FCC Web Documents citing 2.1071

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.pdf
  • S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to DreamBox USA (April 19, 2006). Letter from Carl W. Struckmeyer to Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (May 13, 2006). See Sections 2.907, 2.911 and 2.913 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.907, 2.911, and 2.913. See Sections 2.906, 2.909 and 2.1071 through 2.1077 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.§§ 2.906, 2.909, and 2.1071 through 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to One-O-One iSolutions, Inc. (October 2, 2006). Letter from Christoph Goeltner, to Gabriel Collazo, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (November 5, 2006). See Section 1.80(b)(3) of the Rules, 47
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2437A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2437A1.pdf
  • 15.101(a) of the Rules, unintentional radiators that function as digital computer peripherals, and are marketed for use in a residential environment or for use by the general public, such as XLNT Idea's Nexis 100AP AutoPrinter, Nexis 100AP Publisher, and Xi440 CD/DVD Printer, are required to be approved prior to marketing through either the Declaration of Conformity procedures described in Sections 2.1071-2.1077 of the Rules, or by the Certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031-2.1060 of the Rules. In addition, unintentional radiators are required to comply with the conducted and radiated emissions specified in Sections 15.107 and 15.109 of the Rules. As the manufacturer, XLNT Idea is the party responsible for assuring that these devices are compliant with all applicable technical and administrative
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.pdf
  • should be a much easier task for both.'' Id. See Waiver Order at paras. 1 and 11. See Sage Comments at 12 (proposing that ``[i]f FEMA updates the technical standards, requiring changes to its conformance test, the manufacturer must retake the conformity test, and resubmit the resulting new SDoC as an update to its certification documentation''). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1071-2.1077. Sage Comments at 11. See also TFT Reply Comments at 3 (``Even though a unit that only receives CAP messages and does not decode or encode EAS protocol messages might be utilized by an EAS Participant, TFT agrees with Sage that such devices must be tested for compliance with CAP.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1043. See id. See, e.g., 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2253A1.txt
  • they contemplate a connection to a personal computer via a USB port or other connection. This connection places the device into the category of a Class B personal computer peripheral, and under Sections 15.101, 2.803, and 2.1204 of the Commission's rules (47 C.F.R. §§ 15.101, 2.803, 2.1204) the device must either be authorized under the Declaration of Conformity procedures (Sections 2.1071-1077) or certification procedures (Sections 2.1031 et al), All digital devices are subject to the same emissions limits, however, different approval processes have been established based on the complexity of testing required to conform with the rules. Since the emission limits are the same irrespective of the manner of authorization, devices properly verified prior to the date of this Public Notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3189A1.txt
  • purposes of this NAL, we need not address VIA's request for confidential treatment of certain other information included in its LOI response. A Declaration of Conformity is an equipment authorization procedure where the responsible party makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with applicable technical standards. 47 C.F.R. § 2.906. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1071 to 2.1077. 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.107(a) and 15.109(a). VIA stated that BIOS is the firmware that controls the basic functions of the board. 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a). 47 C.F.R. § 2.906(b). Under Section 2.907 of the Rules, the term ``identical'' means identical within the variation that can be expected to arise as a result of quantity production techniques. 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • obtain FCC approval before marketing new personal computer products and thus allow such products to reach the marketplace more quickly. These rules all align the FCC's equipment authorization requirements for personal computers with those used in other parts of the world. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302, 303, 307. Section Number and Title: 2.906 Declaration of Conformity. 2.909 Responsible Party. 2.1071 Cross Reference. 2.1072 Limitation on Declaration of Conformity. 2.1073 Responsibilities. 2.1074 Identification. 2.1075 Retention of Records. 2.1076 FCC inspection and submission of equipment for testing. 2.1077 Compliance information. PART 15-RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICES SUBPART A-GENERAL Brief Description: These rules specify the testing and labeling requirements for the ``Declaration of Conformity'' (DoC) procedure which permits these devices to be authorized based on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.txt
  • S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to DreamBox USA (April 19, 2006). Letter from Carl W. Struckmeyer to Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (May 13, 2006). See Sections 2.907, 2.911 and 2.913 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.907, 2.911, and 2.913. See Sections 2.906, 2.909 and 2.1071 through 2.1077 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.§§ 2.906, 2.909, and 2.1071 through 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to One-O-One iSolutions, Inc. (October 2, 2006). Letter from Christoph Goeltner, to Gabriel Collazo, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (November 5, 2006). See Section 1.80(b)(3) of the Rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2437A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2437A1.txt
