a future rulemaking proceeding. WRC-07 modifications to the remaining 14 international footnotes are minor in nature, and require no further action on our part beyond updating the text of these footnotes to reflect the text now specified in the ITU Radio Regulations. Specifically, nine of the modified international footnotes (5.84, 5.108, 5.111, 5.115, 5.130, 5.145, 5.200, 5.256, and 5.266) involve the deletion of a reference to Appendix 13 of the ITU Radio Regulations, which WRC-07 suppressed, and five of the modified international footnotes (5.79A, 5.82, 5.134, 5.287, and 5.328A) involve updates and the removal of expired information. Updates to U.S. Table and Domestic Footnotes Below 30 MHz Fixed Use of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched- with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/case-studies/Hurricane-Ike-Harris%20County-120109.pdf
  • 6 9/14/2008 12 21262 5.91 98.4% 12 10 9/13/2008 9 32898 9.14 91.4% 13 6 9/14/2008 20 10461 2.91 48.4% 14 10 9/13/2008 18 26514 7.37 73.7% 15 11 9/13/2008 12 33765 9.38 85.3% 16 7 9/13/2008 19 7539 2.09 29.9% 17 8 9/14/2008 15 11433 3.18 39.7% 18 14 9/15/2008 9 31780 8.83 63.1% 19 14 9/16/2008 11 21023 5.84 41.7% 20 4 9/13/2008 14 5253 1.46 36.5% 21 4 9/13/2008 21 2524 0.70 17.5% 22 11 9/13/2008 8 34942 9.71 88.2% 23 11 9/11/2008 9 27056 7.52 68.3% 24 6 9/13/2008 8 7193 2.00 33.3% 25 The usage in erlang is the air seconds divided by 3600 seconds. 26 Site utilization is the usage in erlang divided by number
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 4 MOD USA/AI 1.10/1 495-1 800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3_Rcd.pdf
  • primary allocation to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 2185 MODUSA/AI 1.10/1 495-1800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • effective in the United States, the Commission must adopt them in a future rulemaking proceeding. WRC-07 modifications to the remaining 14 international footnotes are minor in nature, and require no further action on our part beyond updating the text of these footnotes to reflect the text now specified in the ITU Radio Regulations. Specifically, nine of the modified international footnotes (5.84, 5.108, 5.111, 5.115, 5.130, 5.145, 5.200, 5.256, and 5.266) involve the deletion of a reference to Appendix 13 of the ITU Radio Regulations, which WRC-07 suppressed, and five of the modified international footnotes (5.79A, 5.82, 5.134, 5.287, and 5.328A) involve updates and the removal of expired information. Updates to U.S. Table and Domestic Footnotes Below 30 MHz Fixed Use of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched- with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/case-studies/Hurricane-Ike-Harris%20County-120109.pdf
  • 6 9/14/2008 12 21262 5.91 98.4% 12 10 9/13/2008 9 32898 9.14 91.4% 13 6 9/14/2008 20 10461 2.91 48.4% 14 10 9/13/2008 18 26514 7.37 73.7% 15 11 9/13/2008 12 33765 9.38 85.3% 16 7 9/13/2008 19 7539 2.09 29.9% 17 8 9/14/2008 15 11433 3.18 39.7% 18 14 9/15/2008 9 31780 8.83 63.1% 19 14 9/16/2008 11 21023 5.84 41.7% 20 4 9/13/2008 14 5253 1.46 36.5% 21 4 9/13/2008 21 2524 0.70 17.5% 22 11 9/13/2008 8 34942 9.71 88.2% 23 11 9/11/2008 9 27056 7.52 68.3% 24 6 9/13/2008 8 7193 2.00 33.3% 25 The usage in erlang is the air seconds divided by 3600 seconds. 26 Site utilization is the usage in erlang divided by number
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 4 MOD USA/AI 1.10/1 495-1 800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3_Rcd.pdf
  • primary allocation to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 2185 MODUSA/AI 1.10/1 495-1800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • effective in the United States, the Commission must adopt them in a future rulemaking proceeding. WRC-07 modifications to the remaining 14 international footnotes are minor in nature, and require no further action on our part beyond updating the text of these footnotes to reflect the text now specified in the ITU Radio Regulations. Specifically, nine of the modified international footnotes (5.84, 5.108, 5.111, 5.115, 5.130, 5.145, 5.200, 5.256, and 5.266) involve the deletion of a reference to Appendix 13 of the ITU Radio Regulations, which WRC-07 suppressed, and five of the modified international footnotes (5.79A, 5.82, 5.134, 5.287, and 5.328A) involve updates and the removal of expired information. Updates to U.S. Table and Domestic Footnotes Below 30 MHz Fixed Use of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.txt
  • Special provisions for satellite systems. § 5.65 Defective applications. § 5.67 Amendment or dismissal of applications. § 5.69 License grants that differ from applications. § 5.71 License period. § 5.73 Experimental report. § 5.77 Change in equipment and emission characteristics. § 5.79 Transfer and assignment of station authorization for conventional experimental radio licenses. § 5.81 Discontinuance of station operation. § 5.84 Non-interference basis. § 5.85 Frequencies and policy governing their assignment. § 5.91 Notification of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. § 5.95 Informal objections. § 5.101 Frequency stability. § 5.103 Types of emission. § 5.105 Authorized bandwidth. § 5.107 Transmitter control requirements. § 5.109 Inspection and maintenance of antenna structure marking and associated control equipment. § 5.110 Power limitations. § 5.111
