FCC Web Documents citing 2.1031

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1760A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1760A1.pdf
  • 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom 10, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Division subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom 10. The advertisement describes the CellCom 10 as ``revolutionary'' and exhorts readers to ``join the revolution.'' Section
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.pdf
  • enforcement officials from measuring the speed of the users' vehicles. The Division preliminarily determined that at least two of the models, the RMR-S201 (also known as the Phazer II) and the RMR-C450 jammers, were intentional radiators, devices which are generally required under Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Division also concluded, however, that the devices under investigation were apparently not eligible to receive a grant of certification because their intended purpose is to interfere with a licensed radio service, a violation of Section 333 of the Act. On August 9, 2005, the Division sent RMR a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') seeking further
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2437A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2437A1.pdf
  • and are marketed for use in a residential environment or for use by the general public, such as XLNT Idea's Nexis 100AP AutoPrinter, Nexis 100AP Publisher, and Xi440 CD/DVD Printer, are required to be approved prior to marketing through either the Declaration of Conformity procedures described in Sections 2.1071-2.1077 of the Rules, or by the Certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031-2.1060 of the Rules. In addition, unintentional radiators are required to comply with the conducted and radiated emissions specified in Sections 15.107 and 15.109 of the Rules. As the manufacturer, XLNT Idea is the party responsible for assuring that these devices are compliant with all applicable technical and administrative requirements. XLNT Idea admits that it marketed and sold units of the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1031A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1031A1.pdf
  • been authorized by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As intentional radiators, wireless microphones are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Sennheiser admits that it manufactured and sold units of a wireless microphone in the United States within the past year. Sennheiser further admits that the device was not certified prior to marketing in the United States. Accordingly, we find that Sennheiser apparently marketed uncertified radio frequency devices in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b)
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.pdf
  • displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as audio/video transmitters, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Iftron admits that from June 2006, when it first manufactured the device, to July of 2008, it manufactured and marketed units of the Stinger Pro that were capable of transmitting on 2.468 GHz. Although amateur radio equipment is not required to be certified, the Stinger Pro, as sold in the United States prior to July
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1535A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1535A1.pdf
  • authorized by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As intentional radiators, wireless video transmitters are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. LawMate admits that it manufactured and sold units of two of its wireless video transmitters in the United States within the past year. LawMate further admits that the devices were not certified prior to marketing in the United States. Accordingly, we find that LawMate apparently marketed uncertified radio frequency devices in willful and repeated violation
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.pdf
  • be operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as audio/video transmitters, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. In your LOI response, you admit that the two devices operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Specifically, the 2.4 GHz device is capable of operating on 2370 MHz, 2390 MHz, and 2490 MHz, and the 900 MHz device is capable of operating
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.pdf
  • accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter .... Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.pdf
  • accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter .... Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2303A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2303A1.pdf
  • authorized by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by §2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. As an intentional radiator, the WH Transmitter is required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing in accordance with the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. In addition, because the WH Transmitter operates in the 106.7-107.9 MHz frequency band, it is subject to the emission limit specified in Section 15.239(b) of the Rules, which provides: The field strength of any emissions within the permitted 200 kHz band shall not exceed 250 microvolts/meter at 3 meters. The emission limit in this paragraph
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2383A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2383A1.pdf
  • 47 C.F.R. § 2.801 defines a radiofrequency device as ``any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radiofrequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means.'' An intentional radiator is ``[a] device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. § 15.3 (o). 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b); see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031-2.1060. LOI Response at 2. See Eure Family Ltd. Partnership, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 21861 (2002); VIA Technologies, Inc, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 19 FCC Rcd 19526, 19529 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2004). Id. at 1-2. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.pdf
  • in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.pdf
  • be operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Pursuant to Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators such as audio/video transmitters must be authorized in accordance with the Commission's certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to the initiation of marketing in the U.S. It does not appear, however, that the above-cited devices are capable of receiving a grant of certification. In your LOI response, you indicate that the video transmitters operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, because these devices are capable of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-253A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-253A1.pdf
  • Group, Inc. (``Macally''). In its July 17, 2008, response to the LOI, Macally identified Power 7 as the manufacturer of the FM Cup Transmitter from April 2007 to the present. As an intentional radiator, the FM Cup Transmitter was required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Commission records indicate that Power 7 did not obtain an equipment certification for the FM Cup Transmitter until July 11, 2008. By LOI dated July 29, 2008, the Division initiated an investigation into whether Power 7 marketed an unauthorized radio frequency device -- specifically, the FM Cup Transmitter -- in the United States. In its
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.pdf
  • for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. However, the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera operate on 1.2 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Therefore, these devices do not comply with the FCC's technical standards and cannot be certified or marketed within the United States. Accordingly, it appears
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1088A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1088A1.pdf
  • the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless remote control transmitters marketed by USA Shutter, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. USA Shutter admits that it marketed five models of uncertified remote control transmitters. Accordingly, it appears USA Shutter has violated Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.201 of the Rules by marketing in the United States wireless remote control transmitter devices prior to obtaining certification.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.pdf
