FCC Web Documents citing 2.939

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1390A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1390A1.pdf
  • (waiver granted); waiver extended, Order, 21 FCC Rcd. 15072 (WTB, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division 2006): waiver extended, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 18325 (WTB, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division 2008). Since GPS location information cannot be deciphered by GMRS users who don't have the necessary equipment, it is considered to be a coded message. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.939(a)(2), which authorizes the Commission to revoke an equipment authorization if it is determined that the equipment does not conform to the pertinent technical requirements. Id. at 4. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful', ... means the conscious
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.pdf
  • procedures in revoking an equipment authorization as it does when revoking a radio station license. Pursuant to section 312(c) of the Act, before revoking a radio station license, the Commission must serve the licensee with an order to show cause why an order of revocation should not be issued and must provide the licensee with an opportunity for hearing. Section 2.939(a)(1) of the Rules authorizes the Commission to revoke any equipment authorization for ``false statements or representations made either in the application or in materials or response submitted in connection therewith.'' Section 2.939(a)(2) of the Rules, moreover, provides that the Commission may revoke any equipment authorization ``[i]f upon subsequent inspection or operation it is determined that the equipment does not conform
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1704A1.txt
  • J Communications under FCC ID # OAJFR1-GPS violate Section 95.631 of the Rules and/or the explicit terms of the equipment authorization for the radios; and To determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to issue (a), whether the equipment authorization held by J Communications, FCC ID # OAJFR1-GPS, should be revoked. The OSC ordered J Communications, pursuant to section 2.939(b) of the rules, within thirty days of the release of the OSC (i.e., by March 10, 2004), in person or by its attorney, to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard. The OSC directed that the notice of appearance state that J Communications would appear on the date fixed for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.txt
  • RMC-535 learned mode transmitter manufactured by Tung Shih under FCC ID No. MMORMC575 conforms to the technical requirements specified by its equipment authorization; and To determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to issues (d) and (e), whether equipment authorization FCC ID No. MMORMC575 held by Tung Shih should be revoked. The OSC ordered Tung Shih, pursuant to section 2.939(b) of the Commission's rules, within thirty days of the release of the OSC (i.e., by March 2, 2005), in person or by its attorney, to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard. The OSC directed that the notice of appearance state that Tung Shih would appear on the date fixed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-191A1.txt
  • Equipment Authorizations for Learned Mode Remote Control Transmitter Devices, FCC ID Nos. MMORC0196M and MMORMC575 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) EB Docket No. 05-30 EB-02-TS-606 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Adopted: January 26, 2005 Released: January 31, 2005 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order to Show Cause, we commence a hearing proceeding pursuant to Section 2.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), to determine whether the equipment authorizations held by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. (``Tung Shih'') for learned mode remote control transmitter devices (``learned mode transmitters''), FCC ID Nos. MMORC0196M and MMORMC575, should be revoked. Devices manufactured by Tung Shih under those FCC ID numbers apparently have the capability to transmit on frequencies that are not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1589A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1589A1.txt
  • arrangements are made to meet all of the conditions of this waiver. This condition will ensure that equipment will continue to be listed in the SafeView data base even if it is resold. Finally, we will require SafeView to obligate parties who purchase this device to operate them consistent with the terms of this Order. The provisions of 47 C.F.R. §2.939(a) allow the Commission to revoke the certification grant, if SafeView or any operator of these devices fails to comply with the obligations placed on them in accordance with the equipment authorization program. We believe that the high capital expense for the SafeView equipment, coupled with the Commission's requirements for approving and operating unlicensed devices and with the specific conditions placed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
  • under the Commission's rules. Need: The rules provide procedures and conditions under which grants can be dismissed, limited and revoked. The rules also specify measurement procedures to be applied generally for radiofrequency devices. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336. Section Number and Title: 2.917 Dismissal of application. 2.927 Limitations on grants. 2.937 Equipment defect and/or design change. 2.939 Revocation or withdrawal of equipment authorization. 2.941 Availability of information relating to grants. 2.945 Sampling tests of equipment compliance. 2.947 Measure procedure. 2.952 Limitation on verification. 2.953 Responsibility for compliance. 2.954 Identification. 2.955 Retention of records. 2.956 FCC inspection and submission of equipment for testing. PART 15 RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICES SUBPART C-INTENTIONAL RADIATORS Brief Description: The rule specifies radiated emission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1390A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1390A1.txt
  • (waiver granted); waiver extended, Order, 21 FCC Rcd. 15072 (WTB, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division 2006): waiver extended, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 18325 (WTB, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division 2008). Since GPS location information cannot be deciphered by GMRS users who don't have the necessary equipment, it is considered to be a coded message. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.939(a)(2), which authorizes the Commission to revoke an equipment authorization if it is determined that the equipment does not conform to the pertinent technical requirements. Id. at 4. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful', ... means the conscious
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-676A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-676A1.txt
  • 1157-59. See, e.g., WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. Given these limitations, our waiver of Section 90.1321(c) to allow certification of the BMAX-Si does not disturb the Commission's decision declining to increase the power limit for mobile units, see 3650 MHz MO&O, 22 FCC Rcd at 10437 ¶ 42. The provisions of 47 C.F.R. §2.939(a) allow the Commission to revoke the certification grant, if Alvarion or any operator of these devices fails to comply with the obligations placed on them in accordance with the equipment authorization program. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.939(a). See, e.g., 3650 MHz Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 6511-6513 ¶¶ 25-30. See, e.g., WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157; Northeast Cellular, 897
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-676A1_Rcd.pdf
  • is certified as a mobile station only for fixed-mode operation limited to the maximum EIRP and power density as specified in the above- captioned application by Alvarion. The location of the fixed-mode operation must be registered in the Universal Licensing System (ULS) database by the license holder prior to operation and the device may only 30The provisions of 47 C.F.R. §2.939(a) allowthe Commission to revoke the certification grant, if Alvarion or any operator of these devices fails to comply with the obligations placed on them in accordance with the equipment authorization program. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.939(a). 31See, e.g., 3650 MHz Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 6511-6513 ¶¶ 25-30. 32See, e.g., WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at1157; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.txt
  • procedures in revoking an equipment authorization as it does when revoking a radio station license. Pursuant to section 312(c) of the Act, before revoking a radio station license, the Commission must serve the licensee with an order to show cause why an order of revocation should not be issued and must provide the licensee with an opportunity for hearing. Section 2.939(a)(1) of the Rules authorizes the Commission to revoke any equipment authorization for ``false statements or representations made either in the application or in materials or response submitted in connection therewith.'' Section 2.939(a)(2) of the Rules, moreover, provides that the Commission may revoke any equipment authorization ``[i]f upon subsequent inspection or operation it is determined that the equipment does not conform
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-24A1.txt
  • Ltd. Grantee of Equipment Authorization for General Mobile Radio Service Radios, FCC ID# OAJFR1-GPS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) EB Docket No. 04-28 EB-02-TS-588 FRN # 0005-8369-60 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Adopted: February 4, 2004 Released: February 9, 2004 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order to Show Cause, we commence a hearing proceeding pursuant to Section 2.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), to determine whether the equipment authorization held by J Communications Co., Ltd. (``J Communications'') for its General Mobile Radio Service (``GMRS'') radios, FCC ID# OAJFR1-GPS, should be revoked. The GMRS radios manufactured by J Communications under FCC ID# OAJFR1-GPS have the capability to transmit data, specifically Global Positioning System (``GPS'') location information, in contravention of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-263A1.txt
  • interference. The requirements of Section 15.525(f) limiting the coordination of routine UWB operations to no longer than 15 business days from the receipt of the coordination request by NTIA, will still be applicable. We also will require UltraVision to obligate parties who purchase UltraSensor systems to operate them consistent with the terms of this Order. The provisions of 47 C.F.R. §2.939(a) allow the Commission to revoke the certification grant, if UltraVision or any operator of these devices fails to comply with the obligations placed on them in accordance with the equipment authorization program. We reiterate that as an unlicensed device, an UltraSensor system must be operated under the general non-interference requirements of Section 15.5 of our rules. Under these rules, the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
  • coefficients found in the modified equation presented above. More specifically, the regression equation using a households passed variable yielded the following relationship: log of average monthly rate = 3.527 + .032 low penetration - .023 overbuild - .283 municipal - .174 LEC + .016 MSO - 13.1 reciprocal of average total channels + .016 log of median household income - 2.939 reciprocal of system household passed + .027 cluster. The fact that the coefficients from both regression equations are similar indicates that no significant simultaneity exists in our re-estimated regression equation. If a simultaneity were found, it would also be possible to solve this problem by using a simultaneous equation estimation technique. It should be noted, however, that AT&T's modified regression
