FCC Web Documents citing 3.29

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2512A1.txt
  • transmitted at sea by or between maritime mobile stations located on board ships subject to U.S. registry and utilizing foreign coast and coast earth station facilities. The intent of this Public Notice is to invite informal public comment on the qualifications of this applicant. All comments will be reviewed in accordance with guidelines established by the Commission in 47 C.F.R. §3.29. Comments must be mailed to the Office of the Secretary, Room TW-B204F, with a copy to the Accounting Authority Certification Officer, Room 1A663, at 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. All interested parties have thirty (30) days from the date of this notice to submit comments. If you have any questions, please contact Susan Donahue, Chief, Revenue and Receivables
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3180A1.txt
  • 40th Court Pompano Beach FL 33064 World-Link Communications, Inc. 74 Main Street Framingham, MA 01701 Maritime Communications Services PTE LTD 10 Anson Road #25-14 Singapore 079903 The intent of this Public Notice is to invite informal public comment on the qualifications of these applicants. All comments will be reviewed in accordance with giidelines established by the Commission in 47 CFR 3.29. Comments must be mailed to the Office of the Secretary, Room TW-B204F, along with a copy to the Accounting Authority Certification Officer, Room 1A821, at 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D. C. - 20554. All interested parties have thirty 30 days from the date of this notice to submit comments. If you have any questions, please contact Claudette Pride, Chief
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3941A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3941A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3941A1.txt
  • ADC International, LLC 1655 N Fort Meyer Drive Suite 650 Arlington VA 22209 Arrowhead Global Solutions, Inc. 1501 Farm Credit Drive Suite 4400 McLean, VA 22102 The intent of this Public Notice is to invite informal public comment on the qualifications of these applicants. All comments will be reviewed in accordance with giidelines established by the Commission in 47 CFR 3.29. Comments must be mailed to the Office of the Secretary, Room TW-B204F, along with a copy to the Accounting Authority Certification Officer, Room 1A821, at 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D. C. - 20554. All interested parties have thirty 30 days from the date of this notice to submit comments. If you have any questions, please contact Claudette Pride, Chief
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-702A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-702A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-702A1.txt
  • the following applicant has applied for certification as an accounting authority: Singapore Telecommunications Limited 15 Hill Street #03-00 Telephone House 1 Singapore 17352, Republic of Singapore The intent of this Public Notice is to invite informal public comment on the qualifications of this applicant. All comments will be reviewed in accordance with guidelines established by the Commission in 47 CFR 3.29. Comments must be mailed to the Office of the Secretary, Room TW-B204F, along with a copy to Room 1A840, at 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D. C. - 20554. All interested parties have thirty (30) days from the date of this notice to submit comments. If you have any questions, please contact Claudette Pride, Chief Revenue & Receivables Operations Group
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1541A1.txt
  • it seeks to communicate with ALSAT-designated satellites. ALSAT may be listed as a point of communication only for routinely authorized earth stations. In response to question E49 of FCC Form 312 Schedule B, CNN lists 46.01 dBW/4 kHz as the Maximum EIRP density per carrier which corresponds to a maximum power density at the input of the antenna flange of -3.29 dBW/4 kHz for the 36M0F9W emission. Pursuant to Section 25.212(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.212(c), the maximum input power density into the antenna flange exceeds our routinely authorized power level of -14 dBW/4 kHz. Because the proposed power exceeds our limits for routine processing, CNN must identify the specific satellites as its points of communication. Furthermore, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2327A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2327A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2327A1.txt
  • 76.5(b). We note that even if we were to accept this wide variation between the population and sample proportions, the submitted data for this system appears questionable. For the first year, there is no standard error listed for the net weekly circulation share (33.33 percent). In addition, that share and the total weekly viewing share with the standard error added (3.29 + 3.39 - 6.68 percent) exceed the criteria in the rules (i.e., 3 percent share of total viewing hours and net weekly circulation of 25 percent). Accordingly, WGME-TV has not demonstrated that WBZ-TV was no longer significantly viewed in the first year precluding a finding that WBZ-TV did not meet the significant viewing criteria for the required two year period.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • 0.11 + 0.63 0.72 0.61 -0.11 - Average Block, Sports, AM Drive 0.59 0.61 0.58 -0.03 - 0.16 0.25 0.14 -0.11 - Average Block, Advertisements, Evening 1.20 1.20 1.20 0.00 - 1.02 1.04 1.02 -0.02 - Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, Evening 0.82 1.10 0.77 -0.33 - 0.57 0.79 0.54 -0.24 - Average Block, Music, Evening 2.55 2.79 2.51 -0.28 - 3.29 3.58 3.25 -0.33 - Average Block, News, Evening 0.35 0.44 0.33 -0.10 - 0.12 0.27 0.10 -0.17 - Average Block, Sports, Evening 0.95 0.50 1.03 0.53 + 0.29 0.14 0.31 0.17 + Number of Syndicated Programs 1.34 0.98 1.41 0.43 + 0.64 0.67 0.64 -0.03 - Number of Personalities 2.93 2.45 3.03 0.58 + 3.60 2.93 3.71 0.78 + Note:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2101A1.txt
  • that the following applicant has applied for Certification as an Accounting Authority: Vizada, Inc. 1101 Wootton Parkway, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, USA The intent of this Public Notice is to invite informal public comment on the qualifications of this applicant from any interested parties. All comments will be reviewed in accordance with guidelines established by the Commission in 47 C.F.R. § 3.29. Comments must be mailed to the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554, with a copy to the Accounting Authority Certification Officer, Federal Communications Commission, Room 1-A637, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. All interested parties have thirty (30) days from the date of this notice to submit comments. If you have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-814A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-814A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-814A1.txt
  • 10, 2009 NOTIFICATION OF NEWLY CERTIFIED ACCOUNTING AUTHORITY In accordance with Part 3 of the Commission's Rules, this public notice announces that the following applicant has been certified by the Commission as an Accounting Authority: Vizada, Inc. 1101 Wootton Parkway, 10th Floor Rockville, Maryland, 20852, USA This public notice is published by the Commission as required by 47 C.F.R. § 3.29 of our rules. Comments may be mailed to the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554, with a copy to the Accounting Authority Certification Officer, Federal Communications Commission, Room 1-A637, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this notice the Commission will notify the International
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM Music Format Market Measure 2005 5.08 4.86 4.00 * (1229) (819) (1019) 2007 5.08 4.77 4.05 * (896) (788) (1333) 2009 3.84 3.67 2.93 * (805) (810) (1295) Contour Measure 2005 3.65 4.71 * 5.91 * (1250) (827) (990) 2007 3.37 4.42 * 5.62 * (1018) (793) (1206) 2009 2.48 3.29 * 4.14 * (925) (766) (1219) Foreign Language Format Market Measure 2005 2.45 2.07 1.85 * (89) (50) (75) 2007 2.87 2.28 2.17 * (69) (57) (104) 2009 2.23 1.49 * 1.53 * (76) (54) (116) Contour Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228584A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228584A3.txt
  • 8,737 0.03 0.06 0.45 1.87 1 10 12 13 19Singapore 1,181 37,326 1,262 39,769 2,383 0.03 0.04 0.10 0.43 7 11 n.a . 30 18Spain 3,982 31,911 2 35,895 2,641 0.12 8.24 1.28 1.72 7 12 9 11 12Brazil 3,318 22,276 7,048 32,642 43,242 0.11 0.09 0.24 0.56 1 13 16 25 17Italy 4,965 27,296 20 32,281 3,782 0.18 0.27 3.29 2.35 7 14 11 8 9France 8,595 12,722 10,091 31,408 4,462 0.38 0.29 0.51 1.65 7 15 15 15 15Taiwan 1,768 29,087 1 30,856 14,175 0.06 0.12 0.29 0.70 1 16 13 12 6Sweden 3,177 19,414 3,182 25,773 1,109 0.14 0.18 0.49 0.28 3 17 19 14 14Switzerland 4,586 20,842 0 25,428 1,711 0.22 0.45 0.30 1.43 6 18 14
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242532A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242532A8.txt