  • to Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules, a radio frequency device may not be marketed within the United States unless the device complies with the applicable technical and administrative provisions of the Rules. Section 15.201 of the Rules requires intentional radiators to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Radio frequency devices must also comply with all applicable identification and labeling requirements prior to marketing. On August 18, 2009, the Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry to Qomo. The LOI directed Qomo to respond to a series of questions regarding the advertising, sale, importation, and labeling of certain of its radio frequency response systems.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.pdf
  • regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibits the marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with all applicable administrative, technical, labeling and identification requirements. Ordinarily, intentional radiators must be authorized in accordance with the certification procedures set forth in Section 2.1031 through Section 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing in the United States. Section 2.803(g) of the Rules, however, provides in pertinent part: [R]adio frequency devices that could not be authorized or legally operated under the current rules ... shall not be operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-7A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-7A1.pdf
  • this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter.... Transmitters that are utilized for operation under Part 90 of the Rules, such as the MSR 200 and/or MSR 300, are generally required by Section 90.203 to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031-2.1060 of the Rules. Under Section 2.803(c) of the Rules, a party is allowed, in limited circumstances, to market devices prior to receiving equipment authorization from the Commission. Specifically, devices may be Advertised or displayed, e.g., at a trade show or exhibition, prior to equipment authorization . . . provided that the advertising contains, and the display is accompanied by, a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.pdf
  • operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Further, pursuant to section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as wireless microphones, must be authorized in accordance with the Commission's certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Commission Rules expressly prohibit the marketing of wireless microphones that can operate in the 700 MHz frequency band. Specifically, section 74.851(g) of the Rules prohibits the manufacture, importation, sale, lease, offer for sale or lease, or shipment of wireless microphones and other low power auxiliary
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1911A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1911A1.pdf
  • day.'' See Callais Cablevision, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd at 1362. 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. §§ 74.801 - 74.882; see supra note 3. 47 C.F.R. § 74.851(f). A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031 - 2.1060. LOI Response at 1 - 2. Marketing, as defined in 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(e)(4), ``includes sale or lease, or offering for sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment, or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' Pursuant to section 2.807(b) of the Rules, the section 2.803
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.pdf
  • or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, are generally required by section 15.201 of the Commission's rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Commission's rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating between 906 - 924 MHz, the SecurityMan SM-302T is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in section 15.249(a) of the rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to section 15.249(d) of the rules, except for harmonics,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-976A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-976A1.pdf
  • authorized by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As an intentional radiator, the RemoteLinc is required by section 15.201(b) of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. SmartLabs admits that it manufactured and marketed units of its RemoteLinc device in the United States within the past year. It appears that these violations were repeated since SmartLabs indicates that the marketing of these devices has continued since May 2007. SmartLabs further admits that the device was not certified prior to marketing in the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-574A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-574A1.pdf
  • devices in the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with the applicable technical standards as well as the administrative requirements relating to equipment labeling and consumer disclosure. Under Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as AM transmitters, must be certified in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sections 2.1031 through 2.1060 of the Rules. ``Kits,'' as defined in Section 15.3(p) of the Rules, however, generally do not require authorization. 3. On November 15, 2006, the Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division) issued the letter of inquiry (LOI) to Mr. Mann in response to a complaint alleging that Mr. Mann was assembling SSTRAN model AMT3000 AM transmitters (AMT3000 transmitters) from kits
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2253A1.txt
  • a personal computer via a USB port or other connection. This connection places the device into the category of a Class B personal computer peripheral, and under Sections 15.101, 2.803, and 2.1204 of the Commission's rules (47 C.F.R. §§ 15.101, 2.803, 2.1204) the device must either be authorized under the Declaration of Conformity procedures (Sections 2.1071-1077) or certification procedures (Sections 2.1031 et al), All digital devices are subject to the same emissions limits, however, different approval processes have been established based on the complexity of testing required to conform with the rules. Since the emission limits are the same irrespective of the manner of authorization, devices properly verified prior to the date of this Public Notice do not need to be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2394A1.txt
  • to marketing, the enclosures to your response indicate that you are also marketing the Shotwatcher for professional video production. Therefore, we find that it is not amateur apparatus and must be classified as an intentional radiator required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.201, to be approved prior to marketing through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031 - 2.1060. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's implementing regulations provides that: no
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2229A1.txt
  • April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division'') subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom. Section 2.803(c) of the Rules allows the advertising or display of radio frequency
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2350A1.txt
  • the periodic operation limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND CSI manufactures and markets the PT-1 ``Petlocator'' transmitter, which is used to track pets, children and model airplanes. Transmitters and other intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. CSI holds an equipment certification for the PT-1 under FCC Identifier CFXPT-1. The Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory (``OET Lab'') requested a sample of the PT-1 from CSI pursuant to Section 2.945 of the Rules and tested the sample for compliance with the Rules. The OET Lab found that the PT-1 substantially exceeds
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-861A1.txt
  • April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Commission's equipment authorization database, however, indicated that Vitec did not hold any equipment certifications. The Bureau subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Bureau obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom. Section 2.803(c)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1760A1.txt
  • 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom 10, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Division subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom 10. The advertisement describes the CellCom 10 as ``revolutionary'' and exhorts readers to ``join the revolution.'' Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.txt