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched- with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/case-studies/Hurricane-Ike-Harris%20County-120109.pdf
  • 6 9/14/2008 12 21262 5.91 98.4% 12 10 9/13/2008 9 32898 9.14 91.4% 13 6 9/14/2008 20 10461 2.91 48.4% 14 10 9/13/2008 18 26514 7.37 73.7% 15 11 9/13/2008 12 33765 9.38 85.3% 16 7 9/13/2008 19 7539 2.09 29.9% 17 8 9/14/2008 15 11433 3.18 39.7% 18 14 9/15/2008 9 31780 8.83 63.1% 19 14 9/16/2008 11 21023 5.84 41.7% 20 4 9/13/2008 14 5253 1.46 36.5% 21 4 9/13/2008 21 2524 0.70 17.5% 22 11 9/13/2008 8 34942 9.71 88.2% 23 11 9/11/2008 9 27056 7.52 68.3% 24 6 9/13/2008 8 7193 2.00 33.3% 25 The usage in erlang is the air seconds divided by 3600 seconds. 26 Site utilization is the usage in erlang divided by number
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 4 MOD USA/AI 1.10/1 495-1 800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3_Rcd.pdf
  • primary allocation to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 2185 MODUSA/AI 1.10/1 495-1800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • effective in the United States, the Commission must adopt them in a future rulemaking proceeding. WRC-07 modifications to the remaining 14 international footnotes are minor in nature, and require no further action on our part beyond updating the text of these footnotes to reflect the text now specified in the ITU Radio Regulations. Specifically, nine of the modified international footnotes (5.84, 5.108, 5.111, 5.115, 5.130, 5.145, 5.200, 5.256, and 5.266) involve the deletion of a reference to Appendix 13 of the ITU Radio Regulations, which WRC-07 suppressed, and five of the modified international footnotes (5.79A, 5.82, 5.134, 5.287, and 5.328A) involve updates and the removal of expired information. Updates to U.S. Table and Domestic Footnotes Below 30 MHz Fixed Use of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • CO INC -5.53 -14.21 10.12 2.12 613012 C ACS-AK JUNEAU -10.34 -8.39 -2.13 0.00 613013 C KETCHIKAN PUBLIC UT 3.91 -5.64 10.12 6.97 613015 C MATANUSKA TEL ASSOC -5.63 -7.85 2.41 -15.16 613016 C MUKLUK TEL CO INC 3.18 -7.31 11.31 6.47 613016A C MUKLUK TEL CO INC -5.29 -13.70 9.75 0.00 613017 C ALASKA TEL CO 1.76 -1.53 3.34 -5.84 613017A C ALASKA TEL CO 1.04 -1.70 2.79 0.00 613018 C NUSHAGAK ELEC & TEL 8.93 -2.08 11.25 12.05 613019 C OTZ TEL COOPERATIVE -0.81 -12.57 13.45 6.28 613020 C ACS-N SITKA -8.68 -4.10 -4.78 -94.56 613022 C ACS-AK GREATLAND -11.66 -27.81 22.38 INFINITE 613023 C UNITED UTILITIES INC 1.11 -6.64 8.30 1.32 613023A C UNITED UTILITIES INC -27.66 -8.90
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • CO INC -5.53 -14.21 10.12 2.12 613012 C ACS-AK JUNEAU -10.34 -8.39 -2.13 0.00 613013 C KETCHIKAN PUBLIC UT 3.91 -5.64 10.12 6.97 613015 C MATANUSKA TEL ASSOC -5.63 -7.85 2.41 -15.16 613016 C MUKLUK TEL CO INC 3.18 -7.31 11.31 6.47 613016A C MUKLUK TEL CO INC -5.29 -13.70 9.75 0.00 613017 C ALASKA TEL CO 1.76 -1.53 3.34 -5.84 613017A C ALASKA TEL CO 1.04 -1.70 2.79 0.00 613018 C NUSHAGAK ELEC & TEL 8.93 -2.08 11.25 12.05 613019 C OTZ TEL COOPERATIVE -0.81 -12.57 13.45 6.28 613020 C ACS-N SITKA -8.68 -4.10 -4.78 -94.56 613022 C ACS-AK GREATLAND -11.66 -27.81 22.38 INFINITE 613023 C UNITED UTILITIES INC 1.11 -6.64 8.30 1.32 613023A C UNITED UTILITIES INC -27.66 -8.90
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.txt
  • Special provisions for satellite systems. § 5.65 Defective applications. § 5.67 Amendment or dismissal of applications. § 5.69 License grants that differ from applications. § 5.71 License period. § 5.73 Experimental report. § 5.77 Change in equipment and emission characteristics. § 5.79 Transfer and assignment of station authorization for conventional experimental radio licenses. § 5.81 Discontinuance of station operation. § 5.84 Non-interference basis. § 5.85 Frequencies and policy governing their assignment. § 5.91 Notification of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. § 5.95 Informal objections. § 5.101 Frequency stability. § 5.103 Types of emission. § 5.105 Authorized bandwidth. § 5.107 Transmitter control requirements. § 5.109 Inspection and maintenance of antenna structure marking and associated control equipment. § 5.110 Power limitations. § 5.111
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched- with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/case-studies/Hurricane-Ike-Harris%20County-120109.pdf
  • 6 9/14/2008 12 21262 5.91 98.4% 12 10 9/13/2008 9 32898 9.14 91.4% 13 6 9/14/2008 20 10461 2.91 48.4% 14 10 9/13/2008 18 26514 7.37 73.7% 15 11 9/13/2008 12 33765 9.38 85.3% 16 7 9/13/2008 19 7539 2.09 29.9% 17 8 9/14/2008 15 11433 3.18 39.7% 18 14 9/15/2008 9 31780 8.83 63.1% 19 14 9/16/2008 11 21023 5.84 41.7% 20 4 9/13/2008 14 5253 1.46 36.5% 21 4 9/13/2008 21 2524 0.70 17.5% 22 11 9/13/2008 8 34942 9.71 88.2% 23 11 9/11/2008 9 27056 7.52 68.3% 24 6 9/13/2008 8 7193 2.00 33.3% 25 The usage in erlang is the air seconds divided by 3600 seconds. 26 Site utilization is the usage in erlang divided by number
