FCC Web Documents citing 2.1077
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.pdf
- Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to DreamBox USA (April 19, 2006). Letter from Carl W. Struckmeyer to Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (May 13, 2006). See Sections 2.907, 2.911 and 2.913 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.907, 2.911, and 2.913. See Sections 2.906, 2.909 and 2.1071 through 2.1077 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.§§ 2.906, 2.909, and 2.1071 through 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to One-O-One iSolutions, Inc. (October 2, 2006). Letter from Christoph Goeltner, to Gabriel Collazo, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (November 5, 2006). See Section 1.80(b)(3) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. §
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.pdf
- Date 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105. A Class B digital device is ``[a] digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments.'' 47 C.F.R. § 15.3(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803(a), 2.1077, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105. A Class B digital device is ``[a] digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments.'' 47 C.F.R. § 15.3(i). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Mr. Hal Reisiger, President, Enhanced Vision (September 30, 2009)
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.pdf
- that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. § 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. § 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. § 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. However, unlike the Declaration of Conformity procedure, it does not require that an accredited laboratory make the measurements or that a Declaration of Conformity be
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3189A1.txt
- this NAL, we need not address VIA's request for confidential treatment of certain other information included in its LOI response. A Declaration of Conformity is an equipment authorization procedure where the responsible party makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with applicable technical standards. 47 C.F.R. § 2.906. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1071 to 2.1077. 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.107(a) and 15.109(a). VIA stated that BIOS is the firmware that controls the basic functions of the board. 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a). 47 C.F.R. § 2.906(b). Under Section 2.907 of the Rules, the term ``identical'' means identical within the variation that can be expected to arise as a result of quantity production techniques. 47 C.F.R. § 2.907.
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
- equipment authorization requirements for personal computers with those used in other parts of the world. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302, 303, 307. Section Number and Title: 2.906 Declaration of Conformity. 2.909 Responsible Party. 2.1071 Cross Reference. 2.1072 Limitation on Declaration of Conformity. 2.1073 Responsibilities. 2.1074 Identification. 2.1075 Retention of Records. 2.1076 FCC inspection and submission of equipment for testing. 2.1077 Compliance information. PART 15-RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICES SUBPART A-GENERAL Brief Description: These rules specify the testing and labeling requirements for the ``Declaration of Conformity'' (DoC) procedure which permits these devices to be authorized based on a manufacturer's or supplier's declaration that the computer product conforms with all FCC requirements. Need: The streamlined DoC equipment authorization procedure saves industry a significant amount
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2497A1.txt
- that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. § 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. § 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. § 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to iBuypower, Inc. (May 22, 2006). Letter from Darren Su, Vice President, American Future Technology Corporation dba iBuypower, to Neal McNeil, Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau. If a product must be tested and authorized under a DoC, the responsible party must ensure that all dissimilar models of the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.txt
- Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to DreamBox USA (April 19, 2006). Letter from Carl W. Struckmeyer to Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (May 13, 2006). See Sections 2.907, 2.911 and 2.913 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.907, 2.911, and 2.913. See Sections 2.906, 2.909 and 2.1071 through 2.1077 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.§§ 2.906, 2.909, and 2.1071 through 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to One-O-One iSolutions, Inc. (October 2, 2006). Letter from Christoph Goeltner, to Gabriel Collazo, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (November 5, 2006). See Section 1.80(b)(3) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. §
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.txt
