FCC Web Documents citing 2.902

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-147A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-147A1.pdf
  • equipment models is ongoing, and therefore is not addressed in this NAL. Id. at 4. See also 47 C.F.R. � 73.1660(a)(1). Verification is a self-authorization procedure where the manufacturer or the importer, in the case of imported equipment, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.902 and 2.909(b). Id. See also 47 C.F.R. � 2.955 (describing those verification records required to be maintained by the manufacturer). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Chris Rea, Inter Tech FM (July 10, 2008) (``Second LOI''). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.pdf
  • (requiring AM, FM or TV transmitters to be verified for compliance following the procedures describe in Part 2 of the Rules). Verification is a self-authorization procedure where the manufacturer or the importer, in the case of imported equipment, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.902 and 2.909(b). While Inter Tech claims to have marketed these transmitters solely to full power FM stations, Inter Tech admitted that one of these transmitters was "inadvertently" sold to Sidon Video Productions and then resold to a Low Power FM (``LPFM'') station located in the United States. First Response at 6. See First Response at 4. See also 47 C.F.R.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.pdf
  • equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z). Section 15.3(i) of the Rules defines ``Class B digital device'' as ``a digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(i). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. 47 C.F.R. � 15.107. 47 C.F.R. � 15.109. 47 C.F.R. � 15.19. 47 C.F.R. � 15.105. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1203; see also 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1204, 2.1205. See LOI, supra note 3. See Letter from Clifford M. Harrington and Tony Lin, Counsel for PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. to Nissa Laughner, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.pdf
  • are ``identical'' in ``electronic design and topology'' to other products. Specifically, Behringer claims that: the V-AMP 2 is identical to the Bass V-AMP; the GMX212 is identical to the GMX1200H; the V-Amp Pro is identical to the BASS V-AMP PRO; and the LX112 is identical to the LX1200H. In support, Behringer provides a comparative analysis of the models. Under Section 2.902(b) of the Rules, a device's equipment verification attaches to all devices the manufacturer or importer subsequently markets that are ``identical'' to the sample tested and verified as compliant with the Commission's applicable technical standards. Under Section 2.908 of the Rules, ``identical'' is defined as ``identical within the variation that can be expected to arise as a result of quantity production
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-209A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-209A1.pdf
  • ``any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radio frequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.3(h) and 15.3(k). 47 C.F.R. � 15.101(a). Verification is a procedure where the manufacturer makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.902(a). 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Letter from Austin Hughes Solutions, Inc. to Mr. Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (September 1, 2006) (``Response'') at Document No.: REF-6001. See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau to Austin Hughes Electronics, Ltd. (June 9, 2006). The LOI was inadvertently addressed to Austin
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.pdf
  • manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. However, unlike the Declaration of Conformity procedure, it does not require that an accredited laboratory make the measurements or that a Declaration of Conformity be supplied with the equipment. 47 C.F.R. � 2.902(a). 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. � 2.801 defines a radio frequency device as ``any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radio frequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o) defines an intentional radiator as ``[a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.204(d). Modification
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.pdf
  • and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999) (``Forfeiture Policy Statement''). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(E). NAL Response at 25. See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5); see also 47 C.F.R. 1.80(d). NAL Response at 25. 47 C.F.R. � 15.101(a). 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. 47 C.F.R. � 2.909(b). See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.901-2.1093. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 15.101(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 15.101-15.123. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.952. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.955. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.956. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.954, 15.19 and 15.21. 47 C.F.R. � 15.101(a); see also Behringer USA, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-976A1.txt
  • verified SpeedCharger actual working units. Id. at SCH000001. 47 C.F.R. � 15.101(a). The Rules describe verification as ``a procedure where the manufacturer makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. Submittal of a sample unit or representative data to the Commission demonstrating compliance'' is generally not required. 47 C.F.R. � 2.902(a). The Rules further provide that the verification attaches to any device the manufacturer subsequently markets that is identical to that which tested complaint with applicable technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.902(b) Interpretation and Amendment of Part 2, Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules Relating to the Marketing if Radiofrequency Devices, 58 FCC 2d 784, 787 �� 15-16 (1976). Matter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • 0.300* (8.68) 1.2134 (0.23) 0.380 (0.25) 0.000119 (0.65) 0.548 147 Format 20 HHI -0.036 (0.63) -0.005* (5.39) -0.1836 (-1.21) 0.033 (0.76) -0.000005 (-0.94) 0.345 147 Format 11 Count -3.079* (2.09) 0.171* (6.53) 0.8787 (0.22) 0.638 (0.57) 0.000109 (0.78) 0.488 147 Format 11 HHI -0.001 (0.02) -0.006* (5.50) -0.1456 (-0.94) -0.006 (-0.13) 0.000000 (-0.01) 0.349 147 With Demographics: Format 101 Count -2.902 (1.28) 0.421* (9.84) 0.9066 (0.15) 0.822 (0.48) 0.000037 (0.16) 0.720 140 Format 101 HHI 0.018 (0.43) -0.004* (4.96) -0.0530 (-0.46) 0.005 (0.15) -0.000005 (-1.18) 0.495 140 Format 20 Count -1.282 (0.62) 0.274* (7.02) 0.4563 (0.08) 0.948 (0.60) -0.000069 (-0.33) 0.568 140 Format 20 HHI -0.029 (0.50) -0.005* (4.85) -0.1312 (-0.86) 0.017 (0.39) -0.000005 (-0.92) 0.431 140 Format 11 Count -3.547*
