FCC Web Documents citing 2.1

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fcc.gov/pshs/techtopics/techtopics4.html
  • ^4 Portable Operating System Interface is the collective name of a family of IEEE standards that define the application programming interface (API) for software compatible with variants of the Unix operating system. The family of POSIX standards is formally designated as IEEE 1003 and the international standard name is ISO/IEC 9945. See [75]http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/posix/. ^5 See [76]http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-264A1.doc. ^6 47 C.F.R. Section 2.1. For the FCC order adopting this definition, see Facilitating Opportunities for Flexible, Efficient, and Reliable Spectrum Use Employing Cognitive Radio Technologies, ET Docket No. 03-108, Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 5486 (2005), also available at [77]http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.doc. ^7 See [78]http://www.sdrforum.org/. ^8 See [79]http://www.sdrforum.org/uploads/news_162003public_safety_sig_03_25_ 04.doc. ^9 See [80]http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuradio/. Linux is a free Unix-type operating system originally created by Linus Torvalds with
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1673 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1674 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1675 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1676 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1754 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1756 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1757 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1758 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1763 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1764 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1766 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1767 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1784A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1784A1.pdf
  • Spectrum Enf. Div. 2006). 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). A wireless access point is a transmitter/receiver used to provide wireless internet access. 47 C.F.R. � 15.247(d). Industry Canada is a regulatory agency of the Canadian government. AboCom received a grant of equipment authorization for the wireless access point under FCC ID MQ4ARM94 on April 22, 2004. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as an ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to AboCom Systems, Inc.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.pdf
  • 10, 2006) (``Response'') at 4, � 10, Exhibit 1, Application of Salsgiver Telecom, Inc. for approval to offer, render, furnish or supply telecommunication services as a Competitive Access Provider to the Public in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Order, Docket No. A-311373, Feb. 7, 2006 (``Salsgiver CAP Authorization Order'') at 2-6. CAP Tariff, ``Application of Tariff'' and ``Service Offered'' and Sections 2.1.1., 3.1, Pages 4, 8 and 25 of 28. Complaint at 1-2, � 3; Response at 2, � 3. Section 224(a)(1) of the Act defines ``utility,'' in pertinent part, as ``a local exchange carrier ... who owns or controls poles, ducts, conduits, or rights-of-way used, in whole or in part, for any wire communications.'' 47 U.S.C. � 224(a)(1). 47 U.S.C. �
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.pdf
  • use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. 47 C.F.R. � 2.801 defines a radiofrequency device as ``any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radiofrequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means.'' Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Citation (Compliance and Inf. Bur., Compliance Div., Inv. Group, February 13, 1997). The citation was issued pursuant to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.pdf
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.pdf
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.pdf
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.pdf
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.pdf
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.pdf
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.pdf
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.pdf
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3266 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3270 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3392 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3393 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.pdf
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3483 Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3974A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3974A1.pdf
  • Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission See Letter from Kathryn Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Surveillance-Video.com (March 13, 2007). See Letter from Reuben Weinstein, President, Surveillance-Video.com to Jacqueline Johnson, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (April 16, 2007). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The 1.2 GHz wireless camera purposely transmits RF energy on restricted frequencies.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4017A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4017A1.pdf
  • LLC (``Rally'') is a Washington-state company that specializes in communications investments. Rally is the secured and only lender of Telesphere. On September 20, 2006, Rally completed an accelerated conversion of Telephere debt to equity, acquiring a majority stock ownership of 64.9 percent in Telesphere and effectively obtaining control of Telesphere. Shortly thereafter on October 4, 2006, Rally acquired an additional 2.1 percent interest, increasing the company's stock ownership in Telesphere to 67 percent. On October 12, 2006, Rally and Telesphere filed a joint domestic and international section 214 application to the Commission for approval of the transfers of control. The applicants stated that the acquisition of corporate control was necessary to improve immediately the financial position of Telesphere. Subsequently on October
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4721A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4721A1.pdf
  • the charge is anything but punitive. We therefore direct NPTC, within 60 days, to amend the Pole Attachment Agreement to limit the penalty for unauthorized attachments to compensatory damages, in accordance with Mile Hi Cable Partners. Salsgiver's Other Facial Challenges to the Pole Attachment Agreement Are Denied. Salsgiver's remaining claims are denied. Contrary to Salsgiver's allegations, we find that sections 2.1, 5.2.1, 5.3, 6.1, 6.4, 6.7, 9.1, 9.2, and 9.5 of the Pole Attachment Agreement are not facially unlawful. As to its claims regarding sections 2.6, 3.2, 5.11, 5.5.4, 6.2, 6.6, and 6.16 of the Pole Attachment Agreement, Salsgiver has failed to meet its burden of proving the facts necessary to show that those provisions would be unlawful, as applied. Salsgiver
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-472A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-472A1.pdf
  • states: ``Carrier does not transmit messages pursuant to this Tariff, but its services may be used for that purpose.'' We conclude, based on an examination of the Tariff as a whole, that DQE CNS does, in fact, offer to transmit information of the user's choosing through its CAP Tariff, and thus qualifies as a ``telecommunications carrier'' under the Act. Section 2.1.A of the CAP Tariff states: ``This Tariff contains the regulations and rates applicable to intrastate telecommunications services provided by Carrier [DQE CNS] to business customers for the origination and termination of telecommunications between points within the State.'' Section 1 defines ``Telecommunications'' as the ``transmission of voice communications or, subject to the transmission capabilities of the service, the transmission of data,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-486A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-486A1.pdf
  • [that] details services, equipment and pricing offered by the telephone company (a common carrier) to all potential customers'') (emphasis added). See CAP Tariff Section 1, 3rd Revised page 1; Switched Access Tariff, Original Title Page. Similar language describing the carrier's undertaking to offer service in accordance with the terms of its tariffs is contained in Fibertech's IXC Tariff at Section 2.1.1, Original page 1, and its IXC Reseller Tariff at Section 2.1.1, Original page 1. See Response at 13, � 40; NPTC May 25 Letter at 1-4. Fibertech May 5 Letter at 1. Chiaino Declaration at 2, �� 2-3. See, e.g., NPTC May 25 Letter at 1-4; Response at 6-8, 12-13 �� 13, 16-17, 40; NPTC Dec. 15 Letter at 1,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4874A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4874A1.pdf
  • Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The GPS intercept device (which operates in the 1575.42 MHz band) and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1019A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1019A1.pdf
  • the Effective Date of the Consent Decree. This Consent Decree cannot be modified without the advance written consent of both Parties. This Consent Decree may be signed in counterparts. For the Enforcement Bureau: ____________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau __________________________ Date For Rajant Corporation: ___________________________ Robert Schena Chief Executive Officer ___________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. � � 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. Letter from Kathryn Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau to Robert Schena, Chief Executive Officer, Rajant Corporation (September 4, 2007). Letter from Patricia J. Paoletta, Esq., Counsel
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1196A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1196A1.pdf
  • Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The GPS Jammer (which operates in the 1450 MHz to 1600 MHz
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1202A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1202A1.pdf
  • radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o). Section 2.803(e)(4) of the Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.807(d). 47 U.S.C. �� 154 (i), 154 (j) and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-155A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-155A1.pdf
  • Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The GPS Blocker (which operates in the 1450 MHz to 1600 MHz
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.pdf
  • Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' Your response indicates that the 1.3 GHz device is shipped with a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1730A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1730A1.pdf
  • See Revised Plan, Section 1.3 Plan Development and Regional Participation at 10-11. See Revised Plan Appendix A - Bylaws at 66-73 (adopted Aug. 14, 2006). See Revised Plan Appendix B - Original Region 20 Member List and Contact Information; see also, Plan Appendix B-1 Region 20 Membership at Time of Completion of the 700 MHz Plan. See Revised Plan, Section 2.1 - Notification Process at 13-15. . See Revised Plan Sections 3.0 - 3.1 Regional Plan Administration and Frequency Coordination (description of spectrum allocation); see also, Section 3.6 Process for Requesting Channel Assignments at 23. See Revised Plan, Sections 6.0 - 6.4. System Design/Efficiency Requirements (addressing interference protection; spectrum efficiency standards; ``orphaned channels'' and system implementation). Id.; see also, Revised Plan,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2051A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2051A1.pdf
  • Sincerely, Kathryn S. Berthot Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau www.ebay.com. Section 2.803(e)(4) of the Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' Furthermore, section 2.803(g) of the Rules provides that radio frequency devices that
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1050A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1050A1.pdf
  • an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ Kathryn S. Berthot Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Monster Cable Products, Inc. and Monster LLC: ________________________________ David Tognotti General Counsel and Vice President of Administration ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to David Tognotti, General Counsel, Monster, LLC (February 9, 2007) (``February 9, 2007 LOI''). 47 U.S.C. �
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1235A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1235A1.pdf
  • Docket No. 96-86, Public Notice, 22 FCC Rcd 19461 (PSHSB 2007). See Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Reminds 700 MHz Regional Planning Committees of the January 31, 2008 Deadline to Amend 700 MHz Narrowband Plans and Provides Further Guidance, PS Docket No. 06-229, WT Docket No. 96-86, Public Notice, 22 FCC Rcd 21889 (PSHSB 2007). See Revised Plan, Section 2.1 Notification Process at 5-6 (on October 14, 2002, a November 6, 2002 pre-planning meeting was announced by James A. Wilson, 800 MHz RPC Chair and 700 MHz Convener); see also Revised Plan, Appendix D - Meeting Attendance and Minutes at 35-44. See Revised Plan, Appendix A - By-Laws of the 700 MHz RPC Region 27. See Revised Plan, Appendix B
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.pdf
  • (2007); see also, Pilot Travel Centers, LLC, Notice of Apparent Liability, 19 FCC Rcd 23113, 23114 (2004) (``[R]adio transmitting equipment that transmits solely on Amateur Radio Service (``ARS'') frequencies is not subject to equipment authorization requirements prior to manufacture or marketing.''). 47 C.F.R. �15.205(a). This section allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Section 2.1 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1, defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' Marketing, as defined in 47
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1697A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1697A1.pdf
  • the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). 47 U.S.C. � 333. Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The GPS-JM2 GPS Jammer (which operates in the 1450 MHz to 1600
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.pdf
  • Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). See 5 U.S.C. � 552(a)(e)(3). See 18
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1865A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1865A1.pdf
  • in the development of coordinated regional plans, and developed a Regional Planning Guidebook. Following the sunset of the NCC's charter on July 25, 2003, the National Public Safety Telecommunications Council (NPSTC) agreed to continue to provide assistance to regional planners. A copy of the 700 MHz Regional Planning Guidebook is available at the NPSTC website at http://www.npstc.org/nccsubcom.jsp. See Plan, Section 2.1 - Notification Process at 6 (the convening meeting was held at the Georgia Public Safety Training Center, Forsyth, GA). Id. Meeting notifications were published by FCC public notice, placement in the Association of Public Safety Communications Officials, Inc. magazine and The Atlanta Journal Constitution. The Georgia Mutual Aid Group and National Emergency Number Association, GA Chapter, all counties in GA,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-214A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-214A1.pdf
  • facsimile), each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Humax Co., Ltd.: ________________________________ Tae Hun Kim President, U.S. Operation ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Jaeho Lee, Humax Co., Ltd. (April 20, 2006) (``April 20, 2006 LOI''). 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b).
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-215A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-215A1.pdf
  • by facsimile), each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Wistron NeWeb Corporation: ________________________________ Jeffrey Gau Chief Operating Officer ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Edward Yeh, Wistron NeWeb Corporation (April 20, 2006) (``April 20, 2006 LOI''). 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b).
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-226A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-226A1.pdf
  • each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Ki Ryung Electronics Co., Ltd.: ________________________________ Young-hoon Bae President and CEO ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to I.C. Kim, Q&C Department Manager, Ki Ryung Electronics Co., Ltd. (dated June 20, 2006). 47 U.S.C.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-229A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-229A1.pdf
  • any number of counterparts (including by facsimile), each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. _______________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date ________________________________ Thomas C. Malone Senior Vice President Audiovox Corporation ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 et seq. and 15.1 et seq. See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau to Mr.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.pdf
  • Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The listed video transmitters intentionally transmit radio frequency energy on restricted frequencies.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.pdf
  • C.F.R. �15.3(o). See 47 C.F.R. � 15.201. A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1031 - 2.1060. 47 C.F.R. � 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The video transmitters listed in your response intentionally transmit radio frequency energy
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-35A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-35A1.pdf
  • in the development of coordinated regional plans, and developed a Regional Planning Guidebook. Following the sunset of the NCC's charter on July 25, 2003, the National Public Safety Telecommunications Council (NPSTC) agreed to continue to provide assistance to regional planners. A copy of the 700 MHz Regional Planning Guidebook is available at the NPSTC website at http://www.npstc.org/nccsubcom.jsp. See Plan, Section 2.1 Notification Process at 22. See Plan, Section 11 - Bylaws at 49-56 (adopted April 4, 2006). See Plan, Section 12 - Region 51 Members and Agencies at 57-81 (membership and voting status). See Plan, Section 2.2 - Operations of the RPC at 22-24. The RPC maintains a webpage at http://www.region51.hctx.net. See Plan, Section 13 - Lists of Meetings, Summaries of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-670A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-670A1.pdf
  • facsimile), each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. ________________________________ Kathryn S. Berthot Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date ________________________________ D. Bruce Sewell Senior Vice President and General Counsel Intel Corporation ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 et seq., 15.1 et seq., and 68.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 et seq., 15.1 et seq., and 68.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b); 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 et seq., 15.1 et seq. and 68.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-4A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-4A1.pdf
  • in the development of coordinated regional plans, and developed a Regional Planning Guidebook. Following the sunset of the NCC's charter on July 25, 2003, the National Public Safety Telecommunications Council (NPSTC) agreed to continue to provide assistance to regional planners. A copy of the 700 MHz Regional Planning Guidebook is available at the NPSTC website at http://www.npstc.org/nccsubcom.jsp. See Plan, Section 2.1 - Notification at 7; see also Plan, Appendix C - Meeting Notifications, Agenda and Summary of Meeting Minutes at 27-32 (notifications were published by FCC public notice and by placement in the Association of Public Safety Communications Officials, Inc., and Emergency Numbering Professional magazines, and the Pittsburg Post-Gazette and The Tribune-Review newspapers). See Plan, Appendix C - Meeting Notifications, Agenda
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-857A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-857A1.pdf
  • by attachment to letter from Robert W. McCaugern, Deputy Director General, Spectrum Engineering to Mr. Bruce Franca, Deputy Chief Engineer, Office of Engineering and Technology, Federal Communications Commission (Dec. 9, 1994) (Letter Amendment). Arrangement F at �� 3-4. Interim Arrangement at �� 2-3. Letter Amendment at Annex A. Id. at Annex B, Tables C1 and C2. Interim Arrangement at � 2.1(a). License WPPC814 authorizes the County of Oakland to operate on the following channel pairs which are primary to licensees in Canada in Canada Border Region 3 which includes Oakland County, Michigan: 821.1000 MHz/866.1000 MHz, 821.1375 MHz/ 866.1375 MHz, 821.2125 MHz/866.2125 MHz, 821.2500 MHz/866.2500 MHz, and 821.3500 MHz/866.3500 MHz. License WPPC814 also authorizes Oakland County to transmit on the five mutual
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-860A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-860A1.pdf
  • by attachment to letter from Robert W. McCaugern, Deputy Director General, Spectrum Engineering to Mr. Bruce Franca, Deputy Chief Engineer, Office of Engineering and Technology, Federal Communications Commission (Dec. 9, 1994) (Letter Amendment). Arrangement F at �� 3-4. Interim Arrangement at �� 2-3. Letter Amendment at Annex A. Id. at Annex B, Tables C1 and C2. Interim Arrangement at � 2.1(a). License call signs WPKU987, WPMS956, WPMS961, WPRF275 and WPRH880 are located in Canada Border Region 4 which includes portions of the State of Washington. The specific frequencies which are primary to licensees in Canada are listed in Attachment I. The control stations are authorized to operate anywhere within the State of Washington. See licenses call signs WPKU987, WPMS956, WPMS961, WPRF275
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-867A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-867A1.pdf
  • in the development of coordinated regional plans, and developed a Regional Planning Guidebook. Following the sunset of the NCC's charter on July 25, 2003, the National Public Safety Telecommunications Council (NPSTC) agreed to continue to provide assistance to regional planners. A copy of the 700 MHz Regional Planning Guidebook is available at the NPSTC website at http://www.npstc.org/nccsubcom.jsp. See Plan, Section 2.1 - Notification Process at 14 (notifications were published by FCC public notice and Region 34 email lists); see also Plan, Appendix D - Meeting Notices and Related Documentation at 86-101. See Plan, Appendix A - By-Laws of Region 34 at 75-79. See Plan, Appendix B - Region 34 Membership List and Contact Information at 80-81. See Plan, Appendix D -
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.pdf
  • Id. 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(g). 47 C.F.R. � 15.201(b). Section 15.3(o) of the Rules defines an ``intentional radiator'' as a ``device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o). 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Id. Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]mission[s] on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The subject transmitters intentionally transmit radio frequency energy on restricted frequencies within
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.pdf
  • Operation of Low Power Auxiliary Stations in the 698-806 Band, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 25 FCC Rcd 643 (2010). Effective June 12, 2010, operation of wireless microphones in the 700 MHz frequency band is prohibited. 47 C.F.R. � 74.851(g). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Section 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]mission[s] on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The subject wireless microphones intentionally transmit radio frequency energy on restricted frequencies
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1538A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1538A1.pdf
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including for use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. ��87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1, 76.613(a). Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, � 14 (1985). 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47 C.F.R. � 76.1706.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1539A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1539A1.pdf
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including for use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. ��87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1, 76.613(a). Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, � 14 (1985). 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47 C.F.R. � 76.1706.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1540A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1540A1.pdf
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including for use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. ��87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1, 76.613(a). Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, � 14 (1985). 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47 C.F.R. � 76.1706.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1651A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1651A1.pdf
  • �76.616. These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V; 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1, 76.613(a). See Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, � 14 (1985). See 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.615(b)(7). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.611(a). See 47 C.F.R. �
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275666A1.pdf
  • 07-TR-1006 Steven K. Jones Thomas W. Phillips ii Table of Contents Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................................vi 1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................................1 1.1 TV Band Incumbent Uses............................................................................................................2 1.2 Interference Concerns, and Test Objectives................................................................................3 1.3 Test Scope and Approach............................................................................................................4 1.3.1 Assessing Sensing Ability and Interference Potential with respect to Television Services....5 1.3.2 Assessing Sensing Ability and Interference Potential with respect to Wireless Microphones6 2 White Space Prototype Devices.........................................................................................................7 2.1 Prototype A (Versions 1 and 2)...................................................................................................7 2.2 Prototype B................................................................................................................................10 3 DTV Scanning/Spectrum Sensing Capability Tests.......................................................................11 3.1 Test Approach...........................................................................................................................11 3.2 Bench Tests to Determine Minimum DTV Signal Detection Threshold.....................................12 3.2.1 Baseline Detection Threshold Tests (Single DTV Input Signal)..........................................12 3.2.2 Multiple-Signal Detection Threshold Tests (Two DTV Input Signal).................................15 3.3 Field Tests with Over-the-Air Signals.......................................................................................18 3.3.1 Field Test Site 1....................................................................................................................20 3.3.2 Field Test
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.pdf
  • 90deg CCW 11.3 14.3 15.3 14.3 11.3 Overall Min 6.3 Site 1: Single-Family Home Wall Table 3-3shows the results of all measurements at site 1for two meters separation between the transmit antenna and the TV receiver. The measurements were performed on three TV receivers for front and rear aspects of the TV. The individual threshold EIRP measurements at site 1averaged 2.1 dB lower than those at site 0for the seven measurements at corresponding conditions. This result is unexpected, given that the wall attenuation at site 1 was expected to result in higher threshold EIRP values at site 1. We note, however, that differences in the multipath environment, such as a possible difference in effective depth of the ground planes could cause
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-63A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-63A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-63A1.txt
  • Service (Other Than Broadcast), File No. 0314-EX-PL-1999, filed Dec. 1, 1999. Global Frontiers Petition for Rulemaking at 10-11. 47 C.F.R. � 26.101(a). 47 C.F.R. � 26.209(a). Table of Frequency Allocations, 47 C.F.R. � 2.106, international footnote S5.442. The aeronautical mobile service is defined as a mobile service between aeronautical stations and aircraft stations, or between aircraft stations. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). Footnote S5.442 also limits the sub-band 4825-4835 MHz to the mobile, except aeronautical mobile, service. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.105(c)(2) (setting forth restrictions for secondary services). Per international footnote S5.443, in Argentina, Australia, and Canada, the allocation of the sub-bands 4825-4835 MHz and 4950-4990 MHz to the radio astronomy service is on a primary basis. Table of Frequency Allocations, 47
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.txt
  • the unsuspecting legitimate subscriber. The term ``hardened ESN'' refers to the design requirement that the ESN be made absolutely unalterable (i.e., physically impossible to alter, by any person, for any reason). See 18 U.S.C � 1029(a)(7) (2000). for a leading smart card manufacturer's views on the security advantages of smart cards. This channelization plan is referenced in OET 53, Section 2.1.1.1, by its former codification, section 22.902 of the Commission's rules. The current rule, section 22.905, contains a typographical error: in the Block B control channel pairs, last line, it should read ``835.620'' instead of ``835.920''. See 47 C.F.R. � 22.901(d)(2). Of the digital technologies commonly used to provide cellular telephone service, the time-division multiple access (TDMA) technology uses the same
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.txt
  • See Reorganization and Revision of Part 87 Governing the Aviation Services, Memorandum Opinion and Order, PR Docket No. 87-214, 3 FCC Rcd 4171 (1988). The Commission formerly also used the acronym AMSS(R) to refer to this service. A mobile satellite service is a radio communication service between mobile earth stations and one or more space stations. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. A mobile earth station is an earth station intended for use while in motion or during halts at unspecified points. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.201. See Amendment of Parts 2 and 22 of the Commission's Rules Relative to Cellular Communications Systems, Report and Order, Gen. Docket Nos. 84-1231, 84-1233, 84-1234, 2 FCC Rcd 1825 (1986). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.txt
  • � 42. Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at � 10. See 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(3)(D). Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at � 10. See 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(3)(A), (D). An ``out-of-band emission'' is an ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies immediately outside the necessary bandwidth which results from the modulation process, but excluding spurious emissions.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). A ``spurious emission'' is an ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' Id. � 2.1(c). The objective of most of the Commission's traditional
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.txt
  • Order, 49 FR 2357 (January 19, 1984). . See Final Acts of the World Administrative Radio Conference for Dealing with Frequency Allocations in Certain Parts of the Spectrum (WARC-92) at p. 92. An active sensor is an EESS or SRS measuring instrument by means of which information is obtained by transmission and reception of radio waves. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See Final Acts of the World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-97) at p. 71. A passive sensor is an EESS or SRS measuring instrument by means of which information is obtained by reception of radio waves of natural origin. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See Final Acts of the World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-2000) at pp. 43-46. See also United States Proposals for
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 02-353 Adopted: November 7, 2002 Released: November 22, 2002 Comments Due: February 7, 2003 Reply Comments Due: March 14, 2003 By the Commission: Chairman Powell, and Commissioners Copps and Martin issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph Number I. Introduction . . . . . . . . .
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-325A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-325A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-325A1.txt
  • �� 309(j)(4)(B)-(C) (relating to the promotion of service to rural areas and the provision of economic opportunities for rural telephone companies). 47 U.S.C. �� 309(j)(3)(B)-(D). Generally, after notice and comment, we have addressed these policies in adopting service rules for particular spectrum bands. See, e.g., In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 02-305 (rel. Nov. 22, 2002). We encourage rural interests to participate in these service-specific rulemaking proceedings. See In the Matter of Statement of Policy on Establishing a Government-to-Government Relationship with Indian Tribes, Policy Statement, FCC 00-207, 16 FCC Rcd 4078 (2000); 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(f)(3). Rural Radiotelephone Service is
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.txt
  • same requirement that we have for broadband PCS mobile/portable operation in the 1.9 GHz band. However, the Coalition notes that we adopted the 2-watt limit in the Two-Way Order without any explanation and urges that we delete this power limit. It says that the limit unduly restricts the flexibility of equipment designers to make the most efficient use of the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz bands. The Coalition emphasizes, however, that it is not advocating any change in the restrictions on power contained in Parts 1 and 2 that are designed to assure the protection of human health and safety; in fact, it recommends that we clarify that those limits apply to MDS and ITFS by adding those services to the list
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.txt
  • 2002). The Commission reserved for further analysis the possible AWS use of the 2160-2165 MHz band. Id. at �7. The Commission concurrently adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the licensing, technical, and operational rules to be applied to the newly allocated AWS bands. See In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 02-305 (rel. Nov. 22, 2002). See 47 C.F.R. � 101.101. Sections 22.601 and 22.602 provide that no new systems will be authorized on these channels pursuant to Part 22. 47 C.F.R. �� 22.601, 22.602. Section 22.602 also provides procedures for transitioning Paging and Radiotelephone Service licensees from these channels. Id. 47 C.F.R. �
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-187A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-187A1.pdf
  • at slide 11. ``LI'' means Lawful Intercept. TIA Reply Comments at Declaration of Terri L. Brooks at 14. SIA Comments at 2. Space Station System Licensee, Inc., Assignor and Iridium Constellation LLC, Assignee, for Consent to Assignment of License Pursuant to Section 310(d) of the Communications Act, Memorandum Opinion, Order and Authorization, 17 FCC Rcd 2271 at Appendix A, � 2.1 (2002). See also, e.g., International Authorizations Granted, IB Docket No. 04-4, Public Notice, DA 04-628 (rel. March 8, 2004) (granting the assignment or transfer of control of space and earth station licenses relating to the Globalstar mobile satellite service to New Operating Globalstar LLC, subject to conditions, including assumption of agreements previously made with LEAs); Motient Services Inc. and TMI
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 04-356 WT Docket No. 02-353 Adopted: September 9, 2004 Released: September 24, 2004 Comment Date: November 23, 2004 Reply Comment Date: January 7, 2005 By the Commission: Chairman Powell, Commissioners Abernathy, Copps, and Adelstein issuing separate statements. Table of Contents Heading Paragraph # I. introduction 1 II.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-38A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-38A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-38A1.txt
  • ed., Addison, Wellsley, Longman, Inc., 1999). See Spectrum Aggregation R&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 22688-91, �� 39-43. Promoting Efficient Use of Spectrum through Elimination of Barriers to the Development of Secondary Markets, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 20604 (2003) (``Secondary Markets R&O''). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162 (2003). See Spectrum Aggregation R&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 22708, � 89. Sprint PCS Reply Comments at 8-10 in Year 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review-Amendment of Part 22 of the Commission's Rules to Modify or Eliminate Outdated Rules Affecting the Cellular Radiotelephone Service and Other Commercial Mobile Radio
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.txt
  • Final Acts of the World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-97), Geneva, 1997, and Final Acts of the World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-2000), Istanbul, 2000, (Radio Regulations); Chadwick Request. In the amateur service, ``operating privileges'' generally refer to the frequency bands available to the control operator of an amateur station and to the emission types an amateur station may transmit. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1(c), 97.3(a)(4). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.1. The purpose of the amateur service includes recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service to the public as a voluntary noncommercial communications service, continuation of the amateur's proven ability to contribute to the advancement of the radio art; expansion of the existing reservoir of trained operators, technicians, and electronic experts; and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-143A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-143A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-143A1.txt
  • the Commission already has sought comment on proposed rule changes regarding some of the other issues raised by petitioners in this proceeding. See Amendment of Part 97 of the Commission's Rules Governing the Amateur Radio Services, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, WT Docket No. 04-140, 19 FCC Rcd 7293, 7300 � 11 (2004) (Phone Band Expansion NPRM). See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1(c), 97.3(a)(4). The Commission's regulation of the amateur service is based on the following principles: recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service to the public as a voluntary noncommercial communications service; continuation and extension of the amateur's proven ability to contribute to the advancement of the radio art; encouragement and improvement of the service through rules which provide
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.txt
  • 700 MHz Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 1059-1061 �� 91-94. Rural Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 19089 �14. RVW Comments at 2. The Commission has allocated 82 megahertz of spectrum on a CMA basis: 20 megahertz of AWS spectrum, see 47 C.F.R. � 27.6(h)(1); Service Rules for the Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Order on Reconsideration, FCC 05-149, 2005 WL 1964113, at *7 � 20 (rel. Aug. 15, 2005) (AWS-1 Order on Reconsideration); 50 megahertz for cellular service, see 47 C.F.R. � 22.909; Tenth CMRS Competition Report, 20 FCC Rcd at 15934-3 � 70; and the 12 megahertz in paired Block C in the Lower 700 MHz
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.txt
  • rule changes that relate to M-LMS operations in the M-LMS Band. 47 C.F.R. � 90.205(k). 47 C.F.R. � 15.247. In a spread spectrum system, information is conveyed by modulation of a carrier by some conventional means, and the bandwidth is deliberately widened by a spreading function over that which would be needed to transmit the information alone. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). M-LMS licensees currently may operate at 49.2 Watts, while Part 15 devices may operate at 4 Watts, a 10.9 dB difference. See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.247, 90.205(k). In this regard, we note the discussion below on the possibility of imposing a power spectral density requirement. See infra paras. 32-33. In commenting on these comparisons using reduced M-LMS power limits, commenters
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-107A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-107A1.pdf
  • still pending. See ``Correction to Public Notice DA 96-586 `FCC Announces Winning Bidders in the Auction of 1020 Licenses to Provide 900 MHz SMR in Major Trading Areas,''' Public Notice, 18 FCC Rcd 18367 (WTB 1996). See ``Multi-Radio Service Auction Closes,'' Public Notice, 17 FCC Rcd 1446 (WTB 2002). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS-1 Report and Order). 15 U.S.C. � 632. Letter from Jere W. Glover, Chief Counsel for Advocacy, SBA, to William E. Kennard, Chairman, FCC (May 27, 1999). The Small Business Act contains a definition of ``small-business concern,'' which the RFA incorporates into its own definition of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
  • Richard S. Whitt, Esq., Washington Telecom and Media Counsel, Google, Inc. to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, filed May 21, 2007 (Google Ex Parte). Comment Sought on Google Proposals Regarding Service Rules for 700 MHz Spectrum, 72 Fed. Reg. 29930 (May 30, 2007) (Google 700 MHz Service Rules PN). See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058,14069 � 20 (2005) (AWS-1 Order on Reconsideration). See 700 MHz Commercial Services Notice, 21 FCC Rcd at 9362-69 �� 27-48. Id. at 9347 � 2, 9362-73 �� 27-59. Id. at 9352-53 � 11, 9370-72 �� 51-55; Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-14A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-14A1.pdf
  • Initial Brief on Damages at 20-22; Defendants' Reply Brief on Damages at 6-10. See, e.g., Damages Joint Statement at 12; Damages Reply at 26-27; Defendants' Initial Brief on Damages at 17-19, 25 and Att. 5; Defendants' Reply Brief on Damages at 9, Attachment B (directing Debit Card Providers to maintain call information). See, e.g., Liability Answer at Attachment B-11, part 2.1. Defendants' Initial Brief on Damages at 20-22 (citing C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc., Hearing Designation Order, 16 FCC Rcd 8801, 8808 at � 21 (Enf. Bur. 2001); New Valley Corp. v. Pacific Bell, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 5128, 5134 at � 14 (2000); Hi-Tech Furnace Systems, Inc. v. FCC, 224 F.3d 781, 787
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.txt
  • Services Transmissions originating in the AWS-3 band could potentially cause harmful interference to adjacent band services. For example, AWS-3 base, fixed or mobile stations could cause interference to AWS-1 and proposed AWS-2 services, which will operate in the 2110-2155 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz bands, respectively, as well as other existing services that currently operate in the upper part of the 2.1 GHz band - such as Broadband Radio Service (BRS), Fixed Microwave services (FS) and MSS/ATC. In the following paragraphs, we seek comment on possible technical and operational rules to protect these various services from harmful interference. As discussed above, if we were to adopt an uplink/downlink approach for the 2155-2175 MHz band, it could be used to implement systems using
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-177A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-177A1.pdf
  • still pending. See ``Correction to Public Notice DA 96-586 `FCC Announces Winning Bidders in the Auction of 1020 Licenses to Provide 900 MHz SMR in Major Trading Areas,''' Public Notice, 18 FCC Rcd 18367 (WTB 1996). See ``Multi-Radio Service Auction Closes,'' Public Notice, 17 FCC Rcd 1446 (WTB 2002). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS-1 Report and Order). 15 U.S.C. � 632. Letter from Jere W. Glover, Chief Counsel for Advocacy, SBA, to William E. Kennard, Chairman, FCC (May 27, 1999). The Small Business Act contains a definition of ``small-business concern,'' which the RFA incorporates into its own definition of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.txt
  • the current standards of judicial review. See Adarand Constructors v. Pe�a, 515 U.S. 200 (1995) (requiring a strict scrutiny standard of review for government mandated race-conscious measures); United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996) (applying an intermediate standard of review to a state program based on gender classification). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS-1 Report and Order). See Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, Third Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 10 FCC Rcd 175, 196 (1995); Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, Fifth Report
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-164A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-164A1.pdf
  • Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, from Aida Alvarez, Administrator, Small Business Administration, dated August 10, 1999. See ``Lower 700 MHz Band Auction Closes,'' Public Notice, 17 FCC Rcd 17272 (WTB 2002). See ``Lower 700 MHz Band Auction Closes,'' Public Notice, 18 FCC Rcd 11873 (WTB 2003). Id. Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS-1 Report and Order). See Implementation of section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, Third Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 10 FCC Rcd 175, 196 (1995); Implementation of section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, Fifth Report
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-176A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-176A1.pdf
  • STA to operate those repeaters for a period of 180 days. Administration of effective spectrum policy requires that licensees comply with Commission rules and that the Commission is vigilant in its oversight. This will foster a level playing field for competition and encourage technological innovation. The American public requires and deserves no less. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 25.120. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 et seq. and 15.1 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 25.120. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Patrick L. Donnelly, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. (June
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-177A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-177A1.pdf
  • others will be referred to the FCC's International Bureau for processing. Administration of effective spectrum policy requires that licensees comply with Commission rules and that the Commission is vigilant in its oversight. This will foster a level playing field for competition and encourage technological innovation. The American public requires and deserves no less. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 25.120. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 25.120. See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, FCC, to William J. Bailey, Senior Vice President, Regulatory and Government Affairs, XM
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-184A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-184A1.pdf
  • Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, from Aida Alvarez, Administrator, Small Business Administration, dated August 10, 1999. See ``Lower 700 MHz Band Auction Closes,'' Public Notice, 17 FCC Rcd 17272 (WTB 2002). See ``Lower 700 MHz Band Auction Closes,'' Public Notice, 18 FCC Rcd 11873 (WTB 2003). Id. Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS-1 Report and Order). See Implementation of section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, Third Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 10 FCC Rcd 175, 196 (1995); Implementation of section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, Fifth Report
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.pdf
  • inconsistent with Congress' direction that both the CMSAAC and the Commission, separately, consult NIST. Cf, WARN Act � 602(a) and � 603(g). There would have been no need for the Commission to consult NIST again if, as the commenters suggest, Congress intended the Commission to simply adopt the CMSAAC's recommendations ``as is.'' Ericsson Comments at 5. See CMSAAC recommendations, � 2.1, figure2-1 (CMAS Functional Reference Model). See CMSAAC recommendations, � 8. The Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) refers to Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) Standard CAP-V1.1, October 2005. See CMSAAC recommendations, � 2.2.4 Provisions have also been made for authorized alert originators to formulate and distribute alerts via the Alert Gateway in free text. See e.g., CMSAAC recommendations,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-74A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-74A1.pdf
  • of Air-Ground Telecommunications Services et al., Order on Reconsideration and Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19663, paras. 28-42 (2005). Id. See Letter from Hector V. Barreto, Administrator, SBA, to Gary D. Michaels, Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, FCC (filed Sept. 19, 2005). See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058, App. C (2005). See ``Auction of Advanced Wireless Services Licenses Scheduled for June 29, 2006; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-19A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-19A1.pdf
  • G, Interconnection Agreement-Texas between Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and UTEX Communications Corp. at 17; Answer at 7, para. 8; Answer Legal Analysis at 14. 47 U.S.C. �� 251, 252. See, e.g., Stipulated Facts at 6, para. 17; Complaint at Ex. G. See, e.g., Complaint Exhibit G, Interconnection Agreement-Texas between Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and UTEX Communications Corp. at 378, � 2.1.1. See, e.g., Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 6-7; Stipulated Facts at 2-4. above, but that caveat is not relevant here. Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 4-7. See, e.g., Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 7-8; Stipulated Facts at 2-6. See, e.g., Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 8; Stipulated Facts at 2-6. See, e.g., Complaint, Exhibits B and C. We recognize that the tariff at issue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1476A1.txt
  • at � 25 (1989). Response at p. 7. Reply at Exhibit 1. Complaint at p. 2, n. 1; Response at p. 7. The sample provided in the Complaint was executed on June 29, 1982. The letter suggests that there was some discussion and unfruitful attempts at negotiation between the parties. Response at Attachment 1. Complaint at Exhibit 3. Old Agreement �2.1; New Agreement �2.1. Old Agreement �2.5; New Agreement �2.4. Old Agreement �2.1; New Agreement �2.1. Old Agreement, Exhibit B. Old Agreement; Exhibit C. Old Agreement �2.6; New Agreement ��2.7 &2.8 New Agreement �2.6. Old Agreement,�2.9; New Agreement �1. Old Agreement, Specifications, Item 7; New Agreement, �2.9 & Specifications, Item 7. Old Agreement �2.10; New Agreement �2.10. Old Agreement �3.10; New
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1765A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1765A1.txt
  • at � 30, n. 82 (citing Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35); Bell Atlantic/Vodafone AirTouch Order, 2000 WL 332670, at � 25, n. 49 (same). See also, Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997). Public Interest Statement at 2. See Geotek Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 802-803, �� 26-27. Pittencrieff Communications, Inc., Transferor, and Nextel Communications, Inc., Transferee, For Consent to Transfer Control of Pittencrieff Communications, Inc. and its Subsidiaries, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 8935, 8946, 8948, 8953, �� 24,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1907A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1907A1.txt
  • 2. See also 47 C.F.R. � 19.61 (1958). 47 C.F.R. � 19.61(a) (1958). Id. See also Revision of Operating Rules for Class D Stations in the Citizens Radio Service, First Report and Order, Docket No. 20210, 54 FCC 2d 841 (1975) (maintaining prohibition against communication with an amateur radio station, an unlicensed station, or foreign stations). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. The international Radio Regulations provide that stations in the Fixed and Mobile services, except aeronautical mobile, may be licensed in the the frequency segment segment 26.96-27.41 MHz in ITU Regions 1 and 3. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. Comments of NAB at 1-2. ``Illegal transmissions'' as the term is used by NAB, refers to CB
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2217A1.txt
  • to the change in structure height, which if it is not deemed a technical change, is a minor modification. Therefore, we decline to address Tucson's waiver request. 9. Instead, we propose to resolve Tucson's claim that it has met the standard for retaining primary status while making minor modifications. To affirmatively justify primary status, Tucson states that it utilizes its 2.1 GHz microwave repeater to provide communications circuits for high speed power line protection, and control and monitoring of its high voltage power transmission system that serves the Green Valley community and a large mining operation. Tucson asserts that in providing such services, it relies upon the protection that primary status provides. Tucson states that, as a licensee with primary status,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2223A1.txt
  • These include but may extend beyond factors relating to cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. See also, Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997) (``DOJ Horizontal Merger Guidelines''). See, generally, Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions with Respect to Commercial Mobile Services, Fifth Report, FCC 00-289, 2000 WL 1166196 (F.C.C.) (Aug. 18, 2000). 47 C.F.R. � 22.942. 47 C.F.R. � 20.6. For example, in the Houma-Thibodaux, Louisiana cellular market, SBC owns
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2239A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2239A1.txt
  • identification of market participants and analysis of market structure, market concentration, and potential entry. These include but may extend beyond factors relating to cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20014 � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15368 � 35. See also Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4. For example, the Commission has granted the following microwave licenses in the Gulf: Union Oil Company of California, WPQS652, File No. 0000108919 (Sept. 21, 2000); Coastal Product Service, WPQS632, File No. 0000117254 (Sept. 21, 2000); Petroleum Communications, Inc., WPQR754, File No. 0000163392 (Sept. 6, 2000); Vastar Resources, Inc., WPON831, File No. 0000055157 (Apr. 21, 2000). See Opposition at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2443A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2443A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2443A1.txt
  • These include but may extend beyond factors relating to cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35). See also, Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997). With respect to the provision of commercial communications services, TeleCorp, through its subsidiaries also holds LMDS licenses. See Public Interest Statement at 5. TeleCorp, through other affiliates, also recently obtained 39 GHz licenses. See The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Announces the Grant of 1961 License to Operate in the 39
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2581A1.txt
  • electrical function and orbit from a fixed-earth station and allow information to be transmitted to the satellite that can alter the electrical function of the spacecraft and, if necessary, adjust its orbit. TT&C functions may be conducted in bands allocated to the space operation service or in the band on which the underlying service is being provided. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. This Order and Authorization is a license for AstroVision's space stations, however, AstroVision must request separate authorization for any associated earth stations. AstroVision's Application at 18-19. Id at 19. EarthWatch's Comment at 2. Left-Hand Circular Polarization is defined as circular polarized wave, in which the electric field vector, observed in any fixed plane, normal to the direction of propagation, whilst
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2608A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2608A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2608A1.txt
  • serve local residents and visitors. 3. We believe the proposal warrants consideration because the proposed allotment would provide a first local service to the community of Ephraim, Wisconsin. A staff engineering analysis indicates that Channel 295A can be allotted to Ephraim consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's Rules provided there is a site restriction 3.4 kilometers (2.1 miles) northeast of the community. The site restriction will prevent a short-spacing to Station WOCO, Channel 296A, Oconto, Wisconsin. Since Ephraim is located within 320 kilometers of the U.S.-Canadian border, concurrence of the Canadian Government will be requested for the allotment of Channel 295A at Ephraim. 4. In view of the fact that the proposed allotment could provide a first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2663A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2663A1.txt
  • in decibels, of the power required at the input of a loss-free reference antenna to the power supplied to the input of the given antenna to produce, in a given direction, the same field strength or the same power flux-density at the same distance. When not specified otherwise, the gain refers to the direction of maximum radiation." 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. In other words, gain refers to an antenna's ability to collect, concentrate, and direct energy in a particular fashion, such as a beam. Antennas are generally shaped like parabolas, or in other words, like large, curved bowls. The "axis," or boresight, is the line running through the center of the bowl and perpendicular to the plane of the edge of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2671A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2671A1.txt
  • of the FCC Rules, June 30, 2000. See also Ex Parte Presentation of Astrolink in IB Docket No. 98-172, dated December 30, 1999. Letter from Richard L. Gobbi to Thomas S. Tycz, dated January 19, 2000. Ex parte presentation of Astrolink in IB Docket No. 98-172, dated December 30, 1999. See ITU Radio Regulation S1.23. See also 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 (defining ``space operations''). See ITU Radio Regulation S1.21. See also Amendment of the Commission's Rules with Regard to the 3650-3700 MHz Government Transfer Band, FCC 00-363, � � 33, 132 (released October 24, 2000) (Part 2 of the Commission's Rules permits TT&C operations in the 3650-3700 MHz band for satellite systems that include operations in the fixed satellite service). The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2845A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2845A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2845A1.txt
  • as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(i), and Section 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.925, that the Request for Waiver of Section 80.1061 filed by McMurdo Limited on October 16, 2000 is GRANTED subject to the condition that McMurdo meet the requirements set forth in RTCM Recommended Standards for 406 MHz Satellite Emergency Position-Indicating Radiobeacons (EPIRBs), Version 2.1, RTCM Paper 82-2000/SC110-STD. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Section 80.1061 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 80.1061, IS WAIVED to the extent necessary to permit certification of McMurdo's EPIRB, FCC Identification Number KLS-82-501. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION D'wana
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-721A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-721A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-721A1.txt
  • These include but may extend beyond factors relating to cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. See also, Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997). These include, in this case, mobile voice services, mobile data services, and messaging services. Applications at 9. These markets are cellular service areas, as follows: Phoenix, Tucson, Tucson unserved, Albuquerque and Arizona-2. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 22.942. Applications at 9. DOJ also requires that the Applicants divest these licenses
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-730A1.txt
  • These include but may extend beyond factors relating to cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. See also Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997). With respect to the provision of commercial communications services, VoiceStream, through its subsidiaries, also holds local multipoint distribution service (``LMDS'') and specialized mobile radio (``SMR'') licenses. See Public Interest Statement at 2. No competitive issues are raised with respect to these licenses, however, because Aerial does not hold licenses
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-925A1.txt
  • These include but may extend beyond factors relating to cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. See also Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997) (``Merger Guidelines''). The petitions of Mobile Phone and TeleTouch and the comments of Metrocall address only Applicants' request for a waiver of the narrowband PCS ownership restriction. Public Interest Statement at 11, 19. Paging Network To Miss Interest Payments, Dow Jones News Service, Jan. 27, 2000. The Strategis Group,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1160A1.txt
  • complete the check no earlier than 4 seconds after the subscriber hangs up; (3) make an off-hook stutter dial tone check after an unanswered incoming call no more than once; (4) perform no off-hook stutter dial tone checks after an unanswered incoming call if the visual message indicator is already lit; (5) take the line off-hook for no more than 2.1 seconds per stutter dial tone check; (6) synchronize off-hook checks when multiple stutter dial tone detection and visual signalling devices are attached to the same line so that only one check is made per calling event for a single line; (7) do not block dial tone to a subscriber attempting to initiate a call as an off-hook stutter dial tone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1247A1.txt
  • NORTH AMERICA INCORPORATED LOS ANGELES 02/05/2001 22425.00000 34-05-55.0 N CA RM WLV934 118-19-32.2 W 0000417441 GLOBECAST NORTH AMERICA INCORPORATED LOS ANGELES 02/05/2001 22625.00000 34-05-55.0 N CA RM WLA742 116-56-10.0 W 0000417442 GLOBECAST NORTH AMERICA INCORPORATED SAN DIEGO 02/05/2001 10715.00000 32-41-48.1 N CA RM WLA742 116-56-10.0 W 0000417442 GLOBECAST NORTH AMERICA INCORPORATED SAN DIEGO 02/05/2001 11175.00000 32-41-48.1 N CA RM WHA400 117-32-02.1 W 0000417447 GLOBECAST NORTH AMERICA INCORPORATED SANTIAGO PEAK 02/05/2001 06256.50000 33-42-40.0 N CA RM WHA400 117-32-02.1 W 0000417447 GLOBECAST NORTH AMERICA INCORPORATED SANTIAGO PEAK 02/05/2001 06404.79000 33-42-40.0 N US RM WLL345 U 0000417448 GLOBECAST NORTH AMERICA INCORPORATED 02/05/2001 02110.00000 - 02130.00000 US RM WLL345 U 0000417448 GLOBECAST NORTH AMERICA INCORPORATED 02/05/2001 02160.00000 - 02180.00000 US RM WLL345 U 0000417448 GLOBECAST
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1261A1.txt
  • W.). In addition, we find that this channel is acceptable under the 2 percent criterion for de minimis impact that is applied in evaluating requests for modification of initial DTV allotments under Section 73.623(c)(2) for Station KETS-TV with the following specifications: DTV DTV power Antenna DTV Service State & City Channel (kW) HAAT (m) Pop. (thous.) AR Little Rock *5 2.1 540.1 848 3. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i), 5(c)(1), 303(g) and (r) and 307(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.61, 0.204(b) and 0.283 of the Commission's Rules, IT IS ORDERED, That effective July 9, 2001, the DTV Table of Allotments, Section 73.622(b) of the Commission's Rules, IS AMENDED, with respect to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1619A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1619A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1619A1.txt
  • latitude, a small portion of the Weddell Sea and a portion of the Ross Sea. The IMO, an international body composed of the major maritime nations, including the United States, defines four ocean areas for purposes of its regulations regarding ship-to-shore communications. See International Maritime Organization, International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea of 1974, as amended (SOLAS), Regulation 2.1 (Edition London 1997). SOLAS Regulation 2.1.12 defines `` Sea area A1'' as the are within the radiotelephone coverage of a Very High Frequency (VHF) coast station refers (about 20-25 miles). Regulation 2.1.13 defines Sea area A2 as the area beyond Sea area A1 that is within the radiotelephone coverage of at least one Medium Frequency (MF) coast station (roughly 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1682A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1682A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1682A1.txt
  • (``2000 Celsat Amendment'') The Bureau also licensed one non-geostationary-satellite orbit (``NGSO'') FSS Ka-Band system. See Teledesic Corporation, Order and Authorization, 12 FCC Rcd 3154 (Int'l Bur. 1997), modified, Teledesic LLC, Order and Authorization, 14 FCC Rcd 2261 (Int'l Bur. 1999). 1997 Celsat Amendment; 2000 Celsat Amendment. MSS feeder links are by definition a type of FSS. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. As a general rule, because MSS feeder links operate with gateway stations at fixed locations, feeder links use frequencies allocated to the FSS. See The Establishment of Policies and Service Rules for the Mobile Satellite Service in the 2 GHz Band, 15 FCC Rcd 16127, 16158 � 72 (2000) (2 GHz MSS Order). Amendment of Celsat America, Inc., File No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-168A1.txt
  • complete the check no earlier than 4 seconds after the subscriber hangs up; (3) make an off-hook stutter dial tone check after an unanswered incoming call no more than once; (4) perform no off-hook stutter dial tone checks after an unanswered incoming call if the visual message indicator is already lit; (5) take the line off-hook for no more than 2.1 seconds per stutter dial tone check; (6) synchronize off-hook checks when multiple stutter dial tone detection and visual signalling devices are attached to the same line so that only one check is made per calling event for a single line; (7) do not block dial tone to a subscriber attempting to initiate a call as an off-hook stutter dial tone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1729A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1729A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1729A1.txt
  • Division, Wireless Telecommunications Division: 1. Introduction. On March 23, 2001, Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (Brazos) filed a petition for reconsideration of a February 14, 2001 action by the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch (LTAB) of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau's Public Safety and Private Wireless Division granting Brazos's November 17, 2000 license modification application, but changing the status of the 2.1 GHZ microwave paths of Fixed Microwave Service (FMS) Station WNTT886, Kosse, Texas, from primary to secondary. Brazos requests that the Commission reinstate Station WNTT886's 2.1 GHz microwave paths' primary status nunc pro tunc. For reasons stated below, we grant Brazos's petition. 2. Background. The Commission has reallocated portions of the 2 GHz band from FMS to emerging technology (ET) services,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1778A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1778A1.txt
  • critical for Search and Resue Operations and are used by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193-87.199. Harmful Interference is any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 & 76.613(a). See, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, 101 F.C.C.2d 117 (1985). 47 C.F.R. � 76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. � 76.615(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.12. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 76.605(a)(11) & 76.610-76.617. 47 C.F.R. � 76.5(a). We also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1779A1.txt
  • critical for Search and Resue Operations and are used by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193-87.199. Harmful Interference is any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 & 76.613(a). See Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, 101 F.C.C.2d 117 (1985). 47 C.F.R. � 76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. � 76.615(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.12. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 76.605(a)(11) & 76.610-76.617. 47 C.F.R. � 76.5(a). We also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1780A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1780A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1780A1.txt
  • are critical for Search and Resue Operations and are used by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193-87.199. Harmful Interference is any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. ��2.1 & 76.613(a). See Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, 101 F.C.C.2d 117 (1985). 47 C.F.R. � 76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. � 76.615(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.12. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 76.605(a)(11) & 76.610-76.617. 47 C.F.R. � 76.5(a). We also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1781A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1781A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1781A1.txt
  • critical for Search and Resue Operations and are used by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193-87.199. Harmful Interference is any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 & 76.613(a). See Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, 101 F.C.C.2d 117 (1985). 47 C.F.R. � 76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. � 76.615(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.12. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 76.605(a)(11) & 76.610-76.617. 47 C.F.R. � 76.5(a). We also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1782A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1782A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1782A1.txt
  • critical for Search and Resue Operations and are used by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193-87.199. Harmful Interference is any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 & 76.613(a). See Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, 101 F.C.C.2d 117 (1985). 47 C.F.R. � 76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. � 76.615(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.12. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 76.605(a)(11) & 76.610-76.617. 47 C.F.R. � 76.5(a). We also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1802A1.txt
  • complete the check no earlier than 4 seconds after the subscriber hangs up; (3) make an off-hook stutter dial tone check after an unanswered incoming call no more than once; (4) perform no off-hook stutter dial tone checks after an unanswered incoming call if the visual message indicator is already lit; (5) take the line off-hook for no more than 2.1 seconds per stutter dial tone check; (6) synchronize off-hook checks when multiple stutter dial tone detection and visual signalling devices are attached to the same line so that only one check is made per calling event for a single line; (7) do not block dial tone to a subscriber attempting to initiate a call as an off-hook stutter dial tone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1862A1.txt
  • the community's second local aural transmission service. Community Present Proposed Port St. Joe, Florida 228C2 228C2, 242A Coordinates: 29-48-00 NL and 85-17-03 WL Additional Information: Petitioner states that the proposed site is necessary to avoid a shortspacing with WZNS, Ft. Walton Beach, Florida (243C1, with coordinates of 30-24-50 NL and 86-37-40 WL). The proposed allotment requires a site restriction of 2.1 km (1.3 miles) southeast of Port St. Joe at the coordinates indicated above. Port St. Joe is an incorporated community that serves as the county seat of Gulf County. Petitioner states that Port St. Joe has a population of 4,044 persons. In compliance with �1.52 of the Commission's rules, petitioner is requested to include with his comments verification that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-192A1.txt
  • NL and 91-31-16 WL (Clayton, LA) Additional Information: The allotment of Channel 257C3 at Saint Joseph, Louisiana, requires a site restriction of 7.6 kilometers (4.7 miles) southeast to avoid a short-spacing to the licensed site of Station WJMI(FM),Channel 259C, Jackson, Mississippi. To accommodate the allotment, the substitution of Channel 266A at Clayton, Louisiana, requires a site restriction of 3.4 kilometers (2.1 miles) northeast to avoid short-spacings to the licensed sites of Station KBON(FM), Channel 266C3, Mamou, Louisiana, and Station WBBV(FM), Channel 267C3, Vicksburg, Mississippi. FCC Contact: Sharon P. McDonald (202) 418-2180 B. MM Docket No. 01-20; RM-10049 Petitioner: Reliance Broadcasting c/o A. Wray Fitch, III Gammon & Granage, P.C. 8280 Greensboro Drive, 7th Floor McLean, Virginia 22102-3807 Proposal: Allot Channel 288C3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2051A1.txt
  • the ratio of the power required at the input of a loss-free reference antenna to the power supplied to the input of the given antenna to produce, in a given direction, the same field strength or the same power flux-density at the same distance. When not specified otherwise, the gain refers to the direction of maximum radiation. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. In other words, gain refers to an antenna's ability to collect, concentrate, and direct energy in a particular fashion, i.e., a beam. See 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review -- Streamlining and Other Revisions of Part 25 of the Commission's Rules Governing the Licensing of, and Spectrum Usage by, Satellite Network Earth Stations and Space Stations, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, IB Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2106A1.txt
  • No. 01-228; RM-10256 Petitioner: Jeraldine Anderson 1702 Cypress Drive Irving, Texas 75061 Proposal: Allot Channel 284A at Junction, Texas as potentially the community's fourth FM transmission service. Community Present Proposed Junction, Texas 228C2, 277C3, 297A 284A, 228C2, 277C3, 297A Coordinates: 30-28-19 NL and 99-45-47 WL Additional Information: The proposed allotment of Channel 253A at Junction requires a site restriction of 2.1 km (1.3 miles) southeast of Junction (center city coordinates: 30-29-21 NL and 99-46-18 WL). Petitioner states that Junction is an incorporated city with a population exceeding 2,600 persons. FCC Contact: Deborah A. Dupont (202) 418-7072 MM Docket No. 01-229; RM-10257 Petitioner: Charles Crawford 4553 Bordeaux Avenue Dallas, Texas 75205 Proposal: Allot Channel 289A at Caseville, Michigan as the community's first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2208A1.txt
  • the Texas State Data Center. Pyeatt also states that Big Wells has its own local government, post office, city hall, fire department and numerous churches that serve the community. A staff engineering analysis indicates that Channel 271A can be allotted to Big Wells consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's Rules provided there is a site restriction 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) east of the community. The site restriction will prevent a conflict with Station KUVA, Channel 272A, Uvalde, Texas. Since Big Wells is located within 320 kilometers of the U.S.-Mexican border, concurrence of the Mexican Government will be requested for the allotment of Channel 271A at Big Wells. 3. In view of the fact that the proposed allotment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2481A1.txt
  • does not indicate whether EchoStar had a role in the selection of the third director. TRW Petition, p. 28. TRW in its Petition cites � 2.8(x) of the Stock Purchase Agreement, which places limitations on aggregate capital expenditures and commitments in excess of $500 for additions to property, plant equipment or tangible assets. TRW Petition, p. 29. TRW notes � 2.1 of the Stock Purchase Agreement, where it is noted that there is a requirement that VisionStar ``may not take or fail to take certain specified actions without super majority Board and/or shareholder approval.'' TRW Petition, p. 29. Under the Shareholders Agreement, certain actions require at least 54.9% of the voting shares. Since EchoStar obtained a 49.9% interest in VisionStar on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2539A1.txt
  • are critical for Search and Resue Operations and are used by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193-87.199. Harmful Interference is any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. ��2.1 & 76.613(a). See Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, 101 F.C.C.2d 117 (1985). 47 C.F.R. � 76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. � 76.615(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.12. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 76.605(a)(11) & 76.610-76.617. 47 C.F.R. � 76.5(a). We also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2685A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2685A1.txt
  • and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 10,089, � 30, n. 82 (WTB/IB 2000) (and cases cited therein); Applications of Vodafone AirTouch Plc and Bell Atlantic Corporation, 2000 WL 332670, � 25, n. 49 (WTB/IB 2000) (and cases cited therein). See also Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997). Public Interest Statement at 2-3. Id. at 5, quoting In the Matter of Implementation of Section 6002(b) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions With Respect to Commercial Mobile Services, FCC 01-192 (rel. July 17, 2001) (``Sixth CMRS Competition Report'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-270A1.txt
  • Additional Unresolved Issues shall list each unresolved issue between Petitioner and Respondent for which arbitration is sought that is not identified in Petitioner's Statement of Unresolved Issues and the position of each of the parties on each of these issues. This portion of the response shall be organized on an issue-by issue basis and shall contain the information specified in 2.1 and 2.2, above. The Statement of Relevant Authority shall be organized on an issue-by-issue basis in the same manner as Respondent's Statement of Unresolved Issues and Statement of Additional Unresolved Issues and, to the extent not provided by Petitioner, shall: Identify any proceeding pending before the state commission or this Commission relating to the disputed issues; and Discuss all federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2732A1.txt
  • generated that relate to U.S. METs. Compliance with U.S. Law: Nothing in this Agreement or the Implementation Plan shall excuse Motient, MSI, MSV or TMI from any obligation it may have to comply with U.S. legal requirements for the retention, preservation, or production of information or data. ARTICLE II NON-OBJECTION BY DOJ AND FBI TO GRANT OF LICENSES TO MSV 2.1 Non-Objection to Current Application: Upon the execution of this Agreement by all of the Parties and adoption of the Implementation Plan by MSV, the FBI and the DOJ shall jointly and promptly notify the FCC that, provided the FCC adopts a condition substantially the same as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto (the ``Condition to FCC Licenses''), the FBI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2765A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2765A1.txt
  • 15 FCC RCd 10,089, � 30 n. 82 (WTB/IB 2000) (and cases cited therein); In re Applications of Vodafone AirTouch Plc and Bell Atlantic Corporation, 2000 WL 332670, � 25, n. 49 (WTB/IB 2000) (and cases cited therein). See also, Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997). Public Interest Statement at 12-14. Id. at 3. Id. at 13. See, e.g., In re Application of AWI Spectrum Co., LLC, 16 FCC Rcd 10945, 10950 � 11 (WTB 2001); Motorola Order at �� 11-12. See Public Interest Statement at 4. See also, Application at Exhibit 1 and Exhibit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3008A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3008A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3008A1.txt
  • in coordination of FSS networks. The five factors identified were: Aggregation of off-axis power from multiple aircraft; Antenna mis-pointing; Antenna gain pattern variation; Input power-to-the-antenna variation; and Antenna capture by adjacent satellites. Each of these factors is mapped to a specific recommends clause in WP 4A's DNR drafted for its October 2001 meeting in Geneva. Recommends 1 addresses aggregation. Recommends 2.1 addresses antenna mis-pointing. Recommends 2.2 addresses antenna gain pattern variation. Recommends 2.3 addresses e.i.r.p. variation. Recommends 3 addresses antenna capture by adjacent satellites. Finally, recommends 4 and 5 address control and monitoring of AMSS terminals. PanAmSat, LMC and Intelsat state that these recommends clauses, initiated by Boeing's submissions to WP 4A, represent the U.S. consensus on the appropriate measures for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-303A1.txt
  • complete the check no earlier than 4 seconds after the subscriber hangs up; (3) make an off-hook stutter dial tone check after an unanswered incoming call no more than once; (4) perform no off-hook stutter dial tone checks after an unanswered incoming call if the visual message indicator is already lit; (5) take the line off-hook for no more than 2.1 seconds per stutter dial tone check; (6) synchronize off-hook checks when multiple stutter dial tone detection and visual signalling devices are attached to the same line so that only one check is made per calling event for a single line; (7) do not block dial tone to a subscriber attempting to initiate a call as an off-hook stutter dial tone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-414A1.txt
  • this channel change is acceptable under the 2 percent criterion for de minimis impact that is applied in evaluating requests for modification of initial DTV allotments under Section 73.623(c)(2). We propose to substitute DTV Channel for DTV Channel for station at with the following specifications: State & City DTV Channel DTV power (kW) Antenna HAAT (m) AR Little Rock *5 2.1 540.1 4. Accordingly, we seek comments on the proposed amendment of the DTV Table of Allotments, Section 73.622(b) of the Commission's Rules, for the community listed below, to read as follows: Channel No. City Present Proposed Little Rock, Arkansas 12c, 22, *5, 12c, 22, 30, 32, 30, 32, 43c 43c, *47 5. The Commission's authority to institute rule making proceedings,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-740A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-740A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-740A1.txt
  • response to the Notice in this proceeding. 2. We believe the public interest would be served by allotting Channel 295A to Ephraim, Wisconsin, as it will provide the community with its first local broadcast service. Channel 295A can be allotted to Ephraim in compliance with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's Rules with a site restriction 3.4 kilometers (2.1 miles) northeast of the community. The site restriction will prevent a short-spacing to Station WOCO, Channel 296A, Oconto, Wisconsin. Since Ephraim is located within 320 kilometers of the U. S.-Canadian border, concurrence of the Canadian Government has been requested for this allotment. 3. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i), 5(c)(1), 303(g) and (r) and 307(b) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A1.txt
  • mobile or fixed use. Key features of 3G or IMT-2000 systems are: high degree of commonality of design worldwide; compatibility of services within IMT-2000 and with fixed networks; high quality; use of small pocket-terminal with worldwide roaming capability; capability for multimedia applications, and a wide range of services (paging, voice telephony, digital data, audio and visual communications) and terminals. Table 2.1 describes some of the key service attributes and capabilities expected of IMT-2000 or 3G systems: Table 2.1: IMT-2000 Systems/Capabilities Capabilities to support circuit and packet data at high bit rates: - 144 kb/s or higher in high mobility (vehicular) traffic - 384 kb/s or higher for pedestrian traffic - 2 Mb/s or higher for indoor traffic Interoperability and roaming among
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A2.txt
  • mobile or fixed use. Key features of 3G or IMT-2000 systems are: high degree of commonality of design worldwide; compatibility of services within IMT-2000 and with fixed networks; high quality; use of small pocket-terminal with worldwide roaming capability; capability for multimedia applications, and a wide range of services (paging, voice telephony, digital data, audio and visual communications) and terminals. Table 2.1 describes some of the key service attributes and capabilities expected of IMT-2000 or 3G systems: Table 2.1: IMT-2000 Systems/Capabilities Capabilities to support circuit and packet data at high bit rates: - 144 kb/s or higher in high mobility (vehicular) traffic - 384 kb/s or higher for pedestrian traffic - 2 Mb/s or higher for indoor traffic Interoperability and roaming among
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-947A1.txt
  • Communications, Inc. and VoiceStream Wireless Holding Corporation, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 10,089, � 30, n.82 (WTB/IB 2000); In re Applications of Vodafone AirTouch PLC and Bell Atlantic Corporation, 15 FCC Rcd. 16,507, � 25, n.49 (WTB/IB 2000); Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997) (``Revised Horizontal Merger Guidelines''). See 47 C.F.R. � 20.6. As part of all applications for assignment or transfer of control of CMRS licenses, the assignee or transferee must certify that grant of the application would not cause the assignee or transferee to be in violation of the spectrum aggregation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-950A1.txt
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. ��87.193-87.199. Harmful Interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. ��2.1 & 76.613(a). Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 F.C.C.2d 117, para. 14 (1985) [hereinafter MO&O]. 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1412A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1412A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1412A2.txt
  • Standardized Report for State Commissions on CO Codes Assigned by NANPA 8.4, 8.8 Weekly and monthly. Part 4 Form Delinquency Notifications 4.4 Contingent, for code holders not submitting Part 4 forms. Relief Planning Report 5.1.5 Quarterly. Summary of NANPA Performance Reports . Summary of Performance Reports Name Reference Media Periodicities Customer Response Rates 2.7.1 Contingent and annual. Dispute/Plan of Action 2.1.2 Contingent, to be prepared within one business day. Reserved. Reserved. Reserved. Self-Assessment 7.10, 9.5 Annually and Quarterly to NANC. Reserved. Post-Audit Corrective Action Plan 9.1.4 Within 20 days after receipt of the auditor's report and monthly until completion. Unauthorized User Access 2.13.5, 7.7.9 Contingent upon occurrence. System Outage 7.19.7 Contingent upon occurrence to all clients. Privacy Breach 7.19.8.3 Contingent upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • the SRS to a primary allocation to satisfy requirements for high data rate space science missions. USA/ /2 MOD Appendix 7 ANNEX 7 TABLE 8c Parameters required for the determination of coordination distance for a receiving earth station Receiving space radiocommunication service designation Space Research Frequency band (GHz) 14.8-15.35 Transmitting terrestrial service designations Fixed, mobile Method to be used � 2.1, � 2.2 Modulation at earth station (1) N p0 (%) 0.1 Earth station n 2 Interference p (%) 0.05 Parameters NL (dB) 0 and criteria Ms (dB) 1 W (dB) 0 E (dBW) A 25(5) Terrestrial in B (2) N -8 Station Pt (dBW) A -20(5) Parameters in B N -53 Gx (dBi) 45 Reference band-width(6) B (Hz) 1 Permissible
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1420A1.txt
  • transmit without prior permission from the satellite licensee or authorized service provider. See 47 C.F.R. �� 25.115(d) and 25.136 (2001). ``E.i.r.p.'' is a conventional abbreviation for Equivalent Isotropically Radiated Power, which is the product of the power supplied to a transmitting antenna and its gain in a given direction relative to that of an isotropic antenna. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 (2001). See Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 to Implement the Global Mobile Personal Communications by Satellite (GMPCS) Memorandum of Understanding and Arrangements and Petition of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration to Amend Part 25 of the Commission's Rules to Establish Emissions Limits for Mobile and Portable Earth Stations Operating in the 1610-1660.5 MHz Band (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A2.txt
  • they do not trade. The second solution concept is the ``Shapley Value,'' which measures what each player could reasonably expect to receive as his/her share of the reward in a more general cooperative game. A third solution concept is the ``Core,'' which defines a range of bargaining outcomes for the buyers and the sellers that no coalition can improve upon. A.2.1 The ``Nash Bargaining'' Solution The most straightforward bargaining problem can be represented as a ``divide-the-surplus'' game in which two parties bargain over the division of a known prize or surplus (e.g., gains from trade). If the parties reach an agreement about the division of surplus, they are entitled to keep their respective share. Based upon a set of ``reasonable'' and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A5.txt
  • 6020318OG 4 6 4 747 791 264 1200 4 6020318OG 4 7 4 956 923 182 1400 4 6020318OG 4 8 4 1427 1450 286 2200 54 6020318OG 5 5 1 198 32 1.8 2000 1 6020318OG 5 7 1 121 22 2.8 1400 118 6020318OG 5 8 1 203 35 1.98 2200 56 6020318OG 5 9 1 143 15 2.1 1400 28 6020318OG 5 6 2 112 16 10.2 1200 102 6020318OG 5 5 3 745 339 420 2000 3 6020318OG 5 6 3 478 203 210 1200 3 6020318OG 5 7 3 600 237 147 1400 3 6020318OG 5 8 3 913 372 77 2200 167 6020318OG 5 9 3 627 195 280 1400 83 6020318OG 5 5 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1629A1.txt
  • Commission in response to the Notice. 2. We believe that the public interest would be served by the allotment of Channel 271A at Big Wells, Texas, as it will provide the community with its first local FM broadcast service. Channel 271A can be allotted to Big Wells in compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a site restriction 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) east of the community. The site restriction will prevent a conflict with Station KUVA, Channel 272A, Uvalde, Texas. Although Mexican concurrence has been requested for the allotment of Channel 271A at Big Wells, notification has not been received. Therefore, operation with the facilities specified for Big Wells herein is subject to modification, suspension, or termination without right
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1816A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1816A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1816A1.txt
  • Spectrum John Storch, Western Wireless . Audio and video tapes of the workshops can be purchased from CACI Productions (formerly Infocus Media), 341 Victory Drive, Herndon, VA 20170, by calling CACI at (703) 834-1470 or by faxing CACI at (703) 834-0111. For further information, contact Michael Marcus at (202) 418-2418 voice, (202) 418-1944 fax, and e-mail mmarcus@fcc.gov. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ tXT���e� 2)�V``� (c)}�l�tmE...bϡ gs�>o���(R)"q�Q ܆���D N ��- >��r�Kp��-~i�f�M�� z} ���� tm��(c)��cv `��� 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2030A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2030A1.txt
  • Gumbert, for Michael A. Ferrante, Chief, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, to Dennis C. Brown, Counsel for Michael J. Taylor (dated Jan. 31, 2002). The Commission uses ``Line A'' as a coordination point with Canadian authorities in the assignment of paging channels. Line A, which approximately parallels the U.S.-Canadian border, is defined in Section 2.1 of our rules. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See Petition at 1-2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.928 (certain frequency assignments require coordination with Canada); 47 C.F.R. � 22.169 (channel assignments are subject to the applicable provisions and requirements of treaties and other international agreements between the United States and Canada). Interim Coordination Considerations for the Band 929-932 MHz (Sept. 14, 1983); Further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.txt
  • a traveler? SUBPART E - TECHNICAL REGULATIONS 95.623 R/C transmitter channel frequencies. PART 2 - FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS SUBPART A - TERMINOLOGY Brief Description: This rule provides definitions for terms used in rules. Need: This rule is essential for the implementation and understanding of other rule sections. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. � 302 2.1(c) Definitions PART 2 - FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS SUBPART B - ALLOCATION, ASIGNMENT AND USE OF RADIO FREQUENCIES Brief Description: These rules display the Table of Frequency Allocations, which sets forth a ``road map'' of the service allocations of radio frequency spectrum throughout the world. The Table of Allocations also indicates how spectrum is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2317A1.txt
  • 22, Description and Justification. 47 C.F.R. � 61.54(j). Tariff FCC No. 1, Third Revised Page 2-12, section 2.4.1(A). RCA Communications, Inc., Revisions to FCC Tariff Nos. 1 and 2, CC Docket No. 80-766, Transmittal Nos. 191 and 273, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 94 FCC 2d 1338 (1983). WorldCom Petition at 10-12. Tariff FCC No. 1, Fourth Revised Page 2-5, section 2.1.8(A). Tariff FCC No. 1, Original Page 2-5.1, section 2.1.8(A). WorldCom Petition at 3-5. See supra, note 7. See 47 C.F.R. �1.1206(b)(2), as revised. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-2317 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-2317 � �� � F � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.txt
  • are applicable to the singular as well as the plural forms of such terms and to the masculine as well as to the feminine and neuter genders of such term. Whenever the words "include," "*mcludes," or "including" are used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words "without limitation." ARTICLE 2:FACILITIES, INFORMATION STORAGE AND ACCESS 2.1 Domestic Communications Infrastructure. Except to the extent and under conditions concurred in by the FBI and the DOJ in writing: 00 In the absence of strictly bonafide commercial reasons, all Domestic Communications Infrastructure that is owned, operated or controlled by a Domestic Communications Company shall at all times be located in the United States and will be directed, controlled, supervised
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2577A1.txt
  • 2000); Nevada Bell Telephone Company, Tariff FCC No. 1, Original Page 2-35 to 36 (effective Mar. 3, 2001). See Ameritech Operating Companies, Tariff FCC No. 2, 1st Revised Page 40, Section 2.4.1(A). See Ameritech Operating Companies, Tariff FCC No. 2, 1st Revised Page 40, Section 2.4.1(A). See, e.g., Ameritech Operating Companies, Tariff FCC No. 2, 3rd Revised Page 27, Section 2.1.8(A) (effective June 6, 1998). See, e.g., Ameritech Operating Companies, Tariff FCC No. 2, Original Page 40.1 and Original Page 40.2. See, e.g., Ameritech Operating Companies, Tariff FCC No. 2, Original Page 40.1 See, e.g., Ameritech Operating Companies, Tariff FCC No. 2, Original Page 40.1 See, e.g., Ameritech Operating Companies, Tariff FCC No. 2, Original Page 40.2 and Original Page 40.3.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2948A1.txt
  • 280, 304-05 (1987). BellSouth apparently never implemented this provision. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.3(b). NECA F.C.C. Tariff No. 5, Fourth revised page 2-26, section 2.4.1(A). NECA F.C.C. Tariff No. 5, second revised pages 2-26.1-2-26.2 and original pages 2-26.3-2-26.4, section 2.4.1(A). NECA F.C.C. Tariff No. 5, original page 2-26.4, section 2.4.1(A)(4). NECA F.C.C. Tariff No. 5, second revised page 2-9, section 2.1.8(B). NECA F.C.C. Tariff No. 5, original page 2-26.3, section 2.4.1(A)(2). National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., Tariff FCC No. 5, Transmittal No. 951, Description and Justification at 1. Id. at 3. Petition of Sprint to Reject or Alternatively Suspend and Investigate (Aug. 28, 2002) (Sprint Petition); WorldCom Petition to Reject or, in the Alternative, Suspend and Investigate (Aug. 28, 2002) (WorldCom
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3099A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3099A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3099A1.txt
  • KO4563). Id. Waiver Request at 2. Application for Reinstatement at 2, � 4. In accordance with specific requirements, the Commission may reinstate a license if reinstatement would serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.44(b)(1). See Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, and Cable Television Relay Service, Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6410, 6424 � 94. Waiver Request at 2. Id. at 3. Id. at 2. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-3099 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-3099
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3199A1.txt
  • 76.616. These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations and are used by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 80.1051 - 80.1061 and 87.193-87.199. Harmful Interference is any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See id. �� 2.1 & 76.613(a). See Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, 101 F.C.C.2d 117 (1985). 47 C.F.R. � 76.611(a). Id. � 76.1804. See id. � 76.1801. See, e.g., id. �� 76.605(a)(11) & 76.610-76.617. Id. � 76.5(a). We also treat, for certain CLI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-861A1.txt
  • to support this important functionality, while simultaneously enforcing mandatory FRN use. Instructions for copying a form with the new mandatory FRN functionality follow. From the IBFS Application Menu System screen, scroll down to the application form to be copied. Click the select box to the left of the desired form and then press the Copy a Form button. See Exhibit 2.1 below. Exhibit 2.1 being prepared and press the PREFILL CORES DATA button. See Exhibit 2.2 below. Exhibit 2.2 The IBFS Application Menu Screen will reappear. Scroll down to see that a copy of the form has been created. Click on the copy to make any changes needed to the form and proceed as usual. See Exhibit 2.3. Note: Although the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-885A1.txt
  • band provided the protection to the analogue emissions is at least as great as that which currently is in force with analogue-to-analogue protection. To accomplish this may require that the digital spectral power density (and total power) be lower by several dB than is currently used for the same emission circuit using either DSB or SSB emissions. 2 Emission characteristics 2.1 Bandwidth and centre frequency A full digitally modulated emission will have a 10 kHz bandwidth with its centre frequency at any of the 5 kHz possibilities within the HFBC bands. There are ``simulcast'' modes, which are a combination of analogue and digital emissions of the same programme in the same channel, that may use a digital emission of 5 kHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-937A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-937A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-937A1.txt
  • are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193-87.199. Harmful Interference includes any interference that "endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services." See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 & 76.613(a). Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 F.C.C.2d 117, para. 14 (1985) [hereinafter MO&O]. 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.1804(g). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1163A1.txt
  • if ever, be needed. We conclude that the more logical reading of this sentence is that a LEC may impose additional charges on an IXC for wiring that runs from the POT - which is at the ``suitable location'' - to the IXC's interexchange equipment. We reject the argument of AT&T and ASCENT that other language in the modified section 2.1.5 of the ECA tariff gives IXCs the right to designate the POT. Specifically, AT&T and ASCENT point to the requirement that ``entrance cable or drop wiring and wire or intrabuilding cable'' be installed under tariff ``by the [LEC] to such Point of Termination.'' Although this language does obligate LECs to install entrance cable or drop wiring to the POT, it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2.txt
  • that such flexibility: (1) is consistent with international agreements, (2) would be in the public interest, (3) would not deter investment in communications services and systems, or technology development, and (4) would not result in harmful interference among users. See id. What is commonly referred to as MDS or wireless cable spectrum includes 33 different 6 megahertz channels in the 2.1-2.2 GHz and 2.5-2.7 GHz spectrum bands. These channels include MDS, MMDS, and ITFS channels. MDS operators generally use the MMDS and MDS channels and lease excess capacity from ITFS operators. The 4.9GH Band Transferred From Federal Government Use, WT Docket No. 00-32, Second Report and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 3955 (2002). See Competitive Bidding Conforming Edits
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2_Erratum.doc
  • that such flexibility: (1) is consistent with international agreements, (2) would be in the public interest, (3) would not deter investment in communications services and systems, or technology development, and (4) would not result in harmful interference among users. See id. What is commonly referred to as MDS or wireless cable spectrum includes 33 different 6 megahertz channels in the 2.1-2.2 GHz and 2.5-2.7 GHz spectrum bands. These channels include MDS, MMDS, and ITFS channels. MDS operators generally use the MMDS and MDS channels and lease excess capacity from ITFS operators. The 4.9GH Band Transferred From Federal Government Use, WT Docket No. 00-32, Second Report and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 3955 (2002). See Competitive Bidding Conforming Edits
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1771A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1771A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1771A1.txt
  • United States. 1.1 Since the early 1980's, Cellular SIDs have been assigned by the FCC and have been a required element of the FCC authorization. 1.2 In August 2002, the Commission adopted an Order to eliminate SIDs from being a required element of the license and to transition the administration of SIDs to the private sector. 2.0 CELLULAR SID FUNCTION 2.1 System Identification Numbers, or SIDs, are numeric identifiers assigned to cellular systems. SIDs are transmitted by the cellular system so that the cellular mobile stations can determine whether the system through which they are communicating is a system to which they subscribe, or whether they are considered by the system to be roamers. 3.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND CONSTRAINTS These guidelines are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2073A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2073A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2073A1.txt
  • submitted the waiver request in the alternative, arguing that Subsections 25.210(e) and (f) were inapplicable because its license authorizes provision of MSS. As defined for allocational purposes, however, FSS can refer to MSS feeder-link operation, and the spectrum that Boeing proposes to use for feeder-link operation is allocated for FSS rather than MSS feeder links specifically. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1(c) and 2.106. Minor Amendment to Application For Modification of Authority for Use of the 1990-2025/2165-2200 MHz and Associated Frequency Bands for a Mobile-Satellite System FCC File No. SAT-MOD-20020726-00113, filed on March 18, 2003 (``March 18 Amendment''). Application at 29. The Commission has established identical PFD limits for downlinks in the adjacent 10.95-11.2 GHz band. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.208(b). The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2073A1_Erratum.doc
  • submitted the waiver request in the alternative, arguing that Subsections 25.210(e) and (f) were inapplicable because its license authorizes provision of MSS. As defined for allocational purposes, however, FSS can refer to MSS feeder-link operation, and the spectrum that Boeing proposes to use for feeder-link operation is allocated for FSS rather than MSS feeder links specifically. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1(c) and 2.106. Minor Amendment to Application For Modification of Authority for Use of the 1990-2025/2165-2200 MHz and Associated Frequency Bands for a Mobile-Satellite System FCC File No. SAT-MOD-20020726-00113, filed on March 18, 2003 (``March 18 Amendment''). Application at 29. The Commission has established identical PFD limits for downlinks in the adjacent 10.95-11.2 GHz band. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.208(b). The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2574A1.txt
  • and reference coordinates indicated below. Accordingly, we seek comment on the proposed amendment of the FM Table of Allotments, Section 73.202(b) of the Commission's Rules, with respect to Blanchard and Weatherford, Oklahoma: Community Present Proposed Blanchard, Oklahoma --- 247A Weatherford, Oklahoma 247C1, 286A 286A Proposed Coordinates for Channel 247A at Blanchard, Oklahoma: 35-07-21 NL and 97-40-18 WL, at a site 2.1 km (1.3 miles) southwest of Blanchard. 9. The Commission's authority to institute rule making proceedings, showings required, cut-off procedures, and filing requirements are contained in the attached Appendix and are incorporated by reference herein. In particular, we note that a showing of continuing interest is required in paragraph 2 of the Appendix before a channel will be allotted. 10. Pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2612A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2612A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2612A1.txt
  • the United States" and requires these stations to use frequencies assigned by NTIA. See also Federal Spectrum Management Processes Report, Public Safety Wireless Network, at 3-8 (September 1998). Thus, federal entities cannot lawfully use FCC-administered non-Federal Government spectrum without NTIA approval in its capacity of overseer and policy manager of all Federal use of radio spectrum. See NTIA Manual �� 2.1-2.3 Telecommunications Policy). The IRAC consists of a representative appointed by each of approximately 20 member Federal departments and agencies together with such other departments and agencies as NTIA might designate. The IRAC's substructure consists of the Frequency Assignment Subcommittee (FAS), the Spectrum Planning Subcommittee (SPS), the Technical Subcommittee, the Radio Conference Subcommittee, Emergency Planning Subcommittee, the International Notification Group, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2711A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2711A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2711A1.txt
  • channel (MDS) and multiple channel (MMDS) multipoint distribution service. The use of MMDS will specifically refer to that individual service in those cases where the distinction is significant. Single channel operations will be referred to as ``MDS'', where appropriate. See Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, and Cable Television Relay Service, Gen. Docket No. 90-54, Second Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 6792 at � 1 (1990) (Second Report and Order) (citing Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2733A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2733A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2733A1.txt
  • Additional Unresolved Issues shall list each unresolved issue between Petitioner and Respondent for which arbitration is sought that is not identified in Petitioner's Statement of Unresolved Issues and the position of each of the parties on each of these issues. This portion of the response shall be organized on an issue-by issue basis and shall contain the information specified in 2.1 and 2.2, of the AT&T/Cox/WorldCom Procedural Public Notice. The Statement of Relevant Authority shall be organized on an issue-by-issue basis in the same manner as Respondent's Statement of Unresolved Issues and Statement of Additional Unresolved Issues and, to the extent not provided by Petitioner, shall: Identify any proceeding pending before the state commission or this Commission relating to the disputed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2921A1.txt
  • grid and associated programming documentation consistent (filed Mar. 22, 1993); FCC Form 330 dated Aug. 4, 1993 executed by Centre's Supt. of Schools, completed FAA Form 7460, and accompanying Centre cover letter (filed Aug. 5, 1993).) Petition at 4-5, citing Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, & Cable Television Relay Service, Gen. Docket Nos. 90-54 and 80-113, Order on Reconsideration, 6 FCC Rcd 6764, 6769-70 �� 28-31 (1991) (Wireless Cable Reconsideration Order). Petition at 4. Id. at 5. 47 C.F.R. � 74.903(b). Wireless Cable Reconsideration Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2946A1.txt
  • given on April 9, 1998. See Broadcast Actions, Report No. 44216, Public Notice (rel. Apr. 9, 1998). See Amendment (filed May 11, 1998) (Petition, Exhibit 2). See Petition at 4. Id. at 2. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.902(d)(1) (1994). Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, and Cable Television Relay Service, GN Docket Nos. 90-54, 80-113, Second Order on Reconsideration, 10 FCC Rcd 7074, 7085 � 29 (1995). Petition at 2. Id. at 3. See Mike Gruss, Order on Reconsideration, 17 FCC Rcd 466 � 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.txt
  • raised by those departments and agencies. In these meetings, GCL, New GX, and ST Telemedia represented that: (a) they have no present plans, and are not aware of present plans of any other entity, that Page 3 would result in a Domestic Communications Company providing Domestic Communications through facilities located outside the United States, except as otherwise provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement, (b) ST Telemedia is an entity whose commercial operations are wholly separate from the government of the Republic of Singapore and whose activities are overseen by independent regulatory authorities in Singapore, (c) no government has or will have, as a direct or indirect shareholder of New GX, special voting or veto rights concerning the actions of New
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3164A1.txt
  • joy.alford@fcc.gov. By the Deputy Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. - FCC - Attachment 1 -Region 10 Plan Revisions 1. Cover Page - Replace with new Cover Page - Revision 1 dated August 6, 2003. 2. Table of Contents, pages i - iv, - Replace with revised Table of Contents (Revised 8-6-03) 3. Page 3, Section 2.1 - Delete the last two sentences of the last paragraph. 4. Page 4, Section 2.4 - 2nd paragraph - 1st sentence - Change the ``Georgia APCO local frequency advisors'' to ``Georgia State Frequency Coordinator'' and -6th sentence - change ``Local APCO Frequency Advisor'' to ``Georgia State Frequency Coordinator''. 5. Page 5, Section 3.0 - 2nd sentence - change the ``APCO''
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3408A1.txt
  • C.F.R. �76.616. These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. ��87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. ��2.1 & 76.613(a). Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, para. 14 (1985) (hereinafter MO&O). 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.1804(g). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3495A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3495A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3495A1.txt
  • be engineered in a manner that will avoid the predicted Grade B extension without rendering the booster useless. Biltmore also submits a Longley Rice analysis which demonstrates that substantial terrain obstructions between the proposed transmitter site and the predicted Grade B extension prevent actual service to the predicted extension area. Biltmore further asserts that substantial public interest benefits to the 2.1 million viewers who will receive new service from the booster station "provide ample grounds for waiver of Section 74.731(j) to permit a theoretical de minimis extension of the KADY-TV Grade B contour to 400 viewers." According to Biltmore, KDAY-TV, one of only two television stations licensed to Ventura County, has lost over $8 million dollars since 1998, and due to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3622A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3622A1.txt
  • F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1968) (per curiam)). Request for Declaratory Ruling on the Use of Digital Modulation by Multipoint Distribution Service and Instructional Television Fixed Service Stations, Declaratory Ruling and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 18839 (1996) (Declaratory Ruling and Order). Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, & Cable Television Relay Service, Second Order on Reconsideration, Gen. Docket No. 90-54, 10 FCC Rcd 7074 (1995). Declaratory Ruling and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 18839, 18853 � 23. Petition, at i. Id. at 7. (...continued from previous page) (continued....)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3668A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 74.902(c). Id. MMDS Allocation R&O, 94 F.C.C.2d at 1247-48 � 110. Id. at 1236 � 85.c. Id. at 1247-48 � 110. Id. at 1236 � 85.c. MMDS Allocation MO&O on Recon, 98 F.C.C.2d at 132-33 � 12. Id. Id. Amendment of Parts 1, 2, and 21 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 7 FCC Rcd 3266, 3270 � 19 (1992). The Commission decided to accept applications to modify facilities from existing MDS licensees and conditional licensees as well as from entities eligible for ITFS. Id. Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act - - Competitive Bidding, Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3947A1.txt
  • U.S.C. � 251(c)(2)(B) cited in Verizon Reply Brief at 4. Verizon Brief at 4 (quoting Tr. at 30); see also Verizon Reply Brief at 2; Tr. at 44. See Verizon Reply Brief at 3; Tr. at 35-37. Verizon Reply Brief at 2 (citing Ex. 1 (Apr. 1, 2003 Amendment No. 3 to Interconnection Agreement between Verizon and Cavalier at � 2.1.1)). Id. at 2-3 (citing Tr. at 30). Id. at 6. See id. at 3; Tr. at 35-37. See Verizon Brief at 3 (citing Verizon Direct Testimony of Albert Panel at 6); Verizon Reply Brief at 2-3 (citing Tr. at 30); see also Tr. at 40, 44. 47 U.S.C. � 251(c)(2)(B) cited in Verizon Reply Brief at 4. Verizon Brief at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-631A1.txt
  • Contact: Deborah A. Dupont, (202) 418-7072. G. MM Docket No. 01-228; RM-10256 Action: At the request of Jeraldine Anderson, we are allotting Channel 284A at Junction, Texas, as the community's fourth local FM transmission service. Coordinates: The reference coordinates for Channel 284A at Junction are 30-28-19 NL and 99-45-47 West Longitude. Additional Information: This allotment requires a site restriction of 2.1 km (1.3 miles) southeast of Junction at the coordinates indicated above. FCC Contact: Deborah A. Dupont, (202) 418-7072. H. MM Docket No. 01-233; RM-10261 Action: At the request of Charles Crawford, we are allotting Channel 290A at Alton, Missouri, as the community's first local aural transmission service. Coordinates: The reference coordinates for Channel 290A at Alton are 36-44-39 NL and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-864A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-864A1.txt
  • United States. 1.1 Since the early 1980's, Cellular SIDs have been assigned by the FCC and have been a required element of the FCC authorization. 1.2 In August 2002, the Commission adopted an Order to eliminate SIDs from being a required element of the license and to transition the administration of SIDs to the private sector. 2.0 CELLULAR SID FUNCTION 2.1 System Identification Numbers, or SIDs, are numeric identifiers assigned to cellular systems. SIDs are transmitted by the cellular system so that the cellular mobile stations can determine whether the system through which they are communicating is a system to which they subscribe, or whether they are considered by the system to be roamers. 3.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND CONSTRAINTS These guidelines are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-864A1_Erratum.doc
  • United States. 1.1 Since the early 1980's, Cellular SIDs have been assigned by the FCC and have been a required element of the FCC authorization. 1.2 In August 2002, the Commission adopted an Order to eliminate SIDs from being a required element of the license and to transition the administration of SIDs to the private sector. 2.0 CELLULAR SID FUNCTION 2.1 System Identification Numbers, or SIDs, are numeric identifiers assigned to cellular systems. SIDs are transmitted by the cellular system so that the cellular mobile stations can determine whether the system through which they are communicating is a system to which they subscribe, or whether they are considered by the system to be roamers. 3.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND CONSTRAINTS These guidelines are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1639A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1639A4.txt
  • License Desc Lat Deg Lat Min Lat Sec Lat Dir Lon Deg Lon Min Lon Sec Lon Dir CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 32 54.2 N 96 39 3.5 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 32 12.3 N 96 39 3.2 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 31 13.8 N 96 39 2.7 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 29 45.8 N 96 39 2.1 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 28 25.0 N 96 38 44.9 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 28 23.8 N 96 38 17.2 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 27 7.5 N 96 37 56.7 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 27 6.7 N 96 38 28.2 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 26 18.1 N 96 38 51.5 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1639A4_Erratum.pdf
  • License Desc Lat Deg Lat Min Lat Sec Lat Dir Lon Deg Lon Min Lon Sec Lon Dir CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 32 54.2 N 96 39 3.5 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 32 12.3 N 96 39 3.2 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 31 13.8 N 96 39 2.7 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 29 45.8 N 96 39 2.1 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 28 25.0 N 96 38 44.9 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 28 23.8 N 96 38 17.2 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 27 7.5 N 96 37 56.7 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 27 6.7 N 96 38 28.2 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 26 18.1 N 96 38 51.5 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1703A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1703A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1703A1.txt
  • (1996) � 9. 47 C.F.R. � 76.923. See, e.g., Allen Response at 5-7; DeSoto Response at 5-7. Implementation of Section 301(j) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Aggregation of Equipment Costs by Cable Operators, 11 FCC Rcd 6778, 6778-79 (1996) � 2. See, e.g., Farmers Branch Appeal, Appendix A (City of Farmers Branch, Texas, Ordinance No. 2748) at 2 � 2.1. DeSoto Appeal at 10-11; Flower Mound Appeal at 9-10. Form 1205 and its instructions are available at http://www.fcc.gov/formpage.html (visited March 25, 2004). Comcast Corp. & AT&T Corp., 17 FCC Rcd 23246 (2002), affirmed sub nom. Consumer Federation of America v. FCC, 348 F.2d 1049 (D.C. Cir. 2003). Allen Appeal, Attachment C (Letter from Robbin Pepper, Comcast Cable Commun., Inc., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-222A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-222A1.txt
  • Action by Deputy Chief, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. - FCC - Attachment 1 - Region 10 Plan Revisions 1. Cover Page - Replace with new Cover Page - Revision 1 dated August 6, 2003. 2. Table of Contents, pages i - iv, - Replace with revised Table of Contents (Revised 8-6-03) 3. Page 3, Section 2.1 - Delete the last two sentences of the last paragraph. 4. Page 4, Section 2.4 - 2nd paragraph - 1st sentence - Change the ``Georgia APCO local frequency advisors'' to ``Georgia State Frequency Coordinator'' and -6th sentence - change ``Local APCO Frequency Advisor'' to ``Georgia State Frequency Coordinator''. 5. Page 5, Section 3.0 - 2nd sentence - change the ``APCO''
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2267A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2267A1.txt
  • 418-2180 D. MB Docket No. 04-269; RM-11010 Petitioner: Linda A. Davidson 2134 Oak Street, Unit C Santa Monica, California 90405 Proposal: Allot Channel 299A at San Joaquin, California, as the community's second local FM transmission service. Community Present Proposed San Joaquin, California 288B1 288B1, 299A Coordinates: 36-36-00 NL and 120-12-36 WL Additional Information: This allotment requires a site restriction of 2.1 kilometers (1.2 miles) west to avoid a short-spacing to the licensed site for Station KZOL(FM), Channel 300B1, North Fork, California. Contact: Sharon P. McDonald (202) 418-2180 E. MB Docket No. 04-270; RM-11012 Petitioner: Charles Crawford 4553 Bordeaux Avenue Dallas, Texas 75205 Proposal: Allot Channel 281A at Rosepine, Louisiana, as the community's first local aural transmission service. Community Present Proposed Rosepine,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2498A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2498A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2498A1.txt
  • restrictions and reference coordinates indicated below. Accordingly, we seek comment on the proposed amendment of the FM Table of Allotments, 47 C.F.R. Section 73.202(b), with respect to Morrison and Sparta, Tennessee: Community Present Proposed Morrison, Tennessee --- 287A Sparta, Tennessee 288A --- Proposed Coordinates for Channel 287A at Morrison, Tennessee: 35-37-27 NL and 85-53-37 WL, at a site 3.4 km (2.1 miles) northeast of Morrison. 9. The Commission's authority to institute rule making proceedings, showings required, cut-off procedures, and filing requirements are contained in the attached Appendix and are incorporated by reference herein. In particular, we note that a showing of continuing interest is required in paragraph 2 of the Appendix before a channel will be allotted. 10. Pursuant to 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.txt
  • applicable to the singular as well as the plural forms of such terms and to the masculine as well as to the feminine and neuter genders of such term. Whenever the words ``include,'' ``includes,'' or ``including'' are used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words ``without limitation.'' ARTICLE 2: FACILITIES, INFORMATION STORAGE AND ACCESS 2.1 Domestic Communications Infrastructure. Except to the extent and under conditions concurred in by the FBI, the DOJ and the DHS in writing: (a) all Domestic Communications Infrastructure shall at all times be located in the United States and will be directed, controlled, supervised and managed by VSNL America; and (b) all Domestic Communications that are carried by or through, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2671A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2671A1.txt
  • service to the community of Union Gap. Davidson states that Union Gap is an incorporated city located in Yakima County with a 2000 U.S. Census population of 5,621 people. A staff engineering analysis indicates that Channel 285A can be allotted to Union Gap consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's Rules with a site restriction 3.4 kilometers (2.1 miles) southeast of the community at coordinates 46-31-48 NL and 120-27-18 WL. The proposed site will require concurrence by Canada because it is located within 320 kilometers (199 miles) of the Canadian border. 3. In view of the fact that the proposed allotment could provide a first local service to Union Gap, the Commission believes it would serve the public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3005A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3005A4.txt
  • License Desc Lat Deg Lat Min Lat Sec Lat Dir Lon Deg Lon Min Lon Sec Lon Dir CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 32 54.2 N 96 39 3.5 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 32 12.3 N 96 39 3.2 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 31 13.8 N 96 39 2.7 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 29 45.8 N 96 39 2.1 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 28 25.0 N 96 38 44.9 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 28 23.8 N 96 38 17.2 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 27 7.5 N 96 37 56.7 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 27 6.7 N 96 38 28.2 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41 26 18.1 N 96 38 51.5 W CW-BTA332-D Area 2 41
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3203A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3203A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3203A2.txt
  • AR JONESBORO KTEJ 2769 19 1230. 310 355414.0 20 50. 310 355414.0 312947 18806.5 904614.0 904614.0 AR JONESBORO KVTJ 2784 48 1410. 297 353616.0 49 1000. 295 353616.0 1367822 24599.0 903118.0 903118.0 AR JONESBORO KAIT 13988 8 316. 533 355317.0 9 18. 531 355322.0 660275 38797.9 9056 9.0 9056 8.0 AR LITTLE ROCK KETS 2770 2 100. 543 342823.0 5 2.1 548 342631.0 942060 29442.6 921211.0 9213 3.0 AR LITTLE ROCK KTHV 2787 11 316. 521 344757.0 12 55. 519 344757.0 1119908 42326.6 922959.0 922959.0 AR LITTLE ROCK KLRT-TV 11951 16 5000. 539 344757.0 30 1000. 449 344757.0 1022752 30013.0 922929.0 922929.0 AR LITTLE ROCK KARK-TV 33440 4 100. 503 344757.0 32 989. 474 344757.0 1086435 38168.9 922959.0 922959.0 AR LITTLE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3445A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3445A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3445A1.txt
  • that the public interest would be served by the allotment of Channel 276A at Dexter, Georgia, since it will provide a first local aural transmission service to that community. Channel 276A can be allotted to Dexter, Georgia, consistent with the technical requirements of the Commission's rules, at coordinates 32-25-59 NL and 83-01-33 WL, with a site restriction of 3.3 kilometers (2.1 miles) east of Dexter. 3. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the General Accounting Office pursuant tot he Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. Section 801(a)(1)(A). 4. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority contained in 47 U.S.C. Sections 4(i), 5(c)(1), 303(g) and (r) and 307(b) and 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3534A1.txt
  • performance standards of the Commission's rules, due to the width of its main lobe, as well as an indication that each antenna was compliant with the side lobe pattern requirements specified in Section 25.209 of the Commission's Rules in the plane of the geostationary satellite orbit as it appears at the particular earth station location for off-axis angles starting at 2.1 degrees in the transmit band. The description indicated that ``the antennas are to be aligned with a nominal pointing accuracy of less than or equal to 0.3 degrees with wind'' (for the 0.75 and 0.96 meter antennas) and ``less than or equal to .4 degrees'' (for the 1.0 meter antenna) and ``will operate at a maximum input power density at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.txt
  • (prescribing 0 dBW limit on peak EIRP of mobile terminals). MSV ATC Application, Appendix E. Id. Inmarsat Opposition at p.36. EIRP - i.e., equivalent isotropic radiated power - is defined in the Commission's rules as the product of the power supplied to an antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to an isotropic antenna. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. An isotropic antenna is one that radiates equally in all directions. Reply of Inmarsat Ventures Ltd filed Apr. 26, 2004 (``Inmarsat Reply'') at 27, citing MSV ATC Application at 15-16. Id. at 28. ATC Report and Order at �142 and Appendix C2 � 1.3.1. It seems clear from context that ``-10 dBW'' in the last sentence of �142 is a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3618A1.txt
  • supra note 17, at 14; Appeal of Local Rate Order (``Colleyville Appeal'') by Comcast of Texas II, Inc., at 14-15, filed on March 4, 2004; Town of Flower Mound's Opposition Pleading to Comcast Cablevision of California/Colorado/Illinois/Indiana/Texas, Inc.'s Appeal of Local Rate Order (``Flower Mound Opposition''), filed on Feb. 18, 2004, Exhibit A (Town of Flower Mound, Texas, Ordinance No. 01-04, �2.1 at 2); Grapevine Appeal, supra note 17, at 14; McKinney Appeal, supra note 17, at 14. Allen Appeal, supra note 17, at 14-15; Colleyville Appeal, supra note 18, at 14-15; Flower Mound Appeal, supra note 17, at 14; Grapevine Appeal, supra note 17, at 14-15; McKinney Appeal, supra note 17, at 14-15. Dallas Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 10639, �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3661A1.txt
  • more efficient use of spectrum, because more stations can transmit on a given segment of spectrum in a given time. Commonly referred to as a ``single sideband'' by amateur radio operators. See id. and associated text. Commonly referred to as ``AM phone'' or the type of signal that an AM broadcast station transmits. Petition at 4. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1(c), 97.3(a) (4). Herein, ``amateur radio service'', ``Amateur Service'' and ``Amateur Radio Service'' are synonymous. See 47 C.F.R. � 97.1. See 47 C.F.R. � 97.101. See 47 C.F.R. � 97.101(b). Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 97.101(a). See id. See Petition at 4. See Petition at 2. Id. Id. See Petition at 2. Id. See Petition at 4. See Petition at 5.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3664A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3664A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 04-356 WT Docket No. 02-353 ORDER Adopted: November 19, 2004 Released: November 19, 2004 By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: On September 24, 2004, the Commission released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking public comment on service rules in connection with Advanced Wireless Services in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3848A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3848A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3848A1.txt
  • are allotting Channel 285A at Union Gap, Washington, as the community's first local aural transmission service. Union Gap is an incorporated city with a 2000 U.S. Census population of 5,621 persons. Coordinates: The reference coordinates for Channel 285A at Union Gap are 46-31-48 North Latitude and 120-27-18 West Longitude. Additional Information: This allotment requires a site restriction located 3.4 kilometers (2.1 miles) southeast of the community at the coordinates indicated above. Because the reference coordinates at Union Gap are located within 320 kilometers (199 miles) of the U.S.-Canadian border, concurrence of the Canadian Government has been obtained for this allotment. FCC Contact: Helen McLean (202) 418-2738. 2. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority found in 47 U.S.C. Sections 4(i), 5(c)(1), 303(g) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A2.txt
  • 00297 0353616.0 49 1000. 00295 0353616.0 539665 15448.4 1368007 24611.1 00903118.0 00903118.0 AR LITTLE ROCK KARK-DT 33440 04 100. 00503 0344757.0 32 1000 503.0 344757 1110696 40760.6 1104893 39912.4 00922959.0 922959 AR LITTLE ROCK KATV 33543 07 316. 00591 0342823.0 22 750. 00574 0342824.0 1037216 37710.3 1087397 43307.4 00921211.0 00921210.0 AR LITTLE ROCK KETS 2770 02 100. 00543 0342823.0 05 2.1 00548 0342631.0 1073108 39037.0 944030 29496.3 00921211.0 009213 3.0 AR LITTLE ROCK KLRT-TV 11951 16 5000. 00539 0344757.0 30 1000. 00449 0344757.0 1008168 28848.5 1022752 30013.0 00922929.0 00922929.0 AR LITTLE ROCK KTHV 2787 11 316. 00521 0344757.0 12 55. 00519 0344757.0 1043135 34738.4 1123112 42543.6 00922959.0 00922959.0 AR LITTLE ROCK KWBF 37005 42 3390. 00334 0344756.0 44 1000. 00485 0344745.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A4.txt
  • 1410.0 183. 27 750. 00183 419121 12582.7 581942 19185.9 AL TUSCALOOSA WCFT-TV 21258 33 4370.0 662. 05 5.4 00641 1406444 33361.9 1631420 44209.7 AR ARKADELPHIA KETG-TV 2768 09 316.00 326. 13 7.3 00326 358192 24270.8 299268 22305.5 AR FAYETTEVILLE KAFT-TV 2767 13 316.00 506. 09 19. 00509 814316 31095.9 873260 34748.8 AR LITTLE ROCK KETS-TV 2770 02 100.00 543. 05 2.1 00543 1073855 39097.5 995603 33110.7 AR LITTLE ROCK KWBF 37005 42 5000.0 156. 44 1000 00334 685934 14173.4 1019235 29419.2 AR MOUNTAIN VIEW KEMV-TV 2777 06 100.00 424. 13 20. 00425 433867 30980.3 456990 30654.1 CA AVALON KAZA-TV 29234 54 5000.0 366. 47 350. 937 8246526 19911.5 14670468 31201.7 CA FRESNO KGPE 56034 47 2630.0 597. 34 330. 00597 1270366
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3979A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3979A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3979A1.txt
  • VEK839, Bunker Hill, Ontario; Station VEK855, Cornwall, Ontario; Station XNG529, Cornwall, Ontario; and Station XNG530, South Mountain, Ontario. Id. MO&O, 19 FCC Rcd at 7608-09 �� 5-7. 47 U.S.C. � 316. See Supplement to Petition for Reconsideration at 2. See id. See id. at 2-3. See id. at 2, 7. See id. at 7. See id. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See Exchange of Notes (October 24, 1962) Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America Concerning the Coordination and Use of Radio Frequencies Above Thirty Megacycles Per Second, Technical Annex, � 4(a), (b) (revised June 16, 1965) (U.S.-Canada Agreement). See MO&O, 19 FCC Rcd at 7608 � 5 & n.9. The U.S.-Canada Agreement allows
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4048A1.txt
  • Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Transmittal Nos. 1430, 84, 187, 843, and 3022, respectively, Tariffs FCC Nos. 2, 1, 1, 39, and 73, respectively, (filed December 13, 2004). See, e.g., Ameritech Operating Companies Transmittal No. 1430, 2nd Revised Page 40.1, Section 2.4.1 (A). See, e.g., id. See, e.g., id. See, e.g., id. at 6th Revised Page 27, section 2.1.8. See, e.g., id. at 3rd Revised Page 28.1, section 2.1.8(A)(2). See, e.g., id. at Description and Justification, pp. 1-2 (citing Verizon Petition for Emergency Declaratory and Other Relief, WC Docket No. 02-202, Policy Statement, 17 FCC Rcd 26884 (2002)). Ameritech Operating Companies, Nevada Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Southern New England Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-574A1.txt
  • Rules. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131 and 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION D'wana R. Terry Chief, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See FCC File No. 0001391357 (filed Aug. 8, 2003). See id. at Request for Rule Waiver: Primary Status in the 2.1 GHz Band (Waiver Request). Marathon requests a waiver of Section 101.81 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 101.81, regarding primary status in the 2.1 GHz band. Id. Marathon petitions to maintain primary status. Id. See Redevelopment of Spectrum to Encourage Innovation in the Use of New Telecommunications Technologies, First Report and Order and Third Notice of Proposed Rule Making,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-675A1.txt
  • than Channel 300A, can be allotted to Dexter, Georgia, in full compliance with the Commission's technical requirements. 2. A staff analysis has determined that Channel 276A can be allotted to Dexter, Georgia, consistent with the requirements of Sections 73.207(b)(1) and 73.315(a) of the Commission's rules utilizing coordinates of 32-25-59 NL and 83-01-33 WL, with a site restriction of 3.3 kilometers (2.1 miles) east of Dexter. 3. Since allotting Channel 276A to Dexter, Georgia, could provide a first local aural transmission service to Dexter and areas surrounding that city, we believe that it would serve the public interest to solicit comments on the possible allotment of Channel 276A to Dexter, Georgia. Accordingly, we seek comments on the proposed amendment to the FM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.txt
  • on March 17, 2005. Public Notice, FCC Clarifies Equipment Certification Procedures for ``Learned Mode'' or ``Trainable'' Transmitters, 17 FCC Rcd 21423 (OET 2002). Section 15.3(o) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o), defines an intentional radiator as ``A device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.939(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 2.939(a)(4). Federal Communications Commission DA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1023A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1023A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1023A1.txt
  • required. 4. For all of the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the public interest would be served by substituting Channel 287A for Channel 288A at Sparta, Tennessee, and realloting Channel 287A at Morrison, Tennessee. Channel 287A can be allotted at Morrison in compliance with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's Rules with a site restriction of 3.4 kilometers (2.1 miles) northeast of Morrison at reference coordinates of: 35-37-27 NL and 85-53-37 WL. 5. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the General Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. �801(a)(a)(A). 6. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority found in 47 U.S.C. Sections 4(i),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1029A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1029A1.txt
  • Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission Letter from Houda Nounou, Assistant General Counsel, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., to Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (March 16, 2005). You also indicated that Wal-Mart has returned its inventory of 54 units to the supplier and permanently discontinued marketing this product. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1029 Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1030A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1030A1.txt
  • in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission Additionally, in response to a Letter of Inquiry, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. identified GPS Outfitters as its supplier of Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antennas. See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Citation, DA 05-1029 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., released April 8, 2005). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1030 Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1031A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1031A1.txt
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. � 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1031 Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1033A1.txt
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. � 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1033 Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1034A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1034A1.txt
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. � 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1034 Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1035A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1035A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1035A1.txt
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. � 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1035 Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1036A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1036A1.txt
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. � 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1036 Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1037A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1037A1.txt
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. � 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1037 Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1107A1.txt
  • to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. � 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission Letter from Bob Baker, Vice President, Dallas Avionics, Inc., to Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (March 30,2005). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1107 Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1155A1.txt
  • Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Ming-Hang Ho, Gilsson Technologies (March 7, 2005). See Letter from Ming-Hang Ho, Gilsson Technologies, to Thomas Fitz-Gibbon and Yasin Ozer, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (March 26, 2005) (``Response''). You also indicated that Gilsson has permanently removed the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas from its website. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' Response at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-130A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 04-356 WT Docket No. 02-353 ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2005 Released: January 19, 2005 By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: On September 24, 2004, the Commission released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking public comment on service rules in connection with Advanced Wireless Services in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1722A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1722A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1722A1.txt
  • Fixed Service, the Multipoint Distribution Service, and the Private Operational Fixed Microwave Service, Gen Docket No. 80-112 and CC Docket No. 80-116, Report and Order, 94 FCC 2d 1203 (1983) (First Leasing Decision). Id. at 1206-07 � 4. Id. See Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, and Cable Television Relay Service, Gen. Docket No. 90-54, Second Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 6792, 6793, 6801-06 �� 4, 42-58 (1991) (Second Report and Order); see also Second Report and Order at Appendix C; 47 C.F.R. � 74.990 (1991). See former 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1818A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1818A1.txt
  • operations, such as two-way fixed and mobile broadband applications. It also expands the original MDS-ITFS band by adding to it five megahertz of additional spectrum from below 2500 MHz, which increases the total size of the band to 194 megahertz. This will provide room for the future relocation of MDS Channels 1 and 2, which are presently located in the 2.1 GHz band. In order to reflect these new opportunities for providing broadband service, the BRS/EBS R&O and FNPRM renames the MDS service as BRS, and renames the ITFS service as EBS. The BRS/EBS R&O and FNPRM establishes simpler and more flexible rules for licensees, including geographic area licensing and the ability to employ the technology of their choice. For EBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-191A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 15.205(a). Public Notice, FCC Clarifies Equipment Certification Procedures for ``Learned Mode'' or ``Trainable'' Transmitters, DA 02-2850 (October 28, 2002). Section 15.3 (o), of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o), defines an intentional radiator as ``A device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The OET Laboratory determined that the LRT-1 was capable of being tuned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-20A1.txt
  • 94-102, Order on Reconsideration, FCC 03-98 (rel. May 8, 2003). Commission adopted service rules for the first 90 megahertz of Advanced Wireless Service (AWS) spectrum, consisting of 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz. Most significantly, the order provided for flexible use of the spectrum under Part 27 of the Rules. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003). as amended by Erratum, DA 04-3208, 19 FCC Rcd 19651 (2004) and Erratum, DA 04-3459, rel. Oct. 29, 2004. See also In the Matter of Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 MHz Band, Supplemental Order and Order on Reconsideration, WT Docket 02-55, FCC 04-294 (rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2424A1.txt
  • executed with Telesat Canada on June 29, 2005. See Appendix B. Augmentation messages referred to here are messages that contain error correction information that provide for differential corrections to the GPS receive signals, resulting in more accurate GPS navigation information. See Lockheed February 2004 Amendment at 11. See Lockheed February 2004 Amendment, Revised Table 4.1-1. . See also 47 C.F.R. �2.1. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106 footnote 5.458 and footnote US342. In addition, Section 25.203(c) of the Commission's rules requires that an Earth station applicant, prior to filing its application, shall coordinate its proposed frequency usage with existing terrestrial users and with applicants for terrestrial station authorizations. Therefore, we remind Lockheed that it is required to coordinate its two feeder uplink
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2424A1_Erratum.doc
  • executed with Telesat Canada on June 29, 2005. See Appendix B. Augmentation messages referred to here are messages that contain error correction information that provide for differential corrections to the GPS receive signals, resulting in more accurate GPS navigation information. See Lockheed February 2004 Amendment at 11. See Lockheed February 2004 Amendment, Revised Table 4.1-1. . See also 47 C.F.R. �2.1. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106 footnote 5.458 and footnote US342. In addition, Section 25.203(c) of the Commission's rules requires that an Earth station applicant, prior to filing its application, shall coordinate its proposed frequency usage with existing terrestrial users and with applicants for terrestrial station authorizations. Therefore, we remind Lockheed that it is required to coordinate its two feeder uplink
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2718A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2718A1.txt
  • this regard. The public is invited to comment on this showing. 5. Consistent with the technical requirements of the Commission's rules, Channel 292A can be allotted to Marlinton, West Virginia, utilizing coordinates of 38-13-24 NL and 80-05-41 WL, and Channel 291A can be allotted to Keswick, Virginia, utilizing coordinates of 38-01-48 NL and 78-22-55 WL, with a site restriction of 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) northwest of Keswick. 6. Accordingly, we seek comments on the proposed amendment to the FM Table of Allotments, Section 73.202(b) of the Commission's Rules, with respect to the communities listed below, as follows: Channel Nos. City Present Proposed Churchville, Virginia 292B1 -------- Keswick, Virginia --------- 291A Marlinton, West Virginia ---------- 292A 7. The Commission's authority to institute
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2998A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2998A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2998A1.txt
  • the amplified signal through another antenna. These devices are commonly used to deliver a strong GPS signal indoors for testing, calibrating, or experimenting with GPS receivers in a controlled environment. See Letter from Robert G. Kirk to Neal McNeil (March 2, 2005). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The re-radiators and repeaters purposely transmit RF energy on these restricted frequencies.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3102A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3102A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3102A2.txt
  • perform the functions as identified. The contractor shall provide a monthly report to the FCC on contractor staffing status. The report shall include numbers by labor category, shortages and overages, and yearly turnover rate. Availability Staff should be available a minimum of five days a week, eight hours a day for each respective pooling time zone as defined in Section 2.1 of this document. Pooling administration hours of operation shall allow block applicants and block holders in all time zones access during the majority of the client's core business hours. The PA is required to obtain prior approval from the FCC or its designee to any exception to the above. Core Hours Core business hours for the contractor shall fall between
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3126A1.txt
  • Services, Including Third Generation Wireless Systems, ET Docket No. 00-258, Second Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 23193 (2002), Eighth Report and Order and Fifth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order, FCC 05-172 (rel. Sept. 29, 2005) (AWS Allocation Eighth Report and Order, Fifth NPRM, and Order. See also Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (recon. pending), modified by Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005). BRS/EBS R&O and FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd 14165, 14184 � 38. Id. at 14203 � 88. Except in this background paragraph, references to Channels 1 and/or 2/2A in this Public Notice refer to channel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-337A1.txt
  • Consent Decree. This Consent Decree cannot be modified without the advance written consent of both Parties. This Consent Decree may be signed in counterparts. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Perfect Fit Industries, Inc.: ________________________________ Louis R. Morris President and Chief Executive Officer ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. Perfect Fit Industries, Inc., 19 FCC Rcd 19889 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., 2004). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-337 Federal Communications Commission DA 05-337 Federal Communications Commission DA 05-337
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-36A1.txt
  • should be preferred. 5. For all of the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the public interest would be served by substituting Channel 247A for Channel 247C1 at Weatherford, Oklahoma, and realloting Channel 247A at Blanchard, Oklahoma. Channel 247A can be allotted at Blanchard in compliance with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's Rules with a site restriction of 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) southwest of Blanchard at reference coordinates of: 35-07-21 NL and 97-40-18 WL. 6. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the General Accounting Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. �801(a)(a)(A). 7. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority found in 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-472A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-472A1.txt
  • 2004). 47 C.F.R. � 0.459. Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. Application for Review (filed October 22, 2004). On November 15, 2004, PFI filed a Supplement to its Application for Review. Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. Supplement to Application for Review (filed November 15, 2004). Perfect Fit Industries, Inc., DA 05-337 (Enf. Bur., February 10, 2005). 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. Motion to Withdraw Application for Review (filed February 10, 2005). PFI included the November 15, 2004 Supplement to its Application for Review within the scope of its Motion to Withdraw. 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. Federal Communications Commission DA 05-472 Federal Communications Commission DA 05-472 h5g h5g h5g h5g
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-487A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-487A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-487A1.txt
  • of funds: debt, preferred stock, and common stock. The cost of each source reflects the risk of the assets in which the firm invests. See 2000 Biennial Review Spectrum Aggregation Limits for Commercial Mobile Radio Services, WT Docket No. 01-14, Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 22668, 22688-91 (2001). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162 (2003). The use of any geographic area to calculate mobile telecommunications subscribership and penetration rates for purposes of this report does not imply that the same geographic area will be used in any other Commission proceedings to define the relevant geographic markets. Such proceedings could include an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1272A1.txt
  • Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, Including Third Generation Wireless Systems, ET Docket No. 00-258, Second Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 23193 (2002), Eighth Report and Order, Fifth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 15866 (2005) (2005 Commission Order). See also Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) modified by Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005). See Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, Including Third Generation Wireless Systems, ET Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1279A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1279A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit D D D � � D X � D � � D � � DA 06-1279 Released: June 15, 2006 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Opens Filing Window for Proposals To DEVELOP AND manage the clearinghouse that will administer the relocation cost sharing plan for licensees in The 2.1 GHz BandS (WT Docket No. 02-353, ET Docket No. 00-258) By this Public Notice, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (``WTB'' or ``Bureau'') solicits proposals from entities who wish to act as a neutral, not-for-profit clearinghouse responsible for facilitating cost sharing among entrants benefiting from the relocation of incumbent licensees in the 2.1 GHz bands. The Bureau will accept proposals until July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1442A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1442A1.txt
  • Systems, Inc., 1F No. 21 Yanfa, 2nd Road, SBIP, Hsinchu City, Taiwan. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Joseph P. Casey Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). 47 C.F.R. � 15.247(d). A wireless access point is a transmitter/receiver used to provide wireless internet access. Industry Canada is a regulatory agency of the Canadian Government. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to AboCom Systems, Inc. (March
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1525A1.txt
  • incumbent BRS licensees from the 2150-2160/62 MHz portion of the band. See Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, Including Third Generation Wireless Systems, ET Docket No. 00-258, Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Ninth Report and Order and Order, 21 FCC Rcd 4473 (2006). The Commission also issued guidance, along with the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, to assist AWS-1 licensees to begin implementing service during the transition of federal operations from the band while providing interference protection to incumbent federal government operations until they have been
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1555A1.txt
  • Consent Decree. This Consent Decree cannot be modified without the advance written consent of both Parties. This Cnsent Decree may be signed in counterparts. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Applied Wireless Identifications Group, Inc.: ________________________________ Larry Kellam Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1555 Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1555 Q � d � � " � 0 � " � 0 � " � 0 � u �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1651A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1651A1.txt
  • D, p. 3. DBS Freeze Public Notice. ITU Region 2 includes North, Central, and South America and Greenland. See Article 5, Section I of the ITU Radio Regulations. BSS is the international term used for a radiocommunication service in which signals transmitted or retransmitted by space stations are intended for direct reception by the general public. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. DBS is the term used in the United States to describe the domestic implementation of the BSS international service. The Regional Administrative Radio Conference in 1983 (RARC-83) developed and adopted the Region 2 BSS and feeder-link Plans. It was not until 1985, at the World Administrative Radio Conference (WARC Orb-85), that the Region 2 Plans were adopted internationally worldwide and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1984A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1984A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 06-1984 October 4, 2006 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU FINDS CTIA AND PCIA QUALIFIED TO administer the relocation cost-sharing plan for licensees in The 2.1 GHz BandS (WT Docket No. 02-353, ET Docket No. 00-258) By this Public Notice, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (``WTB'' or ``Bureau'') concludes that the public interest is best served by designating more than one entity to administer the relocation cost-sharing plan for licensees in the 2.1 GHz bands. The Bureau also finds CTIA and PCIA, the two entities that filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2019A1.txt
  • Communications Commission See Letter from Kathryn Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to LightObject d/b/a Actionbuy Trading Co. (March 20, 2006). See Letter from Kachun Wong to Neal McNeil, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (April 24, 2006). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The 1.2 GHz wireless camera purposely transmits RF energy on restricted frequencies.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-202A1.txt
  • satellites and the requirement to meet the provisions of Article 21, Table 21-4. dination involving the MetSat or FSS service in this band, indicating the networks for which the value of (T/T calculated by the method in � 2.2.1.2 and 3.2 of Appendix 8 exceeds 6%. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Frequency allocations Section IV - Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) USA/ / 1 MOD 5.519 Additional allocation: the band 18.10-18.3 GHz is also allocated to the meteorological-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis. Its use is limited to geostationary satellites and shall be in accordance with the provisions of Article 21, Table 21-4. Reasons: Expanding the current 18.1-18.3 GHz geostationary meteorological-satellite service (space-to-Earth) allocation to the band 18.0-18.1 GHz by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2246A1.txt
  • acquired 64.9 percent of Telesphere's capital stock. Thus, Telesphere and Rally Capital consummated a transaction where Rally Capital acquired control of Telesphere and its domestic services and common carrier transmission lines. Applicants state that financial circumstances required the Applicants to act without Commission consent to improve the financial position of Telesphere. On October 4, 2006, Rally Capital acquired an additional 2.1 percent of Telesphere's capital stock. Applicants state that the proposed transaction will serve the public interest. Applicants submit that the transaction will strengthen Telesphere's financial position, allowing it to expand its service offerings and compete more effectively with other carriers in the market. Applicants argue that the transaction will have no impact on any participant's share of the local exchange,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2360A1.txt
  • District Court for the District of New Jersey. Specifically, the district court ordered that plaintiffs in the matter Combined Companies, Inc. and Winback & Conserve Program, Inc., One Stop Financial, Inc., Group Discounts, Inc. and 800 Discounts, Inc. v. AT&T Corp., Civ. No. 95-908 (WGB), file with the Commission to initiate an administrative proceeding to resolve the issues under section 2.1.8 of AT&T's Tariff No. 2 as well as any other issues left open by the D.C. Circuit's Opinion in AT&T Corp. v. FCC, 394 F.3d 933 (D.C. Cir. 2005). Interested parties may file comments on or before December 20, 2006, and reply comments on or before January 17, 2007. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-238A1.txt
  • - FCC - AWS is the collective term used for new and innovative fixed and mobile terrestrial wireless applications using bandwidth that is sufficient for the provision of a variety of applications including those using voice and data (such as internet browsing, message services, and full-motion video) content. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (``AWS-1 Service Rules Order''); modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005). Although AWS is commonly associated with so-called third generation (``3G'') applications and has been