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 4 MOD USA/AI 1.10/1 495-1 800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3_Rcd.pdf
  • primary allocation to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 2185 MODUSA/AI 1.10/1 495-1800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • effective in the United States, the Commission must adopt them in a future rulemaking proceeding. WRC-07 modifications to the remaining 14 international footnotes are minor in nature, and require no further action on our part beyond updating the text of these footnotes to reflect the text now specified in the ITU Radio Regulations. Specifically, nine of the modified international footnotes (5.84, 5.108, 5.111, 5.115, 5.130, 5.145, 5.200, 5.256, and 5.266) involve the deletion of a reference to Appendix 13 of the ITU Radio Regulations, which WRC-07 suppressed, and five of the modified international footnotes (5.79A, 5.82, 5.134, 5.287, and 5.328A) involve updates and the removal of expired information. Updates to U.S. Table and Domestic Footnotes Below 30 MHz Fixed Use of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • CO INC -5.53 -14.21 10.12 2.12 613012 C ACS-AK JUNEAU -10.34 -8.39 -2.13 0.00 613013 C KETCHIKAN PUBLIC UT 3.91 -5.64 10.12 6.97 613015 C MATANUSKA TEL ASSOC -5.63 -7.85 2.41 -15.16 613016 C MUKLUK TEL CO INC 3.18 -7.31 11.31 6.47 613016A C MUKLUK TEL CO INC -5.29 -13.70 9.75 0.00 613017 C ALASKA TEL CO 1.76 -1.53 3.34 -5.84 613017A C ALASKA TEL CO 1.04 -1.70 2.79 0.00 613018 C NUSHAGAK ELEC & TEL 8.93 -2.08 11.25 12.05 613019 C OTZ TEL COOPERATIVE -0.81 -12.57 13.45 6.28 613020 C ACS-N SITKA -8.68 -4.10 -4.78 -94.56 613022 C ACS-AK GREATLAND -11.66 -27.81 22.38 INFINITE 613023 C UNITED UTILITIES INC 1.11 -6.64 8.30 1.32 613023A C UNITED UTILITIES INC -27.66 -8.90
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • CO INC -5.53 -14.21 10.12 2.12 613012 C ACS-AK JUNEAU -10.34 -8.39 -2.13 0.00 613013 C KETCHIKAN PUBLIC UT 3.91 -5.64 10.12 6.97 613015 C MATANUSKA TEL ASSOC -5.63 -7.85 2.41 -15.16 613016 C MUKLUK TEL CO INC 3.18 -7.31 11.31 6.47 613016A C MUKLUK TEL CO INC -5.29 -13.70 9.75 0.00 613017 C ALASKA TEL CO 1.76 -1.53 3.34 -5.84 613017A C ALASKA TEL CO 1.04 -1.70 2.79 0.00 613018 C NUSHAGAK ELEC & TEL 8.93 -2.08 11.25 12.05 613019 C OTZ TEL COOPERATIVE -0.81 -12.57 13.45 6.28 613020 C ACS-N SITKA -8.68 -4.10 -4.78 -94.56 613022 C ACS-AK GREATLAND -11.66 -27.81 22.38 INFINITE 613023 C UNITED UTILITIES INC 1.11 -6.64 8.30 1.32 613023A C UNITED UTILITIES INC -27.66 -8.90
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.txt
  • Special provisions for satellite systems. § 5.65 Defective applications. § 5.67 Amendment or dismissal of applications. § 5.69 License grants that differ from applications. § 5.71 License period. § 5.73 Experimental report. § 5.77 Change in equipment and emission characteristics. § 5.79 Transfer and assignment of station authorization for conventional experimental radio licenses. § 5.81 Discontinuance of station operation. § 5.84 Non-interference basis. § 5.85 Frequencies and policy governing their assignment. § 5.91 Notification of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. § 5.95 Informal objections. § 5.101 Frequency stability. § 5.103 Types of emission. § 5.105 Authorized bandwidth. § 5.107 Transmitter control requirements. § 5.109 Inspection and maintenance of antenna structure marking and associated control equipment. § 5.110 Power limitations. § 5.111
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched- with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/case-studies/Hurricane-Ike-Harris%20County-120109.pdf
  • 6 9/14/2008 12 21262 5.91 98.4% 12 10 9/13/2008 9 32898 9.14 91.4% 13 6 9/14/2008 20 10461 2.91 48.4% 14 10 9/13/2008 18 26514 7.37 73.7% 15 11 9/13/2008 12 33765 9.38 85.3% 16 7 9/13/2008 19 7539 2.09 29.9% 17 8 9/14/2008 15 11433 3.18 39.7% 18 14 9/15/2008 9 31780 8.83 63.1% 19 14 9/16/2008 11 21023 5.84 41.7% 20 4 9/13/2008 14 5253 1.46 36.5% 21 4 9/13/2008 21 2524 0.70 17.5% 22 11 9/13/2008 8 34942 9.71 88.2% 23 11 9/11/2008 9 27056 7.52 68.3% 24 6 9/13/2008 8 7193 2.00 33.3% 25 The usage in erlang is the air seconds divided by 3600 seconds. 26 Site utilization is the usage in erlang divided by number
