FCC Web Documents citing 3.43

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2925A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2925A2.txt
  • Measurement No. 5 Mean time to clear network/average duration of trouble (Measured in hours) DS0 DS1 Texas Period BOC & Affiliates Non-Affiliates Variance Period BOC & Affiliates Non-AffiliatesVariance July 2000 2.96 4.36 (1.40) July 2000 2.28 4.24 (1.96) August 2000 2.17 4.18 (2.01) August 2000 2.49 3.03 (0.54) September 2000 2.70 3.80 (1.10) September 2000 2.16 2.92 (0.76) October 2000 3.43 3.38 0.05 October 2000 2.52 3.40 (0.88) November 2000 4.95 3.94 1.01 November 2000 2.52 3.14 (0.62) December 2000 3.03 4.74 (1.71) December 2000 2.88 3.87 (0.99) January 2001 2.33 4.15 (1.82) January 2001 2.54 3.56 (1.02) February 2001 3.25 3.74 (0.49) February 2001 2.42 3.13 (0.71) March 2001 3.42 3.36 0.06 March 2001 2.44 3.01 (0.57) Oklahoma March 2001
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-181A1.txt
  • Line Sharing and Splitting OSS for Line Sharing $ 0.89 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-181 APPENDIX A ­ RATES 20 VERIZON VIRGINIA UNBUNDLED NETWORK ELEMENTS VERIZON VIRGINIA RECURRING RATES Unbundled Line Ports POTS/PBX/CTX $ 2.83 ISDN BRI or Ctx Port $ 5.99 ISDN PRI Port $ 118.71 Unbundled Public Access Line Port (UPALP) $ 2.83 Unbundled Coin Port (UCP) $ 3.43 SMDI II (Simplified Message Desk Interface) Port $ 236.35 Switched DS1 Port (DS1 Port with Line Treatment) $ 42.37 Automatic Identified Outward Dialing (AIOD) $ 2.37 Direct Inward Dialing and Outward (DID/DOD) $ 5.22 IDLC Port per Interface Group (TR008/GR303) $ 243.76 Unbundled Dedicated Trunk Ports Dedicated Trunk Port - End Office Included in line port Dedicated Trunk Port -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1227A1.txt
  • because it could provide a substantial increase in area and population served by Station KWJK-FM. We note that the Petitioner is proposing to change its transmitter site. A staff engineering analysis reveals that there would be a gain of service to a population of 35,465 persons within an area of 2,287 square kilometers. There would be a loss area of 3.43 square kilometers; however, the loss area is unpopulated. Channel 272A can also be substituted for vacant but applied for Channel 226A at Wheatland, Missouri, at the reference site proposed by the Petitioner, which is located 5.4 kilometers northwest of Wheatland. This proposed site is fully spaced and meets the Commission's technical requirements. We note, however, that if WRL's proposed transmitter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • for three values of X. B-5 Table B-2. Deviation in Threshold U from Straight-Line Projection as D Approaches DMIN Deviation in Threshold U from Straight-Line Projection (dB) Interference Mechanism D/DMIN1 = 16 dBm D/DMIN = 3 dB D/DMIN = 1 dB D/DMIN = 0 dB Linear (M = 1) -0.11 -3.02 -6.87 Infinite Second order (M = 2) -0.06 -1.51 -3.43 Infinite Third order (including third-order intermodulation of a pair of equal- power interferers) (M = 3) -0.04 -1.01 -2.29 Infinite Cross modulation (M = 2, L = 1) -0.06 -1.51 -3.43 Infinite Note: 1 For the nominal DMIN value of -84 dBm, D/DMIN = 16 dB when D = -68 dBm Effect of AGC The above relationships are expected to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.txt
  • 0.7119 -1.47 Percentage of Market Population Black or African American -0.0043 0.8970 0.9957 0.0159 0.4760 1.0160 -0.16 Percentage of Market Population Hispanic or Latino 0.0331 0.3390 1.0336 0.0143 0.3680 1.0144 0.15 Percentage of Market Population Aged 18 to 24 0.0617 0.7750 1.0636 0.1120 0.3760 1.1185 -0.37 Percentage of Market Population Aged 25 to 34 -0.5231 0.6820 0.5927 -0.0935 0.7660 0.9107 -3.43 Percentage of Market Population Aged 35 to 44 0.1793 0.6820 1.1964 0.2477 0.3740 1.2811 -0.48 Percentage of Market Population Aged 45 to 64 0.1546 0.6400 1.1671 -0.0147 0.8980 0.9854 1.34 Percentage of Market Population Aged 65 or over -0.2910 0.6360 0.7475 -0.0081 0.9490 0.9920 -2.24 Percentage of College Graduates in Market Population -0.0670 0.3500 0.9352 -0.0318 0.4950 0.9687 -0.29 Noncommercial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • 26.00 16.85 13.00 8.57 -39.11 - FM Only Format 101 Count 10.35 15.50 11.24 8.64 7.03 4.29 -11.21 - Format 101 HHI 0.14 0.09 0.12 0.14 0.18 0.30 0.21 + Format 20 Count 7.44 9.97 7.87 6.66 5.80 3.86 -6.11 - Format 20 HHI 0.19 0.15 0.17 0.19 0.22 0.34 0.19 + Format 11 Count 6.47 8.24 6.84 5.93 5.20 3.43 -4.81 - Format 11 HHI 0.21 0.17 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.36 0.19 + Number of Stations 14.36 23.47 15.80 11.20 8.77 5.57 -17.90 - Source: Ownership Database (from FCC), Edison Airplay Database Effect of Consolidation? [6] = [5]-[1] Table 11: Market Level Regressions Estimating the Effect of Ownership Structure on Format Commercial, In-Market, Edison Surveyed Stations HHI Stations Percent of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-402A1.txt
  • Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Nov. 2004 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb. 2005 13 0.09 0.10 9.24 11.65 Nov. 2005 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb. 2006 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TABLE 2 - WTLV VIEWING IN GAINESVILLE Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Nov. 2004 12 3.43 3.55 5.53 6.49 Feb. 2005 13 1.22 0.99 13.60 12.49 Nov. 2005 18 0.17 0.16 2.12 2.28 Feb. 2006 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TABLE 3 - WJXT VIEWING IN GAINESVILLE Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Nov. 2004 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb. 2005 13 0.92 0.76 13.60 12.49 Nov.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour Measure 2005 2.31 2.80 3.03 (45) (30) (24) 2007 2.05 2.76 2.71 (45) (38) (46) 2009 1.50 1.81 2.07 * (56) (48) (63) Miscellaneous Format Market Measure 2005 3.03 2.51 1.34 (8) (5) (6) 2007 4.54 6.17 4.32 (35) (25) (41) 2009 3.94 4.27 3.43 (51) (44) (79) Contour Measure 2005 1.52 1.77 4.43 (8) (6) (5) 2007 3.46 5.44 * 5.64 * (34) (27) (40) 2009 2.68 3.33 4.75 * (47) (49) (78) * - difference between the category mean and the mean of the No LPFM category is statistically different from zero using a two-sided unpaired t-test at the 95 percent level of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.txt
  • 8,561 2,133 0.30 1.43 1.11 1.33 3 14 24 26 28Israel 1,141 5,093 180 6,414 582 0.22 0.82 1.28 1.77 7 15 19 20 20Singapore 867 4,748 152 5,767 2,604 0.18 0.43 0.40 0.56 6 16 29 n.a. n.a.Chile 1,081 4,585 38 5,704 1,308 0.23 0.82 1.09 1.96 7 17 13 12 14Philippines 3,143 1,847 2 4,992 2,574 1.70 2.17 3.43 5.05 6 18 16 16 16Venezuela 1,913 2,412 0 4,325 1,700 0.79 1.31 1.49 2.14 1 19 n.a. n.a. n.a.Denmark 1,267 234 2,520 4,021 542 0.46 2.89 5.82 7.00 6 20 23 29 29Argentina 779 3,150 30 3,959 1,128 0.24 0.46 0.76 1.34 6 21 28 27 23Colombia 1,391 2,273 24 3,688 1,313 0.61 1.26 1.54 3.11 7 22 15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213377A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213377A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213377A2.txt