- Date 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105. A Class B digital device is ``[a] digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments.'' 47 C.F.R. § 15.3(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803(a), 2.1077, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105. A Class B digital device is ``[a] digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments.'' 47 C.F.R. § 15.3(i). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Mr. Hal Reisiger, President, Enhanced Vision (September 30, 2009)
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.txt
- a Wireless Medical Telemetry Service, ET Docket No. 99-255, Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd. 11,206 (2000). , supra. AMPTP reply comments at 2; AMPTP Petition at 5. AMPTP Petition at 5. , supra for our proposals regarding the TV BAS emission mask. 47 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J. 47 C.F.R. § 2.952. Id. 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1073, 2.1074, and 2.1077 AMPTP Petition at 4. 47 C.F.R. § 73.683. 47 C.F.R. § 74.861(e)(1). supra. The 250 milliwatts proposed for WAVDs is 7 dB more than the 50 milliwatts allowed for wireless microphones in the VHF-TV band. 47 C.F.R. § 74.861(e)(5). An NTSC television signal contains a picture carrier at 1.25 MHz from the lower band edge, a chrominance subcarrier at 3.579545
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.txt
- may enter into agreements with the manufacturer or importer to become the responsible party. If equipment is modified by a party other than the responsible party, the party performing the modification becomes responsible for the compliance of the equipment. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.909(c). See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1071, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.19. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1077. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1077(b). See Notice at p. 18215. Id.. Id. Id. See CEA comments at 4, Cisco comments at 6-7, IBM comments at 1, ITI comments at 2, Motorola comments at 2-3, Shure comments at 3, Uniden comments at 4, and TIA comments at 4. See CEA comments at 4, Cisco comments at 6 and Motorola comments at
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.txt
- Internet access. These rule changes applied to information statements required by Sections 15.21, 15.27(a) and 15.105(e) of the rules. In their petitions, Cisco and ITI note that the rule changes adopted in the Second Report and Order that allow information statements to be supplied in alternative forms do not apply to the compliance information statements that are required by Section 2.1077 to be supplied with equipment authorized under the DoC procedure. Cisco states that the omission of Section 2.1077 from the same treatment of other information was not recognized by the industry during the filing of comments during the FCC proceeding. It states that in reviewing the requirements and comparing the various types of information, it cannot identify any good reason
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.txt
- that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. § 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. § 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. § 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. However, unlike the Declaration of Conformity procedure, it does not require that an accredited laboratory make the measurements or that a Declaration of Conformity be
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.txt
- ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.906(a). Under the DOC procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the DOC listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1077. The DOC procedure may be used only for certain types of unintentional radiators. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.101. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(6). See, e.g., Globcom, Inc. d/b/a Globcom Global Communications, 18 FCC Rcd 19893, 19903 ¶ 23 (2003), rev. pending; Roadrunner Transportation, Inc., 15 FCC Rcd 9669, 9671-71 ¶ 8 (2000); Cate Communications Corp., 60 RR 2d 1386, 1388 ¶
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.txt
- that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. § 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. § 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. § 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. However, unlike the Declaration of Conformity procedure, it does not require that an accredited laboratory make the measurements or that a Declaration of Conformity be
- http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3189A1.html
- of this NAL, we need not address VIA's request for confidential treatment of certain other information included in its LOI response. 8 A Declaration of Conformity is an equipment authorization procedure where the responsible party makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with applicable technical standards. 47 C.F.R. 2.906. See 47 C.F.R. 2.1071 to 2.1077. 9 47 C.F.R. 15.107(a) and 15.109(a). 10 VIA stated that BIOS is the firmware that controls the basic functions of the board. 11 47 C.F.R. 15.101(a). 12 47 C.F.R. 2.906(b). 13 Under Section 2.907 of the Rules, the term ``identical'' means identical within the variation that can be expected to arise as a result of quantity production techniques. 47 C.F.R.
