FCC Web Documents citing 2.1060

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1760A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1760A1.pdf
  • of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom 10, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Division subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom 10. The advertisement describes the CellCom 10 as ``revolutionary'' and exhorts readers to ``join the revolution.'' Section 2.803(c) of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.pdf
  • from measuring the speed of the users' vehicles. The Division preliminarily determined that at least two of the models, the RMR-S201 (also known as the Phazer II) and the RMR-C450 jammers, were intentional radiators, devices which are generally required under Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Division also concluded, however, that the devices under investigation were apparently not eligible to receive a grant of certification because their intended purpose is to interfere with a licensed radio service, a violation of Section 333 of the Act. On August 9, 2005, the Division sent RMR a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') seeking further information with
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1031A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1031A1.pdf
  • by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As intentional radiators, wireless microphones are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Sennheiser admits that it manufactured and sold units of a wireless microphone in the United States within the past year. Sennheiser further admits that the device was not certified prior to marketing in the United States. Accordingly, we find that Sennheiser apparently marketed uncertified radio frequency devices in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.pdf
  • for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as audio/video transmitters, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Iftron admits that from June 2006, when it first manufactured the device, to July of 2008, it manufactured and marketed units of the Stinger Pro that were capable of transmitting on 2.468 GHz. Although amateur radio equipment is not required to be certified, the Stinger Pro, as sold in the United States prior to July 2008, was
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1535A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1535A1.pdf
  • the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As intentional radiators, wireless video transmitters are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. LawMate admits that it manufactured and sold units of two of its wireless video transmitters in the United States within the past year. LawMate further admits that the devices were not certified prior to marketing in the United States. Accordingly, we find that LawMate apparently marketed uncertified radio frequency devices in willful and repeated violation of Section
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.pdf
  • advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as audio/video transmitters, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. In your LOI response, you admit that the two devices operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Specifically, the 2.4 GHz device is capable of operating on 2370 MHz, 2390 MHz, and 2490 MHz, and the 900 MHz device is capable of operating on 980
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.pdf
  • the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter .... Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics, emissions from
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.pdf
  • the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter .... Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics, emissions from
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2303A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2303A1.pdf
  • the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by §2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. As an intentional radiator, the WH Transmitter is required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing in accordance with the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. In addition, because the WH Transmitter operates in the 106.7-107.9 MHz frequency band, it is subject to the emission limit specified in Section 15.239(b) of the Rules, which provides: The field strength of any emissions within the permitted 200 kHz band shall not exceed 250 microvolts/meter at 3 meters. The emission limit in this paragraph is based
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.pdf
  • with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics, emissions from
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.pdf
  • advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Pursuant to Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators such as audio/video transmitters must be authorized in accordance with the Commission's certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to the initiation of marketing in the U.S. It does not appear, however, that the above-cited devices are capable of receiving a grant of certification. In your LOI response, you indicate that the video transmitters operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, because these devices are capable of operating on
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-253A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-253A1.pdf
  • (``Macally''). In its July 17, 2008, response to the LOI, Macally identified Power 7 as the manufacturer of the FM Cup Transmitter from April 2007 to the present. As an intentional radiator, the FM Cup Transmitter was required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Commission records indicate that Power 7 did not obtain an equipment certification for the FM Cup Transmitter until July 11, 2008. By LOI dated July 29, 2008, the Division initiated an investigation into whether Power 7 marketed an unauthorized radio frequency device -- specifically, the FM Cup Transmitter -- in the United States. In its response, Power
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.pdf
  • or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. However, the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera operate on 1.2 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Therefore, these devices do not comply with the FCC's technical standards and cannot be certified or marketed within the United States. Accordingly, it appears Spy Camera
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1088A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1088A1.pdf