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • MOBILE 5.79 Aeronautical radionavigation 471 472A US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 472A US231 US294 Maritime (80) 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 472 Page 4 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 471 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 474 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US14 US18 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) MOBILE US221 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.79) 61.65 (0.13) 123.23 (1.88) 0.0178 (1.59) 0.6235 103 CPP, Average -521.59 (1.48) 2.63 (1.64) -1.75 (-0.00) 234.92* (2.30) 0.0281 (1.60) 0.6649 103 CPM, AM Drive 7.08 (0.48) -0.04 (0.64) -24.85 (-0.81) 5.09 (1.20) -0.0014 (-1.89) 0.0566 103 CPM, Evening 5.78 (0.50) -0.05 (0.91) -11.05 (-0.46) -0.20 (-0.06) -0.0017* (-2.88) 0.1426 103 CPM, Average 4.76 (0.36) -0.06 (1.07) -21.16 (-0.76) 5.84 (1.52) -0.0013* (-2.02) 0.0831 103 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 20.39 (0.11) -1.12 (1.20) 210.53 (0.53) 48.39 (0.86) -0.0180 (-1.80) 0.9373 103 CPP, Evening 39.39 (0.35) -0.55 (0.99) 76.29 (0.32) 9.56 (0.28) -0.0080 (-1.33) 0.9170 103 CPP, Average 49.07 (0.31) -0.93 (1.17) 118.38 (0.35) 49.90 (1.04) -0.0149 (-1.74) 0.9389 103 CPM, AM Drive 15.44 (1.15) -0.02 (0.23) 8.98 (0.31) -0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 415-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 5.72 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 MOBILE US221 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US239 Aviation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 4 MOD USA/AI 1.10/1 495-1 800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3_Rcd.pdf
  • primary allocation to the maritime mobile service in 415 ­ 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 2185 MODUSA/AI 1.10/1 495-1800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization of transmissions for MSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. SUP USA/AI 1.10/2 5.82A Reason: This is a consequential change to allocating the entire 495-505 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • effective in the United States, the Commission must adopt them in a future rulemaking proceeding. WRC-07 modifications to the remaining 14 international footnotes are minor in nature, and require no further action on our part beyond updating the text of these footnotes to reflect the text now specified in the ITU Radio Regulations. Specifically, nine of the modified international footnotes (5.84, 5.108, 5.111, 5.115, 5.130, 5.145, 5.200, 5.256, and 5.266) involve the deletion of a reference to Appendix 13 of the ITU Radio Regulations, which WRC-07 suppressed, and five of the modified international footnotes (5.79A, 5.82, 5.134, 5.287, and 5.328A) involve updates and the removal of expired information. Updates to U.S. Table and Domestic Footnotes Below 30 MHz Fixed Use of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231902A1.txt
  • international footnote 472A has been replaced with international footnote 5.82 in the band 435-495 kHz and international footnote 472 has been replaced with international footnote 5.83 in the band 495-505 kHz. (ii) On page 5 of the Table, in the band 510-525 kHz of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 474 has been replaced with international footnote 5.84. (iii) On page 14 of the Table, in the band 13360-13410 kHz of the Federal Government Table of Frequency Allocations, international footnote 5.149 has been replaced with United States footnote US342. (iv) On page 21 of the Table, the heading has been changed from ``25175-28000 kHz (HF)'' to ``26175-28000 kHz (HF).'' (c) After page 21 of the Table and before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NORTH DAKOTA Cont. 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.46 -2.29 11.01 34.12 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.45 0.00 2.45 -1.40 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 11.55 6.55 4.69 12.67 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.67 -1.10 -2.59 -100.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -1.06 6.97 13.45 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 4.79 -0.78 5.61 8.21 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -0.31 -0.43 0.12 -8.09 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. 7.77 -1.60 9.52 46.87 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -2.01 -1.99 -0.01 -11.39 381638 A MIDSTATE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 6.40 0.00 6.40 12.26 382247 A>CNEMONT TELEPHONE COOP. - ND 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 16.55 29.10 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 6.40 -3.22 9.95 19.43 351134 C COLO TEL. CO. -7.26 2.08 -9.14 -23.72 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 1.07 -6.06 7.59 12.94 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 4.07 -5.07 9.64 18.00 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO. 7.77 -0.75 8.58 20.50 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. 0.58 -4.97 5.84 6.87 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. 