- http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2497A1.html
- that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to iBuypower, Inc. (May 22, 2006). Letter from Darren Su, Vice President, American Future Technology Corporation dba iBuypower, to Neal McNeil, Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau. If a product must be tested and authorized under a DoC, the responsible party must ensure that all dissimilar models of the
- http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
- to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC- accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. However, unlike the Declaration of Conformity procedure, it does not require that an accredited laboratory make the measurements or that a Declaration of Conformity be
- http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-30A1.html
- ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the DOC procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the DOC listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. The DOC procedure may be used only for certain types of unintentional radiators. See 47 C.F.R. S 15.101. 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(6). See, e.g., Globcom, Inc. d/b/a Globcom Global Communications, 18 FCC Rcd 19893, 19903 P 23 (2003), rev. pending; Roadrunner Transportation, Inc., 15 FCC Rcd 9669, 9671-71 P 8 (2000); Cate Communications Corp., 60 RR 2d 1386, 1388 P
- http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-321A1.html
- Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to DreamBox USA (April 19, 2006). Letter from Carl W. Struckmeyer to Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (May 13, 2006). See Sections 2.907, 2.911 and 2.913 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. SS 2.907, 2.911, and 2.913. See Sections 2.906, 2.909 and 2.1071 through 2.1077 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.SS 2.906, 2.909, and 2.1071 through 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to One-O-One iSolutions, Inc. (October 2, 2006). Letter from Christoph Goeltner, to Gabriel Collazo, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (November 5, 2006). See Section 1.80(b)(3) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S
- http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-45A1.html
- that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. However, unlike the Declaration of Conformity procedure, it does not require that an accredited laboratory make the measurements or that a Declaration of Conformity be
- http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-521A1.html
- Date 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105. A Class B digital device is "[a] digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803(a), 2.1077, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105. A Class B digital device is "[a] digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(i). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Mr. Hal Reisiger, President, Enhanced Vision (September 30, 2009)
- http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3189A1.html
- of this NAL, we need not address VIA's request for confidential treatment of certain other information included in its LOI response. 8 A Declaration of Conformity is an equipment authorization procedure where the responsible party makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with applicable technical standards. 47 C.F.R. 2.906. See 47 C.F.R. 2.1071 to 2.1077. 9 47 C.F.R. 15.107(a) and 15.109(a). 10 VIA stated that BIOS is the firmware that controls the basic functions of the board. 11 47 C.F.R. 15.101(a). 12 47 C.F.R. 2.906(b). 13 Under Section 2.907 of the Rules, the term ``identical'' means identical within the variation that can be expected to arise as a result of quantity production techniques. 47 C.F.R.
- http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2497A1.html
- that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to iBuypower, Inc. (May 22, 2006). Letter from Darren Su, Vice President, American Future Technology Corporation dba iBuypower, to Neal McNeil, Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau. If a product must be tested and authorized under a DoC, the responsible party must ensure that all dissimilar models of the
- http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
- to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC- accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. However, unlike the Declaration of Conformity procedure, it does not require that an accredited laboratory make the measurements or that a Declaration of Conformity be
- http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-30A1.html
- ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the DOC procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the DOC listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. The DOC procedure may be used only for certain types of unintentional radiators. See 47 C.F.R. S 15.101. 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(6). See, e.g., Globcom, Inc. d/b/a Globcom Global Communications, 18 FCC Rcd 19893, 19903 P 23 (2003), rev. pending; Roadrunner Transportation, Inc., 15 FCC Rcd 9669, 9671-71 P 8 (2000); Cate Communications Corp., 60 RR 2d 1386, 1388 P
- http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-321A1.html
- Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to DreamBox USA (April 19, 2006). Letter from Carl W. Struckmeyer to Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (May 13, 2006). See Sections 2.907, 2.911 and 2.913 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. SS 2.907, 2.911, and 2.913. See Sections 2.906, 2.909 and 2.1071 through 2.1077 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.SS 2.906, 2.909, and 2.1071 through 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to One-O-One iSolutions, Inc. (October 2, 2006). Letter from Christoph Goeltner, to Gabriel Collazo, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (November 5, 2006). See Section 1.80(b)(3) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S
- http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-45A1.html
- that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer, makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. However, unlike the Declaration of Conformity procedure, it does not require that an accredited laboratory make the measurements or that a Declaration of Conformity be
- http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-521A1.html
- Date 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105. A Class B digital device is "[a] digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803(a), 2.1077, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105. A Class B digital device is "[a] digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(i). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Mr. Hal Reisiger, President, Enhanced Vision (September 30, 2009)