  • 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.10 7 12 9 10 18China 1,585 52,979 245 54,809 85,937 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.45 7 13 8 8 10Korea, South 3,037 36,700 1,261 40,998 27,085 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.29 1 14 n.a. n.a. n.a.Austria 387 39,021 0 39,408 229 0.01 0.20 3.26 2.99 1 15 13 16 25Italy 15,613 18,834 0 34,447 7,151 0.83 0.18 0.27 3.29 1 16 16 13 12Sweden 4,887 29,207 32 34,126 2,080 0.17 0.14 0.18 0.49 6 17 12 9 11Brazil 5,724 19,547 6,570 31,841 42,929 0.22 0.11 0.09 0.24 7 18 15 15 15Taiwan 2,201 27,413 1 29,615 14,811 0.08 0.06 0.12 0.29 1 19 14 11 8France 13,738 5,778 7,561 27,077 6,581 1.03 0.38 0.29 0.51 7 20 19 26
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Beneficiaries ................................................... Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by State ..................................................... Table 2.9 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State ..................Table 2.10 Link Up Assistance - Payments - by State .......................................................... Table 2.11 Local Switching Support Payment Trueups by State or Jurisdiction ......................Table 3.13 Local Switching Support Payment Trueups by Study Area ....................................Table 3.29 Long-Term Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction .......................................... Table 3.10 Long-Term Support Payments by Study Area ........................................................ Table 3.26 Loops - by State or Jurisdiction .............................................................. Table 3.20 Loops - by Study Area ........................................................................ Table 3.34 Low-Income Average Benefits by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.12 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .................................................Table 2.5 Low-Income Support Payments ....................................................................... Table 2.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.txt
  • Beneficiaries ................................................... Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by State ..................................................... Table 2.9 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State ..................Table 2.10 Link Up Assistance - Payments - by State .......................................................... Table 2.11 Local Switching Support Payment Trueups by State or Jurisdiction ......................Table 3.13 Local Switching Support Payment Trueups by Study Area ....................................Table 3.29 Long-Term Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction .......................................... Table 3.10 Long-Term Support Payments by Study Area ........................................................ Table 3.26 Loops - by State or Jurisdiction .............................................................. Table 3.20 Loops - by Study Area ........................................................................ Table 3.34 Low-Income Average Benefits by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.12 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .................................................Table 2.5 Low-Income Support Payments ....................................................................... Table 2.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 6.51 13.50 12.22 Nevada 5.25 8.25 6.53 0.00 3.50 2.91 0.00 1.75 1.45 5.25 10.00 7.98 5.25 13.50 10.89 New Hampshire 8.20 8.25 8.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.20 8.25 8.20 8.20 8.25 8.20 New Jersey 7.38 8.06 8.05 0.00 3.46 3.43 0.00 1.73 1.71 7.38 9.79 9.77 7.38 13.25 13.20 New Mexico 7.91 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 3.29 0.00 1.75 1.65 7.91 10.00 9.89 7.91 13.50 13.18 New York 6.17 8.25 8.09 0.00 3.50 3.30 0.00 1.75 1.65 6.17 10.00 9.73 6.17 13.50 13.03 North Carolina 7.83 8.25 8.08 3.50 3.50 3.49 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.58 10.00 9.83 13.08 13.50 13.32 North Dakota 3.50 8.25 8.00 0.00 3.50 1.86 0.00 1.75 0.93 3.50 10.00 8.93 3.50 13.50 10.79
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • calculations. Consequently the amounts shown in Table 3.6 are a better indication of the actual HCLS payments. 42 Companies getting hold-harmless support have those amounts shown in Table 3.22. 3 - 11 IAS payments for price-cap companies. Only those study areas that are eligible for these payments, regardless of whether they receive any support, are included in the table. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only those years for which a support mechanism was in place. The 1998 amounts in Tables 3.22, 3.26, and 3.29 are the actual payments after processing the final true-ups for 1998.43 Table 3.27 has the final ICLS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
  • Nebraska 1998 3.48 90.7% 92.8% 88.9% 2.2% -4.0% 96.6% 97.0% 95.1% 0.4% -1.9% Nevada 1988 2.91 78.4% 90.8% 86.6% 12.3% * -4.2% 93.0% 93.8% 93.3% 0.8% -0.5% New Hampshire 1998 0.00 82.2% 93.6% 92.0% 11.4% * -1.6% 94.8% 97.1% 95.4% 2.4% -1.7% New Jersey 1998 3.43 83.2% 88.6% 93.2% 5.4% 4.5% 93.6% 96.1% 95.8% 2.5% * -0.3% New Mexico 1987 3.29 61.8% 69.6% 84.7% 7.8% * 15.1%* 82.1% 86.0% 91.7% 3.9% * 5.7%* New York 1985 3.30 84.6% 87.5% 89.0% 6.0% * 1.5% 91.4% 94.5% 94.8% 3.1% * 0.3% North Carolina 1986 3.50 73.5% 83.6% 87.6% 10.1% * 3.9% 89.0% 93.5% 93.7% 4.5% * 0.2% North Dakota 1990 1.86 85.2% 93.6% 86.0% 8.5% * -7.6%# 93.9% 96.2% 94.0% 2.3% * -2.1%#
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 831 1999 837 934 872 847 2000 862 986 889 876 2001 899 1,024 917 914 2002 944 1,050 1,021 950 2003 946 1,027 968 954 2004 986 1,025 1,031 985 1980 1.85% 2.96% 1981 1.98 2.88 1982 1.97 3.27 1983 2.00 3.48 1984 1.89 3.16 1985 1.86 2.90 1986 1.89 2.95 1987 1.96 3.10 1988 1.99 3.22 1989 1.95 3.29 1990 1.99 3.26 1991 1.99 3.27 1992 1.99 3.29 1993 2.03 3.48 1994 2.07 3.37 3.00% 2.12% 1995 2.09 3.29 2.98 2.14 1996 2.16 3.56 3.12 2.22 1997 2.19 3.70 2.84 2.28 1998 2.22 3.55 2.70 2.31 1999 2.18 3.41 2.63 2.27 2000 2.19 3.50 2.72 2.27 2001 2.19 3.54 2.67 2.28 2002 2.24 3.48 2.94 2.30 2003 2.23 3.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by State ..................................................... Table 2.9 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State ..................Table 2.10 Link Up Assistance - Payments - by State .......................................................... Table 2.11 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction .................. Table 3.13 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................................ Table 3.29 Long-Term Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction .......................................... Table 3.10 Long-Term Support Payments by Study Area ........................................................ Table 3.26 Low-Income Average Benefits by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.12 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .................................................Table 2.5 Low-Income Support Payments ....................................................................... Table 2.2 Low-Income Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.4 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
  • Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by State ..................................................... Table 2.9 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State ..................Table 2.10 Link Up Assistance - Payments - by State .......................................................... Table 2.11 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction .................. Table 3.13 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................................ Table 3.29 Long-Term Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction .......................................... Table 3.10 Long-Term Support Payments by Study Area ........................................................ Table 3.26 Low-Income Average Benefits by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.12 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .................................................Table 2.5 Low-Income Support Payments ....................................................................... Table 2.2 Low-Income Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.4 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • 162 294 1.49 75 293 Delaware 117 42 75 0.38 19 75 District of Columbia 185 40 145 0.73 37 145 Florida 2,262 894 1,368 6.91 349 1,362 Georgia 1,156 362 794 4.01 203 790 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 149 64 85 0.43 22 85 Idaho 178 64 114 0.58 29 114 Illinois 1,065 413 651 3.29 166 649 Indiana 555 259 296 1.50 76 295 Iowa 296 108 188 0.95 48 187 Kansas 268 84 184 0.93 47 183 Kentucky 395 163 233 1.18 59 232 Louisiana 417 184 233 1.18 60 232 Maine 161 55 105 0.53 27 105 Maryland 662 244 418 2.11 107 416 Massachusetts 779 288 491 2.48 125 489 Michigan 786
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • the actual HCLS payments. 3 - 11 payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism.44 Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only those years for which a support mechanism was in place. The 1998 amounts in Tables 3.22, 3.26, and 3.29 are the actual payments after processing the final true-ups for 1998.45 Table 3.27 has the final ICLS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 6.25 156 16 323 24 1993 11,513 1,945 11,564 1.00 5.95 136 12 366 23 1994 13,616 2,347 12,543 0.92 5.35 123 12 441 25 1995 15,889 2,830 14,335 0.90 5.07 120 6 514 48 1996 19,325 3,520 14,598 0.76 4.15 119 5 661 26 1997 22,753 4,259 15,661 0.69 3.68 110 4 851 28 1998 24,250 4,477 14,726 0.61 3.29 64 2 921 36 1999 28,515 5,305 14,980 0.53 2.82 57 2 1,216 31 2000 30,135 5,742 14,909 0.49 2.60 33 1 1,480 251 2001 33,287 6,265 11,380 0.34 1.82 10 * 1,419 199 2002 35,064 5,926 9,956 0.28 1.64 ** ** 988 113 2003 42,664 7,350 8,944 0.21 1.22 ** ** 620 156 2004 63,553 10,895 9,178 0.14 0.84
