FCC Web Documents citing 3.75

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.txt
  • for RPCs to determine the number and location of the wideband interoperability channels, while Motorola proposes a greater number of wideband interoperability channels. Under the NPSTC proposal, licensees would be allowed to aggregate wideband channels from 50 kilohertz wideband ``building blocks'' to form 1.25 megahertz broadband channels and these 1.25 kHz channels can be aggregated to form channels up to 3.75 kHz wide and centered at 770/800 MHz. The broadband channels would be surrounded by .975 megahertz guard bands (1.95 megahertz total). These broadband channels, NPSTC states, would be located between the 767-773/797-803 MHz bands. NPSTC also suggests retaining six 50 kilohertz channels for wideband interoperability. If adopted, NPSTC envisions that licensees would have a number of options for utilizing the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
  • 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 2. Region 33 (Ohio) 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 3. NATOA 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 6-7; see also California 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 8, Region 16 (Kansas) 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 1-3; Region 9 (Florida) 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 2. Under this approach, the lower 3.75 megahertz of the broadband segment would be reserved for broadband only. See NPSTC 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 20; see also APCO 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 6-7; Region 40 (Texas North) 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 2-3; San Diego County 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 8-9. NPSTC 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 20-21. Id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A1.txt
  • rate of 3.84 Mcps. Modulation is dual-channel QPSK. CDMA Multi-Carrier - This radio interface also is called cdma2000 and operates in FDD. The radio interface is a wideband spread spectrum system that uses code division multiple access (CDMA) technology and provides a 3G evolution for systems using the current TIA/EIA-95-B family of standards. RF channel bandwidths of 1.25 megahertz and 3.75 megahertz are supported at this time but the specification can be extended to bandwidths up to 15 megahertz. CDMA TDD - This radio interface employs a direct-sequence CDMA radio access scheme. There are two versions: UTRA Time Division Duplex (TDD) that uses a 5 megahertz bandwidth and a chip rate of 3.84 Mcps, and TD-SCDMA that uses 1.6 megahertz bandwidth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A2.txt
  • rate of 3.84 Mcps. Modulation is dual-channel QPSK. CDMA Multi-Carrier - This radio interface also is called cdma2000 and operates in FDD. The radio interface is a wideband spread spectrum system that uses code division multiple access (CDMA) technology and provides a 3G evolution for systems using the current TIA/EIA-95-B family of standards. RF channel bandwidths of 1.25 megahertz and 3.75 megahertz are supported at this time but the specification can be extended to bandwidths up to 15 megahertz. CDMA TDD - This radio interface employs a direct-sequence CDMA radio access scheme. There are two versions: UTRA Time Division Duplex (TDD) that uses a 5 megahertz bandwidth and a chip rate of 3.84 Mcps, and TD-SCDMA that uses 1.6 megahertz bandwidth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2716A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2716A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2716A1.txt
  • provide Charter with a good quality signal to resolve any doubt. In its opposition, Charter argues that the instant Complaint should be denied because WTLJ does not deliver a signal of sufficient strength to Charter's principal headend. In support, Charter points out that the test results TCT submitted in Exhibit 1 of its complaint show readings below the -45 dBm (+3.75 dbmv) threshold required by the Commission's rules. Charter argues that its position is further supported by re-testing conducted by its engineers, which shows signal strength readings ranging from -72.13 dBm to -70.90 dBm. In its reply, TCT argues that the Commission's rules provide an alternative for a station to obtain mandatory carriage status when the station does not deliver an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3030A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3030A1.txt
  • Channel 18 WMBC-DT, Newton, NJ; (6) 2nd Adj. Channel 21, WLIW(TV), Garden City, NY; (7) 5th Adj. Channel 24 WNYE-DT, New York, NY. See Engineering Exhibit of Larry H. Will, P.E. (Attachment 2 to the Application and the Waiver Request). . Factored into our analysis is Direct Connect's proposal to limit mobile operating range in the direction of WMBC-DT to 3.75 miles (5.95 km) from the proposed transmitter site. Goosetown, 16 FCC Rcd at 12797-8 ¶ 13 and n.46. Petition at 8. To the extent Entravision requests the Commission to compel Direct Connect to accept other conditions beyond what the Commission has previously recognized in Goosetown, its informal objection is dismissed. This determination, however, is not meant to prevent or inhibit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3019A1.txt
  • that it agree not to interfere with existing and future TV stations. The Division also determined, based on these engineering analyses, that Direct Connect's proposed base station would satisfy all the protection criteria of Section 90.307. This conclusion was based in part on Direct Connect's representation that it would limit the mobile operating range in the direction of WMBC-DT to 3.75 miles (5.95 kilometers) from the base station. Lastly, the Division noted that grant of the application and waiver request would be consistent with the public interest by increasing the availability and delivery of communications services - including the provision of non-switched, wide area network capabilities for public safety entities - throughout the greater New York metropolitan area. Consequently, the Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 19.67 19.64 18.98 18.56 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming 4.84 4.60 4.89 5.52 NC-17MoviesorTV-MA-S/TV-MA-LTV 0.75 0.48 0.63 0.83 ViolentProgramming "ViolentProgramming" 1.52 1.71 1.94 1.63 TV-PG-VTelevision 1.43 1.45 1.54 1.41 TV-14-VTelevision 1.37 1.40 1.56 1.51 TV-MA-VTelevision 0.15 0.16 0.23 0.22 Anyofthethreeabove 2.95 3.01 3.33 3.14 Anyofthelasttwoabove 1.52 1.56 1.79 1.73 ReligiousProgramming NetworksShowingPrimarilyReligiousProgramming 1.64 1.56 1.49 1.40 "ReligiousProgramming" 3.31 3.15 2.92 2.79 OverallTargeting AverageTVContentRating(wherenotedforTV) 3.71 3.75 3.84 3.93 AverageMPAARating(wherenotedformovies) 3.99 3.93 3.98 3.95 Observations 61,31464,56067,53071,984 Notes:Reportedinthetableisthepercentageofquarter-hoursofprogrammingbyprogramtypeandyear. ItistheanalogofTable6splitoutbyyear.Averageisoverthesamenetworksandtimeperiodsdescribed inthenotestoTable6.Source:Authorcalculations.39 Table11: ProgramAvailabilitybyProgramTypeandTime 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2006 Variable 2003 2004 2005 2006 NewsProgramming AnyNews 47.79 46.11 48.59 51.07 NetworkNews 55.60 52.73 52.15 47.71 LocalNews 46.52 45.14 48.11 51.53 PublicAffairsProgramming 57.48 57.79 54.52 48.05 MinorityProgramming NetworksTargetingBlackAudiences 17.91 19.00 21.41 23.61 TargetingLatinoAudiences OnNetworksTargetingLatinoAudiences 14.14 13.43 13.50 13.81 Spanish-LanguageProgramming 13.57 12.97 12.24 14.14 NetworksTargetingOtherDiverseAudiences 13.29
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • News, Evening -0.1273* (2.11) -0.0005 (0.69) -0.2752 (-1.31) -0.0276 (-1.13) -0.000020* (-3.22) 0.0903 114 Average Block, Sports, AM Drive -0.5721 (0.63) 0.0027 (0.24) 0.1326 (0.05) -0.8613* (-1.99) -0.000030 (-0.28) 0.0537 100 Average Block, Music, Evening -6.3285 (1.67) -0.0988* (2.14) -0.8090 (-0.06) -2.0792 (-1.35) 0.000183 (0.47) 0.0389 114 Average Block, News, Evening -1.3116 (1.71) -0.0055 (0.58) -4.2009 (-1.58) -0.3169 (-1.02) -0.000295* (-3.75) 0.1094 114 With Demographics: Percent News, AM Drive -0.0253 (0.15) 0.0026 (1.19) 1.3032* (2.35) 0.2431* (2.75) -0.000030 (-1.39) 0.2061 98 Percent News, Evening -0.1357* (2.20) -0.0005 (0.66) -0.1654 (-0.78) -0.0140 (-0.56) -0.000020* (-2.93) 0.2206 112 Average Block, Music, Evening -4.3478 (1.06) -0.1492* (2.82) -3.8024 (-0.27) -3.7502* (-2.23) -0.000001 (-0.00) 0.0301 112 Average Block, News, Evening -1.2998 (1.72) -0.0034 (0.35) -3.2743
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • 5.113 3.23-3.4 FIXED MOBILE except aeronautical mobile BROADCASTING 5.113 5.116 5.118 3.23-3.4 FIXED MOBILE except aeronautical mobile Radiolocation US340 Maritime (80) Aviation (87) Private Land Mobile (90) 3.4-3.5 AERONAUTICAL MOBILE (R) 3.4-3.5 AERONAUTICAL MOBILE (R) US283 US340 Aviation (87) 3.5-3.8 AMATEUR FIXED MOBILE except aeronautical mobile 3.5-3.75 AMATEUR 5.119 3.5-3.9 AMATEUR FIXED MOBILE 3.5-4 3.5-4 AMATEUR Amateur Radio (97) 5.92 3.75-4 AMATEUR FIXED MOBILE except aeronautical mobile (R) 3.8-3.9 FIXED AERONAUTICAL MOBILE (OR) LAND MOBILE 3.9-3.95 AERONAUTICAL MOBILE (OR) 5.123 3.9-3.95 AERONAUTICAL MOBILE BROADCASTING 3.95-4 FIXED BROADCASTING 5.122 5.125 3.95-4 FIXED BROADCASTING 5.126 US340 US340 4-4.063 FIXED MARITIME MOBILE 5.127 5.126 4-4.063 FIXED MARITIME MOBILE US340 4.063-4.438 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.109 5.110 5.130 5.131 5.132 5.128 4.063-4.438 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.109
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.txt
  • 100.00% 17 6.94 9.59 7 7 WILMINGTON 132 NC 193,400 100.00% 12 9.33 10.77 6 6 YAKIMA-PASCO-RCHLND-KNNWCK 126 OR 26,200 11.41% 2 1.06 3.05 0 1 WA 203,400 88.59% 23 4.03 10.63 9 7 YOUNGSTOWN 111 OH 224,200 83.13% 16 13.92 15.29 5 6 PA 45,500 16.87% 5 5.3 5.86 0 0 YUMA-EL CENTRO 164 AZ 71,100 58.91% 10 1.99 3.75 3 0 CA 49,600 41.09% 16 3.61 4.66 6 0 ZANESVILLE 203 CA 32,800 100.00% 10 3.61 8.52 4 4 APPENDIX D In-State Stations Received by Households within Each DMA See Appendix D Excel chart attached to this document APPENDIX E In-State Stations Carried by DBS in Each DMA See Appendix E Excel chart attached to this document APPENDIX F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.txt
  • several other cities HUF 6500 31.25839 45.3069Optional. price unknown Activation Fee: Free; Contract Fee: 37501 Free with contract DSL/VOIP/IPTV 1Budapest and several other cities HUF 6500 31.25839 45.3069Optional. price unknown Activation Fee: Free; Contract Fee: 37500 Free with contract DSL/VOIP/IPTV 0.512Budapest and several other cities HUF 4850 23.3235733.80592Optional. price unknown Activation Fee: Free; Contract Fee: 37500 Free with contract DSL/VOIP/IPTV 3.75Budapest and several other cities HUF 4850 23.3235733.80592Optional. price unknown Activation Fee: Free; Contract Fee: 37500 Free with contract DSL/VOIP/IPTV 1Budapest and several other cities HUF 8550 41.11681 59.596Optional. price unknown Activation Fee: Free; Contract Fee: 37504 Free with contract DSL/VOIP/IPTV 6.25Budapest and several other cities HUF 6500 31.25839 45.3069Optional. price unknown Activation Fee: Free; Contract Fee: 37502 Free with contract