  • in the total amount of support available from the high-cost loop support fund to the previous year's support amount, increased by an index factor that is equal to the rate of growth in the total number of working loops nationwide for the calendar year preceding the annual data filing. For example, in 1998, the total number of working loops grew 3.43 percent. Thus, the amount of high-cost loop support available in 2000 was the 1999 support amount ($864.2 million) increased by 3.43 percent, which equals $893.8 million. The Commission originally adopted the indexed cap on the high-cost loop fund in order to limit fund growth and moderate annual fluctuations in the size of the fund pending the Commission's consideration of permanent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243550A1.txt
  • Line Sharing and Splitting OSS for Line Sharing $ 0.89 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-281 APPENDIX A ­ RATES 5 VERIZON VIRGINIA UNBUNDLED NETWORK ELEMENTS VERIZON VIRGINIA RECURRING RATES Unbundled Line Ports POTS/PBX/CTX $ 2.83 ISDN BRI or Ctx Port $ 5.99 ISDN PRI Port $ 118.71 Unbundled Public Access Line Port (UPALP) $ 2.83 Unbundled Coin Port (UCP) $ 3.43 SMDI II (Simplified Message Desk Interface) Port $ 236.35 Switched DS1 Port (DS1 Port with Line Treatment) $ 42.37 Automatic Identified Outward Dialing (AIOD) $ 2.37 Direct Inward Dialing and Outward (DID/DOD) $ 5.22 IDLC Port per Interface Group (TR008/GR303) $ 243.76 Unbundled Dedicated Trunk Ports Dedicated Trunk Port - End Office Included in line port Dedicated Trunk Port -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 0 0.00 0.96 0.24 32 42 Rhode Island 841,707 0.40 0.04 0.31 41 53 South Carolina 2,253,187 1.06 1.19 1.10 146 189 South Dakota 265,444 0.13 0.39 0.19 25 33 Tennessee 2,787,140 1.32 0.67 1.16 154 200 Texas 14,789,447 6.99 10.26 7.81 1,038 1,348 Utah 726,725 0.34 0.46 0.37 50 64 Vermont 466,518 0.22 0.11 0.19 26 33 Virginia 7,264,272 3.43 3.06 3.34 444 577 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 3,755,291 1.77 3.09 2.10 280 363 West Virginia 1,239,779 0.59 0.51 0.57 76 98 Wisconsin 2,722,330 1.29 1.16 1.25 167 217 Wyoming 244,755 0.12 0.14 0.12 16 21 Total 3/ 211,638,064 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% $13,348 $17,331 NA - Not Applicable. Note: LEC is an abbreviation for local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • 0 0.00 0.96 0.24 32 42 Rhode Island 841,707 0.40 0.04 0.31 41 53 South Carolina 2,253,187 1.06 1.19 1.10 146 189 South Dakota 265,444 0.13 0.39 0.19 25 33 Tennessee 2,787,140 1.32 0.67 1.16 154 200 Texas 14,789,447 6.99 10.26 7.81 1,038 1,348 Utah 726,725 0.34 0.46 0.37 50 64 Vermont 466,518 0.22 0.11 0.19 26 33 Virginia 7,264,272 3.43 3.06 3.34 444 577 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 3,755,291 1.77 3.09 2.10 280 363 West Virginia 1,239,779 0.59 0.51 0.57 76 98 Wisconsin 2,722,330 1.29 1.16 1.25 167 217 Wyoming 244,755 0.12 0.14 0.12 16 21 Total 3/ 211,638,064 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% $13,348 $17,331 NA - Not Applicable. Note: LEC is an abbreviation for local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 9.75 8.24 13.50 12.75 Nebraska 6.51 8.25 7.01 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.51 10.00 8.75 6.51 13.50 12.22 Nevada 5.25 8.25 6.53 0.00 3.50 2.91 0.00 1.75 1.45 5.25 10.00 7.98 5.25 13.50 10.89 New Hampshire 8.20 8.25 8.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.20 8.25 8.20 8.20 8.25 8.20 New Jersey 7.38 8.06 8.05 0.00 3.46 3.43 0.00 1.73 1.71 7.38 9.79 9.77 7.38 13.25 13.20 New Mexico 7.91 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 3.29 0.00 1.75 1.65 7.91 10.00 9.89 7.91 13.50 13.18 New York 6.17 8.25 8.09 0.00 3.50 3.30 0.00 1.75 1.65 6.17 10.00 9.73 6.17 13.50 13.03 North Carolina 7.83 8.25 8.08 3.50 3.50 3.49 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.58 10.00 9.83 13.08 13.50 13.32
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-MISSISSIPPI -0.90 -2.52 1.66 -18.84 287449 A MYRTLE TEL. CO., INC. 12.83 -1.02 13.99 79.83 MISSOURI Total -1.32 -3.72 2.49 -2.92 420463 C BPS TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.27 -1.00 1.28 -9.38 420472 C CASS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY -8.84 0.79 -9.56 -18.44 421151 C SPECTRA COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC -2.39 -1.12 -1.29 -22.19 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 1.38 -3.43 4.99 3.03 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 9.50 0.22 9.27 26.90 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO -4.84 1.73 -6.46 -11.22 421860 A ALMA COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY DBA ALMA TELCO. 5.59 -1.06 6.71 12.32 421864 C CHARITON VALLEY TELEPHONE CO. 6.57 -0.79 7.43 8.38 421865 C CITIZENS TELEPHONE CO - MISSOURI 3.16 -3.17 6.54 5.97 421866 C OZARK
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
  • Montana 1987 3.00 79.6% 86.3% 88.1% 6.7% * 1.8% 90.3% 94.1% 93.7% 3.8% * -0.4% Nebraska 1998 3.48 90.7% 92.8% 88.9% 2.2% -4.0% 96.6% 97.0% 95.1% 0.4% -1.9% Nevada 1988 2.91 78.4% 90.8% 86.6% 12.3% * -4.2% 93.0% 93.8% 93.3% 0.8% -0.5% New Hampshire 1998 0.00 82.2% 93.6% 92.0% 11.4% * -1.6% 94.8% 97.1% 95.4% 2.4% -1.7% New Jersey 1998 3.43 83.2% 88.6% 93.2% 5.4% 4.5% 93.6% 96.1% 95.8% 2.5% * -0.3% New Mexico 1987 3.29 61.8% 69.6% 84.7% 7.8% * 15.1%* 82.1% 86.0% 91.7% 3.9% * 5.7%* New York 1985 3.30 84.6% 87.5% 89.0% 6.0% * 1.5% 91.4% 94.5% 94.8% 3.1% * 0.3% North Carolina 1986 3.50 73.5% 83.6% 87.6% 10.1% * 3.9% 89.0% 93.5% 93.7% 4.5% * 0.2% North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 9.70 8.23 13.50 12.64 Nebraska 6.17 8.25 7.05 0.00 3.50 3.44 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.17 10.00 8.77 6.17 13.50 12.21 Nevada 5.55 8.25 6.15 0.00 3.50 2.95 0.00 1.75 1.47 5.55 10.00 7.63 5.55 13.50 10.57 New Hampshire 8.13 8.25 8.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.13 8.25 8.14 8.13 8.25 8.14 New Jersey 7.02 8.25 8.00 0.00 3.46 3.43 0.00 1.73 1.72 7.02 9.98 9.72 7.02 13.44 13.15 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.32 0.00 1.75 1.66 8.25 10.00 9.91 8.25 13.50 13.22 New York 6.17 8.25 8.02 0.00 3.50 3.22 0.00 1.75 1.61 6.17 10.00 9.63 6.17 13.50 12.86 North Carolina 7.41 8.25 7.92 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.75 7.41 10.00 9.67 7.41 13.50 13.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 9.70 8.23 13.50 12.64 Nebraska 6.17 8.25 7.05 0.00 3.50 3.44 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.17 10.00 8.77 6.17 13.50 12.21 Nevada 5.55 8.25 6.15 0.00 3.50 2.95 0.00 1.75 1.47 5.55 10.00 7.63 5.55 13.50 10.57 New Hampshire 8.13 8.25 8.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.13 8.25 8.14 8.13 8.25 8.14 New Jersey 7.02 8.25 8.00 0.00 3.46 3.43 0.00 1.73 1.72 7.02 9.98 9.72 7.02 13.44 13.15 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.32 0.00 1.75 1.66 8.25 10.00 9.91 8.25 13.50 13.22 New York 6.17 8.25 8.02 0.00 3.50 3.22 0.00 1.75 1.61 6.17 10.00 9.63 6.17 13.50 12.86 North Carolina 7.41 8.25 7.92 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.75 7.41 10.00 9.67 7.41 13.50 13.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • -7.90 -0.25 0.00 401691 C ALLTEL ARKANSAS, INC. -2.57 -2.06 -0.52 -45.80 401692 C ARKANSAS TELEPHONE COMPANY -9.42 -0.71 -8.76 0.00 401697 C CENTRAL ARKANSAS TEL. COOP INC. -4.48 -1.71 -2.82 -11.14 401698 C CLEVELAND CTY TEL. CO. -0.31 -1.46 1.17 -7.36 401699 C DECATUR TELEPHONE CO INC- ARKANSAS -0.65 -3.72 3.19 -18.00 401702 C SOUTH ARKANSAS TEL. CO.,INC. 17.55 -3.43 21.73 37.38 401704 C LAVACA TELEPHONE-AR 5.60 -6.38 12.80 259.91 401705 C CENTURYTEL OF ARKANSAS, INC. 0.82 -2.55 3.46 0.16 401709 C MADISON COUNTY TEL. CO. INC. 9.27 1.46 7.70 22.98 401710 A MAGAZINE TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.16 -1.47 7.74 18.97 401711 C CENTURYTEL OF MOUNTAIN HOME, INC. -1.42 -0.92 -0.51 -9.16 401712 A MOUNTAIN VIEW TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.20 -0.69 6.93