  • enforcement officials from measuring the speed of the users' vehicles. The Division preliminarily determined that at least two of the models, the RMR-S201 (also known as the Phazer II) and the RMR-C450 jammers, were intentional radiators, devices which are generally required under Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Division also concluded, however, that the devices under investigation were apparently not eligible to receive a grant of certification because their intended purpose is to interfere with a licensed radio service, a violation of Section 333 of the Act. On August 9, 2005, the Division sent RMR a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') seeking further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2437A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2437A1.txt
  • and are marketed for use in a residential environment or for use by the general public, such as XLNT Idea's Nexis 100AP AutoPrinter, Nexis 100AP Publisher, and Xi440 CD/DVD Printer, are required to be approved prior to marketing through either the Declaration of Conformity procedures described in Sections 2.1071-2.1077 of the Rules, or by the Certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031-2.1060 of the Rules. In addition, unintentional radiators are required to comply with the conducted and radiated emissions specified in Sections 15.107 and 15.109 of the Rules. As the manufacturer, XLNT Idea is the party responsible for assuring that these devices are compliant with all applicable technical and administrative requirements. XLNT Idea admits that it marketed and sold units of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1031A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1031A1.txt
  • been authorized by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As intentional radiators, wireless microphones are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Sennheiser admits that it manufactured and sold units of a wireless microphone in the United States within the past year. Sennheiser further admits that the device was not certified prior to marketing in the United States. Accordingly, we find that Sennheiser apparently marketed uncertified radio frequency devices in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.txt
  • displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as audio/video transmitters, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Iftron admits that from June 2006, when it first manufactured the device, to July of 2008, it manufactured and marketed units of the Stinger Pro that were capable of transmitting on 2.468 GHz. Although amateur radio equipment is not required to be certified, the Stinger Pro, as sold in the United States prior to July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1535A1.txt
  • authorized by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As intentional radiators, wireless video transmitters are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. LawMate admits that it manufactured and sold units of two of its wireless video transmitters in the United States within the past year. LawMate further admits that the devices were not certified prior to marketing in the United States. Accordingly, we find that LawMate apparently marketed uncertified radio frequency devices in willful and repeated violation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.txt
  • be operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as audio/video transmitters, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. In your LOI response, you admit that the two devices operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Specifically, the 2.4 GHz device is capable of operating on 2370 MHz, 2390 MHz, and 2490 MHz, and the 900 MHz device is capable of operating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.txt
  • accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter .... Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.txt
  • accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter .... Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2303A1.txt
  • authorized by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by §2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. As an intentional radiator, the WH Transmitter is required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing in accordance with the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. In addition, because the WH Transmitter operates in the 106.7-107.9 MHz frequency band, it is subject to the emission limit specified in Section 15.239(b) of the Rules, which provides: The field strength of any emissions within the permitted 200 kHz band shall not exceed 250 microvolts/meter at 3 meters. The emission limit in this paragraph
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2383A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2383A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2383A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. § 2.801 defines a radiofrequency device as ``any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radiofrequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means.'' An intentional radiator is ``[a] device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. § 15.3 (o). 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b); see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031-2.1060. LOI Response at 2. See Eure Family Ltd. Partnership, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 21861 (2002); VIA Technologies, Inc, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 19 FCC Rcd 19526, 19529 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2004). Id. at 1-2. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.txt
  • in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.txt
  • be operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Pursuant to Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators such as audio/video transmitters must be authorized in accordance with the Commission's certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to the initiation of marketing in the U.S. It does not appear, however, that the above-cited devices are capable of receiving a grant of certification. In your LOI response, you indicate that the video transmitters operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, because these devices are capable of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-253A1.txt
  • Group, Inc. (``Macally''). In its July 17, 2008, response to the LOI, Macally identified Power 7 as the manufacturer of the FM Cup Transmitter from April 2007 to the present. As an intentional radiator, the FM Cup Transmitter was required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Commission records indicate that Power 7 did not obtain an equipment certification for the FM Cup Transmitter until July 11, 2008. By LOI dated July 29, 2008, the Division initiated an investigation into whether Power 7 marketed an unauthorized radio frequency device -- specifically, the FM Cup Transmitter -- in the United States. In its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.txt
  • for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. However, the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera operate on 1.2 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Therefore, these devices do not comply with the FCC's technical standards and cannot be certified or marketed within the United States. Accordingly, it appears
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1088A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1088A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1088A1.txt
  • the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless remote control transmitters marketed by USA Shutter, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. USA Shutter admits that it marketed five models of uncertified remote control transmitters. Accordingly, it appears USA Shutter has violated Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.201 of the Rules by marketing in the United States wireless remote control transmitter devices prior to obtaining certification.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.txt
  • to Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules, a radio frequency device may not be marketed within the United States unless the device complies with the applicable technical and administrative provisions of the Rules. Section 15.201 of the Rules requires intentional radiators to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Radio frequency devices must also comply with all applicable identification and labeling requirements prior to marketing. On August 18, 2009, the Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry to Qomo. The LOI directed Qomo to respond to a series of questions regarding the advertising, sale, importation, and labeling of certain of its radio frequency response systems.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.txt
  • regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibits the marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with all applicable administrative, technical, labeling and identification requirements. Ordinarily, intentional radiators must be authorized in accordance with the certification procedures set forth in Section 2.1031 through Section 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing in the United States. Section 2.803(g) of the Rules, however, provides in pertinent part: [R]adio frequency devices that could not be authorized or legally operated under the current rules ... shall not be operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-7A1.txt
  • this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter.... Transmitters that are utilized for operation under Part 90 of the Rules, such as the MSR 200 and/or MSR 300, are generally required by Section 90.203 to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031-2.1060 of the Rules. Under Section 2.803(c) of the Rules, a party is allowed, in limited circumstances, to market devices prior to receiving equipment authorization from the Commission. Specifically, devices may be Advertised or displayed, e.g., at a trade show or exhibition, prior to equipment authorization . . . provided that the advertising contains, and the display is accompanied by, a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.txt
  • operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Further, pursuant to section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as wireless microphones, must be authorized in accordance with the Commission's certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Commission Rules expressly prohibit the marketing of wireless microphones that can operate in the 700 MHz frequency band. Specifically, section 74.851(g) of the Rules prohibits the manufacture, importation, sale, lease, offer for sale or lease, or shipment of wireless microphones and other low power auxiliary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1911A1.txt
  • day.'' See Callais Cablevision, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd at 1362. 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. §§ 74.801 - 74.882; see supra note 3. 47 C.F.R. § 74.851(f). A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031 - 2.1060. LOI Response at 1 - 2. Marketing, as defined in 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(e)(4), ``includes sale or lease, or offering for sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment, or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' Pursuant to section 2.807(b) of the Rules, the section 2.803
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.txt
  • or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, are generally required by section 15.201 of the Commission's rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Commission's rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating between 906 - 924 MHz, the SecurityMan SM-302T is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in section 15.249(a) of the rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to section 15.249(d) of the rules, except for harmonics,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-976A1.txt
  • authorized by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As an intentional radiator, the RemoteLinc is required by section 15.201(b) of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. SmartLabs admits that it manufactured and marketed units of its RemoteLinc device in the United States within the past year. It appears that these violations were repeated since SmartLabs indicates that the marketing of these devices has continued since May 2007. SmartLabs further admits that the device was not certified prior to marketing in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-574A1.txt
  • devices in the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with the applicable technical standards as well as the administrative requirements relating to equipment labeling and consumer disclosure. Under Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as AM transmitters, must be certified in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sections 2.1031 through 2.1060 of the Rules. ``Kits,'' as defined in Section 15.3(p) of the Rules, however, generally do not require authorization. 3. On November 15, 2006, the Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division) issued the letter of inquiry (LOI) to Mr. Mann in response to a complaint alleging that Mr. Mann was assembling SSTRAN model AMT3000 AM transmitters (AMT3000 transmitters) from kits
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-160A1.txt
  • 15.121. The Commission's regulations regarding the Cellular Radiotelephone Service are set forth in Part 22 of the FCC rules, 47 C.F.R. Part 22, Subpart H. Cellular telephones use frequencies in the 824-849 MHz and 869-894 MHz bands to connect mobile users to other cellular system users and to the Public Switched Telephone Network. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.101(a) and § 2.1031 et seq. Order, at 5395-96; 47 C.F.R. § 15.121(b). See Order, at 5396-97; 47 C.F.R. § 15.121(a)(2). See Order, at 5399-400; 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.121(f)(1)-(f)(2). See Notice of Proposed Rule Making in ET Docket No. 98-76, 13 FCC Rcd 12937, 12942-12943 (1998) ("NPRM"); Order at 5392-5393. See Tandy petition for partial reconsideration at 3-4. See also Uniden petition for partial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-225A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-225A1.txt
  • II Order''). The Commission explained that it adopted this procedural framework in order to avoid issues of national comity and international coordination responsibilities for space stations. Id. at 24,174 ¶ 188. For purposes of this proposal, the term ``fixed station'' refers to terrestrial base stations that would be used to communicate with mobile terminals or handsets. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031 et seq. See, e.g. 47 C.F.R. §§ 25.136(a) and 25.135(b). See ICO Letter at Appendix B. 47 C.F.R. § 2.106, NG156, NG1668. Second Report and Order and Second Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 12,322-53 ¶¶ 18-112. The incumbent licensees in the 2 GHz MSS uplink band from 1990-2025 MHz are the broadcast auxiliary service, cable television relay
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-58A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-58A1.txt
  • §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), That the Application for Review filed by Transportation Intelligence, Inc. IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Caton Acting Secretary Letter from Kenneth R. Nichols, Chief of OET's Laboratory Division, to Donald J. Evans, November 17, 2000. See 47 CFR §§ 2.803, 2.1204. The requirements of the Commission's equipment authorization procedure are set forth in Sections 2.1031-2.1060 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031-2.1060. See 47 CFR § 2.929. See n. 1, supra. On August 3, 2001, TransIntel filed a Petition for Immediate Suspension and Permanent Revocation of Equipment Certification. This pleading is being considered as a supplemental filing to the Application for Review. At the time of Highway's authorization for the subject equipment, the terminology for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.txt
  • frequency bands 1631.5-1660.5 MHz (transmit) and 1530-1559 MHz (receive) throughout the Continental United States, United States Territories, Alaska, and Hawaii, Order and Authorization, 15 FCC Rcd 18117 (Sat. Div., Int'l Bur. 2000); Iridium U.S., L.P., Order and Authorization, 11 FCC Rcd 20474 (Int'l Bur. 1996). See, e.g., 18 GHz Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 13471, ¶ 87. 47 C.F.R. § 2.1031 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1033. Flexibility Notice, 16 FCC Rcd at 15555, ¶ 53 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 2.1031 et seq.) Flexibility Notice, 16 FCC Rcd at 15555, ¶ 53. See, e.g., ICO Comments at 48. MSV also supports requiring handsets to comply with Part 2, Subpart J of our rules, provided that MSS operators are not required
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1_Erratum.doc