2.39 -6.63 9.67 17.27 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 2.44 -5.94 8.90 27.34 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.18 -2.05 9.43 20.27 3 - 214 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628 77,126,584 29.81 45,061,187 17.41 32,065,397 12.39 Georgia 1,522,611 67,951,503 44.63 46,116,649 30.29 21,834,854 14.34 Guam 31,572 5,725,451 181.35 4,201,789 133.09 1,523,662 48.26 Hawaii 183,609 3,192,205 17.39 1,541,027 8.39 1,651,178 8.99 Idaho 252,120 3,671,411 14.56 2,478,819 9.83 1,192,592 4.73 Illinois 2,100,961 88,488,681 42.12 47,759,772 22.73 40,728,909 19.39 Indiana 1,011,130 17,868,280 17.67 11,963,076 11.83 5,905,204 5.84 Iowa 481,226 14,158,376 29.42 9,871,715 20.51 4,286,661 8.91 Kansas 470,490 15,371,665 32.67 12,352,973 26.26 3,018,692 6.42 Kentucky 663,885 32,960,351 49.65 20,472,153 30.84 12,488,198 18.81 Louisiana 727,709 45,925,722 63.11 29,303,482 40.27 16,622,240 22.84 Maine 202,084 7,207,679 35.67 5,430,660 26.87 1,777,019 8.79 Maryland 869,113 24,244,694 27.90 9,477,622 10.90 14,767,072 16.99 Massachusetts 980,459 25,549,403 26.06 19,208,945 19.59 6,340,458 6.47 Michigan 1,757,604 50,138,978 28.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00 Qwest - Idaho South ID 243,895 166,912 83,781 34.35 30.27 Qwest - Idaho North ID 18,771 12,783 6,470 34.47 28.59 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 29,858 16,662 25,307 84.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 IOWA 1.97 -4.70 7.00 31.47 KANSAS -0.06 -6.92 7.37 6.40 KENTUCKY -1.28 -4.95 3.85 10.76 LOUISIANA 6.80 -11.73 20.99 25.58 MAINE 1.81 -5.10 7.28 -14.37 MARYLAND 4.51 -3.41 8.19 6.59 MASSACHUSETTS 0.81 -6.62 7.95 -100.00 MICHIGAN -1.87 -10.25 9.34 6.31 MINNESOTA -2.53 -5.04 2.64 14.81 MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 MISSOURI -4.14 -5.11 1.03 3.28 MONTANA -2.32 -5.04 2.87 11.26 NEBRASKA -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 35,672 235,378 5.26 5.15 6.12 38 0.46 47 Nevada 603,568 83,377 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC. -7.15 -1.76 -5.49 -53.22 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. -3.23 -3.78 0.57 -6.95 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 4.70 -3.50 8.49 13.52 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -4.66 -3.36 -1.35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • CO INC -5.53 -14.21 10.12 2.12 613012 C ACS-AK JUNEAU -10.34 -8.39 -2.13 0.00 613013 C KETCHIKAN PUBLIC UT 3.91 -5.64 10.12 6.97 613015 C MATANUSKA TEL ASSOC -5.63 -7.85 2.41 -15.16 613016 C MUKLUK TEL CO INC 3.18 -7.31 11.31 6.47 613016A C MUKLUK TEL CO INC -5.29 -13.70 9.75 0.00 613017 C ALASKA TEL CO 1.76 -1.53 3.34 -5.84 613017A C ALASKA TEL CO 1.04 -1.70 2.79 0.00 613018 C NUSHAGAK ELEC & TEL 8.93 -2.08 11.25 12.05 613019 C OTZ TEL COOPERATIVE -0.81 -12.57 13.45 6.28 613020 C ACS-N SITKA -8.68 -4.10 -4.78 -94.56 613022 C ACS-AK GREATLAND -11.66 -27.81 22.38 INFINITE 613023 C UNITED UTILITIES INC 1.11 -6.64 8.30 1.32 613023A C UNITED UTILITIES INC -27.66 -8.90
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • CO INC -5.53 -14.21 10.12 2.12 613012 C ACS-AK JUNEAU -10.34 -8.39 -2.13 0.00 613013 C KETCHIKAN PUBLIC UT 3.91 -5.64 10.12 6.97 613015 C MATANUSKA TEL ASSOC -5.63 -7.85 2.41 -15.16 613016 C MUKLUK TEL CO INC 3.18 -7.31 11.31 6.47 613016A C MUKLUK TEL CO INC -5.29 -13.70 9.75 0.00 613017 C ALASKA TEL CO 1.76 -1.53 3.34 -5.84 613017A C ALASKA TEL CO 1.04 -1.70 2.79 0.00 613018 C NUSHAGAK ELEC & TEL 8.93 -2.08 11.25 12.05 613019 C OTZ TEL COOPERATIVE -0.81 -12.57 13.45 6.28 613020 C ACS-N SITKA -8.68 -4.10 -4.78 -94.56 613022 C ACS-AK GREATLAND -11.66 -27.81 22.38 INFINITE 613023 C UNITED UTILITIES INC 1.11 -6.64 8.30 1.32 613023A C UNITED UTILITIES INC -27.66 -8.90
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • O-1 Acknowledgement Message Timeliness F.12.2 O-2 Acknowledgement Message Completeness Network Outage Notification F.14.1 M&R-7 Mean Time to Notify CLEC of Major Network Outages DISAGGREGATED PERFORMANCE METRIC DATA al - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time [M&R-6] F.5.1 Region(seconds) 42.30 26.98 37.42 24.23 55.31 25.67 33.50 25.43 1 8.39 29.67 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer [OS-1] F.6.1 LA(seconds) 5.84 5.30 5.23 5.45 5.18 % Answered in 30 seconds [OS-2] F.6.2 LA(%) 95.80% 96.50% 96.60% 96.10% 96.60% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer [DA-1] F.7.1 LA(seconds) 4.85 4.26 5.59 4.39 4.33 % Answered in 20 seconds [DA-2] F.7.2 LA(%) 96.30% 97.00% 94.40% 97.10% 97.30% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy [B-3] F.9.1 Region(%) 99.81% 100.0% 99.41% 100.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • because it is not currently in use. Thus, it is planned that at WRC-03, Member States will consider whether non-GMDSS requirements should be maintained in the ITU Radio Regulations. However, at this time, we need only to update our Rules by renumbering three international footnotes. Accordingly, we propose to renumber international footnotes 472, 472A, and 474 as S5.83, S5.82, and S5.84, respectively. The U.S. Coast Guard currently operates several NAVTEX stations on the frequency 518 kHz. The 1997 World Radiocommunication Conference ("WRC-97") adopted two requirements concerning NAVTEX operations. First, international footnote S5.131 requires that the frequency 4209.5 kHz be used exclusively for the transmission by coast stations of meteorological and navigational warnings and urgent