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.txt
  • (requiring AM, FM or TV transmitters to be verified for compliance following the procedures describe in Part 2 of the Rules). Verification is a self-authorization procedure where the manufacturer or the importer, in the case of imported equipment, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.902 and 2.909(b). While Inter Tech claims to have marketed these transmitters solely to full power FM stations, Inter Tech admitted that one of these transmitters was "inadvertently" sold to Sidon Video Productions and then resold to a Low Power FM (``LPFM'') station located in the United States. First Response at 6. See First Response at 4. See also 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.txt
  • equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z). Section 15.3(i) of the Rules defines ``Class B digital device'' as ``a digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(i). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. 47 C.F.R. � 15.107. 47 C.F.R. � 15.109. 47 C.F.R. � 15.19. 47 C.F.R. � 15.105. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1203; see also 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1204, 2.1205. See LOI, supra note 3. See Letter from Clifford M. Harrington and Tony Lin, Counsel for PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. to Nissa Laughner, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 1.485 INDIANA 892,896,940 3,317,961 269.11 13,936,565 1.246 IOWA 398,092,547 1,468,226 271.14 20,847,145 1.864 KANSAS 532,254,808 1,284,666 414.31 75,665,016 6.765 KENTUCKY 712,414,889 1,904,145 374.14 22,308,492 1.995 LOUISIANA 861,650,719 2,002,682 430.25 56,705,280 5.070 MAINE 247,391,696 767,662 322.27 4,959,224 0.443 MARYLAND 859,432,298 3,483,388 246.72 302,590 0.027 MASSACHUSETTS 836,359,735 3,529,151 236.99 0 0.000 MICHIGAN 1,399,521,821 5,105,300 274.13 19,938,091 1.783 MINNESOTA 750,735,484 2,565,929 292.58 32,454,200 2.902 MISSISSIPPI 598,603,587 1,250,753 478.59 31,526,332 2.819 MISSOURI 1,012,022,465 3,081,156 328.46 38,626,040 3.453 MONTANA 196,654,733 480,860 408.96 25,944,105 2.320 NEBRASKA 267,453,890 764,517 349.83 18,576,249 1.661 NEVADA 284,129,386 1,248,633 227.55 5,213,486 0.466 NEW HAMPSHIRE 218,687,054 719,375 304.00 350,676 0.031 NEW JERSEY 1,415,473,749 5,577,359 253.79 0 0.000 NEW MEXICO 329,606,283 909,041 362.59 21,133,231 1.889 NEW YORK 3,066,808,463 10,230,291 299.78 6,963,673 0.623 NORTH CAROLINA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 1.485 INDIANA 892,896,940 3,317,961 269.11 13,936,565 1.246 IOWA 398,092,547 1,468,226 271.14 20,847,145 1.864 KANSAS 532,254,808 1,284,666 414.31 75,665,016 6.765 KENTUCKY 712,414,889 1,904,145 374.14 22,308,492 1.995 LOUISIANA 861,650,719 2,002,682 430.25 56,705,280 5.070 MAINE 247,391,696 767,662 322.27 4,959,224 0.443 MARYLAND 859,432,298 3,483,388 246.72 302,590 0.027 MASSACHUSETTS 836,359,735 3,529,151 236.99 0 0.000 MICHIGAN 1,399,521,821 5,105,300 274.13 19,938,091 1.783 MINNESOTA 750,735,484 2,565,929 292.58 32,454,200 2.902 MISSISSIPPI 598,603,587 1,250,753 478.59 31,526,332 2.819 MISSOURI 1,012,022,465 3,081,156 328.46 38,626,040 3.453 MONTANA 196,654,733 480,860 408.96 25,944,105 2.320 NEBRASKA 267,453,890 764,517 349.83 18,576,249 1.661 NEVADA 284,129,386 1,248,633 227.55 5,213,486 0.466 NEW HAMPSHIRE 218,687,054 719,375 304.00 350,676 0.031 NEW JERSEY 1,415,473,749 5,577,359 253.79 0 0.000 NEW MEXICO 329,606,283 909,041 362.59 21,133,231 1.889 NEW YORK 3,066,808,463 10,230,291 299.78 6,963,673 0.623 NORTH CAROLINA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.txt
  • at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 68.102. MRA Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 24708, para. 48. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10547, para. 63. 47 U.S.C. � 161. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 2.902(a). 47 C.F.R. � 68.3(b)(3). MRA Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 24691, 24707, paras. 10, 45. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 10551-552, para. 74-75. See 47 U.S.C. � 151. See supra n.22. See Part 68 First Report and Order, 56 FCC 2d at 613. See 47 U.S.C. � 161(a). See 47 U.S.C. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-435A1.txt
  • (released May 19, 1986) available through the International Reference Center, FCC, identified in Section 0.453(m) of this Title. 13. Amend � 25.132 by revising paragraph (a) and adding new paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows: � 25.132 Verification of earth station antenna performance standards. (a) All applications for transmitting earth stations must be accompanied by a certificate pursuant to � 2.902 of the chapter from the manufacturer of each antenna that the results of a series of radiation pattern tests performed on representative equipment in representative configurations by the manufacturer demonstrates that the equipment complies with the performance standards set forth in � 25.209. The licensee must be prepared to demonstrate the measurements to the Commission on request. * * *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.txt