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 16.79 8,312,830 16.76 Vermont 99,103 1,688,371 17.04 1,203,640 12.15 484,731 4.89 Virgin Islands 17,716 6,564,337 370.53 3,440,558 194.21 3,123,779 176.33 Virginia 1,192,092 26,883,955 22.55 22,469,704 18.85 4,414,251 3.70 Washington 1,021,349 19,991,183 19.57 13,380,126 13.10 6,611,057 6.47 West Virginia 281,215 8,946,648 31.81 6,359,909 22.62 2,586,739 9.20 Wisconsin 880,031 24,649,890 28.01 15,568,198 17.69 9,081,692 10.32 Wyoming 87,462 899,733 10.29 599,605 6.86 300,128 3.43 Totals 49,202,066 $2,284,109,333 $46.42 $1,359,437,063 $27.63 $924,672,270 $18.79 Source: Raw funding data provided by the Universal Service Administrative Company, rollups performed by Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, FCC. Activity through June 30, 2006. Because of the appeals process, funding commitments and disbursements can be made after the end of the program year. Also, disbursements may continue beyond
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 9.70 8.23 13.50 12.64 Nebraska 6.17 8.25 7.05 0.00 3.50 3.44 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.17 10.00 8.77 6.17 13.50 12.21 Nevada 5.55 8.25 6.15 0.00 3.50 2.95 0.00 1.75 1.47 5.55 10.00 7.63 5.55 13.50 10.57 New Hampshire 8.13 8.25 8.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.13 8.25 8.14 8.13 8.25 8.14 New Jersey 7.02 8.25 8.00 0.00 3.46 3.43 0.00 1.73 1.72 7.02 9.98 9.72 7.02 13.44 13.15 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.32 0.00 1.75 1.66 8.25 10.00 9.91 8.25 13.50 13.22 New York 6.17 8.25 8.02 0.00 3.50 3.22 0.00 1.75 1.61 6.17 10.00 9.63 6.17 13.50 12.86 North Carolina 7.41 8.25 7.92 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.75 7.41 10.00 9.67 7.41 13.50 13.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 2.40 3.99 2.80 303 402 Minnesota 2,188,192 1.13 1.29 1.17 126 168 Mississippi 2,578,272 1.33 0.43 1.10 119 158 Missouri 3,649,298 1.88 3.66 2.32 251 334 Montana 481,922 0.25 0.54 0.32 35 46 Nebraska 786,440 0.40 1.08 0.57 62 82 Nevada 515,030 0.26 0.30 0.27 30 39 New Hampshire 1,326,187 0.68 0.31 0.59 64 85 New Jersey 7,207,430 3.71 2.60 3.43 371 493 New Mexico 706,858 0.36 0.86 0.49 53 70 New York 18,437,373 9.49 5.30 8.44 913 1,212 North Carolina 4,906,158 2.52 2.54 2.53 274 363 North Dakota 326,175 0.17 0.32 0.21 22 30 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 7,232,699 3.72 4.33 3.87 419 557 Oklahoma 1,549,332 0.80 0.67 0.76 83 110 Oregon 1,609,160 0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 925,317 549,716 359,513 38.85 13.81 Embarq - United Telephone of Missouri MO 146,002 114,072 40,548 27.77 32.12 Qwest - Montana MT 187,825 140,681 51,188 27.25 15.59 Windstream - Nebraska NE 68,311 49,044 20,407 29.87 67.11 Qwest - Nebraska NE 205,160 142,571 73,433 35.79 26.49 Embarq - Central Telephone - Nevada NV 534,747 433,324 104,810 19.60 (3.43) Verizon - Contel Nevada NV 34,803 23,350 12,676 36.42 6.68 AT&T - Pacific Telesis - Nevada Bell NV 189,788 141,649 60,619 31.94 (0.14) 11 - 13 Table 11.6 Average Net Investment ($000) - 2006 Study Area State Code Subject to Separations Interstate Intrastate Percent Interstate Percent Rate of Return Verizon New England - New Hampshire NH $586,349 $386,876 $195,201 33.29
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • 2.40 3.99 2.80 303 402 Minnesota 2,188,192 1.13 1.29 1.17 126 168 Mississippi 2,578,272 1.33 0.43 1.10 119 158 Missouri 3,649,298 1.88 3.66 2.32 251 334 Montana 481,922 0.25 0.54 0.32 35 46 Nebraska 786,440 0.40 1.08 0.57 62 82 Nevada 515,030 0.26 0.30 0.27 30 39 New Hampshire 1,326,187 0.68 0.31 0.59 64 85 New Jersey 7,207,430 3.71 2.60 3.43 371 493 New Mexico 706,858 0.36 0.86 0.49 53 70 New York 18,437,373 9.49 5.30 8.44 913 1,212 North Carolina 4,906,158 2.52 2.54 2.53 274 363 North Dakota 326,175 0.17 0.32 0.21 22 30 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 7,232,699 3.72 4.33 3.87 419 557 Oklahoma 1,549,332 0.80 0.67 0.76 83 110 Oregon 1,609,160 0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 6.63 10.00 8.04 6.63 13.50 9.90 Mississippi 6.50 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.29 0.00 1.75 1.64 6.50 10.00 9.89 6.50 13.50 13.18 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.41 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 6.50 10.00 9.16 6.50 13.50 12.65 Montana 8.24 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.94 0.00 1.75 1.47 8.24 10.00 9.71 8.24 13.50 12.65 Nebraska 6.10 8.25 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.43 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.10 10.00 8.79 6.10 13.50 12.22 Nevada 5.54 8.25 6.17 0.00 3.50 1.95 0.00 1.75 0.97 5.54 10.00 7.14 5.54 13.50 9.09 New Hampshire 8.15 8.25 8.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.15 8.25 8.16 8.15 8.25 8.16 New Jersey 7.08 8.25 8.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.08 8.25 8.02 7.08 8.25 8.02 New
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.24 0.11 14.12 25.85 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.22 -0.30 2.53 1.80 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -5.34 -2.19 -3.22 -92.38 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -2.36 -0.42 -1.95 -8.34 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -1.36 -1.06 -0.31 -4.54 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08 3.66 5.80 461835 C SUNFLOWER TELEPHONE CO.,INC. -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 9.89 13.39 13.39 13.39 South Carolina 7.38 8.25 8.23 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.13 10.00 9.98 12.63 13.50 13.48 South Dakota 8.08 8.25 8.17 0.00 3.50 0.25 0.00 1.75 0.12 8.08 10.00 8.30 8.08 13.50 8.54 Tennessee 6.84 8.25 8.15 0.00 3.50 3.18 0.00 1.75 1.59 6.84 10.00 9.74 6.84 13.50 12.91 Texas 5.09 8.25 7.19 0.00 3.50 3.43 0.00 1.75 1.71 5.09 10.00 8.91 5.09 13.50 12.34 Utah 8.09 8.25 8.12 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 8.09 10.00 9.87 8.09 13.50 13.36 Vermont 8.14 8.25 8.17 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 8.14 10.00 9.92 8.14 13.50 13.41 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Virginia 6.68
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 9.89 13.39 13.39 13.39 South Carolina 7.38 8.25 8.23 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.13 10.00 9.98 12.63 13.50 13.48 South Dakota 8.08 8.25 8.17 0.00 3.50 0.25 0.00 1.75 0.12 8.08 10.00 8.30 8.08 13.50 8.54 Tennessee 6.84 8.25 8.15 0.00 3.50 3.18 0.00 1.75 1.59 6.84 10.00 9.74 6.84 13.50 12.91 Texas 5.09 8.25 7.19 0.00 3.50 3.43 0.00 1.75 1.71 5.09 10.00 8.91 5.09 13.50 12.34 Utah 8.09 8.25 8.12 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 8.09 10.00 9.87 8.09 13.50 13.36 Vermont 8.14 8.25 8.17 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 8.14 10.00 9.92 8.14 13.50 13.41 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Virginia 6.68
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A4.pdf
  • 9.89 13.39 13.39 13.39 South Carolina 7.38 8.25 8.23 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.13 10.00 9.98 12.63 13.50 13.48 South Dakota 8.08 8.25 8.17 0.00 3.50 0.25 0.00 1.75 0.12 8.08 10.00 8.30 8.08 13.50 8.54 Tennessee 6.84 8.25 8.15 0.00 3.50 3.18 0.00 1.75 1.59 6.84 10.00 9.74 6.84 13.50 12.91 Texas 5.09 8.25 7.19 0.00 3.50 3.43 0.00 1.75 1.71 5.09 10.00 8.91 5.09 13.50 12.34 Utah 8.09 8.25 8.12 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 8.09 10.00 9.87 8.09 13.50 13.36 Vermont 8.14 8.25 8.17 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 8.14 10.00 9.92 8.14 13.50 13.41 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Virginia 6.68