information to ships by means of narrow-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • service allocations in these bands on a co-primary basis. Therefore, we will remove US236 and reinstate the direct U.S. Table fixed service allocation for the 4000-4063 kHz and 8100-8195 kHz bands on a primary basis to match the ITU table. Until WRC-03 decides whether to maintain non-GMDSS requirements, we are also renumbering international footnotes 472A and 474 as 5.82 and 5.84, respectively, in our U.S. Table to reflect ITU changes. Aeronautical Fixed Service Regarding the aeronautical fixed service, in the Notice the Commission proposed to delete the limitation on use of the 160-190 kHz band to aeronautical fixed use from our Rules because this band is currently unused by the aeronautical fixed service. This was proposed in response to decisions made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • e. In the list of Federal Government (G) footnotes, add footnotes Gxxx and Gyyy. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * 505-2107 kHz (MF) Page 5 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.80 415-435 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.72 5.82 5.77 5.78 5.82 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A Aeronautical radionavigation 5.82 US231 US294 435-495 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.82 US231 US294 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 495-505 MOBILE (distress and calling) 5.83 Maritime (80) 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile Land mobile 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 Maritime (80) 510-525 MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE (ships only) 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 US14 US225 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) 5.72 525-535 BROADCASTING 5.86 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 525-535 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION (radiobeacons) US18 MOBILE US221
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.txt
  • Special provisions for satellite systems. § 5.65 Defective applications. § 5.67 Amendment or dismissal of applications. § 5.69 License grants that differ from applications. § 5.71 License period. § 5.73 Experimental report. § 5.77 Change in equipment and emission characteristics. § 5.79 Transfer and assignment of station authorization for conventional experimental radio licenses. § 5.81 Discontinuance of station operation. § 5.84 Non-interference basis. § 5.85 Frequencies and policy governing their assignment. § 5.91 Notification of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. § 5.95 Informal objections. § 5.101 Frequency stability. § 5.103 Types of emission. § 5.105 Authorized bandwidth. § 5.107 Transmitter control requirements. § 5.109 Inspection and maintenance of antenna structure marking and associated control equipment. § 5.110 Power limitations. § 5.111
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42; and 1999, at 50-55. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for the Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 20.50 2 Time Warner 15.95 3 DirecTV 9.23 4 Comcast 8.26 Top 4 53.94 5 MediaOne 5.84 6 Cox 4.67 7 Charter 3.60 8 EchoStar 3.23 Top 8 71.28 9 Adelphia 2.01 10 Century 1.66 Top 10 74.95 Top 25 84.92 Top 50 89.58 HHI 923(3) Notes: (1) MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and as reported in Paul Kagan Assocs., Inc., Top Cable System Operators as of June 1999, Cable TV Investor, August 20, 1999,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • 4-05 (missed non-dispatch due dates), indicate some statistically significant disparities in Verizon's performance in meeting competitors' due dates for resale POTS provisioning in September and October 2000. In September 2000, competitors experienced an average of 9.05 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 4.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers, and in October competitors experienced an average of 5.84 provisioning delay days for resale POTS, as compared to 3.64 delay days for Verizon retail customers (PR 4-02). Also, in September, Verizon missed 0.20 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale POTS as compared to 0.11 percent of non-dispatch due dates for its retail customers, and in October Verizon missed 0.12 percent of competitors' non-dispatch due dates for resale