  • frequency bands 1631.5-1660.5 MHz (transmit) and 1530-1559 MHz (receive) throughout the Continental United States, United States Territories, Alaska, and Hawaii, Order and Authorization, 15 FCC Rcd 18117 (Sat. Div., Int'l Bur. 2000); Iridium U.S., L.P., Order and Authorization, 11 FCC Rcd 20474 (Int'l Bur. 1996). See, e.g., 18 GHz Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 13471, ¶ 87. 47 C.F.R. § 2.1031 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1033. Flexibility Notice, 16 FCC Rcd at 15555, ¶ 53 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 2.1031 et seq.) Flexibility Notice, 16 FCC Rcd at 15555, ¶ 53. See, e.g., ICO Comments at 48. MSV also supports requiring handsets to comply with Part 2, Subpart J of our rules, provided that MSS operators are not required
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-198A1.txt
  • The particulars for applications for certification are given in Section 2.1033. Inquiry into the Future Role of Low Power Television Broadcasting and Television Translators in the National Telecommunications System. 45 F.R. 69178 (1980). 47 C.F.R. § 74.731(f). 47 C.F.R. § 74.750(c). . 47 C.F.R. § 74.750(c). 47 C.F.R. § 74.750(a). The certification procedure is set forth in Sections 2.907 and S2.1031-2.1060 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.907 and 2.1031-2.1060; the verification procedure is set forth in Sections 2.902 and 2.951-2.962 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.907 and 2.951-2.962. Under the certification procedure, applicants (equipment manufacturers or responsible parties) submit descriptions of equipment, measurement data, and other information to the Commission in an application for grant of equipment authorization. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.txt
  • Order in ET Docket 99-231, 15 FCC Rcd. 16244 (2000). See also Second Report and Order in ET Docket 99-231, 17 FCC Rcd. 10755 (2002). 47 C.F.R. § 15.247(b)(1). Id. See First Report and Order in ET Docket 99-231, 15 FCC Rcd 16244 (2000) at paragraph 15. The Commission's equipment certification authorization procedure is set fort in Section 2.907 and 2.1031 - 2.1060, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.907 and 2.1031 - 2.1060. See Public Notice, Part 15 Unlicensed Modular Transmitter Approval, DA 00-1407, released June 26, 2000. See, ``IEC 61000-4-4, Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) - Part 4-4: Testing and measurement techniques - Electrical fast transient/burst immunity test,'' published by the International Electrotechnical Commission. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-220A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-220A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-220A1.txt
  • of Parts 2 and 25 to Implement the Global Mobile Personal Communications by Satellite (GMPCS) Memorandum of Understanding and Arrangements, IB Docket 99-67, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 8903 (2002), Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 24423 (2003). 47 C.F.R. § 74.750. The certification procedure is set forth in Sections 2.907 and 2.1031-2.1060 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.907 and 2.1031-2.1060; the verification procedure is set forth in Sections 2.902 and 2.951-2.962 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.902 and 2.951-2.962. Under the certification procedure, applicants (equipment manufacturers or responsible parties) submit descriptions of equipment, measurement data, and other information to the Commission in an application for grant of equipment authorization. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-56A1.txt
  • 6. Hewlett Packard Company 7. IEEE 802 8. Intel Corporation 9. Information Technology Industry Council 10. Itron, Inc. 10. Joint Electron Device Engineering Council 11. Motorola, Inc. 13. Nortel Networks 14. Pegasus Technologies, Inc. 15. Symbol Technologies, Inc. 16. Wi-Fi Alliance 47 C.F.R. § 15.5. The Commission's equipment certification procedure is set forth in Sections 2.907, 2.927, 2.931, and Sections 2.1031 through 2.1060, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.907, 2.927, 2.931 and 2.1031-2.1060. See Public Notice, DA 00-1407. See, e.g., Ed Liu ex parte filed June 6, 2005 and Intel ex parte filed May 2, 2005. See Public Notice, Part 15 Unlicensed Modular Transmitter Approval, DA 00-1407, released June 26, 2000 (Public Notice). See also, Modification of Parts 2 and 15 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-106A1.txt
  • 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom 10, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') subsequently investigated Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom 10. The advertisement describes the CellCom 10 as ``revolutionary'' and exhorts readers to ``join the revolution.''
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-14A1.txt
  • the tank. Testing for such emissions should be performed with the radar transmitting in a direction away from the measurement instrument and toward RF absorbing material. The applicant would be required to provide in the certification application information on the types of tank materials (and their attenuation coefficients) it intends to use with the TLPR device. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031-2.1060. Siemens Waiver Request, ET Docket 06-216 (filed November 3, 2006.) Krohne made no specific comments on the waiver and directed most of its comments to the Petition for Rulemaking. Comments of Krohne at 2 and comments of Ohmart/VEGA at 12. Pulsed radar TLPRs are smaller because they use lesser amounts of electronic and software signal conditioning. Comments of Ohmart/VEGA at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.txt
  • to characterize antenna radiation patterns. ECC Report 139 at p. 2. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.947. TCBs are accredited third-party product certification bodies authorized to issue a grant of certification for certain products in lieu of a traditional grant issued by the Commission. Notice and Order, 25 FCC Rcd. 601, 610 (2010) at para. 24. See also, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031-2.1060. . Krohne TLPR operation inside steel tanks in this band is pursuant to a waiver of the 9-9.2 GHz and 9.3-9.5 GHz restricted bands of Section 15.205(a) issued in 2001 by Bruce Franca, Acting Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology of the FCC, with concurrence of the National Telecommunication Information Administration (NTIA). See letter of September 5, 2001, from William
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2394A1.html
  • prior to marketing, the enclosures to your response indicate that you are also marketing the Shotwatcher for professional video production.1 Therefore, we find that it is not amateur apparatus and must be classified as an intentional radiator2 required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201, to be approved prior to marketing through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 2.1031 - 2.1060. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's implementing regulations provides that: no person
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2229A1.html
  • April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters ("NAB") trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 2. The Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division") subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom. Section 2.803(c) of the Rules allows the advertising or display of radio
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2350A1.html
  • periodic operation limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. CSI manufactures and markets the PT-1 "Petlocator" transmitter, which is used to track pets, children and model airplanes. Transmitters and other intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. CSI holds an equipment certification for the PT-1 under FCC Identifier CFXPT-1. 3. The Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory ("OET Lab") requested a sample of the PT-1 from CSI pursuant to Section 2.945 of the Rules and tested the sample for compliance with the Rules. The OET Lab found that the PT-1 substantially
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-861A1.html
  • April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters ("NAB") trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Commission's equipment authorization database, however, indicated that Vitec did not hold any equipment certifications. 2. The Bureau subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Bureau obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom. Section
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1760A1.html
  • 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters ("NAB") trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom 10, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 3. The Division subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom 10. The advertisement describes the CellCom 10 as "revolutionary" and exhorts readers to "join the revolution."