  • in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless remote control transmitters marketed by USA Shutter, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. USA Shutter admits that it marketed five models of uncertified remote control transmitters. Accordingly, it appears USA Shutter has violated Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.201 of the Rules by marketing in the United States wireless remote control transmitter devices prior to obtaining certification. If, after
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.pdf
  • 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules, a radio frequency device may not be marketed within the United States unless the device complies with the applicable technical and administrative provisions of the Rules. Section 15.201 of the Rules requires intentional radiators to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Radio frequency devices must also comply with all applicable identification and labeling requirements prior to marketing. On August 18, 2009, the Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry to Qomo. The LOI directed Qomo to respond to a series of questions regarding the advertising, sale, importation, and labeling of certain of its radio frequency response systems. Qomo responded
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.pdf
  • to this section.'' Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibits the marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with all applicable administrative, technical, labeling and identification requirements. Ordinarily, intentional radiators must be authorized in accordance with the certification procedures set forth in Section 2.1031 through Section 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing in the United States. Section 2.803(g) of the Rules, however, provides in pertinent part: [R]adio frequency devices that could not be authorized or legally operated under the current rules ... shall not be operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.pdf
  • displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Further, pursuant to section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as wireless microphones, must be authorized in accordance with the Commission's certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Commission Rules expressly prohibit the marketing of wireless microphones that can operate in the 700 MHz frequency band. Specifically, section 74.851(g) of the Rules prohibits the manufacture, importation, sale, lease, offer for sale or lease, or shipment of wireless microphones and other low power auxiliary stations intended
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1911A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1911A1.pdf
  • Callais Cablevision, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd at 1362. 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. §§ 74.801 - 74.882; see supra note 3. 47 C.F.R. § 74.851(f). A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031 - 2.1060. LOI Response at 1 - 2. Marketing, as defined in 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(e)(4), ``includes sale or lease, or offering for sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment, or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' Pursuant to section 2.807(b) of the Rules, the section 2.803 requirements do
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.pdf
  • including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, are generally required by section 15.201 of the Commission's rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Commission's rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating between 906 - 924 MHz, the SecurityMan SM-302T is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in section 15.249(a) of the rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to section 15.249(d) of the rules, except for harmonics, emissions from
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-976A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-976A1.pdf
  • the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As an intentional radiator, the RemoteLinc is required by section 15.201(b) of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. SmartLabs admits that it manufactured and marketed units of its RemoteLinc device in the United States within the past year. It appears that these violations were repeated since SmartLabs indicates that the marketing of these devices has continued since May 2007. SmartLabs further admits that the device was not certified prior to marketing in the United States.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-574A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-574A1.pdf
  • the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with the applicable technical standards as well as the administrative requirements relating to equipment labeling and consumer disclosure. Under Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as AM transmitters, must be certified in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sections 2.1031 through 2.1060 of the Rules. ``Kits,'' as defined in Section 15.3(p) of the Rules, however, generally do not require authorization. 3. On November 15, 2006, the Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division) issued the letter of inquiry (LOI) to Mr. Mann in response to a complaint alleging that Mr. Mann was assembling SSTRAN model AMT3000 AM transmitters (AMT3000 transmitters) from kits and then
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.txt
  • in preparation for the submission of an application for a grant of certification. This proscription shall not apply to the marketing to a licensed amateur radio operator of an external radio frequency power amplifier provided the amplifier is for use at an amateur radio station and the requirements of Sections 97.315 and 97.317 of this chapter are met. 3. Section 2.1060 is amended by removing paragraph (c), redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (c) and revising paragraph (c) to read as follows: § 2.1060 Equipment for use in the amateur radio service. * * * * * (c) Certification of external radio frequency power amplifiers may be denied when denial would prevent the use of these amplifiers in services other than the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2394A1.txt
  • the enclosures to your response indicate that you are also marketing the Shotwatcher for professional video production. Therefore, we find that it is not amateur apparatus and must be classified as an intentional radiator required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.201, to be approved prior to marketing through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031 - 2.1060. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's implementing regulations provides that: no person shall
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2229A1.txt
  • issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division'') subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom. Section 2.803(c) of the Rules allows the advertising or display of radio frequency devices prior