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • -7.57 1.87 -9.27 -23.53 613020 C ACS - NORTHLAND SITKA -4.25 -0.81 -3.46 -31.58 613022 C ACS - ALASKA GREATLAND -28.32 12.21 -36.12 0.00 613023 C UNITED UTILITIES INC. 2.50 1.08 1.41 -1.57 613023A C UNITED UTILITIES INC. -1.46 -1.63 0.18 -100.00 613025 C YUKON TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -9.01 -1.98 -7.17 -25.60 613026 A NORTH COUNTRY TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.49 7.78 3.43 12.11 613028 C SUMMIT TEL & TEL CO OF ALASKA 10.33 7.48 2.64 10.26 TOTAL AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 673900 C AMERICAN SAMOA TELECOMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 TOTAL ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 450815 C HOPI TELECOMMUNICATIONS INCORPORATED (452175 CENTURYTEL) 2.32 -7.41 10.51 17.94 452169 C SAN CARLOS APACHE TELECOMM. UTILITY, INC. -2.86 0.52 -3.37 -6.77
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293258A1.txt
  • unneeded blocks to be made available to other carriers. Telephone Numbers Returned - As required by the Commission's Numbering Resource Optimization Orders, carriers are returning large quantities of telephone numbers that they do not need to the NANPA so that those numbers can be assigned to other carriers with more immediate needs. In the fourth quarter of 2008, carriers returned 3.43 million telephone numbers to the NANPA. In the first quarter of 2009, carriers returned 1.89 million telephone numbers to the NANPA. Most Utilized Area Codes in the United States -New York's area code 646 (which is coincident with New York City's area code 212) is the most utilized, with 79.2% of numbers assigned to customers. Arizona's area code 480 is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293258A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293258A2.txt
  • 17 FCC Rcd 252 (2001) (Third NRO Order); Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket Nos. 99-200, 96-98, 95-116, Fourth Report and Order in CC Docket No. 99-200 and CC Docket No. 95-116, and Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket No. 99-200, 18 FCC Rcd 12472 (2003) (Fourth NRO Order). 3 In the fourth quarter of 2008, carriers returned 3.43 million telephone numbers to the NANPA. In the first quarter of 2009, carriers returned 1.89 million telephone numbers to the NANPA. Background The United States uses ten-digit telephone numbers, which are organized in accordance with the North American Numbering Plan (NANP).3 The NANP divides the country into separate geographic areas called numbering plan areas (NPAs), more commonly called area codes.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 452179 C GILA RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 17.46 -0.19 17.68 23.98 452191 C ACCIPITER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 68.72 33.83 26.07 70.60 452200 C FORT MOJAVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 6.39 -1.07 7.53 7.75 452226 C MIDVALE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, INC.-ARIZONA 31.51 6.11 23.94 40.37 452302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. - AZ -11.18 -8.88 -2.53 -54.80 453334 C TABLE TOP TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.06 -4.18 3.26 -3.43 Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* 3 - 155 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2006 to 2007 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 452179 C GILA RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 17.46 -0.19 17.68 23.98 452191 C ACCIPITER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 68.72 33.83 26.07 70.60 452200 C FORT MOJAVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 6.39 -1.07 7.53 7.75 452226 C MIDVALE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, INC.-ARIZONA 31.51 6.11 23.94 40.37 452302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. - AZ -11.18 -8.88 -2.53 -54.80 453334 C TABLE TOP TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.06 -4.18 3.26 -3.43 Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* 3 - 155 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2006 to 2007 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • MN 6.31 -12.50 21.50 59.35 361499 A CROSSLAKE TEL CO -6.38 -6.31 -0.07 0.00 361500 A NORTHERN TEL CO - MN 27.85 0.00 27.85 82.48 361501 C WEST CENTRAL TEL 14.01 -3.82 18.54 21.17 361502 A WESTERN TEL CO -10.15 -15.28 6.05 -42.70 361505 A WIKSTROM TEL CO, INC 16.08 -3.18 19.89 64.66 361507 A WINSTED TEL CO -1.49 -4.75 3.43 -100.00 361508 A WINTHROP TEL CO 0.99 -3.87 5.05 -43.12 361510 C WOODSTOCK TEL CO 9.97 -1.06 11.14 12.86 361512 A WOLVERTON TEL CO 22.96 -1.18 24.43 76.85 361515 A ZUMBROTA TEL CO -4.27 -4.90 0.66 0.00 361654 A INTERSTATE TELECOMM. 10.16 -3.31 13.94 42.35 365142 C QWEST CORP-MN -6.46 -11.87 6.14 0.00 367123 C CITIZENS-FRONTIER-MN 24.99 -2.25 27.87 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • MN 6.31 -12.50 21.50 59.35 361499 A CROSSLAKE TEL CO -6.38 -6.31 -0.07 0.00 361500 A NORTHERN TEL CO - MN 27.85 0.00 27.85 82.48 361501 C WEST CENTRAL TEL 14.01 -3.82 18.54 21.17 361502 A WESTERN TEL CO -10.15 -15.28 6.05 -42.70 361505 A WIKSTROM TEL CO, INC 16.08 -3.18 19.89 64.66 361507 A WINSTED TEL CO -1.49 -4.75 3.43 -100.00 361508 A WINTHROP TEL CO 0.99 -3.87 5.05 -43.12 361510 C WOODSTOCK TEL CO 9.97 -1.06 11.14 12.86 361512 A WOLVERTON TEL CO 22.96 -1.18 24.43 76.85 361515 A ZUMBROTA TEL CO -4.27 -4.90 0.66 0.00 361654 A INTERSTATE TELECOMM. 10.16 -3.31 13.94 42.35 365142 C QWEST CORP-MN -6.46 -11.87 6.14 0.00 367123 C CITIZENS-FRONTIER-MN 24.99 -2.25 27.87 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • Samoa 8.25 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 8.25 0.04 0.02 8.27 8.31 Arizona 8.01 1.22 0.61 8.62 9.84 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 8.14 2.42 1.21 9.34 11.76 Arkansas 7.42 2.34 1.17 8.59 10.93 7.09 3.49 1.74 8.84 12.33 7.16 3.24 1.62 8.78 12.03 California 6.60 3.42 1.71 8.31 11.74 8.03 3.50 1.75 9.78 13.28 6.61 3.43 1.71 8.32 11.75 Colorado 8.21 3.49 1.75 9.96 13.46 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 8.21 3.49 1.75 9.96 13.46 Connecticut 7.48 1.18 0.59 8.07 9.25 7.48 3.50 1.75 9.23 12.73 7.48 2.55 1.28 8.76 11.31 Delaware 8.13 0.00 0.00 8.13 8.13 8.13 3.50 1.75 9.88 13.38 8.13 3.23 1.61 9.74 12.97 District of Columbia 5.59 3.50 1.75 7.34 10.84 5.59
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-157A1.txt