  • Order in GEN Docket 89-116, 89-117 and 89-118, 8 FCC Rcd 4236 (1993). A new version, ANSI C63.4-2000, is now available. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.301, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.201(b). See April 16, 2001 letter from Phillip Inglis to the Office of Engineering and Technology. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 2.907 and 2.1033. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.902 and 2.955. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.21. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.105. See May 24, 2001 letter from Intel Corporation on behalf of ITI to the Office of Engineering and Technology. See 47 C.F.R. � 95.401(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 95.627. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1055(a). The type-acceptance procedure was merged with the certification procedure in 1998. See Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1.txt
  • and REC M.1480. ITU-R REC M.1480 (2000), Annex 1. See �� 48-50, supra. See NTIA Report 01-383, The Temporal and Spectral Characteristics of Ultrawideband Signals, January 2001. See, also, Public Notice DA 01-171 (Jan. 24, 2001). Notice at �24. Globalstar Comments at 7. Inmarsat Reply Comments at 6. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.203(g). Verification is defined in 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. Certification is defined in 47 C.F.R. � 2.907. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. � 603. 15 U.S.C. � 632 See 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS Code 513340. Comsat Corporation, Globalstar USA, Honeywell International, Inc., and Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC (``MSVS'') each holds one of the current licenses for 1.6 GHz mobile satellite stations.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1_Erratum.doc
  • and REC M.1480. ITU-R REC M.1480 (2000), Annex 1. See �� 48-50, supra. See NTIA Report 01-383, The Temporal and Spectral Characteristics of Ultrawideband Signals, January 2001. See, also, Public Notice DA 01-171 (Jan. 24, 2001). Notice at �24. Globalstar Comments at 7. Inmarsat Reply Comments at 6. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.203(g). Verification is defined in 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. Certification is defined in 47 C.F.R. � 2.907. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. � 603. 15 U.S.C. � 632 See 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS Code 513340. Comsat Corporation, Globalstar USA, Honeywell International, Inc., and Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC (``MSVS'') each holds one of the current licenses for 1.6 GHz mobile satellite stations.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.txt
  • devices, ultrasonic equipment and induction cooking ranges. The Commission proposed, in the Notice, to expand the applicability of the conducted limits to include all Part 18 consumer devices, including microwave ovens. Verification is a procedure where the manufacturer makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party, as defined in � 2.909, makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. Certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission or its designated entities, based on representations and test data submitted by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-100A1.txt
  • Rcd 24687 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.907. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.948(d). The laboratory must be accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA), the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) or a Designating Authority of a trading partner having a Mutual Recognition Agreement/Arrangement (MRA) with the United States See 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. See description of In-House PLB systems in � 13. Although each computer to be networked must be connected to an In-House PLB module, all In-House PLB modules are similar in functionalities; in most cases, identical In-House modules are used to interconnect. Each module must be authorized through the Equipment authorization program; however, one equipment authorization number covers all identical models.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.txt
  • comments at 3. See Cisco comments at 12. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.201(b). See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 2.907 and 2.1033. See Notice at p. 18216. The proposed frequency cutoff of 490 kHz was selected to avoid possible interference to the marine distress band at 495-505 kHz, and the AM broadcast band at 535-1705 kHz. Id. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.902 and 2.955. See Notice at p. 18216. See AdvaMed comments at 2, Cisco comments at 12, ITI comments at 9, Linear comments at 5, Polhemus comments at 3-4, TIA comments at 6, TRP comments at 5-8, TRP reply comments at 3-6, Uniden comments at 4, and Wacom comments at 1. See Cisco comments at 12, Linear comments at 5, Polhemus
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-198A1.txt
  • Power Television Broadcasting and Television Translators in the National Telecommunications System. 45 F.R. 69178 (1980). 47 C.F.R. � 74.731(f). 47 C.F.R. � 74.750(c). . 47 C.F.R. � 74.750(c). 47 C.F.R. � 74.750(a). The certification procedure is set forth in Sections 2.907 and S2.1031-2.1060 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 2.907 and 2.1031-2.1060; the verification procedure is set forth in Sections 2.902 and 2.951-2.962 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 2.907 and 2.951-2.962. Under the certification procedure, applicants (equipment manufacturers or responsible parties) submit descriptions of equipment, measurement data, and other information to the Commission in an application for grant of equipment authorization. The Commission reviews this submission and, if it finds the device to be in compliance with the applicable rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-283A1.txt