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • 7.28 * (374) (239) (228) 2007 4.48 5.89 * 6.89 * (312) (270) (303) 2009 3.46 4.21 * 5.37 * (278) (290) (308) Table 9 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Market Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM All Markets Market Measure 2005 4.74 4.50 3.68 * (1416) (935) (1196) 2007 4.74 4.49 3.75 * (1064) (935) (1611) 2009 3.56 3.42 2.72 * (1004) (990) (1630) Contour Measure 2005 3.38 4.33 * 5.58 * (1484) (969) (1094) 2007 3.15 4.12 * 5.28 * (1248) (971) (1391) 2009 2.30 3.04 * 3.89 * (1184) (962) (1478) * - difference between the category mean and the mean of the No LPFM category is statistically different from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A11.txt
  • P Qm(1- i) (34) Whenthisexpressioniscombinedwith(32)weobtainamarking-clearingconditionwhichde- terminesPQ.Thisisthesecondequationinoursystem.Oncecombinedwith(33)theonly unknownsinthisexpressionarePQand A. Thefinalequationinoursystemistheequalitybetweentheaggregatebundleofadvertising andindividualadvertisinglevelsinthesymmetricequilibrium, A=Ai.Combiningthisequality with(30)weobtainanexpressionwhoseunknownsare i,PQand A.Giventhesethreeunknowns andthethreenon-linearrelationshipsoutlinedabove,weemploythefsolveroutineinMaple7.00 tosolveforthenumericalvalueofourunknowns.Ourfirstpassoccurswithanassumptionof twentyfirms. Theremainingendogenousvariablesarethencalculatedfromidentitiesandotherrelation- ships.Oncethevalueofalltheendogenousvariableshasbeencalculated,aloopisexecutedin whichthenumberoffirmsisincreasedincrementallybyone.Thefsolveroutineiscalledagain, theequilibriumiscalculated,andthelooprepeatsuntilthefirmnumberreachesthirty. 25 References Anderson,S.andS.Coate,"MarketProvisionofPublicGoods:TheCaseof Broadcasting,"2001.WorkingPaper,UniversityofVirginiaandCornellUniversity. Beebe,J.,"InstitutionalStructureandProgramChoiceinTelevisionMarkets,"Quarterly JournalofEconomics,1977,91(1),15­37. Berry,S.andJ.Waldfogel,"DoMergersIncreaseProductVariety:EvidencefromRadio Broadcasting,"QuarterlyJournalofEconomics,2001,116(3),1009­10025. Blanchard,O.andF.Giavazzi,"MacroeconomicEffectsofRegulationandDeregulationin GoodsandLaborMarkets,"February2001.WorkingPaperNo.8120,NationalBureauof EconomicResearch. d'Aspremont,C.,J.Gabszewicz,andJ.F.Thisse,"OnHotelling's`Stabilityin Competition',"Econometrica,1979,47(5),1145­1150. Gabszewicz,D.LausselJ.andN.Sonnac,"TV-BroadcastingCompetitionand Advertising,"2000.DiscussionPaper00/6,CORE,UniversiteCatholiquedeLouvain. Gal-Or,E.andA.Dukes,"MinimumDifferentiationinCommercialMediaMarkets,"2001. WorkingPaper,UniversityofPittsburgh. Hotelling,H.,"StabilityinCompetition,"EconomicJournal,1929,39(153),41­57. Nilssen,T.andL.Sorgard,"TVAdvertising,ProgrammingInvestmentsand Product-MarketOligopoly,"2000.WorkingPaper,UniversityofOslo. Rothenberg,R.,"ConsumerSovereigntyandtheEconomicsofTVProgramming,"Studiesin PublicCommunication,1962,4,45­54. Spence,M.andB.Owen,"TelevisionProgramming,MonopolisticCompetitionand 26 Welfare,"QuarterlyJournalofEconomics,1977,91(1),103­126. Steiner,P.,"ProgramPatternsandPreferencesandtheWorkabilityofCompetitioninRadio Broadcasting,"QuarterlyJournalofEconomics,1952,66(2),194­223. Tirole,J.,TheTheoryofIndustrialOrganization,Cambridge:MITPress,1988. 27 Table1:ParameterValues w 25 KB.75 Y 10,000 K 4.95 .75 µQ2 3.75 µB2 KQ.75 µ .025 Table2:NumericalWelfareResults (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) RelativetoBaseline m i B A N Q P PQ U 201.0500.417 0.7460.9350.6521.1681.0851.0720.897 211.0750.381 0.8360.9560.7761.1151.0411.0430.934 221.1000.359 0.9020.9720.8681.0711.0201.0250.961 231.1250.344 0.9550.9860.9401.0331.0081.0110.982 241.1500.333 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000 251.1750.325 1.0391.0141.0520.9700.9950.9901.016 261.2000.319 1.0741.0271.0970.9440.9900.9821.030 271.2250.314 1.1051.0401.1380.9190.9870.9741.043 281.2500.310 1.1341.0531.1740.8960.9850.9671.055 291.2750.306 1.1611.0661.2080.8740.9830.9611.067 301.3000.303 1.1861.0781.2390.8540.9810.9541.078 28 Figure1:Results B, i P,Ai P,Ai -1 -1 ·StrongSwitchingOff ·CrowdingOut ·Weak Switc hing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243419A1.txt
  • technology, such as QPSK and rate 3/4 or 112 encoding, or equivalent, must provide more power to overcome the effects of adjacent satellite interfhence while meeting performance objectives including the 2 degree spacing requirement. 3.2 KU BAND BSS WlTH 4.5 DEGREE SPACING. A 45 centimeter antema, typical for this service, has a gain of 33.5 dBi and a beamwidth of 3.75 degrees at 12.45 GHz. These antanas are not required to comply with Part 25.209, however, close to the mainlobe the Part 25.209 characteristic is met.' In any event, at 4.5 degree spacing, the mainlobe gain is higher than the sidelobe characteristic of Part 25.209. Part 25.209 characteristic may be used close in to the sidelobes for orbital spacings between 9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244534A1.txt
  • technology, such as QPSK and rate 3/4 or 1/2 encoding, or equivalent, must provide more power to overcome the effects of adjacent satellite interference while meeting performance objectives including the 2 degree spacing requirement. 3.2 KU BAND BSS WITH 4.5 DEGREE SPACING. A 45 centimeter antenna, typical for this service, has a gain of 33.5 dBi and a beamwidth of 3.75 degrees at 12.45 GHz. These antennas are not required to comply with Part 25.209, however, close to the mainlobe the Part 25.209 characteristic is met.' In any event, at 4.5 degree spacing, the mainlobe gain is higher than the sidelobe characteristic of Part 25.209. Part 25.209 characteristic may be used close in to the sidelobes for orbital spacings between 9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • CO. INC. 23.67 -1.65 25.75 53.05 415214 C SOUTHWESTERN BELL-KANSAS -7.97 -6.19 -1.90 0.00 KENTUCKY Total 0.74 -3.51 4.40 4.80 260396 A BALLARD RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 12.72 -1.07 13.93 84.59 260398 A BRANDENBURG TEL. CO., INC. 3.10 -1.55 4.73 0.00 260401 C DUO COUNTY TEL. COOP., INC. 15.35 -0.23 15.62 33.08 260402 C ALLTEL KENTUCKY, INC. -4.47 -0.75 -3.75 0.00 260406 C FOOTHILLS RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 8.31 -0.01 8.31 17.22 260408 A GEARHEART COMM. DBA COALFIELDS TEL. CO. 8.23 -2.07 10.51 0.00 260411 C LESLIE COUNTY TEL. CO., INC. 3.45 -0.55 4.02 2.93 260412 A LEWISPORT TEL. CO., INC. 10.80 -2.50 13.64 INFINITE 260413 C LOGAN TEL. COOP., INC. -2.12 -4.21 2.17 -3.99 260414 A MOUNTAIN RURAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • CO. INC. 23.67 -1.65 25.75 53.05 415214 C SOUTHWESTERN BELL-KANSAS -7.97 -6.19 -1.90 0.00 KENTUCKY Total 0.74 -3.51 4.40 4.80 260396 A BALLARD RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 12.72 -1.07 13.93 84.59 260398 A BRANDENBURG TEL. CO., INC. 3.10 -1.55 4.73 0.00 260401 C DUO COUNTY TEL. COOP., INC. 15.35 -0.23 15.62 33.08 260402 C ALLTEL KENTUCKY, INC. -4.47 -0.75 -3.75 0.00 260406 C FOOTHILLS RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 8.31 -0.01 8.31 17.22 260408 A GEARHEART COMM. DBA COALFIELDS TEL. CO. 8.23 -2.07 10.51 0.00 260411 C LESLIE COUNTY TEL. CO., INC. 3.45 -0.55 4.02 2.93 260412 A LEWISPORT TEL. CO., INC. 10.80 -2.50 13.64 INFINITE 260413 C LOGAN TEL. COOP., INC. -2.12 -4.21 2.17 -3.99 260414 A MOUNTAIN RURAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA 1.74 -3.03 4.91 4.30 ALASKA -1.43 -6.56 5.49 -2.18 AMERICAN SAMOA -6.46 1.06 -7.44 -51.22 ARIZONA -3.62 -6.12 2.66 14.29 ARKANSAS -0.49 -3.05 2.64 -6.46 CALIFORNIA -1.16 -2.79 1.67 13.02 COLORADO -4.88 -3.70 -1.23 -7.81 CONNECTICUT -5.71 -4.25 -1.52 0.00 DELAWARE -0.28 -3.20 3.02 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.46 -4.93 -3.71 0.00 FLORIDA 3.72 -3.75 7.76 17.84 GEORGIA 3.74 -3.96 8.02 10.72 GUAM 0.81 -0.32 1.13 -10.06 HAWAII 7.02 -3.22 10.58 67.17 IDAHO -6.18 -1.58 -4.68 -7.69 ILLINOIS -2.19 -4.38 2.28 21.00 INDIANA -2.13 -3.54 1.46 30.43 IOWA -1.04 -4.22 3.32 25.76 KANSAS -2.87 -7.00 4.45 4.98 KENTUCKY -1.87 -3.96 2.17 -3.57 LOUISIANA -0.01 -5.02 5.27 -2.15 MAINE 1.10 -4.82 6.22 15.59 MARYLAND -0.77 -3.61
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA 1.74 -3.03 4.91 4.30 ALASKA -1.43 -6.56 5.49 -2.18 AMERICAN SAMOA -6.46 1.06 -7.44 -51.22 ARIZONA -3.62 -6.12 2.66 14.29 ARKANSAS -0.49 -3.05 2.64 -6.46 CALIFORNIA -1.16 -2.79 1.67 13.02 COLORADO -4.88 -3.70 -1.23 -7.81 CONNECTICUT -5.71 -4.25 -1.52 0.00 DELAWARE -0.28 -3.20 3.02 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.46 -4.93 -3.71 0.00 FLORIDA 3.72 -3.75 7.76 17.84 GEORGIA 3.74 -3.96 8.02 10.72 GUAM 0.81 -0.32 1.13 -10.06 HAWAII 7.02 -3.22 10.58 67.17 IDAHO -6.18 -1.58 -4.68 -7.69 ILLINOIS -2.19 -4.38 2.28 21.00 INDIANA -2.13 -3.54 1.46 30.43 IOWA -1.04 -4.22 3.32 25.76 KANSAS -2.87 -7.00 4.45 4.98 KENTUCKY -1.87 -3.96 2.17 -3.57 LOUISIANA -0.01 -5.02 5.27 -2.15 MAINE 1.10 -4.82 6.22 15.59 MARYLAND -0.77 -3.61
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.69 0.43 2.00 New Hampshire 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.21 0.38 0.86 New Jersey 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 New Mexico 2.08 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 0.84 0.81 4.81 New York 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.10 0.08 0.30 North Carolina 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.10 1.24 North Dakota 3.75 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 4.40 0.13 2.70 11.05 N. Mariana Islands 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 1.21 2.06 Ohio 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.18 0.06 0.54 Oklahoma 2.38 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.89 0.11 0.64 5.03 Oregon 0.92 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.73 0.32 2.65 Pennsylvania 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.25 0.07 0.73
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.69 0.43 2.00 New Hampshire 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.21 0.38 0.86 New Jersey 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 New Mexico 2.08 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 0.84 0.81 4.81 New York 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.10 0.08 0.30 North Carolina 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.10 1.24 North Dakota 3.75 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 4.40 0.13 2.70 11.05 N. Mariana Islands 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 1.21 2.06 Ohio 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.18 0.06 0.54 Oklahoma 2.38 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.89 0.11 0.64 5.03 Oregon 0.92 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.73 0.32 2.65 Pennsylvania 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.25 0.07 0.73
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 5.09 11.67 250305 C MON-CRE TEL. COOP. INC. -10.51 -3.41 -7.35 -17.38 250306 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF ALABAMA, LLC -13.40 -3.12 -10.62 -100.00 250307 C MOUNDVILLE TEL. CO. 3.25 -2.24 5.62 6.24 250308 C NEW HOPE TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.04 -1.70 4.82 5.51 250311 A OAKMAN TEL. CO., INC. -1.22 -5.10 4.09 2.48 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 1.57 -2.10 3.75 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. -2.18 -2.35 0.17 -8.06 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. -6.85 1.03 -7.80 -16.77 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. -2.48 -4.80 2.44 -2.74 250317 C ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 7.01 -2.94 10.26 24.94 250318 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF THE SOUTH, LLC -4.97 -1.81 -3.22 -100.00 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -1.03 -2.22 1.22
