FCC Web Documents citing 2.948

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1358A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1358A1.pdf
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Alco Electronics Ltd. (``Alco''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Alco for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act'') 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b), regarding the marketing and labeling of digital television converter boxes. The Bureau and Alco have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2103A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2103A1.pdf
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Imation Corp. (``Imation''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Imation for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b), regarding the marketing and labeling of digital television (``DTV'') converter boxes. The Bureau and Imation have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.pdf
  • is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. § 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. § 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. § 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.txt
  • EQUIPMENT AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES Brief Description: These rules provide technical standards for radio equipment and their parts and components. Need: These rules permit the Commission to carry out its responsibilities under the Communications Act and the various treaties and international regulations, and to promote the efficient utilization of the spectrum. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. §§ 154, 303. Section Number and Title: 2.948 Description of measurement facilities. 2.1033(b)(11) Application for certification. 2.1055(a)(2) Measurements required; Frequency stability. SUBPART K - IMPORTATION OF DEVICES CAPABLE OF CAUSING HARMFUL INTERFERENCE Brief Description: These rules are designed to prevent interference from radio-frequency devices and to facilitate the filing of FCC Form 740 information regarding equipment importation. Need: These rules control technical criteria, reducing filing and handling burden
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2497A1.txt
  • Office of Engineering and Technology, dated November 29, 2005. A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. § 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. § 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. § 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to iBuypower, Inc. (May 22, 2006). Letter from Darren Su, Vice President, American Future Technology Corporation dba iBuypower, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1358A1.txt
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Alco Electronics Ltd. (``Alco''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Alco for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act'') 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b), regarding the marketing and labeling of digital television converter boxes. The Bureau and Alco have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2049A1.txt
  • correctly, the Commission adopted an accreditation requirement to provide assurance that the test laboratory has the capability to do proper testing in compliance with the Commission's rules. The Commission's rules also require that Telecommunication Certification Bodies (TCBs), which are designated by the Commission to approve equipment on its behalf, be accredited as test laboratories consistent with the Commission's rules. Section 2.948 (d) of the Commission's rules sets forth the requirements for accreditation bodies and for test laboratories. An entity seeking to be recognized by the Commission as an accreditation body for test laboratories must demonstrate that it complies with applicable International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards for recognizing such bodies and that it is competent in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2103A1.txt
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Imation Corp. (``Imation''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Imation for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b), regarding the marketing and labeling of digital television (``DTV'') converter boxes. The Bureau and Imation have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1497A1.txt
  • that would facilitate the recognition of future additional laboratory accreditation bodies. OET also requested comment on a request from ACLASS Accreditation Services (ACLASS), an ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board Company (ACLASS), to be recognized by the Commission as an accreditation body that performs accreditation of laboratories testing equipment for authorization under Parts 2, 15 and 18 of the Commission's rules. Section 2.948 (d) of the Commission's rules sets forth the requirements for accreditation bodies and for test laboratories, and specifies that any entity seeking recognition from the FCC as an accreditation body must obtain the approval of OET. An entity will gain OET recognition as an accreditation body based on the requirements for accreditation bodies established by the International Organization for Standardization
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241424A1.txt
  • the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: (a) Revise paragraph 57 by replacing the sentence ``Currently, the Commission's rules do not address re-evaluation intervals for laboratories that submit Part 15 and Part 18 test data for certification,'' with, ``Currently the Commission's rules do not address re-evaluation intervals for laboratories that test devices for Part 15 and Part 18 compliance.'' (b) Revise Section 2.948 of Appendix A: Proposed Rule Changes to remove proposed changes to paragraph 2.948(a)(2). The aforementioned paragraph was revised in the Second Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order in ET Docket No. 01-278, released July 17, 2003. The text of paragraph 2.948(a)(2) shall continue to read as adopted in that Order. (c) Revise paragraph 2.948(d) of Appendix A: Proposed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.txt
  • -30 °C specified in Section 2.1055(a)(1). We believe the rules should be changed to reflect the established practice for FRS transmitter frequency stability measurements. Accordingly, we are proposing to amend our rules to specify that FRS frequency stability measurements are to be made from -20 °C to +50 °C. We request comments on this proposal. Accreditation of Test Laboratories Section 2.948 of the rules require laboratories that submit test data for equipment subject to certification under Parts 15 and 18 of the rules to file an up-to-date description of its facility with the Commission. Many of these laboratories are accredited by a recognized accrediting organization such as American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) or the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-100A1.txt
  • § 302(a). The Commission recently made changes to Part 2 of the rules to allow designated private organizations, called Telecommunication Certification Bodies (TCBs), to approve equipment in the same manner as the Commission. See Report and Order in GEN Docket 98-68, 13 FCC Rcd 24687 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 2.907. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.906. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.948(d). The laboratory must be accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA), the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) or a Designating Authority of a trading partner having a Mutual Recognition Agreement/Arrangement (MRA) with the United States See 47 C.F.R. § 2.902. See description of In-House PLB systems in ¶ 13. Although each computer to be networked must be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.txt
  • 2 of the rules to modify sections that need to be updated to reflect the availability of more recent industry documents, or that needed other minor revisions. We received comments supporting the proposals and are adopting the following changes. Section 2.202 Bandwidths: add entries to the table of necessary bandwidth calculations in paragraph (g) for newer digital modulation types. Section 2.948 Description of measurement facilities: remove references to expired transition dates and obsolete measurement procedures, update references to reflect the availability of the new ANSI C63.4-2001 measurement procedure, and to correct the Commission's mailing address. Section 2.1033 Application for certification: re-designate paragraph 2.1033(c)(17) on composite devices as paragraph 2.1033(d) to correct a numbering error. Sections 2.1061 through 2.1065 Filing for Application
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.txt
  • propose to modify these sections of the Rules to require electronic filing for all changes in address, company name, contact person, and control/sale of the grantee. This process will provide the Commission with an electronic record of all transactions which will save both time and resources. Electronic filing will also support the E-Government initiative. 3. Accreditation of Test Laboratories Section 2.948 Description of Measurement Facilities. Currently the Commission's rules do not address re-evaluation intervals for laboratories that submit Part 15 and Part 18 test data for certification. Accrediting bodies that evaluate the laboratories generally determine these intervals themselves. While domestic laboratories are generally re-evaluated at two-year intervals, some Accrediting Bodies reassess foreign laboratories only every 7 years. We believe that it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-165A1.txt
  • 15 and Part 18 compliance. Accrediting bodies that evaluate the laboratories generally determine these intervals themselves. While domestic laboratories are generally re-evaluated at two-year intervals, some Accrediting Bodies reassess foreign laboratories only every 7 years. We indicated that it is important that all laboratories, both foreign and domestic, be re-certified on a common interval. Therefore, we proposed to modify Section 2.948 to clarify that all test sites, both foreign and domestic, must be reassessed by their Accrediting Body every two years. We proposed to modify Section 2.962(e)(1) to clarify that every Telecommunications Certification Body must be re-accredited every 2 years for continued accreditation. Globespan Virata, Inc. supports the laboratory re-accreditation proposals. It notes that because equipment technology, test methods, and regulations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-188A1.txt
  • or deny petitions for rulemaking which are repetitive or moot or which for other reasons plainly do not warrant consideration by the Commission. (g) The Chief of the Office of Engineering and Technology is authorized to enter into agreements with the National Institute of Standards and Technology and other accreditation bodies to perform accreditation of test laboratories pursuant to § 2.948(d) of this chapter. In addition, the Chief is authorized to make determinations regarding the continued acceptability of individual accrediting organizations and accredited laboratories. (h) The Chief of the Office of Engineering and Technology is delegated authority to enter into agreements with the National Institute of Standards and Technology to perform accreditation of Telecommunication Certification Bodies (TCBs) pursuant to §§ 2.960
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.txt
  • 302(a). In 1999, the Commission made changes to Part 2 of the rules to allow designated private organizations, called Telecommunication Certification Bodies (TCBs), to approve equipment in the same manner as the Commission, see Report and Order in GEN Docket 98-68, 13 FCC Rcd 24687 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 2.907. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.906. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.948(d). The laboratory must be accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA), the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) or a Designating Authority of a trading partner having a Mutual Recognition Agreement/Arrangement (MRA) with the United States See 47 C.F.R. § 2.902. See Notice at ¶44. Id. See comments of Ameren at 10; UPLC at 13; Main.Net at 8;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-30A1.txt
  • or deny petitions for rulemaking which are repetitive or moot or which for other reasons plainly do not warrant consideration by the Commission. (g) The Chief of the Office of Engineering and Technology is authorized to enter into agreements with the National Institute of Standards and Technology and other accreditation bodies to perform accreditation of test laboratories pursuant to § 2.948(d) of this chapter. In addition, the Chief is authorized to make determinations regarding the continued acceptability of individual accrediting organizations and accredited laboratories. (h) The Chief of the Office of Engineering and Technology is delegated authority to enter into agreements with the National Institute of Standards and Technology to perform accreditation of Telecommunication Certification Bodies (TCBs) pursuant to §§ 2.960
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.txt
  • is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. § 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. § 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. § 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.txt
  • note 4. A DOC is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - has measurements taken to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.906(a). Under the DOC procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the DOC listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1077. The DOC procedure may be used only for certain types of unintentional radiators. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.101. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(6). See, e.g., Globcom, Inc. d/b/a Globcom Global Communications, 18 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.txt
  • is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. § 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. § 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. § 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.wp
  • and Retlif comments at 4. 32For example, Guide 65 requires that product certifiers be impartial, responsible for their decisions, have a quality system, have personnel with the appropriate knowledge and experience, document the certification system, maintain records of approvals, conduct internal audits, and perform post-market surveillance. See Notice at para. 12. 33See CCL comments at 3. 34See 47 C.F.R. § 2.948(d). 35See 47 C.F.R. Part 15. 9 support for requiring TCBs to be Guide 25 accredited30 and for the other additional qualifications criteria that we proposed.31 17. We find that Guide 65, an existing international standard, establishes appropriate qualifications for product certifiers.32 Guide 65 will be used as the primary qualification criteria for TCBs under MRAs, so use of this document
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2497A1.html
  • Office of Engineering and Technology, dated November 29, 2005. A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to iBuypower, Inc. (May 22, 2006). Letter from Darren Su, Vice President, American Future Technology Corporation dba iBuypower, to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
  • Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC- accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-30A1.html
  • note 4. A DOC is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - has measurements taken to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the DOC procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the DOC listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. The DOC procedure may be used only for certain types of unintentional radiators. See 47 C.F.R. S 15.101. 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(6). See, e.g., Globcom, Inc. d/b/a Globcom Global Communications, 18 FCC
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-45A1.html
  • is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1358A1.html
  • Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Alco Electronics Ltd. ("Alco"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Alco for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the "Act") 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b), regarding the marketing and labeling of digital television converter boxes. 2. The Bureau and Alco have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2103A1.html
  • Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Imation Corp. ("Imation"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Imation for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b), regarding the marketing and labeling of digital television ("DTV") converter boxes. 2. The Bureau and Imation have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
  • 15.3(r). "JBP" is the equipment class code assigned by the Commission to designate Part 15 Class B Computing Device Peripherals on FCC Form 731, Application for Equipment Authorization. See https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/index.cfm. Shenzhen Tangreat Technology Co., Ltd., Application for Equipment Authorization FCC Form 731 TCB Version. Shenzhen BST Technology Co., Ltd., a test laboratory authorized to perform certification testing pursuant to section 2.948 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 2.948, conducted the test and prepared the test report. See https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhib its&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=754164&fcc_id='XRLTG-VI PJAMM'. See id. See FCC ID No. XRL-TGVIPJAMM, at https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/GenericSearch.cfm. On September 30, 2010, OET conformed the certification issued under FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM to reflect the actual device that was submitted for testing, substituting "Computer peripheral for preprocessing data" for "RF
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00171.doc
  • mindful, however, of commenters' concerns that governmental presence is necessary to supply the force of law behind the technical criteria governing CPE manufacture and connection to the wireline telephone network without harm. Record at 20, 24, 26, and 113. MRA Order at 24687 - 24688. Record at 283, 284. Record at 203, 204, 221, 206-211, 251. 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.906, 2.948. As TIA has pointed out, the similarly named "Supplier's Declaration of Conformity" process established in ISO/IEC Guide 2:1996 does not require accreditation. TIA Ex Parte, Supplemental Comments, filed July 29, 1999, at 18, 19. TIA Comments, filed July 29, 1999, at 3, 7, 8. Id. at 8. 47 C.F.R. § 2.902. ITI Comments, filed August 6, 1999, at 3, 4.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.wp
  • and Retlif comments at 4. 32For example, Guide 65 requires that product certifiers be impartial, responsible for their decisions, have a quality system, have personnel with the appropriate knowledge and experience, document the certification system, maintain records of approvals, conduct internal audits, and perform post-market surveillance. See Notice at para. 12. 33See CCL comments at 3. 34See 47 C.F.R. § 2.948(d). 35See 47 C.F.R. Part 15. 9 support for requiring TCBs to be Guide 25 accredited30 and for the other additional qualifications criteria that we proposed.31 17. We find that Guide 65, an existing international standard, establishes appropriate qualifications for product certifiers.32 Guide 65 will be used as the primary qualification criteria for TCBs under MRAs, so use of this document
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/da002204.doc
  • words ``Financial Services Branch, FCC, 1919 M Street NW.,'' and adding, in their place, ``Financial Operations Center, FCC, 445-12th Street, SW.'' PART 2 -- FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS 12. The authority citation for Part 2 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302, 303, 307, 336, and 337, unless otherwise noted. Section 2.948(b)(8)(i)(A) is amended by removing the words ``2025 M Street, NW., Office of Engineering and Technology (room 7317)'' and adding, in their place, ``445-12th Street, SW., Office of Engineering and Technology''. PART 3 -- AUTHORIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF ACCOUNTING AUTHORITIES IN MARITIME AND MARITIME MOBILE-SATELLITE RADIO SERVICES 14. The authority citation for Part 3 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Reports/coresforms.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit FCC FILINGS AND FORMS REQUIRING A CORES REGISTRATION NUMBER Updated February 28, 2005 You can verify that the form you are submitting is the most current version or edition by accessing www.fcc.gov/formpage/html 1 SECTION 1 - FILINGS TITLE RESPONSIBLE OFFICE TEST SITE FILINGS (47 CFR Sect 2.948) OET GRANTEE CODE FILINGS OET TCB RELATED FILINGS OET ACCREDITOR/DESIGNATING BODY OET ACCREDITED TEST LABS OET AERONAUTICAL FREQUENCY NOTIFICATIONS (47 CFR Sec. 76.1804) MB CABLE COMMUNITY REGISTRATIONS (47 CFR Sec. 76.1801) MB CABLE SPECIAL REFIEF PETITION (Sec. 76.7) MB REQUEST FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY (Pursuant to Sections 78.33, 76.29, 73.1635 AND ALL OTHER SERVICES) ALL BUREAUS MAIN STUDIO REQUEST (Pursuant
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1998/dd980928.html
  • URL: [3]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/Brdcst_Actions/ ac980928.txt Report No: 24335. Released: September 28, 1998. BROADCAST APPLICATIONS. Internet URL: [4]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/Brdcst_Applicat ions/ap980928.txt Report No: ET-98-7. Released: September 28, 1998. EQUIPMENT AUTHORIZATION DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY ANNOUNCES OPTION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING TO REGISTER NEW TEST FIRM AND/OR RENEW TEST FIRM.Test Firm Registration and Renewal are being accepted electronically in accordance with 47 CFR 2.948. Both procedures can be accomplished by using the Internet and accessing www.fcc.gov, Electronic Filing, OET Equipment Authorization Division Electronic Filing. Note available options of Register New Test Firm, and Add Exhibits or Renew Test Firm. Dkt No.: WT-98-35. Contact: Bette Taube email: btaube@fcc.gov or Fax: (301) 344-2050. Internet URL: [5]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/199 8/pnet8019.wp ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- WPXQ-TV. Granted must-carry complaint
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2497A1.html
  • Office of Engineering and Technology, dated November 29, 2005. A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to iBuypower, Inc. (May 22, 2006). Letter from Darren Su, Vice President, American Future Technology Corporation dba iBuypower, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
  • Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC- accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-30A1.html
  • note 4. A DOC is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - has measurements taken to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the DOC procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the DOC listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. The DOC procedure may be used only for certain types of unintentional radiators. See 47 C.F.R. S 15.101. 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(6). See, e.g., Globcom, Inc. d/b/a Globcom Global Communications, 18 FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-45A1.html
  • is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
  • 15.3(r). "JBP" is the equipment class code assigned by the Commission to designate Part 15 Class B Computing Device Peripherals on FCC Form 731, Application for Equipment Authorization. See https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/index.cfm. Shenzhen Tangreat Technology Co., Ltd., Application for Equipment Authorization FCC Form 731 TCB Version. Shenzhen BST Technology Co., Ltd., a test laboratory authorized to perform certification testing pursuant to section 2.948 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 2.948, conducted the test and prepared the test report. See https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhib its&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=754164&fcc_id='XRLTG-VI PJAMM'. See id. See FCC ID No. XRL-TGVIPJAMM, at https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/GenericSearch.cfm. On September 30, 2010, OET conformed the certification issued under FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM to reflect the actual device that was submitted for testing, substituting "Computer peripheral for preprocessing data" for "RF
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/database/database.html
  • Part 15 * Search: [18]http://www.fcc.gov/oet/fccid/ * The following files are no longer maintained. + Documentation: [19]ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Datab ases/eadf.dat/eadfdoc.zip + Download: [20]ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Datab ases/eadf.dat/ + Search: [21]http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/ead * Experimental Licensing - 47 CFR Part 5 * Search: [22]https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/oet/els/forms/rep orts/Search_Form.hts?form=Limited_Search * The following files are no longer maintained. + Documentation: [23]http://ftp.fcc.gov/XFS_AlphaTest/zipped/expermnt.txt + Download: [24]http://ftp.fcc.gov/XFS_AlphaTest/zipped/expermnt.zip * Contract Test Sites - 47 CFR Part 2 Section 2.948 * Download: [25]http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/database/testsite/ last reviewed/updated 8/4/10 __________________________________________________________________ [26]Skip Bottom FCC Navigation Links and Contact Info [27]FCC Home | [28]Search | [29]RSS | [30]Updates | [31]E-Filing | [32]Initiatives | [33]Consumers | [34]Find People __________________________________________________________________ If you have questions about this web page, or would like more information pertaining to OET, please send e-mail to [35]oetinfo@fcc.gov __________________________________________________________________ [36]Skip FCC Footer and Contact