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • and Other Charges 2.81 2.57 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.16 $14.76 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $40.16 $39.70 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.44 1.62 Total Connection Charge $42.72 $42.00 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.84 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.49 $3.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2001 (As of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 67VALOR Texas 53,580 47,486 6,094 106,849 5.70 2,641 0 Total $25,482,348 $18,111,483 $7,370,868 1 Data is from the initial report. Qwest has an extension until mid-July to file its final 2001 rate-of-return report. 2 Data is from the initial report. They had no revisions. Maximum Rate of Return 53.67% Minimum Rate of Return 0.86 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.95 Standard Deviation 5.84 Non-Price Cap Companies Rate of Return Summary January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002 Summary of Reports Filed April 1, 2003 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry Analysis Division, April 15, 2003. Switched Traffic Sensitive Common Special End Local Name of Company Interstate Line Access Office Information Transport Total National Exchange Carrier Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 23GRIDLEY TELEPHONE CO. 13.44 11.17 13.91 14.26 15.14 14.43 24HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 11.17 (14.33) 10.26 40.60 11.53 25HORRY TELEPHONE CO. 15.33 11.11 18.59 18.22 23.80 21.15 26ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.45 10.47 8.91 3.37 (800.00) 10.96 7.92 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 12.65 11.42 11.42 25.15 242.03 15.18 18.85 28MADISON TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.59 11.17 (7.64) 3.39 21.70 6.19 29MCNABB TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 11.17 5.70 (10.13) 4.31 30MONTROSE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 11.17 (13.62) 8.66 8.21 8.49 31MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.91 11.17 3.52 17.31 27.45 18.56 32ONEIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.39 11.17 (45.16) 11.27 68.99 14.47 33ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. **
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge separate subscriber
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 5.93 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, October 2001 Monitoring Report (November 2001) and access tariff filings. Residential and Single-Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 Source: Access tariff filings. 5.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 07/01/03 06/30/04 5.96 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 07/01/04 06/30/05 5.92 6.24 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01 4.78 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 01/01/02 06/30/02 4.92 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.22 07/01/02 06/30/03 5.62 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.08 Source: Access tariff filings. (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • MUTUAL TEL. CO. 15.08 1.93 12.91 121.24 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 5.18 0.65 4.50 6.31 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.81 0.55 12.19 64.52 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 13.37 0.94 12.31 70.82 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 11.91 -0.50 12.48 69.57 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 12.41 2.56 9.60 37.17 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.84 -0.52 6.39 12.86 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 11.40 -0.80 12.29 36.02 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 10.84 -1.14 12.12 55.90 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 1,307,828 42,609,118 32.58 29,813,170 22.80 12,795,948 9.78 New Mexico 320,306 19,016,608 59.37 12,956,793 40.45 6,059,814 18.92 New York 2,882,188 280,908,301 97.46 225,689,986 78.31 55,218,315 19.16 North Carolina 1,293,638 28,451,374 21.99 23,209,159 17.94 5,242,216 4.05 North Dakota 109,201 1,751,269 16.04 1,369,869 12.54 381,400 3.49 Northern Mariana Is. 10,004 498,872 49.87 301,878 30.18 196,994 19.69 Ohio 1,835,049 60,202,291 32.81 49,493,247 26.97 10,709,045 5.84 Oklahoma 623,110 28,710,442 46.08 20,602,740 33.06 8,107,703 13.01 Oregon 546,231 10,860,849 19.88 6,735,925 12.33 4,124,923 7.55 Pennsylvania 1,814,311 54,057,752 29.80 42,852,091 23.62 11,205,661 6.18 Puerto Rico 612,725 76,756,365 125.27 52,251,223 85.28 24,505,142 39.99 Rhode Island 157,347 4,689,127 29.80 3,424,844 21.77 1,264,283 8.04 South Carolina 677,411 52,048,009 76.83 40,789,891 60.21 11,258,118 16.62 South Dakota 128,603 1,951,361 15.17 1,089,347 8.47 862,014 6.70
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.06 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 94.32 280466 C SLEDGE TEL. CO., INC. -26.89 22.74 -40.44 -42.39 280467 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO. 10.21 -0.48 10.75 78.65 283301 C SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI TEL. CO. -2.42 2.67 -4.95 -7.77 285184 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI 2.86 -2.48 5.47 0.00 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 10.82 0.82 9.92 49.62 MISSOURI Total -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.84 0.41 5.40 9.55 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.84 0.40 3.42 3.34 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC 5.07 0.04 5.02 8.30 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.72 -0.48 2.21 -2.48 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 7.98 3.65 4.18 7.94 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO 18.36 3.71 14.12 25.04 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to 1/01/98 carriers did not charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/00 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Rates in Effect * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. 