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by State ..................................................... Table 2.9 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State ..................Table 2.10 Link Up Assistance - Payments - by State .......................................................... Table 2.11 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction .................. Table 3.13 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................................ Table 3.29 Long-Term Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction .......................................... Table 3.10 Long-Term Support Payments by Study Area ........................................................ Table 3.26 Low-Income Average Benefits by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.12 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .................................................Table 2.5 Low-Income Support Payments ....................................................................... Table 2.2 Low-Income Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.4 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
  • Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by State ..................................................... Table 2.9 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State ..................Table 2.10 Link Up Assistance - Payments - by State .......................................................... Table 2.11 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction .................. Table 3.13 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................................ Table 3.29 Long-Term Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction .......................................... Table 3.10 Long-Term Support Payments by Study Area ........................................................ Table 3.26 Low-Income Average Benefits by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.12 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .................................................Table 2.5 Low-Income Support Payments ....................................................................... Table 2.2 Low-Income Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.4 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 7.85 10.00 9.18 8.69 13.50 12.68 Massachusetts 8.15 8.25 8.15 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.90 10.00 9.90 13.40 13.50 13.40 Michigan 7.10 8.25 7.29 2.00 3.50 2.05 1.00 1.75 1.03 8.10 10.00 8.31 10.10 13.50 10.36 Minnesota 6.63 8.25 7.11 0.00 3.50 1.86 0.00 1.75 0.93 6.63 10.00 8.04 6.63 13.50 9.90 Mississippi 6.50 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.29 0.00 1.75 1.64 6.50 10.00 9.89 6.50 13.50 13.18 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.41 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 6.50 10.00 9.16 6.50 13.50 12.65 Montana 8.24 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.94 0.00 1.75 1.47 8.24 10.00 9.71 8.24 13.50 12.65 Nebraska 6.10 8.25 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.43 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.10 10.00 8.79 6.10 13.50 12.22 Nevada 5.54 8.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • Service Monitoring Report. Table 3.22 has HCLS payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism.47 Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only those years for which a support mechanism was in place. Table 3.27 has the final ICLS true-ups for 2002 through on an average schedule basis, are attributed by NECA on the basis of those carriers' average
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 6.25 156 16 323 24 1993 11,513 1,945 11,564 1.00 5.95 136 12 366 23 1994 13,616 2,347 12,543 0.92 5.35 123 12 441 25 1995 15,889 2,830 14,335 0.90 5.07 120 6 514 48 1996 19,325 3,520 14,598 0.76 4.15 119 5 661 26 1997 22,753 4,259 15,661 0.69 3.68 110 4 851 28 1998 24,250 4,477 14,726 0.61 3.29 64 2 921 36 1999 28,515 5,305 14,980 0.53 2.82 57 2 1,216 31 2000 30,135 5,742 14,909 0.49 2.60 33 1 1,480 251 2001 33,287 6,265 11,380 0.34 1.82 10 * 1,419 199 2002 35,064 5,926 9,956 0.28 1.64 ** ** 988 113 2003 42,664 7,350 8,944 0.21 1.22 ** ** 743 156 2004 63,553 10,895 9,178 0.14 0.84
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 876 2001 899 1,024 917 914 2002 944 1,050 1,021 950 2003 946 1,027 968 954 2004 986 1,025 1,031 985 2005 1,032 1,124 1,032 1,038 2006 1,074 1,154 1,033 1,072 1980 1.85% 2.96% 1981 1.98 2.88 1982 1.97 3.27 1983 2.00 3.48 1984 1.89 3.16 1985 1.86 2.90 1986 1.89 2.95 1987 1.96 3.10 1988 1.99 3.22 1989 1.95 3.29 1990 1.99 3.26 1991 1.99 3.27 1992 1.99 3.29 1993 2.03 3.48 1994 2.07 3.37 3.00% 2.12% 1995 2.09 3.29 2.98 2.14 1996 2.16 3.56 3.12 2.22 1997 2.19 3.70 2.84 2.28 1998 2.22 3.55 2.70 2.31 1999 2.18 3.41 2.63 2.27 2000 2.19 3.50 2.72 2.27 2001 2.19 3.54 2.67 2.28 2002 2.24 3.48 2.94 2.30 2003 2.23 3.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by State ..................................................... Table 2.9 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State ..................Table 2.10 Link Up Assistance - Payments - by State .......................................................... Table 2.11 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction .................. Table 3.13 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................................ Table 3.29 Long-Term Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction .......................................... Table 3.10 Long-Term Support Payments by Study Area ........................................................ Table 3.26 Low-Income Average Benefits by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.12 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .................................................Table 2.5 Low-Income Support Payments ....................................................................... Table 2.2 Low-Income Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.4 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
  • Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by State ..................................................... Table 2.9 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State ..................Table 2.10 Link Up Assistance - Payments - by State .......................................................... Table 2.11 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction .................. Table 3.13 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................................ Table 3.29 Long-Term Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction .......................................... Table 3.10 Long-Term Support Payments by Study Area ........................................................ Table 3.26 Low-Income Average Benefits by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.12 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .................................................Table 2.5 Low-Income Support Payments ....................................................................... Table 2.2 Low-Income Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.4 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A4.pdf
  • 24.00 - 24.00 - Massachusetts 9.89 8.00 9.90 8.00 9.89 8.00 6.76 - 6.77 - 6.77 - Michigan 8.28 15.27 8.04 14.86 8.37 14.22 20.50 11.03 26.08 11.00 24.98 11.00 Minnesota 7.76 9.62 8.07 10.22 8.05 13.43 18.85 39.81 20.05 20.33 13.27 18.20 Mississippi 9.68 20.83 9.76 24.65 9.81 25.32 22.56 18.00 21.60 18.00 20.68 - Missouri 8.59 2.57 9.18 3.29 9.08 2.08 17.92 - 17.69 10.00 17.73 10.00 Montana 9.65 16.16 10.13 19.77 9.86 21.38 12.80 16.10 14.59 16.05 14.01 15.97 Nebraska 8.89 14.72 8.89 14.71 8.81 14.75 14.48 14.00 16.11 13.97 16.11 16.23 Nevada 7.63 5.85 7.07 6.26 7.17 6.32 16.86 60.00 19.57 21.86 18.77 18.00 New Hampshire 8.15 - 8.16 - 8.17 - 18.48 - 17.10 - 18.33
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Service Monitoring Report. Table 3.22 has HCLS payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism. Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only those years for which a support mechanism was in place. Table 3.27 has the final ICLS true-ups for 2002 through 2006, and Table 3.29 has the final LSS true-ups for 2002 through 2006.52 The other numbers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by State ..................................................... Table 2.9 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State ..................Table 2.10 Link Up Assistance - Payments - by State .......................................................... Table 2.11 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction .................. Table 3.13 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................................ Table 3.29 Long-Term Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction .......................................... Table 3.10 Long-Term Support Payments by Study Area ........................................................ Table 3.26 Low-Income Average Benefits by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.12 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .................................................Table 2.5 Low-Income Support Payments ....................................................................... Table 2.2 Low-Income Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.4 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
  • Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by State ..................................................... Table 2.9 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State ..................Table 2.10 Link Up Assistance - Payments - by State .......................................................... Table 2.11 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction .................. Table 3.13 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................................ Table 3.29 Long-Term Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction .......................................... Table 3.10 Long-Term Support Payments by Study Area ........................................................ Table 3.26 Low-Income Average Benefits by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.12 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .................................................Table 2.5 Low-Income Support Payments ....................................................................... Table 2.2 Low-Income Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.4 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 336,575 4.48 4.45 5.26 58 0.70 71 New Hampshire 361,260 28,743 127,107 6.40 6.39 6.60 40 0.48 49 New Jersey 1,967,993 403,276 1,380,730 6.24 6.24 6.35 283 3.38 348 New Mexico 540,055 48,440 256,384 6.50 7.00 9.20 74 0.89 92 New York 3,722,719 436,197 2,140,635 6.33 6.35 6.69 488 5.84 600 North Carolina 2,324,982 175,286 1,011,370 6.26 6.40 7.19 275 3.29 338 North Dakota 115,236 2,814 69,866 6.50 7.00 8.52 16 0.20 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,763,624 175,668 1,276,025 5.66 5.68 6.23 295 3.53 362 Oklahoma 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50 6.87 7.75 105 1.26 129 Pennsylvania 3,541,398 323,320 1,395,758 5.99 5.97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.txt
  • 24.00 - 24.00 - 24.09 - Massachusetts 9.90 8.00 9.89 8.00 9.92 7.67 6.77 - 6.77 - 6.75 - Michigan 7.95 14.86 8.30 14.22 8.22 14.11 25.75 11.00 24.94 11.00 24.58 12.33 Minnesota 8.06 10.22 8.04 13.43 7.87 17.50 20.05 20.33 13.27 18.20 12.25 17.37 Mississippi 9.76 24.65 9.80 25.32 9.78 24.92 21.60 18.00 20.67 - 21.92 - Missouri 9.18 3.29 9.09 2.08 9.08 2.61 17.69 10.00 18.01 10.00 17.90 10.00 Montana 10.06 19.80 9.79 21.41 9.63 21.89 14.59 16.05 14.01 15.97 13.91 16.17 Nebraska 8.89 14.71 8.81 14.75 8.94 14.81 16.11 13.97 16.11 16.23 16.22 17.00 Nevada 7.07 6.26 7.17 6.35 7.23 6.44 19.57 21.86 18.77 18.00 18.91 16.88 New Hampshire 8.16 - 8.17 - 8.08 - 17.10 - 18.33
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • Service Monitoring Report. Table 3.22 has HCLS payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism. Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only those years for which a support mechanism was in place. Table 3.27 has the final ICLS true-ups for 2005 through 2007, and Table 3.29 has the final LSS true-ups for 2005 through 2007.49 The other numbers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 6.25 156 16 323 24 1993 11,513 1,945 11,564 1.00 5.95 136 12 366 23 1994 13,616 2,347 12,543 0.92 5.35 123 12 441 25 1995 15,889 2,830 14,335 0.90 5.07 120 6 514 48 1996 19,325 3,520 14,598 0.76 4.15 119 5 661 26 1997 22,753 4,259 15,662 0.69 3.68 110 4 851 28 1998 24,250 4,477 14,726 0.61 3.29 64 2 921 36 1999 28,515 5,305 14,980 0.53 2.82 57 2 1,216 31 2000 30,135 5,742 14,909 0.49 2.60 33 1 1,480 251 2001 33,287 6,265 11,386 0.34 1.82 10 * 1,419 199 2002 35,064 5,926 9,956 0.28 1.64 ** ** 988 113 2003 42,664 7,350 9,294 0.21 1.22 ** ** 8993 2004 63,553 10,895 9,176 0.14 0.84 **
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • Assistance - Annual Payments - by State ............................................... Table 2.11 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by State or Jurisdiction ............................... Table 2.9 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - Tribal and Non-Tribal Areas - by State ..........Table 2.10 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction .................. Table 3.13 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................................ Table 3.29 Long-Term Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction .......................................... Table 3.10 Long-Term Support Payments by Study Area ........................................................ Table 3.26 Low-Income Average Benefits by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.12 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .................................................Table 2.5 Low-Income Support Payments ....................................................................... Table 2.2 Low-Income Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.4 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC ................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.txt
  • Assistance - Annual Payments - by State ............................................... Table 2.11 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by State or Jurisdiction ............................... Table 2.9 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - Tribal and Non-Tribal Areas - by State ..........Table 2.10 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction .................. Table 3.13 Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................................ Table 3.29 Long-Term Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction .......................................... Table 3.10 Long-Term Support Payments by Study Area ........................................................ Table 3.26 Low-Income Average Benefits by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.12 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .................................................Table 2.5 Low-Income Support Payments ....................................................................... Table 2.2 Low-Income Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.4 Minutes - Interstate Access ­ ILEC ................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 0.89 Kentucky 1,542 1.24 493 1.13 6 1.38 3,343 1.31 4,092,197 1.30 Louisiana 1,710 1.37 488 1.11 6 1.50 3,896 1.52 4,249,605 1.35 Maine 579 0.46 211 0.48 1 0.14 972 0.38 1,393,823 0.44 Maryland 2,792 2.24 854 1.95 4 1.04 5,124 2.00 7,729,202 2.45 Massachusetts 2,609 2.09 1,590 3.63 6 1.55 5,624 2.20 6,513,904 2.06 Michigan 3,719 2.98 1,442 3.29 10 2.39 7,821 3.06 7,930,336 2.51 Minnesota 2,006 1.61 873 1.99 7 1.68 4,164 1.63 4,623,973 1.46 Mississippi 1,018 0.82 182 0.42 4 0.99 2,252 0.88 3,229,711 1.02 Missouri 2,568 2.06 519 1.19 6 1.42 4,835 1.89 6,674,043 2.11 Montana 406 0.33 101 0.23 2 0.40 723 0.28 1,244,348 0.39 Nebraska 606 0.49 298 0.68 2 0.58 1,451 0.57 1,795,825
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • Service Monitoring Report. Table 3.22 has HCLS payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism. Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only those years for which a support mechanism was in place. Table 3.27 has the final ICLS true-ups for 2006 through 2008, and Table 3.29 has the final LSS true-ups for 2006 through 2008.52 The other numbers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • 1.01 9.09 1.07 10.10 1.09 15.48 1.33 7.32 PR-8-02 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0.60 0.76 0.69 0.96 0.77 1.19 0.83 0.91 1n,2n,3n,4n UNE xDSL Loops PR-2-01 Av. Interval Completed - Total No Dispatch 13.60 10.75 17.81 12.08 1b,2a PR-2-02 Av. Interval Completed - Total Dispatch 9.67 9.46 6.69 5.58 PR-4-02 Average Delay Days - Total 3.29 6.65 9.55 7.72 5.08 14.19 9.00 8.24 4x PR-4-04 % Missed Appointment - Verizon - Dispatch 8.80 4.33 2.96 0.66 PR-4-05 % Missed Appointment - Verizon - No Dispatch 0.46 2.49 0.88 11.54 0.73 3.85 0.53 1.41 2c PR-4-14 % Completed On Time [With Serial Number] 85.70 86.98 90.59 94.72 PR-6-01 % Install. Troubles Reported within 30 Days 4.28 8.59
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.txt
  • March April Number Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC Notes Preorder and OSS Interface Availability OSS Response Times PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - EDI 2.75 2.42 2.76 2.26 2.69 2.71 2.70 NA PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - CORBA 2.75 1.19 2.76 0.89 2.69 0.97 2.70 1.45 PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - Web GUI 2.75 5.59 2.76 3.29 2.69 NA 2.70 3.21 PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - EDI 0.12 3.67 0.14 NA 0.12 NA 0.13 NA PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - CORBA 0.12 1.97 0.14 NA 0.12 NA 0.13 NA PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - Web GUI 0.12 5.39 0.14 2.17 0.12 1.15 0.13 1.50 4a PO-1-03 Address Validation - EDI 4.72 3.65 4.46 NA 4.48 NA 4.33