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • 5.09 11.67 250305 C MON-CRE TEL. COOP. INC. -10.51 -3.41 -7.35 -17.38 250306 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF ALABAMA, LLC -13.40 -3.12 -10.62 -100.00 250307 C MOUNDVILLE TEL. CO. 3.25 -2.24 5.62 6.24 250308 C NEW HOPE TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.04 -1.70 4.82 5.51 250311 A OAKMAN TEL. CO., INC. -1.22 -5.10 4.09 2.48 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 1.57 -2.10 3.75 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. -2.18 -2.35 0.17 -8.06 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. -6.85 1.03 -7.80 -16.77 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. -2.48 -4.80 2.44 -2.74 250317 C ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 7.01 -2.94 10.26 24.94 250318 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF THE SOUTH, LLC -4.97 -1.81 -3.22 -100.00 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. -1.03 -2.22 1.22
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 0.34 35 Florida 5,009,421 499,865 2,205,385 6.50 6.75 7.39 627 7.50 770 Georgia 2,094,235 207,159 1,085,771 6.50 6.76 7.23 274 3.28 337 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 314,388 31,904 192,982 6.50 7.00 8.14 46 0.55 57 Idaho 366,167 26,477 188,239 6.37 6.50 7.15 46 0.55 57 Illinois 3,002,161 322,834 1,949,267 4.81 4.81 5.20 313 3.75 385 Indiana 1,683,862 95,441 759,743 5.90 6.02 6.97 190 2.27 233 Iowa 734,841 34,057 346,190 5.40 5.18 6.35 76 0.91 93 Kansas 532,413 29,297 321,080 5.47 5.43 5.96 60 0.72 74 Kentucky 938,701 88,600 426,512 6.38 6.67 7.51 117 1.40 144 Louisiana 1,045,264 87,413 505,916 6.50 6.76 6.96 131 1.57 161 Maine 356,712 18,836 123,493 6.41 6.39 6.90 39 0.47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 0.34 35 Florida 5,009,421 499,865 2,205,385 6.50 6.75 7.39 627 7.50 770 Georgia 2,094,235 207,159 1,085,771 6.50 6.76 7.23 274 3.28 337 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 314,388 31,904 192,982 6.50 7.00 8.14 46 0.55 57 Idaho 366,167 26,477 188,239 6.37 6.50 7.15 46 0.55 57 Illinois 3,002,161 322,834 1,949,267 4.81 4.81 5.20 313 3.75 385 Indiana 1,683,862 95,441 759,743 5.90 6.02 6.97 190 2.27 233 Iowa 734,841 34,057 346,190 5.40 5.18 6.35 76 0.91 93 Kansas 532,413 29,297 321,080 5.47 5.43 5.96 60 0.72 74 Kentucky 938,701 88,600 426,512 6.38 6.67 7.51 117 1.40 144 Louisiana 1,045,264 87,413 505,916 6.50 6.76 6.96 131 1.57 161 Maine 356,712 18,836 123,493 6.41 6.39 6.90 39 0.47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • FRONTIER COMMUN -13.74 2.90 -16.17 0.00 542318 C FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY 51.43 -1.86 54.31 106.62 542319 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.-CA (GTE) -1.32 -6.52 5.56 0.00 542321 C HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY -1.18 -2.88 1.75 0.00 542322 C HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY -14.95 1.41 -16.13 -49.52 542323 C WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY -10.77 -11.08 0.35 -17.86 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 4.80 1.02 3.75 2.93 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.70 -1.90 7.75 6.77 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -9.17 -9.50 0.36 0.00 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 0.75 -1.33 2.11 -3.61 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. 14.08 -4.57 19.54 22.76 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.70 -2.01 4.81 1.69 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA 2.54 -2.61 5.29 0.00 542346 C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • C HAXTUN TEL CO -5.59 -5.70 0.12 -18.17 462192 C BIG SANDY TELECOM -10.36 -4.61 -6.03 -76.01 462193 C NUCLA-NATURITA TEL -2.65 -3.27 0.65 -45.35 462194 C NUNN TEL CO 4.08 -6.79 11.67 5.08 462195 C SOUTH PARK TEL. CO. -0.12 -3.89 3.92 -0.50 462196 C PEETZ COOP TEL CO 3.40 -2.89 6.48 2.24 462197 C PHILLIPS COUNTY TEL 47.65 -3.75 53.41 116.30 462198 A PINE DRIVE TEL CO 0.56 -4.50 5.30 -37.76 462199 C PLAINS COOP TEL ASSN 3.70 -6.03 10.35 4.54 462201 C RICO TEL CO 8.71 -12.06 23.62 0.00 3 - 160 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2008 to 2009 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • C HAXTUN TEL CO -5.59 -5.70 0.12 -18.17 462192 C BIG SANDY TELECOM -10.36 -4.61 -6.03 -76.01 462193 C NUCLA-NATURITA TEL -2.65 -3.27 0.65 -45.35 462194 C NUNN TEL CO 4.08 -6.79 11.67 5.08 462195 C SOUTH PARK TEL. CO. -0.12 -3.89 3.92 -0.50 462196 C PEETZ COOP TEL CO 3.40 -2.89 6.48 2.24 462197 C PHILLIPS COUNTY TEL 47.65 -3.75 53.41 116.30 462198 A PINE DRIVE TEL CO 0.56 -4.50 5.30 -37.76 462199 C PLAINS COOP TEL ASSN 3.70 -6.03 10.35 4.54 462201 C RICO TEL CO 8.71 -12.06 23.62 0.00 3 - 160 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2008 to 2009 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A2.txt
  • at a fixed rate, looking for buffer under-runs (which would manifest themselves to users as a pause in video). The Whitebox recorded the time to initial buffer, the total number of buffer under-runs and the total delay in microseconds due to these under-runs. The test operated at four bit rates: 768 kilobits per second (kbps), 1.25 Mbps, 2.25 Mbps, and 3.75 Mbps. Voice over IP The test operated over UDP and, unlike the video streaming test, utilized bi-directional traffic, as is typical for voice calls. The Whitebox would handshake with the server, and each would initiate a UDP stream with the other. The test used a 64 kbps stream with the same characteristics and properties (i.e., packet sizes, delays, bitrate) as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-235A1.txt
  • have operating frequencies (base and mobile) that are 15 kHz or less removed from proposed stations that will operate with a 25 kHz channel bandwidth; stations that have operating frequencies (base and mobile) that are 7.5 kHz or less removed from proposed stations that will operate with a 12.5 kHz bandwidth; or stations that have operating frequencies (base and mobile) 3.75 kHz or less removed from proposed stations that will operate with a 6.25 kHz bandwidth; and (ii) Stations with service areas (37 dBu contour for stations in the 150-174 MHz band and 39 dBu contour for stations in the 421-512 MHz bands; see Sec. 90.205) that overlap a circle with radius 113 km (70 mi.) from the proposed base station.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-348A1.txt
  • the spectrum needs identified by those commenters who suggested designating specific amounts of spectrum for state use. While the commenters sought amounts ranging from APCO's suggestion of 1.25-2.0 megahertz as the minimum for the RPCs to set-aside to Joint Commenters AASHTO, et al. and Virginia's request for all 8.8 megahertz of the reserve spectrum, most commenters sought between 2.5 to 3.75 megahertz of spectrum. NYSTEC suggests at least 2.5 megahertz of spectrum should be designated for statewide systems. California requests 2.8 megahertz of spectrum for state systems and another 3.1 for multi-jurisdictional radio systems. Florida requests 3.75 megahertz of spectrum. Arizona has no objection to licensing all 8.8 megahertz of the reserve spectrum to the State, as a blanket license for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • 4.33 2.96 0.66 PR-4-05 % Missed Appointment - Verizon - No Dispatch 0.46 2.49 0.88 11.54 0.73 3.85 0.53 1.41 2c PR-4-14 % Completed On Time [With Serial Number] 85.70 86.98 90.59 94.72 PR-6-01 % Install. Troubles Reported within 30 Days 4.28 8.59 4.28 8.45 4.27 5.31 5.02 3.99 PR-8-01 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0.33 3.75 0.15 4.07 0.15 1.59 0.00 1.17 PR-8-02 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0.33 0.84 0.00 1.22 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.29 UNE 2 Wire xDSL Line Sharing PR-2-01 Av. Interval Completed - Total No Dispatch 4.23 4.90 3.86 3.98 3.85 4.98 PR-2-02 Av. Interval Completed - Total Dispatch 4.75 4.73 NA 19.00 24.00 0.00 1b,2a,3a,4a PR-4-02 Average
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.txt
  • MHz of spectrum among the MSS proponents. Under this scenario, the following formula would express the amount of spectrum available for each MSS system, in each direction of transmission: 30 megahertz ( (Number of System Proponents) = Size of Each Spectrum Segment Thus, under this approach, the eight 2 GHz MSS system proponents would choose Selected Assignments of 7.5 megahertz (3.75 megahertz in each direction of transmission) each. Either of these approaches would make it possible to allocate the 2020-2025 MHz and 2165-2170 MHz frequency bands for other services, if supported in the record as being in the public interest. Under either approach, we would retain 56 to 60 megahertz of spectrum for MSS in the 1990-2020 and 2170-2200 MHz bands.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-304A1.txt
  • Rcd at 604, ¶ 17. Siemens Comments to the Notice at 12. See Seventh Competition Report, 17 FCC at 13038 n.368. See also ``Wireless Missionary Qualcomm fighting uphill battle to convert cell customers to use its CDMA technology,'' San Diego Union-Trib., June 9, 2002 at H1. Cdma2000 requires a 1.25 megahertz channel (1x) to meet the vehicular performance value, a 3.75 megahertz channel (3x) to meet the pedestrian performance value and a 7.5 megahertz (6x) channel to meet the indoor performance value. W-CDMA meets the standards using paired channels of a minimum size of 5 megahertz each. See ITU Rec. ITU-R M.1455-1 at 16. Further Notice, 16 FCC Rcd at (16043) ¶ 38. See, e.g., AT&T Wireless Comments to the Further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • Sharing/<6 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 3.49 3.81 2.32 3.77 2.33 3.65 2.20 2.16 2.38 2.20 B.2.1.8.1.12W Analog Loop Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.03 4.83 4.82 4.52 5.33 4.63 4.50 4.58 5.00 4.21 B.2.1.8.2.12W Analog Loop Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.00 8.00 11.41 6.50 10.61 7.00 11.32 6.00 11.16 5.67 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.1.9.1.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.01 3.64 4.81 3.73 5.31 4.29 4.54 3.75 5.01 3.76 B.2.1.9.1.42W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 3.33 1.53 3.11 1.59 3.64 1.52 3.50 1.89 4.22 4,5 B.2.1.9.2.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 9.03 4.55 9.89 6.14 10.18 8.08 11.42 7.92 11.33 5.90 B.2.1.11.1.42W Analog Loop w/INP Non- Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 1.53 1.59 4.00 1.52 1.89 3 B - 25 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number]
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-16A1.txt
  • MSS spectrum be reallocated for AWS use without waiting for spectrum to be abandoned. We solicited comment on two possible approaches to achieve reallocation, one which would retain Selected Assignments of 7 megahertz of spectrum (3.5 megahertz in each direction), which are already provided in the authorizations, and one which would provide for Selected Assignments of 7.5 megahertz of spectrum (3.75 megahertz in each direction). Either approach would make it possible to reallocate the 2018/2020-2025 MHz and 2165-2170/2172 MHz bands to other services. Under either proposed approach, 56 to 60 megahertz of spectrum would be retained for MSS in the 1990-2018/2020 MHz and 2170/2172-2200 MHz bands. We also requested comment on the use of abandoned spectrum. Specifically, we sought comment on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.txt