  • an FCC license or order reserving spectrum. 3. Section 25.132 is amended by revising the first sentence of Paragraph (a) to read as follows: �25.132 Verification of earth station antenna performance standards (a) All applications for transmitting earth stations in the C and Ku-bands not subject to the certification requirement in �25.129 must be accompanied by a certificate pursuant to �2.902 of this chapter from the manufacturer of each antenna that the results of a series of radiation pattern tests performed on representative equipment in representative configurations by the manufacturer which demonstrates that the equipment complies with the performance standards set forth in �25.209. * * * * 4. Section 25.135 is amended by revising Paragraphs (c) and (d) to read
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-220A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-220A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-220A1.txt
  • and Arrangements, IB Docket 99-67, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 8903 (2002), Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 24423 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 74.750. The certification procedure is set forth in Sections 2.907 and 2.1031-2.1060 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 2.907 and 2.1031-2.1060; the verification procedure is set forth in Sections 2.902 and 2.951-2.962 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 2.902 and 2.951-2.962. Under the certification procedure, applicants (equipment manufacturers or responsible parties) submit descriptions of equipment, measurement data, and other information to the Commission in an application for grant of equipment authorization. The Commission reviews this submission and, if it finds the device to be in compliance with the applicable rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.txt
  • Rcd 24687 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.907. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.948(d). The laboratory must be accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA), the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) or a Designating Authority of a trading partner having a Mutual Recognition Agreement/Arrangement (MRA) with the United States See 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. See Notice at �44. Id. See comments of Ameren at 10; UPLC at 13; Main.Net at 8; Current Technologies at 24; PPL Telcom at 8; Duke Energy at 13-14; HECO at 5. See e.g., comments of AMA at 9; ARRL at 24; David Garnier; Gary C. Sutcliffe. See comments of ARRL at 23. See comments of NTIA at 14. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.txt
  • application and wait for approval before the equipment can be marketed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 2.907 and 2.1033. Verification requires the manufacturer to have the equipment tested and to retain certain information on file. No application filing is required for verification and the equipment may be sold as soon as it is found to comply. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.902 and 2.955. See Second Report and Order at p. 14756. See ITI petition at 3. See Second Report and Order at p. 14762. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C � 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1966) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-263A1.txt
  • Supplemental Comments (Joint Supplemental Comments) of Sirius and XM Radio, ET Docket No. 98-42 (March 4, 2001), at 9. See Joint Supplemental Comments. See 47 C.F.R. �18.203. Consumer ISM equipment are authorized under either the Declaration of Conformity or Certification procedure prior to use or marketing. Non-consumer ISM equipment are subject to the verification procedure. See also, 47 C.F.R. �� 2.902, 2.906 & 2.907. See 47 C.F.R. �18.305(c). See 47 C.F.R. �18.111. Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-263 Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-XXX Non-Public - For Internal Use only 03/12/2004 c c d � � . C | � � � � � ` @0 ` @0 c �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-39A1.txt
  • such as the Zoom recording devices, be authorized by the Commission prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Verification is a self-authorization procedure where the manufacturer or the importer, in the case of imported equipment, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.902 and 2.909(b). The verification test reports provided by Samson for the MRS-802CD only included tests of the conducted emission limits (prescribed by 47 C.F.R. � 15.107), not the radiated emission limits. Letter from Joseph P. Casey, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Robert J. Ungar, Esq. (September 4, 2003). Letter from Robert J. Ungar, Esq., to Thomas D. Fitz-Gibbon,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-39A1_Erratum.doc
  • such as the Zoom recording devices, be authorized by the Commission prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Verification is a self-authorization procedure where the manufacturer or the importer, in the case of imported equipment, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.902 and 2.909(b). The verification test reports provided by Samson for the MRS-802CD only included tests of the conducted emission limits (prescribed by 47 C.F.R. � 15.107), not the radiated emission limits. Letter from Joseph P. Casey, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Robert J. Ungar, Esq. (September 4, 2003). Letter from Robert J. Ungar, Esq., to Thomas D. Fitz-Gibbon,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.txt
  • Y of this Chapter. * * * * * 9. Amend � 25.132 by revising paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows: � 25.132 Verification of earth station antenna performance standards. (a)(1) All applications for transmitting earth stations, except for earth stations operating in the 20/30 GHz band, must be accompanied by a certificate pursuant to � 2.902 of this chapter from the manufacturer of each antenna that the results of a series of radiation pattern tests performed on representative equipment in representative configurations by the manufacturer demonstrates that the equipment complies with the performance standards set forth in � 25.209. The licensee must be prepared to demonstrate the measurements to the Commission on request. (2) All applications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1_Erratum.doc