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 0.28 0.47 0.27 0.47 19 - 1991800Resale ISDN BRI 0.34 1.07 0.65 1.19 0.97 1.14 0.82 1.07 0.17 0.96 19 - 1991900Resale CTX 0.65 0.30 0.45 0.28 0.47 0.28 0.34 0.29 0.44 0.26 19 - 1992000Resale PBX 0.10 0.13 0.05 0.12 0.05 0.14 0.08 0.12 0.11 0.10 19 - 1992200Resale DS1 0.00 3.77 2.22 3.28 2.27 3.44 0.00 3.79 0.00 3.29 19 - 1992400Resale VGPL/DS0 0.00 1.11 0.00 0.92 14.29 1.12 0.00 0.88 0.00 1.05abcde 19 - 1992603UNE lp 8db and 5.5db 2/4 w 0.36 0.44 0.33 0.40 0.34 0.47 0.35 0.44 0.35 0.44 19 - 1992702UNE lp 2 w Dig ISDN cap 0.25 0.34 0.19 0.42 0.47 0.42 0.23 0.91 0.35 0.86 19 - 1992801UNE lp 2 w Dig xDSL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • F.2.2 Loops/FL (%) 92.80% 80.96% 99.09% 99.07% 98.90% General - Ordering Average Speed of Answer F.4.1 Region (seconds) 194.86 35.16 259.48 58.19 269.17 29.60 282.45 40.05 315.73 22.08 General - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time F.5.1 Region (seconds) 64.68 25.99 52.80 28.04 84.66 27.23 53.70 24.35 66.71 26.57 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer F.6.1 FL (seconds) 3.29 3.50 4.19 3.82 4.78 % Answered in 30 seconds F.6.2 FL (%) 98.70% 98.50% 97.60% 97.90% 96.90% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer B - 53 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • such as an overbuild cable system, as indicated by the small number of subscribers to BSPs and the limited entry by LEC thus far. Several other MVPD technologies, such as private cable systems and wireless cable systems, offer consumers alternatives to incumbent cable services, but only in limited areas, and their overall share of the MVPD market has declined from 3.29 percent to 2.88 percent over the last year. The Commission recently opened a proceeding to investigate whether the current local franchising process inhibits competitive entry in the retail market for the distribution of video programming. The Franchising NPRM seeks comment on issues relating to the implementation of Section 621(a)(1) of the Communications Act. Specifically, the Commission asks how it can
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.txt
  • instruments. We perform estimation using the generalized method of moments. The first regression differs from the Adelphia Order only in adding TEAM COUNT. Table 1 DBS Penetration and RSN Access Independent Variables Dependent Variable: LN DBS PENETRATION Coefficient z-statistic LN CABLE PRICE 2.11* 2.15 LN CABLE CHANNELS -1.11* -2.61 PHILLY -0.53* -6.59 SANDIEGO -0.47* -5.52 CHARLOTTE -0.21 -1.45 KEYDMA 0.21* 3.29 TEAM COUNT -0.03 -1.94 DBSOVERAIR -0.09 -1.43 CABLECOMP 0.27 1.18 HDTV -0.12 -1.53 INTERNET -0.06 -0.52 LN INCOME -0.29* -2.44 LN MULTIDWELL -0.37* -10.45 LN LATITUDE -0.01 -0.03 CONSTANT -0.73 -0.26 Observations 676 Centered R-Squared 0.26 F-Statistic (14, 661) 40.57 Hansen J Statistic 27.22 * - significant at 95% confidence level Most coefficients change only slightly in terms of statistical
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-170A1.txt
  • overbuild cable system, as indicated by the small number of subscribers to BSPs [broadband service providers] and the limited entry by LEC[s] thus far. Several other MVPD technologies, such as private cable systems and wireless cable systems, offer consumers alternatives to incumbent cable services, but only in limited areas, and their overall share of the MVPD market has declined from 3.29 percent to 2.88 percent over the last year'' (internal citations omitted)). See Turner II, 520 U.S. at 197. Carriage of Digital Television Broadcast Signals, Amendments to Part 76 of the Commission's Rules, CS Docket No. 98-120, Petition for Reconsideration of ABC Television Affiliates Association, CBS Television Network Affiliates Association, NBC Television Affiliates, ABC Owned Television Stations, NBC and Telemundo Stations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.txt
  • $19,167 $45,251 $53,837 14.1 0.28 0.80 82.3 Michigan 8 145.3 58.6 18,158 7,323 $16,433 $31,109 $36,540 16.9 9.73 24. 04 84.3 Minnesota 9 145.1 56.0 16,120 6,219 $16,468 $34,147 $42,576 12.7 5.89 15 .31 85.3 New Mexico 10 136.4 51.0 13,637 5,104 $13,844 $26,102 $32,446 19.5 1.18 3.15 72.7 Utah 13 131.9 43.9 10,146 3,379 $14,248 $33,697 $45,477 13.1 1.13 3.29 7 9.2 Wisconsin 8 131.5 51.4 16,438 6,430 $16,492 $35,111 $44,244 13.0 10.32 2 6.65 94.0 North Dakota 27 128.2 50.2 4,749 1,861 $15,417 $30,125 $42,435 13.9 1.55 3.98 94.0 U.S. Virgin Islands 3 108.6 40.6 36,204 13,549 $14,647 $26,925 NA NA 315.37 831.58 1 7.2 Nebraska 33 108.5 43.4 3,289 1,316 $15,094 $29,650 $37,598 13.5 2.04 5.1 4 96.3
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc98091.pdf
  • 41 196.17 31 6.54 40 Atlantic Cellular Company 1.00 5.03 6.03 42 75.29 45 6.03 41 Dobson Comm. (SEC) 1.41 4.20 5.61 43 77.22 44 5.61 42 Southern New Eng. 5.53 5.53 44 138.13 36 5.53 43 Pricellular Corporation 5.10 5.10 45 127.38 39 5.10 44 ACC-PCS (PK) 5.04 5.04 46 50.42 49 5.04 45 Poka Lambro (PK) 0.06 1.34 3.29 4.69 47 74.67 46 4.69 46 DCC PCS (PK) 4.49 4.49 48 44.85 50 4.49 47 US Unwired 1.29 0.47 2.44 4.21 49 70.85 48 3.99 48 Texas Utilities 3.96 3.96 50 118.66 42 3.96 49 THIRD ANNUAL CMRS COMPETITION REPORT PAGE B-6 Notes: (1) All of the operators' POPs equals their total net POPs. Net POPs are calculated for
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc99136.pdf
  • Inc. 7.15 7.15 37 71.47 46 7.15 37 Puerto Rico Telephone (9) 3.52 3.52 7.04 38 123.27 35 3.52 46 Vanguard Cellular 6.80 6.80 39 170.11 30 6.80 38 Chase Telecom 6.16 6.16 40 184.89 27 6.16 39 American Cellular 5.17 5.17 41 129.35 33 5.17 40 Clearcomm 5.12 5.12 42 76.78 45 5.12 41 Poka Lambro (PK) 0.06 1.34 3.29 4.69 43 54.58 49 4.69 42 DCC PCS (PK) 4.49 4.49 44 44.85 51 4.49 43 Texas Utilities 4.10 4.10 45 122.98 36 4.10 44 Commnet (SEC) 3.88 3.88 46 97.00 41 3.88 45 CC Puerto Rico 3.30 3.30 47 82.53 42 3.30 47 Cincinnati Bell (8) 3.20 3.20 48 63.96 48 3.20 48 Price Comm. 3.18 3.18 49 79.39
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fcc98091.pdf
  • 41 196.17 31 6.54 40 Atlantic Cellular Company 1.00 5.03 6.03 42 75.29 45 6.03 41 Dobson Comm. (SEC) 1.41 4.20 5.61 43 77.22 44 5.61 42 Southern New Eng. 5.53 5.53 44 138.13 36 5.53 43 Pricellular Corporation 5.10 5.10 45 127.38 39 5.10 44 ACC-PCS (PK) 5.04 5.04 46 50.42 49 5.04 45 Poka Lambro (PK) 0.06 1.34 3.29 4.69 47 74.67 46 4.69 46 DCC PCS (PK) 4.49 4.49 48 44.85 50 4.49 47 US Unwired 1.29 0.47 2.44 4.21 49 70.85 48 3.99 48 Texas Utilities 3.96 3.96 50 118.66 42 3.96 49 THIRD ANNUAL CMRS COMPETITION REPORT PAGE B-6 Notes: (1) All of the operators' POPs equals their total net POPs. Net POPs are calculated for
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=85
  • * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=85F ri, 07 Nov 2008 20:50:01 GMT Summary Permits: 43 construction permits for LPTV and TV translator digital companion channels Qualified Bidders: 27 Rounds Completed: 16 Bidding Days: 3 Results for Round 16 Gross Revenue: $114,150.00 - Dollar Change: $4,300.00 - % Change: 3.91 Net Revenue: $90,925.00 - Dollar Change: $2,900.00 - % Change: 3.29 New Bids: 2 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 0 Permits with PWBs*: 30 FCC Held Permits: 13 Eligible Bidders: 23 (of 27 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=85F ri, 07 Nov 2008 22:05:02 GMT Summary Permits: 43 construction permits for LPTV and TV translator digital companion channels Qualified Bidders: 27 Rounds Completed:
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=93
  • Bidders: 66 (of 109 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=93T ue, 03 Apr 2012 15:50:02 GMT Summary Permits: 119 FM Broadcast construction permits Qualified Bidders: 109 Rounds Completed: 23 Bidding Days: 6 Results for Round 23 Gross Revenue: $4,231,550.00 - Dollar Change: $74,000.00 - % Change: 1.78 Net Revenue: $3,648,047.50 - Dollar Change: $116,160.00 - % Change: 3.29 New Bids: 18 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 2 Permits with PWBs*: 93 FCC Held Permits: 26 Eligible Bidders: 64 (of 109 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=93T ue, 03 Apr 2012 17:05:01 GMT Summary Permits: 119 FM Broadcast construction permits Qualified Bidders: 109 Rounds Completed: 24 Bidding Days: 6 Results for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • F.2.2 Loops/FL (%) 92.80% 80.96% 99.09% 99.07% 98.90% General - Ordering Average Speed of Answer F.4.1 Region (seconds) 194.86 35.16 259.48 58.19 269.17 29.60 282.45 40.05 315.73 22.08 General - Maintenance Center Average Answer Time F.5.1 Region (seconds) 64.68 25.99 52.80 28.04 84.66 27.23 53.70 24.35 66.71 26.57 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer F.6.1 FL (seconds) 3.29 3.50 4.19 3.82 4.78 % Answered in 30 seconds F.6.2 FL (%) 98.70% 98.50% 97.60% 97.90% 96.90% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer B - 53 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris04.pdf
  • Nebraska 1998 3.48 90.7% 92.8% 88.9% 2.2% -4.0% 96.6% 97.0% 95.1% 0.4% -1.9% Nevada 1988 2.91 78.4% 90.8% 86.6% 12.3% * -4.2% 93.0% 93.8% 93.3% 0.8% -0.5% New Hampshire 1998 0.00 82.2% 93.6% 92.0% 11.4% * -1.6% 94.8% 97.1% 95.4% 2.4% -1.7% New Jersey 1998 3.43 83.2% 88.6% 93.2% 5.4% 4.5% 93.6% 96.1% 95.8% 2.5% * -0.3% New Mexico 1987 3.29 61.8% 69.6% 84.7% 7.8% * 15.1%* 82.1% 86.0% 91.7% 3.9% * 5.7%* New York 1985 3.30 84.6% 87.5% 89.0% 6.0% * 1.5% 91.4% 94.5% 94.8% 3.1% * 0.3% North Carolina 1986 3.50 73.5% 83.6% 87.6% 10.1% * 3.9% 89.0% 93.5% 93.7% 4.5% * 0.2% North Dakota 1990 1.86 85.2% 93.6% 86.0% 8.5% * -7.6%# 93.9% 96.2% 94.0% 2.3% * -2.1%#
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • PBX Trunk in Urban Areas (As of October 15) 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Monthly Representative Service Charge * $39.24 $39.18 $40.86 $40.96 $40.35 $39.83 $40.10 $40.13 $40.07 $40.36 $39.96 $39.65 $39.79 Subscriber Line Charges 4.98 4.98 4.85 4.78 5.36 5.45 5.61 5.57 5.74 5.17 6.92 6.95 6.68 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 3.29 3.29 2.66 2.47 2.38 1.74 1.36 1.13 0.58 0.49 0.39 0.24 0.24 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 5.63 5.65 5.71 5.90 5.89 5.83 6.05 6.12 6.24 6.27 6.39 6.26 6.19 Total Monthly Charge $53.14 $53.10 $54.08 $54.11 $53.98 $52.85 $53.12 $52.95 $52.63 $52.29 $53.66 $53.10 $52.90 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $49.40 $49.36 $51.49 $51.24 $51.21 $51.05 $51.09 $50.92 $50.46
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • Urban Areas (As of October 15) 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Monthly Representative Service Charge * $39.24 $39.18 $40.86 $40.96 $40.35 $39.83 $40.10 $40.13 $40.07 $40.36 $39.96 $39.65 $39.75 $39.38 Subscriber Line Charges 4.98 4.98 4.85 4.78 5.36 5.45 5.61 5.57 5.74 5.17 6.92 6.95 6.56 6.41 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 3.29 3.29 2.66 2.47 2.38 1.74 1.36 1.13 0.58 0.49 0.39 0.24 0.23 0.17 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 5.63 5.65 5.71 5.90 5.89 5.83 6.05 6.12 6.24 6.27 6.39 6.26 7.51 8.02 Total Monthly Charge $53.14 $53.10 $54.08 $54.11 $53.98 $52.85 $53.12 $52.95 $52.63 $52.29 $53.66 $53.10 $54.06 $53.98 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $49.40 $49.36 $51.49 $51.24 $51.21 $51.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 763 1997 791 945 833 807 1998 818 915 811 831 1999 837 934 872 847 2000 862 986 889 876 2001 899 1,024 917 914 2002 944 1,050 1,021 950 1980 1.85% 2.96% 1981 1.98 2.88 1982 1.97 3.27 1983 2.00 3.48 1984 1.89 3.16 1985 1.86 2.90 1986 1.89 2.95 1987 1.96 3.10 1988 1.99 3.22 1989 1.95 3.29 1990 1.99 3.26 1991 1.99 3.27 1992 1.99 3.29 1993 2.03 3.48 1994 2.07 3.37 3.00% 2.12% 1995 2.09 3.29 2.98 2.14 1996 2.16 3.56 3.12 2.22 1997 2.19 3.70 2.84 2.28 1998 2.22 3.55 2.70 2.31 1999 2.18 3.41 2.63 2.27 2000 2.19 3.50 2.72 2.27 2001 2.19 3.54 2.67 2.28 2002 2.24 3.48 2.94 2.30 Household Expenditure for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 807 1998 818 915 811 831 1999 837 934 872 847 2000 862 986 889 876 2001 899 1,024 917 914 2002 944 1,050 1,021 950 2003 946 1,027 968 954 1980 1.85% 2.96% 1981 1.98 2.88 1982 1.97 3.27 1983 2.00 3.48 1984 1.89 3.16 1985 1.86 2.90 1986 1.89 2.95 1987 1.96 3.10 1988 1.99 3.22 1989 1.95 3.29 1990 1.99 3.26 1991 1.99 3.27 1992 1.99 3.29 1993 2.03 3.48 1994 2.07 3.37 3.00% 2.12% 1995 2.09 3.29 2.98 2.14 1996 2.16 3.56 3.12 2.22 1997 2.19 3.70 2.84 2.28 1998 2.22 3.55 2.70 2.31 1999 2.18 3.41 2.63 2.27 2000 2.19 3.50 2.72 2.27 2001 2.19 3.54 2.67 2.28 2002 2.24 3.48 2.94 2.30 2003 2.23 3.58
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • based on unlimited service where available, and measured service with 200 same-zone 8 local calls elsewhere. 24 Table 3C Nationwide Averages for a Local PBX Business Trunk7 Rates as of October 15 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Representative Service charge $39.24 $40.97 $41.05 $40.81 $39.89 $40.21 8 Subscriber Line Charges 4.98 4.85 4.78 5.32 5.45 5.59 Extra for Touch-tone 3.29 2.66 2.47 2.36 1.74 1.39 Tax including 911 charges 5.63 5.69 5.88 5.93 5.82 6.03 Total monthly charge 53.14 54.17 54.18 54.42 52.90 53.22 # cities offering Unlimited Service 56 54 54 54 53 53 Unlimited Service base rate 49.40 51.54 51.28 51.21 51.20 51.38 Subscriber Line Charges 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.01 6.16 6.17 Extra for Touch-tone 3.29 2.66 2.47
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 10.43 0.00 30 Table 1.18 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a PBX Trunk in Urban Areas 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Monthly Representative Service Charge* $39.24 $39.18 $40.86 $40.96 $40.35 $39.83 $40.10 $40.13 $40.16 Subscriber Line Charges 4.98 4.98 4.85 4.78 5.36 5.45 5.61 5.57 5.72 Extra for Touch-tone 3.29 3.29 2.66 2.47 2.38 1.74 1.36 1.13 0.65 Tax including 911 Charges 5.63 5.65 5.71 5.90 5.89 5.83 6.05 6.12 6.23 Total Monthly Charge 53.14 53.10 54.08 54.11 53.98 52.85 53.12 52.95 52.77 Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $49.40 $49.36 $51.49 $51.24 $51.21 $51.05 $51.09 $50.92 $50.87 Subscriber Line Charges 5.68 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.02 6.16 6.17 6.10 6.57 Extra
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • and State Subscriber Line Charges 6.93 6.28 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 0.63 0.00 Other 12.60 12.85 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service 71.29 66.04 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-rate Service 54 - Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $20.81 $17.40 Federal and State Subscriber Line Charges 8.55 8.25 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 0.42 0.00 Other 5.82 3.29 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 35.61 29.19 Cost of a 5-minute Daytime Call 9.24¢ 8.00¢ Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 78 - Basic Connection Charge for Three Lines $155.84 $149.25 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 0.67 0.00 Other 9.99 9.80 Total Connection Charge for Three Lines 166.50 153.47 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • Association 12.70% 12.40% 14.52% - - - 12.62% 1ACS of Anchorage 20.05 12.42 16.95 45.35% (0.31)% 21.49%35.41 2ALLTEL Alabama, Inc. 10.76 11.80 18.10 9.42 3.47 7.58 3ALLTEL Arkansas, Inc. 12.95 11.80 12.53 8.99 (9,355.47) 20.81 16.12 4ALLTEL Carolina, Inc. 8.82 11.80 (0.06) 10.31 (2,020.31) 4.57 8.24 5ALLTEL Florida, Inc. 9.71 11.80 5.94 (4.46) 4.11 1.53 6ALLTEL Georgia Properties 8.19 8.44 3.29 7.88 (5,981.88) 15.05 11.30 7ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. 5.25 11.80 (8.08) 12.46 2.53 9.72 8ALLTEL Mississippi, Inc. 11.30 11.80 8.90 11.07 8.32 9.80 9ALLTEL Missouri, Inc. 11.99 11.80 12.94 13.14 10.74 11.97 10ALLTEL New York, Inc. 10.33 11.80 2.98 30.04 (12,202.60) 7.80 18.56 11ALLTEL Oklahoma Properties 11.20 11.80 12.38 11.03 4.91 10.00 12ALLTEL Pennsylvania, Inc. 10.42 11.80 7.45 12.21 (12,326.38) 8.12
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 48,094 1.31 40,120 1.09 7,975 0.22 Mississippi 133,052 7.81 18,872 1.11 114,180 6.70 Missouri 66,380 1.53 43,165 0.99 23,215 0.53 Montana 46,391 7.18 8,374 1.30 38,016 5.88 Nebraska 23,621 1.96 13,960 1.16 9,660 0.80 Nevada 14,680 0.93 20,016 1.27 -5,335 -0.34 New Hampshire 8,544 0.81 14,279 1.36 -5,736 -0.55 New Jersey 3,504 0.04 91,952 1.14 -88,447 -1.09 New Mexico 37,701 3.29 14,953 1.31 22,748 1.99 New York 53,021 0.34 159,102 1.03 -106,081 -0.69 North Carolina 34,304 0.56 65,174 1.07 -30,870 -0.51 North Dakota 24,969 4.98 6,148 1.23 18,821 3.75 Ohio 19,587 0.23 76,213 0.91 -56,626 -0.67 Oklahoma 65,942 2.63 24,411 0.98 41,532 1.66 Oregon 46,888 1.84 28,929 1.13 17,958 0.70 Pennsylvania 28,812 0.28 92,096 0.91 -63,285 -0.62 Rhode Island 25 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 6.25 155 16 323 24 1993 11,513 1,945 11,564 1.00 5.95 135 12 366 23 1994 13,616 2,347 12,543 0.92 5.35 123 12 441 25 1995 15,889 2,830 14,335 0.90 5.07 119 6 514 48 1996 19,325 3,520 14,598 0.76 4.15 119 5 661 26 1997 22,753 4,259 15,662 0.69 3.68 110 4 851 28 1998 24,250 4,477 14,726 0.61 3.29 50 3 921 36 1999 28,515 5,305 14,980 0.53 2.82 57 2 1,216 31 2000 29,216 6,627 14,901 0.51 2.25 33 1 1,480 251 Note: Data represent traffic and circuits from all U.S. points. 1/ Billed revenue in Table 6.1 differs from billed revenue in Table 6.3. The amounts shown here represent charges to end-user customers and equal the amounts
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 6.25 156 16 323 24 1993 11,513 1,945 11,564 1.00 5.95 136 12 366 23 1994 13,616 2,347 12,543 0.92 5.35 123 12 441 25 1995 15,889 2,830 14,335 0.90 5.07 120 6 514 48 1996 19,325 3,520 14,598 0.76 4.15 119 5 661 26 1997 22,753 4,259 15,661 0.69 3.68 110 4 851 28 1998 24,250 4,477 14,726 0.61 3.29 64 2 921 36 1999 28,515 5,305 14,980 0.53 2.82 57 2 1,216 31 2000 30,135 5,742 14,909 0.49 2.60 33 1 1,480 251 2001 33,287 6,265 11,380 0.34 1.82 10 * 1,419 199 2002 35,064 5,926 9,695 0.28 1.64 ** ** 988 113 * Denotes revenues less than $500,000. ** Data not filed. 1 Billed revenues in Table 6.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 6.25 156 16 323 24 1993 11,513 1,945 11,564 1.00 5.95 136 12 366 23 1994 13,616 2,347 12,543 0.92 5.35 123 12 441 25 1995 15,889 2,830 14,335 0.90 5.07 120 6 514 48 1996 19,325 3,520 14,598 0.76 4.15 119 5 661 26 1997 22,753 4,259 15,661 0.69 3.68 110 4 851 28 1998 24,250 4,477 14,726 0.61 3.29 64 2 921 36 1999 28,515 5,305 14,980 0.53 2.82 57 2 1,216 31 2000 30,135 5,742 14,909 0.49 2.60 33 1 1,480 251 2001 33,287 6,265 11,380 0.34 1.82 10 * 1,419 199 2002 35,064 5,926 9,956 0.28 1.64 ** ** 988 113 2003 42,664 7,350 8,944 0.21 1.22 ** ** 620 156 * Denotes revenues less than $500,000.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 6.25 156 16 323 24 1993 11,513 1,945 11,564 1.00 5.95 136 12 366 23 1994 13,616 2,347 12,543 0.92 5.35 123 12 441 25 1995 15,889 2,830 14,335 0.90 5.07 120 6 514 48 1996 19,325 3,520 14,598 0.76 4.15 119 5 661 26 1997 22,753 4,259 15,661 0.69 3.68 110 4 851 28 1998 24,250 4,477 14,726 0.61 3.29 64 2 921 36 1999 28,515 5,305 14,980 0.53 2.82 57 2 1,216 31 2000 30,135 5,742 14,909 0.49 2.60 33 1 1,480 251 2001 33,287 6,265 11,386 0.34 1.82 10 * 1,419 199 Note: Data represent traffic and circuits from all U.S. points. * Denotes revenues less than $500,000. 1/ Billed revenues in Table 6.1 differ from billed revenues