  • equation no matter what the actual bandwidth in use. We will adapt Section 101.111(a)(2)(iv) which applies from 24 GHz to 70-90 GHz to achieve the desired result. Therefore, the emission mask for 70, 80, and 90 GHz shall apply only at the edge of each bandwidth used, and not to subchannels established by licenses within the bandwidth in use (1.25, 3.75 etc, up the maximum 12.9 GHz). A carrier of the subchannels can be located sufficiently far from the channel edges so that the emission levels of the mask can be satisfied. The value of B (bandwidth) for all cases shall be 500 MHz and the mean output power used in the calculation is the sum of the output power of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.txt
  • are identical, low-power, mobile operations at 2496-2572 MHz and 2614-2690 MHz will be protected through the transition plan and transmitting antenna height requirements. Presently, the response band is largely unused as there are only six licenses in this band in the entire U.S. 3G Final Report at 49. FDD code division multiple access (CDMA) channel widths are currently 1.25 MHz, 3.75MHz and 5 MHz. TDD standard channel sizes are currently 5, 10 and 15 MHz. , infra. For PCS and AWS technical rules and frequency assignments see 47 C.F.R. Parts 24 and 27 respectively. If a licensee currently has only the fourth channel in a group, they will receive one 6 megahertz channel. , infra. Id. The Coalition originally proposed placing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.txt
  • for RPCs to determine the number and location of the wideband interoperability channels, while Motorola proposes a greater number of wideband interoperability channels. Under the NPSTC proposal, licensees would be allowed to aggregate wideband channels from 50 kilohertz wideband ``building blocks'' to form 1.25 megahertz broadband channels and these 1.25 kHz channels can be aggregated to form channels up to 3.75 kHz wide and centered at 770/800 MHz. The broadband channels would be surrounded by .975 megahertz guard bands (1.95 megahertz total). These broadband channels, NPSTC states, would be located between the 767-773/797-803 MHz bands. NPSTC also suggests retaining six 50 kilohertz channels for wideband interoperability. If adopted, NPSTC envisions that licensees would have a number of options for utilizing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
  • 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 2. Region 33 (Ohio) 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 3. NATOA 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 6-7; see also California 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 8, Region 16 (Kansas) 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 1-3; Region 9 (Florida) 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 2. Under this approach, the lower 3.75 megahertz of the broadband segment would be reserved for broadband only. See NPSTC 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 20; see also APCO 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 6-7; Region 40 (Texas North) 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 2-3; San Diego County 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 8-9. NPSTC 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 20-21. Id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1_Erratum.doc
  • 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 2. Region 33 (Ohio) 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 3. NATOA 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 6-7; see also California 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 8, Region 16 (Kansas) 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 1-3; Region 9 (Florida) 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 2. Under this approach, the lower 3.75 megahertz of the broadband segment would be reserved for broadband only. See NPSTC 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 20; see also APCO 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 6-7; Region 40 (Texas North) 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 2-3; San Diego County 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 8-9. NPSTC 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 20-21. Id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1.txt
  • for satellite communications. See FCC Report to Congress as Required by the Orbit Act, Ninth Report, FCC 08-152 (rel. Jun. 18, 2008) at 4 n.19. 47 C.F.R. § 101.147(a) n.25. 47 C.F.R. § 101.109. The bandwidths for specific frequencies in the bands are specified in 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.147(i) and (l). Links with bandwidths of 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 1.25, 2.5, 3.75, 5.0, and 10.0 MHz can be authorized in both bands. 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.147(i) and (l). See Redevelopment of Spectrum to Encourage Innovation in the Use of New Telecommunications Technologies, ET Docket No. 92-9, Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 7 FCC Rcd 6100, 6102 ¶¶ 10-11 (1992). FWCC 6 GHz Petition at 4. FCC Universal Licensing System (ULS) review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1_Rcd.pdf
  • used for satellite communications. See FCC Report to Congress as Required by the Orbit Act, Ninth Report, FCC 08-152 (rel. Jun. 18, 2008) at 4 n.19. 647 C.F.R. § 101.147(a) n.25. 747 C.F.R. § 101.109. The bandwidths for specific frequenciesin the bands are specified in 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.147(i) and (l). Links with bandwidths of 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 1.25, 2.5, 3.75, 5.0, and 10.0 MHz can be authorized in both bands. 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.147(i) and (l). 9622 Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-58 historically assigned for private use with narrower channels.8 FWCC explains that fixed service bands such as the Lower 6 GHz Band and Upper 6 GHz Band carry critical services such as public safety communications (including police and fire
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-6A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-6A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-6A1.txt
  • primetime, distributed evenly during the 30-day period. Therefore, if the viewer notifications begin, for example, 8 days before the station's termination on February 17, the station must broadcast notifications 120 times, including 30 times in primetime, distributed evenly during the 8-day period; i.e., the station must broadcast notifications every day on-air at least 15 times a day, including at least 3.75 times in primetime (i.e., four times a day for six of the eight days and three times a day for the other two days), for the 8-day period. Third DTV Periodic Report and Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 3058, ¶ 134. These notifications must include: (1) the station's call sign and community of license; (2) the fact that the station
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.txt
  • removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by more than 250 %. (13) 30 + 20(fd - 2) dB, or 55 + 10 log (P) dB, or 65 dB, whichever is least, on any frequency removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by a displacement frequency (fd in kHz) of more than 2 kHz up to and including 3.75 kHz. (14) 55 + 10 log (P) dB on any frequency removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by more than 3.75 kHz. (15) 30 dB on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by 12.5 kHz to 22.5 kHz. (16) 43 + 10 log (P) dB on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by more
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1_Rcd.pdf
  • to and including 250% of the authorized bandwidth. (12) 56+10log(P)dB on any frequency removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by more than 250%. (13) 30+20(fd-2)dB, or 55+10log(P) dB, or 65dB, whichever is least,on any frequency removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by a displacement frequency (fd in kHz) of more than 2kHz up to and including 3.75kHz. (14) 55+10log(P) dB on any frequency removed from the center of the authorized bandwidth by more than 3.75kHz. (15) 30dB on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by 12.5kHz to 22.5kHz. (16) 43+10log(P) dB on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency by more than 22.5kHz. (17) 30dB on any frequency removed from the channel center frequency
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-109A1.txt
  • (l). The 6425-6525 MHz band allows mobile operations and is shared with mobile stations licensed pursuant to Parts 74 and 78 of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.147(j). 47 C.F.R. § 101.109. The bandwidths for specific frequencies in the bands are specified in 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.147(i) and (l). Links with bandwidths of 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 1.25, 2.5, 3.75, 5.0, and 10.0 MHz can be authorized in both bands. 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.147(i) and (l). 47 C.F.R. Part 25.202; 47 C.F.R. § 2.106. Satellite uplink channels at 5925-6425 MHz are paired with space-to-earth channels at 3700-4200 MHz. In combination, the two sets of channels are referred to as the C-band when used for satellite communications. See FCC Report to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-36A1.txt
  • LMCC further supplemental comments at 4-5. Section 90.187 currently provides that a geographically proximate incumbent (under the criteria discussed above) is an ``affected licensee'' if its assigned frequency is 15 kilohertz or less from the assigned frequency of a proposed 25 kilohertz bandwidth station, 7.5 kilohertz or less from the assigned frequency of a proposed 12.5 kilohertz bandwidth station, or 3.75 kilohertz or less from the assigned frequency of a proposed 6.25 kilohertz bandwidth station. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.187(b)(1)(i), (iii)(A)-(C); see also NSTN, 22 FCC Rcd at 18646-47 ¶¶ 7-8 (citing Refarming Second Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 8661 ¶ 38). Specifically, LMCC proposes that a 25 kilohertz bandwidth station be deemed an ``affected licensee'' if its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.txt
  • find that our goal to ensure that the WCS spectrum is used intensively in the public interest will be furthered by requiring that each point-to-point link have a minimum payload capacity (megabits/second (Mbits/s) for a given bandwidth). We agree with the WCS Coalition that the capacity requirements in section 101.141(b) of our rules-which require for nominal bandwidths of 1.25, 2.5, 3.75 and 5 megahertz, a minimum payload capacity of 3.08 Mbits/s, 6.17 Mbits/s, 12.30 Mbits/s, and 18.5 Mbits/s, respectively-may require more construction than would be necessary to ensure meaningful deployment in certain markets. Rather, we believe that the less stringent payload requirement specified in section 101.141(a) of the rules is sufficient to ensure that the valuable WCS spectrum is used efficiently
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1_Rcd.pdf
