FCC Web Documents citing 3.25

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298799A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298799A1.pdf
  • wireless communications employing a network built in accordance with the FCC Cost Model in 10 megahertz of spectrum in four scenarios depicting various types of emergencies. For each scenario, we calculate the expected value of utilization of the network. We assume for purposes of this analysis an LTE network whose capacity averaged over each sector is 7.5 Mb/s (downlink) and 3.25 Mb/s (uplink). These figures represent average throughput and are in-line with current industry benchmarks. In addition, while studies of voice communications among present day emergency responders during disaster events have shown that the command and control communication structure used by public safety results in a sparse, highly compact process of communication, our analysis departs from this model to yield a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1276A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1276A1.txt
  • antenna restrictions may petition the Commission to determine if the restrictions are permissible or prohibited by the Rule. The Rule places the burden of demonstrating that a challenged restriction complies with the Rule on the party seeking to impose the restriction. the petition Petitioners ask the Commission to rule on the validity of the antenna installation restrictions found in Section 3.25 of the Association's CC&Rs, which provides: No television, radio, shortwave, microwave, satellite or other antenna, pole, tower or dish shall be placed, constructed or maintained upon any lot (including, but not limited to, upon the roof of exterior walls of any Living Unit or other structure) unless: (i) the antenna, pole, tower or dish is fully screened and not Visible
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2925A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2925A2.txt
  • 2.17 4.18 (2.01) August 2000 2.49 3.03 (0.54) September 2000 2.70 3.80 (1.10) September 2000 2.16 2.92 (0.76) October 2000 3.43 3.38 0.05 October 2000 2.52 3.40 (0.88) November 2000 4.95 3.94 1.01 November 2000 2.52 3.14 (0.62) December 2000 3.03 4.74 (1.71) December 2000 2.88 3.87 (0.99) January 2001 2.33 4.15 (1.82) January 2001 2.54 3.56 (1.02) February 2001 3.25 3.74 (0.49) February 2001 2.42 3.13 (0.71) March 2001 3.42 3.36 0.06 March 2001 2.44 3.01 (0.57) Oklahoma March 2001 1.68 3.69 (2.01) March 2001 2.29 2.83 (0.54) Kansas March 2001 1.97 3.56 (1.59) March 2001 2.78 3.13 (0.35) Performance Measure Differences Attachment A-7 Objective VIII, Procedure 3 8 Performance Measurement No. 6 Time from PIC change request to implementation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3360A1.txt
  • U.S. Census. Douglas will continue to receive local service from noncommercial educational Station KRMC(FM), (Channel 219B1), as well as Station KDAP-FM (Channel 243A), and AM Stations KDAP and KAPR. Petition for rule making, Exhibit A. See, e.g., Gualala, California, 5 FCC Rcd 6268 (1990). Petitioner advises that if Channel 237C is allotted at Tombstone, Station KCDQ would be limited to 3.25 kW ERP at 741 meters HAAT on the 238 degree radial to provide equivalent protection to the allocation of Channel 237C at Caborca. With regard to the allocation of Channel 239B at Santa Cruz, the KCDQ facility would be limited to an ERP of 25.6 kW at 708 meters HAAT on the 217 degree radial. A white area refers to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.txt
  • on steps to maintain or exceed such standards and practices. ' 3.24. Notice of Obligations. Domestic Communications Companies shall instruct appropriate officials, employees, contractors, and agents as to the security restrictions and safeguards imposed by this Agreement, including the reporting requirements in Sections 5.5, 5.6, and 5.7 of this Agreement, and shall issue periodic reminders to them of such obligations. 3.25. Access to Classified, Controlled Unclassified, or Sensitive Information Nothing contained in this Agreement shall limit or affect the authority of a U.S. government agency Page 20 to deny, limit or revoke Domestic Communications Companies' access to Classified, Controlled Unclassified, and Sensitive Information under that agency's jurisdiction. ARTICLE 4: DISPUTES 4.1. The Parties shall use their best efforts to resolve any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • 165 0.62 0.50 0 3.67 100 Average Block, Sports, AM Drive 0.64 0.00 0 7.29 165 0.16 0.00 0 2.00 100 Average Block, Advertisements, Evening 1.18 1.04 0 7.50 169 1.07 0.77 0 7.50 114 Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, Evening 0.82 0.25 0 7.39 169 0.62 0.28 0 6.25 114 Average Block, Music, Evening 2.57 2.90 0 11.53 169 3.23 3.25 0 11.53 114 Average Block, News, Evening 0.37 0.00 0 2.83 169 0.12 0.00 0 2.15 114 Average Block, Sports, Evening 0.99 0.00 0 13.08 169 0.34 0.00 0 8.23 114 Midwest Census Region 25% 251 25% 251 South Census Region 40% 251 40% 251 West Census Region 17% 251 17% 251 Notes: 1. "Format 101 Count" counts the number
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • Overbuilder in Overbuilt Markets Dependent Variable (Log Price) Estimated Coefficient t-Statistic Log HHI 0.110*** 3.23 Log Income 0.042*** 3.76 Log National Subscribers 0.029*** 14.55 Log Capacity 0.074*** 3.46 Log Density -0.000 0.21 Log Density Squared 0.000 0.03 Overbuild Competition -0.112*** 12.14 Local-into-Local 0.032*** 4.22 Vertical Affiliation -0.071*** 7.84 Log Channels 0.118*** 3.92 2007 0.054*** 9.60 2008 0.106*** 16.66 Constant 0.993*** 3.25 Observations 1993 --- Centered R-Squared 0.46 --- Root Mean Squared Error 0.103 --- Significant at: *** 99-percent confidence level. Second Regression Estimation: Includes only Incumbent Observations in Overbuilt Markets Dependent Variable (Log Price) Estimated Coefficient t-Statistic Log HHI 0.072** 2.26 Log Income 0.026** 2.31 Log National Subscribers 0.030*** 14.58 Log Capacity 0.071*** 3.22 Log Density -0.000 0.87 Log Density Squared
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • Conversation Minute 3/ 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225384A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225384A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225384A1.txt
  • Licensee Name: GANNETT GEORGIA, L.P. Requested Facility: Ch No:4 N Latitude: 32-45-10; W Longitude: 83-33-32 ERP (Average): 7 kW; HAAT: 180.8 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 17433 Call Sign: KLDT-DT File No: BDSTA-20020703ABO City: LAKE DALLAS State: TX Grant Date: 07/30/2002 Licensee Name: JOHNSON BROADCASTING OF DALLAS, INC. Requested Facility: Ch No:54 N Latitude: 33-0-19; W Longitude: 96-58-59 ERP (Average): 3.25 kW; HAAT: 121.4 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 13991 Call Sign: WFIE-DT File No: BDSTA-20020709ABI City: EVANSVILLE State: IN Grant Date: 07/26/2002 Licensee Name: LIBCO, INC. Requested Facility: Ch No:46 N Latitude: 37-53-14; W Longitude: 87-31-7 ERP (Average): 128 kW; HAAT: 310 meters; Antenna: ND -6- Facility ID: 22570 Call Sign: KTVL-DT File No: BDSTA-20020710AAS City: MEDFORD State: OR Grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.txt
  • + - - . 16 TABLE 3 PARAMETRIC WEIBULL SURVIVAL ESTIMATES (Z-statistics in parentheses) Weibull (No Unobserved Heterogeneity) Weibull (Gamma-distributed Unobserved Heterogeneity) Millions of Subs -0.07*** (3.92) -0.13*** (3.95) Missing Subs -0.65*** (2.61) -1.07** (2.31) Vertical Integration 0.00 (0.07) 0.00 (0.02) Spinoff -1.39*** (2.64) -2.69*** (2.67) Missing Vertical or Spinoff 0.56** (2.51) 1.74*** (3.22) Born before 1984 -0.89* (1.94) -3.48*** (3.25) Constant -2.87*** (9.23) -4.46*** (6.58) a 0.28* (1.83) 2.39*** (3.95) sports a 0.79 (1.63) 3.36 (1.27) shop a 0.68** (2.52) 4.26*** (2.57) gvariance 6.30*** (3.24) Observations 305 305 Failures 96 96 Log Likelihood -363.10*** -348.97*** *- significant at 10% level, ** - significant at 5% level, *** - significant at 1% level 17 In the estimation without unobserved heterogeneity, an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ...................................... Table 3.31 High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes - by State or Jurisdiction.......Table 3.18 High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes - by Study Area ................. Table 3.32 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction............................. Table 3.6 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by Study Area ......................................... Table 3.22 High-Cost Model Support Payments by Non-Rural Study Area ........................ Table 3.25 High-Cost Model Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.9 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History ............................................................ Table 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History - ILECs and CETCs ........................... Table 3.2 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total ............................................................ Chart 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total - ILECs and CETCs ............................Chart 3.2 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by State or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.txt
  • ...................................... Table 3.31 High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes - by State or Jurisdiction.......Table 3.18 High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes - by Study Area ................. Table 3.32 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction............................. Table 3.6 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by Study Area ......................................... Table 3.22 High-Cost Model Support Payments by Non-Rural Study Area ........................ Table 3.25 High-Cost Model Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.9 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History ............................................................ Table 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History - ILECs and CETCs ........................... Table 3.2 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total ............................................................ Chart 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total - ILECs and CETCs ............................Chart 3.2 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by State or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Only those study areas that are eligible for these payments, regardless of whether they receive any support, are included in the table. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Only those study areas that are eligible for these payments, regardless of whether they receive any support, are included in the table. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism.42 Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has 40 These are the carriers that settle on a cost basis. Costs for the remaining ILECs, which settle on an average schedule basis, are attributed by NECA on the basis of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • Minute) * To 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Customer Perception Surveys - Sample Sizes ........................................................ Table 9.5 Embedded High-Cost Loop Fund Formulas ......................................................... Table 3.3 Expenses and Taxes ................................................................................................ Table 11.2 Expenses - Total Operating ..................................................................................... Table 11.9 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction............................. Table 3.6 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by Study Area ......................................... Table 3.22 High-Cost Model Support Payments by Non-Rural Study Area ........................ Table 3.25 High-Cost Model Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.9 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History ............................................................ Table 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History - ILECs and CETCs ........................... Table 3.2 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total ............................................................ Chart 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total - ILECs and CETCs ............................Chart 3.2 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by State or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
  • Customer Perception Surveys - Sample Sizes ........................................................ Table 9.5 Embedded High-Cost Loop Fund Formulas ......................................................... Table 3.3 Expenses and Taxes ................................................................................................ Table 11.2 Expenses - Total Operating ..................................................................................... Table 11.9 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction............................. Table 3.6 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by Study Area ......................................... Table 3.22 High-Cost Model Support Payments by Non-Rural Study Area ........................ Table 3.25 High-Cost Model Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.9 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History ............................................................ Table 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History - ILECs and CETCs ........................... Table 3.2 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total ............................................................ Chart 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total - ILECs and CETCs ............................Chart 3.2 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by State or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • 3,416 1,014 Indiana 2,845 1.71 1,233 370 1,291 383 Iowa 1,446 0.87 627 188 656 195 Kansas 1,345 0.81 583 175 610 181 Kentucky 2,000 1.20 867 260 907 269 Louisiana 2,547 1.53 1,104 332 1,156 343 Maine 611 0.37 265 80 277 82 Maryland 3,576 2.14 1,549 466 1,622 481 Massachusetts 3,919 2.35 1,698 510 1,778 528 Michigan 5,431 3.25 2,353 707 2,464 731 Minnesota 2,823 1.69 1,223 368 1,281 380 Mississippi 1,411 0.85 611 184 640 190 Missouri 2,860 1.71 1,239 372 1,298 385 Montana 407 0.24 176 53 185 55 Nebraska 984 0.59 426 128 446 132 Nevada 1,320 0.79 572 172 599 178 New Hampshire 687 0.41 298 89 312 93 New Jersey 6,326 3.79 2,741 824
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • have been made to non-rural carriers if the forward-looking high cost model had not been implemented, which form the basis of the hold-harmless calculations. Consequently the amounts shown in Table 3.6 are a better indication of the actual HCLS payments. 3 - 11 payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism.44 Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • Minute) * To 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • Conversation Minute 3 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275829A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275829A1.txt
  • by the Commission's Numbering Resource Optimization Orders, carriers are returning large quantities of telephone numbers that they do not need to the NANPA so that those numbers can be assigned to other carriers with more immediate needs. In the first half of 2006, carriers returned 3.69 million telephone numbers to the NANPA. In the second half of 2006, carriers returned 3.25 million telephone numbers to the NANPA. Most Utilized Area Codes in the United States -New York's area code 212 (New York City) is the most utilized, with 73.4% of numbers assigned to customers. Florida's area code 754 is next, with 70.5% of numbers assigned to customers. Customers Moving Millions of Telephone Numbers to New Carriers - Since wireless number portability
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Customer Perception Surveys - Sample Sizes ........................................................ Table 9.5 Embedded High-Cost Loop Fund Formulas ......................................................... Table 3.3 Expenses and Taxes ................................................................................................ Table 11.2 Expenses - Total Operating ..................................................................................... Table 11.9 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction............................. Table 3.6 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by Study Area ......................................... Table 3.22 High-Cost Model Support Payments by Non-Rural Study Area ........................ Table 3.25 High-Cost Model Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.9 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History ............................................................ Table 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History - ILECs and CETCs ........................... Table 3.2 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total ............................................................ Chart 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total - ILECs and CETCs ............................Chart 3.2 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by State or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
  • Customer Perception Surveys - Sample Sizes ........................................................ Table 9.5 Embedded High-Cost Loop Fund Formulas ......................................................... Table 3.3 Expenses and Taxes ................................................................................................ Table 11.2 Expenses - Total Operating ..................................................................................... Table 11.9 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction............................. Table 3.6 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by Study Area ......................................... Table 3.22 High-Cost Model Support Payments by Non-Rural Study Area ........................ Table 3.25 High-Cost Model Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.9 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History ............................................................ Table 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History - ILECs and CETCs ........................... Table 3.2 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total ............................................................ Chart 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total - ILECs and CETCs ............................Chart 3.2 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by State or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • 355,246 4.46 4.43 5.29 67 0.71 82 New Hampshire 425,392 39,748 147,093 6.41 6.40 6.62 47 0.50 58 New Jersey 2,327,195 621,404 1,521,569 6.25 6.25 6.35 337 3.56 409 New Mexico 621,280 52,071 268,334 6.50 7.00 9.20 82 0.87 100 New York 4,210,586 598,753 2,583,300 6.34 6.36 6.69 574 6.06 696 North Carolina 2,716,242 208,094 1,008,019 6.27 6.41 7.23 308 3.25 373 North Dakota 148,308 4,208 73,507 6.50 7.00 8.60 20 0.21 24 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 3,237,028 239,234 1,392,397 5.66 5.68 6.25 341 3.60 413 Oklahoma 952,775 76,278 428,319 5.50 5.37 6.04 99 1.04 120 Oregon 1,068,365 90,793 364,865 6.50 6.87 7.81 125 1.32 152 Pennsylvania 3,997,749 454,802 1,522,594 5.99 5.98
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • Also, only those study areas that received payments for the support mechanism covered by the table for those years are included in the table. Payments for 1998 through 2001 can be found in the 2006 Universal Service Monitoring Report. Table 3.22 has HCLS payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism.47 Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • Minute) * To 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279927A1.txt
  • unneeded blocks to be made available to other carriers. Telephone Numbers Returned - As required by the Commission's Numbering Resource Optimization Orders, carriers are returning large quantities of telephone numbers that they do not need to the NANPA so that those numbers can be assigned to other carriers with more immediate needs. In the second half of 2006, carriers returned 3.25 million telephone numbers to the NANPA. In the first half of 2007, carriers returned 3.65 million telephone numbers to the NANPA. Most Utilized Area Codes in the United States -New York's area code 212 (New York City) is the most utilized, with 73.5% of numbers assigned to customers. The District of Columbia's area code 202 is next, with 69.6% of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279929A1.txt
  • 17 FCC Rcd 252 (2001) (Third NRO Order); Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket Nos. 99-200, 96-98, 95-116, Fourth Report and Order in CC Docket No. 99-200 and CC Docket No. 95-116, and Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket No. 99-200, 18 FCC Rcd 12472 (2003) (Fourth NRO Order). 3 In the second half of 2006, carriers returned 3.25 million telephone numbers to the NANPA. In the first half of 2007, carriers returned 3.65 million telephone numbers to the NANPA. Utahans port their numbers the most, porting 16.1% of their assigned numbers. Californians and Minnesotans are next, with 14.4% of assigned numbers ported. Background The United States uses ten-digit telephone numbers, which are organized in accordance with the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • Conversation Minute 3 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Customer Perception Surveys - Sample Sizes ........................................................ Table 9.5 Embedded High-Cost Loop Fund Formulas ......................................................... Table 3.3 Expenses and Taxes ................................................................................................ Table 11.2 Expenses - Total Operating ..................................................................................... Table 11.9 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction............................. Table 3.6 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by Study Area ......................................... Table 3.22 High-Cost Model Support Payments by Non-Rural Study Area ........................ Table 3.25 High-Cost Model Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.9 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History ............................................................ Table 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History - ILECs and CETCs ........................... Table 3.2 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total ............................................................ Chart 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total - ILECs and CETCs ............................Chart 3.2 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by State or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
  • Customer Perception Surveys - Sample Sizes ........................................................ Table 9.5 Embedded High-Cost Loop Fund Formulas ......................................................... Table 3.3 Expenses and Taxes ................................................................................................ Table 11.2 Expenses - Total Operating ..................................................................................... Table 11.9 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction............................. Table 3.6 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by Study Area ......................................... Table 3.22 High-Cost Model Support Payments by Non-Rural Study Area ........................ Table 3.25 High-Cost Model Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.9 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History ............................................................ Table 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History - ILECs and CETCs ........................... Table 3.2 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total ............................................................ Chart 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total - ILECs and CETCs ............................Chart 3.2 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by State or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • Intrastate End-User Intrastate 1 - 47 Table 1.19 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues: 2006 (Dollars in Millions) CLEC Allocation Interstate Interstate Intrastate Intrastate Lines Percentage End-User Total End-User Total Jun 06 1/ Revenues Revenues Revenues Revenues Alabama 365,944 1.23% $63 $88 $118 $149 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 970,453 3.25 167 235 314 396 Arkansas 162,545 0.55 28 39 53 66 California 2,900,279 9.73 499 701 939 1,185 Colorado 528,727 1.77 91 128 171 216 Connecticut 261,681 0.88 45 63 85 107 Delaware 101,513 0.34 17 25 33 41 District of Columbia 144,600 0.48 25 35 47 59 Florida 1,617,538 5.42 278 391 523 661 Georgia 909,236 3.05 156 220
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • for those years are included in the table. Payments for 1998 through 2001 can be found in the 2006 Universal Service Monitoring Report, and payments for 2002 and 2003 can be found in the 2007 Universal Service Monitoring Report. Table 3.22 has HCLS payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism. Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • (National Average in Cents per Minute) 1 Total Charge per Conversation Minute 3 05/26/8401/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/8505/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/8509/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/8505/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/8612/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/8706/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/8712/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/8811/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • Table 1.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied .................. Table 9.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Sample Sizes ........................................................ Table 9.5 Embedded High-Cost Loop Fund Formulas ......................................................... Table 3.3 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction............................. Table 3.6 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by Study Area ......................................... Table 3.22 High-Cost Model Support Payments by Non-Rural Study Area ........................ Table 3.25 High-Cost Model Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.9 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History ............................................................ Table 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History - ILECs and CETCs ........................... Table 3.2 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total ............................................................ Chart 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total - ILECs and CETCs ............................Chart 3.2 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by State or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
  • Table 1.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied .................. Table 9.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Sample Sizes ........................................................ Table 9.5 Embedded High-Cost Loop Fund Formulas ......................................................... Table 3.3 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction............................. Table 3.6 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by Study Area ......................................... Table 3.22 High-Cost Model Support Payments by Non-Rural Study Area ........................ Table 3.25 High-Cost Model Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.9 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History ............................................................ Table 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History - ILECs and CETCs ........................... Table 3.2 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total ............................................................ Chart 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total - ILECs and CETCs ............................Chart 3.2 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by State or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • form the basis of the hold-harmless calculations. Consequently the amounts shown in Table 3.6 are a better indication of the actual HCLS payments. 3 - 12 payments for 2004 can be found in the 2008 Universal Service Monitoring Report. Table 3.22 has HCLS payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism. Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • Conversation Minute 3 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298799A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298799A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298799A1.txt
  • wireless communications employing a network built in accordance with the FCC Cost Model in 10 megahertz of spectrum in four scenarios depicting various types of emergencies. For each scenario, we calculate the expected value of utilization of the network. We assume for purposes of this analysis an LTE network whose capacity averaged over each sector is 7.5 Mb/s (downlink) and 3.25 Mb/s (uplink). These figures represent average throughput and are in-line with current industry benchmarks. In addition, while studies of voice communications among present day emergency responders during disaster events have shown that the command and control communication structure used by public safety results in a sparse, highly compact process of communication, our analysis departs from this model to yield a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • Conversation Minute 3 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • Table 9.5 Data Used to Allocate Nationwide Revenue to States................................. Table 1.17 Embedded High-Cost Loop Fund Formulas ......................................................... Table 3.3 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction............................. Table 3.6 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by Study Area ......................................... Table 3.22 High-Cost Model Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.9 High-Cost Model Support Payments by Study Area ...................................... Table 3.25 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History ............................................................ Table 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History - ILECs and CETCs ........................... Table 3.2 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total ............................................................ Chart 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total - ILECs and CETCs ............................Chart 3.2 High-Cost Support Mechanisms - 2009 - Monthly Support per Loop..... ............ Table 3.16 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.txt
  • Table 9.5 Data Used to Allocate Nationwide Revenue to States................................. Table 1.17 Embedded High-Cost Loop Fund Formulas ......................................................... Table 3.3 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction............................. Table 3.6 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by Study Area ......................................... Table 3.22 High-Cost Model Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.9 High-Cost Model Support Payments by Study Area ...................................... Table 3.25 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History ............................................................ Table 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History - ILECs and CETCs ........................... Table 3.2 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total ............................................................ Chart 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund Payments - Total - ILECs and CETCs ............................Chart 3.2 High-Cost Support Mechanisms - 2009 - Monthly Support per Loop..... ............ Table 3.16 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 659 344 1,004 0.42 Maryland 3,284 1,779 5,063 2.12 Massachusetts 3,598 1,849 5,447 2.28 Michigan 4,813 2,316 7,129 2.98 Minnesota 2,607 1,288 3,895 1.63 Mississippi 1,293 728 2,021 0.85 Missouri 2,984 1,569 4,552 1.91 Montana 463 275 738 0.31 Nebraska 865 455 1,320 0.55 Nevada 1,373 756 2,129 0.89 New Hampshire 693 395 1,088 0.46 New Jersey 5,059 2,714 7,773 3.25 New Mexico 928 526 1,454 0.61 New York 10,443 5,241 15,684 6.56 North Carolina 4,568 2,461 7,028 2.94 North Dakota 333 179 512 0.21 N. Mariana Islands 13 9 22 0.01 Ohio 5,718 2,828 8,546 3.58 Oklahoma 1,698 855 2,554 1.07 Oregon 1,825 981 2,806 1.17 Pennsylvania 6,549 3,357 9,905 4.15 Puerto Rico 1,286 753 2,039 0.85 Rhode Island 534
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • and 2003 can be found in the 2007 Universal Service Monitoring Report, payments for 2004 can be found in the 2008 Universal Service Monitoring Report, and payments for 2005 can be found in the 2009 Universal Service Monitoring Report. Table 3.22 has HCLS payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism. Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • Conversation Minute 3 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308934A1.doc
  • 0 R/ParentTreeNextKey 111/RoleMap 126 0 R/Type/StructTreeRoot/ClassMap 127 0 R>> endobj 124 0 obj <> endobj 125 0 obj <> endobj 126 0 obj <> endobj 127 0 obj <>/CM11<>/CM12<>/CM13<>/CM14<>/CM15<3.25/O/Layout>>/CM16< 9.625/O/Layout>>/CM17<>/CM18<>/CM19<>/CM21<>/CM22<>/CM1<>/CM2<>/CM3<>/CM4<>/CM5<>/CM6<>/CM7<>/CM8<>/CM9<>>> endobj 128 0 obj <> endobj 129 0 obj <
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
    • 3.49 1.75 9.59 13.08 7.37 3.49 1.75 9.12 12.62 Utah 8.07 3.50 1.75 9.82 13.32 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 8.08 3.50 1.75 9.83 13.32 Vermont 7.98 3.50 1.75 9.73 13.23 NA NA NA NA NA 7.98 3.50 1.75 9.73 13.23 Virgin Islands 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 NA NA NA NA NA 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 Virginia 7.22 3.25 1.62 8.84 12.09 7.82 3.49 1.74 9.56 13.05 7.78 3.47 1.74 9.51 12.99 Washington 7.70 2.65 1.32 9.02 11.67 8.10 0.82 0.41 8.51 9.32 7.77 2.31 1.15 8.93 11.24 West Virginia 8.27 0.00 0.00 8.27 8.28 8.25 3.48 1.74 9.99 13.47 8.25 3.28 1.64 9.89 13.16 Wisconsin 7.39 2.42 1.21 8.60 11.02 7.00 2.65 1.33 8.33 10.98 7.14 2.57 1.28
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-389A1.txt
    • last year, the number of subscribers to, and market shares of, MMDS, SMATV, and OVS have remained relatively stable. However, the number of HSD subscribers continues to decline. During the period under review, cable rates rose faster than inflation. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, between June 2000 and June 2001, cable prices rose 4.24 percent compared to a 3.25 percent increase in the Consumer Price Index (``CPI''), which measures general price changes. Concurrently with these rate increases, capital expenditures for the upgrading of cable facilities increased, the number of video and non-video services offered increased, and programming costs increased. We also note that cable operators' pricing decisions may be affected by direct competition. Available evidence indicates that when an
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
    • 2.00 2.24 2.00 1 - 105000Avg Resp Pre-Order Rej/Fail Inq Verigate: Rndtrp 16.27 tbd 7.03 tbd 8.91 tbd 2.01 tbd 2.45 tbd 1 - 105600Avg Resp Pre-Order Mech Loop Qual Actual - Verigate: Rndtrp 14.6811.23 13.18 9.28 13.5110.33 13.3810.30 13.6310.66 1 - 105700Avg Resp Pre-Order Mech Loop Qual Design - Verigate: Rndtrp 2.89 4.51 2.56 3.60 2.24 4.07 2.24 4.41 3.25 4.37 1 - 106000Avg Resp Pre-Order Addr Verif EDI-CORBA: Rndtrp 3.14 4.50 2.98 4.50 2.89 4.50 4.42 4.50 1.62 4.50 1 - 106002Avg Resp Pre-Order TN EDI-CORBA: Rndtrp 2.85 4.50 2.37 4.50 2.32 4.50 4.32 4.50 4.02 4.50 1 - 106003Avg Resp Pre-Order CSR EDI-CORBA: Rndtrp 2.6710.00 2.7010.00 3.1310.00 11.7410.00 1.4710.00 1 - 106005Avg Resp Pre-Order Svc Appt Sch EDI-CORBA:
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
    • May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data A.2.1.1.1.2Residence/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 0.86 0.70 0.84 0.88 0.83 0.83 0.81 0.77 1.00 0.73 A.2.1.1.2.1Residence/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.64 4.00 4.68 4.33 4.86 5.00 4.64 4.00 4.25 4.00 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.1.2.1.1Business/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 3.54 3.25 6.02 4.10 6.40 4.08 4.92 4.49 5.88 5.56 A.2.1.2.1.2Business/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 1.29 0.94 1.22 1.08 1.23 0.96 1.25 0.84 1.28 0.92 A.2.1.2.2.1Business/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.28 8.57 11.50 5.25 12.35 9.50 14.71 3.33 13.70 6.60 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.1.2.2.2Business/>=10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 4.07 7.00 13.72 5.50 0.52 1.00 7.00 0.83 1,2,4 A.2.1.3.1.1Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 21.96 10.11 23.01 6.62 23.84 12.49 26.81
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.txt
    • It is our expectation that the TDMA time-slots vacated by an MT in order to reduce its transmit duty cycle would not be utilized by another MT. Table 1.10.A Vocoder Associated Transmit Power and Duty Cycles Vocoder Rate (kbps) No. Skipped TDMA Frames MT Transmit Duty Cycle Transmit Power (dBW) 13 0 100 % X 6.5 1 50 % X+3.0 3.25 3 25 % X+6.0 2.6 4 20 % X+7.0 2.4 Average of 4.4 18.2 % X+7.4 Unlike the MT to BS power control factor, the average power reduction obtained by using a vocoder will be dependent upon the distribution of users. For example, if a user is within a building at the maximum structural attenuation, the MT will be transmitting
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4_Erratum.doc
    • It is our expectation that the TDMA time-slots vacated by an MT in order to reduce its transmit duty cycle would not be utilized by another MT. Table 1.10.A Vocoder Associated Transmit Power and Duty Cycles Vocoder Rate (kbps) No. Skipped TDMA Frames MT Transmit Duty Cycle Transmit Power (dBW) 13 0 100 % X 6.5 1 50 % X+3.0 3.25 3 25 % X+6.0 2.6 4 20 % X+7.0 2.4 Average of 4.4 18.2 % X+7.4 Unlike the MT to BS power control factor, the average power reduction obtained by using a vocoder will be dependent upon the distribution of users. For example, if a user is within a building at the maximum structural attenuation, the MT will be transmitting
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
    • 87.139 is amended by adding paragraph (l) to read as follows: § 87.139 Emission limitations. * * * * * (l)(1) For Universal Access Transceiver transmitters, the average emissions measured in a 100 kHz bandwidth must be attenuated below the maximum emission level by at least: Frequency (MHz) Attenuation (dB) +/- 0.5 0 +/- 1.0 18 +/- 2.25 50 +/- 3.25 60 The mask shall be defined by drawing straight lines through the above points on log semi-paper. (2) Universal Access Transceiver transmitters with an output power of 5 Watts or more must limit their emissions by at least 43 + 1- log (P) dB on any frequency removed from the assigned frequency by more than 250% of the occupied bandwidth.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-205A1.txt
    • PRTC White Paper, App. A. . PRTC serves almost 1.2 million lines. Id. In 1999, PRTC received a total of approximately $133 million in high cost universal service support, comprised of $44 million in high-cost loop support, and $89 million in long term support (LTS). See Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Universal Service Monitoring Report, Tables 3.22, 3.25 (Oct. 2004). PRTC received ``hold-harmless'' high-cost loop support in 2000 through 2003. PRTC also received LTS in 2000 though June 2004. LTS was merged with ICLS July 1, 2004. With the consolidation of LTS into ICLS, no carriers received interim hold-harmless LTS support after the second quarter of 2004. We also note that PRTC is permitted to assess the subscriber
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-148A1.txt
    • paragraph (l) to read as follows: § 87.139 Emission limitations. * * * * * (l)(1) For Universal Access Transceiver transmitters, the average emissions measured in a 100 kHz bandwidth must be attenuated below the maximum emission level contained within the authorized bandwidth by at least: Frequency (MHz) Attenuation (dB) +/- 0.5 0 +/- 1.0 18 +/- 2.25 50 +/- 3.25 60 (2) Universal Access Transceiver transmitters with an output power of 5 Watts or more must limit their emissions by at least 43 + 10 log (P) dB on any frequency removed from the assigned frequency by more than 250% of the authorized bandwidth. Those emissions shall be measured with a bandwidth of 100 kHz. P in the above equation
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-65A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-65A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-65A1.txt
    • Telecommunications Act of 1996, Commercial Availability of Navigation Devices, Compatibility Between Cable Systems and Consumer Electronic Equipment, CS Docket No. 97-80, PP Docket No. 00-67, Third Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 25 FCC Rcd 14657 (2010). ComScore estimates that in November 2007, 138 million Americans, representing about 75 percent of U.S. Internet users, watched a video online, averaging 3.25 hours during the month. ComScore, Inc., Google Sites' Share of Online Video Market Expands to 31 Percent in November 2007, According to ComScore Video Metrix (press release) Jan. 17, 2008. ComScore estimates that three years later, this number increased to 172 million Americans, representing 84 percent of Internet users, averaging 14.7 hours during November 2010. ComScore, Inc., ComScore Releases November
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
    • Trouble Report Rate MR-2-02-2341 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Loop 0.48 0 0.79 0 1.18 1.2 0.23 0 0.36 0 MR-2-03-2341 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Central Office 0.38 0 0.23 0.65 0.32 1.2 0.27 0 0.36 0 MR-2-04-2341 % Subsequent Reports 21.74 NA 21.43 0 13.16 20 NA NA b,c MR-2-05-2341 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 2.42 1.38 2.32 3.25 1.59 0 3.77 5.29 MR-3 ­ Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01-2341 % Missed Repair Appointment ­ Loop 30 NA 17.65 NA 30.77 0 60 NA 37.5 NA c MR-3-02-2341 % Missed Repair Appointment ­ Central Office 0 NA 40 0 14.29 0 0 NA 25 NA b,c MR-3-03-2341 % CPE/TOK/FOK - Missed Appointment 13.73 0 14 0 8.57 NA 0 0
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/f970217a.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/f970217a.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/f970217a.wp
    • to latitude 41 N.; thence N N southwesterly along a line bearing 219T to the point of intersection at 37 N. latitude, 6713' W. N N N longitude with a line bearing 122T from the New Jersey shoreline at 4018' N. latitude (just south N N of the Shrewsbury River); thence northwesterly along this line to the coast. 11 § 3.25-1 Fifth district. (a) The District Office is in Portsmouth, Va. (b) The Fifth Coast Guard District is comprised of: North Carolina; Virginia, District of Columbia; Maryland; Delaware; that part of Pennsylvania east of a line drawn along 7855' W. longitude south N to 4100' N. latitude, thence west to 7900' W. longitude, and thence south to the N N Pennsylvania-Maryland
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.wp
    • 8044. 199 See, e.g., Revision of Part 22 and Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate Future Development of 200 Paging Systems, WT Docket No. 96-18, and Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, PP Docket No. 93-253, Notice of Proposed Rule Making (Paging Systems Notice), 11 FCC Rcd 3108. See 33 C.F.R. §§ 3.05-1, 3.25-1, 3.35-1, 3.40-1, 3.45-1, 3.55-1, 3.65-1, 3.70-1, and 3.85-1 and Appendix 201 C. 42 facilitate the development of automated systems. 198 2. Proposed geographic service areas 76. Because loading criteria will no longer limit public coast stations to only one or two channels, we anticipate receiving a large number of applications for new licenses and modifications to existing licenses. In cases
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/vsmith.pdf
    • by Treatment: Superadditive Environment Nonflexible Flexible Equal 5 (n=26) 2 (n=29) Unequal 0 (n=27) 2 (n=25) Table 9: Linear Model Parameter Estimates for Efficiency: Superadditive Environment Variable Estimate p-value Intercept 68.7 0.0 Flexible 6.29 0.002 Unequal 2.69 0.16 Level of Synergy (Medium) -3.04 0.25 Level of Synergy (High) -0.88 0.51 Number of Bidders -1.69 0.48 Overlap 3.31 0.05 CE Exists -3.25 0.11 Table 10: Normalized (Mean, Median) Revenue: Additive Environment Treatments Nonflexible Flexible Equal 1.41, 1.31 1.45, 1.45 Unequal 1.39, 1.39 1.31, 1.29 Table 11: Linear Model Parameter Estimates for Normalized Revenue: Additive Environment Variable Estimate p-value Intercept 1.46 0.0 Flexible -0.01 0.84 Unequal 0.04 0.21 Environment Pairing -0.01 0.91 Number of Bidders -0.03 0.44 Table 12: Normalized Revenue (Mean, Median):
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=91
    • 12 Permits with PWBs*: 101 FCC Held Permits: 43 Eligible Bidders: 96 (of 117 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=91M on, 02 May 2011 17:05:01 GMT Summary Permits: 144 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 117 Rounds Completed: 15 Bidding Days: 4 Results for Round 15 Gross Revenue: $7,920,800.00 - Dollar Change: $249,000.00 - % Change: 3.25 Net Revenue: $6,390,465.00 - Dollar Change: $312,980.00 - % Change: 5.15 New Bids: 34 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 3 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 3 Permits with PWBs*: 101 FCC Held Permits: 43 Eligible Bidders: 96 (of 117 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=91M on, 02 May 2011 19:05:02 GMT Summary Permits: 144 construction permits for FM
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.wp
    • follows. 1992/1993 Bell Atlantic-South's actual BFP revenue requirement per-line overran the forecast by 1.85% due to an overrun in BFP revenue requirement relative to the company's forecast.407 1993/1994 Bell Atlantic-South's actual BFP revenue requirement per-line underran the forecast by 1.89% due to an underrun in BFP revenue requirement.408 1994/1995 Bell Atlantic-South's actual BFP revenue requirement per-line overran the forecast by 3.25 % due to an overrun in BFP revenue requirement.409 1995/1996 Bell Atlantic-South's actual BFP revenue requirement per-line underran the forecast by 2.57% due to an underrun in BFP revenue requirement coupled with an overrun in end-user demand.410 1996/1997 Bell Atlantic-South's actual BFP revenue requirement per-line underran the forecast by 1.98% due to a combination of an underrun in BFP revenue
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
    • May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data A.2.1.1.1.2Residence/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 0.86 0.70 0.84 0.88 0.83 0.83 0.81 0.77 1.00 0.73 A.2.1.1.2.1Residence/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.64 4.00 4.68 4.33 4.86 5.00 4.64 4.00 4.25 4.00 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.1.2.1.1Business/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 3.54 3.25 6.02 4.10 6.40 4.08 4.92 4.49 5.88 5.56 A.2.1.2.1.2Business/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 1.29 0.94 1.22 1.08 1.23 0.96 1.25 0.84 1.28 0.92 A.2.1.2.2.1Business/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.28 8.57 11.50 5.25 12.35 9.50 14.71 3.33 13.70 6.60 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.1.2.2.2Business/>=10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 4.07 7.00 13.72 5.50 0.52 1.00 7.00 0.83 1,2,4 A.2.1.3.1.1Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 21.96 10.11 23.01 6.62 23.84 12.49 26.81
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
    • 26.35 0.08 91.25 1.95 California San Diego SBC 14.44 0.06 65.62 2.75 California San Francisco SBC 15.52 0.06 70.54 2.75 California San Jose SBC 15.16 0.06 65.62 2.75 Colorado Boulder Qwest 46.98 26.74 0.14 59.83 4.50 Colorado Colorado Springs Qwest 44.22 25.23 0.13 57.90 4.50 Colorado Denver Qwest 46.62 26.53 0.14 59.74 4.50 Connecticut Ansonia SBC 46.64 27.86 0.18 68.90 3.25 Connecticut Norwalk SBC 43.69 27.86 0.18 68.90 3.25 District of Columbia Washington Verizon 19.19 0.07 83.25 1.50 Florida Miami BellSouth 41.80 32.54 0.12 60.20 5.00 Florida Tampa Verizon 42.10 74.07 4.25 Florida West Palm Beach BellSouth 39.59 30.23 0.12 59.92 5.00 Georgia Albany BellSouth 43.69 36.19 0.12 58.25 5.00 Georgia Atlanta BellSouth 61.02 50.01 0.12 58.25 5.00 Hawaii Honolulu Verizon
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
    • 3.33 3.49 3.87 3.48 3.63 4.06 3.72 3.80 4.18 3.84 3.98 4.29 3.96 4.06 4.83 4.47 4.67 19851.98 1.80 1.70 2.59 2.33 2.00 3.00 2.82 2.20 3.48 3.29 3.34 3.66 3.48 3.45 3.85 3.72 3.63 3.97 3.84 3.70 4.07 3.96 3.80 4.43 4.28 4.10 19861.75 1.67 1.61 2.26 2.12 2.11 2.57 2.47 2.46 2.95 2.85 2.84 3.14 3.04 3.03 3.33 3.25 3.24 3.44 3.35 3.34 3.54 3.46 3.45 3.79 3.68 3.67 19871.48 1.45 1.46 1.89 1.85 1.86 2.09 2.04 2.06 2.38 2.32 2.34 2.56 2.51 2.52 2.75 2.70 2.70 2.95 2.90 2.92 2.96 2.91 2.93 3.08 3.04 3.04 19881.47 1.44 1.44 1.78 1.75 1.76 1.98 1.94 1.94 2.16 2.12 2.13 2.34 2.40 2.40 2.43 2.50 2.50 2.64 2.69 2.71 2.64 2.71
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
    • Including Touch-Tone, Inside Wiring Company Flat-Rate Measured/Message Daytime Call Surcharges, and Taxes Maintenance Plan Service Service Alabama Huntsville BellSouth $49.86 $36.85 $0.17 $69.00 $5.00 Alaska Anchorage Anchorage 35.68 65.70 2.00 Arizona Tucson Qwest 43.27 47.30 6.25 Arkansas Pine Bluff SBC 45.95 30.61 0.07 93.43 6.50 Arkansas West Memphis SBC 59.04 28.85 0.07 94.55 6.50 California Anaheim SBC 17.00 0.01 72.92 3.25 California Bakersfield SBC 17.00 0.01 72.92 3.25 California Fresno SBC 17.57 0.01 72.92 3.25 California Long Beach Verizon 27.75 0.08 93.30 1.95 California Los Angeles SBC 16.99 0.01 72.92 3.25 California Oakland SBC 17.00 0.01 72.92 3.25 California Salinas SBC 17.66 0.01 72.92 3.25 California San Bernadino Verizon 27.73 0.08 92.03 1.95 California San Diego SBC 17.00 0.01 72.92 3.25
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
    • 0.0900 97.67 1.95 Michigan Detroit Ameritech 21.54 0.0842 44.52 3.50 Michigan Grand Rapids Ameritech 17.91 0.0820 44.52 3.50 Michigan Saginaw Ameritech 19.19 0.0842 44.52 3.50 Minnesota Detroit Lakes US West 42.28 27.69 0.0900 51.01 3.00 Minnesota Minneapolis US West 54.85 37.30 0.0900 51.25 3.00 Mississippi Pascagoula BellSouth 56.16 39.37 0.0600 71.69 3.00 Missouri Kansas City SBC 45.62 27.08 0.0800 61.50 3.25 Missouri Mexico SBC 36.29 22.15 0.0800 59.96 3.25 Missouri St. Louis SBC 45.15 26.80 0.0800 61.63 3.25 Montana Butte US West 44.07 25.19 0.0500 61.40 3.00 Nebraska Grand Island US West 47.79 30.59 0.0927 49.13 3.00 New Jersey Phillipsburg Bell Atlantic 17.64 0.0650 80.27 0.95 New Mexico Alamogordo US West 56.37 25.76 0.1560 57.29 3.00 New York Binghamton Bell Atlantic
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
    • 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25 2.55 6.45 4.30 2.75 April 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 3.852.752.10 4.85 3.30 2.65 5.50 4.30 2.75 November 1, 1967 0.500.500.50 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 3.852.652.10 4.40 3.20 2.60 4.90 3.70 2.75 August 1, 1968 0.500.500.50 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 3.752.652.10 4.35 3.20 2.60 4.85 3.70 2.75 January 1,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
    • per Switched per Switched Conversation Access Access Minute Minute** Minute *** Minute* Minute* 05/26/8401/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/8505/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/8509/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/8505/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/8612/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/8706/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/8712/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/8811/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
    • per Switched per Switched Conversation Access Access Minute Minute** Minute *** Minute* Minute* 05/26/8401/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/8505/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/8509/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/8505/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/8612/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/8706/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/8712/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/8811/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
    • Conversation Minute 3/ 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
    • per Switched per Switched Conversation Access Access Minute Minute** Minute *** Minute* Minute* 05/26/8401/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/8505/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/8509/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/8505/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/8612/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/8706/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/8712/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/8811/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
    • per Switched per Switched Conversation Access Access Minute Minute** Minute *** Minute* Minute* 05/26/8401/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/8505/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/8509/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/8505/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/8612/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/8706/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/8712/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/8811/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
    • Conversation Minute 3/ 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
    • Conversation Minute 3 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
    • Conversation Minute 3 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
    • Conversation Minute 3/ 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
    • Conversation Minute 3 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
    • replaced for non-rural companies by USAC hold-harmless data. 40 The high-cost loop support projections for 2000 and 2001 in Table 3.23 were reduced from the amounts reported in the USAC filings to account for implementation of the forward-looking non-rural high-cost model support mechanism. Under sections 54.309 3 - 11 that qualify for these payments are included in the table. Table 3.25 provides estimates, by non- rural study area, of the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism, along with the hold-harmless support for the years 2000 through 2003.41 Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.28 has ICLS payments. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
    • 3.294.09 3.42 3.434.37 3.63 3.624.49 3.74 3.744.60 3.84 3.835.15 4.32 4.32 19841.65 1.48 1.622.27 1.96 2.192.79 2.56 2.763.69 3.33 3.493.87 3.48 3.634.06 3.72 3.804.18 3.84 3.984.29 3.96 4.064.83 4.47 4.67 19851.98 1.80 1.702.59 2.33 2.003.00 2.82 2.203.48 3.29 3.343.66 3.48 3.453.85 3.72 3.633.97 3.84 3.704.07 3.96 3.804.43 4.28 4.10 19861.75 1.67 1.612.26 2.12 2.112.57 2.47 2.462.95 2.85 2.843.14 3.04 3.033.33 3.25 3.243.44 3.35 3.343.54 3.46 3.453.79 3.68 3.67 19871.48 1.45 1.461.89 1.85 1.862.09 2.04 2.062.38 2.32 2.342.56 2.51 2.522.75 2.70 2.702.95 2.90 2.922.96 2.91 2.933.08 3.04 3.04 19881.47 1.44 1.441.78 1.75 1.761.98 1.94 1.942.16 2.12 2.132.34 2.40 2.402.43 2.50 2.502.64 2.69 2.712.64 2.71 2.732.75 2.84 2.84 19891.71 1.70 1.702.01 2.00 2.002.21 2.15 2.202.21 2.15 2.202.30 2.15 2.252.31 2.15 2.302.40 2.35 2.352.50
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-9.pdf
    • 2,900.1 483.1 163.6 859.8 1,896.0 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 1,102.5 585.7 841.9 79.7 2,085.8 720.1 99.5 2,137.6 16,925.4 For Scheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 4 51 58 0 7 3 3 1 64 Events per Hundred Switches 0.2 3.8 4.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 4.1 Events per Million Access Lines 0.17 3.25 3.03 0.00 0.46 0.17 0.14 0.06 8.05 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 5.1 4.0 24.8 NA 14.3 10.7 2.3 NA 32.4 Avg. Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 8.5 11.2 18.5 NA 52.3 20.8 23.6 NA 9.9 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 28.1 53.3 539.9 NA 243.6 203.9 55.6 NA 364.7 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 4.9 173.4
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
    • Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.37 High-Cost Loop Support - Percentage Changes - by Jurisdiction....................... Table 3.18 High-Cost Loop Support - Percentage Changes - by Study Area ........................ Table 3.32 High-Cost Model Support Payment Projections by Jurisdiction ....................... Table 3.10 High-Cost Programs Fund Size Projections and Actuals ................................. Table 3.1 High-Cost Support - Non-Rural by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.25 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Jurisdiction ...................... Table 3.15 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Study Area ........................Table 3.30 High-Cost Support Mechanisms ­ Payments per Loop by State ....................... Table 3.16 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
    • Indiana 4,562,362 1.98 1.96 1.98 324 388 Iowa 1,777,584 0.77 0.88 0.80 131 157 Kansas 1,642,179 0.71 0.41 0.64 104 125 Kentucky 1,929,395 0.84 0.46 0.74 122 146 Louisiana 2,620,120 1.14 0.81 1.05 173 207 Maine 1,526,222 0.66 0.24 0.56 91 109 Maryland 4,632,410 2.01 1.53 1.89 310 371 Massachusetts 8,089,003 3.51 1.24 2.94 482 578 Michigan 6,378,524 2.77 4.70 3.25 533 639 Minnesota 2,419,785 1.05 1.33 1.12 183 220 Mississippi 1,197,964 0.52 0.22 0.45 73 88 Missouri 2,863,876 1.24 2.45 1.54 253 303 Montana 627,176 0.27 0.52 0.33 55 66 Nebraska 946,016 0.41 0.93 0.54 89 106 Nevada 523,469 0.23 0.21 0.22 37 44 New Hampshire 1,345,297 0.58 0.35 0.53 86 103 New Jersey 11,186,451 4.85 3.12 4.42 724 868
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
    • and 2001, USAC included all potential interim hold harmless payments in its high-cost loop 3 - 11 that qualify for these payments are included in the table. Table 3.24 provides estimates, by non- rural study area, of the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism, along with the hold-harmless support for the years 2000 through 2004.42 Table 3.25 has LTS payments. Table 3.26 has ICLS payments. Table 3.27 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.28 has LSS payments. Table 3.29 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables (except 3.24) contains the annual amounts for 1998 through 2004. The 1998 amounts in Tables 3.22, 3.25, and 3.28 are the actual payments after
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
    • Minute) * To 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-intro.pdf
    • Beneficiaries - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State ..................Table 2.10 Link Up Assistance - Payments - by State .......................................................... Table 2.11 Local Switching Support Payment Projections by State or Jurisdiction .................Table 3.12 Local Switching Support Payment Projections by Study Area ...............................Table 3.28 Long-Term Support Payment Projections by State or Jurisdiction .........................Table 3.9 Long-Term Support Payment Projections by Study Area .......................................Table 3.25 Loops - by State or Jurisdiction .............................................................. Table 3.19 Loops - by Study Area ........................................................................ Table 3.33 Low-Income Average Benefits by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.12 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .................................................Table 2.5 Low-Income Support Payments ....................................................................... Table 2.2 Low-Income Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 2.4 Minutes - Interstate Access - by Study Area ........................................................Table
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
    • Minute ** ¢ Per Minute # Minute ## (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) 05/26/8401/14/85 5.24 5.24 3.10 17.26 01/15/8505/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/8509/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/8505/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/8612/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/8706/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/8712/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/8811/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 *The weighted average national charges
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-0.pdf
    • History by State ...........................................Table 2.5 Lifeline Monthly Support by State ..................................................................... Table 2.1 Line Usage per Day ............................................................................................ Table 8.7 Link-Up Assistance - Payments - History by State .............................................Table 2.9 Link-Up Assistance - Payments - History by Study Area ...................................Table 2.10 Link-Up Assistance - Subscribers - History by State ..........................................Table 2.8 Local Exchange Carrier Study Areas - Changes ................................................. Table 3.25 Local, Mobile and Toll Service Revenue by Type of Service Provider .............Table 1.4 Local Switching Support - Payment Projections - by Study Area ......................Table 3.17 Long Term Support - Payment History .............................................................. Table 3.5 Long Term Support - Payment Projections - by Study Area ..............................Table 3.16 Loops - Summary ............................................................................................... Table 8.6 Loops by State .................................................................................................... Table 3.12 Loops by
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-3.pdf
    • the unseparated NTS revenue requirements for each year. Table 3.22 shows the number of loops. Table 3.23 shows the unseparated NTS revenue requirement per loop. Table 3.24 shows the Universal Service Fund payments. In compiling the historical data, it is necessary to account for changes that have occurred in the study areas over time. These changes are noted in Table 3.25.15 In cases where study areas have merged, the pre-merger data for all of the merged study areas have been combined and reported as the data for the surviving study area. In cases where there has been an ownership change resulting in a code number change, the pre-change data is reported under the new code number and name. In the case
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
    • per Switched per Switched Conversation Access Access Minute Minute** Minute *** Minute* Minute* 05/26/8401/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/8505/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/8509/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/8505/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/8612/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/8706/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/8712/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/8811/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-0.pdf
    • ..................................................................................................Table 11.14 Investment - Plant ...................................................................................................Table 11.13 Investment - Reserves .............................................................................................Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link-Up Assistance by State - Monthly, 1998 ......................................Table 2.2 Lifeline and Link-Up Assistance by Study Area - Monthly, 1998 .............................Table 2.3 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - History by State .................................................Table 2.5 Lifeline Monthly Support by State ...........................................................................Table 2.1 Local Exchange Carrier Study Areas - Changes ......................................................Table 3.25 Local Switching Support - Payment History ...........................................................Table 3.6 Local Switching Support - Payment Projections - by Study Area ............................Table 3.17 Long Term Support - Payment History ...................................................................Table 3.5 Long Term Support - Payment Projections - by Study Area ...................................Table 3.16 Loops by State .......................................................................................................Table 3.12 Loops by Study Area ..............................................................................................Table 3.22 Minutes of Use - Interstate Access - Tier 1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-3.pdf
    • per loop. Table 3.24 shows the Universal Service Fund payments. an average schedule basis, are attributed by NECA on the basis of those carriers' average number of loops per exchange. 3 - 6 In compiling the historical data, it is necessary to account for changes that have occurred in the study areas over time. These changes are noted in Table 3.25.16 In cases where study areas have merged, the pre-merger data for all of the merged study areas have been combined and reported as the data for the surviving study area. In cases where there has been an ownership change resulting in a code number change, the pre-change data is reported under the new code number and name. In the case
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
    • per Switched per Switched Conversation Access Access Minute Minute** Minute *** Minute* Minute* 05/26/8401/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/8505/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/8509/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/8505/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/8612/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/8706/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/8712/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/8811/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-0.pdf
    • History by State ...........................................Table 2.5 Lifeline Monthly Support by State ..................................................................... Table 2.1 Line Usage per Day ............................................................................................ Table 8.7 Link-Up Assistance - Payments - History by State .............................................Table 2.9 Link-Up Assistance - Payments - History by Study Area ...................................Table 2.10 Link-Up Assistance - Subscribers - History by State ..........................................Table 2.8 Local Exchange Carrier Study Areas - Changes ................................................. Table 3.25 Local, Mobile and Toll Service Revenue by Type of Service Provider .............Table 1.4 Local Switching Support - Payment Projections - by Study Area ......................Table 3.17 Long Term Support - Payment History .............................................................. Table 3.5 Long Term Support - Payment Projections - by Study Area ..............................Table 3.16 Loops - Summary ............................................................................................... Table 8.6 Loops by State .................................................................................................... Table 3.12 Loops by
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-3.pdf
    • revenue requirements for each year. Table 3.22 shows the number of loops. Table 3.23 shows the unseparated NTS revenue requirement per loop. Table 3.24 shows the Universal Service Fund payments. 3 - 5 In compiling the historical data, it is necessary to account for changes that have occurred in the study areas over time. These changes are noted in Table 3.25.14 In cases where study areas have merged, the pre-merger data for all of the merged study areas have been combined and reported as the data for the surviving study area. In cases where there has been an ownership change resulting in a code number change, the pre-change data is reported under the new code number and name. In the case
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
    • per Switched per Switched Conversation Access Access Minute Minute** Minute *** Minute* Minute* 05/26/8401/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/8505/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/8509/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/8505/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/8612/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/8706/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/8712/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/8811/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
    • per Switched per Switched Conversation Access Access Minute Minute** Minute *** Minute* Minute* 05/26/8401/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/8505/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/8509/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/8505/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/8612/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/8706/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/8712/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/8811/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
    • Loop Payments - by Study Area ....................................................Table 3.32 High-Cost Programs Fund Size Projections ................................................ Table 3.7 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Non-Rural by Jurisdiction.................. Table 3.13 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Non-Rural by Study Area .............. Table 3.26 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Jurisdiction ...................... Table 3.12 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Study Area ....................... Table 3.25 High-Cost Support Programs ­ Net Revenues by State .................................Table 3.14 Income - Net ...........................................................................................................Table 11.5 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support - Payment Projections - by Jurisdiction ........................ Table 3.11 Interstate Access Support - Payment Projections - by Study Area .........................Table 3.24 Investment - Average Net .......................................................................................Table 11.6 Investment - Gross ..................................................................................................Table 11.3 Investment -
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
    • Changes - by Jurisdiction....................... Table 3.21 High-Cost Loop Support - Percentage Changes - by Study Area ........................ Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Payment Formulas .................................................................. Table 3.2 High-Cost Loop Payment History ......................................................................... Table 3.3 High-Cost Loop Payment Projections - by Jurisdiction....................................... Table 3.8 High-Cost Loop Payment Projections - by Study Area ....................................... Table 3.26 High-Cost Loop Payments - by Jurisdiction.................................................... Table 3.25 High-Cost Loop Payments - by Study Area .................................................... Table 3.37 High-Cost Loop Support Mechanism ­ Net Dollar Flow by State ................... Table 3.14 High-Cost Model Support Mechanism ­ Net Dollar Flow by State ................... Table 3.17 High-Cost Model Support Payment Projections - Non-Rural by Jurisdiction ........Table 3.12 High-Cost Programs Fund Size Projections ................................................ Table 3.1 High-Cost Support Payment Projections -
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual02.pdf
    • 2,900.1 483.1 163.6 234.1 1,896.0 Outage Line-Minute per 1,000 Access Lines 1,151.3 585.7 841.9 79.7 2,085.8 720.1 99.5 180.1 16,925.4 For Scheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 5 51 20 0 7 3 3 0 64 Events per Hundred Switches 0.3 3.8 1.4 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 4.1 Events per Million Access Lines 0.22 3.25 1.04 0.00 0.46 0.17 0.14 0.00 8.05 Average Outage Duration in Minutes per Event 29.3 4.0 7.1 NA 14.3 10.7 2.3 NA 32.4 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 7.4 11.2 20.0 NA 52.3 20.8 23.6 NA 9.9 Outage Line-Minute per Event in Thousands 99.9 53.3 136.4 NA 243.6 203.9 55.6 NA 364.7 Outage Line-Minute per 1,000 Access Lines
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
    • Delaware 88.3 1.85 86.5 6.2 80.3 28.6 14.1 37.3 80.0 0.239DE District of Columbia 195.9 3.17 192.7 0.6 192.1 58.5 27.4 105.9 191.8 0.329DC Florida 2,563.2 46.13 2,517.1 635.3 1,881.8 1,003.8 335.0 528.9 1,867.6 14.271FL Georgia 990.4 22.76 967.6 103.1 864.5 395.0 161.0 299.5 855.5 9.031GA Hawaii 164.9 2.69 162.2 32.8 129.3 61.8 31.9 35.5 129.2 0.140 HI Idaho 186.5 3.25 183.2 27.9 155.3 78.1 32.2 44.1 154.3 0.978 ID Illinois 1,323.9 2.26 1,321.7 214.2 1,107.5 475.3 219.1 412.3 1,106.7 0.808 IL Indiana 750.5 1.84 748.6 194.5 554.1 275.0 99.1 179.8 553.9 0.206 IN Iowa 245.5 6.23 239.3 48.7 190.6 81.5 34.5 72.7 188.7 1.838 IA Kansas 298.7 298.7 52.9 245.8 102.0 41.8 102.0 245.8 KS Kentucky 464.9 6.85 458.0 106.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
    • 3.80 7.05 3.10 5.85 2.30 4.30 1.80 3.30 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 1956 3.80 7.05 3.10 5.85 2.30 4.30 1.80 3.30 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 1957 3.80 7.05 3.10 5.85 2.30 4.30 1.80 3.30 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 1958 3.80 7.05 3.10 5.85 2.30 4.30 1.80 3.30 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 1959 4/ 3.45 6.45 2.65 4.90 2.25 4.25 1.75 3.25 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 1960 3.45 6.45 2.65 4.90 2.25 4.25 1.75 3.25 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 1961 3.45 6.45 2.65 4.90 2.25 4.25 1.75 3.25 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 1962 3.45 6.45 2.65 4.90 2.25 4.25 1.75 3.25 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 1963 5/ 3.45 6.45 2.65 4.90 1.50 2.75 2.25 4.25 1.75 3.25 1.10 2.10 0.80 1.55 0.60
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
    • DAKOTA 36.3 1.493 34.8 32.0 2.83 2.83 ND OHIO 299.1 0.126 299.0 297.1 1.87 0.3 0.7 0.004 0.9 0.93 OH OKLAHOMA 182.6 50.174 132.5 131.3 1.20 1.20 OK OREGON 138.1 4.882 133.2 117.7 15.58 15.58 OR PENNSYLVANIA 556.0 (0.346) 556.4 498.7 32.29 3.6 6.8 10.4 21.92 PA RHODE ISLAND 42.7 42.7 42.7 (0.02) (0.02)RI SOUTH CAROLINA 85.0 0.111 84.9 81.7 3.25 3.25 SC SOUTH DAKOTA 32.7 0.038 32.7 32.6 0.09 0.09 SD TENNESSEE 116.7 116.7 112.8 3.98 3.98 TN TEXAS 505.6 (2.038) 507.6 501.2 6.41 6.41 TX UTAH 77.0 0.211 76.8 76.2 0.53 0.53 UT VERMONT 38.3 38.3 38.3 (0.01) (0.01)VT VIRGINIA 159.6 (0.591) 160.2 143.1 17.05 1.0 1.9 2.9 14.13 VA WASHINGTON 322.1 4.766 317.3 298.5 18.77 18.77WA WEST VIRGINIA
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
    • 0.53 47.4 FL GEORGIA 169.1 124.6 44.5 46.7 (2.3) (2.94) 0.13 (12.74) (15.55) 13.3 GA HAWAII 131.3 84.4 46.9 40.0 6.9 0.89 (0.08) 0.55 1.36 5.6 HI IDAHO 12.1 15.3 (3.2) (3.2) (0.0) (2.18) (1.10) (0.76) (4.03) 4.0 ID ILLINOIS 480.8 339.1 141.7 115.4 26.3 (0.86) (0.61) 0.11 (1.36) 27.7 IL INDIANA 267.2 191.5 75.7 58.1 17.6 2.21 0.33 0.71 3.25 14.3 IN IOWA 24.3 31.3 (7.0) (6.0) (1.0) (3.15) (1.80) (1.74) (6.69) 5.6 IA KANSAS 98.8 67.8 31.0 26.2 4.8 (0.40) (0.03) 0.01 (0.42) 5.3 KS KENTUCKY 89.8 48.3 41.4 34.6 6.9 0.48 (0.16) 0.21 0.53 6.3 KY LOUISIANA 102.3 49.7 52.6 46.7 5.9 (1.59) 0.04 (1.55) 7.4 LA MAINE 23.8 6.3 17.5 13.1 4.5 0.79 0.00 0.10 0.90 3.6
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
    • 0.50 4.19 24.4 NC NORTH DAKOTA 5.5 5.0 0.6 0.3 0.3 (0.50) (0.25) (0.28) (1.03) 1.3 ND OHIO 467.5 370.2 97.3 66.0 31.3 0.91 0.83 0.53 2.27 29.0 OH OKLAHOMA 126.3 121.1 5.3 (4.7) 10.0 (0.31) (0.11) 0.03 (0.39) 10.4 OK OREGON 94.0 64.8 29.2 21.1 8.0 (0.94) (0.57) (0.26) (1.77) 9.8 OR PENNSYLVANIA 435.7 228.9 188.2 119.0 69.2 8.08 3.25 3.49 14.82 54.4 PA RHODE ISLAND 78.3 78.0 0.2 (1.5) 1.7 (4.99) (2.10) (1.45) (8.53) 10.3 RI SOUTH CAROLINA 40.4 16.2 24.2 17.0 7.3 0.34 0.09 0.16 0.59 6.7 SC SOUTH DAKOTA 93.9 57.8 36.2 27.2 9.0 1.07 0.81 0.44 2.32 6.7 SD TENNESSEE 5.5 6.2 (0.7) (0.7) (0.0) (0.72) (0.30) (0.29) (1.31) 1.3 TN TEXAS 164.0 99.3 64.7 45.3
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
    • 1.39 1.90 3.72 1.07 2.14 0.72 1.44 2.03 3.96 1.24 2.40 0.83 1.60 Sprint 1.81 3.45 1.11 2.13 0.75 1.45 1.89 3.63 1.17 2.25 0.78 1.52 1.98 3.80 1.23 2.36 0.83 1.59 1986 AT&T 1.64 3.14 0.98 1.88 0.72 1.38 1.73 3.33 1.04 2.00 0.76 1.47 1.84 3.54 1.10 2.12 0.81 1.56 MCI 1.55 3.04 0.91 1.80 0.66 1.31 1.66 3.25 0.95 1.91 0.67 1.34 1.77 3.46 1.07 2.09 0.79 1.54 Sprint 1.54 3.03 0.90 1.79 0.65 1.30 1.65 3.24 0.94 1.90 0.66 1.33 1.76 3.45 1.06 2.08 0.78 1.52 1987 AT&T 1.31 2.56 0.81 1.59 0.62 1.20 1.40 2.75 0.87 1.71 0.66 1.29 1.51 2.96 0.94 1.84 0.71 1.39 MCI 1.27 2.51 0.72 1.44 0.60 1.18 1.35 2.70 0.72 1.45
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
    • Trouble Report Rate MR-2-02-2341 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Loop 0.48 0 0.79 0 1.18 1.2 0.23 0 0.36 0 MR-2-03-2341 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Central Office 0.38 0 0.23 0.65 0.32 1.2 0.27 0 0.36 0 MR-2-04-2341 % Subsequent Reports 21.74 NA 21.43 0 13.16 20 NA NA b,c MR-2-05-2341 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 2.42 1.38 2.32 3.25 1.59 0 3.77 5.29 MR-3 ­ Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01-2341 % Missed Repair Appointment ­ Loop 30 NA 17.65 NA 30.77 0 60 NA 37.5 NA c MR-3-02-2341 % Missed Repair Appointment ­ Central Office 0 NA 40 0 14.29 0 0 NA 25 NA b,c MR-3-03-2341 % CPE/TOK/FOK - Missed Appointment 13.73 0 14 0 8.57 NA 0 0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=3
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=3&contrast=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=3&contrast=highContrast
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=3&fontsize=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=3&fontsize=largeFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=3&fontsize=mediumFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=3
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=3&contrast=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=3&contrast=highContrast
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=3&fontsize=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=3&fontsize=largeFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=3&fontsize=mediumFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=3
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=3&contrast=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=3&contrast=highContrast
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=3&fontsize=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=3&fontsize=largeFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=3&fontsize=mediumFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=3
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=3&contrast=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=3&contrast=highContrast
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=3&fontsize=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=3&fontsize=largeFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=3&fontsize=mediumFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=3
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=3&contrast=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=3&contrast=highContrast
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=3&fontsize=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=3&fontsize=largeFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=3&fontsize=mediumFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=3
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=3&contrast=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=3&contrast=highContrast
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=3&fontsize=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=3&fontsize=largeFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=3&fontsize=mediumFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=3
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=3&contrast=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=3&contrast=highContrast
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=3&fontsize=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=3&fontsize=largeFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=3&fontsize=mediumFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=3
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=3&contrast=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=3&contrast=highContrast
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=3&fontsize=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=3&fontsize=largeFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=3&fontsize=mediumFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=3
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=3&contrast=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=3&contrast=highContrast
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=3&fontsize=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=3&fontsize=largeFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=3&fontsize=mediumFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=3
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=3&contrast=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=3&contrast=highContrast
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=3&fontsize=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=3&fontsize=largeFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=3&fontsize=mediumFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=3
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=3&contrast=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=3&contrast=highContrast
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=3&fontsize=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=3&fontsize=largeFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=3&fontsize=mediumFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=3
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=3&contrast=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=3&contrast=highContrast
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=3&fontsize=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=3&fontsize=largeFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=3&fontsize=mediumFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=3
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=3&contrast=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=3&contrast=highContrast
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=3&fontsize=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=3&fontsize=largeFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=3&fontsize=mediumFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=3
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=3&contrast=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=3&contrast=highContrast
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=3&fontsize=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=3&fontsize=largeFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=3&fontsize=mediumFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=3
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=3&contrast=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=3&contrast=highContrast
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=3&fontsize=
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=3&fontsize=largeFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=3&fontsize=mediumFont
    • submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Open-Market Reorganization... * [83]Mobile Wireless Competition Report (14th Annual) 05.31.2010 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [84]Telephone Penetration Report (through March 2009) 05.10.2010 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels on a state-by-state basis for various... * [85]International Telecommunications Data Report (2008) 03.25.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) annual report compiling data on ... * [86]Semi-Annual Report by the Office of Inspector General 03.24.2010 For the reporting period of October 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. * [87]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 06/30/09) 02.24.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in ... *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/enbanc/102998/tr102998.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/enbanc/102998/tr102998.txt http://www.fcc.gov/enbanc/102998/tr102998.wp
    • Ms. Chairman. 10 What we are describing is that whatever the 11 assessment mechanism is that is finally implemented from 12 USAC and if it's a percentage of revenue, if it's a line, 13 whatever it turns out to be, and let me for the moment, 14 let's just pick a revenue assessment, and it turn out to be 15 3.25 percent, then all carriers would put on their bill 3.25 16 percent. They wouldn't raise it. They wouldn't lower it. 17 They would put 3.25 percent. 18 And by virtue of all carriers who have an 19 assessment paying in to the Fund, meaning collecting the 20 money from the retail user, by doing that the local company, 21 if
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/summary_data_female_ownership_2004-2005.pdf
    • Latino F W MARIA DEL PILAR PIRALLO, MAYAGUEZ, PR 00680 11.50 Hisp. or Latino M W LUIS R. PIRALLO PAGAN, MAYAGUEZ, PR 00680 46.00 Hisp. or Latino F W GINETTE P. PIRALLO, MAYAGUEZ, PR 00680 11.50 Hisp. or Latino M W MANUEL PIRALLO-PAGAN, CHULA VISTA, CA 91910 1.58 Hisp. or Latino M W CARLOS D. PIRALLO-RIVERA, SAN JUAN, PR 00919 3.25 F ESTATE OF JOSE LUIS PIRALLO, C/O LIRIO PIRALLO, BOX 1370, MAYAGUEZ, PR 11.50 Hisp. or Latino F W GINETTE M. PIRALLO-PAGAN, BAY HARBOR ISLAND, FL Ownership summary: 4 female owners hold a total of 75.42% of the votes Facilities included in the filing with WAEL: Page 137 of 159 Ownership Report for 2004 - 2005 Female Ownership 6/9/2006 File
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/summary_data_female_ownership_2006-2007.pdf
    • 11.50 Hisp. or Latino M W LUIS R. PIRALLO PAGAN, P.O. BOX 1370, MAYAGUEZ, PR 00681 46.00 Hisp. or Latino F W GINETTE P. PIRALLO, BOX 1370, MAYAGUEZ, PR 00681 11.50 Hisp. or Latino M W MANUEL PIRALLO PAGAN, 2972 LITTLE COURT, DELTONA, FL 32738 1.58 Hisp. or Latino M W CARLOS D. PIRALLO-RIVERA, BOX 195416, SAN JUAN, PR, 00919 3.25 X ESTATE OF JOSE LUIS PIRALLO, C/O EDWARD H., MEYER, 5900 ARLINGTON AVENUE, RIVERDALE, NY 11.50 Hisp. or Latino F W GINETTE M. PIRALLO-PAGAN, 10141 E. BAY HARBOR DRIVE 4C, BAY HARBOR ISLANDS, FL 33154 Ownership summary: 3 female owners hold a total of 72.17% of the votes Facilities included in the filing with WAEL-FM: Page 144 of 165 Ownership
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/summary_data_minority_ownership_2004-2005.pdf
    • Latino W MARIA DEL PILAR PIRALLO, MAYAGUEZ, PR 00680 F 11.50 Hisp. or Latino W LUIS R. PIRALLO PAGAN, MAYAGUEZ, PR 00680 M 46.00 Hisp. or Latino W GINETTE P. PIRALLO, MAYAGUEZ, PR 00680 F 11.50 Hisp. or Latino W MANUEL PIRALLO-PAGAN, CHULA VISTA, CA 91910 M 1.58 Hisp. or Latino W CARLOS D. PIRALLO-RIVERA, SAN JUAN, PR 00919 M 3.25 ESTATE OF JOSE LUIS PIRALLO, C/O LIRIO PIRALLO, BOX 1370, MAYAGUEZ, PR F 11.50 Hisp. or Latino W GINETTE M. PIRALLO-PAGAN, BAY HARBOR ISLAND, FL F Ownership summary: 6 minority owners hold a total of 96.75% of the votes Page 147 of 179 Ownership Minority Report for 2004 - 2005 6/9/2006 Facilities included in the filing with WLRP: File #
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/summary_data_minority_ownership_2006-2007.pdf
    • 11.50 Hisp. or Latino W LUIS R. PIRALLO PAGAN, P.O. BOX 1370, MAYAGUEZ, PR 00681 M 46.00 Hisp. or Latino W GINETTE P. PIRALLO, BOX 1370, MAYAGUEZ, PR 00681 F 11.50 Hisp. or Latino W MANUEL PIRALLO PAGAN, 2972 LITTLE COURT, DELTONA, FL 32738 M 1.58 Hisp. or Latino W CARLOS D. PIRALLO-RIVERA, BOX 195416, SAN JUAN, PR, 00919 M 3.25 ESTATE OF JOSE LUIS PIRALLO, C/O EDWARD H., MEYER, 5900 ARLINGTON AVENUE, RIVERDALE, NY X 11.50 Hisp. or Latino W GINETTE M. PIRALLO-PAGAN, 10141 E. BAY HARBOR DRIVE 4C, BAY HARBOR ISLANDS, FL 33154 F Ownership summary: 6 minority owners hold a total of 96.75% of the votes Page 143 of 185 Ownership Minority Report for 2006 - 2007 9/16/2008
  • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol_response082800.pdf
    • 3.24What are the anticipated revenues and margins for a merged AOL and Time Warner for the following: a. an AOL customer who subscribes to AOL Plus service and/or any other AOL offered ISP service over Time Warner cable, b. an AOL customer who subscribers to AOL Plus service and/or any other AOL offered ISP service over DSL. [ ] 16 3.25Are there any conditions in AOL's contracts with its AOL Plus partners, or partners in any other AOL-offered ISP service delivered via DSL, that would require AOL to offer itself over multiple platforms, or prevent it from eliminating one or more platforms? There are no conditions or limits present in AOL contracts that would require AOL to offer its service over
  • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
    • 19.73 $ 27.62 $ 35.51 $ 43.40 $ 51.29 $ 59.18 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 2 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% *Expected* Percentage of 20.0% 0.77 $ 1.07 $ 1.38 $ 1.69 $ 2.00 $ 2.30 $ (Boston) Subscribers 50.0% 1.54 $ 2.16 $ 2.78 $ 3.40 $ 4.01 $ 4.63 $ On-Line 80.0% 2.32 $ 3.25 $ 4.18 $ 5.10 $ 6.03 $ 6.96 $ 100.0% 2.84 $ 3.97 $ 5.11 $ 6.24 $ 7.38 $ 8.51 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.7: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN PORTLAND SCENARIO L2TP 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% Percentage of 20.0% 7.41 $ 9.26 $ 11.12 $ 12.97
  • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/genmot2_reply022502.pdf
    • lowest marks of any service providers we regularly evaluate ­ even lower than those for technical support from computer manufacturers." 98 Eighth MVPD Competition Report at ¶ 9 ("During the period under review, cable rates rose faster than inflation. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, between June 2000 and June 2001, cable prices rose 4.24 percent compared to a 3.25 percent increase in the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), which measures general price changes."); Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, 22 Comm. Reg (P&F) 1414 at ¶ 9 (2001) ("Seventh MVPD Competition Report") ("During the period under review, cable rates rose faster than inflation. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/nab4_petition020402.pdf
    • would "eliminate the $360 annual prepaid programming commitment, resulting in a lower upfront cost for consumers."132 · For the 1997 holiday season, DirecTV offered a price promotion consisting of $100 off professional installation or a free installation kit worth $50 with the 127. Eighth Annual Report, supra note 6, at ¶ 9 ("cable prices rose 4.24 percent compared to a 3.25 percent increase in the Consumer Price Index"). 128. EchoStar Press Release, EchoStar Unveils a New Generation of Digital Satellite Receivers (July 23, 1998) ("EchoStar, the company that made satellite television affordable. . . ."). 129. EchoStar Press Release, EchoStar Announces Special Promotion in Select Cable Rate Increase Markets (June 6, 1996). 130. Ken Kusmer, Thomson DirecTV, U.S.S.B. Offering Seasonal Incentives
  • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1998PDFs/4302C98.PDF
    • Includequotationmarks. 6 Column(c)data "04011952" 52-61 Thisfieldcontainsthedatacorresponding tocolumn(c)asshownintheFormSection oftheReportDefinition. DoNOToverridedesignatedN/A's. Format:"mmddyyyy" Enter"00000000"inthefieldif designatedbyN/A. Includequotationmarks. 7 Column(d)data "04011995" 63-72 Column(d)data Format:SeeField6above. 8 Column(e)data 3000 74-82 Thisfieldcontainsthedatacorresponding tocolumn(e)asshownintheFormSection oftheReportDefinition. DoNOToverridedesignatedN/As. Format:Rightjustifiedandspacefilled Enter-99999inintegerrowsand-99999.00 indecimalrowswhereafieldisdesignated byN/A.Allotherfieldsmustbepopulated. Iftherearenodataapplicabletoanopen field,enterzero. Enter-88888inintegerrowsand-88888.00 inpercentagerowsonthe"publicversion" diskettetoindicatethatconfidential treatmenthasbeenrequested. FCCReport43-02-AutomatedReportSpecifications December1998 Page72of108 RECORDTYPEB11-LONG-TERMDEBTDATARECORD(continued) Field Item Example Position Description 9 Column(f)data -234 84-92 Column(f)data Format:SeeField8above. 10 Column(g)data 0 94-102 Column(g)data Format:SeeField8above. 11 Column(h)data 3.25 104-112 Thisfieldcontainsdatacorresponding tocolumn(h)asshownintheFormSection oftheReportDefinition. Format:Enterasapercentandroundtotwo decimalplaces.SeeField8format aboveiffielddesignatedbyN/A. 12 Column(i)data 4.25 114-122 Column(i)data Format:SeeField11above. FCCReport43-02-AutomatedReportSpecifications December1998 Page73of108 RECORDTYPEB11-LONG-TERMDEBTDATARECORD(continued) Field Item Example Position Description 13 EndofRecordCode "XQ" 124-127 AlwayscontainsthelettersXQcapitalized withnospacebetweenthemtoindicatethe endoftherecord. Format:Includequotationmarks. Note:Separateallfieldswithcommas. Footnoterecordsareneededifanydataforthecurrentperioddiffermateriallyfromthose forthepreviousperiodandthedifferenceisnotself-explanatorybutwascausedbyunusual circumstancesthathavenotbeenexplainedinapreviousreport,orifthecarrierdoesnot followtheproceduresdescribedintherow/columninstructionsintheReportDefinition. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123 Samplerecords: 1523,"LBIL","B11a",100.0, 2,"XQ" 1524,"LBIL","B11a",101.0,"SeriesC,3-1/4% ","04011952","04011995", 3000, -234, 0, 1525,"LBIL","B11a",102.0,"SeriesD,3-1/4% ","07151955","07151995", 455, -156, 0,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1998PDFs/4302S98.PDF
    • Includequotationmarks. 6 Column(c)data "04011952" 52-61 Thisfieldcontainsthedatacorresponding tocolumn(c)asshownintheFormSection oftheReportDefinition. DoNOToverridedesignatedN/A's. Format:"mmddyyyy" Enter"00000000"inthefieldif designatedbyN/A. Includequotationmarks. 7 Column(d)data "04011995" 63-72 Column(d)data Format:SeeField6above. 8 Column(e)data 3000 74-82 Thisfieldcontainsthedatacorresponding tocolumn(e)asshownintheFormSection oftheReportDefinition. DoNOToverridedesignatedN/As. Format:Rightjustifiedandspacefilled Enter-99999inintegerrowsand-99999.00 indecimalrowswhereafieldisdesignated byN/A.Allotherfieldsmustbepopulated. Iftherearenodataapplicabletoanopen field,enterzero. Enter-88888inintegerrowsand-88888.00 inpercentagerowsonthe"publicversion" diskettetoindicatethatconfidential treatmenthasbeenrequested. FCCReport43-02-AutomatedReportSpecifications December1998 Page72of108 RECORDTYPEB11-LONG-TERMDEBTDATARECORD(continued) Field Item Example Position Description 9 Column(f)data -234 84-92 Column(f)data Format:SeeField8above. 10 Column(g)data 0 94-102 Column(g)data Format:SeeField8above. 11 Column(h)data 3.25 104-112 Thisfieldcontainsdatacorresponding tocolumn(h)asshownintheFormSection oftheReportDefinition. Format:Enterasapercentandroundtotwo decimalplaces.SeeField8format aboveiffielddesignatedbyN/A. 12 Column(i)data 4.25 114-122 Column(i)data Format:SeeField11above. FCCReport43-02-AutomatedReportSpecifications December1998 Page73of108 RECORDTYPEB11-LONG-TERMDEBTDATARECORD(continued) Field Item Example Position Description 13 EndofRecordCode "XQ" 124-127 AlwayscontainsthelettersXQcapitalized withnospacebetweenthemtoindicatethe endoftherecord. Format:Includequotationmarks. Note:Separateallfieldswithcommas. Footnoterecordsareneededifanydataforthecurrentperioddiffermateriallyfromthose forthepreviousperiodandthedifferenceisnotself-explanatorybutwascausedbyunusual circumstancesthathavenotbeenexplainedinapreviousreport,orifthecarrierdoesnot followtheproceduresdescribedintherow/columninstructionsintheReportDefinition. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123 Samplerecords: 1523,"LBIL","B11a",100.0, 2,"XQ" 1524,"LBIL","B11a",101.0,"SeriesC,3-1/4% ","04011952","04011995", 3000, -234, 0, 1525,"LBIL","B11a",102.0,"SeriesD,3-1/4% ","07151955","07151995", 455, -156, 0,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1999PDFs/4302C99.PDF
    • an open field, enter zero. Enter ­88888 in integer rows on the "public version" diskette to indicate that confidential treatment has been requested. 9 Column (f) data ­ 234 84 ­ 92 Column (f) data Format: See Field 8 above. 10 Column (g) data 0 94 ­ 102 Column (g) data Format: See Field 8 above. 11 Column (h) data 3.25 104 ­ 112This field contains the data corresponding to column (h) as shown in the Form Section of the Report Definition. Format: Enter as a percent and round to two decimal places. See format for Field 8 above if field designated by N/A. 12 Column (i) data 4.25 114 ­ 122Column (i) data Format: See Field 11 above. 13 End
  • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1999PDFs/4302S99.PDF
    • an open field, enter zero. Enter ­88888 in integer rows on the "public version" diskette to indicate that confidential treatment has been requested. 9 Column (f) data ­ 234 84 ­ 92 Column (f) data Format: See Field 8 above. 10 Column (g) data 0 94 ­ 102 Column (g) data Format: See Field 8 above. 11 Column (h) data 3.25 104 ­ 112This field contains the data corresponding to column (h) as shown in the Form Section of the Report Definition. Format: Enter as a percent and round to two decimal places. See format for Field 8 above if field designated by N/A. 12 Column (i) data 4.25 114 ­ 122Column (i) data Format: See Field 11 above. 13 End