FCC Web Documents citing 2.955

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-147A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-147A1.pdf
  • in this NAL. Id. at 4. See also 47 C.F.R. § 73.1660(a)(1). Verification is a self-authorization procedure where the manufacturer or the importer, in the case of imported equipment, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.902 and 2.909(b). Id. See also 47 C.F.R. § 2.955 (describing those verification records required to be maintained by the manufacturer). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Chris Rea, Inter Tech FM (July 10, 2008) (``Second LOI''). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Chris Rea, Inter Tech FM (November 24,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.pdf
  • 2.909(b). While Inter Tech claims to have marketed these transmitters solely to full power FM stations, Inter Tech admitted that one of these transmitters was "inadvertently" sold to Sidon Video Productions and then resold to a Low Power FM (``LPFM'') station located in the United States. First Response at 6. See First Response at 4. See also 47 C.F.R. § 2.955 (describing those verification records required to be maintained by the manufacturer). Inter Tech's use of the word ``module'' in this context does not refer to the Commission's Part 15 certification for modular use, as these amplifiers are not low power devices. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.212. Inter Tech refers to these devices as modules to indicate that these devices are
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.pdf
  • 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2)(E). NAL Response at 25. See 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5); see also 47 C.F.R. 1.80(d). NAL Response at 25. 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a). 47 C.F.R. § 2.902. 47 C.F.R. § 2.909(b). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.901-2.1093. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.101-15.123. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.952. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.955. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.956. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.954, 15.19 and 15.21. 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a); see also Behringer USA, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd 1820, 1825 ¶ 15 (2006), forfeiture ordered, 22 FCC Rcd 10451 (2007) (``Behringer'') (forfeiture paid). See Communications Act Amendments of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-234, 92 Stat. 33 (1978).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.txt
  • marketing any of its digital electronic organs in the U.S., it must ensure that it complies with these requirements as well. Failure to do so may result in separate enforcement action. Finally, pursuant to Section 2.956(a)(1) of the Rules, we order Johannus to submit to the Enforcement Bureau a copy of the verification records required to be maintained under Section 2.955 of the Rules for each separate model of digital electronic organ, including both existing models and any new models, which it imports into the United States within the next two years following the release of this NAL. Such records must be submitted no later than fifteen (15) days from the date of importation of each model of digital electronic organ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1933A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1933A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1933A1.txt
  • device does not cause harmful interference.'' The ``Space Needle'' model radios sold by the Space Needle Corporation, were purchased from the importer Clegg Industries, Inc., in March 2005. As the importer of the devices, Clegg is deemed the responsible party, as defined in Section 2.909 of the Rules and, as such, is required to maintain the records listed in Section 2.955 of the Rules, including the testing information that demonstrates the device's compliance with the verification requirements. Clegg's August 8, 2005 response to the Seattle Office's July 15, 2005 LOI included a copy of a verification report for the ``Space Needle'' model radio. The verification report indicated that the testing laboratory received a sample radio for testing on July 27, 2005
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
  • Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336. Section Number and Title: 2.917 Dismissal of application. 2.927 Limitations on grants. 2.937 Equipment defect and/or design change. 2.939 Revocation or withdrawal of equipment authorization. 2.941 Availability of information relating to grants. 2.945 Sampling tests of equipment compliance. 2.947 Measure procedure. 2.952 Limitation on verification. 2.953 Responsibility for compliance. 2.954 Identification. 2.955 Retention of records. 2.956 FCC inspection and submission of equipment for testing. PART 15 RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICES SUBPART C-INTENTIONAL RADIATORS Brief Description: The rule specifies radiated emission limits for intentional radiators for which no other requirements identified in this part. Need: The limits specified in this section cover emission from intentional radiators which are not explicitly identified in other rule
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.txt