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2350A1.txt
  • operation limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND CSI manufactures and markets the PT-1 ``Petlocator'' transmitter, which is used to track pets, children and model airplanes. Transmitters and other intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. CSI holds an equipment certification for the PT-1 under FCC Identifier CFXPT-1. The Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory (``OET Lab'') requested a sample of the PT-1 from CSI pursuant to Section 2.945 of the Rules and tested the sample for compliance with the Rules. The OET Lab found that the PT-1 substantially exceeds the radiated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-861A1.txt
  • issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Commission's equipment authorization database, however, indicated that Vitec did not hold any equipment certifications. The Bureau subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Bureau obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom. Section 2.803(c) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1760A1.txt
  • of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom 10, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Division subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom 10. The advertisement describes the CellCom 10 as ``revolutionary'' and exhorts readers to ``join the revolution.'' Section 2.803(c) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.txt
  • from measuring the speed of the users' vehicles. The Division preliminarily determined that at least two of the models, the RMR-S201 (also known as the Phazer II) and the RMR-C450 jammers, were intentional radiators, devices which are generally required under Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Division also concluded, however, that the devices under investigation were apparently not eligible to receive a grant of certification because their intended purpose is to interfere with a licensed radio service, a violation of Section 333 of the Act. On August 9, 2005, the Division sent RMR a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') seeking further information with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1031A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1031A1.txt
  • by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As intentional radiators, wireless microphones are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Sennheiser admits that it manufactured and sold units of a wireless microphone in the United States within the past year. Sennheiser further admits that the device was not certified prior to marketing in the United States. Accordingly, we find that Sennheiser apparently marketed uncertified radio frequency devices in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.txt
  • for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as audio/video transmitters, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Iftron admits that from June 2006, when it first manufactured the device, to July of 2008, it manufactured and marketed units of the Stinger Pro that were capable of transmitting on 2.468 GHz. Although amateur radio equipment is not required to be certified, the Stinger Pro, as sold in the United States prior to July 2008, was
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1535A1.txt
  • the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As intentional radiators, wireless video transmitters are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. LawMate admits that it manufactured and sold units of two of its wireless video transmitters in the United States within the past year. LawMate further admits that the devices were not certified prior to marketing in the United States. Accordingly, we find that LawMate apparently marketed uncertified radio frequency devices in willful and repeated violation of Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.txt
  • advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as audio/video transmitters, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. In your LOI response, you admit that the two devices operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Specifically, the 2.4 GHz device is capable of operating on 2370 MHz, 2390 MHz, and 2490 MHz, and the 900 MHz device is capable of operating on 980
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.txt
  • the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter .... Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics, emissions from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.txt
  • the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter .... Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics, emissions from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2303A1.txt
  • the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by §2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. As an intentional radiator, the WH Transmitter is required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing in accordance with the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. In addition, because the WH Transmitter operates in the 106.7-107.9 MHz frequency band, it is subject to the emission limit specified in Section 15.239(b) of the Rules, which provides: The field strength of any emissions within the permitted 200 kHz band shall not exceed 250 microvolts/meter at 3 meters. The emission limit in this paragraph is based
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.txt
  • with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics, emissions from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.txt
  • advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Pursuant to Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators such as audio/video transmitters must be authorized in accordance with the Commission's certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to the initiation of marketing in the U.S. It does not appear, however, that the above-cited devices are capable of receiving a grant of certification. In your LOI response, you indicate that the video transmitters operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, because these devices are capable of operating on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-253A1.txt
  • (``Macally''). In its July 17, 2008, response to the LOI, Macally identified Power 7 as the manufacturer of the FM Cup Transmitter from April 2007 to the present. As an intentional radiator, the FM Cup Transmitter was required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Commission records indicate that Power 7 did not obtain an equipment certification for the FM Cup Transmitter until July 11, 2008. By LOI dated July 29, 2008, the Division initiated an investigation into whether Power 7 marketed an unauthorized radio frequency device -- specifically, the FM Cup Transmitter -- in the United States. In its response, Power
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.txt
  • or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. However, the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera operate on 1.2 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Therefore, these devices do not comply with the FCC's technical standards and cannot be certified or marketed within the United States. Accordingly, it appears Spy Camera
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1088A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1088A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1088A1.txt
  • in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless remote control transmitters marketed by USA Shutter, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. USA Shutter admits that it marketed five models of uncertified remote control transmitters. Accordingly, it appears USA Shutter has violated Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.201 of the Rules by marketing in the United States wireless remote control transmitter devices prior to obtaining certification. If, after
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.txt
  • 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules, a radio frequency device may not be marketed within the United States unless the device complies with the applicable technical and administrative provisions of the Rules. Section 15.201 of the Rules requires intentional radiators to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Radio frequency devices must also comply with all applicable identification and labeling requirements prior to marketing. On August 18, 2009, the Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry to Qomo. The LOI directed Qomo to respond to a series of questions regarding the advertising, sale, importation, and labeling of certain of its radio frequency response systems. Qomo responded
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.txt
  • to this section.'' Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibits the marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with all applicable administrative, technical, labeling and identification requirements. Ordinarily, intentional radiators must be authorized in accordance with the certification procedures set forth in Section 2.1031 through Section 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing in the United States. Section 2.803(g) of the Rules, however, provides in pertinent part: [R]adio frequency devices that could not be authorized or legally operated under the current rules ... shall not be operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.txt
  • displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Further, pursuant to section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as wireless microphones, must be authorized in accordance with the Commission's certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Commission Rules expressly prohibit the marketing of wireless microphones that can operate in the 700 MHz frequency band. Specifically, section 74.851(g) of the Rules prohibits the manufacture, importation, sale, lease, offer for sale or lease, or shipment of wireless microphones and other low power auxiliary stations intended
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1911A1.txt
  • Callais Cablevision, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd at 1362. 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. §§ 74.801 - 74.882; see supra note 3. 47 C.F.R. § 74.851(f). A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031 - 2.1060. LOI Response at 1 - 2. Marketing, as defined in 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(e)(4), ``includes sale or lease, or offering for sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment, or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' Pursuant to section 2.807(b) of the Rules, the section 2.803 requirements do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.txt
  • including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, are generally required by section 15.201 of the Commission's rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Commission's rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating between 906 - 924 MHz, the SecurityMan SM-302T is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in section 15.249(a) of the rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to section 15.249(d) of the rules, except for harmonics, emissions from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-976A1.txt
  • the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As an intentional radiator, the RemoteLinc is required by section 15.201(b) of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. SmartLabs admits that it manufactured and marketed units of its RemoteLinc device in the United States within the past year. It appears that these violations were repeated since SmartLabs indicates that the marketing of these devices has continued since May 2007. SmartLabs further admits that the device was not certified prior to marketing in the United States.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-574A1.txt
  • the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with the applicable technical standards as well as the administrative requirements relating to equipment labeling and consumer disclosure. Under Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as AM transmitters, must be certified in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sections 2.1031 through 2.1060 of the Rules. ``Kits,'' as defined in Section 15.3(p) of the Rules, however, generally do not require authorization. 3. On November 15, 2006, the Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division) issued the letter of inquiry (LOI) to Mr. Mann in response to a complaint alleging that Mr. Mann was assembling SSTRAN model AMT3000 AM transmitters (AMT3000 transmitters) from kits and then
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.txt
  • ET Docket 99-231, 15 FCC Rcd. 16244 (2000). See also Second Report and Order in ET Docket 99-231, 17 FCC Rcd. 10755 (2002). 47 C.F.R. § 15.247(b)(1). Id. See First Report and Order in ET Docket 99-231, 15 FCC Rcd 16244 (2000) at paragraph 15. The Commission's equipment certification authorization procedure is set fort in Section 2.907 and 2.1031 - 2.1060, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.907 and 2.1031 - 2.1060. See Public Notice, Part 15 Unlicensed Modular Transmitter Approval, DA 00-1407, released June 26, 2000. See, ``IEC 61000-4-4, Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) - Part 4-4: Testing and measurement techniques - Electrical fast transient/burst immunity test,'' published by the International Electrotechnical Commission. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4335.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.205 and 25.202. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.915(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.31 through 15.35. These sections specify general testing procedures applicable to unlicensed transmitters. In addition, some industry procedures such as the ANSI C63.4 procedure for measuring emissions from intentional and unintentional radiators are incorporated by reference into the rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1046 through 2.1060. This technology has been referred to as ``heteromorphic waveforms''. above. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 - 612 has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA ), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.txt
  • in preparation for the submission of an application for a grant of certification. This proscription shall not apply to the marketing to a licensed amateur radio operator of an external radio frequency power amplifier provided the amplifier is for use at an amateur radio station and the requirements of Sections 97.315 and 97.317 of this chapter are met. 3. Section 2.1060 is amended by removing paragraph (c), redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (c) and revising paragraph (c) to read as follows: § 2.1060 Equipment for use in the amateur radio service. * * * * * (c) Certification of external radio frequency power amplifiers may be denied when denial would prevent the use of these amplifiers in services other than the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-149A1.txt
  • frequency power amplifiers may be constructed for evaluation purposes in preparation for the submission of an application for a grant of certification. (4) If the external radio frequency power amplifier is intended for operation in the Amateur Radio Service under Part 97 of this Part, the requirements of Sections 97.315 and 97.317 of this chapter shall be met. 3. Section 2.1060 is amended by removing paragraph (c), redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (c) and revising paragraph (c) to read as follows: § 2.1060 Equipment for use in the amateur radio service. * * * * * (c) Certification of external radio frequency power amplifiers may be denied when denial would prevent the use of these amplifiers in services other than the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-149A1_Erratum.doc
  • frequency power amplifiers may be constructed for evaluation purposes in preparation for the submission of an application for a grant of certification. (4) If the external radio frequency power amplifier is intended for operation in the Amateur Radio Service under Part 97 of this Part, the requirements of Sections 97.315 and 97.317 of this chapter shall be met. 3. Section 2.1060 is amended by removing paragraph (c), redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (c) and revising paragraph (c) to read as follows: § 2.1060 Equipment for use in the amateur radio service. * * * * * (c) Certification of external radio frequency power amplifiers may be denied when denial would prevent the use of these amplifiers in services other than the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-56A1.txt
  • Packard Company 7. IEEE 802 8. Intel Corporation 9. Information Technology Industry Council 10. Itron, Inc. 10. Joint Electron Device Engineering Council 11. Motorola, Inc. 13. Nortel Networks 14. Pegasus Technologies, Inc. 15. Symbol Technologies, Inc. 16. Wi-Fi Alliance 47 C.F.R. § 15.5. The Commission's equipment certification procedure is set forth in Sections 2.907, 2.927, 2.931, and Sections 2.1031 through 2.1060, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.907, 2.927, 2.931 and 2.1031-2.1060. See Public Notice, DA 00-1407. See, e.g., Ed Liu ex parte filed June 6, 2005 and Intel ex parte filed May 2, 2005. See Public Notice, Part 15 Unlicensed Modular Transmitter Approval, DA 00-1407, released June 26, 2000 (Public Notice). See also, Modification of Parts 2 and 15 of the Commission's Rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-106A1.txt
  • of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom 10, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') subsequently investigated Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom 10. The advertisement describes the CellCom 10 as ``revolutionary'' and exhorts readers to ``join the revolution.'' Section 2.803(c)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2394A1.html
  • marketing, the enclosures to your response indicate that you are also marketing the Shotwatcher for professional video production.1 Therefore, we find that it is not amateur apparatus and must be classified as an intentional radiator2 required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201, to be approved prior to marketing through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 2.1031 - 2.1060. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's implementing regulations provides that: no person shall sell
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2229A1.html
  • issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters ("NAB") trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 2. The Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division") subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom. Section 2.803(c) of the Rules allows the advertising or display of radio frequency devices
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2350A1.html
  • limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. CSI manufactures and markets the PT-1 "Petlocator" transmitter, which is used to track pets, children and model airplanes. Transmitters and other intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. CSI holds an equipment certification for the PT-1 under FCC Identifier CFXPT-1. 3. The Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory ("OET Lab") requested a sample of the PT-1 from CSI pursuant to Section 2.945 of the Rules and tested the sample for compliance with the Rules. The OET Lab found that the PT-1 substantially exceeds the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-861A1.html
  • issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters ("NAB") trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Commission's equipment authorization database, however, indicated that Vitec did not hold any equipment certifications. 2. The Bureau subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Bureau obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom. Section 2.803(c) of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1760A1.html
  • of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters ("NAB") trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom 10, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 3. The Division subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom 10. The advertisement describes the CellCom 10 as "revolutionary" and exhorts readers to "join the revolution." Section 2.803(c)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-299A1.html