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2439A1.txt
  • and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The ITU, headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, is an international organization within the United Nations System where administrations coordinate global telecommunication networks and services. BSS is the international term used for a radiocommunication service in which signals transmitted or retransmitted by space stations are intended for direct reception by the general public. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. DBS is the term used in the United States to describe the domestic implementation of the BSS international service in the 12.2-12.7 GHz band. The provisions of Appendices 30 and 30A of the International Radio Regulations are applicable to the BSS in the frequency bands 11.7-12.2 GHz (Region 3), 11.7-12.5 GHz (Region 1) and 12.2-12.7 GHz (Region 2), and to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2440A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2440A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2440A1.txt
  • 0.261, and is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John V. Giusti Acting Chief, International Bureau See paragraphs 20-21, infra. where administrations coordinate global telecommunication networks and services. BSS is the international term used for a radiocommunication service in which signals transmitted or retransmitted by space stations are intended for direct reception by the general public. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. DBS is the term used in the United States to describe the domestic implementation of the BSS international service in the 12.2-12.7 GHz band. The provisions of Appendices 30 and 30A of the International Radio Regulations are applicable to the BSS in the frequency bands 11.7-12.2 GHz (Region 3), 11.7-12.5 GHz (Region 1) and 12.2-12.7 GHz (Region 2), and to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2452A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2452A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2452A1.txt
  • the requirements of this Consent Decree shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the Effective Date. This Consent Decree may be signed in counterparts. For: Boston Scientific Corporation ___________________________ William F. McConnell, Jr. Senior Vice President, Administration Date: ___________________________ For: Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission ____________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau Date: __________________________ 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. Respironics, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation, Order, ET Docket No. 05-331, DA 06-2316 (OET, released November 16, 2006). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2477A1.txt
  • Telesphere Networks Ltd. (Telesphere) to Rally Capital, LLC (Rally Capital), a Washington based limited liability company. Pursuant to a conversion of Telesphere debt to equity in Telesphere, on September 20, 2006, Rally Capital, LLC acquired 64.9 percent of Telesphere's capital stock, and therefore, without prior Commission approval, acquired control of Telesphere. On October 4, 2006, Rally Capital acquired an additional 2.1 percent of Telesphere's capital stock. Thus Rally Capital now owns 67 percent of Telesphere's capital stock. The following U.S. entities and individual U.S. citizen hold 10 percent or greater ownership interests in Telesphere through Rally Capital: Teledesic LLC (100 percent of Rally Capital's units and indirectly 67 percent of Telesphere's capital stock); Teledesic Corporation (99 percent of Teledesic LLC's units
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-333A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-333A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-333A2.txt
  • Part 15 Pending OMB Approval 3060-1021 Sec. 25.139 11/30/08 3060-1022 Sec. 101.1403 01/31/09 3060-1023 Sec. 101.103 01/31/09 3060-1024 Sec. 101.1413 01/31/09 3060-1025 Sec. 101.1440 01/31/09 3060-1026 Sec. 101.1417 01/31/09 3060-1027 Sec. 27.602 03/31/06 3060-1028 International Signaling Point Code (ISPC) 10/31/08 3060-1029 Data Network Identification Code (DNIC) 10/31/08 3060-1030 Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands 01/31/09 3060-1031 Revision of the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems - Petition of City of Richardson, TX; Order on Reconsideration II 08/31/06 3060-1032 Commercial Availability of Navigation Devices and Compatibility Between Cable Systems and Consumer Electronics Equipment, CS Docket No. 97-80 and PP Docket No. 00-67 03/31/07 3060-1033 FCC 396-C 07/31/07 3060-1034
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-431A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-431A1.txt
  • 418-2180 D. MB Docket No. 04-269; RM- 11010 Action: At the request of Linda A. Davidson, we are allotting Channel 299A at San Joaquin, California as the community's second local FM transmission service. Coordinates: The reference coordinates for Channel 299A at San Joaquin are 36-36-00 North Latitude and 120-12-36 West Longitude. Additional Information: This allotment requires a site restriction of 2.1 kilometers (1.2 miles) west to avoid a short-spacing to the licensed site for Station KZOL(FM), Channel 200B1, North Fork, California. FCC Contact: Sharon P. McDonald (202) 418-2180 E. MB Docket No. 04-270; RM-11012 Action: At the request of Charles Crawford, we are allotting Channel 281A at Rosepine, Louisiana, as the community's first local aural transmission service. Coordinates: The reference coordinates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-62A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-62A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-62A1.txt
  • of funds: debt, preferred stock, and common stock. The cost of each source reflects the risk of the assets in which the firm invests. See 2000 Biennial Review Spectrum Aggregation Limits for Commercial Mobile Radio Services, WT Docket No. 01-14, Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 22668, 22688-91 (2001). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162 (2003). The use of any geographic area to calculate mobile telecommunications subscribership and penetration rates for purposes of this report does not imply that the same geographic area will be used in any other Commission proceedings to define the relevant geographic markets. Such proceedings could include an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-955A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-955A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-955A1.txt
  • local service from AM Station WNLR. Therefore, we grant Petitioner's reallotment proposal. 4. Consistent with the technical requirements of the Commission's Rules, Channel 292A can be allotted to Marlinton, West Virginia, utilizing coordinates of 38-13-24 NL and 80-05-41WL, and Channel 291A can be allotted to Keswick, Virginia, utilizing coordinates of 38-01-48 NL and 78-22-55 WL, with a site restriction of 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) northwest of Keswick. 5. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). 6. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority contained in 47 U.S.C. Sections 4(i), 5(c)(1), 303(g) and (r) and 307(b) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • the provision of service through the deployment of receive earth stations in the territory of administration A can only occur with its approval. APPENDIX 30B (Rev. WRC-2000) Provisions and associated Plan for the fixed-satellite service in the frequency bands 4 500-4 800 MHz, 6 725-7 025 MHz, 10.70-10.95 GHz, 11.20-11.45 GHz and 12.75-13.25 GHz USA/ /01 NOC Article 1 and 2.1 ARTICLE 1 Objective of the provisions and associated Plan 1.1 The objective of the procedures prescribed in this Appendix is to guarantee in practice, for all countries, equitable access to the geostationary-satellite orbit in the frequency bands of the fixed-satellite service covered by this Appendix. tion of assignments in conformity with Part A of the Plan. ARTICLE 2 Definitions 2.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-10A1.txt
  • FCC Secretary dated Aug. 21, 2006 from Josh L. Roland, Counsel for Globalstar LLC. In this order, we refer to both GUSA Licensee, LLC and its predecessor as GUSA. The term "feeder link" refers to fixed-satellite service radio links carrying signals in both directions between a MSS satellite and an earth station at a fixed point. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Feeder link earth stations that distribute information to, and receive information from, terrestrial telecommunication networks, e.g., the public switched telephone network and the Internet, are generally known as gateways. The term ``Big LEO MSS'' denotes mobile satellite service systems that transmit to mobile earth stations in the 1610-1626.5 MHz band. MSS is a radiocommunication service between mobile earth stations and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1120A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 00-258 WT Docket No. 02-353 Adopted: March 8, 2007 Released: March 8, 2007 By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: Table of Contents Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. BACKGROUND 2 III. DISCUSSION 6 A. Duties and Responsibilities of the Clearinghouses 6 1. Scope; representations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-11A1.txt
  • FCC Secretary dated Aug. 21, 2006 from Josh L. Roland, Counsel for Globalstar LLC. In this order, we refer to both GUSA Licensee, LLC and its predecessor as GUSA. The term "feeder link" refers to fixed-satellite service radio links carrying signals in both directions between a MSS satellite and an earth station at a fixed point. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Feeder link earth stations that distribute information to, and receive information from, terrestrial telecommunication networks, e.g., the public switched telephone network and the Internet, are generally known as gateways. The term ``Big LEO MSS'' denotes mobile satellite service systems that transmit to mobile earth stations in the 1610-1626.5 MHz band. MSS is a radiocommunication service between mobile earth stations and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-125A1.txt
  • provides local exchange service in only one of them, Alabama, and that the dominant local exchange carrier in that instance is not a party to this transaction. However, as described above, the Applicants assert that CenturyTel provides competitive access service, but not local exchange services, in one Illinois exchange served by Madison River (Galesburg North). Nationwide, CenturyTel currently serves approximately 2.1 million access lines and 1.2 million long-distance customers. The Applicants state that CenturyTel is a publicly traded company, of which no person or entity owns 10 percent or more of the equity. On December 17, 2006, CenturyTel entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the ``Agreement'') with Madison River LLC and Madison River Corp. Pursuant to the Agreement, CenturyTel will acquire
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1490A1.txt
  • to its existing international section 214 authorization, ITC-214-20011010-00517. Cognigen will provide service to its remaining customers pursuant to its international section 214 authorization, ITC-214-20040213-00073. Acceris is a wholly owned subsidiary of North Central Equity LLC (North Central), a privately-held Minnesota holding company. Mr. Elam Baer (sole member Board of Governors), U.S. citizen, holds 54.6% interest in North Central, of which 2.1 units are held by his spouse Janis Clay. No other individual or entity holds 10 percent or greater equity or voting interest in North Central. This authorization is without prejudice to the Commission's action on any other related pending application(s). Cognigen Networks, Inc. Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: Acceris Management and Acquisition LLC Cognigen Networks, Inc. Assignment Acceris Management
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • 16.9 N-4/N-8 0.4 5.7 5.1 12.2 3.4 9.5 9.8 16.3 N-3/N-6 -1.2 5.2 3.1 15.1 -0.2 5.9 6.4 11.3 N-2/N-4 -1.9 -0.2 -0.6 3.0 -6.6 0.5 0.2 5.6 N-1/N-2 -0.3 0.7 0.2 4.0 -0.3 0.7 0.1 3.6 N+1/N+2 -1.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 -1.3 0.6 0.5 2.3 N+2/N+4 -1.5 2.7 0.1 11.3 -1.2 4.0 3.9 11.4 N+3/N+6 -0.2 7.2 6.8 14.1 2.1 9.8 9.9 14.7 N+4/N+8 1.5 8.2 7.0 16.4 0.7 8.7 8.9 13.8 N+5/N+10 0.0 7.9 9.1 12.8 -0.3 7.1 7.3 13.7 -1.9 4.7 4.1 16.4 -6.6 5.9 6.8 16.9 Note 1 For D = -53 dBm, the actual means, medians, and maxima for channels N+3/N+6 and beyond on the positive side and N-4/N-8 and beyond on the negative side are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1673 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1674 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1675 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1676 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1728A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1728A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1728A1.txt
  • Pty. Ltd. Locked Bag 2086 North Ryde, New South Wales 1670 AUSTRALIA Attn: Craig John Duncan, Project Engineering Manager Letter dated Aug. 16, 2006 from John F. Flood, Vice President, Engineering, ACR Electronics Inc. to Tim Maguire, Federal Communications Commission (Letter). See 47 C.F.R. � 80.1061(a). See RTCM Paper 77-2002/SC110-STD, ``RTCM Recommended Standards for 406 Emergency Position-Indicating Radiobeacons (EPIRBs), Version 2.1 dated June 20, 2002'' (RTCM SC-110 STD). See Letter at 2. See RTCM SC-110 STD sections 2.3.1.1 and 2.3.1.2; see also RTCM SC-110 STD section 2.3.1.3, which states, ``A separate test switch or switch position is required for this test function. The test switch (or similar control) should automatically return (for example, spring-loaded switch) from the test position.'' See Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1754 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1756 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1757 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1758 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1763 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1764 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1766 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1767 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1784A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1784A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1784A1.txt
  • Spectrum Enf. Div. 2006). 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). A wireless access point is a transmitter/receiver used to provide wireless internet access. 47 C.F.R. � 15.247(d). Industry Canada is a regulatory agency of the Canadian government. AboCom received a grant of equipment authorization for the wireless access point under FCC ID MQ4ARM94 on April 22, 2004. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as an ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to AboCom Systems, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.txt
  • 10, 2006) (``Response'') at 4, � 10, Exhibit 1, Application of Salsgiver Telecom, Inc. for approval to offer, render, furnish or supply telecommunication services as a Competitive Access Provider to the Public in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Order, Docket No. A-311373, Feb. 7, 2006 (``Salsgiver CAP Authorization Order'') at 2-6. CAP Tariff, ``Application of Tariff'' and ``Service Offered'' and Sections 2.1.1., 3.1, Pages 4, 8 and 25 of 28. Complaint at 1-2, � 3; Response at 2, � 3. Section 224(a)(1) of the Act defines ``utility,'' in pertinent part, as ``a local exchange carrier ... who owns or controls poles, ducts, conduits, or rights-of-way used, in whole or in part, for any wire communications.'' 47 U.S.C. � 224(a)(1). 47 U.S.C. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2946A1.txt
  • be in the public interest. As part of its waiver request, Sunflower attaches a chart showing Nielsen reported audience shares for the all-day share. The chart shows that, over the period from November 2004 to February 2006, KSCW's average all-day share was a 2.27 share. The highest share the station experienced was 2.7 in November 2006, and the lowest was 2.1 on four different occasions. With respect to KSCW's financial condition, Sunflower appends cash flow data intended to show negative cash flow for the three years preceding the filing of the instant application. In addition, in a Declaration, Lyle Banks, President and Chairman of Banks Broadcasting, Inc., parent of KSCW's licensee, states that the station has ``suffered operating losses each year
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.txt
  • use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. 47 C.F.R. � 2.801 defines a radiofrequency device as ``any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radiofrequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means.'' Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Citation (Compliance and Inf. Bur., Compliance Div., Inv. Group, February 13, 1997). The citation was issued pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.txt
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.txt
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.txt
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.txt
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.txt
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.txt
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.txt
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.txt
  • a radar ``scrambler.'' An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3266 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3270 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3392 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3393 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A10.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A10.txt
  • new entrants and there has been a major shift of viewers toward cable networks. For cable systems, there is now significant direct competition from Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) providers. With this rise of competition as the backdrop, this study will reexamine the evidence regarding vertical integration in primetime broadcast television and on cable/DBS systems. 2. TELEVISION PROGRAMMING ON BROADCAST NETWORKS 2.1 Historical Background 5 Starting in 1970, the financial interest and syndication rules issued by the FCC explicitly restricted the ability of major networks to take ownership stakes in various types of programming. With the rise of cable networks, the expansion in the number of broadcast networks, and the skepticism over whether it would really be in the interest of broadcast
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A2.txt
  • 100% DUE TO MULTIPLE RESPONSES COPYRIGHT � THE NIELSEN COMPANY NIELSEN MEDIA RESEARCH FCC PHONE SURVEY MAY 2007 PAGE: 6 TABLE 002 (continued) Q2. WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF INFORMATION DO YOU GET FROM BROADCAST TELEVISION CHANNELS? EXAMPLES OF THESE CHANNELS WOULD BE ABC OR CBS. BASE: RESPONDENTS WHO WATCH BROADCAST TELEVISION TOTAL =========== OTHER 5.1 DON'T WATCH BROADCAST 2.1 DON'T KNOW 0.9 REFUSE 0.4 DATA BASED UPON FEWER THAN 145 RESPONDENTS DO NOT MEET MINIMUM REPORTING STANDARDS AND ARE SUPPLIED FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. RESPONSES MAY ADD TO MORE THAN 100% DUE TO MULTIPLE RESPONSES COPYRIGHT � THE NIELSEN COMPANY NIELSEN MEDIA RESEARCH FCC PHONE SURVEY MAY 2007 PAGE: 7 TABLE 003 Q3. IN AN AVERAGE WEEK, HOW MUCH
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • According to Arbitron, AQH persons is "the average number of persons estimated to have listened to a station for a minimum of five minutes during any quarter-hour in a time period" (or day part). The AQH Rating is "calculated by dividing the number of AQH Persons by the survey area population within the same sex/age group." (See Arbitron Guide, p. 2.1.) 37 Arbitron does not provide ratings data for non-commercial stations, and it provides listener data (but not ratings) for stations outside of Arbitron markets. 38 I do not have station-specific ratings data for 152 of 569 commercial, in-market stations in my database. 16 market population, the market effective buying income ("EBI") per capita, and a breakdown of population along race
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • and *p<.10. 39 Table 7: Political News Coverage by Cross-Ownership (in seconds) Cross-Owned Station Broadcasts (n=87) Non Cross-Owned Station Broadcasts (n=225) Difference in Means Speaking time of state and local candidates Total speaking 24.4 (37.3) 24.3 (34.1) +0.1 State and local candidate coverage Total candidate 76.5 (101.0) 69.8 (80.2) +6.7 Partisan issue coverage Total partisan issues 89.9 (85.4) 92.0 (93.2) -2.1 Opinion poll coverage Total polls 9.7 (24.3) 6.3 (16.9) +3.4 Notes: Mean and standard deviation. Difference in means is (cross-owned less non-cross- owned); ***p<.01, **p<.05, and *p<.10. 40 Table 8: Total State and Local Candidate Speaking Time (in seconds) Independent variables (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Local station ownership Cross-owned newspaper 0.4 (0.10) 6.6 (1.11) 7.8 (1.20) 8.0 (1.28) 9.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.txt
  • seriousanalysis. Recommendations TheFCCshouldtakestepstoimprovetheirdatacollectionprocess.Stronge�ort shouldbemadetoensureafull,consistentandaccuratereportingofownershipstatus anditscomposition.Thisshouldbealongrunendeavour. Currently,theFCCsimply�agsasminorityorfemaleownedany�rmwithgreater than50%femaleorminorityownership.Thisinformationismaintainedasasep- arate(andincomplete)spreadsheetthatisnotlinkedtothebroadcensusof�rms. Instead,informationonminorityandfemaleownershipshouldbecarefullytracked andintegratedintothemain�rmdatabaseinacoherentfashion. Inaddition,�rmsshouldbeclassi�ednotonlybyraceandgender,butwhetherthe companyispubliclytradedorprivatelyowned.E�ortsshouldalsobemadetotrack thedemographicsofminorityaswellasmajoritystakeholders. Morebroadly,theFCCshouldfurtherexaminetherationalebehindthisexercise.In particularwerecommendrevisitingthefollowingpoints: �Beforeconsideringpotentiallycostlyregulationsaimedatchangingtheowner- shipstructureintheseindustries,theFCCshouldaskwhetherthereareinfact quanti�ablebene�tstoincreasingminorityandfemaleownership.Howexactly willownershippoliciesa�ectchange? �Recentevidence(e.g.Gentzkow&Shapiro,2006)suggeststhatmediacontent isdrivenmorebydemand(i.e.consumerpreferences)thansupply(i.e.owner preferences).Ifthisisthecase,howwillchangeofownershipa�ectcontent? �Whatconstitutesownership?Thedebatethusfarhasfocusedonprivatelyowned companiesand,withinthatcategory,ononlythemajoritystakeholder.Doesfair representationrequireacontrollinginterest?Ifnot,shouldn�twebetracking ownershippatternsbelowthe50%cuto�?Isn�tittheoverallcompositionofthe �rmthatmatters? 3 �Furthermore,whatroledopublic�rmsplay?Itisarguablethatpublicenterprises arethemostbroadlyrepresentativeofall.Unfortunately,littleisknownabout theroleofthisimportantandrapidlyexpandingsegment. �Finally,howdoestheadventofnon-traditionalmedia(e.g.theinternet)change thedebate?Theproliferationofnews,opinion,andinformationoutletsavailable ontheinternetisgivingvoicetoaneverincreasingrangeofviewpoints.This suggestsanovelandlowcostmethodofensuringthatmorevoiceshavethe chancetobeheard:subsidizingbroadbandaccess.Thedemocraticnatureof informationdi�usionviatheinternetislimitedonlybyconsumeraccess:not everyonecancheaplyconnect.However,thisproblemisrelativelyinexpensive toremedy,withlittle(ifany)downside. 2DataonMinorityandFemaleOwnershipPatterns Themostcompletedatasourcecurrentlyavailableforanalyzingthestatusoffemaleand minorityownersintheUnitedStatesisthe2002SurveyofBusinessOwners(SBO),which ispartofthe2002EconomicCensus.TheSBOisastrati�edsampleofbusinesseswith receiptsof$1000ormore,compiledfromtheuniverseof�rmstrackedbytheCensusandIn- ternalRevenueService.The2002surveycontainsinformationonover5:5millionnon-farm businesseswithpaidemployees.Industriesareclassi�edaccordingtotheNorthAmerican IndustryClassi�cationSystem(NAICS).ThedataaretabulatedbyNAICS,processedby theCensusbureau,andmadeavailableinavarietyofforms.Thedataweareusinginclude informationatthe6digitNAICSlevelonbusinessfrom18twodigitNAICSlinesand providedetailedinformationontheraceandgenderofbusinessowners.Only�rmswith paidemployeesareincluded.Businessownershipisde�nedashaving51percentormore ofthestockorequityinthebusinessandiscategorizedby: Gender:Male,FemaleorequallyMale/FemaleOwned Ethnicity:HispanicorLatinoornonHispanicorLatino Race:White,BlackorAfricanAmerican,AmericanIndianorAlaskaNative,Asian, NativeHawaiianorOtherPaci�cIslander 4 Notethatbusinessmaybetabulatedinmorethanonegroup,eitherbecausethemajority orsoleownerreportedmorethanoneraceorbecauseamajoritycombinationofowners reportedmorethanonerace. 2.1AnalysisoftheCensusdata Table1presentsabreakdownof�rmownershipbygender.Firmsarecategorizedasfemale owned,maleownedorequallymalenfemaleowned.Thepercentagesreportedarerelativeto theuniverseofprivatelyheld�rms,inordertominimizedistortionscreatedbydi�erential ratesofpublicownership.Forcomparisonpurposes(andtoillustratethispoint),theraw dataarealsopresentedintheappendixinTable7.Itisimmediatelyclearthattheshare ofpubliclyheld�rmsvariessigni�cantlyacrosstheseindustries,causingthenumbersin Table7tore�ectboththisdi�erenceandthedi�erenceinthesharesbygender.Sincewe areprimarilyinterestedinthelatter,wefocusontheinformationinTable1andleavethe complimentinformationfortheappendix.Weshouldnotethattheshareofpubliclytraded �rmsisaninterestingareaforfutureanalysis,butemphasizethatinternalownershipin public�rmsishardtotrack.Thereareindividualswhoholdsigni�cantsharesinthese �rms,butthemajorityoftheequityisheldbyalargegroupofpeoplewhoseidentityand in�uenceonthe�rmmaybequitehardtopreciselyallocate. SincethepopulationoftheUnitedStatesisapproximately51.1percentfemale,itis immediatelyobviousthatwomenareunder-representedineverylineofbusiness.Across allnon-farm,privatelyheldbusinesseswithpaidemployees,womenownonly17.74%of �rms,whilemenown68.41%.Femaleownershipisstrongestintheeducationsectorand weakestinutilities.Amongthethreelinesofmediaenterprisesunderanalysishere(Radio Station,TVStations,andNewspaperPublishers),womenown14.01%,13.68%,and20.56% respectively,numberswhicharebroadlyinlinewiththeoveralluniverseofbusinesses. Therefore,whateverisdrivingtheseasymmetriesisclearlysystematic,notspeci�ctothese particularindustries.Asnotedabove,thenumbersreportedinTable7intheappendix showamuchhigherdegreeofvariation,duetothedi�erencesinthepercentofpublicly owned�rms.However,thisdoesnotchangethebroadconclusionthatthethreemedia industriesarebasicallyinlinewiththebroaduniverseof�rmswithregardtothestatusof femaleownership.Womenareunder-representedacrosstheboard. 5 Table1:OwnershipbyGender NAICSName %Female%Male%Equal 22 Utilities 10.58 75.72 13.70 23 Construction 7.32 79.84 12.84 31-33 Manufacturing 13.78 72.73 13.49 42 WholesaleTrade 12.88 73.78 13.34 44-45 RetailTrade 20.27 61.18 18.55 48-49 Transportation&Warehousing 12.34 70.22 17.44
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.txt
  • Rcd at 1335. An ``unintentional radiator'' is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information.'' RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3483 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3974A1.txt
  • Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission See Letter from Kathryn Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Surveillance-Video.com (March 13, 2007). See Letter from Reuben Weinstein, President, Surveillance-Video.com to Jacqueline Johnson, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (April 16, 2007). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The 1.2 GHz wireless camera purposely transmits RF energy on restricted frequencies.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4017A1.txt
  • LLC (``Rally'') is a Washington-state company that specializes in communications investments. Rally is the secured and only lender of Telesphere. On September 20, 2006, Rally completed an accelerated conversion of Telephere debt to equity, acquiring a majority stock ownership of 64.9 percent in Telesphere and effectively obtaining control of Telesphere. Shortly thereafter on October 4, 2006, Rally acquired an additional 2.1 percent interest, increasing the company's stock ownership in Telesphere to 67 percent. On October 12, 2006, Rally and Telesphere filed a joint domestic and international section 214 application to the Commission for approval of the transfers of control. The applicants stated that the acquisition of corporate control was necessary to improve immediately the financial position of Telesphere. Subsequently on October
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4160A1.txt
  • the 3650-3700 MHz Government Transfer Band, First Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 15 FCC Rcd 20488, 20538 � 129 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. We note that amateur satellite and earth exploration satellite services (active) are permitted in this band under some circumstances and conditions. 47 C.F.R. � 2.106, notes 5.282, US397. See 47 C.F.R. �2.1(c), definition of Space Operation Service. Orbcomm License Corp. Request for Special Temporary Authority, File No. SAT-STA-20070919-00127, Narrative at 1. Modification Application at Narrative Description at 3-4 n.6. 47 C.F.R. � 25.113(g). See also ITU Radio Regulation 18.1 (requiring a license for a transmitting station ``established or operated by a private person or enterprise'') and 47 U.S.C. � 303(r). 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
  • Operating Under Part 15 04/30/09 3060-1021 Sec. 25.139 11/30/08 3060-1022 Sec. 101.1403 01/31/09 3060-1023 Sec. 101.103 01/31/09 3060-1024 Sec. 101.1413 01/31/09 3060-1025 Sec. 101.1440 01/31/09 3060-1026 Sec. 101.1417 01/31/09 3060-1027 Sec. 27.602 03/31/09 3060-1028 International Signaling Point Code (ISPC) 10/31/08 3060-1029 Data Network Identification Code (DNIC) 10/31/08 3060-1030 Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands 06/30/10 3060-1031 Revision of the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems - Petition of City of Richardson, TX; Order on Reconsideration II 10/31/09 3060-1033 FCC 396-C 05/31/10 3060-1034 Digital Audio Broadcasting Systems and Their Impact on the Terrestrial Radio Broadcast Service 01/31/10 3060-1035 FCC 309, FCC 310 and FCC 311 01/31/09 3060-1036 Potential
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-435A1.txt
  • Fixed Service, the Multipoint Distribution Service, and the Private Operational Fixed Microwave Service, Gen Docket No. 80-112 and CC Docket No. 80-116, Report and Order, 94 FCC 2d 1203 (1983) (First Leasing Decision). Id. at 1206-07 � 4. Id. See Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, and Cable Television Relay Service, Gen. Docket No. 90-54, Second Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 6792, 6793, 6801-06 �� 4, 42-58 (1991) (Second Report and Order); see also Second Report and Order at Appendix C; 47 C.F.R. � 74.990 (1991). See former 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4619A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4619A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4619A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 00-258 WT Docket No. 02-353 Adopted: November 14, 2007 Released: November 15, 2007 By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: introduction This order resolves two petitions for reconsideration of the Clearinghouse Order, which set forth the details of the duties and responsibilities of the clearinghouses
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4721A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4721A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4721A1.txt
  • the charge is anything but punitive. We therefore direct NPTC, within 60 days, to amend the Pole Attachment Agreement to limit the penalty for unauthorized attachments to compensatory damages, in accordance with Mile Hi Cable Partners. Salsgiver's Other Facial Challenges to the Pole Attachment Agreement Are Denied. Salsgiver's remaining claims are denied. Contrary to Salsgiver's allegations, we find that sections 2.1, 5.2.1, 5.3, 6.1, 6.4, 6.7, 9.1, 9.2, and 9.5 of the Pole Attachment Agreement are not facially unlawful. As to its claims regarding sections 2.6, 3.2, 5.11, 5.5.4, 6.2, 6.6, and 6.16 of the Pole Attachment Agreement, Salsgiver has failed to meet its burden of proving the facts necessary to show that those provisions would be unlawful, as applied. Salsgiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-472A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-472A1.txt
  • states: ``Carrier does not transmit messages pursuant to this Tariff, but its services may be used for that purpose.'' We conclude, based on an examination of the Tariff as a whole, that DQE CNS does, in fact, offer to transmit information of the user's choosing through its CAP Tariff, and thus qualifies as a ``telecommunications carrier'' under the Act. Section 2.1.A of the CAP Tariff states: ``This Tariff contains the regulations and rates applicable to intrastate telecommunications services provided by Carrier [DQE CNS] to business customers for the origination and termination of telecommunications between points within the State.'' Section 1 defines ``Telecommunications'' as the ``transmission of voice communications or, subject to the transmission capabilities of the service, the transmission of data,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-486A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-486A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-486A1.txt
  • [that] details services, equipment and pricing offered by the telephone company (a common carrier) to all potential customers'') (emphasis added). See CAP Tariff Section 1, 3rd Revised page 1; Switched Access Tariff, Original Title Page. Similar language describing the carrier's undertaking to offer service in accordance with the terms of its tariffs is contained in Fibertech's IXC Tariff at Section 2.1.1, Original page 1, and its IXC Reseller Tariff at Section 2.1.1, Original page 1. See Response at 13, � 40; NPTC May 25 Letter at 1-4. Fibertech May 5 Letter at 1. Chiaino Declaration at 2, �� 2-3. See, e.g., NPTC May 25 Letter at 1-4; Response at 6-8, 12-13 �� 13, 16-17, 40; NPTC Dec. 15 Letter at 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4874A1.txt
  • Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The GPS intercept device (which operates in the 1575.42 MHz band) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4877A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4877A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4877A1.txt
  • 25, 2007 from John F. Flood, Vice President, Engineering, ACR Electronics Inc. to Scot Stone, Federal Communications Commission (Petition). Letter dated April 17, 2007 from Scot Stone, Deputy Chief, Mobility Division to ACR Electronics, Inc., 22 FCC Rcd 7316 (WTB MD 2007). 47 C.F.R. � 80.1061(a). See RTCM Paper 77-2002/SC110-STD, ``RTCM Recommended Standards for 406 Emergency Position-Indicating Radiobeacons (EPIRBs), Version 2.1 dated June 20, 2002.'' Letter dated May 10, 2007 from Craig Duncan, Project Engineering Manager, Standard Communications Pty. Ltd. to Scot Stone, Federal Communications Commission. Letter dated Aug. 16, 2006 from John F. Flood, Vice President, Engineering, ACR Electronics Inc. to Tim Maguire, Federal Communications Commission. Petition at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(i). 47 C.F.R. � 0.401; see also 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-605A1.txt
  • Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, CC Docket No. 96-45, at 3-5, filed July 15, 2003 (SBI July 2003 Ex Parte). See Letter from David LaFuria, Counsel for SBI, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, CC Docket No. 96-45, at 3, filed Feb. 24, 2006 (SBI Feb. 2006 Ex Parte) (Utah does not regulate CMRS carriers, citing Utah Code Ann. � 54-2.1(23)(b)). SBI Feb. 2006 Ex Parte at 3-4. SBI Petition at 12. Id. at 13-14. The determination of whether the Commission has jurisdiction to consider an ETC petition for service on tribal lands is greatly informed by the participation of the tribe and the state commission or other state authorities. Twelfth Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 12268, para. 124.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-668A1.txt
  • of Proposed Rule Making, and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 15866 (2005). See http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_factsheet&id=66 . See Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems and Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, ET Docket No. 00-258 and WT Docket No. 02-353, Ninth Report and Order and Order, 21 FCC Rcd 4473 (2006). See Current Systems, including Broadband over Power Line Systems and Amendment of Part 15 Regarding New Requirements and Measurement Guidelines for Access Broadband over Power Line Systems, ET Docket Nos. 03-104 and 04-37, Memorandum Opinion And Order, 21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-674A1.txt
  • of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Provision of Fixed and Mobile Broadband Access, Educational and Other Advanced Services in the 2150-2162 and 2500-2690 MHz Bands, Third Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Report and Order, WT Docket No. 03-66, 21 FCC Rcd. 5606 (2006) (BRS/EBS 3rd MO&O). See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003); modified by Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005) (codified at 47 C.F.R. Part 27, Subpart L). See Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-675A1.txt
  • Service and for the Satellite Services Operating Bi-directionally in the 17.3-17.8 GHz Frequency Band, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, IB Docket No. 06-123, 21 FCC Rcd 7426 (2006). BSS is the international term used for a radiocommunication service in which signals transmitted or retransmitted by space stations are intended for direct reception by the general public. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. In this item, the term ``17 GHz band'' generally refers to the space-to-Earth (downlink) frequencies at 17.3-17.7 GHz and the corresponding Earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies at 24.75-25.25 GHz. Amendment of the Commission's Policies and Rules for Processing Applications in the Direct Broadcast Satellite Service, Feasibility of Reduced Orbital Spacing for Provision of Direct Broadcast Satellite Service in the United States, Notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-73A1.txt
  • court. The Inga Companies' Request for Declaratory Rulings arises out of a primary jurisdiction referral made by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The Inga Companies are plaintiffs in that court proceeding, which was stayed pending the FCC's resolution of the issue referred on primary jurisdiction. Specifically, the Commission was asked to determine ```whether section 2.1.8 [of AT&T's Tariff FCC No. 2] permits an aggregator to transfer traffic under a [tariffed] plan without transferring the plan itself in the same transaction.''' In its Order on Primary Jurisdiction Referral, the FCC initially concluded that section 2.1.8 did not apply to transfers of traffic alone. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, however,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1019A1.txt
  • the Effective Date of the Consent Decree. This Consent Decree cannot be modified without the advance written consent of both Parties. This Consent Decree may be signed in counterparts. For the Enforcement Bureau: ____________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau __________________________ Date For Rajant Corporation: ___________________________ Robert Schena Chief Executive Officer ___________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. � � 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. Letter from Kathryn Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau to Robert Schena, Chief Executive Officer, Rajant Corporation (September 4, 2007). Letter from Patricia J. Paoletta, Esq., Counsel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1090A1.txt
  • Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and Rural Service Area (RSA) licenses. MSAs and RSAs were originally used to license cellular service. 47 C.F.R. � 22.909. The Commission's rules for the 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz bands use a slightly refined definition of MSAs and RSAs. 47 C.F.R. � 27.6(h)(1); see also Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, FCC 03-251, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, 25,176 n.83 (2003), modified by Order on Reconsideration, FCC 05-149, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058 (2005) (codified at 47 C.F.R. Part 27, Subpart L). CMAs cannot be combined to form EAs because several CMAs cross EA borders. . See also ``Auction of Broadband PCS Spectrum Scheduled
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1090A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1090A2.txt
  • CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 46 0 1.6 N 118 33 59.0 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 46 0 3.3 N 117 58 36.3 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 51 38.5 N 117 58 35.9 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 51 38.6 N 117 58 18.7 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 49 1.8 N 117 58 21.4 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 49 2.1 N 118 2 38.3 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 46 25.5 N 118 2 38.5 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 46 25.3 N 118 3 55.4 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 46 17.5 N 118 3 55.4 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 48 14 N 118 13 37.0 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 51 17 N 118 21 51.0 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1196A1.txt
  • Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The GPS Jammer (which operates in the 1450 MHz to 1600 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1202A1.txt
  • radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o). Section 2.803(e)(4) of the Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.807(d). 47 U.S.C. �� 154 (i), 154 (j) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1254A1.txt
  • during the inspection but found the EAS equipment non-operational. He was unable to produce any evidence, EAS logs, or printouts to demonstrate that the EAS had been operational at any point during the past year. He also stated the printer for the EAS had been broken for a year. Inspection of the transmitter site revealed station WMER-AM was operating at 2.1 kW at night, instead of the required 0.101 kW. Mr. Glass confirmed that the station had been using the same STL since the station began operations, but was not able to provide a current license for the STL. The only license found expired June 1, 2004. A search of the FCC licensee database did not reveal a current license for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1272A1.txt
  • than to the existence of opposition to a use.''); see also Indiana Forest Alliance, Inc v. United States Forest Service, 325 F.3d 851, 858 (7th Cir. 2003) (establishing ``a two-step approach to determining whether an agency has acted arbitrarily or capriciously in deciding not to prepare an EIS in the face of scientific controversy'' (emphasis added)). See EA at Sections 2.1-2.4.5. The Site Selection Criteria applied by S-R were: 1. Ground electrical conductivity necessary for optimal AM transmission; 2. Expansion of signal coverage into underserved regions and important commuter routes; 3. Topographic or building obstructions (to avoid sources of signal interference); 4. Protection of co-channel stations from interference; 5. Compliance with local zoning restrictions; 6. Population density considerations (attempting to locate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-155A1.txt
  • Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The GPS Blocker (which operates in the 1450 MHz to 1600 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.txt
  • Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' Your response indicates that the 1.3 GHz device is shipped with a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1730A1.txt
  • See Revised Plan, Section 1.3 Plan Development and Regional Participation at 10-11. See Revised Plan Appendix A - Bylaws at 66-73 (adopted Aug. 14, 2006). See Revised Plan Appendix B - Original Region 20 Member List and Contact Information; see also, Plan Appendix B-1 Region 20 Membership at Time of Completion of the 700 MHz Plan. See Revised Plan, Section 2.1 - Notification Process at 13-15. . See Revised Plan Sections 3.0 - 3.1 Regional Plan Administration and Frequency Coordination (description of spectrum allocation); see also, Section 3.6 Process for Requesting Channel Assignments at 23. See Revised Plan, Sections 6.0 - 6.4. System Design/Efficiency Requirements (addressing interference protection; spectrum efficiency standards; ``orphaned channels'' and system implementation). Id.; see also, Revised Plan,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2051A1.txt
  • Sincerely, Kathryn S. Berthot Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau www.ebay.com. Section 2.803(e)(4) of the Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' Furthermore, section 2.803(g) of the Rules provides that radio frequency devices that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-401A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-401A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-401A1.txt
  • stations at given positions, when one or more satellites are used; the given position may be a specified fixed point or any fixed point within specific areas; in some cases this service includes satellite-to-satellite links, which may also be operated in the inter-satellite service; the FSS also may include feeder links for other space radio-communication services. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Raysat, Inc., Application for Authority to Operate 4,000 In-Motion Mobile Satellite Antennas in the 14.0-14.5 GHz and 11.7-12.2 GHz Frequency Bands, IBFS File No. SES-LIC-20060629-01083 (Application). The Raysat application was originally filed on June 29, 2006, by an affiliated company, Raysat, Inc. Raysat, Inc. is a developer and manufacturer of phased array antennas for use in satellite communications and is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • Standardized Report for State Commissions on CO Codes Assigned by the NANPA 8.4, 8.8 Weekly and monthly. Part 4 Form Delinquency Notifications 4.4 Contingent, for code holders not submitting Part 4 forms. Relief Planning Report 5.1.5 Quarterly. Summary of NANPA Performance Reports . Summary of Performance Reports Name Reference Frequency Customer Response Rates 2.7.1 Contingent and annual. Dispute/Plan of Action 2.1.2 Contingent, to be prepared within one business day. Self-Assessment 7.10, 9.5 Annually and Quarterly to NANC. Post-Audit Corrective Action Plan 9.1.4 Within 20 days after receipt of the auditor's report and monthly until completion. Unauthorized User Access 2.13.5, 7.7.9 Contingent upon occurrence. System Outage 7.19.7 Contingent upon occurrence to all clients. Privacy Breach 7.19.8.3 Contingent upon occurrence, to affected client,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • the phrase ``the United States and its insular areas'' to replace ``the United States and possessions'' in footnotes US247 and we are using the term ``conterminous United States'' to replace ``continental United States'' in footnote US11 and ``contiguous 48 States'' in US217.'' In addition, we are adding the terms ``conterminous United States'' and ``insular area'' and their definitions to Section 2.1. These modifications promote consistency and provide for a common use of these terms. Fifth, footnote US379 was adopted by the Commission in the Above 76 GHz R&O. Our review finds that the reference to this footnote was inadvertently overwritten in the WRC-03 Omnibus R&O. Therefore, we take this opportunity to correct the U.S. Table by adding ``US379'' immediately to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A1.txt
  • Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and Rural Service Area (RSA) licenses. MSAs and RSAs were originally used to license cellular service. 47 C.F.R. � 22.909. The Commission's rules for the 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz bands use a slightly refined definition of MSAs and RSAs. 47 C.F.R. � 27.6(h)(1); see also Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, FCC 03-251, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, 25,176 n.83 (2003), modified by Order on Reconsideration, FCC 05-149, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058 (2005) (codified at 47 C.F.R. Part 27, Subpart L). CMAs cannot be combined to form EAs because several CMAs cross EA borders. BTAs are material copyright (c) 1992 Rand McNally & Company. Rights granted pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A2.txt
  • CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 46 0 1.6 N 118 33 59.0 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 46 0 3.3 N 117 58 36.3 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 51 38.5 N 117 58 35.9 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 51 38.6 N 117 58 18.7 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 49 1.8 N 117 58 21.4 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 49 2.1 N 118 2 38.3 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 46 25.5 N 118 2 38.5 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 46 25.3 N 118 3 55.4 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 46 17.5 N 118 3 55.4 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 48 14 N 118 13 37.0 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 1 45 51 17 N 118 21 51.0 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-892A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-892A1.txt
  • fixed operations are in higher frequency bands allocated to the BAS. Cable Television Relay Service (CARS) stations, which are licensed by the FCC's Media Bureau, are not within the scope of this public notice. See 47 C.F.R. � 27.1133 (Protection of Part 74 and Part 78 operations). See also Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, 25,211-25,212 �� 129-130 (2003). See 47 C.F.R. � 25.254(a)(3). DOD uplink Earth stations at 11 sites have primary access to the 2025-2110 MHz band to support military space operations (also known as tracking, telemetry, and commanding) on a co-equal basis with stations in the incumbent Television BAS,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1050A1.txt
  • an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ Kathryn S. Berthot Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Monster Cable Products, Inc. and Monster LLC: ________________________________ David Tognotti General Counsel and Vice President of Administration ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to David Tognotti, General Counsel, Monster, LLC (February 9, 2007) (``February 9, 2007 LOI''). 47 U.S.C. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1.txt
  • by increasing prices or reducing output.'' See id. n.298 (citing DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines � 2.2) Coordinated intereaction consists of actions by a group of firms that are profitable for each of the firms involved only because the other firms react by accommodating these actions rather than attempting to undercut them. See id. n.299 (citing DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines � 2.1). Verizon/MCI Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 18336-37, paras. 83-84. See id. at 18483, para. 92. SBC/AT&T Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 18342-44, paras. 92-99; Verizon/MCI Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 18484-85, paras. 93-95; Petition of Qwest Communications International Inc. for Forbearance from Enforcement of the Commission's Dominant Carrier Rules as They Apply After Section 272 Sunsets, WC Docket No. 05-333,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1_Rcd.pdf
  • by increasing prices or reducing output." See id. n.298 (citing DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines � 2.2) Coordinated intereaction consists of actions by a group of firms that are profitable for each of the firms involved only because the other firms react by accommodating these actions rather than attempting to undercut them. See id. n.299 (citing DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines � 2.1). 84Verizon/MCI Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 18336-37, paras. 83-84. 85See id. at 18483, para. 92. 86SBC/AT&T Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 18342-44, paras. 92-99; Verizon/MCI Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 18484-85, paras. 93-95; Petition of Qwest Communications International Inc. for Forbearance from Enforcement of the Commission's Dominant Carrier Rules as They Apply After Section 272 Sunsets, WC Docket No. 05-333,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1235A1.txt
  • Docket No. 96-86, Public Notice, 22 FCC Rcd 19461 (PSHSB 2007). See Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Reminds 700 MHz Regional Planning Committees of the January 31, 2008 Deadline to Amend 700 MHz Narrowband Plans and Provides Further Guidance, PS Docket No. 06-229, WT Docket No. 96-86, Public Notice, 22 FCC Rcd 21889 (PSHSB 2007). See Revised Plan, Section 2.1 Notification Process at 5-6 (on October 14, 2002, a November 6, 2002 pre-planning meeting was announced by James A. Wilson, 800 MHz RPC Chair and 700 MHz Convener); see also Revised Plan, Appendix D - Meeting Attendance and Minutes at 35-44. See Revised Plan, Appendix A - By-Laws of the 700 MHz RPC Region 27. See Revised Plan, Appendix B
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.txt
  • (2007); see also, Pilot Travel Centers, LLC, Notice of Apparent Liability, 19 FCC Rcd 23113, 23114 (2004) (``[R]adio transmitting equipment that transmits solely on Amateur Radio Service (``ARS'') frequencies is not subject to equipment authorization requirements prior to manufacture or marketing.''). 47 C.F.R. �15.205(a). This section allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Section 2.1 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1, defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' Marketing, as defined in 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1697A1.txt
  • the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). 47 U.S.C. � 333. Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The GPS-JM2 GPS Jammer (which operates in the 1450 MHz to 1600
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1752A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1752A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1752A1.txt
  • Application, System Description and Technical Information at 6.1.2. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. 47 C.F.R. � 2.106, Footnote US203. See, e.g., Row 44 Application, attachment entitled "A Coordination Agreement Between the National Science Foundation ("NSF") and Row 44, Inc. ("Row 44") for Operation of the Row 44 AMSS and Radio Astronomy Sites Jointly Sharing the 14.0-14.5 GHz Band," at Table 2.1. Rec. ITU-R M.1643, Annex 1, Part B. Row 44 AMSS Application, Appendix 1. Id., System Description and Technical Information at 6.1.3. 47 C.F.R. � 2.106, Footnotes NG145 and NG183; Procedures to Govern the Use of Satellite Earth Stations on Board Vessels in the 5925-6425 MHz/3700-4200 MHz Bands and 14.0-14.5 GHz/11.7-12.2 GHz Bands, Report and Order, IB Docket No. 02-10, 20
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1752A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Hence, Row 44 requests a waiver to permit operations in the 11.7-12.2 GHz band on a 7047 C.F.R. � 2.106, Footnote US203. 71 See, e.g., Row44 Application, attachment entitled "A Coordination Agreement Between the National Science Foundation ("NSF") and Row44, Inc. ("Row44") for Operation of the Row44 AMSS and Radio Astronomy Sites Jointly Sharing the 14.0-14.5 GHz Band," at Table 2.1. 72Rec. ITU-R M.1643, Annex 1, Part B. 73Row44 AMSS Application, Appendix 1. 74Id., System Description and Technical Information at 6.1.3. 7547 C.F.R. � 2.106, Footnotes NG145 and NG183; Procedures to Govern the Use of Satellite Earth Stations on Board Vessels in the 5925-6425 MHz/3700-4200 MHz Bands and 14.0-14.5 GHz/11.7-12.2 GHz Bands,Report and Order, IB Docket No. 02-10, 20 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.txt
  • Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). See 5 U.S.C. � 552(a)(e)(3). See 18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1780A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1780A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1780A1.txt
  • Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Panora Communications Cooperative and Prairie Telephone Co., Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' of the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission's Rules (filed July 15, 2009) (Petition); 47 C.F.R. Part 36 App. (defining ``study area''). The subject area is a 2.1 square mile section located on the north side of Lake Panorama within the Lake Panorama Association, a private residential development in Guthrie County, Iowa. See Petition at 1-2. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1865A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1865A1.txt
  • in the development of coordinated regional plans, and developed a Regional Planning Guidebook. Following the sunset of the NCC's charter on July 25, 2003, the National Public Safety Telecommunications Council (NPSTC) agreed to continue to provide assistance to regional planners. A copy of the 700 MHz Regional Planning Guidebook is available at the NPSTC website at http://www.npstc.org/nccsubcom.jsp. See Plan, Section 2.1 - Notification Process at 6 (the convening meeting was held at the Georgia Public Safety Training Center, Forsyth, GA). Id. Meeting notifications were published by FCC public notice, placement in the Association of Public Safety Communications Officials, Inc. magazine and The Atlanta Journal Constitution. The Georgia Mutual Aid Group and National Emergency Number Association, GA Chapter, all counties in GA,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1876A1.txt
  • given FS licensee, both parties are required to negotiate in good faith, which requires each party to provide information to the other that is reasonably necessary to facilitate the relocation process. Orange Crush states that T-Mobile approached it in December 2006 to initiate such negotiations and that Orange Crush informed T-Mobile that it was in the process of relocating its 2.1 GHz equipment due to the loss of the Control site lease. According to Orange Crush, both parties agreed that it would be wasteful for Orange Crush to physically relocate its 2.1 GHz system given that it would need to be cleared out of the 2.1 GHz band to accommodate T-Mobile's AWS operations. As such, according to Orange Crush, both parties
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1876A1_Rcd.pdf
  • FS licensee, both parties are required to negotiate in good faith, which requires each party to provide information to the other that is reasonably necessary to facilitate the relocation process.10 4. Orange Crush states that T-Mobile approached it in December 2006 to initiate such negotiations and that Orange Crush informed T-Mobile that it was in the process of relocating its 2.1 GHz equipment due to the loss of the Control site lease.11According to Orange Crush, both parties agreed that it would be wasteful for Orange Crush to physically relocate its 2.1 GHz system given that it would need to be cleared out of the 2.1 GHz band to accommodate T-Mobile's AWS operations.12As such, according to Orange Crush, both parties agreed that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • SomeadministrationsexpectdeploymentofUASsthroughouttheairspacestructure.AsUAS deploymentincreases,itwillbeimpracticalforsomeuserstodeployinsegregatedairspace. SomeUASswillneedtointegratewiththecurrentairspaceusersinasafeandseamlessmanner. Toaccomplishintegrationintonon-segregatedairspace,UASswillrequirehighintegrity communicationlinksbetweentheunmannedaircraft(UA)andremotecontrolcenterscapableof relayingthenecessaryairtrafficcontrol(ATC)messagesandflightcriticalaircraftinformation. TheUASpilotwillneedsenseandavoidfunctionsforsituationalawareness. TheInternationalCivilAviationOrganization(ICAO)futurecommunicationsstudymaybeable toidentifytechnologieswithsomecapabilitytomeettherequirementsforcommandandcontrol, includingtherelayingofATCcommunications.Theaeronauticalmobile(R)service(AM(R)S) andaeronauticalmobile-satellite(R)service(AMS(R)S)aretheappropriateservicesto accommodatecommandandcontrolandATCradiocommunications.TheITU-Risexamining existingaeronauticalallocationstosatisfyspectrumrequirementspriortostudyingnew allocations. Command&Control Innon-segregatedairspace,theremotepilotmustreliablymonitorthestatusoftheUA, passcontrolinstructionstotheirUA,andinteractwiththeappropriateairtraffic controllersmonitoringairspacewithinwhichtheirUAisflying.Aline-of-sightlink mightprovidethesecapabilitiesforUAflyingandmaneuveringinalocalizedarea.A combinationofaterrestrialradioandsatellitenetworkcouldprovidethesecapabilitiesto UAflyingtrans-horizon. RelayofAirTrafficControl(ATC)Communications SafeoperationofmannedorunmannedaircraftdependsonATCcommunications.Pilots actbasedonATCinstructions.Whenthepilotisremote(notintheaircraft)thepilotand ATCmustmaintainacommunicationchanneltorelayinformationfromaradiointhe aircrafttothepilotontheground.Earlyconceptsassumethatthisfunction,ifdigitized, couldbepartofthecommandandcontrollinks. SenseandAvoid ThesafeflightoperationofUAnecessitatesadvancedtechniquestodetectandtrack nearbyaircraft,terrain,andobstaclestonavigation.Unmannedaircraftmustavoidthese objectsinamannerequivalenttothatofamannedaircraft.Theremotepilotwillneedto 3 beawareoftheenvironmentwithinwhichtheaircraftisoperating,beabletoidentifythe potentialthreatstothecontinuedsafeoperationoftheaircraft,andtaketheappropriate action.Theradiodeterminationserviceallocationscouldpotentiallyaccommodatethe senseandavoidfunction.TheITU-Risexaminingexistingaeronauticalradionavigation service(ARNS)allocationsforsuitablebandwidthpriortostudyingnewARNS allocations.TheUASindustryisstudyingthesuitabilityofvarioustechnologiesfor senseandavoid. Payload Resolution421(WRC-07)Resolves1specificallyexcludestheallocationofspectrumat WRC-llforpayloadapplications.However,invitesITU-R3doescallforthe developmentofanITU-Rreportorrecommendationonhowtoaccommodatethe radiocommunicationrequirementsforUASpayloads.Thepurposeofthisagendaitemis nottoseeknewspectrumallocationstomeetpayloadrequirements. Thisagendaitemseekstoidentifythespectrumrequirementsnecessarytosupportthesafe operationofUASsincurrentandfutureairspacestructures.SpectrumforUASforsafetyand regularityofflightinnon-segregatedairspacecanbeaccommodatedin""'illneedAM(R)S, AMS(R)S,orARNSallocationsorinotherallocationsthatcanmeetperformancerequirements establishedbyICAO/ITU-RRecommendation.inordertoreceivethesufficientstatusand protectionfromharmfulinterference. The5030-5091MHzbandisanappropriatebandtosatisfytheterrestrial,line-of-sight, spectrumrequirementsforthecommandandcontrolofUASsinnon-segregatedairspace. Currently,thereisminimumusageinthisbandworldwide.Thelackofanexistingorplanned microwavelandingsystemdeploymentintheUnitedStatesensuresavailabilityofappropriate aeronauticalspectrumforaterrestrialline-of-sightUASsysteminthe5030-5091MHzband. Proposal: ARTICLE5 Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo.2.1) MODUSA/AI1.3/1 4800-5570MHz Allocationtoservices Region1 I Region2 T Region3 5030-5091 AERONAUTICALRADIONAVIGATION I AERONAUTICALMOBILE(R) 5.3675.444 4 Reasons:ToprovideanAM(R)Sallocationtosupportline-of-sightcontrollinksforunmanned aircraft(VA). 5 Terrestrial Services 6 DOCUMENTWAC/049(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica PROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE AgendaItem1.5: Toconsiderworldwide/regionalharmonizationofspectrumfor electronicnewsgathering(ENG),takingintoaccounttheresultsofITU-Rstudiesin accordancewithResolution954(WRC-07); Background: WRC-07establishedResolution954(WRC-07),which'invitesITU-Rtocarryout studiesofENGregardingpossiblesolutionsforglobal/regionalharmonizationin frequencybandsandtuningranges,takingintoaccount:availabletechnologiesto maximizeefficientandflexibleuseoffrequency;systemcharacteristicsandoperational practiceswhichfacilitatetheimplementationofthesesolutions...'CPM11-1established aframeworkforthestudiestobeundertakenasoutlinedinResolution954(WRC-07) underWRC-11AgendaItem1.5. Resolution954callsfortheITU-Rtoincludeinitsstudies"...sharingandcompatibility issueswithservicesalreadyhavingallocationsinfrequencybandsandtuningranges whichhavepotentialforENGuse"and"toproposeoperationalmeasurestofacilitate operationofENGequipmentconsistentwithglobalcirculationofradiocommunication equipment.."FurthermoretheITU-Risto"...reporttheresultsofthosestudiestothe WorldRadiocommunicationConference2011". ThereisnospecificmentionofaddressingchangestotheArticle5oftheRadio RegulationsineithertheagendaitemtextorinRes954.Thuscarefulconsideration needstobegiventoanysolutionsforthisagendaitemthatrefertoregulatorychangesin Article5.Itmaybepossiblethatrationalization(theuseofavailabletechnologyto maximizeefficientandflexibleuseoffrequencyassets)wouldbeeffectiveinutilizing existingspectrumallocationsinthemobileandfixedservicewhereENGisemployed RecommendationITU-RM.1824,"Systemcharacteristicsoftelevisionoutside broadcast,electronicnewsgatheringandelectronicfieldproductioninthemobile serviceforuseinsharingstudies", providesdigitalandanaloguesystemparametersfor BASinthemobileservice.RecommendationITU-RF.1777,"Systemcharacteristicsof televisionoutsidebroadcast,electronicnewsgatheringandelectronicfieldproductionin thefixedserviceforuseinsharingstudies", providesdigitalandanaloguesystem parametersforBASinthefixedservice.ReportITU-RBT.2069,"Spectrumusageand operationalcharacteristicsofterrestrialelectronicnewsgatheringsystems(ENG), 7 TelevisionOutsideBroadcast(TVOB)andElectronicFieldProduction(EFP)", provides
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A3.txt
  • flightoperationscurrentlytakeplaceinsegregatedairspace,toensurethesafetyoftheairvehicle andotherairspaceusers. SomeadministrationsexpectdeploymentofUASsthroughouttheairspacestructure.AVAS deploymentincreases,itwillbeimpracticalforsomeuserstodeployinsegregatedairspace.Some UASswilJneedtointegratewiththecurrentairspaceusersinasafeandseamlessmanner.To accomplishintegrationintonon-segregatedairspace,VASswilJrequirehighintegrity communicationlinksbetweentheunmannedaircraft(VA)andremotecontrolcenterscapableof relayingthenecessaryaij'tmfficcontrol(ATC)messagesandflightcriticalaircraftinformation.The VASpilotwillneedsenseandavoidfunctionsforsituationalawareness. TheInternationalCivilAviationOrganization(ICAO)futurecommunicationsstudymaybeableto identifytechnologieswithsomecapabilitytomeettherequirementsforcommandandcontrol, includingtherelayingofATCcommunications.Theaeronauticalmobile(R)service(AM(R)S)and aeronauticalmobile-satellite(R)service(AMS(R)S)aretheappropriateservicestoaccommodate commandandcontrolandATCradiocommunications.TheITV-Risexaminingexisting aeronauticalaJlocationstosatisfyspectrumrequirementspriortostudyingnewallocations. Command&Control Innon-segregatedairspace,theremotepilotmustreliablymonitorthestatusoftheVA, passcontrolinstructionstotheirVA,andinteractwiththeappropriateairtrafficcontrollers monitoringairspacewithinwhichtheirVAisflying.Aline-of-sightlinkmightprovide thesecapabilitiesforUAflyingandmaneuveringinalocalizedarea.Acombinationofa terrestrialradioandsatellitenetworkcouldprovidethesecapabilitiestoVAflyingtrans- horizon. RelayofAirTrafficControl(ATC)Commullicatiolls SafeoperationofmannedorunmannedaircraftdependsonATCcommunications.Pilots actbasedonATCinstructions.Whenthepilotisremote(notintheaircraft)thepilotand ATCmustmaintainacommunicationchanneltorelayinformationfromaradiointhe aircrafttothepilotontheground.Earlyconceptsassumethatthisfunction,ifdigitized, couldbepartofthecommandandcontrollinks. SenseandAvoid ThesafeflightoperationofVAnecessitatesadvancedtechniquestodetectandtracknearby aircraft,terrain,andobstaclestonavigation.Unmannedaircraftmustavoidtheseobjectsin 10 amannerequivalenttothatofamannedaircraft.Theremotepilotwillneedtobeawareof theenvironmentwithinwhichtheaircraftisoperating,beabletoidentifythepotential threatstothecontinuedsafeoperationoftheaircraft,andtaketheappropriateaction.The radiodeterminationserviceallocationscouldpotentiallyaccommodatethesenseandavoid function.TheITU-Risexaminingexistingaeronauticalradionavigationservice(ARNS) allocationsforsuitablebandwidthpriortostudyingnewARNSallocations.TheUAS industryisstudyingthesuitabilityofvarioustechnologiesforsenseandavoid. Payload Resolution421(WRC-07) Resolves1specificallyexcludestheallocationofspectrumat WRC-IIforpayloadapplications.However, invitesITU-R3doescallforthedevelopment ofanITU-Rreportorrecommendationonhowtoaccommodatetheradiocommunication requirementsforUASpayloads.Thepurposeofthisagendaitemisnottoseeknew spectrumallocationstomeetpayloadrequirements. Thisagendaitemseekstoidentifythespectrumrequirementsnecessarytosupportthesafeoperation ofUASsincurrentandfutureairspacestructures.SpectrumforUASforsafetyandregularityof flightinnon-segregatedairspacewillneedAM(R)S,AMS(R)S,orARNSallocationinorderto receivethesufficientstatusandprotectionfromharmfulinterference. The5030-5091MHzbandisanappropriatebandtosatisfytheterrestrial,line-of-sight,spectrum requirementsforthecommandandconu'olofUASsinnon-segregatedairspace.Currently,thereis minimumusageinthisbandworldwide.Thelackofanexistingorplannedmicrowavelanding systemdeploymentintheUnitedStatesensuresavailabilityofappropriateaeronauticalspectrulllfor aterresu-ialline-of-sightVASsysteminthe5030-5091MHzband. Proposal: ARTICLE5 FI'equencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo.2.1) MODUSNAI1.3/1 4800-5570MHz Allocationtoservices Region1 I Region2 I Region3 5030-5091 AERONAUTICALRADlONAVIGATION AloRONAUTICALMOBILE(R) 5.3675.444 II Reasons:ToprovideanAM(R)Sallocationtosupportline-of-sightcontrollinksforunmanned aircraft(UA). 12 DocumentWAC/40(Ol.09.09) Mr.JohnGiusti ActingChiefofthe[nrernationalBureau FederalCommunicationsCommision 445J 2'hStreetW Washington,DC20554 DearMr.Giusti: TheNationalTelecommunicationsandInformationAdminitration(NTlA)onbehalfofthe ExecutiveBranchagencies,approvesthereleaseofdraftExecutiveBranchproposalsforWRC- II agendaitems1.2,1.6(Res.955),1.23,and1.24. NTlAproposesnochange(NOC)foragendaitems1.2,1.6(Res.955),and1.23.Underagenda item1.24,NTIAproposesa50MHzextensionofthecurrentmeteorological-satelliteservice allocationinthe7750-7850MHzband.Thisadditionalspectrumwillprovidethenecessary bandwidthforthetransmisionofun-codedrawinstrumentdata. NTiAconsideredtheFederalagencies'inputtowardthedevelopment'ofU.S.proposalsfor WRC-li.NTlAforwardsthispackageforyourconsiderationandreviewbyyourWRC-I J AdvisoryCommittee,Dr.Dm'leneDrazenovichistheprimarycontactfrommystaff. Sincerely, (OriginalSignedAugust11,2009) KarlB.Nebbia AssociateAdminitrator OfficeofSpectrumManagement Enclosures 13 UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE AgendaItem 1.2:takingintoaccounttheITU-Rstudiescarriedoutinaccordancewith Resolution 95](Rev.WRC-07),tocakeappropriateactionwithaviewtoenhancingthe internationalregulatoryframework Backgl'oundInformation:Agendaitem1.2originatedatWRC-03asagendaitem7,1, Resolution951(WRC-03),"Optionstoimprovetheinternationalspectrumregulatory framework."TheDirector'sReporttoWRC-07includestheresultsoftheITU-Rstudiesin responsetoResolution951(WRC-03).Theconferenceconcludedthatitwasnecessaryforthe ITU-Rtoevaluatevariousoptions.Theseoptionsincludemaintenanceofthecurrentpractice (nochangetotheinternationalspectrumregulatoryframework),thereviewandpossiblerevision ofexistingservicedefinitions,introductionofanewprovisionintheRadioRegulationsenabling substitutionbetweenasignmentsofspecificservices,andil1lroductionofcompositeervicein theTableofFrequencyAllocations.Resolution951(Rev.WRC-07)detailstheseoptionsand providestheguidelinesforimplementationofthisresolution.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-214A1.txt
  • facsimile), each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Humax Co., Ltd.: ________________________________ Tae Hun Kim President, U.S. Operation ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Jaeho Lee, Humax Co., Ltd. (April 20, 2006) (``April 20, 2006 LOI''). 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-215A1.txt
  • by facsimile), each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Wistron NeWeb Corporation: ________________________________ Jeffrey Gau Chief Operating Officer ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Edward Yeh, Wistron NeWeb Corporation (April 20, 2006) (``April 20, 2006 LOI''). 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-226A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-226A1.txt
  • each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Ki Ryung Electronics Co., Ltd.: ________________________________ Young-hoon Bae President and CEO ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.1 et seq. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to I.C. Kim, Q&C Department Manager, Ki Ryung Electronics Co., Ltd. (dated June 20, 2006). 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-229A1.txt
  • any number of counterparts (including by facsimile), each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. _______________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date ________________________________ Thomas C. Malone Senior Vice President Audiovox Corporation ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 et seq. and 15.1 et seq. See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau to Mr.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2416A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 12.9N 73 2 30.9W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 29 50.3N 73 4 3W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 27 31.6N 73 5 44.6W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 25 17.1N 73 7 35.6W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 23 7.1N 73 9 35.5W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 21 2.1N 73 11 44W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 19 2.3N 73 14 0.9W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 17 8.1N 73 16 25.6W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 15 19.7N 73 18 57.8W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 13 37.5N 73 21 37.2W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 12 1.8N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2416A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2416A5.txt
  • 158.475 to 158.505 40 32 12.9N 73 2 30.9W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 29 50.3N 73 4 3W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 27 31.6N 73 5 44.6W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 25 17.1N 73 7 35.6W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 23 7.1N 73 9 35.5W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 21 2.1N 73 11 44W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 19 2.3N 73 14 0.9W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 17 8.1N 73 16 25.6W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 15 19.7N 73 18 57.8W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 13 37.5N 73 21 37.2W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 12 1.8N 73 24 23.1W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.txt
  • Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The listed video transmitters intentionally transmit radio frequency energy on restricted frequencies.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2508A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2508A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2508A1.txt
  • NETWORKS BY PANORA COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE non-STREAMLINED Pleading Cycle Established WC Docket No. 09-212 Comments Due: December 14, 2009 Reply Comments Due: December 21, 2009 On November 17, 2009, Prairie Telephone Co., Inc. d/b/a Western Iowa Networks (Prairie) and Panora Communications Cooperative (PCC) (together, Applicants) filed an application pursuant to sections 63.03 and 63.04 of the Commission's rules to transfer a 2.1 square mile portion of Prairie's Yale, Iowa local telephone exchange to PCC. The Applicants do not seek streamlined treatment for this application under section 63.03(b) of the Commission's rules. Prairie, an Iowa corporation, is a rural incumbent local exchange carrier (LEC) serving approximately 940 access lines in three exchanges: the Yale exchange in Guthrie and Dallas Counties in central Iowa,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.txt
  • C.F.R. �15.3(o). See 47 C.F.R. � 15.201. A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1031 - 2.1060. 47 C.F.R. � 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The video transmitters listed in your response intentionally transmit radio frequency energy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-35A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-35A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-35A1.txt
  • in the development of coordinated regional plans, and developed a Regional Planning Guidebook. Following the sunset of the NCC's charter on July 25, 2003, the National Public Safety Telecommunications Council (NPSTC) agreed to continue to provide assistance to regional planners. A copy of the 700 MHz Regional Planning Guidebook is available at the NPSTC website at http://www.npstc.org/nccsubcom.jsp. See Plan, Section 2.1 Notification Process at 22. See Plan, Section 11 - Bylaws at 49-56 (adopted April 4, 2006). See Plan, Section 12 - Region 51 Members and Agencies at 57-81 (membership and voting status). See Plan, Section 2.2 - Operations of the RPC at 22-24. The RPC maintains a webpage at http://www.region51.hctx.net. See Plan, Section 13 - Lists of Meetings, Summaries of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.txt
  • at 13. AWS refers to terrestrial wireless systems with sufficient bandwidth for both voice service and data services such as internet web-browsing and full-motion video, operating in certain designated frequency bands. The Commission adopted rules for AWS operation in the paired 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz ``AWS-1'' bands in Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (``AWS-1 Report and Order''), modified by Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005), and is considering proposed rules for AWS operation in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz ``AWS-2'' bands and the 2155-2180 MHz ``AWS-3'' band in pending rulemakings. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • Cable System Serving Their Community, January 1, 2006 2005 January 1, 2006 More than 750 MHz 750 MHz 331 - 749 MHz 330 or Less MHz Mean N Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Sample groups overall 736 751 749 3.7 25.4% 1.9 63.9% 2.0 8.7% 1.1 2.1% 0.5 Noncompetitive Communities 734 433 747 4.2 25.5% 2.1 63.3% 2.2 8.9% 1.2 2.3% 0.6 Communities relieved from rate regulation 754 318 765 4.9 24.9% 2.7 68.0% 2.8 6.7% 1.6 0.4% 0.4 2nd cable operator subgroup (overall) 756 106 759 5.6 13.7% 3.6 82.1% 4.1 4.2% 2.4 0.0% 0.0 2nd cable operator subgroup (incumbents) 757 53 753 6.9 11.3% 4.4 83.0% 5.2 5.7% 3.2 0.0% 0.0 2nd cable operator
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.txt
  • also offered some tentative conclusions consistent with existing AWS service rules, such as allowing flexible use of this spectrum and licensing this spectrum under Part 27 of the Commission's rules. 87. In 2005, the Commission designated yet another 20 MHz of spectrum for AWS, specifically the 2155-2175 MHz band ("AWS-3"), thus establishing 70 MHz of contiguous AWS spectrum in the 2.1 GHz band (from 2110 to 2180 MHz).219 An application for exclusive use of the 212 See FCC and NTIA � Coordination Procedures in the 1710-1755 MHz Band, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 4730 (2006). 213 See Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-587A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-587A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-587A1.txt
  • delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.241 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.241 and 0.261, and is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John V. Guisti Acting Chief, International Bureau Julius Knapp Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology The LMSS is a mobile-satellite service (MSS) in which mobile earth stations are located on land. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. The MSS is a radio-communication service between mobile earth stations and one or more space stations, or between space stations used by this service, or between mobile earth stations by means of one or more space stations. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. A mobile earth station is an earth station intended for use while in motion or during halts at unspecified
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-670A1.txt
  • facsimile), each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. ________________________________ Kathryn S. Berthot Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date ________________________________ D. Bruce Sewell Senior Vice President and General Counsel Intel Corporation ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 et seq., 15.1 et seq., and 68.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 et seq., 15.1 et seq., and 68.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b); 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 et seq., 15.1 et seq. and 68.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.txt
  • not included in the list of No. 9.36.2 � since they were outside the coordination arc � should be included into the coordination procedure as their T/T value exceeds the threshold value of 6%. Logically for these administrations the concept of No. 9.41 should also apply. The current Rule of Procedure on Nos. 9.41 � 9.42 recognizes this problem (see �.2.1 of the RoP in Annex 1) and suggests that such cases should be considered under No. 9.52 (disagreement communicated to the initiating administration). For such a case the Rule states that the administration should, "while applying No. 9.52 and without having to apply No. 9.41, bring into the bilateral coordination discussion any of their networks located outside the coordination arc
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1223A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1223A2.txt
  • in Local Telecommunications Markets Multiple Tenant Environments (MTEs) 3060-1021 WTB-BD Section 25.139, NGSO FSS Coordination and Information Sharing Between MVDDS Licensees in the 12.2 GHz to 12.7 GHz Band 3060-1022 WTB-BD Sections 101.1403, 101.103(f), 101.1413, 101.1440, and 101.1417, MVDDS and DBS Reporting and Third Party Disclosure Requirements 3060-1030 WTB-BD Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands 3060-1070 WTB-BD Allocation and Service Rules for the 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz 92- 95 GHz Bands 3060-1094 WTB-BD Licensing, Operation, and Transition of the 2500-2690 MHz Band 3060-0192 WTB-MD Section 87.103, Posting Station License 3060-0202 WTB-MD Section 87.37 Developmental license 3060-0221 WTB-MD Section 90.155 (b) and (d), Time in Which Station Must be Placed in Operation 3060-0222 WTB-MD
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A2.txt
  • agenda item 1.11. The CPM text for Agenda Item 1.11 has several Methods. Method B recognizes a protection criteria agreed in the ITU-R for the non -GSO ISS links operating in the band above 23.15 GHz. This criteria is proposed for inclusion in the Radio Regulations. Proposal Article 5 Frequency Allocations Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) MOD USA/1.11/1 32 22-24.75 GHz Reason- This allocation proposal fulfills the requirements of the agenda item and ensures protection of all services in the allocation before the conference. ADD USA/1.11/2 5.ISS The aggregated unwanted emission levels from all earth stations in the space research service in the band 22.55-22.85 GHz shall not exceed a power density of -215 dBW/Hz at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A2_Rcd.pdf
  • agenda item 1.11. The CPM text for Agenda Item 1.11 has several Methods. Method B recognizes a protection criteria agreed in the ITU-R for the non -GSO ISS links operating in the band above 23.15 GHz. This criteria is proposed for inclusion in the Radio Regulations. Proposal Article 5 Frequency Allocations Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) MOD USA/1.11/1 10250 22-24.75 GHz Reason- This allocation proposal fulfills the requirements of the agenda item and ensures protection of all services in the allocation before the conference. ADD USA/1.11/2 5.ISS The aggregated unwanted emission levels from all earth stations in the space research service in the band 22.55-22.85 GHz shall not exceed a power density of -215 dBW/Hz at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A3.txt
  • spacecraft relative to Earth. With regard to geostationary satellites, coordination would resolve the potential interference from the unlikely scenario of transmissions with maximum antenna coupling and minimum propagation loss. As a result, passive and active services can share frequencies above 1 000 GHz without constraints. 4 Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Frequency allocations Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) MOD USA/AI 1.6/1 5.565 A number of frequency bands in Tthe frequency band range 275-13 000 GHz may be are used by administrations for experimentation with, and development of, various active and passive services applications. In theis band frequency range 275-1 000 GHz a need has been identified for the following frequency bands for measurements by spectral line measurements for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A3_Rcd.pdf
  • spacecraft relative to Earth. With regard to geostationary satellites, coordination would resolve the potential interference from the unlikely scenario of transmissions with maximum antenna coupling and minimum propagation loss. As a result, passive and active services can share frequencies above 1 000 GHz without constraints. 10261 Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Frequency allocations Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) MOD USA/AI 1.6/1 5.565 A number of frequency bands in Tthefrequency band range275-13 000 GHz may be areused by administrations for experimentation with, and development of, various active and passive services applications. In theisbandfrequency range 275-1 000 GHz a need has been identified for the following frequency bands for measurements by spectral line measurements for passive services: - radio astronomy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1495A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1495A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1495A1.txt
  • Cablevision, a Delaware corporation, is majority-owned by a group comprised of Charles F. Dolan and his family, who collectively own a 69.5% voting interest in Cablevision. Cablevision is a facilities-based provider of bundled video, voice, and broadband Internet services in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut. It provides basic video service to approximately 3.1 million subscribers, voice service to approximately 2.1 million residential and small business customers, and broadband service to approximately 2.6 million customers. Bresnan is a cable provider serving 300,000 subscribers in 148 communities in Colorado, Utah, Montana, and Wyoming. Bresnan also provides voice service to 126,000 subscribers and broadband service to 220,000 subscribers. On June 13, 2010, certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of Cablevision entered into an Agreement and Plan
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1.txt
  • Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17484 � 82; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21570 � 115 n.341. Coordinated interaction consists of actions by a group of firms that are profitable for each of the firms involved only because the other firms react by accommodating these actions rather than attempting to undercut them. See DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines � 2.1; AT&T-Verizon Wireless Order at � 49 n.167; AT&T-Centennial Order, 24 FCC Rcd at 13939 � 52 n.201; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17484 � 82; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21580 � 151. For unilateral effects, the unchallenged aspects include: (1) product differentiation and substitutability; (2) network effects; (3) marginal cost reductions; (4) spectrum and advanced
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17484 � 82; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21570 � 115 n.341. 140Coordinated interaction consists of actions by a group of firms that are profitable for each of the firms involved only because the other firms react by accommodating these actions rather than attempting to undercut them. See DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines� 2.1; AT&T-Verizon Wireless Orderat �49 n.167; AT&T-Centennial Order, 24 FCC Rcd at 13939 � 52 n.201; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17484 � 82; Cingular- AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21580 � 151. 141For unilateral effects, the unchallenged aspects include: (1) product differentiation and substitutability; (2)network effects; (3) marginal cost reductions; (4) spectrum and advanced wireless services;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1750A1.txt
  • Stations in the Radiolocation Service (filed Aug. 10, 2010) (Petition). The FOD radar detection technology developed by Trex uses a low-power, three-dimensional imaging, frequency-modulated continuous wave radar system, mounted on a vehicle to provide mobility. Id. at 4. See id. at 4; see also Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular No. 15/5220-24, Airport Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Detection Equipment, at � 2.1 (Sept. 30, 2009) (``The presence of FOD on airport runways, taxiways, aprons and ramps poses a significant threat to safety of air travel.''). FOD at airports includes any object found in an inappropriate location that can damage aircraft or equipment, injure airport personnel or passengers, or affect logistics and airport operations. FOD can vary in size and form, and includes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1750A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Stations in the Radiolocation Service(filed Aug. 10, 2010) (Petition). 2The FOD radar detection technology developed by Trex uses a low-power, three-dimensional imaging, frequency- modulated continuous wave radar system, mounted on a vehicle to provide mobility. Id. at 4. 3See id. at 4; see also Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular No. 15/5220-24, Airport Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Detection Equipment, at � 2.1 (Sept. 30, 2009) ("The presence of FOD on airport runways, taxiways, aprons and ramps poses a significant threat tosafety of air travel."). FOD at airports includes any object found in an inappropriate location that can damage aircraft or equipment, injure airport personnel or passengers, or affect logistics and airport operations. FOD can vary in size and form, andincludes parts fallen
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-18A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 12.9N 73 2 30.9W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 29 50.3N 73 4 3W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 27 31.6N 73 5 44.6W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 25 17.1N 73 7 35.6W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 23 7.1N 73 9 35.5W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 21 2.1N 73 11 44W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 19 2.3N 73 14 0.9W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 17 8.1N 73 16 25.6W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 15 19.7N 73 18 57.8W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 13 37.5N 73 21 37.2W CP-BEA010-FA Excluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 12 1.8N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-18A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-18A5.txt
  • 158.475 to 158.505 40 32 12.9N 73 2 30.9W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 29 50.3N 73 4 3W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 27 31.6N 73 5 44.6W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 25 17.1N 73 7 35.6W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 23 7.1N 73 9 35.5W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 21 2.1N 73 11 44W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 19 2.3N 73 14 0.9W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 17 8.1N 73 16 25.6W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 15 19.7N 73 18 57.8W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 13 37.5N 73 21 37.2W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area 158.475 to 158.505 40 12 1.8N 73 24 23.1W CP-BEA010-FAExcluded Area
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A2.txt
  • is never the situation seen in practice. Trees and other foliage, terrain and hills higher than the coastal radar's elevation, and buildings attenuate the potentially interfering signal significantly, beyond that of the idealized flat or smooth spherical earth models that have formed the basis of sharing studies. 39 Proposal: Article 5 Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) MOD USA/AI 1.15/1 3 230 � 5 003 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 4 438-4 6504 400 FIXED MOBILE except aeronautical mobile (R) 4 438-4 6504 400 FIXED MOBILE except aeronautical mobile 4 440-4 500 FIXED MOBILE except aeronautical mobile (R) RADIOLOCATION 5.XXX 4 440-4 500 FIXED MOBILE except aeronautical mobile RADIOLOCATION 5.XXX 4 4384
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A2_Rcd.pdf
  • is never the situation seen in practice. Trees and other foliage, terrain and hills higher than the coastal radar's elevation, and buildings attenuate the potentially interfering signal significantly, beyond that of the idealized flat or smooth spherical earth models that have formed the basis of sharing studies. 18551 Proposal: Article 5 Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) MOD USA/AI 1.15/1 3 230 � 5 003 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 4 438-4 6504 400 FIXED MOBILE except aeronautical mobile (R) 4 438-4 6504 400 FIXED MOBILE except aeronautical mobile 4 440-4 500 FIXED MOBILE except aeronautical mobile (R) RADIOLOCATION 5.XXX 4 440-4 500 FIXED MOBILE except aeronautical mobile RADIOLOCATION 5.XXX 4 4384
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A3_Rcd.pdf
  • can 1 For AMS(R)S priority access to the sub-bands 1 555-1 559 MHz and 1 656.5-1 660.5 MHz, see also RR No. 5.362A. 18628 utilize during coordination discussions to accommodate priority access to AMS(R)S spectrum in the bands that are under the provisions of No. 5.357A. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Frequency allocations Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) NOC USA/AI 1.7/1 1525-1610 MHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 1525-1530 SPACE OPERATION (space-to-Earth) FIXED MOBILE-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth) 5.208B 5.351A Earth exploration-satellite Mobile except aeronautical mobile 5.349 1525-1530 SPACE OPERATION (space-to-Earth) MOBILE-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth) 5.208B 5.351A Earth exploration-satellite Fixed Mobile 5.343 1525-1530 SPACE OPERATION (space-to-Earth) FIXED MOBILE-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth) 5.208B 5.351A Earth exploration-satellite Mobile 5.349 5.341 5.342 5.350 5.351
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.txt
  • \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof SEQ SectionNumber _Toc280004905 \\* ARABIC }}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 2}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof -} {\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof PAGEREF _Toc280004905 \\h }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof {\*\datafield 08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b02000000080000000e0000005f0054006f0063 003200380030003000300034003900300035000000}}}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 1}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \b0\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof \par }\pard\plain \ltrpar\s30\ql \li240\ri0\sb120\widctlpar\tqr\tldot\tx8976\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\ faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin240\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 2.1 High-Level Requirements\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof SEQ SectionNumber _Toc280004906 \\* ARABIC }}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 2}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof -} {\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof PAGEREF _Toc280004906 \\h }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof {\*\datafield 08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b02000000080000000e0000005f0054006f0063 003200380030003000300034003900300036000000}}}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 1}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof \par }\pard\plain \ltrpar\s33\ql \li677\ri0\widctlpar\tqr\tldot\tx8976\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto \adjustright\rin0\lin677\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-357A1.txt
  • subject to the Amended Agreement. Section 4. As of the Effective Date, VSH and VLLC are hereby added as signatories and parties to the Amended Agreement with all the rights, benefits and obligations of the MH subsidiaries that are subject to the Amended Agreement. Section 5. As of the Effective Date, the Agreement shall be amended with effect that Section 2.1 is modified to allow for more than one Implementation Plan inasmuch as VLLC may require its own separate Implementation Plan. The modified Section 2.1 is as follows: 2.1 Implementation Plan(s). Certain of the rights and obligations of the Parties are set forth in further detail in one or more Implementation Plan(s), which are executed by Vizada and are incorporated in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • Local Area Network (RLAN) devices that are brought on board the aircraft by passengers. Therefore, since these systems are for aviation personnel use and not the general flying public, such systems may be able to meet the pfd limits needed to protect other allocated services. 4 Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Frequency allocations Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) MOD USA/AI1.12/1 37-38 GHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 37-37.5 FIXED MOBILE ADD 5.AMS SPACE RESEARCH (space-to-Earth) 5.547 ADD 5.AMS 37.5-38 FIXED FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth) MOBILE ADD 5.AMS SPACE RESEARCH (space-to-Earth) Earth exploration-satellite (space-to-Earth) 5.547 ADD 5.AMS ADD USA/AI1.12/2 5.AMS In the band 37-38 GHz, the power flux-density (pfd) produced at the surface of the Earth radiated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2_Rcd.pdf
  • Local Area Network (RLAN) devices that are brought on board the aircraft by passengers. Therefore, since these systems are for aviation personnel use and not the general flying public, such systems may be able to meet the pfd limits needed to protect other allocated services. 2154 Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Frequency allocations Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) MOD USA/AI1.12/1 37-38 GHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 37-37.5 FIXED MOBILE ADD 5.AMS SPACE RESEARCH (space-to-Earth) 5.547ADD 5.AMS 37.5-38 FIXED FIXED-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth) MOBILE ADD 5.AMS SPACE RESEARCH (space-to-Earth) Earth exploration-satellite (space-to-Earth) 5.547ADD 5.AMS ADD USA/AI1.12/2 5.AMS In the band 37-38 GHz, the power flux-density (pfd) produced at the surface of the Earth radiated by anystation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • radiotelegraphy. Based on current worldwide operational experience, other maritime applications are compatible with radiotelegraphy. It is also vital for the maritime community to have a globally harmonized primary allocation to the maritime mobile service in 415 � 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 4 MOD USA/AI 1.10/1 495-1 800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3_Rcd.pdf
  • radiotelegraphy. Based on current worldwide operational experience, other maritime applications are compatible with radiotelegraphy. It is also vital for the maritime community to have a globally harmonized primary allocation to the maritime mobile service in 415 � 526.5 kHz for MMSI, security related broadcasts, and data communication systems. Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) 2185 MODUSA/AI 1.10/1 495-1800 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 495-505 MARITIME MOBILE SUP 5.82A SUP 5.82B 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION 505-510 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 505-526.5 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Aeronautical mobile 510-525 MARITIME MOBILE 5.79A 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION Land mobile Reason: Maritime mobile service allocations and global harmonization
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-407A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-407A1.txt
  • 25.215. The amendment, IBFS File No. SAT-AMD-20100212-00027, was placed on Public Notice on February 26, 2010. Public Notice, Policy Branch Information, Report No. SAT-00667 (Feb. 26, 2010). BSS is the international term used for a radiocommunication service in which the signals transmitted or retransmitted by space stations are intended for direct reception by the general public. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. DBS is the term used in the United States to describe the domestic implementation of the BSS international service in the 12.2-12.7 GHz frequency bands. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.201, at definition of ``Direct Broadcast Satellite Service,'' and 47 C.F.R. 25.202(a)(7). The ITU Radio Regulations divide the world into three Regions. In general, Region 1 includes Africa, Europe, Northern and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-407A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 25.215. 6The amendment, IBFS File No. SAT-AMD-20100212-00027, was placed on Public Notice on February 26, 2010. Public Notice, Policy Branch Information, Report No. SAT-00667 (Feb. 26, 2010). 7BSS is the international term used for a radiocommunication service in which the signals transmitted or retransmitted by space stations are intended for direct reception by the general public. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. DBS is the term used in the United States to describe the domestic implementation of the BSS international service in the 12.2-12.7 GHz frequency bands. See47 C.F.R. � 25.201, at definition of "Direct Broadcast Satellite Service," and 47 C.F.R. 25.202(a)(7). The ITU Radio Regulations divide the world into three Regions. In general, Region 1 includes Africa, Europe, Northern and Western
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-4A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-4A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-4A1.txt
  • in the development of coordinated regional plans, and developed a Regional Planning Guidebook. Following the sunset of the NCC's charter on July 25, 2003, the National Public Safety Telecommunications Council (NPSTC) agreed to continue to provide assistance to regional planners. A copy of the 700 MHz Regional Planning Guidebook is available at the NPSTC website at http://www.npstc.org/nccsubcom.jsp. See Plan, Section 2.1 - Notification at 7; see also Plan, Appendix C - Meeting Notifications, Agenda and Summary of Meeting Minutes at 27-32 (notifications were published by FCC public notice and by placement in the Association of Public Safety Communications Officials, Inc., and Emergency Numbering Professional magazines, and the Pittsburg Post-Gazette and The Tribune-Review newspapers). See Plan, Appendix C - Meeting Notifications, Agenda
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1.txt
  • for AWS-1 base stations in counties with population density more than 100 per square mile). AWS-1 systems are terrestrial wireless systems with sufficient bandwidth for both voice service and data services such as internet web-browsing and full-motion video, operating in the paired 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (``AWS-1 Report and Order''), modified by Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005). PCS systems are terrestrial mobile wireless systems operating in assigned spectrum blocks in the 1850-1910 MHz and 1930-1990 MHz bands. See 47 C.F.R. � 24.200 et seq. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1_Rcd.pdf
  • AWS-1 base stations in counties with population density more than 100 per square mile). AWS-1 systems are terrestrial wireless systems with sufficient bandwidth for both voice service and data services such as internet web-browsing and full-motion video, operating in the paired 1710-1755 MHz and 2110- 2155 MHz bands. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) ("AWS-1 Report and Order"), modified by Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005). PCS systems are terrestrial mobile wireless systems operating in assigned spectrum blocks in the 1850-1910 MHz and 1930-1990 MHz bands. See 47 C.F.R. � 24.200 et seq. 73See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • this will more clearly indicate that we are referring to an international footnote. Prior to WRC-07, the U.S. Table included references to 130 international footnotes. WRC-07 modified 19 and suppressed (i.e., removed) 4 of those footnotes. In the paragraphs below, we also discuss those footnotes. discussion Updates to Display Format of the Allocation Table Frequency Nomenclature In Radio Regulation No. 2.1 of the 2008 Edition of the ITU Radio Regulations, frequencies are expressed in kilohertz (kHz) up to and including ``3 000'' kHz (i.e., 3,000 kHz). In accordance with ITU Radio Regulation No. 2.1, we revise the Commission's Allocation Table by expressing frequencies in the High Frequency (HF) spectrum from 3025 to 27500 kHz in megahertz (MHz), i.e., from 3.025 to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-857A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-857A1.txt
  • by attachment to letter from Robert W. McCaugern, Deputy Director General, Spectrum Engineering to Mr. Bruce Franca, Deputy Chief Engineer, Office of Engineering and Technology, Federal Communications Commission (Dec. 9, 1994) (Letter Amendment). Arrangement F at �� 3-4. Interim Arrangement at �� 2-3. Letter Amendment at Annex A. Id. at Annex B, Tables C1 and C2. Interim Arrangement at � 2.1(a). License WPPC814 authorizes the County of Oakland to operate on the following channel pairs which are primary to licensees in Canada in Canada Border Region 3 which includes Oakland County, Michigan: 821.1000 MHz/866.1000 MHz, 821.1375 MHz/ 866.1375 MHz, 821.2125 MHz/866.2125 MHz, 821.2500 MHz/866.2500 MHz, and 821.3500 MHz/866.3500 MHz. License WPPC814 also authorizes Oakland County to transmit on the five mutual
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-860A1.txt
  • by attachment to letter from Robert W. McCaugern, Deputy Director General, Spectrum Engineering to Mr. Bruce Franca, Deputy Chief Engineer, Office of Engineering and Technology, Federal Communications Commission (Dec. 9, 1994) (Letter Amendment). Arrangement F at �� 3-4. Interim Arrangement at �� 2-3. Letter Amendment at Annex A. Id. at Annex B, Tables C1 and C2. Interim Arrangement at � 2.1(a). License call signs WPKU987, WPMS956, WPMS961, WPRF275 and WPRH880 are located in Canada Border Region 4 which includes portions of the State of Washington. The specific frequencies which are primary to licensees in Canada are listed in Attachment I. The control stations are authorized to operate anywhere within the State of Washington. See licenses call signs WPKU987, WPMS956, WPMS961, WPRF275
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-867A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-867A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-867A1.txt
  • in the development of coordinated regional plans, and developed a Regional Planning Guidebook. Following the sunset of the NCC's charter on July 25, 2003, the National Public Safety Telecommunications Council (NPSTC) agreed to continue to provide assistance to regional planners. A copy of the 700 MHz Regional Planning Guidebook is available at the NPSTC website at http://www.npstc.org/nccsubcom.jsp. See Plan, Section 2.1 - Notification Process at 14 (notifications were published by FCC public notice and Region 34 email lists); see also Plan, Appendix D - Meeting Notices and Related Documentation at 86-101. See Plan, Appendix A - By-Laws of Region 34 at 75-79. See Plan, Appendix B - Region 34 Membership List and Contact Information at 80-81. See Plan, Appendix D -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-897A1.txt
  • petition for a waiver of the study area boundary freeze on July 15, 2009. Prairie has agreed to sell and transfer the subject area to Panora. On August 10, 2009, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) released a public notice seeking comment on the petition. The area to be transferred from Prairie to Panora has 35 residential access lines in a 2.1 square mile area currently in Prairie's Yale, Iowa exchange, which is located on the north side of Lake Panorama within the Lake Panorama Association, a private residential development in Guthrie County. The Petitioners state that Panora is beginning a project to upgrade its exchange to provide fiber-to-the-home to all of its customers. Panora would like to include the 35 residential
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.txt
  • Id. 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(g). 47 C.F.R. � 15.201(b). Section 15.3(o) of the Rules defines an ``intentional radiator'' as a ``device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o). 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Id. Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]mission[s] on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The subject transmitters intentionally transmit radio frequency energy on restricted frequencies within
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.txt
  • Operation of Low Power Auxiliary Stations in the 698-806 Band, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 25 FCC Rcd 643 (2010). Effective June 12, 2010, operation of wireless microphones in the 700 MHz frequency band is prohibited. 47 C.F.R. � 74.851(g). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Section 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``[e]mission[s] on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The subject wireless microphones intentionally transmit radio frequency energy on restricted frequencies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1173A1.txt
  • Public Notice, DA 11-1035 (rel. June 10, 2011). Investcorp S.A.'s 39.6 percent interest is held indirectly through control of various corporations. Of these corporations, only TelePacific Equity Limited individually owns or controls more than 10 percent of TPAC Holdings. Applicants state that all of the intermediate corporations and the approximate magnitudes of their interests are as follows: Investcorp Properties Limited (2.1 percent); Investcorp International, Inc. (1.9 percent); Investcorp TPC L.P. (5.9 percent); and Investcorp Secondary Partners I, L.P. (7.4 percent). In addition, Investcorp S.A., or a wholly owned subsidiary of Investcorp S.A., has entered into revocable management agreements to direct the voting and disposition of the stock held by Aguanga Limited (2.3 percent); Cahuilla Limited (2.3 percent); Fallbrook Limited (2.3 percent);
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-133A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(b)(2). Federal Communications Commission Mindel De La Torre Chief, International Bureau The Commission's rules define MSS to be: ``A radiocommunication service: (1) Between mobile earth stations and one or more space stations, or between space stations used by this service; or (2) Between mobile earth stations by means of one or more space stations.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). ``L-Band'' broadly refers to the frequency range from one to two gigahertz, a portion of which is allocated for MSS operations. Specifically, 1525-1559 MHz is domestically and internationally allocated for transmission from satellites to mobile earth stations and 1610-1660.5 MHz for transmission from mobile earth stations to satellites. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. LightSquared is licensed for MSS operation in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-133A1_Rcd.pdf
  • purposesof the integrated service rule. We also attach conditions to address concerns that commenters 1The Commission's rules define MSS to be: "A radiocommunication service: (1) Between mobile earth stations and one or more space stations, or between space stations used by this service; or (2) Between mobile earth stations by means of one or more space stations." 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). 2"L-Band" broadly refers to the frequency range from one to two gigahertz, a portion of which is allocated for MSS operations. Specifically, 1525-1559 MHz is domestically and internationally allocated for transmission from satellites to mobile earth stations and 1610-1660.5 MHz for transmission from mobile earth stations to satellites. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. LightSquared is licensed for MSS operation in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1355A1.txt
  • National Public Safety Telecommunications Council (NPSTC) agreed to continue to provide assistance to regional planners. A copy of the 700 MHz Regional Planning Guidebook is available at the NPSTC website at http://www.npstc.org/nccsubcom.jsp. See Plan, Section 3.2 - Operations of the Regional Planning Committee at 13. See Plan, Section 1.6 - Development of the Plan at 7; see also, Plan, Section 2.1 Notification/Operation of the Region at 7-8 (meeting notices were published by FCC public notice, and notifications were sent to the Sac and Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa/Meskwaki, and a copy of the proposed Regional Plan). See Plan, Appendix A - Membership at 22-23. See Plan, Appendix B - By-Laws at 24-28. See Plan, Appendix C - Meeting Notifications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1369A1.txt
  • Tj 1 0 0 1 81.8 169.699 Tm 90 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (Id.) Tj 1 0 0 1 95.75 169.699 Tm 93 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (at 7;) Tj 1 0 0 1 115.4 169.949 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (see also) Tj 1 0 0 1 150 170.199 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (EPL 3389-A at 2.1 \(providing that "ITS encourages you to work with more than one vendor as) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.95 158.399 Tm (you make your decisions."\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 82.05 136.599 Tm 94 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (See) Tj 1 0 0 1 98.4 136.849 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (Request for Review at) Tj 1 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.txt
  • more than 10,000 households who receive no in-state signals. Wyoming and New Hampshire have the highest percentage of households who receive no in-state programming - 3.5 percent, representing 7,952 and 18,341 households, respectively. In addition to Minnesota, Wyoming, and New Hampshire, there are two other states that have greater than one percent of households that receive no in-state programming: Vermont (2.1 percent), and Kansas (1.20 percent). With respect to the Section 304(2) analysis, the Bureau found that, based on Commission data, about 99.98 percent of the 117.2 million total U.S. households have access to at least one in-state station either over the air or via an MVPD. Regarding over-the-air reception of in-state programming, we found ten state segments (out of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1455A2_Rcd.pdf
  • 1.2 Background ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Court Cases and FCC Proceedings ........................................................ 1-3 1.2.2 Draft Procedures .................................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................... 1-4 1.4 Proposed Action .................................................................................................. 1-6 1.5 Scope of the PEA ................................................................................................ 1-6 1.6 Public Involvement ............................................................................................. 1-7 1.6.1 Scoping Process ..................................................................................... 1-7 1.6.2 Draft PEA .............................................................................................. 1-7 1.6.3 Summary ................................................................................................ 1-8 CHAPTER TWO PURPOSE AND NEED .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Need .................................................................................................................... 2-1 CHAPTER THREE ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 No Action Alternative ......................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Alternative 1 � Existing ASR Program with FAA Lighting Changes ................ 3-3 3.3 Alternative 2 � Modifications to The ASR Program .......................................... 3-4 3.3.1 Alternative 2 Option A � Require an EA for All Projects Submitted for Registration Except for Certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1538A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1538A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1538A1.txt
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including for use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. ��87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1, 76.613(a). Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, � 14 (1985). 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47 C.F.R. � 76.1706.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1539A1.txt
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including for use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. ��87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1, 76.613(a). Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, � 14 (1985). 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47 C.F.R. � 76.1706.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1540A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1540A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1540A1.txt
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including for use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. ��87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1, 76.613(a). Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, � 14 (1985). 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47 C.F.R. � 76.1706.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1651A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1651A1.txt
  • �76.616. These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V; 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1, 76.613(a). See Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, � 14 (1985). See 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.615(b)(7). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.611(a). See 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1707A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1707A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1707A1.txt
  • (851-854 MHz) and Upper Band (861-865 MHz) Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced,'' Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 17162 (2000). See, ``800 MHz SMR Service Lower 80 Channels Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced,'' Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 1736 (2000). See generally 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517210. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058, App. C (2005). See ``Auction of Advanced Wireless Services Licenses Scheduled for June 29, 2006; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2058A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2058A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2058A1.txt
  • comment on whether any of these figures are de minimis under Commission policy and would thus not trigger FM Priorities (1) or (2) for purposes of comparison with other mutually exclusive proposals. 8. A staff engineering analysis has determined that Channel 287C2 can be allotted to Williams, in conformity with the Commission's Rules, provided there is a site restriction of 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) northeast at reference coordinates 35-15-57 NL and 112-10-47 WL. Channel 228C2 can be allotted at Ehrenberg at a site 18.8 kilometers (17.9 miles) northeast of the community at coordinates 33-48-00 NL and 114-19-12 WL. Channel 281C can be allotted at First Mesa at a site 16.8 kilometers (105 miles) south of the community at coordinates 35-41-09 NL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
  • 0.7 207 74.9 0.5 Wireless MVPD subgroup Basic service 31 30.6 0.6 31 24.8 0.5 Cable programming 31 46.0 0.7 31 48.5 0.5 Expanded basic service 31 76.6 0.4 31 73.3 0.2 Low penetration test subgroup Basic service 34 26.8 1.9 34 26.0 1.9 Cable programming 34 48.2 2.7 34 47.4 2.4 Expanded basic service 34 75.0 2.6 34 73.4 2.1 Source: 2009 survey. Attachment 11 Double and Triple Play Packages January 1, 2009 Sample Group Variable Video and Internet Package Video, Internet, and Telephony Package n Mean S.E. n Mean S.E. Sample groups overall Package price 624 $86.86 0.66 661 $116.74 0.67 Video channels 623 142.2 2.9 662 148.2 2.7 Noncompetitive Communities Package price 261 $85.75 0.96 276 $116.97 0.96
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-297A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-297A2.txt
  • of error plus or minus $1.4 million. Since only one completed audit in the sample resulted in the full disbursement being designated as improper, this worst case scenario appears very unlikely. In conclusion, for now it is best to rely on the two alternatives in Method I. We can be highly confident that the true improper payment rate was between 2.1 and 4.2 percent. 1 This is equivalent to `ignoring the non-respondents (incomplete audits).' 2 This is equivalent to post-stratifying the sample by whether or not the audit was reconciled, and assuming a worst-case 100% improper payment rate among the incompletes. APPENDIX A 2 Method I: Final Second Round Results for High Cost: FY2007 This table excludes the eight incomplete audits
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A2.txt
  • 10.5 - 10.6 GHZ DL 13.25-13.4 GHZ DL 30 15.43-15.63 GHZ UL This document addresses a sub-set of the above frequency bands (7125-7250 MHz, 8400-8500 MHz, 10.5-10.55 GHz and 13.25-13.4 GHz). The other bands will be the subject of separate proposals. Proposals: ARTICLE 5 Frequency allocations * * * * * Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) * * * * * MOD USA/1.25/1 5 570-7 250 MHz ADD USA/1.25/2 5.MSS Use of the band 7 125-7 250 MHz by the mobile-satellite service is limited to geostationary satellite systems and is subject to application of No. 9.21. The use of this band by the mobile-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.14. Reason:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A2_Rcd.pdf
  • 10.5 - 10.6 GHZ DL 13.25-13.4 GHZ DL 3529 15.43-15.63 GHZ UL This document addresses a sub-set of the above frequency bands (7125-7250 MHz, 8400-8500 MHz, 10.5-10.55 GHz and 13.25-13.4 GHz). The other bands will be the subject of separate proposals. Proposals: ARTICLE 5 Frequency allocations * * * * * Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) * * * * * MOD USA/1.25/1 5570-7250 MHz ADD USA/1.25/2 5.MSS Use of the band 7 125-7 250 MHz by the mobile-satellite service is limited to geostationary satellite systems and is subject to application of No. 9.21. The use of this band by the mobile-satellite service is subject to application of the provisions of No. 9.14. Reason:To allocate 7125-7250
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.txt
  • 11.3 kHz. Any interference in the lower portion, i.e. 8.3 - 9 kHz, would impact the whole system. Therefore, it is important to protect the full range of the signal to ensure that the systems will be able to use their allocated band without interference. Proposal: 41 ARTICLE 5 Frequency allocations Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) MOD USA/1.16/1 98.3-110 kHz Reasons: A primary allocation to the meteorological aids service in 8.3-11.3 kHz will protect the lightning detection systems from users operating under No. 4.4. Interference in the lower portion, i.e. 8.3-9 kHz, is expected to impact the whole system. MOD USA/1.16/2 5.53 Administrations authorizing the use of frequencies below 9 8.3 kHz shall ensure that no
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3_Rcd.pdf
  • 11.3 kHz. Any interference in the lower portion, i.e. 8.3 - 9 kHz, would impact the whole system. Therefore, it is important to protect the full range of the signal to ensure that the systems will be able to use their allocated band without interference. Proposal: 3631 ARTICLE 5 Frequency allocations Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) MOD USA/1.16/1 98.3-110 kHz Reasons:A primary allocation to the meteorological aids service in 8.3-11.3 kHz will protect the lightning detection systems from users operating under No. 4.4. Interference in the lower portion, i.e. 8.3-9 kHz, is expected to impact the whole system. MOD USA/1.16/2 5.53 Administrations authorizing the use of frequencies below 9 8.3 kHz shall ensure that no harmful
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-461A1.txt
  • This action is effective upon release of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julius P. Knapp Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology Bluechiip Ltd. Tracking Solutions, Request for Waiver of Section 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules, filed November 12, 2010. See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.3(z) and 15.3(o). See 47 C.F.R. � 15.209. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.205. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Spurious emissions are defined as, ``Emissions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' Necessary bandwidth is defined as, ``...the width of the frequency band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-504A1.txt
  • Street, S.E. and Shorts School River Road in Snohomish. The EA notes that this location is \'93the FCC, FAA and locally permitted transmitter location for KRKO-AM.\'94}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar\s21\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i {\*\xmlopen\xmlns2{\factoidname place}}{\*\xmlopen\xmlns2{\factoidname State}}Id.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 {\*\xmlclose}{\*\xmlclose} at Section 2.1.1. }}}{ \rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 The area is described as \'93rural\'94 and \'93made up predominantly of large undeveloped parcels devoted almost exclusively to agricultural use.\'94}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar\s21\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i {\*\xmlopen\xmlns2{\factoidname place}}{\*\xmlopen\xmlns2{\factoidname State}}Id.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 {\*\xmlclose}{\*\xmlclose} at Sections 2.1.2 &
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1.txt
  • ``box'' (Orange's Livebox, Iliad's Freebox and Neuf Cegetel's Neuf Box) that customers can use to access broadband, VoIP, and Wi-Fi. In addition, Bouygues Telecom offers a quadruple-play package called ``Ideo.'' In February 2010, the government announced that mobile operators will have to pay a minimum of 120 million Euros for the last two remaining tranches of 3G spectrum in the 2.1 GHz band. Other Media: France has a mix of publicly- and privately-operated television stations. State-owned France Televisions operates four networks, one of which is a network of regional stations. There are a large number of privately-owned regional and local television stations. The public broadcaster, Radio France, operates seven national networks and a series of regional networks. Radio France Internationale (RFI),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 7437 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-732 Neuf Cegetel's Neuf Box) that customers can use to access broadband, VoIP, and Wi-Fi. In addition, Bouygues Telecom offers a quadruple-play package called "Ideo."154 In February 2010, the government announced that mobile operators will have to pay a minimum of 120 million Euros for the last two remaining tranches of 3G spectrum in the 2.1 GHz band. Other Media: France has a mix of publicly-and privately-operated television stations. State-owned France Televisions operates four networks, one of which is a network of regional stations. There are a large number of privately-owned regional and local television stations. The public broadcaster, Radio France, operates seven national networks and a series of regional networks. Radio France Internationale (RFI), under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-838A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-838A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-838A1.txt
  • No. FRA-2010-0058, Positive Train Control Implementation Plan, at 4-4 (ver. 1.1 posted Nov. 17, 2010), available at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FRA-2010-0058-0007; The Kansas City Southern Railway, Docket No. FRA-2010-0059, Positive Train Control Implementation Plan, at 1-2, 3-2, 4-1, 5-7 (ver. 1.1 posted Nov. 17, 2010), available at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FRA-2010-0059-0005; Long Island Railroad, Docket No. FRA-2010-0031, PTC Implementation Plan, at 1-3-4, 4-7, 7-1, 7-3 (ver. 2.1 posted Nov. 17, 2010), available at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FRA-2010-0031-0005; Metro-North Railroad, Docket No. FRA-2010-0032, PTC Implementation Plan, Vol. 1, at 1-37, 4-7 (ver. 5.0 posted Nov. 17, 2010), available at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FRA-2010-0032-0005; New Jersey Transit, Docket No. FRA-2010-0033, Positive Train Control Implementation Plan, 66, 73, 86 (ver. 2.0 posted Nov. 17, 2010), available at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FRA-2010-0033-0004; Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District, Docket No. FRA-2010-0043,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-838A1_Rcd.pdf
  • FRA-2010-0058, Positive Train Control Implementation Plan, at 4-4 (ver. 1.1 posted Nov. 17, 2010), available athttp://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FRA-2010-0058- 0007; The Kansas City Southern Railway, Docket No. FRA-2010-0059, Positive Train Control Implementation Plan, at 1-2, 3-2, 4-1, 5-7 (ver. 1.1 posted Nov. 17, 2010), available at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FRA-2010-0059-0005; Long Island Railroad, Docket No. FRA- 2010-0031, PTC Implementation Plan, at 1-3-4, 4-7, 7-1, 7-3 (ver. 2.1 posted Nov. 17, 2010), available at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FRA-2010-0031-0005; Metro-North Railroad, Docket No. FRA- 2010-0032, PTC Implementation Plan, Vol. 1, at 1-37, 4-7 (ver. 5.0 posted Nov. 17, 2010), available at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FRA-2010-0032-0005; NewJersey Transit, Docket No. FRA- 2010-0033, PositiveTrain Control Implementation Plan, 66, 73, 86 (ver. 2.0 posted Nov. 17, 2010), available at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FRA-2010-0033-0004; Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District, Docket No. FRA-2010-0043,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-927A1.txt
  • 214 application on May 17 and 18, 2011. Investcorp S.A.'s 39.6 percent interest is held indirectly through control of various corporations. Of these corporations, only TelePacific Equity Limited individually owns or controls more than 10 percent of TPAC Holdings. Applicants state that all of the intermediate corporations and the approximate magnitudes of their interests are as follows: Investcorp Properties Limited (2.1 percent); Investcorp International, Inc. (1.9 percent); Investcorp TPC L.P. (5.9 percent); and Investcorp Secondary Partners I, L.P. (7.4 percent). In addition, Investcorp S.A., or a wholly owned subsidiary of Investcorp S.A., has entered into revocable management agreements to direct the voting and disposition of the stock held by Aguanga Limited (2.3 percent); Cahuilla Limited (2.3 percent); Fallbrook Limited (2.3 percent);
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-168A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-168A2.txt
  • - $ 8,329,585 $ Central Office Equipment (COE) Category Impact Summary Eastex Telephone Cooperative, Inc. Frozen UnFrozen Frozen Cat. Unfrozen Cat. Interstate Interstate Part 32 Cable & Wire Description 12/31/09 Category Category Allocated CostsAllocated Costs Variance Allocator Impact Account Category Costs Factors Factors 12/31/09 12/31/09 2410 1 Exchange Line 0.917459 0.943430 98,654,972 $ 101,447,560 $ 2,792,588 $ 0.250000 698,147 $ 2.1 Exchange Trunk - EAS 0.031263 0.021427 3,361,733 $ 2,304,013 $ (1,057,720) $ 0.000000 - $ 2.2 Exchange Trunk - Toll 0.000000 0.000000 - $ - $ - $ 0.000000 - $ 2.3 Exchange Trunk - WB 0.016102 0.011036 1,731,445 $ 1,186,671 $ (544,774) $ 1.000000 (544,774) $ 2.4 Exchange Trunk - 0.000000 0.000000 - $ - $ - $ 0.000000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-193A1.txt
  • conducted at Licensee's premises during normal business hours and in a manner that does not unreasonably interfere with Licensee's operations. 1.9. If Licensee sells, makes available to a third party, or otherwise disposes of Licensee-owned media on which the Licensed Materials are or were resident, that media must be erased and scrubbed before such sale or disposal. 2.Disclaimer of Warranties 2.1.LICENSEE ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT (A) COSTQUEST HAS NOT MADE ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES TO LICENSEE REGARDING THE LICENSED MATERIALS AND (B) THE LICENSED MATERIALS ARE BEING PROVIDED TO LICENSEE "AS IS," WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND. COSTQUEST DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE LICENSED MATERIALS ARE FREE FROM DEFECTS. COSTQUEST EXPRESSLY EXCLUDES AND DISCLAIMS ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • Jackson, TN 292 Urban Oldies 3.4 10 3 WUVS-LP Muskegon, MI 237 Urban Contemporary 3.3 8 4 KCSA-LP San Angelo, TX 289 Oldies 2.9 9 5 KBOL-LP Waterloo-Cedar Falls 251 Urban Adult Contemporary 2.6 11 6 WRES-LP Asheville 159 Urban Contemporary 2.5 11 7 WSBL-LP South Bend 179 Spanish Variety 2.2 12 8 WGVV-LP Quad Cities (Davnprt-RI-Moline) 147 Urban Contemporary 2.1 13 9 WGAG-LP Bluefield, WV 284 Oldies 2.0 13 10 WIGV-LP Providence-Warwick-Pawtucket 41 Contemporary Christian 1.6 18 Top Ten for TSL TSL 1 WPJI-LP Clarksville-Hopkinsville, TN-KY 201 Religious 2115.0 1 2 WIGV-LP Providence-Warwick-Pawtucket 41 Contemporary Christian 1860.0 1 3 WFBM-LP Sunbury-Selinsgrove-Lewisbrg, PA 221 Southern Gospel 1170.0 1 4 KSKQ-LP Medford-Ashland, OR 208 Variety 1140.0 3 5 WSBL-LP South Bend 179
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-325A1.txt
  • The Petitioner contends that Westfield is home to schools, a library, and a museum and historical society. It states that the community has also an established business development corporation and is home to several local businesses. 3. Channel 265A can be allotted to Westfield consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Rules with a site restriction 3.4 kilometers (2.1 miles) west of the community. The reference coordinates are 42-18-51 NL and 79-37-04 WL. The allotment of Channel 265A at Westfield is located 320 kilometers (199 miles) from the Canadian border. Therefore, Canadian concurrence has been requested and approved by the Canadian government. 4. The Petitioner's proposal warrants consideration. Therefore, we will solicit comments on the proposed amendment to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-377A1.txt
  • one percent subscribed, the others electing to take basic service or expanded basic service. While this low percentage likely reflects a number of factors, the data indicate that family-friendly packages generally lack sports programming (e.g. ESPN) and thus many families may not consider it to be a viable alternative to expanded basic service. On average, expanded basic service packages included 2.1 channels devoted to regional sports networks, and family-friendly packages included 0.3 channels devoted to regional sports networks. As of January 1, 2010, the average price for a family-friendly package, including the additional price of equipment if not included with the package, was $32.70, which fell between the average for basic service ($17.93) and expanded basic service ($54.44). Cable Programming Channels
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-550A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-550A1.txt
  • (851-854 MHz) and Upper Band (861-865 MHz) Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced,'' Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 17162 (2000). See, ``800 MHz SMR Service Lower 80 Channels Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced,'' Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 1736 (2000). See generally 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517210. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058, App. C (2005). See ``Auction of Advanced Wireless Services Licenses Scheduled for June 29, 2006; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-550A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Category (851-854 MHz) and Upper Band (861-865 MHz) Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced," Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 17162 (2000). 45See, "800 MHz SMR Service Lower 80 Channels Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced," Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 1736 (2000). 46See generally 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517210. 47SeeService Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058, App. C (2005). 48See"Auction of Advanced Wireless Services Licenses Scheduled for June 29, 2006; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and Other
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-597A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-597A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-597A1.txt
  • frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including for use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1, 76.613(a). See, e.g., Callais Cablevision, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd 1359 (2001). See 47 C.F.R. �� 76.601-76.617. See also Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 101 FCC 2d 117, 123, para. 14 (1985). 47 C.F.R. � 76.605(a)(12).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-705A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-705A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-705A2.txt
  • start of the contract which shall include numbers by labor category. Thereafter, the contractor will then advise the FCC as no change on a monthly basis. In the event of a change, the report shall show shortages and overages, and yearly turnover rate. Availability Staff shall be available a minimum of five (5) days a week, as defined in Section 2.1 of this document. However, since block applicants and block holders are located in multiple time zones, the contractor shall provide a mechanism (e.g., voicemail, email, facsimile) to be accessible on a 24-hour basis in order to meet the needs of all of its clients. The contractor is required to obtain prior approval from the FCC or its designee to any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-973A1.txt
  • agreements are explicit that Mr. Reed and MSG maintain ultimate control over the Station, and RAAD has failed to provide any evidence to show that this is not true in practice. See SSA at Section 2.2.1 - Personnel. See Declaration of George R. Reed, attached as Exhibit to MSG Opposition. See Declaration of George Reed at 2; SSA at Sections 2.1.6 and 2.2.2 (providing that ``with the exception of the provision of Provided Programming [the programming WFI provides, which shall not comprise more than 15% of the programming on the Station during any week], neither WFI nor MSG will perform any duties with respect to selecting or procuring programming''). Mr. Reed explains that he hired Marnie Ferrer as the full-time General
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-1707A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-1707A1.txt
  • additional technical information. 13 TT&C operations monitor a satellite's orbit from a fixed- earth station and allow information to be transmitted to the satellite that can adjust that orbit if necessary. TT&C functions may be conducted in bands allocated to the space operation service or in the band on which the underlying service is being provided. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. The applicant initially requested to use portions of the 1690-1710 MHz and 2025-2110 MHz for TT&C. See letter from Walter Scott to Secretary, FCC (Jan.28, 1993). AMSC and Motorola opposed this request, arguing that the 1690-1710 MHz band should be reserved for mobile-satellite service operations. 15 See letter from Walter Scon to Chief, Satellite Radio Branch (June 17, 1993). 16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-1849A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-1849A1.txt
  • function and orbit from a fixed-earth station and allow informa tion to be transmitted to the satellite that can alter the electrical function of the spacecraft and, if necessary, adjust that orbit. TT&C functions may be conducted in bands allocated to the space operation service or in the band on which the underlying service is being provided. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. 10 Space Imaging Application at 10. 11 12 Remote sensing systems are intended to operate in the EESS allocation. EESS is defined as "[a] radiocommunication Service between earth stations and one or more space stations, which may include links between space stations in which: (1) informa tion relating to the characteristics of the Earth and its natural phenomena is obtained
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-1919A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-1919A1.txt
  • its data METs will not exceed the revised maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits established in IEEE/ANSI C95.1-1991. Rockwell indicates that the antennas used with its METs are quadrafilar helix in design, 10.1 cm tall and 3.5 cm in diameter. Applying the MPE limit of 1.1 mW/cm2 under ANSI C95.1-1991, the separation distance required for Rockwell's MET antennas is 5.4 cm (2.1 inches).28 Rockwell further states that its MET antennas will be mounted within a radome enclosure having a ra dius of 11 cm and therefore will pose no radiation hazard to unsuspecting persons nearby. Based on this analysis, we find that Rockwell's METs meet the ANSI C-95-1991 MPE limit and are in compliance with Commission Rules re garding radiation hazards. We
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-353A1.txt
  • satellite's electrical function and orbit from a fixed-earth station and allow information to be transmitted to the satellite that can alter the electrical function of the spacecraft and, if necessary, adjust that orbit. TT&C functions may be conducted in bands allocated to the space operation service or in the band on which the underlying service is being provided. 47 C.F.R. �2.1. A sun-synchronous orbit permits the earth observing remote-sensing satellite to pass directly over a given spot on the ground at the same local time; i.e., with the sun in essentially the same position in the sky from one day to the next. As a result, shadows in pictures taken on different days by the satellite are at the same angles,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-179846A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-179846A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-179846A1.txt
  • switch. (v) "U.S. MET" means a MET that is put into service in the United States by a party that is authorized to distribute or otherwise provide TMI's mobile satellite services in the United States. (w) "Wire Communication" has the meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. � 2510(l). ARTICLE II NON-OBJECTION BY DoJ AND FBI TO GRANT OF LICENSE TO TMI 2.1 Non-Objection. (a) Upon the execution of this Agreement and adoption by TMI of the Implementation Plan, the DoJ and the FBI shall: (i) immediately notify the FCC that, provided the FCC approves this Agreement and adopts the Condition to FCC Licenses, the DoJ and the FBI have no objection to grant of TMI's pending license application in FCC File No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-184137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-184137A1.txt
  • PUBLIC SERVICE COMEREDOSIA 12/27/1999 06725.00000 39-49-13.1 N IL RO KSE41 090-33-58.4 W 0000062760 CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMEREDOSIA 12/27/1999 06755.00000 39-49-13.1 N Page 24 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL RO KSE49 087-39-35.0 W 0000062761 CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY HUTSONVILLE 12/27/1999 06745.00000 39-08-02.1 N IL RO KSI34 090-24-06.4 W 0000062762 CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY ROODHOUSE 12/27/1999 06585.00000 39-29-11.1 N IL RO KSI34 090-24-06.4 W 0000062762 CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY ROODHOUSE 12/27/1999 06595.00000 39-29-11.1 N IL RO KSI35 090-19-16.4 W 0000062763 CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY JERSEYVILLE 12/27/1999 06745.00000 39-07-24.1 N IL RO KSI35 090-19-16.4 W 0000062763 CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-185275A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-185275A1.txt
  • 084-04-55.0 W 0000069288 NEW PAR LIMA 01/13/2000 06850.00000 40-50-58.0 N OH MD WLT571 084-04-55.0 W 0000069288 NEW PAR LIMA 01/13/2000 10558.75000 40-50-58.0 N TN MD WMQ436 083-09-22.6 W 0000069301 TENNESSEE RSA #4 SUB 2, INC. JIMTOWN 01/13/2000 02112.00000 35-58-03.4 N TN MD WMQ436 083-09-22.6 W 0000069301 TENNESSEE RSA #4 SUB 2, INC. JIMTOWN 01/13/2000 02128.00000 35-58-03.4 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0000069364 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 01/13/2000 02165.20000 46-01-33.2 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0000069364 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 01/13/2000 02168.40000 46-01-33.2 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0000069364 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 01/13/2000 06795.00000 46-01-33.2 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0000069364 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 01/13/2000 10618.12500 46-01-33.2 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201656A1.txt
  • - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA NE 071-48-07.8 W 0000040597 BACKLINK, LLC Worcester 10/07/1999 22625.00000 42-15-51.0 N AZ NE 112-29-03.9 W 0000075297 Southwestco Wireless Limited PartnershipAshfork 01/24/2000 06636.25000 35-13-00.3 N MI NE 083-11-12.7 W 0000092878 Pathnet Inc. Wyandotte 03/28/2000 06197.24000 42-11-02.1 N MI NE 083-11-12.7 W 0000092878 Pathnet Inc. Wyandotte 03/28/2000 06197.24000 42-11-02.1 N MI NE 083-11-12.7 W 0000092878 Pathnet Inc. Wyandotte 03/28/2000 06256.54000 42-11-02.1 N MI NE 083-11-12.7 W 0000092878 Pathnet Inc. Wyandotte 03/28/2000 06256.54000 42-11-02.1 N MI NE 083-11-12.7 W 0000092878 Pathnet Inc. Wyandotte 03/28/2000 06286.19000 42-11-02.1 N MI NE 083-11-12.7 W 0000092878 Pathnet Inc. Wyandotte 03/28/2000 06315.84000 42-11-02.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201826A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201826A1.txt
  • These include but may extend beyond factors relating to cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. See also Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997). With respect to the provision of commercial communications services, VoiceStream, through its subsidiaries, also holds local multipoint distribution service (``LMDS'') and specialized mobile radio (``SMR'') licenses. See Public Interest Statement at 2. No competitive issues are raised with respect to these licenses, however, because Aerial does not hold licenses
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201826A1_Erratum.doc
  • These include but may extend beyond factors relating to cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. See also Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997). With respect to the provision of commercial communications services, VoiceStream, through its subsidiaries, also holds local multipoint distribution service (``LMDS'') and specialized mobile radio (``SMR'') licenses. See Public Interest Statement at 2. No competitive issues are raised with respect to these licenses, however, because Aerial does not hold licenses
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202481A1.txt
  • 087-52-47.7 W 0000080657 BACKLINK LLC Deerfield 05/05/2000 21725.00000 42-09-43.6 N IL AM 087-51-23.8 W 0000080658 BACKLINK LLC Northbrook 05/05/2000 19560.00000 42-08-24.3 N IL AM 087-51-23.8 W 0000080658 BACKLINK LLC Northbrook 05/05/2000 21225.00000 42-08-24.3 N IL AM 087-51-45.4 W 0000080659 BACKLINK LLC Northbrook 05/05/2000 19640.00000 42-08-20.9 N IL AM 087-51-45.4 W 0000080659 BACKLINK LLC Northbrook 05/05/2000 21625.00000 42-08-20.9 N PA AM 075-09-02.1 W 0000089891 BACKLINK LLC PHILADELPHIA 05/03/2000 17920.00000 39-56-50.0 N PA AM 075-10-25.0 W 0000089892 BACKLINK LLC PHILADELPHIA 05/03/2000 19480.00000 39-53-28.5 N CA AM WLT564 117-30-03.2 W 0000094439 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LYTLE CREEK 05/03/2000 02121.60000 34-12-49.0 N CA AM WLT564 117-30-03.2 W 0000094439 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LYTLE CREEK 05/03/2000 02128.00000 34-12-49.0 N Page 5 CF - Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202671A1.txt
  • Inc. OFFSHORE 05/09/2000 00959.15000 29-19-37.2 N GM NE 088-24-33.0 W 0000125799 Vastar Resources Inc. Offshore 05/09/2000 00955.55000 29-14-27.0 N GM NE 093-08-55.5 W 0000125800 Vastar Resources Inc. Offshore 05/09/2000 00958.35000 29-35-34.8 N MS NE 088-58-04.0 W 0000125965 Mississippi Power Company BEAUMONT 05/09/2000 00932.25625 31-15-27.0 N MS NE 088-58-04.0 W 0000125965 Mississippi Power Company BEAUMONT 05/09/2000 00941.25625 31-15-27.0 N AZ NE 114-43-02.1 W 0000126009 Bose Corporation San Luis 05/09/2000 23125.00000 32-27-56.7 N MS NE 089-05-44.0 W 0000126081 Mississippi Power Company GULFPORT 05/09/2000 00932.35625 30-24-49.0 N MS NE 089-05-44.0 W 0000126081 Mississippi Power Company GULFPORT 05/09/2000 00941.35625 30-24-49.0 N CO NE 104-12-19.8 W 0000126598 Colorado Interstate Gas Co. (Wiggins) Wiggins 05/10/2000 06813.75000 40-13-44.9 N CO NE 104-12-19.8 W 0000126598 Colorado Interstate Gas Co.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202973A1.txt
  • LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 21425.00000 32-54-06.2 N TX AM 096-46-08.8 W 0000100865 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 17840.00000 32-54-52.2 N Page 13 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX AM 096-46-08.8 W 0000100865 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 21275.00000 32-54-52.2 N TX AM 096-46-02.1 W 0000100866 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 17880.00000 32-54-49.9 N TX AM 096-46-02.1 W 0000100866 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 21575.00000 32-54-49.9 N TX AM 096-46-10.9 W 0000100867 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 18040.00000 32-54-53.4 N TX AM 096-46-10.9 W 0000100867 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 21725.00000 32-54-53.4 N TX AM 096-46-04.0 W 0000100868 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 17880.00000 32-55-21.1 N TX AM 096-46-04.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203279A1.txt
  • 0000156456 TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS INC FORT WORTH 06/06/2000 18142.00000 - 18580.00000 32-39-35.4 N TX MD WPNC609 097-24-12.9 W 0000156456 TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS INC FORT WORTH 06/06/2000 18142.00000 - 18580.00000 32-39-35.4 N TX MD WPNC609 097-24-12.9 W 0000156456 TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS INC FORT WORTH 06/06/2000 18142.00000 - 18580.00000 32-39-35.4 N IL MD WPNL944 088-14-10.2 W 0000156496 TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS INC NAPERVILLE 06/06/2000 18142.00000 - 18580.00000 41-48-02.1 N FL MD WPNH564 080-18-58.5 W 0000156524 TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS INC MIAMI 06/06/2000 18142.00000 - 18580.00000 25-56-27.9 N FL MD WPNH564 080-18-58.5 W 0000156524 TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS INC MIAMI 06/06/2000 18142.00000 - 18580.00000 25-56-27.9 N MS MD WNTG990 089-19-26.0 W 0000156548 MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY HATTIESBURG 06/06/2000 00928.55625 31-20-55.0 N MS MD WNTG990 089-19-26.0 W 0000156548 MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY HATTIESBURG 06/06/2000 00932.33125 31-20-55.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.txt
  • footnote 348, second sentence; paragraph 163, second and third sentences; paragraph 176, first sentence; and paragraph 177, fourth, fifth and sixth sentences, by replacing ``primarily rural'' with ``very low-density'' Amend footnote 315 to read as follows: ``Modified Proposal at � 3.2.4; VALOR April 14 Letter, Appendix B � 61.48(l)(1)(ii)(A).'' Amend footnote 316 to read as follows: ``Modified Proposal at � 2.1.6; Appendix B � 61.48(l)(1)(i)(A) and (B).'' Amend footnote 317 to read as follows: ``Modified Proposal at � 2.4; Appendix B � 61.48(l)(1)(i)(C).'' Amend footnote 318 to read as follows: ``VALOR April 14 Letter; Appendix B �� 61.45(b)(1)(iii) and 61.48(l)(1)(i)(D).'' Amend footnote 319 to read as follows: ``Modified Proposal at � 3.2.4; Appendix B � 61.48(l)(2).'' Amend paragraph 155, fourth sentence,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203818A1.txt
  • RM WDU673 096-18-25.8 W 0000179508 SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY NEW PRUE 06/29/2000 06093.45000 36-16-42.6 N OK RM WDU673 096-18-25.8 W 0000179508 SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY NEW PRUE 06/29/2000 06152.75000 36-16-42.6 N OK RM WDU673 096-18-25.8 W 0000179508 SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY NEW PRUE 06/29/2000 06152.75000 36-16-42.6 N OK RM WDU672 096-39-32.9 W 0000179509 SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY MARAMEC 06/29/2000 06345.49000 36-13-02.1 N Page 39 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OK RM WDU672 096-39-32.9 W 0000179509 SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY MARAMEC 06/29/2000 06404.79000 36-13-02.1 N OK RM WDU672 096-39-32.9 W 0000179509 SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY MARAMEC 06/29/2000 11325.00000 36-13-02.1 N OK
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203907A1.txt
  • 06/19/2000 18142.00000 - 18580.00000 41-56-05.1 N TX NE 096-48-35.0 W 0000169598 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. DALLAS 06/19/2000 10795.00000 32-51-45.4 N TX NE 096-53-15.0 W 0000169899 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. DALLAS 06/19/2000 11445.00000 32-54-38.4 N TX NE 096-53-15.0 W 0000170353 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. DALLAS 06/19/2000 11525.00000 32-54-38.4 N OK NE 095-53-17.8 W 0000171552 Scripps Howard Broadcasting Company Tulsa 06/20/2000 23575.00000 36-11-02.1 N OK NE 096-05-54.0 W 0000171633 Scripps Howard Broadcasting Company SAND SPRINGS 06/20/2000 23525.00000 36-11-46.0 N VA NE 077-13-48.8 W 0000171659 BACKLINK LLC VIENNA 06/20/2000 21425.00000 38-55-01.5 N VA NE 077-13-48.8 W 0000171659 BACKLINK LLC VIENNA 06/20/2000 21925.00000 38-55-01.5 N VA NE 077-14-56.8 W 0000171660 BACKLINK LLC VIENNA 06/20/2000 22625.00000 38-55-45.3 N VA NE 077-14-56.8 W 0000171660 BACKLINK LLC VIENNA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204064A1.txt
  • 0000187976 BACKLINK LLC ATLANTA 07/13/2000 18120.00000 33-51-04.2 N CA NE 118-14-52.5 W 0000187978 BACKLINK LLC LOS ANGELES 07/13/2000 19640.00000 34-02-56.4 N CA NE 118-15-16.3 W 0000187979 BACKLINK LLC LOS ANGELES 07/13/2000 19680.00000 34-02-55.5 N WA NE 122-20-05.0 W 0000187981 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 07/13/2000 19680.00000 47-36-02.3 N WA NE 122-20-07.4 W 0000187982 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 07/13/2000 19560.00000 47-34-51.2 N WA NE 122-20-02.1 W 0000187983 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 07/13/2000 19400.00000 47-36-05.3 N WA NE 122-18-56.6 W 0000187984 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 07/13/2000 17840.00000 47-35-17.4 N WA NE 122-18-56.6 W 0000187984 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 07/13/2000 18000.00000 47-35-17.4 N WA NE 122-18-56.6 W 0000187984 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 07/13/2000 18120.00000 47-35-17.4 N NJ NE 074-01-59.6 W 0000187986 BACKLINK LLC JERSEY CITY 07/13/2000 19560.00000 40-43-06.6 N MO NE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204402A1.txt
  • COMPANY AUGUSTA 07/17/2000 00941.28125 39-21-02.4 N WV NE 078-45-16.1 W 0000189495 HAMPSHIRE GAS COMPANY KIRBY 07/17/2000 00932.25625 39-11-54.4 N WV NE 078-45-16.1 W 0000189495 HAMPSHIRE GAS COMPANY KIRBY 07/17/2000 00941.25625 39-11-54.4 N CA NE 118-15-46.0 W 0000189961 KTLA Inc Los Angeles 07/17/2000 22225.00000 34-03-01.0 N CA NE 118-18-57.0 W 0000189977 KTLA Inc Los Angeles 07/17/2000 23425.00000 34-05-48.0 N FL NE 080-02-02.1 W 0000190006 WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS CORPSINGER ISLAND 07/17/2000 18142.00000 - 18580.00000 26-47-07.2 N CA NE 119-10-00.4 W 0000190027 Kern County Superintendent of Schools Bakersfield 07/17/2000 06152.75000 35-22-29.9 N CA NE 119-45-46.5 W 0000190028 Kern County Superintendent of Schools Mckittrick 07/17/2000 06063.80000 35-17-30.9 N CA NE 119-45-46.5 W 0000190028 Kern County Superintendent of Schools Mckittrick 07/17/2000 06404.79000 35-17-30.9 N CA NE 120-21-06.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204615A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204615A1.txt
  • N MO MD WPQN490 090-11-33.1 W 0000193355 KATLINK LLC ST. LOUIS 07/25/2000 21475.00000 38-37-42.2 N MO MD WPQN490 090-11-33.1 W 0000193355 KATLINK LLC ST. LOUIS 07/25/2000 21625.00000 38-37-42.2 N MO MD WPQN489 090-11-21.2 W 0000193356 KATLINK LLC ST LOUIS 07/25/2000 22825.00000 38-37-40.5 N MO MD WPQN487 090-11-36.7 W 0000193357 KATLINK LLC ST. LOUIS 07/25/2000 22675.00000 38-37-53.8 N MO MD WPQN488 090-11-02.1 W 0000193358 KATLINK LLC ST. LOUIS 07/25/2000 22525.00000 38-37-50.6 N WA MD WPON995 122-21-28.4 W 0000193444 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 07/25/2000 17920.00000 47-37-04.5 N Page 11 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WA MD WPON995 122-21-28.4 W 0000193444 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205050A1.txt
  • 0000204140 KATLINK LLC SAN DIEGO 08/11/2000 21725.00000 32-45-50.0 N PA MD WPOM702 075-20-38.6 W 0000204146 BACKLINK LLC NORRISTOWN 08/11/2000 19640.00000 40-06-56.9 N PA MD WPOM702 075-20-38.6 W 0000204146 BACKLINK LLC NORRISTOWN 08/11/2000 21425.00000 40-06-56.9 N PA MD WPOM703 075-20-16.5 W 0000204147 BACKLINK LLC BRIDGEPORT 08/11/2000 22625.00000 40-06-26.3 N MO MD WPOM912 094-35-02.4 W 0000204150 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 08/11/2000 19320.00000 39-06-02.1 N MO MD WPOM912 094-35-02.4 W 0000204150 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 08/11/2000 19360.00000 39-06-02.1 N MO MD WPOM912 094-35-02.4 W 0000204150 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 08/11/2000 19440.00000 39-06-02.1 N MO MD WPOM912 094-35-02.4 W 0000204150 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 08/11/2000 22425.00000 39-06-02.1 N MO MD WPOM912 094-35-02.4 W 0000204150 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 08/11/2000 22625.00000 39-06-02.1 N MO MD WPOM912
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205248A1.txt
  • 0000205556 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. PHOENIX 08/15/2000 11365.00000 33-30-32.1 N CA NE 118-26-27.5 W 0000205557 BACKLINK LLC Los Angeles 08/15/2000 18000.00000 34-02-29.0 N CA NE 118-24-40.4 W 0000205558 BACKLINK LLC Los Angeles 08/15/2000 17840.00000 34-03-33.9 N CA NE 118-26-32.5 W 0000205559 BACKLINK LLC Los Angeles 08/15/2000 17960.00000 34-02-52.5 N CA NE 118-23-33.9 W 0000205560 BACKLINK LLC Beverly Hills 08/15/2000 17880.00000 34-04-02.1 N AZ NE 112-04-11.5 W 0000205562 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. PHOENIX 08/15/2000 10715.00000 33-27-33.1 N AZ NE 112-01-40.5 W 0000205564 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. PHOENIX 08/15/2000 11215.00000 33-30-31.6 N AZ NE 112-04-32.5 W 0000205567 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. PHOENIX 08/15/2000 11605.00000 33-27-00.1 N CA NE 118-21-40.4 W 0000205569 BACKLINK LLC North Hollywood 08/15/2000 18040.00000 34-08-41.5 N CA NE 118-22-05.4 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205600A1.txt
  • RM KNKN389 090-34-04.5 W 0000212805 IOWA RSA 5 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Long Grove 08/31/2000 41-43-11.1 N IA RM KNKN389 090-34-04.5 W 0000212805 IOWA RSA 5 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Long Grove 08/31/2000 41-43-11.1 N IA RM KNKN389 090-34-04.5 W 0000212805 IOWA RSA 5 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Long Grove 08/31/2000 41-43-11.1 N IA RM KNKN389 090-56-48.5 W 0000212805 IOWA RSA 5 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Lowden 08/31/2000 41-53-02.1 N Page 63 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IA RM KNKN389 090-39-29.5 W 0000212805 IOWA RSA 5 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MAQUOKETA 08/31/2000 42-02-52.1 N IA RM KNKN389 091-16-04.6 W 0000212805 IOWA RSA 5 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Mechanicsville 08/31/2000 41-53-39.0 N IA RM KNKN389 091-13-15.6 W 0000212805 IOWA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205762A1.txt
  • 21775.00000 39-48-34.5 N DE MD WPOM737 075-32-40.3 W 0000215620 BACKLINK LLC WILMINGTON 09/07/2000 21775.00000 39-48-34.5 N CA MD WPOS938 117-08-56.0 W 0000215629 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SAN MARCOS 09/07/2000 17925.00000 33-08-25.1 N CA MD WMR584 117-16-57.1 W 0000215630 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC VISTA 09/07/2000 10642.50000 33-11-14.1 N CA MD WPNC967 117-03-36.1 W 0000215631 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC ESCONDIDO 09/07/2000 10623.12500 33-08-02.1 N DE MD WPOM733 075-32-36.4 W 0000215634 BACKLINK LLC WILMINGTON 09/07/2000 21575.00000 39-48-41.7 N Page 17 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Call Sign Longitude Receipt Date File Number Applicant Name Latitude DE MD 075-32-36.4 W 0000215634 WILMINGTON 09/07/2000 39-48-41.7 N DE WPOM735 075-32-35.8 W 0000215635 BACKLINK LLC WILMINGTON 09/07/2000 21375.00000 39-48-40.1 N DE MD WPOM735
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205915A1.txt
  • Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC LA MESA 09/12/2000 10552.50000 32-46-07.4 N CA MD WLU305 117-01-52.2 W 0000217403 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC LA MESA 09/12/2000 10563.12500 32-46-07.4 N CA MD WLU305 117-01-52.2 W 0000217403 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC LA MESA 09/12/2000 10577.50000 32-46-07.4 N UT MD WPON843 113-52-56.9 W 0000217412 WWC License L.L.C. Saint George 09/12/2000 06600.62500 37-09-17.9 N CA MD WLU306 117-07-02.1 W 0000217418 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SAN DIEGO 09/12/2000 10617.50000 32-47-26.2 N CA MD WLN641 117-10-22.1 W 0000217419 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SAN DIEGO 09/12/2000 19425.00000 32-49-11.2 N CA MD WLN641 117-10-22.1 W 0000217419 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SAN DIEGO 09/12/2000 19445.00000 32-49-11.2 N CA MD WLN641 117-10-22.1 W 0000217419 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SAN DIEGO 09/12/2000 19485.00000 32-49-11.2 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206274A1.txt
