FCC Web Documents citing 2.936

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.pdf
  • seeking further information regarding its distribution of the DM500-S and DM7020-S receivers. In its response dated November 5, 2006, One-O-One included a Declaration of Conformity test report for the DM500-S. One-O-One did not provide a test report for the DM7020-S receiver, and added that to the best of its knowledge, ``there is no FCC certificate available for the DM7020-S.'' Sections 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.§§ 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29, require that documents and/or test samples demonstrating equipment compliance be provided to the Commission upon reasonable request. Neither DreamBox USA nor One-O-One has provided documentation or other proof indicating that the DM7020-S receiver complies with either the Declaration of Conformity or certification requirements for television interface devices as
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.pdf
  • To determine whether Shenzhen made false statements or representations either in the application or in materials submitted in connection therewith (see section 2.939(a)(1)); To determine whether the Commission would be warranted in refusing to grant an original application for equipment authorization for the device certified under FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM (see section 2.939(a)(4)); To determine whether Shenzhen willfully violated sections 2.936 and 2.946 of the Rules by failing to provide a test sample of the device being marketed under FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM upon request by the Commission, and otherwise willfully failed to respond to a Commission request for information regarding the device; and To determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing issues, whether the equipment authorization
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.txt
  • seeking further information regarding its distribution of the DM500-S and DM7020-S receivers. In its response dated November 5, 2006, One-O-One included a Declaration of Conformity test report for the DM500-S. One-O-One did not provide a test report for the DM7020-S receiver, and added that to the best of its knowledge, ``there is no FCC certificate available for the DM7020-S.'' Sections 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.§§ 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29, require that documents and/or test samples demonstrating equipment compliance be provided to the Commission upon reasonable request. Neither DreamBox USA nor One-O-One has provided documentation or other proof indicating that the DM7020-S receiver complies with either the Declaration of Conformity or certification requirements for television interface devices as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.txt
  • To determine whether Shenzhen made false statements or representations either in the application or in materials submitted in connection therewith (see section 2.939(a)(1)); To determine whether the Commission would be warranted in refusing to grant an original application for equipment authorization for the device certified under FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM (see section 2.939(a)(4)); To determine whether Shenzhen willfully violated sections 2.936 and 2.946 of the Rules by failing to provide a test sample of the device being marketed under FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM upon request by the Commission, and otherwise willfully failed to respond to a Commission request for information regarding the device; and To determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing issues, whether the equipment authorization
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.txt
  • generates a radio frequency waveform and sends the data to a wireless LAN card that further processes and transmits the radio signal. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.944. Failure to comply within 14 days may be grounds for denial of equipment authorization or monetary forfeitures. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.931. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.943 and 2.946. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.936(a) and 2.938(a). We note that Sections 303(e) and Section 4(i) of the Communications Act continue to give the Commission authority to request data that will assist us in carrying out our responsibilities under the Act. See 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 303(e). See generally In the matter of Modification of Parts 2 and 15 of the Commission's Rules for unlicensed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.txt
  • that can adapt its parameters and characteristics to the electromagnetic spectrum environment or in a purest sense can deviate from a normal, perfect, or mature form; having different forms at different stages of existence. See the XG Program web site at http://www.darpa.mil/ato/programs/xg/index.htm. See the contract announcement at http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/micro_stories.pl?ACCT=683194&TICK=RTN4 &STORY=/www/story/08-15-2002/0001784186&EDATE=Aug+15,+2002. , News Release dated November 19, 2004. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.936, 2.943 and 2.946. In 2003 the Commission added 255 MHz of spectrum at 5.470-5.725 GHz where U-NII equipment could operate. See Report and Order in ET Docket No. 03-122, 18 FCC Rcd 24484 (2003). The rules require U-NII equipment operating in this band to incorporate DFS to protect Federal Government Radar systems that also operate in this band. Many transmitters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-66A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-66A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-66A1.txt
  • certified as software defined radios. . Specifically, MSS references statements in footnote 4 and paragraphs 20, 39 and 67 of the Cognitive Radio Report and Order. Grantees of equipment certification are required to maintain records of equipment specifications and any changes that may affect compliance and must make these records available for inspection by the Commission. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.936(a) and 2.938(a). We note that Section 303(e) and Section 4(i) of the Communications Act give the Commission authority to request data that will assist it in carrying out its responsibilities under the Act. See 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 303(e). See MSS petition at 9 and MSS reply to opposition at 3. Such amplifiers must comply with limits on the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-321A1.html
  • seeking further information regarding its distribution of the DM500-S and DM7020-S receivers. In its response dated November 5, 2006, One-O-One included a Declaration of Conformity test report for the DM500-S. One-O-One did not provide a test report for the DM7020-S receiver, and added that to the best of its knowledge, "there is no FCC certificate available for the DM7020-S." Sections 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.SS 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29, require that documents and/or test samples demonstrating equipment compliance be provided to the Commission upon reasonable request. Neither DreamBox USA nor One-O-One has provided documentation or other proof indicating that the DM7020-S receiver complies with either the Declaration of Conformity or certification requirements for television interface devices as
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
  • cause why the equipment authorization it holds under FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM should not be revoked and why a Forfeiture Order in an amount not to exceed one hundred and twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($112,500) should not be issued against Shenzhen for willfully and/or repeatedly violating sections 302(b) and 333 of the Act and sections 2.803, 2.907(b), 2.931, 2.932, 2.936 and 2.946 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. In response to complaints regarding the marketing of a radio frequency device called the TxTStopper(TM) that is advertised as preventing cell phone use in moving motor vehicles, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the FCC's Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") launched an investigation. The Division staff observed that the txtstopper.com website describes the TxTStopper(TM)
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-321A1.html
  • seeking further information regarding its distribution of the DM500-S and DM7020-S receivers. In its response dated November 5, 2006, One-O-One included a Declaration of Conformity test report for the DM500-S. One-O-One did not provide a test report for the DM7020-S receiver, and added that to the best of its knowledge, "there is no FCC certificate available for the DM7020-S." Sections 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.SS 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29, require that documents and/or test samples demonstrating equipment compliance be provided to the Commission upon reasonable request. Neither DreamBox USA nor One-O-One has provided documentation or other proof indicating that the DM7020-S receiver complies with either the Declaration of Conformity or certification requirements for television interface devices as
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
  • cause why the equipment authorization it holds under FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM should not be revoked and why a Forfeiture Order in an amount not to exceed one hundred and twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($112,500) should not be issued against Shenzhen for willfully and/or repeatedly violating sections 302(b) and 333 of the Act and sections 2.803, 2.907(b), 2.931, 2.932, 2.936 and 2.946 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. In response to complaints regarding the marketing of a radio frequency device called the TxTStopper(TM) that is advertised as preventing cell phone use in moving motor vehicles, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the FCC's Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") launched an investigation. The Division staff observed that the txtstopper.com website describes the TxTStopper(TM)