  • Y of this Chapter. * * * * * 9. Amend � 25.132 by revising paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows: � 25.132 Verification of earth station antenna performance standards. (a)(1) All applications for transmitting earth stations, except for earth stations operating in the 20/30 GHz band, must be accompanied by a certificate pursuant to � 2.902 of this chapter from the manufacturer of each antenna that the results of a series of radiation pattern tests performed on representative equipment in representative configurations by the manufacturer demonstrates that the equipment complies with the performance standards set forth in � 25.209. The licensee must be prepared to demonstrate the measurements to the Commission on request. (2) All applications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.txt
  • manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. However, unlike the Declaration of Conformity procedure, it does not require that an accredited laboratory make the measurements or that a Declaration of Conformity be supplied with the equipment. 47 C.F.R. � 2.902(a). 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. � 15.101. A Class B digital device is ``a device marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 15.107, 15.109. 47 C.F.R. � 15.19(a)(3). 47 C.F.R. � 15.105(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1203-2.1205. See Letter from Joseph P. Casey, Chief, Spectrum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.txt
  • are ``identical'' in ``electronic design and topology'' to other products. Specifically, Behringer claims that: the V-AMP 2 is identical to the Bass V-AMP; the GMX212 is identical to the GMX1200H; the V-Amp Pro is identical to the BASS V-AMP PRO; and the LX112 is identical to the LX1200H. In support, Behringer provides a comparative analysis of the models. Under Section 2.902(b) of the Rules, a device's equipment verification attaches to all devices the manufacturer or importer subsequently markets that are ``identical'' to the sample tested and verified as compliant with the Commission's applicable technical standards. Under Section 2.908 of the Rules, ``identical'' is defined as ``identical within the variation that can be expected to arise as a result of quantity production
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-209A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-209A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-209A1.txt
  • ``any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radio frequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.3(h) and 15.3(k). 47 C.F.R. � 15.101(a). Verification is a procedure where the manufacturer makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.902(a). 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Letter from Austin Hughes Solutions, Inc. to Mr. Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (September 1, 2006) (``Response'') at Document No.: REF-6001. See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau to Austin Hughes Electronics, Ltd. (June 9, 2006). The LOI was inadvertently addressed to Austin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.txt
  • manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. However, unlike the Declaration of Conformity procedure, it does not require that an accredited laboratory make the measurements or that a Declaration of Conformity be supplied with the equipment. 47 C.F.R. � 2.902(a). 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. � 2.801 defines a radio frequency device as ``any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radio frequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o) defines an intentional radiator as ``[a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.204(d). Modification
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.txt
  • and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999) (``Forfeiture Policy Statement''). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(E). NAL Response at 25. See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5); see also 47 C.F.R. 1.80(d). NAL Response at 25. 47 C.F.R. � 15.101(a). 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. 47 C.F.R. � 2.909(b). See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.901-2.1093. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 15.101(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 15.101-15.123. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.952. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.955. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.956. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.954, 15.19 and 15.21. 47 C.F.R. � 15.101(a); see also Behringer USA, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-84A1.txt
  • on the method used to comply with the mandate. Senate Committee Report to S. 2847 at 3. We note that our existing equipment authorization procedures would be inappropriate here because they are generally used to ensure compliance with RF safety or interference issues, neither of which is relevant to demonstrating compliance with the CALM Act. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 2.902 (verification) and � 2.907 (certification). See, e.g., ATSC A/85 RP Annex H at 61 (stating ``[g]oal is to present to the viewer consistent audio loudness across commercials, programs, and channel changes''). See also, e.g., House Floor Debate of S. 2847 at H7720 (Rep. Eshoo stating that the bill would ``make the volume of commercials and regular programming uniform so consumers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-60A1.txt
  • to implement further reforms to the process that will allow technically compliant devices to reach the marketplace more quickly. See 47 C.F.R. Part 2 Subpart J. See 47 U.S.C. � 302a(a). See 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). See 47 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J, � 2.901, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.907 and 2.962. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.906 and 2.902. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.925-2.926. See Revisions of Parts 2, 15, 18, and 83 of the Rules and Regulations to set up a single system of identification for all devices covered under the equipment authorization program, Report and Order, Docket No. 20790, 70 FCC 2d 2346 (1979). The three-character format is codified in Section 2.926(c) and shown in an example
