FCC Web Documents citing 2.956

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-146A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-146A1.pdf
  • AP-4000s and 412 AP-700s that were mislabeled with the FCC ID IXMAPAGAT02. Additionally, Proxim stated that on May 7, 2008, it corrected the mislabeling by implementing an ``Engineering Change Order'' which ensured that the products were properly labeled and that it will ship replacement labels to customers by August 22, 2008. The second LOI also directed Proxim pursuant to Section 2.956(a)(2) of the Rules to submit, within 10 calendar days, an unmodified, production line sample of the AP-4000 for testing at the Laboratory of the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET Lab''). Proxim submitted a sample for testing. The OET Lab tested the sample on October 17, 2008, and found that it was not compliant with the DFS requirement of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.pdf
  • Response at 25. See 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5); see also 47 C.F.R. 1.80(d). NAL Response at 25. 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a). 47 C.F.R. § 2.902. 47 C.F.R. § 2.909(b). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.901-2.1093. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.101-15.123. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.952. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.955. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.956. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.954, 15.19 and 15.21. 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a); see also Behringer USA, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd 1820, 1825 ¶ 15 (2006), forfeiture ordered, 22 FCC Rcd 10451 (2007) (``Behringer'') (forfeiture paid). See Communications Act Amendments of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-234, 92 Stat. 33 (1978). S. Rep. No. 95-580, at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.txt
  • technical standards in repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Johannus's importing and marketing digital electronic organs that do not comply with the technical requirements set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. In addition, we order Johannus, pursuant to Section 2.956(a)(1) of the Rules, to submit to the Enforcement Bureau a copy of the verification records for each model of organ which it imports into the United States in the next two years. II. BACKGROUND On March 27, 2003, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Johannus was importing digital electronic organs that were not in compliance with the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
  • 154, 302a, 303, and 336. Section Number and Title: 2.917 Dismissal of application. 2.927 Limitations on grants. 2.937 Equipment defect and/or design change. 2.939 Revocation or withdrawal of equipment authorization. 2.941 Availability of information relating to grants. 2.945 Sampling tests of equipment compliance. 2.947 Measure procedure. 2.952 Limitation on verification. 2.953 Responsibility for compliance. 2.954 Identification. 2.955 Retention of records. 2.956 FCC inspection and submission of equipment for testing. PART 15 RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICES SUBPART C-INTENTIONAL RADIATORS Brief Description: The rule specifies radiated emission limits for intentional radiators for which no other requirements identified in this part. Need: The limits specified in this section cover emission from intentional radiators which are not explicitly identified in other rule parts and form the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.txt
  • Response at 25. See 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5); see also 47 C.F.R. 1.80(d). NAL Response at 25. 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a). 47 C.F.R. § 2.902. 47 C.F.R. § 2.909(b). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.901-2.1093. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.101-15.123. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.952. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.955. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.956. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.954, 15.19 and 15.21. 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a); see also Behringer USA, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd 1820, 1825 ¶ 15 (2006), forfeiture ordered, 22 FCC Rcd 10451 (2007) (``Behringer'') (forfeiture paid). See Communications Act Amendments of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-234, 92 Stat. 33 (1978). S. Rep. No. 95-580, at
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3544A1.html
  • technical standards in repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Johannus's importing and marketing digital electronic organs that do not comply with the technical requirements set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. In addition, we order Johannus, pursuant to Section 2.956(a)(1) of the Rules,3 to submit to the Enforcement Bureau a copy of the verification records for each model of organ which it imports into the United States in the next two years. II. BACKGROUND 2. On March 27, 2003, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Johannus was importing digital electronic organs that were not in compliance with the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-109A1.html
  • Response at 25. See 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5); see also 47 C.F.R. 1.80(d). NAL Response at 25. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.101(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.902. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.909(b). See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.901-2.1093. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. S: 15.101(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.101-15.123. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.952. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.955. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.956. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.954, 15.19 and 15.21. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.101(a); see also Behringer USA, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd 1820, 1825 P: 15 (2006), forfeiture ordered, 22 FCC Rcd 10451 (2007) ("Behringer") (forfeiture paid). See Communications Act Amendments of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-234, 92 Stat. 33 (1978). S. Rep. No. 95-580, at
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-146A1.html
  • and 412 AP-700s that were mislabeled with the FCC ID IXMAPAGAT02. Additionally, Proxim stated that on May 7, 2008, it corrected the mislabeling by implementing an "Engineering Change Order" which ensured that the products were properly labeled and that it will ship replacement labels to customers by August 22, 2008. 5. The second LOI also directed Proxim pursuant to Section 2.956(a)(2) of the Rules to submit, within 10 calendar days, an unmodified, production line sample of the AP-4000 for testing at the Laboratory of the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET Lab"). Proxim submitted a sample for testing. The OET Lab tested the sample on October 17, 2008, and found that it was not compliant with the DFS requirement of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3544A1.html
  • technical standards in repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Johannus's importing and marketing digital electronic organs that do not comply with the technical requirements set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. In addition, we order Johannus, pursuant to Section 2.956(a)(1) of the Rules,3 to submit to the Enforcement Bureau a copy of the verification records for each model of organ which it imports into the United States in the next two years. II. BACKGROUND 2. On March 27, 2003, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Johannus was importing digital electronic organs that were not in compliance with the