  • in the total amount of support available from the high-cost loop support fund to the previous year's support amount, increased by an index factor that is equal to the rate of growth in the total number of working loops nationwide for the calendar year preceding the annual data filing. For example, in 1998, the total number of working loops grew 3.43 percent. Thus, the amount of high-cost loop support available in 2000 was the 1999 support amount ($864.2 million) increased by 3.43 percent, which equals $893.8 million. The Commission originally adopted the indexed cap on the high-cost loop fund in order to limit fund growth and moderate annual fluctuations in the size of the fund pending the Commission's consideration of permanent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • 1.21 D.1.3.4.1 DSAP/Region (seconds) 2.71 0.53 2.71 0.52 2.68 2.87 2.61 2.84 2.56 5.27 D.1.3.4.2 DSAP/Region (seconds) 2.57 0.53 2.57 0.52 2.58 2.87 2.55 2.84 2.53 5.27 D.1.3.5.1 CRSECSRL/Region (seconds) 3.21 2.12 3.24 1.14 3.20 2.01 3.07 1.76 3.01 1.13 D.1.3.5.2 CRSECSRL/Region (seconds) 2.87 2.12 2.95 1.14 2.94 2.01 2.85 1.76 2.60 1.13 D.1.3.6.1 COFFI/Region (seconds) 4.60 0.63 4.35 0.64 3.43 2.97 3.15 3.38 3.12 4.24 D.1.3.6.2 COFFI/Region (seconds) 7.28 0.63 3.73 0.64 3.68 2.97 3.68 3.38 3.70 4.24 D.1.3.7.1 PSIMS/ORB/Region (seconds) 4.60 0.04 4.35 0.04 3.43 0.63 3.15 0.58 3.12 0.35 D.1.3.7.2 PSIMS/ORB/Region (seconds) 7.28 0.04 3.73 0.04 3.68 0.63 3.68 0.58 3.70 0.35 Average Response Interval - CLEC (TAG) (BST Measure Includes Additional 2 Seconds) D.1.4.1.1 RSAG, by TN/Region
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-247A1.txt
  • (``DOL'') for Intelsat (post-merger with PanAmSat), SES, and PanAmSat (pre-merger with Intelsat). The estimates of DOL in Table 3 are a measurement of the extent of business risk facing satellite carriers. By definition, DOL measures, in percentages, the sensitivity of the firm's net income to changes in sales revenue. Taking Intelsat as an example, the estimated DOL elasticity coefficient of 3.43 means that a ten percent increase (decrease) in sales revenue will result in nearly a 35 percent increase (decrease) in net income, a substantial fluctuation in net earnings resulting from a moderate change in sales revenue. The estimates of DOL reported in Table 3 are highly suggestive of significant business risk that communications satellite carriers face in their business operations.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1227A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1227A1.pdf
  • because it could provide a substantial increase in area and population served by Station KWJK-FM. We note that the Petitioner is proposing to change its transmitter site. A staff engineering analysis reveals that there would be a gain of service to a population of 35,465 persons within an area of 2,287 square kilometers. There would be a loss area of 3.43 square kilometers; however, the loss area is unpopulated. Channel 272A can also be substituted for vacant but applied for Channel 226A at Wheatland, Missouri, at the reference site proposed by the Petitioner, which is located 5.4 kilometers northwest of Wheatland. This proposed site is fully spaced and meets the Commission's technical requirements. We note, however, that if WRL's proposed transmitter
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • Household 5-Digit Zips Hybrid Zips MSA Total 5-Digit Zips Hybrid Zips MSA Total (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) MSA Pop (Mil.) 0.005 0.003 0.009 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.015 0.027 0.014 (2.74)** (1.99)* (3.09)** (1.99)* (1.80) (0.88) (2.88)** (3.11)** (2.57)* MSA Median Inc. (000) -0.001 0.002 -0.001 (0.96) (1.68) (0.46) MSA Fr. College Degree 0.230 0.098 0.144 (3.43)** (1.21) (2.00)* MSA Fr. Under Age 30 -0.884 -0.303 -0.319 (7.47)** (2.77)** (1.11) MSA Fr. Over Age 65 4.1603 2.2409 2.988 (10.61)** (5.12)** (2.59)* Constant 0.199 0.206 0.238 0.192 0.220 0.232 0.532 0.632 0.553 (41.41)** (6.45)** (34.08)** (4.01)** (45.46)** (7.64)** (42.50)** (33.71)** (41.73)** Observations 11,763 11,763 7,397 7,397 269 269 11,751 7,392 269 MSA's 269 269 269 269 269 269
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=65
  • licenses in the 800 MHz band in the three alternative band configurations. Licenses in only one of these mutually incompatible band configurations will be awarded. Qualified Bidders: 9 Rounds Completed: 119 Bidding Days: 13 Results for Round 119 Gross Revenue: $38,005,000.00 - Dollar Change: 381000.00 - % Change: 1.01 Net Revenue: $36,333,500.00 - Dollar Change: -1290500.00 - % Change: - 3.43 New Bids: 1 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 0 Licenses with PWBs*: 2 FCC Held Licenses: 0 Eligible Bidders: 3 (of 9 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=65W ed, 31 May 2006 20:15:00 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 65 will offer nationwide commercial licenses in the 800 MHz band in the three
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=79
  • 61 (of 77 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=79T ue, 08 Sep 2009 15:50:03 GMT Summary Permits: 122 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 77 Rounds Completed: 17 Bidding Days: 5 Results for Round 17 Gross Revenue: $5,367,800.00 - Dollar Change: $77,200.00 - % Change: 1.46 Net Revenue: $4,522,960.00 - Dollar Change: $150,055.00 - % Change: 3.43 New Bids: 22 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 2 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 2 Permits with PWBs*: 83 FCC Held Permits: 39 Eligible Bidders: 61 (of 77 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=79T ue, 08 Sep 2009 17:05:02 GMT Summary Permits: 122 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 77 Rounds Completed: 18 Bidding Days: 5 Results
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01157.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01157.txt
  • in the total amount of support available from the high-cost loop support fund to the previous year's support amount, increased by an index factor that is equal to the rate of growth in the total number of working loops nationwide for the calendar year preceding the annual data filing. For example, in 1998, the total number of working loops grew 3.43 percent. Thus, the amount of high-cost loop support available in 2000 was the 1999 support amount ($864.2 million) increased by 3.43 percent, which equals $893.8 million. The Commission originally adopted the indexed cap on the high-cost loop fund in order to limit fund growth and moderate annual fluctuations in the size of the fund pending the Commission's consideration of permanent
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • 1.21 D.1.3.4.1 DSAP/Region (seconds) 2.71 0.53 2.71 0.52 2.68 2.87 2.61 2.84 2.56 5.27 D.1.3.4.2 DSAP/Region (seconds) 2.57 0.53 2.57 0.52 2.58 2.87 2.55 2.84 2.53 5.27 D.1.3.5.1 CRSECSRL/Region (seconds) 3.21 2.12 3.24 1.14 3.20 2.01 3.07 1.76 3.01 1.13 D.1.3.5.2 CRSECSRL/Region (seconds) 2.87 2.12 2.95 1.14 2.94 2.01 2.85 1.76 2.60 1.13 D.1.3.6.1 COFFI/Region (seconds) 4.60 0.63 4.35 0.64 3.43 2.97 3.15 3.38 3.12 4.24 D.1.3.6.2 COFFI/Region (seconds) 7.28 0.63 3.73 0.64 3.68 2.97 3.68 3.38 3.70 4.24 D.1.3.7.1 PSIMS/ORB/Region (seconds) 4.60 0.04 4.35 0.04 3.43 0.63 3.15 0.58 3.12 0.35 D.1.3.7.2 PSIMS/ORB/Region (seconds) 7.28 0.04 3.73 0.04 3.68 0.63 3.68 0.58 3.70 0.35 Average Response Interval - CLEC (TAG) (BST Measure Includes Additional 2 Seconds) D.1.4.1.1 RSAG, by TN/Region
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt103.pdf
  • and average revenue per minute breakouts for 1992 - 2001 for domestic and international calls. For comparison, the table also shows the per-minute charges restated to 2001 dollars. 1930 $0.27 $2.91 1970 $0.23 $1.05 1931 0.27 3.14 1971 0.25 1.07 1932 0.26 3.39 1972 0.24 1.03 1933 0.28 3.75 1973 0.25 1.01 1934 0.27 3.60 1974 0.26 0.92 1935 0.27 3.43 1975 0.27 0.90 1936 0.25 3.20 1976 0.29 0.89 1937 0.22 2.67 1977 0.28 0.83 1938 0.21 2.69 1978 0.29 0.78 1939 0.22 2.75 1979 0.29 0.71 1940 0.21 2.66 1980 0.30 0.65 1941 0.21 2.50 1981 0.33 0.64 1942 0.22 2.34 1982 0.34 0.63 1943 0.21 2.15 1983 0.35 0.62 1944 0.22 2.17 1984 0.32 0.55 1945 0.21 2.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris03.pdf