  • N Page 21 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City ME MD WMR346 068-27-08.1 W 0000229246 BANGOR CELLULAR TELEPHONE, L.P.DAVIDSON 09/28/2000 02171.60000 45-58-48.1 N ME MD WMR346 068-27-08.1 W 0000229246 BANGOR CELLULAR TELEPHONE, L.P.DAVIDSON 09/28/2000 10553.12500 45-58-48.1 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0000229251 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 09/28/2000 02168.40000 46-01-33.2 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0000229251 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 09/28/2000 06795.00000 46-01-33.2 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0000229251 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 09/28/2000 10618.12500 46-01-33.2 N CA MD WLT563 117-20-48.2 W 0000229303 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP COLTON 09/28/2000 05945.20000 34-02-15.0 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206369A1.txt
  • TN NE 086-46-50.0 W 0000231745 KATLINK LLC Nashville 10/03/2000 19440.00000 36-09-48.2 N TN NE 086-46-52.9 W 0000231746 KATLINK LLC Nashville 10/03/2000 19680.00000 36-09-46.0 N TN NE 086-46-56.0 W 0000231747 KATLINK LLC Nashville 10/03/2000 19600.00000 36-09-17.1 N TN NE 086-46-41.9 W 0000231748 KATLINK LLC Nashville 10/03/2000 19520.00000 36-09-45.6 N MI NE 083-14-34.8 W 0000231815 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. DETROIT 10/03/2000 10835.00000 42-29-02.1 N MI NE 083-09-38.7 W 0000231823 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. DETROIT 10/03/2000 11325.00000 42-33-37.1 N TX NE 106-30-14.5 W 0000231839 The University of Texas at El Paso El Paso 10/03/2000 21800.00000 - 23600.00000 31-46-20.9 N MI NE 083-14-44.8 W 0000231840 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. DETROIT 10/03/2000 10875.00000 42-28-37.1 N Page 20 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206584A1.txt
  • N CA NE 117-18-13.2 W 0000238000 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC SAN BERNARDINO 10/12/2000 10725.00000 34-06-18.0 N CA NE 118-35-28.0 W 0000238001 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC BAKERSFIELD 10/12/2000 17865.00000 35-27-10.4 N CA NE 118-35-28.0 W 0000238001 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC BAKERSFIELD 10/12/2000 19385.00000 35-27-10.4 N CA NE 118-47-54.5 W 0000238004 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC EDISON 10/12/2000 19425.00000 35-18-39.3 N CA NE 122-17-02.1 W 0000238057 BACKLINK LLC Emeryville 10/12/2000 17760.00000 37-49-49.9 N CA NE 122-17-02.1 W 0000238057 BACKLINK LLC Emeryville 10/12/2000 17800.00000 37-49-49.9 N Page 38 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 122-17-02.1 W 0000238057 BACKLINK LLC Emeryville 10/12/2000 17840.00000 37-49-49.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206940A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206940A1.txt
  • VA RM WPIT685 076-29-07.8 W 0000244258 PAGING NETWORK OF AMERICA, INC.SUFFOLK 10/23/2000 00929.58750 36-49-55.5 N TX RM WPIW567 094-56-12.8 W 0000244950 PAGEMART II INC LIVINGSTON 09/08/2000 00929.76250 30-41-38.7 N TX RM WPIW567 094-45-59.8 W 0000244950 PAGEMART II INC LUFKIN 09/08/2000 00929.76250 31-21-55.7 N TX RM WPIW567 094-40-26.8 W 0000244950 PAGEMART II INC NACOGDOCHES 09/08/2000 00929.76250 31-41-28.6 N TX RM WPIW606 097-25-02.1 W 0000244956 PAGEMART II INC FORT WORTH 09/08/2000 00929.71250 32-43-27.5 N IL RM WPIW606 090-36-31.5 W 0000244956 PAGEMART II INC MONMOUTH 09/08/2000 00929.71250 40-53-25.1 N HI RM WPIW606 155-10-57.0 W 0000244956 PAGEMART II INC NINOLE 09/08/2000 00929.71250 19-54-44.0 N TX RM WPIW606 102-28-09.5 W 0000244956 PAGEMART II INC ODESSA 09/08/2000 00929.71250 31-50-42.5 N MN RM WPIW606 093-05-42.8 W 0000244956 PAGEMART
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207245A1.txt
  • FALLS 11/01/2000 11215.00000 47-37-20.6 N UT MD WNTC510 109-08-46.4 W 0000240222 CHEVRON USA INC VERNAL 10/16/2000 00928.49375 40-21-19.8 N UT MD WNTC510 109-08-46.4 W 0000240222 CHEVRON USA INC VERNAL 10/16/2000 00952.49375 40-21-19.8 N Page 81 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA MD WHJ302 079-52-02.1 W 0000242997 PEOPLES NATURAL GAS COMPANY WILKINSBURG 10/19/2000 02184.80000 40-26-31.2 N PA MD WHJ302 079-52-02.1 W 0000242997 PEOPLES NATURAL GAS COMPANY WILKINSBURG 10/19/2000 02188.00000 40-26-31.2 N PA MD WHJ302 079-52-02.1 W 0000242997 PEOPLES NATURAL GAS COMPANY WILKINSBURG 10/19/2000 02191.20000 40-26-31.2 N PA MD WHJ302 079-52-02.1 W 0000242997 PEOPLES NATURAL GAS COMPANY WILKINSBURG 10/19/2000 06770.00000 40-26-31.2 N PA MD WHJ301 079-53-13.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207434A1.txt
  • N NY AM WLL412 074-00-27.3 W 0000255829 ALBANY TELEPHONE COMPANY PROVIDENCE 11/09/2000 02168.40000 43-06-35.9 N NY AM WLL412 074-00-27.3 W 0000255829 ALBANY TELEPHONE COMPANY PROVIDENCE 11/09/2000 02178.00000 43-06-35.9 N NY AM WLL412 074-00-27.3 W 0000255829 ALBANY TELEPHONE COMPANY PROVIDENCE 11/09/2000 06063.80000 43-06-35.9 N NY AM WLL412 074-00-27.3 W 0000255829 ALBANY TELEPHONE COMPANY PROVIDENCE 11/09/2000 06600.62500 43-06-35.9 N IL MD WPOU532 088-19-02.1 W 0000243404 Pathnet MAHOMET 11/08/2000 11225.00000 40-11-13.1 N IL MD WPOU532 088-19-02.1 W 0000243404 Pathnet MAHOMET 11/08/2000 11265.00000 40-11-13.1 N IL MD WPOU532 088-19-02.1 W 0000243404 Pathnet MAHOMET 11/08/2000 11345.00000 40-11-13.1 N IL MD WPOU532 088-19-02.1 W 0000243404 Pathnet MAHOMET 11/08/2000 11545.00000 40-11-13.1 N IN MD WPOR650 086-34-41.0 W 0000243973 Pathnet STILLWELL 11/08/2000 06063.80000 41-32-14.1 N IN MD WPOR653 086-18-54.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207700A1.txt
  • Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA MD WLT355 070-44-07.0 W 0000270616 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLCWAREHAM 11/22/2000 02178.00000 41-46-57.0 N MA MD WLT355 070-44-07.0 W 0000270616 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLCWAREHAM 11/22/2000 06404.79000 41-46-57.0 N MA MD WLT355 070-44-07.0 W 0000270616 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLCWAREHAM 11/22/2000 11405.00000 41-46-57.0 N MA MD WPOU744 071-05-02.1 W 0000270661 WINSTAR WIRELESS FIBER CORP CAMBRIDGE 11/22/2000 19400.00000 42-21-45.3 N MA MD WPOU744 071-05-02.1 W 0000270661 WINSTAR WIRELESS FIBER CORP CAMBRIDGE 11/22/2000 19440.00000 42-21-45.3 N MA MD WPON959 071-03-32.1 W 0000270669 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. Boston 11/22/2000 17840.00000 42-21-13.3 N MA MD WPON959 071-03-32.1 W 0000270669 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. Boston 11/22/2000 17880.00000 42-21-13.3 N NY NE 073-59-31.4 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208701A1.txt
  • Valley Telephone Cooperative, Inc. Dos Cabezas 12/29/2000 06404.79000 32-13-02.3 N Page 7 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WPNJ794 102-23-46.7 W 0000309674 TEXAS RSA 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/b/a XIT Cellular HEREFORD 12/29/2000 06256.54000 34-55-30.2 N TX MD WPQP791 096-46-02.1 W 0000309712 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 12/29/2000 17880.00000 32-54-49.9 N TX MD WPQP791 096-46-02.1 W 0000309712 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 12/29/2000 17880.00000 32-54-49.9 N TX MD WPQP790 096-46-08.8 W 0000309713 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 12/29/2000 17840.00000 32-54-52.2 N TX MD WPQP790 096-46-08.8 W 0000309713 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 12/29/2000 17960.00000 32-54-52.2 N TX MD WPQP789 096-46-12.0 W 0000309715 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 12/29/2000 17800.00000 32-54-06.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208868A1.txt
  • RM WPJD385 R 099-08-12.2 W 0000312901 BIZTEL, INC. (C/O AT&T CORP) ABILENE 01/04/2001 39900.00000 - 39950.00000 31-56-39.5 N PA RM WMT634 R 074-37-28.5 W 0000312903 BIZTEL, INC. (C/O AT&T CORP) PHILADELPHIA 01/04/2001 38750.00000 - 38800.00000 39-52-30.4 N PA RM WMT634 R 074-37-28.5 W 0000312903 BIZTEL, INC. (C/O AT&T CORP) PHILADELPHIA 01/04/2001 39450.00000 - 39500.00000 39-52-30.4 N OR RM WPJC643 R 122-38-02.1 W 0000312918 BIZTEL, INC. (C/O AT&T CORP) EUGENE 01/04/2001 38750.00000 - 38800.00000 43-26-44.4 N OR RM WPJC643 R 122-38-02.1 W 0000312918 BIZTEL, INC. (C/O AT&T CORP) EUGENE 01/04/2001 39450.00000 - 39500.00000 43-26-44.4 N TX RM WPJD292 R 101-12-53.5 W 0000312920 BIZTEL, INC. (C/O AT&T CORP) AMARILLO 01/04/2001 39200.00000 - 39250.00000 34-43-04.2 N TX RM WPJD292 R 101-12-53.5 W 0000312920 BIZTEL,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209092A1.txt
  • N MO MD WPQN490 090-11-31.4 W 0000317570 KATLINK LLC ST. LOUIS 01/09/2001 21475.00000 38-37-41.1 N MO MD WPQN490 090-11-31.4 W 0000317570 KATLINK LLC ST. LOUIS 01/09/2001 21625.00000 38-37-41.1 N MO MD WPQS645 090-11-23.5 W 0000317571 KATLINK LLC St. Louis 01/09/2001 19400.00000 38-37-41.5 N MO MD WPQS644 090-11-22.7 W 0000317572 KATLINK LLC St. Louis 01/09/2001 19440.00000 38-37-28.4 N MO MD WPQN488 090-11-02.1 W 0000317573 KATLINK LLC ST. LOUIS 01/09/2001 22525.00000 38-37-50.6 N AL MD WMJ509 087-05-40.0 W 0000318887 RCC Holdings, Inc. SELMA 01/09/2001 06615.00000 32-27-52.0 N AL MD WMJ510 086-42-34.0 W 0000318888 RCC Holdings, Inc. CLANTON 01/09/2001 02121.60000 32-49-28.0 N AL MD WMJ510 086-42-34.0 W 0000318888 RCC Holdings, Inc. CLANTON 01/09/2001 06775.00000 32-49-28.0 N WA MD WPOM256 122-19-46.5 W 0000319950 BACKLINK LLC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209552A1.txt
  • 0000341119 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. Houston 01/23/2001 21675.00000 29-44-01.8 N CA NE 118-17-12.2 W 0000341356 BACKLINK LLC Los Angeles 01/24/2001 17800.00000 34-03-44.3 N CA NE 118-17-31.1 W 0000341357 BACKLINK LLC Los Angeles 01/24/2001 17880.00000 34-03-41.5 N CA NE 118-16-52.4 W 0000341358 BACKLINK LLC Los Angeles 01/24/2001 21325.00000 34-03-36.4 N CA NE 118-15-30.8 W 0000341359 BACKLINK LLC Los Angeles 01/24/2001 17840.00000 34-04-02.1 N CA NE 118-17-23.4 W 0000341360 BACKLINK LLC Los Angeles 01/24/2001 17960.00000 34-03-41.4 N OR NE 122-42-46.4 W 0000342173 BACKLINK LLC Portland 01/24/2001 18120.00000 45-27-22.9 N CA NE 118-13-36.2 W 0000342197 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership VERNON 01/24/2001 19485.00000 34-00-11.0 N CA NE 122-23-32.9 W 0000342524 BACKLINK LLC San Francisco 01/24/2001 17840.00000 37-47-35.0 N CA NE 122-23-16.6 W 0000342525 BACKLINK
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209663A1.txt
  • W. LK MCHGN INDSTRL I, ELK GROVE VILLAGE, IL New Station Other Facilities Changes LEAD CALLSIGN: WLX630 File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPIFB-20000818CRW CHICAGO INSTRU TECH FOUNDATION D1, D2, D3 SCHILLER PARK, IL Call Sign NEW (307372) Non-Common Carrier Status. Lat. 41 57 20 N. - Lon. 87 52 2 W. 41D 57M 20.3S N 87D 52M 02.1S W, SCHILLER PARK, IL Antenna # 1 C/L RCAMSL 218.00 meters, Antenna # 2 C/L RCAMSL 218.00 meters, Antenna # 3 C/L RCAMSL 218.00 meters New Station Other Facilities Changes LEAD CALLSIGN: WLX630 File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPIFH-20000818AWS CHICAGO INSTRU TECH FOUNDATION D1, D2, D3 CHICAGO, IL Call Sign NEW (305909) Non-Common Carrier Status. Lat. 41
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209663A1.txt
  • 136.00 meters, Antenna # 3 C/L RCAMSL 136.00 meters, Antenna # 4 C/L RCAMSL 136.00 meters New Station Other Facilities Changes LEAD CALLSIGN: WLW859 File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPIFH-20000818CPZ EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER REGION XII G3, G4 NOLANVILLE, TX Call Sign NEW (307323) Non-Common Carrier Status. Lat. 31 5 39 N. - Lon. 97 34 52 W. 2.1KM WEST, .3KM NORTH OF GLEN HOLLOW RD. AND STATE RT. 439, NOLANVILLE, TX New Station Other Facilities Changes LEAD CALLSIGN: WLX352 File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPIFH-20000818BVN EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER REGION XII G3, G4 WACO, TX Call Sign NEW (306690) Non-Common Carrier Status. Lat. 31 32 3 N. - Lon. 97 10 56 W. 1200 BLOCK 46TH
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209814A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209814A1.txt
  • BRAZOS ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE INC PLEASANT GROVE 01/31/2001 06825.00000 31-08-58.2 N TX AM WJX96 096-52-51.4 W 0000347452 BRAZOS ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE INC PLEASANT GROVE 01/31/2001 06850.00000 31-08-58.2 N TX AM WJX96 096-52-51.4 W 0000347452 BRAZOS ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE INC PLEASANT GROVE 01/31/2001 06850.00000 31-08-58.2 N IN MD WNTY513 P 085-54-49.9 W 0000347389 JOHNSON COUNTY RURAL ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP COLUMBUS 01/08/2001 00956.25625 39-12-02.1 N IN MD WNTY514 P 085-46-26.9 W 0000347396 JOHNSON COUNTY RURAL ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP SHELBYVILLE 01/08/2001 00956.25625 39-30-52.1 N IN MD WNTY515 P 086-03-08.9 W 0000347404 JOHNSON COUNTY RURAL ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP FRANKLIN 01/08/2001 00956.25625 39-28-27.1 N IN MD WPOT639 P 086-34-24.0 W 0000347420 JOHNSON COUNTY RURAL ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP DANVILLE 01/08/2001 00956.25625 39-48-06.1 N TX MD WJX96 096-52-51.4 W 0000347452 BRAZOS ELECTRIC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210319A1.txt
  • 40-00-59.0 N AZ NE 112-00-40.9 W 0000367922 Modern Industries, Inc. Phoenix 02/14/2001 21975.00000 33-26-52.4 N AZ NE 111-58-49.5 W 0000367923 Modern Industries, Inc. Phoenix 02/14/2001 23175.00000 33-22-34.3 N NH NE P 070-46-30.0 W 0000368572 Bay State Gas Company Portsmouth 02/15/2001 00956.44375 43-02-36.6 N AK NE 150-18-03.1 W 0000368803 Matanuska Telephone Association Inc. Trapper Creek 02/15/2001 22425.00000 62-19-05.2 N AK NE 150-07-02.1 W 0000368845 Matanuska Telephone Association Inc. Talkeetna 02/15/2001 21225.00000 62-19-17.2 N OK NE 097-07-38.0 W 0000369262 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative MARIETTA 02/15/2001 00932.40625 33-56-22.4 N OK NE 097-07-38.0 W 0000369262 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative MARIETTA 02/15/2001 00941.40625 33-56-22.4 N CA NE 121-28-36.8 W 0000369666 SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT ELVERTA 02/15/2001 00928.04375 38-42-49.6 N CA NE 121-28-36.8 W 0000369666 SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210541A1.txt
  • 083-34-36.8 W 0000364865 Pathnet, Inc OAKVILLE 02/20/2001 06004.50000 42-04-30.2 N MI MD WPNN555 083-34-36.8 W 0000364865 Pathnet, Inc OAKVILLE 02/20/2001 06034.15000 42-04-30.2 N MI MD WPNN555 083-34-36.8 W 0000364865 Pathnet, Inc OAKVILLE 02/20/2001 06063.80000 42-04-30.2 N MI MD WPNN555 083-34-36.8 W 0000364865 Pathnet, Inc OAKVILLE 02/20/2001 06063.80000 42-04-30.2 N MI MD WPQN572 083-03-27.7 W 0000364888 Pathnet Inc. Detroit 02/20/2001 05945.20000 42-20-02.1 N MI MD WPQN572 083-03-27.7 W 0000364888 Pathnet Inc. Detroit 02/20/2001 05945.20000 42-20-02.1 N MI MD WPQN572 083-03-27.7 W 0000364888 Pathnet Inc. Detroit 02/20/2001 06004.50000 42-20-02.1 N MI MD WPQN572 083-03-27.7 W 0000364888 Pathnet Inc. Detroit 02/20/2001 06004.50000 42-20-02.1 N Page 4 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210955A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210955A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210955A1.txt
  • prices charged to buyers). See Merger Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. at 41556-41557 � 1.3. See, e.g. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. at 363 (``[A] significant increase in the concentration . . . must be enjoined in the absence of evidence clearly showing that the merger is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects.''). See also Merger Guidelines at 41558 �� 2.1, 2.2; New York v. Kraft General Foods, 926 F. Supp. 321, 359 (S.D.N.Y. 1995); Amendment of Parts 20 and 24 of the Commission's Rules -- Broadband PCS Competitive Bidding and the Commercial Mobile Radio Service Spectrum Cap, WT Docket No. 96-59, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 7824 (1996). See Merger Guidelines Section 4; see, e.g., FTC v. University Health,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211420A1.txt
  • 40-42-41.4 N NY NE 074-00-06.5 W 0000402532 New York, City of (Police Dept.) New York 03/21/2001 06705.00000 40-42-41.4 N MO NE 092-58-19.2 W 0000402706 CITY OF MARCELINE MARCELINE 03/16/2001 00932.28125 39-41-57.9 N MO NE 092-58-19.2 W 0000402706 CITY OF MARCELINE MARCELINE 03/16/2001 00941.28125 39-41-57.9 N NM NE 108-42-10.3 W 0000402792 NAVAJO TRIBAL UTILITY AUTHORITYSHIPROCK 03/21/2001 06197.24000 36-46-38.0 N TX NE 098-29-02.1 W 0000403297 City of San Antonio - Radio MaintenanceSan Antonio 03/21/2001 06620.00000 29-25-07.3 N TX NE 098-23-07.0 W 0000403340 City of San Antonio - Radio MaintenanceSAN ANTONIO 03/21/2001 06780.00000 29-36-03.0 N TX NE 094-57-50.7 W 0000403551 CITY OF BAYTOWN Baytown 03/21/2001 00958.35000 29-49-12.8 N NY NE 073-59-05.0 W 0000403596 New York, City of (Police Dept.) Brooklyn 03/22/2001 06865.00000 40-41-42.9 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212278A1.txt
  • 04/18/2001 10558.12500 47-55-17.3 N WA NE 122-55-37.0 W 0000430968 Sprint Spectrum L.P. PORT TOWNSEND 04/18/2001 10623.12500 48-00-57.0 N CA NE 114-37-41.0 W 0000431244 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Needles 04/18/2001 10562.50000 34-49-16.0 N CO NE 104-52-08.9 W 0000431590 BACKLINK LLC Englewood 04/18/2001 22625.00000 39-35-00.1 N CO NE 104-51-43.9 W 0000431591 BACKLINK LLC Englewood 04/18/2001 22775.00000 39-32-20.3 N CO NE 104-52-02.1 W 0000431592 BACKLINK LLC Englewood 04/18/2001 22525.00000 39-33-56.3 N CO NE 104-51-44.5 W 0000431593 BACKLINK LLC Englewood 04/18/2001 22875.00000 39-34-04.7 N CO NE 104-53-06.0 W 0000431594 BACKLINK LLC Englewood 04/18/2001 22925.00000 39-34-17.8 N CO NE 104-52-56.7 W 0000431595 BACKLINK LLC Englewood 04/18/2001 22475.00000 39-34-14.7 N CO NE 104-53-53.6 W 0000431596 BACKLINK LLC Englewood 04/18/2001 22625.00000 39-34-24.7 N CO NE 104-52-59.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212302A1.txt
  • NY MD WPQN633 073-43-53.9 W 0000410788 BACKLINK LLC White Plains 03/28/2001 21675.00000 41-01-23.1 N NY MD WPQW745 074-00-14.6 W 0000410842 BACKLINK LLC New York 03/28/2001 22575.00000 40-44-30.2 N NJ MD WPQQ962 074-02-05.9 W 0000410843 BACKLINK LLC JERSEY CITY 03/28/2001 21375.00000 40-42-58.2 N CA MD KMQ79 117-18-53.1 W 0000410903 Verizon California Incorporated SAN BERNARDINO 03/28/2001 06034.15000 34-06-08.0 N CA MD KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 0000410904 Verizon California Incorporated RUNNING SPRINGS 03/28/2001 06286.19000 34-11-26.0 N CA MD KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 0000410904 Verizon California Incorporated RUNNING SPRINGS 03/28/2001 11445.00000 34-11-26.0 N CA MD KNL85 117-01-43.1 W 0000410905 Verizon California Incorporated RUNNING SPRINGS 03/28/2001 10755.00000 34-14-10.0 N CA MD KNL85 117-01-43.1 W 0000410905 Verizon California Incorporated RUNNING SPRINGS 03/28/2001 10955.00000 34-14-10.0 N CA MD KNL88 116-54-44.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212477A1.txt
  • 04/26/2001 RO WNWD529 0000440530 SOUTHWEST REPEATER CO 04/24/2001 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GA AM WPON777 084-23-28.4 W 0000324145 Advanced Telemedia Atlanta 04/24/2001 18142.00000 - 18580.00000 33-48-34.8 N IN AM WNTY513 P 085-54-49.9 W 0000347389 JOHNSON COUNTY RURAL ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP COLUMBUS 04/18/2001 00956.25625 39-12-02.1 N PA AM P 076-53-46.8 W 0000361785 CITIZENS ELECTRIC COMPANY LEWISBURG 04/25/2001 00956.29375 40-57-37.3 N Page 32 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MT AM WAH710 115-47-38.6 W 0000388677 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co Troy 04/23/2001 05945.20000 48-29-13.8 N MT AM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212840A1.txt
  • 39-28-03.1 N AZ NE 112-51-07.0 W 0000451685 SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL & POWER DISTRICT ARLINGTON 05/07/2001 06615.00000 33-20-45.1 N CT NE 073-30-35.6 W 0000451779 WWFE, INC. Stamford 05/07/2001 21925.00000 41-03-33.7 N CT NE 073-30-35.7 W 0000451780 WWFE, INC. Stamford 05/07/2001 23125.00000 41-03-36.4 N AK NE 150-18-03.1 W 0000452257 Matanuska Telephone Association Inc. Trapper Creek 05/08/2001 22425.00000 62-19-05.2 N AK NE 150-07-02.1 W 0000452323 Matanuska Telephone Association Inc. Talkeetna 05/08/2001 21225.00000 62-19-17.2 N TX NE 098-08-52.8 W 0000452551 Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Marion 05/08/2001 06635.00000 29-37-16.9 N PA NE P 079-52-50.9 W 0000454331 FOX CHAPEL AUTHORITY PITTSBURGH 05/03/2001 00956.26875 40-31-19.2 N IA NE P 091-31-05.2 W 0000454344 CITY OF SOLON SOLON 05/03/2001 00956.43125 41-48-24.1 N AR NE P 091-47-51.0 W 0000454350 HAMBURG
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213011A1.txt
  • W 0000465327 Gateway Public Radio, Inc Brewton 05/17/2001 00949.50000 31-12-12.0 N CD - Paging and Radiotelephone State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CT MD KDS296 072-43-16.0 W 0000464172 ARCH CONNECTICUT VALLEY, INC. NEWINGTON 05/17/2001 00072.78000 41-40-11.0 N IL MD KWU353 089-01-46.7 W 0000464618 METAMORA TELEPHONE COMPANY NORMAL 05/17/2001 00158.10000 40-31-02.1 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WA AM 122-01-53.4 W 0000290216 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Maple Valley 04/05/2001 18777.50000 47-24-37.9 N WA AM 122-01-53.4 W 0000290216 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Maple Valley 04/05/2001 19295.00000 47-24-37.9 N CO AM WDU495 104-32-09.8 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213235A1.txt
  • 0000468636 SALINAS CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY LOCKWOOD 05/22/2001 06585.62500 35-57-04.8 N CA MD WMQ680 121-00-06.6 W 0000468636 SALINAS CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY LOCKWOOD 05/22/2001 06735.62500 35-57-04.8 N CA MD WMQ679 121-06-53.7 W 0000468642 SALINAS CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY KING CITY 05/22/2001 06735.62500 36-12-20.8 N CA MD WMQ681 120-45-08.6 W 0000468651 SALINAS CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY KING CITY 05/22/2001 06745.62500 36-10-59.8 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0000470151 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 05/23/2001 06130.51000 46-44-22.2 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0000470151 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 05/23/2001 06150.28000 46-44-22.2 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0000470151 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 05/23/2001 06820.00000 46-44-22.2 N ME MD WMR983 067-48-52.8 W 0000470197 MAINE RSA #1, INC MARS HILL 05/23/2001 02121.60000 46-31-29.5 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213422A1.txt
  • 066-23-56.2 W 0000456824 NewComm Wireless Services, Inc. Morovis 05/29/2001 19405.00000 18-19-05.9 N CA AM WMJ339 116-37-31.0 W 0000475247 AB Cellular Holding, LLC BARSTOW 05/31/2001 05945.20000 34-38-37.9 N CA AM WMJ339 116-37-31.0 W 0000475247 AB Cellular Holding, LLC BARSTOW 05/31/2001 06755.00000 34-38-37.9 N CA AM WMJ339 116-37-31.0 W 0000475247 AB Cellular Holding, LLC BARSTOW 05/31/2001 06785.00000 34-38-37.9 N CA AM WLW491 117-03-02.1 W 0000475314 AB Cellular Holding, LLC BARSTOW 05/31/2001 06197.24000 34-51-20.9 N CA AM WLW491 117-03-02.1 W 0000475314 AB Cellular Holding, LLC BARSTOW 05/31/2001 06615.00000 34-51-20.9 N TX AM WLB847 106-28-58.9 W 0000475948 Dallas MTA LP, d/b/a Verizon Wireless EL PASO 05/31/2001 06301.01500 31-47-46.3 N Page 4 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213589A1.txt
  • Inc. Ft. Collins 06/08/2001 11245.00000 40-32-55.9 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MO MD KNKN391 090-03-35.8 W 0000479829 EASTERN MISSOURI CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ST. GENEVIEVE 06/04/2001 37-55-07.6 N MS MD KNKA799 090-12-02.3 W 0000480110 JACKSON CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. (d/b/a CENTURYTEL WIRELESS, INC.) Jackson 06/04/2001 32-20-02.1 N IN MD KNKA762 087-24-14.0 W 0000480334 Westel-Indianapolis LLC Sullivan 06/04/2001 39-06-32.4 N MN MD KNKN572 093-41-21.9 W 0000484807 Minnesota Southern Cellular Telephone Company d/b/a HickoryTech Wireless Wells 06/07/2001 43-42-37.1 N MN MD KNKR255 091-31-39.7 W 0000484991 ACC Minnesota License LLC Silver Creek 06/08/2001 47-07-32.3 N KS MD KNKA255 097-23-27.4 W 0000485265 WICHITA SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIPVALLEY CENTER 06/08/2001 37-52-32.8 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213963A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213963A1.txt
  • N MN MD WME932 091-38-17.5 W 0000494761 Marathon Media Group, L.L.C. WINONA 06/19/2001 00946.62500 44-03-09.9 N KS MD WPSL490 094-43-21.0 W 0000495884 1051FM, LLC Overland Park 06/19/2001 00946.50000 38-55-31.0 N KS MD WPSL490 094-43-21.0 W 0000495884 1051FM, LLC Overland Park 06/19/2001 00947.00000 38-55-31.0 N MA MD WAC263 071-03-49.8 W 0000496557 Emerson College Boston 06/20/2001 00950.50000 42-21-10.0 N MS MD WLG527 089-00-02.1 W 0000498343 CHASE RADIO PROPERTIES, LLC BILOXI 06/21/2001 00950.50000 30-23-58.7 N PA MD KGK38 075-25-24.7 W 0000499034 Citadel Broadcasting Company Bethlehem 06/22/2001 00948.00000 40-39-20.4 N PA MD WHQ419 075-25-24.7 W 0000499066 Citadel Broadcasting Company Bethlehem 06/22/2001 00951.00000 40-39-20.4 N IL MD WMU416 088-08-28.0 W 0000499260 AAA ENTERTAINMENT LICENSING LLCPhilo 06/22/2001 00949.00000 40-01-29.0 N Page 4 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214594A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214594A1.txt
  • W 0000223179 HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY CLARKSBURG 07/10/2001 19102.50000 39-16-34.3 N TX AM 095-02-32.0 W 0000398542 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. ARP 07/09/2001 05945.20000 32-14-35.0 N TX AM 095-02-32.0 W 0000398542 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. ARP 07/09/2001 06004.50000 32-14-35.0 N AK AM 150-18-03.1 W 0000452257 Matanuska Telephone Association Inc. Trapper Creek 07/12/2001 22425.00000 62-19-05.2 N AK AM 150-07-02.1 W 0000452323 Matanuska Telephone Association Inc. Talkeetna 07/10/2001 21225.00000 62-19-17.2 N TX AM WMK776 094-44-02.7 W 0000454368 NORTHEAST TEXAS CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY HENDERSON 07/11/2001 06197.24000 32-10-09.5 N TX AM WMK776 094-44-02.7 W 0000454368 NORTHEAST TEXAS CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY HENDERSON 07/09/2001 06197.24000 32-10-09.5 N TX AM WMK776 094-44-02.7 W 0000454368 NORTHEAST TEXAS CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY HENDERSON 07/11/2001 06197.24000 32-10-09.5 N TX
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214996A1.txt
  • 0000480331 University of Hawaii Lanai City 07/25/2001 06315.84000 20-50-30.4 N MI AM P 083-21-04.0 W 0000498321 Ash TWP Water Department CARLETON 07/25/2001 00956.44375 42-03-03.0 N CO AM 104-48-49.9 W 0000522265 Donala Water & Sanitation District Colorado Springs 07/26/2001 00928.28125 39-03-21.9 N CO AM 104-48-49.9 W 0000522265 Donala Water & Sanitation District Colorado Springs 07/26/2001 00952.28125 39-03-21.9 N PA AM KBE93 079-52-02.1 W 0000538777 CNG Transmission Corp. WILKINSBURG 07/27/2001 06152.75000 40-26-31.2 N Page 34 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA AM KBE93 079-52-02.1 W 0000538777 CNG Transmission Corp. WILKINSBURG 07/27/2001 06785.00000 40-26-31.2 N PA AM KBE93 079-52-02.1 W 0000538777 CNG Transmission Corp. WILKINSBURG 07/27/2001 06825.00000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215309A1.txt
  • Direction) 1/ Other includes medium and large business, institutional, and government customers. Number of Providers Zero 44.0% 30.1% 25.0% One 24.5 25.8 24.5 Two 14.2 16.7 18.6 Three 8.1 9.3 10.7 Four 4.4 6.0 6.2 Five 2.6 4.2 4.1 Six 1.5 3.1 3.0 Seven 0.6 2.2 2.3 Eight 0.2 1.2 2.0 Nine 0.0 0.6 1.6 Ten or More 0.0 0.9 2.1 * Data for June 2000 have been revised. December 1999 June 2000* December 2000 Table 8 Percentage of Zip Codes with High-Speed Lines in Service High-Speed Providers by Zip Code Number of Reporting Providers 7 or more 4 to 6 1 to 3 (As of December 31, 2000) Alabama 29% 62% 5% 4% 0% 0% Alaska 78 22 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215390A1.txt
  • 45-48-30.0 N PA AM 075-14-42.0 W 0000496383 Aeronautical Radio Inc. Philadelphia 08/06/2001 00130.60000 39-52-13.3 N MT AM 114-15-19.8 W 0000537386 FLATHEAD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY KALISPELL 08/08/2001 00121.60000 48-18-51.4 N MT AM 114-15-19.8 W 0000537386 FLATHEAD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY KALISPELL 08/08/2001 00124.55000 48-18-51.4 N MT AM 114-15-19.8 W 0000537386 FLATHEAD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY KALISPELL 08/08/2001 00132.62500 48-18-51.4 N CO MD KFN7 106-01-02.1 W 0000553886 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC ALAMOSA 08/09/2001 00130.02500 37-32-30.0 N CO MD KFN7 106-01-02.1 W 0000553886 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC ALAMOSA 08/09/2001 00131.55000 37-32-30.0 N Page 1 AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CO MD KFN7 106-01-02.1 W 0000553886 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC ALAMOSA 08/09/2001 00136.80000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • Inc. at (202) 857-3800. The report can also be downloaded [file names: TREND101.ZIP, TREND101.PDF] from the FCC-State Link Internet site at . i Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................1-1 Access Charges............................................................................................1-3 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges..........................................................................1-5 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges......................................................................1-6 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier..........................................................1-7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier......................................................1-8 Advanced Telecommunications....................................................................2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Lines.....................................................................................................2-3 Table 2.2 Advanced Services Lines..........................................................................................2-3 Table 2.3 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines......................................................2-3 Table 2.4 High-Speed Lines by Technology..............................................................................2-4 Consumer Expenditures...............................................................................3-1 Table 3.1 Household Expenditures for Telephone Service.........................................................3-3 Chart 3.1 Monthly Telephone Service Expenditures..................................................................3-3 Table 3.2 Average Monthly Household Telecommunications Expenditures by Type of Provider.........................................................................................................3-4 Earnings.......................................................................................................4-1 Table 4.1 Interstate Rate-of-Return Summary...........................................................................4-3 Employment and Labor Productivity...........................................................5-1 Table 5.1 Annual
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215731A1.txt
  • THEDFORD 08/22/2001 06197.24000 41-52-09.9 N NE AM WGY657 100-34-07.5 W 0000534939 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co THEDFORD 08/21/2001 06282.19000 41-52-09.9 N NE AM WGY657 100-34-07.5 W 0000534939 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co THEDFORD 08/22/2001 06286.19000 41-52-09.9 N IL AM P 088-36-21.0 W 0000538073 Sullivan, City of Sullivan 08/24/2001 00956.33125 39-35-51.0 N PA AM KBE93 079-52-02.1 W 0000538777 CNG Transmission Corp. WILKINSBURG 08/21/2001 06152.75000 40-26-31.2 N PA AM KBE93 079-52-02.1 W 0000538777 CNG Transmission Corp. WILKINSBURG 08/21/2001 06785.00000 40-26-31.2 N PA AM KBE93 079-52-02.1 W 0000538777 CNG Transmission Corp. WILKINSBURG 08/21/2001 06825.00000 40-26-31.2 N PA AM KBE93 079-52-02.1 W 0000538777 CNG Transmission Corp. WILKINSBURG 08/21/2001 06845.00000 40-26-31.2 N PA AM KBE93 079-52-02.1 W 0000538777 CNG Transmission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215884A1.txt
  • 08/29/2001 06610.62500 41-50-01.1 N IL AM KJV95 089-29-24.3 W 0000530394 State of Illinois, Department of Transportation DIXON 08/29/2001 06615.62500 41-50-01.1 N IN AM 087-23-52.0 W 0000540198 INDIANA, STATE OF Covington 08/27/2001 06034.15000 40-08-10.1 N IN AM WNTM219 087-24-30.0 W 0000540199 INDIANA, STATE OF NEWPORT 08/27/2001 06286.19000 39-51-14.1 N IN AM WPRS596 087-25-53.1 W 0000540200 Indiana, State of Newport 08/27/2001 06197.24000 39-50-02.1 N IN AM 087-23-58.1 W 0000540201 Indiana, State of Clinton 08/27/2001 05945.20000 39-39-40.1 N MA AM 070-57-32.2 W 0000549168 Massachusetts Water Resources AuthorityWinthrop 08/31/2001 11245.00000 42-21-17.4 N Page 49 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA AM 071-17-43.2 W 0000549282 Massachusetts Water Resources
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216388A1.txt
  • 102-21-41.6 W 0000599542 N.E. Colorado Cellular Inc. Rushville 09/21/2001 42-44-52.9 N Page 25 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NE NE 102-32-55.6 W 0000599542 N.E. Colorado Cellular Inc. White Clay 09/21/2001 42-52-36.9 N IL RM KNKN900 089-51-08.4 W 0000593530 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessFOREST CITY 09/17/2001 40-22-02.1 N IL RM KNKN900 090-03-46.4 W 0000593530 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessHAVANA 09/17/2001 40-18-05.2 N KY RM KNKQ306 088-11-35.7 W 0000593570 KENTUCKY RSA NO. 1 PARTNERSHIPAurora 09/17/2001 36-46-33.9 N KY RM KNKQ306 089-04-02.2 W 0000593570 KENTUCKY RSA NO. 1 PARTNERSHIPBardwell 09/17/2001 36-54-34.2 N KY RM KNKQ306 088-22-08.1 W 0000593570 KENTUCKY RSA NO. 1 PARTNERSHIPCalvert City 09/17/2001 37-02-00.2 N KY RM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216732A1.txt
  • W 0000612506 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Gooding 10/03/2001 17835.00000 42-51-54.3 N ID MD WPRX298 111-53-15.2 W 0000612511 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Iona 10/03/2001 06815.00000 43-32-40.0 N ID MD WPRX635 114-27-35.1 W 0000612513 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Twin Falls 10/03/2001 17815.00000 42-34-51.7 N ID MD WPRV477 112-10-06.6 W 0000612514 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC McCammon 10/03/2001 19455.00000 42-37-44.4 N CA MD WLW491 117-03-02.1 W 0000612536 AB Cellular LA, LLC BARSTOW 10/03/2001 06197.24000 34-51-20.9 N CA MD WLW491 117-03-02.1 W 0000612536 AB Cellular LA, LLC BARSTOW 10/03/2001 06615.00000 34-51-20.9 N Page 13 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WLW491 117-03-02.1 W 0000612536
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216824A1.txt
  • to support this important functionality, while simultaneously enforcing mandatory FRN use. Instructions for copying a form with the new mandatory FRN functionality follow. From the IBFS Application Menu System screen, scroll down to the application form to be copied. Click the select box to the left of the desired form and then press the Copy a Form button. See Exhibit 2.1 below. Exhibit 2.1 IB customers are presented with the IBFS Pre-Form Information screen. Enter the FRN and password of the Applicant for which the form is being prepared and press the PREFILL CORES DATA button. See Exhibit 2.2 below. Exhibit 2.2 The IBFS Application Menu Screen will reappear. Scroll down to see that a copy of the form has been
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217105A1.txt
  • MD WPRT527 081-30-41.8 W 0000634137 KATLINK LLC (debtor-in-possession) Beachwood 10/18/2001 17920.00000 41-27-54.8 N OH MD WPRT527 081-30-41.8 W 0000634137 KATLINK LLC (debtor-in-possession) Beachwood 10/18/2001 17920.00000 41-27-54.8 N OH MD WPRT526 081-32-03.6 W 0000634146 KATLINK LLC (debtor-in-possession) Shaker Hts 10/18/2001 17840.00000 41-27-50.2 N OH MD WPRT526 081-32-03.6 W 0000634146 KATLINK LLC (debtor-in-possession) Shaker Hts 10/18/2001 17840.00000 41-27-50.2 N PR MD WPTA780 066-33-02.1 W 0000634705 SprintCom, Inc. EXEDENTE 10/19/2001 17905.00000 18-03-52.9 N PR MD WPSY883 066-28-27.0 W 0000634738 SprintCom, Inc. JUANA DIAZ 10/19/2001 17845.00000 18-02-02.0 N MD MD WMT234 079-05-09.0 W 0000634765 USCOC OF CUMBERLAND, INC. GRANTSVILLE 10/19/2001 06382.55000 39-41-09.0 N MD MD WMT234 079-05-09.0 W 0000634765 USCOC OF CUMBERLAND, INC. GRANTSVILLE 10/19/2001 06785.00000 39-41-09.0 N NE MD WML226 102-58-45.7 W 0000635260 Corban
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217280A1.txt
  • AM 071-13-04.0 W 0000625525 Local Communications Network, Inc. Wood Hill 10/24/2001 11325.00000 42-39-16.0 N MA AM 071-13-04.0 W 0000625525 Local Communications Network, Inc. Wood Hill 10/24/2001 11405.00000 42-39-16.0 N Page 13 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA MD WPQP765 075-09-02.1 W 0000635759 BACKLINK LLC (debtor-in-possession) PHILADELPHIA 10/22/2001 17800.00000 39-56-50.0 N PA MD WPQP765 075-09-02.1 W 0000635759 BACKLINK LLC (debtor-in-possession) PHILADELPHIA 10/22/2001 17840.00000 39-56-50.0 N PA MD WPQP765 075-09-02.1 W 0000635759 BACKLINK LLC (debtor-in-possession) PHILADELPHIA 10/22/2001 17880.00000 39-56-50.0 N PA MD WPQP765 075-09-02.1 W 0000635759 BACKLINK LLC (debtor-in-possession) PHILADELPHIA 10/22/2001 17920.00000 39-56-50.0 N PA MD WPQP765 075-09-02.1 W 0000635759 BACKLINK LLC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217478A1.txt
  • 10/30/2001 10628.12000 35-21-37.0 N CA MD WMI203 120-39-24.0 W 0000642310 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SANTA MARGARITA 10/30/2001 10995.00000 35-21-37.0 N CA MD WMI203 120-39-24.0 W 0000642310 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SANTA MARGARITA 10/30/2001 11265.00000 35-21-37.0 N CA MD WMI263 121-03-37.0 W 0000642334 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CAMBRIA 10/30/2001 06745.00000 35-31-41.0 N CA MD WMI204 120-51-02.1 W 0000642350 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MORRO BAY 10/30/2001 06585.00000 35-23-46.3 N CA MD WMI204 120-51-02.1 W 0000642350 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MORRO BAY 10/30/2001 11485.00000 35-23-46.3 N AK MD WNEE676 151-23-16.0 W 0000642537 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INCKENAI 10/29/2001 06795.00000 60-41-37.9 N UT MD WLS625 111-28-51.6 W 0000642829 WASATCH UTAH RSA NO. 2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PARK
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217848A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217848A1.txt
  • Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City LA MD KGN5 090-12-04.3 W 0000655690 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC FOURCHON 11/13/2001 00131.57500 29-00-46.8 N MD NE 076-40-06.0 W 0000655682 Aeronautical Radio Inc. Baltimore 11/13/2001 00130.60000 39-10-31.3 N MD NE 076-40-06.0 W 0000655685 Aeronautical Radio Inc. Baltimore 11/13/2001 00131.40000 39-10-31.3 N CA NE 121-24-02.1 W 0000655691 Aeronautical Radio Inc. McClellan 11/13/2001 00129.37500 38-40-03.4 N TN NE 085-12-13.6 W 0000655698 Aeronautical Radio Inc. Chattanooga 11/13/2001 00131.57500 35-02-06.9 N TX NE 097-40-11.5 W 0000655700 Aeronautical Radio Inc. Austin 11/13/2001 00131.30000 30-11-40.3 N MD NE 078-45-39.1 W 0000655703 Aeronautical Radio Inc. Cumberland 11/13/2001 00131.40000 39-36-55.0 N MD NE 077-43-20.0 W 0000655714 Aeronautical Radio Inc. Hagerstown 11/13/2001 00131.40000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218188A1.txt
  • AM 077-42-14.0 W 0000626086 Local Communications Network, Inc. Loudoun Heights 11/27/2001 06286.19000 39-17-44.0 N VA AM 077-42-14.0 W 0000626086 Local Communications Network, Inc. Loudoun Heights 11/27/2001 06345.49000 39-17-44.0 N SD AM WMR299 101-42-21.0 W 0000627000 WWC License L.L.C. PHILLIP 11/29/2001 06256.54000 43-58-15.0 N SD AM WMR299 101-42-21.0 W 0000627000 WWC License L.L.C. PHILLIP 11/29/2001 06355.37000 43-58-15.0 N PA AM WPQP765 075-09-02.1 W 0000635759 BACKLINK LLC (debtor-in-possession) PHILADELPHIA 11/28/2001 17800.00000 39-56-50.0 N PA AM WPQP765 075-09-02.1 W 0000635759 BACKLINK LLC (debtor-in-possession) PHILADELPHIA 11/28/2001 17840.00000 39-56-50.0 N PA AM WPQP765 075-09-02.1 W 0000635759 BACKLINK LLC (debtor-in-possession) PHILADELPHIA 11/28/2001 17880.00000 39-56-50.0 N PA AM WPQP765 075-09-02.1 W 0000635759 BACKLINK LLC (debtor-in-possession) PHILADELPHIA 11/28/2001 17920.00000 39-56-50.0 N PA AM WPQP765 075-09-02.1 W 0000635759 BACKLINK LLC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218852A1.txt
  • 077-24-50.0 W 0000713344 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessRICHMOND 12/27/2001 10705.00000 37-33-53.0 N VA MD WLC210 077-24-50.0 W 0000713344 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessRICHMOND 12/27/2001 10775.00000 37-33-53.0 N VA MD WLC210 077-24-50.0 W 0000713344 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessRICHMOND 12/27/2001 10815.00000 37-33-53.0 N CA MD KMQ79 117-18-53.1 W 0000714447 Verizon California Inc. SAN BERNARDINO 12/28/2001 06063.80000 34-06-08.0 N CA MD KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 0000714448 Verizon California Inc. RUNNING SPRINGS 12/28/2001 06315.84000 34-11-26.0 N CA MD KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 0000714448 Verizon California Inc. RUNNING SPRINGS 12/28/2001 11525.00000 34-11-26.0 N CA MD KNL85 117-01-43.1 W 0000714449 Verizon California Inc. RUNNING SPRINGS 12/28/2001 10915.00000 34-14-10.0 N CA MD KNL85 117-01-43.1 W 0000714449 Verizon California Inc. RUNNING SPRINGS 12/28/2001 11035.00000 34-14-10.0 N CA MD KNL88 116-54-44.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219394A1.txt
  • Inc. Tennille 01/14/2002 06640.00000 29-46-42.8 N Page 11 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL NE 083-19-40.5 W 0000732430 M/A Com Private Radio Systems, Inc. Tennille 01/14/2002 06690.00000 29-46-42.8 N MT NE 112-01-31.7 W 0000732883 Touch America Helena 01/14/2002 22475.00000 46-36-02.1 N IL NE 090-38-19.6 W 0000732908 Illinois RSA #3, Inc. MACOMB 01/14/2002 06780.00000 40-28-05.4 N MT NE 112-32-06.5 W 0000733223 Cutthroat Communications Butte 01/14/2002 06755.00000 46-00-51.4 N NC NE 076-20-50.5 W 0000733858 NORTH CAROLINA RSA #9, INC. ELIZABETH CITY 01/15/2002 06585.00000 36-24-43.0 N ID NE 114-30-11.3 W 0000733872 Touch America Jerome 01/15/2002 22925.00000 42-42-30.8 N ID NE 114-42-30.9 W 0000733951
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219743A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219743A1.txt
  • A 0000751343 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. 01/29/2002 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 MD WNFW720 A 0000751343 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. 01/29/2002 00810.88750 IN MD WNFW720 085-02-44.9 W 0000751343 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. FORT WAYNE 01/29/2002 00855.88750 41-04-22.2 N IN MD WNFW720 085-02-44.9 W 0000751343 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. FORT WAYNE 01/29/2002 00855.88750 41-04-22.2 N VA MD WNFW722 P 079-57-02.1 W 0000751344 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MID-ATLANTIC, INC. 01/29/2002 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 37-16-36.5 N Page 23 GX - SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA MD WNFW722 P 079-57-02.1 W 0000751344 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MID-ATLANTIC, INC. 01/29/2002 00810.41250 37-16-36.5 N VA MD WNFW722 079-56-11.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220113A1.txt
  • PARTNERSHIP NORWALK 02/14/2002 17965.00000 33-54-21.1 N Page 12 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR NE 124-14-06.3 W 0000772628 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Brookings 02/14/2002 19435.00000 42-02-43.4 N OR NE 124-16-51.7 W 0000772629 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Brookings 02/14/2002 17875.00000 42-03-02.1 N NV NE 115-19-10.0 W 0000773990 SOUTHWESTCO WIRELESS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP JEAN 02/15/2002 10558.12500 35-46-37.0 N NV NE 115-23-08.4 W 0000774081 SOUTHWESTCO WIRELESS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Primm 02/15/2002 10623.12500 35-37-13.2 N AL NE 086-05-33.9 W 0000774208 ALABAMA CELLULAR SERVICE LLC SCOTTSBORO 02/15/2002 05945.20000 34-38-50.3 N CA NE 121-32-58.0 W 0000774310 UbiquiTel PCS OROVILLE 02/15/2002 19415.00000 39-28-42.0 N CA NE 124-10-57.0 W 0000774311
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220305A1.txt
  • 081-37-02.0 W 0000775332 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP TAZEWELL 02/19/2002 00854.28750 37-02-59.0 N VA MD WPSY209 081-37-02.0 W 0000775332 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP TAZEWELL 02/19/2002 00860.61250 37-02-59.0 N VA MD WPSX692 082-03-25.0 W 0000775333 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. ABINGDON 02/19/2002 00852.46250 36-35-58.0 N VA MD WPSX692 082-03-25.0 W 0000775333 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. ABINGDON 02/19/2002 00854.48750 36-35-58.0 N TN MD WPSX692 082-11-02.1 W 0000775333 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. ELIZABETHTOWN 02/19/2002 00852.46250 36-18-06.9 N TN MD WPSX692 082-11-02.1 W 0000775333 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. ELIZABETHTOWN 02/19/2002 00854.48750 36-18-06.9 N TX MD WPRZ587 094-12-58.0 W 0000775334 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. BEAUMONT 02/19/2002 00851.76250 30-10-18.0 N TX MD WPRZ587 094-12-58.0 W 0000775334 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. BEAUMONT 02/19/2002 00852.88750 30-10-18.0 N TX MD WPRZ587 094-12-58.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220999A1.txt
  • KTVU PARTNERSHIP Lafayette 03/11/2002 17710.00000 37-54-01.4 N CA MD KMV54 116-56-09.0 W 0000804300 STATION VENTURE OPERATIONS LPSAN DIEGO 03/11/2002 06975.00000 - 07000.00000 32-41-48.1 N CA MD WLO480 116-56-09.0 W 0000804841 STATION VENTURE OPERATIONS LPSAN DIEGO 03/12/2002 12850.00000 - 12875.00000 32-41-48.1 N CA MD WGR805 116-58-14.0 W 0000805375 STATION VENTURE OPERATIONS, LPPoway 03/12/2002 06950.00000 - 06975.00000 33-00-34.0 N CA MD WAY670 117-32-02.1 W 0000805460 STATION VENTURE OPERATIONS, LPCorona 03/12/2002 06925.00000 - 06950.00000 33-42-40.0 N CA MD WAY670 117-32-02.1 W 0000805460 STATION VENTURE OPERATIONS, LPCorona 03/12/2002 06925.00000 - 06950.00000 33-42-40.0 N OK MD WAT25 097-08-32.0 W 0000809125 KXII LICENSEE CORPORATION ARDMORE 03/14/2002 06937.50000 34-08-33.3 N OK MD WBB506 096-48-01.0 W 0000809192 KXII LICENSEE CORPORATION MADILL 03/14/2002 06887.50000 34-01-58.3 N CA NE 117-09-48.1 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221156A1.txt
  • LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. LOCUST 03/19/2002 00854.76250 35-16-15.5 N MD KNNU760 A 0000815269 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. 03/19/2002 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 MD KNNU760 A 0000815269 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. 03/19/2002 00818.21250 VA MD KNNU760 X 0000815269 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. 03/19/2002 00818.21250 MI MD KNNU760 082-51-36.7 W 0000815269 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. MOUNT CLEMENS 03/19/2002 00863.21250 42-39-02.1 N MI MD KNNU760 082-51-36.7 W 0000815269 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. MOUNT CLEMENS 03/19/2002 00863.21250 42-39-02.1 N MD WPRL252 A 0000815270 NEXTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 03/19/2002 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 MD WPRL252 A 0000815270 NEXTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 03/19/2002 00810.28750 MD WPRL252 A 0000815270 NEXTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 03/19/2002 00810.28750 MD WPRL252 A 0000815270 NEXTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 03/19/2002 00855.28750
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221477A1.txt
  • 10557.50000 34-56-06.1 N CA MD KMK77 118-55-20.4 W 0000832723 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY BAKERSFIELD 04/02/2002 06745.62500 35-21-39.9 N Page 11 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL MD WML875 089-51-08.4 W 0000835147 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessFOREST CITY 04/03/2002 02162.00000 40-22-02.1 N IL MD WML875 089-51-08.4 W 0000835147 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessFOREST CITY 04/03/2002 06063.80000 40-22-02.1 N IL MD WML875 089-51-08.4 W 0000835147 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessFOREST CITY 04/03/2002 06093.45000 40-22-02.1 N WI MD WPQT562 088-31-46.4 W 0000835197 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATING COMPANY Elkhorn 04/03/2002 06745.00000 42-39-45.2 N WI MD WPQT562 088-31-46.4 W 0000835197 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATING COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221478A1.txt
  • Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI AM 157-50-09.0 W 0000832864 Lesea Broadcasting Corporation HONOLULU 04/03/2002 02050.00000 21-16-58.0 N TP - TV Pickup State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH AM KW8584 P 083-32-13.7 W 0000372611 WTVG, INC. TOLEDO 04/04/2002 01990.00000 - 02008.00000 41-39-02.1 N OH AM KW8584 P 083-32-13.7 W 0000372611 WTVG, INC. TOLEDO 04/04/2002 02042.00000 - 02076.00000 41-39-02.1 N OH AM KW8584 P 083-32-13.7 W 0000372611 WTVG, INC. TOLEDO 04/04/2002 02076.00000 - 02093.00000 41-39-02.1 N OH AM KW8584 P 083-32-13.7 W 0000372611 WTVG, INC. TOLEDO 04/04/2002 02097.90000 - 02110.00000 41-39-02.1 N TS - TV Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221659A1.txt
  • Television Stations, Inc. NEW YORK 04/08/2002 13075.00000 - 13100.00000 40-44-54.4 N CA NE 122-28-34.2 W 0000838301 KNTV Licensee Inc. San Francisco 04/05/2002 12750.00000 37-48-26.5 N TP - TV Pickup State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH AM KW8584 P 083-32-13.7 W 0000372611 WTVG, INC. TOLEDO 04/05/2002 01990.00000 - 02008.00000 41-39-02.1 N OH AM KW8584 P 083-32-13.7 W 0000372611 WTVG, INC. TOLEDO 04/05/2002 02042.00000 - 02076.00000 41-39-02.1 N OH AM KW8584 P 083-32-13.7 W 0000372611 WTVG, INC. TOLEDO 04/05/2002 02076.00000 - 02093.00000 41-39-02.1 N OH AM KW8584 P 083-32-13.7 W 0000372611 WTVG, INC. TOLEDO 04/05/2002 02097.90000 - 02110.00000 41-39-02.1 N TS - TV Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221823A1.txt
  • Northeast Texas Consortium (NETnet)GILMER 04/18/2002 06375.14000 32-44-06.4 N AZ NE 114-20-07.8 W 0000854080 EPEC Communications Corporation Yuma 04/18/2002 00928.31875 32-40-12.2 N AZ NE 114-20-07.8 W 0000854080 EPEC Communications Corporation Yuma 04/18/2002 00952.31875 32-40-12.2 N Page 33 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE 095-13-02.1 W 0000854091 The Northeast Texas Consortium (NETnet)Tyler 04/18/2002 05945.20000 32-25-40.8 N TX NE 095-13-02.1 W 0000854091 The Northeast Texas Consortium (NETnet)Tyler 04/18/2002 05945.20000 32-25-40.8 N TX NE 095-13-02.1 W 0000854091 The Northeast Texas Consortium (NETnet)Tyler 04/18/2002 05945.20000 32-25-40.8 N TX NE 095-13-02.1 W 0000854091 The Northeast Texas Consortium (NETnet)Tyler 04/18/2002 05945.20000 32-25-40.8 N TX NE 095-13-02.1 W 0000854091 The Northeast
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221846A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221846A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221846A1.txt
  • an extremely difficult proceeding for the Commission, but we believe the Commission has arrived at a policy that appropriately balances the competing interests while allowing an important new service to move forward. We look forward to an auction for these licenses in the near future and the provision of the corresponding new services to the American people. See 47 C.F.R. 2.1 (``harmful interference'' is defined as ``interference which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service.. . . ``)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222214A1.txt
  • 04/30/2002 17745.00000 36-40-53.3N 087-24-35.3 W 0000870207 UBIQUITEL PCS CLARKSVILLE TN 04/30/2002 17785.00000 36-35-27.8N 087-24-47.0 W 0000871363 MICROSPACE COMMUNICATIONS CO RALEIGH NC 05/01/2802~ 21525.00000 35-49-30.5N 078-36-33.0 W 0000871376 MICROSPACE COMMUNICATIONS CO RALEIGH NC 05/01/2002 10855.00000 35-46-47.0N 078-40-29.0 W 0000871438 CNG COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PHOENIX AZ 05/O 112002 19480.00000 33-30-50.9N 112-04-26.7 W 0000871454 Centennial Puerto Rico License Corp. Lares PR 05/01/2002 06605.00000 18-18-21.0N 066-52-02.1 W 0000871514 USCOC OF GRETER IOWA, INC. MARSHALLTOWNIA 05/01/2002 06665.00000 42-02-49.8N 092-52-57.8 W NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE Page 23 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) Latitude Longitude Area Op.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222720A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222720A1.txt
  • (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CO AM WNKL319 X 0000804906 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 05/17/2002 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 CO AM WNKL319 X 0000804906 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 05/17/2002 00817.13750 CO AM WNKL319 X 0000804906 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 05/17/2002 00818.13750 CO AM WNKL319 X 0000804906 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 05/17/2002 00819.13750 CO AM WNKL319 X 0000804906 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 05/17/2002 00820.13750 CO AM WNKL319 106-50-02.1 W 0000804906 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ASPEN 05/17/2002 00856.53750 39-13-33.0 N CO AM WNKL319 106-50-02.1 W 0000804906 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ASPEN 05/17/2002 00857.53750 39-13-33.0 N CO AM WNKL319 106-50-02.1 W 0000804906 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ASPEN 05/17/2002 00858.53750 39-13-33.0 N CO AM WNKL319 106-50-02.1 W 0000804906 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ASPEN 05/17/2002 00859.53750 39-13-33.0 N CO AM WNKL319 106-50-02.1 W 0000804906 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222893A1.txt
  • 0000896057 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. MEDFORD 05/22/2002 06655.62500 42-19-23.4 N OR MD WPNL463 122-52-17.1 W 0000896057 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. MEDFORD 05/22/2002 06665.00000 42-19-23.4 N Page 8 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR MD WMK791 122-45-02.1 W 0000896084 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. BALDY 05/22/2002 06825.00000 42-17-50.4 N OR MD WMI467 122-28-45.0 W 0000896099 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. PINEHURST 05/22/2002 06835.62500 42-03-52.4 N CA MD WMS908 122-11-51.8 W 0000896125 BAY AREA CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY CROCKETT 05/22/2002 05945.20000 38-01-43.7 N CA MD WMS908 122-11-51.8 W 0000896125 BAY AREA CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY CROCKETT 05/22/2002 05974.85000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223320A1.txt
  • Company Tyler 06/04/2002 00949.12500 32-18-10.4 N TX MD WMV774 095-17-22.1 W 0000912780 Citadel Broadcasting Company Tyler 06/04/2002 00946.37500 32-18-10.4 N TX MD WMV774 095-17-22.1 W 0000912780 Citadel Broadcasting Company Tyler 06/04/2002 00946.62500 32-18-10.4 N IL NE 088-56-05.0 W 0000911496 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICENSES, INC. MARION 06/03/2002 00949.12500 37-45-15.0 N KS NE 097-53-05.6 W 0000914523 Waitt Radio, Inc. Hutchinson 06/05/2002 00949.00000 38-04-02.1 N NV NE 115-44-53.0 W 0000917656 L. Topaz Enterprises, Inc. Elko 06/07/2002 00945.50000 40-49-42.0 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City ID AM 111-59-52.4 W 0000824363 CWLab, LLC Idaho Falls 06/03/2002 19600.00000 43-28-56.4 N PR AM WQP80 066-18-55.6 W 0000832425
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223968A1.txt
  • IA MD WPJP249 P 093-45-59.8 W 0000941306 WILKS LICENSE COMPANY, LLC Urbandale 06/26/2002 00450.75000 41-38-11.6 N IA MD WPJP249 P 093-45-59.8 W 0000941306 WILKS LICENSE COMPANY, LLC Urbandale 06/26/2002 00455.55000 41-38-11.6 N IA MD WPJP244 P 093-45-59.8 W 0000941340 WILKS LICENSE COMPANY, LLC Urbandale 06/26/2002 00455.20000 41-38-11.6 N OH NE 082-35-50.1 W 0000936527 Fifth Avenue Broadcasting Company, Inc.Sheridan 06/24/2002 00450.02000 38-28-02.1 N IA NE 093-45-24.0 W 0000941364 Wilks License Company, LLC DES MOINES 06/26/2002 00455.85000 41-39-46.0 N TI - TV Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN MD KEP46 094-23-05.9 W 0000935520 CBS Broadcasting Inc. COLD SPRING 06/24/2002 01990.00000 - 02008.00000 45-25-41.8 N DC MD WPNK625 077-00-18.9 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224395A1.txt
  • MADISON 06/20/2002 00956.40625 40-37-52.0 N MI NE 084-23-38.8 W 0000953885 Panhandle Eastern Piple Line Company JACKSON 07/08/2002 06555.00000 42-09-22.1 N MD NE 076-53-48.0 W 0000953999 UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND LAUREL 07/08/2002 11215.00000 39-05-19.0 N MD NE 076-53-48.0 W 0000953999 UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND LAUREL 07/08/2002 11605.00000 39-05-19.0 N TX NE 098-58-52.0 W 0000954031 Duke Energy Field Services LP MIRANDO CITY 07/08/2002 00928.43125 27-24-02.1 N TX NE 098-58-52.0 W 0000954031 Duke Energy Field Services LP MIRANDO CITY 07/08/2002 00952.43125 27-24-02.1 N OK NE 098-36-08.0 W 0000954423 ANR Pipeline Company FAIRVIEW 07/09/2002 02139.60000 36-13-25.0 N CA NE 119-47-01.5 W 0000955846 GOTTSCHALKS, INC. KINGS 07/09/2002 22075.00000 36-51-35.8 N CA NE 119-47-01.5 W 0000955846 GOTTSCHALKS, INC. KINGS 07/09/2002 22175.00000 36-51-35.8 N Page 36 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224621A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224621A1.txt
  • Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD WPNG345 112-24-17.5 W 0000963594 ALLTEL Communications of the Southwest Limited Partnership PRESCOTT 07/15/2002 11685.00000 34-24-55.0 N GA MD WMT578 083-22-32.8 W 0000963731 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP dba Verizon Wireless TOCCOA 07/16/2002 02178.00000 34-31-46.7 N GA MD WMT578 083-22-32.8 W 0000963731 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP dba Verizon Wireless TOCCOA 07/16/2002 06362.79000 34-31-46.7 N CA MD KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 0000963835 Verizon California Inc. RUNNING SPRINGS 07/16/2002 11405.00000 34-11-26.0 N CA MD KNL87 117-06-25.1 W 0000963856 Verizon California Inc. RUNNING SPRINGS 07/16/2002 10915.00000 34-12-21.0 N GA MD WLV352 083-28-15.6 W 0000963918 Athens Cellular, Inc. COMMERCE 07/16/2002 06226.89000 34-10-20.4 N GA MD WLV352 083-28-15.6 W 0000963918 Athens Cellular, Inc. COMMERCE 07/16/2002 06256.54000 34-10-20.4 N GA MD WLV352 083-28-15.6 W 0000963918
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225135A1.txt
  • CAROLINA RSA #9, INC. WILLIAMSTON 07/30/2002 06315.84000 35-48-19.0 N NC MD WMQ453 076-59-29.0 W 0000980088 NORTH CAROLINA RSA #9, INC. WILLIAMSTON 07/30/2002 06345.49000 35-48-19.0 N NC MD WMQ453 076-59-29.0 W 0000980088 NORTH CAROLINA RSA #9, INC. WILLIAMSTON 07/30/2002 06372.67000 35-48-19.0 N NC MD WMQ453 076-59-29.0 W 0000980088 NORTH CAROLINA RSA #9, INC. WILLIAMSTON 07/30/2002 06745.00000 35-48-19.0 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0000980089 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 07/30/2002 06130.51000 46-44-22.2 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0000980089 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 07/30/2002 06150.28000 46-44-22.2 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0000980089 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 07/30/2002 06825.00000 46-44-22.2 N TN MD WPNH378 084-04-09.7 W 0000980102 UNITED STATES CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY (GREATER KNOXVILLE), L. P. KNOXVILLE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225370A1.txt
  • El Dorado 08/05/2002 00928.31875 30-59-58.6 N TX MD WPUR739 100-31-05.3 W 0000985867 Duke Energy Field Services, LP El Dorado 08/05/2002 00952.06875 30-59-58.6 N TX MD WPUR739 100-31-05.3 W 0000985867 Duke Energy Field Services, LP El Dorado 08/05/2002 00952.26875 30-59-58.6 N TX MD WPUR739 100-31-05.3 W 0000985867 Duke Energy Field Services, LP El Dorado 08/05/2002 00952.31875 30-59-58.6 N MA MD WPOP234 071-16-02.1 W 0000986090 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OFFOXBORO 08/05/2002 06226.89000 42-04-34.3 N TX MD WPTZ968 097-44-36.4 W 0000986990 Nicolas Communications Corporation Austin 08/05/2002 21925.00000 30-16-05.4 N TX MD WNTP982 097-38-00.0 W 0000987788 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS INCROBSTOWN 08/06/2002 00928.65625 27-42-29.0 N TX MD WNTP982 097-38-00.0 W 0000987788 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS INCROBSTOWN 08/06/2002 00952.65625 27-42-29.0 N AK MD WBD335 148-19-25.8 W 0000987955 ARCO COMMUNICATIONS INC.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225899A1.txt
  • W 0000886680 Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. EL CAMPO 08/28/2002 02165.20000 29-14-13.0 N TX AM WMK942 096-16-45.0 W 0000886680 Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. EL CAMPO 08/28/2002 02178.00000 29-14-13.0 N TX AM WMK942 096-16-45.0 W 0000886680 Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. EL CAMPO 08/28/2002 06063.80000 29-14-13.0 N NV AM WPSF335 114-37-41.0 W 0000957052 WAYNE, WILLIAM LAUGHLIN 08/29/2002 19640.00000 35-07-41.0 N OK AM WPNL241 097-01-02.1 W 0000967286 OK-3 CELLULAR INC PERKINS 08/27/2002 06197.24000 35-59-15.2 N VA AM WPOL930 077-42-13.7 W 0000990802 Washington/Baltimore Cellular Limited Partnership LOUDOUN HEIGHTS 08/26/2002 05945.20000 39-17-44.0 N VA AM WPOL930 077-42-13.7 W 0000990802 Washington/Baltimore Cellular Limited Partnership LOUDOUN HEIGHTS 08/26/2002 06585.00000 39-17-44.0 N VA AM WPOL930 077-42-13.7 W 0000990802 Washington/Baltimore Cellular Limited Partnership LOUDOUN HEIGHTS 08/26/2002 06666.25000 39-17-44.0 N MO AM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226596A1.txt
  • WMK363 085-48-54.8 W 0001031223 Kentucky RSA 4 Cellular General PartnersELIZABETHTOWN 09/17/2002 02165.20000 37-42-07.2 N KY MD WMK363 085-48-54.8 W 0001031223 Kentucky RSA 4 Cellular General PartnersELIZABETHTOWN 09/17/2002 02178.00000 37-42-07.2 N KY MD WMK363 085-48-54.8 W 0001031223 Kentucky RSA 4 Cellular General PartnersELIZABETHTOWN 09/17/2002 06123.10000 37-42-07.2 N IL MD WML875 089-51-08.4 W 0001031594 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessFOREST CITY 09/18/2002 02162.00000 40-22-02.1 N IL MD WML875 089-51-08.4 W 0001031594 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessFOREST CITY 09/18/2002 06063.80000 40-22-02.1 N IL MD WML875 089-51-08.4 W 0001031594 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessFOREST CITY 09/18/2002 06093.45000 40-22-02.1 N IL MD WML875 089-51-08.4 W 0001031594 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessFOREST CITY 09/18/2002 06645.00000 40-22-02.1 N IL MD WML875 089-51-08.4 W 0001031594 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessFOREST
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A17.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A17.txt
  • SURVEY AUGUST 23-SEPTEMBER 1; 3-5, 2002 TABLE 008 Q3B. IN THE PAST 7 DAYS DID YOU WATCH LOCAL NEWS AND CURRENT AFFAIRS ON...? BASE: RESPONDENTS WHO GET THEIR LOCAL NEWS FROM TELEVISION TOTAL ----- UNWEIGHTED TOTAL 2876 WEIGHTED TOTAL 186340 (000) 100.0 BROADCAST TELEVISION CHANNELS 67.0 CABLE OR SATELLITE NEWS CHANNELS 58.0 SOME OTHER CHANNEL 4.0 DON'T KNOW 0.9 REFUSE 2.1 DATA BASED UPON FEWER THAN 145 RESPONDENTS DO NOT MEET MINIMUM REPORTING STANDARDS AND ARE SUPPLIED FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. RESPONSES MAY ADD TO MORE THAN 100% DUE TO MULTIPLE RESPONSES COPYRIGHT 2002 NIELSEN MEDIA RESEARCH, INC. NIELSEN MEDIA RESEARCH PAGE: 9 FCC PHONE SURVEY AUGUST 23-SEPTEMBER 1; 3-5, 2002 TABLE 009 Q4. WHAT SOURCES, IF ANY, HAVE YOU USED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A22.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A22.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A22.txt
  • entry into television networking, the business is currently not particularly profitable. Precise data are not publicly available, but most observers suggest that, in the aggregate, the networks are losing money. It is certainly true that their revenues have been growing only very slowly. Table 5 shows that, in real terms, network advertising revenues grew at an average annual rate of 2.1 percent from 1990-2000. The large and increasing share of network video advertising accounted for by cable networks suggests that broadcast networks are feeling significant competitive pressure. In addition, it appears that programming costs have been rising. The networks have adopted various measures to respond to the competitive environment and cost pressures that they face. On the revenue side, they have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226886A1.txt
  • AM WMK527 091-28-33.0 W 0001020511 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. IOWA CITY 09/27/2002 06345.49000 41-40-27.0 N IA AM WMK527 091-28-33.0 W 0001020511 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. IOWA CITY 09/27/2002 06585.00000 41-40-27.0 N IA AM WMK527 091-28-33.0 W 0001020511 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. IOWA CITY 09/27/2002 06665.00000 41-40-27.0 N MT AM 112-01-31.7 W 0001035910 Touch America Helena 09/25/2002 22425.00000 46-36-02.1 N MT AM 112-01-31.7 W 0001035910 Touch America Helena 09/25/2002 22575.00000 46-36-02.1 N WA AM WPJD855 122-55-36.6 W 0001038098 AMERICAN TELEVISION AND COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION GARDINER 09/26/2002 06182.41500 48-00-58.3 N Page 5 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WA AM WPJD855
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227176A1.txt
  • VT MD WPQE439 073-05-06.4 W 0001047057 CENTRAL VERMONT PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION West Rutland 10/03/2002 00461.98750 43-37-23.2 N VT MD WPQE439 073-05-06.4 W 0001047057 CENTRAL VERMONT PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION West Rutland 10/03/2002 00461.98750 43-37-23.2 N YX - SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Trunked State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CO MD WNKL319 106-50-02.1 W 0001042737 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ASPEN 09/30/2002 00856.53750 39-13-34.0 N CO MD WNKL319 106-50-02.1 W 0001042737 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ASPEN 09/30/2002 00857.53750 39-13-34.0 N CO MD WNKL319 106-50-02.1 W 0001042737 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ASPEN 09/30/2002 00858.53750 39-13-34.0 N CO MD WNKL319 106-50-02.1 W 0001042737 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ASPEN 09/30/2002 00859.53750 39-13-34.0 N CO MD WNKL319 106-50-02.1 W 0001042737 TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228009A1.txt
  • OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY TITLE: Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems (ET Docket No. 00-258). SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Second Report and Order that would allocate spectrum in the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz bands that can be used to provide advanced wireless services (AWS), such as those services commonly identified as ``3G'' or ``IMT-2000.'' 5 WIRELESS TELE-COMMUNICATIONS TITLE: Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands. SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking concerning service rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228237A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228237A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228237A4.txt
  • SEPARATE STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER KEVIN J . MARTIN Re: Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules To Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services To Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Services, Second Report and Order, ET Docket No. 00-258; Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz Bands, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, WT Docket No. 02-XXX I am pleased to support these items, which allocate spectrum and seek comment on service rules for advanced wireless services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz bands. These items provide two 45 MHz blocks of contiguous spectrum which, we propose, can be used for a range of advanced wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228542A1.txt
  • is conveyed by modulation of a carrier by some conventional means, (2) the bandwidth is deliberately widened by means of a spreading function over that which would be needed to transmit the information alone. (In some spread spectrum systems, a portion of the information being conveyed by the system may be contained in the spreading function.)'' See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See Section VI, infra. See Section VII, infra. See Section VIII, infra. See Section VII, infra. Where spectrum is made available on a commons basis, spectrum usage rights are non-exclusive, and therefore new users do not depend on the transferability of such rights to obtain access to the spectrum. Nonetheless, there is no reason to restrict the transferability of such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228552A1.pdf
  • it is advisable to check with authors before quoting or referencing these working papers in other publications. This document is available on the FCC's World Wide Web site at http://www.fcc.gov/opp/workingp.html. ii Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ii Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................iv A Proposal for a Rapid Transition to Market Allocation of Spectrum...........................................1 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................1 2 Elements of a Market Regime for Spectrum...........................................................................3 2.1 Flexibility of Use............................................................................................................3 2.2 Exhaustive assignment of spectrum rights......................................................................4 2.3 Exclusive licenses...........................................................................................................5 2.4 Proper definition of interference rights...........................................................................6 2.5 Special provisions for low-power devices......................................................................7 3 Elements of an Efficient Transition to Spectrum Markets......................................................8 3.1 Speed...............................................................................................................................9 3.2 Low transaction costs......................................................................................................9 3.3 Transparency...................................................................................................................9 3.4 Liquidity........................................................................................................................10 3.5 Participation..................................................................................................................10 3.6 Simultaneity..................................................................................................................11 3.7 Package Bidding...........................................................................................................14 4 A Proposed Transition Market Mechanism: Band-Restructuring Auctions........................16 4.1 Simultaneous
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228691A1.txt
  • 122-20-06.4 W 0001030416 FISHER BROADCASTING - SEATTLE RADIO, LLC SEATTLE 11/12/2002 00946.37500 47-36-49.3 N WA AM WLF814 122-20-06.4 W 0001030416 FISHER BROADCASTING - SEATTLE RADIO, LLC SEATTLE 11/12/2002 00946.37500 47-36-49.3 N WA AM WLF814 122-20-06.4 W 0001030416 FISHER BROADCASTING - SEATTLE RADIO, LLC SEATTLE 11/12/2002 00946.62500 47-36-49.3 N OH AM WLI684 082-06-31.5 W 506022 ELYRIA-LORAIN BROADCASTING CO ELYRIA 11/02/1999 00947.87500 41-22-02.1 N OH AM WLI684 082-06-31.5 W 506022 ELYRIA-LORAIN BROADCASTING CO ELYRIA 11/02/1999 00948.12500 41-22-02.1 N IL MD WMV403 088-56-05.0 W 0001086526 Clear Channel Broadcasting Licenses, Inc.MARION 11/12/2002 00947.01250 37-45-15.0 N MI MD WOG95 083-12-15.5 W 0001086537 Infinity Broadcasting Operations Inc. SOUTHFIELD 11/12/2002 00949.00000 42-30-10.7 N OK MD WHQ386 095-53-04.0 W 0001086795 Clear Channel Broadcasting Licenses, Inc.Tulsa 11/12/2002 00946.87500 36-07-30.7 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229150A1.txt
  • OF OLYMPIA 11/25/2002 06815.00000 46-58-23.3 N WA MD KCX59 123-08-18.5 W 0001102746 WASHINGTON, STATE OF OLYMPIA 11/25/2002 06835.00000 46-58-23.3 N CT MD WNTN533 073-35-02.4 W 0001103082 GREENWICH, TOWN OF GREENWICH 11/26/2002 11653.12500 41-02-28.3 N CT MD WNTN535 073-41-50.5 W 0001103316 GREENWICH, TOWN OF GREENWICH 11/26/2002 11643.12500 41-04-27.3 N CT MD WNTN531 073-37-51.0 W 0001103324 GREENWICH, TOWN OF GREENWICH 11/26/2002 11153.12500 41-02-02.1 N CT MD WNTN531 073-37-51.0 W 0001103324 GREENWICH, TOWN OF GREENWICH 11/26/2002 11163.12500 41-02-02.1 N CT MD WNTN531 073-37-51.0 W 0001103324 GREENWICH, TOWN OF GREENWICH 11/26/2002 17880.00000 41-02-02.1 N CT MD WNTN531 073-37-51.0 W 0001103324 GREENWICH, TOWN OF GREENWICH 11/26/2002 18080.00000 41-02-02.1 N CT MD WNTN531 073-37-51.0 W 0001103324 GREENWICH, TOWN OF GREENWICH 11/26/2002 18762.50000 41-02-02.1 N CT MD WNTN532
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229201A1.txt
  • OF OLYMPIA 11/25/2002 06815.00000 46-58-23.3 N WA MD KCX59 123-08-18.5 W 0001102746 WASHINGTON, STATE OF OLYMPIA 11/25/2002 06835.00000 46-58-23.3 N CT MD WNTN533 073-35-02.4 W 0001103082 GREENWICH, TOWN OF GREENWICH 11/26/2002 11653.12500 41-02-28.3 N CT MD WNTN535 073-41-50.5 W 0001103316 GREENWICH, TOWN OF GREENWICH 11/26/2002 11643.12500 41-04-27.3 N CT MD WNTN531 073-37-51.0 W 0001103324 GREENWICH, TOWN OF GREENWICH 11/26/2002 11153.12500 41-02-02.1 N CT MD WNTN531 073-37-51.0 W 0001103324 GREENWICH, TOWN OF GREENWICH 11/26/2002 11163.12500 41-02-02.1 N CT MD WNTN531 073-37-51.0 W 0001103324 GREENWICH, TOWN OF GREENWICH 11/26/2002 17880.00000 41-02-02.1 N CT MD WNTN531 073-37-51.0 W 0001103324 GREENWICH, TOWN OF GREENWICH 11/26/2002 18080.00000 41-02-02.1 N CT MD WNTN531 073-37-51.0 W 0001103324 GREENWICH, TOWN OF GREENWICH 11/26/2002 18762.50000 41-02-02.1 N CT MD WNTN532
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229376A1.txt
  • LLC. DALLAS 12/04/2002 17840.00000 32-47-12.4 N TX NE 096-47-38.0 W 0001110104 WINSTAR SPECTRUM, LLC. DALLAS 12/04/2002 18080.00000 32-47-12.4 N TX NE 096-47-38.0 W 0001110104 WINSTAR SPECTRUM, LLC. DALLAS 12/04/2002 22925.00000 32-47-12.4 N TX NE 096-48-03.0 W 0001110107 WINSTAR SPECTRUM, LLC. DALLAS 12/04/2002 19400.00000 32-48-10.4 N TX NE 096-48-03.0 W 0001110107 WINSTAR SPECTRUM, LLC. DALLAS 12/04/2002 19640.00000 32-48-10.4 N MA NE 071-05-02.1 W 0001110108 WINSTAR SPECTRUM, LLC. CAMBRIDGE 12/04/2002 19360.00000 42-21-45.3 N MA NE 071-05-02.1 W 0001110108 WINSTAR SPECTRUM, LLC. CAMBRIDGE 12/04/2002 19400.00000 42-21-45.3 N MA NE 071-05-02.1 W 0001110108 WINSTAR SPECTRUM, LLC. CAMBRIDGE 12/04/2002 19440.00000 42-21-45.3 N MA NE 071-03-32.1 W 0001110113 WINSTAR SPECTRUM, LLC. BOSTON 12/04/2002 17720.00000 42-21-13.3 N MA NE 071-03-32.1 W 0001110113 WINSTAR SPECTRUM, LLC. BOSTON 12/04/2002 17800.00000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230012A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230012A1.txt
  • MD KQK739 080-37-58.3 W 0001131963 CITICASTERS LICENSES, INC. YOUNGSTOWN 12/23/2002 00161.70000 41-01-12.2 N OH MD KQK739 P 080-37-58.3 W 0001131963 CITICASTERS LICENSES, INC. YOUNGSTOWN 12/23/2002 00161.70000 41-01-12.2 N OH MD KQK739 080-37-58.3 W 0001131963 CITICASTERS LICENSES, INC. YOUNGSTOWN 12/23/2002 00161.73000 41-01-12.2 N OH MD KQK739 P 080-37-58.3 W 0001131963 CITICASTERS LICENSES, INC. YOUNGSTOWN 12/23/2002 00161.73000 41-01-12.2 N CA MD KPL205 122-39-02.1 W 0001132047 UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION CA STATE UN (NEAR) REDDING 12/23/2002 00450.01000 40-36-00.5 N NV MD KAK696 115-07-53.0 W 0001134342 CITICASTERS LICENSES, INC. LAS VEGAS 12/26/2002 00153.23000 36-06-48.9 N NV MD KAK696 P 115-08-26.4 W 0001134342 CITICASTERS LICENSES, INC. LAS VEGAS 12/26/2002 00153.23000 36-07-51.8 N NE A 0001133641 Florida Public Radio, Inc. 12/26/2002 00161.67000 IA NE 092-26-42.0 W 0001133641 Florida Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230620A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230620A1.txt
  • (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA MD KNKC497 079-37-45.0 W 0001166469 Schuylkill Mobile Fone, Inc. CORRY 01/21/2003 00157.86000 41-52-49.0 N Page 1 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI MD WHU27 083-32-04.8 W 0001171644 AMCI Acquisition, L.P. HOLLY 01/24/2003 06226.89000 42-47-02.1 N MI MD WHU27 083-32-04.8 W 0001171644 AMCI Acquisition, L.P. HOLLY 01/24/2003 06226.89000 42-47-02.1 N MI MD WHU27 083-32-04.8 W 0001171644 AMCI Acquisition, L.P. HOLLY 01/24/2003 06286.19000 42-47-02.1 N MI MD WHU27 083-32-04.8 W 0001171644 AMCI Acquisition, L.P. HOLLY 01/24/2003 06286.19000 42-47-02.1 N MI MD WHU27 083-32-04.8 W 0001171644 AMCI Acquisition, L.P. HOLLY 01/24/2003 06345.49000 42-47-02.1 N MI MD WHU27
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231191A1.txt
  • - The City of Laredo, Texas. In the Matter of Review of the Commission's Broadcast and Cable Equal Employment Opportunity Rules and Policies (MM Docket No. 98-204). Petition for Clarification, Or, In The Alternative For Partial Reconsideration - Minority Media and Telecommunications Council. February 7 In the Matter of Services Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands (WT Docket No. 02-353). Comments - The National Telecommunications and Information Administration. February 10 In the Matter of 2002 Biennial Regulatory Review - Review of the Commission's Broadcast Ownership Rules (MB Docket No. 02-277)/Cross-Ownership of Broadcast Stations and Newspapers (MM Docket No. 01-235)/Rules and Policies Concerning Multiple Ownership of Radio Broadcast Stations in Local Markets (MM Docket No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231527A1.txt
  • Corporation Parker 02/19/2003 00956.28125 34-26-46.0 N AZ NE P 114-18-18.1 W 0001203081 Southwest Gas Corporation Parker 02/19/2003 00956.28125 34-26-46.0 N AZ NE P 114-36-55.6 W 0001203141 Southwest Gas Corporation Bullhead 02/19/2003 00956.28125 35-04-45.7 N AZ NE P 114-36-55.6 W 0001203141 Southwest Gas Corporation Bullhead 02/19/2003 00956.28125 35-04-45.7 N AZ NE P 114-14-11.6 W 0001203172 Southwest Gas Corporation Ehrenberg 02/19/2003 00956.28125 33-47-02.1 N AZ NE P 114-14-11.6 W 0001203172 Southwest Gas Corporation Ehrenberg 02/19/2003 00956.28125 33-47-02.1 N AZ NE P 114-24-54.4 W 0001203217 Southwest Gas Corporation Yuma 02/19/2003 00956.40625 32-40-00.6 N AZ NE P 114-24-54.4 W 0001203217 Southwest Gas Corporation Yuma 02/19/2003 00956.40625 32-40-00.6 N LA NE 093-38-17.0 W 0001203259 Phillips Communications Inc. Toomey 02/19/2003 00932.43125 30-08-43.0 N LA NE 093-38-17.0 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232006A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232006A1.txt
  • Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WNYF555 117-45-12.2 W 0001218563 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA LAGUNA BEACH 03/03/2003 00929.23750 33-32-43.1 N CA MD WNYF555 117-45-12.2 W 0001218563 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA LAGUNA BEACH 03/03/2003 00929.23750 33-32-43.1 N CA MD WNYF555 117-47-08.2 W 0001218563 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA LAGUNA BEACH 03/03/2003 00929.23750 33-33-02.1 N CA MD WNYF555 117-47-08.2 W 0001218563 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA LAGUNA BEACH 03/03/2003 00929.23750 33-33-02.1 N CA MD WNYF555 117-47-08.2 W 0001218563 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA LAGUNA BEACH 03/03/2003 00929.23750 33-33-02.1 N CA MD WNYF555 117-36-07.2 W 0001218563 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 03/03/2003 00929.23750 33-30-09.1 N CA MD WNYF555 117-36-07.2 W 0001218563 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232306A1.txt
  • ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DAGGETT 03/10/2003 10657.50000 34-53-10.9 N CA MD WLU203 117-03-01.1 W 0001226682 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BARSTOW 03/10/2003 10551.25000 34-51-19.9 N CA MD WLU203 117-03-01.1 W 0001226682 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BARSTOW 03/10/2003 10561.25000 34-51-19.9 N CA MD WLU203 117-03-01.1 W 0001226682 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BARSTOW 03/10/2003 10592.50000 34-51-19.9 N CA MD WMW750 117-02-02.1 W 0001226739 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BARSTOW 03/10/2003 10616.25000 34-54-03.9 N CA MD WMW750 117-02-02.1 W 0001226739 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BARSTOW 03/10/2003 10626.25000 34-54-03.9 N CA MD WMW750 117-02-02.1 W 0001226739 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BARSTOW 03/10/2003 10628.12500 34-54-03.9 N CO MD WPNM647 108-32-14.3 W 0001227725 AT&T Wireless Services of Colorado, LLCGRAND JUNCTION 03/11/2003 06585.00000 39-03-28.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232514A1.txt
  • WNYF555 117-45-12.2 W 0001218563 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA LAGUNA BEACH 03/18/2003 00929.23750 33-32-43.1 N CA AM WNYF555 117-45-12.2 W 0001218563 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA LAGUNA BEACH 03/18/2003 00929.23750 33-32-43.1 N CA AM WNYF555 117-45-12.2 W 0001218563 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA LAGUNA BEACH 03/18/2003 00929.23750 33-32-43.1 N CA AM WNYF555 117-47-08.2 W 0001218563 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA LAGUNA BEACH 03/18/2003 00929.23750 33-33-02.1 N CA AM WNYF555 117-47-08.2 W 0001218563 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA LAGUNA BEACH 03/18/2003 00929.23750 33-33-02.1 N CA AM WNYF555 117-47-08.2 W 0001218563 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA LAGUNA BEACH 03/18/2003 00929.23750 33-33-02.1 N CA AM WNYF555 117-36-07.2 W 0001218563 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 03/18/2003 00929.23750 33-30-09.1 N CA AM WNYF555 117-36-07.2 W 0001218563 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232868A1.txt
  • Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MS AM KUS225 090-12-43.0 W 0001108462 SkyTel Corp. JACKSON 03/26/2003 00454.90000 32-17-09.0 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL NE 082-55-11.4 W 0001245848 McElroy Electronics Corporation Key West 03/24/2003 24-38-02.1 N GS - Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA AM 117-57-44.2 W 0001233477 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA FULLERTON 03/28/2003 00929.23750 33-54-19.1 N CA AM 117-57-44.2 W 0001233477 ORANGE, COUNTY OF, CA FULLERTON 03/26/2003 00929.23750 33-54-19.1 N CA AM 117-55-34.2 W 0001233477 ORANGE, COUNTY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233490A1.txt
  • 0001278980 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP GAFFNEY 04/17/2003 06093.45000 35-03-01.4 N SC MD WAH513 081-37-26.3 W 0001278980 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP GAFFNEY 04/17/2003 06123.10000 35-03-01.4 N SC MD WAH513 081-37-26.3 W 0001278980 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP GAFFNEY 04/17/2003 06123.10000 35-03-01.4 N SC MD WAH513 081-37-26.3 W 0001278980 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP GAFFNEY 04/17/2003 06152.75000 35-03-01.4 N CA MD WPNC967 117-03-36.1 W 0001279073 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC ESCONDIDO 04/17/2003 10628.75000 33-08-02.1 N SC MD WAH514 082-00-35.3 W 0001279216 Cellco Partnership MOORE 04/17/2003 06197.20000 34-50-42.4 N SC MD WAH514 082-00-35.3 W 0001279216 Cellco Partnership MOORE 04/17/2003 06197.24000 34-50-42.4 N SC MD WAH514 082-00-35.3 W 0001279216 Cellco Partnership MOORE 04/17/2003 06197.24000 34-50-42.4 N SC MD WAH514 082-00-35.3 W 0001279216 Cellco Partnership MOORE 04/17/2003 06226.89000 34-50-42.4 N Page 25 CF - Common Carrier Fixed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234387A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234387A1.txt
  • Rio Grande City 05/07/2003 00152.48000 26-31-23.2 N TX NE 097-05-25.0 W 0001302656 Awesome Paging, Inc. Rockport 05/07/2003 00152.48000 27-58-51.0 N NM NE 106-34-39.5 W 0001302661 Advanced Communications & Electronics IncAlbuquerque 05/07/2003 00462.82500 35-03-18.4 N NM NE 106-36-59.1 W 0001302661 Advanced Communications & Electronics IncAlbuquerque 05/07/2003 00462.82500 35-05-17.2 N NM NE 106-27-08.0 W 0001302661 Advanced Communications & Electronics IncAlbuquerque 05/07/2003 00462.82500 35-13-02.1 N NM NE 106-24-08.1 W 0001302661 Advanced Communications & Electronics IncManzano 05/07/2003 00462.82500 34-42-03.2 N NE A 123-06-54.0 W 0001304665 MY-COMM INC. 05/08/2003 00460.70000 44-00-07.0 N NE A 123-06-54.0 W 0001304665 MY-COMM INC. 05/08/2003 00465.70000 44-00-07.0 N OR NE 123-06-54.0 W 0001304665 MY-COMM INC. EUGENE 05/08/2003 00460.70000 44-00-07.0 N MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234729A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234729A1.txt
  • & Telegraph CompanyCOLDFOOT 05/15/2003 00454.55000 67-15-09.0 N Page 5 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IN MD KNKJ297 085-36-34.0 W 0001310223 INDIANA PAGING NETWORK, INC. PARIS CROSSING 05/13/2003 00072.76000 38-49-42.0 N IN MD KNKJ297 085-42-09.9 W 0001310223 INDIANA PAGING NETWORK, INC. SCIPIO 05/13/2003 00072.76000 39-04-02.1 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CO AM WPRT855 105-17-33.0 W 0001220628 Sprint Communications Co., LP GOLDEN 05/15/2003 06256.54000 39-54-48.0 N CO AM WPRT855 105-17-33.0 W 0001220628 Sprint Communications Co., LP GOLDEN 05/15/2003 06256.54000 39-54-48.0 N VA AM WBA813
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234913A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234913A1.txt
  • INDIANA, STATE OF - HWY DEPT. TOLLGRANGER 05/20/2003 06595.00000 41-43-50.1 N IN MD KSH83 086-03-48.0 W 0001317562 INDIANA, STATE OF - HWY DEPT. TOLLGRANGER 05/20/2003 10553.12500 41-43-50.1 N IN MD KSH83 086-03-48.0 W 0001317562 INDIANA, STATE OF - HWY DEPT. TOLLGRANGER 05/20/2003 10586.25000 41-43-50.1 N IN MD WHC694 084-59-44.8 W 0001317583 INDIANA, STATE OF - HWY DEPT. TOLLFREMONT 05/20/2003 06785.00000 41-44-02.1 N IN MD WHC694 084-59-44.8 W 0001317583 INDIANA, STATE OF - HWY DEPT. TOLLFREMONT 05/20/2003 11405.00000 41-44-02.1 N IN MD WHC777 085-47-36.9 W 0001317592 INDIANA, STATE OF - HWY DEPT. TOLLBRISTOL 05/20/2003 11215.00000 41-44-16.1 N IN MD WHC777 085-47-36.9 W 0001317592 INDIANA, STATE OF - HWY DEPT. TOLLBRISTOL 05/20/2003 11365.00000 41-44-16.1 N IN MD WHC775 087-30-20.2 W 0001317608 INDIANA, STATE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235763A1.txt
  • WI NE 087-48-59.6 W 0001352980 FIRST REFORM CHURCH SHEBOYGAN 06/18/2003 21835.00000 43-43-19.1 N WA NE 122-33-05.0 W 0001354003 Tacoma City of, Department of Public UtiliGig Harrbor 06/19/2003 11683.12500 47-17-04.0 N FL NE P 081-47-00.5 W 0001354065 Naple, City of Naples 06/19/2003 00956.44375 26-00-00.3 N FL NE P 081-47-00.5 W 0001354065 Naple, City of Naples 06/19/2003 00956.44375 26-00-00.3 N TN NE 089-02-02.1 W 0001354518 GIBSON ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORUNION 06/19/2003 00956.44375 36-24-36.9 N IA NE 094-13-41.9 W 0001354629 Corn Belt Power Cooperative HUMBOLDT 06/19/2003 05945.20000 42-44-09.9 N Page 39 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IA NE 093-57-37.9 W 0001354630 Corn Belt Power Cooperative Eagle Grove 06/19/2003
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237403A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237403A1.txt
  • # PET DUE S. P. # 08/05/2003IOWA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. 2 38 VJ 0 0 15 1 08/20/2003 1 08/12/2003 Refiles material to extend promotions. SYNOPSIS ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 08/05/2003NATIONAL EXCHANGE CAR. ASSOC. 1 995 ENG 0 0 15 1 08/20/2003 5 08/12/2003 Revises regulations in Section 2.1.8 related to refusal and discontinuance of service and Section 2.4.1 related to customer deposits and billing disputes. SYNOPSIS ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 08/05/2003VERIZON TELEPHONE COMPANIES 1 350 ENG 0 0 15 1 08/20/2003 21 08/12/2003 Special Construction cases. SYNOPSIS Page 2 of 3 08/07/2003 PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG:08/06/2003 Non
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237593A1.txt
  • CAROLINA RSA #9, INC. LILLINGTON 08/05/2003 06745.00000 35-25-43.0 N WI MD WLW457 088-36-41.7 W 0001407342 WISCONSIN RSA #7 Limited Partnership HORTONVILLE 08/05/2003 02115.20000 44-20-39.2 N WI MD WLW457 088-36-41.7 W 0001407342 WISCONSIN RSA #7 Limited Partnership HORTONVILLE 08/05/2003 06004.50000 44-20-39.2 N WI MD WLW457 088-36-41.7 W 0001407342 WISCONSIN RSA #7 Limited Partnership HORTONVILLE 08/05/2003 06093.45000 44-20-39.2 N CA MD WLU306 117-07-02.1 W 0001407730 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SAN DIEGO 08/06/2003 19565.00000 32-47-26.2 N CA MD WPOR632 117-13-59.1 W 0001407766 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEPERRIS 08/06/2003 11325.00000 33-47-34.0 N OK MD WMQ978 099-05-03.2 W 0001407777 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNTIPTON 08/06/2003 06585.00000 34-30-24.2 N OK MD WMQ978 099-05-03.2 W 0001407777 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNTIPTON 08/06/2003 06605.00000 34-30-24.2 N Page 8 CF - Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238029A1.txt
  • Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OK NE 097-31-36.1 W 0001419404 OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY 08/15/2003 10637.50000 35-28-11.2 N OK NE 097-13-03.4 W 0001419405 OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY 08/15/2003 06628.75000 35-21-43.7 N OK NE 097-13-03.4 W 0001419405 OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY 08/15/2003 10603.75000 35-21-43.7 N OK NE 097-31-02.1 W 0001419413 OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY 08/15/2003 10627.50000 35-28-06.2 N OK NE 097-31-02.1 W 0001419413 OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY 08/15/2003 10647.50000 35-28-06.2 N OK NE 097-40-27.0 W 0001419415 OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY 08/15/2003 06586.25000 35-22-18.0 N OK NE 097-40-27.0 W 0001419415 OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY 08/15/2003 06601.25000 35-22-18.0 N OK NE 097-40-27.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238048A1.pdf
  • are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193-87.199. Harmful Interference includes any interference that "endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services." See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 & 76.613(a). Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channeling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 F.C.C.2d 117, para. 14 (1985). 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.1804(g). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47 C.F.R. �76.613(c). 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238274A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238274A1.pdf
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. ��87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. ��2.1 & 76.613(a). Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 F.C.C.2d 117, para. 14 (1985) [hereinafter MO&O]. 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238934A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238934A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238934A2.txt
  • /Parent 296 0 R /Next 298 0 R >> endobj 298 0 obj << /Title (2 Dynamic Pricing of an Already-Determined Investment and Usage Plan) /Dest [ 58 0 R /XYZ 0 625 null ] /Parent 296 0 R /Prev 297 0 R /First 299 0 R /Last 300 0 R /Count 4 >> endobj 299 0 obj << /Title (2.1 The Economic Depreciation Identity) /Dest [ 61 0 R /XYZ 0 680 null ] /Parent 298 0 R /Next 301 0 R >> endobj 300 0 obj << /Title (2.3 Benchmark Case: Traditional Revenue Recovery versus TELRIC) /Dest [ 70 0 R /XYZ 0 720 null ] /Parent 298 0 R /Prev 301 0 R /First 302 0 R /Last
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238978A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238978A1.pdf
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. ��87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. ��2.1 & 76.613(a). Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 F.C.C.2d 117, para. 14 (1985) [hereinafter MO&O]. 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239429A1.txt
  • CELLULAR OPERATINFOND DU LAC 09/24/2003 06286.19000 43-48-09.0 N MO MD WMJ315 089-56-21.3 W 0001462729 Cellco Partnership PERRYVILLE 09/25/2003 02168.40000 37-38-56.1 N MO MD WMJ315 089-56-21.3 W 0001462729 Cellco Partnership PERRYVILLE 09/25/2003 02178.00000 37-38-56.1 N MO MD WMJ315 089-56-21.3 W 0001462729 Cellco Partnership PERRYVILLE 09/25/2003 06286.19000 37-38-56.1 N MO MD WPQL555 092-31-30.7 W 0001462751 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCCalifornia 09/25/2003 06745.00000 38-37-02.1 N MO MD WPQL555 092-31-30.7 W 0001462751 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCCalifornia 09/25/2003 06835.00000 38-37-02.1 N Page 13 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IA MD WMQ815 095-45-20.0 W 0001462767 USCOC OF IOWA RSA #1, INC. GLENWOOD 09/25/2003 06034.15000 40-57-16.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239684A1.txt
  • (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MO NE 092-41-24.0 W 0001468106 PEARSON BROADCASTING OF LEBANOLEBANON 09/30/2003 00945.00000 37-40-40.0 N NM NE 106-45-41.0 W 0001468138 SUNRISE BROADCASTING INC. Las Cruces 09/30/2003 00949.00000 32-18-04.0 N CA NE 117-40-15.0 W 0001468525 ADELMAN COMMUNICATIONS, INC ridgecrest 09/30/2003 00950.00000 35-38-40.0 N CO NE 107-38-32.0 W 0001468560 WESTERN SLOPE COMMUNICATIONS Silt 09/30/2003 00945.00000 39-32-43.0 N MS NE 089-00-02.1 W 0001468682 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICBILOXI 09/30/2003 00946.87500 30-23-58.7 N CO NE 107-22-46.5 W 0001468762 WESTERN SLOPE COMMUNICATIONS Glenwood Springs 09/30/2003 00950.50000 39-25-30.7 N CO NE 107-52-54.0 W 0001468926 WS COMMUNICATIONS, L.L.C. Montrose 09/30/2003 00951.50000 38-28-34.0 N TX NE 096-21-52.8 W 0001469210 BRAZOS EDUCATIONAL RADIO Bryan 10/01/2003 00949.87500 30-39-03.1 N TX NE 096-21-52.8 W 0001469210 BRAZOS EDUCATIONAL RADIO Bryan 10/01/2003
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239816A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239816A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239816A1.txt
  • Extension of the Digital Television Construction Deadline; and Commercial Television Stations with May 1, 2002, Deadline. SUMMARY: The Commission will consider an Order concerning applications submitted by commercial television stations seeking extensions of the May 1, 2002, deadline for construction of their digital television facilities. 5 WIRELESS TELE-COMMUNICATIONS TITLE: Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands (WT Docket No. 02-353). SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Report and Order concerning licensing, technical and competitive bidding rules for spectrum at 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz allocated for advanced wireless services (AWS). Additional information concerning this meeting may be obtained from Audrey Spivack or David Fiske, Office of Media Relations, (202) 418-0500; TTY 1-888-835-5322. . .
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240030A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240030A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240030A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit SEPARATE STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN MICHAEL K. POWELL Re: Report and Order in the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands (Adopted October 16, 2003). The 90 MHz of additional licensed spectrum made available today is a key building block for the broadband Internet future of licensed wireless service. Across the country, wireless providers -- from Verizon Wireless in Washington DC to Monet Mobile Networks in the Dakotas -- are increasingly utilizing their licensed spectrum holdings to build infrastructure
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240030A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240030A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240030A3.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. COPPS Approving in Part, Concurring in Part October 16, 2003 RE: Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands (Report and Order; WT Doc. No. 02-353). Advanced Wireless Services, such as 3G and IMT-2000, obviously hold tremendous potential for consumers. I join my colleagues and the Bureau in hopes that these service rules and the auction process will bring about a robust and efficient use of this spectrum, which is exactly what we are supposed to be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240030A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240030A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240030A4.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit SEPARATE STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER KEVIN J . MARTIN Re: Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, WT Docket No. 02-353 I am pleased to support this item, which adopts service rules for advanced wireless services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz bands. The flexible rules we adopt allow the two 45 MHz blocks of contiguous spectrum at issue to be used for a range of advanced wireless services. The wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240030A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240030A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240030A5.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit SEPARATE STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER JONATHAN S. ADELSTEIN Re: Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands; WT Docket No. 02-353 Today is a banner day for wireless service in the United States. By adopting service and technical rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz bands, we are moving a step closer to seeing a new generation of wireless services in this country, including the so-called third generation or 3G mobile
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240461A1.txt
  • 00956.39375 32-58-11.6 N TX NE P 097-23-58.6 W 0001490555 TXU Business Services Co. Fort Worth 10/22/2003 00956.39375 32-46-10.2 N Page 28 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE P 097-06-42.1 W 0001490578 TXU Business Services Co. Denton 10/22/2003 00956.39375 33-18-48.6 N TX NE 095-39-02.1 W 0001491075 TEXAS NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANWEST COLUMBIA 10/22/2003 06735.00000 29-08-57.5 N TX NE 095-34-41.1 W 0001491076 TEXAS NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANBRAZORIA 10/22/2003 06755.00000 29-03-44.2 N TX NE 095-34-41.1 W 0001491076 TEXAS NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANBRAZORIA 10/22/2003 06835.00000 29-03-44.2 N TX NE 095-41-14.6 W 0001491077 TEXAS NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANSWEENY 10/22/2003 06595.00000 29-03-20.9 N TX NE 095-26-23.8 W 0001491078 TEXAS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241381A1.txt
  • W 0001516056 BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS OF Baton Rouge 11/14/2003 06345.49000 30-27-47.2 N LA MD WPUT522 091-06-13.8 W 0001516056 BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS OF Baton Rouge 11/14/2003 06375.14000 30-27-47.2 N LA MD WPUT522 091-06-13.8 W 0001516056 BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS OF Baton Rouge 11/14/2003 06404.79000 30-27-47.2 N SC MD WLN627 082-37-15.0 W 0001516087 NEW YORK NEWCO SUBSIDIARY, INC.ANDERSON 11/14/2003 06197.24000 34-34-02.1 N SC MD WLN627 082-37-15.0 W 0001516087 NEW YORK NEWCO SUBSIDIARY, INC.ANDERSON 11/14/2003 06810.00000 34-34-02.1 N SC MD WLN627 082-37-15.0 W 0001516087 NEW YORK NEWCO SUBSIDIARY, INC.ANDERSON 11/14/2003 10735.00000 34-34-02.1 N LA MD KFA80 093-13-49.7 W 0001516251 BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS OF GILLIS 11/14/2003 06197.24000 30-25-59.7 N LA MD KFA80 093-13-49.7 W 0001516251 BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS OF GILLIS 11/14/2003
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242298A1.txt
  • N ME MD WMW420 070-07-59.0 W 0001539072 LEWISTON CELLTELCO PARTNERSHIPLIVERMORE FALLS 12/09/2003 02121.60000 44-28-56.0 N ME MD WMW420 070-07-59.0 W 0001539072 LEWISTON CELLTELCO PARTNERSHIPLIVERMORE FALLS 12/09/2003 06605.00000 44-28-56.0 N ME MD WMW420 070-07-59.0 W 0001539072 LEWISTON CELLTELCO PARTNERSHIPLIVERMORE FALLS 12/09/2003 06640.00000 44-28-56.0 N ME MD WMW420 070-07-59.0 W 0001539072 LEWISTON CELLTELCO PARTNERSHIPLIVERMORE FALLS 12/09/2003 06685.00000 44-28-56.0 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0001539153 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 12/09/2003 02168.40000 46-01-33.2 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0001539153 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 12/09/2003 06745.00000 46-01-33.2 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0001539153 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 12/09/2003 06795.00000 46-01-33.2 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0001539153 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 12/09/2003 06805.00000 46-01-33.2 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242553A1.txt
  • 12/16/2003 11075.00000 40-21-05.9 N PA NE 080-07-37.4 W 0001547774 Cellco Partnership BRIDGEVILLE 12/16/2003 11115.00000 40-21-05.9 N AL NE 087-35-12.5 W 0001548686 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY LLC GREENSBORO 12/17/2003 06660.62500 32-43-16.4 N PA NE 075-10-16.6 W 0001548785 PHILLY SPORTS WIRELESS PHILADELPHIA 12/17/2003 10955.00000 39-54-16.4 N CA NE 121-02-27.0 W 0001549877 GTE Mobilnet of California Limited PartneSan Lucas 12/17/2003 10552.50000 36-07-15.2 N WY NE 108-51-02.1 W 0001550347 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY INC CODY 12/18/2003 10621.25000 44-35-09.8 N WY NE 108-45-06.6 W 0001550396 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY INC POWELL 12/18/2003 10556.25000 44-45-04.3 N OH NE 082-47-58.0 W 0001550756 MINFORD CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMRICHMONDALE 12/18/2003 06795.00000 39-08-51.0 N TX NE 098-19-13.0 W 0001550895 San Antonio MTA, LP Elmendorf 12/18/2003 05974.85000 29-15-34.0 N Page 22 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242679A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242679A1.txt
  • Latitude City IL AM 089-49-49.0 W 0001562059 Centurion Investments, Inc., d/b/a AVMATSMascoutah 01/02/2004 00122.95000 38-33-26.0 N IL AM 089-49-49.0 W 0001562059 Centurion Investments, Inc., d/b/a AVMATSMascoutah 01/02/2004 00122.95000 38-33-26.0 N TX NE 101-42-57.2 W 0001559568 HUTCHERSON AIR SERVICE INC Plainview 12/15/2003 00123.00000 34-10-35.1 N IL NE 089-49-49.0 W 0001562059 Centurion Investments, Inc., d/b/a AVMATSMascoutah 12/30/2003 00122.95000 38-33-26.0 N CO NE 106-03-02.1 W 0001563115 CITY OF MONTE VISTA MONTE VISTA 12/31/2003 00122.80000 37-32-00.0 N RO KLV7 0001559472 NASSAU COUNTY OF 12/29/2003 Page 1 AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO WDB9 0001560044 FORT COLLINS AND LOVELAND, CITIES OF 12/29/2003 RO KQA4 0001560582 ENGELS AIRCRAFT INC 12/23/2003
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243069A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243069A1.txt
  • GEORGE P 01/14/2004 00466.45000 Page 22 IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MS AM 091-19-38.6 W 0001459750 ADAMS, GEORGE P NATCHEZ 01/14/2004 00461.45000 31-30-19.4 N NC MD WNRM610 077-46-56.0 W 0001575349 METROCALL USA INC ROCKY MOUNT 01/12/2004 00152.48000 35-54-11.0 N PA NE 078-15-02.1 W 0001574648 Pennsel Communications Services Inc Sandy Ridge 01/09/2004 00152.48000 40-46-42.2 N RO WNNM327 0001577262 SPECTRUM COMMUNICATIONS INC 01/07/2004 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NV AM WNTS681 116-11-15.3 W 0001517556 NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION CARLIN 01/15/2004 17720.00000 40-46-54.7 N NV AM WNTS416 116-18-38.3 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243261A1.txt
  • DVDs have made significant impact on the home video market. In the first half of 2003 alone, equipment manufacturers sold 10.3 million DVD players. The newest home video technology is the personal video recorder (``PVR''). Introduced in 1999, PVRs may be purchased from and subscription obtained through an MVPD or directly from a PVR service operator. Currently, there are approximately 2.1 million PVRs in use, as measured by PVR subscriptions. Electric and Gas Utilities: In 1994, some utilities were engaged in the provision of video services through overbuilding incumbent cable systems, though such activity was very limited. Section 103 of the Communications Act, enacted as part of the 1996 Act, removed a significant regulatory barrier that had deterred registered public utility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243416A1.txt
  • Other DBS 45cm dB 20.7 20 25.84 25.84 C/I Other DBS 30 cm dB 20.7 20 25.84 25.84 Feeder Link C/(N+I) dB 24.2 26.2 24.2 26.2 Overall C/(N+I) 45 cm Margin 45 cm 45 cm Overall C/(N+I) 30 cm Margin 30 cm 30 cm dB 12.36 12.35 12.82 12.94 dB 7.36 6.25 7.82 6.84 dB 7.1 1 7.1 1 dB 2.1 1 1.01 7.24 2.24 7.27 1.17 4 n . & CERTIFICATION OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING ENGINEERING INFORMATION SUBMITTED WITH THESE COMMENTS I hereby certify that I am the technically qualified person responsible for preparation of the engineering information submitted with these Comments, that I am familiar with Part 25 of the Commission's Rules, that I have either prepared or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243431A1.txt
  • CA). The Satellite Control Center will be located in Gibraltar. 4 Representative Link Budget Data Rate Modulation Link budget for USAT-S 1 I I I Mbps 27.647 27.647 4PSK 4PSK Beam Peak EIRP Downlink Location Downlink Pattern Gain DBW 54.0 54.0 Washington DC Washington DC DB -1.0 -1.0 C/N system DB C/N Margin DB Detailed Technical Description 7.8 9.1 0.8 2.1 Annex A, attached to this Appendix, provides the ITU Appendix 4 information required by Appendix 30 to modify the Region 2 BSS Plan and that required by Appendix 30A to modify the Region 2 Feeder Link Plan. This information was submitted to the ITU by the UK administration, and received by the Radiocommunication Bureau ("BR") on 712710 1 . Analysis
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243654A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243654A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243654A1.txt
  • lines in 2002. In 2002, the level of customer dissatisfaction with residential repairs declined for all but one reporting holding company, and the level of customer dissatisfaction with residential installations declined for two out of the four reporting holding companies. Average residential installation intervals for individual operating entities ranged from a low of 0.5 business days to a high of 2.1 business days in 2002, as compared to a low of 0.6 business days and a high of 3.2 business days in 2001. The report is available for reference in the FCC's Reference Information Center, Courtyard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W. Copies may be purchased by calling Qualex International at (202) 863-2893. The report can be downloaded from the FCC-State Link
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243667A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243667A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243667A1.txt
  • to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------- Subject: In the Matter of the Amendment of Section 2.106 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum at 2 GHz for use by the Mobile-Satellite Service (ET Docket No. 95-18) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands (WT Docket No. 02-353) Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems (ET Docket No. 00-258) Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L-Band,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243775A1.txt
  • MD WMK684 066-05-09.9 W 0001609042 SAN JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COSAN JUAN 02/06/2004 10658.12500 18-27-46.6 N PR MD WMK684 066-05-09.9 W 0001609042 SAN JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COSAN JUAN 02/06/2004 10755.00000 18-27-46.6 N PR MD WMK684 066-05-09.9 W 0001609042 SAN JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COSAN JUAN 02/06/2004 11485.00000 18-27-46.6 N CA MD WPNC967 117-03-36.1 W 0001609182 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC ESCONDIDO 02/06/2004 10637.50000 33-08-02.1 N Page 18 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WPNC967 117-03-36.1 W 0001609182 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC ESCONDIDO 02/06/2004 10646.25000 33-08-02.1 N PR MD WPNG858 066-03-47.4 W 0001609224 SAN JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COSAN JUAN 02/06/2004 10633.12500 18-19-51.1 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243941A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243941A1.txt
  • from competing effectively with incumbent DBS systems. In this spacing environment, existing DBS systems would also suffer certain operational constraints. In contrast, as the analysis below shows, new entrants operating 6" from existing DBS systems would be able to operate at similar power levels, with similar interference protection, and would be able to provide similar data rates. 2. TECHNICAL ANALYSIS 2.1 General Amroach This Technical Appendix examines the competing approaches for DBS reduced orbital spacing presented by DirecTV' and EchoStar3 in their request for rulemaking and comments on the Commission's Public Notice, respectively. Below, New Skies first addresses the DirecTV approach, which provides incumbent systems with fixed protection criteria and proposes a fixed interference level for new entrant satellites less than
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244685A1.txt
  • CA). The Satellite Control Center will be located in Gibraltar. 4 Representative Link Budget Data Rate Modulation Link budget for USAT-S 1 I I I Mbps 27.647 27.647 4PSK 4PSK Beam Peak EIRP Downlink Location Downlink Pattern Gain DBW 54.0 54.0 Washington DC Washington DC DB -1.0 -1.0 C/N system DB C/N Margin DB Detailed Technical Description 7.8 9.1 0.8 2.1 Annex A, attached to this Appendix, provides the ITU Appendix 4 information required by Appendix 30 to modify the Region 2 BSS Plan and that required by Appendix 30A to modify the Region 2 Feeder Link Plan. This information was submitted to the ITU by the UK administration, and received by the Radiocommunication Bureau ("BR") on 712710 1 . Analysis
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244756A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244756A1.txt
  • 116-57-15.0 W 0001533815 Los Angeles SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHEMET 03/02/2004 10658.75000 33-49-38.0 N CA AM WLV885 116-57-15.0 W 0001533815 Los Angeles SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHEMET 03/02/2004 19645.00000 33-49-38.0 N CA AM WLV885 116-57-15.0 W 0001533815 Los Angeles SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHEMET 03/02/2004 19645.00000 33-49-38.0 N CA AM WLV885 116-57-15.0 W 0001533815 Los Angeles SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHEMET 03/02/2004 19645.00000 33-49-38.0 N ME AM WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0001539153 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 03/04/2004 02168.40000 46-01-33.2 N ME AM WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0001539153 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 03/04/2004 06152.75000 46-01-33.2 N Page 5 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City ME AM WMS772 068-15-02.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245058A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245058A1.txt
  • 0001649828 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEVALLEJO 03/10/2004 17925.00000 38-04-01.2 N CA NE 122-14-16.7 W 0001650809 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEVALLEJO 03/11/2004 19485.00000 38-05-31.0 N CA NE 122-46-10.5 W 0001652301 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1KELSEYVILLE 03/11/2004 06645.00000 38-59-22.2 N CA NE 120-03-51.0 W 0001652547 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTETRUCKEE 03/11/2004 10556.25000 39-22-50.3 N CA NE 121-38-11.6 W 0001653735 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEWATSONVILLE 03/12/2004 19345.00000 36-51-02.1 N CA NE 122-23-23.2 W 0001653910 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTELAKEHEAD 03/12/2004 17885.00000 40-54-57.5 N AZ NE 112-12-31.0 W 0001653954 CNG COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PHOENIX 03/12/2004 17880.00000 33-27-04.0 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD KNKA209 117-27-21.0 W 0001645123 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEFontana 03/08/2004 34-05-12.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245474A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245474A1.txt
  • days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------- Subject: In the Matter of Revision of the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility With Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems (CC Docket No. 94-102) Filed By: -Ari Q. Fitzgerald, Attorney for Onstar Corporation on 03/12/04 Subject: In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands (WT Docket No. 02-353) Filed By: -David L. Nace for Rural Cellular Association on 03/08/04 -Cheryl A. Tritt for T-Mobile USA, Inc. on 03/08/04 -Andrew Kreig for the Wireless Communications Association International, Inc. on 03/08/04 -Steve C. Hillard for Council Tree Communications, Inc. on 03/08/04 -Terry G. Mahn for Powerwave Technologies Inc. on 03/08/04 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------- PUBLIC NOTICE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245582A1.txt
  • N WI MD WLU542 091-11-21.0 W 0001670157 LACROSSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE COLACROSSE 03/24/2004 06152.75000 43-49-01.0 N Page 9 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WI MD WLU542 091-11-21.0 W 0001670157 LACROSSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE COLACROSSE 03/24/2004 06865.00000 43-49-01.0 N PR MD WPVC723 066-52-02.1 W 0001670182 Centennial Puerto Rico License Corp. Lares 03/24/2004 11667.50000 18-18-21.0 N WI MD WLW436 087-59-07.0 W 0001670334 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATINMILWAUKEE 03/24/2004 05945.20000 43-04-06.0 N WI MD WLW436 087-59-07.0 W 0001670334 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATINMILWAUKEE 03/24/2004 06152.75000 43-04-06.0 N WI MD WLW436 087-59-07.0 W 0001670334 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATINMILWAUKEE 03/24/2004 10875.00000 43-04-06.0 N WI MD WLW436 087-59-07.0 W 0001670334
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245856A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245856A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Orangeburg 03/31/2004 00947.00000 33-33-10.5 N SC MD WMU362 080-49-29.3 W 0001679341 MILLER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Orangeburg 03/31/2004 00947.15000 33-33-10.5 N SC MD WPTR217 080-49-29.3 W 0001679355 MILLER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Orangeburg 03/31/2004 00945.00000 33-33-10.5 N SC MD WMU363 080-49-29.3 W 0001679369 MILLER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Orangeburg 03/31/2004 00951.50000 33-33-10.5 N IL NE 089-55-34.3 W 0001676939 VIRDEN BROADCASTING CORP. KEWANEE 03/30/2004 00951.00000 41-14-02.1 N GA NE 083-53-47.0 W 0001677043 THE BROADCASTERS CLUB FORT VALLEY 03/30/2004 00947.75000 32-32-21.4 N MA NE 072-31-26.3 W 0001677566 SAGA COMMUNICATIONS OF NEW ENGEast Longmeadow 03/30/2004 00945.00000 42-04-25.3 N MA NE 072-42-15.0 W 0001677711 SAGA COMMUNICATIONS OF NEW ENGFeeding Hills 03/30/2004 00949.00000 42-05-06.0 N MA NE 072-42-15.0 W 0001677981 SAGA COMMUNICATIONS OF NEW ENGFeeding Hills 03/30/2004 00949.00000 42-05-06.0 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246057A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246057A1.txt
  • of Dallas Dallas 04/06/2004 00121.70000 32-40-41.8 N TX NE 096-52-11.3 W 0001686871 City of Dallas Dallas 04/06/2004 00126.35000 32-40-41.8 N TX NE 096-52-11.3 W 0001686871 City of Dallas Dallas 04/06/2004 00257.80000 32-40-41.8 N FL NE 081-22-06.2 W 0001687532 Florida Hospital Orlando 04/07/2004 00123.05000 28-34-31.0 N IL NE 089-22-25.6 W 0001687622 Greenville Airport Authority greenville 04/07/2004 00123.05000 38-50-05.0 N CO NE 105-52-02.1 W 0001689593 San Luis Valley Regional Airport Board of Alamosa 04/08/2004 00122.80000 37-26-12.0 N CA NE 121-50-34.6 W 0001691230 Aeronautical Radio Inc Monterey 04/09/2004 00136.85000 36-35-13.1 N CA NE 119-50-25.3 W 0001691238 Aeronautical Radio Inc Santa Barbara 04/09/2004 00136.85000 34-25-34.4 N Page 2 AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246534A1.txt
  • SERVICES, INC.MARLETTE 04/21/2004 00931.33750 43-22-51.0 N MI RM KNKO294 083-10-35.7 W 0001704627 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.MELVINDALE 04/21/2004 00931.33750 42-16-12.1 N MI RM KNKO294 084-12-57.9 W 0001704627 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.MIDLAND 04/21/2004 00931.33750 43-37-09.0 N MI RM KNKO294 084-15-35.9 W 0001704627 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.MIDLAND 04/21/2004 00931.33750 43-38-06.0 N MI RM KNKO294 083-41-06.7 W 0001704627 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.MILAN 04/21/2004 00931.33750 42-02-02.1 N MI RM KNKO294 083-34-16.7 W 0001704627 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.MILFORD 04/21/2004 00931.33750 42-33-38.1 N MI RM KNKO294 083-32-11.7 W 0001704627 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.MILFORD 04/21/2004 00931.33750 42-39-38.1 N MI RM KNKO294 082-54-08.7 W 0001704627 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.MT. CLEMENS 04/21/2004 00931.33750 42-32-39.1 N MI RM KNKO294 084-46-18.0 W 0001704627 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.MT. PLEASANT 04/21/2004 00931.33750 43-33-38.1 N MI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246891A1.txt
  • NE 148-24-02.0 W 0001715788 Arctic Slope Telephone Association CoopeDeadhorse 04/28/2004 18000.00000 70-13-37.0 N CA NE 117-31-48.9 W 0001717456 Nextel of California, Inc Rancho Cucamonga 04/29/2004 11365.00000 34-06-01.3 N NH NE 071-10-55.0 W 0001717541 NH #1 RURAL CELLULAR, INC. BERLIN 04/29/2004 10618.12500 44-30-21.0 N NH NE 071-12-47.1 W 0001717601 NH #1 RURAL CELLULAR, INC. Gorham 04/29/2004 10553.12500 44-22-15.8 N CA NE 117-30-02.1 W 0001717704 Nextel of California, Inc Fontana 04/29/2004 10875.00000 34-05-19.0 N PR NE 066-24-07.6 W 0001718303 SAN JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COSANTA ISABEL 04/29/2004 10587.50000 17-57-13.3 N PR NE 066-46-35.5 W 0001718905 SAN JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COHATILLO 04/30/2004 06685.00000 18-23-58.3 N PR NE 066-33-55.1 W 0001719019 SAN JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COFLORIDA 04/30/2004 10572.50000 18-21-55.5 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247368A1.txt
  • Rock 05/11/2004 00945.00000 34-45-42.0 N TX AM WLF352 095-27-47.5 W 0001668341 AMFM TEXAS LICENSES LIMITED PARTHOUSTON 05/14/2004 00946.50000 29-44-02.6 N TX AM WME826 102-21-24.5 W 0001668395 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPODESSA 05/14/2004 00948.37500 31-51-29.5 N TX AM WME826 102-21-24.5 W 0001668395 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPODESSA 05/14/2004 00948.62500 31-51-29.5 N IL AM WQAE562 089-55-34.3 W 0001676939 VIRDEN BROADCASTING CORP. KEWANEE 05/14/2004 00951.00000 41-14-02.1 N WV MD WLG488 079-57-24.2 W 0001730952 BOWERS BROADCASTING CORPORATMORGANTOWN 05/10/2004 00950.37500 39-37-47.2 N WV MD WLG488 079-57-24.2 W 0001730952 BOWERS BROADCASTING CORPORATMORGANTOWN 05/10/2004 00950.62500 39-37-47.2 N PA MD WMW685 080-05-09.0 W 0001732684 NM LICENSING, LLC Erie 05/11/2004 00950.00000 42-07-40.0 N MI MD WHG313 084-31-55.0 W 0001733484 RUBBER CITY RADIO GROUP Holt 05/12/2004 00947.50000 42-39-16.0 N OH MD WMU393 083-01-17.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247633A1.txt
  • Meeteetse 05/19/2004 06795.62500 44-05-36.1 N WY NE 108-40-23.5 W 0001742376 Colorado Interstate Gas Meeteetse 05/19/2004 06845.62500 44-05-36.1 N CA NE 116-56-06.6 W 0001742546 Mabuchi Design and Engineering LLC San Diego 05/19/2004 22485.75000 32-33-22.6 N MA NE 071-01-59.0 W 0001742594 The Stop & Shop Companies Braintree 05/19/2004 19480.00000 42-12-17.0 N CA NE 117-02-46.3 W 0001742599 Uniradio Corp. San Diego 05/19/2004 22464.75000 32-33-02.1 N MA NE 071-00-10.0 W 0001742636 The Stop & Shop Supermarket CompanyQuincy 05/19/2004 19600.00000 42-15-02.0 N MA NE 071-02-54.0 W 0001742715 The Stop & Shop Supermarket CompanyQUINCY 05/19/2004 06256.54000 42-14-49.0 N MA NE 071-02-54.0 W 0001742715 The Stop & Shop Supermarket CompanyQUINCY 05/19/2004 18040.00000 42-14-49.0 N MA NE 071-02-40.0 W 0001742752 The Stop & Shop Supermarket CompanyWEST BRIDGEWAT 05/19/2004 06004.50000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247892A1.txt
  • FIBERTOWER CORPORATION DENVER 05/24/2004 17920.00000 39-39-13.5 N CO NE 104-59-30.8 W 0001747746 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION DENVER 05/24/2004 18000.00000 39-39-13.5 N CO NE 104-59-30.8 W 0001747746 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION DENVER 05/24/2004 18120.00000 39-39-13.5 N CO NE 104-59-02.0 W 0001747749 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION ENGLEWOOD 05/24/2004 19360.00000 39-37-11.6 N PR NE 065-52-37.0 W 0001748111 CENTENNIAL PUERTO RICO LICENSE CSTA. ELENA 05/25/2004 06402.32000 18-02-30.0 N PR NE 066-33-02.1 W 0001748136 CENTENNIAL PUERTO RICO LICENSE CPonce 05/25/2004 11667.50000 18-03-52.9 N PR NE 066-43-03.0 W 0001748162 CENTENNIAL PUERTO RICO LICENSE CARECIBO CELLULA 05/25/2004 11632.50000 18-25-25.0 N PR NE 066-21-36.6 W 0001748378 CENTENNIAL PUERTO RICO LICENSE CLa Ciudad de los Po 05/25/2004 11622.50000 18-01-37.5 N PR NE 066-21-36.6 W 0001748378 CENTENNIAL PUERTO RICO LICENSE CLa Ciudad de los Po 05/25/2004 11667.50000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248267A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248267A1.txt
  • the ITFS label for ITFS licenses and operations. The Order also expands the original MDS-ITFS band by adding to it five megahertz of additional spectrum from below 2500 MHz, which increases the total size of the band to 194 megahertz. This will provide room for the future relocation of MDS Channels 1 and 2, which are presently located in the 2.1 GHz band. The Order retains the existing eligibility rules for ITFS spectrum. Therefore, ITFS licenses in the new band plan will continue to be subject to existing rules that limit eligibility for licensing to qualified educational institutions. The Order also allows ITFS licensees to lease spectrum to BRS providers, provided they comply with existing educational content requirements, and grandfathers all
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249123A1.txt
  • W 0001781368 MONROE, COUNTY OF Monroe 06/22/2004 06621.25000 41-53-37.5 N MI NE 083-23-43.2 W 0001781368 MONROE, COUNTY OF Monroe 06/22/2004 06635.62500 41-53-37.5 N MI NE 083-34-53.8 W 0001781369 MONROE, COUNTY OF DUNDEE 06/22/2004 06795.62500 41-58-08.2 N MI NE 083-34-53.8 W 0001781369 MONROE, COUNTY OF DUNDEE 06/22/2004 06806.25000 41-58-08.2 N OK NE 095-55-23.0 W 0001781495 Tulsa Technology Center Tulsa 06/22/2004 19360.00000 36-04-02.1 N OK NE 095-55-23.0 W 0001781495 Tulsa Technology Center Tulsa 06/22/2004 19480.00000 36-04-02.1 N OK NE 095-55-23.0 W 0001781495 Tulsa Technology Center Tulsa 06/22/2004 19600.00000 36-04-02.1 N OK NE 095-55-23.0 W 0001781495 Tulsa Technology Center Tulsa 06/22/2004 19680.00000 36-04-02.1 N OK NE 095-58-38.4 W 0001781511 Tulsa Technology Center Tulsa 06/22/2004 17840.00000 36-12-38.5 N OK NE 095-58-52.5 W 0001781524 Tulsa Technology
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 91.9 98.0 102.1 81.7 118.1 98.0 125.6 4.3 Taiwan 82.4 88.7 93.9 108.5 112.2 139.1 152.9 121.8 167.0 170.5 162.6 4.2 Thailand 15.8 18.9 22.6 26.3 29.7 26.3 32.2 23.5 25.6 30.2 32.4 2.7 Turkey 16.0 16.8 17.8 21.1 25.9 25.0 28.4 27.0 25.9 24.6 30.3 1.4 United Kingdom 501.6 546.7 590.0 690.7 737.7 945.51,175.21,119.11,001.91,351.71,370.0 6.4 Viet Nam 0.4 1.0 2.1 3.1 5.2 4.1 4.5 7.4 4.5 5.0 4.7 1.5 Total for Countries Shown Above 4,564.34,903.45,418.66,060.87,219.97,880.88,865.79,550.211,520.612,049.812,153.4 9.8% Total for Other Countries 805.5 882.7 966.3 989.71,073.21,289.31,332.81,214.81,367.61,428.21,523.4 3.4 Total for All Countries 5,369.75,786.06,384.97,050.68,293.29,170.010,198.510,765.012,888.213,478.013,676.8 9.0 Total for 5 Largest Routes 58.5%58.5%58.3%59.7%62.6%62.1%62.0%63.2%65.3%66.3%61.9% Canada, India Mexico, Philippines 50.4%50.5%50.7%52.3%55.9%55.8%56.2%58.0%60.9%61.4%54.4% and UK as Percent of Total Other Countries Shown 34.6%34.2%34.2%33.7%31.2%30.2%30.7%30.7%28.5%28.0%34.5% Above as Percent of Total Countries not Shown
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249318A1.txt
  • BROADCASTINHartford 06/30/2004 00946.00000 41-46-18.8 N CT MD WDT928 072-41-59.8 W 0001791242 CONNECTICUT PUBLIC BROADCASTINHartford 06/30/2004 00946.00000 41-46-18.8 N PA MD WLP410 078-24-01.1 W 0001791247 FOREVER BROADCASTING, LLC ALTOONA 06/30/2004 00946.50000 40-27-18.1 N Page 3 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA MD WPNF736 080-19-02.1 W 0001791305 FOREVER BROADCASTING, LLC New Castle 06/30/2004 00950.37500 40-57-14.3 N PA MD WPNF736 080-19-02.1 W 0001791305 FOREVER BROADCASTING, LLC New Castle 06/30/2004 00950.50000 40-57-14.3 N PA MD WPNF736 080-19-02.1 W 0001791305 FOREVER BROADCASTING, LLC New Castle 06/30/2004 00950.62500 40-57-14.3 N TX MD WFD564 097-45-36.6 W 0001792297 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPAUSTIN 07/01/2004 00947.00000 30-13-34.8 N CA MD WPOQ919 121-56-49.8 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249632A1.txt
  • BLUFF ENTERPRISES GREEN FOREST 07/06/2004 00950.50000 36-45-59.0 N MO NE 090-28-52.0 W 0001796940 P.M. BROADCASTING, INC GREEN FOREST 07/06/2004 00950.50000 36-45-59.0 N MA NE 072-31-45.3 W 0001797762 UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST 07/07/2004 00946.87500 42-22-54.3 N TX NE 095-33-14.8 W 0001798282 EAST TEXAS BROADCASTING, INC. PARIS 07/07/2004 00944.50000 33-38-07.3 N OK NE 099-23-31.4 W 0001798815 SHAFFER COMMUNICATIONS GROUP WOODWARD 07/07/2004 00949.00000 36-26-02.1 N IN NE 086-13-18.0 W 0001799254 HOOSIER BROADCASTING CORPORATION INDIANAPOLIS 07/08/2004 00947.00000 39-55-12.0 N MA NE 072-39-25.2 W 0001799941 P. & M. RADIO, LLC SHELBURNE 07/08/2004 00951.00000 42-34-46.7 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA AM WPNG850 122-11-00.8 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249855A1.txt
  • (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL MD KNKA253 081-27-09.0 W 0001810637 Orlando SMSA Limited Partnership ORLANDO 07/16/2004 28-30-23.0 N GS - Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City LA NE WQAQ561 090-14-58.5 W 0001802449 QR3 SECURITY INC. KENNER 07/12/2004 00929.08750 30-01-12.9 N MS NE WQAQ561 090-08-02.1 W 0001802449 QR3 SECURITY INC. RIDGELAND 07/12/2004 00929.08750 32-23-58.3 N CA NE WQAQ561 118-20-45.4 W 0001802449 QR3 SECURITY INC. TORRANCE 07/12/2004 00929.08750 33-49-51.2 N IA NE WQAQ561 093-46-33.3 W 0001802449 QR3 SECURITY INC. WEST DES MOINES 07/12/2004 00929.08750 41-35-04.7 N GX - SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250187A1.txt
  • Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WI AM WHA818 087-57-57.2 W 0001484498 MILWAUKEE RADIO ALLIANCE, LLC MILWAUKEE 07/23/2004 00949.50000 43-05-24.0 N PR AM 066-56-37.0 W 0001718054 JOSE J. ARZUAGA Quebradillas 07/21/2004 00951.37500 18-29-16.0 N PA AM WLP410 078-24-01.1 W 0001791247 FOREVER BROADCASTING, LLC ALTOONA 07/19/2004 00946.50000 40-27-18.1 N PA AM WPNF736 080-19-02.1 W 0001791305 FOREVER BROADCASTING, LLC New Castle 07/19/2004 00950.37500 40-57-14.3 N PA AM WPNF736 080-19-02.1 W 0001791305 FOREVER BROADCASTING, LLC New Castle 07/19/2004 00950.50000 40-57-14.3 N PA AM WPNF736 080-19-02.1 W 0001791305 FOREVER BROADCASTING, LLC New Castle 07/19/2004 00950.62500 40-57-14.3 N Page 2 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250835A1.txt
  • SAN FRANCISCO 08/05/2004 21975.00000 37-45-24.4 N CA MD WCP806 122-24-14.7 W 0001830999 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO 08/05/2004 22085.00000 37-45-24.4 N Page 30 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI NE 083-40-11.2 W 0001825505 GENESEE COUNTY 911 FLINT 07/30/2004 06621.25000 43-05-02.1 N MI NE 083-40-11.2 W 0001825505 GENESEE COUNTY 911 FLINT 07/30/2004 06626.25000 43-05-02.1 N MI NE 083-40-11.2 W 0001825505 GENESEE COUNTY 911 FLINT 07/30/2004 06631.25000 43-05-02.1 N MI NE 083-40-11.2 W 0001825505 GENESEE COUNTY 911 FLINT 07/30/2004 06636.25000 43-05-02.1 N MI NE 083-40-11.2 W 0001825505 GENESEE COUNTY 911 FLINT 07/30/2004 06655.62500 43-05-02.1 N MI NE 083-40-11.2 W 0001825505 GENESEE COUNTY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252367A1.txt
  • Applicant Name Latitude City MI AM P 083-25-01.0 W 0001860794 Alternative Avionics Waterford 09/17/2004 00128.82500 - 00132.00000 42-39-09.0 N CA AM WAL2 117-11-22.8 W 0001872417 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC SAN DIEGO 09/16/2004 00131.62500 32-34-00.8 N CA MD WOJ2 120-24-48.7 W 0001870385 TUOLUMNE, COUNTY OF COLUMBIA 09/14/2004 00122.97500 38-01-44.7 N TX MD KSK7 097-49-44.1 W 0001872430 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC KILLEEN 09/15/2004 00131.95000 31-04-02.1 N NJ MD WPK8 074-09-59.5 W 0001873189 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC NEWARK 09/16/2004 00131.20000 40-40-06.4 N OH MD WQAI204 081-26-32.8 W 0001873227 Aeronautical Radio Inc Akron 09/16/2004 00130.70000 40-54-58.7 N Page 1 AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI NE 083-15-59.8 W 0001874456 MAYFIELD TOWNSHIP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252663A1.txt
  • N CA RM KNKA209 116-35-41.1 W 0001879300 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEBAKER 09/22/2004 35-27-10.9 N CA RM KNKA209 116-19-43.1 W 0001879300 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEBAKER 09/22/2004 35-45-58.9 N CA RM KNKA209 116-19-43.1 W 0001879300 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEBAKER 09/22/2004 35-45-58.9 N CA RM KNKA209 116-53-37.1 W 0001879300 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEBANNING 09/22/2004 33-56-38.1 N CA RM KNKA209 117-02-02.1 W 0001879300 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEBarstow 09/22/2004 34-54-03.9 N CA RM KNKA209 116-44-50.1 W 0001879300 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEBARSTOW 09/22/2004 35-14-23.9 N CA RM KNKA209 117-02-57.0 W 0001879300 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEBERNARDINO 09/22/2004 34-51-20.0 N CA RM KNKA209 116-42-31.0 W 0001879300 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEBIG BEAR CITY 09/22/2004 34-11-32.0 N CA RM KNKA209 116-54-45.1 W 0001879300
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252907A1.txt
  • 10/01/2004 06725.00000 37-15-20.0 N OR AM KOV94 122-32-50.3 W 0001730647 Portland General Electric HAPPY VALLEY 09/27/2004 17960.00000 45-27-07.4 N OR AM WPWG951 122-24-56.7 W 0001730665 Portland General Electric Gresham 09/27/2004 19520.00000 45-30-10.2 N CA AM 116-56-06.6 W 0001742546 Mabuchi Design and Engineering LLC San Diego 09/29/2004 22485.75000 32-33-22.6 N CA AM 117-02-46.3 W 0001742599 Uniradio Corp. San Diego 09/29/2004 22464.75000 32-33-02.1 N MA AM 071-02-54.0 W 0001742715 The Stop & Shop Supermarket CompanyQUINCY 10/01/2004 06256.54000 42-14-49.0 N MA AM 071-02-54.0 W 0001742715 The Stop & Shop Supermarket CompanyQUINCY 09/22/2004 06256.54000 42-14-49.0 N MA AM 071-02-54.0 W 0001742715 The Stop & Shop Supermarket CompanyQUINCY 10/01/2004 17920.00000 42-14-49.0 N Page 20 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253130A1.txt
  • The Federal Communications Commission today allocated spectrum to allow Federal operations to be cleared from spectrum that has been allocated for advanced wireless services (AWS), including third generation wireless (3G) systems. This action is an important step towards the future auction of 90 MHz of spectrum for AWS. The Commission previously allocated the 1710-1755 MHz (1.7 GHz) and 2110-2155 MHz (2.1 GHz) bands for AWS. The 1.7 GHz band was transferred from the Federal Government for private sector use, but Federal operations at certain locations were to remain in this spectrum indefinitely. The U.S. Department of Commerce's National Telecommunications and Information Administration (``NTIA''), working with the Department of Defense and other Federal agencies, developed a set of proposals to clear this
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254574A1.txt
  • N CA MD WAW501 120-57-27.7 W 0001940085 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPMODESTO 11/16/2004 00951.00000 37-40-12.7 N CA MD WLI637 120-57-27.8 W 0001940122 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPMODESTO 11/16/2004 00946.50000 37-40-12.7 N MO MD WGX214 094-32-48.8 W 0001942584 CALVARY BIBLE COLLEGE Kansas City 11/17/2004 00948.00000 38-50-19.0 N WA MD WPXI260 122-57-14.4 W 0001944199 CHEHALIS VALLEY EDUCATIONAL FOUChehalis 11/19/2004 00947.00000 46-41-28.3 N MS NE 089-00-02.1 W 0001937602 GOLDEN GULF COAST BROADCASTINGBiloxi 11/15/2004 00946.00000 30-23-58.7 N KY NE 085-14-47.0 W 0001938336 CBC OF MARION COUNTY, INC LEBANON 11/15/2004 00951.00000 37-35-55.0 N AZ NE 112-28-54.4 W 0001938984 PAYNE-PRESCOTT BROADCASTING CPRESCOTT 11/09/2004 00949.50000 34-32-32.5 N TX NE 097-30-28.7 W 0001939158 WORLD RADIO NETWORK, INC. Brownsville 11/16/2004 00947.00000 25-53-48.9 N NC NE 080-51-19.3 W 0001939188 INFINITY RADIO HOLDINGS, INC.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254883A1.txt
  • 149-42-32.8 W 0001813544 Chugach Electric Association Inc. ANCHORAGE 11/23/2004 06785.00000 61-06-17.0 N AK AM WNTQ274 149-42-32.8 W 0001813544 Chugach Electric Association Inc. ANCHORAGE 11/23/2004 06855.00000 61-06-17.0 N AK AM WNTQ274 149-42-32.8 W 0001813544 Chugach Electric Association Inc. ANCHORAGE 11/23/2004 10551.25000 61-06-17.0 N AK AM WNTQ274 149-42-32.8 W 0001813544 Chugach Electric Association Inc. ANCHORAGE 11/23/2004 10581.25000 61-06-17.0 N MA AM WPJC378 071-07-02.1 W 0001815615 LESLEY COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE 11/23/2004 17880.00000 42-22-49.3 N MA AM WPJC379 071-07-07.1 W 0001815632 LESLEY COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE 11/23/2004 19440.00000 42-23-15.3 N MD AM KOR38 077-08-51.9 W 0001857024 WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COMPANYROCKVILLE 11/24/2004 06625.00000 39-06-02.4 N MD AM KOR38 077-08-51.9 W 0001857024 WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COMPANYROCKVILLE 11/24/2004 06631.25000 39-06-02.4 N VA AM WPNN892 077-19-31.9 W 0001857035 WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COMPANYHERNDON
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255125A1.pdf
  • permit for a new station for QUINCY, IL on channel 25, Effective Radiated Power .8, coordinates NL 39 deg 58 min 19 sec WL 91 deg 19 min 39 sec, as amended. VENTURE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, LLC W25DK 128322 BNPTTL-20000831AVU IL , WINSLOW CHAN-20 E AZ Construction permit for a new station for WINSLOW, AZ on channel 20, Effective Radiated Power 2.1, coordinates NL 34 deg 58 min 16 sec WL 110 deg 39 min 5 sec, as amended. KUSK, LLC K20IH 128386 BNPTT-20000831AXM AZ , HATTIESBURG CHAN-10 E MS Construction permit for a new station for HATTIESBURG, MS on channel 10, Effective Radiated Power 3.0, coordinates NL 31 deg 20 min 30 sec WL 85 deg 37 min 20 sec, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255326A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255326A1.txt
  • Baltimore 12/06/2004 00129.10000 39-10-31.3 N KY NE 084-12-03.1 W 0001962408 Williamsburg-Whitley County Airport BoardWilliamsburg 12/06/2004 00123.07500 36-47-51.2 N NY RM WFE7 074-48-02.6 W 0001961585 SULLIVAN, COUNTY OF DIVISION OFWHITE LAKE 12/06/2004 00122.80000 41-42-09.3 N IN RM WIM3 087-00-40.6 W 0001963221 PORTER COUNTY MUNICIPAL AIRPORValparaiso 12/07/2004 00122.72500 41-26-59.9 N IN RM WIM3 087-00-35.1 W 0001963221 PORTER COUNTY MUNICIPAL AIRPORVALPARAISO 12/07/2004 00122.80000 41-27-02.1 N RO WOT6 0001961520 HORRY, COUNTY OF 12/06/2004 RO WJQ7 0001961967 AMERIFLIGHT INC 12/06/2004 RO WXW6 0001961968 AMERIFLIGHT INC 12/06/2004 RO KHZ8 0001962020 JOE BRIGHAM INC 12/06/2004 RO KZY9 0001962023 AMERIFLIGHT INC 12/06/2004 RO KGK6 0001962495 ASPEN BASE OPERATION 12/02/2004 RO KXD6 0001962899 INDIANAPOLIS AIRPORT AUTHORITY 12/07/2004 RO KLT8 0001963092 MARSHALL, CITY OF 12/07/2004 RO WAB3 0001964503 PAYSON, TOWN OF
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255779A1.txt
  • 10583.12500 42-09-03.4 N MA MD WLV798 071-06-03.2 W 0001980755 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP CANTON 12/22/2004 10588.12500 42-09-03.4 N MA MD WLV798 071-06-03.2 W 0001980755 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP CANTON 12/22/2004 11365.00000 42-09-03.4 N OH MD WQBJ203 081-23-09.2 W 0001982982 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION BAINBRIDGE TWP. 12/23/2004 11405.00000 41-25-13.6 N OH MD WQBJ203 081-23-09.2 W 0001982982 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION BAINBRIDGE TWP. 12/23/2004 17760.00000 41-25-13.6 N WY MD WPZV796 108-51-02.1 W 0001983400 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY INC CODY 12/23/2004 06123.10000 44-35-09.8 N CA NE 117-34-45.0 W 0001978052 Nextel of California, Inc. San Clemente 12/20/2004 10628.75000 33-28-19.2 N CA NE 118-53-02.8 W 0001978405 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICESMOORPARK 12/20/2004 10552.50000 34-15-41.2 N CA NE 118-16-40.0 W 0001978480 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership AGUA DULCE 12/20/2004 10578.75000 34-29-59.0 N CA NE 119-14-31.0 W 0001978487
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256133A1.txt
  • W 0002002300 COLUMBIA, COUNTY OF RIO 01/11/2005 00942.17500 43-24-46.0 N WI MD WNTK828 089-14-01.4 W 0002002300 COLUMBIA, COUNTY OF RIO 01/11/2005 00957.70000 43-24-46.0 N WI MD WNTK828 089-14-01.4 W 0002002300 COLUMBIA, COUNTY OF RIO 01/11/2005 00958.15000 43-24-46.0 N AR MD WNEX625 092-24-10.3 W 0002002451 Arkansas, State of ( Police Dept. ) CROSS ROADS 01/11/2005 06680.00000 34-14-15.7 N MI MD WPYQ798 085-38-02.1 W 0002003895 ALLEGAN COUNTY CENTRAL DISPATCWAYLAND 01/12/2005 06585.00000 42-39-52.1 N MI MD WPYQ798 085-38-02.1 W 0002003895 ALLEGAN COUNTY CENTRAL DISPATCWAYLAND 01/12/2005 06645.00000 42-39-52.1 N Page 30 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI MD WPYP777 085-40-22.0 W 0002003896 ALLEGAN COUNTY CENTRAL DISPATCOTSEGO 01/12/2005
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.txt
  • 0.0 238,021,299 42.8 5.1 23.1 19.9 9.1 Cyprus $5,878,313 68.9 1.9 15.0 11.3 2.9 $288,424 41.8 0.0 37.8 18.7 1.6 $58,206 54.6 0.0 45.4 0.0 0.0 28,345,029 32.9 3.2 34.5 22.3 7.1 Denmark $16,572,844 49.3 2.8 28.1 15.5 4.3 $1,440,655 17.9 18.8 34.6 27.9 0.8 $1,633,327 1.1 98.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 116,207,159 24.2 11.5 37.0 21.5 5.8 Finland $10,939,759 52.1 2.1 23.5 18.8 3.5 $686,855 23.5 0.0 48.1 28.2 0.1 $337,999 0.5 99.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 94,720,074 49.2 3.1 24.8 18.6 4.4 France $170,742,277 60.8 3.6 15.6 16.9 3.1 $9,303,786 41.4 0.5 37.2 19.7 1.2 $17,047,721 12.6 85.9 1.4 0.0 0.0 1,040,128,443 35.1 6.5 32.4 17.8 8.2 Germany $465,210,832 62.0 0.9 13.7 22.3 1.1 $16,282,952 42.1 1.2 23.2 33.1 0.5 $23,855,267
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256480A1.txt
  • REGIONAL INTERNEMoravia 01/26/2005 17980.00000 40-53-09.7 N IA NE 092-51-52.6 W 0002023788 SOUTHERN IOWA REGIONAL INTERNECenterville 01/26/2005 19460.00000 40-45-01.1 N IA NE 092-51-52.6 W 0002023788 SOUTHERN IOWA REGIONAL INTERNECenterville 01/26/2005 19540.00000 40-45-01.1 N IA NE 093-08-06.5 W 0002023789 SOUTHERN IOWA REGIONAL INTERNESeymour 01/26/2005 17900.00000 40-40-57.9 N IA NE 093-08-06.5 W 0002023789 SOUTHERN IOWA REGIONAL INTERNESeymour 01/26/2005 18060.00000 40-40-57.9 N IA NE 092-48-02.1 W 0002023865 SOUTHERN IOWA REGIONAL INTERNEAlbia 01/26/2005 19380.00000 41-01-28.3 N IA NE 092-48-02.1 W 0002023865 SOUTHERN IOWA REGIONAL INTERNEAlbia 01/26/2005 19540.00000 41-01-28.3 N CA NE 117-09-04.3 W 0002023954 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Redlands 01/26/2005 10628.12500 33-59-12.6 N CO NE 105-01-38.0 W 0002023990 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION LITTLETON 01/26/2005 10552.50000 39-31-43.0 N FL NE 080-18-25.0 W 0002025772 M/A COM, INC. MIAMI 01/27/2005
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256639A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256639A1.txt
  • 36-04-33.0 N TX NE 099-55-28.0 W 0002035523 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNGOODLETT 02/04/2005 06645.00000 34-20-42.1 N CA NE 121-33-48.9 W 0002036014 Redding MSA Limited Partnership Viola 02/04/2005 06423.75000 40-33-31.5 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL AM 082-55-11.4 W 0001245848 McElroy Electronics Corporation Key West 01/31/2005 24-38-02.1 N CO AM KNKN387 108-28-58.2 W 0002031531 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY Powder Wash 02/02/2005 40-51-48.2 N CO AM KNKN387 108-28-58.2 W 0002031531 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY Powder Wash 02/02/2005 40-51-48.2 N CO MD KNKN387 108-28-58.2 W 0002031531 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY Powder Wash 02/01/2005 40-51-48.2 N CO MD KNKN387 108-28-58.2 W 0002031531 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY Powder Wash 02/01/2005 40-51-48.2 N Page 32 CL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256825A1.txt
  • N WY MD WPQW560 104-48-01.8 W 0002039963 BNSF Railway Co Guernsey 02/09/2005 06034.15000 42-15-39.3 N WY MD WPQW560 104-48-01.8 W 0002039963 BNSF Railway Co Guernsey 02/09/2005 06093.45000 42-15-39.3 N WY MD WPQW560 104-48-01.8 W 0002039963 BNSF Railway Co Guernsey 02/09/2005 06675.00000 42-15-39.3 N WY MD WIA789 104-43-34.6 W 0002040081 BNSF Railway Co Guernsey 02/09/2005 06835.00000 42-15-53.8 N WY MD WIA791 105-02-02.1 W 0002040268 BNSF Railway Co Glendo 02/09/2005 00957.60000 42-20-46.2 N WY MD WIA791 105-02-02.1 W 0002040268 BNSF Railway Co Glendo 02/09/2005 01985.00000 42-20-46.2 N WY MD WIA791 105-02-02.1 W 0002040268 BNSF Railway Co Glendo 02/09/2005 02181.60000 42-20-46.2 N WY MD WIA791 105-02-02.1 W 0002040268 BNSF Railway Co Glendo 02/09/2005 02197.60000 42-20-46.2 N WY MD WIA791 105-02-02.1 W 0002040268 BNSF Railway
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256927A1.txt
  • 0002051039 Vanguard Cellular Pennsylvania, LLC ASHLEY 02/17/2005 11035.00000 41-12-19.2 N PA MD WPJA755 075-55-35.7 W 0002051039 Vanguard Cellular Pennsylvania, LLC ASHLEY 02/17/2005 11115.00000 41-12-19.2 N MO MD WMW428 091-59-04.0 W 0002051090 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCWILLOW SPRINGS 02/17/2005 02162.00000 36-59-10.0 N MO MD WMW428 091-59-04.0 W 0002051090 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCWILLOW SPRINGS 02/17/2005 06745.00000 36-59-10.0 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0002051337 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 02/17/2005 02168.40000 46-01-33.2 N Page 14 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0002051337 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 02/17/2005 05945.20000 46-01-33.2 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257247A1.pdf
  • for the 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 23318 (2003). See Revision of Parts 2 and 15 of the Commission's Rules to Permit Unlicensed National Infrastructure (U-NII) Devices in the 5GHz Band, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 24484 (2003). Id. Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003). The Commission paired bands in the 1710-1755 MHz bands with symmetrical bands between 2120-2155 MHz. Broadband PCS uses the 1850-1910 and 1930-1990 MHz bands. The Commission allocated and paired five-megahertz blocks of spectrum at 1915-1920 MHz with 1995-2000 MHz, and 2020-2025 MHz with 2175-2180 MHz for AWS use. See Amendment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257272A1.txt
  • AIR, INC. Ardmore 03/03/2005 00949.00000 34-10-28.0 N OR MD WPNI775 123-55-13.5 W 0002067654 ALC COMMUNICATIONS SEASIDE 03/04/2005 00948.00000 45-59-41.4 N MA NE 070-50-17.1 W 0002061775 WESTPORT COMMUNICATIONS LIMITENewburyport 02/28/2005 00950.40000 42-48-54.8 N TN NE 085-02-16.3 W 0002065035 PEG BROADCASTING CROSSVILLE, LLCrossville 03/02/2005 00945.00000 35-56-49.5 N TN NE 085-02-16.3 W 0002065078 PEG BROADCASTING CROSSVILLE, LLCrossville 03/02/2005 00947.00000 35-56-49.5 N SD NE 096-47-02.1 W 0002068165 FELLER BROADCASTING, LLC SIOUX FALLS 03/04/2005 00946.00000 43-31-32.8 N RO WLE210 0002067923 WESTERN STATE COLLEGE OF COLOR 03/04/2005 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO KNKP354 0002061750 MICHAEL JENKINS D/B/A PAGE ME 02/28/2005 RO KNKP668 0002061828 MICHAEL JENKINS D/B/A PAGE ME 02/28/2005
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257592A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257592A1.txt
  • Latitude City AM WPPZ453 0002002397 Bellagio Hotel - MAC Corp 03/15/2005 AM WPPW672 0002005994 GENERAL MOTORS RESEARCH CORP 03/17/2005 RO WPHI532 0002090123 FORD COMMUNICATIONS INC 03/17/2005 RO WPGZ209 0002091596 Verizon New England, Inc. 03/18/2005 IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MT NE 112-20-02.1 W 0002090161 OMNICOM PAGING PLUS LLC LINCOLN 03/17/2005 00462.87500 47-05-40.8 N MT NE 114-51-31.5 W 0002090161 OMNICOM PAGING PLUS LLC PARADISE 03/17/2005 00462.87500 47-22-14.8 N MT NE 115-18-46.0 W 0002090161 OMNICOM PAGING PLUS LLC THOMPSON FALLS 03/17/2005 00462.87500 47-32-33.0 N IQ - DSRC / Intelligent Transportation Service State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257989A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257989A1.txt
  • 084-26-34.7 W 0002103730 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC CANTON 03/29/2005 06226.89000 34-14-19.3 N GA MD WLN436 084-26-34.7 W 0002103730 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC CANTON 03/29/2005 06256.54000 34-14-19.3 N GA MD WLN436 084-26-34.7 W 0002103730 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC CANTON 03/29/2005 06315.84000 34-14-19.3 N GA MD WLN436 084-26-34.7 W 0002103730 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC CANTON 03/29/2005 10616.25000 34-14-19.3 N CA MD KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 0002103853 Verizon California Inc. RUNNING SPRINGS 03/29/2005 06256.54000 34-11-26.0 N CA MD KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 0002103853 Verizon California Inc. RUNNING SPRINGS 03/29/2005 06286.19000 34-11-26.0 N Page 15 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 0002103853
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258113A1.txt
  • 084-21-58.3 W 0002112592 Defiance County Communications CenterDefiance 04/05/2005 00954.55000 41-17-51.8 N OH NE 084-21-58.3 W 0002112599 Defiance County Communications CenterDefiance 04/05/2005 00943.88750 41-17-51.8 N Page 35 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 117-11-25.1 W 0002116062 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF FALLBROOK 04/06/2005 06605.00000 33-24-02.1 N CA NE 117-11-25.1 W 0002116062 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF FALLBROOK 04/06/2005 06695.00000 33-24-02.1 N NC NE 079-59-59.6 W 0002116970 HIGH POINT CITY PUBLIC SERVICE DEHigh Point 04/07/2005 06795.00000 35-57-23.8 N NC NE 079-59-59.6 W 0002116970 HIGH POINT CITY PUBLIC SERVICE DEHigh Point 04/07/2005 06815.00000 35-57-23.8 N FL NE 082-27-26.9 W 0002118588 Hillsborough County - Clerk of the Circuit CTampa 04/08/2005
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258527A1.txt
  • 42-35-03.0 N Page 12 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI RM KNKA244 082-48-42.0 W 0002137991 New Par Harrison Township 04/26/2005 42-35-03.0 N MI RM KNKA244 082-48-42.0 W 0002137991 New Par Harrison Township 04/26/2005 42-35-03.0 N MI RM KNKA244 083-32-04.8 W 0002137991 New Par Holly 04/26/2005 42-47-02.1 N MI RM KNKA244 083-32-04.8 W 0002137991 New Par Holly 04/26/2005 42-47-02.1 N MI RM KNKA244 083-57-20.8 W 0002137991 New Par HOWELL 04/26/2005 42-36-43.1 N MI RM KNKA244 083-57-20.8 W 0002137991 New Par HOWELL 04/26/2005 42-36-43.1 N MI RM KNKA244 083-57-20.8 W 0002137991 New Par HOWELL 04/26/2005 42-36-43.1 N MI RM KNKA244 083-50-33.8 W 0002137991 New Par HOWELL 04/26/2005 42-37-42.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258716A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258716A1.txt
  • TEXARKANA 05/11/2005 00951.00000 33-25-33.0 N FL NE 080-37-27.2 W 0002156733 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPMelbourne 05/11/2005 00948.00000 28-05-14.1 N IN NE 086-03-42.9 W 0002156813 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPINDIANAPOLIS 05/11/2005 00948.50000 39-51-54.1 N FL NE 080-37-27.2 W 0002156878 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPMelbourne 05/11/2005 00944.25000 28-05-14.1 N CO NE 105-03-48.9 W 0002157031 REGENT BROADCASTING OF FT. COLLNorfolk 05/11/2005 00950.50000 40-59-21.9 N FL NE 080-42-02.1 W 0002157063 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPROCKLEDGE 05/11/2005 00948.87500 28-16-43.0 N FL NE 080-42-02.1 W 0002157063 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPROCKLEDGE 05/11/2005 00949.12500 28-16-43.0 N Page 4 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CO NE 105-01-02.9 W 0002157072 REGENT BROADCASTING OF FT. COLLFt. Collins 05/11/2005
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259061A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259061A1.txt
  • Certain pleadings must be filed electronically (electronic mail or facsimile), by hand delivery, or by overnight delivery service other than U.S. Postal Service Express and Priority Mail. AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OK AM 097-47-16.2 W 0002165232 City of Enid Enid 05/26/2005 00122.95000 36-23-02.1 N LA MD KGO5 090-13-03.0 W 0002173570 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC LEEVILLE 05/24/2005 00129.02500 29-13-06.0 N MS MD WPZT708 088-31-53.0 W 0002176537 Trent Lott International Airport Pascagoula 05/26/2005 30-27-44.0 N PR NE 067-07-46.0 W 0002173585 Aeronautical Radio Inc. Aguadilla 05/24/2005 00128.92500 18-29-41.5 N OK NE 095-53-17.2 W 0002173598 Aeronautical Radio Inc Tulsa 05/24/2005 00131.35000 36-11-54.2 N FL NE 080-16-42.2 W 0002173622
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259207A1.txt
  • Cutthroat Communications Missoula 05/27/2005 21275.00000 46-47-47.0 N MT MD WQAJ980 114-00-18.2 W 0002178753 Cutthroat Communications Missoula 05/27/2005 21875.00000 46-47-47.0 N MT MD WQAJ980 114-00-18.2 W 0002178753 Cutthroat Communications Missoula 05/27/2005 21975.00000 46-47-47.0 N MT MD WQAJ980 114-00-18.2 W 0002178753 Cutthroat Communications Missoula 05/27/2005 22125.00000 46-47-47.0 N MA MD WHO992 071-04-01.8 W 0002179587 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BOSTON 05/31/2005 02118.40000 42-21-02.1 N Page 9 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA MD WHO992 071-04-01.8 W 0002179587 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BOSTON 05/31/2005 18040.00000 42-21-02.1 N MA MD WHO992 071-04-01.8 W 0002179587 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BOSTON 05/31/2005 18120.00000 42-21-02.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259341A1.txt
  • Carolina Power and Light Company Castle Haynes 06/09/2005 05974.85000 34-21-21.0 N CA MD KDJ61 122-07-53.8 W 0002193154 Pacific Gas and Electric Company SARATOGA 06/09/2005 06123.10000 37-18-30.7 N CA MD WQCM656 122-01-20.9 W 0002193155 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Cupertino 06/09/2005 06375.14000 37-20-12.8 N LA MD WIA482 090-02-52.5 W 0002194252 LOUISIANA GENERATING, L.L.C. MANDEVILLE 06/09/2005 06770.62500 30-24-46.4 N LA MD WIA483 089-44-02.1 W 0002194260 LOUISIANA GENERATING, L.L.C. SLIDELL 06/09/2005 06735.00000 30-15-52.1 N CO MD KGY78 104-26-48.8 W 0002194453 Colorado Interstate Gas PUEBLO 06/10/2005 06605.62500 38-16-35.0 N CO MD WNTY942 104-01-24.8 W 0002194464 Colorado Interstate Gas FOWLER 06/10/2005 06765.62500 38-10-35.0 N CO MD WPOT546 105-09-58.9 W 0002195629 Aquila, Inc. CANON CITY 06/10/2005 00928.63750 38-26-21.9 N CO MD WPOT546 105-09-58.9 W 0002195629 Aquila, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259477A1.txt
  • Odessa 06/13/2005 00945.12500 31-51-45.0 N MS AM 090-52-55.0 W 0002194588 HOLLADAY BROADCASTING OF LOUISVICKSBURG 06/14/2005 00946.00000 32-20-43.0 N TX AM 094-34-18.7 W 0002200361 ON-AIR FAMILY, LLC Tatum 06/17/2005 00951.00000 32-22-37.6 N TX AM 094-43-57.0 W 0002200495 ON-AIR FAMILY, LLC Longview 06/17/2005 00948.00000 32-32-30.0 N NJ MD WQCS582 074-16-39.5 W 0002198951 WYRS BROADCASTING MANAHAWKIN 06/14/2005 00951.00000 39-43-15.4 N NC MD WLP696 081-34-02.1 W 0002199280 KTC BROADCASTING, INC. Shelby 06/14/2005 00951.85000 35-17-28.0 N MS MD WPNJ380 089-00-02.1 W 0002202098 GOLDEN GULF COAST BROADCASTINGBILOXI 06/14/2005 00946.11250 30-23-58.7 N GA MD WMF924 081-05-49.4 W 0002204488 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPSAVANNAH 06/15/2005 00947.00000 32-05-23.7 N Page 3 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260318A1.txt
  • Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming. SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Notice of Inquiry that seeks comments and information for the Twelfth Annual Report on the status of competition in the market for the delivery of video programming. 3 WIRELESS TELE-COMMUNICATIONS TITLE: Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands (WT Docket No. 02-353). SUMMARY: The Commission will consider an Order on Reconsideration concerning the Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). . . Copies of materials adopted at this meeting can be purchased from the FCC's duplicating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260394A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260394A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260394A5.txt
  • today's action, the Commission approves the transfer of control of all licenses and authorizations held directly and indirectly by Nextel to Sprint. These licenses and authorizations include: Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) licenses in the 800 and 900 MHz bands, licenses in the 1.9 GHz band that resulted from the 800 MHz rebanding proceeding, Broadband Radio Service (BRS) licenses in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz bands, and leases of Educational Broadband Service (EBS) spectrum in the 2.5 GHz band. The FCC concluded today that Sprint's acquisition of Nextel's licenses will serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity, and that the likely public interest benefits of the merger outweigh any potential public interest harms. These public interest benefits include enhanced service quality and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260432A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260432A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260432A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit } STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. COPPS RE: Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands (Order on Reconsideration). I am committed to sticking to our schedule and conducting the AWS auction as soon as possible. The changes that we make today to the band plan will make this a better auction. The band plan balances the needs of different types of wireless companies by offering both geographically large and small auction areas. I
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260432A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260432A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260432A3.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit D SEPARATE STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER JONATHAN S. ADELSTEIN Re: Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands; Order on Reconsideration; WT Docket No. 02-353 I have repeatedly said the FCC needs to improve access to spectrum by those providers who want to offer service to traditionally under-served areas. That is why I pressed for the inclusion of both Economic Area (EA) as well as Cellular Market Area (CMA) licenses in the Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260437A1.txt
  • 2.5 213 1.1 605 3.0 262 1.3 10,744 53.6 20,060 Alaska 1,081 24.5 19 0.4 15 0.3 54 1.2 17 0.4 3,216 73.1 4,403 Arizona 10,528 53.3 455 2.3 189 1.0 626 3.2 162 0.8 7,782 39.4 19,741 Arkansas 3,769 26.7 765 5.4 88 0.6 245 1.7 316 2.2 8,915 63.2 14,098 California 66,419 43.6 7,558 5.0 1,019 0.7 3,204 2.1 2,104 1.4 72,048 47.3 152,351 Colorado 10,290 52.4 95 0.5 119 0.6 580 2.9 257 1.3 8,307 42.3 19,647 Connecticut 6,717 43.2 386 2.5 126 0.8 247 1.6 252 1.6 7,826 50.3 15,553 Delaware 2,199 53.0 39 1.0 88 2.1 99 2.4 19 0.5 1,705 41.1 4,150 District of Columbia 3,560 66.6 22 0.4 154 2.9 158 3.0 22 0.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260567A1.txt
  • Page 34 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NM MD WNTK850 103-52-37.8 W 0002268493 Tri State Generation & Transmission AssoDES MOINES 08/08/2005 06790.00000 36-42-20.0 N NM MD WNTR643 103-27-10.8 W 0002268517 Tri State Generation & Transmission AssoCLAPHAM 08/08/2005 02477.10000 36-09-23.1 N NM MD WNEQ903 106-25-02.1 W 0002269583 Tri State Generation & Transmission AssoABIQUIU 08/08/2005 00957.95000 36-15-14.0 N OK MD WAA757 098-11-56.1 W 0002272780 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHCYRIL 08/10/2005 06256.54000 34-56-46.2 N OK MD WAA757 098-11-56.1 W 0002272780 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHCYRIL 08/10/2005 06315.84000 34-56-46.2 N OK MD WAA757 098-11-56.1 W 0002272780 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHCYRIL 08/10/2005 06615.00000 34-56-46.2 N OK MD WAA757
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260754A1.pdf
  • is proposing that a new code (XXX00) be adopted, to allow a Service Subscriber to request that a notification call be made to his/her incumbent Responsible Organization or Resp Org, prior to a making a Resp Org change through the Help Desk. This change will further protect customer rights for high usage, shared, sensitive and vanity number resources. 2. Background 2.1 NASC Order The FCC issued an order establishing over-riding authority in response to a petition calling the question of Resp Org activities versus customer rights. FCC determined customers should have an option to have their numbers ported through the neutral third party vendor rather than through the incumbent Resp Org. Originally called the Number Administration Service Center (NASC-hence the ``NASC''
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 118.1 98.0 125.6 156.4 9.7 Taiwan 88.7 93.9 108.5 112.2 139.1 152.9 121.8 167.0 170.5 162.6 194.2 6.1 Thailand 18.9 22.6 26.3 29.7 26.3 32.2 23.5 25.6 30.2 32.4 37.1 5.4 Turkey 16.8 17.8 21.1 25.9 25.0 28.4 27.0 25.9 24.6 30.3 34.3 3.6 United Kingdom 546.7 590.0 690.7 737.7 945.5 1,175.2 1,119.1 1,001.9 1,351.7 1,370.0 1,597.3 7.2 Vietnam 1.0 2.1 3.1 5.2 4.1 4.5 7.4 4.5 5.0 4.7 4.1 -5.0 Total for Countries Shown Above 4,903.4 5,418.6 6,060.8 7,219.9 7,880.8 8,865.7 9,550.211,520.612,049.812,153.4 13,809.1 8.9% Total for Other Countries 882.7 966.3 989.7 1,073.2 1,289.3 1,332.8 1,214.8 1,367.6 1,428.2 1,523.4 1,864.9 7.1 Total for All Countries 5,786.0 6,384.9 7,050.6 8,293.2 9,170.010,198.510,765.012,888.213,478.013,676.8 15,674.0 8.7 Total for 5 Largest Routes 58.5% 58.3% 59.7% 62.6%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261169A1.txt
  • MD WQBR764 104-56-21.0 W 0002310207 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION DENVER 09/13/2005 21970.00000 39-41-09.0 N CA MD WHT428 117-17-37.1 W 0002310304 Verizon California Inc. SAN BERNARDINO 09/13/2005 06004.50000 34-06-42.0 N CA MD WHT428 117-17-37.1 W 0002310304 Verizon California Inc. SAN BERNARDINO 09/13/2005 06034.15000 34-06-42.0 N CA MD WHT428 117-17-37.1 W 0002310304 Verizon California Inc. SAN BERNARDINO 09/13/2005 06063.80000 34-06-42.0 N CA MD KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 0002310305 Verizon California Inc. RUNNING SPRINGS 09/13/2005 06256.54000 34-11-26.0 N CA MD KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 0002310305 Verizon California Inc. RUNNING SPRINGS 09/13/2005 06286.19000 34-11-26.0 N CA MD KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 0002310305 Verizon California Inc. RUNNING SPRINGS 09/13/2005 06315.84000 34-11-26.0 N NH MD WML840 072-10-39.0 W 0002311014 RCC Atlantic Licenses, LLC LEBANON 09/13/2005 02171.60000 43-34-38.0 N NH MD WML840 072-10-39.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261303A1.txt
  • OF WYOMING - DEPARTMENT ODOUGLAS 09/20/2005 06315.84000 42-54-36.5 N WY MD WPVB872 105-19-49.6 W 0002321498 STATE OF WYOMING - DEPARTMENT ODOUGLAS 09/20/2005 06345.49000 42-54-36.5 N WY MD WNEN334 106-57-24.2 W 0002321502 STATE OF WYOMING - DEPARTMENT OSHERIDAN 09/20/2005 02196.00000 44-46-22.8 N WY MD WNEN334 106-57-24.2 W 0002321502 STATE OF WYOMING - DEPARTMENT OSHERIDAN 09/20/2005 06755.00000 44-46-22.8 N WY MD WHC894 106-42-02.1 W 0002321646 STATE OF WYOMING - DEPARTMENT OBUFFALO 09/20/2005 02184.80000 44-14-00.9 N WY MD WHC894 106-42-02.1 W 0002321646 STATE OF WYOMING - DEPARTMENT OBUFFALO 09/20/2005 02189.60000 44-14-00.9 N WY MD WHC894 106-42-02.1 W 0002321646 STATE OF WYOMING - DEPARTMENT OBUFFALO 09/20/2005 06152.75000 44-14-00.9 N WY MD WHC894 106-42-02.1 W 0002321646 STATE OF WYOMING - DEPARTMENT OBUFFALO 09/20/2005 06785.00000 44-14-00.9 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261555A1.txt
  • 0002336424 TEXAS INFINITY BROADCASTING L.P.Dallas 10/03/2005 00947.87500 32-48-59.4 N MS NE 090-52-10.9 W 0002336864 COMMANDER COMMUNICATIONS CORVICKSBURG 10/03/2005 00946.87500 32-19-23.2 N MS NE 090-52-10.9 W 0002336864 COMMANDER COMMUNICATIONS CORVICKSBURG 10/03/2005 00947.12500 32-19-23.2 N Page 6 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MS NE 090-52-02.1 W 0002336909 COMMANDER COMMUNICATIONS CORVICKSBURG 10/03/2005 00948.50000 32-20-44.3 N IN NE 086-09-10.0 W 0002338719 RADIO ONE OF INDIANA, LLC INDIANAPOLIS 10/04/2005 00945.00000 39-46-02.0 N NM NE 104-13-46.0 W 0002338947 LINDA S. BLOOM, TRUSTEE FOR RUNNCARLSBAD 10/05/2005 00945.00000 32-25-10.0 N IN NE 084-53-03.0 W 0002339142 COLUMBUS RADIO, INC. LAWRENCEBURG 10/05/2005 00948.50000 39-05-37.0 N AR NE 093-14-22.6 W 0002340140 NOALMARK BROADCASTING CORPORMAGNOLIA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261822A1.txt
  • W 0002352453 Verizon New England, Inc. VINEYARD HAVEN 10/19/2005 06404.79000 41-26-40.4 N CA MD WMT420 121-46-10.8 W 0002352547 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITELIVERMORE 10/19/2005 11245.00000 37-41-47.7 N CA MD WLL764 121-55-20.9 W 0002352622 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITEPleasanton 10/19/2005 10755.00000 37-37-11.8 N AK MD WLN543 149-34-00.0 W 0002352800 Matanuska Telephone Assn Eagle River 10/19/2005 19360.00000 61-19-02.0 N AK MD WPTB611 150-07-02.1 W 0002352803 Matanuska Telephone Association Inc. Talkeetna 10/19/2005 06765.00000 62-19-17.2 N AK MD WGX539 149-45-15.1 W 0002352807 Matanuska Telephone Assoc., Inc. Rural Area 10/19/2005 06605.00000 62-18-28.2 N Page 14 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY MD WQAF650 073-59-27.1 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261981A1.txt
  • KHC5 0002360141 WAUKESHA, COUNTY OF 10/27/2005 RO KPG9 0002360763 WELLS, CITY OF 10/27/2005 RO KMI5 0002361277 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 10/27/2005 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA AM WPNM972 122-23-56.1 W 0002244175 BONNEVILLE HOLDING COMPANY SAN FRANCISCO 10/25/2005 00945.00000 37-47-06.2 N MS AM 090-52-02.1 W 0002336909 COMMANDER COMMUNICATIONS CORVICKSBURG 10/27/2005 00948.50000 32-20-44.3 N WI MD WLP840 092-05-16.7 W 0002356421 STATE OF WISCONSIN - EDUCATIONALSUPERIOR 10/24/2005 00945.50000 46-46-59.6 N MN MD WLP882 092-06-51.4 W 0002356428 STATE OF WISCONSIN - EDUCATIONALDULUTH 10/24/2005 00951.50000 46-47-21.1 N MD NE 077-01-54.6 W 0002358811 INFINITY BROADCASTING EAST INC. Silver Springs 10/26/2005 00946.50000 38-59-41.5 N TX NE 098-40-33.0 W 0002359600 BRYAN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.txt
  • Provider. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Part 2. Telephone Carriers Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission for the Year Ende December 31, 2004, Whose Reports Were Used in the Statistical Tabulations in Parts 1 and 2. . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Table 2.2 - Outside Plant Statistics of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers as of December 31, 2004. . . .
