FCC Web Documents citing 2.953

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
  • be applied generally for radiofrequency devices. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336. Section Number and Title: 2.917 Dismissal of application. 2.927 Limitations on grants. 2.937 Equipment defect and/or design change. 2.939 Revocation or withdrawal of equipment authorization. 2.941 Availability of information relating to grants. 2.945 Sampling tests of equipment compliance. 2.947 Measure procedure. 2.952 Limitation on verification. 2.953 Responsibility for compliance. 2.954 Identification. 2.955 Retention of records. 2.956 FCC inspection and submission of equipment for testing. PART 15 RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICES SUBPART C-INTENTIONAL RADIATORS Brief Description: The rule specifies radiated emission limits for intentional radiators for which no other requirements identified in this part. Need: The limits specified in this section cover emission from intentional radiators which are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.txt
  • also asked commenters to identify any other rules in Part 80 that may have obsolete or inaccurate cross-references. We received no responsive comments. Accordingly, we amend subparagraphs (b) and (c) of section 80.1103 to remove the references to old sections 2.983 and 2.975, respectively, and to instead require compliance with section 2.1033 (governing applications for certification of equipment) or sections 2.953 and 2.955 (governing requirements for parties seeking authorization of equipment under the verification procedures), as appropriate. We also amend section 80.1061 of the Commission's rules to remove an obsolete reference to deleted section 2.1003, and replace it with a reference to sections 2.925 and 2.926, the current Part 2 rules governing equipment identification. We are unaware of any other obsolete
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.txt
  • authorization. * * * * * (c) Applicants for verification must attest that the equipment complies with performance standards as specified in § 80.1101 and, where applicable, that measurements have been made that demonstrate the necessary compliance. Submission of representative data demonstrating compliance is not required unless requested by the Commission. An application must include the items listed in §§ 2.953 and 2.955 of this chapter and a copy of the type-approval certification indicating that equipment meets GMDSS standards and includes all peripheral equipment associated with the specific unit under review. * * * * * Section 80.1113 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: § 80.1113 Transmission of a distress alert. * * * * * (b)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.txt
  • Behringer continued to market a total of 50 models of unauthorized devices in the United States during the past year. Furthermore, notwithstanding its representations in April 2004 that it would submit test reports demonstrating compliance of all 66 of its digital products, to date Behringer still has not submitted test reports verifying compliance of 38 models. Under Sections 2.909(b) and 2.953(b) of the Rules, Behringer, as the manufacturer and importer of Class B digital devices, is the party responsible for ensuring that all its models of audio products are tested and verified as compliant with the applicable technical equipment standards before such products are imported into and marketed in the United States. Although Behringer stated that, prior to the issuance of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.txt
  • party to make measurements or take other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.906, 2.909. Verification is an equipment authorization procedure under which the responsible party makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.909(b), 2.953. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.901 et seq. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 24.51, 27.51, which require that personal communications services (PCS) and WCS devices be authorized under the Certification procedure, respectively. Currently, Part 25 defines earth station transceivers as portable if the transceivers' radiating element would be used within 20 centimeters of the operator's body while the devices are in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the responsible party to make measurements or take other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See47 C.F.R. §§ 2.906, 2.909. Verification is an equipment authorization procedure under which the responsible party makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See47 C.F.R. §§ 2.909(b), 2.953. 709See 47 C.F.R. § 2.901 et seq. 710See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 24.51, 27.51, which require that personal communications services (PCS) and WCS devices be authorized under the Certification procedure, respectively. 711Currently, Part 25 defines earth station transceivers as portable if the transceivers' radiating element would be used within 20 centimeters of the operator's body while the devices are in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
  • continued to market a total of 50 models of unauthorized devices in the United States during the past year. Furthermore, notwithstanding its representations in April 2004 that it would submit test reports demonstrating compliance of all 66 of its digital products, to date Behringer still has not submitted test reports verifying compliance of 38 models.39 16. Under Sections 2.909(b) and 2.953(b) of the Rules,40 Behringer, as the manufacturer and importer of Class B digital devices, is the party responsible for ensuring that all its models of audio products are tested and verified as compliant with the applicable technical equipment standards before such products are imported into and marketed in the United States. Although Behringer stated that, prior to the issuance of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-98.pdf
  • 0.0 0.096.4 $14,59392.9 0.0 2.3 0.0 4.9 1,541,43075.8 1.012.4 6.1 4.7 Iceland $8,900,65161.8 0.616.815.0 5.9 $2,727,53049.4 0.033.716.3 0.6 $230,53894.7 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.2 22,951,43348.3 1.225.522.0 3.1 Ireland $100,444,90460.0 0.130.6 7.2 2.1 $8,948,88265.8 0.021.5 9.2 3.6 $1,108,42347.2 0.038.2 0.014.6 229,977,52758.3 0.422.5 9.1 9.7 Italy $360,480,31746.1 0.345.7 7.3 0.6 $17,654,28245.7 0.038.810.1 5.4 $4,051,66050.6 0.0 1.846.5 1.1 663,478,75140.2 1.341.514.8 2.2 Liechtenstein $108,160 2.4 2.953.4 0.041.3 $467 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 351,750 0.8 7.569.1 0.022.7 Luxembourg $9,129,14963.2 0.126.0 9.8 0.8 $963,78346.0 0.032.021.8 0.3 $756,62857.6 0.0 0.142.3 0.0 22,913,80449.4 0.429.418.9 1.9 Malta $3,185,28069.3 0.320.4 5.7 4.3 $289,76161.1 0.029.3 0.0 9.6 $96,92398.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.8 5,158,06654.9 0.824.2 4.116.0 Netherlands $109,843,68059.9 2.120.1 9.3 8.6 $12,658,66544.6 0.029.8 8.317.2 $6,415,29655.5 0.013.0 0.031.5 403,004,01841.4 5.526.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
  • continued to market a total of 50 models of unauthorized devices in the United States during the past year. Furthermore, notwithstanding its representations in April 2004 that it would submit test reports demonstrating compliance of all 66 of its digital products, to date Behringer still has not submitted test reports verifying compliance of 38 models.39 16. Under Sections 2.909(b) and 2.953(b) of the Rules,40 Behringer, as the manufacturer and importer of Class B digital devices, is the party responsible for ensuring that all its models of audio products are tested and verified as compliant with the applicable technical equipment standards before such products are imported into and marketed in the United States. Although Behringer stated that, prior to the issuance of