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 Jamaica 1.75 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 24/ 1.76 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 Korea, Rep. 2.36 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 25/ 0.89 0.79 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.48 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.29 3.56 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 Netherlands 1.45 1.56 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 Pakistan 2.55 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 1.02 Peru 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.23 1.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • qualify for these payments are included in the table. Table 3.25 provides estimates, by non- rural study area, of the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism, along with the hold-harmless support for the years 2000 through 2003.41 Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.28 has ICLS payments. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables (except 3.31) contains the annual amounts for 1998 through 2003. The 1998 amounts in Tables 3.23, 3.26, and 3.29 are the actual payments after processing the final true-ups for 1998.42 Table 3.29 has the final LSS true-ups for 1999 through 2001.43 The
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • (As of October 15th) 7 - 21 Year 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Monthly Representative Service Charge* $39.24 $39.18 $40.86 $40.96 $40.35 $39.83 $40.10 $40.13 $40.07 $40.36 $39.96 $39.65 $39.75 $39.38 Subscriber Line Charges 4.98 4.98 4.85 4.78 5.36 5.45 5.61 5.57 5.74 5.17 6.92 6.95 6.56 6.41 Extra for Touch-tone 3.29 3.29 2.66 2.47 2.38 1.74 1.36 1.13 0.58 0.49 0.39 0.24 0.23 0.17 Taxes, including 911 and Other Charges 5.63 5.65 5.71 5.90 5.89 5.83 6.05 6.12 6.24 6.27 6.39 6.26 7.51 8.02 Total Monthly Charge 53.14 53.10 54.08 54.11 53.98 52.85 53.12 52.95 52.63 52.29 53.66 53.10 54.06 53.98 Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $49.40 $49.36 $51.49 $51.24 $51.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
  • - Beneficiaries - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State ...................Table 2.10 LinkUp Assistance - Payments - by State ........................................................... Table 2.11 LinkUp Assistance - Payments - by Study Area ................................................. Table 2.12 Local Switching Support - Payment History .......................................................... Table 3.7 Local Switching Support Payment Projections by Jurisdiction .............................. Table 3.14 Local Switching Support Payment Projections by Study Area ...............................Table 3.29 Long-Term Support - Payment History .................................................................. Table 3.6 Long-Term Support Payment Projections by Jurisdiction ...................................... Table 3.11 Long-Term Support Payment Projections by Study Area .......................................Table 3.26 Loops - by Jurisdiction ....................................................................... Table 3.20 Loops - by Study Area ........................................................................ Table 3.34 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .............................................. Table 2.3 Low-Income Programs Fund Sizes and Projections ......................................... Table 2.4 Low-Income
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • Hampshire 172 65 106 0.58 23 112 New Jersey 1,288 505 782 4.25 167 824 New Mexico 200 92 109 0.59 23 114 New York 2,185 845 1,340 7.29 287 1,411 North Carolina 901 412 489 2.66 105 515 North Dakota 91 30 61 0.33 13 64 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 1,086 481 605 3.29 129 637 Oklahoma 330 127 203 1.10 43 214 Oregon 445 173 273 1.48 58 287 Pennsylvania 1,383 595 788 4.28 168 830 Puerto Rico 245 66 179 0.97 38 189 Rhode Island 96 46 50 0.27 11 53 South Carolina 409 188 221 1.20 47 232 South Dakota 86 32 54 0.29 11 57 Tennessee 552 258 294 1.60
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • through 2002 in the 2003 filing. Table 3.18 shows the unseparated NTS revenue requirements for each year. Table 3.19 shows the number of loops. Table 3.20 shows the unseparated NTS revenue requirement per loop. Table 3.21 shows the HCLS payments for 2000 through 2004. The next several tables in this section are data for individual study areas. Tables 3.22 through 3.29 are derived from the quarterly USAC filings of projected payments. Table 3.22 has HCLS payments.41 Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Only those study areas 39 These are the carriers that settle on a cost basis. Costs for the remaining ILECs, which settle on an average schedule basis, are attributed by NECA on the basis of those carriers'
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-intro.pdf
  • High-Cost Model Support Payment Projections by State or Jurisdiction .............. Table 3.8 High-Cost Support - Non-Rural by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.24 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by State or Jurisdiction ............. Table 3.13 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by State - ILECs and CLECs ..... Table 3.14 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Study Area ........................Table 3.29 High-Cost Support Mechanisms ­ Monthly Support per Loop by State .............. Table 3.15 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • elsewhere. 7 - 22 Table 7.10 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a PBX Trunk in Urban Areas 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Monthly Representative Service Charge* $39.24 $39.18 $40.86 $40.96 $40.35 $39.83 $40.10 $40.13 $40.07 $40.36$40.08 Subscriber Line Charges 4.98 4.98 4.85 4.78 5.36 5.45 5.61 5.57 5.74 5.17 6.79 Extra for Touch-tone 3.29 3.29 2.66 2.47 2.38 1.74 1.36 1.13 0.58 0.49 0.39 Taxes, including 911 and Other Charges 5.63 5.65 5.71 5.90 5.89 5.83 6.05 6.12 6.24 6.27 6.39 Total Monthly Charge 53.14 53.10 54.08 54.11 53.98 52.85 53.12 52.95 52.63 52.29 53.65 Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $49.40 $49.36 $51.49 $51.24 $51.21 $51.05 $51.09 $50.92 $50.46 $51.13$50.04 Subscriber Line Charges 5.68
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes .......................................................................................Table 9.3 Switching Systems ..................................................................................................Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................Table 11.11 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ............................................. Table 1.1 Transmission Systems .............................................................................................Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Fund Factors ................................. Table 1.2 Unseparated Non-Trafffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - by Jurisdiction ....... Table 3.17 Unseparated Non-Trafffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ........ Table 3.29 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Jurisdiction ................. Table 3.19 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area .................. Table 3.31 5 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket No. 98-202 October 2001 Introduction and Summary This is the fifth report in a series of reports prepared by federal and state staff members for the Federal-State Joint
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 1.25 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Mechanism ­ Net Dollar Flow by State .................. Table 3.18 Interstate Access Support - Payment Projections - by Jurisdiction ........................ Table 3.11 Interstate Access Support - Payment Projections - by Study Area ......................... Table 3.29 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment - Plant ................................................................................................... Table 11.12 Investment - Reserves ............................................................................................. Table 11.4 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State ...........................................................Table 2.7 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by Study Area ................................................ Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • Jamaica 1.75 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 Japan 10/ 1.76 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.26 Korea, Rep. 2.36 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 Mexico 11/ 0.89 0.791 0.75 0.715 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.29 3.56 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.75 Netherlands 1.45 1.56 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.12 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.75 Pakistan 2.55 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.72 Peru 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.40