  • from measuring the speed of the users' vehicles. The Division preliminarily determined that at least two of the models, the RMR-S201 (also known as the Phazer II) and the RMR-C450 jammers, were intentional radiators, devices which are generally required under Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Division also concluded, however, that the devices under investigation were apparently not eligible to receive a grant of certification because their intended purpose is to interfere with a licensed radio service, a violation of Section 333 of the Act. 3. On August 9, 2005, the Division sent RMR a letter of inquiry ("LOI") seeking further information
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1031A1.html
  • by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As intentional radiators, wireless microphones are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 5. Sennheiser admits that it manufactured and sold units of a wireless microphone in the United States within the past year. Sennheiser further admits that the device was not certified prior to marketing in the United States. Accordingly, we find that Sennheiser apparently marketed uncertified radio frequency devices in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1428A1.html
  • for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as audio/video transmitters, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 4. Iftron admits that from June 2006, when it first manufactured the device, to July of 2008, it manufactured and marketed units of the Stinger Pro that were capable of transmitting on 2.468 GHz. Although amateur radio equipment is not required to be certified, the Stinger Pro, as sold in the United States prior to July 2008,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1535A1.html
  • the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As intentional radiators, wireless video transmitters are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 5. LawMate admits that it manufactured and sold units of two of its wireless video transmitters in the United States within the past year. LawMate further admits that the devices were not certified prior to marketing in the United States. Accordingly, we find that LawMate apparently marketed uncertified radio frequency devices in willful and repeated violation of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1772A1.html
  • advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as audio/video transmitters, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. In your LOI response, you admit that the two devices operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Specifically, the 2.4 GHz device is capable of operating on 2370 MHz, 2390 MHz, and 2490 MHz, and the 900 MHz device is capable of operating on 980
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1823A1.html
  • the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter .... Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics, emissions from
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1824A1.html
  • the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter .... Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics, emissions from
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2303A1.html
  • the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S:2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. As an intentional radiator, the WH Transmitter is required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing in accordance with the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. In addition, because the WH Transmitter operates in the 106.7-107.9 MHz frequency band, it is subject to the emission limit specified in Section 15.239(b) of the Rules, which provides: The field strength of any emissions within the permitted 200 kHz band shall not exceed 250 microvolts/meter at 3 meters. The emission limit in this paragraph is based
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2426A1.html
  • with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics, emissions from
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2506A1.html
  • advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Pursuant to Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators such as audio/video transmitters must be authorized in accordance with the Commission's certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to the initiation of marketing in the U.S. It does not appear, however, that the above-cited devices are capable of receiving a grant of certification. In your LOI response, you indicate that the video transmitters operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, because these devices are capable of operating on
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-253A1.html
  • In its July 17, 2008, response to the LOI, Macally identified Power 7 as the manufacturer of the FM Cup Transmitter from April 2007 to the present. 3. As an intentional radiator, the FM Cup Transmitter was required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Commission records indicate that Power 7 did not obtain an equipment certification for the FM Cup Transmitter until July 11, 2008. 4. By LOI dated July 29, 2008, the Division initiated an investigation into whether Power 7 marketed an unauthorized radio frequency device -- specifically, the FM Cup Transmitter -- in the United States. In its response,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-09-2623A1.html
  • or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. However, the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera operate on 1.2 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Therefore, these devices do not comply with the FCC's technical standards and cannot be certified or marketed within the United States. Accordingly, it appears Spy Camera
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1088A1.html
  • in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless remote control transmitters marketed by USA Shutter, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. USA Shutter admits that it marketed five models of uncertified remote control transmitters. Accordingly, it appears USA Shutter has violated Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.201 of the Rules by marketing in the United States wireless remote control transmitter devices prior to obtaining certification. If, after
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1321A1.html
  • 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules, a radio frequency device may not be marketed within the United States unless the device complies with the applicable technical and administrative provisions of the Rules. Section 15.201 of the Rules requires intentional radiators to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Radio frequency devices must also comply with all applicable identification and labeling requirements prior to marketing. 3. On August 18, 2009, the Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry to Qomo. The LOI directed Qomo to respond to a series of questions regarding the advertising, sale, importation, and labeling of certain of its radio frequency response systems. Qomo
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-669A1.html
  • to this section." Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibits the marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with all applicable administrative, technical, labeling and identification requirements. Ordinarily, intentional radiators must be authorized in accordance with the certification procedures set forth in Section 2.1031 through Section 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing in the United States. 7. Section 2.803(g) of the Rules, however, provides in pertinent part: [R]adio frequency devices that could not be authorized or legally operated under the current rules ... shall not be operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1165A1.html
  • displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Further, pursuant to section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as wireless microphones, must be authorized in accordance with the Commission's certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. 8. Commission Rules expressly prohibit the marketing of wireless microphones that can operate in the 700 MHz frequency band. Specifically, section 74.851(g) of the Rules prohibits the manufacture, importation, sale, lease, offer for sale or lease, or shipment of wireless microphones and other low power auxiliary stations
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1911A1.html
  • Callais Cablevision, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd at 1362. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 74.801 - 74.882; see supra note 3. 47 C.F.R. S: 74.851(f). A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1031 - 2.1060. LOI Response at 1 - 2. Marketing, as defined in 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4), "includes sale or lease, or offering for sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment, or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." Pursuant to section 2.807(b) of the Rules, the section 2.803 requirements do
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-408A1.html
  • advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 6. Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, are generally required by section 15.201 of the Commission's rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Commission's rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating between 906 - 924 MHz, the SecurityMan SM-302T is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in section 15.249(a) of the rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to section 15.249(d) of the rules, except for harmonics, emissions from
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-976A1.html
  • the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As an intentional radiator, the RemoteLinc is required by section 15.201(b) of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 5. SmartLabs admits that it manufactured and marketed units of its RemoteLinc device in the United States within the past year. It appears that these violations were repeated since SmartLabs indicates that the marketing of these devices has continued since May 2007. SmartLabs further admits that the device was not certified prior to marketing in the United
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-574A1.html
  • the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with the applicable technical standards as well as the administrative requirements relating to equipment labeling and consumer disclosure. Under Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as AM transmitters, must be certified in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sections 2.1031 through 2.1060 of the Rules. "Kits," as defined in Section 15.3(p) of the Rules, however, generally do not require authorization. 3. On November 15, 2006, the Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division) issued the letter of inquiry (LOI) to Mr. Mann in response to a complaint alleging that Mr. Mann was assembling SSTRAN model AMT3000 AM transmitters (AMT3000 transmitters) from kits and then
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2394A1.html
  • marketing, the enclosures to your response indicate that you are also marketing the Shotwatcher for professional video production.1 Therefore, we find that it is not amateur apparatus and must be classified as an intentional radiator2 required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201, to be approved prior to marketing through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 2.1031 - 2.1060. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's implementing regulations provides that: no person shall sell
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2229A1.html
  • issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters ("NAB") trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 2. The Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division") subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom. Section 2.803(c) of the Rules allows the advertising or display of radio frequency devices
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2350A1.html
  • limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. CSI manufactures and markets the PT-1 "Petlocator" transmitter, which is used to track pets, children and model airplanes. Transmitters and other intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. CSI holds an equipment certification for the PT-1 under FCC Identifier CFXPT-1. 3. The Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory ("OET Lab") requested a sample of the PT-1 from CSI pursuant to Section 2.945 of the Rules and tested the sample for compliance with the Rules. The OET Lab found that the PT-1 substantially exceeds the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-861A1.html
  • issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters ("NAB") trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Commission's equipment authorization database, however, indicated that Vitec did not hold any equipment certifications. 2. The Bureau subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Bureau obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom. Section 2.803(c) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1760A1.html
  • of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters ("NAB") trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom 10, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 3. The Division subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom 10. The advertisement describes the CellCom 10 as "revolutionary" and exhorts readers to "join the revolution." Section 2.803(c)
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-299A1.html
  • from measuring the speed of the users' vehicles. The Division preliminarily determined that at least two of the models, the RMR-S201 (also known as the Phazer II) and the RMR-C450 jammers, were intentional radiators, devices which are generally required under Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Division also concluded, however, that the devices under investigation were apparently not eligible to receive a grant of certification because their intended purpose is to interfere with a licensed radio service, a violation of Section 333 of the Act. 3. On August 9, 2005, the Division sent RMR a letter of inquiry ("LOI") seeking further information
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1824A1.html
  • the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter .... Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics, emissions from
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-09-2623A1.html
  • or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. However, the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera operate on 1.2 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Therefore, these devices do not comply with the FCC's technical standards and cannot be certified or marketed within the United States. Accordingly, it appears Spy Camera
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1088A1.html
  • in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless remote control transmitters marketed by USA Shutter, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. USA Shutter admits that it marketed five models of uncertified remote control transmitters. Accordingly, it appears USA Shutter has violated Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.201 of the Rules by marketing in the United States wireless remote control transmitter devices prior to obtaining certification. If, after
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1321A1.html
  • 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules, a radio frequency device may not be marketed within the United States unless the device complies with the applicable technical and administrative provisions of the Rules. Section 15.201 of the Rules requires intentional radiators to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Radio frequency devices must also comply with all applicable identification and labeling requirements prior to marketing. 3. On August 18, 2009, the Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry to Qomo. The LOI directed Qomo to respond to a series of questions regarding the advertising, sale, importation, and labeling of certain of its radio frequency response systems. Qomo
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-669A1.html
  • to this section." Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibits the marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with all applicable administrative, technical, labeling and identification requirements. Ordinarily, intentional radiators must be authorized in accordance with the certification procedures set forth in Section 2.1031 through Section 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing in the United States. 7. Section 2.803(g) of the Rules, however, provides in pertinent part: [R]adio frequency devices that could not be authorized or legally operated under the current rules ... shall not be operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1165A1.html
  • displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Further, pursuant to section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as wireless microphones, must be authorized in accordance with the Commission's certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. 8. Commission Rules expressly prohibit the marketing of wireless microphones that can operate in the 700 MHz frequency band. Specifically, section 74.851(g) of the Rules prohibits the manufacture, importation, sale, lease, offer for sale or lease, or shipment of wireless microphones and other low power auxiliary stations
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1911A1.html
  • Callais Cablevision, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd at 1362. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 74.801 - 74.882; see supra note 3. 47 C.F.R. S: 74.851(f). A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1031 - 2.1060. LOI Response at 1 - 2. Marketing, as defined in 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4), "includes sale or lease, or offering for sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment, or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." Pursuant to section 2.807(b) of the Rules, the section 2.803 requirements do
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-408A1.html
  • advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 6. Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, are generally required by section 15.201 of the Commission's rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Commission's rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating between 906 - 924 MHz, the SecurityMan SM-302T is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in section 15.249(a) of the rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to section 15.249(d) of the rules, except for harmonics, emissions from
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-976A1.html
  • the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As an intentional radiator, the RemoteLinc is required by section 15.201(b) of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 5. SmartLabs admits that it manufactured and marketed units of its RemoteLinc device in the United States within the past year. It appears that these violations were repeated since SmartLabs indicates that the marketing of these devices has continued since May 2007. SmartLabs further admits that the device was not certified prior to marketing in the United
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-574A1.html
  • the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with the applicable technical standards as well as the administrative requirements relating to equipment labeling and consumer disclosure. Under Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as AM transmitters, must be certified in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sections 2.1031 through 2.1060 of the Rules. "Kits," as defined in Section 15.3(p) of the Rules, however, generally do not require authorization. 3. On November 15, 2006, the Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division) issued the letter of inquiry (LOI) to Mr. Mann in response to a complaint alleging that Mr. Mann was assembling SSTRAN model AMT3000 AM transmitters (AMT3000 transmitters) from kits and then