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262330A1.txt
  • Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted BOC/Sprint Composite* Weighted Verizon Avg BellSouth Weighted SBC Avg. Qwest 17 ARMIS 43-05 Report 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 BellSouth 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 Qwest 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 SBC Ameritech 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.5 1.4 SBC Pacific 1.5 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.6 SBC Southwestern 0.8 0.8 2.2 1.8 1.9 2.0 SBC SNET 2.1 2.2 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 Verizon GTE 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.5 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 Sprint 4.5 3.9 3.2 1.5 1.4 1.7 Weighted BOC/Sprint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262551A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262551A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262551A2.txt
  • perform the functions as identified. The contractor shall provide a monthly report to the FCC on contractor staffing status. The report shall include numbers by labor category, shortages and overages, and yearly turnover rate. Availability Staff should be available a minimum of five days a week, eight hours a day for each respective pooling time zone as defined in Section 2.1 of this document. Pooling administration hours of operation shall allow block applicants and block holders in all time zones access during the majority of the client's core business hours. The PA is required to obtain prior approval from the FCC or its designee to any exception to the above. Core Hours Core business hours for the contractor shall fall between
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262703A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262703A1.txt
  • 23180.00000 37-30-46.0 N TX NE 100-55-37.0 W 0002400058 BorderCOMM Partners LP DEL RIO 12/05/2005 21565.25000 29-21-59.0 N TX NE 098-15-17.1 W 0002400083 BorderCOMM Partners LP HIDALGO 12/05/2005 21565.25000 26-07-00.4 N TX NE 106-23-16.4 W 0002400084 BorderCOMM Partners LP EL PASO 12/05/2005 21577.50000 31-46-20.7 N WA NE 119-50-34.4 W 0002400294 WESTERN SUB-RSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Moxee 12/05/2005 06656.25000 46-36-45.7 N CA NE 122-22-02.1 W 0002400818 Ubiquitel PCS LAKE CITY 12/06/2005 10641.25000 40-43-58.0 N TX NE 096-38-57.8 W 0002400955 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION GARLAND 12/06/2005 17760.00000 32-55-44.4 N TX NE 096-38-57.8 W 0002400955 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION GARLAND 12/06/2005 23070.00000 32-55-44.4 N CA NE 121-56-36.3 W 0002401242 MetroFi Inc. Santa Clara 12/06/2005 17800.00000 37-20-58.5 N CA NE 121-56-36.3 W 0002401242 MetroFi Inc. Santa Clara 12/06/2005 17840.00000 37-20-58.5 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262865A1.txt
  • 5495 �28. 15 Specifically, under the Commission's rules, "smart radios" or "software defined radios" include any "radio that includes a transmitter in which the operating parameters of frequency range, modulation type or maximum output power can be altered by making a change in software without making any changes to hardware components that affect the radio frequency emissions." 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Whereas "smart radios" can be programmed to transmit and receive on any of a variety of frequencies and/or to use one or more different transmission formats supportable by their hardware design, "cognitive radios" empower the radios to alter their transmitter parameters based on interaction with the environment in which they operate. See Cognitive Radio Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • of Tables and Charts Interstate Common Line Support Payment Trueups by State or Jurisdiction ......... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Payment Trueups by Study Area .......................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Monthly Support - by State ....................................................................... Table 2.3 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries ................................................... Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A11.txt
  • Interval (hours) 3.3 2.8 4.7 4.3 3.7 3.7 5.4 3.8 17.3 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 97.7 99.6 98.6 99.4 98.9 99.5 98.8 98.7 98.1 Residence 98.7 99.7 98.6 99.4 98.9 99.6 98.8 98.8 98.4 Business 90.6 98.8 98.3 99.1 98.5 99.0 98.0 97.5 95.5 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.5 0.3 1.4 1.8 2.1 1.2 0.9 1.4 0.7 Residence 1.2 0.3 1.4 1.6 2.0 1.0 0.8 1.3 0.6 Business 1.9 1.2 1.4 3.0 2.4 2.9 1.5 2.0 2.3 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 31.3 16.0 16.7 26.9 27.7 26.7 25.7 29.0 26.4 Residence 33.5 16.3 17.2 28.8 28.9 27.2 27.1 31.7 28.9 Business 19.9 14.9 14.2 17.6 20.7 23.9 20.1 15.1 13.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.txt
  • of Tables and Charts Interstate Common Line Support Payment Trueups by State or Jurisdiction ......... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Payment Trueups by Study Area .......................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Monthly Support - by State ....................................................................... Table 2.3 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries ................................................... Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • on a non-common-carrier basis. These carriers and service providers may pass on contribution expenses to their customers. The FCC monitors subscriber participation and telephone usage to determine program benefits and costs.24 Historical tables for subscribership and carrier payments by state can be downloaded from the Monitoring Report's Low-Income Support section of the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports website, www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/stats.html. Table 2.1 reports tribal and non-tribal Lifeline subscriber and Link Up beneficiary data for years 1987 through 2004. Table 2.2 and Chart 2.1 report annual low-income support payments for years 1988 through 2004. Table 2.3 reports Lifeline monthly support by state or jurisdiction for both federal and state support as of March 2004, and indicates the additional contribution from the federal program
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
  • 94.8 0.4 Kentucky 88.1 91.4 3.3 * Louisiana 89.7 90.9 1.3 Maine 93.4 96.6 3.2 * Maryland 95.7 93.4 -2.3 # Massachusetts 95.9 96.4 0.5 Michigan 92.8 93.7 0.9 Minnesota 95.8 97.1 1.3 Mississippi 82.4 89.6 7.2 * Missouri 91.5 93.7 2.2 * Montana 91.0 93.5 2.5 * Nebraska 95.7 95.7 0.0 Nevada 90.4 92.2 1.8 New Hampshire 94.3 96.4 2.1 * New Jersey 94.8 95.1 0.3 New Mexico 82.0 91.4 9.4 * New York 91.8 94.5 2.7 * North Carolina 88.3 93.3 5.0 * North Dakota 94.6 95.0 0.3 Ohio 92.4 94.9 2.5 * Oklahoma 90.3 91.0 0.7 Oregon 90.6 95.5 4.9 * Pennsylvania 94.9 95.6 0.7 Rhode Island 93.6 95.3 1.7 South Carolina 83.7 93.4 9.8 * South Dakota
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • took effect on July 1, some companies made subsequent adjustments to their tariffs, which did not take effect until August 11. 1954 - 2004 1994 - 2004 CPI All Items 4.0 % 2.5 % CPI All Services 4.9 3.2 CPI Telephone Services ** 1.7 -0.1 CPI Major Categories: - Food & Beverages * 2.6 - Housing * 2.7 - Apparel 2.1 -1.0 - Transportation 3.7 2.0 - Medical Care 5.9 3.9 - Recreation * 1.6 - Other Goods & Services * 4.4 CPI Public Transportation 5.0 2.0 CPI Utility Natural Gas Service 5.2 5.2 CPI Electricity 3.3 1.2 CPI Sewer & Water Maintenance 5.6 3.5 CPI Postage 4.7 2.8 *** Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Chart 7.1 The CPI telephone service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263694A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263694A1.txt
  • 079-53-38.1 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership Greensboro 01/30/2006 36-08-17.5 N NC RM KNKA316 079-53-38.1 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership Greensboro 01/30/2006 36-08-17.5 N NC RM KNKA316 079-45-07.1 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership Greensboro 01/30/2006 36-09-10.5 N NC RM KNKA316 079-45-07.1 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership Greensboro 01/30/2006 36-09-10.5 N NC RM KNKA316 079-45-07.1 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership Greensboro 01/30/2006 36-09-10.5 N NC RM KNKA316 079-58-02.1 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership Greensboro 01/30/2006 36-10-38.5 N NC RM KNKA316 079-54-56.0 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership GREENSBORO 01/30/2006 36-06-09.0 N NC RM KNKA316 079-54-56.0 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership GREENSBORO 01/30/2006 36-06-09.0 N NC RM KNKA316 079-50-24.1 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership GREENSBORO 01/30/2006 36-07-11.5 N Page 14 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263808A1.txt
  • Name Latitude City NM MD WMJ248 103-08-24.7 W 0002475689 Plateau Telecommunications, Inc. HOBBS 02/08/2006 06345.49000 32-42-11.4 N MO MD WMW707 092-08-13.0 W 0002475709 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCEDINA 02/08/2006 06585.00000 40-10-02.0 N MO MD WMW707 092-08-13.0 W 0002475709 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCEDINA 02/08/2006 06615.00000 40-10-02.0 N MO MD WPQL555 092-31-30.7 W 0002475919 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCCalifornia 02/08/2006 06745.00000 38-37-02.1 N MO MD WPQL555 092-31-30.7 W 0002475919 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCCalifornia 02/08/2006 06775.00000 38-37-02.1 N MO MD WPQL555 092-31-30.7 W 0002475919 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCCalifornia 02/08/2006 06835.00000 38-37-02.1 N NM MD WMJ249 103-19-51.7 W 0002475955 Plateau Telecommunications, Inc. EUNICE 02/08/2006 06063.80000 32-21-58.5 N NM MD WMJ249 103-19-51.7 W 0002475955 Plateau Telecommunications, Inc. EUNICE 02/08/2006 06093.45000 32-21-58.5 N NM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264075A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264075A1.txt
  • N NJ NE 074-26-09.6 W 0002497473 RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OFNew Brunswick 02/23/2006 19625.00000 40-28-46.1 N MD NE 076-39-15.5 W 0002498500 ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY Dunkirk 02/23/2006 10875.00000 38-43-33.9 N MD NE 076-35-39.9 W 0002498501 ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY SOUDERLAND 02/23/2006 11365.00000 38-40-26.0 N MD NE 076-35-39.9 W 0002498501 ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY SOUDERLAND 02/23/2006 11485.00000 38-40-26.0 N MD NE 076-37-02.1 W 0002498502 ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY PRINCE FREDERIC 02/23/2006 10755.00000 38-32-11.1 N MD NE 076-37-02.1 W 0002498502 ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY PRINCE FREDERIC 02/23/2006 10995.00000 38-32-11.1 N MD NE 076-33-26.7 W 0002498503 ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY ISLAND CREEK 02/23/2006 11245.00000 38-27-47.4 N MD NE 076-33-26.7 W 0002498503 ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY ISLAND CREEK 02/23/2006 11405.00000 38-27-47.4 N Page 33 MW
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264205A1.txt
  • WLT963 118-18-03.2 W 0002506660 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership HOLLYWOOD 03/01/2006 19550.00000 34-05-55.0 N CA MD WMJ310 118-18-34.2 W 0002506673 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership LOS ANGELES 03/01/2006 19370.00000 34-04-41.0 N CA MD WPJC720 118-19-35.2 W 0002506691 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership LOS ANGELES 03/01/2006 19570.00000 34-06-18.0 N TX MD WPOM793 097-50-37.1 W 0002510174 T-Mobile License LLC Buda 03/02/2006 06063.80000 30-03-02.1 N CA MD WMS725 117-08-28.1 W 0002511567 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SAN DIEGO 03/03/2006 10652.50000 32-54-53.1 N GM MD WPNA716 090-05-52.2 W 0002512053 Stratos Offshore Services Company OFFSHORE 03/03/2006 06226.89000 28-31-33.8 N GM MD WPNA716 090-05-52.2 W 0002512053 Stratos Offshore Services Company OFFSHORE 03/03/2006 06286.19000 28-31-33.8 N GM MD WPNA716 090-05-52.2 W 0002512053 Stratos Offshore Services Company OFFSHORE 03/03/2006 06315.84000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.txt
  • 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 2,569,764 45.6 3.0 37.4 9.9 4.1 Greece $33,315,312 47.9 5.3 26.6 12.2 8.0 $2,367,838 30.3 0.6 28.8 4.8 35.6 $198,187 0.0 99.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 285,456,736 28.0 5.0 33.3 10.0 23.8 Greenland $124,930 12.4 0.9 14.6 67.8 4.3 $4,285 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 408,590 23.4 0.3 27.7 42.5 6.1 Iceland $3,935,920 64.2 2.1 28.2 1.7 3.7 $437,789 44.1 0.0 24.7 24.0 7.3 $613 0.0 0.0 96.9 0.0 3.1 32,600,288 51.3 1.6 31.4 9.1 6.7 Ireland $57,317,654 33.9 5.0 16.3 40.9 3.9 $3,551,055 51.6 4.3 23.0 10.5 10.7 $2,880,900 0.0 99.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 480,738,032 34.7 7.9 18.7 29.6 9.1 Italy $183,986,860 57.2 2.1 15.1 20.5 5.1 $7,901,387 35.7 0.6 25.5 27.6 10.6 $14,199,568
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264457A1.txt
  • Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership CARSON 03/13/2006 19690.00000 33-50-00.0 N CA MD WPSI340 117-53-08.3 W 0002522790 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Fullerton 03/13/2006 19630.00000 33-52-29.8 N CA MD WLU203 117-03-01.1 W 0002522797 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership BARSTOW 03/13/2006 10587.50000 34-51-19.9 N CA MD WLU203 117-03-01.1 W 0002522797 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership BARSTOW 03/13/2006 11405.00000 34-51-19.9 N CA MD WMW750 117-02-02.1 W 0002522799 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership BARSTOW 03/13/2006 10652.50000 34-54-03.9 N CA MD WMQ712 118-11-22.3 W 0002522800 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership COMPTON 03/13/2006 10577.50000 33-53-04.1 N CA MD WMQ712 118-11-22.3 W 0002522800 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership COMPTON 03/13/2006 10592.50000 33-53-04.1 N Page 3 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264548A1.txt
  • JR, LINDELL DB 03/24/2006 00809.00000 - 00824.00000 Page 53 YM - 800 MHz Trunked SMR (SMR, Site-specific) State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MD WNIE897 A 0002543964 PAKOSTA, ERIC:GRAY JR, LINDELL DB 03/24/2006 00809.00000 - 00824.00000 MO MD WNIE897 090-20-07.4 W 0002543964 PAKOSTA, ERIC:GRAY JR, LINDELL DBCLAYTON 03/24/2006 00857.53750 38-39-02.1 N MO MD WNIE897 090-20-07.4 W 0002543964 PAKOSTA, ERIC:GRAY JR, LINDELL DBCLAYTON 03/24/2006 00858.53750 38-39-02.1 N MO MD WNIE897 090-20-07.4 W 0002543964 PAKOSTA, ERIC:GRAY JR, LINDELL DBCLAYTON 03/24/2006 00859.01250 38-39-02.1 N MO MD WNIE897 090-20-07.4 W 0002543964 PAKOSTA, ERIC:GRAY JR, LINDELL DBCLAYTON 03/24/2006 00859.53750 38-39-02.1 N MO MD WNIE897 090-24-24.4 W 0002543964 PAKOSTA, ERIC:GRAY JR, LINDELL DBCREVE COEUR 03/24/2006 00857.53750
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264785A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264785A1.txt
  • WML586 078-38-41.0 W 0002549603 USCOC OF NORTH CAROLINA RSA #7,OXFORD 03/27/2006 06034.15000 36-16-48.0 N NC MD WML586 078-38-41.0 W 0002549603 USCOC OF NORTH CAROLINA RSA #7,OXFORD 03/27/2006 06110.75000 36-16-48.0 N NC MD WML586 078-38-41.0 W 0002549603 USCOC OF NORTH CAROLINA RSA #7,OXFORD 03/27/2006 06595.00000 36-16-48.0 N IN MD WPJE802 086-14-25.0 W 0002549866 Centennial Michiana License Company LLSOUTH BEND 03/27/2006 06345.49000 41-40-02.1 N IN MD WPJE802 086-14-25.0 W 0002549866 Centennial Michiana License Company LLSOUTH BEND 03/27/2006 06362.79000 41-40-02.1 N IN MD WPJE802 086-14-25.0 W 0002549866 Centennial Michiana License Company LLSOUTH BEND 03/27/2006 11285.00000 41-40-02.1 N FL MD WMG818 084-16-05.8 W 0002550132 ALLTEL Communications, Inc. TALLAHASSEE 03/27/2006 02165.20000 30-21-41.3 N FL MD WMG818 084-16-05.8 W 0002550132 ALLTEL Communications, Inc. TALLAHASSEE 03/27/2006 06197.24000 30-21-41.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264803A1.txt
  • SUBJECT 1 OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY AND WIRELESS TELE-COMMUNICATIONS TITLE: Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems (ET Docket No. 00-258) and Services Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands (WT Docket No. 02-353). SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Ninth Report and Order and Order establishing procedures for the relocation of Broadband Radio Service and Fixed Microwave Service operations, including cost sharing obligations, in the 2.1 GHz band, as well as addressing a related petition for reconsideration. 2 WIRELESS TELE-COMMUNICATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL AND OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264895A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264895A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264895A2.txt
  • Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems; Ninth Report and Order; ET Docket No. 00-258 I am pleased to support this item because it puts in place important relocation procedures that will apply to a number of services in the 2.1 GHz band, in particular Broadband Radio Service (BRS) licensees in the 2150-2160/62 MHz band. Our decision is particularly significant because the adopted procedures are another important step in our efforts to prepare for the upcoming Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) auction later this summer, as a subgroup of AWS licensees ultimately will be responsible for relocation of these BRS operators. While
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264895A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264895A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264895A3.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER DEBORAH TAYLOR TATE Re: Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems (ET Docket No. 00-258); Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands (WT Docket No. 02-353). Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) are new and innovative fixed and mobile terrestrial wireless applications using bandwidth that is sufficient for the provision of a variety of voice and data applications, such as video telephony, wireless Internet access, multimedia streaming, and other high-speed information and entertainment services. These and other advanced services are essential to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264972A1.txt
  • PRAIRIE 04/07/2006 18080.00000 32-41-56.0 N TX MD WQEK366 096-35-26.1 W 0002563931 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION SACHSE 04/07/2006 11245.00000 32-58-53.1 N TX MD WQEK366 096-35-26.1 W 0002563931 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION SACHSE 04/07/2006 17880.00000 32-58-53.1 N TX MD WQEK366 096-35-26.1 W 0002563931 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION SACHSE 04/07/2006 18120.00000 32-58-53.1 N TX MD WQEK366 096-35-26.1 W 0002563931 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION SACHSE 04/07/2006 21970.00000 32-58-53.1 N CA MD WLU306 117-07-02.1 W 0002564643 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SAN DIEGO 04/10/2006 10915.00000 32-47-26.2 N CA MD WLU306 117-07-02.1 W 0002564643 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SAN DIEGO 04/10/2006 19670.00000 32-47-26.2 N VA MD WMW857 076-00-03.2 W 0002565196 Cellco Partnership VIRGINIA BEACH 04/10/2006 10735.00000 36-47-20.4 N VA MD WMW857 076-00-03.2 W 0002565196 Cellco Partnership VIRGINIA BEACH 04/10/2006 10775.00000 36-47-20.4 N VA MD WMW857 076-00-03.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265090A1.txt
  • Morgantown 04/17/2006 00136.62500 39-38-34.5 N WV NE 081-26-21.1 W 0002574699 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Parkersburg 04/17/2006 00136.62500 39-20-42.4 N WV NE 080-13-41.1 W 0002574704 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Clarkesburg 04/17/2006 00136.62500 39-17-47.9 N ND NE 096-48-56.8 W 0002574718 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Fargo 04/17/2006 00130.95000 46-55-14.3 N TX NE 097-49-44.1 W 0002574723 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Fort Hood 04/17/2006 00129.40000 31-04-02.1 N KS NE 095-39-49.0 W 0002574729 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Topeka 04/17/2006 00129.72500 38-57-03.4 N NM NE 105-08-32.6 W 0002574750 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Las Vegas 04/17/2006 00136.85000 35-39-15.2 N NV NE 115-09-08.4 W 0002574756 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Las Vegas 04/17/2006 00128.95000 36-04-49.3 N LA NE 090-39-37.5 W 0002574789 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Houma 04/17/2006 00129.05000 29-33-59.4 N NY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265170A1.txt
  • 29.2 766 5.4 86 0.6 253 1.8 185 1.3 8,674 61.7 14,066 California 68,406 44.2 7,955 5.1 919 0.6 3,578 2.3 2,095 1.4 71,712 46.4 154,666 Colorado 10,511 52.8 70 0.4 132 0.7 539 2.7 257 1.3 8,396 42.2 19,905 Connecticut 6,735 44.1 394 2.6 236 1.5 288 1.9 199 1.3 7,431 48.6 15,283 Delaware 2,292 53.2 29 0.7 91 2.1 78 1.8 21 0.5 1,796 41.7 4,308 District of Columbia 3,701 67.3 26 0.5 156 2.8 140 2.6 22 0.4 1,452 26.4 5,497 Florida 34,648 49.8 1,808 2.6 403 0.6 2,688 3.9 1,110 1.6 28,900 41.5 69,556 Georgia 17,265 45.0 1,664 4.3 328 0.9 1,560 4.1 444 1.2 17,080 44.5 38,342 Guam Not shown to protect carrier confidentiality Hawaii 2,697
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265186A1.txt
  • CA MD WPXV765 120-57-31.6 W 0002582071 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPMODESTO 04/24/2006 00947.00000 37-40-12.4 N MI MD KQI23 085-40-09.9 W 0002582662 CC LICENSES, LLC GRAND RAPIDS 04/25/2006 00950.00000 42-57-52.1 N AL MD WPOL977 086-48-35.0 W 0002582664 CXR HOLDINGS, L.L.C. Birmingham 04/25/2006 00947.50000 33-31-29.4 N CA MD WPWH701 117-02-20.0 W 0002584674 EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION Yucaipa 04/26/2006 00951.50000 34-00-42.0 N SD MD WPOT271 096-47-02.1 W 0002585059 FELLER BROADCASTING, LLC SIOUX FALLS 04/27/2006 00944.12500 43-31-32.8 N SD MD WPOT271 096-47-02.1 W 0002585059 FELLER BROADCASTING, LLC SIOUX FALLS 04/27/2006 00951.62500 43-31-32.8 N OH MD WLD517 081-40-51.9 W 0002585456 IDEASTREAM CLEVELAND 04/27/2006 00945.00000 41-30-01.3 N MI NE 083-11-59.0 W 0002582666 PLONTA BROADCASTING INC. Gagetown 04/25/2006 00951.50000 43-42-24.0 N MI NE 085-35-39.0 W 0002582679 NORTHERN RADIO OF GAYLORD,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265287A1.txt
  • N OK MD WPJF610 098-01-41.0 W 0002594883 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNWAURIKA 05/04/2006 06765.00000 34-08-37.0 N OK MD WPJF610 098-01-41.0 W 0002594883 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNWAURIKA 05/04/2006 06775.00000 34-08-37.0 N OK MD WPJF610 098-01-41.0 W 0002594883 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNWAURIKA 05/04/2006 06785.00000 34-08-37.0 N TX MD WPNN830 098-14-56.0 W 0002594895 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNPETROLIA 05/04/2006 06605.00000 34-02-28.0 N MA MD WLU805 071-10-02.1 W 0002594924 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP WILMINGTON 05/04/2006 05945.20000 42-32-27.3 N MA MD WLU805 071-10-02.1 W 0002594924 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP WILMINGTON 05/04/2006 05974.85000 42-32-27.3 N MA MD WLU805 071-10-02.1 W 0002594924 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP WILMINGTON 05/04/2006 10715.00000 42-32-27.3 N Page 26 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265356A1.txt
  • Telephone Penetration by State (Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State Alabama 87.9% 91.5% 3.6% Alaska 83.8 95.4 11.6 * Arizona 88.8 93.5 4.8 * Arkansas 88.2 88.5 0.3 California 91.7 95.4 3.7 * Colorado 94.4 94.4 0.0 Connecticut 95.5 93.8 -1.7 Delaware 95.0 90.2 -4.8 District of Columbia 94.7 92.2 -2.5 Florida 85.5 90.9 5.4 * Georgia 88.9 86.8 -2.1 Hawaii 94.6 92.8 -1.8 Idaho 89.5 94.0 4.5 * Illinois 95.0 89.0 -6.0 Indiana 90.3 90.0 -0.3 Iowa 95.4 94.4 -1.0 Kansas 94.9 93.9 -1.0 Kentucky 86.9 91.0 4.1 * Louisiana 88.9 93.1 4.2 * Maine 90.7 95.2 4.5 * Maryland 96.3 92.8 -3.5 Massachusetts 94.3 94.3 0.0 Michigan 93.8 92.4 -1.4 Minnesota 96.4 96.6 0.3 Mississippi 82.4 91.8 9.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265358A1.txt
  • 10,425 10,320 10,298 12,746 10,966 11,435 12,337 13,209 13,459 22,296 22,648 21,655 21,713 21,064 56,941 49,682 50,311 50,353 50,785 51,016 78,054 78,265 78,310 77,149 76,447 * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 4 58 Alabama 4.2 Montana 2.5 Alaska 3.4 Nebraska 2.2 Arizona 2.7 Nevada 3.6 Arkansas 3.6 New Hampshire 2.7 California 1.1 New Jersey 2.3 Colorado 2.1 New Mexico 3.6 Connecticut 2.6 New York 1.4 Delaware 2.8 North Carolina 2.0 District Of Columbia 4.7 North Dakota 1.9 Florida 1.7 Ohio 1.9 Georgia 3.3 Oklahoma 3.5 Hawaii 3.1 Oregon 3.1 Idaho 2.6 Pennsylvania 1.4 Illinois 2.4 Rhode Island 3.3 Indiana 3.1 South Carolina 3.6 Iowa 2.8 South Dakota 4.0 Kansas 3.0 Tennessee 2.9 Kentucky 3.5 Texas 1.8 Louisiana
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265487A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265487A1.txt
  • 0002612276 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION YOUNGWOOD 05/17/2006 10875.00000 40-14-00.4 N PA NE 079-40-30.8 W 0002612279 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION FREEPORT 05/17/2006 10835.00000 40-42-49.1 N PA NE 079-39-35.0 W 0002612283 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION SOUTH BUFFALO T 05/17/2006 10795.00000 40-42-48.0 N PA NE 079-59-14.0 W 0002612286 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION PITTSBURGH 05/17/2006 10755.00000 40-23-33.0 N PA NE 079-55-52.0 W 0002612288 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION CLAIRTON 05/17/2006 10835.00000 40-17-48.0 N PA NE 079-52-02.1 W 0002612291 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Pittsburgh 05/17/2006 19680.00000 40-27-37.0 N PA NE 079-53-52.0 W 0002612293 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION MUNHALL 05/17/2006 19460.00000 40-23-46.0 N PA NE 079-53-14.0 W 0002612295 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION WEST MIFFLIN 05/17/2006 19540.00000 40-22-20.0 N PA NE 079-50-43.3 W 0002612297 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION SUMMIT TOWNSHI 05/17/2006 17980.00000 40-49-00.9 N PA NE 080-05-36.0 W 0002612301 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION WEXFORD 05/17/2006 18120.00000 40-37-11.0 N PA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265627A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265627A1.txt
  • 112-08-04.8 W 0002624273 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Stanfield 05/23/2006 17915.00000 32-49-51.4 N AZ NE 112-08-50.5 W 0002624275 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC PHOENIX 05/23/2006 19435.00000 33-54-30.7 N AZ NE 112-07-42.5 W 0002624277 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC NEW RIVER 05/23/2006 17875.00000 33-58-09.4 N FL NE 082-19-29.3 W 0002624278 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION TAMPA 05/23/2006 21875.00000 27-59-57.0 N FL NE 082-26-02.3 W 0002624281 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Lutz 05/23/2006 19620.00000 28-05-02.1 N FL NE 082-24-06.0 W 0002624285 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION TAMPA 05/23/2006 19460.00000 28-03-18.0 N FL NE 082-46-03.1 W 0002624559 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION LARGO 05/23/2006 10835.00000 27-54-05.5 N FL NE 082-17-01.0 W 0002624561 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION BRANDON 05/23/2006 11245.00000 27-56-11.0 N FL NE 082-16-30.3 W 0002624565 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION SEFFNER 05/23/2006 11405.00000 27-58-59.1 N FL NE 082-44-06.7 W 0002624566 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Saint Petersburg 05/23/2006 19380.00000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265787A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265787A1.txt
  • dated April 3, 2006, Sistema would purchase 66 percent of the share capital of WaveCrest's ultimate parent, WaveCrest Group Enterprises Limited ("WaveCrest Group"). WaveCrest Group is a British Virgin Islands company that indirectly wholly owns WaveCrest through a wholly-owned U.K. subsidiary, WaveCrest (UK) Limited. Sistema's majority shareholder is Vladimir P. Evtushenkov, a Russian citizen who holds 62.1 percent direct and 2.1 percent indirect equity and voting interests in Sistema. Mr. Evtushenkov holds his indirect interest through control of Zelnick Holdings Limited, a Republic of Cyprus company. All other shareholders of Sistema hold less than 10 percent of its equity and voting stock. WaveCrest Group's current majority (77.36 percent) shareholder, Marr T&T, would hold 31.66 percent of WaveCrest Group's share capital upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265920A1.txt
  • N Page 28 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IA NE 091-11-02.0 W 0002642628 Iowa RSA No. 4 Limited Partnership WAPELLO 06/07/2006 06345.49000 41-06-32.0 N IA NE 091-17-56.6 W 0002642671 Iowa RSA No. 4 Limited Partnership COLUMBUS JUNCT 06/07/2006 06063.80000 41-17-02.1 N IA NE 091-17-56.6 W 0002642671 Iowa RSA No. 4 Limited Partnership COLUMBUS JUNCT 06/07/2006 06123.10000 41-17-02.1 N IA NE 091-19-11.0 W 0002642699 Iowa RSA No. 4 Limited Partnership Nauvoo 06/07/2006 06226.89000 40-36-18.0 N TX NE 095-37-32.4 W 0002643007 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION HOUSTON 06/08/2006 19460.00000 29-44-19.3 N TX NE 095-37-32.4 W 0002643007 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION HOUSTON 06/08/2006 19540.00000 29-44-19.3 N TX NE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266008A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266008A1.txt
  • 06/13/2006 19540.00000 40-20-57.1 N CA MD WPTL767 118-50-29.3 W 0002648139 Oxnard-Ventura-Simi Limited PartnershipMoorpark 06/13/2006 10587.50000 34-15-12.0 N CA MD WPZZ803 119-05-52.0 W 0002648426 OXNARD VENTURA SIMI LIMITED PARTSOMIS 06/13/2006 10597.50000 34-15-50.0 N AZ MD WML575 109-57-34.0 W 0002648456 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC BISBEE 06/13/2006 06152.75000 31-28-54.9 N AZ MD WML576 110-05-36.9 W 0002649505 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Dragoon 06/13/2006 06197.24000 32-01-02.1 N AZ MD WML576 110-05-36.9 W 0002649505 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Dragoon 06/13/2006 06404.79000 32-01-02.1 N CA MD WPUU429 117-04-54.3 W 0002649929 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEWINCHESTER 06/14/2006 10552.50000 33-41-59.5 N CA MD WLV904 118-18-59.3 W 0002649975 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNELOS ANGELES 06/14/2006 17970.00000 34-05-54.0 N CA MD WMW363 118-20-10.3 W 0002649986 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNELOS ANGELES 06/14/2006
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266108A1.txt
  • NE 076-34-36.0 W 0002657304 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Baltimore 06/20/2006 10915.00000 39-18-10.4 N MD NE 076-34-36.0 W 0002657304 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Baltimore 06/20/2006 11075.00000 39-18-10.4 N MD NE 076-33-51.4 W 0002657307 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION BALTIMORE 06/20/2006 10795.00000 39-17-50.1 N CA NE 118-17-26.0 W 0002657570 COLOR BROADBAND INC TORRANCE 06/20/2006 19640.00000 33-51-21.0 N CA NE 118-11-17.0 W 0002657571 COLOR BROADBAND INC LONG BEACH 06/20/2006 18080.00000 33-46-02.1 N CA NE 118-11-17.0 W 0002657571 COLOR BROADBAND INC LONG BEACH 06/20/2006 22075.00000 33-46-02.1 N CA NE 118-15-20.2 W 0002657572 COLOR BROADBAND INC LOS ANGELES 06/20/2006 11265.00000 34-02-52.0 N MD NE 076-39-47.0 W 0002657593 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION LINTHICUM 06/20/2006 21925.00000 39-13-44.0 N MD NE 076-26-26.7 W 0002657594 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Edgemere 06/20/2006 10875.00000 39-14-13.4 N MD NE 076-40-16.0 W 0002657595 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266127A1.txt
  • that filed waivers for opt-out that went unopposed. I was disappointed that we ultimately were unable to provide these operators with additional certainty but am pleased the Commission made a commitment to review these waivers expeditiously. In April, we also put in place important relocation procedures that will apply to BRS licensees operating on channels 1 and 2 in the 2.1 GHz band. Our decision is particularly significant because the adopted procedures are another important step in our efforts to prepare for the upcoming Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) auction later this summer, as a subgroup of AWS licensees ultimately will be responsible for relocation of these BRS operators. We had to craft a carefully balanced item that considered the needs and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266245A1.txt
  • WMW508 123-21-21.3 W 0002669461 USCOC Of Oregon RSA #5, Inc. SUTHERLIN 06/30/2006 06715.62500 43-22-18.4 N TX MD WLV772 095-25-15.2 W 0002669502 TYLER/LONGVIEW/MARSHALL MSA LIMLINDALE 06/30/2006 06315.84000 32-30-49.7 N TX MD WLV772 095-25-15.2 W 0002669502 TYLER/LONGVIEW/MARSHALL MSA LIMLINDALE 06/30/2006 10623.12500 32-30-49.7 N TX MD WMS401 095-40-50.1 W 0002669528 ALLTEL Communications of Texas LimitedBEN WHEELER 06/30/2006 02174.80000 32-26-21.3 N WY MD WPZV796 108-51-02.1 W 0002669536 Union Telephone Company CODY 06/30/2006 19310.00000 44-35-09.8 N WY MD WLW552 107-49-46.2 W 0002669590 Union Telephone Company WAMSUTTER 06/30/2006 10556.25000 41-44-47.8 N WY MD WPZJ569 108-15-01.5 W 0002669591 Union Telephone Company Tipton 06/30/2006 10621.25000 41-37-23.0 N WY MD WQDW598 105-36-59.4 W 0002669593 Union Telephone Company Gillette 06/30/2006 17850.00000 44-16-42.6 N Page 12 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266585A1.txt
  • Creek Battle Creek 07/18/2006 00956.10000 42-13-49.1 N MI NE 084-56-17.9 W 0002686490 City of Battle Creek MARSHALL 07/18/2006 00955.90000 42-17-06.1 N MI NE 084-48-24.0 W 0002686499 City of Battle Creek Homer 07/18/2006 00959.50000 42-08-47.0 N MI NE 084-56-17.9 W 0002686521 Calhoun, County of MARSHALL 07/18/2006 00957.15000 42-17-06.1 N MI NE 085-10-42.9 W 0002686527 Calhoun, County of Battle Creek 07/18/2006 00953.55000 42-19-02.1 N MT NE 104-31-51.2 W 0002686748 ROOSEVELT COUNTY OF Culbertson 07/17/2006 06375.14000 48-12-02.1 N GA NE 084-14-44.0 W 0002687008 DEKALB COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENLaVista 07/19/2006 06256.54000 33-50-26.0 N GA NE 084-14-44.0 W 0002687008 DEKALB COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENLaVista 07/19/2006 06705.00000 33-50-26.0 N NJ NE 074-14-14.5 W 0002687172 Monmouth County, NJ FREEHOLD 07/19/2006 21225.00000 40-15-51.3 N GA NE 083-53-57.6 W 0002687856 HALL COUNTY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266595A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266595A1.txt
  • any other unbundled network element. Jun 2005 Dec 2000 Jun 2001 Dec 2001 Acquired from Other Carriers Date CLECs ReportingTotal End- User Lines Resold Lines UNEs 1 Lines 2 ResoldUNEsCLEC- Owned Resold 21.0% UNEs 47.0% CLEC-Owned 32.0% Dec 1997 9 159,008 157,132 133 1,876 1.2% Jun 1998 8 161,810 159,118 244 2,692 1.7 Dec 1998 7 164,614 161,191 361 3,423 2.1 Jun 1999 7 167,177 162,909 685 4,268 2.6 Dec 1999 168 187,190 181,203 1,493 5,987 3.2 Jun 2000 159 188,058 179,649 3,312 8,409 4.5 Dec 2000 166 188,223 177,561 5,274 10,662 5.7 Jun 2001 156 187,092 174,752 7,922 12,340 6.6 Dec 2001 164 185,391 171,917 9,460 13,474 7.3 Jun 2002 166 182,345 167,330 11,540 15,015 8.2 Dec 2002 174 181,616
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2005) Table 1.14 Historical Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15) ii Table 1.15 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll Service Calls II. Expenditures on Telephone Service......................................................II-1 A. Residential Expenditures..................................................................II-2 B. Business Expenditures.....................................................................II-2 C. Additional Sources of Information on Expenditures for Telephone Service......II-2 Table 2.1 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Household Location Table 2.2 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Race and National Origin Table 2.3 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Household Income Table 2.4 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Age of the Head of the Household Table 2.5 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Size of the Household Table 2.6 Average Annual Household Telecommunications Expenditures by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267053A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267053A1.pdf
  • Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193-87.199. Section 76.613(a) states that ``[h]armful interference is any emission, radiation or induction which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with this chapter.'' See 47 C.F.R. ��2.1 & 76.613(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a)(1). We note that, although the rule violation cited here is Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules, a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture is being issued in this case because the leaks exceeded the CLI limit of 64 set forth in Section 76.611 of the Rules. 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267604A1.txt
  • 09/21/2006 10653.12500 43-14-08.0 N Page 40 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 123-53-39.1 W 0002761409 Cal-One Cellular L.P. Weott 09/21/2006 06755.00000 40-19-16.5 N CA NE 123-53-39.1 W 0002761409 Cal-One Cellular L.P. Weott 09/21/2006 06785.00000 40-19-16.5 N CA NE 124-05-02.1 W 0002761443 Cal-One Cellular L.P. Scotia 09/21/2006 06625.00000 40-25-13.4 N CA NE 124-05-02.1 W 0002761443 Cal-One Cellular L.P. Scotia 09/21/2006 06665.62500 40-25-13.4 N CA NE 123-42-56.0 W 0002761451 Cal-One Cellular L.P. Bridgevil 09/21/2006 06825.62500 40-29-30.0 N IA NE 093-15-08.3 W 0002761774 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. HUBBARD 09/22/2006 06765.00000 42-20-49.3 N IA NE 093-15-08.3 W 0002761774 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267703A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267703A1.pdf
  • Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193-87.199. Section 76.613(a) states that ``[h]armful interference is any emission, radiation or induction which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with this chapter.'' See 47 C.F.R. ��2.1 & 76.613(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a)(1). 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. �1.80. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(D). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b), 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80, 76.605(a)(12). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. (...continued from previous page) Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ , - . 0 1 2 : ;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267738A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267738A1.txt
  • MD WPOT351 066-00-03.5 W 0002768704 SAN JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COTRUJILLO ALTO 09/28/2006 10558.12500 18-21-05.5 N PR MD WPOT351 066-00-03.5 W 0002768704 SAN JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COTRUJILLO ALTO 09/28/2006 10915.00000 18-21-05.5 N PR MD WPOT351 066-00-03.5 W 0002768704 SAN JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COTRUJILLO ALTO 09/28/2006 11177.50000 18-21-05.5 N FL MD WQFF843 082-26-02.3 W 0002768722 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Lutz 09/28/2006 11405.00000 28-05-02.1 N FL MD WQFF843 082-26-02.3 W 0002768722 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Lutz 09/28/2006 19620.00000 28-05-02.1 N FL MD WQFD410 082-34-09.7 W 0002768723 FiberTower Network Services Corp. TAMPA 09/28/2006 10755.00000 27-58-14.2 N FL MD WQFD410 082-34-09.7 W 0002768723 FiberTower Network Services Corp. TAMPA 09/28/2006 10795.00000 27-58-14.2 N FL MD WQFD410 082-34-09.7 W 0002768723 FiberTower Network Services Corp. TAMPA 09/28/2006 10835.00000 27-58-14.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267917A1.txt
  • NH MD WPON309 072-04-28.3 W 0002781665 New Hampshire RSA 2 Partnership Newbury 10/11/2006 10582.50000 43-18-49.2 N NH MD WPQM249 071-52-51.2 W 0002781667 New Hampshire RSA 2 Partnership Sutton 10/11/2006 10637.50000 43-18-54.2 N NH MD WPQM249 071-52-51.2 W 0002781667 New Hampshire RSA 2 Partnership Sutton 10/11/2006 10647.50000 43-18-54.2 N IL MD WML875 089-51-08.4 W 0002781745 Cellco Partnership FOREST CITY 10/11/2006 02162.00000 40-22-02.1 N IL MD WML875 089-51-08.4 W 0002781745 Cellco Partnership FOREST CITY 10/11/2006 05945.20000 40-22-02.1 N IL MD WML875 089-51-08.4 W 0002781745 Cellco Partnership FOREST CITY 10/11/2006 05974.85000 40-22-02.1 N IL MD WML875 089-51-08.4 W 0002781745 Cellco Partnership FOREST CITY 10/11/2006 06004.50000 40-22-02.1 N IL MD WML875 089-51-08.4 W 0002781745 Cellco Partnership FOREST CITY 10/11/2006 06034.15000 40-22-02.1 N IL MD WML875
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268047A1.txt
  • WQDA693 080-37-27.2 W 0002786495 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPMelbourne 10/16/2006 00944.25000 28-05-14.1 N CA MD WLG244 120-39-24.6 W 0002787101 AMFM RADIO LICENSES, L.L.C. SAN LUIS OBISPO 10/17/2006 00947.50000 35-21-37.9 N SC MD WMU362 080-49-29.3 W 0002788793 MILLER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Orangeburg 10/18/2006 00947.00000 33-33-10.5 N SC MD WMU363 080-49-29.3 W 0002788835 MILLER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Orangeburg 10/18/2006 00951.50000 33-33-10.5 N IA MD WCD963 096-21-02.1 W 0002790194 WESTERN IOWA TECH COMMUNITY COSIOUX CITY 10/19/2006 00951.00000 42-29-00.9 N KS NE 097-15-32.8 W 0002788458 CONNOISSEUR MEDIA, LLC WICHITA 10/17/2006 00947.50000 37-43-10.3 N Page 2 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 120-35-26.7 W 0002788901 KBYN, INC. Angels Camp 10/18/2006
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268283A1.txt
  • Stations Application for Authority Horizon Christian Fellowship EZ Nature of Service:Fixed Satellite Service 48 � 14 ' 4.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: Minot 123 First Street Minot Building, Ward, Minot, ND 101 � 17 ' 39.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: Andrew One 2.4 meters ANTENNA ID: Type 243, Class III 58.02 dBW MCPC digital encoded audio and data @ 2.1Mbps, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M87G7W MCPC digital encoded audio and data @ 2.1Mbps, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M87G7W Points of Communication: Minot - PERMITTED LIST - () Page 3 of 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268453A1.txt
  • Midlothian 11/03/2006 10835.00000 32-26-49.0 N TX NE 096-59-54.0 W 0002808029 AirCanopy Internet Services Midlothian 11/03/2006 10915.00000 32-26-49.0 N TX NE 096-59-54.0 W 0002808029 AirCanopy Internet Services Midlothian 11/03/2006 23125.00000 32-26-49.0 N TX NE 096-49-51.0 W 0002808030 AirCanopy Internet Services Red Oak 11/03/2006 11405.00000 32-28-01.0 N TX NE 096-54-34.0 W 0002808031 AirCanopy Internet Services Midlothian 11/03/2006 11325.00000 32-30-12.0 N TX NE 097-06-02.1 W 0002808032 AirCanopy Internet Services Itasca 11/03/2006 10915.00000 32-09-54.2 N TX NE 097-01-30.0 W 0002808033 AirCanopy Internet Services Midlothian 11/03/2006 11405.00000 32-26-11.0 N TX NE 097-01-30.0 W 0002808033 AirCanopy Internet Services Midlothian 11/03/2006 21925.00000 32-26-11.0 N NY NE 073-57-13.6 W 0002808397 Wyckoff Heights Medical Center New York 11/06/2006 17980.00000 40-45-52.2 N MT NE 105-49-31.8 W 0002808476 KTVQ Communications Inc. Miles
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268502A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268502A1.txt
  • Telesphere Networks Ltd. (Telesphere) to Rally Capital, LLC (Rally Capital), a Washington based limited liability company. Pursuant to a conversion of Telesphere debt to equity in Telesphere, on September 20, 2006, Rally Capital, LLC acquired 64.9 percent of Telesphere's capital stock, and therefore, without prior Commission approval, acquired control of Telesphere. On October 4, 2006, Rally Capital acquired an additional 2.1 percent of Telesphere's capital stock. Thus Rally Capital now owns 67 percent of Telesphere's capital stock. The following U.S. entities and individual U.S. citizen hold 10 percent or greater ownership interests in Telesphere through Rally Capital: Teledesic LLC (100 percent of Rally Capital's units and indirectly 67 percent of Telesphere's capital stock); Teledesic Corporation (99 percent of Teledesic LLC's units
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268576A1.txt
  • Wireless (VAW) LLC DEER PARK 11/14/2006 06625.00000 48-05-16.6 N CA MD WMS759 118-14-03.2 W 0002817005 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNELOS ANGELES 11/14/2006 19560.00000 34-02-15.0 N CA MD WLV906 118-23-08.3 W 0002817283 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEWEST HOLLYWOO 11/14/2006 19400.00000 34-04-37.0 N CA MD WLV906 118-23-08.3 W 0002817283 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEWEST HOLLYWOO 11/14/2006 19680.00000 34-04-37.0 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0002817297 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 11/14/2006 05945.20000 46-44-22.2 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0002817297 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 11/14/2006 06765.00000 46-44-22.2 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0002817297 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 11/14/2006 06785.00000 46-44-22.2 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0002817297 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 11/14/2006 10587.50000 46-44-22.2 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268813A1.txt
  • pleadings must be filed electronically (electronic mail or facsimile), by hand delivery, or by overnight delivery service other than U.S. Postal Service Express and Priority Mail. AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX AM 097-49-44.1 W 0002828694 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Killeen 11/29/2006 00136.97500 31-04-02.1 N IN MD KMF2 086-17-00.0 W 0002829810 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc INDIANAPOLIS 11/28/2006 00130.17500 39-43-28.2 N IN NE 086-17-39.8 W 0002828495 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Indianapolis 11/27/2006 00136.85000 39-43-02.4 N FL NE 082-41-14.7 W 0002828497 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc St Petersburg 11/27/2006 00130.97500 27-54-38.3 N NE NE 100-35-31.5 W 0002828498 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc McCook 11/27/2006 00132.00000 40-12-22.6 N NE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268926A1.txt
  • W 0002822378 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNELOS ANGELES 12/04/2006 19400.00000 34-02-22.0 N CA AM WPJD343 118-16-22.3 W 0002822378 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNELOS ANGELES 12/04/2006 19480.00000 34-02-22.0 N CA AM WPJD343 118-16-22.3 W 0002822378 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNELOS ANGELES 12/04/2006 19480.00000 34-02-22.0 N MA MD WMT853 071-11-50.2 W 0002836180 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP TEWKSBURY 12/04/2006 11485.00000 42-37-10.3 N MA MD WLU805 071-10-02.1 W 0002836184 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP WILMINGTON 12/04/2006 10995.00000 42-32-27.3 N CA MD WPNN777 124-07-35.0 W 0002836345 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1TRINIDAD 12/04/2006 06815.00000 41-05-58.0 N CA MD WPNN777 124-07-35.0 W 0002836345 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1TRINIDAD 12/04/2006 06835.00000 41-05-58.0 N Page 6 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268942A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268942A1.txt
  • Horizon Christian Fellowship EZ Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, Fixed Satellite Service 48 � 14 ' 4.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 123 FIRST STREET MINOT BUILDING, WARD, MINOT, ND 101 � 17 ' 39.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: Andrew One 2.4 meters ANTENNA ID: Type 243, Class III 58.02 dBW MCPC digital encoded audio and data @ 2.1Mbps, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M87G7W MCPC digital encoded audio and data @ 2.1Mbps, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M87G7W Points of Communication: 1 - PERMITTED LIST - () E060397 SES-LIC-20061030-01924E Date Effective: 12/11/2006 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 12/11/2006 - 12/11/2021 Application for Authority NBC Telemundo License Co. Nature of Service:Fixed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269066A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269066A1.txt
  • Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA AM WQDG669 077-29-58.9 W 0002772015 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. RICHMOND 12/11/2006 17980.00000 37-37-22.5 N VA AM WQDG669 077-29-58.9 W 0002772015 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. RICHMOND 12/11/2006 21980.00000 37-37-22.5 N VA AM WQDG669 077-29-58.9 W 0002772015 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. RICHMOND 12/11/2006 22285.00000 37-37-22.5 N ME AM WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0002817297 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 12/13/2006 05945.20000 46-44-22.2 N ME AM WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0002817297 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 12/13/2006 06765.00000 46-44-22.2 N ME AM WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0002817297 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 12/13/2006 06785.00000 46-44-22.2 N ME AM WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0002817297 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 12/13/2006 10552.50000 46-44-22.2 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269176A1.pdf
  • Class U.S. Mail and Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested to SJT Enterprises, PO Box 753, Bartonsville, PA 18321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION G. Michael Moffitt District Director Chicago District Office Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5). 47 U.S.C. � 302(b). 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). 47 U.S.C. �� 401, 501, 503, 510. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269191A1.txt
  • A LIMITED PAAsheville 12/18/2006 00948.50000 35-37-10.4 N IA MD WBJ79 092-17-58.0 W 0002855634 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE WATERLOO 12/20/2006 00945.00000 42-26-38.0 N PA MD WQDC307 076-47-59.7 W 0002856161 WITF, INC. HARRISBURG 12/20/2006 00951.50000 40-14-33.3 N TX MD WLN406 097-48-00.0 W 0002856182 CSSI NON-PROFIT EDUCATIONAL BROWEATHERFORD 12/20/2006 00946.37500 - 00950.00000 32-44-21.0 N OH MD WLI684 082-06-31.5 W 0002858186 ELYRIA-LORAIN BROADCASTING CO.ELYRIA 12/21/2006 00948.00000 41-22-02.1 N IL MD KLP58 088-59-43.0 W 0002858278 CONNOISSEUR MEDIA OF BLOOMINGTBLOOMINGTON 12/21/2006 00949.87500 40-28-59.0 N Page 4 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL MD KLP58 088-59-43.0 W 0002858278 CONNOISSEUR MEDIA OF BLOOMINGTBLOOMINGTON 12/21/2006 00950.12500 40-28-59.0 N TX NE 097-48-00.0 W 0002856183 CSSI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Monthly Support - by State ....................................................................... Table 2.3 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries ................................................... Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A11.txt
  • 12.1 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 97.4 99.5 98.5 99.1 99.1 99.6 99.1 98.5 97.7 Residence 98.7 99.6 98.6 99.2 99.1 99.6 99.1 98.7 98.0 Business 88.5 98.9 98.5 98.3 98.8 99.3 98.5 97.0 94.7 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.7 0.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 1.5 0.8 1.3 0.9 Residence 1.3 0.3 1.4 1.5 2.1 1.0 0.7 1.2 0.8 Business 2.0 0.7 1.3 2.2 2.4 3.8 1.2 2.0 2.3 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 42.2 18.2 15.9 43.4 23.5 29.7 29.0 34.1 26.0 Residence 44.8 18.8 16.3 45.3 24.5 30.6 31.1 37.8 28.4 Business 29.2 16.0 13.6 33.9 17.3 23.6 20.7 15.2 12.9 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 307.3 112.6 144.3 129.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
  • Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Monthly Support - by State ....................................................................... Table 2.3 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries ................................................... Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • 4,949 Fixed Local Service Providers 21,650 21,164 2.2 38,663 82,509 121,172 21,685 Payphone Service Providers 28 26 4.7 71 262 332 23 Wireless Telephony Including Cellular, 23,901 23,414 2.0 6,489 99,829 106,318 22,965 Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers Paging & Messaging Service Providers 96 91 4.5 86 489 575 65 Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) Dispatch 60 58 2.1 1 213 214 57 Wireless Data and Other Mobile Service 116 115 0.9 28 338 365 115 Providers Wireless Service Providers 24,172 23,679 2.0 6,604 100,869 107,473 23,202 Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 21,697 21,162 2.5 11,228 33,307 44,535 22,923 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 924 871 5.8 346 791 1,136 383 Prepaid Calling Card Providers 1,107 1,025 7.4 142 1,453 1,595 1,235
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • a non- common-carrier basis. These carriers and service providers may pass on contribution expenses to their customers. The FCC monitors subscriber participation and telephone usage to determine program benefits and costs.24 Historical tables for subscribership and carrier payments by state can be downloaded from the Monitoring Report's Low-Income Support section of the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports website, www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/stats.html. Table 2.1 reports tribal and non-tribal Lifeline subscriber and Link Up beneficiary data for years 1987 through 2005. Table 2.2 and Chart 2.1 report annual low-income support payments for years 1988 through 2005. Table 2.3 reports Lifeline monthly support by state or jurisdiction for both federal and state support as of March 2005, and indicates the additional contribution from the federal program
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • took effect on July 1, some companies made subsequent adjustments to their tariffs, which did not take effect until August 11. 1955 - 2005 1995 - 2005 CPI All Items 4.1 % 2.5 % CPI All Services 5.0 3.2 CPI Telephone Services ** 1.7 -0.2 CPI Major Categories: - Food & Beverages * 2.5 - Housing * 2.8 - Apparel 2.1 -1.0 - Transportation 3.9 2.3 - Medical Care 5.9 3.9 - Recreation * 1.5 - Other Goods & Services * 4.2 CPI Public Transportation 5.1 2.1 CPI Utility Natural Gas Service 5.5 7.7 CPI Electricity 3.4 1.5 CPI Sewer & Water Maintenance 5.6 3.7 CPI Postage 4.7 1.8 *** Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Chart 7.1 The CPI telephone service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269393A1.txt
  • FIBERTOWER NETWORK SERVICES COFORT WORTH 01/04/2007 19540.00000 32-46-22.2 N TX MD WQBR760 097-23-34.5 W 0002869287 FiberTower Network Services Corp. FORT WORTH 01/04/2007 17960.00000 32-45-34.1 N TX MD WQBR760 097-23-34.5 W 0002869287 FiberTower Network Services Corp. FORT WORTH 01/04/2007 18040.00000 32-45-34.1 N TX MD WQBR760 097-23-34.5 W 0002869287 FiberTower Network Services Corp. FORT WORTH 01/04/2007 18080.00000 32-45-34.1 N MA MD WLU805 071-10-02.1 W 0002869600 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP WILMINGTON 01/05/2007 10915.00000 42-32-27.3 N MA MD WLU805 071-10-02.1 W 0002869600 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP WILMINGTON 01/05/2007 10995.00000 42-32-27.3 N Page 11 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OK MD WMS370 095-51-56.0 W 0002869609 UNITED STATES CELLULAR TELEPHONKIOWA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269691A1.txt
  • Applicant Name Latitude City PR MD WPTC458 065-52-06.6 W 0002884785 SprintCom, Inc. (Puerto Rico) YABUCOA 01/19/2007 17885.00000 18-01-32.8 N PR MD WPTC458 065-52-06.6 W 0002884785 SprintCom, Inc. (Puerto Rico) YABUCOA 01/19/2007 17905.00000 18-01-32.8 N CA NE 117-26-30.1 W 0002878318 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Camp Pendleton 01/16/2007 10597.50000 33-17-22.1 N CA NE 117-49-57.7 W 0002880072 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC ORANGE 01/16/2007 17825.00000 33-49-02.1 N CA NE 117-49-58.8 W 0002880074 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC ORANGE 01/16/2007 19385.00000 33-48-30.5 N KY NE 087-30-54.3 W 0002880100 T-MOBILE USA St Charles 01/16/2007 17890.00000 37-11-24.3 N KY NE 087-27-34.8 W 0002880102 T-MOBILE USA Nortonville 01/16/2007 19450.00000 37-09-03.0 N AL NE 085-09-00.4 W 0002880300 Trillion Partners, Inc. Seale 01/16/2007 11035.00000 32-20-01.7 N AL NE 085-09-00.4 W 0002880300 Trillion Partners, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269802A1.pdf
  • and Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested to M.J. Electronics at its address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Daniel W. Noel District Director New York District Office Northeast Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5). 47 U.S.C. � 302(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a)(1). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3). 47 U.S.C. �� 401, 501, 503, 510. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270046A1.txt
  • Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City ND MD WLI408 097-02-12.6 W 0002886803 CITICASTERS LICENSES, L.P. GRAND FORKS 01/23/2007 00951.50000 47-55-31.8 N CA MD KUZ53 120-57-31.6 W 0002886907 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPMODESTO 01/23/2007 00944.00000 37-40-12.4 N CA MD WHA987 119-47-19.5 W 0002886983 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPFRESNO 01/23/2007 00948.00000 36-48-26.8 N TX MD WGV717 098-29-02.1 W 0002887182 CCB TEXAS LICENSES, L.P. San Antonio 01/23/2007 00945.00000 29-25-07.3 N CA MD WOR30 119-41-31.4 W 0002887255 CITICASTERS LICENSES, L.P. SANTA BARBARA 01/23/2007 00948.50000 34-25-19.9 N Page 2 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WHB996 098-32-34.0 W 0002887380 CCB TEXAS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270048A1.txt
  • of West Virginia DHHR/BPH State TLogan 01/22/2007 06345.49000 37-51-56.7 N WA MD WQFV987 119-59-07.5 W 0002885847 WASHINGTON, STATE OF; Department oPateros 01/22/2007 06730.00000 48-00-53.1 N WI MD WPNM733 091-11-05.8 W 0002887750 LA CROSSE, COUNTY OF LA CROSSE 01/23/2007 00953.55000 43-48-52.1 N WI MD WPNM733 091-11-05.8 W 0002887750 LA CROSSE, COUNTY OF LA CROSSE 01/23/2007 00955.15000 43-48-52.1 N MN MD WPNM735 091-20-02.1 W 0002887753 LA CROSSE, COUNTY OF La Crescent 01/23/2007 00957.15000 43-52-44.8 N IN MD WQES417 085-15-20.3 W 0002890534 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATIONKENDALVILLE 01/25/2007 19320.00000 41-26-07.8 N IN MD WQES417 085-15-20.3 W 0002890534 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATIONKENDALVILLE 01/25/2007 19375.00000 41-26-07.8 N CA MD WPNG278 116-56-10.3 W 0002890759 SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF JAMUL 01/25/2007 06685.00000 32-41-48.7 N CA MD WPNG278 116-56-10.3 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270308A1.txt
  • N VA NE 077-28-59.0 W 0002896173 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 01/30/2007 19600.00000 37-33-02.9 N VA NE 077-28-59.0 W 0002896173 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 01/30/2007 23410.00000 37-33-02.9 N WA NE 124-06-51.2 W 0002896295 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCOCEAN SHORES 01/30/2007 11621.25000 47-03-38.5 N VA NE 077-29-11.5 W 0002896324 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. RICHMOND 01/30/2007 21530.00000 37-34-44.9 N VA NE 077-30-02.1 W 0002896410 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 01/30/2007 19640.00000 37-34-44.4 N VA NE 077-30-02.1 W 0002896410 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 01/30/2007 22730.00000 37-34-44.4 N IA NE 091-43-43.7 W 0002896889 FARMERS CELLULAR TELEPHONE COFARMINGTON 01/31/2007 06765.00000 40-38-42.6 N MA NE 071-45-20.7 W 0002896936 FIBERTOWER NETWORK SERVICES COWORCESTER 01/31/2007 19620.00000 42-14-50.3 N VA NE 077-27-08.9 W 0002897572 Telecom Transport Management, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • DC 20554 at 800-378-3160, facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. The report can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site at: www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/trends.html. Table of Contents 1-1 1-1 Table 1.1Interstate Per-Line Access Charges...............................................................1-3 Table 1.2Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges............................................................1-4 Table 1.3Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier...................................................1-5 Table 1.4Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier.................................... ......... 1-6 2-1 Table 2.1High-Speed Lines....................................................................................2-3 Chart 2.1Total High-Speed Lines..............................................................................2-3 Chart 2.2High-Speed Lines by Technology..................................................................2-3 Table 2.2Advance Services Lines........................................................................... 2-4 Chart 2.3Advance Services Lines........................................................................... 2-4 Chart 2.4Advance Services Lines by Technology.........................................................2-4 Table 2.3Residential High-Speed Lines.....................................................................2-5 Chart 2.5Residential High-Speed Lines.....................................................................2-5 Chart 2.6Residential High-Speed Lines by Technology...................................................2-5 Table 2.4Residential Advanced Services Lines............................................................2-6 Chart 2.7Residential Advanced Services Lines............................................................2-6 Chart 2.8Residential Advanced Services Lines by Technology..........................................2-6 Table 2.5High-Speed Lines
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270666A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270666A1.txt
  • 37-15-40.4 N LA NE 090-03-12.8 W 0002912987 Verizon Wireless Personal CommunicationNew Orleans 02/14/2007 10628.12500 30-01-44.8 N Page 14 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City LA NE 090-03-12.8 W 0002912987 Verizon Wireless Personal CommunicationNew Orleans 02/14/2007 19415.00000 30-01-44.8 N IL NE 087-31-02.1 W 0002913016 FIBERTOWER NETWORK SERVICES COHammond 02/14/2007 21870.00000 41-37-00.1 N IL NE 087-57-36.3 W 0002913018 FIBERTOWER NETWORK SERVICES COWILLOWBROOK 02/14/2007 10755.00000 41-46-25.7 N IL NE 087-42-37.1 W 0002913086 FIBERTOWER NETWORK SERVICES COHOMEWOOD 02/14/2007 11245.00000 41-33-28.5 N IL NE 087-42-37.1 W 0002913086 FIBERTOWER NETWORK SERVICES COHOMEWOOD 02/14/2007 19380.00000 41-33-28.5 N IL NE 087-42-37.1 W 0002913086 FIBERTOWER NETWORK SERVICES COHOMEWOOD 02/14/2007 19600.00000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270855A1.txt
  • Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted BOC/Sprint Composite* Weighted Verizon Avg. BellSouth Weighted AT&T Avg. Qwest 17 ARMIS 43-05 Report 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 BellSouth 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 Qwest 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 AT&T Ameritech 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.5 1.4 1.4 AT&T Pacific 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.5 AT&T Southwestern 0.8 2.2 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 AT&T SNET 2.2 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Verizon GTE 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 Sprint 3.9 3.2 1.5 1.4 1.7 1.7 Weighted BOC/Sprint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271177A1.txt
  • filings", FCC 01-345, Order, (rel.November 29, 2001). Certain pleadings must be filed electronically (electronic mail or facsimile), by hand delivery, or by overnight delivery service other than U.S. Postal Service Express and Priority Mail. AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX AM WGV717 098-29-02.1 W 0002887182 CCB TEXAS LICENSES, L.P. San Antonio 02/27/2007 00951.00000 29-25-07.3 N WA MD WLE982 120-33-47.5 W 0002929380 CITICASTERS LICENSES, L.P. YAKIMA 02/28/2007 00949.00000 46-35-56.0 N WA MD WLE889 120-30-18.0 W 0002929686 CITICASTERS LICENSES, L.P. YAKIMA 02/28/2007 00949.00000 46-31-58.0 N NY MD WPNF820 073-49-16.7 W 0002929768 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPLatham 02/28/2007 00946.50000 42-46-23.6 N WA MD WME976 120-33-47.5 W 0002930805
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271280A1.txt
  • to its existing international section 214 authorization, ITC-214-20011010-00517. Cognigen will provide service to its remaining customers pursuant to its international section 214 authorization, ITC-214-20040213-00073. Acceris is a wholly owned subsidiary of North Central Equity LLC (North Central), a privately-held Minnesota holding company. Mr. Elam Baer (sole member Board of Governors), U.S. citizen, holds 54.6% interest in North Central, of which 2.1 units are held by his spouse Janis Clay. No other entity holds 10 percent or greater equity or voting interest in North Central. Cognigen Networks, Inc. FROM: Current Licensee: Acceris Management and Acquisition LLC Cognigen Networks, Inc. Assignment Acceris Management and Acquisition LLC INFORMATIVE ITC-214-20070212-00067 EDGE TELECOM INC This application has been removed from Streamlined processing pursuant to Section 63.12(c)(3)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271813A1.txt
  • N WA AM 122-19-36.3 W 0002941428 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSEATTLE 03/22/2007 10715.00000 47-35-26.7 N WA AM 122-19-36.3 W 0002941428 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSEATTLE 03/22/2007 10995.00000 47-35-26.7 N WA AM 122-18-32.0 W 0002941432 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSEATTLE 03/22/2007 06345.49000 47-36-57.0 N WA AM 122-18-32.0 W 0002941432 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSEATTLE 03/22/2007 11215.00000 47-36-57.0 N CO AM P 107-13-02.1 W 0002954562 Carbondale, Town of Carbondale 03/20/2007 00956.28125 39-24-00.0 N CA AM WPXC938 122-17-18.3 W 0002958116 NAPA, CITY OF Napa 03/21/2007 06645.00000 38-18-32.9 N CA AM WPXC938 122-17-18.3 W 0002958116 NAPA, CITY OF Napa 03/21/2007 11225.00000 38-18-32.9 N CA AM WPXC938 122-17-18.3 W 0002958116 NAPA, CITY OF Napa 03/21/2007 11225.00000 38-18-32.9 N WA MD WPUS842 121-49-17.4 W 0002953550 KING, COUNTY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272240A1.txt
  • 03/30/2007 23575.00000 42-20-50.0 N MA AM 071-01-53.2 W 0002883120 Towerstream Corp Boston 03/30/2007 17995.00000 42-20-39.1 N VA AM 077-25-57.9 W 0002895176 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/06/2007 17965.00000 37-31-01.5 N VA AM 077-25-57.9 W 0002895176 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/06/2007 21410.00000 37-31-01.5 N VA AM 077-25-57.9 W 0002895176 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/06/2007 22210.00000 37-31-01.5 N VA AM 077-30-02.1 W 0002896410 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/06/2007 19525.00000 37-34-44.4 N VA AM 077-30-02.1 W 0002896410 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/06/2007 22730.00000 37-34-44.4 N TN AM WLN800 086-52-13.9 W 0002919556 Verizon Wireless Tennessee PartnershipJOELTON 04/05/2007 06256.54000 36-20-53.2 N Page 4 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272381A1.txt
  • in prior years, the Commission proposes to receive a direct appropriation of $1,000,000 and to raise the remainder, or $312,000,000, through regulatory fees. During the current fiscal year, the Commission has a spending level of $291,282,388, established in the Continuing Resolution. To continue to operate at our current level, the Commission would require $297,282,388, which would represent an increase of 2.1 percent over the level set in the Continuing Resolution, for nondiscretionary operating increases. Of the total requested for the next fiscal year, $6,000,000 is designated for these nondiscretionary operating increases to maintain Fiscal Year 2007 service levels, including employee salaries for our projected full-time equivalents (FTEs), and inflationary increases for office space rental, supplies, printing, postage, and contractual services. Of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272545A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272545A2.txt
  • 5.645.2 28.9 $43,693 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 20,070,225 25.5 0.0 1.837.3 35.5 Cote d'Ivoire $4,889,284 74.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 22.9 $522,075 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $797 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 27,537,838 52.4 0.0 3.5 0.0 44.2 Djibouti $1,495,497 6.5 1.021.5 4.7 66.3 $63,979 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 6,728,884 5.2 0.813.9 8.1 71.9 Egypt $56,571,109 2.1 0.015.248.4 34.2 $1,721,212 0.0 0.0 2.314.7 83.0 $30,450 0.0 0.093.2 0.6 6.2 585,545,510 1.9 0.010.457.3 30.3 Equatorial Guinea $944,438 21.6 0.018.6 8.2 51.7 $11,876 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $128 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 4,373,091 25.6 0.021.316.7 36.5 Ethiopia $24,179,127 5.6 0.019.321.9 53.2 $775,365 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 98.5 $602 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 99.8 124,434,261 4.6 0.016.029.4 49.9 Gabon $2,130,707
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272549A1.txt
  • 37-31-01.5 N VA AM 077-25-57.9 W 0002895176 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/20/2007 17965.00000 37-31-01.5 N VA AM 077-25-57.9 W 0002895176 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/20/2007 18110.00000 37-31-01.5 N VA AM 077-25-57.9 W 0002895176 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/20/2007 21410.00000 37-31-01.5 N VA AM 077-25-57.9 W 0002895176 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/20/2007 22210.00000 37-31-01.5 N VA AM 077-30-02.1 W 0002896410 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/20/2007 19525.00000 37-34-44.4 N VA AM 077-30-02.1 W 0002896410 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/20/2007 22510.00000 37-34-44.4 N VA AM 077-30-02.1 W 0002896410 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/20/2007 22730.00000 37-34-44.4 N Page 3 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272772A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272772A1.txt
  • 26-39-26.7 N NV NE 115-10-46.6 W 0003001248 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Las Vegas 04/23/2007 17845.00000 36-00-38.5 N NV NE 115-10-26.8 W 0003001250 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Las Vegas 04/23/2007 19405.00000 35-58-24.1 N CA NE 115-59-19.0 W 0003001255 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC CACTUS CITY 04/23/2007 17865.00000 33-39-18.0 N CA NE 115-43-03.3 W 0003001256 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Desert Center 04/23/2007 19425.00000 33-39-40.1 N AZ NE 111-24-02.1 W 0003001257 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Picacho 04/23/2007 06116.30500 32-43-07.2 N AZ NE 112-07-31.5 W 0003001258 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Phoenix 04/23/2007 19305.00000 33-44-45.7 N AZ NE 111-42-44.4 W 0003001259 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Casa Grande 04/23/2007 06368.34500 32-49-18.8 N AZ NE 111-42-44.4 W 0003001259 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Casa Grande 04/23/2007 06388.11200 32-49-18.8 N AZ NE 112-08-10.0 W 0003001261 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Phoenix
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272906A1.txt
  • 10,320 10,298 10,164 10,966 11,435 12,337 13,209 13,459 22,296 22,648 21,655 21,713 21,064 21,188 49,682 50,311 50,353 50,785 51,016 78,054 78,265 78,310 77,149 76,447 75,939 * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 4 82 Alabama 4.1 Montana 2.5 Alaska 3.4 Nebraska 2.2 Arizona 2.7 Nevada 3.6 Arkansas 3.6 New Hampshire 2.7 California 1.1 New Jersey 2.3 Colorado 2.1 New Mexico 3.6 Connecticut 2.6 New York 1.4 Delaware 2.8 North Carolina 2.0 District Of Columbia 4.6 North Dakota 1.9 Florida 1.7 Ohio 1.9 Georgia 3.3 Oklahoma 3.5 Hawaii 3.1 Oregon 3.1 Idaho 2.6 Pennsylvania 1.4 Illinois 2.4 Rhode Island 3.3 Indiana 3.1 South Carolina 3.6 Iowa 2.8 South Dakota 4.0 Kansas 3.0 Tennessee 2.9 Kentucky 3.5 Texas 1.8 Louisiana
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273042A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273042A1.txt
  • LLC BRIGHAM CITY 05/07/2007 21975.00000 41-30-06.6 N UT NE 112-01-02.6 W 0003018644 CONTERRA ULTRA BROADBAND, LLCBRIGHAM CITY 05/07/2007 23025.00000 41-29-27.3 N UT NE 112-00-30.7 W 0003018646 CONTERRA ULTRA BROADBAND, LLCBRIGHAM CITY 05/07/2007 23175.00000 41-30-34.7 N UT NE 112-01-35.2 W 0003018651 CONTERRA ULTRA BROADBAND, LLCBRIGHAM CITY 05/07/2007 23125.00000 41-29-38.2 N UT NE 112-10-38.1 W 0003018653 CONTERRA ULTRA BROADBAND, LLCTREMONTON 05/07/2007 23075.00000 41-43-02.1 N VA NE 076-18-47.0 W 0003021043 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. HAMPTON 05/07/2007 18130.00000 37-00-04.0 N VA NE 076-11-17.8 W 0003021065 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Chesapeake 05/07/2007 21430.00000 36-45-51.1 N VA NE 076-16-56.0 W 0003021088 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. CHESAPEAKE 05/07/2007 22260.00000 36-48-48.0 N WA NE 119-06-39.0 W 0003021365 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Kennewick 05/08/2007 17845.00000 46-12-29.0 N Page 18 CF -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273170A1.txt
  • W 0003029444 CBS BROADCASTING INC. Pittsburgh 05/15/2007 12837.50000 - 12862.50000 40-26-34.2 N CA NE 117-19-29.6 W 0003033307 JEFF CHANG Victorville 05/18/2007 00636.00000 34-30-04.4 N Page 48 TT - TV Translator Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ NE 113-21-20.7 W 0003032203 MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVAGUILA 05/17/2007 07062.50000 34-04-02.1 N AZ NE 113-21-20.7 W 0003032210 MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVAGUILA 05/17/2007 07112.50000 34-04-02.1 N AZ NE 113-21-20.7 W 0003032213 MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVAGUILA 05/17/2007 07012.50000 34-04-02.1 N YK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Trunked State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO WPJW402 0003029076 SPECTRUM COMMUNICATIONS INC 05/15/2007
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273340A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273340A1.txt
  • 05/21/2007 18080.00000 33-52-10.1 N CA NE 118-21-20.8 W 0003037552 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCREDONDO BEACH 05/21/2007 19640.00000 33-51-58.2 N ID NE 111-26-38.9 W 0003038140 Idaho 6-Clark Limited Partnership Macks Inn 05/22/2007 06745.00000 44-33-45.7 N MD NE 076-14-24.6 W 0003038676 FiberTower Network Services Corp. ABERDEEN 05/22/2007 23025.00000 39-30-54.4 N MD NE 076-37-40.0 W 0003038678 FiberTower Network Services Corp. BALTIMORE 05/22/2007 21820.00000 39-18-02.1 N DC NE 076-59-04.0 W 0003038680 FiberTower Network Services Corp. WASHINGTON 05/22/2007 23125.00000 38-54-01.9 N MD NE 077-07-09.2 W 0003038684 FiberTower Network Services Corp. ROCKVILLE 05/22/2007 11285.00000 39-03-12.3 N MD NE 076-40-00.8 W 0003038699 FiberTower Network Services Corp. BALTIMORE 05/22/2007 11285.00000 39-21-12.6 N MD NE 076-40-00.8 W 0003038699 FiberTower Network Services Corp. BALTIMORE 05/22/2007 21975.00000 39-21-12.6 N MD NE 076-14-42.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273621A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273621A1.txt
  • 05/29/2007 00851.56250 MD WQGK999 A 0003045118 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. 05/29/2007 00851.56250 MD WQGK999 A 0003045118 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. 05/29/2007 00851.56250 MD WQGK999 A 0003045118 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. 05/29/2007 00851.56250 MD WQGK999 A 0003045118 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. 05/29/2007 00851.56250 MD WQGK999 A 0003045118 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. 05/29/2007 00851.56250 NC MD WQGK999 078-43-02.1 W 0003045118 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. BRUNSWICK 05/29/2007 00851.56250 34-16-26.6 N NC MD WQGK999 078-43-02.1 W 0003045118 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. BRUNSWICK 05/29/2007 00851.56250 34-16-26.6 N NC MD WQGK999 077-56-30.0 W 0003045118 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. BURGAW 05/29/2007 00851.56250 34-33-12.6 N NC MD WQGK999 077-56-30.0 W 0003045118 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. BURGAW 05/29/2007 00851.56250 34-33-12.6 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273956A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273956A1.txt
  • 35-07-15.2 N NC NE 080-43-35.0 W 0003059633 FiberTower Network Service Corp. MATTHEWS 06/05/2007 11405.00000 35-07-32.0 N NC NE 080-43-35.0 W 0003059633 FiberTower Network Service Corp. MATTHEWS 06/05/2007 23025.00000 35-07-32.0 N NC NE 080-46-02.0 W 0003059636 FiberTower Network Service Corp. MATTHEWS 06/05/2007 11285.00000 35-03-48.0 N NC NE 080-46-02.0 W 0003059636 FiberTower Network Service Corp. MATTHEWS 06/05/2007 21835.00000 35-03-48.0 N NC NE 080-46-02.1 W 0003059638 FiberTower Network Service Corp. Charlotte 06/05/2007 10735.00000 35-15-04.9 N NC NE 080-46-02.1 W 0003059638 FiberTower Network Service Corp. Charlotte 06/05/2007 19345.00000 35-15-04.9 N NC NE 080-55-01.6 W 0003059642 FiberTower Network Service Corp. HUNTERSVILLE 06/05/2007 10735.00000 35-25-35.9 N NC NE 080-55-01.6 W 0003059642 FiberTower Network Service Corp. HUNTERSVILLE 06/05/2007 10775.00000 35-25-35.9 N CO NE 104-51-16.2 W 0003059644 Trillion Partners,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274025A1.txt
  • breakout by region of the country. 35 Table 12 Share of Universal Service Contributions 1/ By Principal Type of Contributor Using Traditional Carrier Categories 2/ Preliminary 1/ Q2 Service Provider Category 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Regional Bell Operating Companies 11.7%14.4%14.3%16.2%18.3%19.9%19.9%19.8%19.8%18.3 14.2% (RBOCs) Including CLEC Affiliates. Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers 2.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.8 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.1 (LECs) Other Than RBOCs Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) Local Resellers and Other Local Carriers Other Than RBOCs 0.8 1.3 2.6 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.5 3.8 4.4 5.0 7.2 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.6 27.0 27.6 26.7 24.5 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274368A1.txt
  • 40-39-32.2 N PA MD WQGG480 076-36-22.9 W 0003071392 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Valley View 06/14/2007 21975.00000 40-39-32.2 N WV MD WPNN817 080-39-49.3 W 0003071907 EASTERBROOKE CELLULAR CORPORAFLATWOODS 06/14/2007 06315.84000 38-43-42.4 N WV MD WPNN817 080-39-49.3 W 0003071907 EASTERBROOKE CELLULAR CORPORAFLATWOODS 06/14/2007 06785.00000 38-43-42.4 N WV MD WPNN817 080-39-49.3 W 0003071907 EASTERBROOKE CELLULAR CORPORAFLATWOODS 06/14/2007 10755.00000 38-43-42.4 N NH MD WMN299 071-16-02.1 W 0003072439 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CANDIA 06/15/2007 02124.80000 43-03-11.8 N NH MD WMN299 071-16-02.1 W 0003072439 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CANDIA 06/15/2007 10556.25000 43-03-11.8 N NH MD WMN299 071-16-02.1 W 0003072439 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CANDIA 06/15/2007 11622.50000 43-03-11.8 N NH MD WPJF602 071-16-04.2 W 0003072442 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CHESTER 06/15/2007 11132.50000 42-57-05.3 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274374A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274374A1.txt
  • Other - Narrative U Continental US NE RMNew Renewal/Modification RORenewal Only NTCertification of Construction EXRequest for Extension of Time MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 122-23-00.0 W 0003070871 SAN FRANCISCO, CITY AND COUNTY OSAN FRANCISCO 06/14/2007 11055.00000 37-37-01.4 N MD NE 076-37-02.1 W 0003071086 Calvert County Government PRINCE FREDERIC 06/14/2007 17755.00000 38-32-11.1 N MD NE 076-34-53.0 W 0003071087 Calvert County Government PRINCE FREDERIC 06/14/2007 19315.00000 38-32-17.0 N MD NE 076-34-53.0 W 0003071087 Calvert County Government PRINCE FREDERIC 06/14/2007 19405.00000 38-32-17.0 N MD NE 076-35-24.1 W 0003071088 Calvert County Government PRINCE FREDRICK 06/14/2007 17845.00000 38-32-56.0 N TX NE 097-19-21.6 W 0003071154 TEXAS, STATE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274855A1.txt
  • 089-39-25.0 W 0003087060 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATINMONROE 06/26/2007 06345.49000 42-37-59.0 N CA MD WQAI848 121-00-53.5 W 0003087127 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC IONE 06/26/2007 17845.00000 38-16-54.8 N CA MD WQGJ838 121-56-58.1 W 0003087227 Wiline Networks Inc San Jose 06/26/2007 17965.00000 37-19-04.6 N CA MD WQFY918 121-58-03.0 W 0003087274 Wiline Networks Inc Santa Clara 06/26/2007 17920.00000 37-23-13.0 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0003087278 Cal-One Cellular L.P. SCOTIA 06/26/2007 06063.80000 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0003087278 Cal-One Cellular L.P. SCOTIA 06/26/2007 06625.00000 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0003087278 Cal-One Cellular L.P. SCOTIA 06/26/2007 06665.62500 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0003087278 Cal-One Cellular L.P. SCOTIA 06/26/2007 10755.00000 40-25-13.4 N Page 10 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275038A1.txt
  • BEACH 07/06/2007 18120.00000 33-34-39.8 N SC MD WLR238 080-17-07.3 W 0003101598 CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON MRAVENAL 07/06/2007 06197.24000 32-51-22.8 N SC MD WLR238 080-17-07.3 W 0003101598 CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON MRAVENAL 07/06/2007 06226.89000 32-51-22.8 N SC MD WLR238 080-17-07.3 W 0003101598 CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON MRAVENAL 07/06/2007 06256.54000 32-51-22.8 N SC MD WLR238 080-17-07.3 W 0003101598 CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON MRAVENAL 07/06/2007 06286.19000 32-51-22.8 N SC MD WLC401 080-12-02.1 W 0003101599 CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON MHOLLYWOOD 07/06/2007 02171.60000 32-44-15.9 N SC MD WLC401 080-12-02.1 W 0003101599 CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON MHOLLYWOOD 07/06/2007 06034.15000 32-44-15.9 N TX NE 095-10-05.8 W 0003093149 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Humble 06/28/2007 10715.00000 30-04-25.8 N CA NE 117-39-12.2 W 0003093292 NEXTPHASE WIRELESS INC Corona 06/29/2007 19400.00000 33-50-59.0 N CA NE 122-11-35.0 W 0003093334 Cal-One Cellular Limited Partnership Mt. Shasta
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.txt
  • 14.3 15.3 14.3 11.3 Overall Min 6.3 Site 1: Single-Family Home Wall Table 3-3 shows the results of all measurements at site 1 for two meters separation between the transmit antenna and the TV receiver. The measurements were performed on three TV receivers for front and rear aspects of the TV. The individual threshold EIRP measurements at site 1 averaged 2.1 dB lower than those at site 0 for the seven measurements at corresponding conditions. This result is unexpected, given that the wall attenuation at site 1 was expected to result in higher threshold EIRP values at site 1. We note, however, that differences in the multipath environment, such as a possible difference in effective depth of the ground planes could
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275804A1.txt
  • AM WQAW491 097-49-37.1 W 0003086637 FiberTower Network Services Corp. AUSTIN 07/30/2007 19440.00000 30-17-16.5 N Page 4 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX AM WQAW491 097-49-37.1 W 0003086637 FiberTower Network Services Corp. AUSTIN 07/30/2007 19495.00000 30-17-16.5 N CA AM WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0003087278 Cal-One Cellular L.P. SCOTIA 08/03/2007 06063.80000 40-25-13.4 N CA AM WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0003087278 Cal-One Cellular L.P. SCOTIA 08/03/2007 06152.75000 40-25-13.4 N CA AM WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0003087278 Cal-One Cellular L.P. SCOTIA 08/03/2007 06625.00000 40-25-13.4 N CA AM WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0003087278 Cal-One Cellular L.P. SCOTIA 08/03/2007 06665.62500 40-25-13.4 N CA AM WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0003087278 Cal-One Cellular
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275965A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275965A1.txt
  • CoRIO PIEDRAS 08/10/2007 17785.00000 18-23-50.8 N PR MD WPOU332 066-02-53.5 W 0003135398 SunCom Wireless Puerto Rico License CoRIO PIEDRAS 08/10/2007 19425.00000 18-23-50.8 N PR MD WPOU333 066-03-57.5 W 0003135399 SunCom Wireless Puerto Rico License CoRIO PIEDRAS 08/10/2007 19345.00000 18-24-24.8 N PR MD WPOU333 066-03-57.5 W 0003135399 SunCom Wireless Puerto Rico License CoRIO PIEDRAS 08/10/2007 19385.00000 18-24-24.8 N NY MD WQGH566 077-43-02.1 W 0003135441 Bell Atlantic Mobile of Rochester, LP Geneseo 08/10/2007 05945.20000 42-50-42.5 N NY MD WQGH566 077-43-02.1 W 0003135441 Bell Atlantic Mobile of Rochester, LP Geneseo 08/10/2007 05974.85000 42-50-42.5 N NY MD WQGH566 077-43-02.1 W 0003135441 Bell Atlantic Mobile of Rochester, LP Geneseo 08/10/2007 06004.50000 42-50-42.5 N NY MD WQGH566 077-43-02.1 W 0003135441 Bell Atlantic Mobile of Rochester, LP Geneseo
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275966A1.txt
  • 18-25-54.8 N PR MD KWU93 066-27-28.9 W 0003133924 PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER AUTMANATI 08/09/2007 06665.00000 18-25-54.8 N Page 3 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PR MD KWU93 066-27-28.9 W 0003133924 PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER AUTMANATI 08/09/2007 06685.00000 18-25-54.8 N MD MD WQEP433 076-37-02.1 W 0003134095 Enoch Pratt Free Library PRINCE FREDERIC 08/09/2007 10915.00000 38-32-11.1 N IL MD WNEK644 087-49-58.2 W 0003134270 SOUTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH PALOS HILLS 08/09/2007 11633.75000 41-42-11.1 N PA MD WPTG686 079-51-12.2 W 0003134637 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIAHILLIARDS 08/09/2007 06750.62500 41-05-24.2 N MO MD WQDD395 092-15-10.6 W 0003134697 Missouri State Highway Patrol Jefferson City 08/09/2007 06197.24000 38-32-51.1 N MO MD WQDD395 092-15-10.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276126A1.txt
  • Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave Broadband Division 07/19/2007 WLN543 FXO Matanuska Telephone Assn 19360.00000000 Eagle River 61-19-2.0 N AK 149-34-0.0 W 2 1 07/19/2007 WPTB611 FXO Matanuska Telephone Association Inc. 6765.00000000 Talkeetna 62-19-17.2 N AK 150-7-2.1 W 2 1 07/18/2007 WQEF977 FXO Telink Networks S W, LLC 18000.00000000 Phoenix 33-27-7.1 N AZ 112-4-19.2 W 1 1 07/18/2007 WQEF977 FXO Telink Networks S W, LLC 18040.00000000 Phoenix 33-27-7.1 N AZ 112-4-19.2 W 2 1 07/18/2007 WQEF977 FXO Telink Networks S W, LLC 6375.14000000 Phoenix 33-27-7.1 N AZ 112-4-19.2 W 3 1 Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276391A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276391A1.txt
  • RORenewal Only NTCertification of Construction EXRequest for Extension of Time MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MD NE 075-49-39.4 W 0003158675 CECIL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELKTON 08/30/2007 19675.00000 39-36-46.2 N MI NE 085-10-43.9 W 0003160039 City of Battle Creek Battle Creek 08/31/2007 00933.37500 42-19-02.1 N MI NE 085-10-43.9 W 0003160039 City of Battle Creek Battle Creek 08/31/2007 00933.97500 42-19-02.1 N MI NE 085-13-56.9 W 0003160072 City of Battle Creek Battle Creek 08/31/2007 00942.97500 42-23-34.1 N MI NE 085-05-54.9 W 0003160084 City of Battle Creek Battle Creek 08/31/2007 00942.37500 42-21-10.1 N RO WNET640 0003151117 LAFAYETTE PARISH SHERIFF'S DEPAR 08/27/2007 RO WNET641 0003151123 LAFAYETTE PARISH SHERIFF'S
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276695A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276695A1.txt
  • N SD NE 096-44-30.9 W 0003170797 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Sioux Falls 09/13/2007 00130.82500 43-34-55.3 N PA NE 080-13-58.3 W 0003170802 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Pittsburgh 09/13/2007 00131.72500 40-29-29.3 N AZ NE 113-56-17.0 W 0003170804 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Kingman 09/13/2007 00131.05000 35-15-34.0 N AZ NE 112-25-10.5 W 0003170807 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Prescott 09/13/2007 00131.05000 34-39-16.1 N IN NE 086-19-02.1 W 0003171056 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc South Bend 09/13/2007 00129.82500 41-42-31.2 N GM NE 087-59-08.9 W 0003171062 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Gulf of Mexico 09/13/2007 00131.72500 28-05-05.9 N VA NE 077-27-20.9 W 0003171065 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Chantilly 09/13/2007 00130.70000 38-56-40.3 N MT RM WCM8 111-09-08.8 W 0003169609 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc BOZEMAN 09/12/2007 00131.20000 45-46-35.7 N RO KIE2 0003165970
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276850A1.txt
  • TN MD WLN584 086-34-57.0 W 0003175344 Verizon Wireless Tennessee PartnershipLAVERGNE 09/18/2007 06595.00000 35-58-54.2 N CA MD KHN97 116-27-54.0 W 0003175349 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMCATHEDRAL CITY 09/18/2007 06034.15000 33-47-13.0 N Page 4 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City SC MD WLC401 080-12-02.1 W 0003175350 CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON MHOLLYWOOD 09/18/2007 06034.15000 32-44-15.9 N CA MD KHN96 116-48-51.0 W 0003175354 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMBANNING 09/18/2007 06595.00000 34-02-16.0 N CA MD KHN96 116-48-51.0 W 0003175354 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMBANNING 09/18/2007 06605.00000 34-02-16.0 N CA MD KHN96 116-48-51.0 W 0003175354 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMBANNING 09/18/2007 06650.00000 34-02-16.0 N CA MD KMY64 118-21-47.3 W 0003175670 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277038A1.txt
  • 21825.00000 39-22-39.2 N KS NE 097-07-44.0 W 0003181592 TRILLION PARTNERS, INC. Clay Center 09/25/2007 21975.00000 39-22-39.2 N KS NE 097-00-56.7 W 0003181594 TRILLION PARTNERS, INC. WAKEFIELD 09/25/2007 19675.00000 39-12-46.8 N KS NE 097-07-12.9 W 0003181597 TRILLION PARTNERS, INC. CLAY CENTER 09/25/2007 21825.00000 39-22-42.6 N KS NE 097-07-12.9 W 0003181597 TRILLION PARTNERS, INC. CLAY CENTER 09/25/2007 21925.00000 39-22-42.6 N KS NE 097-07-02.1 W 0003181599 TRILLION PARTNERS, INC. CLAY CENTER 09/25/2007 21875.00000 39-23-22.2 N KS NE 097-07-00.3 W 0003181602 TRILLION PARTNERS, INC. Clay Center 09/25/2007 18115.00000 39-23-12.0 N KS NE 097-07-00.3 W 0003181602 TRILLION PARTNERS, INC. Clay Center 09/25/2007 23025.00000 39-23-12.0 N KS NE 097-07-00.3 W 0003181602 TRILLION PARTNERS, INC. Clay Center 09/25/2007 23075.00000 39-23-12.0 N KS NE 097-07-00.3 W 0003181602 TRILLION PARTNERS,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A4.txt
  • with the LI Program. Under IPIA standards, a program is at risk if the erroneous payment rate exceeds 2.5 percent and the amount of erroneous payment is greater than $10 million. Statistical results from this stratified random sample suggest that the program is at risk. The erroneous payment rate is estimated at 9.5 percent with a margin of error � 2.1 percent at the 90 percent confidence level. Compliance with rules and regulations was generally high (85 percent or more), exceptions included: advertised supported services, link-up discount, determining consumer qualifications, officer certification, Form 497 submission, and record keeping. Low Income Program Description Program Overview The LI Program of the Universal Service Fund (``USF''), which is administered by the Universal Service Administrative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A6.txt
  • 3 14 Other 1 1 Assertion D.2: Common Line Annual Certification Non-Compliance: Causes* Observed Sample Occurrences Size X N D.2.12 - Applicant/Auditee Weak Internal Controls 1 1 Other 1 1 Assertion E.1 Calculation of Safety Net Additive Non-Compliance: Causes* Observed Sample Occurrences Size X N Other 1 1 Assertion E.2: NECA Submission Non-Compliance: Causes* Observed Sample Occurrences Size X N E.2.1 - Imprecise FCC Rule/s 2 10 E.2.4 - Disregarded FCC Rule/s 1 10 E.2.7 - Inadequate Documentation Retention 2 10 E.2.9 - Inadequate Systems for Collecting, Reporting, and/or Monitoring Data 1 10 E.2.12 - Applicant/Auditee Weak Internal Controls 2 10 E.2.13 - Applicant/Auditee Data Entry Error 3 10 E.2.16 - Service Provider Error (other) 1 10 Other 1 1 Assertion
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277959A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277959A1.txt
  • W 0003215901 KENOSHA CELLULAR TELEPHONE, L.PKENOSHA 10/31/2007 10618.12500 42-34-44.0 N WI NE 087-50-35.0 W 0003215901 KENOSHA CELLULAR TELEPHONE, L.PKENOSHA 10/31/2007 10668.12500 42-34-44.0 N WI NE 087-49-31.1 W 0003215908 KENOSHA CELLULAR TELEPHONE, L.PKENOSHA 10/31/2007 10603.12500 42-36-38.2 N MD NE 076-51-02.3 W 0003216051 AirBand Communications, Inc Columbia 10/31/2007 23025.00000 39-10-39.0 N MD NE 076-43-56.5 W 0003216059 AirBand Communications, Inc Columbia 10/31/2007 10935.00000 39-11-02.1 N TX NE 096-44-10.7 W 0003216184 AirBand Communications, Inc Plano 10/31/2007 17820.00000 33-00-17.5 N IL NE 089-01-29.3 W 0003216199 Cellco Partnership Goreville 10/31/2007 06197.24000 37-33-26.8 N NC NE 078-35-16.4 W 0003216508 AirBand Communications, Inc Raleigh 10/31/2007 18015.00000 35-47-04.3 N UT NE 112-06-02.0 W 0003216554 Beehive Telephone Company, Inc. SALT LAKE CITY 10/31/2007 17815.00000 40-46-50.0 N UT NE 111-57-17.5 W 0003216588
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278130A1.txt
  • Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City ME NE 070-44-23.0 W 0003226272 Portland Cellular Partnership Ossippee 11/08/2007 05974.85000 43-35-17.0 N ME NE 070-44-23.0 W 0003226272 Portland Cellular Partnership Ossippee 11/08/2007 05974.85000 43-35-17.0 N ME NE 070-44-23.0 W 0003226272 Portland Cellular Partnership Ossippee 11/08/2007 06034.15000 43-35-17.0 N ME NE 070-44-23.0 W 0003226272 Portland Cellular Partnership Ossippee 11/08/2007 06034.15000 43-35-17.0 N TX NE 100-01-02.1 W 0003226275 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Merkel 11/08/2007 11215.00000 32-28-05.4 N TX NE 100-01-02.1 W 0003226275 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Merkel 11/08/2007 11285.00000 32-28-05.4 N TX NE 099-53-40.5 W 0003226277 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Abilene 11/08/2007 10715.00000 32-27-32.9 N TX NE 099-53-40.5 W 0003226277 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Abilene 11/08/2007 10835.00000 32-27-32.9 N TX NE 099-41-38.2 W 0003226278 Conterra Ultra
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278415A1.txt
  • N TX NE 096-34-08.7 W 0003235784 San Antonio MTA, L.P. BRENHAM 11/19/2007 06004.50000 30-11-19.1 N TX NE 096-34-08.7 W 0003235784 San Antonio MTA, L.P. BRENHAM 11/19/2007 06063.80000 30-11-19.1 N TX NE 096-26-00.5 W 0003235785 San Antonio MTA, L.P. BRENHAM 11/19/2007 06315.84000 30-09-48.4 N OR NE 124-24-47.7 W 0003236105 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Gold Beach 11/20/2007 10637.50000 42-23-48.0 N OR NE 124-25-02.1 W 0003236374 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Wedderburn 11/20/2007 10572.50000 42-26-24.4 N TX NE 096-48-56.2 W 0003236994 AirBand Communications, Inc Waxahachie 11/20/2007 11055.00000 32-27-38.2 N LA NE 091-11-42.2 W 0003237002 Verizon Wireless Personal CommunicationScotlandville 11/20/2007 05974.85000 30-32-46.1 N LA NE 091-11-42.2 W 0003237002 Verizon Wireless Personal CommunicationScotlandville 11/20/2007 06093.45000 30-32-46.1 N LA NE 090-47-44.0 W 0003237003 Verizon Wireless Personal CommunicationLIVINGSTON 11/20/2007
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278618A1.pdf
  • is published every Tuesday and the Urgent Immediate Emergency Notifications (IEN) are sent out on the same day as long as they are received by Telcordia(R) Routing Administration (TRA) no later than 1:30p.m. Eastern Time. If an EN or IEN is required, the procedures to be followed are documented in Telcordia(R) Rating and Routing Information Notices RRIN 09-05 and RRIN 12-02.1. Assignment of New Telephone Numbers Rather than port or pool telephone numbers to another LATA to restore service, new numbers from the other LATA could be assigned. The numbers could be temporary or permanent depending on the strategy of the serving telecommunications provider and/or the wishes of the customer. There are, of course, pros and cons associated with this alternative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278673A1.txt
  • Kansas City 11/30/2007 06256.54000 39-19-53.1 N MO NE 094-34-55.1 W 0003246061 Aquila, Inc. Kansas City 11/30/2007 06315.84000 39-19-53.1 N MO NE 094-34-55.1 W 0003246061 Aquila, Inc. Kansas City 11/30/2007 10593.12500 39-19-53.1 N MO NE 094-27-25.7 W 0003246062 Aquila, Inc. Kansas City 11/30/2007 06286.19000 38-58-56.1 N MO NE 094-27-25.7 W 0003246062 Aquila, Inc. Kansas City 11/30/2007 10715.00000 38-58-56.1 N MO NE 094-51-02.1 W 0003246063 Aquila, Inc. MARYVILLE 11/30/2007 10715.00000 40-20-41.0 N MO NE 094-47-45.3 W 0003246064 Aquila, Inc. St. Joseph 11/30/2007 06286.19000 39-50-45.9 N MO NE 094-47-45.3 W 0003246064 Aquila, Inc. St. Joseph 11/30/2007 11245.00000 39-50-45.9 N MO NE 094-17-56.6 W 0003246065 Aquila, Inc. PLEASANT HILL 11/30/2007 06125.57000 38-47-49.4 N MO NE 094-17-56.6 W 0003246065 Aquila, Inc. PLEASANT HILL 11/30/2007 10618.12500 38-47-49.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279160A1.txt
  • Inc. Arecibo 12/19/2007 19615.00000 18-26-05.2 N TX MD WQIB387 100-30-25.6 W 0003263746 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Roscoe 12/19/2007 10835.00000 32-20-09.8 N PR MD WPTE329 066-38-45.6 W 0003263810 SprintCom, Inc. Barceloneta 12/19/2007 11265.00000 18-26-25.8 N PR MD WPTE329 066-38-45.6 W 0003263810 SprintCom, Inc. Barceloneta 12/19/2007 18055.00000 18-26-25.8 N AZ MD WML576 110-05-36.9 W 0003263828 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Dragoon 12/19/2007 06845.00000 32-01-02.1 N PR MD WPTD307 066-47-25.4 W 0003263988 SprintCom, Inc. Hatilla Rural 12/19/2007 10705.00000 18-27-39.8 N PR MD WPTD307 066-47-25.4 W 0003263988 SprintCom, Inc. Hatilla Rural 12/19/2007 10765.00000 18-27-39.8 N PR MD WPTD307 066-47-25.4 W 0003263988 SprintCom, Inc. Hatilla Rural 12/19/2007 19680.00000 18-27-39.8 N Page 14 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279161A1.txt
  • SCCOLUMBIA CITY 12/20/2007 18060.00000 41-09-29.6 N WI MD WQV49 091-20-54.0 W 0003265190 WISCONSIN, STATE OF METEOR 12/20/2007 06034.15000 45-41-36.0 N WI MD WQV49 091-20-54.0 W 0003265190 WISCONSIN, STATE OF METEOR 12/20/2007 06226.89000 45-41-36.0 N WI MD WQV49 091-20-54.0 W 0003265190 WISCONSIN, STATE OF METEOR 12/20/2007 06685.00000 45-41-36.0 N MI MD WQAZ288 083-40-11.2 W 0003265231 GENESEE COUNTY 911 FLINT 12/20/2007 06621.25000 43-05-02.1 N MI MD WQAZ288 083-40-11.2 W 0003265231 GENESEE COUNTY 911 FLINT 12/20/2007 06626.25000 43-05-02.1 N MI MD WQAZ288 083-40-11.2 W 0003265231 GENESEE COUNTY 911 FLINT 12/20/2007 06631.25000 43-05-02.1 N MI MD WQAZ288 083-40-11.2 W 0003265231 GENESEE COUNTY 911 FLINT 12/20/2007 06636.25000 43-05-02.1 N MI MD WQAZ288 083-40-11.2 W 0003265231 GENESEE COUNTY 911 FLINT 12/20/2007 06641.25000 43-05-02.1 N MI MD WQAZ288
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Monthly Support - by State ....................................................................... Table 2.3 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries ................................................... Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A11.txt
  • 98.6 96.9 99.3 99.2 99.7 99.5 98.6 98.6 97.6 Residence 98.6 98.2 99.3 99.3 99.7 99.6 98.7 98.8 97.9 Business 98.6 87.6 99.0 99.0 99.5 98.9 97.9 97.2 95.0 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.5 1.4 1.7 1.2 1.5 0.2 1.2 1.5 0.9 Residence 1.5 1.4 1.6 1.1 1.1 0.2 1.1 1.4 0.9 Business 1.4 1.4 2.2 2.2 2.9 0.4 2.0 2.1 2.1 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 16.9 19.4 49.9 21.6 32.1 17.6 33.4 40.5 22.2 Residence 17.3 20.6 52.7 22.4 34.4 18.3 36.9 45.6 24.2 Business 14.7 13.9 35.0 17.5 18.1 14.5 19.1 14.5 12.3 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 153.8 265.8 101.7 179.8 176.1 111.3 188.8 151.8 176.7 Total MSA 153.4 259.2 100.1 176.4 173.9 125.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
  • Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Monthly Support - by State ....................................................................... Table 2.3 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries ................................................... Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • 4,758 Fixed Local Service Providers 20,636 20,328 1.5 38,815 80,538 119,353 20,843 Payphone Service Providers 24 24 1.3 136 339 475 29 Wireless Telephony Including Cellular, 26,086 25,618 1.8 7,322 109,404 116,726 26,857 Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers Paging & Messaging Service Providers 67 64 7.0 90 616 706 77 Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) Dispatch 58 57 2.1 0 213 213 40 Wireless Data and Other Mobile Service 119 118 0.9 7 223 229 88 Providers Wireless Service Providers 26,330 25,857 1.8 7,419 110,456 117,875 27,062 Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 20,630 20,300 1.6 11,569 29,695 41,263 21,351 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 135 113 16.5 71 496 567 143 Prepaid Calling Card Providers 1,524 1,478 3.0 187 2,435 2,622 1,689
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • non- common-carrier basis. These carriers and service providers may pass on contribution expenses to their customers. The FCC monitors subscriber participation and telephone usage to determine program benefits and costs.24 Historical tables for subscribership and carrier payments by state can be downloaded from the Monitoring Report's Low-Income Support section of the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports website at www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/stats.html. Table 2.1 reports tribal and non-tribal Lifeline subscriber and Link Up beneficiary data for years 1987 through 2006. Table 2.2 and Chart 2.1 report annual low-income support payments for years 1988 through 2006. Table 2.3 reports Lifeline monthly support by state or jurisdiction for both federal and state support as of February 2006, and indicates the additional contribution from the federal program
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.txt
  • 91.3 3.1 * Louisiana 89.7 93.9 4.2 * Maine 93.4 96.3 2.9 * Maryland 95.7 95.4 -0.3 Massachusetts 95.9 95.3 -0.6 Michigan 92.8 94.2 1.3 * Minnesota 95.8 97.6 1.8 * Mississippi 82.4 90.5 8.1 * Missouri 91.5 94.9 3.4 * Montana 91.0 93.3 2.3 * Nebraska 95.7 93.5 -2.2 # Nevada 90.4 93.0 2.6 * New Hampshire 94.3 96.4 2.1 * New Jersey 94.8 94.9 0.1 New Mexico 82.0 88.5 6.5 * New York 91.8 91.6 -0.1 North Carolina 88.3 93.3 5.0 * North Dakota 94.6 96.5 1.9 * Ohio 92.4 94.7 2.2 * Oklahoma 90.3 92.2 2.0 Oregon 90.6 96.7 6.0 * Pennsylvania 94.9 96.3 1.4 * Rhode Island 93.6 94.4 0.8 South Carolina 83.7 92.5 8.8 * South
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 7 - 6 1978 7.3% 9.0% 0.9% 1979 8.7 13.3 0.7 1980 9.7 12.5 4.6 1981 8.3 8.9 11.7 1982 5.2 3.8 7.2 1983 3.4 3.8 3.6 1984 3.6 3.9 9.2 1985 2.8 3.8 4.7 1986 2.3 1.1 2.7 1987 2.9 4.4 -1.3 1988 3.7 4.4 1.3 1989 3.5 4.6 -0.3 1990 4.1 6.1 -0.4 1991 3.1 3.1 3.5 1992 2.1 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.3 2.7 1.8 1994 2.2 2.7 0.7 1995 2.0 2.5 1.2 1996 1.9 3.3 2.1 1997 1.5 1.7 0.2 1998 1.1 1.6 0.3* 1999 1.5 2.7 0.4 2000 2.3 3.4 -2.3 2001 2.5 1.6 1.3 2002 1.5 2.4 0.2 2003 1.7 1.9 -2.7 2004 2.4 3.3 -2.5 2005 3.6 3.4 0.4 2006 3.2 2.5 1.7 * The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279231A1.txt
  • 2005 Dec 2005 Dec 2006 Dec 2003 Table 3 Reporting Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (End-User Switched Access Lines in Thousands) Jun 2003 Dec 1999 Percent Jun 2000 Dec 2002 Jun 2002 UNEs 40.7% CLEC-Owned 39.0% Resold 20.3% Dec 1997 9 159,008 157,132 133 1,876 1.2% Jun 1998 8 161,810 159,118 244 2,692 1.7 Dec 1998 7 164,614 161,191 361 3,423 2.1 Jun 1999 7 167,177 162,909 685 4,268 2.6 Dec 1999 168 187,190 181,203 1,493 5,987 3.2 Jun 2000 159 188,058 179,649 3,312 8,409 4.5 Dec 2000 166 188,223 177,561 5,274 10,662 5.7 Jun 2001 156 187,092 174,752 7,922 12,340 6.6 Dec 2001 164 185,391 171,917 9,460 13,474 7.3 Jun 2002 166 182,345 167,330 11,540 15,015 8.2 Dec 2002 174 181,616
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279336A1.txt
  • Chestertown 01/03/2008 06805.00000 39-13-37.3 N AZ MD KPL45 110-50-11.3 W 0003276045 ARIZONA, STATE OF GLOBE 01/04/2008 06645.00000 33-17-37.2 N AZ MD KPL45 110-50-11.3 W 0003276045 ARIZONA, STATE OF GLOBE 01/04/2008 06795.62500 33-17-37.2 N AZ MD WGY654 111-16-29.4 W 0003276085 ARIZONA, STATE OF TORTILLA FLAT 01/04/2008 06585.62500 33-33-19.1 N AZ MD KOO48 112-33-31.6 W 0003277078 ARIZONA, STATE OF BUCKEYE 01/04/2008 06093.00000 33-34-02.1 N AZ MD KOO48 112-33-31.6 W 0003277078 ARIZONA, STATE OF BUCKEYE 01/04/2008 11285.00000 33-34-02.1 N WA NE 121-51-41.4 W 0003271547 SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPHANSON LAKE 12/31/2007 00957.80000 48-03-53.3 N WA NE 121-59-47.0 W 0003272337 SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPARLINGTON 12/31/2007 06760.62500 48-18-08.0 N MD NE 077-24-29.1 W 0003272683 State of Maryland, MIEMSS Frederick 01/02/2008 06585.00000 39-22-21.3 N MD NE 077-24-29.1 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279376A1.txt
  • 38-58-45.0 N IN MD KNKN926 086-29-42.6 W 0003274235 Southern Indiana RSA Limited PartnershipSulphur 01/03/2008 38-13-56.3 N IA MD KNKN536 091-06-09.5 W 0003274807 IOWA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHBurlington 01/03/2008 40-48-35.1 N IA MD KNKN536 091-08-23.0 W 0003274807 IOWA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHBURLINGTON 01/03/2008 40-49-42.0 N IA MD KNKN536 091-17-56.6 W 0003274807 IOWA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHColumbus Junction 01/03/2008 41-17-02.1 N IA MD KNKN536 091-26-10.6 W 0003274807 IOWA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHFORT MADISON 01/03/2008 40-37-56.1 N IL MD KNKN536 090-55-30.5 W 0003274807 IOWA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHIllinois City 01/03/2008 41-23-15.1 N IA MD KNKN536 091-22-56.5 W 0003274807 IOWA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHKEOKUK 01/03/2008 40-23-44.2 N IA MD KNKN536 091-22-56.5 W 0003274807 IOWA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHKEOKUK
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279647A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279647A1.txt
  • Business Only Broadband, LLC Elk Grove Village 01/18/2008 23175.00000 42-00-03.0 N WY NE 108-44-52.0 W 0003294737 CommNet Cellular License Holding LLC LANDER 01/18/2008 10647.50000 42-54-27.0 N UT NE 111-42-28.8 W 0003294805 Wasatch Utah RSA No. 2 Limited PartnersMorgan 01/18/2008 10627.50000 41-03-01.8 N UT NE 111-45-08.6 W 0003294842 Wasatch Utah RSA No. 2 Limited PartnersPeterson 01/18/2008 10562.50000 41-07-20.6 N MT NE 112-20-02.1 W 0003295149 Gold Creek Cellular of Montana Limited PRogers Pass 01/18/2008 10562.50000 47-05-41.8 N MT NE 112-06-26.0 W 0003295164 Gold Creek Cellular of Montana Limited PCASCADE 01/18/2008 10627.50000 47-00-10.0 N MT NE 113-37-22.0 W 0003295215 Gold Creek Cellular of Montana Limited PEAST MISSOULA 01/18/2008 10577.50000 46-44-49.0 N MT NE 113-39-55.0 W 0003295237 Gold Creek Cellular of Montana Limited PEAST MISSOULA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279929A1.txt
  • 5.1 62 0.4 245 1.8 181 1.3 8,422 60.2 13,989 California 75,273 46.8 5,921 3.7 574 0.4 3,744 2.3 2,521 1.6 72,690 45.2 160,721 Colorado 11,278 54.3 46 0.2 113 0.5 528 2.5 268 1.3 8,553 41.2 20,786 Connecticut 7,393 44.9 415 2.5 83 0.5 272 1.7 208 1.3 8,082 49.1 16,454 Delaware 2,511 53.7 39 0.8 81 1.7 97 2.1 21 0.4 1,926 41.2 4,675 District of Columbia 4,078 69.6 22 0.4 136 2.3 170 2.9 24 0.4 1,428 24.4 5,858 Florida 37,712 51.7 1,971 2.7 446 0.6 2,364 3.2 985 1.3 29,487 40.4 72,964 Georgia 18,584 46.8 1,874 4.7 321 0.8 1,064 2.7 586 1.5 17,272 43.5 39,701 Guam 166 29.2 0 0.0 79 13.9 10 1.8 4 0.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279931A1.txt
  • Company Provided Composites) Chart 4 Percent Residential Installation Commitments Met Large Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted BOC/Embarq Composite* Weighted Verizon Avg BellSouth Weighted AT&T Avg. (excluding BellSouth) Qwest 17 ARMIS 43-05 Report 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 AT&T Ameritech 2.0 2.1 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 AT&T BellSouth 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3 AT&T Pacific 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 AT&T Southwestern 2.2 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.1 AT&T SNET 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 Qwest 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 Verizon GTE 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.9 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279997A1.txt
  • 4.9 * California 91.7 96.7 5.0 * Colorado 94.4 97.4 3.0 * Connecticut 95.5 96.7 1.1 Delaware 95.0 95.0 0.0 District of Columbia 94.7 90.5 -4.3 Florida 85.5 93.3 7.8 * Georgia 88.9 92.2 3.3 * Hawaii 94.6 96.9 2.3 Idaho 89.5 96.8 7.3 * Illinois 95.0 94.1 -0.9 Indiana 90.3 91.0 0.7 Iowa 95.4 97.7 2.3 Kansas 94.9 97.0 2.1 Kentucky 86.9 94.4 7.5 * Louisiana 88.9 93.9 5.0 * Maine 90.7 97.0 6.3 * Maryland 96.3 96.3 0.0 Massachusetts 94.3 95.9 1.6 Michigan 93.8 95.6 1.9 * Minnesota 96.4 97.8 1.5 Mississippi 82.4 89.8 7.5 * Missouri 92.1 96.1 4.1 * Montana 92.8 94.7 1.9 Nebraska 94.0 92.8 -1.2 Nevada 89.4 95.5 6.1 * New Hampshire 95.0 96.6 1.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280030A1.txt
  • OF PHOENIX 02/01/2008 10795.00000 33-28-21.1 N AZ AM KOA83 112-06-12.5 W 0003271128 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 01/30/2008 10795.00000 33-28-21.1 N AZ AM KOA83 112-06-12.5 W 0003271128 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 02/01/2008 11215.00000 33-28-21.1 N AZ AM KOA83 112-06-12.5 W 0003271128 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 01/30/2008 11215.00000 33-28-21.1 N AZ AM KOO48 112-33-31.6 W 0003277078 ARIZONA, STATE OF BUCKEYE 01/30/2008 06093.45000 33-34-02.1 N AZ AM KOO48 112-33-31.6 W 0003277078 ARIZONA, STATE OF BUCKEYE 01/30/2008 11285.00000 33-34-02.1 N WI AM WQV50 091-12-57.0 W 0003281077 WISCONSIN, STATE OF, DOT HOLCOMBE 01/31/2008 06004.50000 45-16-48.0 N WI AM WQV50 091-12-57.0 W 0003281077 WISCONSIN, STATE OF, DOT HOLCOMBE 01/31/2008 06034.15000 45-16-48.0 N WI AM WQV50 091-12-57.0 W 0003281077 WISCONSIN, STATE OF, DOT HOLCOMBE 01/31/2008 06795.00000 45-16-48.0 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280031A1.txt
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City KS NE 095-37-03.9 W 0003304431 KANSAS AIR CENTER, INC. TOPEKA 01/28/2008 00122.95000 39-04-02.0 N CA RM WSV6 118-09-31.6 W 0003307808 CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY LONG BEACH 01/30/2008 00122.82500 33-49-02.1 N RO WPXK567 0003305036 State of Montana, Aeronautics Division 01/28/2008 RO WPXJ473 0003306250 Town of Hulett, Wyoming 01/29/2008 RO KYZ4 0003306320 DUTCHESS, COUNTY OF 01/29/2008 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City KS NE 096-13-17.4 W 0003303181 KANSAS RADIO, INC. Emporia 01/28/2008 00947.50000 38-24-36.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280041A1.pdf
  • DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 36M0G7W 66.80 dBW PSK, DATA, FAX, AUDIO, VOICE 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M50G7D PSK, DATA, FAX, AUDIO, VOICE 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 2M50G7D 61.39 dBW PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F 64.50 dBW MCPC DIGITAL CARRIER FOR VIDEO, VOICE DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W MCPC DIGITAL ENCODED AUDIO AND DATA@2.1 MBPS, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M87G7W 58.20 dBW MCPC DIGITAL ENCODED AUDIO AND DATA@2.1 MBPS, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M87G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) 1 - EUTELSAT AB-3 - (5.0 W.L.) 1 - INTELSAT 8 - (89 W.L.) 1 - New Skies 703 - (57 E.L.) E970394 SES-MFS-20080123-00082 E Class
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280613A1.txt
  • WHITEHOUSE 02/29/2008 06635.00000 41-31-57.0 N OH MD WLL437 083-51-25.0 W 0003341325 New Par WHITEHOUSE 02/29/2008 06670.00000 41-31-57.0 N OH MD WLL437 083-51-25.0 W 0003341325 New Par WHITEHOUSE 02/29/2008 10557.50000 41-31-57.0 N OH MD WPOQ313 081-13-44.0 W 0003341422 New Par LOUISVILLE 02/29/2008 06775.00000 40-52-07.0 N OH MD WPOQ313 081-13-44.0 W 0003341422 New Par LOUISVILLE 02/29/2008 06855.00000 40-52-07.0 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0003341438 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership SCOTIA 02/29/2008 06063.80000 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0003341438 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership SCOTIA 02/29/2008 06625.00000 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0003341438 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership SCOTIA 02/29/2008 06665.62500 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0003341438 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership SCOTIA 02/29/2008 10627.50000 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280705A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280705A1.pdf
  • during the inspection but found the EAS equipment non-operational. He was unable to produce any evidence, EAS logs, or printouts to demonstrate that the EAS had been operational at any point during the past year. He also stated the printer for the EAS had been broken for a year. Inspection of the transmitter site revealed station WMER-AM was operating at 2.1 kW at night, instead of the required 0.101 kW. Mr. Glass confirmed that the station had been using the same STL since the station began operations, but was not able to provide a current license for the STL. The only license found expired June 1, 2004. A search of the FCC licensee database did not reveal a current license for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280763A1.pdf
  • DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 36M0G7W 66.80 dBW PSK, DATA, FAX, AUDIO, VOICE 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M50G7D PSK, DATA, FAX, AUDIO, VOICE 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 2M50G7D 61.39 dBW PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F 64.50 dBW MCPC DIGITAL CARRIER FOR VIDEO, VOICE DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W MCPC DIGITAL ENCODED AUDIO AND DATA@2.1 MBPS, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M87G7W 58.20 dBW MCPC DIGITAL ENCODED AUDIO AND DATA@2.1 MBPS, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M87G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) 1 - EUTELSAT AB-3 - (5.0 W.L.) 1 - INTELSAT 8 - (89 W.L.) 1 - New Skies 703 - (57 E.L.) E080021 SES-REG-20080202-00107 E Date
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280904A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280904A1.txt
  • modem service represented 50.6% of these lines while 37.5% were asymmetric DSL (ADSL) connections, 0.2% were symmetric DSL (SDSL) or traditional wireline connections, 1.7% were fiber connections to the end user premises, and 10.0% used other types of technology including satellite, terrestrial fixed or mobile wireless (on a licensed or unlicensed basis), and electric power line. High-speed ADSL increased by 2.1 million lines during the first half of 2007, fiber connections increased by 0.4 million lines, and cable modem service increased by 2.4 million lines. For the full twelve-month period ending June 30, 2007, ADSL increased by 4.9 million lines, fiber connections increased by 0.7 million lines, and cable modem service increased by 5.2 million lines. Advanced Services Lines Advanced services
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281092A1.txt
  • Office of Education Corcoran 03/19/2008 19680.00000 36-06-06.8 N CA NE 119-34-05.0 W 0003365921 Kings County Office of Education Corcoran 03/19/2008 18120.00000 36-05-51.0 N AZ NE 111-47-17.2 W 0003366157 Town of Gilbert GILBERT 03/19/2008 19560.00000 33-19-45.2 N CT NE 072-58-35.0 W 0003366559 WOLCOTT, TOWN OF WOLCOTT 03/19/2008 10553.12500 41-34-45.8 N CT NE 072-58-30.1 W 0003366560 WOLCOTT, TOWN OF WOLCOTT 03/19/2008 10618.12500 41-36-02.1 N MI NE 085-38-33.5 W 0003367263 TRAVERSE CITY LIGHT AND POWER TRAVERSE CITY 03/20/2008 18055.00000 44-45-37.0 N MI NE 085-40-58.0 W 0003367264 TRAVERSE CITY LIGHT AND POWER TRAVERSE CITY 03/20/2008 10995.00000 44-45-37.0 N MI NE 085-40-58.0 W 0003367264 TRAVERSE CITY LIGHT AND POWER TRAVERSE CITY 03/20/2008 19375.00000 44-45-37.0 N Page 4 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281096A1.txt
  • N WY MD WQGK975 109-54-36.3 W 0003364527 Union Telephone Company Marbleton 03/18/2008 06745.00000 42-34-17.9 N WY MD WPOQ674 109-40-05.5 W 0003364542 Union Telephone Company BOULDER 03/18/2008 06585.00000 42-33-51.8 N WY MD KPS40 110-11-43.5 W 0003364550 Union Telephone Company LABARGE 03/18/2008 11245.00000 42-15-41.7 N WY MD KPS40 110-11-43.5 W 0003364550 Union Telephone Company LABARGE 03/18/2008 11485.00000 42-15-41.7 N MA MD WLU805 071-10-02.1 W 0003364557 Cellco Partnership WILMINGTON 03/18/2008 05945.20000 42-32-27.3 N WY MD KPS39 110-19-11.6 W 0003364562 Union Telephone Company LABARGE 03/18/2008 10755.00000 42-19-30.8 N WY MD WPWM858 109-19-14.2 W 0003364567 Union Telephone Company ROCK SPRINGS 03/18/2008 19310.00000 41-34-41.2 N WY MD WPOQ675 110-42-19.6 W 0003364600 Union Telephone Company RAGAN 03/18/2008 10562.50000 41-16-52.8 N MD MD WQIE570 076-21-02.8 W 0003364635 FiberTower Network
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281382A1.txt
  • EL PASO 04/04/2008 21577.50000 31-46-20.7 N KY MD WMN565 084-07-45.7 W 0003386255 Cellco Partnership PITTSBURG 04/04/2008 06226.89000 37-09-07.5 N KY MD WMN565 084-07-45.7 W 0003386255 Cellco Partnership PITTSBURG 04/04/2008 06256.54000 37-09-07.5 N KY MD WMN565 084-07-45.7 W 0003386255 Cellco Partnership PITTSBURG 04/04/2008 06286.19000 37-09-07.5 N KY MD WMN565 084-07-45.7 W 0003386255 Cellco Partnership PITTSBURG 04/04/2008 06315.84000 37-09-07.5 N GA NE 084-27-02.1 W 0003379330 FiberTower Network Services Corp. FAYETTEVILLE 03/31/2008 10755.00000 33-29-42.9 N GA NE 084-27-02.1 W 0003379330 FiberTower Network Services Corp. FAYETTEVILLE 03/31/2008 10915.00000 33-29-42.9 N GA NE 084-27-02.1 W 0003379330 FiberTower Network Services Corp. FAYETTEVILLE 03/31/2008 11035.00000 33-29-42.9 N Page 11 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281385A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281385A1.txt
  • 22025.00000 33-17-41.9 N CA MD WQDR521 117-19-58.5 W 0003381075 City of Oceanside Oceanside, CA 04/01/2008 23075.00000 33-14-54.1 N CA MD WQDR521 117-19-58.5 W 0003381075 City of Oceanside Oceanside, CA 04/01/2008 23225.00000 33-14-54.1 N NY MD WQHC824 073-57-55.3 W 0003381191 NEW YORK, CITY OF Brooklyn 04/01/2008 10558.12500 40-35-06.9 N AZ MD KOO48 112-33-31.6 W 0003382823 ARIZONA, STATE OF BUCKEYE 04/02/2008 02196.80000 33-34-02.1 N MD MD WPNG238 076-51-42.8 W 0003383451 State of Maryland, MIEMSS BRANDYWINE 04/03/2008 06785.00000 38-42-35.4 N OH MD WQHS643 081-30-01.9 W 0003383555 Cuyahoga Falls, City of Cuyahoga Falls 04/03/2008 10578.12500 41-08-38.5 N OH MD WQHS642 081-33-08.0 W 0003383957 Cuyahoga Falls, City of Akron 04/03/2008 10643.12500 41-04-15.0 N AZ MD WQDY748 110-57-27.7 W 0003385663 TUCSON, CITY OF TUCSON 04/04/2008 06226.89000 32-10-35.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281513A1.pdf
  • Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193-87.199. 76.613(a) states that "[h]armful interference is any emission, radiation or induction which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with this chapter." See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 & 76.613(a). 47 C.F.R. � 76.611(a)(1). 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. �1.80. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(E). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b), 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80, 76.605(a)(12). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ) * ` ' $ � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281566A1.txt
  • INMINT HILL 04/08/2008 10875.00000 35-09-29.6 N NC NE 080-57-24.5 W 0003389525 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INCHARLOTTE 04/08/2008 11485.00000 35-07-53.4 N NC NE 080-39-10.4 W 0003389526 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INMATTHEWS 04/08/2008 10835.00000 35-07-15.2 N NC NE 080-46-18.4 W 0003389527 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INCharlotte 04/08/2008 11325.00000 35-03-20.0 N NC NE 080-46-18.4 W 0003389527 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INCharlotte 04/08/2008 11565.00000 35-03-20.0 N NC NE 080-37-02.1 W 0003389528 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INStallings 04/08/2008 06315.84000 35-03-40.2 N NC NE 080-30-56.3 W 0003389529 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INMONROE 04/08/2008 06063.80000 34-58-36.8 N NC NE 080-30-56.3 W 0003389529 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INMONROE 04/08/2008 11365.00000 34-58-36.8 N SC NE 080-51-14.2 W 0003389530 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INPleasant Valley 04/08/2008 10755.00000 35-00-36.0 N SC NE 080-55-10.6 W 0003389531 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INFort Mill
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282288A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282288A1.txt
  • City RO WGH3 0003438199 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc 05/15/2008 RO KAH4 0003438231 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc 05/15/2008 RO KGI4 0003438259 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc 05/15/2008 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City UT MD WPOP479 113-31-09.6 W 0003434669 CANYON MEDIA CORPORATION Washington 05/12/2008 00951.00000 37-08-02.1 N AK MD WPQX559 149-52-13.6 W 0003436164 NEW NORTHWEST BROADCASTERS, LAnchorage 05/13/2008 00946.00000 61-12-50.3 N TX MD WPNI513 095-27-54.0 W 0003437722 UNIVISION RADIO HOUSTON LICENSE HOUSTON 05/14/2008 00950.50000 29-43-41.0 N Page 1 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WQCA787 095-27-54.0 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282289A1.txt
  • 05/16/2008 06805.00000 32-50-13.2 N TX NE 096-00-24.8 W 0003439538 DALLAS, CITY OF Wills Point 05/16/2008 06645.00000 32-50-59.1 N TX NE 096-00-24.8 W 0003439538 DALLAS, CITY OF Wills Point 05/16/2008 06675.00000 32-50-59.1 N TX NE 096-16-36.4 W 0003439539 DALLAS, CITY OF Terrell 05/16/2008 06825.00000 32-48-48.8 N TX NE 096-16-36.4 W 0003439539 DALLAS, CITY OF Terrell 05/16/2008 06835.00000 32-48-48.8 N TX NE 096-33-02.1 W 0003439540 DALLAS, CITY OF SUNNYVALE 05/16/2008 05945.20000 32-46-10.9 N RO WPOP321 0003414419 South Carolina Public Service Authority 04/28/2008 RO WPOP322 0003414420 South Carolina Public Service Authority 04/28/2008 RO WPOP323 0003414421 South Carolina Public Service Authority 04/28/2008 RO WPOP324 0003414422 South Carolina Public Service Authority 04/28/2008 RO WPNM742 0003414683 CREST HILL, CITY OF 04/28/2008 RO WNET352 0003415409 OREGON, CITY OF
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282386A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282386A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282386A1.txt
  • Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Concerning a Ten-Digit Numbering Plan for Internet-Based TRS. Skype: An Order that would address The Skype Communications S.A.R.L. Petition to Confirm a Consumer's Right to Use Internet Communications Software and Attach Devices to Wireless Networks. Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) Spectrum: A Report and Order that would Adopt Service Rules for AWS Spectrum in the 1.9 GHz-2.1 GHz bands, an Order on Reconsideration that would address Petitions for Reconsideration of a Commission Order that addressed Applications and Forbearance Petitions to One of the AWS Bands, and a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would Seek Further Comment Regarding Service Rules for the AWS Spectrum. The FCC will hold a Public Hearing on early termination fees in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282626A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282626A1.txt
  • SUNBERG 05/27/2008 06745.00000 45-16-06.8 N MN RM WOM31 095-10-19.0 W 0003451581 BNSF Railway Co. SUNBERG 05/27/2008 06765.00000 45-16-06.8 N Page 33 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN RM WOM31 095-10-19.0 W 0003451581 BNSF Railway Co. SUNBERG 05/27/2008 06845.00000 45-16-06.8 N MN RM WOM36 095-56-02.1 W 0003453307 BNSF Railway Co. DONNELLY 05/29/2008 06745.00000 45-41-12.8 N MN RM WOM36 095-56-02.1 W 0003453307 BNSF Railway Co. DONNELLY 05/29/2008 06845.00000 45-41-12.8 N MN RM WOM35 094-40-36.9 W 0003453330 BNSF Railway Co. GROVE CITY 05/29/2008 06585.00000 45-10-56.8 N MN RM WOM35 094-40-36.9 W 0003453330 BNSF Railway Co. GROVE CITY 05/29/2008 06685.00000 45-10-56.8 N RO WNTS291 0003450883 MANASSAS, CITY OF
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282628A1.txt
  • applications, subject to the pre-grant notice and petition procedure of Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. AI - Aural Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City UT MD WMU785 113-31-09.6 W 0003454168 MARATHON MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C. Washington 05/29/2008 00950.50000 37-08-02.1 N AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MD AM WHF336 075-32-37.7 W 0003451473 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPSALISBURY 05/30/2008 00948.50000 38-21-51.1 N MN MD WLI697 093-10-02.8 W 0003458495 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE Roseville 05/30/2008 00949.50000 45-01-51.8 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.txt
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Part 2. Telephone Carriers 20052006 Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission Whose Reports Were Used in this Statistical Tabulation. . . 13 105 Table 2.2 - Outside Plant Statistics of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282830A1.txt
  • UNIVERSITY OF S. FLORIDA TAMPA 06/04/2008 02059.00000 - 02076.00000 28-03-44.0 N FL AM KTZ25 082-24-44.3 W 0003409959 UNIVERSITY OF S. FLORIDA TAMPA 06/04/2008 02073.50000 - 02085.50000 28-03-44.0 N FL AM KIX99 082-20-50.4 W 0003453849 BOARD OF TRUSTEES, UNIVERSITY OGAINESVILLE 06/04/2008 02093.00000 - 02110.00000 29-38-51.9 N VT NE 073-12-02.4 W 0003460264 MT. MANSFIELD TELEVISION, INC. SOUTH BURLINGTO 06/02/2008 06950.00000 - 06975.00000 44-27-02.1 N YK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Trunked State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO WPMJ898 0003461604 Communication Specialists Co., Inc. 06/03/2008 Page 54 YK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Trunked State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283016A1.txt
  • Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RI MD WQFP964 071-23-25.0 W 0003468672 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Central Falls 06/11/2008 21925.00000 41-53-12.0 N MO MD WMP220 092-32-58.0 W 0003469109 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCKIRKSVILLE 06/11/2008 06093.45000 40-10-29.0 N MO MD WMP220 092-32-58.0 W 0003469109 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCKIRKSVILLE 06/11/2008 06152.75000 40-10-29.0 N NM MD KNZ49 106-49-02.1 W 0003469247 Qwest Corporation ALBUQUERQUE 06/11/2008 06034.15000 35-01-08.1 N NM MD KNZ49 106-49-02.1 W 0003469247 Qwest Corporation ALBUQUERQUE 06/11/2008 06063.80000 35-01-08.1 N NM MD KNZ49 106-49-02.1 W 0003469247 Qwest Corporation ALBUQUERQUE 06/11/2008 06093.45000 35-01-08.1 N NM MD KNZ49 106-49-02.1 W 0003469247 Qwest Corporation ALBUQUERQUE 06/11/2008 11425.00000 35-01-08.1 N NM MD KNZ49 106-49-02.1 W 0003469247 Qwest Corporation ALBUQUERQUE 06/11/2008 11505.00000 35-01-08.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283017A1.txt
  • Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC LANCASTER 06/11/2008 06034.15000 34-40-08.7 N CA MD WPTN952 117-34-34.0 W 0003468645 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPhelan 06/11/2008 10592.50000 34-23-34.1 N CA MD WPQT460 118-48-59.3 W 0003468690 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBakersfield 06/11/2008 06565.00000 35-15-06.7 N CA MD WPOS904 117-35-40.1 W 0003469623 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC COTO DE CAZA 06/12/2008 19415.00000 33-35-53.0 N CA MD WPOS903 117-35-02.1 W 0003469627 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC SAN JUAN CAPIST 06/12/2008 17855.00000 33-31-40.0 N VI MD WPSR702 064-54-05.5 W 0003469855 Centennial Puerto Rico License Corp. CHARLOTTE AMAL 06/12/2008 11667.50000 18-20-56.2 N VI MD WPTT800 064-51-09.1 W 0003469859 Centennial Puerto Rico License Corp. St. Thomas 06/12/2008 11177.50000 18-19-43.0 N CA MD WPQW524 117-02-57.2 W 0003470032 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRUNNING SPRINGS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283120A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: June 20, 2008 Chelsea Fallon: (202) 418-7991 Matthew Nodine: (202) 418-1646 FCC SEEKS COMMENT ON PROPOSED RULE CHANGES FOR ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICES (AWS) SPECTRUM IN THE 1.9 AND 2.1 GHz BANDS Proposal Would Support Public Access to Free, High-Speed Broadband Internet Services Washington, D.C. - Today, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Further Notice) that proposes public access to free, nationwide, high-speed wireless broadband Internet services using a portion of the winning bidder's network in the 2.1 GHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) spectrum.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283919A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283919A1.txt
  • 06625.62500 37-29-05.0 N MN MD WPYH735 096-02-56.1 W 0003508318 Minnesota, State of Erhard 07/17/2008 06615.00000 46-28-26.6 N MN MD WPQX400 096-14-41.0 W 0003508320 Minnesota State of HAWLEY 07/17/2008 06745.00000 46-52-36.0 N WA MD WQBK426 120-22-15.7 W 0003508374 WASHINGTON, STATE OF; DOT Wenatchee 07/17/2008 11285.00000 47-32-59.2 N MI MD WQHS869 085-10-43.9 W 0003508387 City of Battle Creek Battle Creek 07/17/2008 00954.10000 42-19-02.1 N MI MD WQHS869 085-10-43.9 W 0003508387 City of Battle Creek Battle Creek 07/17/2008 00955.30000 42-19-02.1 N Page 3 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NC MD WQFD683 078-13-35.0 W 0003508534 North Carolina State Highway Patrol Louisburg 07/18/2008 06755.00000 36-01-41.0 N NC MD
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284158A1.txt
  • CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBakersfield 07/22/2008 10755.00000 35-18-22.7 N CA AM WPQT510 118-55-11.3 W 0003463298 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBakersfield 07/22/2008 10835.00000 35-18-22.7 N KS AM 096-02-42.0 W 0003467404 USCOC NEBRASKA/KANSAS, LLC Reading 07/22/2008 06034.15000 38-39-45.8 N KS AM 096-02-42.0 W 0003467404 USCOC NEBRASKA/KANSAS, LLC Reading 07/22/2008 06197.24000 38-39-45.8 N KS AM 096-08-09.0 W 0003467676 USCOC NEBRASKA/KANSAS, LLC Madison 07/22/2008 06256.54000 38-06-02.1 N KS AM 096-08-09.0 W 0003467676 USCOC NEBRASKA/KANSAS, LLC Madison 07/22/2008 06315.84000 38-06-02.1 N CA AM WLN609 118-46-57.3 W 0003488560 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNECALABASAS 07/24/2008 05945.20000 34-05-06.0 N CA AM WLN609 118-46-57.3 W 0003488560 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNECALABASAS 07/24/2008 05974.85000 34-05-06.0 N CA AM WLN609 118-46-57.3 W 0003488560 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNECALABASAS 07/24/2008 06004.50000 34-05-06.0 N CA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284160A1.txt
  • Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN NE 092-01-13.5 W 0003513839 Minnesota, State of Elba 07/23/2008 06725.62500 44-03-58.8 N FL NE 081-59-52.0 W 0003513855 Cape COral, City of Cape Coral 07/23/2008 00928.31875 26-41-48.0 N FL NE 081-59-52.0 W 0003513855 Cape COral, City of Cape Coral 07/23/2008 00952.31875 26-41-48.0 N MN NE 091-21-41.3 W 0003513866 Minnesota, State of Reno 07/23/2008 06715.62500 43-33-02.1 N MN NE 091-24-15.0 W 0003513894 Minnesota, State of Caledonia 07/23/2008 06545.62500 43-40-07.5 N MN NE 091-24-15.0 W 0003513894 Minnesota, State of Caledonia 07/23/2008 06630.62500 43-40-07.5 N MN NE 091-38-41.1 W 0003513919 Minnesota, State of Money Creek 07/23/2008 05974.85000 43-48-39.2 N MN NE 091-38-41.1 W 0003513919 Minnesota, State of Money Creek 07/23/2008 06034.15000 43-48-39.2 N MN NE 091-38-41.1 W 0003513919
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284321A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284321A2.txt
  • 0.221.9 2.129.5 46.3 Algeria $7,190,918 0.024.9 1.718.9 54.4 $561,771 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $27,977 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 76,845,009 0.016.5 1.617.8 64.1 Angola $6,702,223 0.023.6 6.1 7.9 62.4 $142,872 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $22,706 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 26,262,698 0.014.910.016.6 58.5 Benin $2,187,003 0.0 6.1 7.243.2 43.5 $92,925 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 95.2 $128 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 27,092,126 0.0 2.1 8.648.6 40.7 Botswana $5,664,507 0.876.5 0.0 4.1 18.5 $101,935 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 94.1 $48 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 33,593,992 0.571.6 0.0 5.3 22.6 Burkina $3,199,797 0.017.1 8.546.1 28.3 $206,928 0.0 0.0 0.010.3 89.7 $1,803 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 21,276,558 0.011.7 7.951.2 29.3 Burundi $372,892 0.016.613.836.6 33.1 $108,780 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $501 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 6,566,244 0.010.8 4.727.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284343A1.txt
  • WMS518 117-48-43.2 W 0003528407 Los Angeles SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSIRVINE 08/01/2008 17895.00000 33-36-20.1 N CA MD WMS518 117-48-43.2 W 0003528407 Los Angeles SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSIRVINE 08/01/2008 17965.00000 33-36-20.1 N CA MD WPJB570 117-51-09.2 W 0003528424 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEIRVINE 08/01/2008 10653.75000 33-40-07.0 N CA MD WPJB570 117-51-09.2 W 0003528424 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEIRVINE 08/01/2008 11015.00000 33-40-07.0 N MS NE 090-12-02.1 W 0003527671 Verizon Wireless Personal CommunicationJackson 08/01/2008 06345.49000 32-25-35.1 N MS NE 090-12-02.1 W 0003527671 Verizon Wireless Personal CommunicationJackson 08/01/2008 06404.79000 32-25-35.1 N MS NE 090-12-02.1 W 0003527671 Verizon Wireless Personal CommunicationJackson 08/01/2008 10795.00000 32-25-35.1 N MS NE 090-12-02.1 W 0003527671 Verizon Wireless Personal CommunicationJackson 08/01/2008 10875.00000 32-25-35.1 N OR NE 122-25-48.2 W 0003528389 Cellco Partnership Idleyld Park 08/01/2008 06815.63000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284344A1.txt
  • OF HANOVER 08/01/2008 06345.49000 37-45-54.5 N VA NE 077-15-47.4 W 0003528250 HANOVER, COUNTY OF MECHANICSVILLE 08/01/2008 06152.75000 37-35-09.7 N VA NE 077-15-47.4 W 0003528250 HANOVER, COUNTY OF MECHANICSVILLE 08/01/2008 06286.19000 37-35-09.7 N VA NE 077-26-06.4 W 0003528253 HANOVER, COUNTY OF DOSWELL 08/01/2008 06004.50000 37-51-30.0 N VA NE 077-26-06.4 W 0003528253 HANOVER, COUNTY OF DOSWELL 08/01/2008 06093.45000 37-51-30.0 N VA NE 077-40-02.1 W 0003528256 HANOVER, COUNTY OF ROCKVILLE 08/01/2008 06034.15000 37-44-13.4 N VA NE 077-40-02.1 W 0003528256 HANOVER, COUNTY OF ROCKVILLE 08/01/2008 06226.89000 37-44-13.4 N VA NE 077-21-59.9 W 0003528259 HANOVER, COUNTY OF HANOVER 08/01/2008 11245.00000 37-45-54.5 N VA NE 077-11-20.6 W 0003528263 HANOVER, COUNTY OF MECHANICSVILLE 08/01/2008 05974.85000 37-37-53.3 N VA NE 077-11-20.6 W 0003528263 HANOVER, COUNTY OF MECHANICSVILLE 08/01/2008 06404.79000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284492A1.txt
  • Northrop Grumman Information TechnologBrooklyn 08/08/2008 21925.00000 40-40-34.7 N AZ NE 111-30-33.9 W 0003530595 EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY COOLIDGE 08/04/2008 06630.00000 32-55-27.6 N MO NE 089-57-36.0 W 0003530596 Ameren Services Co BAKERVILLE 08/04/2008 00928.06875 36-13-28.0 N MO NE 089-57-36.0 W 0003530596 Ameren Services Co BAKERVILLE 08/04/2008 00952.06875 36-13-28.0 N PA NE 076-48-01.3 W 0003530621 CENTRAL DAUPHIN SCHOOL DISTRICTHarrisburg 08/04/2008 23135.00000 40-17-02.1 N PA NE 076-48-13.0 W 0003530622 CENTRAL DAUPHIN SCHOOL DISTRICTHarrisburg 08/04/2008 21935.00000 40-17-28.0 N MO NE 091-47-08.0 W 0003530645 Ameren Services Co PORTLAND 08/04/2008 00928.10625 38-44-25.0 N MO NE 091-47-08.0 W 0003530645 Ameren Services Co PORTLAND 08/04/2008 00952.10625 38-44-25.0 N MO NE 092-12-31.0 W 0003530686 Ameren Seervices Co JEFFERSON CITY 08/04/2008 00928.41875 38-40-09.0 N MO NE 092-12-31.0 W 0003530686 Ameren
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284857A1.txt
  • State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH NE 084-44-26.8 W 0003557517 Butler County Sheriff - Communications Oxford 08/21/2008 05945.20000 39-29-55.2 N OH NE 084-44-26.8 W 0003557517 Butler County Sheriff - Communications Oxford 08/21/2008 10755.00000 39-29-55.2 N OH NE 084-39-03.5 W 0003557518 Butler County Sheriff - Communications Hamilton 08/21/2008 05974.85000 39-26-02.1 N OH NE 084-39-03.5 W 0003557518 Butler County Sheriff - Communications Hamilton 08/21/2008 06123.10000 39-26-02.1 N OH NE 084-26-18.3 W 0003557519 Butler County Sheriff - Communications Hamilton 08/21/2008 05945.20000 39-22-52.9 N OH NE 084-26-18.3 W 0003557519 Butler County Sheriff - Communications Hamilton 08/21/2008 06063.80000 39-22-52.9 N OH NE 084-47-16.5 W 0003557520 Butler County Sheriff - Communications Oxford 08/21/2008 06315.84000 39-28-02.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284876A1.txt
  • Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau 07/19/2008 KOJ42 FXO WASHINGTON, STATE OF 6345.49000000 KALAMA 46-1-1.4 N WA 122-46-44.4 W7 1 07/19/2008 KOY94 FXO WASHINGTON, STATE OF 11245.00000000 SPOKANE 47-37-25.6 N WA 117-30-7.7 W 6 1 07/19/2008 KPH24 FXO WASHINGTON, STATE OF 10715.00000000 CRESTON 47-44-37.5 N WA 118-31-45.9 W5 1 07/19/2008 KPH25 FXO WASHINGTON, STATE OF 11445.00000000 BEVERLY 46-48-57.4 N WA 119-53-2.1 W 6 1 07/19/2008 KPH25 FXO WASHINGTON, STATE OF 6256.54000000 BEVERLY 46-48-57.4 N WA 119-53-2.1 W 7 1 07/19/2008 KPH30 FXO WASHINGTON, STATE OF 10715.00000000 KENNEWICK 46-6-16.5 N WA 119-8-4.0 W 10 1 07/19/2008 KPH30 FXO WASHINGTON, STATE OF 11155.00000000 KENNEWICK 46-6-16.5 N WA 119-8-4.0 W 11 1 07/19/2008 WBH472 FXO WASHINGTON, STATE OF 10715.00000000 BURLINGTON 48-28-59.3 N WA 122-19-28.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284923A1.txt
  • Columbia 94.7 93.9 -0.8 Florida 85.5 93.8 8.3 * Georgia 88.9 95.0 6.1 * Hawaii 94.6 96.1 1.5 Idaho 89.5 98.1 8.6 * Illinois 95.0 94.1 -0.9 Indiana 90.3 92.2 1.9 Iowa 95.4 97.1 1.7 Kansas 94.9 96.5 1.6 Kentucky 86.9 92.4 5.5 * Louisiana 88.9 96.7 7.7 Maine 90.7 97.8 7.1 * Maryland 96.3 94.7 -1.6 Massachusetts 94.3 96.4 2.1 Michigan 93.8 96.1 2.3 Minnesota 96.4 98.0 1.7 Mississippi 82.4 92.7 10.3 * Missouri 92.1 96.5 4.4 * Montana 92.8 95.1 2.3 Nebraska 94.0 95.3 1.2 Nevada 89.4 93.8 4.3 New Hampshire 95.0 96.7 1.8 New Jersey 94.1 94.3 0.2 New Mexico 85.3 94.0 8.7 * New York 90.8 94.2 3.4 * North Carolina 89.3 92.2 2.8 North Dakota 95.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284926A1.txt
  • 0.3 125 2.2 147 2.5 36 0.6 1,195 20.8 5,755 Florida 37,933 53.6 2,042 2.9 414 0.6 2,539 3.6 1,037 1.5 26,837 37.9 70,801 Georgia 19,386 48.6 1,796 4.5 227 0.6 1,239 3.1 440 1.1 16,775 42.1 39,862 Guam 204 32.9 0 0.0 1 0.2 8 1.4 4 0.7 402 64.8 620 Hawaii 2,821 56.0 14 0.3 26 0.5 106 2.1 170 3.4 1,899 37.7 5,037 Idaho 2,850 45.0 29 0.5 57 0.9 144 2.3 91 1.4 3,170 50.0 6,340 Illinois 27,971 45.6 762 1.2 265 0.4 1,290 2.1 628 1.0 30,439 49.6 61,356 Indiana 10,986 40.4 486 1.8 119 0.4 521 1.9 342 1.3 14,748 54.2 27,202 Iowa 7,300 36.0 313 1.5 144 0.7 271 1.3 146 0.7 12,128 59.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284929A1.txt
  • a breakout by region of the country. Table 12 Share of Universal Service Contributions 1/ By Principal Type of Contributor Using Traditional Carrier Categories 2/ Preliminary 1/ Q2 Service Provider Category 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Regional Bell Operating Companies 11.7%14.4%14.3%16.2%18.3%19.9%19.9%19.8%19.8%18.3%14.1%13.2% (RBOCs) Including CLEC Affiliates. Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers 2.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.8 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.1 2.9 (LECs) Other Than RBOCs Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) Local Resellers and Other Local Carriers Other Than RBOCs 0.8 1.3 2.6 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.5 3.8 4.4 5.0 6.5 6.7 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.6 27.0 27.6 26.7 23.6 22.8 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • DC 20554 at 800-378-3160, facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. The report can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site at: www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/trends.html. Table of Contents 1-1 1-1 Table 1.1Interstate Per-Line Access Charges...............................................................1-3 Table 1.2Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges............................................................1-4 Table 1.3Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier...................................................1-5 Table 1.4Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier.................................... ......... 1-6 2-1 Table 2.1High-Speed Lines....................................................................................2-3 Chart 2.1Total High-Speed Lines..............................................................................2-3 Chart 2.2High-Speed Lines by Technology..................................................................2-3 Table 2.2Advanced Services Lines...........................................................................2-4 Chart 2.3Advanced Services Lines...........................................................................2-4 Chart 2.4Advanced Services Lines by Technology.........................................................2-4 Table 2.3Residential High-Speed Lines.....................................................................2-5 Chart 2.5Residential High-Speed Lines.....................................................................2-5 Chart 2.6Residential High-Speed Lines by Technology...................................................2-5 Table 2.4Residential Advanced Services Lines............................................................2-6 Chart 2.7Residential Advanced Services Lines............................................................2-6 Chart 2.8Residential Advanced Services Lines by Technology..........................................2-6 Table 2.5High-Speed Lines by Information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • Cities, 1994-2007 Table 1.13 Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities Table 1.14 Historical Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities Table 1.15 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll Service Calls II. Expenditures on Telephone Service......................................................II-1 A. Residential Expenditures..................................................................II-2 B. Business Expenditures.....................................................................II-2 C. Additional Sources of Information on Expenditures for Telephone Service......II-2 Table 2.1 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Household Location Table 2.2 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Race and National Origin ii Table 2.3 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Household Income Table 2.4 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Age of the Head of the Household Table 2.5 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Size of the Household Table 2.6 Average Monthly Household Telecommunications Expenditures
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285407A1.txt
  • File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NM NE 108-04-11.0 W 0003573420 Tri-State Generation & Transmission AssoPrewitt 09/09/2008 00955.15000 35-19-10.7 N DE NE 075-11-28.6 W 0003573678 TIDEWATER UTILITIES, INC. LEWES 09/09/2008 00932.28125 38-36-21.3 N DE NE 075-11-28.6 W 0003573678 TIDEWATER UTILITIES, INC. LEWES 09/09/2008 00941.28125 38-36-21.3 N IA NE P 091-27-23.1 W 0003574223 City of Manchester Manchester 09/09/2008 00956.29375 42-29-02.1 N NE NE P 098-36-27.2 W 0003575741 City of Cairo Cairo 09/09/2008 00956.26875 40-59-59.3 N AZ NE P 110-58-33.2 W 0003575756 Town of Oro Valley Oro Valley 09/09/2008 00956.44375 32-25-17.0 N OK NE 099-20-45.4 W 0003575762 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative Carpenter 09/09/2008 06362.79000 35-30-49.8 N OK NE 099-20-45.4 W 0003575762 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative Carpenter 09/09/2008 06372.67000 35-30-49.8 N CA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285756A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285756A1.txt
  • City FL MD WNTS309 081-58-19.0 W 0003587963 FLORIDA, STATE OF BALDWIN 09/22/2008 06615.00000 30-18-27.0 N FL MD WNTS309 081-58-19.0 W 0003587963 FLORIDA, STATE OF BALDWIN 09/22/2008 06645.00000 30-18-27.0 N FL MD WPJB825 081-30-00.0 W 0003587966 FLORIDA, STATE OF DURBIN 09/22/2008 06665.00000 30-05-34.0 N FL MD WPJB825 081-30-00.0 W 0003587966 FLORIDA, STATE OF DURBIN 09/22/2008 06695.00000 30-05-34.0 N MD MD WQEP433 076-37-02.1 W 0003588280 Enoch Pratt Free Library PRINCE FREDERIC 09/22/2008 17865.00000 38-32-11.1 N NY MD WNEU879 077-26-48.0 W 0003588471 MONROE, COUNTY OF ROCHESTER 09/22/2008 06700.62500 43-08-05.0 N NY MD WNEU879 077-26-48.0 W 0003588471 MONROE, COUNTY OF ROCHESTER 09/22/2008 06755.00000 43-08-05.0 N NY MD WPOR391 077-44-37.0 W 0003588476 MONROE, COUNTY OF ROCHESTER 09/22/2008 00933.37500 43-11-10.2 N Page 1 MW - Microwave Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285915A1.txt
  • to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NM NE 106-55-49.0 W 0003595658 Alltel New License Sub LLC Magdalena 09/30/2008 05974.85000 34-09-16.2 N MN NE 093-13-32.8 W 0003595735 Citilink Communications, LLC Lakeville 09/30/2008 17980.00000 44-38-24.5 N MN NE 093-12-56.0 W 0003595742 Citilink Communications, LLC Apple Valley 09/30/2008 17820.00000 44-44-02.1 N MN NE 093-15-26.2 W 0003595747 Citilink Communications, LLC Lakeville 09/30/2008 19380.00000 44-42-04.5 N MN NE 093-15-26.2 W 0003595747 Citilink Communications, LLC Lakeville 09/30/2008 19540.00000 44-42-04.5 N MN NE 093-15-26.2 W 0003595747 Citilink Communications, LLC Lakeville 09/30/2008 19620.00000 44-42-04.5 N MN NE 093-17-18.4 W 0003595750 Citilink Communications, LLC Burnsville 09/30/2008 10915.00000 44-43-21.6 N MN NE 093-17-18.4 W 0003595750 Citilink Communications,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286358A1.txt
  • 23175.00000 41-57-30.5 N IL NE 087-43-21.0 W 0003614815 Sprint Wireless Broadband Company, LLCUNIVERSITY PARK 10/20/2008 17865.00000 41-27-15.0 N IL NE 087-43-21.0 W 0003614815 Sprint Wireless Broadband Company, LLCUNIVERSITY PARK 10/20/2008 21825.00000 41-27-15.0 N IL NE 087-43-21.0 W 0003614815 Sprint Wireless Broadband Company, LLCUNIVERSITY PARK 10/20/2008 21875.00000 41-27-15.0 N IL NE 087-41-09.7 W 0003614816 Sprint Wireless Broadband Company, LLCMARKHAM 10/20/2008 11585.00000 41-35-02.1 N IL NE 087-41-09.7 W 0003614816 Sprint Wireless Broadband Company, LLCMARKHAM 10/20/2008 11665.00000 41-35-02.1 N IL NE 087-41-09.7 W 0003614816 Sprint Wireless Broadband Company, LLCMARKHAM 10/20/2008 23025.00000 41-35-02.1 N IL NE 087-41-09.7 W 0003614816 Sprint Wireless Broadband Company, LLCMARKHAM 10/20/2008 23125.00000 41-35-02.1 N IL NE 087-36-37.1 W 0003614817 Sprint Wireless Broadband Company, LLCChicago 10/20/2008 11055.00000 41-39-03.9 N IL NE 087-36-37.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286554A1.txt
  • N TX MD WCI53 099-08-24.0 W 0003631976 Enterprise Products Operating, LLC BANDERA 10/30/2008 06605.00000 29-41-58.0 N TX MD WCI55 099-34-52.0 W 0003631981 Enterprise Products Operating, LLC HUNT 10/30/2008 06004.50000 29-57-46.0 N TX MD WCI55 099-34-52.0 W 0003631981 Enterprise Products Operating, LLC HUNT 10/30/2008 06765.00000 29-57-46.0 N TX MD WCQ94 098-09-18.0 W 0003632015 Enterprise Products Operating, LLC BEN BOLT 10/30/2008 06730.00000 27-39-02.1 N MA MD WQFU473 071-03-30.0 W 0003633895 PIPELINE WIRELESS, LLC BOSTON 10/31/2008 19640.00000 42-21-30.0 N Page 28 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA MD WQFU473 071-03-30.0 W 0003633895 PIPELINE WIRELESS, LLC BOSTON 10/31/2008 22525.00000 42-21-30.0 N CA MD WQFF274 117-07-58.8 W 0003634002 SKYRIVER
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286957A1.txt
  • WI MD KNKN507 092-20-49.0 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERAMERY 11/14/2008 45-18-28.0 N WI MD KNKN507 092-28-20.7 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERBALSAM LAKE 11/14/2008 45-27-00.9 N WI MD KNKN507 091-51-46.4 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERBARRON 11/14/2008 45-26-13.2 N WI MD KNKN507 091-36-10.5 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERBIRCHWOOD 11/14/2008 45-39-02.8 N WI MD KNKN507 091-35-02.1 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERCAMERON 11/14/2008 45-24-06.8 N WI MD KNKN507 092-10-17.0 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERCumberland 11/14/2008 45-33-10.1 N WI MD KNKN507 092-22-17.7 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERDanbury 11/14/2008 46-00-23.2 N WI MD KNKN507 092-19-05.7 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERDanbury 11/14/2008 46-00-47.8 N WI MD KNKN507 092-33-13.3 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286958A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286958A1.txt
  • LLC Hattiesburg 11/18/2008 31-21-11.6 N MS MD KNKN681 089-21-37.1 W 0003653760 Alltel Communications, LLC HATTIESBURG 11/18/2008 31-16-08.8 N MS MD KNKN681 088-33-26.0 W 0003653760 Alltel Communications, LLC LEAKSVILLE 11/18/2008 31-10-26.0 N MS MD KNKN681 088-27-47.2 W 0003653760 Alltel Communications, LLC Lucedale 11/18/2008 30-54-12.8 N MS MD KNKN681 088-35-39.7 W 0003653760 Alltel Communications, LLC Lucedale 11/18/2008 30-54-52.8 N MS MD KNKN681 088-36-02.1 W 0003653760 Alltel Communications, LLC Lucedale 11/18/2008 30-58-42.7 N MS MD KNKN681 089-11-52.8 W 0003653760 Alltel Communications, LLC MAXIE 11/18/2008 31-00-03.7 N MS MD KNKN681 088-46-28.6 W 0003653760 Alltel Communications, LLC McLain 11/18/2008 31-06-06.9 N MS MD KNKN681 089-30-13.1 W 0003653760 Alltel Communications, LLC PEARL RIVER 11/18/2008 30-54-00.9 N MS MD KNKN681 089-10-51.6 W 0003653760 Alltel Communications, LLC Petal 11/18/2008
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287094A1.txt
  • WI AM KNKN507 092-20-49.0 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERAMERY 11/25/2008 45-18-28.0 N WI AM KNKN507 092-28-20.7 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERBALSAM LAKE 11/25/2008 45-27-00.9 N WI AM KNKN507 091-51-46.4 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERBARRON 11/25/2008 45-26-13.2 N WI AM KNKN507 091-36-10.5 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERBIRCHWOOD 11/25/2008 45-39-02.8 N WI AM KNKN507 091-35-02.1 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERCAMERON 11/25/2008 45-24-06.8 N WI AM KNKN507 092-10-17.0 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERCumberland 11/25/2008 45-33-10.1 N WI AM KNKN507 092-22-17.7 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERDanbury 11/25/2008 46-00-23.2 N WI AM KNKN507 092-19-05.7 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERDanbury 11/25/2008 46-00-47.8 N WI AM KNKN507 092-33-13.3 W 0003650657 WISCONSIN RSA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287238A1.txt
  • 10955.00000 - 11445.00000 46-48-09.0 N AZ NE 111-26-52.5 W 0003663374 TRILLION PARTNERS, INC. Magma 12/01/2008 19375.00000 33-09-13.5 N PR NE 066-09-20.8 W 0003663405 PR Wireless, Inc. Aguas Buenas 12/01/2008 11167.50000 18-13-47.5 N PR NE 067-07-33.5 W 0003663408 PR Wireless, Inc. Hormigueros 12/01/2008 11657.50000 18-08-05.5 N PR NE 066-47-05.5 W 0003663415 PR Wireless, Inc. Utuado 12/01/2008 06745.00000 18-16-00.4 N PR NE 066-52-02.1 W 0003663418 PR Wireless, Inc. Lares 12/01/2008 06585.00000 18-18-21.0 N NC NE 083-03-04.6 W 0003663950 NORTH CAROLINA RSA 1 PARTNERSHNEWPORT 12/02/2008 06765.00000 35-44-01.5 N NC NE 083-06-24.2 W 0003663958 NORTH CAROLINA RSA 1 PARTNERSHSYLVA 12/02/2008 06745.00000 35-27-44.4 N NC NE 083-58-04.7 W 0003663964 NORTH CAROLINA RSA 1 PARTNERSHMURPHY 12/02/2008 06805.00000 35-01-05.2 N NC NE 084-14-29.8 W 0003663989 NORTH CAROLINA RSA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287358A1.txt
  • GREATER MISSOURI, LLCLucerne 12/09/2008 06605.00000 40-28-03.1 N CA NE 121-04-32.3 W 0003672526 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGUSTINE 12/09/2008 10875.00000 37-11-42.6 N CA NE 120-59-53.2 W 0003672545 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGUSTINE 12/09/2008 11365.00000 37-15-28.5 N CA NE 122-13-03.9 W 0003672546 WiLine Networks Inc. Redwood City 12/09/2008 10895.00000 37-29-18.1 N CA NE 122-03-22.0 W 0003672551 WiLine Networks Inc. Fremont 12/09/2008 11545.00000 37-33-02.1 N CA NE 121-58-44.6 W 0003672564 WiLine Networks Inc. Santa Clara 12/09/2008 22675.00000 37-22-37.2 N IL NE 087-37-19.8 W 0003673479 Towerstream Corp Chicago 12/10/2008 17915.00000 41-53-04.6 N IL NE 087-40-27.1 W 0003673480 Towerstream Corp Chicago 12/10/2008 19475.00000 41-59-05.0 N TX NE 096-48-13.4 W 0003673481 Towerstream Corp Dallas 12/10/2008 22020.00000 32-46-48.2 N TX NE 096-47-34.7 W 0003673482 Towerstream Corp Dallas 12/10/2008
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287532A1.txt
  • MD WNTK235 086-50-31.6 W 0003680948 MIDDLE TENNESSEE ELECTRIC MEMBFRANKLIN 12/18/2008 00928.36875 35-58-58.4 N TN MD WNTK235 086-50-31.6 W 0003680948 MIDDLE TENNESSEE ELECTRIC MEMBFRANKLIN 12/18/2008 00952.36875 35-58-58.4 N TN MD WQHL944 086-47-36.6 W 0003680950 MIDDLE TENNESSEE ELECTRIC MEMBThompson Station 12/18/2008 00928.75625 35-46-48.9 N TN MD WQHL944 086-47-36.6 W 0003680950 MIDDLE TENNESSEE ELECTRIC MEMBThompson Station 12/18/2008 00952.75625 35-46-48.9 N TN MD WQHL946 086-23-02.1 W 0003680952 MIDDLE TENNESSEE ELECTRIC MEMBLebanon 12/18/2008 00928.61875 36-09-31.1 N TN MD WQHL946 086-23-02.1 W 0003680952 MIDDLE TENNESSEE ELECTRIC MEMBLebanon 12/18/2008 00952.61875 36-09-31.1 N TN MD WQHM427 087-06-22.9 W 0003680974 MIDDLE TENNESSEE ELECTRIC MEMBFAIRVIEW 12/18/2008 00928.78125 35-55-49.8 N TN MD WQHM427 087-06-22.9 W 0003680974 MIDDLE TENNESSEE ELECTRIC MEMBFAIRVIEW 12/18/2008 00952.78125 35-55-49.8 N TN MD WQHM428 086-15-16.5 W 0003680979 MIDDLE TENNESSEE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Monthly Support - by State ....................................................................... Table 2.3 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries ................................................... Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
  • Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Monthly Support - by State ....................................................................... Table 2.3 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries ................................................... Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • 5,396 Fixed Local Service Providers 18,577 18,266 1.5 39,567 77,830 117,397 18,264 Payphone Service Providers 29 29 1.3 135 284 418 27 Wireless Telephony Including Cellular, 30,162 29,550 1.8 6,735 116,602 123,337 29,959 Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers Paging & Messaging Service Providers 63 59 7.0 45 518 562 64 Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) Dispatch 24 23 2.1 5 124 130 14 Wireless Data and Other Mobile Service 57 55 0.9 14 149 163 45 Providers Wireless Service Providers 30,307 29,688 1.8 6,799 117,393 124,192 30,083 Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 20,842 20,543 1.6 11,124 29,755 40,879 21,706 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 162 141 16.5 79 558 637 156 Prepaid Calling Card Providers 1,670 1,639 3.0 210 1,700 1,910 1,632
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A4.pdf
  • for telephone service for low-income consumers experienced an average growth in penetration rates for low-income households of 3.2% from March 1997 to March 2007.9 In contrast, states that provided a basic or low level of Lifeline support experienced an average decline in telephone penetration rates for low-income households between March 1997 and March 2007 of 0.6%.10 As shown in Table 2.1, more than 6.9 million subscribers paid reduced local rates under the Lifeline program in 2007, whereas the Link Up program, which supports affordable connections to the network, connected about 1.5 million telephone beneficiaries. The Commission's rules are designed to satisfy the 1996 Act's mandates that rates be "affordable" and access be provided to "low-income consumers" in all regions of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A8.pdf
  • 95.7 93.7 -2.0 Nevada 90.4 95.2 4.9 * New Hampshire 94.3 96.8 2.5 * New Jersey 94.8 95.7 0.9 New Mexico 82.0 91.6 9.6 * New York 91.8 93.4 1.6 North Carolina 88.3 94.5 6.3 * North Dakota 94.6 98.0 3.4 * Ohio 92.4 95.9 3.5 * Oklahoma 90.3 94.9 4.6 * Oregon 90.6 96.7 6.1 * Pennsylvania 94.9 97.0 2.1 * Rhode Island 93.6 95.3 1.7 South Carolina 83.7 90.6 6.9 * South Dakota 93.2 97.2 4.0 * Tennessee 88.5 93.2 4.8 * Texas 88.4 93.5 5.1 * Utah 92.5 96.8 4.3 * Vermont 92.3 97.4 5.1 * Virginia 93.1 95.3 2.3 Washington 93.0 96.8 3.8 * West Virginia 87.7 94.5 6.8 * Wisconsin 95.2 96.8 1.6 Wyoming 89.9 96.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • Services 7 - 6 1978 9.0% 0.9% 1979 13.3 0.7 1980 12.5 4.6 1981 8.9 11.7 1982 3.8 7.2 1983 3.8 3.6 1984 3.9 9.2 1985 3.8 4.7 1986 1.1 2.7 1987 4.4 -1.3 1988 4.4 1.3 1989 4.6 -0.3 1990 6.1 -0.4 1991 3.1 3.5 1992 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.7 1.8 1994 2.7 0.7 1995 2.5 1.2 1996 3.3 2.1 1997 1.7 0.2 1998 1.6 0.3* 1999 2.7 0.4 2000 3.4 -2.3 2001 1.6 1.3 2002 2.4 0.2 2003 1.9 -2.7 2004 3.3 -2.5 2005 3.4 0.4 2006 2.5 1.7 2007 4.1 2.1 * The CPI telephone service index was revised in December of 1997. Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of Economic Analysis. Chart 7.2 Table 7.2 Annual
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287727A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287727A1.txt
  • N OK NE 098-42-17.5 W 0003688093 Cellular Network Partnership, A Limited PaChattanooga 12/29/2008 06755.00000 34-23-30.4 N TX NE 094-30-35.0 W 0003688439 Alltel New License Sub LLC TATUM 12/29/2008 06805.00000 32-18-44.2 N AK NE 147-43-58.1 W 0003688509 Alaska DigiTel, L.L.C. Fairbanks 12/29/2008 19675.00000 64-48-48.6 N CO NE 106-22-56.9 W 0003689457 CenturyTel Broadband Services, LLC Vail 12/30/2008 23170.00000 39-38-36.3 N CO NE 106-23-02.1 W 0003689461 CenturyTel Broadband Services, LLC Vail 12/30/2008 21970.00000 39-38-36.4 N CA RM WPOR717 118-00-04.2 W 0003690720 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEWESTMINSTER 01/02/2009 18040.00000 33-44-46.0 N CA RM WPOR717 118-00-04.2 W 0003690720 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEWESTMINSTER 01/02/2009 19525.00000 33-44-46.0 N RO WPOS358 0003688740 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC 12/30/2008 Page 4 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287839A1.txt
  • 01/07/2009 38-18-56.0 N TX AM KNKN428 095-02-05.2 W 0003656920 TX-11 Newco LLC Alto 01/06/2009 31-36-08.6 N TX AM KNKN428 094-28-45.0 W 0003656920 TX-11 Newco LLC Beckville 01/06/2009 32-14-04.4 N TX AM KNKN428 094-57-28.0 W 0003656920 TX-11 Newco LLC BIG SPRINGS 01/06/2009 32-07-25.0 N TX AM KNKN428 094-09-42.0 W 0003656920 TX-11 Newco LLC DE BERRY 01/06/2009 32-18-12.0 N TX AM KNKN428 094-41-02.1 W 0003656920 TX-11 Newco LLC Henderson 01/06/2009 32-19-04.9 N TX AM KNKN428 094-44-02.8 W 0003656920 TX-11 Newco LLC HENDERSON 01/06/2009 32-10-09.2 N TX AM KNKN428 095-10-56.0 W 0003656920 TX-11 Newco LLC JACKSONVILLE 01/06/2009 31-50-19.4 N TX AM KNKN428 095-16-31.6 W 0003656920 TX-11 Newco LLC JACKSONVILLE 01/06/2009 32-00-29.3 N TX AM KNKN428 094-52-02.0 W 0003656920 TX-11 Newco LLC Overton 01/06/2009 32-18-25.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287961A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287961A1.txt
  • connections, 2.3% were fiber connections to the end user premises, and 14.0% used other types of technology including satellite, terrestrial fixed or mobile wireless (on a licensed or unlicensed basis), and electric power line. High-speed ADSL increased by 1.9 million lines during the second half of 2007, fiber connections increased by 0.4 million lines, and cable modem service increased by 2.1 million lines. For the full twelve-month period ending December 31, 2007, ADSL increased by 4.0 million lines, fiber connections increased by 0.8 million lines, and cable modem service increased by 4.5 million lines. Advanced Services Lines Advanced services lines, which deliver services at speeds exceeding 200 kbps in both directions, increased by 15% during the second half of 2007, from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288106A1.txt
  • 01/16/2009 06404.79000 40-36-27.8 N PA MD WMK802 076-27-46.9 W 0003707115 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCTREMONT 01/16/2009 06835.00000 40-36-27.8 N WI MD WQHZ260 089-22-48.4 W 0003707116 NSIGHTTEL WIRELESS, LLC Rhinelander 01/16/2009 06093.45000 45-39-37.6 N WI MD WQHZ260 089-22-48.4 W 0003707116 NSIGHTTEL WIRELESS, LLC Rhinelander 01/16/2009 10755.00000 45-39-37.6 N PA MD WMS866 076-40-58.2 W 0003707130 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHUMMELSTOWN 01/16/2009 10563.12500 40-21-02.1 N PA MD WMS866 076-40-58.2 W 0003707130 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHUMMELSTOWN 01/16/2009 10616.87500 40-21-02.1 N PA MD WMS866 076-40-58.2 W 0003707130 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHUMMELSTOWN 01/16/2009 10623.12500 40-21-02.1 N PA MD WPNC702 076-23-48.2 W 0003707178 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCLEBANON 01/16/2009 06345.49000 40-20-07.9 N PA MD WPNC702 076-23-48.2 W 0003707178 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCLEBANON 01/16/2009 06375.14000 40-20-07.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288108A1.txt
  • th 445 12St., S.W. Below is a listing of applications, subject to the pre-grant notice and petition procedure of Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MD AM WQEP433 076-37-02.1 W 0003588280 Enoch Pratt Free Library PRINCE FREDERIC 01/21/2009 18065.00000 38-32-11.1 N UT AM WPXV769 111-53-55.8 W 0003671398 Murray, City of Murray 01/14/2009 18132.50000 40-38-53.8 N UT AM WPXV769 111-53-55.8 W 0003671398 Murray, City of Murray 01/14/2009 19335.00000 40-38-53.8 N UT AM WPXV769 111-53-55.8 W 0003671398 Murray, City of Murray 01/14/2009 21835.00000 40-38-53.8 N WA AM WQET312 120-13-25.7 W 0003674375
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288535A1.txt
  • Wireless CommunicatNatchez 02/12/2009 05945.20000 31-40-28.0 N MS NE 091-19-39.1 W 0003737281 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatNatchez 02/12/2009 06063.80000 31-40-28.0 N MS NE 091-19-39.1 W 0003737281 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatNatchez 02/12/2009 06743.75000 31-40-28.0 N MS NE 090-31-51.5 W 0003737284 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatMcComb 02/12/2009 06034.15000 31-12-23.3 N MS NE 091-29-10.5 W 0003737286 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatRoxi 02/12/2009 06601.25000 31-04-02.1 N MS NE 091-00-24.5 W 0003737289 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatGloster 02/12/2009 06756.25000 31-11-18.3 N MS NE 091-14-17.5 W 0003737292 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatJeanette 02/12/2009 06583.75000 31-29-47.4 N Page 19 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City ME NE 070-31-39.0 W 0003737430 CUMBERLAND
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288795A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288795A1.txt
  • 080-34-58.2 W 0003743426 North Carolina State Highway Patrol MONROE 02/19/2009 06635.00000 35-01-38.5 N NC MD WNTP782 080-34-58.2 W 0003743426 North Carolina State Highway Patrol MONROE 02/19/2009 06665.00000 35-01-38.5 N AZ MD WNTT603 112-07-24.5 W 0003743963 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 02/19/2009 10551.25000 33-41-58.1 N AZ MD WNTT603 112-07-24.5 W 0003743963 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 02/19/2009 10591.25000 33-41-58.1 N MD MD WQHG514 076-37-02.1 W 0003744269 Calvert County Government PRINCE FREDERIC 02/19/2009 17765.00000 38-32-11.1 N MD MD WQHL441 076-34-53.0 W 0003744272 Calvert County Government PRINCE FREDERIC 02/19/2009 19325.00000 38-32-17.0 N MD MD WQIB419 075-36-39.5 W 0003744278 WICOMICO COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCASalisbury 02/19/2009 10715.00000 38-22-32.6 N AZ MD WPNG231 112-05-13.5 W 0003744353 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 02/19/2009 10656.25000 33-35-38.1 N AZ MD WQIW282 112-18-16.5 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288968A1.txt
  • -- 2 1 01/28/2009 WPJW656 MO LAPEER METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY 451.51250000 Dearborn 42-21-6.3 N MI 83-8-54.0 W 3 1 01/28/2009 WPJW656 MO LAPEER METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY 452.03750000 Dearborn 42-21-6.3 N MI 83-8-54.0 W 3 1 01/28/2009 WPJW656 MO LAPEER METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY 452.71250000 Dearborn 42-21-6.3 N MI 83-8-54.0 W 3 1 01/28/2009 WPJW656 MO LAPEER METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY 451.51250000 Sebewang 43-44-2.1 N MI 83-26-59.3 W 4 1 01/28/2009 WPJW656 MO LAPEER METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY 452.03750000 Sebewang 43-44-2.1 N MI 83-26-59.3 W 4 1 01/28/2009 WPJW656 MO LAPEER METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY 452.71250000 Sebewang 43-44-2.1 N MI 83-26-59.3 W 4 1 01/28/2009 WPJW656 MO LAPEER METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY 451.51250000 Lapeer 43-1-55.1 N MI 83-18-15.8 W 5 1 01/28/2009 WPJW656 MO LAPEER METAL PRODUCTS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288977A1.txt
  • WQIN964 087-53-17.7 W 0003755276 Business Only Broadband, LLC Des Plaines 02/27/2009 19425.00000 42-02-25.4 N IL MD WQIN964 087-53-17.7 W 0003755276 Business Only Broadband, LLC Des Plaines 02/27/2009 19675.00000 42-02-25.4 N IL MD WQIN964 087-53-17.7 W 0003755276 Business Only Broadband, LLC Des Plaines 02/27/2009 21825.00000 42-02-25.4 N IN MD WPJE802 086-14-25.0 W 0003755283 Centennial Michiana License Company LLSOUTH BEND 02/27/2009 06315.84000 41-40-02.1 N IN MD WPJE802 086-14-25.0 W 0003755283 Centennial Michiana License Company LLSOUTH BEND 02/27/2009 06362.79000 41-40-02.1 N IN MD WPJE802 086-14-25.0 W 0003755283 Centennial Michiana License Company LLSOUTH BEND 02/27/2009 11285.00000 41-40-02.1 N IN MD WMN591 085-51-05.0 W 0003755290 Centennial Michiana License Company LLGOSHEN 02/27/2009 06063.80000 41-37-39.0 N IN MD WMN591 085-51-05.0 W 0003755290 Centennial Michiana License Company LLGOSHEN 02/27/2009
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288978A1.txt
  • Anthony 02/26/2009 23410.00000 45-01-41.8 N MN MD WQJT422 093-15-33.8 W 0003754557 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Minneapolis 02/26/2009 21410.00000 45-01-07.6 N MN MD WQJT422 093-15-33.8 W 0003754557 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Minneapolis 02/26/2009 22210.00000 45-01-07.6 N PR NE 067-08-54.7 W 0003752050 PR Wireless, Inc. Aguadilla 02/25/2009 17765.00000 18-27-29.5 N WA NE 121-54-17.3 W 0003752270 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership SNOQUALAMIE 02/25/2009 10557.50000 47-31-02.1 N WA NE 121-49-21.0 W 0003752294 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership NORTH BEND 02/25/2009 10622.50000 47-28-08.0 N CA NE 114-37-48.0 W 0003752304 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership MOHAVE VALLEY 02/25/2009 06377.61000 34-32-45.2 N FL NE 080-18-59.0 W 0003752331 Verizon Wireless Personal CommunicationMIAMI 02/25/2009 11215.00000 25-49-43.0 N FL NE 080-18-59.0 W 0003752331 Verizon Wireless Personal CommunicationMIAMI 02/25/2009 11245.00000 25-49-43.0 N FL NE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289100A1.pdf
  • services, to provide wireless Internet access and other voice and high-speed data services. In re Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 2155-2175 MHz Band (NPRM), 22 F.C.C.R. 17,035, 17,039-41 (�� 6-7) (2007). Service rules have been adopted for one 90 MHz range, now called AWS-1. In re Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, 18 F.C.C.R. 25,162, 25,163 (� 1) (2003). Service rules for a second, 20 MHz, band called AWS-2 have been proposed but not approved. See In re Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands, 19 F.C.C.R. 19,263 (2004). In September 2005, the FCC "designat[ed]" the 2155-2175 MHz band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289167A1.txt
  • Company Provided Composites) Chart 4 Percent Residential Installation Commitments Met Large Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted BOC/Embarq Composite* Weighted Verizon Avg. AT&T BellSouth Weighted AT&T Avg. (excluding BellSouth) Qwest 19 ARMIS 43-05 Report 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 AT&T Ameritech 2.1 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 AT&T BellSouth 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.4 AT&T Pacific 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.3 AT&T Southwestern 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.1 1.0 AT&T SNET 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.8 Qwest 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 Verizon GTE 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.8 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289169A1.txt
  • * Illinois 95.0 94.2 -0.8 Indiana 90.3 92.6 2.2 Iowa 95.4 98.1 2.7 Kansas 94.9 96.7 1.8 Kentucky 86.9 94.7 7.8 * Louisiana 88.9 95.9 6.9 Maine 90.7 97.6 6.9 * Maryland 96.3 93.3 -2.9 Massachusetts 94.3 96.7 2.4 Michigan 93.8 96.0 2.2 Minnesota 96.4 98.3 2.0 Mississippi 82.4 93.0 10.7 * Missouri 92.1 97.0 4.9 * Montana 92.8 94.9 2.1 Nebraska 94.0 95.6 1.6 Nevada 89.4 95.8 6.4 * New Hampshire 95.0 98.2 3.2 New Jersey 94.1 94.6 0.5 New Mexico 85.3 92.4 7.1 New York 90.8 94.3 3.4 * North Carolina 89.3 94.5 5.2 * North Dakota 95.1 98.8 3.7 Ohio 92.2 97.0 4.8 * Oklahoma 91.5 95.1 3.6 Oregon 91.2 97.5 6.3 * Pennsylvania 95.1 97.6 2.5 Rhode
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289173A1.txt
  • 128 0.6 601 2.8 333 1.5 10,840 49.6 21,835 Alaska 1,472 26.4 6 0.1 185 3.3 87 1.6 30 0.5 3,806 68.1 5,585 American Samoa 20 67.9 0 0.0 1 2.8 1 3.3 0 1.6 7 24.5 30 Arizona 13,075 63.0 98 0.5 186 0.9 707 3.4 211 1.0 6,483 31.2 20,760 Arkansas 4,981 34.7 486 3.4 68 0.5 302 2.1 168 1.2 8,333 58.1 14,338 California 81,155 52.4 2,019 1.3 896 0.6 4,532 2.9 2,818 1.8 63,320 40.9 154,739 Colorado 11,757 56.9 63 0.3 202 1.0 568 2.8 338 1.6 7,730 37.4 20,657 Connecticut 7,727 52.5 286 1.9 163 1.1 288 2.0 202 1.4 6,052 41.1 14,719 Delaware 2,589 56.8 14 0.3 76 1.7 110 2.4 29 0.6 1,743 38.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289324A1.txt
  • MD WPOU489 085-39-05.9 W 0003765666 PEG BROADCASTING , LLC McMinnville 03/10/2009 00951.50000 35-37-47.9 N KY MD WPJF431 086-27-09.9 W 0003765851 HERITAGE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Bowling Green 03/10/2009 00946.50000 36-58-47.1 N ND MD WGR739 097-01-27.3 W 0003771672 LEIGHTON ENTERPRISES, INC. Thompson 03/13/2009 00949.00000 47-50-38.6 N ND MD WLF618 097-01-27.3 W 0003771765 LEIGHTON ENTERPRISES, INC. Thompson 03/13/2009 00948.50000 47-50-38.6 N TX MD WGV717 098-29-02.1 W 0003772102 CCB TEXAS LICENSES, INC. San Antonio 03/13/2009 00945.50000 29-25-07.3 N TX MD WQIB475 097-41-37.0 W 0003772301 REO RADIO GROUP, LLC Austin 03/13/2009 00950.50000 30-19-14.0 N Page 3 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA NE 076-17-15.9 W 0003764717 SINCLAIR TELECABLE, INC.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289555A1.txt
  • 149-55-26.2 W 0003779891 ConocoPhillips Communications Inc. KUPARUK FIELD 03/19/2009 17875.00000 70-20-49.9 N AK MD WHH657 149-50-59.2 W 0003779893 ConocoPhillips Communications Inc. KUPARUK FIELD 03/19/2009 19435.00000 70-21-49.9 N AK MD WHH655 149-51-05.2 W 0003779895 ConocoPhillips Communications Inc. KUPARUK FIELD 03/19/2009 19315.00000 70-19-57.9 N AK MD WHH655 149-51-05.2 W 0003779895 ConocoPhillips Communications Inc. KUPARUK FIELD 03/19/2009 19345.00000 70-19-57.9 N AK MD WHH654 149-51-02.1 W 0003779903 ConocoPhillips Communications Inc. KUPARUK FIELD 03/19/2009 17785.00000 70-17-56.9 N AK MD WHH654 149-51-02.1 W 0003779903 ConocoPhillips Communications Inc. KUPARUK FIELD 03/19/2009 17875.00000 70-17-56.9 N AK MD WHH659 150-00-54.2 W 0003779904 ConocoPhillips Communications Inc. KUPARUK FIELD 03/19/2009 19315.00000 70-18-15.9 N AK MD WHH659 150-00-54.2 W 0003779904 ConocoPhillips Communications Inc. KUPARUK FIELD 03/19/2009 19375.00000 70-18-15.9 N AK MD WHH658 149-56-09.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289556A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289556A1.txt
  • 34-12-50.0 N CA RM KNKG523 122-35-40.9 W 0003779252 American Messaging Services, LLC PETALUMA 03/19/2009 00931.11250 38-19-55.6 N AZ RM KNKG523 112-07-01.5 W 0003779252 American Messaging Services, LLC PHOENIX 03/19/2009 00931.11250 33-04-33.1 N AZ RM KNKG523 112-03-58.5 W 0003779252 American Messaging Services, LLC PHOENIX 03/19/2009 00931.83750 33-19-57.1 N AZ RM KNKG523 111-05-31.4 W 0003779252 American Messaging Services, LLC PHOENIX 03/19/2009 00931.11250 33-26-02.1 N AZ RM KNKG523 112-04-22.5 W 0003779252 American Messaging Services, LLC PHOENIX 03/19/2009 00931.11250 33-27-03.1 N AZ RM KNKG523 112-05-14.5 W 0003779252 American Messaging Services, LLC PHOENIX 03/19/2009 00931.11250 33-35-40.1 N CA RM KNKG523 121-55-20.8 W 0003779252 American Messaging Services, LLC PLEASANTON 03/19/2009 00931.11250 37-37-11.7 N CA RM KNKG523 121-55-20.8 W 0003779252 American Messaging Services, LLC PLEASANTON 03/19/2009 00931.58750 37-37-11.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289731A1.txt
  • Inc. STAMFORD 03/23/2009 00931.93750 41-03-54.3 N NY RM KNKG783 073-28-48.4 W 0003782606 Bell Industries, Inc. SYOSSET 03/23/2009 00931.93750 40-49-19.3 N FL RM KNKG783 080-49-09.1 W 0003782606 Bell Industries, Inc. TITUSVILLE 03/23/2009 00931.93750 28-35-47.9 N OH RM KNKG783 083-32-05.7 W 0003782606 Bell Industries, Inc. TOLEDO 03/23/2009 00931.93750 41-39-01.1 N OH RM KNKG783 083-32-04.7 W 0003782606 Bell Industries, Inc. TOLEDO 03/23/2009 00931.93750 41-39-02.1 N AZ RM KNKG783 110-58-16.3 W 0003782606 Bell Industries, Inc. TUCSON 03/23/2009 00931.93750 32-13-20.2 N Page 12 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ RM KNKG783 111-07-01.3 W 0003782606 Bell Industries, Inc. TUCSON 03/23/2009 00931.93750 32-14-56.2 N CA RM KNKG783 119-13-44.3 W 0003782606 Bell
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289861A1.txt
  • 21-18-44.3 N HI MD WQIR529 158-02-52.2 W 0003794170 HONOLULU BOARD OF WATER SUPPLWAIPAHU 04/01/2009 10975.00000 21-25-16.4 N HI MD WQIR529 158-02-52.2 W 0003794170 HONOLULU BOARD OF WATER SUPPLWAIPAHU 04/01/2009 11015.00000 21-25-16.4 N HI MD WQIR529 158-02-52.2 W 0003794170 HONOLULU BOARD OF WATER SUPPLWAIPAHU 04/01/2009 11055.00000 21-25-16.4 N HI MD WQIR330 157-48-33.4 W 0003794178 HONOLULU BOARD OF WATER SUPPLHONOLULU 04/01/2009 11465.00000 21-16-02.1 N HI MD WQIR330 157-48-33.4 W 0003794178 HONOLULU BOARD OF WATER SUPPLHONOLULU 04/01/2009 11545.00000 21-16-02.1 N Page 3 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI MD WQIR330 157-48-33.4 W 0003794178 HONOLULU BOARD OF WATER SUPPLHONOLULU 04/01/2009 11585.00000 21-16-02.1 N HI MD WQIR577 157-58-17.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290060A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290060A1.txt
  • USCOC NEBRASKA/KANSAS, LLC Clarkson 04/09/2009 06625.00000 41-45-24.0 N NY MD WQJX781 073-40-37.6 W 0003803513 AT&T CORP. LYNBROOK 04/09/2009 11225.00000 40-39-30.6 N NY MD WQJX781 073-40-37.6 W 0003803513 AT&T CORP. LYNBROOK 04/09/2009 11265.00000 40-39-30.6 N NY MD WQKA830 073-35-54.2 W 0003803517 AT&T CORP. GARDEN CITY 04/09/2009 10865.00000 40-44-01.6 N NY MD WQJN963 073-59-26.8 W 0003803520 AT&T CORP. NEW YORK 04/09/2009 11305.00000 40-46-02.1 N MT MD WMG844 111-16-23.8 W 0003804143 WWC Holding Co., Inc. Bozeman 04/10/2009 06345.49000 45-38-09.7 N MT MD WMG844 111-16-23.8 W 0003804143 WWC Holding Co., Inc. Bozeman 04/10/2009 06375.14000 45-38-09.7 N MT MD WMG844 111-16-23.8 W 0003804143 WWC Holding Co., Inc. Bozeman 04/10/2009 10795.00000 45-38-09.7 N MT MD WMG844 111-16-23.8 W 0003804143 WWC Holding Co., Inc. Bozeman 04/10/2009 11035.00000 45-38-09.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290575A1.txt
  • 40-21-37.1 N UT AM WQJJ898 111-53-30.4 W 0003821173 Digis LLC LEHI 04/29/2009 18015.00000 40-27-52.0 N TX MD WHK348 096-53-53.9 W 0003820514 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD MARLIN 04/27/2009 06765.00000 31-17-26.6 N TX MD WHK348 096-53-53.9 W 0003820514 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD MARLIN 04/27/2009 06805.00000 31-17-26.6 N CA MD WNEN854 118-12-27.2 W 0003820536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANCOMPTON 04/27/2009 11185.00000 33-54-03.0 N TX MD WQGK214 097-06-02.1 W 0003820539 AirCanopy Internet Services Itasca 04/27/2009 06375.14000 32-09-54.2 N CA MD WNTI375 118-15-11.2 W 0003820548 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANLOS ANGELES 04/27/2009 11685.00000 34-03-00.0 N TX MD WQGK216 097-01-30.0 W 0003820553 AirCanopy Internet Services Midlothian 04/27/2009 06123.10000 32-26-11.0 N TX MD KQB83 096-39-24.9 W 0003820559 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD BREMOND 04/27/2009 06605.00000 31-12-04.6 N TX MD KQB83 096-39-24.9 W 0003820559 UNION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290860A1.txt
  • 0003833234 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTLawnside 05/11/2009 23080.00000 39-52-13.4 N CA NE 123-21-42.5 W 0003833335 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership Zenia 05/11/2009 10552.50000 40-20-40.0 N NJ NE 074-55-52.5 W 0003833383 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTRIVERSIDE 05/11/2009 11185.00000 40-00-36.2 N NJ NE 074-51-04.6 W 0003833387 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTWESTAMPTON 05/11/2009 10755.00000 40-00-12.6 N NJ NE 074-51-04.6 W 0003833387 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTWESTAMPTON 05/11/2009 17970.00000 40-00-12.6 N NJ NE 074-48-02.1 W 0003833390 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTMOUNT HOLLY 05/11/2009 21530.00000 39-59-40.2 N NJ NE 075-05-17.8 W 0003833393 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTDEPTFORD 05/11/2009 11505.00000 39-49-45.1 N NJ NE 075-03-11.5 W 0003833395 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTBLACKWOOD 05/11/2009 11285.00000 39-50-34.0 N NJ NE 075-02-56.7 W 0003833398 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTBLACKWOOD 05/11/2009 11015.00000 39-47-31.5 N NJ NE 075-02-56.7 W 0003833398 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTBLACKWOOD 05/11/2009 11605.00000 39-47-31.5 N NJ NE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290960A1.txt
  • NEWTOWN SQUAR 05/21/2009 00928.08125 39-58-29.0 N PA NE 075-25-21.0 W 0003846665 PECO ENERGY COMPANY NEWTOWN SQUAR 05/21/2009 00928.70625 39-58-29.0 N PA NE 075-25-21.0 W 0003846665 PECO ENERGY COMPANY NEWTOWN SQUAR 05/21/2009 00952.08125 39-58-29.0 N PA NE 075-25-21.0 W 0003846665 PECO ENERGY COMPANY NEWTOWN SQUAR 05/21/2009 00952.70625 39-58-29.0 N UT NE 111-07-13.6 W 0003846740 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYSOLDIER SUMMIT 05/21/2009 00932.41875 39-54-02.1 N UT NE 111-07-13.6 W 0003846740 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYSOLDIER SUMMIT 05/21/2009 00941.41875 39-54-02.1 N TX NE 095-36-00.0 W 0003847127 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYHUFSMITH 05/21/2009 06585.00000 30-07-29.0 N TX NE 095-36-00.0 W 0003847127 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYHUFSMITH 05/21/2009 06845.00000 30-07-29.0 N CA NE 116-57-34.1 W 0003847393 SKY VALLEY NETWORK LLC RAMONA 05/21/2009 17785.00000 33-02-43.2 N CA NE 116-57-21.3 W 0003847401
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291313A1.txt
  • P 072-21-15.3 W 0003860729 JACOBSON, BOB NORWICH 06/05/2009 00469.41250 43-47-00.2 N RO WNPU210 0003860901 SUPREME RADIO COMMUNICATIONS I 06/05/2009 RO WPFI829 0003860913 SUPREME RADIO COMMUNICATIONS I 06/05/2009 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR NE 122-58-28.1 W 0003860718 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISalem 06/05/2009 21875.00000 44-58-02.1 N OR NE 122-58-28.1 W 0003860718 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISalem 06/05/2009 21975.00000 44-58-02.1 N OR NE 123-00-07.3 W 0003860719 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISalem 06/05/2009 23025.00000 44-59-30.4 N OR NE 123-00-07.3 W 0003860719 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISalem 06/05/2009 23075.00000 44-59-30.4 N OR NE 123-00-07.3 W 0003860719 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISalem 06/05/2009 23125.00000 44-59-30.4 N OR NE 123-00-07.3 W 0003860719 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.txt
  • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 85,532,194 0.0 22.0 2.6 29.8 45.6 Kuwait $13,698,850 0.1 22.8 2.0 17.2 57.9 $315,445 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 89.2 $19,653 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 124,067,925 0.2 22.1 3.2 27.2 47.3 Lebanon $34,010,536 0.0 13.5 20.3 42.7 23.4 $328,507 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.6 53.4 $129,697 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 303,461,389 0.0 6.3 22.9 52.9 17.9 Oman $7,284,232 2.1 40.0 0.1 23.1 34.8 $63,886 0.0 27.3 0.0 16.3 56.4 $48,430 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 51,730,022 4.9 33.8 0.1 24.5 36.7 Qatar $6,296,032 0.8 30.7 3.7 22.7 42.1 $282,553 0.0 14.7 0.0 25.4 59.9 $112,511 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 39,671,525 2.1 24.5 3.9 43.5 26.0 Saudi Arabia $40,450,631 0.0 38.3 0.6 18.0 43.1 $1,409,125 0.0 17.6 0.0 14.9 67.5 $77,004
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291567A1.txt
  • Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GA NE 084-01-38.6 W 0003874725 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICONYERS 06/18/2009 10975.00000 33-40-23.7 N GA NE 084-01-38.6 W 0003874725 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICONYERS 06/18/2009 11015.00000 33-40-23.7 N GA NE 084-01-38.6 W 0003874725 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICONYERS 06/18/2009 11055.00000 33-40-23.7 N GA NE 084-01-38.6 W 0003874725 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICONYERS 06/18/2009 11095.00000 33-40-23.7 N GA NE 084-04-02.1 W 0003874726 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISUWANEE 06/18/2009 19525.00000 34-03-40.1 N GA NE 084-04-02.1 W 0003874726 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISUWANEE 06/18/2009 19625.00000 34-03-40.1 N GA NE 084-15-15.9 W 0003874727 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICumming 06/18/2009 10735.00000 34-11-13.4 N GA NE 084-15-15.9 W 0003874727 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICumming 06/18/2009 10775.00000 34-11-13.4 N GA NE 084-15-15.9 W 0003874727 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICumming 06/18/2009 10855.00000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291810A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291810A1.txt
  • WQIS638 084-06-44.7 W 0003858265 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Norcross 06/26/2009 23075.00000 33-57-40.5 N GA AM WQIS638 084-06-44.7 W 0003858265 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Norcross 06/26/2009 23175.00000 33-57-40.5 N GA AM WQIS638 084-06-44.7 W 0003858265 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Norcross 06/26/2009 23225.00000 33-57-40.5 N OR AM 122-41-02.6 W 0003875535 MPX INC Portland 06/22/2009 23135.00000 45-31-46.1 N OR AM 122-41-02.1 W 0003875641 MPX INC Portland 06/22/2009 21935.00000 45-31-20.1 N WA AM 122-20-19.7 W 0003875709 MPX INC Seattle 06/22/2009 22535.00000 47-36-51.6 N WA AM 122-19-59.0 W 0003875733 MPX INC Seattle 06/22/2009 21335.00000 47-36-20.4 N UT MD WQJS209 112-13-57.8 W 0003876312 Intermountain Health Care Tremonton 06/19/2009 06625.00000 41-47-02.7 N UT MD WQJS209 112-13-57.8 W 0003876312 Intermountain Health Care Tremonton 06/19/2009 06685.00000 41-47-02.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291914A1.txt
  • 00129.47500 39-02-55.8 N KY AM KNB5 084-40-04.2 W 0003850197 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Covington 06/30/2009 00130.75000 39-02-55.8 N KY AM KNB5 084-40-04.2 W 0003850197 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Covington 06/30/2009 00131.22500 39-02-55.8 N AR NE 092-28-02.6 W 0003888031 Baxter County Regional Airport AuthorityMidway 06/30/2009 00123.00000 36-22-02.2 N CO NE 106-51-53.7 W 0003889341 City of Steamboat Springs Steamboat Springs 07/01/2009 00122.80000 40-31-02.1 N AR NE 091-53-06.6 W 0003889584 Crossett Airport Commission Crossett 07/01/2009 00122.80000 33-10-19.3 N RO WIU8 0003886956 EAST TEXAS EMERGENCY MEDICAL S 06/29/2009 Page 1 AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO WQAL690 0003887042 City Of Hondo 06/29/2009 RO KPH9 0003887496 BLUE KNOB VALLEY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291915A1.txt
  • 07/01/2009 00122.80000 35-39-39.0 N PA NE 075-52-00.0 W 0003889826 Chester County Aviation Holdings Inc Coatesville 07/02/2009 00122.70000 39-59-00.0 N RO WKJ3 0003890315 HENRY, COUNTY OF 07/02/2009 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH MD WLI684 082-06-31.5 W 0003889456 ELYRIA-LORAIN BROADCASTING CO.ELYRIA 07/01/2009 00948.00000 41-22-02.1 N AZ MD WQIH628 111-39-56.5 W 0003889720 LKCM RADIO GROUP, LP Flagstaff 07/01/2009 00944.25000 35-11-21.0 N Page 1 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN NE 089-45-30.9 W 0003890018 COOK COUNTY COMMUNITY RADIO COGrand Portage 07/02/2009 00945.50000 47-58-27.9 N FL NE 081-01-50.4 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291999A1.txt
  • Wireless, Inc. San Sebastian 07/06/2009 06855.00000 18-20-27.8 N WY NE 104-21-03.4 W 0003892433 Union Telephone Company Burns 07/06/2009 23080.00000 41-12-04.0 N AZ NE 109-37-11.0 W 0003892482 Smith Bagley Inc DBA Cellular One of NE MANY FARMS 07/06/2009 11285.00000 36-21-09.8 N NM NE 107-50-38.0 W 0003892506 Smith Bagley Inc DBA Cellular One of NE Bloomfield 07/06/2009 10795.00000 36-25-05.2 N AZ NE 109-28-02.1 W 0003892518 Smith Bagley Inc DBA Cellular One of NE Round Rock 07/06/2009 11215.00000 36-30-25.5 N CA NE 120-08-58.0 W 0003892868 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1Herlong 07/07/2009 06345.49000 40-08-23.6 N NC NE 080-16-45.8 W 0003893205 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Lexington 07/07/2009 19375.00000 35-39-43.9 N NC NE 080-16-45.8 W 0003893205 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Lexington 07/07/2009 21830.00000 35-39-43.9 N NC NE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292000A1.txt
  • W 0003896202 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChicago 07/10/2009 17965.00000 41-41-39.5 N IL NE 087-35-57.4 W 0003896202 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChicago 07/10/2009 18015.00000 41-41-39.5 N IL NE 087-35-57.4 W 0003896202 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChicago 07/10/2009 18065.00000 41-41-39.5 N IL NE 087-35-57.4 W 0003896202 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChicago 07/10/2009 18115.00000 41-41-39.5 N IL NE 087-41-09.7 W 0003896203 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMARKHAM 07/10/2009 17815.00000 41-35-02.1 N IL NE 087-41-09.7 W 0003896203 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMARKHAM 07/10/2009 17915.00000 41-35-02.1 N IL NE 087-41-09.7 W 0003896203 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMARKHAM 07/10/2009 17965.00000 41-35-02.1 N IL NE 087-41-09.7 W 0003896203 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMARKHAM 07/10/2009 18115.00000 41-35-02.1 N IL NE 087-44-48.4 W 0003896204 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICicero 07/10/2009 19375.00000 41-49-56.6 N IL NE 087-44-48.4 W 0003896204 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292352A1.txt
  • IIISAN ANTONIO 07/17/2009 23025.00000 29-20-55.4 N TX NE 098-32-05.6 W 0003905058 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Antonio 07/17/2009 21825.00000 29-26-47.0 N TX NE 098-28-00.5 W 0003905059 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Antonio 07/17/2009 21825.00000 29-33-09.7 N TX NE 098-27-02.9 W 0003905063 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Antonio 07/17/2009 23025.00000 29-35-03.1 N TX NE 098-27-21.5 W 0003905064 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Antonio 07/17/2009 23025.00000 29-23-02.1 N TX NE 098-33-04.0 W 0003905066 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISAN ANTONIO 07/17/2009 21875.00000 29-30-40.0 N TX NE 098-33-04.0 W 0003905066 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISAN ANTONIO 07/17/2009 21975.00000 29-30-40.0 N TX NE 098-26-35.2 W 0003905067 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Antonio 07/17/2009 17815.00000 29-24-06.6 N TX NE 098-26-35.2 W 0003905067 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Antonio 07/17/2009 17915.00000 29-24-06.6 N TX NE 098-26-35.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292354A1.txt
  • Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NE 0003912630 Peetz Communications L.L.C. 07/24/2009 03650.00000 - 03700.00000 Page 8 TP - TV Pickup State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VT MD KB96836 P 073-12-02.4 W 0003911566 MT. MANSFIELD TELEVISION, INC. STOWE 07/24/2009 01990.00000 - 02110.00000 44-27-02.1 N VT MD KB96836 P 073-12-02.4 W 0003911566 MT. MANSFIELD TELEVISION, INC. STOWE 07/24/2009 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 44-27-02.1 N YM - 800 MHz Trunked SMR (SMR, Site-specific) State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO WQFQ710 0003911693 Nextel License Holdings 4, Inc. 07/24/2009 YX - SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Trunked State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292534A1.txt
  • PRINCETON 07/28/2009 00959.70000 42-29-22.3 N MA MD KCB89 071-53-13.3 W 0003915023 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH PRINCETON 07/28/2009 06197.24000 42-29-22.3 N MA MD KCB89 071-53-13.3 W 0003915023 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH PRINCETON 07/28/2009 06226.89000 42-29-22.3 N MA MD KCB89 071-53-13.3 W 0003915023 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH PRINCETON 07/28/2009 06256.54000 42-29-22.3 N MA MD KCE43 073-16-45.3 W 0003915024 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH LENOX 07/28/2009 06286.19000 42-22-14.3 N MA MD WPOP234 071-16-02.1 W 0003915025 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH FOXBORO 07/28/2009 06226.89000 42-04-34.3 N MA MD WPOP234 071-16-02.1 W 0003915025 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH FOXBORO 07/28/2009 06345.49000 42-04-34.3 N MA MD WNTA303 073-03-54.3 W 0003915026 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH WINDSOR 07/28/2009 06226.89000 42-30-11.3 N MA MD WNTA303 073-03-54.3 W 0003915026 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH WINDSOR 07/28/2009 06256.54000 42-30-11.3 N MA MD KCE44 073-15-59.3 W 0003915027 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH MONTEREY 07/28/2009 00959.70000 42-13-09.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292736A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292736A1.txt
  • HOLDINGS IIIMoorestown 08/04/2009 19375.00000 39-59-19.0 N NJ NE 074-55-54.4 W 0003921210 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMoorestown 08/04/2009 19475.00000 39-59-19.0 N PA NE 075-11-02.4 W 0003921212 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPHILADELPHIA 08/04/2009 21825.00000 39-54-45.0 N PA NE 075-11-02.4 W 0003921212 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPHILADELPHIA 08/04/2009 21875.00000 39-54-45.0 N PA NE 075-11-02.4 W 0003921212 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPHILADELPHIA 08/04/2009 21925.00000 39-54-45.0 N NJ NE 075-04-02.1 W 0003921215 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRUNnemede 08/04/2009 11175.00000 39-51-22.7 N NJ NE 075-04-02.1 W 0003921215 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRUNnemede 08/04/2009 11225.00000 39-51-22.7 N Page 32 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NJ NE 075-04-02.1 W 0003921215 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRUNnemede 08/04/2009 11305.00000 39-51-22.7 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292738A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292738A1.txt
  • W 0003921709 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBristol 08/04/2009 19625.00000 40-06-24.5 N PA NE 074-50-35.0 W 0003921710 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILEVITTOWN 08/04/2009 11225.00000 40-08-19.0 N PA NE 074-50-35.0 W 0003921710 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILEVITTOWN 08/04/2009 17815.00000 40-08-19.0 N PA NE 074-50-35.0 W 0003921710 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILEVITTOWN 08/04/2009 17915.00000 40-08-19.0 N PA NE 075-19-45.4 W 0003921711 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBridgeport 08/04/2009 21925.00000 40-06-02.1 N PA NE 075-22-01.6 W 0003921712 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIVillanova 08/04/2009 19375.00000 40-01-19.9 N PA NE 075-22-01.6 W 0003921712 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIVillanova 08/04/2009 19475.00000 40-01-19.9 N PA NE 075-22-01.6 W 0003921712 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIVillanova 08/04/2009 19575.00000 40-01-19.9 N PA NE 075-22-01.6 W 0003921712 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIVillanova 08/04/2009 19675.00000 40-01-19.9 N PA NE 075-04-58.4 W 0003921713 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292759A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292759A1.txt
  • * Georgia 88.9 95.0 6.1 * Hawaii 94.6 97.2 2.6 Idaho 89.5 96.8 7.3 * Illinois 95.0 94.6 -0.4 Indiana 90.3 93.3 2.9 Iowa 95.4 98.4 3.0 Kansas 94.9 96.5 1.6 Kentucky 86.9 93.4 6.5 * Louisiana 88.9 95.5 6.6 Maine 90.7 97.9 7.2 * Maryland 96.3 95.5 -0.8 Massachusetts 94.3 97.9 3.6 Michigan 93.8 97.1 3.3 Minnesota 96.4 98.4 2.1 Mississippi 82.4 93.5 11.1 * Missouri 92.1 97.2 5.1 * Montana 92.8 95.7 2.9 Nebraska 94.0 95.9 1.9 Nevada 89.4 94.1 4.7 New Hampshire 95.0 98.5 3.6 New Jersey 94.1 94.8 0.6 New Mexico 85.3 92.3 7.0 New York 90.8 94.7 3.8 * North Carolina 89.3 95.3 6.0 * North Dakota 95.1 98.5 3.4 Ohio 92.2 97.5 5.2 * Oklahoma
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292824A1.txt
  • NE 157-50-09.6 W 0003930844 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 08/11/2009 23125.00000 21-18-24.8 N HI NE 157-50-09.6 W 0003930844 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 08/11/2009 23225.00000 21-18-24.8 N Page 32 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI NE 157-49-08.7 W 0003930845 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 08/11/2009 17865.00000 21-18-02.1 N HI NE 157-48-32.8 W 0003930846 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 08/11/2009 17865.00000 21-17-21.1 N HI NE 157-50-16.7 W 0003930847 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 08/11/2009 23175.00000 21-17-32.3 N HI NE 157-50-16.7 W 0003930847 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 08/11/2009 23275.00000 21-17-32.3 N HI NE 157-50-16.7 W 0003930847 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 08/11/2009 23325.00000 21-17-32.3 N HI NE 157-50-16.7 W 0003930847 CLEARWIRE HAWAII
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293004A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293004A1.txt
  • N IN MD KSL61 086-34-43.0 W 0003938224 INDIANA, STATE OF GEORGIA 08/18/2009 06345.49000 38-44-05.2 N IN MD KSL61 086-34-43.0 W 0003938224 INDIANA, STATE OF GEORGIA 08/18/2009 06375.14000 38-44-05.2 N IN MD KBN55 086-09-53.0 W 0003938225 INDIANA, STATE OF INDIANAPOLIS 08/18/2009 06004.50000 39-46-08.2 N IN MD KBN55 086-09-53.0 W 0003938225 INDIANA, STATE OF INDIANAPOLIS 08/18/2009 06123.10000 39-46-08.2 N IN MD WEH769 087-16-02.1 W 0003938226 INDIANA, STATE OF EDWARDSPORT 08/18/2009 05974.85000 38-50-30.2 N IN MD WEH769 087-16-02.1 W 0003938226 INDIANA, STATE OF EDWARDSPORT 08/18/2009 06123.10000 38-50-30.2 N IN MD WEH769 087-16-02.1 W 0003938226 INDIANA, STATE OF EDWARDSPORT 08/18/2009 06765.00000 38-50-30.2 N IN MD WEH770 085-49-18.9 W 0003938227 INDIANA, STATE OF HENRYVILLE 08/18/2009 05945.20000 38-33-53.2 N IN MD WEH770 085-49-18.9 W 0003938227 INDIANA, STATE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293005A1.txt
  • 084-03-49.3 W 0003937261 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISUGAR HILL 08/17/2009 10775.00000 34-04-31.4 N GA MD WQKK720 084-03-49.3 W 0003937261 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISUGAR HILL 08/17/2009 10855.00000 34-04-31.4 N GA MD WQKK720 084-03-49.3 W 0003937261 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISUGAR HILL 08/17/2009 21825.00000 34-04-31.4 N GA MD WQKK720 084-03-49.3 W 0003937261 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISUGAR HILL 08/17/2009 21925.00000 34-04-31.4 N GA MD WQKM267 084-04-02.1 W 0003937262 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISUWANEE 08/17/2009 19525.00000 34-03-40.1 N GA MD WQKM267 084-04-02.1 W 0003937262 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISUWANEE 08/17/2009 19625.00000 34-03-40.1 N GA MD WQKM267 084-04-02.1 W 0003937262 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISUWANEE 08/17/2009 23025.00000 34-03-40.1 N GA MD WQKM267 084-04-02.1 W 0003937262 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISUWANEE 08/17/2009 23125.00000 34-03-40.1 N GA MD WQKM627 084-02-20.8 W 0003937303 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293212A1.txt
  • 08/28/2009 47-06-47.1 N ND AM KNKN343 102-09-50.0 W 0003946110 WWC HOLDING CO., INC. Dodge 08/28/2009 47-18-45.7 N ND AM KNKN343 101-49-45.9 W 0003946110 WWC HOLDING CO., INC. Elgin 08/28/2009 46-25-50.2 N CA MD KNKN228 118-00-30.0 W 0003944895 Cellco Partnership HAIWEE 08/24/2009 36-11-36.0 N ID MD KNKN234 111-55-37.2 W 0003944948 Idaho 6-Clark Limited Partnership Grace 08/24/2009 42-31-09.8 N MT MD KNKN355 112-20-02.1 W 0003945138 Gold Creek Cellular of Montana Limited PRogers Pass 08/24/2009 47-05-41.8 N TN MD KNKQ279 088-05-26.1 W 0003945364 THC Holdings, Inc. Buchanan 08/24/2009 36-26-28.1 N TN MD KNKQ279 088-06-24.0 W 0003945364 THC Holdings, Inc. BUCHANAN 08/24/2009 36-23-02.0 N TN MD KNKQ279 088-50-56.0 W 0003945364 THC Holdings, Inc. Martin 08/24/2009 36-20-32.7 N TN MD KNKQ279 088-50-55.0 W 0003945364 THC Holdings,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293258A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293258A2.txt
  • 3.0 346 1.7 7,592 36.3 20,916 Connecticut 7,897 52.0 355 2.3 107 0.7 330 2.2 198 1.3 6,312 41.5 15,199 Delaware 2,514 54.1 13 0.3 45 1.0 143 3.1 29 0.6 1,904 41.0 4,646 District of Columbia 4,297 74.1 2 0.0 94 1.6 185 3.2 36 0.6 1,187 20.5 5,801 Florida 39,489 55.0 2,359 3.3 391 0.5 2,942 4.1 1,476 2.1 25,164 35.0 71,821 Georgia 19,642 48.4 1,778 4.4 221 0.5 1,414 3.5 695 1.7 16,806 41.4 40,557 Guam 207 34.0 0 0.0 5 0.7 11 1.8 3 0.6 384 62.9 610 Hawaii 2,836 56.6 14 0.3 28 0.6 110 2.2 190 3.8 1,830 36.5 5,007 Idaho 2,671 41.7 65 1.0 317 4.9 152 2.4 104 1.6 3,093 48.3 6,402 Illinois
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293261A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293261A2.txt
  • breakout by region of the country. Table 12 Share of Universal Service Contributions 1/ By Principal Type of Contributor 2/ Preliminary 1/ Q3 Service Provider Category 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Fixed Local Service Providers Regional Bell Operating Companies 11.7%14.4%14.4%16.4%18.4%20.2%20.3%20.4%20.4%18.6%14.5%13.6%12.9% (RBOCs) Including Local Affiliates Other Incumbent Local Exchange 2.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.9 3.3 4.1 4.2 4.2 3.7 3.7 3.5 Carriers (LECs) Including Local Affiliates Competitive Local Exchange Carriers 0.8 1.4 2.7 2.3 2.8 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.4 5.3 6.4 7.8 9.3 (CLECs) Local Resellers, Payphone Providers and Other Local Carriers, Excluding LEC Affiliates Total: Fixed Local Service Providers15.1 17.2 18.6 20.4 23.2 26.5 27.2 28.2 29.0 28.1 24.6 25.1 25.7 Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293347A1.txt
  • W 0003957584 KHNL/KFVE LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLCHONOLULU 09/04/2009 13037.50000 21-18-38.0 N HI NE 157-52-42.0 W 0003957646 KHNL/KFVE LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLCHonolulu 09/04/2009 13187.50000 21-19-23.0 N TP - TV Pickup State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VT AM KB96836 P 073-12-02.4 W 0003911566 MT. MANSFIELD TELEVISION, INC. Burlington 09/01/2009 01990.00000 - 02110.00000 44-27-02.1 N VT AM KB96836 P 073-12-02.4 W 0003911566 MT. MANSFIELD TELEVISION, INC. Burlington 09/01/2009 01999.00000 44-27-02.1 N VT AM KB96836 P 073-12-02.4 W 0003911566 MT. MANSFIELD TELEVISION, INC. Burlington 09/01/2009 02016.50000 44-27-02.1 N VT AM KB96836 P 073-12-02.4 W 0003911566 MT. MANSFIELD TELEVISION, INC. Burlington 09/01/2009 02031.50000 44-27-02.1 N VT AM KB96836 P 073-12-02.4 W 0003911566 MT. MANSFIELD TELEVISION, INC.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293451A1.txt
  • 066-57-36.8 W 0003958929 CCPR SERVICES, INC. SAN SEBASTIAN 09/08/2009 06197.24000 18-20-28.5 N PR MD WMT899 066-57-36.8 W 0003958929 CCPR SERVICES, INC. SAN SEBASTIAN 09/08/2009 06226.89000 18-20-28.5 N PR MD WMT899 066-57-36.8 W 0003958929 CCPR SERVICES, INC. SAN SEBASTIAN 09/08/2009 06392.44000 18-20-28.5 N PR MD WMT899 066-57-36.8 W 0003958929 CCPR SERVICES, INC. SAN SEBASTIAN 09/08/2009 06417.76200 18-20-28.5 N PR MD WQAZ861 066-52-02.1 W 0003958955 CCPR SERVICES, INC. LARES 09/08/2009 05945.20000 18-18-21.0 N PR MD WQAZ861 066-52-02.1 W 0003958955 CCPR SERVICES, INC. LARES 09/08/2009 06140.40000 18-18-21.0 N PR MD WMK287 067-11-04.3 W 0003959020 CCPR SERVICES, INC. RINCON 09/08/2009 05945.20000 18-18-40.0 N PR MD WMK287 067-11-04.3 W 0003959020 CCPR SERVICES, INC. RINCON 09/08/2009 06004.50000 18-18-40.0 N PR MD WMK287 067-11-04.3 W 0003959020 CCPR SERVICES,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293751A1.txt
  • N PA MD WQKR714 075-25-37.3 W 0003970823 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISchwenksville 09/22/2009 11545.00000 40-14-11.2 N PA MD WQKR714 075-25-37.3 W 0003970823 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISchwenksville 09/22/2009 11585.00000 40-14-11.2 N PA MD WQKR714 075-25-37.3 W 0003970823 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISchwenksville 09/22/2009 11625.00000 40-14-11.2 N PA MD WQKR714 075-25-37.3 W 0003970823 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISchwenksville 09/22/2009 11665.00000 40-14-11.2 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0003970936 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRUNnemede 09/22/2009 11175.00000 39-51-22.7 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0003970936 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRUNnemede 09/22/2009 11225.00000 39-51-22.7 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0003970936 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRUNnemede 09/22/2009 11305.00000 39-51-22.7 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0003970936 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRUNnemede 09/22/2009 11465.00000 39-51-22.7 N Page 23 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293755A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293755A1.txt
  • Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI RM WHJ561 158-01-28.1 W 0003974418 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFWAHIAWA 09/23/2009 06640.00000 21-30-08.5 N HI RM WNTW670 157-45-59.1 W 0003974438 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFMAHINUI 09/23/2009 06750.00000 21-24-26.5 N HI RM WNTW671 157-46-01.1 W 0003974442 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFMAHINUI 09/23/2009 06710.00000 21-24-27.5 N HI RM WNTW674 157-55-02.1 W 0003976823 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFHONOLULU 09/24/2009 06640.00000 21-20-05.6 N RO WEE637 0003969778 SAN FRANCISCO, CITY AND COUNTY O 09/21/2009 RO WEE639 0003969789 SAN FRANCISCO, CITY AND COUNTY O 09/21/2009 RO WNTW717 0003969802 IDAHO FALLS, CITY OF 09/21/2009 RO WLA57 0003969847 NEW HAMPSHIRE, STATE OF 09/21/2009 RO WNTA525 0003970540 JOSEPHINE, COUNTY OF 09/21/2009 RO WNTA526 0003970541 JOSEPHINE, COUNTY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293866A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293866A1.txt
  • - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CO MD KNKN387 106-41-58.2 W 0003983628 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY STEAMBOAT SPRIN 10/01/2009 40-21-15.9 N AZ MD KNKN262 109-23-09.5 W 0003983785 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Morenci 10/01/2009 33-05-42.5 N AZ MD KNKN262 110-05-36.9 W 0003983785 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC TEXAS CANYON 10/01/2009 32-01-02.1 N AZ MD KNKN262 109-35-13.2 W 0003983785 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Wilcox 10/01/2009 32-13-02.4 N MT MD KNKN380 112-11-12.5 W 0003985509 WWC HOLDING CO., INC. Choteau 10/01/2009 47-47-56.5 N AZ MD KNKN251 110-01-59.3 W 0003986170 Alltel Communications, LLC Fort Thomas 10/02/2009 33-05-03.2 N Page 7 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294115A1.txt
  • Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL MD WQKP755 087-35-44.7 W 0003996639 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDolton 10/14/2009 19575.00000 41-37-23.8 N IL MD WQKP755 087-35-44.7 W 0003996639 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDolton 10/14/2009 19675.00000 41-37-23.8 N IL MD WQKP755 087-35-44.7 W 0003996639 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDolton 10/14/2009 21825.00000 41-37-23.8 N IL MD WQKP649 087-41-09.7 W 0003996643 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMARKHAM 10/14/2009 11545.00000 41-35-02.1 N IL MD WQKP649 087-41-09.7 W 0003996643 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMARKHAM 10/14/2009 11665.00000 41-35-02.1 N IL MD WQKP649 087-41-09.7 W 0003996643 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMARKHAM 10/14/2009 17815.00000 41-35-02.1 N IL MD WQKP649 087-41-09.7 W 0003996643 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMARKHAM 10/14/2009 17915.00000 41-35-02.1 N IL MD WQKP649 087-41-09.7 W 0003996643 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMARKHAM 10/14/2009 17965.00000 41-35-02.1 N IL MD WQKP649
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294277A1.txt
  • W 0004004092 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDenton 10/21/2009 23075.00000 33-09-00.7 N TX NE 097-06-10.4 W 0004004092 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDenton 10/21/2009 23175.00000 33-09-00.7 N TX NE 097-09-58.0 W 0004004093 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHurst 10/21/2009 17815.00000 32-50-29.0 N TX NE 097-09-58.0 W 0004004093 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHurst 10/21/2009 17915.00000 32-50-29.0 N TX NE 096-47-19.3 W 0004004094 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDALLAS 10/21/2009 23025.00000 32-52-02.1 N TX NE 096-47-19.3 W 0004004094 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDALLAS 10/21/2009 23125.00000 32-52-02.1 N TX NE 097-23-36.5 W 0004004095 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFort Worth 10/21/2009 18015.00000 32-41-03.8 N TX NE 097-23-36.5 W 0004004095 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFort Worth 10/21/2009 18115.00000 32-41-03.8 N TX NE 097-23-36.5 W 0004004095 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFort Worth 10/21/2009 21825.00000 32-41-03.8 N TX NE 097-23-36.5 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294282A1.txt
  • th 445 12St., S.W. Below is a listing of applications, subject to the pre-grant notice and petition procedure of Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MD AM WQEP433 076-37-02.1 W 0003588280 Enoch Pratt Free Library PRINCE FREDERIC 10/21/2009 17865.00000 38-32-11.1 N AZ AM 114-35-04.7 W 0003995270 City of Yuma Yuma 10/19/2009 19315.00000 32-39-26.5 N AZ AM 114-35-04.7 W 0003995270 City of Yuma Yuma 10/19/2009 19435.00000 32-39-26.5 N WA AM WPNM874 122-26-20.0 W 0003996699 City of Portland Camas 10/22/2009 00928.83125 45-35-29.1 N WA AM WPNM874 122-26-20.0 W 0003996699 City of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294459A1.txt
  • TX MD KK7853 P 106-29-00.0 W 0004012296 NPG OF TEXAS, L.P. EL PASO 10/29/2009 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 31-48-18.0 N TX MD KK7853 P 106-29-00.0 W 0004012296 NPG OF TEXAS, L.P. EL PASO 10/29/2009 02450.00000 - 02467.00000 31-48-18.0 N TX MD KK7853 P 106-29-00.0 W 0004012296 NPG OF TEXAS, L.P. EL PASO 10/29/2009 02467.00000 - 02483.50000 31-48-18.0 N WY NE P 106-20-02.1 W 0004009960 SILVERTON BROADCASTING COMPANCasper 10/27/2009 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 42-44-02.9 N WY NE P 106-20-02.1 W 0004009960 SILVERTON BROADCASTING COMPANCasper 10/27/2009 02450.00000 - 02467.00000 42-44-02.9 N WY NE P 106-20-02.1 W 0004009960 SILVERTON BROADCASTING COMPANCasper 10/27/2009 02467.00000 - 02483.50000 42-44-02.9 N WY NE P 106-20-02.1 W 0004009960 SILVERTON BROADCASTING COMPANCasper 10/27/2009 06425.00000 - 06525.00000 42-44-02.9 N WY NE P 106-20-02.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294682A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294682A1.txt
  • 0004030973 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChantilly 11/12/2009 23325.00000 38-51-56.4 N VA NE 077-10-50.2 W 0004030974 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFalls Church 11/12/2009 22225.00000 38-53-16.5 N VA NE 077-26-09.2 W 0004030975 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICentreville 11/12/2009 21875.00000 38-48-41.4 N VA NE 077-26-09.2 W 0004030975 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICentreville 11/12/2009 22025.00000 38-48-41.4 N VA NE 077-09-18.3 W 0004030976 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMcLean 11/12/2009 23125.00000 38-56-02.1 N VA NE 077-09-18.3 W 0004030976 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMcLean 11/12/2009 23275.00000 38-56-02.1 N VA NE 077-10-49.9 W 0004030977 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFalls Church 11/12/2009 22075.00000 38-51-11.1 N PA NE 075-12-17.6 W 0004030987 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChalfont 11/12/2009 17865.00000 40-17-45.9 N VA NE 078-01-43.1 W 0004031235 RAPPAHANNOCK ELECTRIC COOPERALinden 11/13/2009 06226.89000 38-57-08.0 N VA NE 078-01-43.1 W 0004031235 RAPPAHANNOCK ELECTRIC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294834A1.txt
  • 094-05-21.9 W 0004039260 ALLTEL Communications of Southwest ArTEXARKANA 11/19/2009 06197.24000 33-25-56.3 N TX MD WMJ276 094-05-21.9 W 0004039260 ALLTEL Communications of Southwest ArTEXARKANA 11/19/2009 06226.89000 33-25-56.3 N TX MD WMJ276 094-05-21.9 W 0004039260 ALLTEL Communications of Southwest ArTEXARKANA 11/19/2009 06286.19000 33-25-56.3 N TX MD WMJ276 094-05-21.9 W 0004039260 ALLTEL Communications of Southwest ArTEXARKANA 11/19/2009 06345.49000 33-25-56.3 N NM MD KNZ49 106-49-02.1 W 0004039320 Qwest Corporation ALBUQUERQUE 11/19/2009 06152.75000 35-01-08.1 N NM MD KNZ49 106-49-02.1 W 0004039320 Qwest Corporation ALBUQUERQUE 11/19/2009 11265.00000 35-01-08.1 N Page 4 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WV MD WPJE834 081-37-30.0 W 0004039339 New Cingular Wireless PCS,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295091A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295091A1.txt
  • th 445 12St., S.W. Below is a listing of applications, subject to the pre-grant notice and petition procedure of Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MD AM WQEP433 076-37-02.1 W 0003588280 Enoch Pratt Free Library PRINCE FREDERIC 12/02/2009 18065.00000 38-32-11.1 N MD AM WQJR480 076-35-55.2 W 0004003228 Enoch Pratt Free Library Prince Fredrick 12/02/2009 19625.00000 38-33-21.3 N VA AM 079-38-00.7 W 0004050231 Commonwealth of Virginia, Department ofClifton Forge 12/01/2009 05945.20000 37-49-13.2 N VA AM 079-38-00.7 W 0004050231 Commonwealth of Virginia, Department ofClifton Forge 12/01/2009 06004.50000 37-49-13.2 N VA AM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295338A1.txt
  • MD WQKW460 076-34-36.2 W 0004067015 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 12/17/2009 18115.00000 39-18-10.3 N MD MD WQKW460 076-34-36.2 W 0004067015 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 12/17/2009 21825.00000 39-18-10.3 N MD MD WQKV233 076-48-26.6 W 0004069087 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIEllicott City 12/17/2009 21875.00000 39-14-59.3 N MD MD WQKV230 076-47-39.5 W 0004069088 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIEllicott City 12/17/2009 21925.00000 39-14-28.0 N TX MD WQGK214 097-06-02.1 W 0004069096 AirCanopy Internet Services Itasca 12/17/2009 06375.14000 32-09-54.2 N TX MD WQGK214 097-06-02.1 W 0004069096 AirCanopy Internet Services Itasca 12/17/2009 10915.00000 32-09-54.2 N TX MD WQGK214 097-06-02.1 W 0004069096 AirCanopy Internet Services Itasca 12/17/2009 10935.00000 32-09-54.2 N NV MD WQKU445 118-26-05.7 W 0004069514 Arizona Nevada Tower Corporation Hawthorne 12/17/2009 06256.54000 38-30-31.3 N NV MD WQKU445 118-26-05.7 W 0004069514 Arizona
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.txt
  • Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted BOC/Embarq Composite* Weighted Verizon Avg AT&T BellSouth Weighted AT&T Avg. (excluding BellSouth) Qwest 19 ARMIS 43-05 Report 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 AT&T Ameritech 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.7 AT&T BellSouth 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.2 AT&T Pacific 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.3 1.1 AT&T Southwestern 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 AT&T SNET 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.8 0.7 Qwest 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 ** Verizon GTE 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.0 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.9 Embarq (formerly Sprint) 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.5 Weighted BOC/Embarq Composite* 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 * Weighted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Monthly Support - by State ....................................................................... Table 2.3 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries ................................................... Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.txt
  • 98.4 97.3 99.5 99.1 99.7 99.7 99.0 98.3 98.0 Residence 98.5 98.5 99.6 99.0 99.7 99.8 99.1 98.4 98.2 Business 98.3 89.5 99.3 99.0 99.5 99.1 98.2 97.4 95.8 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.3 0.1 2.5 1.8 1.1 Residence 1.8 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.0 2.6 1.7 1.0 Business 1.7 1.3 1.8 1.5 3.4 0.4 1.6 2.1 2.0 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 25.5 23.6 31.7 29.5 33.9 17.5 27.3 46.2 29.0 Residence 26.4 25.7 32.9 31.0 34.9 18.2 29.4 52.2 31.5 Business 21.3 14.5 24.8 23.8 28.3 14.8 20.4 18.9 15.7 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 184.2 252.5 116.2 228.6 164.2 101.9 181.7 161.5 168.4 Total MSA 184.6 242.8 115.2 227.1 161.9 114.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
  • 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Monthly Support - by State ....................................................................... Table 2.3 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries ................................................... Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.txt
  • telephone service for low-income consumers experienced an average growth in penetration rates for low-income households of 4.0% from March 1997 to March 2008.9 In contrast, states that provided a basic or low level of Lifeline support experienced an average increase in telephone penetration rates for low-income households between March 1997 and March 2008 of only 1.4%.10 As shown in Table 2.1, nearly 6.9 million subscribers paid reduced local rates under the Lifeline program in 2008, whereas the Link Up program, which supports affordable connections to the network, connected about 1.6 million telephone beneficiaries. The Commission's rules are designed to satisfy the 1996 Act's mandates that rates be "affordable" and access be provided to "low-income consumers" in all regions of the nation.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 2004 2008 CPI All Items CPI Telephone Services 7 - 5 1980 9.7 12.5 4.6 1981 8.3 8.9 11.7 1982 5.2 3.8 7.2 1983 3.4 3.8 3.6 1984 3.6 3.9 9.2 1985 2.8 3.8 4.7 1986 2.3 1.1 2.7 1987 2.9 4.4 -1.3 1988 3.7 4.4 1.3 1989 3.5 4.6 -0.3 1990 4.1 6.1 -0.4 1991 3.1 3.1 3.5 1992 2.1 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.3 2.7 1.8 1994 2.2 2.7 0.7 1995 2.0 2.5 1.2 1996 1.9 3.3 2.1 1997 1.5 1.7 0.2 1998 1.1 1.6 0.3* 1999 1.5 2.7 0.4 2000 2.3 3.4 -2.3 2001 2.5 1.6 1.3 2002 1.7 2.4 0.2 2003 2.2 1.9 -2.7 2004 3.2 3.3 -2.5 2005 3.5 3.4 0.4 2006 2.8 2.5 1.7 2007 2.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295497A1.txt
  • 12/30/2009 06197.24000 32-51-02.5 N TX MD WPNG263 096-35-30.3 W 0004079129 DALLAS, CITY OF GARLAND 12/30/2009 06655.00000 32-51-02.5 N Page 1 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WPNG263 096-35-30.3 W 0004079129 DALLAS, CITY OF GARLAND 12/30/2009 06665.00000 32-51-02.5 N TX MD WQIW328 096-33-02.1 W 0004079130 DALLAS, CITY OF SUNNYVALE 12/30/2009 05945.20000 32-46-10.9 N TX MD WED400 096-46-32.0 W 0004079131 DALLAS, CITY OF DALLAS 12/30/2009 06197.24000 32-46-56.0 N TX MD WED400 096-46-32.0 W 0004079131 DALLAS, CITY OF DALLAS 12/30/2009 06226.89000 32-46-56.0 N TX MD WED400 096-46-32.0 W 0004079131 DALLAS, CITY OF DALLAS 12/30/2009 06765.00000 32-46-56.0 N TX MD WED400 096-46-32.0 W 0004079131 DALLAS, CITY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295616A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295616A1.txt
  • WQKT525 097-40-30.0 W 0004081687 Unite Wireless of Weatherford, LLC ALEDO 01/04/2010 10735.00000 32-41-38.0 N TX MD WQKT525 097-40-30.0 W 0004081687 Unite Wireless of Weatherford, LLC ALEDO 01/04/2010 10815.00000 32-41-38.0 N CA MD WQFY914 122-08-33.0 W 0004081824 Wiline Networks Inc Cupertino 01/04/2010 11175.00000 37-19-13.0 N CA MD WPZI274 121-52-12.8 W 0004081844 WiLine Networks Fremont 01/04/2010 19390.00000 37-29-16.1 N CA MD KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 0004082357 Verizon California Inc. RUNNING SPRINGS 01/05/2010 11325.00000 34-11-26.0 N CA MD KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 0004082357 Verizon California Inc. RUNNING SPRINGS 01/05/2010 11405.00000 34-11-26.0 N CA MD KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 0004082357 Verizon California Inc. RUNNING SPRINGS 01/05/2010 11445.00000 34-11-26.0 N CA MD KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 0004082357 Verizon California Inc. RUNNING SPRINGS 01/05/2010 11525.00000 34-11-26.0 N Page 4 CF -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295623A1.txt
  • N AZ AM WPTS758 111-58-02.5 W 0004078089 Tempe, City of TEMPE 01/08/2010 19400.00000 33-24-25.1 N AZ AM WPTS758 111-58-02.5 W 0004078089 Tempe, City of TEMPE 01/08/2010 19560.00000 33-24-25.1 N TX AM WQIW326 096-16-36.4 W 0004079123 DALLAS, CITY OF Terrell 01/04/2010 06825.00000 32-48-48.8 N TX AM WQIW326 096-16-36.4 W 0004079123 DALLAS, CITY OF Terrell 01/04/2010 06835.00000 32-48-48.8 N TX AM WQIW328 096-33-02.1 W 0004079130 DALLAS, CITY OF SUNNYVALE 01/04/2010 05945.20000 32-46-10.9 N VA AM 081-58-34.3 W 0004081120 Commonwealth of Virginia, Department ofOakwood 01/04/2010 06625.00000 37-13-31.9 N VA AM 081-58-34.3 W 0004081120 Commonwealth of Virginia, Department ofOakwood 01/04/2010 06695.00000 37-13-31.9 N VA AM 081-22-39.6 W 0004081204 Commonwealth of Virginia, Department ofSpringville 01/04/2010 06152.75000 37-10-49.7 N VA AM 081-22-39.6 W 0004081204 Commonwealth of Virginia,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295960A1.txt
  • 06286.19000 42-22-58.0 N IL MD KSK84 087-56-51.0 W 0004096006 ILLINOIS STATE TOLL HIGHWAY AUTHGURNEE 01/19/2010 06315.84000 42-22-58.0 N MN MD WPXM771 092-58-56.9 W 0004096192 Minnesota, State Of Pine City 01/19/2010 06615.00000 45-50-28.0 N MN MD WPQL513 093-00-39.3 W 0004096212 Minnesota State of North Branch 01/19/2010 06585.00000 45-30-32.9 N MN MD WQJE438 091-21-41.3 W 0004096266 Minnesota, State of Reno 01/19/2010 06855.00000 43-33-02.1 N MN MD WQJF265 091-36-42.3 W 0004096282 Minnesota, State of Spring Grove 01/19/2010 06695.00000 43-34-13.1 N MN MD WQIH462 094-35-19.2 W 0004096411 Minnesota, State of Litchfield 01/19/2010 06315.84000 45-18-41.8 N CO MD WPNI382 105-15-48.9 W 0004096432 PLATTE RIVER POWER AUTHORITY LOVELAND 01/19/2010 10755.00000 40-21-20.9 N CO MD WPNI382 105-15-48.9 W 0004096432 PLATTE RIVER POWER AUTHORITY LOVELAND 01/19/2010 10915.00000 40-21-20.9 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295961A1.txt
  • 20-49-52.5 N HI MD WPON594 156-21-43.5 W 0004095928 Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. Ulupalakua 01/19/2010 06585.00000 20-38-59.7 N HI MD WPON594 156-21-43.5 W 0004095928 Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. Ulupalakua 01/19/2010 06625.00000 20-38-59.7 N HI MD WPON596 156-20-29.9 W 0004095933 Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. Waiakoa 01/19/2010 05974.85000 20-43-30.9 N MN MD WQJN923 093-12-56.0 W 0004095951 Citilink Communications, LLC Apple Valley 01/19/2010 17905.00000 44-44-02.1 N MN MD WQJN920 093-19-41.6 W 0004095955 Citilink Communications, LLC Bloomington 01/19/2010 11565.00000 44-51-23.3 N Page 7 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MO MD WMW238 091-32-32.0 W 0004095961 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCPALMYRA 01/19/2010 06585.00000 39-49-59.0 N MO MD
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296239A1.txt
  • than 10 and no more than 20% Greater than 20 and no more than 30% Greater than 30 and no more than 40% Greater than 40 and no more than 50% Greater than 50 and no more than 60% Greater than 60 and no more than 75% Greater than 75 and no more than 100% 100% or more aDSL 0.7 2.1 7.0 34.4 33.3 16.0 4.9 1.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 sDSL 85.0 13.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other Wireline 95.4 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cable Modem 15.8 12.7 12.2 20.3 16.8 10.6 6.5 3.0 1.6 0.4 0.1 FTTP 76.5 18.0 2.4 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Satellite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296277A1.txt
  • PR MD WPJC685 066-05-49.8 W 0004123631 AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico Inc. GUAYNABO 02/11/2010 11657.50000 18-22-30.1 N WY MD WFY788 110-54-33.6 W 0004124106 Qwest Corporation EVANSTON 02/11/2010 10715.00000 41-21-11.8 N WY MD WFY787 110-57-59.6 W 0004124111 Qwest Corporation EVANSTON 02/11/2010 11215.00000 41-15-59.8 N WA MD WMW979 117-30-31.8 W 0004124300 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SPOKANE 02/12/2010 19375.00000 47-48-46.6 N PR MD WQAZ861 066-52-02.1 W 0004125068 AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico Inc. LARES 02/12/2010 05945.20000 18-18-21.0 N PR MD WQAZ861 066-52-02.1 W 0004125068 AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico Inc. LARES 02/12/2010 06140.40000 18-18-21.0 N PR MD WQAZ861 066-52-02.1 W 0004125068 AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico Inc. LARES 02/12/2010 06595.00000 18-18-21.0 N ID NE 111-37-18.9 W 0004120148 Idaho 6-Clark Limited Partnership RIRIE 02/09/2010 06345.49000 43-34-33.3 N CO NE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296278A1.txt
  • 18065.00000 40-39-54.2 N UT NE 111-50-32.3 W 0004124663 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHolladay 02/12/2010 21975.00000 40-40-53.0 N UT NE 111-56-42.3 W 0004124664 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Jordan 02/12/2010 21875.00000 40-36-15.1 N UT NE 111-56-42.3 W 0004124664 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Jordan 02/12/2010 22025.00000 40-36-15.1 N UT NE 111-56-42.3 W 0004124664 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Jordan 02/12/2010 22175.00000 40-36-15.1 N MO NE 094-32-02.1 W 0004124667 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKansas City 02/12/2010 10815.00000 39-09-11.2 N MO NE 094-32-02.1 W 0004124667 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKansas City 02/12/2010 10935.00000 39-09-11.2 N MO NE 094-32-02.1 W 0004124667 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKansas City 02/12/2010 18015.00000 39-09-11.2 N MO NE 094-32-02.1 W 0004124667 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKansas City 02/12/2010 18115.00000 39-09-11.2 N Page 22 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296480A1.txt
  • 35.3 377 1.9 204 1.0 295 1.5 166 0.8 11,999 59.5 20,151 Kansas 5,500 32.2 491 2.9 113 0.7 272 1.6 178 1.0 10,535 61.7 17,088 Kentucky 8,275 37.9 556 2.5 134 0.6 422 1.9 288 1.3 12,169 55.7 21,844 Louisiana 9,118 42.5 617 2.9 92 0.4 683 3.2 373 1.7 10,591 49.3 21,474 Maine 2,632 41.6 21 0.3 135 2.1 90 1.4 124 2.0 3,331 52.6 6,332 Maryland 14,958 57.4 27 0.1 183 0.7 824 3.2 171 0.7 9,879 37.9 26,042 Massachusetts 20,333 53.4 30 0.1 518 1.4 1,033 2.7 285 0.7 15,904 41.7 38,102 Michigan 20,856 40.2 441 0.9 194 0.4 1,068 2.1 456 0.9 28,859 55.6 51,874 Minnesota 12,048 42.6 156 0.6 231 0.8 519 1.8 461 1.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296559A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296559A1.pdf
  • 8bit � � � � � � � Attachment #1 NORTH AMERICAN NUMBERING COUNCIL (NANC) LOCAL NUMBER PORTABILITY ADMINISTRATION WORKING GROUP (LNPA WG) RECOMMENDED PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF FCC ORDER 09-41 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION: PAGE: 1. Introduction 3 1.1. Adoption and Release of FCC Order 09-41 3 1.2. Key Dates Relative to FCC Order 09-41 4 2. Background 5 2.1. LNPA WG Work Plan for FCC Order 09-41 5 2.2. Formation of LNPA WG Sub-teams 5 2.2.1. ``Define One Business Day'' Sub-team 6 2.2.2. ``Define Simple Port'' Sub-team 7 2.2.3. ``Local Service Request (LSR)'' Sub-team 8 2.2.4. ``Out-of-the-Box'' Sub-team 9 2.2.5. ``WICIS'' Sub-team 11 2.2.6. LNPA WG Liaison to ATIS Ordering & Billing Forum (OBF) 11 3. LNPA WG Key
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296634A1.txt
  • W 0004134184 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 02/23/2010 22075.00000 29-53-45.1 N TX NE 095-18-28.1 W 0004134185 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 02/23/2010 11465.00000 29-59-15.5 N TX NE 095-11-40.8 W 0004134186 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPasadena 02/23/2010 22025.00000 29-38-18.8 N TX NE 095-29-49.2 W 0004134187 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 02/23/2010 22025.00000 29-42-55.4 N TX NE 095-40-04.2 W 0004134188 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 02/23/2010 22025.00000 29-42-02.1 N TX NE 095-36-27.6 W 0004134189 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 02/23/2010 22025.00000 29-44-48.1 N Page 37 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE 095-16-12.8 W 0004134190 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHOUSTON 02/23/2010 23275.00000 29-39-32.8 N TX NE 095-24-01.8 W 0004134191 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296750A1.txt
  • 03/01/2010 10623.75000 39-42-16.4 N NY NE 073-42-08.5 W 0004140678 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIValley Stream 03/01/2010 17815.00000 40-41-25.3 N NY NE 073-42-08.5 W 0004140678 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIValley Stream 03/01/2010 17915.00000 40-41-25.3 N NY NE 073-52-52.6 W 0004140679 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBronx 03/01/2010 22225.00000 40-52-44.0 N NY NE 073-52-52.6 W 0004140679 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBronx 03/01/2010 22375.00000 40-52-44.0 N NY NE 073-47-02.1 W 0004140680 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFlushing 03/01/2010 19375.00000 40-44-19.7 N NY NE 073-47-02.1 W 0004140680 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFlushing 03/01/2010 19475.00000 40-44-19.7 N NY NE 073-47-02.1 W 0004140680 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFlushing 03/01/2010 19525.00000 40-44-19.7 N NY NE 073-47-02.1 W 0004140680 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFlushing 03/01/2010 19625.00000 40-44-19.7 N Page 13 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296751A1.txt
  • 117-51-03.6 W 0004142631 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICity of Industry 03/02/2010 19375.00000 34-00-33.8 N CA NE 117-51-03.6 W 0004142631 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICity of Industry 03/02/2010 19475.00000 34-00-33.8 N CA NE 117-51-03.6 W 0004142631 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICity of Industry 03/02/2010 19525.00000 34-00-33.8 N CA NE 117-51-03.6 W 0004142631 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICity of Industry 03/02/2010 19625.00000 34-00-33.8 N CA NE 117-45-02.1 W 0004142632 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 03/02/2010 18015.00000 34-03-27.4 N CA NE 117-45-02.1 W 0004142632 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 03/02/2010 18115.00000 34-03-27.4 N CA NE 117-45-02.1 W 0004142632 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 03/02/2010 21825.00000 34-03-27.4 N CA NE 117-45-02.1 W 0004142632 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 03/02/2010 21975.00000 34-03-27.4 N CA NE 118-23-24.3 W 0004142633 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296907A1.txt
  • Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NJ NE 074-45-07.9 W 0004158370 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITrenton 03/11/2010 23225.00000 40-12-00.7 N DE NE 075-31-05.5 W 0004158373 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWilmington 03/11/2010 19425.00000 39-48-24.1 N DE NE 075-28-04.9 W 0004158374 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWilmington 03/11/2010 21875.00000 39-49-04.7 N NJ NE 074-43-11.2 W 0004158375 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHamilton 03/11/2010 21925.00000 40-11-38.2 N DE NE 075-40-02.1 W 0004158376 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBear 03/11/2010 21825.00000 39-36-53.5 N DE NE 075-30-54.0 W 0004158378 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWilmington 03/11/2010 17865.00000 39-45-49.0 N DE NE 075-37-00.5 W 0004158379 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIELSMERE 03/11/2010 23025.00000 39-43-56.9 N NJ NE 074-44-36.5 W 0004158380 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITrenton 03/11/2010 21825.00000 40-13-49.1 N DE NE 075-39-07.9 W 0004158382 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWilmington 03/11/2010 21825.00000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297038A1.txt
  • CA MD WPTL751 117-31-29.1 W 0004174892 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCOceanside 03/16/2010 19565.00000 33-24-57.3 N CA MD WPTL751 117-31-29.1 W 0004174892 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCOceanside 03/16/2010 19685.00000 33-24-57.3 N CA MD WHB409 118-18-26.2 W 0004174965 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNELOS ANGELES 03/16/2010 11605.00000 33-57-34.0 N OH MD WML457 082-43-51.0 W 0004175704 OHIO RSA 6 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/WILLIAMSPORT 03/17/2010 05974.85000 40-32-02.1 N OH MD WML457 082-43-51.0 W 0004175704 OHIO RSA 6 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/WILLIAMSPORT 03/17/2010 06034.15000 40-32-02.1 N OH MD WML457 082-43-51.0 W 0004175704 OHIO RSA 6 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/WILLIAMSPORT 03/17/2010 06063.80000 40-32-02.1 N OH MD WML457 082-43-51.0 W 0004175704 OHIO RSA 6 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/WILLIAMSPORT 03/17/2010 06093.45000 40-32-02.1 N OH MD WML457 082-43-51.0 W 0004175704 OHIO RSA 6 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297204A1.txt
  • 0004182476 Prinetime Internet Solutions, LLC BEND 03/22/2010 11155.00000 44-04-38.0 N TX NE 095-25-15.5 W 0004182536 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAngleton 03/22/2010 11485.00000 29-10-38.5 N TX NE 095-25-15.5 W 0004182536 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAngleton 03/22/2010 11565.00000 29-10-38.5 N TX NE 095-25-15.5 W 0004182536 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAngleton 03/22/2010 23425.00000 29-10-38.5 N TX NE 095-14-51.8 W 0004182540 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 03/22/2010 22025.00000 29-41-02.1 N TX NE 095-09-05.3 W 0004182546 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPasadena 03/22/2010 23175.00000 29-38-05.1 N TX NE 095-02-00.1 W 0004182554 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaytown 03/22/2010 22075.00000 29-46-56.9 N TX NE 095-49-09.3 W 0004182568 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKaty 03/22/2010 22075.00000 29-48-08.1 N TX NE 095-22-09.0 W 0004182571 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHOUSTON 03/22/2010 10775.00000 29-39-28.0 N TX NE 095-22-09.0 W 0004182571 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297269A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297269A2.txt
  • Venezuela $30,596,177 0.0 0.3 1.4 11.8 86.5 $1,392,694 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.8 60.2 $1,310,440 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 406,932,633 0.0 0.3 4.3 28.9 66.4 South America $624,259,291 17.1 0.0 1.2 11.1 70.6 $23,515,221 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.1 79.9 $60,839,826 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 8,980,997,459 17.5 0.0 2.6 17.6 62.2 Afghanistan $25,911,784 0.0 0.1 1.5 36.8 61.6 $2,643,014 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 97.9 $65,013 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 148,223,698 0.0 0.1 1.4 35.4 63.2 Bangladesh $13,639,391 0.0 0.1 0.9 21.9 77.1 $929,219 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 99.8 $447,913 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 457,994,093 0.0 0.1 0.8 16.8 82.3 Bhutan $325,300 0.0 0.1 1.1 46.7 52.1 $1,234 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $6,683 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 2,384,428 0.0 0.1 1.0 45.6 53.3 Brunei
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297358A1.txt
  • LOS ANGELES 04/01/2010 19645.00000 34-03-46.0 N CA AM WMS320 118-20-51.2 W 0004112545 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership LOS ANGELES 04/01/2010 19650.00000 34-03-46.0 N CA AM WMS320 118-20-51.2 W 0004112545 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership LOS ANGELES 04/01/2010 19675.00000 34-03-46.0 N CA AM WMS320 118-20-51.2 W 0004112545 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership LOS ANGELES 04/01/2010 19680.00000 34-03-46.0 N PR AM WQAZ861 066-52-02.1 W 0004125068 AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico Inc. LARES 03/29/2010 05945.20000 18-18-21.0 N PR AM WQAZ861 066-52-02.1 W 0004125068 AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico Inc. LARES 03/29/2010 06140.40000 18-18-21.0 N PR AM WQAZ861 066-52-02.1 W 0004125068 AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico Inc. LARES 03/29/2010 06595.00000 18-18-21.0 N NE AM WMQ875 099-49-33.0 W 0004129984 USCOC NEBRASKA/KANSAS, LLC Broken Bow 03/29/2010 06226.89000 41-23-13.0 N NE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297361A1.txt
  • 11245.00000 40-31-14.8 N OR MD WQJR482 122-58-31.8 W 0004193354 NEWBERG, CITY OF NEWBERG 03/31/2010 19345.00000 45-17-55.9 N MN MD WPRX405 092-48-30.0 W 0004193888 CHISAGO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICECENTER CITY 03/31/2010 00942.17500 45-23-30.0 N Page 2 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN MD WPRX404 092-40-02.1 W 0004193890 CHISAGO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICETAYLORS FALLS 03/31/2010 00933.17500 45-24-22.0 N MN MD WPRW847 092-48-30.0 W 0004193891 CHISAGO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICECENTER CITY 03/31/2010 00942.57500 45-23-30.0 N MN MD WPRW848 092-59-52.2 W 0004193902 CHISAGO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICEWYOMING 03/31/2010 00933.57500 45-20-08.9 N MN MD WPRX403 093-00-39.0 W 0004193907 CHISAGO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICENORTH BRANCH 03/31/2010 00934.17500 45-30-33.2 N MN MD WPRX397 092-48-30.0 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297471A1.txt
  • 18115.00000 37-34-08.0 N Page 9 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA MD WQDC354 077-27-27.7 W 0004202211 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTRICHMOND 04/07/2010 19380.00000 37-33-50.6 N VA MD WQDC354 077-27-27.7 W 0004202211 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTRICHMOND 04/07/2010 19425.00000 37-33-50.6 N VA MD WQHH286 077-30-02.1 W 0004202230 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/07/2010 19620.00000 37-34-44.4 N VA MD WQHH286 077-30-02.1 W 0004202230 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/07/2010 19675.00000 37-34-44.4 N VA MD WQHH286 077-30-02.1 W 0004202230 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/07/2010 22430.00000 37-34-44.4 N VA MD WQHG779 077-26-54.2 W 0004202254 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/07/2010 19325.00000 37-32-48.8 N VA MD WQHG779 077-26-54.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297770A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297770A1.txt
  • 079-47-24.6 W 0004220327 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC Greensboro 04/21/2010 19575.00000 36-04-11.3 N NC MD WQEM510 079-47-24.6 W 0004220327 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC Greensboro 04/21/2010 19675.00000 36-04-11.3 N NC MD WQEM510 079-47-24.6 W 0004220327 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC Greensboro 04/21/2010 21825.00000 36-04-11.3 N NC MD WQEM510 079-47-24.6 W 0004220327 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC Greensboro 04/21/2010 21925.00000 36-04-11.3 N NC MD WQKY251 080-46-02.1 W 0004220331 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICharlotte 04/21/2010 23025.00000 35-15-04.9 N NC MD WQKY251 080-46-02.1 W 0004220331 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICharlotte 04/21/2010 23075.00000 35-15-04.9 N NC MD WQKY251 080-46-02.1 W 0004220331 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICharlotte 04/21/2010 23125.00000 35-15-04.9 N NC MD WQKY251 080-46-02.1 W 0004220331 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICharlotte 04/21/2010 23175.00000 35-15-04.9 N NC MD WQLB233 079-46-25.0 W 0004220333 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298039A1.txt
  • 00931.68750 38-22-52.4 N Page 6 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MD MD KNKE387 076-43-17.9 W 0004234526 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. PIKESVILLE 05/04/2010 00931.28750 39-22-40.1 N MD MD KNKE387 076-43-17.9 W 0004234526 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. PIKESVILLE 05/04/2010 00931.68750 39-22-40.1 N MD MD KNKE387 076-37-02.1 W 0004234526 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. PRINCE FREDERIC 05/04/2010 00931.28750 38-32-11.1 N DE MD KNKE387 075-05-51.6 W 0004234526 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. REHOBOTH BEACH 05/04/2010 00931.28750 38-43-02.4 N VA MD KNKE387 077-21-51.0 W 0004234526 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. RESTON 05/04/2010 00931.28750 38-57-44.0 N VA MD KNKE387 077-21-51.0 W 0004234526 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. RESTON 05/04/2010 00931.68750 38-57-44.0 N MD MD
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298040A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298040A1.txt
  • SAN DIMAS 05/07/2010 11565.00000 34-09-15.0 N CA MD WMJ365 117-48-03.2 W 0004237706 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership SAN DIMAS 05/07/2010 11605.00000 34-09-15.0 N CA MD WMJ365 117-48-03.2 W 0004237706 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership SAN DIMAS 05/07/2010 17830.00000 34-09-15.0 N CA MD WMJ365 117-48-03.2 W 0004237706 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership SAN DIMAS 05/07/2010 18120.00000 34-09-15.0 N OK MD WPOR600 097-38-02.1 W 0004237759 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNVelma 05/07/2010 06286.19000 34-28-37.3 N OK MD WPOR600 097-38-02.1 W 0004237759 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNVelma 05/07/2010 06315.84000 34-28-37.3 N OK MD WPOR600 097-38-02.1 W 0004237759 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNVelma 05/07/2010 10572.50000 34-28-37.3 N OK MD WML207 097-55-49.0 W 0004237848 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNDUNCAN 05/07/2010 06034.15000 34-31-41.0 N Page 8 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298240A1.txt
  • N NJ MD WQKR984 074-58-28.5 W 0004246952 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRiverton 05/13/2010 23075.00000 40-00-34.0 N NJ MD WQKR984 074-58-28.5 W 0004246952 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRiverton 05/13/2010 23175.00000 40-00-34.0 N PA MD WQLB792 075-12-34.5 W 0004246954 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISPRINGHOUSE 05/13/2010 19325.00000 40-11-02.5 N PA MD WQLB792 075-12-34.5 W 0004246954 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISPRINGHOUSE 05/13/2010 23225.00000 40-11-02.5 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0004246955 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRUNnemede 05/13/2010 11175.00000 39-51-22.7 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0004246955 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRUNnemede 05/13/2010 11225.00000 39-51-22.7 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0004246955 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRUNnemede 05/13/2010 11305.00000 39-51-22.7 N Page 24 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298389A1.txt
  • 29-54-35.6 N FL NE 081-20-01.6 W 0004249743 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISAINT AUGUSTINE 05/17/2010 10855.00000 29-51-35.5 N FL NE 081-20-01.6 W 0004249743 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISAINT AUGUSTINE 05/17/2010 10935.00000 29-51-35.5 N FL NE 081-20-01.6 W 0004249743 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISAINT AUGUSTINE 05/17/2010 11095.00000 29-51-35.5 N FL NE 081-20-01.6 W 0004249743 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISAINT AUGUSTINE 05/17/2010 11175.00000 29-51-35.5 N FL NE 081-29-02.1 W 0004249744 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIJacksonville 05/17/2010 10775.00000 30-04-29.0 N FL NE 081-42-05.6 W 0004249745 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrange Park 05/17/2010 11225.00000 30-09-44.3 N FL NE 081-42-05.6 W 0004249745 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrange Park 05/17/2010 11305.00000 30-09-44.3 N FL NE 081-42-05.6 W 0004249745 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrange Park 05/17/2010 11345.00000 30-09-44.3 N FL NE 081-42-05.6 W 0004249745 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298677A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298677A1.txt
  • State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR NE 123-08-35.0 W 0004267773 Freewire Broadband LLC Salem 06/02/2010 06152.75000 44-59-04.3 N OR NE 123-08-35.0 W 0004267773 Freewire Broadband LLC Salem 06/02/2010 06256.54000 44-59-04.3 N OR NE 122-44-13.5 W 0004268122 Freewire Broadband LLC Lake Oswego 06/02/2010 21875.00000 45-25-06.3 N MO NE P 094-29-02.1 W 0004268224 Kansas City Chiefs Football Club Kansas City 06/02/2010 06430.00000 39-02-56.2 N MO NE P 094-29-02.1 W 0004268224 Kansas City Chiefs Football Club Kansas City 06/02/2010 06438.00000 39-02-56.2 N MO NE P 094-29-02.1 W 0004268224 Kansas City Chiefs Football Club Kansas City 06/02/2010 06446.00000 39-02-56.2 N MO NE P 094-29-02.1 W 0004268224 Kansas City Chiefs Football Club Kansas City
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298678A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298678A1.txt
  • 117-50-01.0 W 0004266879 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDiamond Bar 06/02/2010 17865.00000 34-00-03.5 N CA MD WQLU879 117-50-01.0 W 0004266879 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDiamond Bar 06/02/2010 17915.00000 34-00-03.5 N CA MD WQLU879 117-50-01.0 W 0004266879 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDiamond Bar 06/02/2010 17965.00000 34-00-03.5 N CA MD WQLU879 117-50-01.0 W 0004266879 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDiamond Bar 06/02/2010 18065.00000 34-00-03.5 N CA MD WQLU695 117-45-02.1 W 0004266882 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 06/02/2010 19375.00000 34-03-27.4 N CA MD WQLU695 117-45-02.1 W 0004266882 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 06/02/2010 19425.00000 34-03-27.4 N CA MD WQLU695 117-45-02.1 W 0004266882 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 06/02/2010 19475.00000 34-03-27.4 N CA MD WQLU695 117-45-02.1 W 0004266882 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 06/02/2010 19525.00000 34-03-27.4 N CA MD WQLU695 117-45-02.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298680A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298680A1.txt
  • 46-47-11.2 N WI MD WQDG202 092-03-53.6 W 0004271004 Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC Superior 06/03/2010 17800.00000 46-41-27.5 N WI MD WQDG202 092-03-53.6 W 0004271004 Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC Superior 06/03/2010 23125.00000 46-41-27.5 N WI MD WQDG202 092-03-53.6 W 0004271004 Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC Superior 06/03/2010 23175.00000 46-41-27.5 N WI MD WQDG203 092-06-55.3 W 0004271007 Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC Superior 06/03/2010 11345.00000 46-41-02.1 N WI MD WQDG203 092-06-55.3 W 0004271007 Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC Superior 06/03/2010 21875.00000 46-41-02.1 N WI MD WQDG203 092-06-55.3 W 0004271007 Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC Superior 06/03/2010 21925.00000 46-41-02.1 N TX MD WQLE988 097-21-36.0 W 0004271388 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFort Worth 06/04/2010 11225.00000 32-42-20.2 N TX MD WQLE988 097-21-36.0 W 0004271388 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFort Worth 06/04/2010 11305.00000 32-42-20.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298839A1.txt
  • - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WQCJ988 116-57-40.4 W 0004277454 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Pauma Valley 06/10/2010 10618.12500 33-18-19.4 N CA MD WQCJ988 116-57-40.4 W 0004277454 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Pauma Valley 06/10/2010 10835.00000 33-18-19.4 N OR MD WQIC648 124-25-02.1 W 0004277530 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Wedderburn 06/10/2010 10572.50000 42-26-24.4 N OR MD WQIC648 124-25-02.1 W 0004277530 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Wedderburn 06/10/2010 10915.00000 42-26-24.4 N PR MD WPOU327 066-04-07.5 W 0004277669 T-Mobile Puerto Rico LLC RIO PIEDRAS 06/10/2010 17765.00000 18-22-51.8 N PR MD WPOU327 066-04-07.5 W 0004277669 T-Mobile Puerto Rico LLC RIO PIEDRAS 06/10/2010 17775.00000 18-22-51.8 N PR MD
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298840A1.txt
  • 157-53-18.6 W 0004279368 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 06/11/2010 21975.00000 21-21-01.3 N HI NE 158-01-47.3 W 0004279373 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECEwa Beach 06/11/2010 19575.00000 21-21-16.9 N Page 28 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WI NE 092-06-55.3 W 0004279376 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISuperior 06/11/2010 11345.00000 46-41-02.1 N WI NE 092-06-55.3 W 0004279376 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISuperior 06/11/2010 21925.00000 46-41-02.1 N WI NE 092-07-04.8 W 0004279379 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISuperior 06/11/2010 23025.00000 46-43-23.9 N WI NE 092-05-51.2 W 0004279381 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISuperior 06/11/2010 21825.00000 46-43-36.7 N WI NE 092-03-53.6 W 0004279383 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISuperior 06/11/2010 23125.00000 46-41-27.5 N OH NE 080-38-59.3 W 0004279398 Open Range
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298934A1.txt
  • 33-52-29.4 N CA MD WQIU264 118-13-09.9 W 0004285896 COLOR BROAD BAND INC COMPTON 06/17/2010 18015.00000 33-52-29.4 N CA MD WQHK341 118-22-56.0 W 0004285899 COLOR BROADBAND INC Culver City 06/17/2010 19625.00000 34-00-46.9 N CA MD WQHK341 118-22-56.0 W 0004285899 COLOR BROADBAND INC Culver City 06/17/2010 19640.00000 34-00-46.9 N CA MD WQFL326 118-11-17.0 W 0004285902 COLOR BROADBAND INC LONG BEACH 06/17/2010 18065.00000 33-46-02.1 N CA MD WQFL326 118-11-17.0 W 0004285902 COLOR BROADBAND INC LONG BEACH 06/17/2010 22075.00000 33-46-02.1 N IL MD WPXX438 088-23-45.5 W 0004285908 DLS Computer Services, Inc. Lake in the Hills 06/17/2010 11545.00000 42-11-33.7 N IL MD WPXX438 088-23-45.5 W 0004285908 DLS Computer Services, Inc. Lake in the Hills 06/17/2010 17800.00000 42-11-33.7 N Page 18 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298935A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298935A1.txt
  • City TX MD WQLK735 095-31-56.0 W 0004286644 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITOMBALL 06/17/2010 19375.00000 30-06-08.5 N TX MD WQLK735 095-31-56.0 W 0004286644 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITOMBALL 06/17/2010 19475.00000 30-06-08.5 N TX MD WQLK735 095-31-56.0 W 0004286644 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITOMBALL 06/17/2010 19525.00000 30-06-08.5 N TX MD WQLK735 095-31-56.0 W 0004286644 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITOMBALL 06/17/2010 19625.00000 30-06-08.5 N TX MD WQGK214 097-06-02.1 W 0004286996 AirCanopy Internet Services Itasca 06/17/2010 06375.14000 32-09-54.2 N TX MD WQKE571 097-10-44.9 W 0004286997 AirCanopy Internet Services LILLIAN 06/17/2010 11225.00000 32-29-54.2 N TX MD WQKE571 097-10-44.9 W 0004286997 AirCanopy Internet Services LILLIAN 06/17/2010 19475.00000 32-29-54.2 N TX MD WQKJ281 097-06-34.0 W 0004286998 AirCanopy Internet Services Venus 06/17/2010 10815.00000 32-25-43.0 N TX MD WQKJ281 097-06-34.0 W 0004286998 AirCanopy Internet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299052A1.txt
  • 3.9 4.1 4.8 Six 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.5 4.2 Seven 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.6 Eight 3.1 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 Nine 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.8 Ten or More 36.9 35.0 35.3 34.0 33.5 33.1 33.6 44.7 Zero 2.2% 2.4% 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.8% 2.6% 0.4% One 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.4 0.9 Two 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.2 Three 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.4 1.3 Four 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 1.3 Five 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.6 Six 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.7 Seven 2.0 2.4 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299296A1.txt
  • Communications, LLC NICEVILLE 06/21/2010 30-28-34.6 N FL MD KNKA537 086-28-11.3 W 0004291744 Alltel Communications, LLC NICEVILLE 06/21/2010 30-31-42.4 N KY MD KNKA672 087-03-21.7 W 0004293464 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCOwensboro 06/22/2010 37-46-19.5 N AZ MD KNKA205 112-04-04.7 W 0004295141 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Phoenix 06/22/2010 33-18-21.2 N AZ MD KNKA205 112-25-37.0 W 0004295141 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Rainbow Valley 06/22/2010 33-13-02.1 N AZ MD KNKA205 111-50-20.9 W 0004295141 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Scottsdale 06/22/2010 33-50-47.9 N FL MD KNKA515 082-48-06.0 W 0004295233 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCClearwater 06/22/2010 27-52-45.0 N FL MD KNKA515 082-48-04.9 W 0004295233 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCClearwater 06/22/2010 27-52-46.1 N FL MD KNKA515 082-50-14.7 W 0004295233 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCClearwater 06/22/2010 27-56-18.1 N FL MD KNKA515
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299557A1.txt
  • Latitude City WI MD WQDG202 092-03-53.6 W 0004300449 Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC Superior 06/28/2010 17800.00000 46-41-27.5 N WI MD WQDG202 092-03-53.6 W 0004300449 Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC Superior 06/28/2010 23125.00000 46-41-27.5 N WI MD WQDG202 092-03-53.6 W 0004300449 Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC Superior 06/28/2010 23175.00000 46-41-27.5 N WI MD WQDG203 092-06-55.3 W 0004300450 Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC Superior 06/28/2010 11345.00000 46-41-02.1 N WI MD WQDG203 092-06-55.3 W 0004300450 Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC Superior 06/28/2010 21875.00000 46-41-02.1 N WI MD WQDG203 092-06-55.3 W 0004300450 Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC Superior 06/28/2010 21925.00000 46-41-02.1 N NC MD WQKY238 078-34-37.1 W 0004300451 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 06/28/2010 11225.00000 35-52-54.6 N NC MD WQKY238 078-34-37.1 W 0004300451 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 06/28/2010 11305.00000 35-52-54.6 N NC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299559A1.txt
  • RO WPQS920 0004306995 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC 07/01/2010 RO WPQT269 0004306996 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC 07/01/2010 RO WPQS260 0004307953 USCOC OF GREATER NORTH CAROLIN 07/02/2010 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD KNKA303 112-25-37.5 W 0004305560 ALLTEL Communications of the SouthwesRAINBOW VALLEY 06/30/2010 33-13-02.1 N CO MD KNKN348 102-15-00.0 W 0004305770 Smoky Hill Cellular of Colorado Limited PaBURLINGTON 06/30/2010 39-18-37.0 N MN MD KNKA439 091-58-48.7 W 0004306448 DULUTH MSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIPDuluth 07/01/2010 46-52-37.8 N NV MD KNKA462 119-53-04.0 W 0004306684 SACRAMENTO VALLEY LIMITED PARTNWashoe 07/01/2010 39-18-59.0 N Page 27 CT - Local Television Transmission State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299561A1.txt
  • W 0004307591 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIClearfield 07/02/2010 19625.00000 41-06-08.9 N UT NE 112-00-00.0 W 0004307591 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIClearfield 07/02/2010 23075.00000 41-06-08.9 N UT NE 111-59-29.1 W 0004307593 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMagna 07/02/2010 22075.00000 40-35-23.4 N UT NE 111-56-29.6 W 0004307596 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRiverton 07/02/2010 23175.00000 40-30-03.8 N UT NE 111-49-13.9 W 0004307598 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHighland 07/02/2010 23175.00000 40-24-02.1 N Page 13 Land Mobile Control Station Meeting the 6.1m Rule Box/Rectangular KMRA around a centerpoint KMRA around a site (listed on application) Area of Operation Key: Modification Amendment Purpose Key: AM MD A P X R C Countywide S Statewide N Nationwide including HI,AK,US Territories T Citywide O Other - Narrative U Continental US NE RMNew Renewal/Modification RORenewal Only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299733A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299733A1.txt
  • WIRELESS PCS, LLCBOONVILLE 07/07/2010 38-57-11.0 N MO MD KNKN570 092-44-34.9 W 0004315264 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBOONVILLE 07/07/2010 38-58-33.6 N MO MD KNKN570 093-33-40.3 W 0004315264 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCONCORDIA 07/07/2010 38-59-56.7 N MO MD KNKN570 092-43-04.7 W 0004315264 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFayette 07/07/2010 39-08-22.1 N MO MD KNKN570 092-40-49.3 W 0004315264 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFayette 07/07/2010 39-09-02.1 N MO MD KNKN570 092-27-42.7 W 0004315264 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHARRISBURG 07/07/2010 39-08-05.9 N Page 20 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MO MD KNKN570 093-44-27.5 W 0004315264 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHigginsville 07/07/2010 39-04-19.8 N MO MD KNKN570 094-00-43.3 W 0004315264 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299965A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299965A1.txt
  • KNKA341 117-17-15.1 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCLEUCADIA 07/14/2010 33-06-45.1 N CA MD KNKA341 116-25-10.6 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMOUNT LAGUNA 07/14/2010 32-53-31.2 N CA MD KNKA341 116-35-36.0 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMOUNTAIN CENTE 07/14/2010 33-35-48.0 N CA MD KNKA341 117-06-42.1 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCNATIONAL CITY 07/14/2010 32-39-14.2 N CA MD KNKA341 116-19-02.1 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCOAK SPRINGS 07/14/2010 32-38-53.2 N CA MD KNKA341 117-21-08.1 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCOCEANSIDE 07/14/2010 33-10-36.1 N CA MD KNKA341 117-22-37.1 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCOCEANSIDE 07/14/2010 33-12-05.1 N CA MD KNKA341 117-21-56.1 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCOCEANSIDE 07/14/2010 33-13-33.1 N Page 20 CL - Cellular State Purpose
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299966A1.txt
  • 07/13/2010 11285.00000 34-04-20.5 N SC NE 081-01-18.3 W 0004321137 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Columbia 07/13/2010 11365.00000 34-04-20.5 N SC NE 081-01-18.3 W 0004321137 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Columbia 07/13/2010 11405.00000 34-04-20.5 N SC NE 081-01-18.3 W 0004321137 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Columbia 07/13/2010 17785.00000 34-04-20.5 N TX NE 095-12-58.2 W 0004321339 GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited PartFOSTORIA 07/13/2010 06063.80000 30-19-02.1 N AK NE 151-24-46.0 W 0004321357 ACS of the Northland License Sub, Inc. HOMER 07/13/2010 11285.00000 59-36-05.0 N Page 15 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PR NE 066-06-04.0 W 0004321555 PR Wireless, Inc. Pueblo Viejo Ward 07/13/2010 17925.00000 18-24-38.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300379A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300379A1.txt
  • W 0004331922 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ALVORD 07/22/2010 33-22-07.7 N TX MD KNKA400 096-24-13.4 W 0004331922 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Blue Ridge 07/22/2010 33-18-37.2 N TX MD KNKA400 097-54-44.6 W 0004331922 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Bridgeport 07/22/2010 33-02-15.3 N TX MD KNKA400 097-47-06.5 W 0004331922 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BRIDGEPORT 07/22/2010 33-13-08.4 N TX MD KNKA400 097-47-02.1 W 0004331922 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BRIDGEPORT 07/22/2010 33-13-15.4 N TX MD KNKA400 096-45-40.7 W 0004331922 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CELINA 07/22/2010 33-20-06.9 N TX MD KNKA400 097-28-11.7 W 0004331922 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CLEBURNE 07/22/2010 32-16-15.2 N TX MD KNKA400 097-23-04.1 W 0004331922 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CLEBURNE 07/22/2010 32-18-49.5 N TX MD KNKA400 096-30-60.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300381A1.txt
  • State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CO NE 105-06-11.2 W 0004332109 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILITTLETON 07/22/2010 23275.00000 39-38-42.4 N CO NE 104-56-43.3 W 0004332110 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHIGHLANDS RANC 07/22/2010 17815.00000 39-32-13.4 N CO NE 104-56-43.3 W 0004332110 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHIGHLANDS RANC 07/22/2010 17915.00000 39-32-13.4 N CO NE 105-06-02.1 W 0004332111 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILITTLETON 07/22/2010 19525.00000 39-36-43.3 N CO NE 105-06-02.1 W 0004332111 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILITTLETON 07/22/2010 19575.00000 39-36-43.3 N CO NE 105-06-02.1 W 0004332111 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILITTLETON 07/22/2010 19625.00000 39-36-43.3 N CO NE 105-06-02.1 W 0004332111 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILITTLETON 07/22/2010 19675.00000 39-36-43.3 N CO NE 105-06-02.1 W 0004332111 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILITTLETON 07/22/2010 22125.00000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300382A1.txt
  • CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIApopka 07/23/2010 10815.00000 28-40-27.9 N FL NE 081-28-48.6 W 0004332883 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIApopka 07/23/2010 10895.00000 28-40-27.9 N FL NE 081-21-56.0 W 0004332885 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWinter Park 07/23/2010 23075.00000 28-35-05.0 N FL NE 081-21-56.0 W 0004332885 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWinter Park 07/23/2010 23225.00000 28-35-05.0 N FL NE 081-27-11.2 W 0004332886 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrlovista 07/23/2010 23075.00000 28-33-02.1 N FL NE 081-27-11.2 W 0004332886 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrlovista 07/23/2010 23125.00000 28-33-02.1 N FL NE 081-27-11.2 W 0004332886 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrlovista 07/23/2010 23225.00000 28-33-02.1 N FL NE 081-27-11.2 W 0004332886 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrlovista 07/23/2010 23275.00000 28-33-02.1 N FL NE 081-28-31.1 W 0004332887 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPine Hills 07/23/2010 23075.00000 28-34-27.5 N FL NE 081-17-08.6 W 0004332889 CLEARWIRE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300669A1.txt
  • WIRELESS PCS, LLCHOLLYWOOD 07/27/2010 38-20-57.2 N MD MD KNKQ436 076-38-29.7 W 0004335815 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHuntingtown 07/27/2010 38-36-19.9 N MD MD KNKQ436 076-03-48.4 W 0004335815 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCLONGWOODS 07/27/2010 38-52-22.7 N MD MD KNKQ436 076-26-35.0 W 0004335815 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCLUSBY 07/27/2010 38-22-54.0 N MD MD KNKQ436 076-26-58.5 W 0004335815 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCLUSBY 07/27/2010 38-26-02.1 N MD MD KNKQ436 075-47-16.9 W 0004335815 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMarydel 07/27/2010 39-07-53.4 N MD MD KNKQ436 075-51-05.8 W 0004335815 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMassey 07/27/2010 39-17-46.8 N MD MD KNKQ436 076-43-36.2 W 0004335815 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMechanicsville 07/27/2010 38-26-39.5 N MD MD KNKQ436 075-19-20.1 W 0004335815 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCNewark 07/27/2010 38-12-57.5 N MD MD KNKQ436
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300671A1.txt
  • 07/29/2010 11445.00000 40-46-31.2 N Page 11 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WY NE 110-28-05.6 W 0004339165 Questar InfoComm, Inc. Kemmerer 07/29/2010 10593.12500 41-45-51.8 N WY NE 110-28-05.6 W 0004339165 Questar InfoComm, Inc. Kemmerer 07/29/2010 10658.12500 41-45-51.8 N ID NE 116-56-02.1 W 0004339382 Idaho RSA No. 2 Limited Partnership Fruitland 07/30/2010 10875.00000 43-57-10.8 N ID NE 116-55-42.0 W 0004339391 Idaho RSA No. 2 Limited Partnership Parma 07/30/2010 11365.00000 43-49-27.0 N RO WPQQ532 0004336428 TEXAS ELECTRONIC TRANSPORT COM 07/27/2010 RO WPQQ533 0004336429 TEXAS ELECTRONIC TRANSPORT COM 07/27/2010 RO WPQR919 0004336430 Texas Electronic Transport Company 07/27/2010 RO WPQR920 0004336431 Texas Electronic Transport Company
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300783A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300783A1.txt
  • N IL MD KNKA218 089-40-20.2 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HIGHLAND 08/03/2010 38-47-28.5 N IL MD KNKA218 089-17-35.5 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HUEY 08/03/2010 38-36-15.9 N IL MD KNKA218 089-48-42.2 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC MASCOUTAH 08/03/2010 38-28-59.3 N IL MD KNKA218 089-51-49.2 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW ATHENS 08/03/2010 38-19-02.1 N IL MD KNKA218 089-38-55.2 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC New Baden 08/03/2010 38-30-43.9 N MO MD KNKA218 091-13-20.2 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW HAVEN 08/03/2010 38-35-57.2 N MO MD KNKA218 090-47-38.5 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ROBERTSVILLE 08/03/2010 38-19-32.5 N MO MD KNKA218 090-26-54.1 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC SAINT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300784A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300784A1.txt
  • Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA MD WQKW552 075-09-40.9 W 0004344847 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPhiladelphia 08/05/2010 23275.00000 39-57-35.4 N PA MD WQKW552 075-09-40.9 W 0004344847 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPhiladelphia 08/05/2010 23325.00000 39-57-35.4 N PA MD WQKW552 075-09-40.9 W 0004344847 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPhiladelphia 08/05/2010 23425.00000 39-57-35.4 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0004344848 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRUNNEMEADE 08/05/2010 11175.00000 39-51-22.7 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0004344848 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRUNNEMEADE 08/05/2010 11225.00000 39-51-22.7 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0004344848 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRUNNEMEADE 08/05/2010 11305.00000 39-51-22.7 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0004344848 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRUNNEMEADE 08/05/2010 11385.00000 39-51-22.7 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0004344848 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301113A1.txt
  • VandenBos, Bruce a 08/16/2010 00468.92500 SD RM WNUD923 096-41-27.1 W 0004354940 VandenBos, Bruce a PLATTE 08/16/2010 00463.92500 42-36-37.0 N RO WPIG848 0004353714 BASTIAN, WILLIAM E 08/16/2010 RO WPIT296 0004353903 OLSON, GERALD R:YEARGIN, DAVID A 08/16/2010 LP - Broadcast Auxiliary Low Power State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY NE 070-10-02.1 W 0004354413 goldson, simeon g mount vernon 08/16/2010 00087.90000 40-10-02.0 N NE N 0004354414 Cowboys Stadium, LP 08/16/2010 00054.00000 - 00072.00000 NE N 0004354414 Cowboys Stadium, LP 08/16/2010 00076.00000 - 00088.00000 NE N 0004354414 Cowboys Stadium, LP 08/16/2010 00174.00000 - 00216.00000 NE N 0004354414 Cowboys Stadium, LP 08/16/2010 00470.00000 - 00488.00000 NE N 0004354414 Cowboys Stadium, LP 08/16/2010 00488.00000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301114A1.txt
  • 29-33-17.1 N TX MD KNKA367 094-54-32.9 W 0004359561 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Cleveland 08/19/2010 30-24-52.6 N TX MD KNKA367 095-05-32.8 W 0004359561 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CLEVELAND 08/19/2010 30-18-56.8 N TX MD KNKA367 095-23-02.8 W 0004359561 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CLUTE 08/19/2010 29-00-08.9 N TX MD KNKA367 095-12-58.2 W 0004359561 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Conroe 08/19/2010 30-19-02.1 N TX MD KNKA367 095-27-21.8 W 0004359561 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CONROE 08/19/2010 30-18-32.8 N TX MD KNKA367 095-46-51.6 W 0004359561 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CYPRESS 08/19/2010 30-02-06.9 N TX MD KNKA367 095-44-30.8 W 0004359561 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC DAMON 08/19/2010 29-18-52.9 N TX MD KNKA367 095-49-55.3 W 0004359561 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC DANCIGER 08/19/2010 29-10-32.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301228A1.txt
  • PCS, LLCBangor 08/25/2010 40-50-36.3 N PA MD KNKA314 075-24-04.7 W 0004365233 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBATH 08/25/2010 40-42-30.3 N PA MD KNKA314 075-23-47.7 W 0004365233 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBATH 08/25/2010 40-46-16.3 N PA MD KNKA314 075-53-15.5 W 0004365233 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBeaver Meadows 08/25/2010 40-55-48.2 N PA MD KNKA314 075-24-45.9 W 0004365233 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBethlehem 08/25/2010 40-39-02.1 N PA MD KNKA314 075-22-34.6 W 0004365233 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBETHLEHEM 08/25/2010 40-35-42.4 N PA MD KNKA314 075-20-30.6 W 0004365233 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBETHLEHEM 08/25/2010 40-36-02.4 N PA MD KNKA314 075-22-56.6 W 0004365233 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBETHLEHEM 08/25/2010 40-37-28.4 N PA MD KNKA314 075-20-49.6 W 0004365233 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBETHLEHEM 08/25/2010 40-38-43.4 N PA MD KNKA314
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301230A1.txt
  • N MI MD KNKN858 085-02-31.0 W 0004367487 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Paradise 08/26/2010 46-37-43.0 N MI MD KNKN858 084-21-35.0 W 0004367487 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC PICKFORD 08/26/2010 46-04-53.0 N MI MD KNKN858 086-44-27.0 W 0004367487 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Rapid River 08/26/2010 45-53-01.0 N MI MD KNKN858 084-33-07.2 W 0004367487 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC RUDYARD 08/26/2010 46-13-02.1 N MI MD KNKN858 084-44-08.1 W 0004367487 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Saint Ignace 08/26/2010 45-51-42.0 N MI MD KNKN858 084-23-16.7 W 0004367487 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Sault Sainte Marie 08/26/2010 46-27-22.9 N MI MD KNKN858 084-20-26.9 W 0004367487 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC SAULT SAINTE MA 08/26/2010 46-29-53.2 N MI MD KNKN858 084-23-16.0 W 0004367487 New Cingular Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301231A1.txt
  • MD WQLQ832 081-29-55.9 W 0004366353 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIORLANDO 08/25/2010 18065.00000 28-35-48.4 N MD MD WQDY643 076-41-22.0 W 0004366360 Baltimore Gas and Electric Company UPPER MARLBORO 08/25/2010 06853.75000 38-52-33.0 N MD MD WQDY643 076-41-22.0 W 0004366360 Baltimore Gas and Electric Company UPPER MARLBORO 08/25/2010 10618.75000 38-52-33.0 N CO MD WQLR500 105-04-30.6 W 0004366495 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFt Collins 08/25/2010 11225.00000 40-35-02.1 N CO MD WQLR500 105-04-30.6 W 0004366495 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFt Collins 08/25/2010 11345.00000 40-35-02.1 N CO MD WQLR500 105-04-30.6 W 0004366495 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFt Collins 08/25/2010 11465.00000 40-35-02.1 N CO MD WQLR500 105-04-30.6 W 0004366495 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFt Collins 08/25/2010 11505.00000 40-35-02.1 N CO MD WQLR500 105-04-30.6 W 0004366495 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFt Collins 08/25/2010 11545.00000 40-35-02.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301232A1.txt
  • MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL NE 080-03-35.7 W 0004367522 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILAKEWORTH 08/26/2010 21325.00000 26-38-34.7 N FL NE 080-02-03.1 W 0004367524 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISinger Island 08/26/2010 11305.00000 26-47-21.4 N FL NE 080-13-14.9 W 0004367525 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITamarac 08/26/2010 21525.00000 26-12-02.1 N FL NE 080-05-25.5 W 0004367527 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Palm Beach 08/26/2010 10775.00000 26-39-11.0 N FL NE 080-05-25.5 W 0004367527 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Palm Beach 08/26/2010 10855.00000 26-39-11.0 N FL NE 080-05-25.5 W 0004367527 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Palm Beach 08/26/2010 23075.00000 26-39-11.0 N FL NE 080-05-25.5 W 0004367527 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Palm Beach 08/26/2010 23175.00000 26-39-11.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301234A1.txt
  • th 445 12St., S.W. Below is a listing of applications, subject to the pre-grant notice and petition procedure of Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA MD WPOP234 071-16-02.1 W 0004361363 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH FOXBORO 08/23/2010 06226.89000 42-04-34.3 N MA MD WPOP234 071-16-02.1 W 0004361363 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH FOXBORO 08/23/2010 06345.49000 42-04-34.3 N MA MD KFR59 071-03-39.1 W 0004362432 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH TAUNTON 08/24/2010 05974.85000 41-52-41.3 N MA MD KFR59 071-03-39.1 W 0004362432 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH TAUNTON 08/24/2010 06872.07500 41-52-41.3 N VA MD WQJF549 077-21-54.0 W 0004364086 HANOVER, COUNTY OF MECHANICSVILLE 08/25/2010 06226.89000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
  • 1.0 94.1 4.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fixed Wireless 51.5 39.8 5.4 2.4 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Power Line 99.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Other 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.1 0.1 0.7 3.8 10.4 20.7 23.1 20.7 17.7 2.1 0.4 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2009 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2009 21 17 Chart 17 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301310A1.txt
  • 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.5 4.2 4.0 Seven 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.6 3.4 Eight 3.1 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.1 Nine 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.6 Ten or More 36.9 35.0 35.3 34.0 33.5 33.1 33.6 44.7 44.0 Zero 2.2% 2.4% 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.8% 2.6% 0.4% 0.5% One 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.4 0.9 1.2 Two 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.2 1.3 Three 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.4 1.3 1.4 Four 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 1.3 1.5 Five 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.6 1.4 Six 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.5 Seven 2.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301340A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301340A1.txt
  • W 0004372551 Texas RSA 19 Limited Partnership FOWLERTON 08/31/2010 28-30-11.3 N TX MD KNKN525 098-37-49.1 W 0004372551 Texas RSA 19 Limited Partnership FREER 08/31/2010 27-49-24.1 N TX MD KNKN525 098-37-08.7 W 0004372551 Texas RSA 19 Limited Partnership FREER 08/31/2010 27-50-05.3 N TX MD KNKN525 097-55-10.4 W 0004372551 Texas RSA 19 Limited Partnership GEORGE WEST 08/31/2010 28-15-17.6 N TX MD KNKN525 098-40-02.1 W 0004372551 Texas RSA 19 Limited Partnership HEBBRONVILLE 08/31/2010 27-18-32.1 N TX MD KNKN525 098-47-03.1 W 0004372551 Texas RSA 19 Limited Partnership JOURDANTON 08/31/2010 28-41-27.1 N TX MD KNKN525 098-08-21.2 W 0004372551 Texas RSA 19 Limited Partnership Karnes City 08/31/2010 28-48-14.1 N TX MD KNKN525 097-52-25.0 W 0004372551 Texas RSA 19 Limited Partnership Kingsville 08/31/2010 27-29-16.0 N TX MD KNKN525
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301341A1.txt
  • 123-53-39.1 W 0004373120 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership Weott 09/01/2010 06197.24000 40-19-16.5 N CA MD WQFX658 123-53-39.1 W 0004373120 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership Weott 09/01/2010 06286.19000 40-19-16.5 N CA MD WQFX658 123-53-39.1 W 0004373120 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership Weott 09/01/2010 06755.00000 40-19-16.5 N CA MD WQFX658 123-53-39.1 W 0004373120 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership Weott 09/01/2010 06785.00000 40-19-16.5 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0004373121 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership SCOTIA 09/01/2010 05945.20000 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0004373121 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership SCOTIA 09/01/2010 06034.15000 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0004373121 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership SCOTIA 09/01/2010 06063.80000 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0004373121 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership SCOTIA 09/01/2010 06625.00000 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301456A1.txt
  • KNKA341 117-17-15.1 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCLEUCADIA 09/09/2010 33-06-45.1 N CA AM KNKA341 116-25-10.6 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMOUNT LAGUNA 09/09/2010 32-53-31.2 N CA AM KNKA341 116-35-36.0 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMOUNTAIN CENTE 09/09/2010 33-35-48.0 N CA AM KNKA341 117-06-42.1 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCNATIONAL CITY 09/09/2010 32-39-14.2 N CA AM KNKA341 116-19-02.1 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCOAK SPRINGS 09/09/2010 32-38-53.2 N CA AM KNKA341 117-21-08.1 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCOCEANSIDE 09/09/2010 33-10-36.1 N CA AM KNKA341 117-22-37.1 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCOCEANSIDE 09/09/2010 33-12-05.1 N CA AM KNKA341 117-21-56.1 W 0004322983 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCOCEANSIDE 09/09/2010 33-13-33.1 N CA AM KNKA341 117-31-29.1 W 0004322983 NEW
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301457A1.txt
  • N OK MD KNKN511 098-59-03.3 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPUTNAM 09/09/2010 35-52-09.0 N OK MD KNKN511 099-19-39.2 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSharon 09/09/2010 36-14-09.0 N OK MD KNKN511 098-19-23.4 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWATONGA 09/09/2010 35-50-35.6 N OK MD KNKN511 098-35-41.1 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWATONGA 09/09/2010 35-51-23.5 N OK MD KNKN511 098-43-02.1 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWEATHERFORD 09/09/2010 35-30-36.0 N OK MD KNKN511 098-43-03.0 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWEATHERFORD 09/09/2010 35-30-39.0 N TX MD KNKA321 106-04-02.9 W 0004384643 ALLTEL Communications of the SouthwesClint 09/10/2010 31-27-28.4 N RO KNKN336 0004382634 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC 09/09/2010 Page 8 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.txt
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Part 2. Telephone Carriers 20062007 Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission Whose Reports Were Used in this Statistical Tabulation. . . 13 105 Table 2.2 - Outside Plant Statistics of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301621A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301621A1.txt
  • 34-41-53.0 N GA MD KNKN697 084-41-17.6 W 0004391260 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Fairmount 09/16/2010 34-26-40.7 N GA MD KNKN697 083-43-29.4 W 0004391260 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hiawassee 09/16/2010 34-50-13.5 N GA MD KNKN697 083-43-48.8 W 0004391260 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HIAWASSEE 09/16/2010 34-57-13.5 N GA MD KNKN697 084-30-19.6 W 0004391260 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Jasper 09/16/2010 34-27-02.1 N Page 25 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GA MD KNKN697 084-20-20.5 W 0004391260 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Jasper 09/16/2010 34-29-17.2 N GA MD KNKN697 084-20-24.7 W 0004391260 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC JASPER 09/16/2010 34-29-19.3 N GA MD KNKN697 084-19-23.4 W 0004391260 New
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301622A1.txt
  • W 0004366328 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrlando 09/14/2010 11055.00000 28-30-12.4 N FL AM 081-18-45.9 W 0004366328 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrlando 09/14/2010 19375.00000 28-30-12.4 N FL AM 081-18-45.9 W 0004366328 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrlando 09/14/2010 19475.00000 28-30-12.4 N FL AM 081-18-45.9 W 0004366328 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrlando 09/14/2010 22425.00000 28-30-12.4 N FL AM 081-27-11.2 W 0004366329 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrlovista 09/13/2010 22525.00000 28-33-02.1 N FL AM 081-27-11.2 W 0004366329 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrlovista 09/13/2010 23075.00000 28-33-02.1 N FL AM 081-27-11.2 W 0004366329 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrlovista 09/13/2010 23125.00000 28-33-02.1 N FL AM 081-27-11.2 W 0004366329 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrlovista 09/13/2010 23225.00000 28-33-02.1 N FL AM 081-27-11.2 W 0004366329 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrlovista 09/13/2010 23275.00000 28-33-02.1 N FL AM 081-17-02.5 W 0004366355 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301765A1.txt
  • 41-45-51.8 N NM NE 103-19-45.4 W 0004394525 ABRAHAM DIVESTITURE COMPANY LLTATUM 09/20/2010 06735.00000 33-15-40.7 N WY NE 110-53-04.7 W 0004394527 Questar InfoComm, Inc. Evanston 09/20/2010 06745.62500 41-27-03.9 N SC NE 080-46-58.6 W 0004394719 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC HILTON HEAD 09/21/2010 10795.00000 32-08-16.6 N SC NE 080-04-15.9 W 0004394720 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Johns Island 09/21/2010 11365.00000 32-36-55.5 N SC NE 080-12-02.1 W 0004394721 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC HOLLYWOOD 09/21/2010 06197.24000 32-44-15.9 N SC NE 080-12-02.1 W 0004394721 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC HOLLYWOOD 09/21/2010 06226.89000 32-44-15.9 N SC NE 080-12-02.1 W 0004394721 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC HOLLYWOOD 09/21/2010 11245.00000 32-44-15.9 N SC NE 080-12-02.1 W 0004394721 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC HOLLYWOOD 09/21/2010 11285.00000 32-44-15.9 N SC NE 080-56-17.3 W 0004394722 Conterra Ultra
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301767A1.txt
  • IIIAlhambra 09/23/2010 21825.00000 34-04-41.0 N CA MD WQLP265 118-08-26.1 W 0004397465 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAlhambra 09/23/2010 21925.00000 34-04-41.0 N CA MD WQLP265 118-08-26.1 W 0004397465 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAlhambra 09/23/2010 21975.00000 34-04-41.0 N CA MD WQLP265 118-08-26.1 W 0004397465 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAlhambra 09/23/2010 22025.00000 34-04-41.0 N CA MD WQLU939 118-19-47.7 W 0004397466 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 09/23/2010 17965.00000 34-06-02.1 N CA MD WQLU939 118-19-47.7 W 0004397466 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 09/23/2010 18015.00000 34-06-02.1 N CA MD WQLU939 118-19-47.7 W 0004397466 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 09/23/2010 18115.00000 34-06-02.1 N CA MD WQLU939 118-19-47.7 W 0004397466 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 09/23/2010 21925.00000 34-06-02.1 N CA MD WQLU939 118-19-47.7 W 0004397466 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 09/23/2010 22025.00000 34-06-02.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • CY-B402, Washington DC 20554 at 800-378-3160, facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. The report can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site at: www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/trends.html. Table of Contents 1-1 1-1 Table 1.1Interstate Per-Line Access Charges...............................................................1-3 Table 1.2Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges............................................................1-4 Table 1.3Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier...................................................1-5 Table 1.4Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier................................................1-7 2-1 Table 2.1High-Speed Connections...........................................................................2-3 Chart 2.1Fixed High-Speed Connections.....................................................................2-3 Chart 2.2High-Speed Connections by Technology.........................................................2-3 Table 2.2Residential High-Speed Connections............................................................2-4 Chart 2.3Residential Fixed High-Speed Connections......................................................2-4 Chart 2.4Residential High-Speed Connections by Technology..........................................2-4 Table 2.3Total High-Speed Connections by Speed Tier...................................................2-5 Table 2.4Residential High-Speed Connections by Speed Tier.......................................... 2-6 Table 2.5High-Speed Connections by Technology by State.............................................2-7 Table 2.6Percentage of High-Speed Connections by Download Speed by State........................2-9 Table 2.7Percentage of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301909A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301909A1.txt
  • WV MD KNKN839 080-20-39.0 W 0004405455 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC MANNINGTON 09/29/2010 39-31-17.0 N WV MD KNKN839 080-51-28.3 W 0004405455 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW MARTINSVILL 09/29/2010 39-36-36.3 N WV MD KNKN839 080-38-08.1 W 0004405455 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Orlando 09/29/2010 38-53-27.5 N OH MD KNKN839 080-57-34.3 W 0004405455 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Paden City 09/29/2010 39-37-02.1 N Page 17 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WV MD KNKN839 080-59-18.2 W 0004405455 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC SISTERVILLE 09/29/2010 39-32-24.1 N WV MD KNKN839 081-11-11.4 W 0004405455 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC St Marys 09/29/2010 39-22-40.3 N WV MD KNKN839 080-45-57.4 W 0004405455
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301910A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301910A1.txt
  • 09/30/2010 36-09-38.4 N WA MD KNKN277 117-48-37.8 W 0004407550 RCC Minnesota, Inc DODGE HILL 10/01/2010 46-31-45.7 N WA MD KNKN277 118-45-13.9 W 0004407550 RCC Minnesota, Inc Touchet 10/01/2010 46-03-57.4 N WA MD KNKN277 118-22-01.0 W 0004407550 RCC Minnesota, Inc WALLA WALLA 10/01/2010 46-03-29.0 N TX MD KNKA258 106-12-17.9 W 0004408388 Dallas MTA, LP Clint 10/01/2010 31-33-15.0 N VA MD KNKQ301 077-27-02.1 W 0004408481 Cellco Partnership Quantico 10/01/2010 38-31-55.8 N AZ NE 112-43-10.9 W 0004405066 Tisdale Telephone Company, LLC Supai 09/29/2010 36-14-42.6 N CT - Local Television Transmission State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City US AM WMN611 N 0004338502 REMOTE FACILITIES CONSULTING SER 09/29/2010 01990.00000 - 02110.00000 GM - 800 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302100A1.txt
  • Erhard 10/06/2010 05945.20000 46-28-26.6 N MN MD WQKX256 095-23-51.2 W 0004412338 Minnesota, State of Warroad 10/06/2010 06541.25000 48-50-49.3 N MN MD WPWD820 096-39-00.5 W 0004412906 STATE OF MINNESOTA Angus 10/06/2010 06595.00000 48-02-02.7 N AZ MD WQKA561 112-17-24.6 W 0004413062 City of Avondale Avondale 10/06/2010 19315.00000 33-28-03.2 N MN MD WQDM485 096-36-19.2 W 0004413094 Minnesota, State of Lake Bronson 10/06/2010 06541.25000 48-43-02.1 N MN MD WQDM485 096-36-19.2 W 0004413094 Minnesota, State of Lake Bronson 10/06/2010 06755.00000 48-43-02.1 N MN MD WQDM485 096-36-19.2 W 0004413094 Minnesota, State of Lake Bronson 10/06/2010 06785.00000 48-43-02.1 N MN MD WQDM675 096-05-06.2 W 0004413150 Minnesota, State of Greenbush 10/06/2010 06805.00000 48-44-31.8 N MN MD WQJE779 096-21-31.3 W 0004413600 Minnesota, State of Barnesville 10/07/2010 06645.00000 46-36-57.3 N MN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302101A1.txt
  • Inc,. Alameda 10/04/2010 22675.00000 37-46-54.5 N NC NE 078-51-24.8 W 0004410595 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC APEX 10/05/2010 11365.00000 35-41-21.9 N NC NE 078-51-24.8 W 0004410595 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC APEX 10/05/2010 11405.00000 35-41-21.9 N NC NE 082-17-38.4 W 0004410600 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC HENDERSONVILLE 10/05/2010 10755.00000 35-27-31.3 N NC NE 082-49-40.2 W 0004410603 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC CANTON 10/05/2010 10795.00000 35-28-02.1 N NC NE 079-00-40.1 W 0004410605 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC MONCURE 10/05/2010 11245.00000 35-38-36.7 N SC NE 081-11-38.2 W 0004410606 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC IRMO 10/05/2010 10795.00000 34-04-52.4 N SC NE 081-18-46.3 W 0004410607 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Chapin 10/05/2010 11285.00000 34-06-37.8 N Page 15 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302272A1.txt
  • 10/15/2010 22560.00000 37-32-48.8 N VA MD WQHG779 077-26-54.2 W 0004423674 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 10/15/2010 23335.00000 37-32-48.8 N Page 4 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA MD WMS866 076-40-58.2 W 0004423696 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHUMMELSTOWN 10/15/2010 10563.12500 40-21-02.1 N VA MD WQDC354 077-27-27.7 W 0004423749 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTRICHMOND 10/15/2010 11245.00000 37-33-50.6 N VA MD WQDC354 077-27-27.7 W 0004423749 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTRICHMOND 10/15/2010 11485.00000 37-33-50.6 N VA MD WQDC354 077-27-27.7 W 0004423749 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTRICHMOND 10/15/2010 11525.00000 37-33-50.6 N VA MD WQDC354 077-27-27.7 W 0004423749 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTRICHMOND 10/15/2010 23135.00000 37-33-50.6 N OH NE 082-59-24.0 W 0004423373 Cellco Partnership
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302273A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302273A1.txt
  • 110-17-31.6 W 0004417059 Uinta County School District #6 Lyman 10/12/2010 21975.00000 41-19-43.5 N WY NE 110-17-31.6 W 0004417059 Uinta County School District #6 Lyman 10/12/2010 22075.00000 41-19-43.5 N WY NE 110-16-15.1 W 0004417060 Uinta County School District #6 Lyman 10/12/2010 23025.00000 41-19-56.4 N WY NE 110-16-15.1 W 0004417060 Uinta County School District #6 Lyman 10/12/2010 23125.00000 41-19-56.4 N WY NE 110-20-02.1 W 0004417061 Uinta County School District #6 Lyman 10/12/2010 23175.00000 41-19-21.3 N WY NE 110-20-02.1 W 0004417061 Uinta County School District #6 Lyman 10/12/2010 23275.00000 41-19-21.3 N LA NE 089-59-33.9 W 0004417460 Louisiana, State Of Arabi 10/12/2010 10558.12500 29-56-57.7 N LA NE 089-55-36.9 W 0004417468 Louisiana, State Of New Orleans 10/12/2010 06152.75000 30-01-12.0 N LA NE 089-55-36.9 W 0004417468 Louisiana,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302397A1.txt
  • 0004413839 AT&T Mobility of Galveston LLC CHAMBERS 10/07/2010 29-50-44.8 N TX MD KNKP971 094-40-00.1 W 0004413839 AT&T Mobility of Galveston LLC Crystal Beach 10/07/2010 29-26-27.6 N TX MD KNKP971 094-20-55.7 W 0004413839 AT&T Mobility of Galveston LLC HAMPSHIRE 10/07/2010 29-51-30.8 N TX MD KNKP971 094-32-21.8 W 0004413839 AT&T Mobility of Galveston LLC PORT BOLIVAR 10/07/2010 29-29-40.2 N TX MD KNKP971 094-30-02.1 W 0004413839 AT&T Mobility of Galveston LLC WINNIE 10/07/2010 29-50-38.5 N WY MD KNKN387 106-31-33.0 W 0004425297 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY Ryan Park 10/18/2010 41-19-36.0 N AL MD KNKN736 086-59-57.0 W 0004425481 Alltel Communications, LLC BRANTLEY 10/18/2010 32-28-48.5 N AL MD KNKN736 086-37-42.0 W 0004425481 Alltel Communications, LLC CLANTON 10/18/2010 32-51-44.5 N AL MD KNKN736 086-56-45.7 W 0004425481 Alltel Communications, LLC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302398A1.txt
  • N KS MD WQLH694 094-44-56.0 W 0004427617 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILenexa 10/20/2010 18065.00000 38-59-32.8 N KS MD WQLH694 094-44-56.0 W 0004427617 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILenexa 10/20/2010 18115.00000 38-59-32.8 N KS MD WQLH694 094-44-56.0 W 0004427617 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILenexa 10/20/2010 21925.00000 38-59-32.8 N KS MD WQLH694 094-44-56.0 W 0004427617 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILenexa 10/20/2010 22075.00000 38-59-32.8 N MO MD WQLS874 094-32-02.1 W 0004427618 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKansas City 10/20/2010 10815.00000 39-09-11.2 N MO MD WQLS874 094-32-02.1 W 0004427618 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKansas City 10/20/2010 10935.00000 39-09-11.2 N MO MD WQLS874 094-32-02.1 W 0004427618 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKansas City 10/20/2010 18015.00000 39-09-11.2 N MO MD WQLS874 094-32-02.1 W 0004427618 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKansas City 10/20/2010 18115.00000 39-09-11.2 N KS MD WQLH964 094-41-50.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302816A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302816A1.txt
  • MD WMS986 104-27-45.0 W 0004445650 Qwest Corporation RATON 11/08/2010 18767.50000 36-54-22.1 N VA MD WQHF373 077-31-22.4 W 0004445686 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 11/08/2010 21330.00000 37-34-07.0 N VA MD WQHF373 077-31-22.4 W 0004445686 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 11/08/2010 21435.00000 37-34-07.0 N VA MD WQHF373 077-31-22.4 W 0004445686 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 11/08/2010 22035.00000 37-34-07.0 N VA MD WQHH286 077-30-02.1 W 0004445726 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 11/08/2010 22635.00000 37-34-44.4 N Page 5 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA MD WQHH286 077-30-02.1 W 0004445726 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 11/08/2010 23235.00000 37-34-44.4 N OR MD WPSF665 124-09-06.4 W 0004445770
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302977A1.txt
  • 11/17/2010 34-55-26.1 N AR AM KNKN753 090-37-53.5 W 0004329648 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWIDENER 11/17/2010 35-05-36.7 N AR AM KNKN753 090-49-15.7 W 0004329648 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWYNNE 11/17/2010 35-10-47.4 N TX MD KNKN472 097-01-34.5 W 0004451976 ALLTEL Newco LLC Gainesville 11/15/2010 33-39-24.8 N TX MD KNKN472 097-09-42.4 W 0004451976 ALLTEL Newco LLC Gainesville 11/15/2010 33-43-11.3 N TX MD KNKN472 097-05-02.1 W 0004451976 ALLTEL Newco LLC GAINESVILLE 11/15/2010 33-37-50.4 N TX MD KNKN472 097-21-04.7 W 0004451976 ALLTEL Newco LLC MUENSTER 11/15/2010 33-39-38.6 N Page 34 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD KNKN472 097-56-07.1 W 0004451976 ALLTEL Newco LLC RINGGOLD 11/15/2010 33-48-52.3 N TX MD KNKN472
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303067A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303067A1.txt
  • N IL AM KNKA218 089-17-35.5 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HUEY 11/24/2010 38-36-15.9 N IL AM KNKA218 089-45-29.0 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Marissa 11/24/2010 38-15-23.9 N IL AM KNKA218 089-48-42.2 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC MASCOUTAH 11/24/2010 38-28-59.3 N IL AM KNKA218 089-51-49.2 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW ATHENS 11/24/2010 38-19-02.1 N IL AM KNKA218 089-38-55.2 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC New Baden 11/24/2010 38-30-43.9 N IL AM KNKA218 089-44-52.4 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW DOUGLAS 11/24/2010 38-57-51.0 N MO AM KNKA218 091-13-20.2 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW HAVEN 11/24/2010 38-35-57.2 N MO AM KNKA218 090-47-38.5 W 0004342929 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303068A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303068A1.txt
  • Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NM MD KDH81 106-47-22.1 W 0004509136 Tri State Generation & Transmission AssoSAN YSIDRO 11/24/2010 06740.62500 35-31-13.1 N NM MD KDH81 106-47-22.1 W 0004509136 Tri State Generation & Transmission AssoSAN YSIDRO 11/24/2010 06865.00000 35-31-13.1 N NM MD WNTB958 107-50-47.2 W 0004509137 Tri State Generation & Transmission AssoGRANTS 11/24/2010 00956.80000 35-09-02.1 N NM MD WNTB958 107-50-47.2 W 0004509137 Tri State Generation & Transmission AssoGRANTS 11/24/2010 10563.12500 35-09-02.1 N IL MD WQGW743 087-37-30.6 W 0004509416 Towerstream Corp. Chicago 11/24/2010 23075.00000 41-53-49.3 N IL MD WQGW743 087-37-30.6 W 0004509416 Towerstream Corp. Chicago 11/24/2010 23275.00000 41-53-49.3 N IL MD WQGW739 087-37-07.4 W 0004509419 Towerstream Corp. Chicago 11/24/2010 21875.00000 41-51-14.8 N IL MD WQGW739 087-37-07.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303390A1.txt
  • PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY GIBSON 12/01/2010 06815.00000 35-36-17.0 N NM MD KKS72 108-41-05.2 W 0004517528 EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY GIBSON 12/01/2010 06855.00000 35-36-17.0 N NM MD KKS73 108-13-35.2 W 0004517604 EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY THOREAU 12/01/2010 06665.00000 35-23-30.0 N NM MD KKS73 108-13-35.2 W 0004517604 EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY THOREAU 12/01/2010 06695.00000 35-23-30.0 N NM MD KKS74 107-36-02.1 W 0004517731 EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY GRANTS 12/01/2010 06555.00000 35-11-12.1 N NM MD KKS74 107-36-02.1 W 0004517731 EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY GRANTS 12/01/2010 06825.00000 35-11-12.1 N NM MD WNTC258 106-46-55.1 W 0004517900 EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY ALBUQUERQUE 12/01/2010 06725.00000 35-04-03.1 N Page 50 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
  • 6.7 19.6 29.2 30.9 4.1 1.2 0.0 91.7 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.9 32.2 17.5 7.5 * * * 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 10.4 60.0 10.8 3.7 2.9 3.4 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 0.7 1.8 2.5 0.8 3.7 4.4 11.7 46.8 29.8 0.5 97.5 100.0 FTTP 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.5 1.2 2.6 10.2 1.6 81.7 2.1 99.8 100.0 Satellite 45.4 39.7 85.1 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.9 100.0 Fixed Wireless 7.7 3.7 11.4 17.7 25.6 27.5 14.3 1.9 1.4 0.2 88.6 100.0 Mobile Wireless 14.0 9.8 23.9 19.9 45.4 5.2 1.8 * 0.0 * 76.1 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 * * 100.0 100.0 Total
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303633A1.txt
  • 078-00-35.0 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC LEROY 12/08/2010 43-01-07.2 N NY MD KNKN865 077-07-01.4 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Lindley 12/08/2010 42-01-34.8 N NY MD KNKN865 077-07-54.8 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Lindley 12/08/2010 42-05-24.1 N NY MD KNKN865 078-08-15.6 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC MIDDLEBURY 12/08/2010 42-47-09.9 N NY MD KNKN865 078-16-02.1 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NORTH ALEXANDE 12/08/2010 42-55-09.2 N NY MD KNKN865 078-26-46.0 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC OLEAN 12/08/2010 42-02-08.0 N NY MD KNKN865 078-23-31.0 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Pembroke 12/08/2010 42-59-24.0 N NY MD KNKN865 079-09-29.2 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC POLAND 12/08/2010 42-09-00.2 N NY MD KNKN865
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303726A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303726A1.txt
  • SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew Britain 12/15/2010 11545.00000 41-41-37.7 N CT AM 072-45-45.7 W 0004422767 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew Britain 12/15/2010 19375.00000 41-41-37.7 N CT AM 072-45-45.7 W 0004422767 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew Britain 12/15/2010 19475.00000 41-41-37.7 N OH AM 084-33-39.8 W 0004423039 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICincinnati 12/14/2010 19425.00000 39-07-38.0 N OH AM 084-32-16.0 W 0004427784 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICincinnati 12/13/2010 19325.00000 39-09-02.1 N OH AM 084-32-16.0 W 0004427784 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICincinnati 12/13/2010 23225.00000 39-09-02.1 N IL MD WNTT957 088-54-52.0 W 0004531095 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD BENTON 12/13/2010 00928.21875 37-59-37.0 N IL MD WNTT957 088-54-52.0 W 0004531095 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD BENTON 12/13/2010 00928.84375 37-59-37.0 N IL MD WNTT957 088-54-52.0 W 0004531095 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD BENTON 12/13/2010 00952.21875 37-59-37.0 N IL MD WNTT957 088-54-52.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303822A1.txt
  • 0004539384 AOptix Technologies, Inc. Campbell 12/20/2010 21625.00000 37-16-46.1 N CA NE 121-56-36.7 W 0004539384 AOptix Technologies, Inc. Campbell 12/20/2010 21725.00000 37-16-46.1 N CA NE 121-56-36.7 W 0004539384 AOptix Technologies, Inc. Campbell 12/20/2010 21825.00000 37-16-46.1 N CA NE 121-56-36.7 W 0004539384 AOptix Technologies, Inc. Campbell 12/20/2010 21975.00000 37-16-46.1 N CA NE 121-56-51.1 W 0004539385 AOptix Technologies, Inc. San Jose 12/20/2010 22825.00000 37-19-02.1 N CA NE 121-56-51.1 W 0004539385 AOptix Technologies, Inc. San Jose 12/20/2010 22925.00000 37-19-02.1 N CA NE 121-56-51.1 W 0004539385 AOptix Technologies, Inc. San Jose 12/20/2010 23025.00000 37-19-02.1 N CA NE 121-56-51.1 W 0004539385 AOptix Technologies, Inc. San Jose 12/20/2010 23175.00000 37-19-02.1 N PA NE 079-54-00.7 W 0004540186 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMunhall 12/20/2010 21975.00000 40-23-14.7 N Page 50 MG -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303823A1.txt
  • Latitude City CA NE 121-57-59.6 W 0004543272 WiLine Networks inc. Santa Clara 12/21/2010 22625.00000 37-22-52.7 N CA NE 122-23-20.1 W 0004543278 WiLine Networks inc. San Francisco 12/21/2010 22625.00000 37-46-13.5 N CA NE 122-24-34.5 W 0004543290 WiLine Networks Inc. San Francisco 12/21/2010 22475.00000 37-47-34.0 N CA NE 122-25-17.8 W 0004543306 WiLine Networks Inc. San Francisco 12/21/2010 21275.00000 37-47-06.2 N NV NE 117-24-02.1 W 0004543706 WWC License L.L.C. GOLCONDA 12/22/2010 06093.45000 40-56-02.1 N NV NE 116-49-43.4 W 0004543762 Southwestco Wireless LP BATTLE MOUNTAIN 12/22/2010 06345.49000 40-42-47.7 N KS NE 096-53-56.0 W 0004543843 Cox Communications Kansas LLC JUNCTION CITY 12/22/2010 06004.50000 39-00-55.0 N TX NE 096-44-45.1 W 0004543910 airBand Communications, Inc. Plano 12/22/2010 21930.00000 33-00-32.2 N KS NE 097-06-46.0 W 0004543979 Cox Communications Kansas
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • Customer Complaints - 2009 .................................. Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................... Table 3.27 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ..........................................................Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Annual Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .............................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State or Jurisdiction ...................................Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal Areas - by State .............Table 2.7 3 Index of Tables and Charts Lifeline Monthly Support - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................Table 2.3 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries ...................................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A11.txt
  • 6. Software Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.04,241.9 0.0 1,410.83,030.21,289.4 7. Hardware Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.9 598.2 673.3 8. Hardware Failure 525.3 0.0 0.01,938.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.013,768.526,880.365,259.513,338.6 9. Natural Causes 0.0 0.0 0.027,664.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0109,724.814,410.85,509.9 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 7.4 0.0 11. Environmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.62,805.9 30.2 12. External Power Failure 0.0 0.0 0.0 597.6 0.0 0.0 0.01,199.6 0.025,483.225,107.01,885.4 13. Massive Line Outage 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.015,861.374,820.530,479.9 14. Remote 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,841.4 735.6 512.7 15. Other/Unknown 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.txt
  • Customer Complaints - 2009 .................................. Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................... Table 3.27 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ..........................................................Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Annual Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .............................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State or Jurisdiction ...................................Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal Areas - by State .............Table 2.7 3 Index of Tables and Charts Lifeline Monthly Support - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................Table 2.3 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries ...................................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A4.txt
  • telephone service for low-income consumers experienced an average growth in penetration rates for low-income households of 4.6% from March 1997 to March 2009.9 In contrast, states that provided a basic or low level of Lifeline support experienced an average increase in telephone penetration rates for low-income households between March 1997 and March 2009 of only 2.9%.10 As shown in Table 2.1, more than 8.5 million subscribers paid reduced local rates under the Lifeline program in 2009, whereas the Link Up program, which supports affordable connections to the network, connected about 1.9 million telephone beneficiaries. The Commission's rules are designed to satisfy the 1996 Act's mandates that rates be "affordable" and access be provided to "low-income consumers" in all regions of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.txt
  • 98.0 3.2 * Rhode Island 93.6 96.6 2.9 * South Carolina 83.7 93.9 10.2 * South Dakota 93.2 97.1 3.9 * Tennessee 88.5 93.2 4.7 * Texas 88.4 94.9 6.5 * Utah 92.5 96.5 4.0 * Vermont 92.3 98.1 5.8 * Virginia 93.1 96.0 3.0 * Washington 93.0 98.2 5.2 * West Virginia 87.7 95.3 7.6 * Wisconsin 95.2 97.3 2.1 Wyoming 89.9 97.2 7.4 * Total United States 91.6% 95.7% 4.1% * * Increase is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. # Decrease is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Differences may not appear to equal changes due to rounding. 6 - 16 Chart 6.2 6 - 17 94.6% or less 94.7% - 96.7% 96.8% or more Average
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 2004 2008 CPI All Items CPI Telephone Services 7 - 5 1980 9.7 12.5 4.6 1981 8.3 8.9 11.7 1982 5.2 3.8 7.2 1983 3.4 3.8 3.6 1984 3.6 3.9 9.2 1985 2.8 3.8 4.7 1986 2.3 1.1 2.7 1987 2.9 4.4 -1.3 1988 3.7 4.4 1.3 1989 3.5 4.6 -0.3 1990 4.1 6.1 -0.4 1991 3.1 3.1 3.5 1992 2.1 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.3 2.7 1.8 1994 2.2 2.7 0.7 1995 2.0 2.5 1.2 1996 1.9 3.3 2.1 1997 1.5 1.7 0.2 1998 1.1 1.6 0.3* 1999 1.5 2.7 0.4 2000 2.3 3.4 -2.3 2001 2.5 1.6 1.3 2002 1.7 2.4 0.2 2003 2.2 1.9 -2.7 2004 3.2 3.3 -2.5 2005 3.5 3.4 0.4 2006 2.9 2.5 1.7 2007 2.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303900A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303900A1.txt
  • 69 1.2 24 0.4 3,873 67.6 5,730 American Samoa 27 66.4 0 0.0 1 1.4 0 0.0 1 2.0 12 30.1 40 Arizona 13,542 62.7 68 0.3 207 1.0 757 3.5 281 1.3 6,742 31.2 21,598 Arkansas 5,163 35.8 409 2.8 41 0.3 221 1.5 216 1.5 8,385 58.1 14,435 California 80,655 52.1 2,126 1.4 709 0.5 4,333 2.8 3,273 2.1 63,689 41.1 154,786 Colorado 12,365 58.1 104 0.5 127 0.6 659 3.1 402 1.9 7,633 35.9 21,288 Connecticut 7,945 52.7 329 2.2 93 0.6 347 2.3 198 1.3 6,174 40.9 15,086 Delaware 2,664 56.5 37 0.8 40 0.9 108 2.3 25 0.5 1,843 39.1 4,718 District of Columbia 4,441 74.3 16 0.3 66 1.1 224 3.8 43 0.7 1,185 19.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304054A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304054A1.txt
  • 4.0 3.8 Seven 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.6 3.4 3.5 Eight 3.1 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.0 Nine 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 Ten or More 36.9 35.0 35.3 34.0 33.5 33.1 33.6 44.7 44.0 44.0 Zero 2.2% 2.4% 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.8% 2.6% 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% One 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.4 0.9 1.2 1.2 Two 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 Three 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 Four 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 1.3 1.5 1.5 Five 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.6 1.4 1.5 Six 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304137A1.txt
  • 0004568669 AOptix Technologies, Inc. Campbell 01/12/2011 21625.00000 37-16-46.1 N CA NE 121-56-36.7 W 0004568669 AOptix Technologies, Inc. Campbell 01/12/2011 21725.00000 37-16-46.1 N CA NE 121-56-36.7 W 0004568669 AOptix Technologies, Inc. Campbell 01/12/2011 21825.00000 37-16-46.1 N CA NE 121-56-36.7 W 0004568669 AOptix Technologies, Inc. Campbell 01/12/2011 21975.00000 37-16-46.1 N CA NE 121-56-51.1 W 0004568670 AOptix Technologies, Inc. San Jose 01/12/2011 22825.00000 37-19-02.1 N CA NE 121-56-51.1 W 0004568670 AOptix Technologies, Inc. San Jose 01/12/2011 22925.00000 37-19-02.1 N CA NE 121-56-51.1 W 0004568670 AOptix Technologies, Inc. San Jose 01/12/2011 23025.00000 37-19-02.1 N CA NE 121-56-51.1 W 0004568670 AOptix Technologies, Inc. San Jose 01/12/2011 23175.00000 37-19-02.1 N UT NE 111-32-20.9 W 0004568782 Utah Broadband LLC Park City 01/12/2011 19625.00000 40-43-26.5 N UT NE 111-31-24.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304247A1.txt
  • RM WMR299 101-42-21.0 W 0004579806 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC PHILLIP 01/20/2011 06345.49000 43-58-15.1 N SD RM WMR299 101-42-21.0 W 0004579806 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC PHILLIP 01/20/2011 06375.14000 43-58-15.1 N SD RM WMR299 101-42-21.0 W 0004579806 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC PHILLIP 01/20/2011 06625.00000 43-58-15.1 N HI RM WLK718 157-49-51.0 W 0004579829 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHONOLULU 01/20/2011 10572.50000 21-17-02.1 N HI RM WLV641 157-56-29.2 W 0004579858 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCAIEA 01/20/2011 10875.00000 21-22-56.8 N Page 21 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI RM WLS628 157-54-37.0 W 0004580059 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCAMP H M SMITH 01/20/2011 06004.50000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304248A1.txt