  • 15.101(a) of the Rules, unintentional radiators that function as digital computer peripherals, and are marketed for use in a residential environment or for use by the general public, such as XLNT Idea's Nexis 100AP AutoPrinter, Nexis 100AP Publisher, and Xi440 CD/DVD Printer, are required to be approved prior to marketing through either the Declaration of Conformity procedures described in Sections 2.1071-2.1077 of the Rules, or by the Certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031-2.1060 of the Rules. In addition, unintentional radiators are required to comply with the conducted and radiated emissions specified in Sections 15.107 and 15.109 of the Rules. As the manufacturer, XLNT Idea is the party responsible for assuring that these devices are compliant with all applicable technical and administrative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-264A1.txt
  • comments at 4. See Nortel comments at 3-4. Declaration of Conformity (DoC) is a self-approval process in which the manufacturer has the equipment tested for compliance at an accredited laboratory. The equipment may be marketed as soon as it is found to be compliant without the need to file an application and wait for an approval. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1071 et. seq. See AirNet comments at 4. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1033. Any changes to a radio would have to ensure it remains consistent with the Commission's operating and service rules, e.g., eligibility, authorized frequency bands and power levels. We specifically note that we are not proposing to change Sections 80.203 and 90.203 concerning the programmability of frequencies by the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.txt
  • average limit, which corresponds to a factor of 10. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.35(b). The 420-450 MHz band is allocated primarily to government radiolocation in the United States. In addition, it is allocated on a secondary basis to the Amateur Radio Service under Part 97, and to the Private Land Mobile Radio Service under Part 90. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1071, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.19. The Telecommunication Industry Association (TIA) recommends that the Commission establish an additional simplified DoC label for equipment if the use is other than home or office. See TIA comments at 6 filed in response to The 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review Report. Computers assembled from tested components tend to be desktop or tower designs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.txt
  • normally the responsible party for equipment authorized under the DoC procedures. Retailers may enter into agreements with the manufacturer or importer to become the responsible party. If equipment is modified by a party other than the responsible party, the party performing the modification becomes responsible for the compliance of the equipment. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.909(c). See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1071, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.19. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1077. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1077(b). See Notice at p. 18215. Id.. Id. Id. See CEA comments at 4, Cisco comments at 6-7, IBM comments at 1, ITI comments at 2, Motorola comments at 2-3, Shure comments at 3, Uniden comments at 4, and TIA comments at 4. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.txt
  • should be a much easier task for both.'' Id. See Waiver Order at paras. 1 and 11. See Sage Comments at 12 (proposing that ``[i]f FEMA updates the technical standards, requiring changes to its conformance test, the manufacturer must retake the conformity test, and resubmit the resulting new SDoC as an update to its certification documentation''). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1071-2.1077. Sage Comments at 11. See also TFT Reply Comments at 3 (``Even though a unit that only receives CAP messages and does not decode or encode EAS protocol messages might be utilized by an EAS Participant, TFT agrees with Sage that such devices must be tested for compliance with CAP.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1043. See id. See, e.g., 47
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01264.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01264.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01264.txt
  • comments at 4. See Nortel comments at 3-4. Declaration of Conformity (DoC) is a self-approval process in which the manufacturer has the equipment tested for compliance at an accredited laboratory. The equipment may be marketed as soon as it is found to be compliant without the need to file an application and wait for an approval. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1071 et. seq. See AirNet comments at 4. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1033. Any changes to a radio would have to ensure it remains consistent with the Commission's operating and service rules, e.g., eligibility, authorized frequency bands and power levels. We specifically note that we are not proposing to change Sections 80.203 and 90.203 concerning the programmability of frequencies by the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3189A1.html
  • For purposes of this NAL, we need not address VIA's request for confidential treatment of certain other information included in its LOI response. 8 A Declaration of Conformity is an equipment authorization procedure where the responsible party makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with applicable technical standards. 47 C.F.R. 2.906. See 47 C.F.R. 2.1071 to 2.1077. 9 47 C.F.R. 15.107(a) and 15.109(a). 10 VIA stated that BIOS is the firmware that controls the basic functions of the board. 11 47 C.F.R. 15.101(a). 12 47 C.F.R. 2.906(b). 13 Under Section 2.907 of the Rules, the term ``identical'' means identical within the variation that can be expected to arise as a result of quantity production techniques.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-321A1.html
  • S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to DreamBox USA (April 19, 2006). Letter from Carl W. Struckmeyer to Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (May 13, 2006). See Sections 2.907, 2.911 and 2.913 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. SS 2.907, 2.911, and 2.913. See Sections 2.906, 2.909 and 2.1071 through 2.1077 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.SS 2.906, 2.909, and 2.1071 through 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to One-O-One iSolutions, Inc. (October 2, 2006). Letter from Christoph Goeltner, to Gabriel Collazo, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (November 5, 2006). See Section 1.80(b)(3) of the Rules, 47
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2437A1.html
  • 15.101(a) of the Rules, unintentional radiators that function as digital computer peripherals, and are marketed for use in a residential environment or for use by the general public, such as XLNT Idea's Nexis 100AP AutoPrinter, Nexis 100AP Publisher, and Xi440 CD/DVD Printer, are required to be approved prior to marketing through either the Declaration of Conformity procedures described in Sections 2.1071-2.1077 of the Rules, or by the Certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031-2.1060 of the Rules. In addition, unintentional radiators are required to comply with the conducted and radiated emissions specified in Sections 15.107 and 15.109 of the Rules. As the manufacturer, XLNT Idea is the party responsible for assuring that these devices are compliant with all applicable technical and administrative
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01264.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01264.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01264.txt
  • comments at 4. See Nortel comments at 3-4. Declaration of Conformity (DoC) is a self-approval process in which the manufacturer has the equipment tested for compliance at an accredited laboratory. The equipment may be marketed as soon as it is found to be compliant without the need to file an application and wait for an approval. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1071 et. seq. See AirNet comments at 4. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1033. Any changes to a radio would have to ensure it remains consistent with the Commission's operating and service rules, e.g., eligibility, authorized frequency bands and power levels. We specifically note that we are not proposing to change Sections 80.203 and 90.203 concerning the programmability of frequencies by the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3189A1.html
  • For purposes of this NAL, we need not address VIA's request for confidential treatment of certain other information included in its LOI response. 8 A Declaration of Conformity is an equipment authorization procedure where the responsible party makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with applicable technical standards. 47 C.F.R. 2.906. See 47 C.F.R. 2.1071 to 2.1077. 9 47 C.F.R. 15.107(a) and 15.109(a). 10 VIA stated that BIOS is the firmware that controls the basic functions of the board. 11 47 C.F.R. 15.101(a). 12 47 C.F.R. 2.906(b). 13 Under Section 2.907 of the Rules, the term ``identical'' means identical within the variation that can be expected to arise as a result of quantity production techniques.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-321A1.html
  • S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to DreamBox USA (April 19, 2006). Letter from Carl W. Struckmeyer to Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (May 13, 2006). See Sections 2.907, 2.911 and 2.913 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. SS 2.907, 2.911, and 2.913. See Sections 2.906, 2.909 and 2.1071 through 2.1077 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.SS 2.906, 2.909, and 2.1071 through 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to One-O-One iSolutions, Inc. (October 2, 2006). Letter from Christoph Goeltner, to Gabriel Collazo, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (November 5, 2006). See Section 1.80(b)(3) of the Rules, 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2437A1.html
  • 15.101(a) of the Rules, unintentional radiators that function as digital computer peripherals, and are marketed for use in a residential environment or for use by the general public, such as XLNT Idea's Nexis 100AP AutoPrinter, Nexis 100AP Publisher, and Xi440 CD/DVD Printer, are required to be approved prior to marketing through either the Declaration of Conformity procedures described in Sections 2.1071-2.1077 of the Rules, or by the Certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031-2.1060 of the Rules. In addition, unintentional radiators are required to comply with the conducted and radiated emissions specified in Sections 15.107 and 15.109 of the Rules. As the manufacturer, XLNT Idea is the party responsible for assuring that these devices are compliant with all applicable technical and administrative