  • find that our goal to ensure that the WCS spectrum is used intensively in the public interest will be furthered by requiring that each point-to-point link have a minimum payload capacity (megabits/second (Mbits/s) for a given bandwidth). We agree with the WCS Coalition that the capacity requirements in section 101.141(b) of our rules-which require for nominal bandwidths of 1.25, 2.5, 3.75 and 5 megahertz, a minimumpayload capacity of 3.08 Mbits/s, 6.17 Mbits/s, 12.30Mbits/s, and 18.5 Mbits/s, respectively-may require more construction than would be necessary to ensure meaningful deployment in certain markets.502Rather, we believe that the less stringent payload requirement specified in section 101.141(a) of the rules503is sufficient to ensure that the valuable WCS spectrum is used efficiently and intensively, while affording
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-84A1.txt
  • expenses but no capital costs. Incumbent LEC Pole Attachment Rates, Based on ARMIS Data ($ per attachment per year) All Costs VZ NY VZ PA AT&T CA AT&T FL AT&T IL AT&T TX Qwest CO Qwest WA Cable Rate 4.58 2.16 5.43 4.92 1.80 2.16 1.58 2.48 Telecom Rate - Urbanized (5 attachers) 6.92 3.26 8.21 7.44 2.72 3.26 2.39 3.75 Telecom Rate - Non-Urbanized (3 attachers) 10.43 4.92 12.39 11.22 4.11 4.92 3.60 5.65 No Capital Costs Telecom Rate - Urbanized (5 attachers) 1.71 0.49 2.47 2.03 0.51 0.94 0.82 0.66 Telecom Rate - Non-Urbanized (3 attachers) 2.58 0.74 3.72 3.06 0.77 1.41 1.24 0.99 Utility Pole Attachment Rates, Based on FERC Data ($ per attachment per year) APPENDIX B
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.txt
  • 08 09 08 25% 23% 21% 41% 35% 33% Source: Analyst Reports, Company Data 08 T-Mobile Q1 2010 $25.0 $20.0 $15.0 $10.0 $5.0 $0.0 08 09 08 08 08 08 09 09 09 Sprint Nextel Verizon WiMAX GPRS GSM/ TDMA EV-DO Rev. A EV-DO Rev. 0 1xRTT CDMA 6.076 6.07 6.395 6.378 6.388 6.383 6.349 3.323 3.257 3.71 3.737 3.703 3.75 3.723 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 $0-$24,999 $25,000-$49,999 $50,000-$74,999 $75,000-$99,999 $100,000-$124,999 $125,000-$149,999 $150,000+ Median Household Income (by Census Tract) Average Number of Mobile Wireless Providers Average Number of Mobile Broadband Providers - 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Verizon Wireless AT&T Sprint Nextel Clearwire* T-Mobile MetroPCS US Cellular Leap Other MHz-Pops (Billions)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1_Rcd.pdf
  • to counterbalance the incentive to "piggy back" onanother provider's network. Id. 382All mobile calling plans specify a calling area ­such as a particular metropolitan area, a state, a region, the provider's entire network, or the entire United States ­within which the subscriber can make a call without (continued....) 6.076 6.07 6.395 6.378 6.388 6.383 6.349 3.323 3.257 3.71 3.737 3.703 3.75 3.723 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 $0-$24,999 $25,000-$49,999 $50,000-$74,999 $75,000-$99,999$100,000-$124,999$125,000-$149,999 $150,000+ Median Household Income (byCensus Tract) Average Number of Mobile Wireless Providers Average Number of Mobile Broadband Providers 9745 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-103 roaming revenues and voice minutes have declined as a percentage of total service revenues and total minutes, respectively, over the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00312.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00312.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00312.txt
  • 75 hopping channels. Output power would be reduced in proportion to the increase in bandwidth over 1 MHz. For example, systems with 3 MHz bandwidths would operate with output power of no more than 320 mW and channel occupancy time no greater than 0.05 second per hop. Each of the 75 channels would be used at least once during a 3.75 second period. Like existing 1 MHz systems, the average time of occupancy on any channel would not be greater than 0.4 second within a 30 second period. Under the proposal, systems using 5 MHz bandwidths would operate with output power of no more than 200 mW and channel occupancy time of no greater than 0.02 second per hop. Each of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.txt
  • MHz of spectrum among the MSS proponents. Under this scenario, the following formula would express the amount of spectrum available for each MSS system, in each direction of transmission: 30 megahertz ( (Number of System Proponents) = Size of Each Spectrum Segment Thus, under this approach, the eight 2 GHz MSS system proponents would choose Selected Assignments of 7.5 megahertz (3.75 megahertz in each direction of transmission) each. Either of these approaches would make it possible to allocate the 2020-2025 MHz and 2165-2170 MHz frequency bands for other services, if supported in the record as being in the public interest. Under either approach, we would retain 56 to 60 megahertz of spectrum for MSS in the 1990-2020 and 2170-2200 MHz bands.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210104-1.pdf
  • RAM = I .`:i b"i Communications Port: Infrared Power Supply NiMt- rechargeable battery Recharge Time: 1 ITour (charger included) Battery Life: Keyboard: Keys Over 1 week ____ ~~ QWERTY layout with special functlprl keys Total of 47 keys plus the NavDisc ' ' : ! - ! select keys Dimensions: Volume: Weight (with battery): ___~ Graphics Display: Actual Message Area: 3.75 r( 2.85 x 1.2 inches (95 x 72 x 30 mm) 9.3 cubic inches (I 53 cc) 6.7 ounces (190 grams) 16 lines x 30 characters 240 x 160 pixels 4-level gray scale EL backlighting ___-- 9 lines x 27 characters Frequency Bands: 940 -941 MHz Channel Spacing: 50 kHz Bit Rate: 6400 ___- Signaling: d-level FSK ?requency Deviation: +/-
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/theory090002.pdf
  • P Qm(1- i) (34) Whenthisexpressioniscombinedwith(32)weobtainamarking-clearingconditionwhichde- terminesPQ.Thisisthesecondequationinoursystem.Oncecombinedwith(33)theonly unknownsinthisexpressionarePQand A. Thefinalequationinoursystemistheequalitybetweentheaggregatebundleofadvertising andindividualadvertisinglevelsinthesymmetricequilibrium, A=Ai.Combiningthisequality with(30)weobtainanexpressionwhoseunknownsare i,PQand A.Giventhesethreeunknowns andthethreenon-linearrelationshipsoutlinedabove,weemploythefsolveroutineinMaple7.00 tosolveforthenumericalvalueofourunknowns.Ourfirstpassoccurswithanassumptionof twentyfirms. Theremainingendogenousvariablesarethencalculatedfromidentitiesandotherrelation- ships.Oncethevalueofalltheendogenousvariableshasbeencalculated,aloopisexecutedin whichthenumberoffirmsisincreasedincrementallybyone.Thefsolveroutineiscalledagain, theequilibriumiscalculated,andthelooprepeatsuntilthefirmnumberreachesthirty. 25 References Anderson,S.andS.Coate,"MarketProvisionofPublicGoods:TheCaseof Broadcasting,"2001.WorkingPaper,UniversityofVirginiaandCornellUniversity. Beebe,J.,"InstitutionalStructureandProgramChoiceinTelevisionMarkets,"Quarterly JournalofEconomics,1977,91(1),15­37. Berry,S.andJ.Waldfogel,"DoMergersIncreaseProductVariety:EvidencefromRadio Broadcasting,"QuarterlyJournalofEconomics,2001,116(3),1009­10025. Blanchard,O.andF.Giavazzi,"MacroeconomicEffectsofRegulationandDeregulationin GoodsandLaborMarkets,"February2001.WorkingPaperNo.8120,NationalBureauof EconomicResearch. d'Aspremont,C.,J.Gabszewicz,andJ.F.Thisse,"OnHotelling's`Stabilityin Competition',"Econometrica,1979,47(5),1145­1150. Gabszewicz,D.LausselJ.andN.Sonnac,"TV-BroadcastingCompetitionand Advertising,"2000.DiscussionPaper00/6,CORE,UniversiteCatholiquedeLouvain. Gal-Or,E.andA.Dukes,"MinimumDifferentiationinCommercialMediaMarkets,"2001. WorkingPaper,UniversityofPittsburgh. Hotelling,H.,"StabilityinCompetition,"EconomicJournal,1929,39(153),41­57. Nilssen,T.andL.Sorgard,"TVAdvertising,ProgrammingInvestmentsand Product-MarketOligopoly,"2000.WorkingPaper,UniversityofOslo. Rothenberg,R.,"ConsumerSovereigntyandtheEconomicsofTVProgramming,"Studiesin PublicCommunication,1962,4,45­54. Spence,M.andB.Owen,"TelevisionProgramming,MonopolisticCompetitionand 26 Welfare,"QuarterlyJournalofEconomics,1977,91(1),103­126. Steiner,P.,"ProgramPatternsandPreferencesandtheWorkabilityofCompetitioninRadio Broadcasting,"QuarterlyJournalofEconomics,1952,66(2),194­223. Tirole,J.,TheTheoryofIndustrialOrganization,Cambridge:MITPress,1988. 27 Table1:ParameterValues w 25 KB.75 Y 10,000 K 4.95 .75 µQ2 3.75 µB2 KQ.75 µ .025 Table2:NumericalWelfareResults (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) RelativetoBaseline m i B A N Q P PQ U 201.0500.417 0.7460.9350.6521.1681.0851.0720.897 211.0750.381 0.8360.9560.7761.1151.0411.0430.934 221.1000.359 0.9020.9720.8681.0711.0201.0250.961 231.1250.344 0.9550.9860.9401.0331.0081.0110.982 241.1500.333 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000 251.1750.325 1.0391.0141.0520.9700.9950.9901.016 261.2000.319 1.0741.0271.0970.9440.9900.9821.030 271.2250.314 1.1051.0401.1380.9190.9870.9741.043 281.2500.310 1.1341.0531.1740.8960.9850.9671.055 291.2750.306 1.1611.0661.2080.8740.9830.9611.067 301.3000.303 1.1861.0781.2390.8540.9810.9541.078 28 Figure1:Results B, i P,Ai P,Ai -1 -1 ·StrongSwitchingOff ·CrowdingOut ·Weak Switc hing
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/releases/fc980155.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/releases/fc980155.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/releases/fc980155.wp
  • 64-kbps lines per user terminal, 0.2 Erlangs per line during the busy hour, and 0.1% blockage 99 probability during the busy hour. This increased bandwidth requirement results from the threefold increase required to compensate for the 100 modulation change multiplied by the 2.6 increase due to elimination of DBA. A 7.8 bandwidth loss factor is used for distances of between 3.75 and 4.81 km, a 2.6 bandwidth loss factor is used 101 for distances of between 2.84 and 3.75 km, and no loss is assumed for distances of less than 2.84 km. See Relocation Order at ¶ 14. 102 23 were using at 18 GHz. As in changing modulation techniques, sacrificing DBA and using FBA also increases the bandwidth required, in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/element8.doc
  • information circuits failure. B. Frequency of raster scan. C. For interference from nearby ships. D. Constant velocity of antenna rotation. 8-45F4 In the circuit contained in Fig. 8F12, there are 5 volts present at points B and C, and there are zero volts present at points A and D. What is the voltage at point E? A. -1.5 Volts. B. 3.75 Volts. C. 23.75 Volts. D. 4.5 Volts. 8-45F5 If the TR tube malfunctions: A. The transmitter might be damaged. B. The receiver might be damaged. C. The klystron might be damaged. D. Magnetron current will increase. 8-45F6 The indicated distance from your own vessel to a lighthouse is found to be in error. What circuit would you suspect? A. Range
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/fcc00-348.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/fcc00-348.pdf
  • the spectrum needs identified by those commenters who suggested designating specific amounts of spectrum for state use. While the commenters sought amounts ranging from APCO's suggestion of 1.25-2.0 megahertz as the minimum for the RPCs to set-aside to Joint Commenters AASHTO, et al. and Virginia's request for all 8.8 megahertz of the reserve spectrum, most commenters sought between 2.5 to 3.75 megahertz of spectrum. NYSTEC suggests at least 2.5 megahertz of spectrum should be designated for statewide systems. California requests 2.8 megahertz of spectrum for state systems and another 3.1 for multi-jurisdictional radio systems. Florida requests 3.75 megahertz of spectrum. Arizona has no objection to licensing all 8.8 megahertz of the reserve spectrum to the State, as a blanket license for