  • N TX MD WQLE819 097-14-42.6 W 0004575843 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKeller 01/18/2011 17815.00000 32-57-31.5 N TX MD WQLE819 097-14-42.6 W 0004575843 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKeller 01/18/2011 17915.00000 32-57-31.5 N TX MD WQLE819 097-14-42.6 W 0004575843 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKeller 01/18/2011 21875.00000 32-57-31.5 N TX MD WQLE819 097-14-42.6 W 0004575843 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKeller 01/18/2011 21925.00000 32-57-31.5 N TX MD WQLD263 097-17-02.1 W 0004575844 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKELLER 01/18/2011 10815.00000 32-56-38.4 N TX MD WQLD263 097-17-02.1 W 0004575844 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKELLER 01/18/2011 10895.00000 32-56-38.4 N TX MD WQLD263 097-17-02.1 W 0004575844 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKELLER 01/18/2011 21875.00000 32-56-38.4 N TX MD WQLD263 097-17-02.1 W 0004575844 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKELLER 01/18/2011 21975.00000 32-56-38.4 N TX MD WQLF323 097-06-32.8 W 0004575845 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304249A1.txt
  • dba NevadBATTLE MOUNTAIN 01/20/2011 06635.62500 40-37-17.6 N CO AM 108-44-52.4 W 0004576133 HJ LLC Gateway 01/20/2011 11545.00000 39-03-55.7 N CO AM 108-44-52.4 W 0004576133 HJ LLC Gateway 01/20/2011 17965.00000 39-03-55.7 N CO AM 108-35-08.2 W 0004576134 HJ LLC Grand Junction 01/20/2011 19525.00000 39-05-51.7 N CO AM 108-28-01.6 W 0004576135 HJ LLC Grand Junction 01/20/2011 11055.00000 39-04-08.0 N NY MD WQLT847 073-47-02.1 W 0004578720 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York 01/19/2011 19375.00000 40-44-19.7 N NY MD WQLT847 073-47-02.1 W 0004578720 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York 01/19/2011 19475.00000 40-44-19.7 N NY MD WQLT847 073-47-02.1 W 0004578720 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York 01/19/2011 19525.00000 40-44-19.7 N NY MD WQLT847 073-47-02.1 W 0004578720 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York 01/19/2011 19575.00000 40-44-19.7 N NY MD WQLT847 073-47-02.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304251A1.txt
  • 34-06-17.8 N GA NE 083-25-48.1 W 0004576128 JACKSON COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY Nicholson 01/18/2011 10735.00000 34-07-00.7 N GA NE 083-25-48.1 W 0004576128 JACKSON COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY Nicholson 01/18/2011 10895.00000 34-07-00.7 N GA NE 083-33-37.9 W 0004576129 JACKSON COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY COMMERCE 01/18/2011 10855.00000 34-08-29.0 N GA NE 083-33-37.9 W 0004576129 JACKSON COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY COMMERCE 01/18/2011 11545.00000 34-08-29.0 N GA NE 083-33-02.1 W 0004576130 JACKSON COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY MAYSVILLE 01/18/2011 10735.00000 34-14-19.7 N GA NE 083-33-02.1 W 0004576130 JACKSON COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY MAYSVILLE 01/18/2011 10855.00000 34-14-19.7 N GA NE 083-30-08.4 W 0004576131 JACKSON COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY ATHENS 01/18/2011 11225.00000 34-02-26.2 N GA NE 083-30-08.4 W 0004576131 JACKSON COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY ATHENS 01/18/2011 11585.00000 34-02-26.2 N CA NE 122-05-41.9 W 0004577793 Santa Cruz,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304517A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304517A1.txt
  • Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN MD WQLV304 093-23-59.0 W 0004601739 Citilink Communications, LLC Osseo 02/03/2011 11325.00000 45-06-42.0 N MN MD WQLU232 093-15-29.0 W 0004601741 Citilink Communications, LLC Burnsville 02/03/2011 19465.00000 44-45-33.0 N MN MD WQJN923 093-12-56.0 W 0004601744 Citilink Communications, LLC Apple Valley 02/03/2011 17905.00000 44-44-02.1 N MN MD WQLV753 093-35-28.6 W 0004601747 Citilink Communications, LLC Chaska 02/03/2011 10915.00000 44-50-52.5 N MN MD WQLV753 093-35-28.6 W 0004601747 Citilink Communications, LLC Chaska 02/03/2011 11035.00000 44-50-52.5 N MN MD WQLV753 093-35-28.6 W 0004601747 Citilink Communications, LLC Chaska 02/03/2011 11185.00000 44-50-52.5 N TX MD WPNG882 096-46-18.0 W 0004602129 Dallas MTA, L.P. LANCASTER 02/04/2011 06315.84000 32-34-01.0 N OH MD WQCE740
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304774A1.txt
  • LLCWHITING 02/14/2011 39-57-25.5 N IL MD KNKN930 088-40-57.3 W 0004614065 ILLINOIS RSA 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIPGenoa 02/14/2011 42-05-50.1 N IL MD KNKN930 089-41-45.9 W 0004614065 ILLINOIS RSA 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIPSterling 02/14/2011 41-47-10.6 N MO MD KNKN653 089-53-31.0 W 0004614429 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Advance 02/15/2011 37-04-09.0 N MO MD KNKN653 090-05-09.3 W 0004614429 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CAMPBELL 02/15/2011 36-29-02.1 N MO MD KNKN653 089-43-06.5 W 0004614429 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Caruthersville 02/15/2011 36-12-18.5 N MO MD KNKN653 089-40-09.4 W 0004614429 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CARUTHERSVILLE 02/15/2011 36-12-07.3 N MO MD KNKN653 089-40-09.8 W 0004614429 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Chaffee 02/15/2011 37-11-17.2 N MO MD KNKN653 089-17-39.2 W 0004614429 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Charleston 02/15/2011 36-56-11.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305045A1.txt
  • N OK AM KNKN511 098-59-03.3 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPUTNAM 03/03/2011 35-52-09.0 N OK AM KNKN511 099-19-39.2 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSharon 03/03/2011 36-14-09.0 N OK AM KNKN511 098-19-23.5 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWATONGA 03/03/2011 35-50-35.6 N OK AM KNKN511 098-35-41.1 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWATONGA 03/03/2011 35-51-23.5 N OK AM KNKN511 098-43-02.1 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWEATHERFORD 03/03/2011 35-30-36.0 N OK AM KNKN511 098-43-03.0 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWEATHERFORD 03/03/2011 35-30-39.0 N MI AM KNKN711 083-30-39.9 W 0004400919 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC AKRON 03/01/2011 43-33-54.3 N MI AM KNKN711 083-02-29.8 W 0004400919 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BAD AXE 03/01/2011 43-47-00.1 N MI AM KNKN711 083-21-59.2 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305046A1.txt
  • airBand Communications, Inc. Paradise Valley 03/03/2011 10945.00000 33-32-28.1 N AZ NE 111-55-07.0 W 0004639442 airBand Communications, Inc. Scottsdale 03/03/2011 11435.00000 33-36-37.0 N TX NE 096-59-25.8 W 0004639444 airBand Communications, Inc. Irving 03/03/2011 22080.00000 32-54-51.4 N NV NE 115-07-46.1 W 0004639446 airBand Communications, Inc. Paradise 03/03/2011 19350.00000 36-06-50.2 N NV NE 115-05-07.8 W 0004639447 airBand Communications, Inc. Sunrise Manor 03/03/2011 17790.00000 36-08-02.1 N TX NE 096-46-56.5 W 0004639581 airBand Communications, Inc. Dallas 03/03/2011 19530.00000 32-46-58.7 N Page 14 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AL NE 086-27-24.8 W 0004640037 Verizon Wireless of the East LP Prattville 03/04/2011 06226.89000 32-32-14.9 N AL NE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305196A1.txt
  • PCS, LLCFOLSOM 03/11/2011 38-38-36.7 N CA AM KNKA323 121-08-16.9 W 0004391280 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFOLSOM 03/11/2011 38-38-38.5 N CA AM KNKA323 121-17-47.6 W 0004391280 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGalt 03/11/2011 38-15-25.3 N CA AM KNKA323 121-19-26.8 W 0004391280 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGalt 03/11/2011 38-17-47.7 N CA AM KNKA323 120-51-51.9 W 0004391280 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGOLD RUN 03/11/2011 39-10-02.1 N CA AM KNKA323 121-06-00.8 W 0004391280 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGRASS VALLEY 03/11/2011 39-07-58.6 N CA AM KNKA323 121-07-55.0 W 0004391280 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHERALD 03/11/2011 38-19-43.0 N CA AM KNKA323 121-36-24.0 W 0004391280 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCISLETON 03/11/2011 38-09-54.5 N CA AM KNKA323 121-18-16.7 W 0004391280 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCLINCOLN 03/11/2011 38-54-06.3 N CA AM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305197A1.txt
  • 066-43-26.4 W 0004647912 Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. Adjuntas 03/10/2011 19435.00000 18-09-52.6 N PR MD WQIJ319 066-45-02.5 W 0004647913 Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. Adjuntas 03/10/2011 17875.00000 18-10-15.2 N Page 8 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City SC MD WQMZ455 080-12-02.1 W 0004647917 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Hollywood 03/10/2011 06197.24000 32-44-15.9 N SC MD WQMZ455 080-12-02.1 W 0004647917 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Hollywood 03/10/2011 06226.89000 32-44-15.9 N SC MD WQMZ455 080-12-02.1 W 0004647917 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Hollywood 03/10/2011 11245.00000 32-44-15.9 N SC MD WQMZ455 080-12-02.1 W 0004647917 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Hollywood 03/10/2011 11285.00000 32-44-15.9 N SC MD WQMZ455 080-12-02.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.txt
  • 4.1 7.5 6.4 18.9 30.6 29.2 5.7 1.6 0.0 92.5 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.3 37.6 * 5.3 0.9 * 0.1 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 10.3 58.0 11.6 3.9 3.4 4.6 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 0.3 1.9 2.2 0.3 1.6 6.9 5.9 26.0 56.3 0.8 97.8 100.0 FTTP 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.2 2.3 5.1 2.1 81.2 7.6 99.9 100.0 Satellite * * 83.7 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 100.0 Fixed Wireless 6.7 3.7 10.4 14.5 25.1 29.8 16.4 3.0 0.5 0.2 89.6 100.0 Mobile Wireless * * 21.0 22.3 35.1 13.9 2.2 5.5 * * 79.0 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 * * 100.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305297A1.txt
  • 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.6 3.4 3.5 3.6 Eight 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.4 Nine 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.8 Ten or More 35.3 34.0 33.5 33.1 33.6 44.7 44.0 44.0 46.6 Zero 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.8% 2.6% 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% 0.4% One 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.4 0.9 1.2 1.2 0.9 Two 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.0 Three 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 Four 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.3 Five 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.4 Six 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.3 Seven 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.4 Eight 2.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305322A1.txt
  • City of Granite Falls 03/16/2011 00122.80000 44-45-08.0 N MN NE 094-22-54.9 W 0004654755 Hutchinson, City of Hutchinson 03/16/2011 00122.80000 44-51-35.9 N MN NE 093-19-00.8 W 0004654822 Faribault, City of Faribault 03/16/2011 00122.80000 44-19-59.9 N AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CO MD WGR736 105-05-02.1 W 0004657058 EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION Lakewood 03/18/2011 00948.50000 39-39-22.9 N IL NE 111-55-22.2 W 0004650275 EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION Tx Tower City 03/14/2011 00950.00000 11-22-33.3 N Page 1 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IN NE 000-53-45.0 W 0004650281 EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION Crawfordsville 03/14/2011
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305324A1.txt
  • CA NE 122-11-21.4 W 0004653800 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CAPAY 03/16/2011 05945.20000 38-39-49.8 N CA NE 122-11-21.4 W 0004653800 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CAPAY 03/16/2011 06404.79000 38-39-49.8 N GA NE 085-01-03.0 W 0004654102 COWETA COUNTY CARROLLTON 03/16/2011 06226.89000 33-33-54.0 N GA NE 084-34-13.2 W 0004654103 COWETA COUNTY Senoia 03/16/2011 06286.19000 33-18-13.9 N GA NE 084-48-47.4 W 0004654104 COWETA COUNTY Newnan 03/16/2011 05974.85000 33-23-02.1 N GA NE 084-48-47.4 W 0004654104 COWETA COUNTY Newnan 03/16/2011 06034.15000 33-23-02.1 N FL NE 082-32-05.6 W 0004654602 Sarasota Police Department Sarasota 03/16/2011 21825.00000 27-21-20.1 N UT NE 111-53-14.8 W 0004655211 Utah, State of Salt Lake City 03/17/2011 19370.00000 40-46-43.8 N UT NE 111-54-16.8 W 0004655238 Utah, State of Salt Lake City 03/17/2011 17810.00000 40-45-47.0 N UT NE 111-53-39.3 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305450A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305450A1.txt
  • State Highway Patrol Lexington 03/25/2011 06725.00000 35-49-03.5 N WI NE 087-48-26.2 W 0004661571 RACINE WASTEWATER UTILITIES RACINE 03/23/2011 00932.44375 42-45-25.4 N WI NE 087-48-26.2 W 0004661571 RACINE WASTEWATER UTILITIES RACINE 03/23/2011 00941.44375 42-45-25.4 N WA NE 122-26-42.3 W 0004662215 Pierce County Tacoma 03/23/2011 11405.00000 47-15-12.7 N WA NE 122-24-36.4 W 0004662222 Pierce County Tacoma 03/23/2011 10915.00000 47-16-00.8 N FL NE 080-42-02.1 W 0004662714 City of Melbourne BONAVENTURE 03/23/2011 11545.00000 28-16-43.0 N CA NE 121-17-26.4 W 0004662854 STOCKTON, CITY OF Stockton 03/23/2011 19325.00000 37-57-11.9 N Page 5 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 119-12-43.9 W 0004663017 Ventura County Office of Education Oxnard 03/23/2011
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305453A1.txt
  • 03/22/2011 19475.00000 39-59-19.0 N Page 43 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City KY MD WPNB393 087-07-33.0 W 0004661639 BIG RIVERS ELECTRIC CORPORATIONCENTRAL CITY 03/23/2011 00934.17500 37-22-01.0 N IL MD WNTH421 087-37-54.0 W 0004662802 WGN Continental Broadcasting CompanyCHICAGO 03/23/2011 21820.00000 41-53-01.8 N IL MD WPNJ494 087-37-02.1 W 0004662835 WGN Continental Broadcasting CompanyCHICAGO 03/23/2011 21820.00000 41-51-59.1 N IL MD WQGW743 087-37-30.6 W 0004662957 Towerstream Corp. Chicago 03/23/2011 23070.00000 41-53-49.3 N NC MD WED845 077-04-41.8 W 0004663486 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMAULANDER 03/24/2011 06865.00000 36-15-19.5 N NC MD WED846 077-04-07.0 W 0004663502 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMWILLIAMSTON 03/24/2011 06705.00000 35-50-28.0 N DC MD WQHG580 077-02-14.9 W 0004663740 JOHNS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305567A1.txt
  • SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19525.00000000 Pennsauken 39-56-57.5 N NJ 75-3-54.0 W 4 1 02/27/2011 WQKR975 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19625.00000000 Pennsauken 39-56-57.5 N NJ 75-3-54.0 W 4 1 02/27/2011 WQKR975 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21875.00000000 Pennsauken 39-56-57.5 N NJ 75-3-54.0 W 5 1 02/27/2011 WQKR978 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11225.00000000 RUNNEMEADE 39-51-22.7 N NJ 75-4-2.1 W 3 1 02/27/2011 WQKR978 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11305.00000000 RUNNEMEADE 39-51-22.7 N NJ 75-4-2.1 W 3 1 02/27/2011 WQKR978 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11465.00000000 RUNNEMEADE 39-51-22.7 N NJ 75-4-2.1 W 4 1 02/27/2011 WQKR978 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11545.00000000 RUNNEMEADE 39-51-22.7 N NJ 75-4-2.1 W 4 1 02/27/2011 WQKR984 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305717A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305717A1.txt
  • 42-30-39.3 N Page 13 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY MD WMS263 077-38-05.3 W 0004681445 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC DANSVILLE 04/06/2011 02174.80000 42-30-39.3 N NY MD WMS264 077-41-25.1 W 0004681465 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HORNELL 04/06/2011 02124.80000 42-21-02.1 N WY MD WQKK442 104-31-00.6 W 0004681512 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Sundance 04/06/2011 05955.08000 44-20-19.6 N WY MD WQKK442 104-31-00.6 W 0004681512 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Sundance 04/06/2011 06024.27000 44-20-19.6 N WY MD WQKK442 104-31-00.6 W 0004681512 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Sundance 04/06/2011 06715.62500 44-20-19.6 N UT MD WQKK428 113-52-59.8 W 0004681517 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305954A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305954A1.txt
  • Transport Management, Inc. ST. PAUL 04/15/2011 11305.00000 44-54-49.7 N MN MD WQJV387 093-11-17.5 W 0004692737 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. ST. PAUL 04/15/2011 23485.00000 44-54-49.7 N MN MD WQJV625 093-11-21.5 W 0004692753 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 04/15/2011 10775.00000 44-58-00.1 N MN MD WQJV625 093-11-21.5 W 0004692753 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 04/15/2011 10815.00000 44-58-00.1 N VA MD WQHH286 077-30-02.1 W 0004692807 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/15/2011 22610.00000 37-34-44.4 N VA MD WQHH286 077-30-02.1 W 0004692807 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/15/2011 22635.00000 37-34-44.4 N VA MD WQHH286 077-30-02.1 W 0004692807 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/15/2011 23235.00000 37-34-44.4 N VA MD WQLZ467 077-29-46.7 W 0004692812 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/15/2011 21410.00000 37-33-36.7 N VA MD WQHF373 077-31-22.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306296A1.txt
  • PCS, LLC JUNE LAKE 04/29/2011 06645.00000 37-44-52.5 N GA NE 081-57-48.0 W 0004702584 TOWER CLOUD, INC. Green's Cut 04/25/2011 10815.00000 33-11-50.2 N GA NE 081-57-48.0 W 0004702584 TOWER CLOUD, INC. Green's Cut 04/25/2011 10855.00000 33-11-50.2 N GA NE 082-00-32.4 W 0004702587 TOWER CLOUD, INC. WAYNESBORO 04/25/2011 11345.00000 33-05-56.5 N GA NE 082-24-25.8 W 0004702595 TOWER CLOUD, INC. Appling 04/25/2011 10775.00000 33-37-02.1 N GA NE 082-16-04.5 W 0004702600 TOWER CLOUD, INC. Appling 04/25/2011 10855.00000 33-37-16.9 N NV NE 115-13-22.8 W 0004702748 MetroPCS AWS, LLC Las Vegas 04/25/2011 11445.00000 36-02-00.1 N NV NE 115-30-01.6 W 0004702753 MetroPCS AWS, LLC Las Vegas 04/25/2011 10955.00000 35-57-55.2 N Page 14 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306419A1.txt
  • 112-02-37.0 W 0004712480 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation RICHFIELD 05/02/2011 11305.00000 38-46-21.0 N UT MD WQHZ280 112-13-54.8 W 0004712482 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation Fillmore 05/02/2011 10562.50000 38-51-55.9 N UT MD WQHZ280 112-13-54.8 W 0004712482 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation Fillmore 05/02/2011 10735.00000 38-51-55.9 N UT MD WQHZ280 112-13-54.8 W 0004712482 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation Fillmore 05/02/2011 10815.00000 38-51-55.9 N VT MD WPNB402 073-11-02.1 W 0004712530 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC COLCHESTER 05/02/2011 05945.20000 44-30-30.1 N VT MD WPNB402 073-11-02.1 W 0004712530 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC COLCHESTER 05/02/2011 06063.80000 44-30-30.1 N VT MD WPNB402 073-11-02.1 W 0004712530 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC COLCHESTER 05/02/2011 06765.00000 44-30-30.1 N VT MD WPNB402 073-11-02.1 W 0004712530 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC COLCHESTER 05/02/2011 10735.00000 44-30-30.1 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306653A1.txt
  • INC GROVETON 05/11/2011 06765.00000 31-02-03.0 N TX NE 095-08-36.9 W 0004724263 The Boeing Company Houston 05/11/2011 17765.00000 29-36-24.6 N TX NE 095-08-36.9 W 0004724263 The Boeing Company Houston 05/11/2011 17815.00000 29-36-24.6 N TX NE 095-08-36.9 W 0004724263 The Boeing Company Houston 05/11/2011 17865.00000 29-36-24.6 N TX NE 095-08-36.9 W 0004724263 The Boeing Company Houston 05/11/2011 17915.00000 29-36-24.6 N TX NE 095-06-02.1 W 0004724264 The Boeing Company Pasadena 05/11/2011 19325.00000 29-35-28.6 N TX NE 095-06-02.1 W 0004724264 The Boeing Company Pasadena 05/11/2011 19375.00000 29-35-28.6 N TX NE 095-06-02.1 W 0004724264 The Boeing Company Pasadena 05/11/2011 19425.00000 29-35-28.6 N TX NE 095-06-02.1 W 0004724264 The Boeing Company Pasadena 05/11/2011 19475.00000 29-35-28.6 N ID NE 112-13-15.0 W 0004724350 PacifiCorp Idaho Falls 05/11/2011 06625.00000 43-33-16.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306654A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306654A1.txt
  • Inc Phoenix 05/12/2011 19520.00000 33-24-57.2 N AZ NE 110-48-15.4 W 0004726159 Coppernet Systems Inc Globe 05/12/2011 11425.00000 33-24-31.5 N AZ NE 110-48-15.4 W 0004726159 Coppernet Systems Inc Globe 05/12/2011 17920.00000 33-24-31.5 N AZ NE 112-04-22.2 W 0004726160 Coppernet Systems Inc Phoenix 05/12/2011 17960.00000 33-27-05.7 N TX NE 098-19-30.3 W 0004726240 CellTex Networks, LLC Floresville 05/12/2011 10735.00000 29-01-57.8 N AZ NE 114-43-02.1 W 0004726368 BOSE CORPORATION SAN LUIS 05/12/2011 23135.00000 32-27-56.7 N Page 17 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ NE 114-41-36.0 W 0004726369 BOSE CORPORATION San Luis 05/12/2011 21935.00000 32-28-49.0 N AZ NE 110-51-10.8 W 0004727032 Coppernet Systems Inc Claypool 05/13/2011 19480.00000 33-24-32.4 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306818A1.txt
  • 05/16/2011 19625.00000 40-01-02.6 N IN NE 085-49-13.2 W 0004728704 Elkhart County Highway Department Goshen 05/16/2011 10795.00000 41-35-41.8 N IN NE 085-53-16.2 W 0004728710 Elkhart County Highway Department Dunlap 05/16/2011 11285.00000 41-36-57.3 N CA NE 120-02-27.2 W 0004729748 County of Santa Barbara Santa Maria 05/16/2011 06795.00000 35-03-00.1 N NC NE 080-14-18.2 W 0004729982 North Carolina State Highway Patrol Richfield 05/17/2011 06635.00000 35-36-02.1 N OR NE 122-53-31.1 W 0004730398 LANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE COTTAGE GROVE 05/17/2011 06197.24000 43-50-34.4 N OR NE 122-24-38.0 W 0004730403 LANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE NIMROD 05/17/2011 06315.84000 44-08-21.2 N IL NE 090-10-53.3 W 0004730537 Madison, County of Alton 05/17/2011 06286.19000 38-53-30.5 N IL NE 090-10-53.3 W 0004730537 Madison, County of Alton 05/17/2011 11365.00000 38-53-30.5 N IL NE 090-00-22.0 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306819A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306819A1.txt
  • DEPARTMECULLMAN 05/16/2011 00956.29375 34-08-50.1 N KS NE 096-11-28.4 W 0004728681 Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LOlpe 05/16/2011 11215.00000 38-17-18.4 N TX NE 097-26-40.6 W 0004728713 Guadalupe Valley Electric Coop. Yorktown 05/16/2011 19375.00000 29-03-18.9 N TX NE 097-28-50.0 W 0004728790 Guadalupe Valley Electric Coop. Yorktown 05/16/2011 17815.00000 28-59-17.0 N IN NE 086-09-20.2 W 0004728997 Fourway Computer Products, Inc. Bremen 05/16/2011 19375.00000 41-27-02.1 N TX NE 099-16-50.4 W 0004729025 EOG RESOURCES INC Cotulla 05/16/2011 10795.00000 28-16-55.8 N Page 42 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE 099-16-50.4 W 0004729025 EOG RESOURCES INC Cotulla 05/16/2011 10875.00000 28-16-55.8 N TX NE 099-34-59.3 W 0004729026 EOG RESOURCES INC Laredo
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306820A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306820A1.txt
  • Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI MD KNKQ319 085-15-59.1 W 0004736869 Alltel Communications Wireless, Inc. GREENVILLE 05/20/2011 43-12-39.1 N MI MD KNKQ319 084-37-21.0 W 0004736869 Alltel Communications Wireless, Inc. ITHACA 05/20/2011 43-19-46.1 N MI MD KNKQ319 085-12-16.1 W 0004736869 Alltel Communications Wireless, Inc. MECOSTA 05/20/2011 43-39-08.1 N MI MD KNKQ319 085-29-17.1 W 0004736869 Alltel Communications Wireless, Inc. MORLEY 05/20/2011 43-29-02.1 N MI MD KNKQ319 084-34-37.4 W 0004736869 Alltel Communications Wireless, Inc. North Star Twp. 05/20/2011 43-15-03.9 N MI MD KNKQ319 085-05-57.1 W 0004736869 Alltel Communications Wireless, Inc. Stanton 05/20/2011 43-18-37.1 N MI MD KNKQ319 084-55-47.1 W 0004736869 Alltel Communications Wireless, Inc. WEIDMAN 05/20/2011 43-41-18.1 N MI MD KNKQ319 085-50-39.2 W 0004736869 Alltel Communications Wireless, Inc. White Cloud 05/20/2011 43-35-28.1 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306919A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306919A1.txt
  • Corporation DURANGO 05/23/2011 37-21-47.0 N CO MD KNKN420 107-40-22.2 W 0004737497 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation Ouray 05/23/2011 38-02-30.0 N CO MD KNKN420 107-46-34.8 W 0004737497 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation Ridgway 05/23/2011 38-10-54.0 N IN MD KNKN604 087-19-22.2 W 0004738284 INDIANA RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERSHFair Oaks 05/23/2011 41-00-31.7 N SD MD KNKN304 099-11-11.5 W 0004739650 Cellular Inc. Network Corporation Burke 05/23/2011 43-22-02.1 N ID MD KNKQ387 114-19-18.4 W 0004739670 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Hailey 05/23/2011 43-30-12.3 N MD MD KNKN938 079-15-43.4 W 0004741630 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Accident 05/25/2011 39-40-53.6 N MD MD KNKN938 079-21-55.2 W 0004741630 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Deep Creek 05/25/2011 39-34-05.2 N MD MD KNKN938 079-18-45.1 W 0004741630 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Grantsville 05/25/2011 39-42-20.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307212A1.txt
  • 30-28-36.5 N FL NE 083-54-12.4 W 0004751873 North Florida Broadband Authority MONTICELLO 06/03/2011 11225.00000 30-28-36.5 N FL NE 083-54-12.4 W 0004751873 North Florida Broadband Authority MONTICELLO 06/03/2011 11385.00000 30-28-36.5 N FL NE 084-13-40.6 W 0004751874 North Florida Broadband Authority Tallahassee 06/03/2011 11265.00000 30-25-24.1 N FL NE 084-13-40.6 W 0004751874 North Florida Broadband Authority Tallahassee 06/03/2011 11305.00000 30-25-24.1 N FL NE 083-16-02.1 W 0004751875 North Florida Broadband Authority LEE 06/03/2011 06093.45000 30-22-10.1 N FL NE 083-16-02.1 W 0004751875 North Florida Broadband Authority LEE 06/03/2011 10775.00000 30-22-10.1 N FL NE 082-09-56.5 W 0004751876 North Florida Broadband Authority WALDO 06/03/2011 11265.00000 29-50-03.6 N Page 9 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307406A1.pdf
  • for Community Media Comments at 13. 77 J.H. SNIDER, NEW MEDIA AND DEMOCRATIC ACCOUNTABILITY: THE GROWTH OF GOVERNMENT ACCESS TV 4, 19 (1998) (SNIDER, NEW MEDIA AND DEMOCRATIC ACCOUNTABILITY) , http://www.jhsnider.net/ MyWritings/98-04-MPSA-NewMediaAndDemocraticAccountability- GrowthOfGovernmentAccessTV.pdf. 78 SNIDER, NEW MEDIA AND DEMOCRATIC ACCOUNTABILITY at 1. 79 NAPAN Comments at 6; Jessica Durkin, Tom Glaisyer & Kara Hadge, AN INFORMATION COMMUNITY CASE STUDY: SEATTLE 2.1 (Media Policy Initiative, New America Found.) (2010), available at http://mediapolicy. newamerica.net/sites/newamerica.net/files/policydocs/SeattleCas- eStudy.pdf (SEATTLE CASE STUDY). 80 SEATTLE CASE STUDY. 81 Email from Bunnie Riedel, Exec. Dir., American Community Television to Christopher Ali, FCC (July 23, 2010); see also Alliance for Community Media Comments at 4. 82 SNIDER, NEW MEDIA AND DEMOCRATIC ACCOUNTABILITY at 21�22. 83 Howard Troxler, With Less Cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307527A1.txt
  • 10755.00000 34-11-49.0 N CA MD WPWX440 117-02-57.0 W 0004755786 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Big Bear City 06/07/2011 10875.00000 34-11-49.0 N CA MD WPWX440 117-02-57.0 W 0004755786 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Big Bear City 06/07/2011 18045.00000 34-11-49.0 N CA MD WPWX440 117-02-57.0 W 0004755786 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Big Bear City 06/07/2011 18085.00000 34-11-49.0 N CA MD WMW750 117-02-02.1 W 0004755792 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Barstow 06/07/2011 10652.50000 34-54-03.9 N CA MD WMW750 117-02-02.1 W 0004755792 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Barstow 06/07/2011 10955.00000 34-54-03.9 N CA MD WPXP560 114-34-56.6 W 0004755931 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Blythe 06/07/2011 06034.15000 33-36-35.5 N CA MD WPXP560 114-34-56.6 W 0004755931 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Blythe 06/07/2011 06093.45000 33-36-35.5 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307528A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307528A1.txt
  • W 0004759211 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership Monroe 06/09/2011 10567.50000 47-51-34.0 N WA MD WQIL572 121-51-49.0 W 0004759211 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership Monroe 06/09/2011 10875.00000 47-51-34.0 N WA MD WQIL572 121-51-49.0 W 0004759211 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership Monroe 06/09/2011 10955.00000 47-51-34.0 N NH MD WML628 071-02-07.3 W 0004760100 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BRENTWOOD 06/10/2011 06034.15000 43-01-09.7 N NH MD WMN299 071-16-02.1 W 0004760123 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CANDIA 06/10/2011 06286.19000 43-03-11.8 N NH MD WMN299 071-16-02.1 W 0004760123 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CANDIA 06/10/2011 11622.50000 43-03-11.8 N CA MD WPXH205 118-06-22.4 W 0004760136 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Cerritos 06/10/2011 10657.50000 33-52-29.0 N CA MD WPXH205 118-06-22.4 W 0004760136 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Cerritos 06/10/2011 11525.00000 33-52-29.0 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307529A1.txt
  • MS NE 089-21-06.8 W 0004760462 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatBruce 06/10/2011 06645.00000 34-02-41.4 N MS NE 088-20-31.7 W 0004760464 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatWise Gap 06/10/2011 06765.00000 33-52-47.0 N MS NE 088-20-31.7 W 0004760464 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatWise Gap 06/10/2011 06855.00000 33-52-47.0 N MS NE 088-22-01.2 W 0004760465 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatAmory 06/10/2011 06605.00000 34-01-28.6 N MS NE 088-36-02.1 W 0004760467 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatQuitman 06/10/2011 06595.00000 32-01-03.0 N MS NE 088-35-07.4 W 0004760469 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatMiddleton 06/10/2011 05945.20000 32-12-32.8 N MS NE 088-35-07.4 W 0004760469 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatMiddleton 06/10/2011 06004.50000 32-12-32.8 N MS NE 088-35-07.4 W 0004760469 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatMiddleton 06/10/2011 06034.15000 32-12-32.8 N MS NE 088-35-07.4 W 0004760469 State of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307791A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307791A1.txt
  • MD WMM368 084-51-06.0 W 0004771497 Cellco Partnership GLENCOE 06/17/2011 06093.45000 38-43-25.0 N KY MD WMM368 084-51-06.0 W 0004771497 Cellco Partnership GLENCOE 06/17/2011 11325.00000 38-43-25.0 N ME MD WPNL469 068-00-09.0 W 0004771563 MAINE RSA #1, INC. VAN BUREN 06/17/2011 06256.54000 47-08-45.0 N ME MD WPNL469 068-00-09.0 W 0004771563 MAINE RSA #1, INC. VAN BUREN 06/17/2011 06585.00000 47-08-45.0 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0004771575 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 06/17/2011 05945.20000 46-44-22.2 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0004771575 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 06/17/2011 06004.50000 46-44-22.2 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0004771575 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 06/17/2011 06785.00000 46-44-22.2 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0004771575 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 06/17/2011 10552.50000 46-44-22.2 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308078A1.txt
  • Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OK MD KNKN730 095-59-26.0 W 0004780629 TEXAS RSA 7B1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIBENNINGTON 06/24/2011 34-01-33.9 N OK MD KNKN730 096-08-46.0 W 0004780629 TEXAS RSA 7B1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIBOKCHITO 06/24/2011 34-01-44.6 N TX MD KNKN730 096-12-31.9 W 0004780629 TEXAS RSA 7B1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIBONHAM 06/24/2011 33-33-37.5 N TX MD KNKN730 095-42-02.1 W 0004780629 TEXAS RSA 7B1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIBrashear 06/24/2011 33-00-02.4 N TX MD KNKN730 096-16-36.2 W 0004780629 TEXAS RSA 7B1 LIMITED PARTNERSHICADDO MILLS 06/24/2011 33-08-48.4 N TX MD KNKN730 095-55-29.5 W 0004780629 TEXAS RSA 7B1 LIMITED PARTNERSHICAMPBELL 06/24/2011 33-07-44.6 N OK MD KNKN730 096-27-25.2 W 0004780629 TEXAS RSA 7B1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIColbert 06/24/2011 33-54-47.8 N TX MD KNKN730 095-39-17.6 W 0004780629 TEXAS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308225A1.txt
  • 30-47-22.7 N MS MD WQJI381 089-46-47.5 W 0004781947 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPoplarville 06/27/2011 06063.80000 30-47-22.7 N MS MD WQJI381 089-46-47.5 W 0004781947 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPoplarville 06/27/2011 06093.45000 30-47-22.7 N MS MD WQJI381 089-46-47.5 W 0004781947 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPoplarville 06/27/2011 06123.10000 30-47-22.7 N MS MD WQKA323 091-29-10.5 W 0004781948 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatRoxi 06/27/2011 06601.25000 31-04-02.1 N MS MD WQKA323 091-29-10.5 W 0004781948 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatRoxi 06/27/2011 06675.00000 31-04-02.1 N MS MD WQKA276 091-13-24.2 W 0004781949 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatWoodville 06/27/2011 06588.75000 31-05-03.7 N MS MD WQKA276 091-13-24.2 W 0004781949 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatWoodville 06/27/2011 06615.00000 31-05-03.7 N MS MD WQKA272 090-46-10.6 W 0004781950 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatLiberty 06/27/2011 06743.75000 31-07-43.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308228A1.txt
  • 44-56-30.3 N WV MD WML682 081-36-12.2 W 0004782164 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCHARLESTON 06/27/2011 11235.00000 38-26-36.4 N WV MD WML682 081-36-12.2 W 0004782164 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCHARLESTON 06/27/2011 11285.00000 38-26-36.4 N NJ MD WQMK387 073-55-21.0 W 0004782195 Goosetown Network Services, LLC ALPINE 06/27/2011 11245.00000 40-57-39.0 N HI MD WLK718 157-49-51.0 W 0004782267 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHONOLULU 06/27/2011 19615.00000 21-17-02.1 N Page 8 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI MD WLK717 157-50-21.0 W 0004782282 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHONOLULU 06/27/2011 18055.00000 21-17-47.0 N WV MD WMW949 080-31-08.2 W 0004782565 HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPASBURY 06/27/2011 06345.49000 37-47-34.4 N WV MD
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308247A1.doc
  • report will be presented to the NANC for endorsement and forwarded to the FCC. The NANPA reported its monthly numbering activities to the NANC and the NOWG. The reports were consistently completed and delivered as required. In addition, in 2010 the NANPA provided monthly reports to the FCC and made presentations at the February, May, October and December NANC meetings. 2.1 Monthly Reports to the FCC As per Section 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5 of the NANPA Technical Requirements Document, the NANPA reported monthly to the FCC on activity in applications, assignments and denials in Central Office (CO) Codes and other numbering resources, as well as the status of and updates on NPA Relief activities. 2.2 NANC Reports In its presentations at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308346A1.txt
  • N FL MD WQMZ658 081-22-34.0 W 0004792188 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrlando 07/06/2011 21275.00000 28-31-32.0 N WA MD KZV55 117-50-50.4 W 0004792260 BNSF Railway Co. TYLER 07/06/2011 06585.00000 47-22-47.3 N WA MD KZV55 117-50-50.4 W 0004792260 BNSF Railway Co. TYLER 07/06/2011 06655.00000 47-22-47.3 N WA MD KZV55 117-50-50.4 W 0004792260 BNSF Railway Co. TYLER 07/06/2011 06685.00000 47-22-47.3 N WA MD KZV57 118-41-02.1 W 0004792267 BNSF Railway Co. LIND 07/06/2011 06665.00000 46-55-35.5 N WA MD KZV57 118-41-02.1 W 0004792267 BNSF Railway Co. LIND 07/06/2011 06705.00000 46-55-35.5 N WA MD KZV65 119-06-08.9 W 0004792270 BNSF Railway Co. PASCO 07/06/2011 06765.00000 46-16-25.0 N WA MD KZV67 117-18-09.3 W 0004792276 BNSF Railway Co. SPOKANE 07/06/2011 05974.85000 47-37-03.3 N WA MD KZV67 117-18-09.3 W 0004792276 BNSF Railway
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308471A1.txt
  • of Texas, L.P.Hillsboro 07/12/2011 10775.00000 32-41-47.6 N ME NE 069-07-35.0 W 0004800128 MAINE RSA #1, INC. Brooks 07/12/2011 06063.80000 44-32-20.3 N Page 18 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE 096-50-12.0 W 0004800232 airBand Communications, Inc. Plano 07/12/2011 11445.00000 33-01-02.1 N AZ NE 111-57-24.6 W 0004800237 airBand Communications, Inc. Tempe 07/12/2011 23130.00000 33-25-49.1 N NY NE 078-40-13.0 W 0004800319 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC KILL BUCK 07/12/2011 06093.45000 42-10-10.0 N PA NE 078-37-28.6 W 0004800346 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BRADFORD 07/12/2011 06345.49000 41-57-07.0 N CA NE 120-48-52.7 W 0004800756 GTE Mobilnet of Santa Barbara Limited PaTempleton 07/13/2011 05945.20000 35-32-10.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308473A1.txt
  • 100-42-44.9 W 0004802820 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Loraine 07/14/2011 06375.14000 32-24-10.7 N TX MD WQIF973 100-42-44.9 W 0004802820 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Loraine 07/14/2011 11245.00000 32-24-10.7 N TX MD WQIF973 100-42-44.9 W 0004802820 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Loraine 07/14/2011 11285.00000 32-24-10.7 N TX MD WQIF973 100-42-44.9 W 0004802820 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Loraine 07/14/2011 11325.00000 32-24-10.7 N TX MD WQIB382 100-01-02.1 W 0004802821 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Merkel 07/14/2011 11215.00000 32-28-05.4 N TX MD WQIB382 100-01-02.1 W 0004802821 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Merkel 07/14/2011 11285.00000 32-28-05.4 N TX MD WQIB382 100-01-02.1 W 0004802821 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Merkel 07/14/2011 11405.00000 32-28-05.4 N TX MD WQIB382 100-01-02.1 W 0004802821 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Merkel 07/14/2011 11485.00000 32-28-05.4 N TX MD WQIB385 099-41-38.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308627A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308627A1.txt
  • 30-28-36.5 N FL MD WQNY719 083-54-12.4 W 0004811877 North Florida Broadband Authority MONTICELLO 07/22/2011 11225.00000 30-28-36.5 N Page 3 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL MD WQNY719 083-54-12.4 W 0004811877 North Florida Broadband Authority MONTICELLO 07/22/2011 11345.00000 30-28-36.5 N FL MD WQNY722 083-16-02.1 W 0004811879 North Florida Broadband Authority LEE 07/22/2011 06093.45000 30-22-10.1 N FL MD WQNY722 083-16-02.1 W 0004811879 North Florida Broadband Authority LEE 07/22/2011 10815.00000 30-22-10.1 N FL MD WQNY777 082-58-18.2 W 0004811881 North Florida Broadband Authority OLD TOWN 07/22/2011 06226.89000 29-33-31.5 N FL MD WQNY777 082-58-18.2 W 0004811881 North Florida Broadband Authority OLD TOWN 07/22/2011 11345.00000 29-33-31.5 N FL MD
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A2.txt
  • having separate legal personality). 1.4 The schedules form part of these terms and conditions. 1.5 A reference to writing or written includes faxes and e-mails. 1.6 Any obligation in these terms and conditions on a person not to do something includes, without limitation, an obligation not to agree, allow, permit or acquiesce in that thing being done. 2. SamKnows' Obligations 2.1 Subject to the Participant complying fully with these terms and conditions, SamKnows shall use reasonable endeavors to: (a) provide the Services under these terms and conditions; (b) supply the Participant with the Whitebox and instructions detailing how it should be connected to the Participant's Connection Equipment; and (c) if requested, SamKnows will provide a pre-paid postage label for the Whitebox
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308837A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308837A1.txt
  • MD WPTY566 122-37-30.1 W 0004820638 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Yreka 07/29/2011 06565.00000 41-36-36.8 N CA MD WPTY566 122-37-30.1 W 0004820638 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Yreka 07/29/2011 11215.00000 41-36-36.8 N CA MD WPTY566 122-37-30.1 W 0004820638 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Yreka 07/29/2011 19375.00000 41-36-36.8 N MO MD WPQL555 092-31-30.7 W 0004820721 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCCalifornia 07/29/2011 06745.00000 38-37-02.1 N MO MD WPQL555 092-31-30.7 W 0004820721 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCCalifornia 07/29/2011 06775.00000 38-37-02.1 N MO MD WPQL555 092-31-30.7 W 0004820721 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCCalifornia 07/29/2011 06815.00000 38-37-02.1 N MO MD WPQL555 092-31-30.7 W 0004820721 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCCalifornia 07/29/2011 06835.00000 38-37-02.1 N CA MD WQNN935 122-23-20.1 W 0004820863 WiLine Networks Inc. San Francisco 07/29/2011 22725.00000 37-46-13.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308979A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308979A1.txt
  • 41-28-55.0 N OH NE 084-06-51.8 W 0004829365 SW Networks Delta 08/05/2011 06685.00000 41-33-06.8 N OH NE 084-06-51.8 W 0004829365 SW Networks Delta 08/05/2011 06845.00000 41-33-06.8 N OH NE 083-54-21.4 W 0004829370 SW Networks SWANTON 08/05/2011 06375.14000 41-36-13.0 N OH NE 083-54-21.4 W 0004829370 SW Networks SWANTON 08/05/2011 06685.00000 41-36-13.0 N IL NE 087-41-09.7 W 0004829374 SW Networks MARKHAM 08/05/2011 06034.15000 41-35-02.1 N IL NE 087-41-09.7 W 0004829374 SW Networks MARKHAM 08/05/2011 06286.19000 41-35-02.1 N OH NE 083-42-19.0 W 0004829378 SW Networks TOLEDO 08/05/2011 06123.10000 41-38-41.0 N OH NE 083-42-19.0 W 0004829378 SW Networks TOLEDO 08/05/2011 06375.14000 41-38-41.0 N OH NE 083-28-40.9 W 0004829382 SW Networks PERRYSVILLE 08/05/2011 06123.10000 41-30-52.3 N IN NE 087-28-01.0 W 0004829387 SW Networks HIGHLAND 08/05/2011 06034.15000 41-31-59.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309336A1.txt
  • AM WPSN554 066-17-41.2 W 0004782246 AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico Inc. DORADO 08/24/2011 11637.50000 18-24-52.5 N PR AM WPSN554 066-17-41.2 W 0004782246 AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico Inc. DORADO 08/24/2011 19345.00000 18-24-52.5 N PR AM WPSN554 066-17-41.2 W 0004782246 AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico Inc. DORADO 08/24/2011 19490.00000 18-24-52.5 N HI AM WLK718 157-49-51.0 W 0004782267 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHONOLULU 08/24/2011 19615.00000 21-17-02.1 N HI AM WLK717 157-50-21.0 W 0004782282 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHONOLULU 08/24/2011 18055.00000 21-17-47.0 N TX AM WQBB393 097-56-52.1 W 0004785959 CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF TPawnee 08/22/2011 05974.85000 28-35-42.8 N TX AM WQBB393 097-56-52.1 W 0004785959 CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF TPawnee 08/22/2011 06034.15000 28-35-42.8 N TX AM WQAX614 097-48-04.0 W 0004785984 CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF TPettus 08/22/2011 06256.54000 28-37-05.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309456A1.txt
  • 34-35-15.5 N GA MD KNKN697 084-41-17.6 W 0004857016 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Fairmount 08/29/2011 34-26-40.7 N GA MD KNKN697 083-43-29.4 W 0004857016 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hiawassee 08/29/2011 34-50-13.5 N GA MD KNKN697 083-43-48.8 W 0004857016 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HIAWASSEE 08/29/2011 34-57-13.5 N GA MD KNKN697 084-30-19.6 W 0004857016 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Jasper 08/29/2011 34-27-02.1 N GA MD KNKN697 084-20-20.5 W 0004857016 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Jasper 08/29/2011 34-29-17.2 N Page 24 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GA MD KNKN697 084-19-23.4 W 0004857016 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC MARBLEHILL 08/29/2011 34-24-44.7 N GA MD KNKN697 084-11-16.5 W 0004857016 New
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309559A1.txt
  • - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WLS684 124-12-07.2 W 0004865242 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership Humboldt Hill 09/06/2011 10637.50000 40-42-51.4 N CA MD WLS684 124-12-07.2 W 0004865242 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership Humboldt Hill 09/06/2011 10647.50000 40-42-51.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0004865243 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership SCOTIA 09/06/2011 05945.20000 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0004865243 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership SCOTIA 09/06/2011 06034.15000 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0004865243 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership SCOTIA 09/06/2011 06063.80000 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0004865243 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership SCOTIA 09/06/2011 06093.45000 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309688A1.txt
  • PCS, LLCBOONVILLE 09/15/2011 38-56-14.4 N MO MD KNKN570 092-45-24.6 W 0004876241 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBOONVILLE 09/15/2011 38-57-11.0 N MO MD KNKN570 092-48-50.3 W 0004876241 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBUNCETON 09/15/2011 38-47-37.9 N MO MD KNKN570 093-16-23.6 W 0004876241 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCole Camp 09/15/2011 38-27-29.8 N MO MD KNKN570 092-40-49.3 W 0004876241 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFayette 09/15/2011 39-09-02.1 N MO MD KNKN570 092-27-42.7 W 0004876241 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHARRISBURG 09/15/2011 39-08-05.9 N MO MD KNKN570 093-44-27.5 W 0004876241 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHigginsville 09/15/2011 39-04-19.8 N MO MD KNKN570 094-00-43.3 W 0004876241 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHolden 09/15/2011 38-43-34.2 N MO MD KNKN570 093-59-48.8 W 0004876241 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHOLDEN 09/15/2011 38-50-59.2 N MO MD KNKN570
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309689A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309689A1.txt
  • (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI MD WQCM451 086-14-15.6 W 0004876683 RADIO LICENSE HOLDING CBC, LLC Muskegon 09/15/2011 00947.50000 43-11-27.4 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI AM WLK718 157-49-51.0 W 0004782267 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHONOLULU 09/16/2011 19615.00000 21-17-02.1 N Page 1 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI AM WLK717 157-50-21.0 W 0004782282 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHONOLULU 09/16/2011 18055.00000 21-17-47.0 N OK AM WPJD252 096-16-46.0 W 0004857242 USCOC OF GREATER OKLAHOMA, LLCKELLYVILLE 09/16/2011 06004.50000 35-56-09.3 N OK
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309858A1.pdf
  • Professional (ST) Other Total Total 15 to 20 years More than 20 years *AES prescribed items ** Sum of responses excluding DNK/NBJ 11 Percentages are weighted to represent the Agency's population. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 2011 FEDERAL EMPLOYEE VIEWPOINT SURVEY RESULTS 93.How long have you been with your current agency (for example, Department of Justice, Environmental Protection Agency)? N % 17 2.1 68 8.4 64 7.9 112 13.8 268 33.0 283 34.9 812 100.0 94.Are you considering leaving your organization within the next year, and if so, why? N % 647 79.7 55 6.8 56 6.9 32 3.9 22 2.7 812 100.0 95.I am planning to retire: N % 28 3.5 100 12.4 90 11.1 591 73.1 809 100.0 Less than 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309881A1.txt
  • 0004757179 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC SOUR LAKE 09/21/2011 30-09-48.8 N TX AM KNKA454 094-01-48.6 W 0004757179 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC VIDOR 09/21/2011 30-06-34.8 N TX AM KNKA454 093-56-52.6 W 0004757179 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC VIDOR 09/21/2011 30-08-14.8 N TX AM KNKA454 094-23-30.8 W 0004757179 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Village Mills 09/21/2011 30-27-56.2 N TX AM KNKA454 094-30-02.1 W 0004757179 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Winnie 09/21/2011 29-50-38.5 N TX AM KNKA454 094-20-55.0 W 0004757179 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC WINNIE 09/21/2011 29-51-32.0 N OK MD KNKQ420 094-57-41.6 W 0004878376 Oklahoma RSA #4 South Partnership KEYS 09/19/2011 35-48-05.0 N IA MD KNKA658 096-23-39.1 W 0004879218 Sioux City MSA Limited Partnership SIOUX CITY 09/19/2011 42-32-36.0 N WV MD KNKN739
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
  • 6 6 Total 8,039 11,242 19,280 18,076 35,796 24,793 17,117 20,847 31,734 1,237 149,599 168,879 Percentages aDSL 2.9 3.3 6.2 5.4 16.4 29.7 31.3 8.4 2.6 0.1 93.8 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.6 34.8 20.6 6.1 1.1 * * 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.3 10.1 56.3 15.5 2.4 3.5 5.0 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 0.3 1.8 2.1 0.1 1.9 5.1 6.5 23.5 59.7 1.2 97.9 100.0 FTTP * * 0.1 0.3 1.1 2.4 4.7 2.2 77.1 12.2 99.9 100.0 Satellite * * 82.8 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.2 100.0 Fixed Wireless 6.5 2.8 9.3 12.8 25.9 31.0 16.7 2.2 1.8 0.4 90.7 100.0 Mobile Wireless 7.7 10.5 18.2 19.1 34.9 14.5 4.6 8.8 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310264A1.txt
  • 3.6 3.7 Eight 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.4 3.5 Nine 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 Ten or More 35.3 34.0 33.5 33.1 33.6 44.7 44.0 44.0 46.6 45.7 Zero 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.8% 2.6% 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% 0.4% 0.4% One 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.4 0.9 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.8 Two 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.1 Three 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 Four 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.3 Five 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.4 Six 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.5 Seven 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.3 1.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310317A1.txt
  • COELDON 10/06/2011 06256.54000 40-56-10.0 N IA MD WMS341 092-10-17.0 W 0004902948 FARMERS CELLULAR TELEPHONE COELDON 10/06/2011 06286.19000 40-56-10.0 N IA MD WMS341 092-10-17.0 W 0004902948 FARMERS CELLULAR TELEPHONE COELDON 10/06/2011 06315.84000 40-56-10.0 N IA MD WMS341 092-10-17.0 W 0004902948 FARMERS CELLULAR TELEPHONE COELDON 10/06/2011 06345.49000 40-56-10.0 N MO MD WPQL555 092-31-30.7 W 0004903037 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCCALIFORNIA 10/06/2011 05974.85000 38-37-02.1 N MO MD WPQL555 092-31-30.7 W 0004903037 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCCALIFORNIA 10/06/2011 06745.00000 38-37-02.1 N MO MD WPQL555 092-31-30.7 W 0004903037 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCCALIFORNIA 10/06/2011 06775.00000 38-37-02.1 N MO MD WLR441 092-17-21.1 W 0004903171 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCSAPP 10/06/2011 06226.89000 38-46-50.3 N MO MD WLR441 092-17-21.1 W 0004903171 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCSAPP 10/06/2011 06256.54000 38-46-50.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310318A1.txt
  • 11637.50000 18-24-31.2 N PR MD WMN627 066-09-41.7 W 0004903747 AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico Inc. BAYAMON 10/06/2011 19675.00000 18-24-31.2 N GA MD WQNW970 082-00-32.4 W 0004903958 TOWER CLOUD, INC. WAYNESBORO 10/06/2011 11345.00000 33-05-56.5 N GA MD WQNW967 081-57-48.0 W 0004903960 TOWER CLOUD, INC. Green's Cut 10/06/2011 10855.00000 33-11-50.2 N GA MD WQNW973 082-24-25.8 W 0004903974 TOWER CLOUD, INC. Appling 10/06/2011 10775.00000 33-37-02.1 N GA MD WQNW973 082-24-25.8 W 0004903974 TOWER CLOUD, INC. Appling 10/06/2011 11385.00000 33-37-02.1 N GA MD WQNW976 082-16-04.5 W 0004903980 TOWER CLOUD, INC. Appling 10/06/2011 10775.00000 33-37-16.9 N GA MD WQNW976 082-16-04.5 W 0004903980 TOWER CLOUD, INC. Appling 10/06/2011 10855.00000 33-37-16.9 N GA MD WQNW976 082-16-04.5 W 0004903980 TOWER CLOUD, INC. Appling 10/06/2011 10895.00000 33-37-16.9 N TX MD WQNL702
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310456A1.txt
  • 0004906447 Alltel Communications, LLC SANTA FE 10/11/2011 19525.00000 35-34-00.1 N NM MD WPOQ771 106-04-21.0 W 0004906447 Alltel Communications, LLC SANTA FE 10/11/2011 19615.00000 35-34-00.1 N NM MD WPON200 106-06-47.1 W 0004906448 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC La Cienega 10/11/2011 17845.00000 35-34-50.1 N NM MD WPON200 106-06-47.1 W 0004906448 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC La Cienega 10/11/2011 17965.00000 35-34-50.1 N AK MD WGX538 150-07-02.1 W 0004906495 Matanuska Telephone Association, Inc. TALKEETNA 10/11/2011 06765.00000 62-19-17.2 N LA MD WQEZ296 090-05-31.8 W 0004906501 Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems of Allentown,Covington 10/11/2011 05945.20000 30-26-14.0 N LA MD WQEZ296 090-05-31.8 W 0004906501 Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems of Allentown,Covington 10/11/2011 05974.85000 30-26-14.0 N LA MD WQEZ296 090-05-31.8 W 0004906501 Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems of Allentown,Covington 10/11/2011 06004.50000 30-26-14.0 N LA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310475A1.txt
  • CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave Broadband Division 09/11/2011 WQLN224 FXO MetroPCS California, LLC 17995.00000000 Lompoc 34-44-31.1 N CA 120-26-49.2 W2 1 Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. IG - Industrial/Business Pool, Conventional Mobility Division 09/09/2011 KNAY784 FB2 ENERGY NORTHWEST 452.03750000 RICHLAND 46-28-17.5 N WA 119-20-2.1 W 1 1 09/09/2011 KNAY784 FB2 ENERGY NORTHWEST 452.26250000 RICHLAND 46-28-17.5 N WA 119-20-2.1 W 1 1 09/09/2011 KNAY784 FB2 ENERGY NORTHWEST 452.63750000 RICHLAND 46-28-17.5 N WA 119-20-2.1 W 1 1 09/09/2011 KNAY784 FB2 ENERGY NORTHWEST 452.98750000 RICHLAND 46-28-17.5 N WA 119-20-2.1 W 1 1 09/09/2011 KNAY784 FB2 ENERGY NORTHWEST 461.46250000 RICHLAND 46-28-17.5 N WA 119-20-2.1 W 1 1 Page
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310633A1.txt
  • 40-56-49.0 N IL NE 088-18-18.6 W 0004919411 World Class Wireless, LLC Yorkville 10/20/2011 11215.00000 41-34-42.2 N MO NE P 090-25-22.1 W 0004919414 CITY OF FARMINGTON FARMINGTON 10/20/2011 00956.36875 37-46-50.1 N IL NE 088-14-11.2 W 0004919415 World Class Wireless, LLC EOLA 10/20/2011 10715.00000 41-47-57.3 N IL NE 088-14-11.2 W 0004919415 World Class Wireless, LLC EOLA 10/20/2011 10755.00000 41-47-57.3 N PA NE 078-15-02.1 W 0004919423 World Class Wireless, LLC Sandy Ridge 10/20/2011 05945.20000 40-46-42.2 N PA NE 078-15-02.1 W 0004919423 World Class Wireless, LLC Sandy Ridge 10/20/2011 06123.10000 40-46-42.2 N PA NE 078-58-11.1 W 0004919432 World Class Wireless, LLC ROCHESTER MILLS 10/20/2011 06197.24000 40-47-49.2 N Page 48 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310781A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310781A1.txt
  • W 0004924493 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Camp Pendleton No 10/24/2011 11665.00000 33-21-12.4 N CA MD WQFL562 117-20-29.2 W 0004924494 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Camp Pendleton 10/24/2011 17760.00000 33-19-05.3 N CA MD WQFL562 117-20-29.2 W 0004924494 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Camp Pendleton 10/24/2011 17855.00000 33-19-05.3 N VI MD WQBK439 064-56-38.6 W 0004924505 CHOICE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC St. Thomas 10/24/2011 19440.00000 18-21-15.2 N TX MD WQGK214 097-06-02.1 W 0004924535 AirCanopy Internet Services Itasca 10/24/2011 10815.00000 32-09-54.2 N TX MD WQKH408 096-51-00.5 W 0004924553 AirCanopy Internet Services Waxahachie 10/24/2011 11385.00000 32-26-23.9 N Page 6 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WQID407 096-46-54.0 W 0004924566 AirCanopy Internet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310871A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310871A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310871A1.txt
  • For instance, shortly after the WTO accord of 1997, the world's telecom market stood at U.S. $602 billion. The Telecommunications Industry Association projects $4.3 trillion in global telecom spending this year. TIA expects that figure to climb to $5.31 trillion in 2014. At the same time, worldwide Internet usage grew from a mere 400 million users in 2000 to over 2.1 billion today. Similarly, world-wide mobile phone subscriptions rose from 700 million in 2000 to over 5.7 billion as of this summer. Indeed, we cannot ignore the unfolding revolution in how we connect to the Internet for information, products and services. In the United States, a large percentage of younger and minority citizens increasingly access the Internet through mobile devices. According
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311016A1.txt
  • FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21975.00000000 Lafayette 40-0-44.1 N CO 105-7-55.6 W 1 1 10/07/2011 WQLR498 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22175.00000000 Lafayette 40-0-44.1 N CO 105-7-55.6 W 2 1 10/07/2011 WQLR498 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22325.00000000 Lafayette 40-0-44.1 N CO 105-7-55.6 W 2 1 10/07/2011 WQLR500 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11225.00000000 Ft Collins 40-35-2.1 N CO 105-4-30.6 W 1 1 10/07/2011 WQLR500 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11345.00000000 Ft Collins 40-35-2.1 N CO 105-4-30.6 W 1 1 10/07/2011 WQLR500 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11505.00000000 Ft Collins 40-35-2.1 N CO 105-4-30.6 W 2 1 10/07/2011 WQLR500 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11585.00000000 Ft Collins 40-35-2.1 N CO 105-4-30.6 W 2 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311026A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311026A1.txt
  • 0004757179 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC SOUR LAKE 11/07/2011 30-09-48.8 N TX AM KNKA454 094-01-48.6 W 0004757179 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC VIDOR 11/07/2011 30-06-34.8 N TX AM KNKA454 093-56-52.6 W 0004757179 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC VIDOR 11/07/2011 30-08-14.8 N TX AM KNKA454 094-23-30.8 W 0004757179 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Village Mills 11/07/2011 30-27-56.2 N TX AM KNKA454 094-30-02.1 W 0004757179 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Winnie 11/07/2011 29-50-38.5 N TX AM KNKA454 094-20-55.0 W 0004757179 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC WINNIE 11/07/2011 29-51-32.0 N MI AM KNKN842 084-08-17.0 W 0004826203 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ALGER 11/09/2011 44-08-24.0 N MI AM KNKN842 083-39-44.4 W 0004826203 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Au Gres 11/09/2011 44-04-35.1 N Page 22 CL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311141A1.txt
  • the pre-grant notice and petition procedure of Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL NE 080-55-38.2 W 0004956395 Massey Ranch Airpark Inc. Edgewater 11/16/2011 00122.70000 28-58-52.0 N AK NE 151-20-02.1 W 0004958393 Union Oil Company of California Cook Inlet 11/17/2011 00123.05000 60-57-41.0 N AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI MD WMV674 084-29-24.0 W 0004951560 NORTHERN STAR BROADCASTING, L.LCHEBOYGAN 11/14/2011 00945.25000 45-39-30.2 N MI MD WMV674 084-29-24.0 W 0004951560 NORTHERN STAR BROADCASTING, L.LCHEBOYGAN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311142A1.txt
  • W 0004962148 Bresnan Communications, LLC Riverton 11/18/2011 06256.54000 43-01-34.0 N WY MD WQNF445 108-45-50.0 W 0004962156 Bresnan Communications, LLC Lander 11/18/2011 06004.50000 42-49-16.0 N Page 45 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NV NE 115-13-25.1 W 0004954505 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILas Vegas 11/15/2011 19375.00000 36-06-02.1 N NV NE 115-13-25.1 W 0004954505 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILas Vegas 11/15/2011 19475.00000 36-06-02.1 N IL NE 090-01-49.4 W 0004954647 Ameren Services Co. Canton 11/15/2011 06197.24000 40-32-06.1 N IL NE 090-01-49.4 W 0004954647 Ameren Services Co. Canton 11/15/2011 06635.00000 40-32-06.1 N IL NE 089-39-43.6 W 0004954654 Ameren Services Co. Bartonville 11/15/2011 06286.19000 40-35-43.3 N IL NE 089-39-43.6 W 0004954654 Ameren
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311144A1.txt
  • of Education Fresno 11/17/2011 11425.00000 36-44-10.1 N Page 9 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 119-47-29.4 W 0004957960 Fresno County Office of Education Fresno 11/17/2011 11665.00000 36-44-10.1 N CA NE 119-33-37.9 W 0004957961 Fresno County Office of Education Sanger 11/17/2011 10775.00000 36-42-02.1 N CA NE 119-33-37.9 W 0004957961 Fresno County Office of Education Sanger 11/17/2011 10935.00000 36-42-02.1 N CA RM WPUC561 120-40-38.0 W 0004953275 San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo 11/14/2011 06795.00000 35-18-07.0 N NJ RM WPTY348 074-31-50.3 W 0004954426 County of Burlington, Public Safety CenterJENKINS 11/15/2011 06585.00000 39-42-28.6 N NJ RM WPTY348 074-31-50.3 W 0004954426 County of Burlington, Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311240A1.txt
  • New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEWCOMERSTOW 11/22/2011 40-13-43.9 N Page 13 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH AM KNKN713 080-49-44.6 W 0004360453 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Powhatan Point 11/22/2011 39-51-05.2 N OH AM KNKN713 080-57-34.3 W 0004360453 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Sardis 11/22/2011 39-37-02.1 N OH AM KNKN713 080-52-11.8 W 0004360453 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Sardis 11/22/2011 39-42-39.4 N OH AM KNKN713 080-52-39.4 W 0004360453 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC SARDIS 11/22/2011 39-39-32.4 N OH AM KNKN713 081-08-06.2 W 0004360453 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Scio 11/22/2011 40-19-59.1 N OH AM KNKN713 081-31-12.0 W 0004360453 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Strasburg 11/22/2011 40-35-39.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311248A1.txt
  • HOLDINGS III, LLC 23575.00000000 Bronx 40-49-36.5 N NY 73-51-38.9 W 4 1 10/23/2011 WQLT839 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23075.00000000 Kearny 40-46-13.6 N NJ 74-8-3.2 W 2 1 10/23/2011 WQLT839 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23225.00000000 Kearny 40-46-13.6 N NJ 74-8-3.2 W 3 1 10/23/2011 WQLT847 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19375.00000000 New York 40-44-19.7 N NY 73-47-2.1 W 4 1 10/23/2011 WQLT847 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19475.00000000 New York 40-44-19.7 N NY 73-47-2.1 W 4 1 10/23/2011 WQLT848 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23025.00000000 Bronx 40-52-38.6 N NY 73-51-42.8 W 1 1 10/23/2011 WQLT848 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23225.00000000 Bronx 40-52-38.6 N NY 73-51-42.8 W 1 1 10/23/2011 WQLT848 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311375A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311375A1.txt
  • Flin 34-12-43.1 N CA 118-13-7.7 W 1 1 10/28/2011 WQLU694 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19525.00000000 City of Industry 34-0-33.8 N CA 117-51-3.6 W 1 1 10/28/2011 WQLU694 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19625.00000000 City of Industry 34-0-33.8 N CA 117-51-3.6 W 1 1 10/28/2011 WQLU695 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21825.00000000 Los Angeles 34-3-27.4 N CA 117-45-2.1 W 1 1 10/28/2011 WQLU695 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21975.00000000 Los Angeles 34-3-27.4 N CA 117-45-2.1 W 1 1 10/28/2011 WQLU695 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19375.00000000 Los Angeles 34-3-27.4 N CA 117-45-2.1 W 2 1 10/28/2011 WQLU695 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19475.00000000 Los Angeles 34-3-27.4 N CA 117-45-2.1 W 2 1 10/28/2011 WQLU696 FXO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311377A1.txt
  • NE 079-05-40.7 W 0004972833 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPAWLEY'S ISLAND 11/30/2011 05974.85000 33-29-53.8 N TX NE 097-18-21.0 W 0004972838 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Lincoln 11/30/2011 11385.00000 30-11-38.3 N NY NE 074-28-06.4 W 0004972902 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC WARNERVILLE 11/30/2011 06315.84000 42-39-56.4 N SC NE 078-59-24.0 W 0004973130 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSURFSIDE BEACH 11/30/2011 06226.89000 33-36-29.0 N TX NE 095-42-02.1 W 0004973154 Texas RSA 7B1 Limited Partnership Brashear 11/30/2011 05974.85000 33-00-02.4 N TX NE 095-39-15.5 W 0004973168 Texas RSA 7B1 Limited Partnership Sulphur Springs 11/30/2011 06226.89000 33-06-43.8 N NY NE 078-50-33.8 W 0004973190 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Cold Spring 11/30/2011 06256.54000 42-07-32.2 N NY NE 077-07-01.4 W 0004973196 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Lindley 11/30/2011 11285.00000 42-01-34.8 N NY NE 077-07-54.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311481A1.txt
  • 10835.00000 44-04-10.5 N WI NE 089-16-47.7 W 0004984155 Waushara, County of Wautoma 12/08/2011 10875.00000 44-04-10.5 N AZ NE 112-26-32.3 W 0004984442 Dysart Unified School District SURPRISE 12/08/2011 17755.00000 33-37-11.6 N NV NE 116-00-59.3 W 0004984704 State of Nevada Dept. of Information TechELKO 12/08/2011 06123.10000 40-43-21.7 N NV NE 119-15-58.4 W 0004984708 State of Nevada Dept. of Information TechFernley 12/08/2011 10715.00000 39-37-02.1 N NV NE 118-28-20.9 W 0004984710 State of Nevada Dept. of Information TechLovelock 12/08/2011 06226.89000 40-10-40.5 N WA NE 120-43-48.8 W 0004986093 KLICKITAT, COUNTY OF GOLDENDALE 12/09/2011 00954.35000 45-44-25.4 N WA NE 120-22-55.9 W 0004986127 KLICKITAT, COUNTY OF BICKLETON 12/09/2011 00957.95000 45-59-30.8 N RO WPTT868 0004979987 WILLIAMSON, COUNTY OF 12/05/2011 RO WPUB373 0004979988 WILLIAMSON, COUNTY OF 12/05/2011 RO WPUB374 0004979989
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311482A1.txt
  • W 0004976816 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership DESERT CENTER 12/02/2011 06345.49000 33-57-39.7 N CA MD WQKB906 114-31-20.7 W 0004976816 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership DESERT CENTER 12/02/2011 06375.14000 33-57-39.7 N CA MD WQKB906 114-31-20.7 W 0004976816 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership DESERT CENTER 12/02/2011 06402.32000 33-57-39.7 N AZ MD WML576 110-05-36.9 W 0004976888 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Dragoon 12/02/2011 06197.24000 32-01-02.1 N AZ MD WML576 110-05-36.9 W 0004976888 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Dragoon 12/02/2011 06404.79000 32-01-02.1 N AZ MD WML576 110-05-36.9 W 0004976888 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Dragoon 12/02/2011 06845.00000 32-01-02.1 N AZ MD WML576 110-05-36.9 W 0004976888 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Dragoon 12/02/2011 11285.00000 32-01-02.1 N NM MD WPNG322 106-33-22.1 W 0004976889 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Bernalillo 12/02/2011 06152.75000 35-17-42.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311483A1.txt
  • 39-10-17.0 N MD MD WQHK532 076-37-13.9 W 0004983250 AirBand Communications, Inc. Glen Burnie 12/07/2011 10995.00000 39-10-17.0 N MD MD WQHK532 076-37-13.9 W 0004983250 AirBand Communications, Inc. Glen Burnie 12/07/2011 11625.00000 39-10-17.0 N MD MD WQHK532 076-37-13.9 W 0004983250 AirBand Communications, Inc. Glen Burnie 12/07/2011 17935.00000 39-10-17.0 N NV MD WQNQ957 115-05-07.8 W 0004983258 airBand Communications, Inc. Sunrise Manor 12/07/2011 10815.00000 36-08-02.1 N NV MD WQNQ957 115-05-07.8 W 0004983258 airBand Communications, Inc. Sunrise Manor 12/07/2011 17790.00000 36-08-02.1 N AL MD WMV987 087-00-27.0 W 0004983373 Cellco Partnership BESSEMER 12/07/2011 06004.50000 33-27-33.4 N AL MD WMV987 087-00-27.0 W 0004983373 Cellco Partnership BESSEMER 12/07/2011 06226.89000 33-27-33.4 N AL MD WMV987 087-00-27.0 W 0004983373 Cellco Partnership BESSEMER 12/07/2011 06345.49000 33-27-33.4 N AL MD WMV987 087-00-27.0 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311523A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311523A1.txt
  • 95.1 98.5 3.4 OHIO 92.2 96.7 4.5 * OKLAHOMA 91.5 95.1 3.6 OREGON 91.2 97.7 6.5 * PENNSYLVANIA 95.1 97.5 2.4 RHODE ISLAND 93.3 97.6 4.3 SOUTH CAROLINA 81.8 95.6 13.8 * SOUTH DAKOTA 92.7 97.8 5.1 * TENNESSEE 87.6 91.4 3.8 TEXAS 89.0 95.8 6.9 * UTAH 90.3 95.8 5.5 * VERMONT 92.7 98.1 5.4 * VIRGINIA 93.1 95.2 2.1 WASHINGTON 92.5 98.4 6.0 * WEST VIRGINIA 88.1 94.7 6.6 * WISCONSIN 94.8 96.3 1.5 WYOMING 89.7 98.2 8.5 * * Increase is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Differences may not appear to equal changes due to rounding. NOVEMBER 1983 JULY 2011 CHANGE 8 Penetration Rate x < 94.6 94.6 <= x < 96.6 96.6 < x Figure
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311599A1.txt
  • 21-18-20.3 N HI MD WQIR578 157-51-10.6 W 0004991686 HONOLULU BOARD OF WATER SUPPLHonolulu 12/14/2011 11095.00000 21-18-20.3 N HI MD WQIR578 157-51-10.6 W 0004991686 HONOLULU BOARD OF WATER SUPPLHonolulu 12/14/2011 11175.00000 21-18-20.3 N HI MD WQIR578 157-51-10.6 W 0004991686 HONOLULU BOARD OF WATER SUPPLHonolulu 12/14/2011 11425.00000 21-18-20.3 N HI MD WQIR330 157-48-33.4 W 0004991688 HONOLULU BOARD OF WATER SUPPLHonolulu 12/14/2011 11465.00000 21-16-02.1 N HI MD WQIR330 157-48-33.4 W 0004991688 HONOLULU BOARD OF WATER SUPPLHonolulu 12/14/2011 11505.00000 21-16-02.1 N Page 3 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI MD WQIR330 157-48-33.4 W 0004991688 HONOLULU BOARD OF WATER SUPPLHonolulu 12/14/2011 11545.00000 21-16-02.1 N HI MD WQIR330 157-48-33.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311727A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311727A1.txt
  • N MI AM KNKN858 085-02-31.0 W 0004802658 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC PARADISE 12/20/2011 46-37-43.0 N MI AM KNKN858 084-21-35.0 W 0004802658 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC PICKFORD 12/20/2011 46-04-53.0 N MI AM KNKN858 086-44-27.0 W 0004802658 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC RAPID RIVER 12/20/2011 45-53-01.0 N MI AM KNKN858 084-33-07.2 W 0004802658 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC RUDYARD 12/20/2011 46-13-02.1 N MI AM KNKN858 084-44-08.1 W 0004802658 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC SAINT IGNACE 12/20/2011 45-51-42.0 N MI AM KNKN858 084-20-26.9 W 0004802658 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC SAULT SAINTE MA 12/20/2011 46-29-53.3 N Page 32 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI AM KNKN858 084-23-15.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • Reported on FCC Form 499-Q: 2009-2011 Table 1.10 Report Table 1.10 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors for 2010-2011 Table 1.11 Report Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms: 2009 & 2010 Chart 1.1 Report Chart 1.1 Distribution of Universal Service Payments: 2010 Table 1.12 Report Table 1.12 Universal Service Support Mechanisms by State: 2010 Tables 1.13 - 1.18Website Table 2.1 Report Table 2.1 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries Table 2.2 Report Table 2.2 Low-Income Support Payments Chart 2.1 Deleted Table 2.3 Report Table 2.3 Average Lifeline Monthly Support by ILEC Status and by State (December 2010) Table 2.4 Report Table 2.6 Low-Income Support Payments by State: 2010 (Years 1998 - 2010 are on the website) Tables 2.5 - 2.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311914A1.txt
  • Applicant Name Latitude City AL MD WHA876 085-25-48.9 W 0005019391 GULF SOUTH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.Dothan 01/06/2012 00948.50000 31-15-09.4 N GA NE 084-56-53.2 W 0005019426 RADIO WEBS, INC. Calhoun 01/06/2012 00947.00000 34-29-55.0 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AK AM WGX538 150-07-02.1 W 0004906495 Matanuska Telephone Association, Inc. TALKEETNA 01/04/2012 06765.00000 62-19-17.2 N OK AM 094-03-14.1 W 0004995570 Pine Telephone Company Inc STRINGTOWN 01/04/2012 11545.00000 34-27-40.0 N NY AM 074-21-23.0 W 0004999453 Goosetown Network Services, LLC ELLENVILLE 01/03/2012 11215.00000 41-41-01.0 N NY AM 074-21-23.0 W 0004999453 Goosetown Network Services, LLC ELLENVILLE 01/03/2012 11405.00000 41-41-01.0 N NC MD WMQ216 081-07-23.0 W 0005013155 USCOC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311988A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311988A1.txt
  • File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR NE 120-10-42.3 W 0005022393 Frontier Telenet Fossil 01/09/2012 19625.00000 45-00-41.0 N OR NE 120-08-15.0 W 0005022440 Frontier Telenet Fossil 01/09/2012 11405.00000 44-53-54.0 N OR NE 118-57-41.5 W 0005022786 Frontier Telenet Canyon City 01/09/2012 23025.00000 44-22-37.8 N OR NE 118-57-01.3 W 0005022827 Frontier Telenet Canyon City 01/09/2012 21825.00000 44-23-14.3 N CA NE 121-56-02.1 W 0005022941 CITY OF SAN JOSE (ECOMM) San Jose 01/09/2012 10785.00000 37-24-04.5 N CA NE 121-55-29.4 W 0005022942 CITY OF SAN JOSE (ECOMM) Los Gatos 01/09/2012 11285.00000 37-13-29.9 N NJ NE 074-03-27.4 W 0005023205 Hudson County Prosecutors Office Jersey City 01/10/2012 11585.00000 40-43-55.9 N NJ NE 074-10-08.0 W 0005023206 Hudson County Prosecutors Office Newark 01/10/2012 10975.00000 40-44-14.0 N TX NE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311989A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311989A1.txt
  • 0005024920 LP Broadband, Inc. Erie 01/11/2012 21375.00000 40-01-40.4 N CA MD WMV950 120-51-31.2 W 0005021969 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCVALLEY SPRINGS 01/09/2012 06625.00000 38-10-39.8 N CA MD WMV950 120-51-31.2 W 0005021969 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCVALLEY SPRINGS 01/09/2012 10572.50000 38-10-39.8 N CA MD WMV950 120-51-31.2 W 0005021969 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCVALLEY SPRINGS 01/09/2012 11245.00000 38-10-39.8 N TX MD WQCY285 097-05-02.1 W 0005021978 Alltel Communications, LLC GAINESVILLE 01/09/2012 05945.20000 33-37-50.4 N TX MD WQCY285 097-05-02.1 W 0005021978 Alltel Communications, LLC GAINESVILLE 01/09/2012 06004.50000 33-37-50.4 N TX MD WQCY285 097-05-02.1 W 0005021978 Alltel Communications, LLC GAINESVILLE 01/09/2012 06063.80000 33-37-50.4 N NJ MD WQIQ558 074-02-03.6 W 0005022175 Business Only Broadband, LLC Jersey City 01/09/2012 10735.00000 40-42-56.5 N NJ MD WQIQ558 074-02-03.6 W 0005022175
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312140A1.txt
  • 34-35-15.5 N GA AM KNKN697 084-41-17.6 W 0004857016 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Fairmount 01/17/2012 34-26-40.7 N GA AM KNKN697 083-43-29.4 W 0004857016 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hiawassee 01/17/2012 34-50-13.5 N GA AM KNKN697 083-43-48.8 W 0004857016 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HIAWASSEE 01/17/2012 34-57-13.5 N GA AM KNKN697 084-30-19.6 W 0004857016 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Jasper 01/17/2012 34-27-02.1 N GA AM KNKN697 084-20-20.5 W 0004857016 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Jasper 01/17/2012 34-29-17.2 N Page 18 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GA AM KNKN697 084-19-23.4 W 0004857016 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC MARBLEHILL 01/17/2012 34-24-44.7 N GA AM KNKN697 084-11-16.5 W 0004857016 New
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312324A1.txt
  • 32-59-02.4 N AL AM WNTY704 087-01-24.9 W 0004884732 ALABAMA POWER COMPANY SUMITON 01/30/2012 00928.89375 33-45-28.3 N AL AM WNTY704 087-01-24.9 W 0004884732 ALABAMA POWER COMPANY SUMITON 01/30/2012 00959.89375 33-45-28.3 N PA AM 077-45-14.6 W 0004918844 World Class Wireless, LLC Boalsburg 01/30/2012 06375.14000 40-45-09.4 N PA AM 077-45-14.6 W 0004918844 World Class Wireless, LLC Boalsburg 01/30/2012 06755.00000 40-45-09.4 N PA AM 078-15-02.1 W 0004919423 World Class Wireless, LLC Sandy Ridge 01/31/2012 05945.20000 40-46-42.2 N PA AM 078-15-02.1 W 0004919423 World Class Wireless, LLC Sandy Ridge 01/30/2012 05945.20000 40-46-42.2 N PA AM 078-15-02.1 W 0004919423 World Class Wireless, LLC Sandy Ridge 01/31/2012 06004.50000 40-46-42.2 N PA AM 078-15-02.1 W 0004919423 World Class Wireless, LLC Sandy Ridge 01/30/2012 06123.10000 40-46-42.2 N PA AM 078-15-02.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312417A1.pdf
  • Licensing System (CLS) Universal Licensing System (ULS) Consumer Complaints Management System (CCMS) Electronic Document Management System (EDOCS) Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) Fee Filer Desktop/Network Document Development and Data Access Tools Form 477 Data Collection System Tower Construction Notification System OFACS (coordination database) FCC Auction System - 17 - MAXIMIZE BENEFITS OF SPECTRUM Performance Commitments and Metrics Outcome-oriented Performance Goal 2.1: Develop and implement flexible, market-oriented spectrum allocation and assignment policies that promote innovation, investment, jobs and consumer benefits, including ensuring meaningful availability of unlicensed spectrum. Targets with Subordinate Measures: (1) Pursue spectrum allocation and license assignment policies to achieve the effective and efficient use of spectrum. Conduct auctions of licenses for electromagnetic spectrum as directed through statutory mandate or Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312454A1.txt
  • 11148.12500 43-25-45.0 N WI NE 089-39-06.1 W 0005061425 Columbia, County of Wisconsin Dells 02/03/2012 00958.35000 43-39-18.9 N ME NE 068-47-05.7 W 0005063211 Maine, State of; MSCommNet Project Bangor 02/06/2012 00953.30000 44-51-19.7 N ME NE 068-47-05.7 W 0005063211 Maine, State of; MSCommNet Project Bangor 02/06/2012 00954.20000 44-51-19.7 N ME NE 069-09-58.5 W 0005063222 Maine, State of; MSCommNet Project Garland 02/06/2012 00956.90000 45-04-02.1 N ME NE 070-46-53.1 W 0005063228 Maine, State of; MSCommNet Project Cornish 02/06/2012 00934.37500 43-45-03.5 N AZ NE 112-27-12.1 W 0005063760 Prescott, City of Prescott 02/06/2012 10995.00000 34-44-58.3 N MN NE 094-45-13.3 W 0005065184 Minnesota, State of Sherburn 02/07/2012 06805.00000 43-39-10.2 N MN NE 094-45-13.3 W 0005065184 Minnesota, State of Sherburn 02/07/2012 06855.00000 43-39-10.2 N MN NE 095-00-37.9 W 0005065251
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312456A1.txt
  • MD KNKA247 092-35-13.8 W 0005064358 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRIVER FALLS 02/07/2012 44-50-06.0 N WI MD KNKA247 092-33-32.0 W 0005064358 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCROBERTS 02/07/2012 44-56-56.0 N MN MD KNKA247 093-08-09.0 W 0005064358 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCROSEMOUNT 02/07/2012 44-43-56.0 N MN MD KNKA247 093-21-58.9 W 0005064358 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSAINT FRANCIS 02/07/2012 45-23-31.9 N MN MD KNKA247 093-33-02.1 W 0005064358 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCShakopee 02/07/2012 44-45-05.2 N MN MD KNKA247 093-27-13.8 W 0005064358 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSHAKOPEE 02/07/2012 44-47-24.9 N WI MD KNKA247 092-40-43.0 W 0005064358 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSOMERSET 02/07/2012 45-07-12.4 N WI MD KNKA247 092-47-32.7 W 0005064358 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCST. JOSEPH 02/07/2012 45-03-38.9 N MN MD KNKA247 093-06-25.8 W 0005064358 NEW
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312457A1.txt
  • MD WQON824 081-10-35.0 W 0005068551 SW Networks WELSHFIELD 02/09/2012 06625.00000 41-22-31.0 N IL MD WQOG713 087-38-43.3 W 0005068667 SW Networks Chicago 02/09/2012 06034.15000 41-47-19.4 N Page 13 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL MD WQOG714 087-41-09.7 W 0005068672 SW Networks Markham 02/09/2012 06034.15000 41-35-02.1 N IL MD WQOG714 087-41-09.7 W 0005068672 SW Networks Markham 02/09/2012 06286.19000 41-35-02.1 N CA MD WPTN458 121-53-38.3 W 0005069150 Nextweb, Inc San Jose 02/10/2012 18065.00000 37-20-15.8 N CA MD WPTN458 121-53-38.3 W 0005069150 Nextweb, Inc San Jose 02/10/2012 21525.00000 37-20-15.8 N CA MD WPTN458 121-53-38.3 W 0005069150 Nextweb, Inc San Jose 02/10/2012 21975.00000 37-20-15.8 N CA MD WPTN458 121-53-38.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312571A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312571A1.txt
  • 02/13/2012 06615.00000 46-09-57.4 N WA MD KPH29 119-12-00.0 W 0005073337 WASHINGTON, STATE OF KENNEWICK 02/13/2012 11525.00000 46-09-57.4 N Page 2 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WA MD KPH29 119-12-00.0 W 0005073337 WASHINGTON, STATE OF KENNEWICK 02/13/2012 11605.00000 46-09-57.4 N WA MD KPH25 119-53-02.1 W 0005073351 WASHINGTON, STATE OF BEVERLY 02/13/2012 11325.00000 46-48-57.4 N WA MD KPH25 119-53-02.1 W 0005073351 WASHINGTON, STATE OF BEVERLY 02/13/2012 11685.00000 46-48-57.4 N WA MD WPYD224 120-11-21.0 W 0005073357 WASHINGTON, STATE OF ELLENSBURG 02/13/2012 06765.00000 47-00-10.5 N WA MD WPYD224 120-11-21.0 W 0005073357 WASHINGTON, STATE OF ELLENSBURG 02/13/2012 10835.00000 47-00-10.5 N WA MD WNTQ639 119-19-46.0 W 0005073364 WASHINGTON, STATE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312574A1.txt
  • N PR MD WPTA872 066-20-18.2 W 0005072547 SprintCom, Inc. VEGA ALTA 02/13/2012 17915.00000 18-25-49.6 N PR MD WPTA872 066-20-18.2 W 0005072547 SprintCom, Inc. VEGA ALTA 02/13/2012 17965.00000 18-25-49.6 N Page 8 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PR MD WPTA780 066-33-02.1 W 0005072553 SprintCom, Inc. EXEDENTE 02/13/2012 17905.00000 18-03-52.9 N PR MD WPTA780 066-33-02.1 W 0005072553 SprintCom, Inc. EXEDENTE 02/13/2012 18115.00000 18-03-52.9 N PR MD WPSU386 066-23-55.1 W 0005072559 SprintCom, Inc. Santa Isabel 02/13/2012 10735.00000 18-01-33.4 N PR MD WPSU386 066-23-55.1 W 0005072559 SprintCom, Inc. Santa Isabel 02/13/2012 11133.75000 18-01-33.4 N PR MD WPTA718 066-21-57.1 W 0005072567 SprintCom, Inc. Coamo 02/13/2012
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312690A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312690A1.txt
  • 11525.00000 33-55-27.1 N CA AM WLN479 116-36-59.1 W 0005017209 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEWHITEWATER 02/22/2012 11565.00000 33-55-27.1 N CA AM WLN479 116-36-59.1 W 0005017209 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEWHITEWATER 02/22/2012 11605.00000 33-55-27.1 N CA AM WLN479 116-36-59.1 W 0005017209 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEWHITEWATER 02/22/2012 19685.00000 33-55-27.1 N TX AM 094-10-19.9 W 0005023082 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Jefferson 02/22/2012 06197.24000 32-50-02.1 N TX AM 094-10-19.9 W 0005023082 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Jefferson 02/22/2012 06315.84000 32-50-02.1 N TX AM 094-37-24.7 W 0005023149 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Avinger 02/22/2012 06345.49000 32-50-15.6 N TX AM 094-37-24.7 W 0005023149 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Avinger 02/22/2012 10755.00000 32-50-15.6 N TX AM 094-37-24.7 W 0005023149 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Avinger 02/22/2012 10835.00000 32-50-15.6 N UT AM WQKB995
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312691A1.txt
  • Angeles 02/24/2012 19675.00000 34-10-18.9 N CA MD WQMI282 119-17-06.0 W 0005091164 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIVisalia 02/24/2012 21870.00000 36-18-37.0 N CA MD WQMI282 119-17-06.0 W 0005091164 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIVisalia 02/24/2012 21875.00000 36-18-37.0 N CA MD WQMI282 119-17-06.0 W 0005091164 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIVisalia 02/24/2012 22025.00000 36-18-37.0 N CO MD WQLR500 105-04-30.6 W 0005091165 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFort Collins 02/24/2012 19525.00000 40-35-02.1 N CO MD WQLR500 105-04-30.6 W 0005091165 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFort Collins 02/24/2012 19625.00000 40-35-02.1 N Page 18 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CO MD WQLR500 105-04-30.6 W 0005091165 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFort Collins 02/24/2012 23075.00000 40-35-02.1 N CO MD WQLR500 105-04-30.6 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312789A1.txt
  • Name Latitude City OH MD WMG537 083-39-22.7 W 0005096334 THE BLANCHARD RIVER BROADCASTIFindlay 02/29/2012 00946.00000 41-01-23.1 N MN NE 095-50-02.3 W 0005101247 LEIGHTON ENTERPRISES, INC. Detroit Lakes 03/02/2012 00949.00000 46-48-46.6 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AK AM WGX538 150-07-02.1 W 0004906495 Matanuska Telephone Association, Inc. TALKEETNA 03/02/2012 06765.00000 62-19-17.2 N Page 1 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WY AM WQKX246 104-49-11.7 W 0005014050 LP Broadband Inc Cheyenne 02/28/2012 11305.00000 41-08-10.0 N WY AM WQKX246 104-49-11.7 W 0005014050 LP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312921A1.txt
  • ASR Program that complies with all applicable environmental laws. Response 1.2: The description of the Proposed Action in the PEA has been clarified to read, in part: ``The Proposed Action is to modify the ASR Program and associated NEPA compliance procedures as necessary to ensure compliance with NEPA and other applicable environmental laws.'' Chapter 2 - Purpose and Need Comment 2.1: The purpose and need for the action is to comply with all applicable laws and to reduce adverse effects to migratory birds caused by communications towers. Response 2.1: The purpose of an action is defined as what the action is intended to do. The purpose of the Proposed Action has been revised to clarify that it is intended to ensure
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312929A1.txt
  • 33-38-45.8 N Page 11 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NM NE 105-46-55.2 W 0005102999 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Ruidoso 03/05/2012 05945.20000 33-24-15.4 N NM NE 105-46-55.2 W 0005102999 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Ruidoso 03/05/2012 10835.00000 33-24-15.4 N NM NE 105-33-02.1 W 0005103000 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Capitan 03/05/2012 11325.00000 33-32-36.6 N NM NE 105-33-02.1 W 0005103000 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Capitan 03/05/2012 21885.00000 33-32-36.6 N NM NE 106-05-18.3 W 0005103001 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Espanola 03/05/2012 10715.00000 35-59-50.0 N NM NE 105-47-20.4 W 0005103002 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Corona 03/05/2012 05974.85000 34-14-45.9 N NM NE 105-47-20.4 W 0005103002 Conterra Ultra
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312930A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312930A1.txt
  • W 0005107843 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc CHARLESTON 03/07/2012 00131.17500 32-53-00.6 N KS MD KAB4 097-25-01.2 W 0005107941 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc WICHITA 03/07/2012 00129.45000 37-39-00.1 N TX MD WDM3 098-27-52.2 W 0005108383 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc SAN ANTONIO 03/08/2012 00131.17500 29-32-07.8 N NM MD KKH7 106-36-25.1 W 0005108388 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc ALBUQUERQUE 03/08/2012 00128.90000 35-02-30.2 N CO MD WAN8 106-01-02.1 W 0005108420 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc ALAMOSA 03/08/2012 00128.90000 37-32-30.0 N TX MD WMB2 101-42-57.7 W 0005108478 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc AMARILLO 03/08/2012 00128.90000 35-13-26.2 N NM MD KCU5 108-14-02.3 W 0005108577 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc FARMINGTON 03/08/2012 00128.90000 36-44-00.0 N CA MD WRE4 118-24-32.3 W 0005108589 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc LOS ANGELES 03/08/2012 00128.90000 33-56-33.0 N NV MD KPF7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312931A1.txt
  • Applicant Name Latitude City NE AM 098-21-41.4 W 0004934946 NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. Grand Island 03/09/2012 11647.00000 40-55-34.1 N Page 1 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NE AM 098-21-40.0 W 0004934954 NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. Grand Island 03/09/2012 11622.00000 40-54-02.1 N NY AM 074-21-23.0 W 0004999453 Goosetown Network Services, LLC ELLENVILLE 03/09/2012 11215.00000 41-41-01.0 N NY AM 074-21-23.0 W 0004999453 Goosetown Network Services, LLC ELLENVILLE 03/09/2012 11405.00000 41-41-01.0 N PR AM WPTA732 066-44-02.6 W 0005072891 SprintCom, Inc. Penuelas 03/09/2012 11305.00000 18-00-51.3 N PR AM WPTA732 066-44-02.6 W 0005072891 SprintCom, Inc. Penuelas 03/09/2012 19425.00000 18-00-51.3 N PR AM WPTA732 066-44-02.6 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312943A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312943A1.txt
  • III, LLC 23075.00000000 South Gate 33-56-58.5 N CA 118-9-31.5 W 2 1 02/09/2012 WQLU625 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23225.00000000 South Gate 33-56-58.5 N CA 118-9-31.5 W 2 1 02/09/2012 WQLU669 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23225.00000000 COMPTON 33-54-59.4 N CA 118-15-11.9 W2 1 02/09/2012 WQLU695 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21925.00000000 Los Angeles 34-3-27.4 N CA 117-45-2.1 W 3 1 02/09/2012 WQLU695 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21875.00000000 Los Angeles 34-3-27.4 N CA 117-45-2.1 W 4 1 02/09/2012 WQLU695 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19375.00000000 Los Angeles 34-3-27.4 N CA 117-45-2.1 W 5 1 02/09/2012 WQLU695 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19425.00000000 Los Angeles 34-3-27.4 N CA 117-45-2.1 W 6 1 02/09/2012 WQLU695 FXO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313091A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313091A1.txt
  • 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA NE 076-51-30.0 W 0005113184 REAL MEDIA, INC. Tappahannock 03/12/2012 00945.50000 37-55-43.0 N OH NE 082-06-31.5 W 0005114175 ELYRIA-LORAIN BROADCASTING CO.Elyria 03/12/2012 00948.00000 41-22-02.1 N CA NE 115-33-30.0 W 0005114181 KHWY, INC. Mountain Pass 03/12/2012 00944.25000 35-29-27.0 N CA NE 121-54-06.4 W 0005115426 LAZER LICENSES, LLC San Jose 03/13/2012 00950.50000 37-21-01.9 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA AM WQOH304 122-23-21.1 W 0004999445
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313092A1.txt
  • N TX MD WQKN698 102-23-58.3 W 0005116851 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOdessa 03/13/2012 10735.00000 31-51-48.4 N TX MD WQKN698 102-23-58.3 W 0005116851 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOdessa 03/13/2012 11015.00000 31-51-48.4 N TX MD WQKN698 102-23-58.3 W 0005116851 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOdessa 03/13/2012 11055.00000 31-51-48.4 N TX MD WQKN698 102-23-58.3 W 0005116851 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOdessa 03/13/2012 11095.00000 31-51-48.4 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0005116852 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRunnemede 03/13/2012 11175.00000 39-51-22.7 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0005116852 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRunnemede 03/13/2012 11385.00000 39-51-22.7 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0005116852 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRunnemede 03/13/2012 11505.00000 39-51-22.7 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0005116852 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRunnemede 03/13/2012 11545.00000 39-51-22.7 N NJ MD WQKR978 075-04-02.1 W 0005116852 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313254A1.txt
  • - 00608.00000 25-48-46.5 N FL NE P 080-21-03.9 W 0005124921 Telefutura Network Miami 03/20/2012 00614.00000 - 00698.00000 25-48-46.5 N FL NE P 080-21-03.9 W 0005124921 Telefutura Network Miami 03/20/2012 00944.10000 - 00951.90000 25-48-46.5 N Page 34 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA AM 078-15-02.1 W 0004919423 World Class Wireless, LLC Sandy Ridge 03/19/2012 05945.20000 40-46-42.2 N PA AM 078-15-02.1 W 0004919423 World Class Wireless, LLC Sandy Ridge 03/19/2012 06004.50000 40-46-42.2 N PA AM 078-15-02.1 W 0004919423 World Class Wireless, LLC Sandy Ridge 03/19/2012 06123.10000 40-46-42.2 N PA AM 078-15-02.1 W 0004919423 World Class Wireless, LLC Sandy Ridge 03/19/2012 06555.00000 40-46-42.2 N PA AM 078-58-11.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313286A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313286A2.txt
  • 6.5 2,065,338 25.4 0.0 3.3 6.5 64.8 Sierra Leone $15,504,746 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.1 98.0 $126,034 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $357,62016.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.6 44,631,099 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.2 98.1 Somalia $11,689,855 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.5 98.9 $14,391 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $18,306100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27,491,397 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.6 99.0 South Africa $26,008,374 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.1 97.8 $1,680,523 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $23,020,081 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 272,878,463 0.1 0.0 0.0 6.8 93.1 Sudan $5,628,829 0.1 0.0 0.5 11.1 88.4 $104,946 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $75,75721.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 78.5 47,603,637 0.1 0.0 0.3 11.6 88.1 Swaziland $575,043 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 96.6 $10,377 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $41697.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 4,631,354 0.0 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313398A1.txt
  • 0004941675 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Reva 03/26/2012 45-32-40.2 N ND AM KNKN343 103-50-27.2 W 0004941675 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Sentinel Butte 03/26/2012 46-52-37.9 N ND AM KNKN343 103-50-24.0 W 0004941675 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Sentinel Butte 03/26/2012 46-52-41.0 N MT AM KNKN343 104-07-01.4 W 0004941675 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Sidney 03/26/2012 47-39-37.8 N ND AM KNKN343 101-01-02.1 W 0004941675 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC WASHBURN 03/26/2012 47-18-04.7 N Page 31 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City ND AM KNKN343 103-22-03.5 W 0004941675 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Watford City 03/26/2012 47-46-19.0 N ND AM KNKN343 103-22-02.7 W 0004941675 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313505A1.txt
  • 22275.00000 39-41-45.6 N CO MD WQNA217 104-56-18.5 W 0005143747 MHO Networks Glendale 03/30/2012 22325.00000 39-41-45.6 N CO MD WQNA217 104-56-18.5 W 0005143747 MHO Networks Glendale 03/30/2012 22375.00000 39-41-45.6 N GA MD KBR60 084-26-42.7 W 0005144023 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPATLANTA 04/02/2012 06746.25000 33-47-52.3 N GA MD KBR60 084-26-42.7 W 0005144023 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPATLANTA 04/02/2012 06755.00000 33-47-52.3 N GA MD WQDF688 084-23-02.1 W 0005144032 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPAtlanta 04/02/2012 06595.00000 33-47-14.6 N GA MD WQCY746 084-23-02.8 W 0005144039 Norfolk Southern Railway Company Atlanta 04/02/2012 06685.00000 33-47-16.1 N GA MD KSM96 084-27-16.7 W 0005144052 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPROSWELL 04/02/2012 06123.10000 34-03-59.3 N GA MD KSM96 084-27-16.7 W 0005144052 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPROSWELL 04/02/2012 06755.00000 34-03-59.3 N GA MD KSM96 084-27-16.7 W 0005144052 NORFOLK
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313700A1.txt
  • Partnership Thurmond 04/16/2012 39-39-04.6 N NC MD KNKA329 080-37-04.1 W 0005167217 Cellco Partnership Monroe 04/16/2012 34-53-53.4 N MO MD KNKN653 089-53-31.3 W 0005167912 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ADVANCE 04/17/2012 37-04-08.4 N MO MD KNKN653 089-32-20.9 W 0005167912 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BENTON 04/17/2012 37-05-39.9 N MO MD KNKN653 090-05-09.3 W 0005167912 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CAMPBELL 04/17/2012 36-29-02.1 N MO MD KNKN653 089-43-06.5 W 0005167912 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Caruthersville 04/17/2012 36-12-18.5 N MO MD KNKN653 089-40-09.4 W 0005167912 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CARUTHERSVILLE 04/17/2012 36-12-07.3 N MO MD KNKN653 089-40-09.8 W 0005167912 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Chaffee 04/17/2012 37-11-17.2 N MO MD KNKN653 089-17-39.2 W 0005167912 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Charleston 04/17/2012 36-56-11.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313837A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313837A1.txt
  • 28-16-45.3 N Page 4 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL MD WQNH873 081-01-24.0 W 0005182823 CITY OF MELBOURNE SAINT CLOUD 04/27/2012 11095.00000 28-16-45.3 N FL MD WQNH873 081-01-24.0 W 0005182823 CITY OF MELBOURNE SAINT CLOUD 04/27/2012 11465.00000 28-16-45.3 N FL MD WQNN504 080-42-02.1 W 0005183014 City of Melbourne BONAVENTURE 04/27/2012 10735.00000 28-16-43.0 N FL MD WQNN504 080-42-02.1 W 0005183014 City of Melbourne BONAVENTURE 04/27/2012 10855.00000 28-16-43.0 N FL MD WQNN504 080-42-02.1 W 0005183014 City of Melbourne BONAVENTURE 04/27/2012 11545.00000 28-16-43.0 N NY MD WQOW463 077-26-31.4 W 0005183489 ONTARIO, COUNTY OF BRISTOL CENTER 04/27/2012 10915.00000 42-47-51.8 N NY MD WQOW463 077-26-31.4 W 0005183489 ONTARIO,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313950A1.txt
  • 117-19-07.6 W 0005189399 Southern California Regional Rail AuthoritColton 05/02/2012 11645.00000 34-05-29.1 N CA MD WQOU576 117-41-49.8 W 0005189401 Southern California Regional Rail AuthoritMontclair 05/02/2012 06315.84000 34-05-38.5 N CA MD WQOU576 117-41-49.8 W 0005189401 Southern California Regional Rail AuthoritMontclair 05/02/2012 11405.00000 34-05-38.5 N CA MD WQOU576 117-41-49.8 W 0005189401 Southern California Regional Rail AuthoritMontclair 05/02/2012 11605.00000 34-05-38.5 N CA MD WQOU582 117-20-02.1 W 0005189404 Southern California Regional Rail AuthoritRiverside 05/02/2012 05974.85000 33-59-51.8 N CA MD WQOU582 117-20-02.1 W 0005189404 Southern California Regional Rail AuthoritRiverside 05/02/2012 06685.00000 33-59-51.8 N CA MD WQOU582 117-20-02.1 W 0005189404 Southern California Regional Rail AuthoritRiverside 05/02/2012 11155.00000 33-59-51.8 N NY MD WIR48 074-00-45.4 W 0005189407 STATE OF NEW YORK, DIVISION OF STNEW SALEM 05/02/2012 05945.20000 42-37-36.2 N NY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313951A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313951A1.txt
  • 32-15-33.3 N CA MD WQBR718 122-06-54.0 W 0005189524 AT&T CALIFORNIA CUPERTINO 05/02/2012 10835.00000 37-17-56.4 N Page 11 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WQBR716 122-00-49.2 W 0005189525 AT&T CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE 05/02/2012 11325.00000 37-18-00.0 N CA MD WPNG326 124-05-02.1 W 0005189716 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership SCOTIA 05/02/2012 06034.15000 40-25-13.4 N CA MD WQFX658 123-53-39.1 W 0005189722 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership Weott 05/02/2012 06286.19000 40-19-16.5 N IA MD WQBC474 092-38-34.3 W 0005189908 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, LLC Oskaloosa 05/02/2012 06152.75000 41-15-15.3 N IA MD WQBC474 092-38-34.3 W 0005189908 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, LLC Oskaloosa 05/02/2012 06715.62500 41-15-15.3 N IA MD
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-163A1.pdf
  • transmitted spectrum may be significantly modified by the frequency response of the antenna such that even the carrier frequency, where employed, may not represent the center frequency. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.205. Spurious emissions are defined as emissions outside of the necessary bandwidth, the level of which may be reduced without affecting the transmission of information. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See, for example, comments of Time Domain at 36-37, Rosemount Measurement at 1, 2 and 8, Interval at 12, LLNL at 4, and the UWBWG at 10, and the reply comments of M/A-COM at 1 and Interval at 11 and 16. MSSI, however, promotes a system that employed pulse and/or spectral shaping to avoid operation within the TV broadcast and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-188A1.txt
  • not be limited to, call records for specific ground stations including abnormal terminations and information regarding channel usage. Records of such information must be retained for at least 30 days. Harmful interference. Harmful interference, for the purpose of this condition, is defined as the serious degradation, obstruction, or repeated interruption of cellular service. See definition of "harmful interference" in section 2.1 of the Commission's rules (47 C.F.R. � 2.1). Any cellular licensee providing cellular service to airborne terminals must immediately take action to resolve any instance of harmful interference, where factual evidence (e.g., time of incident and channel coincide) shows that the instance is likely to have occurred as a result of the operation of ground stations or airborne terminals under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-202A1.txt
  • unilateral anticompetitive conduct by the merged entity or coordinated anticompetitive conduct of multiple market participants.''); Bell Atlantic-NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 19985 � 121 (``Market performance can also be adversely affected if a merger increases the potential for coordinated interaction by firms remaining in the post merger market.''); see also 1992 Horizontal Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. 41552, 41558 � 2.1 (``Lessening of Competition Through Coordinated Interaction''). See 1999 Competition Report, 15 FCC Rcd at 986 � 16, 1053 �168, 1094 Tbl. C-4 (ten largest MVPDs serve almost 75% of the nation's MVPD subscribers), 15 FCC Rcd at 1053-54 � 168 (noting that MVPDs may coordinate their purchasing decisions). See WorldCom-MCI Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 18025 � 121 (``As the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-237A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-237A1.pdf
  • day-to-day management and oversight of the tariffed services. We find nothing inappropriate about the BOCs' selection of an entity that is not a common carrier to perform certain tariff-related functions on their behalf. Issue 6: Whether DSMI gave proper notice before discontinuing service to Beehive. Beehive alleges that DSMI violated the tariff because DSMI terminated Beehive's service without notice. Section 2.1.8(A) of the tariff requires 30 days' written notice prior to terminating a Resp Org's access to the SMS/800 database system. DSMI states that it provided written notice on three separate occasions, with its last letter dated March 22, 1994, and Beehive doesn't dispute receipt of these letters. More than 30 days later, on April 26, 1994, Beehive's service was suspended.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-244A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-244A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-244A5.txt
  • :: :: :: ::: :: :: :: :: 357,dB.dB,dB.dB 358,dB.dB,dB.dB 359,dB.dB,dB.dB ::: :: :: :: :: ::: :: :: :: :: Response RP DegAz,Plane dB,Cross dB 000,dB.dB,dB.dB 001,dB.dB,dB.dB 002,dB.dB,dB.dB 003,dB.dB,dB.dB ::: :: :: :: :: ::: :: :: :: :: 357,dB.dB,dB.dB 358,dB.dB,dB.dB 359,dB.dB,dB.dB Conversion from NAD-27 to NAD-83 shall be done using the algorithm incorporated in the NADCON software, version 2.1 or later, as specified in the Federal Register for August 10, 1990, Volume 55, Number 155, page 32681, and available formatted for IBM PC-compatible computers from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration at: NOAA, NGS, N/NGS12, 1315 East West Highway, Station 9202, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282, phone number (800) 638-8972. When dissimilar bandwidths are used by the desired and undesired
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-264A1.txt
  • 47 U.S.C. � 305; 47 U.S.C. �� 901-904 (NTIA Organization Act). Section 305 of the Act grants NTIA exclusive authority over "radio stations belonging to and operated by the United States" and requires these stations to use frequencies assigned by NTIA. See also Federal Spectrum Management Processes Report, Public Safety Wireless Network, at 3-8 (September 1998). See NTIA Manual �� 2.1-2.3 (Telecommunications Policy). ``Telecommunications policies are made by the Congress, by the Court, by the President, and the [NTIA] with respect to the agencies and establishments of the Federal Government . . .'' Id. at � 2.2. In this connection, we observed that there may be benefits to providing for the adoption of a single, "blanket" authorization that would confer NTIA's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-289A1.txt
  • by 2003 over 66 percent of all wireless subscribers will use SMS to send and receive messages, get information, make data inquiries, and schedule reservations.374 SMS is particularly popular in Europe. By April 1999, customers in the European Union were transmitting one billion short messages per month.375 Sonera (Finland) reports that by year-end 1999 more than 60 percent of its 2.1 million subscribers were using SMS and averaged 21 messages per month.376 367 Id. at 26. 368 Id. at 28. 369 Id. at 29. 370 Id. at 30. 371 Andrew M. Seybold, Short Messaging Service (SMS), MOTHERING MAGAZINE, June 25, 1999, available in 1999 WL 16633524. GSM networks permit messages of 160 characters, CDMA permits 256 characters, and iDEN allows 140
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-348A1.txt
  • Rcd at 17,711 and 17,715. PSWAC Final Report at 317-318. Shared systems also offer a high level of built-in interoperability. Id. See, e.g., PSWAC Final Report at 2. Pennsylvania Comments at 5, see also NYSTEC Comments at 22-23; PSWN Reply Comments at 8. Third Notice, 14 FCC Rcd 231 � 176. See PSWAC Final Report at 2-4, 19 (Key Finding 2.1.7), 22-23 (Key Recommendation 2.2.3). We are adopting a definition of ``state'' that includes United States territories and possessions. See 47 C.F.R. � 90.7, as amended (Appendix F). States will use FCC Form 601 for this application. We also believe that by allowing each state to elect whether to take the designated spectrum, we address Arizona and APCO concerns and avoid
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-369A1.txt
  • 3700-4200, 5925-6425 and 6425-7125 MHz and 10.7-11.7, 12.7-13.25, 17.7-19.7, and 27.5-29.5 GHz. The Fixed-Satellite Service is a radiocommunication service between earth stations at given positions, when one or more satellites are used; the FSS also may include feeder links for other space radiocommunication services. The terrestrial fixed service (FS) is a radiocommunication service between fixed points. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See FWCC Petitions at 2-4. FWCC alleges that satellite earth station operators receive preferential access to shared spectrum because: (1) the Commission licenses earth stations for the entire allocated band and with no loading requirements, while point-to-point terrestrial operations are limited to frequencies actually needed and are subject to stringent spectrum efficiency requirements, and (2) the Commission licenses earth stations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-416A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-416A1.txt
  • B. An example of this application is the addition of a 10-dB gain preamplifier at the antenna terminals of a 3-dB gain antenna to produce an effective gain of 13 dB. Using the UHF Grade B receiver noise figure planning factor of 15 dB and 5 dB line loss the expression (1) below yields a system noise figure which is 2.1 dB less than the planning factor value for the receiver noise figure. That is, NF = 10 log10 [10 + (100-1)]/10 = 12.9 dB. Noise figures of various parts of a receiving system all contribute to the overall system noise figure. The amount they contribute depends largely on the gain of the preceding stages in the system. The mathematical expression
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-417A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-417A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-417A1.txt
  • looks ``dirty'' due to a satellite carrier's choice of encoding and compression techniques. AAPTS advocates a rule requiring satellite carriers to maintain local television stations at a TASO Grade 2 level to avoid material degradation of these signals. DirecTV urges the Commission to refrain from setting standards for material degradation until two industry committees devoted to video picture quality, IEEE G-2.1.6 and ITU VQEG, complete their work. HBO argues that because of the rapid changes in digital technology, there is significant danger that any standards adopted today would quickly be obsolete, or worse, would prevent beneficial changes in transmission parameters as technology improves. We decline to adopt specific picture quality standards at this time. As we stated in the Notice, analog
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • a single actual DBS customer was or could have been adversely impacted by the interference DBS proponents claimed to have been created at the Oxon Hill, MD tests. Decision. We conclude that MVDDS can operate in the 12.2-12.7 GHz band under the existing primary allocation, which requires that a Fixed Service not cause harmful interference to the co-primary BSS. Section 2.1 of our rules defines ``harmful interference'' as ``interference which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service.....'' In some instances, spectrum sharing may result in services causing interference or degradation to or occasional outages of other services. Spectrum management decisions often address this issue by specifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-427A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-427A2.txt
  • FMMix AC Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Youngstown OHClear Channel Communications 1947 1700 7.9 0.9 B WRTK AMClsc Rock Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Niles OHClear Channel Communications 1963 450 0 0.46 B WNCD FMClsc Rock Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Youngstown OHClear Channel Communications 1959 1950 6.2 1.18 B WICT FMCountry Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Grove City PAClear Channel Communications 1962 450 2.1 1.16 B WNIO AMNostalgia Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Youngstown OHClear Channel Communications 1939 150 2.7 0.39 B WTNX FMCHR Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Sharpsville PAClear Channel Communications 1976 500 1.4 0.89 A WPAO AMChristian Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Farrell PAGOCOM Communications LLC 1954 0 0 0 B WBBW AMSports Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Youngstown OHCumulus Broadcasting Inc 1949 150 0.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-430A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-430A1.txt
  • permissive changes. 731 & 159... 495 ECC Federal Communications Commission, Equipment Approval Services, P.O. Box 358315, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5315 * * * * * PART 2 - FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS The authority citation for Part 2 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336, unless otherwise noted. Section 2.1 is proposed to be amended by adding the following definition: � 2.1 Terms and definition. * * * * * (c) * * * Software defined radio. A radio that includes a transmitter in which the operating parameters of the transmitter, including the frequency range, modulation type and maximum radiated or conducted output power can be altered by making a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-435A1.txt
  • the petition for deny is filed. This statement must be in accordance with the provisions of �� 1.41 through 1.52 of this chapter applicable to oppositions to petitions to deny. 21. Revise � 25.201 to read as follows: �25.201 Definitions. (a) Definitions for terms in subpart C of this part appear in paragraph (b) of this section, and in Section 2.1 of this Chapter. (b)(1) Active satellite. An earth satellite carrying a station intended to transmit or re-transmit radiocommunication signals. (2) Base Earth Station. An earth station in the fixed-satellite service or, in some cases, in the land mobile-satellite service, located at a specified fixed point or within a specified area on land to provide a feeder link for the land
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-442A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-442A1.txt
  • high-capacity communications. HP and Nokia state that the propagation characteristics of the 57-59 GHz and 59-64 GHz bands are essentially the same. In particular, we note that Nokia states that it has developed technology that can use the 57-59 GHz band for the fixed links between base stations and that the use of this technology could ease congestion on the 2.1 GHz, 6 GHz, and 11 GHz bands. Nokia further states that it has already begun deploying this type of equipment in the 57-59 GHz band in Europe. Nokia believes that by harmonizing U.S. and international applications, the Commission will foster economies of scale that will encourage the introduction of this spectrally efficient technology in the United States. Harmonix states that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-455A1.txt
  • Report No. 148 (MMB November 29, 2000). The Commission will conduct random audits on a select number of applications prior to or after a license has been issued in reliance on a certification. See 47 C.F.R. �� 74.990, 74.991, 79.992; Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands, 6 FCC Rcd 6792, 6801-06 (1991). The rules provide that an MDS operator may be licensed on ITFS frequencies in areas where at least eight other ITFS channels remain available in the community for future ITFS use. In addition, no more than eight ITFS channels per community may be licensed to MDS operators. To be licensed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-53A1.txt
  • colloquially referred to as the WTO Basic Telecom Agreement, though they are not technically contained in a stand-alone agreement. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. at 41,558 �� 2.1, 2.2. See Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (Revised, April 8, 1997). VoiceStream/Omnipoint Public Interest Statement at 1. We do not further discuss competitive issues regarding these LMDS licenses because Omnipoint is neither a local exchange carrier nor a multi-channel video programming distributor (cable operator). See generally �� 20.6(d) and 22.942(d).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-53A1_Erratum.doc
  • colloquially referred to as the WTO Basic Telecom Agreement, though they are not technically contained in a stand-alone agreement. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. at 41,558 �� 2.1, 2.2. See Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (Revised, April 8, 1997). VoiceStream/Omnipoint Public Interest Statement at 1. We do not further discuss competitive issues regarding these LMDS licenses because Omnipoint is neither a local exchange carrier nor a multi-channel video programming distributor (cable operator). See generally �� 20.6(d) and 22.942(d).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • Massachusetts II Reply at 38. See Massachusetts Department Massachusetts I Comments at 338-39. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 4126, para. 339; SWBT Texas Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 1851, para. 333. Using the carrier-to-carrier numbers provided with the application, the four month (September through December 2000) average for competitive LECs was 12.1 percent, compared to 2.1 percent for Verizon's retail ``special services'' provisioning. See PR-4-01 (Provisioning of POTS/Special Services - Missed Appointments). Specifically, the competitive LEC missed appointment rates for September through December 2000 were 10.71 percent, 2.76 percent, 15.21 percent, and 21.25 percent, respectively. Verizon's performance for its own retail special services for the same period was 2.78 percent, 1.90 percent, 1.43 percent, and 2.04
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.txt
  • the unsuspecting legitimate subscriber. The term ``hardened ESN'' refers to the design requirement that the ESN be made absolutely unalterable (i.e., physically impossible to alter, by any person, for any reason). See 18 U.S.C � 1029(a)(7) (2000). for a leading smart card manufacturer's views on the security advantages of smart cards. This channelization plan is referenced in OET 53, Section 2.1.1.1, by its former codification, section 22.902 of the Commission's rules. The current rule, section 22.905, contains a typographical error: in the Block B control channel pairs, last line, it should read ``835.620'' instead of ``835.920''. See 47 C.F.R. � 22.901(d)(2). Of the digital technologies commonly used to provide cellular telephone service, the time-division multiple access (TDMA) technology uses the same
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-158A1.txt
  • Wi-LAN filed an application for equipment certification for its Wideband Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (W-OFDM) transmitter under the rules for direct sequence spread spectrum systems. The Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") denied that application on the basis that Wi-LAN's W-OFDM device did not meet the definition of a direct sequence spread spectrum system as set forth in Section 2.1 of the rules. Section 2.1 of our rules defines a spread spectrum system as, "[A]n information bearing communications system in which . . . the bandwidth is deliberately widened by means of a spreading function over that which would be needed to transmit the information alone." As stated above, Section 2.1 provides for only two specific types of spread spectrum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-173A1.txt
  • Joanne Suppa) at 1, � 3; Complaint at 3, � 10; Answer at 2, � 4; COMSAT Brief at 3, 4. In fact, with regard to Standard-A service to and from the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean regions, the parties' contract provided solely for the sale of INMARSAT space segment. January 16, 2001 Letter at Attachment B, Attachment 1 at � 2.1; Answer at 3, � 5; COMSAT Brief at 4; IDB Supplemental Brief at 4. See January 16, 2001 Letter at Exhibit A. Id. at Exhibit A, � 1.8. Id. at Exhibit A, Annex A, � 1.1. Id. at Exhibit A, � 2.3. Id. at Exhibit A, � 1.3. See February 2, 2001 Letter at 1. COMSAT Brief at 4, 7,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-182A1.txt
  • excludes all satellite services. See 36-51 GHz Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 24651 n.4. 36-51 GHz Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 24660. The other satellite services included the broadcasting-satellite service (BSS) and mobile-satellite service (MSS). We distinguish between spectrum ``allocations'' and ``designations.'' A spectrum allocation assigns radio frequency spectrum to one of the various pre-defined radio services listed in Section 2.1 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 2.105(b) & n.7. Designations are ``generally only needed where bands are allocated to more than one service and sharing between these services may be difficult.'' 36-51 GHz Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 24650, n.3. Significantly, spectrum designations for a particular service do not necessarily preclude other allocated services from operating in a given
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-18A1.txt
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. ��87.193-87.199. Harmful Interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. ��2.1 & 76.613(a). Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 F.C.C.2d 117, para. 14 (1985) [hereinafter MO&O]. 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-192A1.txt
  • Puerto Rico. As of year-end 2000, Western Wireless had received ETC approval in 10 states and had applications pending in three additional states. At that time, the company was offering service to 2,500 customers in 100 communities in five states. MDS: What is commonly referred to as MDS or wireless cable spectrum includes 33 different 6 megahertz channels in the 2.1-2.2 GHz and 2.5-2.7 GHz spectrum bands. These channels include the Multipoint Distribution Service (``MDS''), Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service (``MMDS''), and Instructional Television Fixed Service (``ITFS'') channels. MDS operators generally use the MMDS and MDS channels and lease excess capacity from ITFS operators, and often hold licenses for spectrum in different markets. MDS has become a new vehicle for offering high-speed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.txt
  • would be to use some of the 2 GHz MSS spectrum for relocation. Paragraph 38 seeks comment on using the 2150-2160 MHz MDS band for relocation purposes. Any of these alternatives would facilitate the relocation of displaced incumbents, including small entities. Finally, the Commission has already received extensive comments on issues related to the possible reallocation of the 2150-2160 MHz (2.1 GHz) spectrum for advanced wireless purposes. Comments filed by the multipoint distribution/instructional television fixed services industry and several equipment manufacturers argue that the 2.1 GHz band is necessary for the continued roll-out of fixed wireless services across the country. Other commenters support the use of 2.1 GHz for advanced wireless services. We are considering both alternatives, and are attempting to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-256A1.txt
  • examine a number of actions we might take to remove unnecessary regulatory barriers to the development of more robust secondary markets in radio spectrum usage rights. Notice of Proposed Rule Making, supra n.18, at � 1. In the Matter of Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting Private Operational Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service & Cable Television Relay Service, 10 FCC Rcd 7074 (1995). See Declaratory Ruling and Order, supra n.14; and Public Notice, supra n.15. See Two-Way Order, supra n.16, 13 FCC Rcd at 19173. For a more complete description of the evolution of the flexible
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-264A1.txt
  • & Electronic or Paper 159... 495 ECC Federal Communications Commission, Equipment Approval Services, P.O. Box 358315, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5315 * * * * * PART 2 - FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS The authority citation for Part 2 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336, unless otherwise noted. Section 2.1 is amended by adding the following definition: � 2.1 Terms and definition. * * * * * (c) * * * Software defined radio. A radio that includes a transmitter in which the operating parameters of frequency range, modulation type or maximum output power (either radiated or conducted) can be altered by making a change in software without making any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.txt
  • �� 15.225(b) and 15.209. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.205. See also 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. Spurious emissions are defined as emissions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions but exclude out-of-band emissions. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). See NCITS B10 Petition for Rule Making to Amend Section 15.225 of the Commission's Rules, filed September 10, 1998, RM-9375. See NCITS B10 supplement filed December 21, 1999. See comments of Texas Instruments, 3M, Motorola, Siemans Microelectronics Inc., and FedEx. See SCS Corp. comments. See NCITS B10 petition at 6-7. See H. Donald Ratliff comments at 1, United Parcel Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.txt
  • the same time and manner as SWBT does for its own advanced services separate affiliate. In particular, SWBT provisioned line shared loops to competing carriers 3.44 and 3.55 days in September and October 2000 respectively. By contrast, SWBT took about one day longer to provision the same type of line shared loops to its separate affiliate. Moreover, SWBT missed only 2.1 and 1.8 percent of the installation due dates for line shared loops provided to competing carriers during the same months. We also find that SWBT installs the high frequency portion of the loop at an acceptable level of quality. Although SWBT has not performed as well in the maintenance and repair of line shared loops as it has for stand-alone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.txt
  • See Reorganization and Revision of Part 87 Governing the Aviation Services, Memorandum Opinion and Order, PR Docket No. 87-214, 3 FCC Rcd 4171 (1988). The Commission formerly also used the acronym AMSS(R) to refer to this service. A mobile satellite service is a radio communication service between mobile earth stations and one or more space stations. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. A mobile earth station is an earth station intended for use while in motion or during halts at unspecified points. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.201. See Amendment of Parts 2 and 22 of the Commission's Rules Relative to Cellular Communications Systems, Report and Order, Gen. Docket Nos. 84-1231, 84-1233, 84-1234, 2 FCC Rcd 1825 (1986). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-30A1.txt
  • Government spectrum. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.105 (a). Radionavigation is defined as radiodetermination used for the purpose of navigation, including obstruction warning. Radiodetermination, in turn, is the determination of the position, velocity and/or other characteristics of an object, or the obtaining of information relating to these parameters, by mean of the propagation properties of radio waves. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. US69 reads as follows: "In the band 31.8-33.4 GHz, ground-based radionavigation aids are not permitted except where they operate in cooperation with airborne or shipborne radionavigation devices." See 47 C.F.R. �� 87.173 (b) and 87.187(x). Radiolocation is defined as radiodetermination used for purposes other than those of radionavigation. See description, note 5 supra. See also, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. US110
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-328A1.txt
  • terrestrial use, is subject to technical and use restrictions that prevent offering of full mobile telephony services, or has insufficient capacity to support significant mobile telephony competition. We believe the spectrum bands that are most likely to support additional competition to the services offered over cellular, broadband PCS, and SMR spectrum in the reasonably near future are the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz bands that are being considered for mobile allocation in our so-called ``3G'' proceeding, and the bands reallocated from television Channels 60-69. However, this spectrum is still at least several months away from being assigned, and after assignment it will take time for incumbent users to be relocated and following that for licensees to build out their networks. Thus, although
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.txt
  • restrains prices charged to buyers). 120 See 1992 Merger Guidelines � 1.3. 121 See, e.g. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. at 363 ("[A] significant increase in the concentration . . . must be enjoined in the absence of evidence clearly showing that the merger is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects."). See also 1992 Horizontal Guidelines at 41558 �� 2.1, 2.2; New York v. Kraft General Foods, 926 F. Supp. 321, 359 (S.D.N.Y. 1995); Amendment of Parts 20 and 24 of the Commission's Rules -- Broadband PCS Competitive Bidding and the Commercial Mobile Radio Service Spectrum Cap, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 7824 (1996). Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-329 30 cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation.122
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-338A1.txt
  • initial Missouri application and assured the Commission in May 2001 that the problem had been addressed. While SWBT acknowledges that its performance with respect to the missed due dates metric has not come into parity, we note that from May to August 2001, SWBT's overall provisioning performance improved significantly. The percentage of missed due dates decreased from 8.1 percent to 2.1 percent during this period. Moreover, in addition to the improved performance as measured by percentages, the actual number of missed dates decreased from 8 days in May to just 3 days in August. We examine SWBT's performance for line-shared loops in the context of its overall performance for all loop types, and do not find that lack of parity on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.txt
  • to the singular as well as the plural forms of such terms and to the masculine as well as to the feminine and neuter genders of such term. Whenever the words "include," "includes," "including" or "such as" are used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words "without limitation." ARTICLE 2: INFORMATION STORAGE AND ACCESS 2.1 Implementation Plan. Certain of the rights and obligations of the Parties are set forth in further detail in an Implementation Plan, which is executed by Telenor and is incorporated in and constitutes an integral part of this Agreement. Telenor shall comply with the Implementation Plan, subject to possible modifications in accordance with Article 9 of this Agreement. The Implementation Plan
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-382A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 25.142. A feeder link is a radio link from a fixed Earth station to a satellite (uplink) or from a satellite to a fixed Earth station (downlink). These links are used for data backhaul, satellite control functions, and to connect satellite systems to other networks, such as the public switched telephone network (PSTN). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Since the 1995 World Radiocommunication Conference, the United States has performed studies on sharing between space and terrestrial services and feeder links near 1.4 GHz for Non-Geostationary Orbiting Mobile Satellite Service (Little LEO) systems with service links below 1 GHz. See WRC 97 Final Acts, Resolution 127, note (d). See Amendments to Part 90 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Private
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.txt
  • � 42. Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at � 10. See 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(3)(D). Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at � 10. See 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(3)(A), (D). An ``out-of-band emission'' is an ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies immediately outside the necessary bandwidth which results from the modulation process, but excluding spurious emissions.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). A ``spurious emission'' is an ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' Id. � 2.1(c). The objective of most of the Commission's traditional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1.txt
  • MHz rather than 406.025 MHz. It believes such a change is warranted because new satellite EPIRB productions may be on frequencies in 3 kHz steps within the 406-406.1 MHz band to prevent saturation of the 406.025 MHz frequency. It further recommends that Section 80.1061(a) be revised to include the current version of the RTCM standard for 406 MHz EPIRBs, Version 2.1, August 22, 2000. In addition, the USCG proposed that Section 80.1061 be revised to specify that independent laboratories, rather than the USCG, verify the compliance of 406 MHz EPIRBs with RTCM standards, stating that this would streamline the authorization process. The Task Force recommends that the reference to the Commandant (G-MVI) be updated to (G-MSE). We agree with the USCG
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1_Erratum.doc
  • MHz rather than 406.025 MHz. It believes such a change is warranted because new satellite EPIRB productions may be on frequencies in 3 kHz steps within the 406-406.1 MHz band to prevent saturation of the 406.025 MHz frequency. It further recommends that Section 80.1061(a) be revised to include the current version of the RTCM standard for 406 MHz EPIRBs, Version 2.1, August 22, 2000. In addition, the USCG proposed that Section 80.1061 be revised to specify that independent laboratories, rather than the USCG, verify the compliance of 406 MHz EPIRBs with RTCM standards, stating that this would streamline the authorization process. The Task Force recommends that the reference to the Commandant (G-MVI) be updated to (G-MSE). We agree with the USCG
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-103A1.txt
  • and completes the check no earlier than 4 seconds after the subscriber hangs-up; (3) makes an off-hook stutter dial tone check after an unanswered incoming call no more than once; (4) perform no off-hook stutter dial tone checks after an unanswered incoming call if the visual message indicator is already lit; (5) take the line off-hook for no more than 2.1 seconds per stutter dial tone check; (6) synchronize off-hook checks when multiple stutter dial tone detection and visual signaling devices are attached to the same line so that only one check is made per calling event for a single line; (7) not block dial tone to a subscriber attempting to initiate a call as an off-hook stutter dial tone detection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-105A1.txt
  • Complaint, Exhibit F (MCImetro/Bell Atlantic Interconnection Agreement 1997). Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, � 25. Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, � 26. Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, � 27. Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, � 27. Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, � 28. Starpower-Verizon Virginia Complaint, Exhibit I (Second Starpower-Verizon Virginia Agreement) at 5, � 2.1. Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, � 29. The parties did not include a complete copy of the Second Starpower-Verizon Virginia Agreement as an exhibit to any of their pleadings. Rather than referencing multiple exhibits when discussing the agreement, we hereafter cite exclusively to the parties' joint stipulations regarding the agreement's terms. Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 7, � 31.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-113A1.txt
  • holder of a non-attributable interest in a broadcast licensee to have the right to nominate a member of the licensee's board of directors, but may not have the right to designate or elect a director. In other words, NBC contends, the licensee entity must have the ability to reject the nominees of the non-attributable interest holder. NBC notes that Section 2.1(b) of the Stockholder Agreement provides that if the rules eventually permit it, then NBC shall have the right to appoint members of Paxson's board. Only in this clause is NBC assured that its nominees will be elected to Paxson's board. NBC states that it has never invoked Section 2.1(b). The three persons that served on Paxson's board did so only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.txt
  • In light of the rules and regulatory safeguards we are adopting herein, we disagree with SkyBridge's assertion that MVDDS will cause harmful interference to NGSO FSS. In reaching this conclusion, we are confident that the rules we adopt herein will limit the interference potential from MVDDS to a level that does not rise to ``harmful interference'' as defined by Section 2.1 of our rules. These rules will ensure that MVDDS and NGSO FSS can share the 12 GHz band while preserving the integrity of the co-primary status of both operations. Therefore, we find that SkyBridge's concern that the Commission's decision to authorize MVDDS violates the prohibition on harmful interference provisions of SHVIA/RLBSA is without merit. Furthermore, a review of the legislative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-131A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-131A1.txt
  • (rel. Feb. 7, 2002). A feeder link is a radio link from an earth station at a given location to a space station, or vice versa, conveying information for a space radiocommunication service other than for the fixed-satellite service. The given location may be at a specified fixed point, or at any fixed point within specified areas. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). This allocation includes 2.2 megahertz for uplinks (at 148-150.05 MHz and 399.9-400.05 MHz) and 1.85 megahertz for downlinks (at 137-138 MHz and 400.15-401 MHz). See NPRM, 13 FCC Rcd at 3429 & 3433, �� 3 & 9. The Notice resulted in 22 comments and 7 reply comments. Also, letters were filed by 89 air-to-ground radio telephone service subscribers urging the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1.txt
  • to Congress pursuant to the Congressional Review Act. The Commission will also send a copy of this Report and Order and FRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA, and a copy of the Report and Order and FRFA (or a summary thereof) will be published in the Federal Register. The term ``out-of-band emission'' is defined in Section 2.1 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1, as an emission in frequencies immediately outside the transmitter's necessary (i.e., authorized) bandwidth that results from modulation. We use the term in a broader sense here, as referring to any emission produced by a transmitter in frequencies outside its authorized bandwidth, whether or not the emission occurs in frequencies immediately outside that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1_Erratum.doc
  • to Congress pursuant to the Congressional Review Act. The Commission will also send a copy of this Report and Order and FRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA, and a copy of the Report and Order and FRFA (or a summary thereof) will be published in the Federal Register. The term ``out-of-band emission'' is defined in Section 2.1 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1, as an emission in frequencies immediately outside the transmitter's necessary (i.e., authorized) bandwidth that results from modulation. We use the term in a broader sense here, as referring to any emission produced by a transmitter in frequencies outside its authorized bandwidth, whether or not the emission occurs in frequencies immediately outside that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-136A1.txt
  • addressed by the proposed power limitations. We also propose to limit access to this band to amateur operators holding a General, Advanced, or Amateur Extra Class license, as requested by ARRL, as a way to insure amateur operations would be conducted in a manner that minimizes the interference potential to other users. We note that with an allocation of only 2.1 kilohertz of spectrum in this band, amateur radio operations may be limited to propagation experiments, telegraphy and low speed data applications. Nonetheless, this allocation would benefit amateur experimentation of the LF range. We seek comment on all of these proposals for a secondary amateur service allocation in the 135.7-137.8 kHz. In declining to propose a secondary amateur service allocation for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • - 10 hours A.1.8 O-8 Reject Interval - Non-Mechanized A.1.9 O-9 FOC Timeliness - Mechanized A.1.12 O-9 FOC Timeliness - Partially Mechanized - 10 hours A.1.13 O-9 FOC Timeliness - Non-Mechanized A.1.14 O-11 FOC & Reject Response Completeness - Mechanized A.1.15 O-11 FOC & Reject Response Completeness - Partially Mechanized A.1.16 O-11 FOC & Reject Response Completeness - Non-Mechanized Provisioning A.2.1 P-4 Order Completion Interval A.2.2 P-1 Held Orders A.2.4 P-2 % Jeopardies - Mechanized A.2.5 P-2 % Jeopardies - Non-Mechanized A.2.7 P-2 Average Jeopardy Notice Interval - Mechanized A.2.8 P-2 Average Jeopardy Notice Interval - Non-Mechanized A.2.9 P-2 % Jeopardy Notice >= 48 hours - Mechanized A.2.10 P-2 % Jeopardy Notice >= 48 hours - Non-Mechanized A.2.11 P-3 % Missed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-149A1.txt
  • Comments at 2-17, raising questions of competitive parity, lack of evidence of cost savings, and the need to grant only secondary status, if any to NMVPDs. We address these specific challenges below. See NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd 11967, 11969 (1999). Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78 and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Band Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, and Cable Television Relay Service, 5 FCC Rcd 6410, 6423 (1990) (quoting Spectrum Utilization Policy for Fixed and Mobile Services in the 947 MHz-40 GHz Band, 48 Fed. Reg. 6730, � 31 (1983)) (``Wireless Cable Order''). NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd at 11967. Wireless Cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-151A1.txt
  • systems, allowing these systems to better avoid occupied channels and thereby evade interference. I am optimistic that this change and the other modifications we make in this item will encourage even greater sharing and result in a more diverse set of products to operate in the unlicensed bands. 47 C.F.R. � 15.247 47 C.F.R � 15.5. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). Id. Frequency hopping systems that use fewer than 75 hopping channels are limited to 125 mW output power. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.247(b). Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making and Order, ET Docket 99-231, 16 FCC Rcd. 10036 (2001). Id. at paragraph 13. These operating standards provide manufacturers with guidance for developing spread spectrum devices for the 2.4 GHz band.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-156A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-156A1.txt
  • both networks, which prevented [AACR] from fulfilling its international correspondent undertakings, and offering its services to customers owning a TRICOM line''). Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 7, � 1.19 (``calls originating in our network and intended for TRICOM were being blocked by limitations on the capacity attributable solely to TRICOM''). See Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 8, � 2.1 (AACR was forced to ``request from international companies with whom [it] hold[s] correspondent relations to abstain from sending [AACR] calls intended for TRICOM network [sic], due to the inability to complete them . . .''). Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 18, � 2.3; Supp. Joint Submission at 2, � 7 (stipulating that .68 centavos Dominicanos is equal to 4.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-164A1.txt
  • Comments at 20-21. Independents' Petition at v; Independents Reply at 17; Staurulakis Reply at 11-12. Many of these rules were in place when Congress established the CMRS classification and redefined mobile service in 1993 and adopted the 1996 Amendments to the Act, and Congress did not change the Commission's definition of mobile station. 47 C.F.R. � 22.99. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 24.5 (Personal Communications Services), 25.201(Satellite Communications), and 101.3 (Fixed Microwave Services). The definition in section 2.1 of the Commission's rules was adopted by the Radio Regulations annexed to the 1947 International Telecommunications Convention ratified by the United States in 1949. 63 Stat. 1399. By contrast, section 2.1 defines fixed service as ``[a] radio communication service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1.txt
  • on the facilities of local exchange carriers (``LECs''). See Sixth Report, at 13433-13434 and Fifth Report, at 17785. Fixed wireless technology generally has lower network deployment costs compared to wireline service and is better suited to serve rural and underserved markets. What is commonly referred to as MDS or wireless cable spectrum includes 33 different 6 megahertz channels in the 2.1-2.2 GHz and 2.5-2.7 GHz spectrum bands. These channels include the Multipoint Distribution Service (``MDS''), Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service (``MMDS''), and Instructional Television Fixed Service (``ITFS'') channels. MDS operators generally use the MMDS and MDS channels and lease excess capacity from ITFS operators. The WCS band at 2305-2320 MHz and 2345-2360 MHz surrounds the Digital Audio Radio Service (``DARS'') spectrum at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1_Erratum.doc
  • on the facilities of local exchange carriers (``LECs''). See Sixth Report, at 13433-13434 and Fifth Report, at 17785. Fixed wireless technology generally has lower network deployment costs compared to wireline service and is better suited to serve rural and underserved markets. What is commonly referred to as MDS or wireless cable spectrum includes 33 different 6 megahertz channels in the 2.1-2.2 GHz and 2.5-2.7 GHz spectrum bands. These channels include the Multipoint Distribution Service (``MDS''), Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service (``MMDS''), and Instructional Television Fixed Service (``ITFS'') channels. MDS operators generally use the MMDS and MDS channels and lease excess capacity from ITFS operators. The WCS band at 2305-2320 MHz and 2345-2360 MHz surrounds the Digital Audio Radio Service (``DARS'') spectrum at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.txt
  • Order, 49 FR 2357 (January 19, 1984). . See Final Acts of the World Administrative Radio Conference for Dealing with Frequency Allocations in Certain Parts of the Spectrum (WARC-92) at p. 92. An active sensor is an EESS or SRS measuring instrument by means of which information is obtained by transmission and reception of radio waves. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See Final Acts of the World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-97) at p. 71. A passive sensor is an EESS or SRS measuring instrument by means of which information is obtained by reception of radio waves of natural origin. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See Final Acts of the World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-2000) at pp. 43-46. See also United States Proposals for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-18A1.txt
  • resolving interference issues. Petition for Rulemaking, filed December 12, 1991 by Lloyd D. Young of Crescomm Transmission Services, Inc. (Crescomm Petition). Qualcomm, Inc. also filed a petition that was addressed in the Crescomm Order but not germane to these proceedings. MMSS is defined as a ``mobile-satellite service in which mobile earth stations are located on board ships.'' 47 CFR � 2.1. Mobile satellite service is defined in the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Radio Regulations as ``a radiocommunication service between mobile earth stations and one or more space stations, or between space stations used by this service; or between mobile earth stations by means of one or more space stations.'' For purposes of this Notice, ``C-band'' denotes the 3700-4200 MHz (4 GHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-229A1.txt
  • channel center frequencies as are specified for the original analog technology, whereas CDMA uses an entirely different channel plan. NPRM at para. 38. Ericsson Comments at 6; Cingular Comments at 17; CTIA Comments at 15; TIA Comments at 6. CTIA Comments at 15. Verizon Comments at 19; Verizon Reply Comments at 10. 47 C.F.R. �� 22.907 and 22.917. ANSI/TIA/EIA-553-A-1999, section 2.1.1.1. 47 C.F.R. � 22.915. NPRM at para. 39. Id. at para. 40-41. Id. at paras. 39-40. Id. at paras. 39-40. 47 C.F.R. � 22.917. NPRM at para. 41. Id. at para. 42. Id. Id. Id. In the NPRM, we proposed that section 22.917 be modified to: ``� 22.917 Emission limitations for cellular equipment. The rules in this section govern the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-23A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-23A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-23A1.txt
  • received on February 25, 2000 New ICO Global (Holdings) Ltd., received on May 9, 2001 Globalstar, received on May 14, 2001 Globalstar, received on June 26, 2001 SBE, received on August 7, 2001 (Reply comments in ET Docket No. 01-75) FSS is a radiocommunication service between earth stations at given points and one or more satellites. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. A feeder link is a bi-directional transmission path between a satellite and an earth station at a fixed point. Feeder link earth stations that distribute information to, and receive information from, terrestrial telecommunication networks, e.g., the public switched telephone network and the Internet, are generally known as gateways. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. MSS is a radiocommunication service between mobile
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1.txt
  • standards governing other earth station parameters, such as power levels, but we focus exclusively on issues related to antenna diameter in this section of the Further Notice. 47 C.F.R. Part 25 (2001). Notice, FCC 00-435, 15 FCC Rcd at 25132 (para. 7). 47 C.F.R. � 25.209. Notice, FCC 00-435, 15 FCC Rcd at 25133 (para. 9), citing 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 (2001). Notice, FCC 00-435, 15 FCC Rcd at 25133 (para. 9). Notice, FCC 00-435, 15 FCC Rcd at 25133 (para. 9). Notice, FCC 00-435, 15 FCC Rcd at 25133 (para. 9). Notice, FCC 00-435, 15 FCC Rcd at 25133 (para. 9). These "ripples" are in the form of a Bessel function of the first kind. Examples of such Bessel functions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1_Erratum.doc
  • standards governing other earth station parameters, such as power levels, but we focus exclusively on issues related to antenna diameter in this section of the Further Notice. 47 C.F.R. Part 25 (2001). Notice, FCC 00-435, 15 FCC Rcd at 25132 (para. 7). 47 C.F.R. � 25.209. Notice, FCC 00-435, 15 FCC Rcd at 25133 (para. 9), citing 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 (2001). Notice, FCC 00-435, 15 FCC Rcd at 25133 (para. 9). Notice, FCC 00-435, 15 FCC Rcd at 25133 (para. 9). Notice, FCC 00-435, 15 FCC Rcd at 25133 (para. 9). Notice, FCC 00-435, 15 FCC Rcd at 25133 (para. 9). These "ripples" are in the form of a Bessel function of the first kind. Examples of such Bessel functions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-261A1.txt
  • recent action, which specified that Federal Government wind profiler radar systems (``wind profilers'') will operate in the sub-band 448-450 MHz; (5) permit U.S. flagged ships to use more spectrum-efficient equipment for on-board mobile radiotelephony communications in areas outside the territorial waters of the United States; (6) delete unused allocations for the International Fixed Public Radiocommunication Services (``IFPRS'') from the bands 2.1-2.2 GHz and 10.7-11.7 GHz; and (7) allocate the band 14-14.5 GHz to the mobile-satellite (Earth-to-space) except aeronautical mobile-satellite service on a secondary basis. We also propose to make numerous ministerial amendments to Part 2 of our Rules. discussion In the United States, radio spectrum may be allocated to either Federal Government or non-Federal Government use exclusively, or for Federal and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • between 100 meters and 10 meters. Thus, international broadcasting is also known as shortwave broadcasting. The fixed service is defined as a radiocommunication service between specified fixed points; a station in the fixed service is a fixed station. The mobile service is defined as a radiocommunication service between mobile and land stations, or between mobile stations. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. The broadcasting service is defined as a radiocommunication service in which the transmissions are intended for direct reception by the general public. Id. While this service may include sound transmissions, television transmissions or other types of transmission, the narrow channel bandwidth assignments made in this frequency range limit its use to sound transmissions. Interference is the effect of unwanted energy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-284A1.txt
  • Revenue Service confirming that the merger of its Hughes subsidiary with EchoStar would be tax free to GM and its shareholders for U.S. federal income-tax purposes. See General Motors Corporation, SEC Form 10-Q, Quarterly Report for the period ending June 30, 2002, (``GM 10-Q June 2002 Report'') at 25. See Application at 18. See Id. at 2. Merger Agreement � 2.1(d)-(e). See EchoStar May 29, 2002 Preliminary Information Statement at 85. The EchoStar Series D convertible preferred stock held by Vivendi is automatically convertible into 10 shares of EchoStar Class A common stock immediately prior to the effectiveness of the merger. Post-merger, Vivendi will hold less than 5% of the equity and about 1% of the voting interests in New EchoStar.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-300A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-300A1.txt
  • C.F.R. �76.616. These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. ��87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. ��2.1 & 76.613(a). Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, para. 14 (1985) (hereinafter MO&O). 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-304A1.txt
  • In general, wireless carriers believe that the 2150-2160 MHz band should be reallocated to allow AWS and that the MDS operators should be relocated. Such an action, they contend would have many benefits for AWS. For example, Telephone and Data Systems claims that the 2150-2160 MHz band is vital as part of a large contiguous allocation for AWS in the 2.1 GHz band. The Wireless Communications Division of the Telecommunications Industry Association states that the reallocation of the 2150-2160 MHz band ``offers the only practical opportunity'' to create a global downlink band for AWS. The Radio Advisory Board of Canada states that a significant step towards the objective of ensuring maximum worldwide commonality would be the adoption of a common base
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 02-353 Adopted: November 7, 2002 Released: November 22, 2002 Comments Due: February 7, 2003 Reply Comments Due: March 14, 2003 By the Commission: Chairman Powell, and Commissioners Copps and Martin issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph Number I. Introduction . . . . . . . . .