11.97 5.79 5.84 27.30 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -0.49 3.24 -3.61 -100.00 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 2.90 1.74 1.13 0.00 TOTAL: ALASKA 13.34 11.67 1.50 23.02 613000 C ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A ATU 4.27 20.52 -13.49 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 3.72 6.73 -2.83 -0.54 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -6.58 1.23 -7.71 -13.28 613003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6.37 204 1.98 225 Iowa 933,127 72,879 536,536 3.86 6.11 7.20 95 0.92 105 Kansas 974,645 166,532 412,423 3.89 6.11 6.67 91 0.88 100 Kentucky 1,532,271 182,680 521,328 3.89 6.48 7.95 135 1.32 149 Louisiana 1,593,652 253,154 686,613 3.89 6.52 7.71 158 1.53 174 Maine 536,253 48,079 203,646 3.85 6.23 7.08 46 0.44 50 Maryland 2,066,464 486,656 1,300,190 3.92 6.07 5.84 224 2.18 247 Massachusetts 2,435,434 419,255 1,436,072 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
  • S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.83 472 495-505kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.84 474 510-525kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.89 480 1605-1705kHz NoactiontakenwithregardtotheNon-Federal GovernmentTableatthistime. S5.111 501 117.975-121.9375 MHz235-267 MHz Inthetextofthefootnote,crossreferencestootherITU rulesareupdated. S5.120 510 144-146MHz WithregardtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,no actiontakenatthistimebecauseWRC-97abrogated Resolution640. S5.138 911 59-64GHz 61-61.5GHz Severalfootnotesthatdesignatebandsforindustrial, scientificandmedical("ISM")applicationshavebeen merged. 916 122-123GHz 922 244-246GHz 22 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.149 547 37.5-38.25MHz AtWRC-95,twenty-threeinternationalfootnotesthat urgeadministrationstotakeallpracticablestepsto protecttheradioastronomyservicefromharmful interferencewerecombinedintoonefootnote,S5.149. 644 322-328.6MHz 644 322-328.6MHz 718 1300-1350MHz 1350-1400MHz 734 1610.6-1613.8MHz 736 1660-1670MHz 765 2655-2690MHz 778 3260-3267MHz 3332-3339MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
  • on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched- with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.doc http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/TR-05-1017-ATSC-reception-testing.pdf
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
  • based on MLP#14; in fact, both computations were performed and the results averaged to determine the loss of those devices. The unit-to-unit variation of the loss of the impedance matching pads at channel-30 frequencies was of interest because of their use in the splitter test setup. The pads were found to be quite well matched-with samples ranging from 5.79 to 5.84 dB at the frequency of TV channel 30. All of the pads and both transformers were found to be flat to within 0.02 dB across the 6-MHz bandwidths of each tested channel (3, 10, and 30). TV-channel-specific measurements of absolute loss of one impedance matching pad (MLP#12) were used in determining minimum signal at TOV because the actual signal level
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/case-studies/Hurricane-Ike-Harris%20County-120109.pdf
  • 6 9/14/2008 12 21262 5.91 98.4% 12 10 9/13/2008 9 32898 9.14 91.4% 13 6 9/14/2008 20 10461 2.91 48.4% 14 10 9/13/2008 18 26514 7.37 73.7% 15 11 9/13/2008 12 33765 9.38 85.3% 16 7 9/13/2008 19 7539 2.09 29.9% 17 8 9/14/2008 15 11433 3.18 39.7% 18 14 9/15/2008 9 31780 8.83 63.1% 19 14 9/16/2008 11 21023 5.84 41.7% 20 4 9/13/2008 14 5253 1.46 36.5% 21 4 9/13/2008 21 2524 0.70 17.5% 22 11 9/13/2008 8 34942 9.71 88.2% 23 11 9/11/2008 9 27056 7.52 68.3% 24 6 9/13/2008 8 7193 2.00 33.3% 25 The usage in erlang is the air seconds divided by 3600 seconds. 26 Site utilization is the usage in erlang divided by number
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • n = /(Nµ) (%) Waiting Prob. PW>0 (%) Average Waiting Time WC (sec) Percent Calls Waiting more than 3 sec PW>3 (%) Busy hour (7/26/07 3-4 PM) 1.572 5.772 9.074 45.37% 0.1% 0.53 0 Right before incident (8/1/07 5-6 PM) 1.253 5.586 6.999 35.00% 0 0 0 Busiest hour after incident (8/1/07 7-8 PM) 2.801 5.927 16.602 83.01% 32.89% 1.74 5.84 58 10. Appendix B: Baseline calculation of Voice over IP (VoIP) The Minneapolis public safety users have P25 mobile voice radios with 4.4 Kbps Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) Vocoder, with 2.8 Kbps Error Correction Coding and 2.4 Kbps Embedded Signaling. This is a total signaling Rate of 9.6 Kbps. The voice IMBE Vocoder is intended to be used throughout Project
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer