FCC Web Documents citing 2.908

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.pdf
  • BASS V-AMP PRO; and the LX112 is identical to the LX1200H. In support, Behringer provides a comparative analysis of the models. Under Section 2.902(b) of the Rules, a device's equipment verification attaches to all devices the manufacturer or importer subsequently markets that are ``identical'' to the sample tested and verified as compliant with the Commission's applicable technical standards. Under Section 2.908 of the Rules, ``identical'' is defined as ``identical within the variation that can be expected to arise as a result of quantity production techniques.'' Behringer, however, failed to provide sufficient documentation to support its argument that the devices are identical. The comparative analysis submitted by Behringer, which purports to establish that these devices were identical, neither diagrams in detail the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.txt
  • BASS V-AMP PRO; and the LX112 is identical to the LX1200H. In support, Behringer provides a comparative analysis of the models. Under Section 2.902(b) of the Rules, a device's equipment verification attaches to all devices the manufacturer or importer subsequently markets that are ``identical'' to the sample tested and verified as compliant with the Commission's applicable technical standards. Under Section 2.908 of the Rules, ``identical'' is defined as ``identical within the variation that can be expected to arise as a result of quantity production techniques.'' Behringer, however, failed to provide sufficient documentation to support its argument that the devices are identical. The comparative analysis submitted by Behringer, which purports to establish that these devices were identical, neither diagrams in detail the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-100A1.html
  • BASS V-AMP PRO; and the LX112 is identical to the LX1200H. In support, Behringer provides a comparative analysis of the models. Under Section 2.902(b) of the Rules, a device's equipment verification attaches to all devices the manufacturer or importer subsequently markets that are "identical" to the sample tested and verified as compliant with the Commission's applicable technical standards. Under Section 2.908 of the Rules, "identical" is defined as "identical within the variation that can be expected to arise as a result of quantity production techniques." Behringer, however, failed to provide sufficient documentation to support its argument that the devices are identical. The comparative analysis submitted by Behringer, which purports to establish that these devices were identical, neither diagrams in detail the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc020116.pdf
  • km LG5.533 = km LGLscosqd2r × ( ) × := Step 3: Calculate the horizontal projection, LG, of the slant- th km Ls6.246 = km Ls hRhs - sinqd2r × ( ) q5 ³ if 2hRhs - ( ) × sinqd2r × ( )22hRhs - ( ) × Re + éêë ùúû0.5sinqd2r× ( ) + q5 < if := km hR2.908 = Step 2: Compute the slant path length Ls below the rain hiht For Northern Europe west of 60 deg long. and North America, see ITU-R P.839-2 hRiff35 ³ iff70 £ 3.20.075f35 - ( ) × - , hR , éë ùû , hR , éë ùû := f38.898 = Latitude = hR 50.075f23 - ( ) × - f23
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-100A1.html
  • BASS V-AMP PRO; and the LX112 is identical to the LX1200H. In support, Behringer provides a comparative analysis of the models. Under Section 2.902(b) of the Rules, a device's equipment verification attaches to all devices the manufacturer or importer subsequently markets that are "identical" to the sample tested and verified as compliant with the Commission's applicable technical standards. Under Section 2.908 of the Rules, "identical" is defined as "identical within the variation that can be expected to arise as a result of quantity production techniques." Behringer, however, failed to provide sufficient documentation to support its argument that the devices are identical. The comparative analysis submitted by Behringer, which purports to establish that these devices were identical, neither diagrams in detail the