• http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreport.doc http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreport.pdf
  • rate of 3.84 Mcps. Modulation is dual-channel QPSK. CDMA Multi-Carrier - This radio interface also is called cdma2000 and operates in FDD. The radio interface is a wideband spread spectrum system that uses code division multiple access (CDMA) technology and provides a 3G evolution for systems using the current TIA/EIA-95-B family of standards. RF channel bandwidths of 1.25 megahertz and 3.75 megahertz are supported at this time but the specification can be extended to bandwidths up to 15 megahertz. CDMA TDD - This radio interface employs a direct-sequence CDMA radio access scheme. There are two versions: UTRA Time Division Duplex (TDD) that uses a 5 megahertz bandwidth and a chip rate of 3.84 Mcps, and TD-SCDMA that uses 1.6 megahertz bandwidth
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000720.doc
  • commits to purchasing and installing any additional equipment necessary to deliver an adequate signal. The Cable Operator responds by stating that KGMC(TV) does not deliver a signal of sufficient strength to the cable systems' headends. The Cable Operator states that the Commission's rules require that UHF stations, such as KGMC(TV), are required to provide a signal level of -45 dBm (+3.75 dBmV). Thus, the cable operator argues that the October 26, 1999 test referred to by KGMC(TV), which produced a signal strength of -.7 dBmV, falls short of the required signal level. The Cable Operator states that it later conducted other signal strength tests (``December 1999 tests'') using the new antenna provided by KGMC(TV), but those tests resulted in lower signal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97298.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97298.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97298.wp
  • 70 percent of the total orders requiring modified due dates. The actual numbers ranged from approximately 1,000 to almost 4,000 orders. Id. By way of comparison, based on 1995 data, it is reasonable to assume that, approximately, more than 494 20,000 Michigan consumers per week currently change their interexchange carrier. In deriving this figure, we assume that Michigan has approximately 3.75 percent of the total access lines in the United States (6,195,898/164,861,912), and that consumers change interexchange carriers at least 30,000,000 times in a year. See Report, Statistics of Communications Common Carriers, Federal Communications Commission, 1995/1996 Edition, at table 2.5 (rel. Dec. 1, 1996) (Common Carrier Statistics) (total number of access lines in Michigan and in the United States) and Motion
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • Sharing/<6 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 3.49 3.81 2.32 3.77 2.33 3.65 2.20 2.16 2.38 2.20 B.2.1.8.1.12W Analog Loop Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.03 4.83 4.82 4.52 5.33 4.63 4.50 4.58 5.00 4.21 B.2.1.8.2.12W Analog Loop Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.00 8.00 11.41 6.50 10.61 7.00 11.32 6.00 11.16 5.67 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.1.9.1.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.01 3.64 4.81 3.73 5.31 4.29 4.54 3.75 5.01 3.76 B.2.1.9.1.42W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 3.33 1.53 3.11 1.59 3.64 1.52 3.50 1.89 4.22 4,5 B.2.1.9.2.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 9.03 4.55 9.89 6.14 10.18 8.08 11.42 7.92 11.33 5.90 B.2.1.11.1.42W Analog Loop w/INP Non- Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 1.53 1.59 4.00 1.52 1.89 3 B - 25 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number]
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt103.pdf
  • revenue per minute for 1930 - 2001 for interstate and international calls, and average revenue per minute breakouts for 1992 - 2001 for domestic and international calls. For comparison, the table also shows the per-minute charges restated to 2001 dollars. 1930 $0.27 $2.91 1970 $0.23 $1.05 1931 0.27 3.14 1971 0.25 1.07 1932 0.26 3.39 1972 0.24 1.03 1933 0.28 3.75 1973 0.25 1.01 1934 0.27 3.60 1974 0.26 0.92 1935 0.27 3.43 1975 0.27 0.90 1936 0.25 3.20 1976 0.29 0.89 1937 0.22 2.67 1977 0.28 0.83 1938 0.21 2.69 1978 0.29 0.78 1939 0.22 2.75 1979 0.29 0.71 1940 0.21 2.66 1980 0.30 0.65 1941 0.21 2.50 1981 0.33 0.64 1942 0.22 2.34 1982 0.34 0.63 1943 0.21 2.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • Massena Verizon 23.26 0.11 118.27 5.71 New York New York City Verizon 23.85 0.11 121.73 5.71 New York Ogdensburg Verizon 23.91 0.11 121.60 5.71 New York Rochester Frontier 18.65 0.12 56.60 North Carolina Raleigh BellSouth 41.55 66.95 5.00 North Carolina Rockingham BellSouth 36.77 66.95 5.00 Ohio Canton Ameritech 34.37 0.08 62.85 4.29 Ohio Cincinnati Cincinnati Bell 53.71 39.00 0.15 49.75 3.75 Ohio Cleveland Ameritech 29.74 0.08 62.85 4.29 Ohio Columbus Ameritech 29.74 0.08 62.85 4.29 Ohio Toledo Ameritech 31.64 0.08 62.85 4.29 Oregon Corvallis Qwest 37.15 27.62 0.15 31.93 4.50 Oregon Portland Qwest 38.84 29.16 0.15 31.93 4.50 Pennsylvania Allentown Verizon 22.87 0.07 79.50 1.50 Pennsylvania Ellwood City Verizon 25.60 0.07 79.50 1.50 Pennsylvania Johnstown Verizon 41.61 23.20 0.14 60.44 4.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.30 0.00 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 6.88 6.03 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $46.25 $45.88 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-Rate Service 54 - Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 1 $17.44 $17.59 Federal and State Subscriber Line Charges 5.33 6.00 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.14 0.00 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 4.11 3.75 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $27.01 $27.34 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.09 0.09 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 86 - Basic Connection Charge $67.25 $62.85 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 4.97 4.50 Total Connection Charge $72.35 $67.35 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 6.63 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • (b) (c) (b) - (c) Unlimited local calling $13.62 $13.84 $8.99 Federal and state SLCs 3.54 3.47 0.23 Taxes and 911 charges 2.34 2.31 1.34 Total for rotary service 19.49 19.62 10.56 9.06 Lowest generally available rate 6.68 6.61 2.87 Federal and state SLCs 3.54 3.47 0.23 Taxes and 911 charges 1.56 1.49 0.65 Total for rotary service 11.79 11.57 3.75 7.82 Minimum connection charge 40.91 41.01 15.86 Taxes 2.42 2.51 1.00 Total for rotary service 43.33 43.52 16.86 26.66 Subsidized monthly service rate averages are for the 70 cities with subsidized monthly rates. These cities represent 73% of the sample weight. Subsidized connection charge averages are for the 90 cities with connection assistance plans. These cities represent 96% of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 1/ REVISED DATA FILED MAY 9, 1997. 2/ BECAME PRICE-CAP JULY 1, 1996; REPORTING PERIOD JULY 1, 1996 - DECEMBER 31, 1996. 3/ NAME CHANGE FROM LINCOLN TELEPHONE AND TELGRAPH COMPANY. MAXIMUM RATE OF RETURN 43.07 MINIMUM RATE OF RETURN (24.26) ARITHMETIC MEAN RATE OF RETURN 18.36 STANDARD DEVIATION OF RATE OF RETURN 10.18 WEIGHTED ARITHMETIC MEAN 14.99 STANDARD DEVIATION 3.75
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • 5.15 287 3.52 288 MINNESOTA 5.41 6.14 5.58 146 1.79 147 MISSISSIPPI 6.49 7.46 6.46 64 0.79 65 MISSOURI 5.99 6.86 6.16 156 1.91 157 MONTANA 6.76 6.77 6.53 26 0.32 26 NEBRASKA 6.31 5.58 6.01 50 0.61 50 NEVADA 5.47 4.84 5.04 58 0.71 58 NEW HAMPSHIRE 5.96 0.00 5.96 40 0.50 41 NEW JERSEY 5.46 6.19 5.48 306 3.75 307 NEW MEXICO 6.92 6.10 6.79 48 0.59 48 NEW YORK 5.96 5.97 5.96 586 7.17 588 NORTH CAROLINA 6.49 6.18 6.31 230 2.81 231 NORTH DAKOTA 5.89 0.00 5.93 20 0.24 20 OHIO 5.00 5.94 5.38 322 3.94 324 OKLAHOMA 5.99 6.59 6.03 91 1.12 92 OREGON 6.20 5.87 6.09 101 1.24 102 PENNSYLVANIA 5.65 5.68 5.69 389 4.76
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • NA NA NA NA NA NA 97.00 Arizona 28.60 5.45 6.83 36.95 1.81 0.80 80.43 17.30 97.73 Arkansas 30.97 4.45 14.78 29.07 0.90 0.85 81.02 21.90 102.92 California 23.61 4.19 18.84 20.16 1.93 0.58 69.30 17.16 86.46 Colorado 35.07 5.75 7.73 37.70 2.10 0.88 89.21 24.76 113.97 Connecticut 24.29 4.65 7.87 36.12 1.51 0.80 75.24 20.20 95.44 Delaware 23.71 4.63 3.75 39.03 0.99 0.56 72.67 21.23 93.90 District of Columbia 32.34 3.76 0.03 30.96 3.58 1.04 71.72 44.85 116.57 Florida 28.79 5.08 12.01 31.39 2.57 0.74 80.58 20.83 101.41 Georgia 37.64 4.96 9.45 32.80 2.08 0.90 87.83 22.26 110.10 Hawaii 35.42 4.76 3.82 27.79 1.13 0.96 73.88 18.23 92.11 Idaho 27.91 5.33 7.66 37.77 0.00 1.25 79.92 16.91 96.83 Illinois 30.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • TABLE 14.6 INDICATORS OF LONG DISTANCE PRICES Restated in 1998 Dollars Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate and International Calls * AT&T Charge per Minute for a 10-Minute Day Rate 200-Mile Call (Basic Rates) Consumer Price Index: All Goods and Services Revenue per Minute 200-Mile Call Charge per Minute 1930 $0.27 $0.35 16.7 $2.68 $3.42 1931 0.27 0.35 15.2 2.89 3.75 1932 0.26 0.35 13.7 3.12 4.16 1933 0.28 0.35 13.0 3.45 4.39 1934 0.27 0.35 13.4 3.31 4.26 1935 0.27 0.35 13.7 3.16 4.16 1936 0.25 0.35 13.9 2.95 4.10 1937 0.22 0.35 14.4 2.45 3.96 1938 0.21 0.26 14.1 2.48 2.95 1939 0.22 0.26 13.9 2.53 2.99 1940 0.21 0.26 14.0 2.45 2.97 1941 0.21 0.26 14.7 2.30 2.83
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 6 TABLE 14.6 AVERAGE REVENUE PER MINUTE Restated in 1998 Dollars Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate and International Calls * AT&T Charge per Minute for a 10-Minute Day Rate 200-Mile Call (Basic Rates) Consumer Price Index: All Goods and Services Revenue per Minute 200-Mile Call Charge per Minute 1930 27¢ 35¢ 16.7 $2.68 $3.42 1931 27 35 15.2 2.89 3.75 1932 26 35 13.7 3.12 4.16 1933 28 35 13.0 3.45 4.39 1934 27 35 13.4 3.31 4.26 1935 27 35 13.7 3.16 4.16 1936 25 35 13.9 2.95 4.10 1937 22 35 14.4 2.45 3.96 1938 21 26 14.1 2.48 2.95 1939 22 26 13.9 2.53 2.99 1940 21 26 14.0 2.45 2.97 1941 21 26 14.7 2.30 2.83
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • Mobile All Toll Toll WirelessRevenues Alabama $38.27 $5.35 $8.26 $25.31 $1.62 $1.01 $79.82 $25.53 $105.35 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 102.37 Arizona 28.10 5.96 5.72 32.95 2.07 1.03 75.83 27.62 103.45 Arkansas 30.29 4.58 11.79 25.71 1.68 1.08 75.12 22.46 97.59 California 22.48 4.21 18.39 18.69 2.47 0.85 67.09 24.98 92.06 Colorado 36.31 6.33 6.24 32.75 3.75 1.22 86.59 28.86 115.45 Connecticut 27.04 4.94 10.68 31.79 2.37 1.22 78.05 23.38 101.43 Delaware 23.71 5.13 4.05 34.10 1.78 0.75 69.51 28.95 98.46 District of Columbia 32.72 3.80 0.03 28.63 4.03 1.67 70.89 46.95 117.84 Florida 28.84 5.70 10.89 28.65 2.46 1.00 77.54 25.92 103.46 Georgia 38.30 5.38 7.52 30.85 3.44 1.21 86.70 24.35 111.05 Guam NA NA NA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Interstate and Calls 1/ Calls Index International Calls Index International Calls All Goods Restated All Goods Restated and Services in 2001 and Services in 2001 (1982-1984 Dollars (1982-1984 Dollars = 100) = 100) 1930 16.7 $0.27 $2.91 1970 38.8 $0.23 $1.05 1931 15.2 0.27 3.14 1971 40.5 0.25 1.07 1932 13.7 0.26 3.39 1972 41.8 0.24 1.03 1933 13.0 0.28 3.75 1973 44.4 0.25 1.01 1934 13.4 0.27 3.60 1974 49.3 0.26 0.92 1935 13.7 0.27 3.43 1975 53.8 0.27 0.90 1936 13.9 0.25 3.20 1976 56.9 0.29 0.89 1937 14.4 0.22 2.67 1977 60.6 0.28 0.83 1938 14.1 0.21 2.69 1978 65.2 0.29 0.78 1939 13.9 0.22 2.75 1979 72.6 0.29 0.71 1940 14.0 0.21 2.66 1980 82.4 0.30 0.65