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.wp
  • during the development and implementation of the electronic filing system. We will provide public notice of any changes in our filing procedures. 66 See ACIL comments at 4, Intertek comments at 5, and TIA comments at 5-6. 67 See Motorola comments at 5, and PCTEST reply comments at 6. 68 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.108. 69 See 47 C.F.R. § 2.939(a). 70 See Curtis-Strauss comments at 1-2. 18 interim, we will accept Part 68 transfers of control by utilizing the same means of communication we employ during the TCB program implementation period.65 36. Written grant of certification. Several parties would like the Commission to ensure that grants issued by TCBs are exactly equivalent to grants issued by the FCC. ACIL, Intertek
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1704A1.html
  • under FCC ID # OAJFR1-GPS violate Section 95.631 of the Rules and/or the explicit terms of the equipment authorization for the radios; and (b) To determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to issue (a), whether the equipment authorization held by J Communications, FCC ID # OAJFR1-GPS, should be revoked. 3. The OSC ordered J Communications, pursuant to section 2.939(b) of the rules,4 within thirty days of the release of the OSC (i.e., by March 10, 2004), in person or by its attorney, to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard.5 The OSC directed that the notice of appearance state that J Communications would appear on the date fixed for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-24A1.html
  • Co., Ltd. ) EB Docket No. 04-28 ) EB-02-TS-588 Grantee of Equipment ) FRN # 0005-8369-60 Authorization for ) General Mobile Radio Service ) Radios, FCC ID# OAJFR1-GPS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Adopted: February 4, 2004 Released: February 9, 2004 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Order to Show Cause, we commence a hearing proceeding pursuant to Section 2.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''),1 to determine whether the equipment authorization held by J Communications Co., Ltd. (``J Communications'') for its General Mobile Radio Service (``GMRS'') radios, FCC ID# OAJFR1-GPS, should be revoked. The GMRS radios manufactured by J Communications under FCC ID# OAJFR1-GPS have the capability to transmit data, specifically Global Positioning System (``GPS'') location information, in contravention of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1014A1.html
  • mode transmitter manufactured by Tung Shih under FCC ID No. MMORMC575 conforms to the technical requirements specified by its equipment authorization; and (f) To determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to issues (d) and (e), whether equipment authorization FCC ID No. MMORMC575 held by Tung Shih should be revoked. 3. The OSC ordered Tung Shih, pursuant to section 2.939(b) of the Commission's rules,4 within thirty days of the release of the OSC (i.e., by March 2, 2005), in person or by its attorney, to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard.5 The OSC directed that the notice of appearance state that Tung Shih would appear on the date fixed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-191A1.html
  • EB Docket No. 05-30 ) EB-02-TS-606 Grantee of Equipment ) Authorizations for ) Learned Mode Remote Control ) Transmitter Devices, FCC ID Nos. MMORC0196M and MMORMC575 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Adopted: January 26, 2005 Released: January 31, 2005 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Order to Show Cause, we commence a hearing proceeding pursuant to Section 2.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''),1 to determine whether the equipment authorizations held by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. (``Tung Shih'') for learned mode remote control transmitter devices (``learned mode transmitters''), FCC ID Nos. MMORC0196M and MMORMC575, should be revoked. Devices manufactured by Tung Shih under those FCC ID numbers apparently have the capability to transmit on frequencies that are not
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1390A1.html
  • (waiver granted); waiver extended, Order, 21 FCC Rcd. 15072 (WTB, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division 2006): waiver extended, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 18325 (WTB, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division 2008). Since GPS location information cannot be deciphered by GMRS users who don't have the necessary equipment, it is considered to be a coded message. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.939(a)(2), which authorizes the Commission to revoke an equipment authorization if it is determined that the equipment does not conform to the pertinent technical requirements. Id. at 4. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that "[t]he term `willful', ... means the conscious
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
  • ) File No.: EB-10-SE-164 Grantee of Equipment Authorization, ) FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM FRN: 0019109180 ) ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING Adopted: February 9, 2011 Released: February 9, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Order to Show Cause, we commence a hearing proceeding pursuant to sections 1.91 and 2.939 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") regarding the device manufactured and marketed under FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM with the brand name "TxTStopper(TM)". The TxTStopper(TM) device was marketed in the United States and apparently has the capability to block, jam, or otherwise interfere with the operation of authorized wireless communications, in violation of sections 302(b) and 333 of the Communications Act of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
  • coefficients found in the modified equation presented above. More specifically, the regression equation using a households passed variable yielded the following relationship: log of average monthly rate = 3.527 + .032 low penetration - .023 overbuild - .283 municipal - .174 LEC + .016 MSO - 13.1 reciprocal of average total channels + .016 log of median household income - 2.939 reciprocal of system household passed + .027 cluster. The fact that the coefficients from both regression equations are similar indicates that no significant simultaneity exists in our re-estimated regression equation. If a simultaneity were found, it would also be possible to solve this problem by using a simultaneous equation estimation technique. It should be noted, however, that AT&T's modified regression
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.wp
  • during the development and implementation of the electronic filing system. We will provide public notice of any changes in our filing procedures. 66 See ACIL comments at 4, Intertek comments at 5, and TIA comments at 5-6. 67 See Motorola comments at 5, and PCTEST reply comments at 6. 68 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.108. 69 See 47 C.F.R. § 2.939(a). 70 See Curtis-Strauss comments at 1-2. 18 interim, we will accept Part 68 transfers of control by utilizing the same means of communication we employ during the TCB program implementation period.65 36. Written grant of certification. Several parties would like the Commission to ensure that grants issued by TCBs are exactly equivalent to grants issued by the FCC. ACIL, Intertek
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1704A1.html
  • under FCC ID # OAJFR1-GPS violate Section 95.631 of the Rules and/or the explicit terms of the equipment authorization for the radios; and (b) To determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to issue (a), whether the equipment authorization held by J Communications, FCC ID # OAJFR1-GPS, should be revoked. 3. The OSC ordered J Communications, pursuant to section 2.939(b) of the rules,4 within thirty days of the release of the OSC (i.e., by March 10, 2004), in person or by its attorney, to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard.5 The OSC directed that the notice of appearance state that J Communications would appear on the date fixed for
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-24A1.html
  • Co., Ltd. ) EB Docket No. 04-28 ) EB-02-TS-588 Grantee of Equipment ) FRN # 0005-8369-60 Authorization for ) General Mobile Radio Service ) Radios, FCC ID# OAJFR1-GPS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Adopted: February 4, 2004 Released: February 9, 2004 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Order to Show Cause, we commence a hearing proceeding pursuant to Section 2.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''),1 to determine whether the equipment authorization held by J Communications Co., Ltd. (``J Communications'') for its General Mobile Radio Service (``GMRS'') radios, FCC ID# OAJFR1-GPS, should be revoked. The GMRS radios manufactured by J Communications under FCC ID# OAJFR1-GPS have the capability to transmit data, specifically Global Positioning System (``GPS'') location information, in contravention of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1014A1.html
  • mode transmitter manufactured by Tung Shih under FCC ID No. MMORMC575 conforms to the technical requirements specified by its equipment authorization; and (f) To determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to issues (d) and (e), whether equipment authorization FCC ID No. MMORMC575 held by Tung Shih should be revoked. 3. The OSC ordered Tung Shih, pursuant to section 2.939(b) of the Commission's rules,4 within thirty days of the release of the OSC (i.e., by March 2, 2005), in person or by its attorney, to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard.5 The OSC directed that the notice of appearance state that Tung Shih would appear on the date fixed
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-191A1.html
  • EB Docket No. 05-30 ) EB-02-TS-606 Grantee of Equipment ) Authorizations for ) Learned Mode Remote Control ) Transmitter Devices, FCC ID Nos. MMORC0196M and MMORMC575 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Adopted: January 26, 2005 Released: January 31, 2005 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Order to Show Cause, we commence a hearing proceeding pursuant to Section 2.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''),1 to determine whether the equipment authorizations held by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. (``Tung Shih'') for learned mode remote control transmitter devices (``learned mode transmitters''), FCC ID Nos. MMORC0196M and MMORMC575, should be revoked. Devices manufactured by Tung Shih under those FCC ID numbers apparently have the capability to transmit on frequencies that are not
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
  • ) File No.: EB-10-SE-164 Grantee of Equipment Authorization, ) FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM FRN: 0019109180 ) ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING Adopted: February 9, 2011 Released: February 9, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Order to Show Cause, we commence a hearing proceeding pursuant to sections 1.91 and 2.939 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") regarding the device manufactured and marketed under FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM with the brand name "TxTStopper(TM)". The TxTStopper(TM) device was marketed in the United States and apparently has the capability to block, jam, or otherwise interfere with the operation of authorized wireless communications, in violation of sections 302(b) and 333 of the Communications Act of