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-325A1.txt
  • �� 309(j)(4)(B)-(C) (relating to the promotion of service to rural areas and the provision of economic opportunities for rural telephone companies). 47 U.S.C. �� 309(j)(3)(B)-(D). Generally, after notice and comment, we have addressed these policies in adopting service rules for particular spectrum bands. See, e.g., In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 02-305 (rel. Nov. 22, 2002). We encourage rural interests to participate in these service-specific rulemaking proceedings. See In the Matter of Statement of Policy on Establishing a Government-to-Government Relationship with Indian Tribes, Policy Statement, FCC 00-207, 16 FCC Rcd 4078 (2000); 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(f)(3). Rural Radiotelephone Service is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • the impact of BellSouth's policy on its competitors is minimal. BellSouth's policy complies with checklist item 2. Although not a factor in our decision here, we note that BellSouth is working on a maintenance process that addresses this situation, which gives us confidence that BellSouth will continue to comply with checklist item 2 in the future.345 340 See generally Florida/Tennessee A.2.1.1.1.1 � A.2.1.1.2.2 (Order Completion Interval, Residence); Florida/Tennessee B.2.1.3.1.1 � B.2.1.3.2.4 (Order Completion Interval, Loop + Port Combinations); Florida/Tennessee A.3.1 (% Missed Repair Appointments); A.3.3 and B.3.3 (Maintenance Average Duration); A.3.4 and B.3.4 (% Repeat Troubles within 30 Days); and A.3.5 and B.3.5 (% Out of Service More than 24 Hours); see generally Appendix D. 341 AT&T Comments at 20-21; AT&T
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-337A1.txt
  • AT&T to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission dated Dec. 9, 2002 at 1 (AT&T Dec. 9 Ex Parte Letter). We note, for example, that SBC's proposed tariff would reduce the notice period for certain customers from the current 30 days to 15 days. See, e.g., SWBT, Tariff FCC No. 73, Transmittal No. 2906, 6th Revised Page 2-20, section 2.1.6(A). Bankruptcy courts frequently require utilities serving bankrupt customers to bill for their services bi-weekly. See Opposition of CTC Communications Corp., DSL.net Communications, LLC, Focal Communications Corp., Level 3 Communications, LLC, Pac-West Telecomm, Inc., and US LEC Corp. at 8 and Exh. 1 (filed Aug. 15, 2002) (CTC et al. Opposition); BellSouth Tariff FCC No. 1, Transmittal No. 657, Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-338A1.txt
  • video subscribers. As of year-end 2001, AOL Time Warner had more than 3.3 million digital video subscribers. By June 2002, AOL Time Warner had as many as 3.9 million subscribers. As of year-end 2001, AT&T reported 3.5 million digital video subscribers. As of June 2002, AT&T reported 3.9 million digital video subscribers. Charter Communications provided digital video service to approximately 2.1 million subscribers as of year-end 2001 and 2.4 million subscribers as of June 2002. Charter expects to have as many as 2.7 million digital video subscribers by year-end 2002. Cablevision began providing digital video service commercially in September 2001. By year-end 2001, Cablevision had 17,200 digital video subscribers, and by June 2002, Cablevision had 42,670 digital video subscribers. Cablevision expects
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-33A1.txt
  • 445 The upperbands of spectrum that have been used for the commercial deployment of wireless high-speed systems generally consist of three different spectrum bands: 24 GHz (formerly known as Digital Electronic Messaging Service or DEMS), 28 GHz (Local Multipoint Distribution Services or LMDS), and 39 GHz bands. 446 This spectrum, made up of 33 different 6 MHz channels in the 2.1-2.2 GHz and 2.5-2.7 GHz spectrum bands, includes MDS, Multichannel MDS (MMDS) and Instructional Television Fixed Service (ITFS) channels. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.900 et seq.; 47 C.F.R. � 74.901 et seq. In a two-way communication system, an MDS operator generally uses the MMDS channels and leased excess capacity on the ITFS channels in the 2.5-2.7 GHz range for downstream communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-53A1.txt
  • is permitted under Section 310(d) to delegate day-to-day operations relating to those three areas, so long as the licensee continues to set the policies guiding those operations. See Southwest Texas Public Broadcasting Council, 85 FCC 2d 713, 715 (1981). Here, the TBA contains an express retention by Air Virginia of ultimate authority over programming, finances and personnel. See TBA � 2.1(a)-(f). Air Virginia expressly retains the responsibility to ensure that the overall programming responds to issues of concern to the community of license and also retains the right at anytime to preempt Clear Channel's programming for emergency programming and for programming which Air Virginia, in its sole discretion, believes to be in the public interest. Id. �� 1.1-1.2. In addition, Air
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.txt
  • Time To Repair - Total 8.2 7.82 7.1 7.01 6.9 7.23 7.8 7.45 5 MR-4-04-3200 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 95 100 97 97 98 98 97 100 5 MR-4-06-3200 % Out of Service > 4 Hours 67 65 63 59.7 61 61.22 59 72.92 5 MR-4-08-3200 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 4.4 0 2.7 3.23 2.1 2.04 2.5 0 5 MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01-3200 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 23 7.5 19 6.06 18 10 17 13.46 18 6.9 TRUNKING Ordering OR 1 - Order Confirmation Timeliness OR-1-12-5020 % On Time FOC (<= 192 Forecasted Trunks) 100 100 62.5 100 90.9 1,3,4 OR-1-12-5030 % On Time FOC (> 192 and Unforecasted Trunks) 48.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.txt
  • effectiveness of the new rules. Implementation of Sections 309(j) and 337 of the Communications Act of 1934 as Amended, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, WT Docket No. 99-87, 15 FCC Rcd 22709, 22737-38 (paras. 60-61) (2000). Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, and Cable Television Relay Service, Gen. Docket Nos. 90-54 and 80-113, 5 FCC Rcd 6410, 6424 (para. 90) (1990) (MDS Order). MDS Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6441 n.73. MDS Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6441 n.73. SIA Comments at 8-9; SES Americom
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1_Erratum.doc
  • effectiveness of the new rules. Implementation of Sections 309(j) and 337 of the Communications Act of 1934 as Amended, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, WT Docket No. 99-87, 15 FCC Rcd 22709, 22737-38 (paras. 60-61) (2000). Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, and Cable Television Relay Service, Gen. Docket Nos. 90-54 and 80-113, 5 FCC Rcd 6410, 6424 (para. 90) (1990) (MDS Order). MDS Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6441 n.73. MDS Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6441 n.73. SIA Comments at 8-9; SES Americom
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-105A1.txt
  • Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.113, 15.209 and 15.217. See also 47 C.F.R. �2.106 footnote US294. See Notice at pages 8962-8963 (paras 22-28). PEP is defined as the average power supplied to the antenna transmission line by a transmitter during one radio frequency cycle at the crest of the modulation envelop taken under normal operating conditions. See 47 C.F.R. �2.1. See Report and Order, Docket No. 20271, 70 FCC 2d 1193 (1978). See e.g. comments of AMRAD at 2. See reply comments of Galasso. See reply comments of Galasso and comments of Hamel. See comments of ARRL at 9. See also comments of Young expressing concern about interference from the power grid. See reply comments of Chester and comments of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-111A1.pdf
  • (rel. Oct. 29, 2002), 17 FCC Rcd 21,530, 21,530. See, e.g., Letter from John E. Benedict, Sprint, Federal Regulatory Affairs-LDD, to Ms. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 01-338 (filed January 10, 2003); Nextel Reply Comments, CC Docket No. 01-338 at 7; and AT&T Wireless Comments, CC Docket No. 01-338 at 3. Horizontal Merger Guidelines, � 2.1. See, e.g., Broadband NPRM, 16 FCC Rcd at 22,762, para. 30; In the Matter of Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Report, 14 FCC Rcd 2398, 2423-24, para. 48 (1999). We note
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.txt
  • With Respect to Commercial Mobile Service, Seventh Report, 17 FCC Rcd 12985, 13038-13063 (2002). We also note that we continue to make strides to free up additional licensed spectrum resources and to provide greater flexibility to unlicensed devices to facilitate spectrum-based broadband access. See, e.g., In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24135 (2002); In the Matter of Additional Spectrum for Unlicensed Devices Below 900 MHz and in the 3 GHz Band, Notice of Inquiry, 17 FCC Rcd 25632 (2002); In the Matter of Amendment of Parts 1, 21, 73, 74 and 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Provision of Fixed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1_Erratum.doc
  • With Respect to Commercial Mobile Service, Seventh Report, 17 FCC Rcd 12985, 13038-13063 (2002). We also note that we continue to make strides to free up additional licensed spectrum resources and to provide greater flexibility to unlicensed devices to facilitate spectrum-based broadband access. See, e.g., In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24135 (2002); In the Matter of Additional Spectrum for Unlicensed Devices Below 900 MHz and in the 3 GHz Band, Notice of Inquiry, 17 FCC Rcd 25632 (2002); In the Matter of Amendment of Parts 1, 21, 73, 74 and 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Provision of Fixed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-132A1.txt
  • studies or preparing an EA, except as indicated in (b)(1)(ii) below and in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section. The term power in column 2 of Table 1 refers to total operating power of the transmitting operation in question in terms of effective radiated power (ERP), effective isotropically radiated power (EIRP), or peak envelope power (PEP), as defined in �2.1 of this chapter. The phrase total transmit power of all channels when used in column 2 of Table 1 means the sum of the ERP or EIRP of all co-located simultaneously operating transmitters owned and operated by a single licensee. When applying criteria of Table 1, radiation in all directions should be considered. For the case of transmitting facilities using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-134A1.txt
  • and advanced wireless applications, such as voice, data and broadband services provided over a variety of high-speed fixed and mobile networks, and which are popularly referred to as 3G systems. We have also proposed service rules for AWS operations in the bands 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz. See also Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24135 (2002). ). See also U.S. Department of Commerce's News Release entitled ``Bush Administration Forges Landmark Plan for Spectrum Allocation,'' dated July 23, 2002. The Commission, which is an independent agency, administers non-Federal Government spectrum and NTIA, which is an operating unit of the U.S. Department of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
  • Number of Channels By Category of Programming� Competitive Group Noncompetitive Group Number of Channels Annual Change Number of Channels Annual Change Category July 2001 July 2002 Number Percent July 2001 July 2002 Number Percent BST and Major CPST Channel Lineup Local broadcast 11.0 11.2 0.2 1.8% 11.4 11.7 0.3 2.6% Standard error 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 Public, educational, and government 2.1 2.2 0.1 4.8% 2.8 2.8 0.0 0.0% Standard error 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Leased access 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0% 0.8 0.9 0.1 12.5% Standard error 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 Other local 1.0 1.2 0.2 20.0% 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0% Standard error 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 Satellite sports 4.5 4.6 0.1 2.2% 4.0 4.3 0.3 7.5% Standard error 0.2 0.2 0.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-138A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-138A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-138A2.txt
  • Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems, ET Docket No. 00-258, Third Report and Order, Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Second Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 2223 (2003) (``AWS Third NPRM''). Services Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24135 (2002) (``AWS Service Rules Notice''). See DTV Second Periodic Review NPRM, 18 FCC Rcd 1279. 47 U.S.C. � 337(a). 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(15)(C)(iv)(II). See Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact upon the Existing Television Broadcast Service, MM Docket No. 87-268, Fifth Report and Order, 12 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-139A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996) (``1996 Act''). Because we find in this Order that all payphone lines should be exempted from the PICC, we need not address this assertion. 5 U.S.C. � 553. See Petition at 6-9. See Coalition Opposition at 10. CALLS NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd at 16880-84, Appendix A at � 2.1. Id. at 16872, para. 1. Id. at 16874, para. 5. See Petition at 10-11. 47 U.S.C. � 276(a)(1). 47 U.S.C. � 276(a)(2). See, e.g., First Payphone Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 20614, para. 146; Wisconsin Public Service Commission, Order Directing Filings, CPD No. 00-01, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2051, 2063, para. 39 (2002) (Wisconsin Payphone Order). The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-145A1.txt
  • Rcd 2661 (1988) (MMDS PN). This filing window remained open until November 1, 1990, following which the Commission changed to a filing system under which applications had to be filed on the same day to be considered mutually exclusive. See Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, and Cable Television Relay Service, Gen. Docket Nos. 90-54 and 80-113, Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6410, 6424 � 90 (1990). Id. Id. Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 21.902(a) (1988). See e.g. 47 C.F.R. � 21.902(c) (1988). See e.g.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-147A1.txt
  • (Mester Channel H3 Application). The three applications will be collectively referred to as the Mester 1992 Applications. See responses to FCC Form 494, Page 2, Question 14(c). See Mester 1992 Applications, Blocks 7(a)-(k); Division Letter at 1. See January 2, 1992 applications. Amendment of Parts 1, 2, and 21 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 7 FCC Rcd 3266, 3270-71 � 19 and n.35 (1992). Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 of the Commission's Rules With Regard to Filing Procedures in the Multipoint Distribution Service and in the Instructional Television Fixed Service and Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act - Competitive Bidding, in MM Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.txt
  • Rcd 14063 (2002). See 47 C.F.R. � 15.205. Spurious emissions are those on a frequency or frequencies outside the necessary bandwidth for the transmission of information, the level of which may be reduced without affecting the transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 and 15.209. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.205. The table in paragraph (a) of this section states that all frequencies above 38.6 GHz are designated as a restricted band. However, paragraph (d)(4) of this section exempts transmitters operating under 47 C.F.R. �� 15.253 and 15.255, which permit operation in the 46.7-46.9 GHz, 76-77 GHz and 57-64 GHz bands, from complying with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-150A1.txt
  • next-generation network technologies. Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems, ET Docket No. 00-258, Second Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 23193 (2002). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24135 (2002). Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems, ET Docket No. 00-258, Third Report and Order, Third Notice of Proposed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-157A1.txt
  • (Bureau). Radio Services Are Transferred From Mass-Media Bureau to Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Public Notice, 17 FCC Rcd 5077 (2002). Accordingly, the Bureau's Public Safety and Private Wireless Division assumed all regulatory duties associated with these services effective March 25, 2002. Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands, Gen. Docket No. 90-54, Second Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 6792 (adopted Sept. 26, 1991, rel. Oct. 25, 1991) (Freeze Order). Id. at 6794 � 9, n.9. Letter from Michael B. Hayden, Chief, Microwave Branch, Private Radio Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Joseph J. Hemenway, dated May 15, 1992; Letter from Michael B. Hayden, Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.txt
  • consider: (1) in-beam/out-of-band and (2) out-of-beam/in-band (or co-frequency). In the first situation, isolation between the two systems is provided by the transmitter out-of-band specifications. If two different MSS systems cover the same geographic area with two different generation satellites, the newer generation system with the higher gain antenna will not necessarily suffer a larger degradation in receiver noise floor. Table 2.1.1.A of Section 2.1 of Appendix C2 analyzes this co-beam, adjacent channel case and shows that the MSS terminals of the fully loaded current-generation MSV system will cause a 3.5% increase in noise temperature of each beam of the current generation Inmarsat MSS system that has four beams covering the United States. For the next-generation system with 100 beams covering the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1_Erratum.doc
  • consider: (1) in-beam/out-of-band and (2) out-of-beam/in-band (or co-frequency). In the first situation, isolation between the two systems is provided by the transmitter out-of-band specifications. If two different MSS systems cover the same geographic area with two different generation satellites, the newer generation system with the higher gain antenna will not necessarily suffer a larger degradation in receiver noise floor. Table 2.1.1.A of Section 2.1 of Appendix C2 analyzes this co-beam, adjacent channel case and shows that the MSS terminals of the fully loaded current-generation MSV system will cause a 3.5% increase in noise temperature of each beam of the current generation Inmarsat MSS system that has four beams covering the United States. For the next-generation system with 100 beams covering the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.txt
  • a potential for interference to the MSS systems operating in the adjacent frequency assignment. Boeing is the only MSS licensee that has provided detailed comments concerning the potential that the ICO ATC system may cause interference to another 2 GHz MSS system. We evaluate the impact that 2 GHz ATC as proposed by ICO would have on Boeing's MSS system. 2.1 MSS Uplink Band (1990-2025 MHz) ICO has proposed three possible ATC modes that would place transmitters in the MSS uplink band; (1) Forward Band Mode that would implement ATC MTs in the MSS uplink band; (2) Reverse Band Mode that would put ATC base stations in the MSS uplink band; and (3) Uplink Duplex Mode that implements both the ATC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4_Erratum.doc
  • a potential for interference to the MSS systems operating in the adjacent frequency assignment. Boeing is the only MSS licensee that has provided detailed comments concerning the potential that the ICO ATC system may cause interference to another 2 GHz MSS system. We evaluate the impact that 2 GHz ATC as proposed by ICO would have on Boeing's MSS system. 2.1 MSS Uplink Band (1990-2025 MHz) ICO has proposed three possible ATC modes that would place transmitters in the MSS uplink band; (1) Forward Band Mode that would implement ATC MTs in the MSS uplink band; (2) Reverse Band Mode that would put ATC base stations in the MSS uplink band; and (3) Uplink Duplex Mode that implements both the ATC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-16A1.txt
  • provide for additional flexibility in that band, as well as any additional spectrum that we retain for UPCS use in the 1910-1920 MHz band. � Seek comment on making available for new services, including AWS, the MSS uplink band spectrum that we are reallocating at 2020-2025 MHz. We also ask whether this band could be paired with spectrum in the 2.1 GHz band. � Seek further comment on making available for new services, including AWS, a 10 megahertz block that is upper adjacent to the existing 45 megahertz AWS allocation in the 2110-2155 MHz band. This spectrum block consists of the remaining 5 megahertz of the MDS band at 2155-2160 MHz combined with an adjacent 5 megahertz spectrum block in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-178A1.txt
  • September 1, 1999, from Sharon Bertelsen, Supervisory Attorney, MDS Section, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Ronald D. Maines, Esq., Counsel to Champion Industries, Inc., regarding File No. CIP-92-01297 (Provo, Utah) (VSD Sept. 1, 1999, Letter). Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78 and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, and Cable Television Relay Service, Gen. Docket No. 90-54, Second Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 6792, 6801-6806 (1991) (Second Report and Order). See also 47 C.F.R. � 74.990 (1991). See 47 C.F.R. � 74.990(a) (1992). Id. Herein, the term ``MDS'' is generally used
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-228A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-228A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-228A4.txt
  • also App. B. Michigan Bell missed PM 54.1-02 (Trouble Report Rate Net of Installations and Repeat Reports; Resold Specials; DS1) in February through April 2003. We note, however, that Michigan Bell's performance has been improving, with Michigan Bell achieving parity in May and June 2003. Michigan Bell also missed certain installation interval submetrics for several months. Michigan Bell missed PM 55-02.1 (Average Installation Interval; UNE; Digital (1-10) (days)) in February and May 2003 and missed PM 55-03 (Average Installation Interval; UNE; DS1 Loop (includes PRI) (days)). As discussed above, we accord the installation interval metrics little weight because results can be affected by a variety of factors outside the BOC's control that are unrelated to provisioning timeliness. See, e.g., Qwest 9-State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
  • any narrow-band spurious emission (excluding intermodulation products) within a 30 kHz measurement bandwidth shall be 10 dB above the power limit specified in the table. Honeywell Comments at 2-3; Rockwell Collins Comments at 4. Honeywell Comments at 4. Mobile Satellite Service is a radio communication service between mobile earth stations and one or more space stations. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. A mobile earth station is an earth station intended for use while in motion or during halts at unspecified points. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.201. See Amendment of Parts 2 and 22 of the Commission's Rules Relative to Cellular Communications Systems, Report and Order, Gen. Docket Nos. 84-1231, 84-1233, 84-1234, 2 FCC Rcd 1825, 1844-45 �� 154-155 (1986) (MSS Allocation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-244A1.txt
  • Program, Inc., One Stop Financial, Inc., Group Discounts, Inc., 800 Discounts, Inc. (the Inga Companies) and Combined Companies, Inc. (collectively Petitioners). Petitioners' requests for declaratory relief stem from a question referred to us, under the doctrine of primary jurisdiction, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The question referred by the Third Circuit is ```whether section 2.1.8 [of AT&T's Tariff FCC No. 2] permits an aggregator to transfer traffic under a [tariffed] plan without transferring the plan itself in the same transaction.''' Interpretation of AT&T's tariff is a matter within this agency's expertise. We conclude that AT&T's tariff did not prohibit such a movement of traffic and thus permitted it. Accordingly, AT&T's conduct was unauthorized and violated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.txt
  • Spread Spectrum and Other Wideband Emissions not Presently Provided for in the FCC Rules and Regulations, First Report and Order, GEN Docket No. 81-413, 101 FCC 2d 419 (1985) (adopting rules in Part 15 for low power spread spectrum devices). The Radio Astronomy Service is astronomy based on the reception of radio waves of cosmic origin. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Footnote 5.556 stated that radio astronomy observations could be carried out under national arrangements in the 72.77-72.91 GHz band and, in making assignments to stations of other services, footnote 5.149 urged administrations to take all practical steps to protect the RAS in this band from harmful interference. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106 nn.5.149, 5.556. See NPRM, 17 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-249A1.pdf
  • and Technology Analysis Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telephone Subscribership in the United States (April 2003) (Telephone Subscribership Report). See also AT&T Comments at 11 (citing November 2002 Telephone Subscribership Report). . According to Bureau of Labor Statistics figures, urban households continue to spend more on telephone service, including local and long-distance service, than do rural households. See Reference Book, Table 2.1 (average annual expenditures on telephone service by household locations). In particular, the IAS mechanism has helped to reduce by $2.6 billion the recovery of common line costs by price cap carriers through inefficient rate elements containing implicit support. Access Charge Reform, Price Cap Performance Review for LECs, CC Docket Nos. 96-262 and 94-1, Order on Remand, 15 FCC Rcd 12962,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ` V Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 02-353 Adopted: October 16, 2003 Released: November 25, 2003 By the Commission: Chairman Powell, Commissioners Martin and Adelstein issuing separate statements; Commissioner Copps approving in part, concurring in part and issuing a separate statement. Table of Contents Heading Paragraph # I. Introduction 1 A. AWS Allocation Order 4 B. AWS Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X � SEPARATE STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN MICHAEL K. POWELL Re: Report and Order in the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands The 90 MHz of additional licensed spectrum made available today is a key building block for the broadband Internet future of licensed wireless service. Across the country, wireless providers -- from Verizon Wireless in Washington DC to Monet Mobile Networks in the Dakotas -- are increasingly utilizing their licensed spectrum holdings to build infrastructure to support Internet applications.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A3.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit SEPARATE STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. COPPS Approving in Part, Concurring in Part Re: Report and Order in the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands Advanced Wireless Services, such as 3G and IMT-2000, obviously hold tremendous potential for consumers. I join my colleagues and the Bureau in hopes that these service rules and the auction process will bring about a robust and efficient use of this spectrum, which is exactly what we are supposed to be encouraging. I also hope that as we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A4.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit SEPARATE STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER KEVIN J . MARTIN Re: Report and Order in the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz Bands I am pleased to support this item, which adopts service rules for advanced wireless services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz bands. The flexible rules we adopt allow the two 45 MHz blocks of contiguous spectrum at issue to be used for a range of advanced wireless services. The wireless industry is already on the forefront in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A5.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit SEPARATE STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER JONATHAN S. ADELSTEIN Re: Report and Order in the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands Today is a banner day for wireless service in the United States. By adopting service and technical rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz bands, we are moving a step closer to seeing a new generation of wireless services in this country, including the so-called third generation or 3G mobile systems. I think our
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-269A1.txt
  • 8 B. RNSS Allocations 21 C. Satellite DARS and Adjacent Bands 37 D. ITFS/MDS Band 41 E. Space Science Services 48 F. The Band 25.25-27.5 GHz 53 G. Other Allocation Issues 57 (1) Secondary AMS(R)S Allocation in the Band 136-137 MHz 57 (2) The Band 420-450 MHz 60 (3) On-board Mobile Radiotelephony Communications 65 (4) IFPRS Use in the Bands 2.1-2.2 GHz and 10.7-11.7 GHz 68 (5) Secondary MSS Use of the band 14-14.5 GHz 72 H. Ministerial Amendments.............................................................. ..........................79 IV. Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification 91 V. ordering clauses 94 Appendix A: Parties Filing Comments and Reply Comments in Response to the Notice Appendix B: Final Rules introduction By this action, we amend Parts 2, 25, and 87 of our Rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-280A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-280A1.txt
  • AWS Further Notice. In a Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking portion of the same document, we sought comment on the best use of these reallocated bands. Such uses could include, for example, additional AWS spectrum - either under new service rules or as an expansion of adjacent-band Broadband PCS frequencies; replacement spectrum for Multipoint Distribution Service (MDS) operations in the 2.1 GHz band; or replacement Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) spectrum in conjunction with a plan to resolve public safety and Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) interference issues in the 800 MHz band. With regard to this last possibility - use of the MSS bands to help resolve 800 MHz public safety interference issues - we note that an extensive record has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-286A1.txt
  • For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR parts 2 and 25 as follows: PART 2 -- FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS 1. The authority citation for Part 2 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336, unless otherwise noted. 2. Section 2.1 is amended by adding a definition in alphabetical order: � 2.1 Terms and definitions. * * * * * (c) * * * * * * * * Baseline. The line from which maritime zones are measured, also known as the coast line. The baseline is a combination of the low-water line and closing lines across the mouths of inland
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-318A1.txt
  • 1 GHz, ET Docket No. 98-142, Report and Order, FCC 02-23, 76 FR 17288 (Apr. 10, 2002), 17 FCC Rcd 2658 (2002). A feeder link is a bi-directional transmission path between a satellite and an earth station at a fixed point. Feeder links convey information for a space radio communication service other than the fixed-satellite service. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See NGSO FSS Ku-Band R&O at � 39. See MSS Feeder Link R&O �� 55-57. These NGSO MSS systems use 2 GHz spectrum for service links and also have feeder uplink operations in the 5091-5250 MHz and 15.43-15.63 GHz bands, but no additional coordination rules are necessary for the feeder uplink bands, as sharing and coordination for those bands were
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.txt
  • that the equipment complies with the applicable rules with the new software loaded to the Commission and must receive an acknowledgement that the changes are acceptable before the modified equipment may be marketed. TCBs are currently not permitted to certify SDRs. See First Report and Order in ET Docket No. 00-47, 16 FCC Rcd 17373 (2001). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1043(b)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.925(e). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.932(e). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.944. For example, a notebook computer may run software that digitally generates a radio frequency waveform and sends the data to a wireless LAN card that further processes and transmits the radio signal. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.944. Failure to comply
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-32A1.txt
  • Rule Making in WT Docket No. 99-66 (``MICS Notice''), 14 FCC Rcd 3659, 3660 (1999). Id., at 3661. MICS Order, supra at 21,042 - 43. In this band, Metaids currently operates radiosondes, which are automatic transmitters, usually carried on an aircraft, free balloon, kite, or parachute, which transmit meteorological data during their journey through the atmosphere. (See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1.) Id. at 21,046. NTIA is responsible for managing the Government portion of the Table of Frequency Allocations. In bands shared between Federal and non-Federal Government services, the Commission and NTIA operate under a long-standing coordination agreement. See NTIA Manual, Basic Coordination Arrangement Between IRAC and the FCC, at p. 8-39. OET Letter, supra at p. 3. ``Biotronik, Inc. Petition for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-330A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-330A1.txt
  • from other broadcast network, diminishing the bargaining power of other local broadcasters in the same local area in their affiliation negotiations with their respective networks. NAB Comments at 22, Sidak Decl. � 28. NAB Comments at 21-24. NAB Comments at 25-28. Applicants' Reply at 63. [REDACTED]. EchoStar Petition at 32. Id. at 33. Id. at 33 citing DOJ/FTC Guidelines � 2.1. EchoStar Petition at 33-34. Id. at 34-36. EchoStar Petition at 32 (citing See United States v. Primestar, Inc. et al., No. 1:98CV01193 (D.D.C.) (filed May 12, 1998) (``DOJ Primestar Complaint''), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f1700/1757.pdf). EchoStar Petition at 36. Id. at 36. Id. at 36. Id. at 37. Id. at 38. Id. at 38-39. Id. at 39. Applicants' Reply at 73-74. Id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.txt
  • propagation, at a distance of 100 meters will be -95.6 dBm/MHz. If the noise plus interference level in a PCS receiver already is at -99 dBm/MHz, the introduction 100 meters away of another PCS handset operating in an adjacent PCS frequency block could increase the noise plus interference level in the first PCS receiver from -99 dBm/MHz to -97.3 dBm/MHz, 2.1 dB above the maximum noise plus interference level that can be accommodated. The emission level permitted by a PCS transmitter into adjacent PCS bands at 100 meters is the same as that permitted from an indoor UWB device, operating in the PCS band at its maximum permitted emission limit, at a distance of only 1.6 meters. Accordingly, PCS transmitters operating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • 10 meters. Thus, international broadcasting in this frequency range is also known as shortwave broadcasting. The fixed service is defined as a radiocommunication service between specified fixed points; a station in the fixed service is a fixed station. The mobile service is defined as a radiocommunication service between mobile and land stations, or between mobile stations. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. The broadcasting service is defined as a radiocommunication service in which the transmissions are intended for direct reception by the general public. Id. While this service may include sound transmissions, television transmissions or other types of transmissions, the narrow channel bandwidth assignments made in the HF bands limit broadcasting to sound transmissions. Interference is the effect of unwanted energy due
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.txt
  • will endeavor vigorously to obtain the support (or non-opposition) of associations and other groups for this MOU. The Parties agree that other provisions of this MOU may be implemented by them without either FCC or Congressional involvement. 1.6. This MOU does not restrict or preclude private agreements between or among any of the Parties. 2 2. DFAST TECHNOLOGY LICENSE AGREEMENT 2.1. The DFAST Technology License Agreement For Unidirectional Digital Cable Products (which is enclosed as part of this package) (hereinafter the "DFAST License Agreement") provides a license to use the DFAST scrambling technology for the POD- Host Interface. It is a standard commercial IP license for the DFAST technology for use in Unidirectional Digital Cable Products. It includes compliance and robustness
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-54A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-54A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-54A6.txt
  • and Qualcomm, Inc. comments at 5. Sources of undesired RF energy can include intentional radiators, e.g., transmitters, unintentional radiators, e.g., receivers, computers and other devices that use RF energy internally but do not radiate that energy as part of their operating functions, and incidental radiators that unintentionally generate and emit RF energy. This is the definition of interference in Section 2.1 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Task Force Report, at pp. 11-15. For example, channel coding, data coding, and error correction coding can be applied to digital signals to improve transmission reliability and performance in the presence of noise or interference. Task Force Report, at pp. 26-27. Task Force Report at pp. 27-30. The Task Force identified several long
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.txt
  • same requirement that we have for broadband PCS mobile/portable operation in the 1.9 GHz band. However, the Coalition notes that we adopted the 2-watt limit in the Two-Way Order without any explanation and urges that we delete this power limit. It says that the limit unduly restricts the flexibility of equipment designers to make the most efficient use of the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz bands. The Coalition emphasizes, however, that it is not advocating any change in the restrictions on power contained in Parts 1 and 2 that are designed to assure the protection of human health and safety; in fact, it recommends that we clarify that those limits apply to MDS and ITFS by adding those services to the list
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4_Erratum.doc
  • same requirement that we have for broadband PCS mobile/portable operation in the 1.9 GHz band. However, the Coalition notes that we adopted the 2-watt limit in the Two-Way Order without any explanation and urges that we delete this power limit. It says that the limit unduly restricts the flexibility of equipment designers to make the most efficient use of the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz bands. The Coalition emphasizes, however, that it is not advocating any change in the restrictions on power contained in Parts 1 and 2 that are designed to assure the protection of human health and safety; in fact, it recommends that we clarify that those limits apply to MDS and ITFS by adding those services to the list
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-69A1.txt
  • feeder downlink is the path from the satellite to the fixed earth station, whereas a feeder uplink is the path from the fixed earth station to the satellite. Feeder link earth stations that distribute information to, and receive information from, terrestrial telecommunication networks, e.g., the public switched telephone network and the Internet, are known as gateways. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See Amendment of Parts 2, 25, and 97 of the Commission's Rules with Regard to the Mobile-Satellite Service Above 1 GHz, ET Docket No. 98-142, Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2658 (2002) (R&O). TV BAS stations include TV pickup stations, TV studio-transmitter-link stations, TV relay stations, TV translator relay stations, TV broadcast licensees, and TV microwave booster stations. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-93A1.txt
  • 1.115, the Application for Review filed by Line of Site, Inc. on July 17, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Line of Site, Inc., Application for Review (filed July 17, 2000) (Line of Site AFR). See Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, and Cable Television Relay Service, Second Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 6792, 6801-06 (1991) (Second Report and Order); see also 47 C.F.R. � 74.990. See 47 C.F.R. � 74.990(c) (1992). See 47 C.F.R. � 74.990(d) (1992). Id. That entity
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.txt
  • 2002). The Commission reserved for further analysis the possible AWS use of the 2160-2165 MHz band. Id. at �7. The Commission concurrently adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the licensing, technical, and operational rules to be applied to the newly allocated AWS bands. See In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 02-305 (rel. Nov. 22, 2002). See 47 C.F.R. � 101.101. Sections 22.601 and 22.602 provide that no new systems will be authorized on these channels pursuant to Part 22. 47 C.F.R. �� 22.601, 22.602. Section 22.602 also provides procedures for transitioning Paging and Radiotelephone Service licensees from these channels. Id. 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.txt
  • argues in response that DBS is entitled to protection only from ``harmful interference'' not from all interference, even if it is measurable. MDS America also argues that the DBS petitioners overlook that it is the Commission, not the DBS operators, whose role it is to define what will legally constitute ``harmful interference'' in accordance with the definition contained in Section 2.1 of the rules. Under that definition, MDS America urges, interference is not to be deemed harmful unless it ``seriously degrades, obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts'' the subject service. Consequently, MDS America contends, DBS service is not entitled to absolute protection from interference, and it is for the Commission to determine what constitutes serious impairment of service. MDS America continues that, while
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-98A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-98A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-98A1.txt
  • for spectrum licenses; (3) the opportunity to obtain licenses through service area partitioning and spectrum disaggregation arrangements with existing licensees; and (4) the adoption of construction benchmark performance requirements. Generally, after notice and comment, we have addressed these policies in adopting service rules for particular spectrum bands. See, e.g., Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24 (2002); see Part 1 Fifth Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 15320-21, � 52. The Commission has also recently released a Notice of Inquiry seeking comment on whether and how the Commission could modify its policies to promote the further development and deployment of wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03J-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03J-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03J-2A1.txt
  • so, increase telephone subscribership among low-income households. Under the Commission's current rules, Tribal TANF is an eligibility criterion for enhanced Lifeline/Link-Up. As discussed below, TANF eligibility varies by state. Adding TANF to the current list of eligibility criteria would permit more low-income individuals, not just those living on tribal lands, to qualify for Lifeline/Link-Up support, thereby increasing telephone subscribership. Although 2.1 million families currently participate in TANF, we cannot project how many additional persons may become eligible for Lifeline/Link-Up if TANF is adopted because many low-income households typically participate in more than one assistance program once they meet the qualifying criteria. Some people who are enrolled in TANF may already be participating in Lifeline/Link-Up through another qualifying assistance program. The Joint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-100A1.txt
  • U.S. - Canada treaty, ``Revised Technical Annex Telecommunication: Coordination and Use of Radio Frequencies Above 30 Megacycles per Second,'' Signed at Ottawa June 16 and 24, 1965; entered into force June 24, 1965. Section 15.205 of the Commission's rules identifies restricted frequency bands in which unlicensed devices are prohibited from operating. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.205. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Spurious emission are defined as emissions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission or information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products. See SIA comments at 4. Id. at 4-7. See 47 C.F. R. � 15.209(a). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-106A1.txt
  • Z-Tel's ``disavowal,'' but upon the totality of Z-Tel's statements and omissions during the proceeding. See Liability Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 7580, � 29 n.67. Petition at 4-5, 17-20. Letter dated December 7, 2001 from Christopher M. Heimann, counsel to Pacific, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC, File No. EB-01-MD-017 (``Heimann Letter'') Ex. 1 (Pacific Agreement) at Attachment 6, � 2.1. Heimann Letter Ex. 1 (Pacific Agreement) at Attachment 6, � 7.4.1 (providing that the shared transport UNE may be used for intraLATA toll ``if requested by [Z-Tel] in connection with LSNE option `C' under Section 6.5.3 above.'') Heimann Letter Ex. 1 (Pacific Agreement) at Attachment 6, � 6.5.3. Petition at 5. Accord Petition at 17-20. With regard to Option C,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-113A1.txt
  • the middle of our important digital television transition. I have lingering concerns about the wisdom of allowing unlicensed operations in the vacant television bands before the DTV transition is complete, and I encourage commenters to fully address this timing issue and any problems that it creates. See 47 C.F.R. Part 15. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.5. As defined in Section 2.1(c) of the Commission's rules and the international radio regulations, harmful interference is ``interference which ... seriously degrades, obstructs, of repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with these [international] Radio Regulations. (RR).'' See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.205 and 15.209. Remote control and medical telemetry devices are the only unlicensed transmitters that are currently permitted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-134A1.txt
  • API/UTC claims that the spectrum allocation should be performed on a site-based, first-come, first-served basis because such entities are exempt from spectrum auctions and not suited for geographic-area licensing. Verizon Wireless argues that the Commission should consider reallocating portions of the S-band to MDS licensees. Specifically, Verizon Wireless proposes two relocation options for MDS systems operating in the 2150-2160/62 MHz (2.1 GHz) band so that advanced wireless services (AWS) may be placed in that spectrum. Verizon Wireless first suggests that MDS systems in the 2.1 GHz band could be relocated to spectrum in the 2500-2690 MHz (2.5 GHz) band as long as that band is realigned as proposed by MDS/ITFS licensees. Verizon Wireless argues that under that proposal, MDS operators would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.txt
  • transmitting power for broadband PCS mobile/portable operations in the 1.9 GHz band is 2 watts EIRP. Noting that we adopted the 2-watt limit in the Two-Way Order without any explanation, the Coalition urged in its Proposal that we delete this power limit, arguing that it unduly restricts the flexibility of equipment designers to make the most efficient use of the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz bands. The Coalition emphasized, however, that it was not advocating any change in the restrictions on power contained in Parts 1 and 2 that are designed to assure the protection of human health and safety; in fact, it recommended that we clarify that those limits apply to MDS and ITFS by adding those services to the list
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-166A1.txt
  • issues relating to adoption of the band plan that will help to remove barriers to entry and increase access to the spectrum. Multiple Licensing; Opportunities for Providers in Small and Rural Areas. In our service-by-service evaluations, in certain circumstances we have determined that it is appropriate to license different market sizes. For example, for AWS in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz bands, the Commission licensed the bands using a range of geographic licensing areas in order to maintain maximum flexibility. That band plan spreads licenses over various blocks of spectrum and uses EAs, REAGs, and a block with 734 licenses based on RSAs/MSAs. The Commission noted the competing needs of parties that sought large and small areas, as well as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.txt
  • $500 million of the costs incurred by public safety entities in changing channels to facilitate band reconfiguration. Other 800 MHz licensees were to bear their own cost of relocation to other bands. Nextel also would relinquish its 700 MHz and 900 MHz band spectrum rights. In return, Nextel would receive a nationwide allotment of ten megahertz of spectrum in the 2.1 GHz band. On December 21, 2001, the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and MRFAC, one of the Commission's certified frequency coordinators, made a joint filing wherein they advanced a band reconfiguration plan which they claimed could be implemented without the need to give Nextel the requested 2.1 GHz spectrum. On March 15, 2002, the Commission issued the NPRM seeking comment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1_Erratum.doc
  • $500 million of the costs incurred by public safety entities in changing channels to facilitate band reconfiguration. Other 800 MHz licensees were to bear their own cost of relocation to other bands. Nextel also would relinquish its 700 MHz and 900 MHz band spectrum rights. In return, Nextel would receive a nationwide allotment of ten megahertz of spectrum in the 2.1 GHz band. On December 21, 2001, the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and MRFAC, one of the Commission's certified frequency coordinators, made a joint filing wherein they advanced a band reconfiguration plan which they claimed could be implemented without the need to give Nextel the requested 2.1 GHz spectrum. On March 15, 2002, the Commission issued the NPRM seeking comment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-187A1.txt
  • at slide 11. ``LI'' means Lawful Intercept. TIA Reply Comments at Declaration of Terri L. Brooks at 14. SIA Comments at 2. Space Station System Licensee, Inc., Assignor and Iridium Constellation LLC, Assignee, for Consent to Assignment of License Pursuant to Section 310(d) of the Communications Act, Memorandum Opinion, Order and Authorization, 17 FCC Rcd 2271 at Appendix A, � 2.1 (2002). See also, e.g., International Authorizations Granted, IB Docket No. 04-4, Public Notice, DA 04-628 (rel. March 8, 2004) (granting the assignment or transfer of control of space and earth station licenses relating to the Globalstar mobile satellite service to New Operating Globalstar LLC, subject to conditions, including assumption of agreements previously made with LEAs); Motient Services Inc. and TMI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-188A1.txt
  • of Mitigation of Orbital Debris, IB Docket No. 02-54, Second Report and Order, FCC 04-130, released June 21, 2004. ``Mobile Satellite Service'' is defined as a radio communication service between mobile earth stations and one or more space stations, between space stations used by this service, or between mobile earth stations by means of one or more space stations. Section 2.1(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish Rules and Policies Pertaining to a Non-Voice, Non-Geostationary Mobile-Satellite Service, CC Docket No. 92-76, Report and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 845 at � 11 (1993) (Section 25.142(c) reporting requirements, including listing of non-scheduled space station outages lasting more than thirty minutes and their causes,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-193A1.txt
  • Adopter Agreement at � 7.2. HDCP Certification at 12. The other agreements cover component manufacturers and resellers. Id. Since many of the relevant provisions of the component manufacturer and reseller agreements are largely duplicated in the adopter agreement, we focus our description of the HDCP licensing regime on its adopter and content participant agreements. Id.; HDCP Adopter Agreement at � 2.1. HDCP Certification at 13; HDCP Adopter Agreement at � 2.2. A similar reciprocal non-assert is contained in the HDCP content participant agreement. See HDCP Certification at 13, Appendix 5 at � 2.2 (``HDCP Content Participant Agreement''). HDCP Certification at 5; HDCP Adopter Agreement at Ex. C, D. The HDCP compliance rules prohibit HDCP from being used to copy and/or redistribute
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-207A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-207A1.txt
  • stations and emergency position-indicating radio beacon stations may also participate in this service. A coast station is defined as a land station in the maritime mobile service. A ship station is defined as a mobile station in the maritime mobile service located on board a vessel which is not permanently moored, other than a survival craft station. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, PR Docket No. 92-257, 10 FCC Rcd 5725, 5725 � 2 (1995). See 47 C.F.R. � 87.373(f). Public correspondence communications are personal or private communications between two or more persons. Public correspondence is defined under the Part 80 Maritime Service Rules as ``[a]ny telecommunication which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-208A1.txt
  • of the Commission's Rules for Unlicensed Devices and Equipment Approval, Report and Order, ET Docket No. 03-201, FCC No. 04-165 (rel. July 12, 2004). Allocations and Service Rules for the 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz Bands,Report and Order, WT Docket No. 02-146, 18 FCC Rcd 23,318 (2003). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands,Report and Order, WT Docket No. 02-353, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162 (2003). FCC Promotes the Deployment of Wireless Broadband Services by Creating New Rules for the 2495-2690 MHz Band While Protecting Educational Services, WT Docket No. 03-66, Press Release (June 10, 2004). FCC Adopts Measures to Increase Rural Investment and Facilitate Deployment of Spectrum-Based Services in Rural Areas,WT Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-20A1.txt
  • stations, in which: (1) Information relating to the characteristics of the Earth and its natural phenomena is obtained from active sensors or passive sensors on earth satellites; (2) Similar information is collected from air-borne or earth-based platforms; (3) Such information may be distributed to earth stations within the system concerned; and (4) Platform interrogation may occur. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. The term ``millimeter wave'' derives from the wavelength of radio signals at frequencies between 30 GHz and 300 GHz, which range between 1 millimeter at 300 GHz and 10 millimeters at 30 GHz. See Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules Regarding Implementation of the Final Acts of the World Administrative Radio Conference, Geneva, 1979, Second Report and Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-213A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-213A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-213A1.txt
  • 1992) (Mester Channel H3 Application). The three applications will be collectively referred to as the Mester 1992 Applications. See responses to FCC Form 494, Page 2, Question 14(c); Mester 1992 Applications, Blocks 7(a)-(k); Division Letter at 1. See January 2, 1992 applications. Amendment of Parts 1, 2, and 21 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 7 FCC Rcd 3266, 3270-71 � 19 and n.35 (1992). Application Return Notification dated April 12, 1993 from Robert James, Chief, Domestic Radio Branch, Domestic Facilities Division to Mester's TV re: File No. 313-CM-P-92 (Channel MDS-1); Application Return Notification dated April 12, 1993 from Robert James, Chief, Domestic Radio Branch, Domestic Facilities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-216A1.txt
  • study of mobile telephone pricing shows a slight increase in the cost of mobile telephone services in 2003, two other indicators of mobile telephony pricing show that the long-term decline in the cost of mobile telephone services continued through 2003. According to one economic research and consulting firm, Econ One, mobile telephone prices in the 25 largest U.S. cities increased 2.1 percent in 2003. The average cost of monthly service - which was calculated across four typical usage plans (50, 200, 500 and 800 minutes) - increased from $35.70 in December 2002 to $36.46 in December 2003. Costs increased the most in Phoenix (+7.4 percent), while they decreased most rapidly in Sacramento (-2.4 percent). Another source of price information is the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 04-356 WT Docket No. 02-353 Adopted: September 9, 2004 Released: September 24, 2004 Comment Date: November 23, 2004 Reply Comment Date: January 7, 2005 By the Commission: Chairman Powell, Commissioners Abernathy, Copps, and Adelstein issuing separate statements. Table of Contents Heading Paragraph # I. introduction 1 II.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-219A1.txt
  • the Commission did not adopt the MDS Industry Compromise as a mechanism to resolve MDS relocation costs and replacement spectrum, the Commission decided to relocate displaced MDS licensees from the 2150-2162 MHz band to the 2.5 GHz band as part of the 2.5 GHz MDS Restructuring R&O. Specifically, this item makes available twelve megahertz of comparable spectrum to the displaced 2.1 GHz MDS users, providing full compensation for the amount of spectrum previously designated for AWS use. For these reasons, we deny the Sprint Petition for Reconsideration and the WCA Petition for Reconsideration as moot since the issues raised no longer apply and have been dealt with in a separate proceeding. PCIA-The Wireless Infrastructure Association, filed a Petition for Partial Reconsideration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-22A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-22A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-22A1.txt
  • points, one below the carrier center frequency and one above the carrier center frequency, outside of which all emissions are attenuated at least 26 dB below the transmitter power.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 22.917(b), 24.238(b). Lucent also raised this issue in the Commission's proceeding regarding Advanced Wireless Services. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003). In that proceeding the Commission stated: ``We continue to believe that the existing rule, as adopted in the [Report and Order], provides the most appropriate way of measuring out-of-band emissions into adjacent spectrum. Our goal in developing out-of-band emission standards is to provide for a minimal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-22A1_Erratum.doc
  • points, one below the carrier center frequency and one above the carrier center frequency, outside of which all emissions are attenuated at least 26 dB below the transmitter power.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 22.917(b), 24.238(b). Lucent also raised this issue in the Commission's proceeding regarding Advanced Wireless Services. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003). In that proceeding the Commission stated: ``We continue to believe that the existing rule, as adopted in the [Report and Order], provides the most appropriate way of measuring out-of-band emissions into adjacent spectrum. Our goal in developing out-of-band emission standards is to provide for a minimal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.txt
  • short distance of the power lines used by this technology. As emphasized by NTIA's Phase 1 study and comments, interference can be rapidly eliminated through various means should it occur. We point out to the individual amateurs commenting in this proceeding that the definition of ``harmful interference'' as used in Section 15.5 of the rules is set forth in Section 2.1 of the rules. We disagree with ARRL's position that there is no reason to act now in this proceeding and that we should delay our decision on rules for Access BPL to provide more time to develop rules to prevent this technology from causing harmful interference. As indicated above, the broadband service capabilities of Access BPL systems offer important opportunities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-246A1.txt
  • new and advanced wireless applications, such as voice, data and broadband services provided over a variety of high-speed fixed and mobile networks, and which are popularly referred to as 3G systems. We have also adopted service rules for AWS operations in the bands 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (``AWS Service Rules R&O''). ). The Commission, which is an independent agency, administers non-Federal Government spectrum. NTIA, which is an operating unit of the U.S. Department of Commerce, administers Federal Government spectrum. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.105. Id. at 3. See Amendment of Parts 2, 25,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-255A1.txt
  • Expands BroadbandAccess 3G Network to Cover 14 Markets From Coast to Coast, available at http://news.vzw.com/news/2004/09/pr2004-09-22c.html (Sept. 22, 2004). For Dobson's spectrum holdings, see the Commission's ULS database; for EDGE launch information, see Dobson launches EDGE services in 16-state service area, RCR Wireless News, October 18, 2004, at 22. DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines � 2. Id. at � 2.2. Id. at � 2.1; see also Viscusi, Vernon & Harrington, Economics of Regulation and Antitrust 107 (2000); Douglas Greer, Industrial Organization and Public Policy 269 (1992). DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines � 2; EchoStar-DirecTV HDO, 17 FCC Rcd. at 20,620 � 153. DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines � 2.2. The term ``unilateral'' refers to the method used by firms to determine strategy, not to the fact that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-26A1.txt
  • FCC Direct Payment is credited to the correct account, the Applicants must ensure that the FCC Direct Payment is, consistent with our instructions for all unjust enrichment payments for a payoff of an installment loan, sent to LOCK BOX number 358440. See Purchase Agreement at 5.8(b), Term Sheet at 2(a), Request for Waiver at 6-7, n.8. See Purchase Agreement at 2.1 & 7.3. Id. at 7.3. Request for Waiver at 7; but see supra n. 24 (noting that the FCC will continue to exercise its authority to entertain regulatory claims and otherwise discharge its regulatory responsibilities with respect to the licenses). Request for Waiver at 8-12. Id. at 14. Id. at 12- 13. Request for Waiver at 15. Id. at 20.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
  • km of the U.S. coastline or FS offshore installations such as in the Gulf of Mexico. Specifically, FWCC argues that ESV transmissions in the C-band may harm critical FS operations, including safety and infrastructure services. FWCC also contends that the C-band is important for future growth of FS and could serve as relocation spectrum for FS in the 1.9 and 2.1 GHz bands. Alternatively, FWCC states that if we permit ESVs to utilize the C-band, we should adopt specific measures to protect FS operations, such as a requirement to coordinate all ESV operations in advance. We address FS operators' concerns in this Report and Order without prohibiting ESV C-band use within a specific distance from the coastline. In particular, we set
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
  • km of the U.S. coastline or FS offshore installations such as in the Gulf of Mexico. Specifically, FWCC argues that ESV transmissions in the C-band may harm critical FS operations, including safety and infrastructure services. FWCC also contends that the C-band is important for future growth of FS and could serve as relocation spectrum for FS in the 1.9 and 2.1 GHz bands. Alternatively, FWCC states that if we permit ESVs to utilize the C-band, we should adopt specific measures to protect FS operations, such as a requirement to coordinate all ESV operations in advance. We address FS operators' concerns in this Report and Order without prohibiting ESV C-band use within a specific distance from the coastline. In particular, we set
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.txt
  • C.F.R. �� 27.53(a)(10) (Wireless Communications Services), 22.917 (Cellular), and 24.238 (Broadband PCS); Cellular Year 2000 Biennial Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 18426 �6. Notice, 18 FCC Rcd at 8397 �38. Id. Cingular Wireless Comments at 18; Verizon Wireless Comments at 10. NTIA Comments at 3. Our definitions specifically define OOBE and spurious emissions separately. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. We recognize that our usage of this terminology in Part 22 and other wireless parts and in recent wireless proceedings does not precisely track the ITU definitions. We use the term ``OOBE'' to mean what the ITU calls ``unwanted emissions.'' Although we agree with NTIA that it would be preferable to harmonize our terms with those of the ITU, doing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1_Erratum.doc
  • C.F.R. �� 27.53(a)(10) (Wireless Communications Services), 22.917 (Cellular), and 24.238 (Broadband PCS); Cellular Year 2000 Biennial Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 18426 �6. Notice, 18 FCC Rcd at 8397 �38. Id. Cingular Wireless Comments at 18; Verizon Wireless Comments at 10. NTIA Comments at 3. Our definitions specifically define OOBE and spurious emissions separately. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. We recognize that our usage of this terminology in Part 22 and other wireless parts and in recent wireless proceedings does not precisely track the ITU definitions. We use the term ``OOBE'' to mean what the ITU calls ``unwanted emissions.'' Although we agree with NTIA that it would be preferable to harmonize our terms with those of the ITU, doing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1.txt
  • to abate the interference being caused to 800 MHz public safety systems. One month later the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and Manufacturers Radio Frequency Advisory Committee (MRFAC), one of the Commission's certified frequency coordinators, made a joint filing wherein they advanced a band reconfiguration plan which they claimed could be implemented without the need to give Nextel the requested 2.1 GHz spectrum. The Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) seeking comment on band reconfiguration, generally, on the Nextel and NAM/MRFAC proposals and on a variety of related issues affecting abatement of interference to 800 MHz public safety systems. In the NPRM, the Commission documented the increasing incidence of interference to 800 MHz band public safety systems from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1_Erratum.doc
  • to abate the interference being caused to 800 MHz public safety systems. One month later the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and Manufacturers Radio Frequency Advisory Committee (MRFAC), one of the Commission's certified frequency coordinators, made a joint filing wherein they advanced a band reconfiguration plan which they claimed could be implemented without the need to give Nextel the requested 2.1 GHz spectrum. The Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) seeking comment on band reconfiguration, generally, on the Nextel and NAM/MRFAC proposals and on a variety of related issues affecting abatement of interference to 800 MHz public safety systems. In the NPRM, the Commission documented the increasing incidence of interference to 800 MHz band public safety systems from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-30A1.txt
  • Rule Making, 17 FCC Rcd 5586 (2002). This issue will be addressed in that proceeding. See supra note 91. ``Mobile Satellite Service'' is defined as a radio communication service between mobile earth stations and one or more space stations, between space stations used by this service, or between mobile earth stations by means of one or more space stations. Section 2.1(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish Rules and Policies Pertaining to a Non-Voice, Non-Geostationary Mobile-Satellite Service, CC Docket No. 92-76, Report and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 845 at � 11 (1993) (Section 25.142(c) reporting requirements, including listing of non-scheduled space station outages lasting more than thirty minutes and their causes,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-33A1.txt
  • the Commission's Rules to Establish a Medical Implant Communications Service in the 402-405 MHz Band) (``MICS Order''), 14 FCC Rcd, 21040 (1999). Id. at 21042-43. In this band, Metaids currently operates radiosondes, which are automatic transmitters, usually carried on an aircraft, free balloon, kite, or parachute, which transmit meteorological data during their journey through the atmosphere. (See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1.) Id. at 21046. We also provided that a MICS device could transmit without prior frequency monitoring, pursuant to a non-radio frequency actuation signal generated by a device external to the body (manual activation) (47 C.F.R. � 95.1209(b)), or in response to a medical implant event (47 C.F.R. �� 95.628(b), 95.1209(b)). These functions are not the subject of the instant waiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-38A1.txt
  • ed., Addison, Wellsley, Longman, Inc., 1999). See Spectrum Aggregation R&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 22688-91, �� 39-43. Promoting Efficient Use of Spectrum through Elimination of Barriers to the Development of Secondary Markets, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 20604 (2003) (``Secondary Markets R&O''). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162 (2003). See Spectrum Aggregation R&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 22708, � 89. Sprint PCS Reply Comments at 8-10 in Year 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review-Amendment of Part 22 of the Commission's Rules to Modify or Eliminate Outdated Rules Affecting the Cellular Radiotelephone Service and Other Commercial Mobile Radio
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.txt
  • strobe light, and an integral GPS receiver. The USCG stated that it has no objection to permitting the use of INMARSAT-E EPIRBs, provided that the INMARSAT-E EPIRB, alone or in conjunction with the system within which it functions: provides for locating (homing) on 121.5 MHz; includes a strobe light which complies with RTCM Recommended Standards for 406 MHz EPIRBs, Version 2.1, August 22, 2000; requires a suitable two-step means of activation which complies with the RTCM standard; if intended for automatic activation, is designed to operate automatically only when the beacon is both out of its mounting bracket and submerged in water, in compliance with the RTCM standard; is capable of providing regular non-manual position updates after the beacon floats free;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-5A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-5A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-5A1.txt
  • DVD players. The newest home video technology is the personal video recorder (``PVR''). Introduced in 1999, this device is capable of pausing, recording and rewinding live television in digital form on an internal hard drive instead of videotape. PVRs may be purchased from and subscription obtained through an MVPD or directly from a PVR service operator. Currently, there are approximately 2.1 million PVRs in use, as measured by PVR subscriptions. Electric and Gas Utilities: In 1994, some utilities were engaged in the provision of video services through overbuilding incumbent cable systems, though such activity was very limited. Section 103 of the Communications Act, enacted as part of the 1996 Act, removed a significant regulatory barrier that had deterred registered public utility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • existing operations. We request comment on this proposal and on whether the secondary non-Federal Government radiolocation service allocation should also be upgraded to primary status. G. Terms, Definitions, and Editorial Amendments In order to reflect additions and revisions to the terms and definitions listed in the ITU Radio Regulations and in the WRC-03 Final Acts, we propose to amend Section 2.1 of the Commission's Rules to: (1) add definitions for adaptive system and high altitude platform station (HAPS); (2) revise the definitions for coordinated universal time (UTC), coordination area, coordination distance, facsimile, geostationary satellite, harmful interference, inclination of an orbit of an earth satellite, telegraphy, and telephony; and (3) make minor editorial modifications to the definitions for administration, broadcasting service, mobile
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.txt
  • Final Acts of the World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-97), Geneva, 1997, and Final Acts of the World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-2000), Istanbul, 2000, (Radio Regulations); Chadwick Request. In the amateur service, ``operating privileges'' generally refer to the frequency bands available to the control operator of an amateur station and to the emission types an amateur station may transmit. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1(c), 97.3(a)(4). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.1. The purpose of the amateur service includes recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service to the public as a voluntary noncommercial communications service, continuation of the amateur's proven ability to contribute to the advancement of the radio art; expansion of the existing reservoir of trained operators, technicians, and electronic experts; and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-118A1.txt
  • Bell Telephone Company, Southern New England Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Transmittal Nos. 1430, 84, 187, 843, and 3022, respectively, Tariffs FCC Nos. 2, 1, 1, 39, and 73, respectively, (filed December 13, 2004). See, e.g., Ameritech Operating Companies Transmittal No. 1430, 2nd Revised Page 40.1, Section 2.4.1 (A). See, e.g., id. at 6th Revised Page 27, section 2.1.8. Ameritech Operating Companies, Nevada Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Southern New England Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Transmittal Nos. 1430, 84, 187, 843, and 3022, respectively, Tariffs FCC Nos. 2, 1, 1, 39, and 73, respectively, Order, DA 04-4048 (WCB rel. Dec. 27, 2004). Ameritech Operating Companies, Nevada Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Southern
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-119A1.txt
  • the second largest DBS operator and the fourth largest MVPD, serving an estimated 10.12 million subscribers nationwide. Id. Rainbow DBS, which provides service under the brand name VOOM, reported an estimated 25,000 subscribers. Id. Dominion, which provides service under the brand name Sky Angel, does not publicly disclose its subscribership numbers on an annualized basis. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517510. 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517510. See 2005 Cable Competition Report, FCC 05-13, � 110. Previously, the Commission reported that IMCC had 250 members; see Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, Tenth Annual Report, 19 FCC Rcd 1606, 1666, � 90 (2004)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-124A1.txt
  • states that ``[m]eaningful efficiency measures consider the benefit to the customer and serve as indicators of how well the program performs.'' Id. at 10. Id. at 8-9. See, e.g., Government Accountability Office, Effectively Implementing the Government Performance and Results Act (Jun. 1996). See Office of Management and Budget, Program Assessment Rating Tool: Schools and Libraries - Universal Service Fund, �� 2.1-2.4 (2003) (``FCC E-Rate PART Report''). The connectivity measurement was of limited usefulness; however, because it did not apply to all program participants, such as libraries and private schools. In addition, once a significant number of public schools achieved Internet connectivity, the value of using this measurement to assess the on-going impact of the E-rate program diminished. As a result, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.txt
  • 6.8 percent, from $25.50 to $27.24 (compared with a 5-year average of 10.4 percent). The Bureau of Labor Statistics (``BLS'') publishes a Consumer Price Index (``CPI'') that measures price inflation related to all goods and services for all urban consumers. By this measure, inflation increased by 1.1 percent over the 12 months ending January 2004, and by an average of 2.1 percent over the past five years. BLS also publishes price indices for many components of the overall CPI, including a price index for a basket of cable services (``cable CPI''). The cable CPI increased by 3.8 percent over the year ending January 2004, and by an average of 4.6 percent over the past five years. Because it covers a different
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-138A1.txt
  • least one county within the market. Structure is defined as factors that determine the competitiveness of a market. These factors include market concentration statistics and the level of entry barriers. See Dennis W. Carlton & Jeffrey M. Perloff, Modern Industrial Organization 247-51 (3rd ed. 1999). See discussion supra para. 50. DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines � 2. Id. � 2.2. Id. � 2.1. See also W. Kip Viscusi, John M. Vernon & Joseph E. Harrington, Jr., Economics of Regulation and Antitrust 107 (2000); Douglas Greer, Industrial Organization and Public Policy 269 (1992). See Cingular-AT&T Wireless, 19 FCC Rcd. at 21570 � 115; Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation (A Nevada Corporation), General Motors Corporation, and Hughes Electronics Corporation (Transferors) and EchoStar Communications Corporation (A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • - 2003 (in millions) Year Premium Cable Service Subscribers (Pay HH) Premium Cable Service Subscriptions (Pay Units) Average Number of Subscriptions Total % Change Over Prior Year Total % Change Over Prior Yr Pay Units/ Pay HH 1998 32.9 3.5% 58.6 6.0% 1.8 1999 34.3 4.3% 60.2 2.7% 1.8 2000 35.7 4.1% 66.8 11.0% 1.9 2001 36.0 0.8% 75.6 13.2% 2.1 2002 35.3 -1.9% 81.1 7.3% 2.3 2003 34.8 -1.4% 83.4 2.8% 2.4 Channel Capacity. Data from the Commission's 2004 Price Survey provides figures on cable system bandwidth and the number of analog and digital video channels being delivered by surveyed cable systems (see Table 3). It shows that approximately 85.7 percent of the sampled cable systems (both competitive and noncompetitive
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-143A1.txt
  • the Commission already has sought comment on proposed rule changes regarding some of the other issues raised by petitioners in this proceeding. See Amendment of Part 97 of the Commission's Rules Governing the Amateur Radio Services, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, WT Docket No. 04-140, 19 FCC Rcd 7293, 7300 � 11 (2004) (Phone Band Expansion NPRM). See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1(c), 97.3(a)(4). The Commission's regulation of the amateur service is based on the following principles: recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service to the public as a voluntary noncommercial communications service; continuation and extension of the amateur's proven ability to contribute to the advancement of the radio art; encouragement and improvement of the service through rules which provide
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1.txt
  • the output power restriction for AWS systems under Part 27. Accordingly, we believe that this issue would be better addressed in our review of petitions for reconsideration of the AWS Report and Order, where the identical form of relief was sought for AWS systems. See In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS Report and Order). See Ericsson Comments at 3 (``Ericsson urges the Commission to eliminate the transmitter output power limit entirely . . . the limit no longer serves its original purpose''); Lucent Comments at 2 (``a requirement on maximum transmitter power is not necessary to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1_Erratum.doc
  • the output power restriction for AWS systems under Part 27. Accordingly, we believe that this issue would be better addressed in our review of petitions for reconsideration of the AWS Report and Order, where the identical form of relief was sought for AWS systems. See In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS Report and Order). See Ericsson Comments at 3 (``Ericsson urges the Commission to eliminate the transmitter output power limit entirely . . . the limit no longer serves its original purpose''); Lucent Comments at 2 (``a requirement on maximum transmitter power is not necessary to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-148A1.txt
  • at least 30 megahertz of spectrum for the provision of mobile telephony services. Many carriers are competing successfully with far less bandwidth today. See, e.g., Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21568-69 & nn.334-35 (discussing services of Verizon Wireless and Dobson) See Application, Public Interest Statement at 73-74. CRA Analysis at 24-25. DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines � 0.1. Id. � 2.1. The DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines define coordinated interaction as comprising actions by a group of firms that are profitable for each of the firms involved only because the other firms react by accommodating these actions rather than by attempting to undercut them. Id. Id. at � 2.11. Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21580-21586 �� 150-164. Application, Public Interest Statement
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-149A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 02-353 Adopted: August 5, 2005 Released: August 15, 2005 By the Commission: Chairman Martin and Commissioners Copps and Adelstein issuing separate statements. Table of Contents Heading Paragraph # I. introduction 1 II. background 2 III. ISSUES ON RECONSIDERATION 4 A. Band Plan 5 B. Provisions for Designated Entities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-149A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-149A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-149A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN KEVIN J. MARTIN Re: Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration (WT Docket No. 02-353), FCC 05-149 By our actions in this order, the Commission takes another step forward in our continuing efforts to make spectrum available for wireless broadband services. Adoption of this order will allow the Commission to move forward expeditiously to auction 90 MHz of wireless spectrum. Making this large swath of spectrum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-149A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-149A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-149A3.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. COPPS RE: Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration (WT Docket No. 02-353), FCC 05-149 I am committed to sticking to our schedule and conducting the AWS auction as soon as possible. The changes that we make today to the band plan will make this a better auction. The band plan balances the needs of different types of wireless companies by offering both geographically
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-149A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-149A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-149A4.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER JONATHAN S. ADELSTEIN Re: Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration (WT Docket No. 02-353), FCC 05-149 I have repeatedly said the FCC needs to improve access to spectrum by those providers who want to offer service to traditionally under-served areas. That is why I pressed for the inclusion of both Economic Area (EA) as well as Cellular Market Area (CMA) licenses in the Advanced Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-14A1.txt
  • costs on business both large and small and has solicited comment on alternatives to its proposals. F. Federal Rules that May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed Rules None. APPENDIX C ITU Recommendation ITU-R M.1643 The Mobile Satellite Service (MSS) is a radio communication service between mobile earth stations and one or more space stations. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 A mobile earth station is an earth station intended for use while in motion or during halts at unspecified points. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.201. The Mobile Satellite Service encompasses the land mobile-satellite service, the maritime mobile-satellite service, and the aeronautical mobile-satellite service. For purposes of this Notice, the "conventional" Ku-band refers to frequencies in the 11.7-12.2 GHz (downlink) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-14A1_Erratum.doc
  • costs on business both large and small and has solicited comment on alternatives to its proposals. F. Federal Rules that May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed Rules None. APPENDIX C ITU Recommendation ITU-R M.1643 The Mobile Satellite Service (MSS) is a radio communication service between mobile earth stations and one or more space stations. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 A mobile earth station is an earth station intended for use while in motion or during halts at unspecified points. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.201. The Mobile Satellite Service encompasses the land mobile-satellite service, the maritime mobile-satellite service, and the aeronautical mobile-satellite service. For purposes of this Notice, the "conventional" Ku-band refers to frequencies in the 11.7-12.2 GHz (downlink) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-155A1.txt
  • charged for the combined basic and CPST service tiers rose from $27.77 in 1998 to $41.04 in 2004, with an average rate of change of 7.4 percent during that period. The cost of the CPST alone increased at an average rate of 10.4 percent, from $15.77 to $27.24. Meanwhile, the average rate of change in the Consumer Price Index was 2.1 percent during that period. FCC data indicate that the average number of channels offered on the combined basic and CPST service tiers rose from 50.3 to 70.3 between 1998 and 2004. Is there evidence that cable subscribers demand and benefit from these additional channels, even at the cost of higher monthly bills? How many channels on average do consumers actually
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-172A1.txt
  • equipment (CPE) in use at the time of relocation (e.g., customer equipment that is used and will continue to be used in the provision of two-way broadband operations) should be part of the comparable facilities requirement. Because we have already identified relocation spectrum in the 2495-2690 MHz band (2.5 GHz band) for BRS licensees currently in the 2150-2160/62 MHz band (2.1 GHz band), we also seek comment on a proposal whereby the Commission would reassign 2.1 GHz BRS licensees, whose facilities have not been constructed or are not in use per Section 101.75 of the Commission's rules, to their corresponding frequency assignments in the 2.5 GHz band as part of the overall BRS transition. Specifically, we propose to modify the licenses
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-173A1.txt
  • and creates incentives for the development of low-power, cellularized broadband operations, which were inhibited by the prior band plan. Second, the Commission expanded the original MDS-ITFS band by adding to it five megahertz of additional spectrum from below 2500 MHz, which will provide room for the future relocation of MDS Channels 1 and 2, which are presently located in the 2.1 GHz band. In addition, the Commission provided licensees with the flexibility to employ the technologies of their choice in the band and to lease spectrum under the Commission's secondary market spectrum leasing policies and procedures. The Commission also implemented geographic area licensing for all licensees in the band, which will allow increased flexibility while reducing administrative burdens on both licensees
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-182A1.txt
  • we do not grant MMC's request for an extension of time in which to ensure that 100 percent of all new digital handset activations are location-capable, but afford MMC additional time in which it may augment the record to address the insufficiency of its request. See supra � 14. See MMC Petition at 6 (twelve percent); NWMC Petition at 5 (2.1 percent); Cellular 29 Petition at 4 (three percent); Lyrix Petition at 4 (two percent); IVC Petition at 5 (3.73 percent of subscriber base plus approximately seven percent consisting of analog units installed in automobiles with on-board customer care and emergency capabilities). MMC Petition at 2; NWMC Petition at 2; Cellular 29 Petition at 2; Lyrix Petition at 2; IVC Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-187A1.txt
  • the second largest DBS operator and the fourth largest MVPD, serving an estimated 10.12 million subscribers nationwide. Id. Rainbow DBS, which provides service under the brand name VOOM, reported an estimated 25,000 subscribers. Id. Dominion, which provides service under the brand name Sky Angel, does not publicly disclose its subscribership numbers on an annualized basis. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517510. Id. U.S. Census Bureau, 1997. Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1997 Economic Census, Subject Series - Establishment and Firm Size, Information Sector 51, Table 4 at 50 (2000). The amount of $10 million was used to estimate the number of small business firms because the relevant Census
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A2.txt
  • MM Docket No. 87-268, FCC 97-115. 2 See Report, Technical Standards for Determining Eligibility for Satellite-Delivered Network Signals Pursuant to the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act, ET Docket No. 00-90, FCC 00-416. du Treil, Lundin & Rackley, Inc. _______________________________________________________________________________________ Consulting Engineers 3 is used to express the DTV planning factors, the noise-limited field strengths calculated from them are the same. 2.1 Use of Geometric Mean Frequency For DTV planning purposes, a frequency dependent dipole factor was calculated for the three television bands (Low VHF, High VHF and UHF) based on the geometric mean of the frequencies at the upper and lower edges of each band. The geometric mean frequency was then used to calculate a single dipole factor for each of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-202A1.txt
  • (2003). AirCell Comments at 5-6. Id. at 6. Amendment of Part 1 of the Commission's Rules-Competitive Bidding Procedures, Third Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 13 FCC Rcd 374, 386 � 14 (1997) (Competitive Bidding Third R&O). Id. at 402-03 � 45. See, e.g., Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162, 25219-20 � 148 (2003); Amendments to Parts 1, 2, 87 and 101 of the Commission's Rules to License Fixed Services at 24 GHz, Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 16934, 16968 �� 79-80 (2000). See also Section 257 Triennial Report to Congress; Identifying and Eliminating Market Entry Barriers For Entrepreneurs and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-205A1.txt
  • household income of a particular geographic area, e.g., a county. The proposed funding mechanism would provide support for geographic areas where the forward-looking cost of providing service exceeds the affordability benchmark. SBC views affordability as an end user's ability to bear the cost of service relative to household income. Bureau of Labor Statistics data indicated that a typical household spends 2.1 percent of its annual income on telephone-related expenses, but only 1.2 percent is associated with local telephone service. SBC argues that the Commission should compare local telephone service expenses to other categories of household expenses. The average household spends 3.2 percent on energy expenses, 3.1 percent on gasoline and motor oil, 5.1 percent on food away from home, and 1.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-213A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-213A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-213A1.txt
  • at 47 U.S.C. � 765f (ORBIT Act). ITU Region 2 includes North, Central, and South America and Greenland. See Article 5, Section I of the ITU Radio Regulations. BSS is the international term used for a radiocommunication service in which signals transmitted or retransmitted by space stations are intended for direct reception by the general public. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. DBS is the term used in the United States to describe the domestic implementation of the BSS international service. The Regional Administrative Radio Conference in 1983 (RARC-83) developed and adopted the Region 2 BSS and feeder-link Plans. It was not until 1985, at the World Administrative Radio Conference (WARC Orb-85), that the Region 2 Plans were adopted internationally worldwide and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-24A1.txt
  • the second largest DBS operator and the fourth largest MVPD, serving an estimated 10.12 million subscribers nationwide. Id. Rainbow DBS, which provides service under the brand name VOOM, reported an estimated 25,000 subscribers. Id. Dominion, which provides service under the brand name Sky Angel, does not publicly disclose its subscribership numbers on an annualized basis. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517510. 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517510. U.S. Census Bureau, 1997. Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1997 Economic Census, Subject Series - Establishment and Firm Size, Information Sector 51, Table 4 at 50 (2000). The amount of $10 million was used to estimate the number of small
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.txt
  • the B-GAN terminal is still in the prototype stage, i.e., it is not yet a commercially-available production item like the other terminals we tested for susceptibility to interference from simulated ATC base station signals. 1.6. We did not test the METs supplied by MSV due to lack of proper test equipment and test software for these particular METs. 2. Methodology 2.1. We conducted the tests on the METs supplied by Inmarsat's equipment manufacturers in accordance with the test plan shown in Annex 1 of this report. We used specialized test equipment supplied by Inmarsat to generate the simulated Inmarsat satellite signals and to conduct bit-error-rate (BER) tests on the METs. Synthesized signal generators with built-in arbitrary waveform generators generated simulated interfering
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-32A1.txt
  • Verizon West PIC Cost Workpaper 1.1 Rows 26 and 28. Verizon's cost study shows that there were approximately 52 percent as many PIC changes in Verizon West as in Verizon East. Verizon Supplemental Comments at Att. B, Exhibit Verizon East PIC Cost Workpaper 2 Row 3 (8,196,979 total PIC changes in Verizon East) and Exhibit Verizon West PIC Cost Workpaper 2.1 Row 5 (4,268,280 total PIC changes in Verizon West). Using a weighted average, Verizon's total PIC costs, excluding PIC freeze costs, are approximately $4.46. Of this total, approximately $0.09, or two percent of the total, are slamming costs. SBC Comments at 6; Verizon Comments at 6. Genesis argues that inclusion of LEC common costs in the PIC change charge potentially
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-49A1.txt
  • the second largest DBS operator and the fourth largest MVPD, serving an estimated 10.12 million subscribers nationwide. Id. Rainbow DBS, which provides service under the brand name VOOM, reported an estimated 25,000 subscribers. Id. Dominion, which provides service under the brand name Sky Angel, does not publicly disclose its subscribership numbers on an annualized basis. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517510. 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517510. See 2005 Cable Competition Report, FCC 05-13, � 110. Previously, the Commission reported that IMCC had 250 members; see Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, Tenth Annual Report, 19 FCC Rcd 1606, 1666, � 90 (2004)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.txt
  • describe the operation of the device's software and security features will not be made available for inspection. * * * * * Part 2 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: The authority citation for Part 2 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303 and 336, unless otherwise noted. Section 2.1 is revised by changing the following definition: � 2.1 Terms and definitions. * * * * * (c) * * * Software defined radio. A radio that includes a transmitter in which the operating parameters of frequency range, modulation type or maximum output power (either radiated or conducted), or the circumstances under which the transmitter operates in accordance with Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1.txt
  • treat Ku-band earth stations routinely if they intersect the antenna gain pattern envelope at 1.5� off-axis or less. Second, SIA defines a new term called the "maximum allowable pointing error." To calculate the maximum allowable pointing error, SIA starts with the antenna gain pattern envelope in Section 25.209(a). According to SIA, a typical earth station has a topocentric angle of 2.1� when looking at a satellite that is 2� away from the target satellite. SIA asserts that the antenna gain pattern envelope allows 20.94 dBi at an off-axis angle of 2.1�. SIA takes a number of antenna gain patterns, and shifts them until the edge of the main lobe is equal to 20.94 dBi at an off-axis angle equal to 2.1�.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1_Erratum.doc
  • treat Ku-band earth stations routinely if they intersect the antenna gain pattern envelope at 1.5� off-axis or less. Second, SIA defines a new term called the "maximum allowable pointing error." To calculate the maximum allowable pointing error, SIA starts with the antenna gain pattern envelope in Section 25.209(a). According to SIA, a typical earth station has a topocentric angle of 2.1� when looking at a satellite that is 2� away from the target satellite. SIA asserts that the antenna gain pattern envelope allows 20.94 dBi at an off-axis angle of 2.1�. SIA takes a number of antenna gain patterns, and shifts them until the edge of the main lobe is equal to 20.94 dBi at an off-axis angle equal to 2.1�.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.txt
  • through the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS) in accordance with the applicable provisions of Part 1, Subpart Y of this Chapter. 15. Revise � 25.201 by adding introductory language, and by adding the following definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: �25.201 Definitions. Definitions for terms in subpart C of this part appear in this section, and in � 2.1 of this chapter. * * * * * C-band. For purposes of this part, the terms "C-band" and "conventional C-band" refer specifically to the 3700-4200 MHz downlink and 5925-6425 MHz uplink frequency bands. These paired bands are allocated to the Fixed-Satellite Service and are also referred to as the 4/6 GHz band(s). * * * Electronic filing. The submission of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1_Erratum.doc
  • through the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS) in accordance with the applicable provisions of Part 1, Subpart Y of this Chapter. 15. Revise � 25.201 by adding introductory language, and by adding the following definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: �25.201 Definitions. Definitions for terms in subpart C of this part appear in this section, and in � 2.1 of this chapter. * * * * * C-band. For purposes of this part, the terms "C-band" and "conventional C-band" refer specifically to the 3700-4200 MHz downlink and 5925-6425 MHz uplink frequency bands. These paired bands are allocated to the Fixed-Satellite Service and are also referred to as the 4/6 GHz band(s). * * * Electronic filing. The submission of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-69A1.txt
  • , infra. Because 36 of the PLMR channels in the Federal bands are licensed on the condition that harmful interference (i.e., interference which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or that seriously degrades, obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with the International Telecommunication Union's Radio Regulations; see 47 CFR � 2.1(c)) is not caused to Federal operations (that is, these 36 PLMR channels operate on secondary basis), it is particularly vital that we account for the Federal narrowbanding efforts in this spectrum. ERP (alternatively, ``e.r.p.'') in a given direction is the product of the power supplied to the antenna and its relative gain to a half-wave dipole in a given direction.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • for International Broadcast Stations........................................ 59 C. SRS and EESS Downlinks at 25.5-27 GHz and ISS at 25.25-27.5 GHz................................ 77 D. RNSS and the Radiolocation Service................................................................. ......... 93 E. Allocation Status of the Little LEO Feeder Link Bands ............................................... 104 F. Remaining Space Radiocommunication Service Issues................................................. 119 G. ITU Terms and Definitions............................................................. ..................... 129 H. Editorial Amendments.............................................................. ......................... 130 1. Sections 2.1 through 2.105................................................................... .............. 133 2. Section 2.106................................................................... .............................. 139 3. Parts 90 and 97...................................................................... ....................... 169 V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS................................................................. ................... 178 A. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis................................................................ ...... 178 B. Paperwork Reduction Act..................................................................... ............... 179 C. Congressional Review Act..................................................................... ............. 180 VI. ORDERING CLAUSES................................................................. ........................ 181 Appendix A: Final Rules Appendix B: Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis I. INTRODUCTION By this action,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-76A1.txt
  • the second largest DBS operator and the fourth largest MVPD, serving an estimated 10.12 million subscribers nationwide. Id. Rainbow DBS, which provides service under the brand name VOOM, reported an estimated 25,000 subscribers. Id. Dominion, which provides service under the brand name Sky Angel, does not publicly disclose its subscribership numbers on an annualized basis. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517510. 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517510. See 2005 Cable Competition Report, FCC 05-13, �110. Previously, the Commission reported that IMCC has 250 members. See Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, 19 FCC Rcd 1606, 1666 (2004) (``2004 Cable Competition Report''). See 2005
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-88A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-88A1.txt
  • at Exh. VIII. Further, this degree of concentration will likely be reduced in the near future because the Commission, in calculating the 200 MHz total, did not include spectrum that has been allocated and designated for advanced wireless services including PCS, but has not yet been auctioned. See, e.g., Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162, 25172 para. 28 (2003) (establishing service rules for 90 MHz of spectrum to be used for advanced wireless services, including 10 MHz licensed on an RSA/MSA basis). See Cingular-AWS Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21542-44 paras. 40-41; see also 19 FCC Rcd at 21552 para. 57 (``as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-96A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-96A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-96A1.txt
  • 134; Marc Ivaldi, Bruno Jullien, Patrick Rey, Paul Seabright, and Jean Tirole, The Economics of Tacit Collusion, n.2, Final Report for DG Competition, European Commission, Institut D'Economie Industrielle (Toulouse) (Mar. 2003); F.M. Scherer and David Ross, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 265, 339 (3rd ed., 1990). The 1997 Horizontal Merger Guidelines use the broader term ``coordinated interaction'' in section 2.1 to refer to ``actions by a group of firms that are profitable for each of them only as a result of the accommodating reactions of the others.'' It is a broader term because it refers to both tacit and express collusion. 1997 Horizontal Merger Guidelines, section 2.1. 1997 Horizontal Merger Guidelines, section 2.1. See, e.g., Carlton and Perloff at 134;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-103A1.txt
  • or is designed to operate within the human body for the purpose of facilitating communications from a medical implant device.'' See Appendix 1 to Subpart E of Part 95 - Glossary of Terms (following 47 C.F.R. � 95.673). Telemetry is the use of telecommunication for automatically indicating or recording measurements at a distance from the measuring instrument. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. First Report and Order in Docket No. 19478 and RM-1842 (Amendment of Parts 2 and 91 of the Commission's Rules to Permit Medical Telemetry and Other Low-Power Uses of Offset Frequencies in the Business Radio Service), 41 F.C.C.2d 8 (1973). Report and Order in ET Docket No. 99-255 and PR Docket No. 92-235 (Amendment of Parts 2 and 95 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-108A1.txt
  • the United States) - London, 15 January 2002. See AIS NPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 20075 n.19, for a description of the initial implementation schedule for the IMO AIS Carriage Requirements. Recommendation ITU-R M.1371-1, ``Technical characteristics for a universal shipborne automatic identification system using time division multiple access in the VHF maritime mobile band,'' with Annexes, at Annex 1, � 2.1.1, Table 2 (2001). See also IMO Resolution A.917(22), ``Guidelines for the On Board Operational Use of Shipborne Universal Automatic Identification System.'' 33 C.F.R. � 164.46(a) Note. 47 C.F.R. �� 80.275, 80.1101(c)(12). In addition to ITU-R M.1371-1, applications for AIS equipment certification must meet the following standards: IMO Resolution MSC.74(69), IEC 61162-1, IEC 61162-100, and IEC 61993-2. See 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-113A1.txt
  • is amended by revising paragraphs (f)(2),(f)(3) and Table 3b and deleting paragraph (f)(2)(iii) to read as follows: Section 15.615 General administrative requirements. (f) * * * (1) * * * (2) Exclusion zones. Exclusion zones encompass the operation of any Access BPL system within 1km of the boundary of coast station facilities at the coordinates listed in Tables 2 and 2.1. Exclusion zones also encompass the operation of Access BPL systems using overhead medium voltage power lines within 65 km of the Very Large Array observatory located at the coordinate 34o 04' 43.50'' N, 107o 37' 03.82'' W. Exclusion zones further encompass the operation of Access BPL systems using overhead low voltage power lines or underground power lines within 47 km
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.txt
  • 700 MHz Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 1059-1061 �� 91-94. Rural Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 19089 �14. RVW Comments at 2. The Commission has allocated 82 megahertz of spectrum on a CMA basis: 20 megahertz of AWS spectrum, see 47 C.F.R. � 27.6(h)(1); Service Rules for the Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Order on Reconsideration, FCC 05-149, 2005 WL 1964113, at *7 � 20 (rel. Aug. 15, 2005) (AWS-1 Order on Reconsideration); 50 megahertz for cellular service, see 47 C.F.R. � 22.909; Tenth CMRS Competition Report, 20 FCC Rcd at 15934-3 � 70; and the 12 megahertz in paired Block C in the Lower 700 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-120A1.txt
  • we refer to orbital locations other than those in the original Region 2 Plan as ``reduced spacing'' or ``non-nine-degree-spaced'' locations. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.201 and 25.202(a)(7). BSS is the international term used for a radiocommunication service in which signals transmitted or retransmitted by space stations are intended for direct reception by the general public. See also 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. DBS is the term used in the United States to describe the domestic implementation of the BSS international service in the 12.2-12.7 GHz frequency bands. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.201 at definition of ``Direct Broadcast Satellite Service''; 47 C.F.R. � 25.202(a)(7). The provisions of Appendices 30 and 30A of the International Radio Regulations are applicable to the BSS in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.txt
  • distress communications, and so we consolidate Sections 80.314, 80.315, and 80.316 into Section 80.314, in the interest of streamlining and clarifying our requirements. Emergency Position Indicating Radiobeacons (EPIRBs) The Commission amended Section 80.1061 of its Rules, governing 406.0-406.1 MHz EPIRBs, in the Report and Order. Among other things, the Commission revised the rule to include the current version - version 2.1 - of the RTCM standard for 406.0-406.1 MHz EPIRBs. In its petition for reconsideration, RTCM says that it fully supports the revised regulations for 406.0-406.1 MHz EPIRBs, but recommends that the Commission adopt two non-substantive changes to Section 80.1061. First, RTCM asks that Section 80.1061(a) be revised to include up-to-date information on how to acquire RTCM standards, noting that its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-142A1.txt
  • and also offered some tentative conclusions consistent with existing AWS service rules, such as allowing flexible use of this spectrum and licensing this spectrum under Part 27 of the Commission's rules. Finally, in 2005, the Commission designated yet another 20 MHz of spectrum for AWS, specifically the 2155-2175 MHz band, thus establishing 70 MHz of contiguous AWS spectrum in the 2.1 GHz band (from 2110 to 2180 MHz). Broadband Radio Service In July 2004, the Commission transformed the rules and policies governing the Multipoint Distribution Service (MDS) and the Instructional Television Fixed Service (ITFS) in the 2500-2690 MHz band by providing licensees with greater flexibility and establishing a more functional band plan. As one part of this action, the Commission renamed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-146A1.txt
  • 14001 n.199; ALLTEL-Western Wireless Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 13076 n.155; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21570 n.341. Coordinated interaction consists of actions by a group of firms that are profitable for each of the firms involved only because the other firms react by accommodating these actions rather than attempting to undercut them. DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines � 2.1. See Sprint-Nextel Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 13995 n.167; ALLTEL-Western Wireless Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 13085 n.211; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21580 � 151. In the Commission's recent major CMRS merger orders, the initial screen typically identified large numbers of local areas as requiring in-depth analysis. For example, in the Cingular-AT&T Wireless merger, 270 CMAs were
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-148A1.txt
  • radionavigation service. We therefore disagree with commenters who do not see any need to amend the Table of Frequency Allocations. See Garmin Comments at 3-4; NTIA Comments at 2. By definition, a data transmission is not considered a radionavigation application. Radionavigation must be accomplished by obtaining information by means of the propagation properties of radio waves. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. The Commission made a similar determination when it recently adopted footnote US343, which authorizes another type of datalink operation (DGPS stations) in the bands 108-117.975 and 1559-1610 MHz. See Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 21457 �� 51-52. See, e.g., Boeing Comments [to the NPRM] at 9-10; ARINC/ATA Reply Comments [to the NPRM] at 7; Rockwell Collins Comments [to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-149A1.txt
  • F2C (Facsimile (FAX)) is an image emission type using frequency modulation of the main carrier. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.201, 97.3(c)(3). ``Harmful interference'' is interference that endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See 47 C.F.R. � 97.1(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.305(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.307(f). See NPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 7302 � 16. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.201, 2.202 for the rules that apply to emission types. A1C signifies double-sideband facsimile transmissions on a single channel containing quantized or digital information without the use of a modulating sub-carrier, excluding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-149A1_Erratum.doc
  • F2C (Facsimile (FAX)) is an image emission type using frequency modulation of the main carrier. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.201, 97.3(c)(3). ``Harmful interference'' is interference that endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See 47 C.F.R. � 97.1(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.305(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.307(f). See NPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 7302 � 16. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.201, 2.202 for the rules that apply to emission types. A1C signifies double-sideband facsimile transmissions on a single channel containing quantized or digital information without the use of a modulating sub-carrier, excluding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A1.txt
  • LEWISBURG 59 8 3.68 577 374622 804225 26153 590 1.7 23264 WV MARTINSBURG 60 12 23 314 392727 780352 24965 2481 6.2 71676 WV MORGANTOWN 24 33 145 457 74963 394145 794545 20788 1370 0.5 66804 WV OAK HILL 4 4 2.73 236 75048 375726 810903 20811 580 3 4685 WV PARKERSBURG 15 49 47.4 193 392059 813356 12809 348 2.1 70592 WV WESTON 5 5 9.96 253 74344 390429 802528 27488 569 0.4 6869 WV WHEELING 7 7 15.5 293 74497 400341 804508 25673 2373 0.1 82575 WY CASPER 6 6 1 536 74715 424426 1062134 20136 70 0 68713 WY CASPER 13 12 3.2 534 74727 424426 1062134 18050 70 0 63177 WY CASPER 14 14 53.3 573 74389
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A2.txt
  • 38 712 446 74655 374519 1222706 23056 6322 1.7 56 Appendix B Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-150 NTSC ChanChanERP (kW)HAAT (m)Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS)Area (sq km) Population (thousand)% Interference Received State and City Facility ID DTV 71586CASAN FRANCISCO 38 391000 428 29544 374519 1222706 24293 6266 4 69619CASAN FRANCISCO 44 45 206 491 74816 374520 1222705 16434 5799 2.1 33778CASAN FRANCISCO 14 51 476 701 28493 372957 1215216 19534 6377 0.1 35280CASAN JOSE 11 12 103 377 64426 374107 1222601 36145 6703 0.1 34564CASAN JOSE 36 36 740 668 74585 372917 1215159 28572 6601 4.5 22644CASAN JOSE 65 411000 418 60706 374115 1222601 23495 6250 3.3 64987CASAN JOSE 48 49 257 688 38067 372957 1215216 21071 6083 1.5 35663CASAN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-156A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-156A1.txt
  • closely with my colleagues and all stakeholders to ensure that the process to make more efficient and effective use of the TV spectrum proceeds smoothly. The TV broadcast bands that are the subject of this proceeding include the following portions of the VHF and UHF radio spectrum: 54-72 MHz, 76-88 MHz, 174-216 MHz and 470-806 MHz. As defined in Section 2.1(c) of the Commission's rules and the international radio regulations, harmful interference is ``interference which ... seriously degrades, obstructs, of repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with these [international] Radio Regulations. (RR).'' See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). See Notice of Proposed Rule Making in ET Docket Nos. 02-380 and 04-186, 19 FCC Rcd 10018 (2004). See 47 C.F.R. Part
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.txt
  • applicable to the singular as well as the plural forms of such terms and to the masculine as well as to the feminine and neuter genders of such term. Whenever the words ``include,'' ``includes,'' or ``including'' are used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words ``without limitation.'' ARTICLE 2: FACILITIES, INFORMATION STORAGE AND ACCESS 2.1. Domestic Communications Infrastructure. Except to the extent and under conditions concurred in by the FBI, DOJ and DHS in writing: (i) all Domestic Communications Infrastructure that is owned, operated or controlled by a Domestic Communications Company shall at all times be located in the United States and will be directed, controlled, supervised and managed by a Domestic Communications Company; and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-178A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 97.1. See 47 C.F.R. � 97.111(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.1(a). See World Radiocommunication Conference Final Acts (Geneva, 2003) (WRC-03 Final Acts), Article 25.6. The WRC-03 Final Acts applicable to the amateur service became effective on July 5, 2003. An administration is any governmental department responsible for discharging obligations under the Radio Regulations. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See Final Acts of the World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-97), Geneva, Switzerland, 1997, and Final Acts of the World Radiocommunication Conference, (WRC-00), Istanbul, 2000, Radio Regulation 25.5. This Radio Regulation stated, ``Any person seeking a license to operate the apparatus of an amateur station shall prove that he is able to send correctly by hand and to receive correctly by ear
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.txt
  • 12.3 12.4 11.5 11.2 11.8 11.6 11.2 Public, educational, & govt. access 2.6 2.6 2.7 3.0 2.8 2.0 3.4 Local commercial leased access 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.9 0.3 Other local, regional, & national 54.9 54.6 57.2 59.0 55.5 56.8 53.8 Basic & expanded basic tiers 70.5 70.3 72.0 73.9 70.5 71.3 68.7 Other analog channels 3.3 3.3 3.3 2.1 4.0 4.0 5.8 Total 73.8 73.6 75.3 76.0 74.5 75.3 74.5 Digital Programming Most highly subscribed tier 33.7 33.6 34.2 35.8 35.1 31.6 20.4 HDTV channels 11.6 11.5 11.6 12.1 11.2 11.6 9.7 Other digital channels 108.1 107.6 113.8 120.0 113.4 104.5 100.6 Total 153.4 152.7 159.6 167.9 159.7 147.7 130.7 Sources: Attachments 3 and 9. Number of channels does
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-185A1.txt
  • products, changing capacity, or changing their own prices. These reactions can alter the total effect on the market and must be taken into account when evaluating potential unilateral effects. See Sprint-Nextel Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 14001 n.199; ALLTEL-Western Wireless Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 13076 n.155; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21570 n.341. DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines � 2.1. See also W. Kip Viscusi, John M. Vernon & Joseph E. Harrington, Jr., Economics of Regulation and Antitrust 107 (2000); Douglas Greer, Industrial Organization and Public Policy 269 (1992). For unilateral effects, our analyses have included the following aspects: (1) product differentiation and substitutability (see Sprint-Nextel Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 14002-07 �� 94-107; ALLTEL-Western Wireless Order, 20 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-185A1_Erratum.doc
  • products, changing capacity, or changing their own prices. These reactions can alter the total effect on the market and must be taken into account when evaluating potential unilateral effects. See Sprint-Nextel Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 14001 n.199; ALLTEL-Western Wireless Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 13076 n.155; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21570 n.341. DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines � 2.1. See also W. Kip Viscusi, John M. Vernon & Joseph E. Harrington, Jr., Economics of Regulation and Antitrust 107 (2000); Douglas Greer, Industrial Organization and Public Policy 269 (1992). For unilateral effects, our analyses have included the following aspects: (1) product differentiation and substitutability (see Sprint-Nextel Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 14002-07 �� 94-107; ALLTEL-Western Wireless Order, 20 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-1A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-1A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-1A1.txt
  • the Commission's Rules to Establish a Medical Implant Communications Service in the 402-405 MHz Band) (``MICS Order''), 14 FCC Rcd, 21040 (1999). Id. at 21042-43. In this band, Metaids currently operates radiosondes, which are automatic transmitters, usually carried on an aircraft, free balloon, kite, or parachute, which transmit meteorological data during their journey through the atmosphere. (See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1.) Id. at 21046. 47 C.F.R. � 95.628(c), (d). 47 C.F.R. � 95.1211. 47 C.F.R. � 95.625(a). The Commission also provided that a MICS device could transmit without prior frequency monitoring, pursuant to a non-radio frequency actuation signal generated by a device external to the body (manual activation) (47 C.F.R. � 95.1209(b)), or in response to a medical implant event (47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.txt
  • rule changes that relate to M-LMS operations in the M-LMS Band. 47 C.F.R. � 90.205(k). 47 C.F.R. � 15.247. In a spread spectrum system, information is conveyed by modulation of a carrier by some conventional means, and the bandwidth is deliberately widened by a spreading function over that which would be needed to transmit the information alone. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). M-LMS licensees currently may operate at 49.2 Watts, while Part 15 devices may operate at 4 Watts, a 10.9 dB difference. See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.247, 90.205(k). In this regard, we note the discussion below on the possibility of imposing a power spectral density requirement. See infra paras. 32-33. In commenting on these comparisons using reduced M-LMS power limits, commenters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.txt
  • Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4388 � 5 (1991); Callais Cablevision, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd 1359, 1362 � 9 (2001). See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b); 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(f). See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7591 � 4 (2002). See supra note 11 and accompanying text. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 defines ``spurious emissions'' as ``[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' See GPS Networking, Inc., RM-11002, 20 FCC Rcd 12256, 12258 (2005). It
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-43A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-43A1.txt
  • new and advanced wireless applications, such as voice, data and broadband services provided over a variety of high-speed fixed and mobile networks, and which are popularly referred to as 3G systems. We have also adopted service rules for AWS operations in the bands 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order in WT Docket No. 02-353, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (``AWS Service Rules R&O''). See also Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration in WT Docket No. 02-353, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005). ). The Commission, which is an independent agency, administers non-Federal Government spectrum.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-45A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 00-258 WT Docket No. 02-353 NINTH REPORT AND ORDER AND ORDER Adopted: April 12, 2006 Released: April 21, 2006 By the Commission: Commissioners Adelstein and Tate issuing separate statements. Table of Contents Heading Paragraph # I. introduction 1 II. background 2 III. ninth Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-45A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-45A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-45A2.txt
  • Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems; Ninth Report and Order; ET Docket No. 00-258 I am pleased to support this item because it puts in place important relocation procedures that will apply to a number of services in the 2.1 GHz band, in particular Broadband Radio Service (BRS) licensees in the 2150-2160/62 MHz band. Our decision is particularly significant because the adopted procedures are another important step in our efforts to prepare for the upcoming Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) auction later this summer, as a subgroup of AWS licensees ultimately will be responsible for relocation of these BRS operators. While
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-45A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-45A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-45A3.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER DEBORAH TAYLOR TATE Re: Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems (ET Docket No. 00-258); Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands (WT Docket No. 02-353). Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) are new and innovative fixed and mobile terrestrial wireless applications using bandwidth that is sufficient for the provision of a variety of voice and data applications, such as video telephony, wireless Internet access, multimedia streaming, and other high-speed information and entertainment services. These and other advanced services are essential to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-46A1.txt
  • protected from MSS interference by PFD limits, as we discuss below. Thus, we do not see the need to modify the MSS allocation in the band as the BRS Petitioners request. We also reject Globalstar's proposal to significantly limit the number of BRS service areas nationwide, because it is inconsistent with the Commission's decision to relocate BRS operations from the 2.1 GHz band to the 2496-2502 MHz band. We note that it may be as long as five years before BRS operations are relocated to this band, and so MSS may operate as it always has during that time. Once BRS operations commence, MSS will have notice of the discrete geographic areas of BRS operation, because Section 27.1235 requires BRS operators
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-47A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-47A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-47A1.txt
  • Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems, ET Docket No. 00-258, Eighth Report and Order, Fifth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 15866 (2005) (``AWS Eighth Report and Order'' and ``AWS Fifth Notice''). See generally ET Docket No. 00-258 and ET Docket No. 95-18. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, WT Docket No. 02-353, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003); modified by Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005) (codified at 47 C.F.R. Part 27, Subpart L) (``AWS Service Rules Order''). The Commission has also proposed service rules for the AWS-2 spectrum. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-50A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-50A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-50A1.txt
  • -FCC- ). Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission' Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems, ET Docket No. 00-258, Second Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 23193 (2002). See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, WT Docket No. 02-353, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003); modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005) (codified at 47 C.F.R. Part 27, Subpart L) (AWS Service Rules R&O). Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-8A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-8A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-8A1.txt
  • Other Procedures, Public Notice, DA 06-3 (rel. January 10, 2006), 71 FR 3513 (January 23, 2006). Implementation of the Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act and Modernization of the Commission's Competitive Bidding Rules and Procedures, Declaratory Ruling and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 20 FCC Rcd 11268 (2005), released June 14, 2005. Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS-1 Service Rules Order). AWS-1 Service Rules Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003). AWS-1 Service Rules Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 25189 � 68. AWS-1 Service Rules Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 25220 � 149. The Commission defined a ``small business'' as an entity with average annual gross revenues
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • ground and ground elevation above mean sea level; (iv) Antenna gain pattern(s) in the plane of the main beam; (v) Longitude range of geostationary satellite orbit (GSO) satellites at which an antenna may be pointed, for proposed earth station antenna(s) accessing GSO satellites; (vi) Horizon elevation plot; (vii) Antenna horizon gain plot(s) determined in accordance with the procedure in Section 2.1 of Annex 5 to Appendix 7 of the ITU Radio Regulations; (viii) Minimum elevation angle; (ix) Maximum equivalent isotropically radiated power (e.i.r.p.) density in the main beam in any [TBD] Hz band; (x) Maximum available RF transmit power density in any [TBD] Hz band at the input terminals of the antenna(s); (xi) Maximum permissible RF interference power level as determined
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • ground and ground elevation above mean sea level; (iv) Antenna gain pattern(s) in the plane of the main beam; (v) Longitude range of geostationary satellite orbit (GSO) satellites at which an antenna may be pointed, for proposed earth station antenna(s) accessing GSO satellites; (vi) Horizon elevation plot; (vii) Antenna horizon gain plot(s) determined in accordance with the procedure in Section 2.1 of Annex 5 to Appendix 7 of the ITU Radio Regulations; (viii) Minimum elevation angle; (ix) Maximum equivalent isotropically radiated power (e.i.r.p.) density in the main beam in any [TBD] Hz band; (x) Maximum available RF transmit power density in any [TBD] Hz band at the input terminals of the antenna(s); (xi) Maximum permissible RF interference power level as determined
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-107A1.txt
  • still pending. See ``Correction to Public Notice DA 96-586 `FCC Announces Winning Bidders in the Auction of 1020 Licenses to Provide 900 MHz SMR in Major Trading Areas,''' Public Notice, 18 FCC Rcd 18367 (WTB 1996). See ``Multi-Radio Service Auction Closes,'' Public Notice, 17 FCC Rcd 1446 (WTB 2002). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS-1 Report and Order). 15 U.S.C. � 632. Letter from Jere W. Glover, Chief Counsel for Advocacy, SBA, to William E. Kennard, Chairman, FCC (May 27, 1999). The Small Business Act contains a definition of ``small-business concern,'' which the RFA incorporates into its own definition of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-128A1.txt
  • the second largest DBS operator and the fourth largest MVPD, serving an estimated 10.12 million subscribers nationwide. Id. Rainbow DBS, which provides service under the brand name VOOM, reported an estimated 25,000 subscribers. Id. Dominion, which provides service under the brand name Sky Angel, does not publicly disclose its subscribership numbers on an annualized basis. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517510. 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517510. See 2005 Cable Competition Report, 20 FCC Rcd at 2816, � 110. Previously, the Commission reported that IMCC had 250 members; see Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, Tenth Annual Report, 19 FCC Rcd 1606, 1666,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
  • Richard S. Whitt, Esq., Washington Telecom and Media Counsel, Google, Inc. to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, filed May 21, 2007 (Google Ex Parte). Comment Sought on Google Proposals Regarding Service Rules for 700 MHz Spectrum, 72 Fed. Reg. 29930 (May 30, 2007) (Google 700 MHz Service Rules PN). See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058,14069 � 20 (2005) (AWS-1 Order on Reconsideration). See 700 MHz Commercial Services Notice, 21 FCC Rcd at 9362-69 �� 27-48. Id. at 9347 � 2, 9362-73 �� 27-59. Id. at 9352-53 � 11, 9370-72 �� 51-55; Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1_Erratum.doc
  • Richard S. Whitt, Esq., Washington Telecom and Media Counsel, Google, Inc. to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, filed May 21, 2007 (Google Ex Parte). Comment Sought on Google Proposals Regarding Service Rules for 700 MHz Spectrum, 72 Fed. Reg. 29930 (May 30, 2007) (Google 700 MHz Service Rules PN). See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058,14069 � 20 (2005) (AWS-1 Order on Reconsideration). See 700 MHz Commercial Services Notice, 21 FCC Rcd at 9362-69 �� 27-48. Id. at 9347 � 2, 9362-73 �� 27-59. Id. at 9352-53 � 11, 9370-72 �� 51-55; Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A2.txt
  • 18410 410 0.2 58912CASAN MATEO 60 43 536 428 44617 374519 1222706 20821 6089 2.4 59013CASANGER 59 36 372 600 43974 370437 1192601 27078 1440 0 67884CASANTA ANA 40 23 50 900 39876 341327 1180344 21304 13620 5.6 12144CASANTA BARBARA 38 211000 923 33205 343128 1195735 36089 1343 0 60637CASANTA BARBARA 3 27 699 917 74818 343132 1195728 42071 1298 2.1 63165CASANTA MARIA 12 19 188 591 74819 345437 1201108 26167 413 0 34440CASANTA ROSA 50 32 19.9 928 72086 384010 1223752 18189 742 4.5 56550CASTOCKTON 13 251000 594 32519 381424 1213003 39491 6024 7.9 20871CASTOCKTON 64 26 425 599 71124 381424 1213003 27821 4135 4.8 10242CASTOCKTON 58 46 600 580 381554 1212924 32953 4769 10.3 16729CATWENTYNINE PALMS 23 150 784
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-141A1.txt
  • Broadband Service,'' respectively, to better reflect the new services anticipated for this band. See BRS/EBS R&O and FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 14182, 14227 �� 6, 164. See First Leasing Decision, 94 FCC Rcd at 1206-07 � 4. Id. See Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, and Cable Television Relay Service, Gen. Docket No. 90-54, Second Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 6792, 6793, 6801-06 �� 4, 42-58 (1991) (Second R&O); see also Second R&O at Appendix C; 47 C.F.R. � 74.990 (1991). See former 47 C.F.R. � 74.990. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-143A1.txt
  • Communications Act, Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 1411, 1478-1480 �� 175-179 (1994) (CMRS Second Report and Order). See CMRS Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 1478-1480 �� 175-179 (declining to impose tariffs on CMRS carriers, in part, because it would allow carriers to maintain artificially high rates); see also, Department of Justice/Federal Trade Commission Merger Guidelines � 2.1 (the amount of information available to companies could be relevant to the companies' abilities to engage in anticompetitive behavior). See id. See ACS Comments at 1-2; SLO Cellular Reply Comments at 5; Navajo Nation Comments at 5 in WT Docket No. 06-156. See 47 U.S.C. �� 301, 303(c), 332. See generally Leap Comments; SLO Cellular Comments; MetroPCS Comments; SouthernLINC Comments;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-144A1.txt
  • retransmitted by an FM broadcast translator station or an FM broadcast booster station. (e) AM or FM radio broadcast station. When used in this Subpart L, the term AM broadcast station or AM radio broadcast station or FM broadcast station or FM radio broadcast station refers to commercial and noncommercial educational AM or FM radio broadcast stations as defined in �2.1 of this chapter, unless the context indicates otherwise. * * * * * (g) Translator coverage contour. The coverage contour for an FM translator providing "fill-in" service is congruent with its parent station: For a fill-in translator for a commercial Class B station it is the predicted 0.5 mV/m field strength contour; for a fill-in translator for a commercial Cass
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-14A1.txt
  • Initial Brief on Damages at 20-22; Defendants' Reply Brief on Damages at 6-10. See, e.g., Damages Joint Statement at 12; Damages Reply at 26-27; Defendants' Initial Brief on Damages at 17-19, 25 and Att. 5; Defendants' Reply Brief on Damages at 9, Attachment B (directing Debit Card Providers to maintain call information). See, e.g., Liability Answer at Attachment B-11, part 2.1. Defendants' Initial Brief on Damages at 20-22 (citing C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc., Hearing Designation Order, 16 FCC Rcd 8801, 8808 at � 21 (Enf. Bur. 2001); New Valley Corp. v. Pacific Bell, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 5128, 5134 at � 14 (2000); Hi-Tech Furnace Systems, Inc. v. FCC, 224 F.3d 781, 787
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-161A1.txt
  • Service in the 2155-2175 MHz Band is Accepted for Filing,'' WT Docket No. 07-16, Public Notice, DA 07-492 (rel. Jan. 31, 2007) (M2Z Application Public Notice). See also PN Setting Pleading Cycle on M2Z Application, 22 FCC Rcd 4442. See id. at 1. Id. at 2. TowerStream Application, Exhibit A at 1-2. TowerStream states that it supports licensing of the 2.1 GHz band in rural areas to rural operators. Id. at 3, n.2. Acknowledging that its proposal does not include a free basic service and has construction benchmarks set less aggressively than M2Z's, Commnet states that its thresholds are potentially achievable and are not being proffered with the intention of renegotiating with the Commission post-licensing. See Commnet Application, Exhibit 2 at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.txt
  • Services Transmissions originating in the AWS-3 band could potentially cause harmful interference to adjacent band services. For example, AWS-3 base, fixed or mobile stations could cause interference to AWS-1 and proposed AWS-2 services, which will operate in the 2110-2155 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz bands, respectively, as well as other existing services that currently operate in the upper part of the 2.1 GHz band - such as Broadband Radio Service (BRS), Fixed Microwave services (FS) and MSS/ATC. In the following paragraphs, we seek comment on possible technical and operational rules to protect these various services from harmful interference. As discussed above, if we were to adopt an uplink/downlink approach for the 2155-2175 MHz band, it could be used to implement systems using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.txt
  • RSNs); see also Cablevision Comments at 23 (citing 2002 Extension Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 12145, � 47; 12th Annual Report, 21 FCC Rcd at 2586, � 183). See Cablevision Comments at 4, 24 and Appendix B at 21-22. Cablevision also contends that the claimed ``must have'' status of RSN programming is refuted by the fact that it lost only 2.1 percent of its subscribers during 2002 when it was unable to carry the YES network. See id. at 24. In response, Verizon argues that the ``loss of a few subscribers by an entrenched incumbent cable operator due to the unavailability of programming pales in competitive significance to the inability of a new entrant to attract subscribers in the first place
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-174A1.txt
  • Bi-directionally in the 17.3-17.8 GHz Frequency Band, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, IB Docket No. 06-123, FCC 07-76 (2007) (``Report and Order.'' ). BSS is the international term used for a radiocommunication service in which signals transmitted or retransmitted by space stations are intended for direct reception by the general public. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. In this item, the term ``17/24 GHz BSS'' generally refers to the broadcasting-satellite service operating on space-to-Earth (downlink) frequencies in the 17.3-17.8 GHz band and the corresponding Earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies in the 24.75-25.25 GHz band. Report and Order at Appendix F. For ease of reference, we will refer to these orbital locations as ``Appendix F'' locations in this Reconsideration Order.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-177A1.txt
  • still pending. See ``Correction to Public Notice DA 96-586 `FCC Announces Winning Bidders in the Auction of 1020 Licenses to Provide 900 MHz SMR in Major Trading Areas,''' Public Notice, 18 FCC Rcd 18367 (WTB 1996). See ``Multi-Radio Service Auction Closes,'' Public Notice, 17 FCC Rcd 1446 (WTB 2002). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS-1 Report and Order). 15 U.S.C. � 632. Letter from Jere W. Glover, Chief Counsel for Advocacy, SBA, to William E. Kennard, Chairman, FCC (May 27, 1999). The Small Business Act contains a definition of ``small-business concern,'' which the RFA incorporates into its own definition of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-181A1.txt
  • Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Provision of Fixed and Mobile Broadband Access, Educational and Other Advanced Services in the 2150-2162 and 2500-2690 MHz Bands, Third Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd 5606 (2006). There are 53 MEAs nationwide compared to 493 BTAs. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003); modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005). There are 734 CMAs nationwide. There are 176 EAs nationwide. See ``Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Announces Extension of Filing and Regulatory Deadlines for Wireless Licensees in Areas
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.txt
  • the current standards of judicial review. See Adarand Constructors v. Pe�a, 515 U.S. 200 (1995) (requiring a strict scrutiny standard of review for government mandated race-conscious measures); United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996) (applying an intermediate standard of review to a state program based on gender classification). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS-1 Report and Order). See Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, Third Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 10 FCC Rcd 175, 196 (1995); Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, Fifth Report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-196A1.txt
  • including a relocation schedule and cost summary for AWS-1 relocation); see also Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Service to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems, ET Docket No. 00-258, Service Rules for Advances Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Ninth Report and Order and Order, 21 FCC Rcd 4473 (2006) (recon. pending) (establishing procedures for the relocation of Broadband Radio Service (BRS) operations from the 2150-2160/62 MHz band and Fixed Microwave Service (FS) operations in the 2.1 GHz band); The Federal Communications Commission and the National Telecommunications and Information administration - Coordination Procedures
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-206A1.txt
  • in 2004 to 96.9 million in 2005. In other words, although cable systems sold premium services to fewer households, the average number of premium cable service subscriptions per subscribing household increased. The data shows growth from an average 3.2 subscriptions per subscribing household in 2004 to an average 3.5 in 2005. The total revenue received from premium services also increased 2.1 percent in 2005. Table 3: Premium Cable Services: 2000 - 2005 (in millions) Year Premium Cable Service Subscribers Premium Cable Service Subscriptions Average Number of Subscriptions Per Subscriber Total Percent Change Over Prior Year Total Percent Change Over Prior Year Subscriptions/Subscribers Percent Change Over Prior Year 2000 28.5 1.8% 65.9 11.7% 2.3 4.5% 2001 29.0 1.8% 75.4 14.4% 2.6 13.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-213A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-213A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-213A1.txt
  • will be discussed in paragraph 16, infra. Id. at 34, Clause 11.2 (a). Id. at 35, Clause 12.1 (a). Id. at 34, Clause 11.1. Id. at 34, Clause 11.2 (a). Id. at Clause 11.2 (b). Narrative at 7. Id. Communications Investment Partners Limited and Inmarsat Finance III Limited, Call Option Agreement (Option) (dated March 19, 2007). Option at 4, Clause 2.1. Narrative at 8. The option provides that Inmarsat Finance may exercise the option on April 14, 2009, Option at 4-5, Clause 3.1.1 or earlier if the contractual provisions barring Inmarsat from owning a distributor of satellite services have been ``waived, terminated, or otherwise have expired.'' Option at 4, Clause 3.1.2 The option provides that the option expires as of 5:00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-215A1.txt
  • WCS proposal would allow SDARS repeaters and WCS base stations to operate at peak power levels exceeding 2 kW EIRP, so long as the average power limit is limited two kilowatts. As proposed by the WCS Coalition, average EIRP would be calculated using the average power of the transmitter measured in accordance with the definition of mean power in Section 2.1 of the Commission's rules. WCS Coalition asserts that a 2 kW EIRP average power limit is simpler to administer than the emission limit proposed by Sirius and would facilitate deployment of both SDARS repeaters and WCS stations. We seek comment on the WCS Coalition's proposal and the methodology on which it is based. Would the adoption of a 2 kW
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.txt
  • applicable to the singular as well as the plural forms of such terms and to the masculine as well as to the feminine and neuter genders of such term. Whenever the words "include," "includes," or "including" are used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words "without limitation." ARTICLE 2: FACILITIES, INFORMATION STORAGE AND ACCESS 2.1. Domestic Communications Infrastructure. Except to the extent and under conditions concurred in by the USG Parties in writing: (i) all Domestic Communications Infrastructure owned, operated or controlled by the Domestic Companies shall at all times be located in the United States and directed, controlled, supervised and managed by the Domestic Companies; (ii) all Domestic Communications that are carried by or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-66A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-66A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-66A1.txt
  • Radio Report and Order. The Information Industry Technology Council (``ITI'') filed comments in opposition of MSS' petition. No comments were filed in response to Cisco's petition. These petitions are discussed in detail below. III. DISCUSSION The Cisco Petition for Clarification. Cisco requests two clarifications of the rules adopted in the Cognitive Radio Report and Order. First, Cisco requests that Section 2.1 of the rules be clarified to match the text of the Order, which states that radios ``not designed or expected to be modified by a party other than the manufacturer'' are not required to be certified as SDRs. This section defines an SDR as a radio containing a transmitter in which the operating parameters can be altered by making a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.txt
  • 06-150 at 7-9; Cingular Reply Comments in WT Docket No. 06-150 at 7-9; Verizon Wireless Comments in WT Docket No. 06-150 at 4-5; Verizon Wireless Reply Comments in WT Docket No. 06-150 at 3-6 (discussing downside of small area licensing and lack of evidence to support smaller geographic areas). See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005) (AWS-1 Order on Reconsideration) (adopting a mix of license sizes). ``AWS-1'' refers to the 90 megahertz of the spectrum in the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands. Licenses involving this spectrum recently were auctioned in Auction No. 66. CTIA Comments in WT Docket No. 06-150 at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1_Erratum.doc
  • 06-150 at 7-9; Cingular Reply Comments in WT Docket No. 06-150 at 7-9; Verizon Wireless Comments in WT Docket No. 06-150 at 4-5; Verizon Wireless Reply Comments in WT Docket No. 06-150 at 3-6 (discussing downside of small area licensing and lack of evidence to support smaller geographic areas). See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005) (AWS-1 Order on Reconsideration) (adopting a mix of license sizes). ``AWS-1'' refers to the 90 megahertz of the spectrum in the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands. Licenses involving this spectrum recently were auctioned in Auction No. 66. CTIA Comments in WT Docket No. 06-150 at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-76A1.txt
  • Table 9b as set forth below. We seek comment on the appropriateness of this approach. Parties proposing an alternative set of values should provide a detailed justification for those values. Table 9b Parameters required for the determination of coordination distance for a transmitting earth station in bands shared bidirectionally with receiving earth stations minal of the receiving antenna. See � 2.1 of Annex 7 to Appendix 7 of the ITU Radio Regulations which provides a default value for two earth stations operating in opposite directions of transmission at frequencies greater than 17/24 GHz. Reference Bandwidth B (Hz) 1.0x106 Reference bandwidth (Hz), i.e., the bandwidth in the receiving station that is subject to the interference and over which the power of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-86A1.txt
  • earth stations at given positions, when one or more satellites are used; the given position may be a specified fixed point or any fixed point within specified areas; in some cases this service includes satellite-to-satellite links, which also may be operated in the inter-satellite service; the FSS also may include feeder links for other space radio-communication services. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum in the Ku- and Extended Ku-Bands to the Vehicle Mounted Earth Station Satellite Service (``VMES'') on a Shared Primary Basis and to Adopt Licensing and Service Rules for VMES Operations in the Ku- and Extended Ku-Bands, Petition for Rulemaking, RM No. 11336 (filed May 24, 2006). Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-119A1.txt
  • serving an estimated 14.67 million subscribers nationwide, as of June 2005; see 2005 Cable Competition Report, 21 FCC Rcd at 2540 � 73. EchoStar, which provides service under the brand name Dish Network, is the second largest DBS operator and the third largest MVPD, serving an estimated 11.45 million subscribers nationwide, as of June 2005. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS Code 517110 (2007). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS Code 515210 (2002). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS Code 517110 (2007). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS Code 515210 (2002). See 2005 Cable Competition Report, 21 FCC Rcd 2544, � 80. See 47 U.S.C. � 573. 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS Code 517110 (2007). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-158A1.txt
  • licensees are limited only by the Fixed and Mobile designation of the spectrum we allocate for AWS and the service rules we ultimately adopt for the bands. Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands, WT Docket No. 04-356, Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 19 FCC Rcd 19263 (2004) (AWS-2 NPRM). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 2155-2175 MHz Band, WT Docket No. 07-195, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcd 17035 (2007) (AWS-3 NPRM). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 27.53(c)(1)(2), 27.53(h). See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-164A1.txt
  • Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, from Aida Alvarez, Administrator, Small Business Administration, dated August 10, 1999. See ``Lower 700 MHz Band Auction Closes,'' Public Notice, 17 FCC Rcd 17272 (WTB 2002). See ``Lower 700 MHz Band Auction Closes,'' Public Notice, 18 FCC Rcd 11873 (WTB 2003). Id. Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS-1 Report and Order). See Implementation of section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, Third Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 10 FCC Rcd 175, 196 (1995); Implementation of section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, Fifth Report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-176A1.txt
  • STA to operate those repeaters for a period of 180 days. Administration of effective spectrum policy requires that licensees comply with Commission rules and that the Commission is vigilant in its oversight. This will foster a level playing field for competition and encourage technological innovation. The American public requires and deserves no less. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 25.120. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1 et seq. and 15.1 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 25.120. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Patrick L. Donnelly, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. (June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-177A1.txt
  • others will be referred to the FCC's International Bureau for processing. Administration of effective spectrum policy requires that licensees comply with Commission rules and that the Commission is vigilant in its oversight. This will foster a level playing field for competition and encourage technological innovation. The American public requires and deserves no less. 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 25.120. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 et seq. and � 15.101 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 25.120. See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, FCC, to William J. Bailey, Senior Vice President, Regulatory and Government Affairs, XM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-181A1.txt
  • n.199; ALLTEL-Western Wireless Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 13076 n.155; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21570 n.341. Coordinated interaction consists of actions by a group of firms that are profitable for each of the firms involved only because the other firms react by accommodating these actions rather than attempting to undercut them. See DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines � 2.1; AT&T Dobson Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 20318-19 � 42; GCI-Alaska DigiTel Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 14896 � 77; DoCoMo-Guam Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 13597 � 25, n.113; ALLTEL-Midwest Wireless Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 11554 � 60; Sprint-Nextel Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 13995 n.167; ALLTEL-Western Wireless Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 13085 n.211; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-184A1.txt
  • Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, from Aida Alvarez, Administrator, Small Business Administration, dated August 10, 1999. See ``Lower 700 MHz Band Auction Closes,'' Public Notice, 17 FCC Rcd 17272 (WTB 2002). See ``Lower 700 MHz Band Auction Closes,'' Public Notice, 18 FCC Rcd 11873 (WTB 2003). Id. Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS-1 Report and Order). See Implementation of section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, Third Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 10 FCC Rcd 175, 196 (1995); Implementation of section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, Fifth Report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-246A1.txt
  • Statement of the Honorable Kevin J. Martin, Chairman, Federal Communications Commission, Before the Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation, U.S. Senate, February 1, 2007, 2007 WL 283773 (F.C.C.). Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP) is the product of the gain of the antenna in a given direction relative to an isotropic antenna and the power supplied to that antenna. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. For purposes of this Order, the conventional C-band is the 3700-4200 MHz and 5925-6425 MHz bands. The conventional Ku-band is the 11.7-12.2 GHz and 14.0-14.5 GHz bands. See Third Further Notice, 20 FCC Rcd at 5622 (para. 74). See 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review -- Streamlining and Other Revisions of Part 25 of the Commission's Rules Governing the Licensing of, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.txt
  • n.199; ALLTEL-Western Wireless Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 13076 n.155; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21570 n.341. Coordinated interaction consists of actions by a group of firms that are profitable for each of the firms involved only because the other firms react by accommodating these actions rather than attempting to undercut them. See DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines � 2.1; Verizon Wireless-RCC Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 12491 � 57; AT&T-Dobson Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 20318-19 � 42; ALLTEL-Midwest Wireless Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 11554 � 60; Sprint-Nextel Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 13995 n.167; ALLTEL-Western Wireless Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 13085 n.211; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21580 � 151. See, e.g., Verizon-RCC, 22
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.txt
  • and also offered some tentative conclusions consistent with existing AWS service rules, such as allowing flexible use of this spectrum and licensing this spectrum under Part 27 of the Commission's rules. In 2005, the Commission designated yet another 20 MHz of spectrum for AWS, specifically the 2155-2175 MHz band (``AWS-3''), thus establishing 70 MHz of contiguous AWS spectrum in the 2.1 GHz band (from 2110 to 2180 MHz). An application for exclusive use of the spectrum in the 2155-2175 MHz band was filed in 2006, and was accepted for filing in January 2007. Subsequently, six other applicants filed similar applications for use of this AWS-3 spectrum. On August 31, 2007, the Commission released an Order dismissing these seven applications without prejudice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-42A1.txt
  • Bds. v. FPC, 450 F.2d 1341, 1346 (D.C. Cir. 1971); cert denied, 405 U.S. 989 (1972); see also Capital Network Sys., Inc. v. FCC, 28 F.3d 201, 204 (D.C. Cir. 1994); American Broadcasting Cos. V. FCC, 663 F.2d 133, 138 (D.C. Cir. 1980). See supra para. 3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.773(a)(v). See Ameritech Operating Companies Tariff F.C.C. No. 2, section 2.1.13; BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, section 2.1.14; Nevada Bell Telephone Company Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, section 2.1.14; Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, section 2.1.14; The Southern New England Telephone Company, Tariff F.C.C. No. 39; section 2.1.H; Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Tariff F.C.C. No. 73, section 2.1.10. See also AT&T Motion and Opposition at 4, 7-8.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-56A1.txt
  • serving an estimated 14.67 million subscribers nationwide, as of June 2005; see 2005 Cable Competition Report, 21 FCC Rcd at 2540 � 73. EchoStar, which provides service under the brand name Dish Network, is the second largest DBS operator and the third largest MVPD, serving an estimated 11.45 million subscribers nationwide, as of June 2005. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 515210. 13 C.F.R. � 121.201 (NAICS Code 515210). See 2005 Cable Competition Report, 21 FCC Rcd 2564-65, � 130. See id. 13 C.F.R. � 121.201 (NAICS Code 515210). See 2005 Cable Competition Report, 21 FCC Rcd 2544, � 80. See 47 U.S.C. � 573. 13 C.F.R. � 121.201 (NAICS Code 515210). See 2005 Cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.txt
  • the current standards of judicial review. See Adarand Constructors v. Pe�a, 515 U.S. 200 (1995) (requiring a strict scrutiny standard of review for government mandated race-conscious measures); United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996) (applying an intermediate standard of review to a state program based on gender classification). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS-1 Report and Order). See Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, Third Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 10 FCC Rcd 175, 196 (1995); Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding, Fifth Report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A1.txt
  • construction permit modification. AETC requests that the parameters for KEMV-DT in Appendix B be adjusted to include an omnidirectional antenna with an ERP of 6.9 kW. The Commission's interference analysis based on recalculated Appendix B facilities shows that KEMV would cause 0.6 percent interference to KTHV, Little Rock, AR (analog channel 11, digital channel 12 for both pre- and post-transition), 2.1 percent interference KETG, Arkadelphia, AR (analog channel 9, digital channel 13 for both pre- and post-transition), and 0.6 percent interference to WHBQ, Memphis, TN (analog channel 13, pre-transition digital channel 53, post-transition digital channel 13). WBBM, Chicago, IL. We deny the petition for reconsideration filed by CBS Corporation (``CBS''), the ultimate owner of station WBBM, channel 2, and WBBM-DT, channel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A2.txt
  • MATEO 60 43 536 428 44617 374519 1222706 20821 6089 2.4 59013CA SANGER 59 36 372 600 43974 370437 1192601 27078 1440 0 67884CA SANTA ANA 40 23 50 900 39876 341327 1180344 21304 13620 5.6 12144CA SANTA BARBARA 38 211000 923 33205 343128 1195735 36089 1343 0 60637CA SANTA BARBARA 3 27 699 917 74818 343132 1195728 42055 1299 2.1 63165CA SANTA MARIA 12 19 188 591 74819 345437 1201108 26167 413 0 34440CA SANTA ROSA 50 32 19.9 928 72086 384010 1223752 18189 742 4.5 56550CA STOCKTON 13 251000 594 32519 381424 1213003 39491 6024 7.9 20871CA STOCKTON 64 26 425 599 71124 381424 1213003 27821 4135 4.8 10242CA STOCKTON 58 46 600 580 381554 1212924 32953 4769 10.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-73A1.txt
  • Nextel et al. plan, T-Mobile has indicated that simply converting BAS channel A7 to digital operations will materially improve the interference environment between AWS and BAS. Id. at n.14. The Sprint Nextel et al. plan indicates that the relocation schedule accommodates many of T-Mobile's market-clearing objectives. Id. at 10-11. Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, WT Docket 02-353, 18 FCC Rcd 25162, � 130 (2003). See supra n.59. We require Sprint Nextel to meet these two benchmarks as a condition for granting the waiver of the BAS transition deadline. We do not believe that these benchmarks will create a large burden for Sprint Nextel because they do not require more
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-7A1.txt
  • nonetheless guided by the Interim Policy. Accordingly, the staff presumed that the relevant geographic market in which to assess the competitive effects of the proposed sale was the Arbitron ``Metro.'' WEHM(FM) was licensed to Southampton, which was located in the Nassau-Suffolk Metro, defined by Nassau and Suffolk Counties in New York. Post-transaction, BIA data indicated that AAA would have a 2.1 percent advertising revenue share in the Nassau-Suffolk Metro. The largest in-metro group owner, Cox Radio, Inc., owned three stations, garnering a 29.5 percent advertising revenue share, according to BIA. Together, the AAA and Cox stations accounted for a 31.6 percent advertising revenue share, which is well below the ``50/70'' screen for flagging radio transactions. 15. Main Street had asserted that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-83A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-83A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-83A1.txt
  • forced to continue legacy operations solely to preserve their authorizations. In supporting BellSouth, Ad Hoc MDS Alliance explains that using prior service as just a factor in a substantial service showing particularly disadvantages BRS Channels 1 and 2/2A licensees because those licensees were in limbo for more than a decade when the Commission announced plans to relocate them from the 2.1 GHz band in favor of AWS. In opposing BellSouth, Clearwire argues that the Commission struck the appropriate balance in the BRS/EBS 2nd R&O between spurring broadband deployment at 2.5 GHz and considering prior operations and other factors in adopting substantial service requirements. Discussion. In the BRS/EBS 2nd R&O, the Commission adopted a substantial service standard, with safe harbors, as the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-85A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-85A1.txt
  • a vehicle for revisiting . . . Section 27.50(a) . . . .'' Section 27.50(a) specifies a limit of 2000 watts ``peak EIRP'' for stations operating in the 2305-2320 and the 2345-2360 MHz bands. Recognizing that the Further Notice did not specifically invite comment on the radiated power rules for WCS at 2.3 GHz or for BRS and EBS at 2.1 GHz and 2.5 GHz, WCA nonetheless cautions that any changes we make to the Part 27 rules ``could affect BRS and EBS unless carefully crafted to preserve the status quo.'' Sirius opposes the WCSW/XM proposal to permit licensees in the WCS band to measure power in terms of average rather than peak values on grounds that any such change must
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-86A1.txt
  • serving an estimated 14.67 million subscribers nationwide, as of June 2005; see 2005 Cable Competition Report, 21 FCC Rcd at 2540 � 73. EchoStar, which provides service under the brand name Dish Network, is the second largest DBS operator and the third largest MVPD, serving an estimated 11.45 million subscribers nationwide, as of June 2005. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS Code 517110 (2007). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 515210 (2002). 5 U.S.C. � 603(c)(1) - (c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. � 801(a)(1)(A). See 5 U.S.C. � 604(b). See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. �� 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (``SBREFA''),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.txt
  • inconsistent with Congress' direction that both the CMSAAC and the Commission, separately, consult NIST. Cf, WARN Act � 602(a) and � 603(g). There would have been no need for the Commission to consult NIST again if, as the commenters suggest, Congress intended the Commission to simply adopt the CMSAAC's recommendations ``as is.'' Ericsson Comments at 5. See CMSAAC recommendations, � 2.1, figure2-1 (CMAS Functional Reference Model). See CMSAAC recommendations, � 8. The Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) refers to Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) Standard CAP-V1.1, October 2005. See CMSAAC recommendations, � 2.2.4 Provisions have also been made for authorized alert originators to formulate and distribute alerts via the Alert Gateway in free text. See e.g., CMSAAC recommendations,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-31A1.txt
  • agencies, and industry addressing telecom issues facing Indian Country to encourage partnerships among these groups to improve telecommunications coverage in American Indian and Alaska Native communities. See, e.g., http://www.fcc.gov/indians/. See Statement of Policy on Establishing a Government-to-Government Relationship with Indian Tribes, Policy Statement, 16 FCC Rcd 4078 (2000). See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS-1 Service Rules Report and Order), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005). See also Service Rules for the 698-746, 747-762 and 777-792 MHz Bands;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-40A1.txt
  • in the Market for Delivery of Video Programming, MB Docket No. 05-255, Twelfth Annual Report, 21 FCC Rcd 2503, 2540, para. 73 (2006). EchoStar, which provides service under the brand name Dish Network, is the second largest DBS operator and the third largest MVPD, serving an estimated 11.45 million subscribers nationwide, as of June 2005. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS Code 517110 (2007). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 515210 (2002). U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ``517919 All Other Telecommunications''; http://www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/ND517919.HTM#N517919. 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517919 (updated for inflation in 2008). U.S. Census Bureau, ``2002 NAICS Definitions: 518111 Internet Service Providers''; http://www.census.gov/epcd/naics02/def/NDEF518.HTM. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, ``Establishment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1.txt
  • any overlap with the channels at 6535 MHz and 6575 MHz that are reserved for emergency restoration and maintenance purposes. API, however, argues that the Upper 6 GHz Band should be preserved for use by private operational fixed microwave licensees, including narrow bandwidth licensees that the Commission has required to vacate both the 1.9 GHz band and, more recently, the 2.1 GHz band. API contends that allowing 30 megahertz licenses in the Upper 6 GHz Band could cause congestion and encourage speculative licensing. API states that channel assignments for incumbent licensees in the 2.1 GHz band are generally limited to a maximum of 800 kHz, and that, as a consequence, those incumbents will not require 30 megahertz bandwidths when they are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1_Rcd.pdf
  • any overlap with the channels at 6535 MHz and 6575 MHz that are reserved for emergency restoration and maintenance purposes.46 13.API, however, argues that the Upper 6 GHz Band should be preserved for use by private operational fixed microwave licensees, including narrow bandwidth licensees that the Commission has required to vacate both the 1.9 GHz band and, more recently, the 2.1 GHz band.47API contends that allowing 30 megahertz licenses in the Upper 6 GHz Band could cause congestion and encourage speculative licensing.48API states that channel assignments for incumbent licensees in the 2.1 GHz band are generally limited to a maximum of 800 kHz, and that, as a consequence, those incumbents will not require 30 megahertz bandwidths when they arerelocated.49API contends that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-59A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-59A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-59A1.txt
  • retransmitted by an FM broadcast translator station or an FM broadcast booster station. (e) AM or FM radio broadcast station. When used in this Subpart L, the term AM broadcast station or AM radio broadcast station or FM broadcast station or FM radio broadcast station refers to commercial and noncommercial educational AM or FM radio broadcast stations as defined in �2.1 of this chapter, unless the context indicates otherwise. * * * * * (g) Translator coverage contour. For a fill-in FM translator rebroadcasting an FM radio broadcast station as its primary station, the FM translator's coverage contour must be contained within the primary station's coverage contour. For purposes of this rule section, the coverage contour of the FM translator has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1.txt
  • satellites from harmful interference. The geocentric angle, which is measured from the center of the earth, is nominally 2.0 degrees between satellites along the GSO plane. The topocentric angle between two satellites is measured from the earth station on the earth's surface and results in a larger angle than the geocentric angle. The topocentric angle between satellites is usually between 2.1 degrees and 2.2 degrees, depending on the earth station's angle of elevation. Because satellites must maintain an orbital longitude within 0.05 degrees of their assigned orbital location, adjacent satellites at closest approach would be separated by at least a 2-degree topocentric angle. In addition, the cessation of emission limit for ESVs is 0.5 degrees. Thus, setting the starting angle at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1_Rcd.pdf
  • adjacent satellites from harmful interference. The geocentric angle, which is measured from the centerof the earth, is nominally 2.0 degrees between satellites along the GSO plane. The topocentric angle between two satellites is measured from the earth station on the earth's surface and results in a larger angle than the geocentric angle. The topocentric angle between satellites is usually between 2.1 degrees and 2.2 degrees, depending on the earth station's angle of elevation.75Because satellites must maintain an orbital longitude within 0.05 degreesof their assigned orbital location, adjacent satellites at closest approach would be separated by at least a 2-degree topocentric angle.76In addition, the cessation of emission limit for ESVs is 0.5 degrees.77Thus, setting the starting angle at 1.5degreesoff-axis, along with an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-64A1.txt
  • Other Revisions of Part 25 of the Commission's Rules Governing the Licensing of, and Spectrum Usage By, Satellite Network Earth Stations and Space Stations, IB Docket No. 00-248, Fifth Report and Order, FCC 05-63, 20 FCC Rcd 5666, 5674, � 17 n. 30 (2005) (``Fifth Report and Order''). See also 47 C.F.R. � 25.201, Definitions. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 2.1, Terms and Definitions, � 25.201, Definitions. Procedures to Govern the Use of Satellite Earth Stations on Board Vessels in the 5925-6425 MHz/3700-4200 MHz Bands and 14.0-14.5 GHz/11.7-12.2 GHz Bands, IB Docket No. 02-10, Report and Order, FCC 04-286, 20 FCC Rcd 674 (2005) (``ESV Report and Order''). ESV Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 681, � 12. Previous to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-66A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-66A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-66A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd 24178 (2000). See Secondary Markets First Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20648-49 � 92 (recognizing that ``Commission adoption of more flexible use or technical rules for various Wireless Radio Services could well enhance the secondary market for spectrum usage rights''). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 27.14(g). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106 (2008). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 (2008) at ``Harmful Interference.'' The definition provides no quantitative guidance on what degree of signal degradation or how many interruptions over what period of time would meet the ``harmful'' threshold. Moreover, there are other factors that have a strong bearing on this determination, such as the nature and purpose of the communications (e.g., voice, video, data, entertainment, public safety, etc.)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-66A1_Rcd.pdf
  • if so, could the Technical Advisory Council (TAC) be used for this process?33Alternatively, should we seek to use the negotiated rulemaking process in such cases?34 Can the Test-Bed concept be a useful model for working out interference protection criteria among disparate users and, if so, how could it be used to promote 30See47 C.F.R. � 2.106 (2008). 31See47 C.F.R. � 2.1 (2008) at "Harmful Interference." 32The definition provides no quantitative guidance on what degree of signal degradation or howmany interruptions over what period of time would meet the "harmful" threshold. Moreover, there are other factors that have a strong bearing on this determination, such as the nature and purpose of the communications (e.g., voice, video, data, entertainment, public safety, etc.) that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-69A1.txt
  • to participate. Tools Used by Specific Online Video Services. As noted above, the diversity of sources for online video and audio is almost infinite. There are, however, certain notable large players. According to Nielsen Online, in April 2009 the top five online video sites as measured by streams were YouTube (58.1 percent), Hulu (3.9 percent), Yahoo! (2.2 percent), Fox Interactive (2.1 percent), and Nickelodeon (1.9 percent). YouTube stands out as one of the most popular sites on the web (all websites included), most popular video site, and most popular site among children. The second most popular video site has only 4 percent market share, demonstrating how profuse the offering of video sites is. The top audio download services include iTunes, Amazon,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-70A1.txt
  • - which represents educational interests that hold EBS licenses - and the Wireless Communications Association International, Inc. (WCA) - which represents commercial operators that lease spectrum from EBS licensees. Our adoption of the NEBSA/WCA Proposal balances the concerns of both educators and commercial lessees. Also on reconsideration, we permit BRS 1 and 2/2A licensees to simultaneously operate, post-transition, in the 2.1 GHz band and in the 2.5 GHz band until all of their customers have migrated to the 2.5 GHz band. This determination is consistent with the Commission's decision in the BRS/EBS Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order to permit such simultaneous operation pre-transition in order to avoid requiring BRS operators to flash cut subscribers to the new band plan. Finally, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-70A1_Rcd.pdf
  • No. 03-66, 23 FCC Rcd 5992 (2008) (BRS/EBS FourthMO&O). 3Ex ParteLetter from Todd Gray, National EBS Association, and Paul J. Sinderbrand, Wireless Communications Association International, Inc. to Marlene H. Dortch, Federal Communications Commission (dated Oct. 16, 2008) (continued....) 12258 Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-70 3.Also on reconsideration, we permit BRS 1 and 2/2A licensees to simultaneously operate, post-transition, in the 2.1 GHz band and in the 2.5 GHz band until all of their customers have migrated to the 2.5 GHz band. This determination is consistent with the Commission's decision in the BRS/EBS Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Orderto permit such simultaneous operation pre-transitionin order to avoid requiring BRS operators to flash cut subscribers to the new band plan. Finally, in light of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-93A1.txt
  • (2005). Id. See Letter from Hector V. Barreto, Administrator, SBA, to Gary D. Michaels, Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, FCC (filed Sept. 19, 2005). The service is defined in section 90.1301 et seq. of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 90.1301 et seq. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058, App. C (2005); Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1.txt
  • Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17484 � 82; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21570 � 115 n.341. Coordinated interaction consists of actions by a group of firms that are profitable for each of the firms involved only because the other firms react by accommodating these actions rather than attempting to undercut them. See DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines � 2.1; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17484 � 82; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21580 � 151. See, e.g., Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17484-85 � 83. For unilateral effects, the unchallenged aspects include: (1) product differentiation and substitutability; (2) network effects; (3) marginal cost reductions; (4) spectrum and advanced wireless services; and (5) penetration.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17484 �82; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21570 � 115 n.341. 201Coordinated interaction consists of actions by a group of firms that are profitable for each of the firms involved only because the other firms react by accommodating these actions rather than attempting to undercut them. See DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines� 2.1; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17484 �82; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21580 � 151. 202See, e.g., Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17484-85 �83. 203For unilateral effects, the unchallenged aspects include: (1) product differentiation and substitutability; (2)network effects; (3) marginal cost reductions; (4) spectrum and advanced wireless services; and (5) penetration. See, e.g., Verizon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.txt
  • of any transmitter may change during operation as a result of changes in the ambient temperature and/or power supply voltage. See 47 C.F.R. Part 2 Subpart J, �� 95.603, 95.605, 95.1109. A transmitter is an apparatus that converts electrical energy received from a source into radio frequency energy capable of being radiated. 47 C.F.R. � 95.601. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 for definitions of the various power designations. 47 C.F.R. Part 95 Subpart E; see Revision of Operating Rules for Class D Stations in the Citizens Radio Service, Docket No. 20120, Third Report and Order, 63 F.C.C. 2d 32 (1976); Personal Radio Services; Update and Simplification of Technical Rules, Order, 50 Fed. Reg. 5074 (1985); Amendment of the Part 95, Subpart
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1_Rcd.pdf
  • frequency of any transmitter may change during operation as a result of changes in the ambient temperature and/or power supply voltage. 26See 47 C.F.R. Part 2 Subpart J, �� 95.603, 95.605, 95.1109. 27A transmitter is an apparatus that converts electrical energy receivedfrom a source into radio frequency energy capable of being radiated. 47 C.F.R. � 95.601. 28See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1 for definitions of the various power designations. 2947 C.F.R. Part 95 Subpart E; seeRevision of Operating Rules for Class D Stations in the Citizens Radio Service, Docket No. 20120, Third Report and Order, 63 F.C.C. 2d 32 (1976); Personal Radio Services; Update and Simplification of Technical Rules, Order, 50 Fed. Reg. 5074 (1985); Amendment of the Part 95, Subpart E,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-107A1.txt
  • Section 101.1011 of the Commission's Rules and Extensions of Time to Construct and Demonstrate Substantial Service, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 5894 (WTB 2008); Consolidated Request of the WCS Coalition for Limited Waiver of Construction Deadline for 132 WCS Licenses, Order, 21 FCC Rcd 14134 (WTB 2006); Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162, 25192 � 76 (2003). Auction of Broadband Radio Service (BRS) Licenses Scheduled for October 27, 2009 Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments, and Other Procedures for Auction 86, Public Notice, AU Docket No. 09-56, 24 FCC Rcd 8277, 8290 � 41 (WTB 2009). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-107A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Section 101.1011 of the Commission's Rules and Extensions of Time to Construct and Demonstrate Substantial Service, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 5894 (WTB 2008); Consolidated Request of the WCS Coalition for Limited Waiver of Construction Deadline for 132 WCS Licenses, Order, 21 FCC Rcd 14134 (WTB 2006); Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162, 25192 � 76 (2003). 50Auction of Broadband Radio Service (BRS) Licenses Scheduled for October 27, 2009Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments, and Other Procedures for Auction 86, Public Notice, AU Docket No. 09-56, 24 FCC Rcd 8277, 8290 � 41 (WTB 2009). 51See47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-109A1.txt
  • a trade association representing the oil and natural gas industry, was the only commenting party opposing the FWCC 6 GHz Petition. API argued that the Upper 6 GHz Band should be preserved for use by private operational fixed microwave licensees, including narrow bandwidth licensees that the Commission has required to vacate both the 1.9 GHz band and, more recently, the 2.1 GHz band. API contended that allowing 30 megahertz licenses in the Upper 6 GHz Band could cause congestion and encourage speculative licensing. API stated that channel assignments for incumbent licensees in the 2.1 GHz band are generally limited to a maximum of 800 kHz, and that, as a consequence, those incumbents will not require 30 megahertz bandwidths when they are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-110A1.txt
  • 1800 N. Kent Street, Suite 1060, Arlington, VA 22209, telephone 703-527-2000, http://www.rtcm.org , e-mail pubs@rtcm.org. (1) RTCM Paper 56-95/SC101-STD, ``RTCM Recommended Minimum Standards for Digital Selective Calling (DSC) Equipment Providing Minimum Distress and Safety Capability,'' Version 1.0, August 10, 1995, IBR approved for � 80.225. (2) RTCM 11000.1, ``RTCM Recommended Standards for 406 MHz Satellite Emergency Position-Indicating Radiobeacons (EPIRBs),'' Version 2.1, dated June 20, 2002, IBR approved for � 80.1061. (3) RTCM 11020.1 (RTCM Paper 110-2004/SC110-STD), ``RTCM Standard 11020.0-Ship Security Alert Systems (SSAS) using the Cospas-Sarsat System,'' Version 1.0, October 9, 2009, IBR approved for � 80.277. (g) COSPAS-SARSAT - International Satellite System for Search and Rescue, 700 de la Gauchetiere West, Suite 2450, Montreal, Quebec H3B 5 M2, Canada, telephone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1.txt
  • Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17484 � 82; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21570 � 115 n.341. Coordinated interaction consists of actions by a group of firms that are profitable for each of the firms involved only because the other firms react by accommodating these actions rather than attempting to undercut them. See DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines � 2.1; AT&T-Centennial Order, 24 FCC Rcd at 13939 � 52 n.201; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17484 � 82; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21580 � 151. For unilateral effects, the unchallenged aspects include: (1) product differentiation and substitutability; (2) network effects; (3) marginal cost reductions; (4) spectrum and advanced wireless services; and (5) penetration. See, e.g.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17484 � 82; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21570 � 115 n.341. 167Coordinated interaction consists of actions by a group of firms that are profitable for each of the firms involved only because the other firms react by accommodating these actions rather than attempting to undercut them. See DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines� 2.1; AT&T-Centennial Order, 24 FCC Rcd at 13939 � 52 n.201; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17484 � 82; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21580 � 151. 168For unilateral effects, the unchallenged aspects include: (1) product differentiation and substitutability; (2)network effects; (3) marginal cost reductions; (4) spectrum and advanced wireless services; and (5) penetration. See, e.g., AT&T-Centennial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-126A1.txt
  • GHz band, 40 megahertz of the L-band, and 10 megahertz of the Big LEO band. See SkyTerra Communications, Inc., Transferor and Harbinger Capital Partners Funds, Transferee, Applications for Consent to Transfer of Control of SkyTerra Subsidiary, LLC, IB Docket No. 08-184, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Declaratory Ruling, 25 FCC Rcd 3059 (IB, OET, WTB 2010). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). See Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L-band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Bands, IB Docket No. 01-185, ET Docket No. 95-18, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 16 FCC Rcd 15,532 at � 1 (2001) (MSS Flexibility NPRM). MSS is also provided in the Little LEO band from 137-138 MHz, 148-150.05 MHz,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A7.txt
  • than 10 and no more than 20% Greater than 20 and no more than 30% Greater than 30 and no more than 40% Greater than 40 and no more than 50% Greater than 50 and no more than 60% Greater than 60 and no more than 75% Greater than 75 and no more than 100% 100% or more aDSL 0.7 2.1 7.0 34.4 33.3 16.0 4.9 1.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 sDSL 85.0 13.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other Wireline 95.4 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cable Modem 15.8 12.7 12.2 20.3 16.8 10.6 6.5 3.0 1.6 0.4 0.1 FTTP 76.5 18.0 2.4 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Satellite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-12A1.txt
  • A software defined radio is a transmitter in which the operating parameters of frequency range, modulation type or maximum output power, or the circumstances under which the radio transmits in accordance with the rules, can be altered by making a change in software without making any changes to hardware components that affect the radio frequency emissions. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Open Source Software (OSS) is software in which the source code is made available for others to study, use, modify and/or redistribute. Some parties use the term Free Software (FS) rather than OSS to describe such software because parties are free to study, use, modify and/or redistribute to the code. GNU/Linux is a widely used OSS operating system and is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-130A1.txt
  • 687, Table B-3. As of June 2006, DISH Network is the second largest DBS operator and the third largest MVPD, serving an estimated 13.01% of MVPD subscribers nationwide. Id. As of June 2006, Dominion served fewer than 500,000 subscribers, which may now be receiving ``Sky Angel'' service from DISH Network. See id. at 581, � 76. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). See 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517110 (2007). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517110 (2007). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517510 (2002). See 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS Code 515120 (2007). Id. This category description continues, ``These establishments operate television broadcasting studios and facilities for the programming and transmission of programs to the public. These establishments also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-174A1.txt
  • on frequencies in the U.S. that differ from the frequencies that the radio operates on in other countries where it is marketed. Manufacturers could certify a TV bands device as a software defined radio, which is defined as a transmitter in which the operating parameters including the frequency range can be modified through a software change. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. A transmitter in which the software is designed or expected to be modified by a party other than the manufacturer must be certified as a software defined radio and must incorporate measures to ensure that only software that has been approved with the transmitter can be loaded into it. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.944. A manufacturer can obtain approval to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-193A1.txt
  • 687, Table B-3. As of June 2006, DISH Network is the second largest DBS operator and the third largest MVPD, serving an estimated 13.01% of MVPD subscribers nationwide. Id. As of June 2006, Dominion served fewer than 500,000 subscribers, which may now be receiving ``Sky Angel'' service from DISH Network. See id. at 581, � 76. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). See 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517110 (2007). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517110 (2007). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517510 (2002). See 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS Code 515120 (2007). Id. This category description continues, ``These establishments operate television broadcasting studios and facilities for the programming and transmission of programs to the public. These establishments also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-196A1.txt
  • land mobile stations, or between land mobile stations. A base station is a land station in the land mobile service. A land mobile station is a mobile station in the land mobile service capable of surface movement within the geographical limits of a country or continent. The fixed service is a radiocommunication service between specified fixed points. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). The operations of land mobile services on channels 14-20 and the Offshore Radiotelephone Service on channels 15-17 in regions along the Gulf of Mexico and the reservation of channel 17 for inter-island communications in Hawaii could be affected by our proposal to recover U/V Bands spectrum if the bands to be recovered encompassed all or portions of channels 14-20. We
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-198A1.txt
  • includes a transmitter in which the operating parameters of frequency range, modulation type, or maximum output power (either radiated or conducted), or the circumstances under which the transmitter operates in accordance with Commission rules, can be altered by making a change in software without making any changes to hardware components that affect the radio frequency emissions.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Draft Conference Preparatory Meeting Report from the Director, Radiocommunication Bureau, ITU, CPM11-2/1-E, dated August 13, 2010, Section 6/1.19/3, p. 410. . . The Forum has worked in collaboration with the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers P1900.1 group to establish a definition of software-defined radio that provides consistency and a clear overview of that technology and its associated benefits. Capabilities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.txt
  • of Air-Ground Telecommunications Services et al., Order on Reconsideration and Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19663, paras. 28-42 (2005). Id. See Letter from Hector V. Barreto, Administrator, SBA, to Gary D. Michaels, Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, FCC (filed Sept. 19, 2005). See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058, App. C (2005). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands et al., Notice of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the Consumers of Air-Ground Telecommunications Services et al., Order on Reconsideration and Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19663, paras. 28�42 (2005). 95Id. 96SeeLetter from Hector V. Barreto, Administrator, SBA, to Gary D. Michaels, Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, FCC (filed Sept. 19, 2005). 97SeeService Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058, App. C (2005). 18030 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-201 the comparable capital requirements and other factors, such as issues involved in relocating incumbents and developing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-37A1.txt
  • granted only for airports with an ASDE-X multilateration system or ADS-B equipment. Id. The IRAC is a committee of the Federal departments, agencies, and administrations that advises NTIA in assigning frequencies to Federal radio stations and in developing and executing policies, programs, procedures, and technical criteria pertaining to the allocation, management, and use of the spectrum. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Our rules already require IRAC coordination of applications for certain frequencies at airports. See 47 C.F.R. �� 87.421 (airport control tower stations), 87.475(a) (radionavigation land stations and radionavigation land test stations). With regard to Atlanta's proposal to give the airport operator priority in license applications, see Atlanta comments at 8-9, we find this unnecessary and feel that the FAA in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-53A1.txt
  • 10, 1999. See ``Correction to Public Notice DA 96-586 `FCC Announces Winning Bidders in the Auction of 1020 Licenses to Provide 900 MHz SMR in Major Trading Areas,''' Public Notice, 18 FCC Rcd 18367 (WTB 1996). See ``Multi-Radio Service Auction Closes,'' Public Notice, 17 FCC Rcd 1446 (WTB 2002). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, 18 FCC Rcd 25162 (2003) (AWS-1 Service Rules Order). See id, at � 144. , (4/15/2008). 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517210. Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish Part 27, the Wireless Communications Service (WCS), Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 10785, 10879 � 194 (1997). See Letter to Amy Zoslov, Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
  • downlink signal strengths. Loosely speaking, unless the downlink and uplink require- ments are more asymmetric than the power differential, the significantly higher power at the base station implies that adequate uplink coverage should result in adequate downlink coverage.31 Impact of spectrum bands Cellular service today typically operates in one of several bands: from 700 to 900 MHz; from 1.7 to 2.1 GHz; and from 2.5 to 2.7GHz (see Chapter 5 of National Broadband Plan for details). Generally speaking, in this range of frequencies lower frequency signals suffer lower propagation losses and there- fore travel farther, allowing larger cell sizes. Lower frequency signals also penetrate into buildings more effectively. Thus, for example, the Okumura-Hata model32 predicts that the radius of rural cells
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-59A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-59A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-59A1.txt
  • See, ``800 MHz SMR Service Lower 80 Channels Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced,'' Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 1736 (2000). See generally 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517210. The service is defined in section 90.1301 et seq. of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 90.1301 et seq. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058, App. C (2005); Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-59A1_Rcd.pdf
  • (2000). 46See, "800 MHz SMR Service Lower 80 Channels Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced," Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 1736 (2000). 47See generally 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517210. 48The service is defined in section 90.1301 et seq. of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 90.1301 et seq. 49SeeService Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14058, App. C (2005); Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915�1920 MHz, 1995�2000 MHz, 2020�2025 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-76A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 2.106 footnote US381 and 47 C.F.R. � 97.303. ARRL Petition at 8. IRAC is a committee of the Federal departments, agencies, and administrations that advises NTIA in assigning frequencies to Federal radio stations and in developing and executing policies, programs, procedures, and technical criteria pertaining to the allocation, management, and use of the spectrum. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See Letter from Karl Nebbia, Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Spectrum Management, NTIA, to Paul L. Rinaldo, ARRL Chief Technology Officer, May 12, 2006 (2006 NTIA Letter). This letter is attached, as Appendix A, to the ARRL Petition. , FCC 10-38 (rel. March 16, 2010) at Appendix B, �� 97.301 (b)-(d), 97.303(h), 97.313(i). Of particular significance in this proceeding, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-77A1.txt
  • station transmissions. See 47 C.F.R. � 24.229(c). See AWS Sixth R&O, 19 FCC Rcd at 20740 � 41. , infra. See DECT Petition at 4. See also Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands, WT Docket No. 04-356, Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 19 FCC Rcd 19263, 19299 �� 90-91, 19303-04 � 106 (2004) (AWS-2 Service Rules NPRM); Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 2155-2175 MHz Band, WT Docket No. 07-195, Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands, WT Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.txt
  • 3,845 981 34.3% 4,954 1,109 28.8% **Verizon Wireless's 2009 subscriber figures include subscribers added as a result of the Alltel merger. If subscribers from the Alltel acquisition were excluded, Verizon Wireless's ``organic'' net adds for 2009 would total approximately 5.97 million, an increase of 8.3 percent. Churn During the past year, churn has increased slightly from 1.9 percent to around 2.1 percent per month, with pre-paid churn rates significantly higher than post-paid churn rates. Churn rates of the two largest national service providers are half the rates for the next two largest providers. Annual Churn is an average for each of the four quarters Annual Churn is an average for each of the four quarters. Verizon Wireless is combined with Alltel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 28.8% **Verizon Wireless's 2009 subscriber figures include subscribers added as a result of the Alltel merger. If subscribers from the Alltel acquisition were excluded, Verizon Wireless's "organic" net adds for 2009 would total approximately 5.97 million, an increase of 8.3 percent. Churn 11415 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-81 During the past year, churn has increased slightlyfrom 1.9 percent to around 2.1 percent per month, with pre-paid churn rates significantly higher than post-paid churn rates. Churn rates of the two largest national service providers are half the rates for the next two largest providers. Comparative Churn 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2Q2009 Monthly Churn % Post-paid churn Pre-paid/resellerchurn Total (Blended) Churn Source: Bernstein Research Annual Churn
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.txt
  • these emission limits on the sharing environment relative to AMT and DSN operations. WCS Customer Premises Equipment Background. The WCS Coalition proposes that WCS fixed CPE devices be limited to an average EIRP of 20 W, with the average EIRP calculated by using the average power of the transmitter measured in accordance with the definition of mean power in Section 2.1 of the Commission's Rules. The WCS Coalition also proposes attenuating the OOBE for such CPE devices by a factor not less than 75 + 10 log (P) dB below the transmitter output power P on all frequencies in the 2320-2345 MHz band. Alternatively, for WCS fixed CPE devices transmitting at no greater than 2 W average transmitter output power, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1_Rcd.pdf
  • service in February 2002. 18Sirius XM's SEC Form 10-Q, filed May 7, 2010, lists 18,944,199 total subscribers; 9,157,165 subscribers on the SIRIUS system and 9,787,034 subscribers on the XM system, as of March 31, 2010. SeeSirius XM's SEC Form 10-Q, available at http://www.faqs.org/sec-filings/100507/SIRIUS-XM-RADIO-INC_10-Q/. The conterminous United States consists of the contiguous 48 States and the District of Columbia. 47 C.F.R. �2.1. 19SDARS Merger Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 12351-52 � 1. See alsoSirius XMJuly 29, 2008, Press Release. 11715 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-82 integration of the two systems difficult in the short term.20In addition, the Commission noted that XM and Sirius had each invested significantly in their existing infrastructure, with the expectation of operating this infrastructure for years to come.21Thus,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-90A1.txt
  • Spectrum Below 5 GHz Transferred from Federal Government Use, 4660-4685 MHz, WT Docket No. 97-82, ET Docket No. 94-32, Order on Reconsideration of the Third Report and Order, Fifth Report and Order, and Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 15 FCC Rcd 15,293, 15,319 � 48 (2000). See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, WT Docket No. 02-353, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, 25,220 � 148 (2003), affirmed by Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058, 14,073 � 28 (2005); 47 C.F.R. � 27.1102 (small business bidding credits for AWS-1). 47 U.S.C. �� 309(j)(3)(C) and (4)(E). Competitive Bidding Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 2385 �� 211-12. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-90A1_Rcd.pdf
  • of Spectrum Below5 GHz Transferred from Federal Government Use, 4660-4685 MHz, WT Docket No. 97-82, ET Docket No. 94-32, Order on Reconsideration of the Third Report and Order, Fifth Report and Order, and Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 15 FCC Rcd 15,293, 15,319 � 48 (2000). 7See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHzBands,Report and Order, WT Docket No. 02-353, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, 25,220 � 148 (2003), affirmed by Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058, 14,073 � 28 (2005); 47 C.F.R. � 27.1102 (small business bidding credits for AWS-1). 847 U.S.C. �� 309(j)(3)(C) and (4)(E). 9Competitive Bidding Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 2385 �� 211-12. 1047 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.txt
  • MHz Cellular SMR PCS AWS BRS EBS Verizon Wireless 28.4 23.3 0.0 18.9 12.8 0.0 0.0 AT&T 16.2 21.3 0.0 32.5 6.8 0.0 0.0 Sprint Nextel 0.0 0.0 17.7 33.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Clearwire 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.4 69.8 T-Mobile 0.0 0.0** 0.0 24.3 23.4 0.0 0.0 MetroPCS 0.3 0.0 0.0 3.2 7.9 0.0 0.0 US Cellular 1.8 2.1 0.0 2.3 1.8 0.0 0.0 Leap 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 7.4 0.0 0.0 Other 19.5 2.1 1.3 7.2 25.5 10.1 42.8 * Weighted average megahertz is the sum of the provider's MHz-POPs, divided by the U.S. population. ** SunCom Wireless License Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of T-Mobile, holds one Cellular license. Mobile Wireless Provider Spectrum Holdings by Band,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1_Rcd.pdf
  • MHz Cellular SMR PCS AWS BRS EBS Verizon Wireless 28.4 23.3 0.0 18.9 12.8 0.0 0.0 AT&T 16.2 21.3 0.0 32.5 6.8 0.0 0.0 Sprint Nextel 0.0 0.0 17.7 33.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Clearwire 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.4 69.8 T-Mobile 0.0 0.0** 0.0 24.3 23.4 0.0 0.0 MetroPCS 0.3 0.0 0.0 3.2 7.9 0.0 0.0 US Cellular 1.8 2.1 0.0 2.3 1.8 0.0 0.0 Leap 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 7.4 0.0 0.0 Other 19.5 2.1 1.3 7.2 25.5 10.1 42.8 * Weighted average megahertz is the sum of the provider's MHz-POPs, divided by the U.S. population. ** SunCom Wireless License Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of T-Mobile, holds one Cellular license. 9831 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-103 Chart
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-107A1.txt
  • (851-854 MHz) and Upper Band (861-865 MHz) Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced,'' Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 17162 (2000). See, ``800 MHz SMR Service Lower 80 Channels Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced,'' Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 1736 (2000). See generally 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517210. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058, App. C (2005). See ``Auction of Advanced Wireless Services Licenses Scheduled for June 29, 2006; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-114A1.txt
  • Rcd 12,749 (2008). Id. See Auction of Advanced Wireless Services Licenses Scheduled for June 29, 2006; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and Other Procedures for Auction No. 66, AU Docket No. 06-30, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 4562 (2006) (``Auction 66 Procedures Public Notice''); See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058, App. C (2005). See Auction of Advanced Wireless Services Licenses Closes; Winning Bidders Announced for Auction No. 66, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 10,521 (2006)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-126A1.txt
  • the CALM Act proceeding]'' and that the ``2010 ATSC A/53 Standard, Part 5, contains the new methods to measure and control audio loudness, reflected in the ATSC A/85 RP.'' Implementation of the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation (CALM) Act, MB Docket No. 11-93, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 26 FCC Rcd 8281 (2011) (citing 2010 ATSC A/53 Standard, Part 5 at � 2.1 at 5 (referencing A/85) and � 5.5 at 9 (Dialogue Level)). ATSC Digital Television Standard, Document A/53 Part 5: 2010 (July 6, 2010). 47 C.F.R. 73.670, note 2. 47 C.F.R. 73.671(c). Comments of WGBH at 6; see also Comments of NAB at note 22. Comments of ACB at 2. Comments of Joe Clark at 4. Reply of NCTA at note
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.txt
  • provide position information to aircraft. See 47 C.F.R. �� 87.173, 87.475(b)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. , supra. Harmful interference is defined as interference which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with the International Telecommunication Union Radio Regulations. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). 47 C.F.R. � 15.237(c). See Innovation in the Broadcast Television Bands: Allocations, Channel Sharing and Improvements to VHF, ET Docket No. 10-235, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 25 FCC Rcd 16498 (2010) (``Spectrum Reallocation NPRM''). See Spectrum Reallocation NPRM, 25 FCC Rcd at 16513 � 47. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.709(a)(2). Personal/portable TV bands devices are not permitted to operate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-134A1.txt
  • The Technology Access Program (TAP) - Gallaudet University, Proposal R1 for Implementation of Real-Time Text Across Platforms, December 2008, available at http://trace.wisc.edu/docs/2008-RTT-Proposal/Proposal-R1-Dec10-2008.pdf (last visited August 15, 2011). Notice of Inquiry at � 41. According to CTIA, U.S. wireless subscribers sent approximately 187.7 billion SMS messages in December 2010, or approximately 5.6 billion SMS messages per day, and a total of 2.1 trillion during the 2010 calendar year. See CTIA - The Wireless Association, Wireless Quick Facts, available at http://www.ctia.org/advocacy/research/index.cfm/aid/10323 (last visited Aug 12, 2011). According to recent research, as of April 2011, approximately 234 million Americans (ages 13 and older) used a mobile device, and of that group, 68.8 percent used text messaging. See comScore, comScore Reports April 2011 U.S. Mobile
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.txt
  • 15499, 16028-29, paras. 1063-64 (1996) (Local Competition Order)); DeGraba at 15. See, e.g., BEREC Common Statement at 2 n.6, 27-30; DeGraba at 15-17. See also Stephen C. Littlechild, Mobile Termination Charges: Calling Party Pays versus Receiving Party Pays, in Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 30, 242 - 277 (2006); J. Scott Marcus, Interconnection in an NGN Environment, ITU/02, (Apr. 2006) available at http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/ngn/documents/Papers/Marcus-060323-Fin-v2.1.p df; David Harbord & Marco Pagnozzi (2008), On-net / Off-net Price Discrimination and ``Bill-and-Keep'' vs. ``Cost-Based'' Regulation of Mobile Termination Rates (Jan. 2008) available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1374851; J. Scott Marcus and Dieter Elixmann, WIK-Consult, The Future of IP Interconnection: Technical, Economic, and Public Policy Aspects, Final Report, Study for the European Commission (Jan. 2008) available at http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/doc/library/ext_stu dies/future_ip_intercon/ip_intercon_study_final.pdf. See, e.g., Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.txt
  • 1999. See Correction to Public Notice DA 96-586, FCC Announces Winning Bidders in the Auction of 1020 Licenses to Provide 900 MHz SMR in Major Trading Areas, Public Notice, 18 FCC Rcd 18367 (WTB 1996). See Multi-Radio Service Auction Closes, Public Notice, 17 FCC Rcd 1446 (WTB 2002). See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058, App. C (2005). See Auction of Advanced Wireless Services Licenses Scheduled for June 29, 2006; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-171A1.txt
  • is not affected by the instant rulemaking. See 60 Meter Allocation R&O, 18 FCC Rcd at 10268. NTIA is an agency of the United States Department of Commerce that serves as the President's principal advisor on telecommunications and information policy issues. NTIA manages Federal use of the radio spectrum and coordinates Federal use with the FCC. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. (i). ). We note that ARRL also identifies itself as ARRL - the national association for Amateur Radio. See Letter from Karl Nebbia, Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Spectrum Management, NTIA, to Paul L. Rinaldo, ARRL Chief Technology Officer, May 12, 2006 (2006 NTIA Letter). This letter is attached, as Appendix A, to the ARRL Petition. , Report No. 2799
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-182A1.txt
  • 2010 ``ATSC Digital Television Standard, Part 5 - AC-3 Audio System Characteristics'' (July 6, 2010) (``2010 ATSC A/53 Standard, Part 5''). We note that this rule change is consistent with the final rules adopted herein because the RP references and requires compliance with the same testing methodology adopted in the 2010 ATSC A/53 Standard, Part 5. See, e.g., RP �� 2.1 (referencing A/53) and 7.1 (stating that the RP ``identifies methods to ensure consistent digital television loudness through the proper use of dialnorm metadata for all content, and thus comply with A/53''). See infra at para. 4. The previous version of the ATSC A/53 Standard, Part 5, which is incorporated by reference in Section 73.682(d), includes an outdated audio loudness measurement
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.txt
  • rates are not unusual for new services where subscribership may grow rapidly from a small base in the early years following launch. TABLE II.1 WORLD SATELLITE SERVICES REVENUES (IN BILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS) SERVICE 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Consumer Satellite TV (DBS/DTH) Satellite Radio (DARS) Consumer Satellite Broadband 41.3 40.2 0.8 0.3 48.9 46.9 1.6 0.3 57.9 55.4 2.1 0.4 68.1 64.9 2.5 0.8 75.3 71.8 2.5 1.0 83.1 79.1 2.8 1.1 Fixed Transponder Agreements Managed Services 9.3 7.3 2.0 10.7 8.5 2.2 12.2 9.6 2.6 13.0 10.2 2.8 14.4 11.0 3.4 15.0 11.1 3.9 Mobile (Voice and Data) 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 Remote Sensing 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.0 TOTAL 52.8 62.0 72.6 84.0 93.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1_Rcd.pdf
  • to 25 percent of world revenues. Estimate supplied by Futron Corporation. 13See Section III, infra. 17289 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-183 TABLE II.1 WORLD SATELLITE SERVICES REVENUES (IN BILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS) 14 SERVICE 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Consumer Satellite TV (DBS/DTH) Satellite Radio (DARS) Consumer Satellite Broadband 41.3 40.2 0.8 0.3 48.9 46.9 1.6 0.3 57.9 55.4 2.1 0.4 68.1 64.9 2.5 0.8 75.3 71.8 2.5 1.0 83.1 79.1 2.8 1.1 Fixed Transponder Agreements15 Managed Services16 9.3 7.3 2.0 10.7 8.5 2.2 12.2 9.6 2.6 13.0 10.2 2.8 14.4 11.0 3.4 15.0 11.1 3.9 Mobile (Voice and Data) 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 Remote Sensing 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.0 TOTAL 52.8 62.0 72.6 84.0 93.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-184A1.txt
  • professionals. 47 C.F.R. � 64.610(d)(1)(i). Such professionals must attest, either to the best of their knowledge or under penalty of perjury, that the applicant is an individual who is deaf-blind. 47 C.F.R. � 64.610(d)(1)(ii). The verification must include the attesting professional's name, title, and contact information. 47 C.F.R. � 64.610(d)(1)(iv). International Committee of Sport for the Deaf, Audiogram Regulations, Version 2.1 at 2 (Nov. 13, 1999), available at www.ciss.org/pdf/AudiogramRegulations.pdf. See Florida Department of Education, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Deaf, Hard of Hearing, http://www.rehabworks.org/deaf.shtml (last visited Sept. 9, 2011); Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Deaf and Hard of Hearing, http://www.dshs.wa.gov/dvr/Individuals/DeafHOH.aspx (last visited Sept. 9, 2011). United States Social Security Administration, Disability Programs, http://www.ssa.gov/disability/ (last visited
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1.txt
  • 2010, at � 1.1.d. FOD varies in size and form and includes a wide range of items such as parts fallen from aircraft; misplaced tools, equipment and supplies; rocks and pavement fragments; luggage; and wildlife. Id. at � 2.2.c. Dark-colored items that are difficult to detect visually against the tarmac make up almost half of FOD. Id. Id. at � 2.1. See Insight SRI Ltd., ``The economic cost of FOD to airlines,'' at 9 (2008). Indirect costs (delays, plane changes, fuel inefficiencies, etc.) are estimated to be another eleven billion dollars. Id. See Petition for Rulemaking to Amend Part 90.103(b) to Add the 78-81 GHz Band to the Table Specifying Frequencies Available for Assignment to Stations in the Radiolocation Service (filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 2010, at � 1.1.d. FOD varies in size and form and includes a wide range of items such as parts fallen from aircraft; misplaced tools, equipment and supplies; rocks and pavement fragments; luggage; and wildlife. Id. at � 2.2.c. Dark-colored items that are difficult to detect visually against the tarmac make up almost half of FOD. Id. 2Id. at � 2.1. 3See Insight SRI Ltd., "The economic cost of FOD to airlines," at 9 (2008). Indirect costs (delays, plane changes, fuel inefficiencies, etc.) are estimated to be another eleven billion dollars. Id. 4See Petition for Rulemaking to Amend Part 90.103(b) to Add the 78-81 GHz Band to the Table Specifying Frequencies Available for Assignment to Stations in the Radiolocation Service (filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-186A1.txt
  • 2009 biennial ownership filings of full power commercial broadcast television stations in order to determine the number of stations controlled by reported racial and ethnic categories. There were 1,394 full-power commercial television stations in the United States as of November 1, 2009, the information collection date. According to the Commission's review of the 2009 data, 29 of these stations, or 2.1 percent, are minority owned. Of those 29 stations, 9 have Black or African-American owners, accounting for 0.6 percent of all stations. American Indian or Alaska Native owners control 10 stations, or 0.7 percent, while Asian owners control nine stations, or 0.6 percent. Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islanders own one station, or 0.1 percent. Hispanic or Latino owners control 36 stations,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-29A1.txt
  • et al., Order on Reconsideration and Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19,663, �� 28-42 (2005). Id. See Letter from Hector V. Barreto, Administrator, Small Business Administration, to Gary D. Michaels, Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, filed Sept. 19, 2005. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058, App. C (2005). See ``Auction of Advanced Wireless Services Licenses Scheduled for June 29, 2006; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-52A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-52A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-52A1.txt
  • (851-854 MHz) and Upper Band (861-865 MHz) Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced,'' Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 17162 (2000). See, ``800 MHz SMR Service Lower 80 Channels Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced,'' Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 1736 (2000). See generally 13 C.F.R. � 121.201, NAICS code 517210. See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058, App. C (2005). See ``Auction of Advanced Wireless Services Licenses Scheduled for June 29, 2006; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-53A1.txt
  • require manufacturers, retailers, and any other entity marketing or selling signal boosters to display the consumer disclosure language conspicuously at the point-of-sale and on their websites. We also seek comment on whether to include enforcement language as part of the consumer disclosure. Operator Requirements. We also propose that if a signal booster is causing harmful interference as defined in Part 2.1 of our rules, the operator of the device must immediately cease operations. While we believe that our proposed rules will facilitate the development and deployment of robust signal boosters which will not harm wireless networks, in the event harmful interference does occur, this safeguard confirms that an interfering signal booster operator must cease operation. In addition, as explained in more
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-57A1.txt
  • Order and the FRFA (or summaries thereof) will also be published in the Federal Register. Connecting America: The National Broadband Plan, Recommendation 5.8.4, p. 87 (2010) (National Broadband Plan). The 90 megahertz figure consists of 40 megahertz of the 2 GHz band, 40 megahertz of the L-band, and 10 megahertz of the Big LEO band. . See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). See generally MSS NPRM, 25 FCC Rcd at 9482-85, 9486-87, �� 4-8, 10-12 (2010) (discussing the allocation and history of these three MSS bands). The MSS Little LEO band (137-138 MHz, 148-150.05 MHz, and 400.15-401 MHz), see 47 C.F.R. � 25.202(a)(3), was excluded from the MSS NPRM because that band is unsuitable for the provision of terrestrial broadband service. Id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-74A1.txt
  • of Air-Ground Telecommunications Services et al., Order on Reconsideration and Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19663, paras. 28-42 (2005). Id. See Letter from Hector V. Barreto, Administrator, SBA, to Gary D. Michaels, Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, FCC (filed Sept. 19, 2005). See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058, App. C (2005). See ``Auction of Advanced Wireless Services Licenses Scheduled for June 29, 2006; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1.txt
  • information we collect is more useful, in the FNPRM we propose to require resale carriers to separate their traffic and revenue by categories of customers. See Section IV.B.2.f, paras. 80-86, infra.) See Section IV.B.2.k, paras. 95-97, infra. Cingular Comments at 1; Verizon Wireless Reply Comments at 1. AT&T Reply Comments at 3 n. 3. In 2004, CMRS carriers accounted for 2.1 billion minutes, approximately 5% of all IMTS resale minutes, and $0.6 billion, approximately 12% of IMTS resale revenues. By 2009 CMRS carriers share of the IMTS resale market has grown to 10.6 billion minutes, approximately 13% of IMTS resale minutes, and $1.8 billion, approximately 24% of IMTS resale revenues. 2004 International Telecommunications Data, Table D; 2009 International Telecommunications Data, Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1_Rcd.pdf
  • industry, available in a timely manner, and historically consistent. We have examined the alternative sources of data that the commenters proposed and found that they do not meet these standards.98First, international traffic and 92SeeSection IV.B.2.k, paras. 95-97,infra. 93Cingular Comments at 1; Verizon Wireless Reply Comments at 1. 94AT&T Reply Comments at 3 n. 3. 95In 2004, CMRS carriers accounted for 2.1 billion minutes, approximately 5% of all IMTS resale minutes, and $0.6 billion, approximately 12% of IMTS resale revenues. By 2009 CMRS carriers share of the IMTS resale market has grown to 10.6 billion minutes, approximately 13% of IMTS resale minutes, and $1.8 billion, approximately 24% of IMTS resale revenues. 2004 International Telecommunications Data, Table D; 2009 International Telecommunications Data, Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-84A1.txt
  • Digital Television Standard, Part 5 - AC-3 Audio System Characteristics'' (July 6, 2010) (``2010 ATSC A/53 Standard, Part 5''). We note that this proposal is consistent with our proposed rules herein because the ATSC A/85 RP references and requires compliance with the same testing methodology adopted in the 2010 ATSC A/53 Standard, Part 5. See, e.g., ATSC A/85 RP �� 2.1 at 9 (referencing A/53) and 7.1 at 17 (stating that the ATSC A/85 RP ``identifies methods to ensure consistent digital television loudness through the proper use of dialnorm metadata for all content, and thus comply with A/53''). See infra at � 4. The previous version of the ATSC A/53 Standard, Part 5, which is incorporated by reference in Section 73.682(d),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-93A1.txt
  • and Pending Applications (all locations are W.L.) U.S. DBS Region 2 Plan Locations APPENDIX E Satellite Angular Separation Values as a Function of Orbital Eccentricity and Orbital Inclination BSS is the term used for a radiocommunication service in which signals transmitted or retransmitted by space stations are intended for direct reception by the general public. See e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. In this item, the term ``17/24 GHz BSS'' generally refers to the broadcasting-satellite service operating on space-to-Earth (downlink) frequencies in the 17.3-17.8 GHz band and the corresponding Earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies in the 24.75-25.25 GHz band. Power flux density is defined as the amount of power flow through a unit area within a unit bandwidth. The units of power flux density
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-93A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Commission allocated the 24.75-25.25 GHz (Earth-to-space) band, on a primary basis, for Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) uplink operations limited to the 17/24 GHz BSS feeder links.6The 25.05-25.25 GHz 1BSS is the term used for a radiocommunication service in which signals transmitted or retransmitted by space stations are intended for direct reception by the general public. See e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. In this item, the term "17/24 GHz BSS" generally refers to the broadcasting-satellite service operating on space-to-Earth (downlink) frequencies in the 17.3-17.8 GHz band and the corresponding Earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies in the 24.75-25.25 GHz band. 2Power flux density is defined as the amount of power flow through a unit area within a unit bandwidth. The units of power flux density
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-19A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-19A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-19A1.txt
  • G, Interconnection Agreement-Texas between Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and UTEX Communications Corp. at 17; Answer at 7, para. 8; Answer Legal Analysis at 14. 47 U.S.C. �� 251, 252. See, e.g., Stipulated Facts at 6, para. 17; Complaint at Ex. G. See, e.g., Complaint Exhibit G, Interconnection Agreement-Texas between Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and UTEX Communications Corp. at 378, � 2.1.1. See, e.g., Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 6-7; Stipulated Facts at 2-4. above, but that caveat is not relevant here. Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 4-7. See, e.g., Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 7-8; Stipulated Facts at 2-6. See, e.g., Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 8; Stipulated Facts at 2-6. See, e.g., Complaint, Exhibits B and C. We recognize that the tariff at issue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-19A1_Rcd.pdf
  • G, Interconnection Agreement-Texas between Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and UTEX Communications Corp. at 17; Answer at 7, para. 8; Answer Legal Analysis at 14. 647 U.S.C. �� 251, 252. See, e.g., Stipulated Facts at 6, para. 17; Complaint at Ex. G. 7See, e.g., Complaint Exhibit G, Interconnection Agreement-Texas between Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and UTEX Communications Corp. at 378, � 2.1.1. 8See, e.g., Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 6-7; Stipulated Facts at 2-4. 9See, e.g., Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 7-8; Stipulated Facts at 2-4. The parties identify a caveat to the facts stated in paragraph 3above, but that caveat is not relevant here. Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 4-7. 10See, e.g., Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 7-8; Stipulated Facts at 2-6. 11See, e.g., Supplemental
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1.txt
  • (not RSAs) had essentially been completed, and for some MSAs, the initial 5-year period was already nearing its end. See, e.g., Amendment of the Commission's Rules for Rural Cellular Service, Order on Reconsideration of Second Report and Order, CC Docket No. 85-388, 4 FCC Rcd 5377, 5380-81 (1989). See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, WT Docket No. 02-353, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005). . . . . See generally CTIA Petition. See Public Notice, supra note 6. See Appendix A. Id. Id. CTIA Revised Plan, Cover Letter dated Sept. 21, 2010. A key difference between CTIA's Petition and its Revised Plan is that, in the former, CTIA appears to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the Commission's Rules for Rural Cellular Service, Order on Reconsideration of Second Report and Order, CC Docket No. 85-388, 4 FCC Rcd 5377, 5380-81 (1989). 26SeeAmendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish NewPersonal Communications Services, Second Report and Order, GEN Docket No. 90-314, 8 FCC Rcd 7700, 7753-54 (1993). 27SeeService Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, WT Docket No. 02-353, 20 FCC Rcd 14058 (2005). 28See Reallocation and Service Rules for the 698-746 MHz Spectrum Band (Television Channels 52-59), Report and Order, GN Docket No. 01-74, 17 FCC Rcd 1022 (2002). 1749 Federal Communications Commission FCC 12-20 wireless services where incumbents were originally licensed on a site-by-site basis but were permitted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-22A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-22A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-22A1.txt
  • of Air-Ground Telecommunications Services et al., Order on Reconsideration and Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19663, paras. 28-42 (2005). Id. See Letter from Hector V. Barreto, Administrator, SBA, to Gary D. Michaels, Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, FCC (filed Sept. 19, 2005). See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058, App. C (2005). See ``Auction of Advanced Wireless Services Licenses Scheduled for June 29, 2006; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.txt
  • Rcd 5710 (2011) (2 GHz Band Co-Allocation Report and Order). below. Amendment of Section 2.106 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum at 2 GHz for Use by the Mobile-Satellite Service, ET Docket No. 95-18, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 12 FCC Rcd 7388, 7391, 7395 �� 5-6, 14 (1997). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). See Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L-Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Bands, IB Docket No. 01-185, ET Docket No. 95-18, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 16 FCC Rcd 15532, 15532 � 1 (2001). Establishment of Policies and Service Rules for the Mobile Satellite Service in the 2 GHz Band, IB
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-36A1.txt
  • average terrain of unlicensed device Required separation (km) from digital or analog TV (full service or low power) protected contour Co-channel (km) Adjacent channel (km) Less than 3 meters 4.0 0.4 3-Less than 10 meters 7.3 0.7 10-Less than 30 meters 11.1 1.2 30-Less than 50 meters 14.3 1.8 50-Less than 75 meters 18.0 2.0 75-Less than 100 meters 21.1 2.1 100-Less than 150 meters 25.3 2.2 150-Less than 200 meters 28.5 2.3 200-250 meters 31.2 2.4 The methodology used by the Joint Petitioners to calculate the required separation distances between TV bands devices and co-channel and adjacent channel TV contours is generally consistent with the methodology described in the Second Report and Order. The Joint Petitioners calculated separation distances from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-45A1.txt
  • mobile stations, or between land mobile stations. A base station is a land station in the land mobile service. A land mobile station is a mobile station in the land mobile service capable of surface movement within the geographical limits of a country or continent. The fixed service is a radiocommunication service between specified fixed points. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). See 47 C.F.R. Part 90 Subpart L and 47 C.F.R. Part 22 Subpart E. The rules specify channels in 13 metropolitan areas, however, operations are allowed in only 11 of those areas due to spectrum limitations in the U.S. border areas. The eleven markets where PLMRS facilities are currently operating on are: Boston, MA; Chicago, IL; Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX; Houston,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-48A1.txt
  • Rcd 12,749 (2008). Id. See Auction of Advanced Wireless Services Licenses Scheduled for June 29, 2006; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and Other Procedures for Auction No. 66, AU Docket No. 06-30, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 4562 (2006) (``Auction 66 Procedures Public Notice''); See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, App. B (2003), modified by Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14,058, App. C (2005). See Auction of Advanced Wireless Services Licenses Closes; Winning Bidders Announced for Auction No. 66, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 10,521 (2006)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.txt
  • TI Comments at 3. AdvaMed Comments at 1-2. Philips Comments at 5. See, e.g., Philips Comments at 10-11. ARRL Comments at 8. Harmful interference is ``[i]nterference which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with [the ITU] Radio Regulations.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. ARRL Comments at 9-10. Philips Comments at 11. See also AdvaMed Comments at 3. GEHC Comments at 18. See 47 C.F.R. � 95.1221(c). Para. 13, supra. Philips Comments at 11. GEHC Comments at 14. See Joint Parties' ex parte, filed July 5, 2011, at 1-2. 47 C.F.R. � 95.1203 (referencing 47 C.F.R. � 95.405). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.924(d).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-349A1.txt
  • services.57 We further noted a trend among users to have fiber optic facilities restored with similar facilities in case of an outage. We found that it was doubtful even then that INTELSATs satellite-based monopoly in the provision of international PSTN could form the basis for the type of cross-subsidization of competitive services that PAS fears. 51 Brattle Report at Exhibit HSH-2.1. 52 AT&T Year-end 1995 Circuit Status Report (filed April 30, 19%); GTE Hawaiian Telephone Company Year-end 1995 Circuit Status Report (filed April 1, 1996); MCI Year-end 1995 Circuit Status Report (filed April 1, 19%); Sprint Year-end Circuit Status Report (filed April 15, 19%). With these reports, MCI and Spruit filed requests that the reports be withheld from public inspection pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-208A1.pdf
  • of the pulse spacing. Fundamental emissions consist of the carrier and modulation products but exclude unwanted emissions. In other words, the fundamental emission is equivalent to the necessary bandwidth. The necessary bandwidth is defined and calculated in 47 CFR � 2.202, and the definition of unwanted emissions, consisting of out-of-band emissions and spurious emissions, is contained in 47 CFR � 2.1. See the measurement procedure specified in 47 CFR � 15.31(a)(6). This procedure references the use of HP Application Note 150-2 which specifies the use of a pulse desensitization correction factor. See 47 CFR �� 15.35(b) and 15.209. Because ultra-wideband systems normally have a low duty cycle, the peak levels are quite high compared to the average emission levels. In addition,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-279A1.txt
  • 97-121, Att. at 2-3 (filed Apr. 6, 1999). SBC estimated 830,000 resold lines. Id. These updated figures represent a 23 percent increase in provision of unbundled loops and a 28 percent increase in resale since the merger application. 61 SBC/Ameritech July 26 Reply Comments at 13. 62 Local Competition, Federal Communications Commission, Common Carrier Bureau, Industry Analysis Div., at Table 2.1 (Aug. 1999) ("Local Competition Report"). 63 See id. at 1, 12. Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-279 16 been most successful in the market for specialized services such as special access and local private line services, which are provided to business customers.64 Aggregate competitive LEC use of resold incumbent LEC lines predominates over their use of unbundled loops by a factor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-305A1.pdf
  • accommodate the range of frequencies to which the carrier frequency can hop. The test of a frequency hopping system is that the near term distribution of hops appears random, the long term distribution appears evenly distributed over the hop set, and sequential hops are randomly distributed in both direction and magnitude of change in the hop set. See 47 C.F.R. �2.1. See 47 C.F.R. �2.1. See 47 C.F.R. �15.5. See NPRM at �� 43-45. See DOT Comments at 7 and Mark IV Comments at 6. See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-313A1.txt
  • Unclassified, and Sensitive Information obtained while a Principal Manager of the Company. Such responsibility shall not terminate by virtue of leaving a position of Principal Manager. The Company shall advise the departing Principal Manager of such responsibility, but failure of the Company to so advise shall not relieve the Principal Manager of such responsibility. ARTICLE II - FACILITIES AND RECORDS 2.1 Except to the extent and under conditions concurred in by the DoD, the DoJ and the FBI in writing: (1) all Domestic Telecommunications Infrastructure owned directly or indirectly by the Parent Corporation will be owned and controlled by the Company and shall at all times be located in the United States, and (2) all telecommunications of U.S. Joint Venture Subscribers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-333A1.pdf
  • Rules and Policies for Local Multipoint Distribution Service and for Fixed Satellite Services, 11 FCC Rcd. 19005 (1996). See DEMS MO&O, supra at 5. Radionavigation is a service used to determine the position, velocity and/or other characteristics of an object, through the use of propagation properties of radio waves for purposes of navigation (e.g., obstruction warning). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See Reallocation Order, supra, 12 FCC Rcd 3471. See 47 C.F.R. � 101. See Reallocation Order, supra at 3480-81 (Appendix A). See 47 C.F.R. � 2. Reallocation Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 3473, � 6 (footnote omitted): On March 5, 1997, [the Commission] received a . . . letter from NTIA [National Telecommunications and Information Administration] making the [24 GHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-344A1.pdf
  • switch. (v) "U.S. MET" means a MET that is put into service in the United States by a party that is authorized to distribute or otherwise provide TMI's mobile satellite services in the United States. (w) "Wire Communication" has the meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. � 2510(l). ARTICLE II NON-OBJECTION BY DoJ AND FBI TO GRANT OF LICENSE TO TMI 2.1 Non-Objection. (a) Upon the execution of this Agreement and adoption by TMI of the Implementation Plan, the DoJ and the FBI shall: (i) immediately notify the FCC that, provided the FCC approves this Agreement and adopts the Condition to FCC Licenses, the DoJ and the FBI have no objection to grant of TMI's pending license application in FCC File No.