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.txt
  • at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 68.102. MRA Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 24708, para. 48. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10547, para. 63. 47 U.S.C. � 161. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 2.902(a). 47 C.F.R. � 68.3(b)(3). MRA Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 24691, 24707, paras. 10, 45. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 10551-552, para. 74-75. See 47 U.S.C. � 151. See supra n.22. See Part 68 First Report and Order, 56 FCC 2d at 613. See 47 U.S.C. � 161(a). See 47 U.S.C. �
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-976A1.html
  • verified SpeedCharger actual working units. Id. at SCH000001. 14 47 C.F.R. 15.101(a). 15 The Rules describe verification as ``a procedure where the manufacturer makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. Submittal of a sample unit or representative data to the Commission demonstrating compliance'' is generally not required. 47 C.F.R. 2.902(a). The Rules further provide that the verification attaches to any device the manufacturer subsequently markets that is identical to that which tested complaint with applicable technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. 2.902(b) 16 Interpretation and Amendment of Part 2, Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules Relating to the Marketing if Radiofrequency Devices, 58 FCC 2d 784, 787 15-16 (1976). 17 Matter
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-39A1.html
  • such as the Zoom recording devices, be authorized by the Commission prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. 14 Verification is a self-authorization procedure where the manufacturer or the importer, in the case of imported equipment, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. 2.902 and 2.909(b). 15 The verification test reports provided by Samson for the MRS-802CD only included tests of the conducted emission limits (prescribed by 47 C.F.R. 15.107), not the radiated emission limits. 16 Letter from Joseph P. Casey, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Robert J. Ungar, Esq. (September 4, 2003). 17 Letter from Robert J. Ungar, Esq., to Thomas
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
  • the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. However, unlike the Declaration of Conformity procedure, it does not require that an accredited laboratory make the measurements or that a Declaration of Conformity be supplied with the equipment. 47 C.F.R. 2.902(a). 5 47 C.F.R. 2.803(e)(4). 6 47 C.F.R. 15.101. 7 A Class B digital device is ``a device marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments.'' 47 C.F.R. 15.3(i). 8 47 C.F.R. 15.107, 15.109. 947 C.F.R. 15.19(a)(3). 10 47 C.F.R. 15.105(b). 11 47 C.F.R. 2.1203-2.1205. 12 See Letter from Joseph P. Casey, Chief, Spectrum
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-100A1.html
  • are "identical" in "electronic design and topology" to other products. Specifically, Behringer claims that: the V-AMP 2 is identical to the Bass V-AMP; the GMX212 is identical to the GMX1200H; the V-Amp Pro is identical to the BASS V-AMP PRO; and the LX112 is identical to the LX1200H. In support, Behringer provides a comparative analysis of the models. Under Section 2.902(b) of the Rules, a device's equipment verification attaches to all devices the manufacturer or importer subsequently markets that are "identical" to the sample tested and verified as compliant with the Commission's applicable technical standards. Under Section 2.908 of the Rules, "identical" is defined as "identical within the variation that can be expected to arise as a result of quantity production
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-209A1.html
  • "any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radio frequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means." See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.3(h) and 15.3(k). 47 C.F.R. S: 15.101(a). Verification is a procedure where the manufacturer makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.902(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). Letter from Austin Hughes Solutions, Inc. to Mr. Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (September 1, 2006) ("Response") at Document No.: REF-6001. See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau to Austin Hughes Electronics, Ltd. (June 9, 2006). The LOI was inadvertently addressed to Austin
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-45A1.html
  • manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. However, unlike the Declaration of Conformity procedure, it does not require that an accredited laboratory make the measurements or that a Declaration of Conformity be supplied with the equipment. 47 C.F.R. S 2.902(a). 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. S 2.801 defines a radio frequency device as "any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radio frequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means." 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(o) defines an intentional radiator as "[a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy by radiation or induction." 47 C.F.R. S 15.204(d). Modification
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-109A1.html
  • and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999) ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"). 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E). NAL Response at 25. See 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5); see also 47 C.F.R. 1.80(d). NAL Response at 25. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.101(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.902. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.909(b). See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.901-2.1093. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. S: 15.101(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.101-15.123. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.952. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.955. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.956. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.954, 15.19 and 15.21. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.101(a); see also Behringer USA, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-147A1.html