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • 9.00 6.75 9.00 7.50 9.00 6.75 1976 3.60 3.60 6.75 5.10 9.00 6.75 9.00 6.75 9.00 7.50 9.00 6.75 1977 3.60 3.60 6.75 5.10 9.00 6.75 9.00 6.75 9.00 7.50 9.00 6.75 1978 4.50 3.60 6.00 4.80 7.80 5.85 9.00 6.75 7.05 5.55 9.00 6.75 1979 4.50 3.60 6.00 4.80 7.35 5.55 7.35 5.55 7.05 5.55 7.35 5.55 1980 4.80 3.75 6.30 5.10 7.80 5.85 7.80 5.85 7.80 5.70 7.80 5.85 1981 3.00 2.40 4.05 3.15 4.95 3.75 4.95 3.75 4.50 3.60 4.95 3.75 1982 4.60 2.77 5.03 3.02 7.38 4.43 7.38 4.43 5.13 4.43 6.34 3.81 1983 4.60 2.77 5.03 3.02 7.38 4.43 7.38 4.43 5.13 4.43 6.34 3.58 1984 4.31 2.59 4.73 2.83 6.92 4.16 6.92 4.16 4.82 2.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • 9.00 6.75 9.00 7.50 9.00 6.75 1976 3.60 3.60 6.75 5.10 9.00 6.75 9.00 6.75 9.00 7.50 9.00 6.75 1977 3.60 3.60 6.75 5.10 9.00 6.75 9.00 6.75 9.00 7.50 9.00 6.75 1978 4.50 3.60 6.00 4.80 7.80 5.85 9.00 6.75 7.05 5.55 9.00 6.75 1979 4.50 3.60 6.00 4.80 7.35 5.55 7.35 5.55 7.05 5.55 7.35 5.55 1980 4.80 3.75 6.30 5.10 7.80 5.85 7.80 5.85 7.80 5.70 7.80 5.85 1981 3.00 2.40 4.05 3.15 4.95 3.75 4.95 3.75 4.50 3.60 4.95 3.75 1982 4.60 2.77 5.03 3.02 7.38 4.43 7.38 4.43 5.13 4.43 6.34 3.81 1983 4.60 2.77 5.03 3.02 7.38 4.43 7.38 4.43 5.13 4.43 6.34 3.58 1984 4.31 2.59 4.73 2.83 6.92 4.16 6.92 4.16 4.82 2.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • Arizona 1,143 1.69 1,090 4 1,231 66 Arkansas 620 0.92 591 2 668 36 California 6,710 9.94 6,394 22 7,222 386 Colorado 1,397 2.07 1,331 5 1,504 80 Connecticut 882 1.31 840 3 949 51 Delaware 180 0.27 171 1 193 10 District of Columbia 375 0.56 357 1 404 22 Florida 4,264 6.32 4,064 14 4,590 246 Georgia 2,528 3.75 2,410 8 2,721 146 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 283 0.42 270 1 305 16 Idaho 273 0.41 261 1 294 16 Illinois 2,897 4.29 2,761 9 3,118 167 Indiana 1,278 1.89 1,218 4 1,375 74 Iowa 530 0.79 505 2 571 31 Kansas 630 0.93 600 2 678 36 Kentucky 1,000 1.48 953 3 1,076 58
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 13.28 INFINITE 401720 C CENTURYTEL OF REDFIELD, INC. 9.02 -1.29 10.44 18.59 401721 A>CRICE BELT TEL. CO.,INC. 25.64 -0.27 25.99 88.73 401722 A E. RITTER TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.82 -2.23 12.33 57.67 401724 C SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS TEL. COOP. INC. 4.53 1.02 3.47 3.98 401726 C TRI-COUNTY TEL. CO. INC.-AR 26.01 -5.95 33.98 59.64 401727 C CENTURYTEL OF SOUTH ARKANSAS, INC. 0.98 3.75 -2.67 -2.67 401729 C WALNUT HILL TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.30 1.56 -0.26 -0.53 401733 C YELCOT TEL. CO.,INC. 13.47 3.18 9.98 25.19 401734 C YELL COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.75 1.17 7.50 15.09 403031 C SCOTT COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.87 -12.00 18.03 7.03 405211 C SOUTHWESTERN BELL-ARKANSAS 3.14 -2.99 6.32 0.00 TOTAL: CALIFORNIA 7.83 -1.65 9.64 2.63 542301 C CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 264 312 1.70 67 329 Arkansas 265 101 164 0.89 35 173 California 3,258 1,251 2,007 10.91 429 2,113 Colorado 625 253 371 2.02 79 391 Connecticut 473 173 300 1.63 64 316 Delaware 111 46 66 0.36 14 69 District of Columbia 240 46 194 1.05 41 204 Florida 2,095 918 1,177 6.40 252 1,240 Georgia 1,077 388 689 3.75 147 726 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 136 64 72 0.39 16 76 Idaho 184 64 121 0.66 26 127 Illinois 1,042 462 579 3.15 124 610 Indiana 578 284 294 1.60 63 309 Iowa 289 114 174 0.95 37 184 Kansas 279 96 183 1.00 39 193 Kentucky 311 146 165 0.90 35 174 Louisiana 418
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 0.51 -2.45 3.03 4.64 Massachusetts -0.59 -5.01 4.66 -6.68 Michigan -4.36 2.11 -6.34 0.64 Minnesota 0.44 -4.76 5.46 -5.28 Mississippi 2.99 -2.25 5.37 2.94 Missouri -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 Montana 1.29 -2.20 3.56 1.08 Nebraska -0.92 -4.70 3.97 9.03 Nevada 0.07 -0.21 0.28 -7.60 New Hampshire -5.90 -4.97 -0.98 5.90 New Jersey -0.97 -4.26 3.44 0.00 New Mexico 2.32 -1.38 3.75 11.16 New York 1.80 -3.79 5.81 -1.36 North Carolina -0.31 -2.11 1.83 14.70 North Dakota 0.91 -0.79 1.71 -2.52 Northern Mariana Islands -11.06 3.18 -13.81 -100.00 Ohio 0.98 -2.31 3.36 -3.07 Oklahoma -4.60 -5.03 0.45 5.02 Oregon 1.31 -4.04 5.58 -2.48 Pennsylvania 0.00 -3.61 3.75 14.96 Puerto Rico -4.17 -3.59 -0.60 -100.00 Rhode Island -3.65 -7.22 3.84 0.00 South Carolina
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 21 TABLE 7.9 AVERAGE REVENUE PER MINUTE Restated in 1998 Dollars Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate and International Calls * AT&T Charge per Minute for a 10-Minute Day Rate 200-Mile Call (Basic Rates) Consumer Price Index: All Goods and Services Revenue per Minute 200-Mile Call Charge per Minute 1930 27¢ 35¢ 16.7 $2.68 $3.42 1931 27 35 15.2 2.89 3.75 1932 26 35 13.7 3.12 4.16 1933 28 35 13.0 3.45 4.39 1934 27 35 13.4 3.31 4.26 1935 27 35 13.7 3.16 4.16 1936 25 35 13.9 2.95 4.10 1937 22 35 14.4 2.45 3.96 1938 21 26 14.1 2.48 2.95 1939 22 26 13.9 2.53 2.99 1940 21 26 14.0 2.45 2.97 1941 21 26 14.7 2.30 2.83
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 23,621 1.96 13,964 1.16 9,657 0.80 Nevada 14,680 0.93 20,021 1.27 -5,341 -0.34 New Hampshire 8,544 0.81 14,283 1.36 -5,739 -0.55 New Jersey 3,504 0.04 91,976 1.14 -88,472 -1.09 New Mexico 37,701 3.29 14,957 1.31 22,744 1.99 New York 53,021 0.34 159,144 1.03 -106,123 -0.69 North Carolina 34,304 0.56 65,191 1.07 -30,887 -0.51 North Dakota 24,969 4.98 6,150 1.23 18,819 3.75 Northern Mariana Islands 3,310 11.06 250 0.84 3,060 10.22 Ohio 19,587 0.23 76,233 0.91 -56,646 -0.67 Oklahoma 65,942 2.63 24,417 0.98 41,525 1.66 Oregon 46,888 1.84 28,937 1.13 17,951 0.70 Pennsylvania 28,812 0.28 92,121 0.91 -63,309 -0.62 Puerto Rico 143,591 9.24 12,891 0.83 130,701 8.41 Rhode Island 25 0.00 9,839 1.21 -9,814 -1.21 South Carolina 50,342 1.80 32,039 1.15 18,303
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 3.92 6.23 7.30 272 2.64 300 Michigan 3,570,150 569,252 1,966,366 3.91 5.47 5.34 331 3.22 365 Minnesota 1,857,734 228,124 1,051,887 3.87 6.06 6.85 189 1.84 209 Mississippi 891,143 142,924 363,642 3.90 6.52 7.73 87 0.84 96 Missouri 2,089,795 389,237 837,810 3.89 6.15 6.89 196 1.90 216 Montana 367,809 28,684 159,742 3.80 6.54 8.23 35 0.34 38 Nebraska 587,445 59,925 312,636 3.75 6.07 6.97 57 0.55 63 Nevada 754,376 187,500 425,421 3.81 5.18 5.98 77 0.75 85 New Hampshire 547,810 74,315 218,146 3.90 6.23 6.68 49 0.47 54 New Jersey 3,264,613 1,295,489 2,217,361 3.92 5.81 5.87 400 3.89 442 New Mexico 604,657 74,003 270,990 3.87 6.54 8.75 62 0.61 69 New York 5,873,721 1,179,479 3,778,469 3.92 6.19 7.30 694 6.75 766 North
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 134.2 267.0 KS Kentucky 456.1 6.17 449.9 76.2 373.7 180.6 55.4 129.9 365.9 7.839KY Louisiana 461.6 10.97 450.7 60.7 390.0 190.1 54.9 132.7 377.7 12.279LA Maine 180.7 2.72 178.0 29.5 148.6 58.4 24.7 65.5 148.6 ME Maryland 773.8 12.72 761.1 143.9 617.2 277.1 75.8 263.8 616.7 0.551MD Massachusetts 962.8 13.51 949.3 108.3 840.9 364.6 105.8 370.4 840.9 MA Michigan 1,278.1 3.75 1,274.3 373.4 901.0 417.1 109.6 373.4 900.1 0.828MI Minnesota 522.4 12.90 509.5 82.8 426.6 129.5 63.5 217.4 410.4 16.202MN Mississippi 247.1 4.73 242.4 15.0 227.4 110.4 44.0 66.0 220.5 6.883MS Missouri 879.1 4.13 875.0 247.8 627.2 260.8 75.2 290.9 626.9 0.306MO Montana 110.1 6.27 103.8 26.3 77.5 29.3 16.5 29.2 75.1 2.410MT Nebraska 213.5 2.73 210.8 50.5 160.3 50.6 32.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 3.11 24.59 54.9 NY NORTH CAROLINA 368.9 208.8 160.1 139.6 20.5 2.15 0.72 0.25 3.12 17.4 NC NORTH DAKOTA (1.7) 3.2 (4.9) (4.3) (0.6) (1.17) (0.65) (0.58) (2.40) 1.8 ND OHIO 447.8 203.0 244.9 209.2 35.7 1.11 0.89 0.57 2.58 33.1 OH OKLAHOMA 78.2 55.9 22.3 15.4 6.9 (0.18) (0.05) 0.02 (0.21) 7.1 OK OREGON 55.6 39.0 16.6 14.6 2.0 (3.75) (1.66) (0.90) (6.30) 8.3 OR PENNSYLVANIA 624.4 432.3 192.1 139.8 37.7 6.96 0.65 3.23 10.84 26.9 PA RHODE ISLAND 27.3 7.5 19.8 15.2 4.6 0.02 (0.15) 0.00 (0.13) 4.7 RI SOUTH CAROLINA 86.1 34.7 51.4 47.7 3.8 (0.25) (0.23) (0.06) (0.54) 4.3 SC SOUTH DAKOTA (0.3) 4.2 (4.5) (4.0) (0.5) (1.02) (0.73) (0.49) (2.24) 1.8 SD TENNESSEE 166.6 54.5 112.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • CHARGE MAY ALSO APPLY (SEE AT&T COMMUNICATIONS TARIFF F.C.C. NO.1, PAGE 41). 3-TIER SERVICE CHARGE PER CALL* CLASSES OF SERVICE AT&T LEC COMMERCIAL CARD CARD CREDIT CARD CUSTOMER DIALED CALLING CARD STATION: CUSTOMER DIALED/AUTOMATED $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 CUSTOMER DIALED AND OPERATOR ASSISTED 1.50 2.50 3.50 CUSTOMER DIALED AND OPERATOR MUST ASSIST 1.50 2.50 3.50 OPERATOR DIALED: CALLING CARD STATION 2.75 3.75 4.75 CALLING CARD PERSON-TO-PERSON 4.50 5.50 6.50 PER CALL OPERATOR STATION: ** U.S. MAINLAND CANADA ORIGINATED ORIGINATED COLLECT 2.25 2.25 BILLED TO THIRD PARTY 2.25 2.25 SENT PAID - COIN 2.25 N/A PERSON-TO-PERSON ** 4.50 4.50 SOURCE: AT&T COMMUNICATIONS TARIFF F.C.C. N0S. 1 AND 27 RES. RATES IN EFFECT MAY 4, 1997. BUS. RATES IN EFFECT NOVEMBER 5, 1997. NOTE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • & TELEGRAPH CO. 39.58% 60.42% 6.94 4.67 9.98% 9BELL ATLANTIC - NEW JERSEY, INC. 37.22% 62.78% 8.83 6.30 14.25% 10BELL ATLANTIC - NEW YORK TELEPHONE CO. 45.19% 54.81% 2.74 2.20 6.81% 11BELL ATLANTIC - PENNSYLVANIA INC. 41.56% 58.44% 5.95 4.02 9.93% 12BELL ATLANTIC - VIRGINIA, INC. 46.82% 53.18% 7.79 5.23 11.65% 13BELL ATLANTIC - WASHINGTON, D.C., INC. 32.38% 67.62% 5.57 3.75 8.07% 14BELL ATLANTIC - WEST VIRGINIA, INC. 41.37% 58.63% 8.09 5.46 12.38% 15BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 33.59% 66.41% 7.81 5.30 11.42% SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC. 16NEVADA BELL 27.58% 72.42% 3.75 2.83 9.14% 17PACIFIC BELL 45.82% 54.18% 1.76 1.64 5.81% 18SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO. 41.63% 58.37% 5.03 3.69 8.73% 19U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 38.98% 61.02% 4.61 3.23 7.20% 20CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE CO.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 2.10 3.85 1.50 2.75 1.10 2.10 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 0.60 1.10 1966 3.00 5.50 2.30 4.30 1.50 2.75 2.10 3.85 1.50 2.75 1.10 2.10 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 0.60 1.10 1967 7/ 2.65 4.90 1.95 3.70 1.50 2.75 2.10 3.85 1.40 2.65 1.10 2.10 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 0.60 1.10 1968 8/ 2.60 4.85 1.95 3.70 1.50 2.75 2.00 3.75 1.40 2.65 1.10 2.10 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 0.60 1.10 1969 2.60 4.85 1.95 3.70 1.50 2.75 2.00 3.75 1.40 2.65 1.10 2.10 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 0.60 1.10 1970 9/ 2.25 4.50 1.35 2.60 1.15 2.15 1.75 3.50 1.05 2.05 0.80 1.55 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 0.55 1.05 1971 10/ 2.25 4.50 1.35 2.60 1.15 2.15 1.75 3.50 1.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00312.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00312.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00312.txt