  • 2.909(b). While Inter Tech claims to have marketed these transmitters solely to full power FM stations, Inter Tech admitted that one of these transmitters was "inadvertently" sold to Sidon Video Productions and then resold to a Low Power FM (``LPFM'') station located in the United States. First Response at 6. See First Response at 4. See also 47 C.F.R. § 2.955 (describing those verification records required to be maintained by the manufacturer). Inter Tech's use of the word ``module'' in this context does not refer to the Commission's Part 15 certification for modular use, as these amplifiers are not low power devices. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.212. Inter Tech refers to these devices as modules to indicate that these devices are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262942A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262942A1.pdf
  • device does not cause harmful interference.'' The ``Space Needle'' model radios sold by the Space Needle Corporation, were purchased from the importer Clegg Industries Inc. in March 2005. As the importer of the devices, Clegg is deemed the responsible party, as defined in Section 2.909 of the Rules and, as such, is required to maintain the records listed in Section 2.955 of the Rules, including the testing information that demonstrates the device's compliance with the verification requirements. Clegg's August 8, 2005 response to the Seattle Office's July 15, 2005 LOI included a copy of a verification report for the ``Space Needle'' model radio. The verification report indicated that the testing laboratory received a sample radio for testing on July 27, 2005
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.txt
  • GEN Docket 89-116, 89-117 and 89-118, 8 FCC Rcd 4236 (1993). A new version, ANSI C63.4-2000, is now available. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.301, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b). See April 16, 2001 letter from Phillip Inglis to the Office of Engineering and Technology. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 2.907 and 2.1033. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.902 and 2.955. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.21. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.105. See May 24, 2001 letter from Intel Corporation on behalf of ITI to the Office of Engineering and Technology. See 47 C.F.R. § 95.401(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 95.627. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1055(a). The type-acceptance procedure was merged with the certification procedure in 1998. See Report and Order in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.txt
  • 3. See Cisco comments at 12. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 2.907 and 2.1033. See Notice at p. 18216. The proposed frequency cutoff of 490 kHz was selected to avoid possible interference to the marine distress band at 495-505 kHz, and the AM broadcast band at 535-1705 kHz. Id. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.902 and 2.955. See Notice at p. 18216. See AdvaMed comments at 2, Cisco comments at 12, ITI comments at 9, Linear comments at 5, Polhemus comments at 3-4, TIA comments at 6, TRP comments at 5-8, TRP reply comments at 3-6, Uniden comments at 4, and Wacom comments at 1. See Cisco comments at 12, Linear comments at 5, Polhemus comments at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.txt
  • wait for approval before the equipment can be marketed. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803, 2.907 and 2.1033. Verification requires the manufacturer to have the equipment tested and to retain certain information on file. No application filing is required for verification and the equipment may be sold as soon as it is found to comply. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.902 and 2.955. See Second Report and Order at p. 14756. See ITI petition at 3. See Second Report and Order at p. 14762. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1966) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-282A1.txt
  • made available to all of the employees involved in the marketing and importation of home recording studios. Employees will be encouraged to ask questions and make any suggestions. This review of FCC requirements will be performed semi-annually. II. No new model of home recording studio will be imported unless Samson has first received and reviewed the records required by Section 2.955 of the Rules, including a report showing that the equipment has been tested and verified for compliance with the Commission's Class B technical standards by an authorized laboratory. These laboratory reports and records will be kept on file and made available to the Commission upon request. III. Each shipment of home recording studios will be sampled by Samson to assure
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.txt
  • commenters to identify any other rules in Part 80 that may have obsolete or inaccurate cross-references. We received no responsive comments. Accordingly, we amend subparagraphs (b) and (c) of section 80.1103 to remove the references to old sections 2.983 and 2.975, respectively, and to instead require compliance with section 2.1033 (governing applications for certification of equipment) or sections 2.953 and 2.955 (governing requirements for parties seeking authorization of equipment under the verification procedures), as appropriate. We also amend section 80.1061 of the Commission's rules to remove an obsolete reference to deleted section 2.1003, and replace it with a reference to sections 2.925 and 2.926, the current Part 2 rules governing equipment identification. We are unaware of any other obsolete or inaccurate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.txt
  • * * * * (c) Applicants for verification must attest that the equipment complies with performance standards as specified in § 80.1101 and, where applicable, that measurements have been made that demonstrate the necessary compliance. Submission of representative data demonstrating compliance is not required unless requested by the Commission. An application must include the items listed in §§ 2.953 and 2.955 of this chapter and a copy of the type-approval certification indicating that equipment meets GMDSS standards and includes all peripheral equipment associated with the specific unit under review. * * * * * Section 80.1113 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: § 80.1113 Transmission of a distress alert. * * * * * (b) The format
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.txt
  • 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2)(E). NAL Response at 25. See 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5); see also 47 C.F.R. 1.80(d). NAL Response at 25. 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a). 47 C.F.R. § 2.902. 47 C.F.R. § 2.909(b). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.901-2.1093. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.101-15.123. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.952. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.955. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.956. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.954, 15.19 and 15.21. 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a); see also Behringer USA, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd 1820, 1825 ¶ 15 (2006), forfeiture ordered, 22 FCC Rcd 10451 (2007) (``Behringer'') (forfeiture paid). See Communications Act Amendments of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-234, 92 Stat. 33 (1978).
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3544A1.html
  • any of its digital electronic organs in the U.S., it must ensure that it complies with these requirements as well. Failure to do so may result in separate enforcement action. 9. Finally, pursuant to Section 2.956(a)(1) of the Rules, we order Johannus to submit to the Enforcement Bureau a copy of the verification records required to be maintained under Section 2.955 of the Rules28 for each separate model of digital electronic organ, including both existing models and any new models, which it imports into the United States within the next two years following the release of this NAL. Such records must be submitted no later than fifteen (15) days from the date of importation of each model of digital electronic organ
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-282A1.html
  • made available to all of the employees involved in the marketing and importation of home recording studios. Employees will be encouraged to ask questions and make any suggestions. This review of FCC requirements will be performed semi-annually. II. No new model of home recording studio will be imported unless Samson has first received and reviewed the records required by Section 2.955 of the Rules, including a report showing that the equipment has been tested and verified for compliance with the Commission's Class B technical standards by an authorized laboratory. These laboratory reports and records will be kept on file and made available to the Commission upon request. III. Each shipment of home recording studios will be sampled by Samson to assure
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1933A1.html
  • does not cause harmful interference." 10. The "Space Needle" model radios sold by the Space Needle Corporation, were purchased from the importer Clegg Industries, Inc., in March 2005. As the importer of the devices, Clegg is deemed the responsible party, as defined in Section 2.909 of the Rules and, as such, is required to maintain the records listed in Section 2.955 of the Rules, including the testing information that demonstrates the device's compliance with the verification requirements. Clegg's August 8, 2005 response to the Seattle Office's July 15, 2005 LOI included a copy of a verification report for the "Space Needle" model radio. The verification report indicated that the testing laboratory received a sample radio for testing on July 27, 2005
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-109A1.html
  • 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E). NAL Response at 25. See 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5); see also 47 C.F.R. 1.80(d). NAL Response at 25. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.101(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.902. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.909(b). See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.901-2.1093. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. S: 15.101(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.101-15.123. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.952. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.955. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.956. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.954, 15.19 and 15.21. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.101(a); see also Behringer USA, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd 1820, 1825 P: 15 (2006), forfeiture ordered, 22 FCC Rcd 10451 (2007) ("Behringer") (forfeiture paid). See Communications Act Amendments of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-234, 92 Stat. 33 (1978).
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-147A1.html
  • in this NAL. Id. at 4. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 73.1660(a)(1). Verification is a self-authorization procedure where the manufacturer or the importer, in the case of imported equipment, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.902 and 2.909(b). Id. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 2.955 (describing those verification records required to be maintained by the manufacturer). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Chris Rea, Inter Tech FM (July 10, 2008) ("Second LOI"). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Chris Rea, Inter Tech FM (November 24,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1513A1.html
  • 2.909(b). While Inter Tech claims to have marketed these transmitters solely to full power FM stations, Inter Tech admitted that one of these transmitters was "inadvertently" sold to Sidon Video Productions and then resold to a Low Power FM ("LPFM") station located in the United States. First Response at 6. See First Response at 4. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 2.955 (describing those verification records required to be maintained by the manufacturer). Inter Tech's use of the word "module" in this context does not refer to the Commission's Part 15 certification for modular use, as these amplifiers are not low power devices. See 47 C.F.R. S: 15.212. Inter Tech refers to these devices as modules to indicate that these devices are
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc020116.pdf
  • = ES altitude AMSL (km) q27.64 = ES elevation (deg) t 45 = e-wave tilt angle (deg) R0.0148.15 = rain rate exceeded 0.01% Now returning to the link budget for the BSS link l01500 .. := btl = Basic Transmission Loss Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-116 140 Increase in noise temp due to rain dBrain_tempRain_margin ( )temp + temp æçè ö÷ø2.955 = Avail099.84043 = Avail0100Rain_outage - := Rain_outage 0.1596 = Rain_outage interpvsAp , p ,Rain_margin , ( ) := required for spline interpolation vs csplineApp , ( ) := Using Mathcad's built in spline interpolation Find the Percent of time associated with the rain margin by interpolating the attn. vs. probability curve Returning to the attenuation vs. probability curve. interpolating to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262942A1.html
  • does not cause harmful interference.''11 9. The ``Space Needle'' model radios sold by the Space Needle Corporation, were purchased from the importer Clegg Industries Inc. in March 2005. As the importer of the devices, Clegg is deemed the responsible party, as defined in Section 2.909 of the Rules and, as such, is required to maintain the records listed in Section 2.955 of the Rules, including the testing information that demonstrates the device's compliance with the verification requirements.12 Clegg's August 8, 2005 response to the Seattle Office's July 15, 2005 LOI included a copy of a verification report for the ``Space Needle'' model radio. The verification report indicated that the testing laboratory received a sample radio for testing on July 27, 2005
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3544A1.html
  • any of its digital electronic organs in the U.S., it must ensure that it complies with these requirements as well. Failure to do so may result in separate enforcement action. 9. Finally, pursuant to Section 2.956(a)(1) of the Rules, we order Johannus to submit to the Enforcement Bureau a copy of the verification records required to be maintained under Section 2.955 of the Rules28 for each separate model of digital electronic organ, including both existing models and any new models, which it imports into the United States within the next two years following the release of this NAL. Such records must be submitted no later than fifteen (15) days from the date of importation of each model of digital electronic organ
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-282A1.html
  • made available to all of the employees involved in the marketing and importation of home recording studios. Employees will be encouraged to ask questions and make any suggestions. This review of FCC requirements will be performed semi-annually. II. No new model of home recording studio will be imported unless Samson has first received and reviewed the records required by Section 2.955 of the Rules, including a report showing that the equipment has been tested and verified for compliance with the Commission's Class B technical standards by an authorized laboratory. These laboratory reports and records will be kept on file and made available to the Commission upon request. III. Each shipment of home recording studios will be sampled by Samson to assure
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1933A1.html
  • does not cause harmful interference." 10. The "Space Needle" model radios sold by the Space Needle Corporation, were purchased from the importer Clegg Industries, Inc., in March 2005. As the importer of the devices, Clegg is deemed the responsible party, as defined in Section 2.909 of the Rules and, as such, is required to maintain the records listed in Section 2.955 of the Rules, including the testing information that demonstrates the device's compliance with the verification requirements. Clegg's August 8, 2005 response to the Seattle Office's July 15, 2005 LOI included a copy of a verification report for the "Space Needle" model radio. The verification report indicated that the testing laboratory received a sample radio for testing on July 27, 2005