  • equipment models is ongoing, and therefore is not addressed in this NAL. Id. at 4. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 73.1660(a)(1). Verification is a self-authorization procedure where the manufacturer or the importer, in the case of imported equipment, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.902 and 2.909(b). Id. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 2.955 (describing those verification records required to be maintained by the manufacturer). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Chris Rea, Inter Tech FM (July 10, 2008) ("Second LOI"). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1513A1.html
  • (requiring AM, FM or TV transmitters to be verified for compliance following the procedures describe in Part 2 of the Rules). Verification is a self-authorization procedure where the manufacturer or the importer, in the case of imported equipment, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.902 and 2.909(b). While Inter Tech claims to have marketed these transmitters solely to full power FM stations, Inter Tech admitted that one of these transmitters was "inadvertently" sold to Sidon Video Productions and then resold to a Low Power FM ("LPFM") station located in the United States. First Response at 6. See First Response at 4. See also 47 C.F.R.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-754A1.html
  • equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(z). Section 15.3(i) of the Rules defines "Class B digital device" as "a digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(i). See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.902. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.906. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.107. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.109. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.19. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.105. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1203; see also 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1204, 2.1205. See LOI, supra note 3. See Letter from Clifford M. Harrington and Tony Lin, Counsel for PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. to Nissa Laughner, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00171.doc
  • 203, 204, 221, 206-211, 251. 47 C.F.R. �� 2.906, 2.948. As TIA has pointed out, the similarly named "Supplier's Declaration of Conformity" process established in ISO/IEC Guide 2:1996 does not require accreditation. TIA Ex Parte, Supplemental Comments, filed July 29, 1999, at 18, 19. TIA Comments, filed July 29, 1999, at 3, 7, 8. Id. at 8. 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. ITI Comments, filed August 6, 1999, at 3, 4. We note that the Commission has relied upon certain factors to develop the hierarchy of equipment approvals in Part 15 of our rules, including complexity of equipment, the relative novelty of the technology, history of compliance with technical requirements, and consensus on testing procedures. If the Commission ultimately chooses Option A,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.txt
  • at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 68.102. MRA Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 24708, para. 48. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10547, para. 63. 47 U.S.C. � 161. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 2.902(a). 47 C.F.R. � 68.3(b)(3). MRA Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 24691, 24707, paras. 10, 45. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 10551-552, para. 74-75. See 47 U.S.C. � 151. See supra n.22. See Part 68 First Report and Order, 56 FCC 2d at 613. See 47 U.S.C. � 161(a). See 47 U.S.C. �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.60 2.602.70 2.70 2.702.70 2.70 2.702.70 2.70 2.702.70 2.70 2.702.80 2.80 2.80 19952.40 2.40 2.402.40 2.40 2.402.50 2.50 2.502.60 2.60 2.602.70 2.70 2.702.70 2.70 2.702.70 2.70 2.702.70 2.70 2.702.80 2.80 2.80 19962.60 2.60 2.602.80 2.70 2.702.80 2.80 2.802.80 2.80 2.802.90 2.80 2.903.00 2.90 2.903.00 2.90 3.003.00 2.90 3.003.10 3.10 3.10 19972.80 2.60 2.602.80 2.60 2.802.80 2.60 2.802.80 2.60 2.802.80 2.90 2.902.80 2.90 3.002.80 2.90 3.002.80 2.90 3.002.80 2.90 3.10 19982.80 2.60 2.502.80 2.60 2.502.80 2.60 2.502.80 2.60 2.502.80 2.90 2.502.80 2.90 2.502.80 2.90 2.502.80 2.90 2.502.80 2.90 2.50 19992.60 2.60 2.602.60 2.60 2.802.60 2.60 2.802.60 2.60 2.802.60 2.90 2.902.60 2.90 3.002.60 2.90 3.002.60 2.90 3.002.60 2.90 3.10 20002.95 3.00 2.802.95 3.00 3.002.95 3.00 3.002.95 3.00 3.202.95 3.00 3.202.95 3.00 3.302.95 3.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 2.60 2.602.70 2.70 2.702.70 2.70 2.702.70 2.70 2.702.70 2.70 2.702.80 2.80 2.80 19952.40 2.40 2.402.40 2.40 2.402.50 2.50 2.502.60 2.60 2.602.70 2.70 2.702.70 2.70 2.702.70 2.70 2.702.70 2.70 2.702.80 2.80 2.80 19962.60 2.60 2.602.80 2.70 2.702.80 2.80 2.802.80 2.80 2.802.90 2.80 2.903.00 2.90 2.903.00 2.90 3.003.00 2.90 3.003.10 3.10 3.10 19972.80 2.60 2.602.80 2.60 2.802.80 2.60 2.802.80 2.60 2.802.80 2.90 2.902.80 2.90 3.002.80 2.90 3.002.80 2.90 3.002.80 2.90 3.10 19982.80 2.60 2.502.80 2.60 2.502.80 2.60 2.502.80 2.60 2.502.80 2.90 2.502.80 2.90 2.502.80 2.90 2.502.80 2.90 2.502.80 2.90 2.50 19992.60 2.60 2.602.60 2.60 2.802.60 2.60 2.802.60 2.60 2.802.60 2.90 2.902.60 2.90 3.002.60 2.90 3.002.60 2.90 3.002.60 2.90 3.10 20002.95 3.00 2.802.95 3.00 3.002.95 3.00 3.002.95 3.00 3.202.95 3.00 3.202.95 3.00 3.302.95 3.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/fcc97218.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/fcc97218.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/fcc97218.txt