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-299A1.html
  • enforcement officials from measuring the speed of the users' vehicles. The Division preliminarily determined that at least two of the models, the RMR-S201 (also known as the Phazer II) and the RMR-C450 jammers, were intentional radiators, devices which are generally required under Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Division also concluded, however, that the devices under investigation were apparently not eligible to receive a grant of certification because their intended purpose is to interfere with a licensed radio service, a violation of Section 333 of the Act. 3. On August 9, 2005, the Division sent RMR a letter of inquiry ("LOI") seeking
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2437A1.html
  • and are marketed for use in a residential environment or for use by the general public, such as XLNT Idea's Nexis 100AP AutoPrinter, Nexis 100AP Publisher, and Xi440 CD/DVD Printer, are required to be approved prior to marketing through either the Declaration of Conformity procedures described in Sections 2.1071-2.1077 of the Rules, or by the Certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031-2.1060 of the Rules. In addition, unintentional radiators are required to comply with the conducted and radiated emissions specified in Sections 15.107 and 15.109 of the Rules. As the manufacturer, XLNT Idea is the party responsible for assuring that these devices are compliant with all applicable technical and administrative requirements. 5. XLNT Idea admits that it marketed and sold units of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1031A1.html
  • been authorized by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As intentional radiators, wireless microphones are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 5. Sennheiser admits that it manufactured and sold units of a wireless microphone in the United States within the past year. Sennheiser further admits that the device was not certified prior to marketing in the United States. Accordingly, we find that Sennheiser apparently marketed uncertified radio frequency devices in willful and repeated violation of Section
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1428A1.html
  • displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as audio/video transmitters, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 4. Iftron admits that from June 2006, when it first manufactured the device, to July of 2008, it manufactured and marketed units of the Stinger Pro that were capable of transmitting on 2.468 GHz. Although amateur radio equipment is not required to be certified, the Stinger Pro, as sold in the United States prior to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1535A1.html
  • authorized by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As intentional radiators, wireless video transmitters are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 5. LawMate admits that it manufactured and sold units of two of its wireless video transmitters in the United States within the past year. LawMate further admits that the devices were not certified prior to marketing in the United States. Accordingly, we find that LawMate apparently marketed uncertified radio frequency devices in willful and repeated
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1772A1.html
  • be operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as audio/video transmitters, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. In your LOI response, you admit that the two devices operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Specifically, the 2.4 GHz device is capable of operating on 2370 MHz, 2390 MHz, and 2490 MHz, and the 900 MHz device is capable of operating
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1823A1.html
  • accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter .... Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1824A1.html
  • accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter .... Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2303A1.html
  • authorized by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S:2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. As an intentional radiator, the WH Transmitter is required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing in accordance with the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. In addition, because the WH Transmitter operates in the 106.7-107.9 MHz frequency band, it is subject to the emission limit specified in Section 15.239(b) of the Rules, which provides: The field strength of any emissions within the permitted 200 kHz band shall not exceed 250 microvolts/meter at 3 meters. The emission limit in this paragraph
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2383A1.html
  • 47 C.F.R. S: 2.801 defines a radiofrequency device as "any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radiofrequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means." An intentional radiator is "[a] device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3 (o). 47 C.F.R. S: 15.201(b); see also 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1031-2.1060. LOI Response at 2. See Eure Family Ltd. Partnership, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 21861 (2002); VIA Technologies, Inc, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 19 FCC Rcd 19526, 19529 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2004). Id. at 1-2. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2426A1.html
  • in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2506A1.html
  • be operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Pursuant to Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators such as audio/video transmitters must be authorized in accordance with the Commission's certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to the initiation of marketing in the U.S. It does not appear, however, that the above-cited devices are capable of receiving a grant of certification. In your LOI response, you indicate that the video transmitters operate within restricted frequency bands listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Thus, because these devices are capable of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-253A1.html
  • Inc. ("Macally"). In its July 17, 2008, response to the LOI, Macally identified Power 7 as the manufacturer of the FM Cup Transmitter from April 2007 to the present. 3. As an intentional radiator, the FM Cup Transmitter was required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Commission records indicate that Power 7 did not obtain an equipment certification for the FM Cup Transmitter until July 11, 2008. 4. By LOI dated July 29, 2008, the Division initiated an investigation into whether Power 7 marketed an unauthorized radio frequency device -- specifically, the FM Cup Transmitter -- in the United States. In
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-09-2623A1.html
  • for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. However, the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera operate on 1.2 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Therefore, these devices do not comply with the FCC's technical standards and cannot be certified or marketed within the United States. Accordingly, it appears
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1088A1.html
  • the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless remote control transmitters marketed by USA Shutter, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. USA Shutter admits that it marketed five models of uncertified remote control transmitters. Accordingly, it appears USA Shutter has violated Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.201 of the Rules by marketing in the United States wireless remote control transmitter devices prior to obtaining certification.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1321A1.html
  • to Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules, a radio frequency device may not be marketed within the United States unless the device complies with the applicable technical and administrative provisions of the Rules. Section 15.201 of the Rules requires intentional radiators to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Radio frequency devices must also comply with all applicable identification and labeling requirements prior to marketing. 3. On August 18, 2009, the Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry to Qomo. The LOI directed Qomo to respond to a series of questions regarding the advertising, sale, importation, and labeling of certain of its radio frequency response
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-669A1.html
  • regulations promulgated pursuant to this section." Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibits the marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with all applicable administrative, technical, labeling and identification requirements. Ordinarily, intentional radiators must be authorized in accordance with the certification procedures set forth in Section 2.1031 through Section 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing in the United States. 7. Section 2.803(g) of the Rules, however, provides in pertinent part: [R]adio frequency devices that could not be authorized or legally operated under the current rules ... shall not be operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-7A1.html
  • this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter.... Transmitters that are utilized for operation under Part 90 of the Rules, such as the MSR 200 and/or MSR 300, are generally required by Section 90.203 to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031-2.1060 of the Rules. Under Section 2.803(c) of the Rules, a party is allowed, in limited circumstances, to market devices prior to receiving equipment authorization from the Commission. Specifically, devices may be Advertised or displayed, e.g., at a trade show or exhibition, prior to equipment authorization . . . provided that the advertising contains, and the display is accompanied by, a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1165A1.html
  • operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Further, pursuant to section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as wireless microphones, must be authorized in accordance with the Commission's certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. 8. Commission Rules expressly prohibit the marketing of wireless microphones that can operate in the 700 MHz frequency band. Specifically, section 74.851(g) of the Rules prohibits the manufacture, importation, sale, lease, offer for sale or lease, or shipment of wireless microphones and other low power
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1911A1.html
  • day." See Callais Cablevision, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd at 1362. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 74.801 - 74.882; see supra note 3. 47 C.F.R. S: 74.851(f). A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1031 - 2.1060. LOI Response at 1 - 2. Marketing, as defined in 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4), "includes sale or lease, or offering for sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment, or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." Pursuant to section 2.807(b) of the Rules, the section 2.803
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-408A1.html
  • lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 6. Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, are generally required by section 15.201 of the Commission's rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Commission's rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating between 906 - 924 MHz, the SecurityMan SM-302T is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in section 15.249(a) of the rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to section 15.249(d) of the rules, except for harmonics,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-976A1.html
  • authorized by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As an intentional radiator, the RemoteLinc is required by section 15.201(b) of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 5. SmartLabs admits that it manufactured and marketed units of its RemoteLinc device in the United States within the past year. It appears that these violations were repeated since SmartLabs indicates that the marketing of these devices has continued since May 2007. SmartLabs further admits that the device was not certified prior to marketing in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-574A1.html
  • devices in the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with the applicable technical standards as well as the administrative requirements relating to equipment labeling and consumer disclosure. Under Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as AM transmitters, must be certified in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sections 2.1031 through 2.1060 of the Rules. "Kits," as defined in Section 15.3(p) of the Rules, however, generally do not require authorization. 3. On November 15, 2006, the Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division) issued the letter of inquiry (LOI) to Mr. Mann in response to a complaint alleging that Mr. Mann was assembling SSTRAN model AMT3000 AM transmitters (AMT3000 transmitters) from kits
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2394A1.html
  • prior to marketing, the enclosures to your response indicate that you are also marketing the Shotwatcher for professional video production.1 Therefore, we find that it is not amateur apparatus and must be classified as an intentional radiator2 required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.201, to be approved prior to marketing through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 2.1031 - 2.1060. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's implementing regulations provides that: no person
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2229A1.html
  • April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters ("NAB") trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 2. The Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division") subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom. Section 2.803(c) of the Rules allows the advertising or display of radio
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2350A1.html
  • periodic operation limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. CSI manufactures and markets the PT-1 "Petlocator" transmitter, which is used to track pets, children and model airplanes. Transmitters and other intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. CSI holds an equipment certification for the PT-1 under FCC Identifier CFXPT-1. 3. The Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory ("OET Lab") requested a sample of the PT-1 from CSI pursuant to Section 2.945 of the Rules and tested the sample for compliance with the Rules. The OET Lab found that the PT-1 substantially
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-861A1.html
  • April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters ("NAB") trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Commission's equipment authorization database, however, indicated that Vitec did not hold any equipment certifications. 2. The Bureau subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Bureau obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom. Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1760A1.html
  • 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and also displayed it at the 2005 National Association of Broadcasters ("NAB") trade show in Las Vegas, NV. Digital wireless intercom systems, such as the CellCom 10, are classified as intentional radiators and are required by Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 3. The Division subsequently began an investigation of Vitec's marketing activities. As part of the investigation, the Division obtained a copy of the April 2005 issue of Broadcast Engineering and confirmed that it contains an advertisement for the CellCom 10. The advertisement describes the CellCom 10 as "revolutionary" and exhorts readers to "join the revolution."
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-299A1.html
  • enforcement officials from measuring the speed of the users' vehicles. The Division preliminarily determined that at least two of the models, the RMR-S201 (also known as the Phazer II) and the RMR-C450 jammers, were intentional radiators, devices which are generally required under Section 15.201 of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. The Division also concluded, however, that the devices under investigation were apparently not eligible to receive a grant of certification because their intended purpose is to interfere with a licensed radio service, a violation of Section 333 of the Act. 3. On August 9, 2005, the Division sent RMR a letter of inquiry ("LOI") seeking
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2437A1.html
  • and are marketed for use in a residential environment or for use by the general public, such as XLNT Idea's Nexis 100AP AutoPrinter, Nexis 100AP Publisher, and Xi440 CD/DVD Printer, are required to be approved prior to marketing through either the Declaration of Conformity procedures described in Sections 2.1071-2.1077 of the Rules, or by the Certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031-2.1060 of the Rules. In addition, unintentional radiators are required to comply with the conducted and radiated emissions specified in Sections 15.107 and 15.109 of the Rules. As the manufacturer, XLNT Idea is the party responsible for assuring that these devices are compliant with all applicable technical and administrative requirements. 5. XLNT Idea admits that it marketed and sold units of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1824A1.html
  • accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter .... Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-09-2623A1.html
  • for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. However, the wireless video transmitters marketed by Spy Camera operate on 1.2 GHz, a restricted frequency band listed in Section 15.205(a) of the Rules. Therefore, these devices do not comply with the FCC's technical standards and cannot be certified or marketed within the United States. Accordingly, it appears
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1088A1.html
  • the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter. Intentional radiators, such as the wireless remote control transmitters marketed by USA Shutter, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. USA Shutter admits that it marketed five models of uncertified remote control transmitters. Accordingly, it appears USA Shutter has violated Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.201 of the Rules by marketing in the United States wireless remote control transmitter devices prior to obtaining certification.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1321A1.html
  • to Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules, a radio frequency device may not be marketed within the United States unless the device complies with the applicable technical and administrative provisions of the Rules. Section 15.201 of the Rules requires intentional radiators to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. Radio frequency devices must also comply with all applicable identification and labeling requirements prior to marketing. 3. On August 18, 2009, the Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry to Qomo. The LOI directed Qomo to respond to a series of questions regarding the advertising, sale, importation, and labeling of certain of its radio frequency response
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-669A1.html
  • regulations promulgated pursuant to this section." Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibits the marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with all applicable administrative, technical, labeling and identification requirements. Ordinarily, intentional radiators must be authorized in accordance with the certification procedures set forth in Section 2.1031 through Section 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing in the United States. 7. Section 2.803(g) of the Rules, however, provides in pertinent part: [R]adio frequency devices that could not be authorized or legally operated under the current rules ... shall not be operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-7A1.html
  • this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter.... Transmitters that are utilized for operation under Part 90 of the Rules, such as the MSR 200 and/or MSR 300, are generally required by Section 90.203 to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031-2.1060 of the Rules. Under Section 2.803(c) of the Rules, a party is allowed, in limited circumstances, to market devices prior to receiving equipment authorization from the Commission. Specifically, devices may be Advertised or displayed, e.g., at a trade show or exhibition, prior to equipment authorization . . . provided that the advertising contains, and the display is accompanied by, a
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1165A1.html
  • operated, advertised, displayed, offered for sale or lease, sold or leased, or otherwise marketed absent a license issued under part 5 of this chapter or a special temporary authorization issued by the Commission. Further, pursuant to section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as wireless microphones, must be authorized in accordance with the Commission's certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. 8. Commission Rules expressly prohibit the marketing of wireless microphones that can operate in the 700 MHz frequency band. Specifically, section 74.851(g) of the Rules prohibits the manufacture, importation, sale, lease, offer for sale or lease, or shipment of wireless microphones and other low power
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1911A1.html
  • day." See Callais Cablevision, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd at 1362. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 74.801 - 74.882; see supra note 3. 47 C.F.R. S: 74.851(f). A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1031 - 2.1060. LOI Response at 1 - 2. Marketing, as defined in 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4), "includes sale or lease, or offering for sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment, or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." Pursuant to section 2.807(b) of the Rules, the section 2.803
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-408A1.html
  • lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 6. Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the SecurityMan SM-302T wireless camera, are generally required by section 15.201 of the Commission's rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Commission's rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating between 906 - 924 MHz, the SecurityMan SM-302T is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in section 15.249(a) of the rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to section 15.249(d) of the rules, except for harmonics,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-976A1.html
  • authorized by the Commission in accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by S: 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter [emphasis added]. As an intentional radiator, the RemoteLinc is required by section 15.201(b) of the Rules to be approved prior to marketing through the equipment certification procedures described in sections 2.1031 - 2.1060 of the Rules. 5. SmartLabs admits that it manufactured and marketed units of its RemoteLinc device in the United States within the past year. It appears that these violations were repeated since SmartLabs indicates that the marketing of these devices has continued since May 2007. SmartLabs further admits that the device was not certified prior to marketing in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-574A1.html
  • devices in the United States unless the devices are authorized under the appropriate equipment authorization procedure and comply with the applicable technical standards as well as the administrative requirements relating to equipment labeling and consumer disclosure. Under Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, intentional radiators, such as AM transmitters, must be certified in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sections 2.1031 through 2.1060 of the Rules. "Kits," as defined in Section 15.3(p) of the Rules, however, generally do not require authorization. 3. On November 15, 2006, the Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division) issued the letter of inquiry (LOI) to Mr. Mann in response to a complaint alleging that Mr. Mann was assembling SSTRAN model AMT3000 AM transmitters (AMT3000 transmitters) from kits