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 1.55 3.05 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.10 2.10 0.85 1.60 0.80 1.55 2.05 4.05 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1971 10/ 1.60 3.10 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.17 2.22 0.85 1.60 0.76 1.46 2.05 4.05 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1972 1.60 3.10 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.17 2.22 0.85 1.60 0.76 1.46 2.05 4.05 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1973 11/ 1.69 3.29 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.26 2.41 0.85 1.60 0.76 1.46 2.19 4.29 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1974 1.69 3.29 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.26 2.41 0.85 1.60 0.76 1.46 2.19 4.29 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1975 12/ 1.85 3.55 1.20 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.60 3.05 1.04 1.98 0.64 1.22 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1976 13/ 1.86 3.56 1.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 1.55 3.05 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.10 2.10 0.85 1.60 0.80 1.55 2.05 4.05 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1971 10/ 1.60 3.10 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.17 2.22 0.85 1.60 0.76 1.46 2.05 4.05 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1972 1.60 3.10 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.17 2.22 0.85 1.60 0.76 1.46 2.05 4.05 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1973 11/ 1.69 3.29 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.26 2.41 0.85 1.60 0.76 1.46 2.19 4.29 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1974 1.69 3.29 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.26 2.41 0.85 1.60 0.76 1.46 2.19 4.29 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1975 12/ 1.85 3.55 1.20 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.60 3.05 1.04 1.98 0.64 1.22 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1976 13/ 1.86 3.56 1.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • REVENUES 3,264 15,998 1/ 51,319 30,194 20,561 1,394 COSTS & EXPENSES 2,517 12,199 1/ 44,351 24,852 15,185 1,378 INTEREST EXPENSE 130 505 191 1,230 761 109 OTHER INCOME & ADJUSTMENTS 2/ 212 390 582 (128) 797 116 INCOME TAXES 321 1,388 2,721 1,529 2,151 7 NET INCOME 508 2,296 4,638 2,455 3,261 16 EARNINGS PER SHARE 2.72 2.09 2.85 3.16 3.29 0.06 DIVIDENDS PER SHARE 1.12 1.15 1.32 3.02 1.44 0 AVG. SHARES OUTSTANDING (MIL.) 186 1,099 1,630 776 992 253 TOTAL ASSETS 5,633 25,339 58,635 53,964 36,301 4,873 PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP. (NET) 3,190 13,873 22,710 35,039 22,861 3,668 LONG-TERM DEBT 1,874 4,610 6,826 13,265 7,348 1,707 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 2,209 8,308 22,647 12,789 15,165 1,679 OPERATING DATA: CUSTOMER LINES (THOUS.)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 1.55 3.05 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.10 2.10 0.85 1.60 0.80 1.55 2.05 4.05 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1971 10/ 1.60 3.10 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.17 2.22 0.85 1.60 0.76 1.46 2.05 4.05 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1972 1.60 3.10 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.17 2.22 0.85 1.60 0.76 1.46 2.05 4.05 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1973 11/ 1.69 3.29 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.26 2.41 0.85 1.60 0.76 1.46 2.19 4.29 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1974 1.69 3.29 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.26 2.41 0.85 1.60 0.76 1.46 2.19 4.29 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1975 12/ 1.85 3.55 1.20 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.60 3.05 1.04 1.98 0.64 1.22 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1976 13/ 1.86 3.56 1.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 0.59 4.34 21.2GA Hawaii 137.2 86.0 51.3 44.8 6.5 0.70 (1.06) 0.46 0.09 6.4 HI Idaho 25.3 21.5 3.8 1.7 2.2 (1.26) (0.69) (0.41) (2.36) 4.5 ID Illinois 483.7 333.9 149.8 116.6 33.1 1.23 0.54 0.59 2.36 30.8 IL Indiana 273.5 195.8 77.8 59.1 18.7 2.02 (0.37) 0.81 2.45 16.2 IN Iowa 48.7 41.0 7.7 5.1 2.6 (1.59) (0.75) (0.95) (3.29) 5.9 IA Kansas 174.9 75.3 99.6 94.9 4.8 (0.74) (0.03) (0.00) (0.78) 5.5KS Kentucky 135.1 73.8 61.3 49.3 12.0 1.17 0.39 1.55 10.4KY Louisiana 145.4 68.5 76.9 68.5 8.4 (0.21) (0.07) 0.19 (0.10) 8.5 LA Maine 40.7 11.0 29.8 22.0 7.8 0.86 0.06 0.27 1.19 6.6ME Maryland 233.4 113.5 119.9 70.4 49.5 7.24 6.60 5.98 19.82 29.7MD Massachusetts 182.8 104.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99136.pdf
  • Inc. 7.15 7.15 37 71.47 46 7.15 37 Puerto Rico Telephone (9) 3.52 3.52 7.04 38 123.27 35 3.52 46 Vanguard Cellular 6.80 6.80 39 170.11 30 6.80 38 Chase Telecom 6.16 6.16 40 184.89 27 6.16 39 American Cellular 5.17 5.17 41 129.35 33 5.17 40 Clearcomm 5.12 5.12 42 76.78 45 5.12 41 Poka Lambro (PK) 0.06 1.34 3.29 4.69 43 54.58 49 4.69 42 DCC PCS (PK) 4.49 4.49 44 44.85 51 4.49 43 Texas Utilities 4.10 4.10 45 122.98 36 4.10 44 Commnet (SEC) 3.88 3.88 46 97.00 41 3.88 45 CC Puerto Rico 3.30 3.30 47 82.53 42 3.30 47 Cincinnati Bell (8) 3.20 3.20 48 63.96 48 3.20 48 Price Comm. 3.18 3.18 49 79.39
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc98091.pdf
  • 41 196.17 31 6.54 40 Atlantic Cellular Company 1.00 5.03 6.03 42 75.29 45 6.03 41 Dobson Comm. (SEC) 1.41 4.20 5.61 43 77.22 44 5.61 42 Southern New Eng. 5.53 5.53 44 138.13 36 5.53 43 Pricellular Corporation 5.10 5.10 45 127.38 39 5.10 44 ACC-PCS (PK) 5.04 5.04 46 50.42 49 5.04 45 Poka Lambro (PK) 0.06 1.34 3.29 4.69 47 74.67 46 4.69 46 DCC PCS (PK) 4.49 4.49 48 44.85 50 4.49 47 US Unwired 1.29 0.47 2.44 4.21 49 70.85 48 3.99 48 Texas Utilities 3.96 3.96 50 118.66 42 3.96 49 THIRD ANNUAL CMRS COMPETITION REPORT PAGE B-6 Notes: (1) All of the operators' POPs equals their total net POPs. Net POPs are calculated for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM Music Format Market Measure 2005 5.08 4.86 4.00 * (1229) (819) (1019) 2007 5.08 4.77 4.05 * (896) (788) (1333) 2009 3.84 3.67 2.93 * (805) (810) (1295) Contour Measure 2005 3.65 4.71 * 5.91 * (1250) (827) (990) 2007 3.37 4.42 * 5.62 * (1018) (793) (1206) 2009 2.48 3.29 * 4.14 * (925) (766) (1219) Foreign Language Format Market Measure 2005 2.45 2.07 1.85 * (89) (50) (75) 2007 2.87 2.28 2.17 * (69) (57) (104) 2009 2.23 1.49 * 1.53 * (76) (54) (116) Contour Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/TABALL02.pdf
  • 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.10 7 12 9 10 18China 1,585 52,979 245 54,809 85,937 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.45 7 13 8 8 10Korea, South 3,037 36,700 1,261 40,998 27,085 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.29 1 14 n.a. n.a. n.a.Austria 387 39,021 0 39,408 229 0.01 0.20 3.26 2.99 1 15 13 16 25Italy 15,613 18,834 0 34,447 7,151 0.83 0.18 0.27 3.29 1 16 16 13 12Sweden 4,887 29,207 32 34,126 2,080 0.17 0.14 0.18 0.49 6 17 12 9 11Brazil 5,724 19,547 6,570 31,841 42,929 0.22 0.11 0.09 0.24 7 18 15 15 15Taiwan 2,201 27,413 1 29,615 14,811 0.08 0.06 0.12 0.29 1 19 14 11 8France 13,738 5,778 7,561 27,077 6,581 1.03 0.38 0.29 0.51 7 20 19 26
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport_2000.pdf
  • 24,856 864 0.07 0.45 1.87 3.52 1 13 11 6 9Sweden 2,958 17,895 0 20,853 2,619 0.17 0.49 0.28 0.28 7 14 9 11 10Hong Kong 1,663 14,463 1,261 17,387 1,299 0.11 0.11 0.26 0.41 7 15 22 15 17Taiwan 3,602 12,955 631 17,188 1,137 0.27 0.29 0.70 1.64 1 16 24 17 18Italy 2,740 10,294 0 13,034 4,260 0.27 3.29 2.35 1.98 3 17 14 24 26Israel 1,357 9,138 240 10,735 388 0.14 0.21 0.75 1.28 6 18 16 29 n.a .Chile 1,177 7,847 90 9,114 373 0.15 0.22 0.82 1.08 1 19 13 14 19Switzerland 2,799 6,235 0 9,034 1,947 0.45 0.30 1.43 1.11 7 20 23 n.a . 21India 1,839 5,920 0 7,759 280 0.31 0.46 1.40 1.77
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM Music Format Market Measure 2005 5.08 4.86 4.00 * (1229) (819) (1019) 2007 5.08 4.77 4.05 * (896) (788) (1333) 2009 3.84 3.67 2.93 * (805) (810) (1295) Contour Measure 2005 3.65 4.71 * 5.91 * (1250) (827) (990) 2007 3.37 4.42 * 5.62 * (1018) (793) (1206) 2009 2.48 3.29 * 4.14 * (925) (766) (1219) Foreign Language Format Market Measure 2005 2.45 2.07 1.85 * (89) (50) (75) 2007 2.87 2.28 2.17 * (69) (57) (104) 2009 2.23 1.49 * 1.53 * (76) (54) (116) Contour Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol_response082800.pdf
  • venture and/or contract considered or proposed since 1997 involving Time Warner and/or AOL and/or AT&T. Consistent with the direction of FCC Staff, the parties are providing all necessary information in its responses to Questions 3.31, 3.32, and 3.33 below regarding any contracts or joint ventures currently under discussion with AT&T, as well as in its responses to Questions 3.27 and 3.29 regarding actual joint ventures, contracts, or equity relationships with AT&T. 3.29Please list each company in which either Time Warner and/or AOL currently hold common ownership with AT&T. Please identify respective ownership percentages, the number of each company's board seats, and each company's respective voting rights. AOL: The only company we have identified in which AOL holds a 5% or greater