  • 0.4% Connecticut 1993 1.16 80.5% 85.9% 92.5% 5.4% 6.6%* 94.7% 95.6% 97.5% 1.0% 1.9% Delaware 1998 2.30 87.3% 94.4% 91.2% 7.1% -3.2% 95.5% 95.2% 96.7% -0.3% 1.4% District of Columbia 1987 3.50 92.5% 81.1% 89.4% -11.4% # 8.3% 95.9% 91.4% 95.0% -4.5% 3.7% Florida 1994 3.50 80.2% 84.4% 89.8% 4.1% * 5.4%* 89.9% 92.1% 95.1% 2.2% * 2.9%* Georgia 1991 3.43 69.1% 81.6% 86.0% 12.5% * 4.4% 85.9% 90.4% 94.8% 4.5% * 4.4%* Hawaii 1987 0.00 76.1% 89.9% 93.9% 13.8% * 4.0% 94.0% 94.9% 97.8% 0.9% 2.9% Idaho 1987 3.48 78.4% 87.9% 88.2% 9.4% * 0.3% 90.6% 95.0% 95.5% 4.4% * 0.5% Illinois 1998 1.65 87.8% 83.2% 80.0% -4.6% -3.2% 95.6% 93.5% 92.3% -2.0% -1.3% Indiana 1998 0.51 80.4% 91.6% 87.5%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris04.pdf
  • Montana 1987 3.00 79.6% 86.3% 88.1% 6.7% * 1.8% 90.3% 94.1% 93.7% 3.8% * -0.4% Nebraska 1998 3.48 90.7% 92.8% 88.9% 2.2% -4.0% 96.6% 97.0% 95.1% 0.4% -1.9% Nevada 1988 2.91 78.4% 90.8% 86.6% 12.3% * -4.2% 93.0% 93.8% 93.3% 0.8% -0.5% New Hampshire 1998 0.00 82.2% 93.6% 92.0% 11.4% * -1.6% 94.8% 97.1% 95.4% 2.4% -1.7% New Jersey 1998 3.43 83.2% 88.6% 93.2% 5.4% 4.5% 93.6% 96.1% 95.8% 2.5% * -0.3% New Mexico 1987 3.29 61.8% 69.6% 84.7% 7.8% * 15.1%* 82.1% 86.0% 91.7% 3.9% * 5.7%* New York 1985 3.30 84.6% 87.5% 89.0% 6.0% * 1.5% 91.4% 94.5% 94.8% 3.1% * 0.3% North Carolina 1986 3.50 73.5% 83.6% 87.6% 10.1% * 3.9% 89.0% 93.5% 93.7% 4.5% * 0.2% North
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • Sprint 1980 $1.01 $1.41 $2.35 $3.15 $2.37 $2.30 $3.54 $2.58 $2.50 $3.74 $2.81 $2.70 $3.77 $3.22 $2.90 $3.97 $3.61 $3.20 $4.17 $3.82 $3.30 1981 1.13 1.63 2.77 3.67 3.07 2.67 4.07 3.39 2.90 4.36 3.62 3.13 4.39 3.66 3.36 4.60 3.84 3.71 4.80 4.00 3.83 1982 1.76 $1.53 $1.53 2.38 $1.54 $1.55 3.00 $1.94 $1.92 3.90 3.28 3.27 4.09 3.42 3.43 4.37 3.63 3.62 4.49 3.74 3.74 4.60 3.84 3.85 5.15 4.32 4.32 1983 1.76 1.54 1.54 2.38 2.10 2.09 3.00 2.70 2.69 3.90 3.28 3.29 4.09 3.42 3.43 4.37 3.63 3.62 4.49 3.74 3.74 4.60 3.84 3.83 5.15 4.32 4.32 1984 1.65 1.48 1.62 2.27 1.96 2.19 2.79 2.56 2.76 3.69 3.33 3.49 3.87 3.48 3.63 4.06 3.72 3.80 4.18
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • Call 90-Mile Call AT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprint 1980$1.01 $1.41 $2.35 $3.15 $2.37 $2.30 $3.54 $2.58 $2.50 $3.74 $2.81 $2.70 $3.77 $3.22 $2.90 $3.97 $3.61 $3.20 $4.17 $3.82 $3.30 19811.13 1.63 2.77 3.67 3.07 2.67 4.07 3.39 2.90 4.36 3.62 3.13 4.39 3.66 3.36 4.60 3.84 3.71 4.80 4.00 3.83 19821.76 $1.53 $1.53 2.38 $1.54 $1.55 3.00 $1.94 $1.92 3.90 3.28 3.27 4.09 3.42 3.43 4.37 3.63 3.62 4.49 3.74 3.74 4.60 3.84 3.85 5.15 4.32 4.32 19831.76 1.54 1.54 2.38 2.10 2.09 3.00 2.70 2.69 3.90 3.28 3.29 4.09 3.42 3.43 4.37 3.63 3.62 4.49 3.74 3.74 4.60 3.84 3.83 5.15 4.32 4.32 19841.65 1.48 1.62 2.27 1.96 2.19 2.79 2.56 2.76 3.69 3.33 3.49 3.87 3.48 3.63 4.06 3.72 3.80 4.18 3.84 3.98
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • (0.17) 45Warwick Valley Telephone Company 9.68 12.80 33.21 7.33 (10.17) 5.47 46Winterhaven Telephone Company 12.74 11.06 31.38 10.02 47Yates City Telephone Company 22.40 11.19 54.36 30.39 9.23 29.99 Maximum Rate of Return 23.60% 17.47%101.41% 45.35% 181.82% 71.70%35.41% Minimum Rate of Return (13.34) 8.44 (36.72) (27.70) (12,326.38) (21.80) (10.76) Weighted Arithmetic Mean 11.98 11.03 14.96 13.01 (396.53) 9.43 10.93 Standard Deviation 3.43 1.87 12.85 8.83 1469.29 7.12 6.38 Reporting Entity 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1 BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. 19.27%21.25%22.83%20.99%20.80%17.91% 2 Qwest Corporation, Including Malheur and El Paso NA 22.13 19.93 19.06 16.56 15.41 SBC Communications, Inc. 3 Southwestern Bell Telephone Company L.P. 15.51 18.81 15.17 10.22 9.91 10.32 4 Ameritech Operating Companies 20.91 25.72 30.24 28.93 22.59 18.22 5 Nevada Bell
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 9.10 10.70 (0.91) 14.42 11.68 57CITIZENS TELEPHONE COMPANY OF HIGGINSVILLE 5.74 6.39 23.95 (1.41) - 20.70 3.31 58CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF ARKANSAS 17.67 12.42 27.93 32.10 (91.33) 29.52 31.00 59CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF CA-ARIZONA 12.89 12.42 6.65 12.13 206.99 17.82 15.74 60CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF CA-CALIFORNIA 13.29 12.42 8.17 7.04 (47.04) 29.31 16.25 61CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF CA-NEVADA 14.76 12.42 3.43 14.54 805.53 30.14 22.13 62CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF ILLINOIS 12.46 12.42 4.82 11.64 (206.75) 23.62 14.40 63CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF IOWA 14.53 12.42 9.37 14.11 (510.83) 29.57 18.61 64CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF KANSAS 12.85 12.42 10.36 11.10 - 28.94 14.76 65CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF MINNESOTA 13.27 12.42 (1.56) 14.71 (217.26) 24.74 16.67 66CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF MISSOURI 12.90 12.42 11.59
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 2.97 HAWAII 269 424 694 0.42 IDAHO 321 329 650 0.39 ILLINOIS 2,701 4,408 7,109 4.26 INDIANA 1,177 2,070 3,248 1.94 IOWA 629 908 1,538 0.92 KANSAS 629 904 1,533 0.92 KENTUCKY 892 1,381 2,274 1.36 LOUISIANA 871 1,552 2,423 1.45 MAINE 302 439 740 0.44 MARYLAND 1,414 1,942 3,356 2.01 MASSACHUSETTS 1,804 2,594 4,399 2.63 MICHIGAN 1,776 3,949 5,725 3.43 MINNESOTA 1,075 1,557 2,632 1.58 MISSISSIPPI 529 872 1,401 0.84 MISSOURI 1,207 1,869 3,076 1.84 MONTANA 239 304 543 0.32 NEBRASKA 400 688 1,088 0.65 NEVADA 1,710 1,113 2,823 1.69 NEW HAMPSHIRE 421 419 840 0.50 NEW JERSEY 2,844 3,345 6,189 3.70 NEW MEXICO 448 513 962 0.58 NEW YORK 4,964 8,298 13,262 7.94 NORTH CAROLINA 1,781 2,932 4,713 2.82
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • 19,593 0.39 (14,638) (0.29) WASHINGTON 24,655 0.62 17,016 0.43 7,639 0.19 WEST VIRGINIA 16,839 1.51 4,404 0.39 12,436 1.11 WISCONSIN 12,055 0.32 15,911 0.42 (3,856) (0.10) WYOMING 12,571 3.84 1,427 0.44 11,144 3.41 UNITED STATES 761,774 0.38 819,171 0.41 (57,397) (0.03) GUAM 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 N. MARIANA ISL. 3,606 15.95 109 0.48 3,497 15.47 PUERTO RICO 48,935 3.43 6,071 0.43 42,864 3.01 VIRGIN ISLANDS 11,329 16.19 292 0.42 11,037 15.77 GRAND TOTAL $825,644 $0.41 $825,644 $0.41 $0 $0.00 13 Table 3 Lifeline Support Annual Monthly Annual Contributions Monthly Annual Monthly Lifeline Support Based On Contributions Support Support Support Payment Presubscribed Per Loop Less Less 1996 Per Loop Lines Contributions Contributions (Thousands) (Thousands) (Thousands) Per Loop ALABAMA $367 $0.01
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 8.11 8.11 7.84 9.27 9.27 Delaware 7.75 7.75 7.75 2.30 2.30 2.30 1.15 1.15 1.15 8.90 8.90 8.90 11.20 11.20 11.20 District of Columbia5.61 5.61 5.61 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 7.36 7.36 7.36 10.86 10.86 10.86 Florida 7.75 7.75 7.75 3.04 3.50 3.50 1.52 1.75 1.75 9.27 9.50 9.50 12.31 13.00 12.99 Georgia 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.43 0.00 1.75 1.71 7.75 9.50 9.46 7.75 13.00 12.89 Guam 7.75 7.75 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 9.75 8.24 13.50 12.75 Nebraska 6.51 8.25 7.01 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.51 10.00 8.75 6.51 13.50 12.22 Nevada 5.25 8.25 6.53 0.00 3.50 2.91 0.00 1.75 1.45 5.25 10.00 7.98 5.25 13.50 10.89 New Hampshire 8.20 8.25 8.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.20 8.25 8.20 8.20 8.25 8.20 New Jersey 7.38 8.06 8.05 0.00 3.46 3.43 0.00 1.73 1.71 7.38 9.79 9.77 7.38 13.25 13.20 New Mexico 7.91 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 3.29 0.00 1.75 1.65 7.91 10.00 9.89 7.91 13.50 13.18 New York 6.17 8.25 8.09 0.00 3.50 3.30 0.00 1.75 1.65 6.17 10.00 9.73 6.17 13.50 13.03 North Carolina 7.83 8.25 8.08 3.50 3.50 3.49 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.58 10.00 9.83 13.08 13.50 13.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Restated and Services in 2001 and Services in 2001 (1982-1984 Dollars (1982-1984 Dollars = 100) = 100) 1930 16.7 $0.27 $2.91 1970 38.8 $0.23 $1.05 1931 15.2 0.27 3.14 1971 40.5 0.25 1.07 1932 13.7 0.26 3.39 1972 41.8 0.24 1.03 1933 13.0 0.28 3.75 1973 44.4 0.25 1.01 1934 13.4 0.27 3.60 1974 49.3 0.26 0.92 1935 13.7 0.27 3.43 1975 53.8 0.27 0.90 1936 13.9 0.25 3.20 1976 56.9 0.29 0.89 1937 14.4 0.22 2.67 1977 60.6 0.28 0.83 1938 14.1 0.21 2.69 1978 65.2 0.29 0.78 1939 13.9 0.22 2.75 1979 72.6 0.29 0.71 1940 14.0 0.21 2.66 1980 82.4 0.30 0.65 1941 14.7 0.21 2.50 1981 90.9 0.33 0.64 1942 16.3 0.22 2.34 1982 96.5 0.34 0.63
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • Year-End Data Rates as of Nov. 1 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Australia $1.58 $1.14 $0.97 $0.83 $0.76 $0.59 $0.59 $0.45 $0.42 $0.30 $0.30 $0.28 Brazil 2.50 2.50 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.27 1.14 1.03 0.85 0.65 0.60 0.60 Canada 24/ 0.42 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 China 3.43 3.72 3.48 3.37 2.93 2.91 2.67 2.13 1.69 1.40 1.01 0.95 Colombia 1.85 1.75 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.65 0.60 Dominican Republic 24/ 1.45 1.42 1.39 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 Egypt 1.95 1.90 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.90 El Salvador 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 8.11 7.84 9.27 9.27 Delaware 7.75 7.75 7.75 2.30 2.30 2.30 1.15 1.15 1.15 8.90 8.90 8.90 11.20 11.20 11.20 District of Columbia 5.61 5.61 5.61 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 7.36 7.36 7.36 10.86 10.86 10.86 Florida 7.75 7.75 7.75 3.04 3.50 3.50 1.52 1.75 1.75 9.27 9.50 9.50 12.31 13.00 12.99 Georgia 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.43 0.00 1.75 1.71 7.75 9.50 9.46 7.75 13.00 12.89 Guam 7.75 7.75 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* OKLAHOMA (CONT.) 431976 C CARNEGIE TELEPHONE CO.INC. 7.47 -1.28 8.87 14.56 431977 C CENTRAL OKLAHOMA TELEPHONE CO. -4.97 0.39 -5.34 -14.10 431979 C CHEROKEE TELEPHONE CO. 38.09 -0.29 38.50 596.80 431980 C CHICKASAW TELEPHONE CO. 12.07 1.25 10.69 16.86 431981 C CHOUTEAU TELEPHONE CO. 0.94 -3.43 4.53 1.38 431982 C CIMARRON TEL. CO. 33.70 -0.57 34.47 63.42 431984 C OKLAHOMA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS INC. 1.14 1.87 -0.71 -11.32 431985 C CROSS TELEPHONE CO. 38.10 2.18 35.15 59.47 431988 C DOBSON TELEPHONE CO. 2.77 2.34 0.43 0.18 431994 C GRAND TELEPHONE CO. INC. 11.14 -0.07 11.22 21.98 431995 C HINTON TELEPHONE CO. 14.44 0.69 13.66 36.24 432006 C
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • INFINITE 401705 C CENTURYTEL OF ARKANSAS, INC. 1.78 -0.56 2.36 0.58 401709 C MADISON COUNTY TEL. CO. INC. -2.55 1.72 -4.19 -21.18 401710 A MAGAZINE TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.50 -2.23 8.93 25.06 401711 C CENTURYTEL OF MOUNTAIN HOME, INC. -0.06 -0.77 0.71 -4.51 401712 A MOUNTAIN VIEW TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.04 2.23 9.60 46.76 401713 C NORTHERN ARKANSAS TEL. CO.,INC. 4.41 0.95 3.43 3.82 401718 A>CPRAIRIE GROVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.42 1.84 0.56 -2.93 401720 C CENTURYTEL OF REDFIELD, INC. 4.19 -6.81 11.80 13.54 401721 C RICE BELT TEL. CO.,INC. -11.72 -1.50 -10.38 -32.66 401722 A E. RITTER TELEPHONE COMPANY 4.90 -4.53 9.88 30.23 401724 C SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS TEL. COOP. INC. -0.43 1.18 -1.59 -6.00 401726 C TRI-COUNTY TEL. CO. INC.-AR -10.48 -2.97 -7.74
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-6.pdf
  • 0.4% Connecticut 1993 1.16 80.5% 85.9% 92.5% 5.4% 6.6%* 94.7% 95.6% 97.5% 1.0% 1.9% Delaware 1998 2.30 87.3% 94.4% 91.2% 7.1% -3.2% 95.5% 95.2% 96.7% -0.3% 1.4% District of Columbia 1987 3.50 92.5% 81.1% 89.4% -11.4% # 8.3% 95.9% 91.4% 95.0% -4.5% 3.7% Florida 1994 3.50 80.2% 84.4% 89.8% 4.1% * 5.4%* 89.9% 92.1% 95.1% 2.2% * 2.9%* Georgia 1991 3.43 69.1% 81.6% 86.0% 12.5% * 4.4% 85.9% 90.4% 94.8% 4.5% * 4.4%* Hawaii 1987 0.00 76.1% 89.9% 93.9% 13.8% * 4.0% 94.0% 94.9% 97.8% 0.9% 2.9% Idaho 1987 3.48 78.4% 87.9% 88.2% 9.4% * 0.3% 90.6% 95.0% 95.5% 4.4% * 0.5% Illinois 1998 1.65 87.8% 83.2% 80.0% -4.6% -3.2% 95.6% 93.5% 92.3% -2.0% -1.3% Indiana 1998 0.51 80.4% 91.6% 87.5%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
  • 4.18 Repairs:Residential 8.63 12.21 10.87 22.52 17.06 8.18 10.82 10.76 Small Business 11.79 10.72 4.49 20.13 14.95 7.28 15.22 11.96 Large Business 9.22 19.05 NA 25.95 14.00 9.54 13.63 4.74 Business Office: Residential 4.89 4.55 5.88 12.46 9.31 7.26 5.68 2.60 Small Business 5.91 5.12 3.62 12.92 10.15 7.31 4.70 7.89 Large Business 11.24 13.14 NA 25.00 7.40 8.02 9.65 3.43 9 - 22 Table 9.4(b): Company Comparision -- Customer Perception Surveys -- 1996 Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied Company AmeritechBell AtlanticBellSouth NYNEX Pacific SBC US West GTE Overall:Residential 2.9 2.25 6.28 3.83 3.99 7.12 8.67 3.07 Small Business 2.36 5.96 12.1 3.74 5.39 6.72 12.38 5.97 Large Business 10.86 9.18 3.92 20.24 6.21 8.21 8 1.51 Installations: Residential 4.13 8.66 5.19
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 13.24 79.35 351169 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOP. TEL. CO.-MOULTON 14.09 4.10 9.60 72.43 351171 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-JESUP 4.93 3.99 0.90 0.00 351172 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-NORA SPRINGS 9.61 0.76 8.78 66.99 351173 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. COOP.-SHELLSBURG 14.48 5.52 8.49 69.01 351174 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-STANTON 19.04 6.55 11.72 81.57 351175 A FARMERS TEL. CO.-BATAVIA 8.30 -3.43 12.15 71.53 351176 A FARMERS TEL. CO.-ESSEX 3.00 -3.54 6.78 55.03 351177 A FARMERS TEL. CO.-RICEVILLE 12.30 0.63 11.60 74.70 351179 A FENTON COOP. TEL. CO. 11.43 -1.07 12.63 74.67 351186 C GTE NORTH INC. - IA 6.83 1.65 5.09 0.00 351187 A MID-IOWA TEL. CO. 18.82 11.58 6.49 61.16 351188 A GOLDFIELD TEL. CO. 9.74 0.65 9.03 68.10 351189
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 371 Indiana 191,921 NA 1.29 30 52 61 89 Iowa 164,069 NA 1.10 25 45 52 76 Kansas 106,686 NA 0.72 17 29 34 49 Kentucky 56,392 NA 0.38 9 15 18 26 Louisiana 69,437 NA 0.47 11 19 22 32 Maine * 31,300 0.25 6 10 12 17 Maryland 160,126 NA 1.08 25 43 51 74 Massachusetts 509,731 NA 3.43 79 138 161 235 Michigan 366,305 NA 2.46 57 99 116 169 Minnesota 287,660 NA 1.93 45 78 91 133 Mississippi 63,515 NA 0.43 10 17 20 29 Missouri 203,537 NA 1.37 31 55 64 94 Montana * 19,700 0.16 4 6 7 11 Nebraska * 45,700 0.36 8 15 17 25 Nevada * 54,900 0.43 10 18 20 30
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • of July 1 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Australia $1.58 $1.14 $0.97 $0.83 $0.76 $0.59 $0.59 $0.45 $0.42 $0.30 $0.30 $0.28 $0.27 Brazil 2.50 2.50 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.27 1.14 1.03 0.85 0.65 0.60 0.38 0.38 Canada 10/ 0.42 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 China 3.43 3.72 3.48 3.37 2.93 2.91 2.67 2.13 1.69 1.40 1.01 0.72 0.70 Colombia 1.85 1.75 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.65 0.55 0.38 Dominican Republic 10/ 1.45 1.42 1.39 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Egypt 1.95 1.90 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.70 0.46 El Salvador 1.50 1.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 24.8 123.6 118.0 5.7 (0.50) (0.21) 0.46 (0.26) 5.9MS Missouri 479.6 363.8 115.8 84.1 31.7 11.52 3.51 5.02 20.05 11.6MO Montana 10.4 9.4 1.0 (0.3) 1.3 0.03 (0.17) (0.37) (0.51) 1.8MT Nebraska 131.3 49.5 81.8 60.4 21.4 8.13 3.37 6.21 17.71 3.7NE Nevada 122.2 77.0 45.2 31.6 13.6 2.57 2.17 0.67 5.40 8.2NV New Hampshire 38.9 17.7 21.2 8.4 12.8 3.43 1.49 3.06 7.98 4.8NH New Jersey 366.9 224.3 142.6 55.9 86.7 25.34 8.39 19.28 53.01 33.7NJ New Mexico 60.2 33.7 26.5 20.3 6.2 1.97 0.20 (0.07) 2.10 4.1NM New York 1,462.4 297.5 1,164.9 795.2 369.7 101.21 29.54 162.49 293.24 76.5NY North Carolina 389.9 275.9 113.9 81.9 32.1 11.12 2.71 4.38 18.21 13.9NC North Dakota 15.3 5.3 10.0 7.0 3.0 1.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 0.85 1.70 0.70 1.40 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 7.2-MCI HISTORICAL RATES AT YEAR END, 1980 THROUGH 1995 INTERSTATE MESSAGE TOLL TELEPHONE RATES (FIVE AND TEN MINUTE CALLS)--CONTINUED BETWEEN WASHINGTON, DC AND DALLAS, TX HOUSTON, TX DAY EVENING NIGHT/WEEKEND DAY EVENING NIGHT/WEEKEND DEC 31 FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN 1980 1/ 1.71 3.43 0.51 1.03 1.72 3.44 0.52 1.03 1981 2/ 1.92 3.84 0.88 1.77 0.63 1.27 1.92 3.84 0.88 1.77 0.63 1.27 1982 3/ 1.92 3.84 0.87 1.73 0.67 1.35 1.92 3.84 0.87 1.73 0.67 1.35 1983 4/ 1.92 3.84 0.95 1.91 0.74 1.48 1.92 3.84 0.95 1.91 0.74 1.48 1984 5/ 2.03 3.96 1.27 2.47 0.84 1.63 2.03 3.96 1.27 2.47
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 1.90 0.75 1.50 288 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 7.2-MCI HISTORICAL RATES AT YEAR END, 1980 THROUGH 1996 INTERSTATE MESSAGE TOLL TELEPHONE RATES (FIVE AND TEN MINUTE CALLS)--CONTINUED BETWEEN WASHINGTON, DC AND DALLAS, TX HOUSTON, TX DAY EVENING NIGHT/WEEKEND DAY EVENING NIGHT/WEEKEND DEC 31 FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN 1980 1/ 1.71 3.43 0.51 1.03 1.72 3.44 0.52 1.03 1981 2/ 1.92 3.84 0.88 1.77 0.63 1.27 1.92 3.84 0.88 1.77 0.63 1.27 1982 3/ 1.92 3.84 0.87 1.73 0.67 1.35 1.92 3.84 0.87 1.73 0.67 1.35 1983 4/ 1.92 3.84 0.95 1.91 0.74 1.48 1.92 3.84 0.95 1.91 0.74 1.48 1984 5/ 2.03 3.96 1.27 2.47 0.84 1.63 2.03 3.96 1.27 2.47
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • COLUMBIA 4.0 4.0 4.00 0.5 0.9 1.3 2.68 DC FLORIDA 242.2 0.137 242.1 241.3 0.72 0.72 FL GEORGIA 95.8 0.001 95.8 92.6 3.20 3.20 GA HAWAII 24.3 0.131 24.1 24.1 HI IDAHO 46.0 0.992 45.0 42.4 2.68 2.68 ID ILLINOIS 276.0 15.449 260.5 223.7 36.85 36.85 IL INDIANA 207.9 5.958 201.9 183.3 18.61 18.61 IN IOWA 98.6 0.627 97.9 94.5 3.43 3.43 IA KANSAS 112.6 112.6 107.5 5.12 5.12 KS KENTUCKY 82.1 4.021 78.1 76.8 1.26 1.26 KY LOUISIANA 53.7 53.7 53.1 0.60 0.60 LA MAINE 118.4 118.4 118.4 (0.04) (0.04)ME MARYLAND 97.9 97.9 79.1 18.86 2.2 4.1 6.3 12.52 MD MASSACHUSETTS 374.9 374.9 374.9 (0.04) (0.04)MA MICHIGAN 799.4 0.069 799.3 798.2 1.12 1.12 MI MINNESOTA 52.7 0.386 52.3 51.0 1.26
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 1.80 0.90 1.80 284 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 7.2-MCI HISTORICAL RATES AT YEAR END, 1980 THROUGH 1998 INTERSTATE MESSAGE TOLL TELEPHONE RATES (FIVE AND TEN MINUTE CALLS)--CONTINUED BETWEEN WASHINGTON, DC AND DALLAS, TX HOUSTON, TX DAY EVENING NIGHT/WEEKEND DAY EVENING NIGHT/WEEKEND DEC 31 FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN 1980 1/ 1.71 3.43 0.51 1.03 1.72 3.44 0.52 1.03 1981 2/ 1.92 3.84 0.88 1.77 0.63 1.27 1.92 3.84 0.88 1.77 0.63 1.27 1982 3/ 1.92 3.84 0.87 1.73 0.67 1.35 1.92 3.84 0.87 1.73 0.67 1.35 1983 4/ 1.92 3.84 0.95 1.91 0.74 1.48 1.92 3.84 0.95 1.91 0.74 1.48 1984 5/ 2.03 3.96 1.27 2.47 0.84 1.63 2.03 3.96 1.27 2.47
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour Measure 2005 2.31 2.80 3.03 (45) (30) (24) 2007 2.05 2.76 2.71 (45) (38) (46) 2009 1.50 1.81 2.07 * (56) (48) (63) Miscellaneous Format Market Measure 2005 3.03 2.51 1.34 (8) (5) (6) 2007 4.54 6.17 4.32 (35) (25) (41) 2009 3.94 4.27 3.43 (51) (44) (79) Contour Measure 2005 1.52 1.77 4.43 (8) (6) (5) 2007 3.46 5.44 * 5.64 * (34) (27) (40) 2009 2.68 3.33 4.75 * (47) (49) (78) * - difference between the category mean and the mean of the No LPFM category is statistically different from zero using a two-sided unpaired t-test at the 95 percent level of
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/circuit.pdf
  • 100% -2% 9 15 29 1Sweden 1,036 3,468 170 4,674 1,805 0.30 0.60 36.00 25% 152% 108% 61% 10 10 13 7Hong Kong 1,273 3,060 41 4,374 1,855 0.42 0.52 0.91 26% 59% 49% 121% 11 11 11 6Brazil 1,595 2,485 1 4,081 1,026 0.64 1.24 3.07 4% 102% 48% 23% 12 14 9 7Philippines 2,835 826 3 3,664 1,599 3.43 5.05 12.29 42% 108% 53% -6% 13 8 10 1Netherlands 1,179 2,028 66 3,273 3,006 0.58 0.56 1.84 10% 7% 8% 78% 14 13 8 4Dominican Republic 2,156 695 0 2,851 833 3.10 2.15 2.57 30% -10% 17% 325% 15 26 22 1Spain 1,722 1,041 46 2,809 1,705 1.65 6.01 14.74 42% 418% 93% -17% 16 16 16 6Venezuela 1,611
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport.pdf
  • 8,561 2,133 0.30 1.43 1.11 1.33 3 14 24 26 28Israel 1,141 5,093 180 6,414 582 0.22 0.82 1.28 1.77 7 15 19 20 20Singapore 867 4,748 152 5,767 2,604 0.18 0.43 0.40 0.56 6 16 29 n.a. n.a.Chile 1,081 4,585 38 5,704 1,308 0.23 0.82 1.09 1.96 7 17 13 12 14Philippines 3,143 1,847 2 4,992 2,574 1.70 2.17 3.43 5.05 6 18 16 16 16Venezuela 1,913 2,412 0 4,325 1,700 0.79 1.31 1.49 2.14 1 19 n.a. n.a. n.a.Denmark 1,267 234 2,520 4,021 542 0.46 2.89 5.82 7.00 6 20 23 29 29Argentina 779 3,150 30 3,959 1,128 0.24 0.46 0.76 1.34 6 21 28 27 23Colombia 1,391 2,273 24 3,688 1,313 0.61 1.26 1.54 3.11 7 22 15
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour Measure 2005 2.31 2.80 3.03 (45) (30) (24) 2007 2.05 2.76 2.71 (45) (38) (46) 2009 1.50 1.81 2.07 * (56) (48) (63) Miscellaneous Format Market Measure 2005 3.03 2.51 1.34 (8) (5) (6) 2007 4.54 6.17 4.32 (35) (25) (41) 2009 3.94 4.27 3.43 (51) (44) (79) Contour Measure 2005 1.52 1.77 4.43 (8) (6) (5) 2007 3.46 5.44 * 5.64 * (34) (27) (40) 2009 2.68 3.33 4.75 * (47) (49) (78) * -difference between the category mean and the mean of the No LPFM category is statistically different from zero usinga two-sided unpaired t-test at the 95 percent level of confidence. Numbers
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • Household 5-Digit Zips Hybrid Zips MSA Total 5-Digit Zips Hybrid Zips MSA Total (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) MSA Pop (Mil.) 0.005 0.003 0.009 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.015 0.027 0.014 (2.74)** (1.99)* (3.09)** (1.99)* (1.80) (0.88) (2.88)** (3.11)** (2.57)* MSA Median Inc. (000) -0.001 0.002 -0.001 (0.96) (1.68) (0.46) MSA Fr. College Degree 0.230 0.098 0.144 (3.43)** (1.21) (2.00)* MSA Fr. Under Age 30 -0.884 -0.303 -0.319 (7.47)** (2.77)** (1.11) MSA Fr. Over Age 65 4.1603 2.2409 2.988 (10.61)** (5.12)** (2.59)* Constant 0.199 0.206 0.238 0.192 0.220 0.232 0.532 0.632 0.553 (41.41)** (6.45)** (34.08)** (4.01)** (45.46)** (7.64)** (42.50)** (33.71)** (41.73)** Observations 11,763 11,763 7,397 7,397 269 269 11,751 7,392 269 MSA's 269 269 269 269 269 269