  • 75 hopping channels. Output power would be reduced in proportion to the increase in bandwidth over 1 MHz. For example, systems with 3 MHz bandwidths would operate with output power of no more than 320 mW and channel occupancy time no greater than 0.05 second per hop. Each of the 75 channels would be used at least once during a 3.75 second period. Like existing 1 MHz systems, the average time of occupancy on any channel would not be greater than 0.4 second within a 30 second period. Under the proposal, systems using 5 MHz bandwidths would operate with output power of no more than 200 mW and channel occupancy time of no greater than 0.02 second per hop. Each of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.txt
  • MHz of spectrum among the MSS proponents. Under this scenario, the following formula would express the amount of spectrum available for each MSS system, in each direction of transmission: 30 megahertz ( (Number of System Proponents) = Size of Each Spectrum Segment Thus, under this approach, the eight 2 GHz MSS system proponents would choose Selected Assignments of 7.5 megahertz (3.75 megahertz in each direction of transmission) each. Either of these approaches would make it possible to allocate the 2020-2025 MHz and 2165-2170 MHz frequency bands for other services, if supported in the record as being in the public interest. Under either approach, we would retain 56 to 60 megahertz of spectrum for MSS in the 1990-2020 and 2170-2200 MHz bands.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/fcc00302.doc
  • downlink, with the remaining spectrum available for assignment based on service to unserved areas. Several commenters supported our Flexible Band Arrangement in the Notice that would have provided for 2.5 megahertz of initial spectrum in both the uplink and downlink bands. Still others favored our traditional band arrangement as a viable second choice because it offered a minimum amount of 3.75 megahertz of spectrum. Thus, we believe that providing for 3.5 megahertz for each system is sufficient to commence operations. In addition, although we are hopeful that all proposed systems proceed toward authorization, it is possible that not all will do so before we first authorize a 2 GHz MSS system. In such case, the remaining system proponents would receive more
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/mdaa0406.html
  • the Commission no later than the close of business 30 days from the date of this notice. See 47 C.F.R. Section 21.30. __________________________________________________________________ MDS NEW STATION APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPMD-20000328AAB NUCENTRIX SPECTRUM RESOURCES, INC. 2A MCALESTER, OK Call Sign 20000328AAB Lat. 34 58 37 N. - Lon. 95 43 1 W. 3.75 MILES N. INTERSECTION HWY 69 & U.S. HWY 270, MCALESTER, OK Antenna C/L RCAMSL 395.00 meters File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPMD-20000328AAA NUCENTRIX SPECTRUM RESOURCES, INC. 1 MCALESTER, OK Call Sign 20000328AAA Non-Common Carrier Status. Lat. 34 58 37 N. - Lon. 95 43 1 W. 3.75 MILES N. INTERSECTION HWY 69 & U.S. HWY 270, MCALESTER,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp38chart.pdf
  • FIXED,MOBILE,BROADCASTING,NG128,NG159.WirelessCommunications(27),BroadcastRadio(TV)(73),AuxiliaryBroadcast(74),PrivateLandMobile(90).GUARDBANDMANAGER 777-792 15FIXED, MOBILE, BROADCASTING, NG128, NG159. Wireless Communications (27), Broadcast Radio (TV) (73), Auxiliary Broadcast (74), Private Land Mobile (90). FLEXIBLE 792-794 2 FIXED, MOBILE, BROADCASTING. Wireless Communications (27), Broadcast Radio (TV) (73), Auxiliary Broadcast (74), Private Land Mobile (90). GUARD BAND MANAGER 794-806 12FIXED, MOBILE, NG128, NG158, NG159. Auxiliary Broadcasting (74), Private Land Mobile (90). PUBLIC SAFETY 806-809.75 3.75FIXED, LAND MOBILE, NG30, NG31, NG43, NG63. Public Mobile (22), Private Land Mobile (90). SMR 809.75-816 6.25FIXED, LAND MOBILE, NG30, NG31, NG43, NG63. Public Mobile (22), Private Land Mobile (90). PLMRS AND SMR (INTERLEAVED) 816-821 5 FIXED, LAND MOBILE, NG30, NG31, NG43, NG63. Public Mobile (22), Private Land Mobile (90). SMR 821-824 3 LAND MOBILE, NG30, NG43, NG63. Private Land Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210104-1.pdf
  • RAM = I .`:i b"i Communications Port: Infrared Power Supply NiMt- rechargeable battery Recharge Time: 1 ITour (charger included) Battery Life: Keyboard: Keys Over 1 week ____ ~~ QWERTY layout with special functlprl keys Total of 47 keys plus the NavDisc ' ' : ! - ! select keys Dimensions: Volume: Weight (with battery): ___~ Graphics Display: Actual Message Area: 3.75 r( 2.85 x 1.2 inches (95 x 72 x 30 mm) 9.3 cubic inches (I 53 cc) 6.7 ounces (190 grams) 16 lines x 30 characters 240 x 160 pixels 4-level gray scale EL backlighting ___-- 9 lines x 27 characters Frequency Bands: 940 -941 MHz Channel Spacing: 50 kHz Bit Rate: 6400 ___- Signaling: d-level FSK ?requency Deviation: +/-
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00235.doc
  • have assigned frequencies (base and mobile) that are 15 kHz or less removed from proposed stations that will operate with a 25 kHz channel bandwidth; stations that have assigned frequencies (base and mobile) that are 7.5 kHz or less removed from proposed stations that will operate with a 12.5 kHz bandwidth; or stations that have assigned frequencies (base and mobile) 3.75 kHz or less removed from proposed stations that will operate with a 6.25 kHz bandwidth; and (ii) Where such stations' service areas (37 dBu contour for stations in the 150-174 MHz band and 39 dBu contour for stations in the 421-512 MHz bands; see § 90.205) overlap a circle with radius 113 km (70 mi.) from the proposed base station.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • 7.28 * (374) (239) (228) 2007 4.48 5.89 * 6.89 * (312) (270) (303) 2009 3.46 4.21 * 5.37 * (278) (290) (308) Table 9 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Market Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM All Markets Market Measure 2005 4.74 4.50 3.68 * (1416) (935) (1196) 2007 4.74 4.49 3.75 * (1064) (935) (1611) 2009 3.56 3.42 2.72 * (1004) (990) (1630) Contour Measure 2005 3.38 4.33 * 5.58 * (1484) (969) (1094) 2007 3.15 4.12 * 5.28 * (1248) (971) (1391) 2009 2.30 3.04 * 3.89 * (1184) (962) (1478) * - difference between the category mean and the mean of the No LPFM category is statistically different from
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • 4.48 5.89 * 6.89 * (312) (270) (303) 2009 3.46 4.21 * 5.37 * (278) (290) (308) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-2 85 Table 9 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Market Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM All Markets Market Measure 2005 4.74 4.50 3.68 * (1416) (935) (1196) 2007 4.74 4.49 3.75 * (1064) (935) (1611) 2009 3.56 3.42 2.72 * (1004) (990) (1630) Contour Measure 2005 3.38 4.33 * 5.58 * (1484) (969) (1094) 2007 3.15 4.12 * 5.28 * (1248) (971) (1391) 2009 2.30 3.04 * 3.89 * (1184) (962) (1478) * -difference between the category mean and the mean of the No LPFM categoryis statistically different from zero using
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/database/spectrum/spinvtbl.pdf
  • analog/digital V/D/Image; 2-way; BW based on need; analog/digital P-R; P- MP USA OmniDir 10.45 ­ 10.5 RADIOLOCATION US58 US108 G32 10.5 ­ 10.55 RADIOLOCATION US59 WTB pt 90 unmodulated carrier P-R P-MP plm: 2,645 10.5 ­ 10.55 RADIOLOCATION US59 303 10.55 ­ 10.6 FIXED Fixed Microwave WTB pt 101 V/D; 1 or 2- way; 400 kHz, 800 kHz, 1.25, 2.5, 3.75 , 5 MHz channels analog/digital S; PTP ils: 3,815 10.55 ­ 10.6 10.6 ­ 10.68 EARTH EXPLORATION- SATELLITE (passive) FIXED US265 SPACE RESEARCH (passive) US277 Fixed Microwave DEMS (Note: systems authorized or applied for prior to 15Jul93, grandfathered) WTB pt 101 V/D; 1 or 2- way; 400 kHz, 800 kHz, 1.25, 2.5, 3.75 , 5 MHz channels analog/ digital S;
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/theory090002.pdf
  • P Qm(1- i) (34) Whenthisexpressioniscombinedwith(32)weobtainamarking-clearingconditionwhichde- terminesPQ.Thisisthesecondequationinoursystem.Oncecombinedwith(33)theonly unknownsinthisexpressionarePQand A. Thefinalequationinoursystemistheequalitybetweentheaggregatebundleofadvertising andindividualadvertisinglevelsinthesymmetricequilibrium, A=Ai.Combiningthisequality with(30)weobtainanexpressionwhoseunknownsare i,PQand A.Giventhesethreeunknowns andthethreenon-linearrelationshipsoutlinedabove,weemploythefsolveroutineinMaple7.00 tosolveforthenumericalvalueofourunknowns.Ourfirstpassoccurswithanassumptionof twentyfirms. Theremainingendogenousvariablesarethencalculatedfromidentitiesandotherrelation- ships.Oncethevalueofalltheendogenousvariableshasbeencalculated,aloopisexecutedin whichthenumberoffirmsisincreasedincrementallybyone.Thefsolveroutineiscalledagain, theequilibriumiscalculated,andthelooprepeatsuntilthefirmnumberreachesthirty. 25 References Anderson,S.andS.Coate,"MarketProvisionofPublicGoods:TheCaseof Broadcasting,"2001.WorkingPaper,UniversityofVirginiaandCornellUniversity. Beebe,J.,"InstitutionalStructureandProgramChoiceinTelevisionMarkets,"Quarterly JournalofEconomics,1977,91(1),15­37. Berry,S.andJ.Waldfogel,"DoMergersIncreaseProductVariety:EvidencefromRadio Broadcasting,"QuarterlyJournalofEconomics,2001,116(3),1009­10025. Blanchard,O.andF.Giavazzi,"MacroeconomicEffectsofRegulationandDeregulationin GoodsandLaborMarkets,"February2001.WorkingPaperNo.8120,NationalBureauof EconomicResearch. d'Aspremont,C.,J.Gabszewicz,andJ.F.Thisse,"OnHotelling's`Stabilityin Competition',"Econometrica,1979,47(5),1145­1150. Gabszewicz,D.LausselJ.andN.Sonnac,"TV-BroadcastingCompetitionand Advertising,"2000.DiscussionPaper00/6,CORE,UniversiteCatholiquedeLouvain. Gal-Or,E.andA.Dukes,"MinimumDifferentiationinCommercialMediaMarkets,"2001. WorkingPaper,UniversityofPittsburgh. Hotelling,H.,"StabilityinCompetition,"EconomicJournal,1929,39(153),41­57. Nilssen,T.andL.Sorgard,"TVAdvertising,ProgrammingInvestmentsand Product-MarketOligopoly,"2000.WorkingPaper,UniversityofOslo. Rothenberg,R.,"ConsumerSovereigntyandtheEconomicsofTVProgramming,"Studiesin PublicCommunication,1962,4,45­54. Spence,M.andB.Owen,"TelevisionProgramming,MonopolisticCompetitionand 26 Welfare,"QuarterlyJournalofEconomics,1977,91(1),103­126. Steiner,P.,"ProgramPatternsandPreferencesandtheWorkabilityofCompetitioninRadio Broadcasting,"QuarterlyJournalofEconomics,1952,66(2),194­223. Tirole,J.,TheTheoryofIndustrialOrganization,Cambridge:MITPress,1988. 27 Table1:ParameterValues w 25 KB.75 Y 10,000 K 4.95 .75 µQ2 3.75 µB2 KQ.75 µ .025 Table2:NumericalWelfareResults (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) RelativetoBaseline m i B A N Q P PQ U 201.0500.417 0.7460.9350.6521.1681.0851.0720.897 211.0750.381 0.8360.9560.7761.1151.0411.0430.934 221.1000.359 0.9020.9720.8681.0711.0201.0250.961 231.1250.344 0.9550.9860.9401.0331.0081.0110.982 241.1500.333 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000 251.1750.325 1.0391.0141.0520.9700.9950.9901.016 261.2000.319 1.0741.0271.0970.9440.9900.9821.030 271.2250.314 1.1051.0401.1380.9190.9870.9741.043 281.2500.310 1.1341.0531.1740.8960.9850.9671.055 291.2750.306 1.1611.0661.2080.8740.9830.9611.067 301.3000.303 1.1861.0781.2390.8540.9810.9541.078 28 Figure1:Results B, i P,Ai P,Ai -1 -1 ·StrongSwitchingOff ·CrowdingOut ·Weak Switc hing