  • which the Multipoint Distribution Service is licensed. See Rand McNally 1992 Commercial Atlas and Marketing Guide, 123rd Edition, pp. 36-39. 13 C.F.R. ( 120.121, SIC Code 4812. 47 C.F.R. (( 2.905, 2.1001. 13 C.F.R. ( 121.201, SIC Code 4812. 13 C.F.R. ( 121.201, SIC Code 4812. 47 C.F.R. ( 2.904. 13 C.F.R. ( 121.201, SIC Code 4812. 47 C.F.R. ( 2.902. 47 C.F.R. ( 2.906. See also Amendment of Parts 2 and 15 of the Commission's Rules to Deregulate the Equipment Authorization Requirements for Digital Devices in ET Docket No. 95-19, released May 14, 1996. 13 C.F.R. ( 121.201, SIC Code 4812. Federal Communications Commission. CCB industry Analysis Division, Telecommunication Industry Revenue: TRS Worksheet Data, Tbl. 1 (Average Total Telecommunication Revenue
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-976A1.html
  • verified SpeedCharger actual working units. Id. at SCH000001. 14 47 C.F.R. 15.101(a). 15 The Rules describe verification as ``a procedure where the manufacturer makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. Submittal of a sample unit or representative data to the Commission demonstrating compliance'' is generally not required. 47 C.F.R. 2.902(a). The Rules further provide that the verification attaches to any device the manufacturer subsequently markets that is identical to that which tested complaint with applicable technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. 2.902(b) 16 Interpretation and Amendment of Part 2, Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules Relating to the Marketing if Radiofrequency Devices, 58 FCC 2d 784, 787 15-16 (1976). 17 Matter
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-39A1.html
  • such as the Zoom recording devices, be authorized by the Commission prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. 14 Verification is a self-authorization procedure where the manufacturer or the importer, in the case of imported equipment, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. 2.902 and 2.909(b). 15 The verification test reports provided by Samson for the MRS-802CD only included tests of the conducted emission limits (prescribed by 47 C.F.R. 15.107), not the radiated emission limits. 16 Letter from Joseph P. Casey, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Robert J. Ungar, Esq. (September 4, 2003). 17 Letter from Robert J. Ungar, Esq., to Thomas
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
  • the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. However, unlike the Declaration of Conformity procedure, it does not require that an accredited laboratory make the measurements or that a Declaration of Conformity be supplied with the equipment. 47 C.F.R. 2.902(a). 5 47 C.F.R. 2.803(e)(4). 6 47 C.F.R. 15.101. 7 A Class B digital device is ``a device marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments.'' 47 C.F.R. 15.3(i). 8 47 C.F.R. 15.107, 15.109. 947 C.F.R. 15.19(a)(3). 10 47 C.F.R. 15.105(b). 11 47 C.F.R. 2.1203-2.1205. 12 See Letter from Joseph P. Casey, Chief, Spectrum
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-100A1.html
  • are "identical" in "electronic design and topology" to other products. Specifically, Behringer claims that: the V-AMP 2 is identical to the Bass V-AMP; the GMX212 is identical to the GMX1200H; the V-Amp Pro is identical to the BASS V-AMP PRO; and the LX112 is identical to the LX1200H. In support, Behringer provides a comparative analysis of the models. Under Section 2.902(b) of the Rules, a device's equipment verification attaches to all devices the manufacturer or importer subsequently markets that are "identical" to the sample tested and verified as compliant with the Commission's applicable technical standards. Under Section 2.908 of the Rules, "identical" is defined as "identical within the variation that can be expected to arise as a result of quantity production
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-209A1.html
  • "any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radio frequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means." See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.3(h) and 15.3(k). 47 C.F.R. S: 15.101(a). Verification is a procedure where the manufacturer makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.902(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). Letter from Austin Hughes Solutions, Inc. to Mr. Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (September 1, 2006) ("Response") at Document No.: REF-6001. See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau to Austin Hughes Electronics, Ltd. (June 9, 2006). The LOI was inadvertently addressed to Austin
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-45A1.html
  • manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. However, unlike the Declaration of Conformity procedure, it does not require that an accredited laboratory make the measurements or that a Declaration of Conformity be supplied with the equipment. 47 C.F.R. S 2.902(a). 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. S 2.801 defines a radio frequency device as "any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radio frequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means." 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(o) defines an intentional radiator as "[a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy by radiation or induction." 47 C.F.R. S 15.204(d). Modification
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-754A1.html
  • equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(z). Section 15.3(i) of the Rules defines "Class B digital device" as "a digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(i). See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.902. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.906. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.107. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.109. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.19. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.105. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1203; see also 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1204, 2.1205. See LOI, supra note 3. See Letter from Clifford M. Harrington and Tony Lin, Counsel for PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. to Nissa Laughner, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau,