FCC Web Documents citing 3.11

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1730A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1730A1.pdf
  • of Operational, Technical and Spectrum Requirements for Meeting Federal, State and Local Public Safety Communications Requirements Through the Year 2010; Request by National Capital Region for Special Temporary Authority to Operate a Broadband Network, in the 700 MHz Public Safety Band, PS Docket No. 06-229; WT Docket No. 96-86, Order, 22 FCC Rcd 20912 (PSHSB 2007). See Revised Plan Section 3.11 - Detailed Description of How Region 20 Maximized Spectrum, Figure 2 - Process for Evaluating User Applications for Voice Channels at 30. See Revised Plan, Section 3.9 Management of Channel Assignments at 26. See also 47 C.F.R. § 90.551 (each station authorized in the 769-775 MHz and 799-805 MHz frequency band must be constructed and placed into operation within 12
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2035A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2035A1.pdf
  • first-come, first-served basis and will be allotted channels if Plan requirements are met. See Plan, Section 5 - Procedures for Frequency Coordination (addressing process, licensee responsibilities and technical requirements) at 23-24. See Plan, Section 4.1 - Processing and Evaluating Applications at 21-22 (listing application requirements); see also, Plan, Appendix K - Evaluation Matrix Point System at 119-122. See Plan, Section 3.11 - Design and Engineering Responsibilities at 16-17; see also Plan, Section 3.13 - Implementation of Channels at 18. See Plan, Section 3.14 - Interoperability Channels; see also Plan, Appendix J - Table of Interoperability Channels at 115-117. See Plan, Section 3.4 - Low Power Channels (addressing service assignments, repeater/incident area network operations and direct or simplex operation) at 12-14; see
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2090A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2090A1.pdf
  • 6.0 - System Design/Efficiency Requirements at 49-52. See also Plan, Section 3.10 - How Region 28 Maximized Spectrum at 31-32 (the Technical Committee will assign channels based on the applicant's proposed technology). See Plan Section 7.0 - Interoperability Channels at 53-54 (planning area covers all or portions of three states: Delaware, Southern New Jersey and Eastern Pennsylvania). See Plan, Section 3.11 - Low Power Channels at 32-33 (low power interoperability frequencies are limited to transmissions with effective radiated power (ERP) of no more than two (2) watts). See Plan, Section 8.0 - Future Planning at 55 (Region 28 initial CAPRAD allotments will be known as ``Window One.'' Channels identified in this plan will be available to applicants operating in the geographic
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-867A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-867A1.pdf
  • efficiency); see also, Plan, Section 3.4 - Technical Evaluation of Applications at 37. See Plan, Section 6 - System Design/Efficiency Requirements at 63-66. See Plan, Section 7-7.5 - Interoperability at 67-69. See also Plan, Appendix M - National Interoperability Frequency Guide at 174-176 (lists all public safety interoperability channels in UHF, VHF, 800 MHz and 700 MHz). See Plan, Section 3.11 - Low Power Channels at 44-48 (describes utilization of low power channels for on-scene incident response, and low power itinerant channels licensed for nationwide operation). See also 47 C.F.R. § 90.531(b)(3) narrowband low power channels subject to regional planning. See Plan, Section 3.6 - Use of the CAPRAD Pre-assignment Table at 38-39. See Plan, Section 1.6 - Plan Development at
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.pdf
  • 3.6.4. See id. According to ECIG, a video crawl can only display up to 1,800 characters of text due to equipment processing limitations and the audio time specifications for EAS messages. Therefore, even using the data supplied in CAP, there is a limit to how much information can be relayed in text format. See id. § 3.6. See id. § 3.11 (``If a CAP-to-EAS device receives an alert in the EAS domain, and it has a duplicate alert that has been received via CAP, but neither has yet aired, it SHOULD use the CAP version of the alert.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 11.33(a)(10). See 47 C.F.R. § 11.54. See id. § 11.54(b). CSRIC Final Report, § 5.1. See, e.g., ECIG Implementation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.txt
  • which the information is collected or maintained. 3.10 Notice of Obligations. Domestic Communications Companies shall instruct appropriate officials, employees, contractors, and agents as to the security restrictions and safeguards imposed by this Agreement, including the reporting requirements in Sections 5.5, 5.6, and 5.7 of this Agreement, and shall issue periodic reminders to them of such obligations. VA0 1 lGRlFJ120093.12 13 3.11 Access to Classified, Controlled Unclassified, or Sensitive Information. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall limit or affect the authority of a U.S. government agency to deny, limit or revoke Domestic Communications Companies' access to Classified, Controlled Unclassified, and Sensitive Information under that agency's jurisdiction. ARTICLE 4: DISPUTES 4.1 Informal Resolution. The Parties shall use their best efforts to resolve any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.txt
  • reject screened persons (``Screened Personnel''). 3.10 Security Officer Responsibilities and Duties. Within 14 calendar days after the Effective Date, VSNL America shall designate, from among the points of contact selected pursuant to Section 3.8, a Security Officer within the United States with the primary responsibility for carrying out VSNL America's obligations under Articles 2, 3 and 5 of this Agreement. 3.11 Nondisclosure of Protected Data. The Security Officer shall not directly or indirectly disclose information concerning Lawful U.S. Process, Classified Information, Sensitive Information, or Controlled Unclassified Information to any third party, or officer, director, shareholder, employee, agent, or contractor of VSNL or VSNL America, including those who serve in a supervisory, managerial or officer role with respect to the Security Officer,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1548A1.txt
  • E38)'' and ``0 dBi Antenna Gain Transmit (Item E41). Moreover, the EIRP Density you provided in the applications do not agree with that derived from other information in the application. Specifically, in Item E49, you indicate that the Maximum EIRP Density per Carrier is -3.36 dBW/4 kHz. This value is less than and therefore inconsistent with the average value of -3.11 dBW/4 kHz as derived from the Maximum EIRP per carrier of 7.0 dBW (Item E48) and a 41 kHz bandwidth for the emission (Item E47). Given these inconsistencies, we cannot determine the actual emission power in use. Furthermore, the Maximum EIRP Density towards the Horizon (Item E60) of -2.0 dBW/4 kHz is inconsistent with the Maximum EIRP Density per Carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3102A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3102A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3102A2.txt
  • and updated. This knowledge base and other pooling FAQs content for each web application shall be updated at least weekly. Reserved System Report Administration The pooling administration system shall be capable of generating and distributing reports to all requesting users who are entitled to receive reports. The full set of reports will be described in the contractor's Management Reporting Plan. 3.11.1 System Reports The system shall be capable of producing the following reports with flexible search functionality (i.e., independently by OCN, State, NPA or any combination of these data elements): Donated Block Report - detailing what an SP has donated to pooling. Details will include NPA-NXX-X, status, rate area, SP name, contaminated? (Y or N), Active and Portable? (Y or N),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 1.20 UNI 37 2.34 Total 1,583100.00 Source:Authorcalculations.Note:IND1-IND9(PBS1-PBS6)are"virtualnetworks"consistingofthefirst,second, etc.Independent(Public)televisionstationofferedineachNielsenDMA.SeeSection4.1formoredetails.AZA =AztecaAmerica,ION=The"i"network,TBN=TrinityBroadcastingNetwork,TEL=Telemundo,TLF= Telefutura,andUNI=Univision 34 Table6: ProgramProductionbyProgrammingType 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2006 AllBroadcast Cable Variable Networks NetworksNetworks NewsProgramming AnyNews 4.14 11.79 2.96 NetworkNews 0.51 2.63 0.18 LocalNews 3.63 9.16 2.78 PublicAffairsProgramming 1.98 3.40 1.76 MinorityProgramming NetworksTargetingBlackAudiences 3.39 0.00 3.91 TargetingLatinoAudiences OnNetworksTargetingLatinoAudiences 8.13 15.17 7.05 Spanish-LanguageProgramming 3.39 5.54 3.05 NetworksTargetingOtherDiverseAudiences 2.65 0.00 3.06 Children'sProgramming "Children'sProgramming" 1.93 0.84 2.10 GMoviesorTV-Y/TV-Y7TV 3.11 1.06 3.42 Eitheroftheabove 5.03 1.90 5.52 FamilyProgramming NetworksTargetingFamilies 10.93 0.00 12.61 TY-GProgramming 11.59 17.05 10.75 Arts,Educational,orDocumentaryProgramming 7.60 6.46 7.77 Eitherofthetwoabove 19.18 23.50 18.52 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming 4.98 0.00 5.75 NC-17MoviesorTV-MA-S/TV-MA-LTV 0.67 0.39 0.72 ViolentProgramming "ViolentProgramming" 1.70 0.53 1.88 TV-PG-VTelevision 1.46 2.31 1.33 TV-14-VTelevision 1.47 2.07 1.37 TV-MA-VTelevision 0.19 0.12 0.20 Anyofthethreeabove 3.11 4.50 2.90 Anyofthelasttwoabove 1.65 2.18 1.57 ReligiousProgramming NetworksShowingPrimarilyReligiousProgramming 1.52
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1730A1.txt
  • of Operational, Technical and Spectrum Requirements for Meeting Federal, State and Local Public Safety Communications Requirements Through the Year 2010; Request by National Capital Region for Special Temporary Authority to Operate a Broadband Network, in the 700 MHz Public Safety Band, PS Docket No. 06-229; WT Docket No. 96-86, Order, 22 FCC Rcd 20912 (PSHSB 2007). See Revised Plan Section 3.11 - Detailed Description of How Region 20 Maximized Spectrum, Figure 2 - Process for Evaluating User Applications for Voice Channels at 30. See Revised Plan, Section 3.9 Management of Channel Assignments at 26. See also 47 C.F.R. § 90.551 (each station authorized in the 769-775 MHz and 799-805 MHz frequency band must be constructed and placed into operation within 12
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2035A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2035A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2035A1.txt
  • first-come, first-served basis and will be allotted channels if Plan requirements are met. See Plan, Section 5 - Procedures for Frequency Coordination (addressing process, licensee responsibilities and technical requirements) at 23-24. See Plan, Section 4.1 - Processing and Evaluating Applications at 21-22 (listing application requirements); see also, Plan, Appendix K - Evaluation Matrix Point System at 119-122. See Plan, Section 3.11 - Design and Engineering Responsibilities at 16-17; see also Plan, Section 3.13 - Implementation of Channels at 18. See Plan, Section 3.14 - Interoperability Channels; see also Plan, Appendix J - Table of Interoperability Channels at 115-117. See Plan, Section 3.4 - Low Power Channels (addressing service assignments, repeater/incident area network operations and direct or simplex operation) at 12-14; see
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2090A1.txt
  • 6.0 - System Design/Efficiency Requirements at 49-52. See also Plan, Section 3.10 - How Region 28 Maximized Spectrum at 31-32 (the Technical Committee will assign channels based on the applicant's proposed technology). See Plan Section 7.0 - Interoperability Channels at 53-54 (planning area covers all or portions of three states: Delaware, Southern New Jersey and Eastern Pennsylvania). See Plan, Section 3.11 - Low Power Channels at 32-33 (low power interoperability frequencies are limited to transmissions with effective radiated power (ERP) of no more than two (2) watts). See Plan, Section 8.0 - Future Planning at 55 (Region 28 initial CAPRAD allotments will be known as ``Window One.'' Channels identified in this plan will be available to applicants operating in the geographic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.txt
  • {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof \par 3.10 Vertical Service Codes (VSC)\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof SEQ SectionNumber _Toc280004968 \\* ARABIC }}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 3}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof -}{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof PAGEREF _Toc280004968 \\h }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof {\*\datafield 08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b02000000080000000e0000005f0054006f0063 003200380030003000300034003900360038000000}} }{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 4}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof \par 3.11 Automatic Number Identification (ANI) II Digits\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof SEQ SectionNumber _Toc280004969 \\* ARABIC }}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 3} }}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof -}{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof PAGEREF _Toc280004969 \\h }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof {\*\datafield 08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b02000000080000000e0000005f0054006f0063 003200380030003000300034003900360039000000}} }{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 5}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof \par }\pard\plain \ltrpar\s31\ql \li0\ri0\sb120\widctlpar\tqr\tldot\tx8976\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\fa
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-867A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-867A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-867A1.txt
  • efficiency); see also, Plan, Section 3.4 - Technical Evaluation of Applications at 37. See Plan, Section 6 - System Design/Efficiency Requirements at 63-66. See Plan, Section 7-7.5 - Interoperability at 67-69. See also Plan, Appendix M - National Interoperability Frequency Guide at 174-176 (lists all public safety interoperability channels in UHF, VHF, 800 MHz and 700 MHz). See Plan, Section 3.11 - Low Power Channels at 44-48 (describes utilization of low power channels for on-scene incident response, and low power itinerant channels licensed for nationwide operation). See also 47 C.F.R. § 90.531(b)(3) narrowband low power channels subject to regional planning. See Plan, Section 3.6 - Use of the CAPRAD Pre-assignment Table at 38-39. See Plan, Section 1.6 - Plan Development at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A3.txt
  • 99.39 17167.28 17644.61 999361 997939 998187 88.43 88.29 88.25 88.16 88.09 16974.77 16805.33 967677 960088 952982 69.20 68.75 68.41 68.03 67.76 11350.19 11434.57 1251441 1236690 1223238 94.98 94.29 93.56 92.63 92.06 13721.87 14092.27 1525317 1514020 1502409 87.11 86.72 86.26 85.72 85.40 16431.33 16556.88 1342231 1334506 1325527 74.03 73.67 73.34 72.99 72.78 15376.12 15525.86 307672 315459 319368 2.86 2.92 2.99 3.05 3.11 9857.70 10362.71 196161 201585 176.46 179.44 183.77 188.13 193.33 116711 118171 1.08 1.10 1.14 1.15 1.16 4312526 4401335 4450030 58.29 59.59 61.05 62.42 63.06 148232.82 160448.91 1153796 1179280 1199297 33.83 34.65 35.52 36.34 36.74 27414.11 29321.14 3158730 3222055 3250733 82.17 83.94 85.98 87.90 88.77 120818.70 131127.67 59131287 59619290 60045068 193.06 194.49 195.60 197.04 197.85 1594653.551649437.67 4352828 4401266 4432571 172.98 174.42
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-705A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-705A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-705A2.txt
  • to, and updated. This knowledge base and other pooling FAQs content for each web application shall be updated as needed. Reserved System Report Administration The pooling administration system shall be capable of generating and distributing reports to all requesting users who are entitled to receive reports. The full set of reports will be described in the contractor's Management Reporting Plan. 3.11.1 System Reports The system shall be capable of producing the following reports with flexible search functionality (i.e., independently by OCN, State, NPA or any combination of these data elements): Donated Block Report - detailing what a service provider has donated to pooling. Details will include NPA-NXX-X, status, rate center, service provider name, contaminated? (Y or N), Active and Portable? (Y
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1789A1.txt
  • 24 (released Dec. 7, 1995). 10 Rulemaking to Amend Pans 1. 2. 21. and 25 of the Commission's Rules to Redesignate the 27.5-29.5 GHz Frequency Band, to Reallocate the 29.5-30.0 GHz Frequency Band, to Establish Rules and Policies for Local Multipoint Distribution Service and for Fixed Satellite Services. First Repon and Order and Fourth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. FCC No. 96-3.11 (released July 22, 1996). 61 F.R. 39425 (July 29. 1996). 13954 the objections that the application is premature have become moot. Additional and Enhanced Service Offerings 8. Enhanced ringing and paging services. MSC requests explicit authorization for the IRIDIUM System to provide enhanced ringing and paging services, in addition to the kinds of MSS service that it originally proposed to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.txt
  • 2,574 1.70 2.17 3.43 5.05 6 18 16 16 16Venezuela 1,913 2,412 0 4,325 1,700 0.79 1.31 1.49 2.14 1 19 n.a. n.a. n.a.Denmark 1,267 234 2,520 4,021 542 0.46 2.89 5.82 7.00 6 20 23 29 29Argentina 779 3,150 30 3,959 1,128 0.24 0.46 0.76 1.34 6 21 28 27 23Colombia 1,391 2,273 24 3,688 1,313 0.61 1.26 1.54 3.11 7 22 15 17 17Taiwan 1,647 1,837 48 3,532 4,580 0.87 0.71 1.64 2.32 7 23 n.a. 21 18India 1,453 1,986 23 3,462 734 0.72 1.44 1.77 2.50 1 24 17 18 12Italy 2,650 709 92 3,451 1,765 3.31 2.60 2.09 2.34 9 25 26 28 27Russia 1,528 1,484 40 3,052 439 1.00 1.53 2.38 3.53 7 26 22 25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213585A1.txt
  • it with the following text: ``The residential fee in the fourth quarter 2000 for Verizon was 5.6688 percent and for AT&T and Sprint was 8.6 percent. See Verizon Select Services, Inc., Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, Section 2.13, issued September 29, 2000; AT&T Tariff F.C.C. No. 27, Sections 3.5.12.B and 24.1.18.B, issued February 18, 2000; Sprint Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, Section 3.11.8, issued October 31, 2000. The business fee in the fourth quarter 2000 for Verizon was 5.6688 percent and for AT&T and Sprint was 6.6 percent. See Verizon Select Services, Inc., Tariff F.C.C. Nos. 2 and 3, Sections 2.12 and 2.17, respectively, issued September 29, 2000; AT&T Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, Section 2.5.9.C1, issued October 19, 1999, and January 10, 2001;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213585A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213585A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213585A2.txt
  • 00-2065 (rel. Sep. 8, 2000). The residential fee in the fourth quarter 2000 for Verizon was 5.6688 percent and for AT&T and Sprint was 8.6 percent. See Verizon Select Services, Inc., Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, Section 2.13, issued September 29, 2000; AT&T Tariff F.C.C. No. 27, Sections 3.5.12.B and 24.1.18.B, issued February 18, 2000; Sprint Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, Section 3.11.8, issued October 31, 2000. The business fee in the fourth quarter 2000 for Verizon was 5.6688 percent and for AT&T and Sprint was 6.6 percent. See Verizon Select Services, Inc., Tariff F.C.C. Nos. 2 and 3, Sections 2.12 and 2.17, respectively, issued September 29, 2000; AT&T Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, Section 2.5.9.C1, issued October 19, 1999, and January 10, 2001;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 67,676,456 62,434,785 1.38 Verizon Wireless 56,536,041 211,282,250 49,806,763 1.10 VoiceStream Wireless Corporation incl. Omnipoint Corporation 2,899,603 7,793,712 5,624,342 0.12 Winstar Communications, Inc. 3,053,257 10,767,053 5,378,260 0.12 Working Assets Long Distance 2,862,837 23,551,832 15,121,203 0.33 World Access Telecommunications Group, Inc. 211,462,004 1,238,406,098 329,380,477 7.28 WorldCom, Inc. 387,182,338 1,858,724,000 618,211,602 13.65 Total for 329 Carriers Not Shown Above 1/ 84,074,165 389,107,995 140,937,100 3.11 Total for all Reporting Carriers 2,593,025,453 15,048,355,630 $4,527,537,359 100.00% 1/ Data are consolidated for affiliated carriers. A total of 379 companies made a total of 451 filings. The 50 companies shown in the table represent 85 filings. Source: Industry Analysis Division, Section 43.61 International Telecommunications Data. 6 - 7 7-1 7 Lifeline and LinkUp Programs In 1984, the FCC, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262551A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262551A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262551A2.txt
  • and updated. This knowledge base and other pooling FAQs content for each web application shall be updated at least weekly. Reserved System Report Administration The pooling administration system shall be capable of generating and distributing reports to all requesting users who are entitled to receive reports. The full set of reports will be described in the contractor's Management Reporting Plan. 3.11.1 System Reports The system shall be capable of producing the following reports with flexible search functionality (i.e., independently by OCN, State, NPA or any combination of these data elements): Donated Block Report - detailing what an SP has donated to pooling. Details will include NPA-NXX-X, status, rate area, SP name, contaminated? (Y or N), Active and Portable? (Y or N),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Common Line Support Payment Trueups by State or Jurisdiction ......... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Payment Trueups by Study Area .......................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.txt
  • Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Common Line Support Payment Trueups by State or Jurisdiction ......... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Payment Trueups by Study Area .......................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • the high-cost programs for 1998 through 2005. The 2005 numbers are based on the assumption that fourth quarter projections will be the same as those for the third quarter. Table 3.6 summarizes HCLS payments, Table 3.7 summarizes safety net additive support payments, Table 3.8 summarizes safety valve support payments, Table 3.9 summarizes HCMS payments,38 Table 3.10 summarizes LTS payments, Table 3.11 summarizes ICLS payments, Table 3.12 summarizes IAS payments, and Table 3.13 summarizes LSS payments. Table 3.14 summarizes the total of these seven payments. Table 3.15 shows the amounts of these payments by state going to ILECs and CETCs for each year since 1999. Table 3.16 shows, by support mechanism by state, for 2004, the monthly support payments per loop to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63 1998 3.17 2.79 2.55 2.16 1.69 1999 3.33 2.70 2.49 2.12 1.63 2000 3.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
  • Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • 555 Indiana 501,936 NA 1.57 74 101 132 167 Iowa 199,115 NA 0.62 29 40 52 66 Kansas 316,946 NA 0.99 46 64 83 105 Kentucky 218,810 NA 0.68 32 44 57 73 Louisiana 283,333 NA 0.88 42 57 74 94 Maine 113,957 NA 0.36 17 23 30 38 Maryland 615,757 NA 1.92 90 123 162 204 Massachusetts 997,760 NA 3.11 146 200 262 331 Michigan 1,575,267 NA 4.92 231 316 413 523 Minnesota 604,152 NA 1.89 89 121 159 201 Mississippi 131,218 NA 0.41 19 26 34 44 Missouri 430,538 NA 1.34 63 86 113 143 Montana * 23,578 0.08 4 5 7 9 Nebraska 205,560 NA 0.64 30 41 54 68 Nevada 149,735 NA 0.47 22 30 39 50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • the high-cost programs for 1998 through 2006. The 2006 numbers are based on the assumption that fourth quarter projections will be the same as those for the third quarter. Table 3.6 summarizes HCLS payments, Table 3.7 summarizes safety net additive support payments, Table 3.8 summarizes safety valve support payments, Table 3.9 summarizes HCMS payments,40 Table 3.10 summarizes LTS payments, Table 3.11 summarizes ICLS payments, Table 3.12 summarizes IAS payments, and Table 3.13 summarizes LSS payments. Table 3.14 summarizes the total of these seven payments. Table 3.15 shows the amounts of these payments by state going to ILECs and CETCs for each year since 1999. Table 3.16 shows, by support mechanism by state, for 2005, the monthly support payments per loop to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Tables and Charts Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
  • Tables and Charts Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • the high-cost programs for 1998 through 2007. The 2007 numbers are based on the assumption that fourth quarter projections will be the same as those for the third quarter. Table 3.6 summarizes HCLS payments, Table 3.7 summarizes safety net additive support payments, Table 3.8 summarizes safety valve support payments, Table 3.9 summarizes HCMS payments,40 Table 3.10 summarizes LTS payments, Table 3.11 summarizes 37 The weighted and unweighted DEM factors were shown in section 8 of this report in 2003 and prior years. The DEM factors were frozen in 2001 for a five year period, which has since been extended. See Jurisdictional Separations Reform and Referral to the Federal-State Joint Board, CC Docket No. 80-286, Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 11382
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63 1998 3.17 2.79 2.55 2.16 1.69 1999 3.33 2.70 2.49 2.12 1.63 2000 3.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
  • Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • the program existed between 1998 and 2008. The 2008 numbers are based on the assumption that fourth quarter projections will be the same as those for the third quarter. Table 3.6 summarizes HCLS payments, Table 3.7 summarizes safety net additive support payments, Table 3.8 summarizes safety valve support payments, Table 3.9 summarizes HCMS payments,45 Table 3.10 summarizes LTS payments, Table 3.11 summarizes ICLS payments, Table 3.12 summarizes IAS payments, and Table 3.13 summarizes LSS payments. Table 3.14 summarizes the total of these seven payments. Table 3.15 shows the amounts of these payments by state going to ILECs and CETCs for each year since 1999. Table 3.16 shows, by support mechanism by state, for 2007, the monthly support payments per loop to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A6.pdf
  • 33,565,313 19.27 10,858,927 6.23 Minnesota 839,243 21,413,472 25.52 17,477,265 20.83 3,936,207 4.69 Mississippi 494,954 37,495,728 75.76 26,763,631 54.07 10,732,097 21.68 Missouri 917,705 29,327,637 31.96 17,854,145 19.46 11,473,492 12.50 Montana 145,416 3,516,707 24.18 2,981,060 20.50 535,647 3.68 Nebraska 286,646 8,813,619 30.75 7,699,049 26.86 1,114,570 3.89 Nevada 412,395 5,630,339 13.65 5,069,328 12.29 561,011 1.36 New Hampshire 205,767 2,324,743 11.30 1,685,538 8.19 639,205 3.11 New Jersey 1,395,602 43,123,120 30.90 32,951,933 23.61 10,171,187 7.29 New Mexico 326,758 31,960,481 97.81 18,233,860 55.80 13,726,621 42.01 New York 2,815,581 188,955,938 67.11 125,508,660 44.58 63,447,278 22.53 North Carolina 1,416,436 53,607,329 37.85 41,052,722 28.98 12,554,607 8.86 North Dakota 98,283 4,879,664 49.65 4,428,037 45.05 451,627 4.60 Northern Mariana Is. 11,718 1,082,531 92.38 871,018 74.33 211,513 18.05 Ohio 1,839,683 76,502,591 41.58 57,540,818
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Monthly Support - by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
  • Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Monthly Support - by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.txt
  • 13.50 9.09 New Hampshire 8.14 8.25 8.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.14 8.25 8.16 8.14 8.25 8.16 New Jersey 7.07 8.25 8.03 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 7.07 10.00 9.77 7.07 13.50 13.25 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.08 0.00 1.75 1.54 8.25 10.00 9.79 8.25 13.50 12.87 New York 5.93 8.25 8.03 0.00 3.50 3.11 0.00 1.75 1.56 5.93 10.00 9.59 5.93 13.50 12.70 North Carolina 7.43 8.25 7.89 3.50 3.50 3.49 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.18 10.00 9.63 12.68 13.50 13.13 North Dakota 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 1.78 0.00 1.75 0.89 8.25 10.00 9.14 8.25 13.50 10.92 N. Marianna Islands 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • be found at http://www.universalservice.org/hc/disbursements/default.aspx. 3 - 10 support payments. Each table summarizes the annual amounts for the high-cost programs for those years the program existed between 1998 and 2009. Table 3.6 summarizes HCLS payments, Table 3.7 summarizes safety net additive support payments, Table 3.8 summarizes safety valve support payments, Table 3.9 summarizes HCMS payments,42 Table 3.10 summarizes LTS payments, Table 3.11 summarizes ICLS payments, Table 3.12 summarizes IAS payments, and Table 3.13 summarizes LSS payments. Table 3.14 summarizes the total of these seven payments. Table 3.15 shows the amounts of these payments by state going to ILECs and CETCs for each year since 1999. Table 3.16 shows, by support mechanism by state, for 2008, the monthly support payments per loop to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297709A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297709A1.txt
  • (75%) and installing and equipping new towers (25%) and hardening those towers; and $0.2 billion to provide for a fleet of public safety deploy- ables (a mix of next generation COWS, COLTS, etc.), vehicular area network systems and non-recurring engi- neering costs for handset development.10 Based on this model, a reasonable year-by-year projection of capital expenses is depicted in Exhibit 3.11 Exhibit 2: Capex Chart Item Cost Notes 41,600 Commercially Deployed Non-rural Sites $4.0 B Excludes hardening costs Ethernet over fiber backhaul connectivity to commercial carrier's backhaul Assumes PS RAN (lit) added to 100% of sites (conservative) Hardening of Existing Commercial Sites $1.5 B Assumes 100% of sites need hardening (conservative) 3,200 Rural Sites (includes hardening) $0.8 B Assumes EMA, blend
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 13.50 9.09 New Hampshire 8.14 8.25 8.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.14 8.25 8.16 8.14 8.25 8.16 New Jersey 7.07 8.25 8.03 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 7.07 10.00 9.77 7.07 13.50 13.25 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.08 0.00 1.75 1.54 8.25 10.00 9.79 8.25 13.50 12.87 New York 5.93 8.25 8.03 0.00 3.50 3.11 0.00 1.75 1.56 5.93 10.00 9.59 5.93 13.50 12.70 North Carolina 7.43 8.25 7.89 3.50 3.50 3.49 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.18 10.00 9.63 12.68 13.50 13.13 North Dakota 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 1.78 0.00 1.75 0.89 8.25 10.00 9.14 8.25 13.50 10.92 N. Marianna Islands 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • by Study Area .................................................................Table 3.34 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues - by State .........Table 1.18 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints - 2009 .................................. Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................... Table 3.27 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ..........................................................Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Annual Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .............................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State or Jurisdiction ...................................Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal Areas - by State .............Table 2.7 3 Index of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.txt
  • by Study Area .................................................................Table 3.34 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues - by State .........Table 1.18 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints - 2009 .................................. Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................... Table 3.27 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ..........................................................Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Annual Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .............................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State or Jurisdiction ...................................Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal Areas - by State .............Table 2.7 3 Index of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • state of the total amounts of these support payments. Each table summarizes the annual amounts for the high-cost programs for those years the program existed between 1998 and 2010. Table 3.6 summarizes HCLS payments, Table 3.7 summarizes safety net additive support payments, Table 3.8 summarizes safety valve support payments, Table 3.9 summarizes HCMS payments,44 Table 3.10 summarizes LTS payments, Table 3.11 summarizes ICLS payments, Table 3.12 summarizes IAS payments, and Table 3.13 summarizes LSS payments. Table 3.14 summarizes the total of these seven payments. Table 3.15 shows the amounts of these payments by state going to ILECs and CETCs for each year since 1999. Table 3.16 shows, by support mechanism by state, for 2009, the monthly support payments per loop to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A6.txt
  • $30,405,642 $39.05 $7,101,785 $9.12 Alaska 127,755 26,042,784 203.85 21,198,389 165.93 4,844,395 37.92 American Samoa 16,908 1,593,682 94.26 0 0.00 1,593,682 94.26 Arizona 568,550 63,809,113 112.23 44,310,651 77.94 19,498,462 34.30 Arkansas 1,014,083 24,126,903 23.79 15,801,053 15.58 8,325,850 8.21 California 5,995,245 397,735,977 66.34 221,945,887 37.02 175,790,090 29.32 Colorado 768,423 21,716,280 28.26 15,546,562 20.23 6,169,717 8.03 Connecticut 1,649,074 27,151,166 16.46 22,026,838 13.36 5,124,327 3.11 Delaware 126,421 955,767 7.56 831,169 6.57 124,597 0.99 District of Columbia 63,885 10,739,442 168.11 1,970,244 30.84 8,769,198 137.27 Florida 2,800,637 88,812,953 31.71 75,655,948 27.01 13,157,005 4.70 Georgia 1,400,734 80,901,368 57.76 66,509,581 47.48 14,391,787 10.27 Guam 32,319 910,238 28.16 339,750 10.51 570,489 17.65 Hawaii 904,565 3,353,126 3.71 1,883,453 2.08 1,469,673 1.62 Idaho 248,698 5,954,061 23.94 4,901,385 19.71 1,052,675 4.23 Illinois 2,137,471
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306567A1.txt
  • or submitted revised filings after that date. Year 2009 data summarized in this report do not include information from filings received after December 2, 2010 or information from filings that were incomplete. Form 499-A requires each filer to choose a principal business activity that best describes its operations. The business activities among which the filer must choose appear in Table 3.11 Each filer must report total revenues, and separately report (domestic) interstate revenues and international revenues.12 Revenues in each of the three categories must be broken down between revenues billed to universal service contributors for resale (carrier's carrier revenues) and revenues billed to de minimis telecommunications providers and end users (end-user revenues).13 Filers must provide further breakdowns of services into local,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312921A1.txt
  • migratory birds, the PEA had an almost limitless range of alternatives available for consideration. The purpose and need define what can be considered reasonable, prudent, and practicable alternatives. The alternatives evaluated in the PEA meet the court-determined purpose and need, and include a wide range of possibilities. With regard to the impacts of existing towers, see Response 3.6, above. Comment 3.11: To comply with CEQ guidance, the No Action Alternative should have been the existing program, which does not include the not-yet-adopted new notice and interim regulations. Response 3.11: The draft procedures were adopted by the Commission on December 6, 2011 (FCC 2011b), and text throughout the PEA has been revised as needed. The No Action Alternative is the continuation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • B at 9, 18. See PO-1-06 for EDI. The performance data for these months show that Verizon consistently responds faster to queries for loop qualification information from the mechanized LiveWire database placed from competitors' application-to-application interfaces than to similar queries placed from VADI's retail pre-ordering interfaces. From October through December 2000, competitors received mechanized loop qualification responses on average within 3.11, 2.92, and 3.02 seconds respectively, as compared to 4.72, 17.26, 11.85 seconds for VADI's retail personnel. In its reply comments, Verizon explains that it has not reported data for the PO-8-01 and PO-8-02 metrics measuring the timeliness of its responses to pre-order manual loop qualification and engineering record requests, because there are currently no electronic pre-ordering OSS functions for manual
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.txt
  • Appointment - Verizon - Dispatch 15.68 0.00 16.25 25.00 18.58 9.09 14.83 0.00 1a,2a,3b,4a,2n PR-4-05 % Missed Appointment - Verizon - No Dispatch 0.08 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.07 0.00 1c,3c,4b PR-6-01 % Installation Troubles reported within 30 Days 4.67 0.59 7.25 2.36 7.32 0.00 6.53 3.08 PR-6-02 % Installation Troubles reported within 7 Days 2.26 0.59 3.48 0.79 3.11 0.00 4.17 3.08 PR-8-01 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 1c,4c PR-8-02 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1c,4c Resale 2-Wire Digital Services PR-2-01 Average Int. Completed - Total No Dispatch 2.50 NA 1.67 NA 0.00 NA 1.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • 2.20 B.2.1.8.1.12W Analog Loop Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.03 4.83 4.82 4.52 5.33 4.63 4.50 4.58 5.00 4.21 B.2.1.8.2.12W Analog Loop Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.00 8.00 11.41 6.50 10.61 7.00 11.32 6.00 11.16 5.67 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.1.9.1.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.01 3.64 4.81 3.73 5.31 4.29 4.54 3.75 5.01 3.76 B.2.1.9.1.42W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 3.33 1.53 3.11 1.59 3.64 1.52 3.50 1.89 4.22 4,5 B.2.1.9.2.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 9.03 4.55 9.89 6.14 10.18 8.08 11.42 7.92 11.33 5.90 B.2.1.11.1.42W Analog Loop w/INP Non- Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 1.53 1.59 4.00 1.52 1.89 3 B - 25 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.pdf
  • 2002 Report at Table 5 (noting that cable modem service is provided over nine million lines, which is approximately 57% of all high-speed lines). Compare Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, High Speed Services July 2002 Report at Table 5 (noting that the difference in number of high-speed lines served by cable modem service and ADSL service was 3.11 million as of December 2001) with High Speed Services December 2002 Report at Table 5 (noting that the difference in number of high-speed lines served by cable modem service and ADSL service was 4.07 million as of June 2002). See, e.g., Third Section 706 Report 2002, 17 FCC Rcd at 2877-81, paras. 79-88. See supra Part V.B. (discussing intermodal alternatives
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.txt
  • CableLabs to make its testing facilities (or optionally MSO facilities) available on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms. 3.10 With respect to encoding rules, the Parties agree to contact the DTLA to discuss the subject of potential infringement claims that could arise as a result of differences between the encoding rule proposal contemplated by this MOU and the "5C" encoding rules. 3.11 MSOs and CE Manufacturers acknowledge that technology advances and certain standards may need to transition or sunset. MSO and CE Manufacturers will meet at least annually to discuss technology sunsets, and may submit recommendations to the FCC as part of the biennial review process, or such earlier review as may be appropriate. 3.12 The design of Unidirectional Digital Cable Products
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.txt
  • Inmarsat satellite signal was maintained at 1530 MHz. 3.10. The ordinate of the odd-numbered figures below is labeled with the combined power level of the pair of interfering signals that creates a third-order intermodulation product at 1530 MHz. The abscissa of these figures is labeled with the frequency of f2, where the intermodulation product is at 1530 MHz = 2f1-f2. 3.11. Inmarsat Terminal A 3.11.1. Inmarsat Terminal A is a portable Inmarsat MET. The single-carrier harmful interference susceptibility levels for this MET are shown in Figure 3. The third-order intermodulation product harmful interference susceptibility levels for this MET are shown in Figure 4. 3.11.2. Referring to Figure 4 below, one can see that the level of the CW signal that causes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.txt
  • Date, Domestic Communications Companies shall designate, from among the points of contact selected pursuant to Section 3.8, a Security Officer within the United States with the primary responsibility for carrying out the Domestic Communications Company's obligations under Articles 2, 3 and 5 of this Agreement. The Security officer shall stand in a direct reporting relationship with the Director of Network. 3.11. Disclosure of Protected Data. In carrying out the responsibilities set forth in Section 3.10, the Security Officer shall not directly or indirectly disclose information concerning Lawful U.S. Process, Classified Information, Sensitive Information, or Controlled Unclassified Information to any third party or to any officer, director, shareholder, employee, agent, or contractor of any Domestic Communications Company, including those who serve in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.txt
  • by foreign nongovernmental entities to Domestic Companies for access to or disclosure of (i) U.S. Hosting Data, or (ii) Domestic Communications carried by or through, in whole or in part, the Domestic Communications Infrastructure, unless the disclosure of the legal process or request would be in violation of an order of a court of competent jurisdiction within the United States. 3.11. Security of Lawful U.S. Process. The Domestic Companies shall protect the confidentiality and security of all Lawful U.S. Process served upon them and the confidentiality and security of Classified and Sensitive Information in accordance with U.S. Federal and state law or regulation and this Agreement. Information concerning Lawful U.S. Process, Classified Information, or Sensitive Information shall be under the custody
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-57A1.txt
  • measured by the model upheld in Qwest I) are not high enough to qualify for non-rural high-cost model support. 2009 Universal Service Monitoring Report, Table 3.6. At the same time, however, PRTC has continued to receive other forms of high-cost support, including more than $59 million in Interstate Common Line Support in 2008. See 2009 Universal Service Monitoring Report, Tables 3.11 & 3.15. Prior to the 1996 Act, only incumbent local exchange carriers (``ILECs''), such as PRTC, received high-cost support. In the Universal Service First Report and Order, the Commission concluded that high-cost support should be ``portable,'' i.e., when a particular customer switches from an incumbent carrier to a new entrant, support should flow to the customer's new carrier. The Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.txt
  • 3.6.4. See id. According to ECIG, a video crawl can only display up to 1,800 characters of text due to equipment processing limitations and the audio time specifications for EAS messages. Therefore, even using the data supplied in CAP, there is a limit to how much information can be relayed in text format. See id. § 3.6. See id. § 3.11 (``If a CAP-to-EAS device receives an alert in the EAS domain, and it has a duplicate alert that has been received via CAP, but neither has yet aired, it SHOULD use the CAP version of the alert.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 11.33(a)(10). See 47 C.F.R. § 11.54. See id. § 11.54(b). CSRIC Final Report, § 5.1. See, e.g., ECIG Implementation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.txt
  • Rcd 8149, 8175, para. 58 (citing CSRIC Final Report, § 5.1). See id. at 8175, para. 59. See id. Monroe Comments at 25-26. See also Sage Comments at 13. See BWWG Comments at 26. See also Trilithic Comments at 8 (``We agree that duplicate messages should be handled in accordance with the ECIG implementation recommendations.''). See ECIG Implementation Guide, § 3.11. See id. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.33(a)(11). See Third FNPRM, 26 FCC Rcd 8149, 8175, para. 60. BWWG Comments at 27. Trilithic Comments at 9. Sage Comments at 13. See 47 C.F.R. § 11.33(a)(11) (``A header code with the EAN Event code specified in § 11.31(c) that is received through any of the audio inputs must override all other messages.'').
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.wp
  • the Telecommunications Act of 1996, is to bring to all Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-168 18 See AT&T Tariff FCC No. 27, 3rd Rev. P. 24-555, at § 24.1.18.C (eff. July 1, 1999); MCI Tariff FCC No. 1, 14th Rev. P. 16.3, at § C.1.061111 (eff. July 1, 1999); Sprint Tariff FCC No. 1, 4th Rev. P. 38.2, at § 3.11.10 (eff. Oct. 17, 1998). 19 See AT&T Tariff FCC No. 27, 1st Rev. P. 4-7.3, at § 4.1.1.N (eff. June 15, 1999); 1st Rev. P. 24-57.39, at § 24.1.1.U.2 (eff. Sept. 5, 1998). 7 Americans the benefits of a robust and competitive communications marketplace. Since passage of the Act, competition has created greater choice and value for many consumers. Some
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01145.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01145.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01145.txt
  • 00-2065 (rel. Sep. 8, 2000). The residential fee in the fourth quarter 2000 for Verizon was 5.6688 percent and for AT&T and Sprint was 8.6 percent. See Verizon Select Services, Inc., Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, Section 2.13, issued September 29, 2000; AT&T Tariff F.C.C. No. 27, Sections 3.5.12.B and 24.1.18.B, issued February 18, 2000; Sprint Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, Section 3.11.8, issued October 31, 2000. The business fee in the fourth quarter 2000 for Verizon was 5.6688 percent and for AT&T and Sprint was 6.6 percent. See Verizon Select Services, Inc., Tariff F.C.C. Nos. 2 and 3, Sections 2.12 and 2.17, respectively, issued September 29, 2000; AT&T Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, Section 2.5.9.C1, issued October 19, 1999, and January 10, 2001;
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • 3rd Rev. P. 19.183, at § C.3.421 (eff. Jan. 3, 1998). Low-Volume Long-Distance Users NOI, 15 FCC Rcd at 6303-04. AT&T Tariff FCC No. 27, 3rd Rev. P. 24-555 at §24.1.18 C (eff. July 1, 1999); MCI Tariff FCC No. 1, 16th Rev. P. 16.3, §1.061111A. (eff. August 1, 1999); Sprint Tariff FCC No. 1, 6th Rev. P. 38.2, § 3.11.10 (eff. Aug. 1, 1999). As discussed in Section IV.C.2, in the Universal Service Ninth Report and Order we reformed our high-cost universal service support mechanism for non-rural carriers to enable states to maintain reasonably comparable intrastate rates. See AT&T Tariff FCC No. 27, 2nd Rev. P. 24-555 at §24.1.18 D (eff. July 1, 1998). See Universal Service Ninth Report and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980230.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980230.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980230.wp
  • with the tracking tool software are encouraged to try the tracking tool software for the 800 MHz SMR auction at http://www.fcc.gov/wtb/auctions. This tool cannot be used for the LMDS auction but has similar functionality and provides a useful tool for practice. The tracking tool is a Microsoft \ Excelª v5.0 WorkBook, which runs on Microsoft Windowsª v3.1, Windows for WorkGroupsª v3.11, and Windows 95. With this auction tracking tool, bidders can import round results and analyze the bidding in the auction. Technical support for the tracking tool can be obtained by calling the FCC Technical Support Hotline. Please review the information included with the tracking tool README file thoroughly before calling technical support. User Requirements. This software is not designed for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980572.pdf
  • payment. 2 Attachment D: Provides detailed information about how winning bidders should complete their required FCC Form 601 for LMDS license applications. Attachment E: Provides instructions for registering and filing the FCC Form 601 electronically. Attachment F: Provides instructions for accessing the FCC Network using Windows 95. Attachment G: Provides instructions for accessing the FCC Network using Windows 3.1 or 3.11. Copies of this public notice will be mailed via overnight mail to each winning bidder. Bidders should note that this auction involves rules and procedures different in some respects from those used in previous Commission auctions. Some Part 1 and 101 rules relevant to this bidding process, have been recently revised.2 For example, Section 1.2112 includes revised ownership disclosure requirements
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • On Time LSR/ASR Reject Facility Check 100 100 100 96.97 100 a,b RESALE (PROVISIONING) POTS ­ Provisioning - Total PR-2 - Average Completed Interval PR-2-04-2100 Average Interval Completed - Dispatch (6-9 Lines) 4.65 4.5 4.16 3.4 a,b PR-2-05-2100 Average Interval Completed - Dispatch (>= 10 Lines) 3.5 7 5.33 8.83 PR-4 - Missed Appointments PR-4-02-2100 Average Delay Days ­ Total 3.11 2.08 3.25 3.42 2.83 2.5 2.74 4.17 3.07 2.22 PR-4-03-2100 % Missed Appointment ­ Customer 1.77 2.65 1.5 1.91 1.57 2.61 2.24 2.22 a,b,c,d,e PR-4-04-2100 % Missed Appointment ­ Verizon ­ Dispatch 5.96 5.21 5.8 5.63 5.17 3.58 5.03 3.81 5.07 4.66 PR-4-05-2100 % Missed Appointment ­ Verizon ­ No Dispatch 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.01
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • characteristics not available in all markets. 30 Table 2: Overall Evidence of Preference Externalities Circulation per Capita Circulation per Household 5-Digit Zips Hybrid Zips MSA Total 5-Digit Zips Hybrid Zips MSA Total (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) MSA Pop (Mil.) 0.005 0.003 0.009 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.015 0.027 0.014 (2.74)** (1.99)* (3.09)** (1.99)* (1.80) (0.88) (2.88)** (3.11)** (2.57)* MSA Median Inc. (000) -0.001 0.002 -0.001 (0.96) (1.68) (0.46) MSA Fr. College Degree 0.230 0.098 0.144 (3.43)** (1.21) (2.00)* MSA Fr. Under Age 30 -0.884 -0.303 -0.319 (7.47)** (2.77)** (1.11) MSA Fr. Over Age 65 4.1603 2.2409 2.988 (10.61)** (5.12)** (2.59)* Constant 0.199 0.206 0.238 0.192 0.220 0.232 0.532 0.632 0.553 (41.41)** (6.45)** (34.08)** (4.01)** (45.46)** (7.64)** (42.50)**
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cblkelec.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cblkelec.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cblkelec.wp
  • Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device * Additional disk space may be required if a large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software has not been completely tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960005.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960005.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960005.wp
  • Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device * Additional disk space may be required if a large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software has not been completely tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960010.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960010.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960010.wp
  • Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device * Additional disk space may be required if a large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960012.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960012.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960012.wp
  • Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device * Additional disk space may be required if a large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/07/releases/da960586.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/07/releases/da960586.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/07/releases/da960586.wp
  • install the remote system) o Five blank MS-DOS® formatted 3.5" 1.44MB floppy disks o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software (will be available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for WorkGroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software has not been completely tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/07/releases/da960709.pdf
  • Drive (to install the remote system) o Five blank MS-DOS® formatted 3.5" 1.44MB floppy disks o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for WorkGroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/c_retool.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/c_retool.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/c_retool.wp
  • be available via the Internet and the FCC Auctions Bulletin Board System. Attachments A, B, and C to this Public Notice provide detailed instructions concerning access of this software via the Internet (Attachment A) and Auctions BBS (Attachments B and C). The tracking tool is a Microsoft Excelª v5.0 WorkBook, which runs on Microsoft Windowsª v3.1 and Windows for WorkGroupsª v3.11. With this auction tracking tool, bidders can import round results and analyze the bidding in the C-Block Reauction, which is scheduled to begin on July 3, 1996. The "Markets" and "Bidders" worksheets are the central features of the tool. The "Markets" worksheet presents bidding activity for every license in the auction. It includes data such as the standing high bid
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da961153.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da961153.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da961153.wp
  • Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device * Additional disk space may be required if a large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/pn_96889.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/pn_96889.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/pn_96889.wp
  • or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive o Three blank MS-DOS® formatted 1.44MB floppy disks Software Requirements: o FCC Form 175 Application Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Form 175 Application has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment, you
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/auc9611f.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/auc9611f.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/auc9611f.wp
  • above Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Mock Auction Bidding System, you will need the following: 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive Three (3) blank MS-DOS formatted 1.44MB floppy disks Software Requirements: FCC Mock Auction Bidding System (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Mock Auction Bidding System has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/bip_def.pdf
  • VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: 1.44MB 3.5" floppy drive Three blank MS-DOS® formatted 1.44MB floppy disks Software Requirements: FCC Form 175 application software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode NOTE: The FCC Form 175 application has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. Access to Application Software 53 Applicants who wish to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/d1961026.pdf
  • above Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: 1.44 MB 3.5" floppy drive Three blank MS-DOS® formatted 1.44 MB floppy disks Software Requirements: FCC Form 175 application software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode NOTE: The FCC Form 175 application software has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. Access to Application Software Applicants who wish to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da961414.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da961414.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da961414.wp
  • be available via the Internet and the FCC Auctions Bulletin Board System. Attachments A, B, and C to this Public Notice provide detailed instructions concerning access of this software via the Internet (Attachment A) and Auctions BBS (Attachments B and C). The tracking tool is a Microsoft Excelª v5.0 WorkBook, which runs on Microsoft Windowsª v3.1 and Windows for WorkGroupsª v3.11. With this auction tracking tool, bidders can import round results and analyze the bidding in the D/E/F block auction. The "Markets" and "Bidders" worksheets are the central features of the tools. The "Markets" worksheet presents bidding activity for every license in the auction. It includes data such as the standing high bid and bidder, number of bids placed, and price
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da970081.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da970081.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da970081.wp
  • Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device * Additional disk space may be required if a large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/d96-1850.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/d96-1850.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/d96-1850.wp
  • or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive o Three blank MS-DOS® formatted 1.44MB floppy disks Software Requirements: o FCC Form 175 Application Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Form 175 Application has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment, you
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/da97-16.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/da97-16.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/da97-16.wp
  • Tool. A software tool for tracking the progress of the auction will be made available to the public no later than Friday, January 10, 1997. The software will be available via the Internet (http://www.fcc.gov/wtb/pn_tool2.html) and the FCC Auctions Bulletin Board System. The tracking tool is a Microsoft Excelª v5.0 WorkBook, which runs on Microsoft Windowsª v3.1 and Windows for WorkGroupsª v3.11. With this auction tracking tool, bidders can import round results and analyze the bidding in the auction. Technical support for the tracking tool can be obtained at (202) 414-1250. Please review the information included with the tracking tool readme file thoroughly before calling technical support. User Requirements. This software is not designed for novice computer users. To be used effectively,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/da970011.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/da970011.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/da970011.wp
  • above Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Mock Auction Bidding System, you will need the following: 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive Three (3) blank MS-DOS formatted 1.44MB floppy disks Software Requirements: FCC Mock Auction Bidding System (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Mock Auction Bidding System has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970386.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970386.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970386.wp
  • other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive o Three blank MS-DOS® formatted 1.44MB floppy disks B-2 Software Requirements: o FCC Form 175 Application Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Form 175 Application has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment, you
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970700.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970700.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970700.wp
  • the WCS auction released by the Commission during the course of the auction. Auction Tracking Tool. A software tool for tracking the progress of the auction will be made available via the Internet (http://www.fcc.gov/wtb/pn_tool2.html) and the FCC Auctions Bulletin Board System. The tracking tool is a Microsoft Excelª v5.0 WorkBook, which runs on Microsoft Windowsª v3.1 and Windows for WorkGroupsª v3.11. With this auction tracking tool, bidders can import round results and analyze the bidding in the auction. Technical support for the tracking tool can be obtained by calling the FCC Technical Support Hotline. Please review the information included with the tracking tool README file thoroughly before calling technical support. User Requirements. This software is not designed for novice computer users.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970886.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970886.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970886.wp
  • large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: The software for filing the FCC Form 600 electronically will be available for downloading by 5:30 Eastern Time p.m. on April 29, 1997. o FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 Note: The FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment, you should check with your local network administrator
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/wcsbip.pdf
  • or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive o Three blank MS-DOS® formatted 1.44MB floppy disks Software Requirements: o FCC Form 175 Application Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Form 175 Application has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment, you
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da971672.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da971672.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da971672.wp
  • or above Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: 1.44 MB 3.5" Floppy Drive Three blank MS-DOS® formatted 1.44-MB floppy disks Software Requirements: FCC Form 175 Application Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 C-3 Note: The FCC Form 175 Application has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows 95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment, check with your local network administrator for
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972222.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972222.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972222.wp
  • SMR auction released by the Commission during the course of the auction. Auction Tracking Tool. A software tool for tracking the progress of the auction will be made available via the Internet at http://www.fcc.gov/wtb/auctions/smr200u2.html and the FCC Auctions Bulletin Board System. The tracking tool is a Microsoft Excelª v5.0 WorkBook, which runs on Microsoft Windowsª v3.1 and Windows for WorkGroupsª v3.11. With this auction tracking tool, bidders can import round results and analyze the bidding in the auction. Technical support for the tracking tool can be obtained by calling the FCC Technical Support Hotline. Please review the information included with the tracking tool README file thoroughly before calling technical support. User Requirements. This software is not designed for novice computer users.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972583.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972583.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972583.wp
  • the bidder's upfront 3 payment will be first applied to satisfy the withdrawal payment(s) before being applied toward its down payment. 2 Attachment E: Provides instructions for registering and filing the FCC Form 601 electronically. Attachment F: Provides instructions for accessing the FCC Network using Windows 95. Attachment G: Provides instructions for accessing the FCC Network using Windows 3.1 or 3.11. Bidders should note that this auction involves rules and procedures different in some respects from those used in previous Commission auctions. Some Part 90 rules, relevant to this bidding process, were revised after the latest release of the Code of Federal Regulations, in book form, on October 1, 1996.2 Effective immediately, the Commission changed the market codes for this auction,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980141.pdf
  • Attachment D. A list of hardware and software requirements for operating the FCC Remote Bidding System can be found in Attachment E. Please be advised that the FCC Remote Bidding System has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows NT environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating 5 systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1, Windows for Workgroups 3.11, or Windows 95. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. Bid Submission Advisory: Once the auction commences, applicants are reminded to be careful to verify their bids prior to submission to avoid mistakes. Normally, a bidder that withdraws a high bid during the course of an auction is subject to a withdrawal payment. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2104(g)(1). Bidders therefore
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980141e.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980141e.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980141e.wp
  • and software: CPU: Intel® 80486 or above RAM: 8 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 12 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes© compatible modem Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device Microsoft® Windowsª 3.1, Windows for Workgroupsª 3.11, or Windows 95ª Internet browser software that is compatible with Netscape® Navigatorª 2.0 or Microsoft Explorerª 3.0 Note: The FCC Remote Bidding System has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows NTª environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1, Windows for Workgroups 3.11, or Windows 95. This includes any other emulated
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980230.pdf
  • themselves with the tracking tool software are encouraged to try the tracking tool software for the 800 MHz SMR auction at http://www.fcc.gov/wtb/auctions. This tool cannot be used for the LMDS auction but has similar functionality and provides a useful tool for practice. The tracking tool is a Microsoft Excelª v5.0 WorkBook, which runs on Microsoft Windowsª v3.1, Windows for WorkGroupsª v3.11, and Windows 95. With this auction tracking tool, bidders can import round results and analyze the bidding in the auction. Technical support for the tracking tool can be obtained by calling the FCC Technical Support Hotline. Please review the information included with the tracking tool README file thoroughly before calling technical support. User Requirements. This software is not designed for
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980230e.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980230e.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980230e.wp
  • 12 MB available disk space (Windows 3.1) 33 MB available disk space (Windows 95) o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device o FCC Mock Bidding System software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft® Windows 95ª, Microsoft® Windowsª 3.1, or Microsoft® Windows for Workgroupsª 3.11 o Internet browser software that is compatible with Netscape® Navigatorª 2.0 and Microsoft® Explorerª 3.0. To create backup installation disks for the FCC Mock Bidding System, you need the following: o 1.44-MB 3.5" floppy drive o Three blank MS-DOS® formatted 1.44-MB floppy disks Note: The FCC Mock Bidding System has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows NTª
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980572e.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980572e.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980572e.wp
  • (TIN) with the FCC and electronically filing FCC Form 601. To perform either of these procedures, you must first connect to the FCC Network. Note the following: C Attachment F describes how Windows 95 users can connect to the FCC Network using the Dial-Up Networking features of Windows 95. C Attachment G describes how Windows 3.1 and Windows for Workgroups 3.11 users can connect to the FCC Network using a PPP Dialer application that is available for downloading. You also need Internet Web Browser software to electronically register and file FCC Form 601. Netscape Navigator 3.01 and Microsoft Internet Explorer 3.02 with the file upload add-on were used during testing. Conventions The instructions in this attachment use the following typographical conventions:
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980572g.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980572g.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980572g.wp
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit G-1 Attachment G ACCESSING THE FCC NETWORK USING WINDOWS 3.1 OR 3.11 This attachment describes how to access the FCC Network from a system that is running the Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Windows for Workgroups 3.11 operating system. This involves using the FCC-supplied Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer. This attachment summarizes the hardware and software required for the PPP Dialer, then describes the procedures for performing the following tasks: C Downloading the Dialer
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da972081.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da972081.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da972081.wp
  • other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: o 1.44 M 3.5" Floppy Drive o Three blank MS-DOS® formatted 1.44-M floppy disks Software Requirements: o FCC Form 175 Application Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 Note: The FCC Form 175 Application has not been tested in Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows 95 2 environments. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment, check with your local network administrator for any
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da980572.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da980572.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da980572.wp
  • payment. 2 Attachment D: Provides detailed information about how winning bidders should complete their required FCC Form 601 for LMDS license applications. Attachment E: Provides instructions for registering and filing the FCC Form 601 electronically. Attachment F: Provides instructions for accessing the FCC Network using Windows 95. Attachment G: Provides instructions for accessing the FCC Network using Windows 3.1 or 3.11. Copies of this public notice will be mailed via overnight mail to each winning bidder. Bidders should note that this auction involves rules and procedures different in some respects from those used in previous Commission auctions. Some Part 1 and 101 rules relevant to this bidding process, have been recently revised. For example, Section 1.2112 includes revised 2 ownership disclosure
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/lmdsbp_c.pdf
  • pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: o 1.44 MB 3.5" Floppy Drive o Three blank MS-DOS® formatted 1.44-MB floppy disks 117 Software Requirements: o FCC Form 175 Application Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 Note: The FCC Form 175 Application has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows 95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment, check with your local network administrator for any
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981689.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981689.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981689.wp
  • C RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) C Hard Disk: 12 MB available disk space C 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) C Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes© compatible modem C Monitor: VGA or above C Mouse or other pointing device C Microsoft® Windowsª 3.1, Windows for Workgroupsª 3.11, or Windows 95ª C Netscape® Communicatorª 4.05
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981787.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981787.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981787.wp
  • will be available on Wednesday, September 9, 1998. (Please note: This tool is not for use during the Phase II 220 MHz Service auction but has similar functionality and provides a useful tool for practice before and during the 220 Mock Auction.) The tracking tool is a Microsoft Excelª v5.0 WorkBook, which runs on Microsoft Windowsª v3.1, Windows for WorkGroupsª v3.11, and Windows 95. With this auction tracking tool, bidders can import round results and analyze the bidding in the auction. Technical support for the tracking tool can be obtained by calling the FCC Technical Support Hotline. Please review the information included with the tracking tool README file thoroughly before calling technical support. User Requirements. This software is not designed for
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=79
  • 67 (of 77 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=79F ri, 04 Sep 2009 15:05:02 GMT Summary Permits: 122 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 77 Rounds Completed: 14 Bidding Days: 4 Results for Round 14 Gross Revenue: $5,152,100.00 - Dollar Change: $120,000.00 - % Change: 2.38 Net Revenue: $4,239,215.00 - Dollar Change: $127,785.00 - % Change: 3.11 New Bids: 28 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 5 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 15 Permits with PWBs*: 82 FCC Held Permits: 40 Eligible Bidders: 62 (of 77 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=79F ri, 04 Sep 2009 17:05:01 GMT Summary Permits: 122 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 77 Rounds Completed: 9 Bidding Days: 3 Results
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.wp
  • the Telecommunications Act of 1996, is to bring to all Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-168 18 See AT&T Tariff FCC No. 27, 3rd Rev. P. 24-555, at § 24.1.18.C (eff. July 1, 1999); MCI Tariff FCC No. 1, 14th Rev. P. 16.3, at § C.1.061111 (eff. July 1, 1999); Sprint Tariff FCC No. 1, 4th Rev. P. 38.2, at § 3.11.10 (eff. Oct. 17, 1998). 19 See AT&T Tariff FCC No. 27, 1st Rev. P. 4-7.3, at § 4.1.1.N (eff. June 15, 1999); 1st Rev. P. 24-57.39, at § 24.1.1.U.2 (eff. Sept. 5, 1998). 7 Americans the benefits of a robust and competitive communications marketplace. Since passage of the Act, competition has created greater choice and value for many consumers. Some
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01145.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01145.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01145.txt
  • 00-2065 (rel. Sep. 8, 2000). The residential fee in the fourth quarter 2000 for Verizon was 5.6688 percent and for AT&T and Sprint was 8.6 percent. See Verizon Select Services, Inc., Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, Section 2.13, issued September 29, 2000; AT&T Tariff F.C.C. No. 27, Sections 3.5.12.B and 24.1.18.B, issued February 18, 2000; Sprint Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, Section 3.11.8, issued October 31, 2000. The business fee in the fourth quarter 2000 for Verizon was 5.6688 percent and for AT&T and Sprint was 6.6 percent. See Verizon Select Services, Inc., Tariff F.C.C. Nos. 2 and 3, Sections 2.12 and 2.17, respectively, issued September 29, 2000; AT&T Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, Section 2.5.9.C1, issued October 19, 1999, and January 10, 2001;
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001917.doc
  • on behalf of Competitive Local Exchange Carriers, 14 FCC 13861 (1999). Id. at 13865, para. 9. Id. 13865-87, paras. 10-13. See supra para. 3. Average calls per Frontier customer per month: Genesee to Ulysses - 6.22; Genesee to Coudersport - 5.37; Millport to Ulysses - 0.82; Millport to Coudersport - 8.09; Shinglehouse to Ulysses - 0.19; Shinglehouse to Coudersport - 3.11. Genesee has 483 access lines; Shinglehouse has 1,256 access lines; and Millport has 406 access lines. Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1917 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1917 r s û ü „Ð „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „`ú „0ý ˆ 2 6 V ‡
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • 3rd Rev. P. 19.183, at § C.3.421 (eff. Jan. 3, 1998). Low-Volume Long-Distance Users NOI, 15 FCC Rcd at 6303-04. AT&T Tariff FCC No. 27, 3rd Rev. P. 24-555 at §24.1.18 C (eff. July 1, 1999); MCI Tariff FCC No. 1, 16th Rev. P. 16.3, §1.061111A. (eff. August 1, 1999); Sprint Tariff FCC No. 1, 6th Rev. P. 38.2, § 3.11.10 (eff. Aug. 1, 1999). As discussed in Section IV.C.2, in the Universal Service Ninth Report and Order we reformed our high-cost universal service support mechanism for non-rural carriers to enable states to maintain reasonably comparable intrastate rates. See AT&T Tariff FCC No. 27, 2nd Rev. P. 24-555 at §24.1.18 D (eff. July 1, 1998). See Universal Service Ninth Report and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • B at 9, 18. See PO-1-06 for EDI. The performance data for these months show that Verizon consistently responds faster to queries for loop qualification information from the mechanized LiveWire database placed from competitors' application-to-application interfaces than to similar queries placed from VADI's retail pre-ordering interfaces. From October through December 2000, competitors received mechanized loop qualification responses on average within 3.11, 2.92, and 3.02 seconds respectively, as compared to 4.72, 17.26, 11.85 seconds for VADI's retail personnel. In its reply comments, Verizon explains that it has not reported data for the PO-8-01 and PO-8-02 metrics measuring the timeliness of its responses to pre-order manual loop qualification and engineering record requests, because there are currently no electronic pre-ordering OSS functions for manual
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • 2.20 B.2.1.8.1.12W Analog Loop Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.03 4.83 4.82 4.52 5.33 4.63 4.50 4.58 5.00 4.21 B.2.1.8.2.12W Analog Loop Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.00 8.00 11.41 6.50 10.61 7.00 11.32 6.00 11.16 5.67 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.1.9.1.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.01 3.64 4.81 3.73 5.31 4.29 4.54 3.75 5.01 3.76 B.2.1.9.1.42W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 3.33 1.53 3.11 1.59 3.64 1.52 3.50 1.89 4.22 4,5 B.2.1.9.2.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 9.03 4.55 9.89 6.14 10.18 8.08 11.42 7.92 11.33 5.90 B.2.1.11.1.42W Analog Loop w/INP Non- Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 1.53 1.59 4.00 1.52 1.89 3 B - 25 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris02.pdf
  • 0.2% 0.0% Michigan 1989 2.29 80.9% 86.0% 86.4% 5.1% 0.5% 93.3% 94.9% 94.7% 1.6% -0.1% Minnesota 1988 0.07 85.2% 91.7% 92.1% 6.5% * 0.4% 95.9% 97.4% 97.5% 1.5% 0.1% Mississippi 1991 3.40 71.3% 76.6% 79.4% 5.3% 2.9% 81.9% 89.4% 90.9% 7.5% * 1.4% Missouri 1987 1.05 82.5% 95.2% 88.3% 12.7% * -6.9% 92.2% 97.5% 95.4% 5.3% * -2.0% Montana 1987 3.11 79.6% 86.3% 92.9% 6.7% 6.6%* 90.3% 94.1% 96.1% 3.8% 2.0% Nebraska 1998 3.45 90.7% 92.8% 92.7% 2.2% -0.1% 96.6% 97.0% 96.5% 0.4% -0.4% Nevada 1988 1.40 78.4% 90.8% 92.1% 12.3% 1.3% 93.0% 93.8% 95.9% 0.8% 2.1% New Hampshire 1998 0.00 82.2% 93.6% 92.7% 11.4% * -0.8% 94.8% 97.1% 97.8% 2.4% 0.7% New Jersey 1998 0.00 83.2% 88.6% 86.1% 5.4% -2.5%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • Sprint AT&T WorldCom Sprint AT &T WorldCom Sprint AT&T WorldCom Sprint AT &T WorldCom Sprint AT &T WorldCom Sprint 1980 $0.65 $0.91 $1.52 $2.04 $0.71 $0.92 $2.30 $0.77 $1.00 $2.43 $0.84 $1.08 $2.45 $0.97 $1.16 $2.58 $1.08 $1.28 $2.71 $1.15 $1.32 1981 0.73 1.05 1.80 2.38 1.41 1.07 2.64 1.57 1.16 2.83 1.68 1.25 2.85 1.69 1.35 2.98 1.77 1.48 3.11 1.85 1.53 1982 1.05 $0.65 $0.61 1.42 $0.89 $0.84 1.80 $1.12 $1.05 2.33 1.46 1.39 2.45 1.45 1.44 2.62 1.65 1.54 2.69 1.69 1.60 2.76 1.73 1.63 3.09 1.93 1.82 1983 1.05 0.92 0.89 1.42 1.26 1.19 1.80 1.39 1.30 2.33 1.61 1.59 2.45 1.70 1.68 2.62 1.81 1.72 2.69 1.86 1.80 2.76 1.91 1.82 3.09 2.13 1.99 1984 0.99
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 3.50 3.50 3.00 3.50 3.50 3.00 3.50 3.50 3.00 3.50 3.50 3.00 3.50 3.50 3.00 3.50 3.50 3.00 90-Mile Call AT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprint 1980$0.65 $0.91 $1.52 $2.04 $0.71 $0.92 $2.30 $0.77 $1.00 $2.43 $0.84 $1.08 $2.45 $0.97 $1.16 $2.58 $1.08 $1.28 $2.71 $1.15 $1.32 19810.73 1.05 1.80 2.38 1.41 1.07 2.64 1.57 1.16 2.83 1.68 1.25 2.85 1.69 1.35 2.98 1.77 1.48 3.11 1.85 1.53 19821.05 $0.65 $0.61 1.42 $0.89 $0.84 1.80 $1.12 $1.05 2.33 1.46 1.39 2.45 1.45 1.44 2.62 1.65 1.54 2.69 1.69 1.60 2.76 1.73 1.63 3.09 1.93 1.82 19831.05 0.92 0.89 1.42 1.26 1.19 1.80 1.39 1.30 2.33 1.61 1.59 2.45 1.70 1.68 2.62 1.81 1.72 2.69 1.86 1.80 2.76 1.91 1.82 3.09 2.13 1.99 19840.99 0.90 0.97 1.36
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63 1998 3.17 2.79 2.55 2.16 1.69 1999 3.33 2.70 2.49 2.12 1.63 2000 3.33
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63 1998 3.17 2.79 2.55 2.16 1.69 1999 3.33 2.70 2.49 2.12 1.63 2000 3.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 3.452.24 1.38 3.562.311.42 3.76 2.44 1.50 3.96 2.57 1.58 September 13, 19771.000.650.40 1.310.850.52 2.241.450.89 3.041.971.21 3.342.17 1.33 3.542.30 1.41 3.562.311.42 3.76 2.44 1.50 3.96 2.57 1.58 June 6, 1980 1.010.650.40 1.410.910.56 2.351.520.94 3.152.041.26 3.542.30 1.41 3.742.43 1.49 3.772.451.50 3.97 2.58 1.58 4.17 2.71 1.66 June 28, 1981 1.130.730.45 1.631.050.65 2.771.801.10 3.672.381.46 4.072.64 1.62 4.362.83 1.74 4.392.851.75 4.60 2.98 1.84 4.80 3.11 1.92 April 2, 1982 1.761.050.70 2.381.420.95 3.001.801.20 3.902.331.56 4.092.45 1.63 4.372.62 1.74 4.492.691.79 4.60 2.76 1.84 5.15 3.09 2.06 May 25, 1984 1.650.990.66 2.271.360.90 2.791.671.11 3.692.211.47 3.872.32 1.54 4.062.43 1.62 4.182.501.67 4.29 2.57 1.71 4.83 2.89 1.93 April 26, 1985 2.091.250.83 2.711.621.08 3.211.921.28 3.692.211.47 3.872.32 1.54 4.062.43 1.62 4.182.501.67 4.29 2.57 1.71 4.83 2.89 1.93 June 1, 1985 1.981.180.79 2.591.551.03
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 3.452.24 1.38 3.562.311.42 3.76 2.44 1.50 3.96 2.57 1.58 September 13, 19771.000.650.40 1.310.850.52 2.241.450.89 3.041.971.21 3.342.17 1.33 3.542.30 1.41 3.562.311.42 3.76 2.44 1.50 3.96 2.57 1.58 June 6, 1980 1.010.650.40 1.410.910.56 2.351.520.94 3.152.041.26 3.542.30 1.41 3.742.43 1.49 3.772.451.50 3.97 2.58 1.58 4.17 2.71 1.66 June 28, 1981 1.130.730.45 1.631.050.65 2.771.801.10 3.672.381.46 4.072.64 1.62 4.362.83 1.74 4.392.851.75 4.60 2.98 1.84 4.80 3.11 1.92 April 2, 1982 1.761.050.70 2.381.420.95 3.001.801.20 3.902.331.56 4.092.45 1.63 4.372.62 1.74 4.492.691.79 4.60 2.76 1.84 5.15 3.09 2.06 May 25, 1984 1.650.990.66 2.271.360.90 2.791.671.11 3.692.211.47 3.872.32 1.54 4.062.43 1.62 4.182.501.67 4.29 2.57 1.71 4.83 2.89 1.93 April 26, 1985 2.091.250.83 2.711.621.08 3.211.921.28 3.692.211.47 3.872.32 1.54 4.062.43 1.62 4.182.501.67 4.29 2.57 1.71 4.83 2.89 1.93 June 1, 1985 1.981.180.79 2.591.551.03
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 102 ILLINOIS 1,009 1,036 4.11 1,011.30 325.08 686 INDIANA 464 486 1.93 474.01 152.49 322 IOWA 204 244 0.97 238.07 68.92 169 KANSAS 201 239 0.95 233.40 69.28 164 KENTUCKY 277 362 1.44 353.17 97.33 256 LOUISIANA 312 336 1.33 327.66 108.86 219 MAINE 121 145 0.57 141.22 32.00 109 MARYLAND 468 469 1.86 457.45 156.73 301 MASSACHUSETTS 782 783 3.11 763.93 192.28 572 MICHIGAN 671 694 2.76 677.54 263.49 414 MINNESOTA 298 395 1.57 385.58 135.12 250 MISSISSIPPI 223 237 0.94 231.83 57.76 174 MISSOURI 545 584 2.32 570.31 147.41 423 MONTANA 56 81 0.32 79.05 22.18 57 NEBRASKA 161 184 0.73 179.91 44.94 135 NEVADA 140 445 1.77 434.23 150.12 284 NEW HAMPSHIRE 168 179 0.71 174.44 35.09 139
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • Rates) Consumer Price Index: All Goods and Services (1982-1984 = 100)Revenue per Minute Basic Rate 200-Mile Call Charge per Minute 1930 $0.27 $0.35 16.7 $2.83 $3.61 1931 0.27 0.35 15.2 3.05 3.97 1932 0.26 0.35 13.7 3.30 4.40 1933 0.28 0.35 13.0 3.64 4.64 1934 0.27 0.35 13.4 3.50 4.50 1935 0.27 0.35 13.7 3.34 4.40 1936 0.25 0.35 13.9 3.11 4.34 1937 0.22 0.35 14.4 2.59 4.19 1938 0.21 0.26 14.1 2.62 3.11 1939 0.22 0.26 13.9 2.67 3.16 1940 0.21 0.26 14.0 2.59 3.14 1941 0.21 0.26 14.7 2.43 2.99 1942 0.22 0.26 16.3 2.28 2.69 1943 0.21 0.22 17.3 2.10 2.19 1944 0.22 0.22 17.6 2.11 2.15 1945 0.21 0.22 18.0 2.03 2.10 1946 0.20 0.22 19.5 1.74
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 2 8 0.15 NobelTel, LCC 20 111 8 0.15 NOS Communications, Inc. 11 99 20 0.36 PaeTec Communications, Inc. 12 50 12 0.23 PT-1 Long Distance, Inc. 27 265 48 0.88 Puerto Rico Telephone 3 18 10 0.18 Qwest Communications International, Inc. 16 105 21 0.40 RNK, Inc. d/b/a RNK Telecom 4 29 13 0.24 Sprint Corporation 144 621 169 3.11 Startec Global Communications Corporation 25 168 27 0.50 Talk America Inc. 9 60 21 0.39 Telco Group Inc. 241 2,534 411 7.59 Telecom Italia of North America, Inc. 124 470 39 0.71 TeleDirect Telecommunications Group, LLC 50 217 21 0.39 Time Warner Telecom, Inc. 1 7 5 0.10 Transcom Communications, Inc. 7 92 6 0.10 United States Cellular Corporation 4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 67,676,456 62,434,785 1.38 Verizon Wireless 56,536,041 211,282,250 49,806,763 1.10 VoiceStream Wireless Corporation incl. Omnipoint Corporation 2,899,603 7,793,712 5,624,342 0.12 Winstar Communications, Inc. 3,053,257 10,767,053 5,378,260 0.12 Working Assets Long Distance 2,862,837 23,551,832 15,121,203 0.33 World Access Telecommunications Group, Inc. 211,462,004 1,238,406,098 329,380,477 7.28 WorldCom, Inc. 387,182,338 1,858,724,000 618,211,602 13.65 Total for 329 Carriers Not Shown Above 1/ 84,074,165 389,107,995 140,937,100 3.11 Total for all Reporting Carriers 2,593,025,453 15,048,355,630 $4,527,537,359 100.00% 1/ Data are consolidated for affiliated carriers. A total of 379 companies made a total of 451 filings. The 50 companies shown in the table represent 85 filings. Source: Industry Analysis Division, Section 43.61 International Telecommunications Data. 6 - 7 7-1 7 Lifeline and LinkUp Programs In 1984, the FCC, in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/m96-indx.pdf
  • - Monthly ........................................ Table 4.1 Minutes of Use - Interstate Access - Total - Quarterly ....................................... Table 4.4 Minutes of Use - Interstate Access - Total Non-Premium .................................. Table 4.13 Minutes of Use - Interstate Access - Total Premium .......................................... Table 4.10 Non-operating Items - Total ................................................................................ Table 6.10 Non-Traffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - Unseparated - by Company ....... Table 3.11 Non-Traffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - Unseparated - by State .............. Table 3.5 NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State ................................................ Table 3.7 NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Company ......................................... Table 3.13 Other Operating Income or Loss ......................................................................... Table 6.8 Penetration - Households .................................................................................... Chart 1.1 Penetration - Individuals ..................................................................................... Chart 1.8 Penetration by Household Size ........................................................................... Table
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • 1,288 4 1,454 78 Montana 210 0.31 200 1 225 12 Nebraska 479 0.71 456 2 515 28 Nevada 399 0.59 380 1 429 23 New Hampshire 267 0.40 255 1 288 15 New Jersey 1,809 2.68 1,724 6 1,947 104 New Mexico 369 0.55 352 1 398 21 New York 5,205 7.71 4,960 17 5,601 300 North Carolina 2,101 3.11 2,002 7 2,261 121 North Dakota 157 0.23 150 1 169 9 Northern Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,537 3.76 2,418 8 2,731 146 Oklahoma 743 1.10 708 2 799 43 Oregon 707 1.05 674 2 761 41 Pennsylvania 2,386 3.54 2,274 8 2,568 137 Puerto Rico 532 0.79 507 2 573 31 Rhode Island 205
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • amounts of these projected payments. Each table summarizes the annual amounts for the high-cost programs for 1998 through 2003. The 2003 numbers are based on the assumption that fourth quarter projections will be the same as those for the third quarter. Table 3.8 summarizes HCLS payments,35 Table 3.9 summarizes safety net additive support payments, Table 3.10 summarizes HCMS payments,36 Table 3.11 summarizes LTS payments, Table 3.12 summarizes IAS payments, Table 3.13 summarizes ICLS payments, and Table 3.14 summarizes LSS payments. Table 3.15 summarizes the total of these seven payments. Table 3.16 shows, by support mechanism, for 2002, the payments per loop to carriers.37 33 47 C.F.R. § 54.307. 34 The filing dates for projections for previous quarters can be found in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-6.pdf
  • 0.2% 0.0% Michigan 1989 2.29 80.9% 86.0% 86.4% 5.1% 0.5% 93.3% 94.9% 94.7% 1.6% -0.1% Minnesota 1988 0.07 85.2% 91.7% 92.1% 6.5% * 0.4% 95.9% 97.4% 97.5% 1.5% 0.1% Mississippi 1991 3.40 71.3% 76.6% 79.4% 5.3% 2.9% 81.9% 89.4% 90.9% 7.5% * 1.4% Missouri 1987 1.05 82.5% 95.2% 88.3% 12.7% * -6.9% 92.2% 97.5% 95.4% 5.3% * -2.0% Montana 1987 3.11 79.6% 86.3% 92.9% 6.7% 6.6%* 90.3% 94.1% 96.1% 3.8% 2.0% Nebraska 1998 3.45 90.7% 92.8% 92.7% 2.2% -0.1% 96.6% 97.0% 96.5% 0.4% -0.4% Nevada 1988 1.40 78.4% 90.8% 92.1% 12.3% 1.3% 93.0% 93.8% 95.9% 0.8% 2.1% New Hampshire 1998 0.00 82.2% 93.6% 92.7% 11.4% * -0.8% 94.8% 97.1% 97.8% 2.4% 0.7% New Jersey 1998 0.00 83.2% 88.6% 86.1% 5.4% -2.5%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
  • State ........................................................... Table 2.11 LinkUp Assistance - Payments - by Study Area ................................................. Table 2.12 Local Switching Support - Payment History .......................................................... Table 3.7 Local Switching Support Payment Projections by Jurisdiction .............................. Table 3.14 Local Switching Support Payment Projections by Study Area ...............................Table 3.29 Long-Term Support - Payment History .................................................................. Table 3.6 Long-Term Support Payment Projections by Jurisdiction ...................................... Table 3.11 Long-Term Support Payment Projections by Study Area .......................................Table 3.26 Loops - by Jurisdiction ....................................................................... Table 3.20 Loops - by Study Area ........................................................................ Table 3.34 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .............................................. Table 2.3 Low-Income Programs Fund Sizes and Projections ......................................... Table 2.4 Low-Income Support Payments by State ......................................................... Table 2.2 Low-Income Support Payments per Loop by State .................................... Table 2.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • amounts for the high-cost programs for 1998 through 2004. The 2004 numbers are based on the assumption that fourth quarter projections will be the same as those for the third quarter. Table 3.6 summarizes HCLS payments,36 Table 3.7 summarizes safety net additive support payments, Table 3.8 summarizes HCMS payments,37 Table 3.9 summarizes LTS payments, Table 3.10 summarizes ICLS payments, Table 3.11 summarizes IAS payments, and Table 3.12 summarizes LSS payments. Table 3.13 summarizes the total of these seven payments. Table 3.14 shows the amounts of these payments by state going to ILECs and CLECs for each year since 1999. Table 3.15 shows, by support mechanism by state, for 2003, the support payments per loop to carriers.38 35 The filing dates for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-intro.pdf
  • Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payment Projections by State or Jurisdiction ................Table 3.11 Interstate Access Support Payment Projections by Study Area ..............................Table 3.27 Interstate Common Line Support Payment Projections by State or Jurisdiction ..... Table 3.10 Interstate Common Line Support Payment Projections by Study Area .................. Table 3.26 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-0.pdf
  • - Monthly ........................................ Table 4.1 Minutes of Use - Interstate Access - Total - Quarterly ....................................... Table 4.4 Minutes of Use - Interstate Access - Total Non-Premium .................................. Table 4.13 Minutes of Use - Interstate Access - Total Premium .......................................... Table 4.10 Non-operating Items - Total ................................................................................ Table 6.10 Non-Traffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - Unseparated - by Company ....... Table 3.11 Non-Traffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - Unseparated - by State .............. Table 3.5 NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State ................................................ Table 3.7 NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Company ......................................... Table 3.13 Other Operating Income or Loss ......................................................................... Table 6.8 Penetration - Households .................................................................................... Chart 1.1 Penetration - Individual Adults ........................................................................... Chart 1.8 Penetration by Household Size ...........................................................................
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-3.pdf
  • which the change appears in the NECA data files. The dates in Table 3.15 indicate the years when the changes actually occurred. 142 each year. Table 3.6 shows the number of loops. Table 3.7 shows the unseparated NTS revenue requirement per loop. Table 3.8 shows the Universal Service Fund payments. Corresponding data for individual study areas are presented in Tables 3.11 through 3.14. In compiling the historical data, it is necessary to account for changes that have occurred in the study areas over time. These changes are noted in Table 3.15. In cases where study areas have 11 merged, the pre-merger data for all of the merged study areas have been combined and reported as the data for the surviving study
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-0.pdf
  • Access - Total - Monthly ........................................ Table 8.1 Minutes of Use - Interstate Access - Total - Quarterly .......................................Table 8.4 Minutes of Use - Interstate Access - Total Non-Premium ..................................Table 8.13 Minutes of Use - Interstate Access - Total Premium .......................................... Table 8.10 Non-operating Items - Total ................................................................................ Table 11.10 Non-Traffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - Unseparated - by State ..............Table 3.11 Non-Traffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - Unseparated - by Study Area ....Table 3.21 NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State ................................................ Table 3.13 NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area ...................................... Table 3.23 Other Operating Income or Loss ......................................................................... Table 11.8 Penetration - Households .................................................................................... Chart 6.1 Penetration - Individual Adults ........................................................................... Chart 6.8 Penetration by Household Size
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-3.pdf
  • for state totals, of the unseparated NTS revenue requirement, the number of loops, the revenue requirement per loop, and the Universal Service Fund payments. The phrase, "payments in later year" in the last column refers to the fact that the payments are made two years after the costs are incurred; in this case, in the years 1997 and 1998. Tables 3.11 through 3.14 present state summaries of the historical information filed for 1992 through 1996 in the 1997 filing. Table 3.11 shows the unseparated NTS revenue requirements for each year. Table 3.12 shows the number of loops. Table 3.13 shows the unseparated NTS revenue requirement per loop. Table 3.14 shows the Universal Service Fund payments. The remaining tables in this section
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
  • Business Office: Residential 5.94 11.17 5.21 18.90 2.07 7.15 2.17 1.88 Small Business 6.02 5.22 2.31 15.86 4.02 6.64 3.56 4.70 Large Business 13.37 9.79 NA 12.51 2.70 13.78 9.00 0.00 9 - 23 Table 9.4(c): Company Comparision -- Customer Perception Surveys -- 1997 Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied Company AmeritechBell AtlanticBellSouth NYNEX Pacific SBC US West GTE Installations: Residential 5.52 3.11 5.73 11.54 4.00 5.52 4.86 7.77 Small Business 10.24 7.82 5.83 17.13 6.00 6.36 11.88 13.92 Large Business 10.33 9.29 4.49 16.92 8.00 11.85 18.00 6.38 Repairs:Residential 10.38 8.34 8.54 21.38 11.00 8.03 7.00 11.80 Small Business 11.93 10.30 7.37 20.21 9.00 5.73 7.96 13.71 Large Business 15.82 9.04 5.62 20.24 10.00 8.07 16.00 6.72 Business Office: Residential 8.24 3.47
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-0.pdf
  • ............................Table 3.17 Long Term Support - Payment History ...................................................................Table 3.5 Long Term Support - Payment Projections - by Study Area ...................................Table 3.16 Loops by State .......................................................................................................Table 3.12 Loops by Study Area ..............................................................................................Table 3.22 Minutes of Use - Interstate Access - Tier 1 .............................................................Table 8.1 Non-operating Items - Total ....................................................................................Table 11.10 Non-Traffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - Unseparated - by State ....................Table 3.11 Non-Traffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - Unseparated - by Study Area ...........Table 3.21 NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State ......................................................Table 3.13 NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area ............................................Table 3.23 Other Operating Income or Loss .............................................................................Table 11.8 Penetration - Households ........................................................................................Chart 6.1 Penetration - Individual Adults ................................................................................Chart 6.8 Penetration by Household Size ...............................................................................Table 6.5 3 Index of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-3.pdf
  • for state totals, of the unseparated NTS revenue requirement, the number of loops, the revenue requirement per loop, and the Universal Service Fund payments. The phrase, "payments in later year" in the last column refers to the fact that the payments are made two years after the costs are incurred; in this case, in the years 1999 and 2000. Tables 3.11 through 3.14 present state summaries of the historical information filed for 1994 through 1998 in the 1999 filing. Table 3.11 shows the unseparated NTS revenue requirements for each year. Table 3.12 shows the number of loops. Table 3.13 shows the unseparated NTS revenue requirement per loop. Table 3.14 shows the Universal Service Fund payments. The remaining tables in this section
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-9.pdf
  • 13.86 11.83 NA 7.93 NA Business Office: 5.94 5.21 2.07 2.23 Small Business 5.22 15.86 6.64 4.62 13.37 NA 2.70 NA Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 21 Table 9.4(b): Company Comparision -- 1997 Customer Perception Surveys Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied Company Ameritech Bell Atlantic BellSouth NYNEX Pacific SBC US West GTE Installations: Residential 5.52 3.11 11.54 4.18 4.90 7.77 10.24 7.82 17.13 6.15 11.98 13.97 10.33 9.29 16.92 7.80 NA 6.41 Residential 10.38 8.54 21.38 8.03 7.07 Small Business 11.93 7.37 20.21 5.73 8.05 Large Business 15.82 5.62 20.24 8.07 NA Business Office: Residential 3.47 6.11 2.65 6.64 2.16 Small Business 6.21 6.18 5.04 5.93 5.55 Large Business 5.75 4.15 7.10 15.41 0.00 Please refer
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-0.pdf
  • Access - Total - Monthly ........................................ Table 8.1 Minutes of Use - Interstate Access - Total - Quarterly .......................................Table 8.4 Minutes of Use - Interstate Access - Total Non-Premium ..................................Table 8.13 Minutes of Use - Interstate Access - Total Premium .......................................... Table 8.10 Non-operating Items - Total ................................................................................ Table 11.10 Non-Traffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - Unseparated - by State ..............Table 3.11 Non-Traffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - Unseparated - by Study Area ....Table 3.21 NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State ................................................ Table 3.13 NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area ...................................... Table 3.23 Other Operating Income or Loss ......................................................................... Table 11.8 Penetration - Households .................................................................................... Chart 6.1 Penetration - Individual Adults ........................................................................... Chart 6.8 Penetration by Household Size
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-3.pdf
  • for state totals, of the unseparated NTS revenue requirement, the number of loops, the revenue requirement per loop, and the Universal Service Fund payments. The phrase, "payments in later year" in the last column refers to the fact that the payments are made two years after the costs are incurred; in this case, in the years 1998 and 1999. Tables 3.11 through 3.14 present state summaries of the historical information filed for 1993 through 1997 in the 1998 filing. Table 3.11 shows the unseparated NTS revenue requirements for each year. Table 3.12 shows the number of loops. Table 3.13 shows the unseparated NTS revenue requirement per loop. Table 3.14 shows the Universal Service Fund payments. The remaining tables in this section
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Total Operating .....................................................................................Table 11.9 Factors - Interstate DEM ­ Unweighted ..................................................Table 8.11 Factors - Interstate DEM ­ Weighted .....................................................Table 8.12 High-Cost Loop Payment Formulas ..................................................................Table 3.1 High-Cost Loop Payment History .........................................................................Table 3.2 High-Cost Loop Payment Projections - by Study Area .......................................Table 3.12 High-Cost Programs Fund Size Projections ................................................ Table 3.9 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Non-Rural by State ......................... Table 3.11 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Non-Rural by Study Area .............. Table 3.16 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by State ...............................Table 3.10 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Study Area ....................... Table 3.15 Income - Net ...........................................................................................................Table 11.5 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Investment - Average Net .......................................................................................Table 11.6 Investment - Gross ..................................................................................................Table 11.3 Investment -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • .............. Table 3.26 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Jurisdiction ...................... Table 3.12 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Study Area ....................... Table 3.25 High-Cost Support Programs ­ Net Revenues by State .................................Table 3.14 Income - Net ...........................................................................................................Table 11.5 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support - Payment Projections - by Jurisdiction ........................ Table 3.11 Interstate Access Support - Payment Projections - by Study Area .........................Table 3.24 Investment - Average Net .......................................................................................Table 11.6 Investment - Gross ..................................................................................................Table 11.3 Investment - Other ..................................................................................................Table 11.13 Investment - Plant ...................................................................................................Table 11.12 Investment - Reserves .............................................................................................Table 11.4 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State ...........................................................Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by Study Area ................................................ Table 2.7 Lifeline Assistance
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll Revenues ......................... Table 1.25 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Mechanism ­ Net Dollar Flow by State .................. Table 3.18 Interstate Access Support - Payment Projections - by Jurisdiction ........................ Table 3.11 Interstate Access Support - Payment Projections - by Study Area ......................... Table 3.29 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment - Plant ................................................................................................... Table 11.12 Investment - Reserves ............................................................................................. Table 11.4 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State ...........................................................Table 2.7 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by Study
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual98.pdf
  • 9.1 1419.8 14. Remote 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 118.0 0.0 41.4 0.0 9.1 15. Other/Unknown 0.0 32.0 127.0 1342.1 385.0 36.0 0.0 0.0 386.1 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications Table 2(d): Company Comparision -- 1997 Customer Perception Surveys Company Ameritech Bell Atlantic BellSouth NYNEX Pacific SBC US West GTE Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied Installations: Residential 5.52 3.11 5.73 11.54 4.18 5.52 4.90 7.77 Small Business 10.24 7.82 5.83 17.13 6.15 6.36 11.98 13.97 Large Business 10.33 9.29 4.49 16.92 7.80 11.85 NA 6.41 Repairs: Residential 10.38 8.34 8.54 21.38 10.57 8.03 7.07 11.82 Small Business 11.93 10.30 7.37 20.21 8.71 5.73 8.05 13.75 Large Business 15.82 9.04 5.62 20.24 9.60 8.07 NA 6.75 Business Office: Residential 8.24
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .184 Table 3.11 -Accounting Rates for Peak-Period International Telephone Service Calls for Selected International Points. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 Table 3.11 -Accounting Rates for Peak-Period International Telephone Service Calls for Selected International Points. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 Table 3.10 - Net Settlement Payouts for International Telephone Service for Selected International Points. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 3.11 -Accounting Rates for Peak-Period International Telephone Service Call for Selected International Points. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 Table 3.10 - Net Settlement Payouts for International Telephone Service for Selected International Points. . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 Table 3.11 -Accounting Rates for Peak-Period International Telephone Service Call for Selected International Points. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • ATLANTIC - WEST VIRGINIA, INC. 40.25% 59.75% 7.95 5.26 11.11% 13. BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 38.56% 61.44% 4.62 3.33 9.51% NYNEX CORPORATION: 14. NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. 37.59% 62.41% 6.27 4.35 8.41% 15. NEW YORK TELEPHONE CO. 45.65% 54.35% 3.32 2.59 5.41% PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP: 16. NEVADA BELL 32.74% 67.26% 5.02 3.72 9.90% 17. PACIFIC BELL 40.81% 59.19% 3.98 3.11 4.71% 18. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO. 37.77% 62.23% 5.26 3.87 9.41% 19. U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 40.97% 59.03% 4.23 3.16 6.50% 20. CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE CO. 34.83% 65.17% 0.38 0.70 5.40% 21. THE SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE CO. 36.89% 63.11% 7.39 4.91 6.72% ALLTEL CORPORATION: 22. ALLTEL GEORGIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. 36.29% 63.71% 5.92 4.08 N/A 23. ALLTEL PENNSYLVANIA INC.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • - Telephone Service Accounting Rates for Selected Countries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181 Table 3.11 -Accounting Rates for Selected Countries in U.S. Dollars. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • d/b/a LDDS WorldCom $1 $1 $124 $291 $364 $500 Total for Carriers Not Shown Above 1 * 1 2 3 2 3 6 210 Total for All Carriers $8,042 $9,219$10,331$11,505$12,431$14,160$14,234$15,250$14,246$14,528$14,172$10,844 HHI Index 3/ 6,497 6,007 5,469 4,897 4,789 4,413 4,354 3,880 3,811 3,474 3,864 3,723 See notes at the end of the tables. 163 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Table 3.11 - Accounting Rates for Peak-Period International Telephone Service Calls for Selected International Points 7/ 10/ Rates as of Sept. 2 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Australia 8/ 10/ 0.68 SDR 0.6 SDR 0.55 SDR 0.4 SDR 0.4 SDR0.308 SDR0.308 SDR0.22 SDR0.22 SDR0.22 SDR0.22 SDR0.22 SDR 0.22 SDR Brazil 10/ $1.60 $1.50 $1.40
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc00idx.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .184 Table 3.11 -Accounting Rates for Peak-Period International Telephone Service Calls for Selected International Points. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc01idx.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 Table 3.11 -Accounting Rates for Peak-Period International Telephone Service Calls for Selected International Points. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc02idx.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 Table 3.10 - Net Settlement Payouts for International Telephone Service for Selected International Points. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 3.11 -Accounting Rates for Peak-Period International Telephone Service Call for Selected International Points. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc03idx.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 Table 3.10 - Net Settlement Payouts for International Telephone Service for Selected International Points. . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 Table 3.11 -Accounting Rates for Peak-Period International Telephone Service Call for Selected International Points. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc99idx.pdf
  • - Telephone Service Accounting Rates for Selected Countries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181 Table 3.11 -Accounting Rates for Selected Countries in U.S. Dollars. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/da002161.doc
  • R. Baldwin c/o Dennis F. Begley, Esq. Reddy, Begley & McCormick 2175 K Street, N.W., Suite 350 Washington, D.C. 20037 Proposal: Allot Channel 290A at Burgin, Kentucky as the community's first local aural transmission service. Community Present Proposed Burgin, Kentucky -- 290A Coordinates: 37- 42-56 NL and 84-44-08 WL Additional Information: This allotment requires a site restriction of 5.01 kilometers (3.11 miles) southeast of city reference coordinates. FCC Contact: Arthur D. Scrutchins (202) 418-2180 C. MM Docket No. 00-174; RM-9965 Petitioner: Nick Koster P.O. Box 340091 Austin, TX 78734 Proposal: Allot Channel 244A at Kailua-Kona, Hawaii as the community's first local FM transmission service. Community Present Proposed Kailua-Kona, Hawaii ------ 244A Coordinates: 19-38-26 NL and 155-59-44 WL Additional Information: This allotment
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1997/d970886e.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1997/d970886e.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1997/d970886e.wp
  • large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: The software for filing the FCC Form 600 electronically will be available for downloading by 5:30 Eastern Time p.m. on April 29, 1997. * FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) * Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 Note: The FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in a networked environment, you should check with your local network administrator
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989a.wp
  • the FCC and electronically filing FCC Forms 601, 603, and 604. To perform either of these procedures, you must first connect to the FCC Network as follows: C Attachment E describes how Windows 95 users can connect to the FCC Network using the Dial-Up Networking features of Windows 95. C Attachment F describes how Windows 3.1 and Windows for Workgroups 3.11 users can connect to the FCC Network using a PPP Dialer application that is available for downloading. You also need Internet Web Browser software to electronically register and file FCC Form 601. Netscape Communicator 4.05 with JDK 1.1, Netscape Navigator 3.01, and Microsoft Internet Explorer 3.02 with the file upload patch were used during FCC internal testing. Important: You must
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989b.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989b.wp
  • of June 1998. To use the Universal Licensing System (ULS) to electronically file for license renewal, you must first connect to the FCC Network. Note the following: " Attachment E describes how Windows 95 users can connect to the FCC Network using the Dial-Up Networking features of Windows 95. " Attachment F describes how Windows 3.1 and Windows for Workgroups 3.11 users can connect to the FCC Network using a PPP Dialer application that is available for downloading. Conventions The instructions in this attachment use the following typographical conventions: bold Represents objects on the screen that you click with the mouse pointer, including buttons, Internet links, icon, tabs, menu items (e.g., Cancel button, Auctions link, Save option in the File menu).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989c.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989c.wp
  • for specific applications or licenses with the Commission. To search the FCC Network for an application, you must first connect to the FCC Network. Note the following: " Attachment E describes how Windows 95 users can connect to the FCC Network using the Dial-Up Networking features of Windows 95. " Attachment F describes how Windows 3.1 and Windows for Workgroups 3.11 users can connect to the FCC Network using a PPP Dialer application that is available for downloading. Conventions The instructions in this attachment use the following typographical conventions: bold Represents objects on the screen that you click with the mouse pointer, including buttons, Internet links, icon, tabs, menu items (e.g., Cancel button, Auctions link, Save option in the File menu).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989f.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989f.wp
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit F-1 Attachment F ACCESSING THE FCC NETWORK USING WINDOWS 3.1 OR 3.11 This attachment describes how to access the FCC Network from a system that is running the Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Windows for Workgroups 3.11 operating system. This involves using the FCC-supplied Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer. This attachment summarizes the hardware and software required for the PPP Dialer, then describes the procedures for performing the following tasks: C Downloading the Dialer
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980097.pdf
  • persons seeking answers to legal questions should call Wilbert Nixon, Yanic T- homas, or Chris Gacek at 202/418-7240. This document contains the following attachments: Attachment A: Applications Accepted for Filing Attachment B: Instructions for Searching for Applications listed in Attachment A Attachment C: Accessing the FCC Network Using Windows 95 Attachment D: Accessing the FCC Network Using Windows 3.1 or 3.11 l Attachment A Report Number: 2 FCC Land Mobile Auction SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Auctioned New Applications Accepted for Filing Auction ID: 16 ~Date of Repore: 01/20/1998 i. Market Markee Area Description Applicant Name File Number BEA001 A Bangor, ME Nextel License Acquisition Corp. OOooOoooog BEA001 B Bangor, ME Nextel License Acquisition Corp. 0000000009 BEA001 C Bangor, ME Nextel License Acquisition
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980230.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980230.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980230.wp
  • with the tracking tool software are encouraged to try the tracking tool software for the 800 MHz SMR auction at http://www.fcc.gov/wtb/auctions. This tool cannot be used for the LMDS auction but has similar functionality and provides a useful tool for practice. The tracking tool is a Microsoft \ Excelª v5.0 WorkBook, which runs on Microsoft Windowsª v3.1, Windows for WorkGroupsª v3.11, and Windows 95. With this auction tracking tool, bidders can import round results and analyze the bidding in the auction. Technical support for the tracking tool can be obtained by calling the FCC Technical Support Hotline. Please review the information included with the tracking tool README file thoroughly before calling technical support. User Requirements. This software is not designed for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980572.pdf
  • payment. 2 Attachment D: Provides detailed information about how winning bidders should complete their required FCC Form 601 for LMDS license applications. Attachment E: Provides instructions for registering and filing the FCC Form 601 electronically. Attachment F: Provides instructions for accessing the FCC Network using Windows 95. Attachment G: Provides instructions for accessing the FCC Network using Windows 3.1 or 3.11. Copies of this public notice will be mailed via overnight mail to each winning bidder. Bidders should note that this auction involves rules and procedures different in some respects from those used in previous Commission auctions. Some Part 1 and 101 rules relevant to this bidding process, have been recently revised.2 For example, Section 1.2112 includes revised ownership disclosure requirements
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980989.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980989.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980989.wp
  • * Attachment D - [ [11]WordPerfect Version | [12]Acrobat Version ] Instructions for Manual Filing of ULS Forms for Part 22 Paging Applications. * Attachment E - [ [13]WordPerfect Version | [14]Acrobat Version ] Accessing the FCC Network Using Windows 95 * Attachment F - [ [15]WordPerfect Version | [16]Acrobat Version ] Accessing the FCC Network Using Windows 3.1 or 3.11 References 1. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980989.wp 2. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980989.zip 3. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980989.pdf 4. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/dac80989.pdf 5. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989a.wp 6. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989a.pdf 7. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989b.wp 8. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989b.pdf 9. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989c.wp 10. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989c.pdf 11. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989d.wp 12. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989d.pdf 13. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989e.wp 14. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989e.pdf 15. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989f.wp 16. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/d980989f.pdf
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/dac80989.pdf
  • the FCC and electronically filing FCC Forms 601, 603, and 604. To perform either of these procedures, you must first connect to the FCC Network as follows: C Attachment E describes how Windows 95 users can connect to the FCC Network using the Dial-Up Networking features of Windows 95. C Attachment F describes how Windows 3.1 and Windows for Workgroups 3.11 users can connect to the FCC Network using a PPP Dialer application that is available for downloading. You also need Internet Web Browser software to electronically register and file FCC Form 601. Netscape Communicator 4.05 with JDK 1.1, Netscape Navigator 3.01, and Microsoft Internet Explorer 3.02 with the file upload patch were used during FCC internal testing. Important: You must
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • On Time LSR/ASR Reject Facility Check 100 100 100 96.97 100 a,b RESALE (PROVISIONING) POTS ­ Provisioning - Total PR-2 - Average Completed Interval PR-2-04-2100 Average Interval Completed - Dispatch (6-9 Lines) 4.65 4.5 4.16 3.4 a,b PR-2-05-2100 Average Interval Completed - Dispatch (>= 10 Lines) 3.5 7 5.33 8.83 PR-4 - Missed Appointments PR-4-02-2100 Average Delay Days ­ Total 3.11 2.08 3.25 3.42 2.83 2.5 2.74 4.17 3.07 2.22 PR-4-03-2100 % Missed Appointment ­ Customer 1.77 2.65 1.5 1.91 1.57 2.61 2.24 2.22 a,b,c,d,e PR-4-04-2100 % Missed Appointment ­ Verizon ­ Dispatch 5.96 5.21 5.8 5.63 5.17 3.58 5.03 3.81 5.07 4.66 PR-4-05-2100 % Missed Appointment ­ Verizon ­ No Dispatch 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.01
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form477/477systemguide.pdf
  • Completing the Cover Page 3-7 3.5 Using the Submission Menu 3-7 3.6 A Form 477 Submission with Insuffici ent Data cannot be Submitted 3-9 3.7 Entering Part I, Broadband Statewide Totals 3-9 3.8 Entering Part II, Local Telephone and Interconnected VoIP Totals 3-13 3.9 Part III, Mobile Local Telephone Information 3-15 3.10 Entering Part IV Information, Explanations and Comments 3-15 3.11 Entering Part V data, ZIP Code Information 3-15 3.12 Entering Census Tract Information by Hand 3-15 3.13 Revising Census Tract Information 3-17 3.14 Entering Census Tract Information by Upload File 3-18 3.15 Entering Census Tract Information by Upload File ­ Large Files 3-20 3.16 Entering Data by File Upload 3-21 3.17 Service-Location Address Data 3-22 Form 477 System Guide 2/17/2010
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/circuit.pdf
  • 18% -9% 24 n.a. n.a. 7Malaysia 572 1,544 1 2,117 1,714 0.37 1.54 2.24 33% 453% 199% 652% 25 22 24 7China 1,501 422 4 1,927 1,073 3.56 4.27 19.59 16% 40% 21% 73% 26 28 28 3Israel 1,082 843 1 1,926 266 1.28 1.77 4.48 26% 74% 43% -9% 27 23 20 6Colombia 1,137 739 9 1,885 376 1.54 3.11 4.56 -3% 95% 20% -17% 28 27 19 9Russia 1,266 533 22 1,821 451 2.38 3.53 6.16 20% 79% 35% -18% 29 29 30 6Argentina 773 1,012 1 1,786 626 0.76 1.34 3.59 11% 95% 47% 1% 30 30 n.a. 10Maritime - Atlantic 0 1,137 630 1,767 0 0.00 0.00 n.a. 0% 0% 55% 0% Top 30 international Points Circuits156,147175,379
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport.pdf
  • 2,574 1.70 2.17 3.43 5.05 6 18 16 16 16Venezuela 1,913 2,412 0 4,325 1,700 0.79 1.31 1.49 2.14 1 19 n.a. n.a. n.a.Denmark 1,267 234 2,520 4,021 542 0.46 2.89 5.82 7.00 6 20 23 29 29Argentina 779 3,150 30 3,959 1,128 0.24 0.46 0.76 1.34 6 21 28 27 23Colombia 1,391 2,273 24 3,688 1,313 0.61 1.26 1.54 3.11 7 22 15 17 17Taiwan 1,647 1,837 48 3,532 4,580 0.87 0.71 1.64 2.32 7 23 n.a. 21 18India 1,453 1,986 23 3,462 734 0.72 1.44 1.77 2.50 1 24 17 18 12Italy 2,650 709 92 3,451 1,765 3.31 2.60 2.09 2.34 9 25 26 28 27Russia 1,528 1,484 40 3,052 439 1.00 1.53 2.38 3.53 7 26 22 25
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
  • this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? As noted in Question 3.9, the FCC may share the information collected through the Broadband Dead Zone Report and Consumer Broadband Test with the NTIA, USDA Rural Development Agency (non-PII data), and the 56 State Designated Entities. The information will be used to support the National Broadband Map. 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? As noted in Question 3.9, any PII that the FCC shares with the NTIA and the 56 State Designated Entities transmissions will be disclosed under the rules of the agreement between the
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ccd.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-core-financial.pdf
  • transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? Financial data are shared with the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Department of Agriculture as part of various Federal financial agreements and interagency agreements, i.e., Congressionally mandated requirements and statutes. 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? U.S. Department of Treasury, U.S. Department of Agriculture, NFC, Inter-Agency Security Agreement (ISA) will all have security measures in place to insure that the information, including PII) data remain secure during all
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-criminal-investigative-files.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-crisis.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-dqc.pdf
  • sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 19 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ecfs.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-email.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-experimental-radio.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-faca.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 20 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-financial.pdf
  • transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? Financial data are shared with the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Department of Agriculture as part of various Federal financial agreements and interagency agreements, i.e., Congressionally mandated requirements and statutes. 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? U.S. Department of Treasury has security measures in place during transmission of data. 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-foia.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-general-investigative-files.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ils.pdf
  • sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 18 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-investigations-hearings.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-labor-employee-relations.pdf
  • sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 20 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-lmts.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pams.pdf
  • sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is 19 not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pay-leave-garnish.pdf
  • system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? The Pay, Leave, and Garnishment Records information system may transmit miscellaneous personnel/payroll records to/from NFC and the USDA for HRM. 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? Each agency that participates in the information transmission/sharing processes, including the FCC, NFC, USDA, IRS, and state revenue/taxation agencies, etc. is responsible for its own security protocol/mechanisms. 3.12 If there is sharing
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-personal-security-files.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 22 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-physical-access.pdf
  • sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 21 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-reasonable-accommodation-requests.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 20 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-remedy.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-rmis.pdf
  • not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? The financial and applicant registration data in RMIS, including PII covered by FCC/OMD-25, "Revenue Management Information System" SORN, may be shared with the U.S. Treasury, U.S. Department of Justice, and other federal agencies as required to adhere to FCC and Congressionally mandated statutes and regulations. 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of information, including PII, are there security measures in place to prevent unauthorized access during transmission? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC, U.S. Department of Treasury, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, and all other federal agencies with whom the Commission shares information in RMIS, including the PII covered by
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-small-business-contacts.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-telephone-call-details.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-transit.pdf
  • sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 20 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-uls.pdf
  • system, including personally identifiable information (PII) covered by WTB-1, "Wireless Licensing Services Records (ULS)" SORN, which is transmitted or shared is done via the FCC's CORES and RMIS information system. The information consists generally of data that Congress requires the FCC to provide to certain federal agencies and also to screen applicants, i.e., drug debarment, civil or criminal liabilities, etc. 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? Transmission of information, including any personally identifiable information (PII), in the ULS information system with other information systems within the FCC is safeguarded by firewalls, strong passwords, repeated login lock-out requirements, and
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-violators.pdf
  • information sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pshsb-coop-plan.pdf
  • sharing or transmission, please skip to Section 4.0 Data Quality, Utility, Objectivity, and Integrity Requirements: 18 3.10 If the information system covered by this system of records noticed (SORN) transmits/shares personal information between the FCC network and a public or other non-FCC network, which is not covered by this Privacy Impact Assessment, what information is shared/transmitted/disclosed and for what purposes? 3.11 If there is such transmission/sharing of personal information, how is the information secured for transmission-what security measures are used to prevent unauthorized access during transmission, i.e., encryption, etc.? 3.12 If there is sharing or transmission to other information systems, with what other non-FCC organizations, groups, and individuals will the information be shared? (Check all that apply and provide a brief
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • characteristics not available in all markets. 30 Table 2: Overall Evidence of Preference Externalities Circulation per Capita Circulation per Household 5-Digit Zips Hybrid Zips MSA Total 5-Digit Zips Hybrid Zips MSA Total (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) MSA Pop (Mil.) 0.005 0.003 0.009 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.015 0.027 0.014 (2.74)** (1.99)* (3.09)** (1.99)* (1.80) (0.88) (2.88)** (3.11)** (2.57)* MSA Median Inc. (000) -0.001 0.002 -0.001 (0.96) (1.68) (0.46) MSA Fr. College Degree 0.230 0.098 0.144 (3.43)** (1.21) (2.00)* MSA Fr. Under Age 30 -0.884 -0.303 -0.319 (7.47)** (2.77)** (1.11) MSA Fr. Over Age 65 4.1603 2.2409 2.988 (10.61)** (5.12)** (2.59)* Constant 0.199 0.206 0.238 0.192 0.220 0.232 0.532 0.632 0.553 (41.41)** (6.45)** (34.08)** (4.01)** (45.46)** (7.64)** (42.50)**
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs-psap/nena-aid062505.pdf
  • PURPOSE AND SCOPE........................................................................................................................................6 2.2 REASON TO IMPLEMENT...................................................................................................................................6 2.3 BENEFITS.........................................................................................................................................................6 2.4 TECHNICAL IMPACTS SUMMARY......................................................................................................................6 2.5 DOCUMENT TERMINOLOGY..............................................................................................................................6 2.6 REASON FOR REISSUE......................................................................................................................................6 2.7 COST FACTORS.................................................................................................................................................6 2.8 COST RECOVERY CONSIDERATIONS.................................................................................................................7 2.9 ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS...........................................................................................................................7 3 MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS......................................................................................................................8 3.1 PARTIES...........................................................................................................................................................8 3.2 AUTHORITY......................................................................................................................................................8 3.3 DEFINITIONS....................................................................................................................................................8 3.4 ASSISTANCE TO BE RENDERED.........................................................................................................................8 3.5 CONDITION(S) FOR IMPLEMENTATION..............................................................................................................8 3.6 REQUEST FOR IMPLEMENTATION......................................................................................................................8 3.7 IMPLEMENTATION............................................................................................................................................8 3.8 DEMOBILIZATION.............................................................................................................................................9 3.9 COMPENSATION...............................................................................................................................................9 3.10 INSURANCE......................................................................................................................................................9 3.11 LIABILITY.........................................................................................................................................................9 3.12 MAINTENANCE.................................................................................................................................................9 3.13 EXCLUSIVITY...................................................................................................................................................9 3.14 SIGNATURES.....................................................................................................................................................9 4 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................................10 4.1 AMERICAN RADIO RELAY LEAGUE................................................................................................................10 4.2 COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY STATEWIDE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT.................................................................................................................................................................10 4.3 FLORIDA CHAPTER ASSOCIATED PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS OFFICIALS..........................................10 4.4 NORTH CAROLINA CHAPTER OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY NUMBER ASSOCIATION..................................10 4.5 NORTH CAROLINA STATEWIDE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT..10 4.6 STATE OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/plans/University_of_Washington_Emergency_Response_Management_Plan_4-2009.pdf
  • Planning Functions 2.7 Table 2-D ­ UW EOC Logistics Functions 2.8 Table 2-E ­ UW EOC Finance Functions 2.10 Section 3 Checklists 1 UW Emergency Policy Council (President's Cabinet) 3.1 2 EOC Director 3.2 3 EOC Administration & Support Staff 3.6 4 Internal Liaison(s) 3.7 5 External Liaison(s) 3.8 6 News and Information Services (PIO) 3.9 7 Operations Section Chief 3.11 8 UW Police 3.14 9 Facilities Services 3.15 10 Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) 3.16 11 Health Sciences Administration 3.17 12 Medical Triage/First Aid Centers 3.18 13 Communications/Computing (UW Technology) 3.19 14 Pre-Entry Assessment Team (PEAT) Liaison 3.20 15 Care and Shelter 3.21 16 Student Life 3.23 17 Emergency Staff Services 3.24 18 Planning Section Chief 3.2_ 19 Situation Status
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/plans/valleycommctr.pdf
  • ORI which agency they are representing (i.e., "This is Valley Com for Renton Police") and provide their operator number. 3.10 The dispatcher or call receiver will confirm extradition. If the ORI advises they use "the chain" advise the officer and ask which jail facility the subject will be transported to (i.e., the Regional Justice Center or the King County Jail). 3.11 Once confirmed, the dispatcher shall print a copy of the hit to the station and will identify the arresting officer, for example: ACC/TTUKPD. ***** SAVE FOR OFCR MARSHALL ***** 3.12 Upon confirmation advise the officer that the hit has been confirmed, including the amount of bail and extradition, or for vehicles whether the registered owner information is available". 3.12.1 Generally,
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol_response082800.pdf
  • to the February 8, 2000 paper by Mr. Britt for the analysis leading Time Warner to the decision to pursue open access, and to the Justice Department order that AT&T divest its interest in Road Runner for the document precipitating the discussions to restructure the Road Runner partnership.3 Any additional documents are being produced under separate cover letter. For AOL 3.11Please produce all documents, including, but not limited to, business plans or competitive analyses, produced by AOL or any third-parties at the request of AOL, that support the stated decision to provide open access on Time Warner's cable modem platform post merger. AOL is producing documents responsive to this request under separate cover letter. Instant Messaging For Time Warner to offer
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/ziker_comment101300.pdf
  • Web site: http://www.microsoft.com/enable Networks Not Supported in Windows Me --------------------------------------------------- The following network systems are not supported in Windows Me. These networks may work after you upgrade to Windows Me, but Microsoft does not guarantee that they will work correctly. - Vines16: All versions earlier than 7.1 - Netware: Using Client for Microsoft Networks connecting to server versions earlier than 3.11. - Microsoft Netware Directory Services or NDS for connecting to Non-Bindery Novell 4.x servers - Client32: It is recommended that you use Client32 versions later than 2.2. - Client 32 for DOS/Win31: All versions. - VLM/NetX: Monolithic drivers (ipx.com) - Lantastic16: All versions - Lantastic32: All versions earlier than 7.0 - Pathworks16: Not supported - Pathworks32: It is recommended that
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nbc-telemundo/exhibit6.pdf
  • or affecting the Company or any of its Subsidiaries; or (iii) judgment, order or decree outstanding against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. As of the date hereof, there is no action, suit, proceeding, claim, arbitration or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened, that threatens the validity of this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. 3.11 Environmental Matters. Except for such matters which would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Company Material Adverse Effect: (a) the Company and each of its Subsidiaries has obtained all permits, approvals and authorizations required under Environmental Laws (hereinafter "Environmental Permits"), and is and has been in compliance with all requirements under such Environmental