• http://licensing.fcc.gov/prod/callsign/manuser.html
  • who holds a construction permit and wishes to make an initial call sign selection. A [14]Transfer/Assignment Request should be issued when a proposed transferee/assignee desires a different call sign for the station to be transferred or assigned. An [15]Exchange Request should be issued when two licensees (who are primary holders) want to exchange or relinquish one of their call signs. 2.1 Change Requests Users wanting to change their authorized call sign to a new, available call sign can issue a change request on-line by clicking the CHANGE button. 2.1.1 The Change Request Screen The Change Request screen has dialog boxes for the REQUESTED (new) CALL SIGN and the CURRENT CALL SIGN. Users should enter an available call sign in the REQUESTED
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.txt
  • unilateral anticompetitive conduct by the merged entity or coordinated anticompetitive conduct of multiple market participants.''); Bell Atlantic-NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 19985 � 121 (``Market performance can also be adversely affected if a merger increases the potential for coordinated interaction by firms remaining in the post merger market.''); see also 1992 Horizontal Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. 41552, 41558 � 2.1 (``Lessening of Competition Through Coordinated Interaction''). See 1999 Competition Report, 15 FCC Rcd at 986 � 16, 1053 �168, 1094 Tbl. C-4 (ten largest MVPDs serve almost 75% of the nation's MVPD subscribers), 15 FCC Rcd at 1053-54 � 168 (noting that MVPDs may coordinate their purchasing decisions). See WorldCom-MCI Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 18025 � 121 (``As the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/broadbandtoday.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/broadbandtoday.pdf
  • at > Villagenet Inc. Enters National DSL Market, available at Covad Introduces New Services to Help Power the Next-generation Internet, available at These fixed wireless providers have licenses operate at specific parts (or bands) of the spectrum. The following list details the various types of fixed wireless companies and their bands of operation: Multichannel Multipoint Distribution System (2.1-2.7 GHz); Local Multipoint Distribution Service (28-31 GHz); Teligent (24 GHz); and Winstar (38 GHz). See,e.g., Salomon Report at 21; Winstar To Provide Boston Properties With Advanced Broadband Telecommunications Services, July 8, 1999, available at ; . According to some industry estimates, ILECs are failing to meet the data needs of 750,000 multi-dwelling units in the United States-needs that could be
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
  • has continued over the past year. Audience share statistics for Monday through Sunday, 24 hours a day, show that non-premium cable audience shares rose 7.8 percent from an average 42.2 share from July 1998 through June 1999, to an average 45.5 share between July 1999 and June 2000. Monday through Sunday, 24 hours a day, broadcast television audience shares decreased 2.1 percent from an average 60.9 share from July 1998 through June 1999, to an average 59.6 share between July 1999 and June 2000. Cable Networks. In 1999, the number of basic cable networks increased from 139 to 147, a 5.8 percent increase. The number of premium networks increased 139 percent in 1999 from 18 at the end of 1998 to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.txt
  • 30-31 (Ameritech believes that price discounts granted to large MSOs, for example, is more widespread than the complaints filed or the Commission's rulings); and Bellsouth Comments at 14-15 (steep discounts granted only to large MSOs is a barrier to entry in MVPD markets). 648DirecTV/USSB is the fifth largest MVPD with 3.5 million subscribers; Primestar is the seventh largest MVPD with 2.1 million subscribers; and Echostar is the eleventh largest MVPD with 1.2 million subscribers. 649See App. C, Tbl. C-1. 92 152. As explained in the 1997 Report, the 1992 Cable Act directs the Commission to place limits on the concentration of ownership of cable systems at the national level.644 This direction reflects concerns that such concentration could have anticompetitive effects on
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.wp
  • Lifeline support by certifying their participation in additional means tested assistance programs, such as the programs administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs150 or Indian Health Services.151 We encourage commenters to 145 See Monitoring Report, June 1999, CC Docket No. 98-202, (rel. Jul. 12, 1999). Section 2, Low-Income Support, contained information about the Lifeline and Link Up support mechanisms. Table 2.1 Lifeline Monthly Support by State or Jurisdiction provides information about the amount of support in each state's programs. See also National Exchange Carrier Association, Federal Universal Service Programs Fund Size Projections & Contribution Base for the Third Quarter 1999, appendix 5. (filed April 30, 1999). 146 47 C.F.R. � 54.409(a). 147 See Universal Service Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 8973.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97228.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97228.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97228.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97228.wp
  • may be drawn about the feasibility of full scale competitive entry); AT&T May 1 Comments at 8 (responding to SBC's claims and asserting that "Congress did not vote down any 'metric' amendments to the facilities-based provider requirement that became law . . ."). 39. SBC Brief in Support at 10 (citing SBC Application, Appendix - Volume II, Tab 3, at 2.1.1 & 4); see also Bell Atlantic Apr. 28 Comments at 9 n.4. According to Bell Atlantic, "SBC has an approved agreement with a competitor that is offering service to residential subscribers under an effective tariff (and that is legally obligated to provide service upon demand), and this should be adequate to apply under Track A." Id. 40. SBC Reply Comments
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98082.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98082.wp
  • Plan (NANP), a telephone number functions like an address: every number is associated with an individual switch operated by a particular local telephone company in a specific Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-82 39 See AIN PROGRAM, NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM, LOCAL NUMBER PORTABILITY: AIN AND NS/EP IMPLICATIONS, �� 2.0-2.5 (July 1996) [hereinafter LOCAL NUMBER PORTABILITY REPORT]. 40 See id. at � 2.1. 41 See id. 42 See id. 43 See id. at �� 2.3, 5. 44 See In re Telephone Number Portability, Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd. 12281, 12287-88 (1997) (Second Report and Order). 45 NORTH AMERICAN NUMBERING COUNCIL, LOCAL NUMBER PORTABILITY ADMINISTRATION SELECTION WORKING GROUP REPORT [hereinafter NANC RECOMMENDATION] App. D (Architecture & Administrative Plan for Local Number Portability),
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98225.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98225.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98225.wp
  • AT&T, MCI, and Sprint have a combined 82.7 percent market share of residential direct dial toll minutes. 1998 Long Distance Market Shares Report at Table 4.3. GTE provides the following estimates of market shares based on retail long distance revenues of "residence and low-volume business facilities-based carriers": AT&T (66.8 percent); Sprint (12.7 percent); MCI (12.3 percent); Frontier (2.3 percent); LCI (2.1 percent); WorldCom (1.9 percent); Qwest (0.1 percent). GTE Mar. 13 Comments, Schmalensee and Taylor Aff. at Ex. 12, citing Frost & Sullivan. Frost & Sullivan define "low-volume business customers" as those that spend less than $4,170 per month for long distance service. The Applicants state that they cannot comment in detail on the findings or methodologies of the Frost &
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
  • Portability, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 8352, 8362, 8499 (1996) (First Number Portability Order); BellSouth Varner Aff. at para. 182. See, e.g., SGAT � XI.C & Attach. G at para. D; Second BellSouth Louisiana Application App. B, Vol. 4, Tab 30, Agreement Between BellSouth and AT&T (AT&T Agreement), Attach. 8 at para. 2.1. 859 Under DID, the carrier that originally served the called customer re-routes the telephone calls over a dedicated facility to the acquiring carrier's switch. First Number Portability Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8362, 8499; BellSouth Varner Aff. para. 182. See, e.g., SGAT � XI.C & Attach. G at para. E. 157 when changing local service providers hampers the development of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.pdf
  • residential customers with existing telephone service purchased over two million additional telephone lines for their homes between 1996 and 1997. Trends in Telephone Service, Federal Communications Commission, Sept. 1999, at Table 20.4 (Trends in Telephone Service). The number of cellular telephone subscribers increased by nearly 14 million subscribers between December 1997 and December 1998. Trends in Telephone Service at Table 2.1. 157 Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Report, 14 FCC Rcd 2398, 2419-20, 2428, 2445-46, paras. 42, 56, 90 (1999) (706 Report) (Report finds that there is currently rapid demand for broadband
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99279.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99279.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99279.txt
  • Docket No. 97-121, Att. at 2-3 (filed Apr. 6, 1999). SBC estimated 830,000 resold lines. Id. These updated figures represent a 23 percent increase in provision of unbundled loops and a 28 percent increase in resale since the merger application. SBC/Ameritech July 26 Reply Comments at 13. Local Competition, Federal Communications Commission, Common Carrier Bureau, Industry Analysis Div., at Table 2.1 (Aug. 1999) (``Local Competition Report''). See id. at 1, 12. Id. at 1. See AT&T Oct. 15 Petition at 11 (citing a recent study by the Consumer Federation of America, Stonewalling Local Competition: The Baby Bell Strategy to Subvert the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1998) at 20, for the proposition that local competition affects little more than one percent of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • Reform Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15999-00, 16005. Access Charge Reform Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 16005. The CCL charge already has been eliminated for Ameritech, Bell Atlantic, PacTel, Southwestern Bell Telephone, U S WEST, Aliant, SNET and Cincinnati Bell. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14320-24. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14324-26. Modified Proposal at � 2.1.2.1. Modified Proposal at � 2.1.2.2.1. See Appendix C, Chart 1 for a comparison of the SLC and PICC caps under our current rules and as proposed by CALLS. Although the CALLS Proposal describes this cost review proceeding to be limited to primary residential and single-line business lines, CALLS subsequently clarified its submission to include all residential lines as part of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.txt
  • the same time and manner as SWBT does for its own advanced services separate affiliate. In particular, SWBT provisioned line shared loops to competing carriers 3.44 and 3.55 days in September and October 2000 respectively. By contrast, SWBT took about one day longer to provision the same type of line shared loops to its separate affiliate. Moreover, SWBT missed only 2.1 and 1.8 percent of the installation due dates for line shared loops provided to competing carriers during the same months. We also find that SWBT installs the high frequency portion of the loop at an acceptable level of quality. Although SWBT has not performed as well in the maintenance and repair of line shared loops as it has for stand-alone
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcomp99-1.pdf
  • may be purchased by calling International Transcription Services, Inc. (ITS) at (202) 857-3800. The report can be downloaded [file name LCOMP99-1.PDF or LCOMP99-1.ZIP] from the FCC-State Link internet site at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/stats on the World Wide Web. LOCAL COMPETITION: AUGUST 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW...............................................................1 I. PRELIMINARY STATISTICAL ANALYSES OF LOCAL COMPETITION..............3 II. NEW ENTRANT SHARE OF THE NATIONWIDE MARKET......................11 Chart 2.1Fiber Miles...................................................15 Chart 2.2Percentage Growth in Fiber Mileage..................................15 Table 2.1Local Service Market............................................16 Table 2.2Total Telecommunications Revenue..................................17 Table 2.3Revenue for Services Provided to Other Carriers for Resale Reported by Carriers that Contribute to Universal Service Support Mechanisms...........18 Table 2.4Revenue for Services Provided to End Users Reported by Carriers that Contribute to Universal Service Support Mechanisms......................19 Table 2.5Telecommunications Revenue: All Carriers.............................20 III.NEW ENTRANT
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/in-region_applications/ameritech_mi/amercom.html
  • provided here in a single zip file: [10]amerrpl.zip (945 KB, 18 files, 1.71 MB unzipped). See the [11]Reply Comments Table below for the names of the parties who submitted disks and their associated files. Comments 20 comments were filed electronically with the FCC for this proceeding and are provided here in a single* zip file: [12]amercom.zip (560 KB, 27 files, 2.1 MB unzipped). See the [13]Comments Table below for the names of the parties who submitted disks and their associated files. * AT&T's and The Department of Justice comments are only available separately via links in the table below. To download a zip file: click on the highlighted file name above, then use your browser's normal save function to save the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
  • 41 50.0 183.0 11664 544 11453 533 1.3 0.5 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 12 57 1000.0 610.0 43525 908 41216 868 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MONTGOMERY 20 16 50.0 226.0 12730 369 12234 365 0.5 0.2 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 26 14 50.0 183.0 12881 376 12595 372 4.0 2.9 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 32 51 284.8 545.0 28418 538 28011 535 3.2 2.1 99.8 AL MONTGOMERY 45 46 50.0 308.0 11831 366 11666 365 1.9 1.1 100.0 AL MOUNT CHEAHA 7 56 1000.0 610.0 41663 2006 38089 1739 0.3 0.1 99.6 AL OPELIKA 66 31 50.0 207.0 10492 469 9990 460 0.0 0.0 100.0 AL OZARK 34 33 50.0 142.0 8785 229 8749 228 0.7 0.1 100.0 AL SELMA 8 55 1000.0 515.0
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00430.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00430.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00430.txt
  • permissive changes. 731 & 159... 495 ECC Federal Communications Commission, Equipment Approval Services, P.O. Box 358315, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5315 * * * * * PART 2 - FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS The authority citation for Part 2 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336, unless otherwise noted. Section 2.1 is proposed to be amended by adding the following definition: � 2.1 Terms and definition. * * * * * (c) * * * Software defined radio. A radio that includes a transmitter in which the operating parameters of the transmitter, including the frequency range, modulation type and maximum radiated or conducted output power can be altered by making a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00455.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00455.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00455.txt
  • Report No. 148 (MMB November 29, 2000). The Commission will conduct random audits on a select number of applications prior to or after a license has been issued in reliance on a certification. See 47 C.F.R. �� 74.990, 74.991, 79.992; Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands, 6 FCC Rcd 6792, 6801-06 (1991). The rules provide that an MDS operator may be licensed on ITFS frequencies in areas where at least eight other ITFS channels remain available in the community for future ITFS use. In addition, no more than eight ITFS channels per community may be licensed to MDS operators. To be licensed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.txt
  • � 42. Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at � 10. See 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(3)(D). Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at � 10. See 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(3)(A), (D). An ``out-of-band emission'' is an ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies immediately outside the necessary bandwidth which results from the modulation process, but excluding spurious emissions.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). A ``spurious emission'' is an ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' Id. � 2.1(c). The objective of most of the Commission's traditional
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.txt
  • Wi-LAN filed an application for equipment certification for its Wideband Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (W-OFDM) transmitter under the rules for direct sequence spread spectrum systems. The Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") denied that application on the basis that Wi-LAN's W-OFDM device did not meet the definition of a direct sequence spread spectrum system as set forth in Section 2.1 of the rules. Section 2.1 of our rules defines a spread spectrum system as, "[A]n information bearing communications system in which . . . the bandwidth is deliberately widened by means of a spreading function over that which would be needed to transmit the information alone." As stated above, Section 2.1 provides for only two specific types of spread spectrum
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
  • 0.0 0.0 100.0 AKSITKA 13 2 1.0 33.0 6622 9 1132 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 ALANNISTON 40 58 253.2 350.0 21331 1124 17127 616 0.2 0.0 99.3 ALBESSEMER 17 18 178.0 675.0 32514 1313 28727 1131 2.5 0.3 100.0 ALBIRMINGHAM 6 50 1000.0 420.0 37237 1647 34243 1547 0.0 0.0 99.4 ALBIRMINGHAM 10 53 1000.0 404.0 32562 1543 28403 1428 2.1 2.3 99.9 ALBIRMINGHAM 13 52 998.4 408.0 33339 1570 29111 1465 0.0 0.0 100.0 ALBIRMINGHAM 42 30 159.2 421.0 26381 1330 23781 1253 0.3 0.3 99.9 ALBIRMINGHAM 68 36 50.0 314.0 14449 1016 13255 977 0.0 0.0 99.5 ALDEMOPOLIS 41 19 50.0 333.0 15153 121 15040 121 0.4 0.4 100.0 ALDOTHAN 4 36 1000.0 573.0 48620 784 44475 765 0.0
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
  • mounted antennas" means antennas mounted in or on a building structure that is occupied as a workplace or residence. The term "power" in column 2 of Table 1 refers to total operating power of the transmitting operation in question in terms of effective radiated power (ERP), equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP), or peak envelope power (PEP), as defined in � 2.1 of this chapter. For the case of the Cellular Radiotelephone Service, subpart H of part 22 of this chapter; the Personal Communications Service, part 24 of this chapter and the Specialized Mobile Radio Service, part 90 of this chapter, the phrase "total power of all channels" in column 2 of Table 1 means the sum of the ERP or EIRP
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
  • 41 50.0 183.0 11664 544 11453 533 1.3 0.5 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 12 57 1000.0 610.0 43525 908 41216 868 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MONTGOMERY 20 16 50.0 226.0 12730 369 12234 365 0.5 0.2 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 26 14 50.0 183.0 12881 376 12595 372 4.0 2.9 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 32 51 284.8 545.0 28418 538 28011 535 3.2 2.1 99.8 AL MONTGOMERY 45 46 50.0 308.0 11831 366 11666 365 1.9 1.1 100.0 AL MOUNT CHEAHA 7 56 1000.0 610.0 41663 2006 38089 1739 0.3 0.1 99.6 AL OPELIKA 66 31 50.0 207.0 10492 469 9990 460 0.0 0.0 100.0 AL OZARK 34 33 50.0 142.0 8785 229 8749 228 0.7 0.1 100.0 AL SELMA 8 55 1000.0 515.0
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • a single actual DBS customer was or could have been adversely impacted by the interference DBS proponents claimed to have been created at the Oxon Hill, MD tests. Decision. We conclude that MVDDS can operate in the 12.2-12.7 GHz band under the existing primary allocation, which requires that a Fixed Service not cause harmful interference to the co-primary BSS. Section 2.1 of our rules defines ``harmful interference'' as ``interference which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service.....'' In some instances, spectrum sharing may result in services causing interference or degradation to or occasional outages of other services. Spectrum management decisions often address this issue by specifying
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.txt
  • would be to use some of the 2 GHz MSS spectrum for relocation. Paragraph 38 seeks comment on using the 2150-2160 MHz MDS band for relocation purposes. Any of these alternatives would facilitate the relocation of displaced incumbents, including small entities. Finally, the Commission has already received extensive comments on issues related to the possible reallocation of the 2150-2160 MHz (2.1 GHz) spectrum for advanced wireless purposes. Comments filed by the multipoint distribution/instructional television fixed services industry and several equipment manufacturers argue that the 2.1 GHz band is necessary for the continued roll-out of fixed wireless services across the country. Other commenters support the use of 2.1 GHz for advanced wireless services. We are considering both alternatives, and are attempting to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01264.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01264.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01264.txt
  • & Electronic or Paper 159... 495 ECC Federal Communications Commission, Equipment Approval Services, P.O. Box 358315, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5315 * * * * * PART 2 - FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS The authority citation for Part 2 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336, unless otherwise noted. Section 2.1 is amended by adding the following definition: � 2.1 Terms and definition. * * * * * (c) * * * Software defined radio. A radio that includes a transmitter in which the operating parameters of frequency range, modulation type or maximum output power (either radiated or conducted) can be altered by making a change in software without making any
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01382.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01382.txt
  • C.F.R. � 25.142. 15 A feeder link is a radio link from a fixed Earth station to a satellite (uplink) or from a satellite to a fixed Earth station (downlink). These links are used for data backhaul, satellite control functions, and to connect satellite systems to other networks, such as the public switched telephone network (PSTN). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. 16 Since the 1995 World Radiocommunication Conference, the United States has performed studies on sharing between space and terrestrial services and feeder links near 1.4 GHz for Non-Geostationary Orbiting Mobile Satellite Service (Little LEO) systems with service links below 1 GHz. See WRC 97 Final Acts, Resolution 127, note (d). 17 See Amendments to Part 90 of the Commission's Rules
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2001/d012072a.pdf
  • 0.16-0.20Source: Viterbi GSM 200 kHz 13.3 15.2 (13.3*8/7) 0.08 effective reuse = 7 PHS 300 kHz 32 12.8 (32*8/20) 0.04 effective reuse = 20 With Adaptive Antennas PHS 300 kHz 32 64 (32*8/4) 0.21 effective reuse = 4, DDI Pocket GSM 200 kHz 13.3 53.2 (13.3*8/2) 0.27 effective reuse = 2, AC/OEM Trials IntelliWave FWA 300 kHz 128 640 (128*2*2.5) 2.1 effective reuse = 1/2.5, Various Operators ! Adaptive antenna gains are significant ! Adaptive antenna benefits vary with air interface and adaptive antenna type (more on this later) 14 A Word About Reuse ! When talking about spectral efficiency, "reuse" means feasible reuse of traffic resources ! Traffic resource examples " AMPS (FDMA): 30 kHz carrier " DAMPS/IS-136 (TDMA/FDMA): 30
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/MB/Orders/2002/fcc02113r.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/MB/Orders/2002/fcc02113r.txt
  • holder of a non-attributable interest in a broadcast licensee to have the right to nominate a member of the licensee's board of directors, but may not have the right to designate or elect a director.24 In other words, NBC contends, the licensee entity must have the ability to reject the nominees of the non-attributable interest holder. NBC notes that Section 2.1(b) of the Stockholder Agreement provides that if the rules eventually permit it, then NBC shall have the right to appoint members of Paxson's board. Only in this clause is NBC assured that its nominees will be elected to Paxson's board. NBC states that it has never invoked Section 2.1(b). The three persons that served on Paxson's board did so only
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
  • restrains prices charged to buyers). 120 See 1992 Merger Guidelines � 1.3. 121 See, e.g. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. at 363 ("[A] significant increase in the concentration . . . must be enjoined in the absence of evidence clearly showing that the merger is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects."). See also 1992 Horizontal Guidelines at 41558 �� 2.1, 2.2; New York v. Kraft General Foods, 926 F. Supp. 321, 359 (S.D.N.Y. 1995); Amendment of Parts 20 and 24 of the Commission's Rules -- Broadband PCS Competitive Bidding and the Commercial Mobile Radio Service Spectrum Cap, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 7824 (1996). Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-329 30 cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation.122
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98231.pdf
  • channels. Id. We also have agreed that the 20 hours per channel per week ITFS programming standard for licensees leasing excess capacity helps to insure that ITFS licenses are not secured merely to realize financial gain from wireless cable operators. Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, & Cable Television Relay Service, Order on Reconsideration, 6 FCC Rcd 6764, 6773-74 (1991) ("Wireless Cable Reconsideration Order"). See Amendment of Part 74 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the Instructional Television Fixed Service, Notice of Proposed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
  • 41 50.0 183.0 11664 544 11453 533 1.3 0.5 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 12 57 1000.0 610.0 43525 908 41216 868 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MONTGOMERY 20 16 50.0 226.0 12730 369 12234 365 0.5 0.2 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 26 14 50.0 183.0 12881 376 12595 372 4.0 2.9 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 32 51 284.8 545.0 28418 538 28011 535 3.2 2.1 99.8 AL MONTGOMERY 45 46 50.0 308.0 11831 366 11666 365 1.9 1.1 100.0 AL MOUNT CHEAHA 7 56 1000.0 610.0 41663 2006 38089 1739 0.3 0.1 99.6 AL OPELIKA 66 31 50.0 207.0 10492 469 9990 460 0.0 0.0 100.0 AL OZARK 34 33 50.0 142.0 8785 229 8749 228 0.7 0.1 100.0 AL SELMA 8 55 1000.0 515.0
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00019.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00019.pdf
  • i.e., clock, personal and portable, we find that the area where such receivers could potentially experience degradation from interference is small, generally 1 km or less from an LPFM antenna site. This interference analysis is shown in the following table: LPFM Potential Interference Radius Receiver Category Desired Signal Level -45 dBm -55 dBm -65 dBm Clock 0.3 km 0.7 km 2.1 km Portable 1.0 km 0.9 km 1.0 km Personal 0.4 km 0.5 km 0.5 km Further, we believe that this analysis provides a conservative estimate of actual interference potential of LPFM given NAB's performance criteria and the fact that NAB's sample included some of the poorer performing radios among the four studies. In addition, as pointed out by Rappaport and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Agenda/2002/ag021107.html
  • OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY TITLE: Amendment of Part 2 of the Commissions Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems (ET Docket No. 00-258). SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Second Report and Order that would allocate spectrum in the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz bands that can be used to provide advanced wireless services (AWS), such as those services commonly identified as 3G or IMT-2000. 5 WIRELESS TELE-COMMUNICATIONS TITLE: Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands. SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking concerning service rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210101-1.pdf
  • people with disabili- ties by fostering the development, adaptation, and broad use of innovations in communication technology. Now in its second year, the company has invested over $500,000 on this program. 3 See United States Architecture and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, Telecommunications Access Advisory Committee, ACCESS TO TELECOMMJ- NICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND CUSTOMER PREMISES EQUIPMENT BY INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES, Final Report ll2.1 (January 1997). 4 Examples of recent Ameritech Pioneers activities include: The Cabins in the Woods. Working with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, the Pioneers have funded and built three cabins, which are fully accessible to people with physical disabilities, so that they can enjoy some time in a natural setting. Sports Jamboree for the Physically Challenged. Each year Ameritech
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Factsheets/tribal_lands_fact_sheet.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Factsheets/tribal_lands_fact_sheet.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Factsheets/tribal_lands_fact_sheet.txt
  • authorities, an additional reduction in a qualified subscriber's local phone bill of up to $3.50 per month in certain states. Thus, the maximum, federal lifeline assistance support per month for any subscriber is $7.00. These two programs amount to approximately $550 million a year. - $500 million for Lifeline; $50 million for Link Up. 5.3 million Americans receive Lifeline service; 2.1 million Americans receive Link Up service. These programs are part of the Universal Service Fund, and funding is assessed on carriers' interstate and international end-user telecommunications revenues. CHANGES TO CURRENT PROGRAMS The order increases the discount off the local phone bill that eligible low-income consumers on tribal lands can receive under the current federal Lifeline program by $25. Under the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.wp
  • at 13; NPSTC Comments at 10. 56 See California Comments at para. 41. 57 See Ericsson Comments at 4; California Comments at paras. 5, and 19. 58 See e.g. Comments of NPSTC at 10; FLEWUG Comments at 9. 59 See, e.g., National Plan Report and Order, 3 FCC Rcd at 907; PSWAC Final Report at 18. 60 See key finding 2.1.1 of the PSWAC Final Report at 18. 15 3. Types of Communications 22. In order to successfully perform their missions in the modern world, public safety entities must rely on a forward-looking spectrum policy that promotes beneficial technological advances into their communications systems.51 When the Commission last allocated spectrum for public safety in 1987 it acknowledged the need for both
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da991200.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da991200.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da991200.txt
  • colloquially referred to as the WTO Basic Telecom Agreement, though they are not technically contained in a stand-alone agreement. See Bell Atlantic-NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT-MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. at 41,558 �� 2.1, 2.2 (``Guidelines''). See Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (Revised, April 8, 1997) (``1997 Revised Guidelines''). Application at Exhibit 3. AirTouch Communications, AirTouch Factbook: Mid-Year 1998, at 2-3. AirTouch also holds minority investment interests in Globalstar, a satellite-based mobile phone system; in QUALCOMM, a U.S.-based telecommunications equipment manufacturer; and in IDC,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.wp
  • shares retained by PRTA will be transferred to a newly created government instrumentality organized as a subsidiary of the Government Development Bank of Puerto Rico. Id. at 13 n.13. For convenience, we refer to this future entity as "PRTA." 24 Id. at 4. 25 Id. at 4 n.5; GTE Holdings, February 5, 1999 Letter at 2; see Shareholders Agreement, � 2.1 (filed as an Attachment to the GTE Holdings, February 5, 1999 Letter). GTE Holdings states that it intends to name the chief executive officer of PRTC. Radio License Applications at 4. GTE Holdings' power is, however, limited by provisions requiring unanimous consent of the directors named by PRTA or approval by PRTA for certain major actions or actions directly affecting
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000721.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000721.txt
  • These include but may extend beyond factors relating to cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. See also, Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997). These include, in this case, mobile voice services, mobile data services, and messaging services. Applications at 9. These markets are cellular service areas, as follows: Phoenix, Tucson, Tucson unserved, Albuquerque and Arizona-2. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 22.942. Applications at 9. DOJ also requires that the Applicants divest these licenses
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00053.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00053.txt
  • colloquially referred to as the WTO Basic Telecom Agreement, though they are not technically contained in a stand-alone agreement. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. at 41,558 �� 2.1, 2.2. See Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (Revised, April 8, 1997). VoiceStream/Omnipoint Public Interest Statement at 1. We do not further discuss competitive issues regarding these LMDS licenses because Omnipoint is neither a local exchange carrier nor a multi-channel video programming distributor (cable operator). See generally �� 20.6(d) and 22.942(d).
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2001/fcc01256.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2001/fcc01256.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2001/fcc01256.txt
  • examine a number of actions we might take to remove unnecessary regulatory barriers to the development of more robust secondary markets in radio spectrum usage rights. Notice of Proposed Rule Making, supra n.18, at � 1. In the Matter of Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting Private Operational Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service & Cable Television Relay Service, 10 FCC Rcd 7074 (1995). See Declaratory Ruling and Order, supra n.14; and Public Notice, supra n.15. See Two-Way Order, supra n.16, 13 FCC Rcd at 19173. For a more complete description of the evolution of the flexible
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc00289.pdf
  • by 2003 over 66 percent of all wireless subscribers will use SMS to send and receive messages, get information, make data inquiries, and schedule reservations.374 SMS is particularly popular in Europe. By April 1999, customers in the European Union were transmitting one billion short messages per month.375 Sonera (Finland) reports that by year-end 1999 more than 60 percent of its 2.1 million subscribers were using SMS and averaged 21 messages per month.376 367 Id. at 26. 368 Id. at 28. 369 Id. at 29. 370 Id. at 30. 371 Andrew M. Seybold, Short Messaging Service (SMS), MOTHERING MAGAZINE, June 25, 1999, available in 1999 WL 16633524. GSM networks permit messages of 160 characters, CDMA permits 256 characters, and iDEN allows 140
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc98091.pdf
  • through their existing broadband PCS, cellular, and SMR licenses. Third, customers can switch providers at low cost.264 Analysts note that the monthly churn265 in paging is higher than other segments of the wireless industry partially due to a lower up front investment. Churn in the paging industry was 2.8 percent at year-end 1996 compared to 1.5 percent for SMR and 2.1 percent for cellular.266 Fourth, as noted above, in response to competition, paging carriers have begun to transform themselves from "paging" carriers to "messaging" carriers. Finally, as noted in the Second Report, paging prices are quite low compared to other CMRS services.267 While there 260First Report, at 8867-68; Second Report, at 11305. 261Second Report, at 11305. 262Id. 263PageMart signed an agreement
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Martin/Statements/2002/stkjm219.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Martin/Statements/2002/stkjm219.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Martin/Statements/2002/stkjm219.txt
  • Order at 68. See also Order at 53, 72, 76 and 85. [112][13] I approve only the auctions, eligibility and broadcast carriage sections of the Order at V.B.5, V.B.2.b and V.B.1.d respectively. [113][14] Fox Television Stations v. FCC, 280 F.3d 1027, 1042 (D.C. Cir. 2002); United States Telephone Association v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521 (D.C. Cir. 1999). [114][15] 47 C.F.R. 2.1. [115][16] See note 1, supra. [116][17] Order at 68. [117][18] Order at 19. [118][19] See note 3, above. [119][20] Order at 72: In adopting these EPFD limits, we find that an increase of 10% over current DBS unavailability is the appropriate starting point for our analysis but need not be a strict limit. (emphasis supplied). See also 79 and 84,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp208.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp208.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp208.txt
  • difficult proceeding for the Commission, but we believe the Commission has arrived at a policy that appropriately balances the competing interests while allowing an important new service to move forward. We look forward to an auction for these licenses in the near future and the provision of the corresponding new services to the American people. _______________________ [4][1] See 47 C.F.R. 2.1 (harmful interference is defined as interference which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service.. . . ) References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp208.txt 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp208.pdf 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp208.html#_ftn1 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp208.html#_ftnref1
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp211.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp211.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp211.txt
  • area operation. See 47 CFR 1.929(d)(1). [26][6] A similar argument applies to DBS interference complaints that arise more than a year after the MVDDS service is installed. Any interference issues should be detected and repaired in a reasonable time and providing all parties a year to get it right strikes a reasonable balance of the interests. [27][7] See 47 C.F.R. 2.1 (harmful interference is defined as interference which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service.. .. ) Harmful interference has never been defined on a service specific basis. Therefore the dissents criticism of our failure to do so here also rings hollow. Prior to initiation of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/2001/stgt124.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/2001/stgt124.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/2001/stgt124.txt
  • prices charged to buyers). See Merger Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. at 41556-41557 � 1.3. See, e.g. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. at 363 (``[A] significant increase in the concentration . . . must be enjoined in the absence of evidence clearly showing that the merger is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects.''). See also Merger Guidelines at 41558 �� 2.1, 2.2; New York v. Kraft General Foods, 926 F. Supp. 321, 359 (S.D.N.Y. 1995); Amendment of Parts 20 and 24 of the Commission's Rules -- Broadband PCS Competitive Bidding and the Commercial Mobile Radio Service Spectrum Cap, WT Docket No. 96-59, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 7824 (1996). See Merger Guidelines Section 4; see, e.g., FTC v. University Health,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.txt
  • where such receivers could potentially experience degradation from interference is small, generally 1 km or less. This interference analysis is shown in the following table: LPFM Potential Interference Radius Based on NAB Tests Receiver Category Desired Signal Level -45 dBm (Close to Station) -55 dBm (~Principle Community) -65 dBm (~Protected Service) Clock 0.3 km (0.2 mi.) 0.7 km (0.4 mi.) 2.1 km (1.3 mi.) Portable 1.0 km (0.6 mi.) 0.9 km (0.6 mi.) 1.0 km (0.6 mi.) Personal 0.4 km (0.3 mi.) 0.5 km (0.3 mi.) 0.5 km (0.3 mi.) The above Table shows the approximate radius around an LPFM station where interference could potentially occur to a 3rd adjacent channel full service station with different types of radios, based on
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-280705A1.html
  • during the inspection but found the EAS equipment non-operational. He was unable to produce any evidence, EAS logs, or printouts to demonstrate that the EAS had been operational at any point during the past year. He also stated the printer for the EAS had been broken for a year. Inspection of the transmitter site revealed station WMER-AM was operating at 2.1 kW at night, instead of the required 0.101 kW. Mr. Glass confirmed that the station had been using the same STL since the station began operations, but was not able to provide a current license for the STL. The only license found expired June 1, 2004. A search of the FCC licensee database did not reveal a current license for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01018.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01018.html
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. ��87.193-87.199. Harmful Interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. ��2.1 & 76.613(a). Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 F.C.C.2d 117, para. 14 (1985) [hereinafter MO&O]. 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47 C.F.R.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01173.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01173.html
  • Joanne Suppa) at 1, � 3; Complaint at 3, � 10; Answer at 2, � 4; COMSAT Brief at 3, 4. In fact, with regard to Standard-A service to and from the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean regions, the parties' contract provided solely for the sale of INMARSAT space segment. January 16, 2001 Letter at Attachment B, Attachment 1 at � 2.1; Answer at 3, � 5; COMSAT Brief at 4; IDB Supplemental Brief at 4. See January 16, 2001 Letter at Exhibit A. Id. at Exhibit A, � 1.8. Id. at Exhibit A, Annex A, � 1.1. Id. at Exhibit A, � 2.3. Id. at Exhibit A, � 1.3. See February 2, 2001 Letter at 1. COMSAT Brief at 4, 7,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-937A1.html
  • frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. 87.193-87.199. 4 Harmful Interference includes any interference that "endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services." See 47 C.F.R. 2.1 & 76.613(a). 5 Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 F.C.C.2d 117, para. 14 (1985) [hereinafter MO&O]. 6 47 C.F.R. 76.605(a)(12). 7 47 C.F.R. 76.611(a). 8 47 C.F.R. 76.1804(g). 9 47 C.F.R. 76.614.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-105A1.html
  • Complaint, Exhibit F (MCImetro/Bell Atlantic Interconnection Agreement 1997). 31 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, 25. 32 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, 26. 33 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, 27. 34 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, 27. 35 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, 28. 36 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Complaint, Exhibit I (Second Starpower-Verizon Virginia Agreement) at 5, 2.1. 37 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, 29. The parties did not include a complete copy of the Second Starpower- Verizon Virginia Agreement as an exhibit to any of their pleadings. Rather than referencing multiple exhibits when discussing the agreement, we hereafter cite exclusively to the parties' joint stipulations regarding the agreement's terms. 38 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 7,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-156A1.html
  • between both networks, which prevented [AACR] from fulfilling its international correspondent undertakings, and offering its services to customers owning a TRICOM line''). 50 Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 7, 1.19 (``calls originating in our network and intended for TRICOM were being blocked by limitations on the capacity attributable solely to TRICOM''). See Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 8, 2.1 (AACR was forced to ``request from international companies with whom [it] hold[s] correspondent relations to abstain from sending [AACR] calls intended for TRICOM network [sic], due to the inability to complete them . . .''). 51 Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 18, 2.3; Supp. Joint Submission at 2, 7 (stipulating that .68 centavos Dominicanos is equal to 4.2 cents
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-300A1.html
  • 76.616. These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. 87.193-87.199. 5 Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. 2.1 & 76.613(a). 6 Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, para. 14 (1985) (hereinafter MO&O). 7 47 C.F.R. 76.605(a)(12). 8 47 C.F.R. 76.611(a). 9 47 C.F.R. 76.615(b)(7). 10 47 C.F.R.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3408A1.html
  • 76.616. These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. 87.193-87.199. 4 Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. 2.1 & 76.613(a). 5 Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, para. 14 (1985) (hereinafter MO&O). 6 47 C.F.R. 76.605(a)(12). 7 47 C.F.R. 76.611(a). 8 47 C.F.R. 76.1804(g). 9 47 C.F.R.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-106A1.html
  • Z-Tel's ``disavowal,'' but upon the totality of Z-Tel's statements and omissions during the proceeding. See Liability Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 7580, 29 n.67. 52 Petition at 4-5, 17-20. 53 Letter dated December 7, 2001 from Christopher M. Heimann, counsel to Pacific, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC, File No. EB-01-MD-017 (``Heimann Letter'') Ex. 1 (Pacific Agreement) at Attachment 6, 2.1. 54 Heimann Letter Ex. 1 (Pacific Agreement) at Attachment 6, 7.4.1 (providing that the shared transport UNE may be used for intraLATA toll ``if requested by [Z-Tel] in connection with LSNE option `C' under Section 6.5.3 above.'') 55 Heimann Letter Ex. 1 (Pacific Agreement) at Attachment 6, 6.5.3. 56 Petition at 5. Accord Petition at 17-20. 57 With regard to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1014A1.html
  • 17, 2005. 8 Public Notice, FCC Clarifies Equipment Certification Procedures for ``Learned Mode'' or ``Trainable'' Transmitters, 17 FCC Rcd 21423 (OET 2002). 9 Section 15.3(o) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.3(o), defines an intentional radiator as ``A device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 10 47 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J. 11 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' 12 47 C.F.R. 2.939(a)(2). 13 47 C.F.R. 2.939(a)(4). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.pdf 2.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1029A1.html
  • Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 Letter from Houda Nounou, Assistant General Counsel, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., to Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (March 16, 2005). 2 You also indicated that Wal-Mart has returned its inventory of 54 units to the supplier and permanently discontinued marketing this product. 3 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 4 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1029A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1029A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1030A1.html
  • advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1Additionally, in response to a Letter of Inquiry, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. identified GPS Outfitters as its supplier of Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antennas. See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Citation, DA 05-1029 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., released April 8, 2005). 2 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 3 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1030A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1030A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1031A1.html
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1031A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1031A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1033A1.html
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1033A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1033A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1034A1.html
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1034A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1034A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1035A1.html
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1035A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1035A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1036A1.html
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1036A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1036A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1037A1.html
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1037A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1037A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1107A1.html
  • this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 Letter from Bob Baker, Vice President, Dallas Avionics, Inc., to Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (March 30,2005). 2 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 3 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1107A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1107A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1155A1.html
  • Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Ming-Hang Ho, Gilsson Technologies (March 7, 2005). 2 See Letter from Ming-Hang Ho, Gilsson Technologies, to Thomas Fitz-Gibbon and Yasin Ozer, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (March 26, 2005) (``Response''). 3 You also indicated that Gilsson has permanently removed the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas from its website. 4 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' 5 Response at 2. 6 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1155A1.pdf
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-191A1.html
  • C.F.R. 15.205(a). 3 Public Notice, FCC Clarifies Equipment Certification Procedures for ``Learned Mode'' or ``Trainable'' Transmitters, DA 02-2850 (October 28, 2002). 4 Section 15.3 (o), of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.3(o), defines an intentional radiator as ``A device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 5 47 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J 6 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 7 The OET Laboratory determined that the LRT-1 was capable of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2998A1.html
  • amplified signal through another antenna. These devices are commonly used to deliver a strong GPS signal indoors for testing, calibrating, or experimenting with GPS receivers in a controlled environment. 3 See Letter from Robert G. Kirk to Neal McNeil (March 2, 2005). 4 Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The re-radiators and repeaters purposely transmit RF energy on these restricted frequencies.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-337A1.html
  • This Consent Decree cannot be modified without the advance written consent of both Parties. 25. This Consent Decree may be signed in counterparts. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Perfect Fit Industries, Inc.: ________________________________ Louis R. Morris President and Chief Executive Officer ________________________________ Date _________________________ 1 47 U.S.C. 302a(b). 2 47 C.F.R. 2.1 et seq. and 15.1 et seq. 3 47 U.S.C. 154(i). 4 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. 5 47 U.S.C. 302a(b). 6 47 C.F.R. 2.1 et seq. and 15.1 et seq. 7 Perfect Fit Industries, Inc., 19 FCC Rcd 19889 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., 2004). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-337A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-337A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-472A1.html
  • 47 C.F.R. 0.459. 3 Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. Application for Review (filed October 22, 2004). On November 15, 2004, PFI filed a Supplement to its Application for Review. Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. Supplement to Application for Review (filed November 15, 2004). 4 Perfect Fit Industries, Inc., DA 05-337 (Enf. Bur., February 10, 2005). 5 47 U.S.C. 302a(b). 6 47 C.F.R. 2.1 et seq. and 15.1 et seq. 7 Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. Motion to Withdraw Application for Review (filed February 10, 2005). PFI included the November 15, 2004 Supplement to its Application for Review within the scope of its Motion to Withdraw. 8 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-472A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-472A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1442A1.html
  • Systems, Inc., 1F No. 21 Yanfa, 2^nd Road, SBIP, Hsinchu City, Taiwan. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Joseph P. Casey Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(a). 47 C.F.R. S 15.247(d). A wireless access point is a transmitter/receiver used to provide wireless internet access. Industry Canada is a regulatory agency of the Canadian Government. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to AboCom Systems, Inc. (March
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1555A1.html
  • 22. This Consent Decree cannot be modified without the advance written consent of both Parties. 23. This Cnsent Decree may be signed in counterparts. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Applied Wireless Identifications Group, Inc.: ________________________________ Larry Kellam Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S 2.1 et seq. and S 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S 154(i). 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S 2.1 et seq. and S 15.1 et seq. Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1555 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1555 3 References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1555A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1555A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2019A1.html
  • Communications Commission See Letter from Kathryn Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to LightObject d/b/a Actionbuy Trading Co. (March 20, 2006). See Letter from Kachun Wong to Neal McNeil, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (April 24, 2006). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The 1.2 GHz wireless camera purposely transmits RF energy on restricted frequencies.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2452A1.html
  • requirements of this Consent Decree shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the Effective Date. 23. This Consent Decree may be signed in counterparts. For: Boston Scientific Corporation ___________________________ William F. McConnell, Jr. Senior Vice President, Administration Date: ___________________________ For: Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission ____________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau Date: __________________________ 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S 2.1 et seq. and S 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S 154(i). 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S 2.1 et seq. and S 15.101 et seq. Respironics, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation, Order, ET Docket No. 05-331, DA 06-2316 (OET, released November 16, 2006). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-489A1.html
  • Debarment, File No. EB-06-IH-0853 Dear Mr. Tsao: The Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'' or ``Commission'') has received notice of the conviction of Premio, Inc., f/k/a Premio Computers, Inc. (``Premio'') for conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. 1, and for mail fraud and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341 and 2.1 Consequently, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. 54.521, this letter constitutes official notice of Premio's suspension from the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism (``E-rate program''). In addition, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') hereby notifies Premio that we are commencing debarment proceedings against it.2 I. Notice of Suspension Pursuant to section 54.521(a)(4) of the Commission's rules,3 Premio's conviction requires the Bureau to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-30A1.html
  • Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4388 P 5 (1991); Callais Cablevision, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd 1359, 1362 P 9 (2001). See 47 U.S.C. S 503(b); 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(f). See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7591 P 4 (2002). See supra note 11 and accompanying text. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1 defines "spurious emissions" as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." See GPS Networking, Inc., RM-11002, 20 FCC Rcd 12256, 12258 (2005). It
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1673A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1673 1
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1674A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1674 1
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1675A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1675 1
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1676A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1676 1
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1754A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1754 2
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1756A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1756 3
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1757A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1757 4
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1758A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1758 4
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1763A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1763 4
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1764A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1764 2
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1766A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1766 4
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1767A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1767 4
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1784A1.html
  • Spectrum Enf. Div. 2006). 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(a). A wireless access point is a transmitter/receiver used to provide wireless internet access. 47 C.F.R. S 15.247(d). Industry Canada is a regulatory agency of the Canadian government. AboCom received a grant of equipment authorization for the wireless access point under FCC ID MQ4ARM94 on April 22, 2004. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as an "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to AboCom Systems, Inc.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2150A1.html
  • 10, 2006) ("Response") at 4, P 10, Exhibit 1, Application of Salsgiver Telecom, Inc. for approval to offer, render, furnish or supply telecommunication services as a Competitive Access Provider to the Public in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Order, Docket No. A-311373, Feb. 7, 2006 ("Salsgiver CAP Authorization Order") at 2-6. CAP Tariff, "Application of Tariff" and "Service Offered" and Sections 2.1.1., 3.1, Pages 4, 8 and 25 of 28. Complaint at 1-2, P 3; Response at 2, P 3. Section 224(a)(1) of the Act defines "utility," in pertinent part, as "a local exchange carrier ... who owns or controls poles, ducts, conduits, or rights-of-way used, in whole or in part, for any wire communications." 47 U.S.C. S 224(a)(1). 47 U.S.C. S
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-299A1.html
  • use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. 47 C.F.R. S 2.801 defines a radiofrequency device as "any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radiofrequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means." Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Citation (Compliance and Inf. Bur., Compliance Div., Inv. Group, February 13, 1997). The citation was issued pursuant to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-304A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-307A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-308A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-309A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-310A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-311A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-312A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-313A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3266A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3266 3
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3270A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3270 2
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3392A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3392 3
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3393A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3393 3
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3483A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3483 3
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3974A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission See Letter from Kathryn Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Surveillance-Video.com (March 13, 2007). See Letter from Reuben Weinstein, President, Surveillance-Video.com to Jacqueline Johnson, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (April 16, 2007). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The 1.2 GHz wireless camera purposely transmits RF energy on restricted frequencies.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4017A1.html
  • LLC ("Rally") is a Washington-state company that specializes in communications investments. Rally is the secured and only lender of Telesphere. On September 20, 2006, Rally completed an accelerated conversion of Telephere debt to equity, acquiring a majority stock ownership of 64.9 percent in Telesphere and effectively obtaining control of Telesphere. Shortly thereafter on October 4, 2006, Rally acquired an additional 2.1 percent interest, increasing the company's stock ownership in Telesphere to 67 percent. 7. On October 12, 2006, Rally and Telesphere filed a joint domestic and international section 214 application to the Commission for approval of the transfers of control. The applicants stated that the acquisition of corporate control was necessary to improve immediately the financial position of Telesphere. Subsequently on
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4721A1.html
  • is anything but punitive. We therefore direct NPTC, within 60 days, to amend the Pole Attachment Agreement to limit the penalty for unauthorized attachments to compensatory damages, in accordance with Mile Hi Cable Partners. 1. Salsgiver's Other Facial Challenges to the Pole Attachment Agreement Are Denied. 29. Salsgiver's remaining claims are denied. Contrary to Salsgiver's allegations, we find that sections 2.1, 5.2.1, 5.3, 6.1, 6.4, 6.7, 9.1, 9.2, and 9.5 of the Pole Attachment Agreement are not facially unlawful. As to its claims regarding sections 2.6, 3.2, 5.11, 5.5.4, 6.2, 6.6, and 6.16 of the Pole Attachment Agreement, Salsgiver has failed to meet its burden of proving the facts necessary to show that those provisions would be unlawful, as applied. Salsgiver
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-472A1.html
  • "Carrier does not transmit messages pursuant to this Tariff, but its services may be used for that purpose." We conclude, based on an examination of the Tariff as a whole, that DQE CNS does, in fact, offer to transmit information of the user's choosing through its CAP Tariff, and thus qualifies as a "telecommunications carrier" under the Act. 15. Section 2.1.A of the CAP Tariff states: "This Tariff contains the regulations and rates applicable to intrastate telecommunications services provided by Carrier [DQE CNS] to business customers for the origination and termination of telecommunications between points within the State." Section 1 defines "Telecommunications" as the "transmission of voice communications or, subject to the transmission capabilities of the service, the transmission of data,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-486A1.html
  • [that] details services, equipment and pricing offered by the telephone company (a common carrier) to all potential customers") (emphasis added). See CAP Tariff Section 1, 3^rd Revised page 1; Switched Access Tariff, Original Title Page. Similar language describing the carrier's undertaking to offer service in accordance with the terms of its tariffs is contained in Fibertech's IXC Tariff at Section 2.1.1, Original page 1, and its IXC Reseller Tariff at Section 2.1.1, Original page 1. See Response at 13, P 40; NPTC May 25 Letter at 1-4. Fibertech May 5 Letter at 1. Chiaino Declaration at 2, PP 2-3. See, e.g., NPTC May 25 Letter at 1-4; Response at 6-8, 12-13 PP 13, 16-17, 40; NPTC Dec. 15 Letter at 1,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4874A1.html
  • Rules defines "marketing" as the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The GPS intercept device (which operates in the 1575.42 MHz band) and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-14A1.html
  • Initial Brief on Damages at 20-22; Defendants' Reply Brief on Damages at 6-10. See, e.g., Damages Joint Statement at 12; Damages Reply at 26-27; Defendants' Initial Brief on Damages at 17-19, 25 and Att. 5; Defendants' Reply Brief on Damages at 9, Attachment B (directing Debit Card Providers to maintain call information). See, e.g., Liability Answer at Attachment B-11, part 2.1. Defendants' Initial Brief on Damages at 20-22 (citing C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc., Hearing Designation Order, 16 FCC Rcd 8801, 8808 at P 21 (Enf. Bur. 2001); New Valley Corp. v. Pacific Bell, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 5128, 5134 at P 14 (2000); Hi-Tech Furnace Systems, Inc. v. FCC, 224 F.3d 781, 787
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1019A1.html
  • Date of the Consent Decree. 24. This Consent Decree cannot be modified without the advance written consent of both Parties. 25. This Consent Decree may be signed in counterparts. For the Enforcement Bureau: ____________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau __________________________ Date For Rajant Corporation: ___________________________ Robert Schena Chief Executive Officer ___________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 C.F.R. S: S: 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.101 et seq. Letter from Kathryn Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau to Robert Schena, Chief Executive Officer, Rajant Corporation (September 4, 2007). Letter from Patricia J. Paoletta, Esq., Counsel
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1196A1.html
  • Rules defines "marketing" as the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The GPS Jammer (which operates in the 1450 MHz to 1600 MHz
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1202A1.html
  • radio frequency energy by radiation or induction." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(o). Section 2.803(e)(4) of the Rules defines "marketing" as the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.807(d). 47 U.S.C. S:S: 154 (i), 154 (j) and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-155A1.html
  • Rules defines "marketing" as the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The GPS Blocker (which operates in the 1450 MHz to 1600 MHz
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1685A1.html
  • Rules defines "marketing" as the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." Your response indicates that the 1.3 GHz device is shipped with a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2051A1.html
  • Sincerely, Kathryn S. Berthot Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau www.ebay.com. Section 2.803(e)(4) of the Rules defines "marketing" as the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." Furthermore, section 2.803(g) of the Rules provides that radio frequency devices that
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-177A1.html
  • others will be referred to the FCC's International Bureau for processing. Administration of effective spectrum policy requires that licensees comply with Commission rules and that the Commission is vigilant in its oversight. This will foster a level playing field for competition and encourage technological innovation. The American public requires and deserves no less. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.101 et seq. 47 C.F.R. S: 25.120. 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.101 et seq. 47 C.F.R. S: 25.120. See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, FCC, to William J. Bailey, Senior Vice President, Regulatory and Government Affairs, XM
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1050A1.html
  • an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ Kathryn S. Berthot Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Monster Cable Products, Inc. and Monster LLC: ________________________________ David Tognotti General Counsel and Vice President of Administration ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.1 et seq. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to David Tognotti, General Counsel, Monster, LLC (February 9, 2007) ("February 9, 2007 LOI"). 47 U.S.C. S:
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1428A1.html
  • (2007); see also, Pilot Travel Centers, LLC, Notice of Apparent Liability, 19 FCC Rcd 23113, 23114 (2004) ("[R]adio transmitting equipment that transmits solely on Amateur Radio Service ("ARS") frequencies is not subject to equipment authorization requirements prior to manufacture or marketing."). 47 C.F.R. S:15.205(a). This section allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Section 2.1 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1, defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." Marketing, as defined in 47
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1697A1.html
  • the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). 47 U.S.C. S: 333. Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The GPS-JM2 GPS Jammer (which operates in the 1450 MHz to 1600
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1772A1.html
  • Rules defines "marketing" as the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b)(3). See 5 U.S.C. S: 552(a)(e)(3). See 18
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-214A1.html
  • facsimile), each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Humax Co., Ltd.: ________________________________ Tae Hun Kim President, U.S. Operation ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.1 et seq. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Jaeho Lee, Humax Co., Ltd. (April 20, 2006) ("April 20, 2006 LOI"). 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b).
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-215A1.html
  • by facsimile), each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Wistron NeWeb Corporation: ________________________________ Jeffrey Gau Chief Operating Officer ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.1 et seq. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Edward Yeh, Wistron NeWeb Corporation (April 20, 2006) ("April 20, 2006 LOI"). 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b).
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-226A1.html
  • each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Ki Ryung Electronics Co., Ltd.: ________________________________ Young-hoon Bae President and CEO ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.1 et seq. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, to I.C. Kim, Q&C Department Manager, Ki Ryung Electronics Co., Ltd. (dated June 20, 2006). 47 U.S.C.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-229A1.html
  • any number of counterparts (including by facsimile), each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. _______________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date ________________________________ Thomas C. Malone Senior Vice President Audiovox Corporation ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1 et seq. and 15.1 et seq. See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau to Mr.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2506A1.html
  • Rules defines "marketing" as the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The listed video transmitters intentionally transmit radio frequency energy on restricted frequencies.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-670A1.html
  • facsimile), each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. ________________________________ Kathryn S. Berthot Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date ________________________________ D. Bruce Sewell Senior Vice President and General Counsel Intel Corporation ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1 et seq., 15.1 et seq., and 68.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1 et seq., 15.1 et seq., and 68.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b); 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1 et seq., 15.1 et seq. and 68.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-09-2623A1.html
  • C.F.R. S:15.3(o). See 47 C.F.R. S: 15.201. A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1031 - 2.1060. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The video transmitters listed in your response intentionally transmit radio frequency energy
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1164A1.html
  • Id. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(g). 47 C.F.R. S: 15.201(b). Section 15.3(o) of the Rules defines an "intentional radiator" as a "device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(o). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). Id. Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]mission[s] on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The subject transmitters intentionally transmit radio frequency energy on restricted frequencies within
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1165A1.html
  • Operation of Low Power Auxiliary Stations in the 698-806 Band, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 25 FCC Rcd 643 (2010). Effective June 12, 2010, operation of wireless microphones in the 700 MHz frequency band is prohibited. 47 C.F.R. S: 74.851(g). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Section 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]mission[s] on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The subject wireless microphones intentionally transmit radio frequency energy on restricted frequencies
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1538A1.html
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including for use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. S:S:87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that "endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services." See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1, 76.613(a). Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, P: 14 (1985). 47 C.F.R. S:76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. S:76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. S:76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. S:76.614. 47 C.F.R. S:76.613(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 76.1706.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1539A1.html
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including for use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. S:S:87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that "endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services." See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1, 76.613(a). Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, P: 14 (1985). 47 C.F.R. S:76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. S:76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. S:76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. S:76.614. 47 C.F.R. S:76.613(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 76.1706.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1540A1.html
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including for use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. S:S:87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that "endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services." See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1, 76.613(a). Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, P: 14 (1985). 47 C.F.R. S:76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. S:76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. S:76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. S:76.614. 47 C.F.R. S:76.613(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 76.1706.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1651A1.html
  • S:76.616. These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V; 47 C.F.R. S:S: 87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that "endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services." See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1, 76.613(a). See Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, P: 14 (1985). See 47 C.F.R. S:76.605(a)(12). See 47 C.F.R. S: 76.615(b)(7). See 47 C.F.R. S: 76.611(a). See 47 C.F.R. S:
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/FCC-12-19A1.html
  • G, Interconnection Agreement-Texas between Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and UTEX Communications Corp. at 17; Answer at 7, para. 8; Answer Legal Analysis at 14. 47 U.S.C. S:S: 251, 252. See, e.g., Stipulated Facts at 6, para. 17; Complaint at Ex. G. See, e.g., Complaint Exhibit G, Interconnection Agreement-Texas between Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and UTEX Communications Corp. at 378, S: 2.1.1. See, e.g., Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 6-7; Stipulated Facts at 2-4. See, e.g., Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 7-8; Stipulated Facts at 2-4. The parties identify a caveat to the facts stated in paragraph 3 above, but that caveat is not relevant here. Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 4-7. See, e.g., Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 7-8; Stipulated Facts at 2-6. See, e.g.,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc0034.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc0034.txt
  • deployed such fix beginning in September 1992. NYT Brief at 4-5. Even though this software fix eventually failed and NYT's network again permitted secondary dialtone to occur, we find that NYT's failure to correct the secondary dialtone problem on its first attempt does not constitute unjust or unreasonable conduct. NYT Brief at 3. NYNEX FCC Tariff No. 1 at � 2.1.3(A). See NYT Brief at 4 (citing AT&T v. New York City Human Resources Admin., 833 F.Supp. 962, 974 (S.D.N.Y. 1993), Gentile v. Garden City Alarm Co., Inc., 541 N.Y.S.2d 505 (App. Div. 1989)). We note that while there does not appear to be any consensus in Commission, state, or federal cases, NYT's proffered definition of "willful misconduct" is similar to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-431A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-431A1.pdf
  • 418-2180 D. MB Docket No. 04-269; RM- 11010 Action: At the request of Linda A. Davidson, we are allotting Channel 299A at San Joaquin, California as the community's second local FM transmission service. Coordinates: The reference coordinates for Channel 299A at San Joaquin are 36-36-00 North Latitude and 120-12-36 West Longitude. Additional Information: This allotment requires a site restriction of 2.1 kilometers (1.2 miles) west to avoid a short-spacing to the licensed site for Station KZOL(FM), Channel 200B1, North Fork, California. FCC Contact: Sharon P. McDonald (202) 418-2180 E. MB Docket No. 04-270; RM-11012 Action: At the request of Charles Crawford, we are allotting Channel 281A at Rosepine, Louisiana, as the community's first local aural transmission service. Coordinates: The reference coordinates
• http://transition.fcc.gov/headlines2008.html
  • Regional Workshop and Roundtable. News Release: [1050]Word | [1051]Acrobat 6/23/08 FCC Grants Formal Complaint Regarding Verizon Customer Retention Practices. Order: [1052]Word | [1053]Acrobat Martin Statement: [1054]Word | [1055]Acrobat Copps Statement: [1056]Word | [1057]Acrobat McDowell Statement: [1058]Word | [1059]Acrobat Erratum: [1060]Word | [1061]Acrobat 6/20/08 FCC Seeks Comment on Proposed Rule Changes for Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) Spectrum in the 1.9 and 2.1 GHz Bands. News Release: [1062]Word | [1063]Acrobat FNPRM: [1064]Word | [1065]Acrobat 6/19/08 Commissioner Tate Honored By Cable In The Classroom. [1066]Word | [1067]Acrobat 6/17/08 Rules Amended to Require Telemarketers to Honor Do-Not-Call List Registrations Indefinitely. News Release: [1068]Word | [1069]Acrobat Order: [1070]Word | [1071]Acrobat Martin Statement: [1072]Word | [1073]Acrobat Copps Statement: [1074]Word | [1075]Acrobat Adelstein Statement: [1076]Word | [1077]Acrobat Tate
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files09/CREPOR09.pdf
  • 93.8 $133,039 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $18,855 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 46,969,454 0.0 0.2 5.7 0.0 94.1 Madagascar $7,008,866 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 99.7 $18,662 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $4,396 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 20,520,060 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 99.5 Malawi $2,117,160 0.0 0.4 2.4 0.0 97.2 $99,804 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $2,506 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 23,840,798 0.0 0.3 2.1 0.0 97.7 Mali $17,663,368 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 97.4 $492,644 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $7,878 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 113,242,828 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 97.8 Mauritania $2,628,349 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 96.4 $21,605 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $4,180 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 15,272,162 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 95.7 Mauritius $1,219,718 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.0 99.4 $1,216,978 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files10/CREPOR10.pdf
  • 6.5 2,065,338 25.4 0.0 3.3 6.5 64.8 Sierra Leone $15,504,746 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.1 98.0 $126,034 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $357,62016.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.6 44,631,099 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.2 98.1 Somalia $11,689,855 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.5 98.9 $14,391 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $18,306100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27,491,397 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.6 99.0 South Africa $26,008,374 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.1 97.8 $1,680,523 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $23,020,081 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 272,878,463 0.1 0.0 0.0 6.8 93.1 Sudan $5,628,829 0.1 0.0 0.5 11.1 88.4 $104,946 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $75,75721.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 78.5 47,603,637 0.1 0.0 0.3 11.6 88.1 Swaziland $575,043 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 96.6 $10,377 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $41697.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 4,631,354 0.0 0.0
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
  • 35.2 33.1 74.3 70.7 77.2 66.7 64.9 Independents 20.2 19.0 11.0 10.7 10.2 19.8 15.0 8.1 7.8 7.4 21.9 24.2 17.8 27.0 28.4 Local 14.4 13.3na na na 11.3 9.3na na na 18.1 22.2na na na Distant and Superstations 5.8 5.7na na na 8.5 5.6na na na 3.8 2.0na na na Public 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.1 3.8 5.1 5.0 6.3 6.7 Cable 13.5 25.7 33.0 46.6 49.7 24.5 39.3 45.0 54.9 57.4-- -- -- -- -- Basic 7.7 20.0 27.5 38.1 41.1 14.2 29.9 37.8 44.9 47.3-- -- -- -- -- Pay 5.8 5.7 5.5 5.5 5.4 10.4 9.3 7.2 6.4 6.2-- -- -- -- -- Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • forth more product variety, readily suggests population as an instrument for stations and formats. Columns 1 through 4 show how stations and formats vary with population, 12 Of course, a listening share that increases with population is sufficient, but not necessary, to show that 16 with and without controls. With controls, an additional million persons in the market brings forth 2.1 stations and 1.2 formats. The last two columns of table 3 show how AQH listening varies with stations and formats, including controls, using population as an instrument for stations and formats. The respective effects of stations and formats remain significant and are roughly double their OLS counterparts in table 2. This is a striking - although not a surprising -
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-c.pdf
  • Benefits Whom in Differentiated Product Markets. NBER working paper 7391. 33 Table 1: Stations and Listening, by Race and Format, 1997 101 Markets with Black Listening 54 Markets with Hisp. Listening Percent of Stations Percent of Listening Percent of Stations Percent of Listening Format Non-Black Black Non-Hisp. Hispanic Adult Contemp. (AC) 5.9 6.7 2.0 5.0 5.4 3.4 AC/Contemp. Hit Radio 2.1 2.9 0.8 2.3 2.9 1.5 Adult Contemp./New Rock 0.6 1.1 0.3 1.1 1.5 0.6 AC/Soft Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Album Oriented Rock (AOR) 5.3 6.0 0.7 4.5 4.9 2.4 AOR/Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 AOR/Classic Rock 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Album Oriented Rock/New Rock 3.0 3.7 0.5 3.1 3.3 1.9 Album
• http://transition.fcc.gov/pshs/techtopics/techtopics4.html
  • ^4 Portable Operating System Interface is the collective name of a family of IEEE standards that define the application programming interface (API) for software compatible with variants of the Unix operating system. The family of POSIX standards is formally designated as IEEE 1003 and the international standard name is ISO/IEC 9945. See [75]http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/posix/. ^5 See [76]http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-264A1.doc. ^6 47 C.F.R. Section 2.1. For the FCC order adopting this definition, see Facilitating Opportunities for Flexible, Efficient, and Reliable Spectrum Use Employing Cognitive Radio Technologies, ET Docket No. 03-108, Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 5486 (2005), also available at [77]http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.doc. ^7 See [78]http://www.sdrforum.org/. ^8 See [79]http://www.sdrforum.org/uploads/news_162003public_safety_sig_03_25_ 04.doc. ^9 See [80]http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuradio/. Linux is a free Unix-type operating system originally created by Linus Torvalds with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/realaudio/presentations/2003/021203/featuredetection.pdf
  • -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 x 10-7 Frequency (MHz) -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 x 10-7 Frequency (MHz) Power Spectr al D ens ity ( dBW /Hz) Power Spectr al D ens ity ( dBW /Hz) 31 �2003 The MITRE Corporation Spectrum of M-ary PSK Signal in Noise after Squaring 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3 x 10-7 Frequency (MHz) Power Spectr al D ens ity ( dBW /Hz) SNR > 10 dB 32 �2003 The MITRE Corporation Feature Detector Design Process I Using mathematical model of waveform, derive expression for cyclic correlation function � Account for modulation, filtering and equalization, statistics of data sequence � Example
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/00c/releases/fc000063.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/00c/releases/fc000063.pdf
  • Service (Other Than Broadcast), File No. 0314-EX-PL-1999, filed Dec. 1, 1999. Global Frontiers Petition for Rulemaking at 10-11. 47 C.F.R. � 26.101(a). 47 C.F.R. � 26.209(a). Table of Frequency Allocations, 47 C.F.R. � 2.106, international footnote S5.442. The aeronautical mobile service is defined as a mobile service between aeronautical stations and aircraft stations, or between aircraft stations. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). Footnote S5.442 also limits the sub-band 4825-4835 MHz to the mobile, except aeronautical mobile, service. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.105(c)(2) (setting forth restrictions for secondary services). Per international footnote S5.443, in Argentina, Australia, and Canada, the allocation of the sub-bands 4825-4835 MHz and 4950-4990 MHz to the radio astronomy service is on a primary basis. Table of Frequency Allocations, 47
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/fc980228.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/fc980228.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/fc980228.wp
  • (PCS) Licensees, WT Docket No. 97-82, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 12 FCC Rcd 16436, 16446 (1997) (C Block Second Report and Order). Mobility Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 6613, 6617. 54 The terms "mean power" and "peak power" (referred to as "peak envelope power") are defined at 47 C.F.R. 55 � 2.1(c). Limited to a maximum of 100 milliwatts peak power output, a mobile RTU is precluded from transmitting more than 100 milliwatts. With a 100 milliwatt mean power output limit, however, the output power is limited to 100 milliwatts only over a time interval, thereby permitting the RTU output power at some points during the time interval (the modulation peaks) to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/d980547a.pdf
  • of their respective boards or principals, and it is subject to negotiation with and consent of the United States and potential Designated Entities, as well as agreement to terms of final documentation. Neither this Term Sheet nor the Plan shall bind the FCC to approve the transactions contemplated by the Term Sheet or the Plan. 2 OVERVIEW OF THE PLAN 2.1 Subject to Sections 7.8 and 7.9, on the effective date of the Plan (the "Effective Date"), in exchange for payment of certain cash and entry into the agreements specified below: 2.1.1DCR shall transfer the Licenses for the Chicago MTA (hereinafter, the "Chicago Licenses") and the Licenses for the Dallas MTA (hereinafter the "Dallas Licenses") to certain subsidiaries of NEWGSM Co.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/06/releases/oroc6130.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/06/releases/oroc6130.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/06/releases/oroc6130.wp
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Unless otherwise indicated, "MDS" includes single channel Multipoint Distribution Service 1 stations and Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service stations. Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FCC 96-130 Washington, D.C. In the Matter of Amendment of Parts 21, 43, ) 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules ) Governing Use of the Frequencies in ) the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: ) Gen. Docket No. 90-54 Private Operational-Fixed Microwave ) Gen. Docket No. 80-113 Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, ) Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, ) Instructional Television Fixed Service, ) and Cable Television Relay Service. )) In the Matter of )) Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 of the ) Commission's Rules With Regard to ) Filing
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fc970112.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fc970112.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fc970112.wp
  • allocation for the broadcasting-satellite service (sound) in the 2310-2320 MHz and 2345-2360 MHz bands. WCS licensees will be permitted to provide any of these services. We Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-112 Out-of-band emissions are emissions on a frequency or frequencies immediately outside the necessary bandwidth which 5 result from the modulation process, but exclude spurious emissions. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Concurrent with the adoption of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we are denying WCA's Emergency Motion 6 for Stay, ruling that the Appropriations Act does not afford the Commission the authority to defer the commencement date of the WCS auction. See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish Part 27, the Wireless Communication s Service ("WCS"), GN Docket No. 96-228,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.wp
  • prior to commencing their operations. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106, international footnote S5.396 (formerly 751B). The Amateur Radio Service is a radiocommunication service for the purpose of self-training, intercommunication and 12 technical investigations carried out by amateurs, that is, by duly authorized persons interested in radio technique solely with a personal aim and without pecuniary interest. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. During the reallocation process, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration ("NTIA" ) 13 recommended the following constraints: (1) the 2300-2310 MHz band must not be used for airborne or space-to-Earth links; (2) commercial operations at 2300-2310 MHz must be limited to less than one watt of power; (3) unwanted emission levels of commercial applications on any frequency below 2300 MHz
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/15/releases/fc970070.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/15/releases/fc970070.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/15/releases/fc970070.wp
  • questions about the impact of satellite DARS on the financial viability of local broadcast stations. In general, the Commission encourages competition for the provision of telecommunications services wherever possible and removes barriers for new competitors. Commenters differ sharply on the effect of satellite DARS on the profitability of terrestrial stations, with estimates of the reduction in terrestrial stations' profitability spanning 2.1- 3.5% to 52%-122%. The wide range of these estimates do not allow us to judge the effect of 55 satellite DARS on terrestrial stations' profitability. The Kagan Study, by focusing on historical indicators of revenue and profitability and not considering the time path for satellite DARS diffusion, likely overestimates the potential impact of satellite DARS on terrestrial stations profitability. The
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/fc970082.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/fc970082.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/fc970082.wp
  • of the public agencies involved. 115 f. Spectrum Sharing Plan Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-82 Harmful interference is defined in the Commission's Rules as interference which endangers the functioning of a 116 radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with these [International Radio] Regulations.'' 47 CFR � 2.1. PAGE 37 SEGMENTATION PLAN FREQUENCY BAND SPECTRUM 31.000-31.075 GHz 75megahertz 31.075-31.225 GHz 150 megahertz 79. Based on the considerations expressed in the record, we have decided to modify our proposal to designate the 31 GHz band on a primary protected basis for LMDS. Instead, we adopt a plan to share the 300 megahertz based on features of both the plans
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/lmdsbp_e.pdf
  • USDOT Letter of Sept. 26, 1996; SBA Reply Comments to Fourth NPRM at 2-3. 115 Harmful interference is defined in the Commission's Rules as interference which endangers the functioning of a 116 radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with these [International Radio] Regulations.'' 47 CFR � 2.1. bands. All new point-to-point licenses would be issued in the two outer band segments. Sierra asserts that it offers the plan after consultation with LMDS interests.113 78. Endgate supports the Sierra plan as a reasonable compromise of the various compet- ing interests. It argues that we should increase the existing 50 milliwatt power limit at 31 GHz to approximately a
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/220_e.pdf
  • the Commission's Rules To Provide for Filing and Processing of Applications for 82 Unserved Areas in the Cellular Service and To Modify Other Cellular Rules, CC Docket No. 90-6, Second Report and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 2449 (1992). See Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78 and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 83 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting Private Operational Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, and Cable Television Relay Service, Second Order on Reconsideration, Gen. Docket Nos. 90-54 and 80-113, 10 FCC Rcd 7074 (1995). PAGE 26 such a claim. Nor does SMR explain its statement, in referring to the data provided in the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.wp
  • because we have changed the method by which protected service areas for cellular service are determined, and have also changed the distance that defines protected service areas for 326 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-57 Incom Comments at 5 (citing Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78 and 94 of the Commission's Rules 327 Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting Private Operational-fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, and Cable Television Relay Service, GN Docket Nos. 90-54 and 80- 113, Second Order on Reconsideration, 10 FCC Rcd 7074 (1995) (Second Order on Reconsideration). See Second Order on Reconsideration at 7078 (para. 9). 328 See Amendment of Part 90
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc980093.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc980093.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc980093.wp
  • of the Commission's Rules To Provide for Filing and Processing of Applications for Unserved Areas 82 in the Cellular Service and To Modify Other Cellular Rules, CC Docket No. 90-6, Second Report and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 2449 (1992). See Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78 and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 83 GHz Bands Affecting Private Operational Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, and Cable Television Relay Service, Second Order on Reconsideration, Gen. Docket Nos. 90-54 and 80-113, 10 FCC Rcd 7074 (1995). PAGE 25 48. SMR also asserts that Commission's decision in the 220 MHz Third Report and Order to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/19/releases/fc950319.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/19/releases/fc950319.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/19/releases/fc950319.wp
  • Commission's 52 Rules, which permits PCS licensees to "provide any mobile communications service on their assigned spectrum. Fixed services may be provided only if they are ancillary to mobile operations. Broadcasting as defined by the Communications Act is prohibited." 47 C.F.R. � 24.3. We note that Broadcast Auxiliary services are not considered a Broadcasting service as 53 defined in Section 2.1 of our Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. 12 mobile, maritime mobile, and aeronautical mobile uses. In that instance, the Commission found 48 that the GPMS allocation served the public interest. The Commission rejected claims that such 49 an allocation was unlawful, noting that "[n]othing in Sections 303(a)-(c) suggests the Commission is not permitted to take into account marketplace forces when
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.wp
  • Guide, 123rd Edition, pp. 36-39. See 47 C.F.R. Subpart P. 192 See 47 C.F.R. � 80.371(c). In addition, VHF Channel 88 may be authorized within 120 km (75 miles) of the 193 Canadian border on the Great Lakes, the St. Lawrence Seaway, and the Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca and its approaches. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. 194 The U.S. channels are VHF Channel 84, 25, 86, 87, and 28. (Channel 28 is also assignable to Canadian stations 195 within the frequency coordination zone, following successful coordination with the United States.) In addition, VHF channel 26 is shared between the U.S. and Canada and VHF channel 88 is also assignable to United States stations within the frequency
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/fc950041.pdf
  • if (1) the directional gain of the antenna does not exceed 6 dBi, or if the directional gain of the antenna exceeds 6 dBi, it reduces its transmitter output power below 1 watt by the proportional amount that the directional gain of the antem exceeds 6 dBi;& and (2) either 84 47 C.F.R. 5 15.3(m). See also 47 C.F.R. 6 2.1. ILs SBMS and MobileVision stated they supported this field disturbance sensor limitation as an interference determinant.See Ex Parte Comments of SBMS dated August 12.1994, and Ex Parte Comments of MobileVision dated August 12, 1994. Multilateration entities concur that the majority of interference complaints from Part 15 devices concern field disturbance sensors and long range video links.& the LMS Consensus Position
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/lmsbp_g.pdf
  • if (1) the directional gain of the antenna does not exceed 6 dBi, or if the directional gain of the antenna exceeds 6 dBi, it reduces its transmitter output power below 1 watt by the proportional amount that the directional gain of the antem exceeds 6 dBi;& and (2) either 84 47 C.F.R. 5 15.3(m). See also 47 C.F.R. 6 2.1. ILs SBMS and MobileVision stated they supported this field disturbance sensor limitation as an interference determinant.See Ex Parte Comments of SBMS dated August 12.1994, and Ex Parte Comments of MobileVision dated August 12, 1994. Multilateration entities concur that the majority of interference complaints from Part 15 devices concern field disturbance sensors and long range video links.& the LMS Consensus Position
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc980194.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc980194.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc980194.wp
  • are educational and include providing educational and instructional television material to such accredited institutions and governmental organizations." 47 C.F.R. � 74.932(a). Under the Commission's rules, wireless cable operators are permitted to apply for ITFS channels under certain 260 conditions. See Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands, 6 FCC Rcd 6792, 6801-06 (1991). In allowing the utilization of available ITFS frequencies by wireless cable ventures, the Commission emphasized that it would adopt procedural rules which "provide for the absolute primacy of ITFS applications vis-a-vis wireless cable applications where the two may be mutually-exclusive." Id. at 6805. Accordingly, Section 74.990(e) provides that "[i]f an
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc970059.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc970059.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc970059.wp
  • is required: an indication as to whether or not the transmitting antenna site is within 200 kilometers (124 miles) of the U.S.-Mexico border, and an indication as Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-59 21 to whether or not the transmitting antenna site is North of Line A or East of Line C. Line A and Line C are defined in � 2.1 of this chapter. For each adjacent geographic area within 200 kilometers (124 miles) of each transmitting antenna site to be added, deleted or modified, the geographic area designator and name, and the shortest distance (in kilometers) to the boundary of that geographic area. (3) For each antenna to be added, deleted or modified, the following is required: an indication of
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc990098.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc990098.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc990098.wp
  • procedures for sites in the U.S./Mexico border area. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.923, 22.531(e). Industry Canada is the Canadian agency that regulates 230 telecommunications services and their providers in Canada. The Commission uses Line A and Line C as a coordination point with Canadian authorities in the assignment of paging channels. Line A and Line C are defined in section 2.1 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See 47 U.S.C. � 90.175(c). 231 Blooston Petition at 18. 232 Id. 233 Canada Telecommunication: Coordination and Use of Radio Frequencies Above 30 Megacycles per Second, 234 October 24, 1962, as amended, June 24, 1965, U.S.-Canada. Interim Coordination Considerations for the Band 929-931 MHz, Sept. 14, 1983, as amended, Further Interim 235 Coordination
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/pagebp_g.pdf
  • or modified, the following supplementary information is required: An indication as to whether or not the transmitting antenna site is within 200 kilometers (124 miles) of the U.S.-Mexico border, and an indication as to whether or not the transmitting antenna site is North of Line A or East of Line C. Line A and Line C are defined in � 2.1 of this chapter. For each adjacent geographic area within 200 kilometers (124 miles) of each transmitting antenna site to be added, deleted or modified, the geographic area designator and name, and the shortest distance (in kilometers) to the boundary of that geographic area. (3) The height (in meters) above average terrain of the center of radiation of the antenna, the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc980194.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc980194.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc980194.wp
  • are educational and include providing educational and instructional television material to such accredited institutions and governmental organizations." 47 C.F.R. � 74.932(a). Under the Commission's rules, wireless cable operators are permitted to apply for ITFS channels under certain 260 conditions. See Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands, 6 FCC Rcd 6792, 6801-06 (1991). In allowing the utilization of available ITFS frequencies by wireless cable ventures, the Commission emphasized that it would adopt procedural rules which "provide for the absolute primacy of ITFS applications vis-a-vis wireless cable applications where the two may be mutually-exclusive." Id. at 6805. Accordingly, Section 74.990(e) provides that "[i]f an
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/fc010382.pdf
  • C.F.R. � 25.142. 15 A feeder link is a radio link from a fixed Earth station to a satellite (uplink) or from a satellite to a fixed Earth station (downlink). These links are used for data backhaul, satellite control functions, and to connect satellite systems to other networks, such as the public switched telephone network (PSTN). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. 16 Since the 1995 World Radiocommunication Conference, the United States has performed studies on sharing between space and terrestrial services and feeder links near 1.4 GHz for Non-Geostationary Orbiting Mobile Satellite Service (Little LEO) systems with service links below 1 GHz. See WRC 97 Final Acts, Resolution 127, note (d). 17 See Amendments to Part 90 of the Commission's Rules
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/fc020152.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/fc020152.txt
  • receive protection from interference only to the extent that such radiation 490 Cornell Reply Comments at 5. 491 See Service Rules Notice, 17 FCC Rcd at 2538 � 97. 492 A radiosonde is an automatic radio transmitter in the meteorological aids service usually carried on an aircraft, free balloon, kite, or parachute that transmits meteorological data. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. 493 See 1995 NTIA Spectrum Reallocation Report � 5, p.4. 494 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. In the lower-adjacent 1668.4-1670 MHz, footnote US99 states that meteorological aid services (radiosonde) will avoid operations to the maximum extent practicable. 47 C.F.R. � 2.106, footnote US99. 495 See ArrayComm ex parte letter dated February 26, 2002. 496 See1995 NTIA Spectrum Reallocation Report, Appendix C.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • protected from harmful interference.100 98 See October 28, 1999 ex parte filing of FWCC. 99 See e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 25.203 and 101.103. 100 Harmful interference is that which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with Commission rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-418 23 (ii) Coordination of NGSO FSS with FS stations 43. Proposal. The NPRM proposed that NGSO FSS gateway receivers in the downlink (10.7- 11.7 GHz) band would be protected from terrestrial transmitters through coordination.101 In the coordination process, new facilities from either service are responsible for determining the location of existing operations within a specified
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc020116.pdf
  • SkyBridge petition for reconsideration at 11. 46 Id. at 15. 47 See Northpoint Opposition to Petitions for Reconsideration generally at 4, 10 & 14, et seq. 48 See RLBSA, � 2002(b)(2). 49 See SkyBridge petition for reconsideration at 10. Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-116 12 MVDDS to a level that does not rise to "harmful interference" as defined by Section 2.1 of our rules.50 These rules will ensure that MVDDS and NGSO FSS can share the 12 GHz band while preserving the integrity of the co-primary status of both operations. Therefore, we find that SkyBridge's concern that the Commission's decision to authorize MVDDS violates the prohibition on harmful interference provisions of SHVIA/RLBSA is without merit. 20. Furthermore, a review of the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/nr221846.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/nr221846.txt
  • are available to DBS providers. We believe simplicity, clarity, and ease of implementation necessitate the majority's approach. We also believe the noticeable impact, if any, on DBS customers will be minimal and is outweighed by the overall consumer benefits to be derived from a new service. We also acknowledge, however, that the Commission's predictive model is 1 See 47 C.F.R. 2.1 ("harmful interference" is defined as "interference which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service.. . . ") 2 just that -- a prediction. Therefore, the Commission has also adopted a "safety valve" that allows individual DBS licensees or distributors to present evidence that the appropriate
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/resources/Canadianagreement.pdf
  • the United States of America (U.S.) and the Department of Industry of Canada, herein referred to as the Administrations, concerns the sharing between Canadian and U.S. broadband wireless systems in the 24.25-24.45 GHz, 25.05-25.25 GHz, and 38.6-40.0 GHz bands.1 1.2 This Arrangement is subject to review at any time at the request of either Administration. 2. Use of the Bands 2.1 The 24.25�24.45 GHz and 25.05�25.25 GHz (collectively, 24 GHz) bands are designated for point-to-multipoint digital communication systems in the U.S. and for broadband wireless applications, including point-to-point and point-to-multipoint systems, in Canada. The bands are licensed by service areas as indicated in Appendix A. 2.2 The 38.6�40.0 GHz (38 GHz) band is designated for point-to-point, point-to-multipoint and mobile systems in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/58/comments/da041639-counciltree.pdf
  • Tree Proposal Bands Auctioned or Assigned to Cingular (as set forth in Public Notice) for Revised Auction #58 Market Name POPs Tier C3 C4 C5 C3 C4 C5 C3 C4 C5 C3 C4 C5 El Paso, TX 0.7 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Los Angeles, CA 16.4 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Portland, OR 2.1 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Sarasota, FL 0.6 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Allentown, PA 0.7 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Denver, CO 2.7 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Gainesville, FL 0.3 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Hagerstown, MD 0.4 2 10
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/58/comments/da041639-ctia-reply.pdf
  • small businesses that won the closed licenses.12 Moreover, despite the DE Commenters' claims that closed bidding rules are necessary to enable small businesses to obtain capital financing and develop successful businesses, there is no evidence that small businesses acquiring 8 See Comments of Verizon Wireless at 8-9. 9 See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, 18 FCC Rcd 25162, � 148 (2003); Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding Installment Payment Financing for Personal Communications Services (PCS) Licensees, Sixth Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd 16266, � 22 n.67 (2000) ("C/F Block Sixth R&O"). 10 See, e.g., Comments of 3G PCS, LLC at 1; Comments of Coloma Spectrum, LLC at
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/58/comments/da041639-t-mobile-reply.pdf
  • not justified in light of the fact that bidding credits are more effective at fulfilling the goals and mandates of Section 309(j). 16 C/F Block Sixth R&O at � 22. 17 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(3). 18 See, e.g., American Women in Radio and Television Comments at 3. 19 See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, 18 FCC Rcd 25162, � 148 (2003); C/F Block Sixth R&O at � 22 n. 67. 8 III. AT A MINIMUM, THE LICENSES RETURNED BY NEXTWAVE SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO OPEN BIDDING. Regardless of whether the Commission ultimately decides to retain closed bidding rules for some of the licenses being auctioned in Auction No. 58, the Commission must
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/58/comments/da041639-verizon.pdf
  • Auction No. 58 would close 91 of those licenses to non-DEs, even though they are licenses that NextWave previously built out20 and could have sold, free of DE restrictions, to any other carrier earlier this year. These licenses could just as easily have been part of the 17 See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report and Order, WT Docket No. 02-353, FCC 03-251 (rel. Nov. 25, 2003) ("AWS Order") at �68; see Reallocation and Service Rules for the 698-746 MHz Spectrum Band (Television Channels 52-59), GN Docket No. 01- 74, 17 FCC Rcd 1022 at � 85. 18 AWS Order at �68. "We do not see a need to supplement the incentives
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/anticollusion/releases//da970674.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/anticollusion/releases//da970674.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/anticollusion/releases//da970674.wp
  • 8.25 percent at the time the loan was Federal Communications Commission DA 97-674 Tomlinson v. The 1661 Corporation, 377 F.2d 291, 299 (5th Cir. 1967). 48 NextWave at � 53 n.142 (citing Roth Steel Tube Co. v. Commissioner, 800 F.2d 625, 631-632 (6th Cir. 1986)). 49 Id. 50 December 16 Supplemental Response to Letter of Inquiry, Ex. 1 at � 2.1. 51 See Fox II, 11 FCC Rcd at 5721, � 17. Fox had a debt to equity ratio of 1400 to 1. 52 9 signed, this factor standing alone is not significant enough to warrant a finding that the Hyundai Loan Agreement should be characterized equity rather than debt. 18. Accordingly, we find that GWI's unconditional promise to repay Hyundai
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/98540191.pdf
  • and simplified eligibility constraints as much as possible. Common across each of the auction forms were ten licenses offered for sale. The licenses were generically labeled A, B, C, ...., J and had values to bidders ranging from 5 no synergy among licenses to a high degree of synergy among licenses. The rules of the market mechanisms are detailed next. 2.1 SMR Auction Rules Participants submit a series of single-item, sealed bids for desired licenses. Following the submission of such bids, the high bid for each license is posted. These high bids then become the standing bids for the next round of bidding. In addition to these general rules, we adopted the following specific rules: 0. Activity: In order to be
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/98540193.pdf
  • likely effect of a given rule on the performance of the SMR auction. This research analyzes the effects of two SMR auction rules� the rule that assigns unequal eligibility points to different licenses, and the rule that tapers the amount of eligibility that the bidder maintains during the course of the auction for a given level of bidding activity. 5 2.1 Eligibility Rules The FCC employs a Simultaneous Multi-Round (SMR) ascending bid auction to assign radio spectrum licenses. Under such an auction, participants submit single-item bids for individual spectrum licenses. Once the bids are submitted, a simple algorithm identifies the current high bids and the current high bidders. Participants have the opportunity to raise their bids in subsequent rounds. The auction
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/cr_2.pdf
  • and the auctioning problem becomes the much harder one of finding prices for the many possible packages of licenses. The Vickrey pricing rule is one solution to this problem that works exactly in a certain class of environments. A carefully designed auction that invokes a pay-your-bid rule may identify approximately optimal prices for packages in a wider class of environments. 2.1 Demand Reduction The problem of demand reduction is entirely analogous to the problem of withholding supply in monopoly theory. Corresponding to the concept of marginal revenue in that theory is the concept of marginal expenditure. The marginal expenditure to acquire a license is the price paid for the license plus the increase in the total amount paid for the other
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/cr_3.pdf
  • the least will depend on the pattern of complementarities that are anticipated. In this section, we describe three canonical types of complementarities which we Charles River Associates Report 2: Simultaneous Ascending Auctions with Package Bidding 7 believe have a high likelihood of arising and which offer guidance in developing principles for restricting the types of packages allowed in the auction. 2.1 Geographical License Structures The geographical partition of licenses that characterized the A and B Block PCS auctions will serve as one of the focuses of our approach. In that auction, the United States was partitioned into 51 disjoint regions called MTAs (Major Trading Areas). Each MTA was, in turn, composed of many smaller units called BTAs (Basic Trading Areas). The
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/plott.pdf
  • G F E D C B Actual outcome at 98% efficiency. The inefficiency is due to misallocations of the second six items, which are of low value. Only I and K are in the wrong hands. The colors represent bidders and not whether a package is involved. 19990625-2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1.2 2.1 2.2 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2 6.1 6.2 7.1 7.2 8.1 8.2 Round.Phase 990605-2 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 Time (seconds) Amount Revenue Total Value Sealed Bid Phase Continuous Phase 34 items 8 people package incentives 990705-1 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/FCC-Comments.pdf
  • 1 Theactualauction#31rulesthusinvolvesahybridofORandXOR expressionsthatseemstohaveconfusedsomecommentators.Focus- ingonthebiddingruleswithinasingleroundapparentlyledsome toconceiveofauction#31asessentiallyusingthe"OR"language. IfonlyORbidswerepermitted,withdrawalswouldbeneededto allowabidderwhohasbidonAandnowwantstobidonBtoavoid theexposureproblem.Intheactualauction#31rules,however,the mutualexclusivityofbidsacrossroundseliminatestheinter-round exposureproblemandwithittheneedtoallowbidwithdrawalsas protection. Whenbidsexpireaftertworounds-asIunderstandthattheydounderthe currentauction#31rules-thentheserulesdonotinduceafullyexpressive biddinglanguageevenwhenbidsacrossroundsareconsidered.Aconsequence isthattheinter-roundexposureproblemcannotbecompletelyovercomeunder thecurrentrules.Inthiscasetheauctionimplementsabiddinglanguageofthe form: {bidORbidOR...ORbid}XOR{bidORbidOR...ORbid}. ThisiscertainlymoreexpressivethantheORlanguage.Forexampleabid- derwhovaluedAXORB,asinProf.MilgromandProf.Ausubel'sexample, wouldbeabletoexpressthisvaluationintheauction#31languagebutnot intheORlanguage(ignoringdifferencesinthebidder'streatmentunderthe auctionrulesforplacingasetofbidsacrosstworoundsratherthaninasin- gleround).Indeed,asProf.MilgromandProf.Ausubelpointout,thefact thatbiddersmayrenewthesamebidfromoneroundtoanothermeansthat theauction#31languageisstrictlymoreexpressivethantheORlanguage. However,theauction#31languagecanstillnotrepresentthevaluationofa bidderwhowantsAXORBXORCasitallowsonlytwosetsofbidstobe mutuallyexclusive.Indeed,auction#31bidsarenotfullyexpressiveaslongas theyexpireafteranynumbernofrounds,becauseasetofn+1XOR'edbids couldnotbeexpressed.Likewise,evenwithoutbidexpiration,abiddercannot expressthedesireforn+1bidstobemutuallyexclusiveinthenthroundof theauction.Finally,abiddercannotupdatethepriceofferonmorethanone bidperroundwithoutcausingthesideeffectthatthetwoupdatedbidsmay bejointlysatisfied.Itisonlywhenbidsneverexpire,biddersgetanarbitrarily largenumberofroundsinwhichtoplaceXORbids,andbiddersareguaran- teednottoupdatemorethanonebidperroundthatwegettheXOR-of-OR biddinglanguage,whichisasupersetoftheXORlanguageandthereforefully expressive. 2 2ComputationalIssuesinBiddingLanguages Prof.MilgromandProf.Ausubelwrote: TheOR-of-XORstructureissaidtohavetwoadvantagesoverthe XORstructure.First,totheextentthatbidderswishtoplacebids withacorrespondingadditivestructure,itenablesbidderstodoso easilyandcompactly.However,straightforwardbidsinanascend- ingpackageauctiondonotgenerallyhavesuchanadditivestruc- ture.Thegoalshouldbetocreateasimpleinterfacethatmakes straightforwardbiddingeasy.Thisrequirementisorthogonaltothe OR-of-XORstructuralissues. ThesecondadvantageofOR-of-XORisthatreportingbidsinthis formsimplifiesthewinnerdeterminationproblem.Thisisuseful, butsecondary.Still,itisencouragingthatcomputerscientistKevin Leyton-Brownreportedthatitwouldbepossibletokeepthesecom- putationaladvantagesofanOR-of-XORinterfaceevenwiththe changesrequiredtomakestraightforwardbiddingeasy. Iwillrespondtotwoissueshere.First,I'llelaborateuponwhatismeant bytheclaimthattheOR-of-XOR'sbiddinglanguageimprovescomputation. Second,I'llgothroughsomeofthebiddinglanguagemodificationsthatwould supportstraightforwardbidding,anddiscusstheircomputationalconsequences. 2.1ComputationalAdvantagesofOR-of-XOR AslongasbiddersareallowedtoplacefullyexpressiveOR-of-XORbids,they arealsoallowedtoplacesimpleXORbids.1Thismeansthatthereisnocompu- tationalbenefittoanOR-of-XORbiddinglanguageoverasimpleXORbidding languageifbidders'bidsneverhaveanadditivestructure,asbidderswillplace simpleXORbidsinbothcases.However,eveninthisdegeneratecase,thereis noadditionalcomputationalcostforofferinganOR-of-XORbiddinglanguage. InpractisetherewillbecomputationalsavingsiftheOR-of-XORlanguageis everusedbybidders;furthermorebidderswillhaveaccesstoamorecompact andintuitivewayofspecifyingtheirvaluationswhentheirvaluationsinclude additivity. Toseewherethiscomputationalsavingscomesfrom,andtoseewhythere isacomputationaladvantagetousingeitheranOR-of-XORorsimpleXOR languageinsteadoftheXOR-of-ORlanguageregardlessofwhetherbidshave anadditivestructure,itisusefultoconsiderhowthebiddinglanguageinteracts withtheoptimizationalgorithm.Intuitively,mostwaysofsettinguptheop- timizationproblemdonotgivethealgorithminformationaboutwhichbidders placedwhichbids;instead,thealgorithmconsidersthesetofallbidstobein- dependentlysatisfiable(thus,OR'ed).Thisworksforbidsthatoriginatedfrom 1WhenbidderssubmitonlyasingleXOR'edset,OR-of-XORbidsareequivalenttosimple XORbids. 3 differentbidders,butasjuststateddoesnotallowbidderstospecifymutual exclusivitybetweentheirbids.AsolutionthatYoavShohamandIproposedis tointroduce"dummygoods"intobids:goodsthatarenotactuallysoldinthe auction,butwhichareaddedtoallbidsinanXORsetsothattheoptimization algorithmcannotallocatemorethanoneofthem.2 Ifweconsidertheprocessof"expandingout"bidsfromthebiddinglanguage intoORbidswithdummygoods,weseethatsimpleXORbidswillhaveasingle uniquedummygoodaddedtoallbidsbythesamebidder.Wecanalsorepresent OR-of-XORbidswithasingledummygood,butwehavetocreatemorebids: essentiallywehavetoignoretheadditivitybetweenthebidder'svaluationsfor theXOR'edsetsandmakeasinglebidforeverysetofbidsthatcouldbe allocatedtothebidder.Intheworstcaseiftherearemsetsandeachseti containsnigoods,thenumberofbidswewillhaveaftertheexpansionis: m i=1 2ni-1 . Thisisterrible:thenumberofexpandedbidsgrowsexponentiallywiththe sizeofthelargestsetandgeometricallywiththenumberofsets.Forexample, twosetsoftenbidseachcantranslateintomorethanamillionbids!Luckily thereisawayofexpandingouttheOR-of-XORlanguagethatdoesnotincrease thenumberofbidsatall:wecanuseauniquedummygoodforeachXOR'edset ratherthanforeachbidder.Thisapproachrequiresslightlymoredummygoods (equaltothetotalnumberofsetsratherthanthenumberofbidders)butreduces thenumberofbidsbyexploitingtheadditivestructureinthebidder'svaluation. Essentially,wedonothavetoexplicitlyexpandoutallthefullbundlesinwhich thebidderisinterested-instead,wecanusetheoptimizationalgorithm'sOR languagetorepresentthesesetsimplicitly.Continuingthepreviousexample, twosetsoftenbidseachcouldberepresentedwithtwentybidsandtwodummy goods.Sincethissecondexpansiontechniquecreatesexponentially-fewerbids intheworstcase,itcanleadtomuchshorterrunningtimesfortheoptimization algorithm. Unfortunately,thingsdonotworksowellwhenexpandingoutbidsthat wereexpressedintheXOR-of-ORlanguage.Aslongasthereismorethanone XORset(inthecaseofauction#31,aslongasabidderhasplacedanybids ineachoftwoconsecutiverounds)wehavenoalternativetoexpandingoutthe bidsasabove,makinganewbidforeverysetofoldbidsthatcouldbeallocated toeachbidder.Asabove,theexpansiongenerates m
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/ausubel-milgrom.pdf
  • used to enforce a low-price outcome. Section 9 concludes. 2. Background A variety of developments have contributed to the present drive to develop and implement package auctions. These can be grouped into three general categories: rapid advances in technology, favorable developments in regulated spectrum markets and unregulated Internet exchange markets, and research that highlights the potential benefits of package auctions. 2.1 Changing Technology and Markets The most important group factors contributing to the new package bidding designs is associated with the rapid advance of technology, which enables certain new auction designs. To understand the technical challenge, suppose that bidders submit bids for overlapping packages. Given these bids, the first step of finding the sets of "consistent" bids in which each individual
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/combexch.pdf
  • bundleofitemsS.ThisistheminimumpaymentanagentwillacceptforbundleS.Such abiddinglanguagecanalsobereadilyextendedtoallowagentstobidformultipleunitsof items. Logicalpredicatescanbeintroducedtoconnectthesesimplebiddingelements.One exampleare"additive-or"connectors,thatallowanagenttostatethatanynumberofaset ofbidsand/oraskscanbeselectedsimultaneouslybythemarket-maker.Anotherexample are"exclusive-or"connectors,thatallowanagenttostatethatatmostoneofasetofbids and/oraskscanbeselected. Steppingbackfromthespecificsofthebiddinglanguage,anylanguagewillinducevalues overdifferenttrades.LetIdenotethesetofagents. Definition1(Trade).Atrade i=( i(1),..., i(|G|)),where i(j) Zisaninteger, definesatransferof i(j)unitsofitemj Gtoagentiif i(j)>0,andatransferof i(j) unitsofitemjfromagentiif i(j)<0. Let denotethesetofallpossibletrades.Eachagentcanbeengagedinbothbuying andsellingitems,soatradeallowstheexchangeofitemsinbothdirections,dependingon thesignof i(j).Wealsoallowtradesofmultipleunitsofthesamegood,i.e. i(j)isnot restrictedtojust{-1,0,1}butcanbeanyintegervalue.7 Bidsandasksinduceareportedvalue, vi( i) R,foreverytrade i . Definition2(Valuationfunction).Avaluationfunction vi( i)denotesanagent'snet valueforthetrade. Bidsindicatepositivevalueforbuyingabundleofitems,whileasksindicatenegative valueforsellingabundleofitems.Thisexplicitrepresentationofthevalueofatradedoes notallowanagenttospecifyapreferencefortheidentityofthebuyerorsellerwithwhich itexecutesitstrade.Howeverthisiswithoutlossofgenerality,becausewecanintroduce theidentityofanagentintothegoodspacewitha"dummyitem"appendedtothebids andasksofthatagent,essentiallyconvertingattributesintosetsofproducts.Additional sideconstraints(e.g.alimitonthenumberofwinners,onthevolumeoftrade,etc.)can alsobeimplementeddirectlywithintheclearingrulesoftheexchange. Returningtooursimplebiddinglanguage,supposetherearegoodsG={A,B,C}and considerbid(AB,10)andask(C,5)fromagent1.Thesebidsinducevaluationfunction, v1([1,1,0])=10, v1([0,0,-1])=-5, v1([1,1,-1])=5.Thevaluesforothertradesare constructedtobeconsistentwithvalue- forsellinganythingotherthanitemC,azero valueforbuyingS {AB},andnoadditionalvalueforbuyingmorethanbundleAB. 7Althoughwerefertotradesoverintegervaluesofitems,allthemechanismsthatareproposedinthis paperextendimmediatelytoproblemswithfractionalallocationsofitems. 8 2.1Clearing Asdiscussedintheintroduction,exchangescancleareitherperiodically,withintervals betweenperiodsmeasuredforexampleintimeorinbidvolume,orcontinuously,withany feasibletradeclearedimmediately.Periodicclearingprobablyincreasesallocative-efficiency incombinatorialexchanges,becauseitprovidesanopportunitytoaggregateacrossalarger numberofbidsandasks.Inaddition,thepaymentschemesthatwepresentinthispaper aremostapplicabletoperiodicclearing,becausethatpresentsthemostchoiceforsurplus distribution.TheNYSEisacontinuousdoubleauction,inwhichtraderssubmitbids andasksforimmediateexecution.TheArizonaStockExchange(AZX)isaperiodic,or callmarket,inwhichbidsandasksareaccumulatedandclearedatperiodic,pre-specified intervals[31].Callmarketsarealsousedtoopensessionsincontinuousmarkets(e.g.the BoursedeParis),andusedforlessactivesecuritiesandbonds. Bidsmaybeopenorclosed.Thisreferstotheinformationthatispassedontothebidders bythemarketmaker.Inanopenbidmarketallagentsmayobserveallthesubmittedbids (probablywithouttheidentityofthebidder),theymayalsolearnwhatarethewinning bidsandhowmuchthewinnerspay/arepaid.Inaclosed(orsealed)bidmarkettheagents havenoknowledgeoftheotheragents'bidsandlearnonlywhethertheirownbidswonor notandtheirownpayment.Therearemanypossibilitiesbetweenthesetwoextremes;for instance,submittedbidsarenotrevealedtootheragents,everyoneisnotifiedofhis/her tradeinthecurrentprovisionaloutcomeandnon-winnersareprovidedwithaminimumbid increment(oraskdecrement)toentertheprovisionaltradeifotherbidsremainunchanged. Openbids,andgeneralmarkettransparency,mayencouragebettercoordinationbetween agents,butalsoallowmoremanipulationinthinmarkets. TheNASDAQisanexampleofanexchangewithopenbids,althoughtradinginforma- tionisnotevenlydistributedacrossparticipants;accesstoinformationaboutbidsandasks waitingtoclear(inthe"limitbook")isdistributedamongmarketbrokersandhelduntil thetradesarecleared.Anewplan,theNextNasdaq,callsfortheimplementationofacen- tralizeddatabaseofbidsandasksthatisvisibletoallmarketparticipants[31].Intypical procurementexamplesonewouldexpectclosedbidsbecausetheinformationcontainedin bidsmaywellpresentusefulinformationtocompetitors[9]. Followingthediscussionintheintroduction,inthispaperweareinterestedinmecha- nismsinwhichtheoveralltradethatisimplementedgivenasetofbidsandasksisthat whichmaximizesreportedvalue(orsurplus).Wedefinethisasthewinnerdetermination problem. Definition3(winnerdeterminationproblem).Thewinnerdeterminationproblemin acombinatorialexchangeistocomputetheoveralltradethatmaximizesrevenuegivena setofbidsandasks. Formally,let =( 1,..., |I|) �i I denoteacompletetradeacrossallagents.Given 9 reportedvaluationfunctions, vi( i)fortrades i,ageneralmathematicalprogramming formulationforthewinnerdeterminationproblemis: =argmax �i i I vi( i) s.t.feasible( ) wherefeasible( )areasetofconstraintstodefinewhetherornotthetradeisfeasible. Afeasibletrademustrespectsupplyanddemand,forexamplewithoutallocatingthe
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/sandholm2.pdf
  • oncombinationsofitems[8;9;1;4;10;11;3;15;5;12; 13].Toourknowledge,allofthatliteraturehasfocused onclearingcombinatorialauctionssoastomaximizeun- constrainedeconomicvalue.Inmostreal-worldmarket- places,especiallyinbusiness-to-businesscommerce,there areotherconsiderationsbesidesmaximizingimmediateeco- nomicvaluethatmustbetakenintoaccount. Inthispaperweintroduceandanalyzetwomethodsforin- corporatingtheseadditionalconsiderations:sideconstraints � Thisworkwasfundedby,andconductedat,CombineNet,Inc., 311S.CraigSt.,Pittsburgh,PA15213. onthetradingoutcome,andbidre-weightingwithmultivari- atefunctionstoincludenon-priceattributes.Inshort,our goalistodevelopmarketdesignsthatarecomputationally tractabletoclear,andwheretrueeconomicvalueismaxi- mized,takingintoaccountallthepertinentconstraintsand attributesofthemarket.Thesideconstraintscouldbeim- posedbyanyparty:thebuyer(s),theseller(s),thepartywho executesthemarketplace,thepartywhodevelopsthetech- nologyforclearingthemarket,aregulatorybodysuchasthe SEC,liquidityproviders(suchasmarketmakersontheNAS- DAQorspecialistsontheNYSE),etc.Similarly,thesetof pertinentattributesandtheirvaluescouldbespecifiedbyany party. Thepriorliteraturehasfocusedonthesettingswherebids mustbeacceptedasawholeorrejected,whilewealsocover theimportantpracticalsettingwherebidscanbepartiallyac- cepted.Theliteraturehasalsofocusedonsettingswithfree disposal(sellerscankeepanyitemand/orbuyerscantake extraunitsofanyitem).Weanalyzemarketsbothwithand withoutfreedisposal. Wefirstdiscusssideconstraintsinmarketswherebidsare onindividualitems,andthenmovetomarketswherebidscan besubmittedoncombinationsofitems.Finally,weshowhow tointegratenon-priceattributesinto(combinatorial)market designs. 2SingletonBids Inthissectionweshowthatcertainpracticalsideconstraints canmakeevennoncombinatorialauctionshardtoclear. Definition1(WDP)Thesellerhas�items(oneuniteach) tosell.Eachbidderplacesasetofbidsonindividualitems. Thewinnerdeterminationproblem(WDP)istodeterminea revenue-maximizingallocationofitemstobidders. Intheabsenceofsideconstraints,WDPcanbesolvedinpoly- timebypickingthehighestbidforeachitemindependently. Thebudgetconstraintbelowillustrateshowsharpthe�vs. � � -completecutoffisinthespaceofsideconstraints.This isespeciallysurprisingsinceasimilarconstraint,wherethe numberofitemssoldtoeachbidderisconstrained,leadstoa WDPthatwasrecentlyshowntobepolytimesolvableusing b-matching[15].� � Multi-itemauctions(withbidsonindividualitemsonly)with certaintypesofstructuralsideconstraintsarealsosolvableinpoly- timeusingb-matching[6]. Definition2(BUDGET)WDPwheretheamountsoldto anybidderdoesnotexceedherbudget.� Theorem2.1BUDGETis��-complete(whetherornotthe sellerhastosellalltheitems),evenwithintegerprices. PROOF.WereducePARTITION[2]toBUDGET.InPAR- TITION,wehaveasetofintegers� ܽ ܾ �� , andthegoalistopartition�intotwosubsets and (i.e. and �)s.t. � � � � � where� ���ܾ��.WecreateaninstanceofBUDGET asfollows.Correspondingtoeach� ,wecreateanitem . Therearetwobidders,say,AndyandBob;eachplacesthebid ofsameprice,� ,foritem .ThebudgetforAndyandBob eachis�(halfofthetotal).ThisinstanceofBUDGEThasa solutionwithrevenue��ifandonlyiftheoriginalpartition problemhasapartition. � Ifbidscanbeacceptedpartially,BUDGETcanbesolved inpolytimeusinglinearprogramming. Anotherpracticalsideconstraintisthenumberofwinners. Forexample,thesellermaynotwanttheoverheadofdealing withalargenumberofwinningbidders. Definition3(MAX-WINNERS)WDPwhereatmost bid- dersreceiveitems. Theorem2.2MAX-WINNERSis��-complete(whetheror notthesellerhastosellalltheitems),evenwithinteger prices. PROOF.WereduceSET-COVER[2]toMAX-WINNERS. Givenaninstanceofsetcover,namely,agroundset � � � ,andasetofsubsets ˽ ˾ �� , where� ,weformulateaninstanceofMAX- WINNERSasfollows.Wecreateanitem foreachelement inthegroundset .Correspondingtoeachset� ,wecreate abidder ,whoplacesa$1bidoneachitemintheset�
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/sandholm3.pdf
  • ofeachitem,withandwithoutfreedisposal.We firsttheoreticallycharacterizethecomplexity.The mostinterestingresultsarethatreverseauctions withfreedisposalcanbeapproximated,andinall ofthecaseswithoutfreedisposal,evenfindinga feasiblesolutionis��-complete.Wethenranex- perimentsonknownbenchmarksaswellasones whichweintroduced,tostudythecomplexityof themarketvariantsinpractice.Caseswithfreedis- posaltendedtobeeasierthanoneswithout.On manydistributions,reverseauctionswithfreedis- posalwereeasierthanauctionswithfreedisposal- astheapproximabilitywouldsuggest-butinter- estingly,ononeofthemostrealisticdistributions theywereharder.Single-unitexchangeswereeasy, butmulti-unitexchangeswereextremelyhard. 1Introduction Combinatorialmarketscanbeusedtoreacheconomicallyef- ficientallocationsofgoods,services,tasks,resources,etc., inmultiagentsystemsevenwhentheagents'valuationsfor bundlesofitemsarenotadditive.Someitemscanbecomple- mentary,andotherscanbesubstitutes. Whilecombinatorialmarketshavemajoreconomicad- vantages,theycanbecomputationallycomplextoclear. Therehasbeenarecentsurgeofinterestindeveloping combinatorialclearingalgorithms[Rothkopfetal.,1998; Sandholm,1999;Fujishimaetal.,1999;Lehmannetal., 1999;SandholmandSuri,2000;Anderssonetal.,2000; HoosandBoutilier,2000;Sandholmetal.,2001;Sandholm andSuri,2001;deVriesandVohra,2000].However,the bulkofthisworkhasfocusedonsingle-unitcombinatorial auctionswithfreedisposal,withsomeworkonmulti-unit � Thisworkwasfundedby,andconductedat,CombineNet,Inc., 311S.CraigSt.,Pittsburgh,PA15213. combinatorialauctionswithfreedisposal[Sandholm,2000; SandholmandSuri,2000;Leyton-Brownetal.,2000b; GonenandLehmann,2000].Othergeneralizationshavealso beendiscussed,buttheircomplexityhasnotbeenanalyzed theoreticallyorexperimentally[Sandholm,2000;Sandholm andSuri,2000]. Inthispaperwestudythecomplexityofthemainother variantsofcombinatorialmarkets.Westudyauctions,reverse auctions,andexchanges.Ineachsettingswestudythesingle- unitaswellasthemulti-unitcase.Weanalyzeeachofthese variationswithandwithoutfreedisposal.�Thisleadsto�� � � � �� importantsettings,ofwhichonly�havereceived significantattentionsofar. Wefirstdefinethedifferentmarkettypes,andanalyzethe complexityofwinnerdeterminationandapproximationtheo- retically.Wethencomparethetypesexperimentally.Finally, wediscussshadowpricesinauctionsandexchanges. 2ClassesofCombinatorialMarkets Inthissectionweintroducedifferentcombinatorialmarket types,anddiscussthecomplexityofwinnerdetermination fromatheoreticalperspective. 2.1Single-UnitAuctions Themostbasiccombinatorialauction,andthetypethathas receivedmostoftheattentioninpreviouswork[Sandholm, 1999;Fujishimaetal.,1999;SandholmandSuri,2000],isa single-unitcombinatorialauctionwithfreedisposal. Definition1Theauctioneerhasasetofitems,� � � � ,tosell,andthebuyerssubmitasetofbids, � � � .Abidisatuple � � , where� �isasetofitemsand� �isaprice.The binarycombinatorialauctionwinnerdeterminationproblem (BCAWDP)istolabelthebidsaswinningorlosingsoasto maximizetheauctioneer'srevenueundertheconstraintthat eachitemcanbeallocatedtoatmostonebidder: � � � � � � s.t. �� � � � � � � � � � � Weuseastrongversionofthenofreedisposalcase.Ifthereis nofreedisposal,thesellershavetoselleverythingandthebuyers cannotacceptanythingextrabeyondwhattheybidon.Inthefuture, weplantoalsostudythecasewheredisposalisneitherfreenor impossible,butratherbetweenthesetwoendsofthespectrum.For example,disposalcouldhaveapredeterminedcost. Ifthereisnofreedisposal(auctioneerisnotwillingtokeep anyoftheitems,andbiddersarenotwillingtotakeextra items),anequalityisusedinplaceoftheinequality. Bynowitiswellknownthat(thedecisionversionof) BCAWDPwithfreedisposal(evenwithintegerprices)is � � -complete[Rothkopfetal.,1998].Itcannotevenbe approximatedtoaratioofҽ �inpolytime(unless� � � )-asshownin[Sandholm,1999]usingtheinapprox-
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/vsmith.pdf
  • bidding by limiting a bidder's ability to bid on licenses in subsequent bidding rounds if he fails to maintain a certain level of bidding activity in the previous round. To establish eligibility conditions the FCC considers the product of the amount of spectrum (megahertz) assigned to a given license and the total population within the license service area. (See section 2.1.3 below for how our environment parameterizes population effects). This "MHz-POPs " value for each license is assigned a number of eligibility points. A bidder maintains eligibility points for bidding in subsequent rounds by owning the current high bid on a license, or by submitting an "improving" bid that is equal to the current high bid plus some specified bid increment.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2003/papers/masterevanjohn.pdf
  • it is advisable to check with authors before quoting or referencing these working papers in other publications. This document is available on the FCC's World Wide Web site at http://www.fcc.gov/opp/workingp.html. ii Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ii Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................iv A Proposal for a Rapid Transition to Market Allocation of Spectrum...........................................1 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................1 2 Elements of a Market Regime for Spectrum...........................................................................3 2.1 Flexibility of Use............................................................................................................3 2.2 Exhaustive assignment of spectrum rights......................................................................4 2.3 Exclusive licenses...........................................................................................................5 2.4 Proper definition of interference rights...........................................................................6 2.5 Special provisions for low-power devices......................................................................7 3 Elements of an Efficient Transition to Spectrum Markets......................................................8 3.1 Speed...............................................................................................................................9 3.2 Low transaction costs......................................................................................................9 3.3 Transparency...................................................................................................................9 3.4 Liquidity........................................................................................................................10 3.5 Participation..................................................................................................................10 3.6 Simultaneity..................................................................................................................11 3.7 Package Bidding...........................................................................................................14 4 A Proposed Transition Market Mechanism: Band-Restructuring Auctions........................16 4.1 Simultaneous
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc000289.pdf
  • by 2003 over 66 percent of all wireless subscribers will use SMS to send and receive messages, get information, make data inquiries, and schedule reservations.374 SMS is particularly popular in Europe. By April 1999, customers in the European Union were transmitting one billion short messages per month.375 Sonera (Finland) reports that by year-end 1999 more than 60 percent of its 2.1 million subscribers were using SMS and averaged 21 messages per month.376 367 Id. at 26. 368 Id. at 28. 369 Id. at 29. 370 Id. at 30. 371 Andrew M. Seybold, Short Messaging Service (SMS), MOTHERING MAGAZINE, June 25, 1999, available in 1999 WL 16633524. GSM networks permit messages of 160 characters, CDMA permits 256 characters, and iDEN allows 140
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc95317.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc95317.txt
  • 52 Kansas City A WirelessCo, LP 2.9 24 Kansas City B APT 2.9 24 Buffalo-Rochester A WirelessCo, LP 2.8 19 Buffalo-Rochester B AT&T Wireless PCS 2.8 20 Salt Lake City A Western PCS 2.6 46 Salt Lake City B WirelessCo, LP 2.6 46 Jacksonville A Powertel PCS 2.3 46 Jacksonville B PCS PRIMECO 2.3 45 Columbus A AT&T Wireless PCS 2.1 22 Columbus B APT 2.1 22 El Paso-Albuquerque A Western PCS 2.1 9 El Paso-Albuquerque B AT&T Wireless PCS 2.1 9 Little Rock A Southwestern Bell 2.1 13 Little Rock B WirelessCo, LP 2.1 12 Oklahoma City A Western PCS 1.9 11 Oklahoma City B WirelessCo, LP 1.9 13 Spokane-Billings A Poka Lambro 1.9 6 Spokane-Billings B WirelessCo, LP 1.9
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc99136.pdf
  • WNP and Nextband; plans to offer LMDS commercially as a complement to its CLEC fiber networks by end of 1999 WinStar 14.7 million (A) 2.3 million (B) San Francisco, New Orleans, Salt Lake City, Norfolk, Orlando, other parts of California Use of LMDS in conjunction with its 38 GHz spectrum to extend its reach to other cities Touch America, Inc. 2.1 million (A) 2.1 million (B) parts of Montana, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, Idaho, North Dakota, Washington, Minnesota Begin LMDS buildout in Helena and Billings, MT; use spectrum to link 30 cities to its 10,000 mile fiber network; and equipment contract with Nortel BTA Associates 3.0 million (A) 675,000 (B) Colorado Begin offering LMDS services by the end of 1999 Liberty Cellular,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fcc98091.pdf
  • through their existing broadband PCS, cellular, and SMR licenses. Third, customers can switch providers at low cost.264 Analysts note that the monthly churn265 in paging is higher than other segments of the wireless industry partially due to a lower up front investment. Churn in the paging industry was 2.8 percent at year-end 1996 compared to 1.5 percent for SMR and 2.1 percent for cellular.266 Fourth, as noted above, in response to competition, paging carriers have begun to transform themselves from "paging" carriers to "messaging" carriers. Finally, as noted in the Second Report, paging prices are quite low compared to other CMRS services.267 While there 260First Report, at 8867-68; Second Report, at 11305. 261Second Report, at 11305. 262Id. 263PageMart signed an agreement
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fcc_report_052507_final.pdf
  • significant. The difference in ranks between TPB and MPB is 49 (ten observations), which is significant (p = 0.03). Finally, the difference in ranks between TPB and SMR is 55 (ten observations), which is significant at the one-percent level: TPB SMR. One cause of efficiency reductions with SMR is the incidence of unsold licenses, which happens at a rate of 2.1 licenses (out of 18) when averaged over all sessions. Likewise, on average 1.0 license is unsold under MPB while there are virtually no unsold licenses with TPB, see Figure 4. 11 License Distribution 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Player Number Lice nse s Won Unsold 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Figure 4. Licenses Acquired by Regional
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=releases_auction&id=6&page=O
  • BTA Installment Payment This order denies the request of Inforum Communications, Inc. seeking reconsideration and waiver of the Commission's installment payment rules. [79]pdf - [80]Word 4/1/1996 THIRD ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION AND ORDER TO CLARIFY (FCC 96-130) In the Matter of Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, and Cable Television Relay Service. This Order affirms the Commission's adoption of the Second Order on Reconsideration which revised the definition of the protected service area of Multipoint Distribution Service stations. [81]pdf - [82]text - [83]WordPerfect 6/30/1995 REPORT AND ORDER
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=releases_auction&id=66&page=O
  • (FCC 06-8) Implementation of the Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act and Modernization of the Commission's Competitive Bidding Rules and Procedures [88]pdf - [89]Word Statement of Chairman Martin: [90]pdf - [91]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [92]pdf - [93]Word Statement of Commissioner Adelstein: [94]pdf - [95]Word 8/15/2005 ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION (FCC 05-149) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands The FCC advanced its efforts to make spectrum available for an array of innovative wireless services and technologies, including voice, data, video, and other wireless broadband services offered over Third Generation ("3G") mobile networks. [96]pdf - [97]Word Statement of Chairman Martin: [98]pdf - [99]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [100]pdf - [101]Word Statement of Commissioner Adelstein: [102]pdf - [103]Word
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=releases_auction&id=66&page=P
  • WTB announces the status of FCC Form 175 applications to participate in the upcoming Advanced Wireless Service License Auction No. 66. [63]pdf - [64]Word Attachment A: [65]pdf Attachment B: [66]pdf 6/15/2006 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 06-1279) WTB Opens Filing Window for the Proposal to Develop and Manage the Clearinghouse that will Administer the Relocation Cost Sharing Plan for Licensees in the 2.1 GHz Bands [67]pdf - [68]Word 5/19/2006 PUBLIC NOTICE (FCC 06-71) Auction of Advanced Wireless Services Licenses Rescheduled for August 9, 2006; Revised Schedule, Filing Requirements and Supplemental Procedures for Auction No. 66 This public notice announces the revised schedule, filing requirements, and supplemental procedures for the upcoming auction of Advanced Wireless Services licenses in the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=releases_year&y=1996&m=4
  • Enforce Defaulf Payment Rules This Public Notice reminds bidders that the Commission rules concerning default payments will be enforced in all auctions. [70]text 4/1/1996 THIRD ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION AND ORDER TO CLARIFY (FCC 96-130) Auction [71]6 In the Matter of Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, and Cable Television Relay Service. This Order affirms the Commission's adoption of the Second Order on Reconsideration which revised the definition of the protected service area of Multipoint Distribution Service stations. [72]pdf - [73]text - [74]WordPerfect Go to an Auction:
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=releases_year&y=2003&m=11
  • November 2003 11/26/2003 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 03-3781) Auction [44]53 Multichannel Video Distribution and Data Service Spectrum Auction This Public Notice reports the status of applications received for participation in Auction No. 53. [45]pdf - [46]Word Attachment A: [47]pdf Attachment B: [48]pdf 11/25/2003 REPORT AND ORDER (FCC 03-251) Auction [49]66 Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands In this Report and Order, we adopt service rules for Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) in the 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz bands, including provisions for application, licensing, operating and technical rules, and for competitive bidding [50]pdf - [51]Word Statement of Chairman Powell: [52]pdf - [53]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [54]pdf - [55]Word Statement of Commissioner Martin: [56]pdf - [57]Word
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=releases_year&y=2005&m=8
  • Closes; Winning Bidders Announced for Auction No. 61 The WTB announces the winning bidders for the Automated Maritime Telecommunications System Licenses Auction No. 61. [45]pdf - [46]Word Attachment A: [47]pdf Attachment B: [48]pdf Attachment C: [49]pdf Attachment D: [50]pdf - [51]Word 8/15/2005 ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION (FCC 05-149) Auction [52]66 Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands The FCC advanced its efforts to make spectrum available for an array of innovative wireless services and technologies, including voice, data, video, and other wireless broadband services offered over Third Generation ("3G") mobile networks. [53]pdf - [54]Word Statement of Chairman Martin: [55]pdf - [56]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [57]pdf - [58]Word Statement of Commissioner Adelstein: [59]pdf - [60]Word
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=releases_year&y=2006&m=6
  • the Commission's Rules The WTB, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division granted a waiver request filed by WSS, LLC of Section 1.2109 of the Commission's rules [55]pdf - [56]Word 6/15/2006 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 06-1279) Auction [57]66 WTB Opens Filing Window for the Proposal to Develop and Manage the Clearinghouse that will Administer the Relocation Cost Sharing Plan for Licensees in the 2.1 GHz Bands [58]pdf - [59]Word 6/7/2006 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 06-1197) Auction [60]65 Auction of 800 MHz Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service Licenses Closes, Winning Bidders Announced for Auction No. 65 The WTB announces the close of and winning bidders for Auction No. 65. [61]pdf - [62]Word Attachment A: [63]pdf Attachment B: [64]pdf Attachment C: [65]pdf - [66]Word 6/2/2006 NEWS RELEASE Auction [67]65
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/Element%209.pdf
  • trickle flow of electrons during unused periods. C. Resistance measured when plates short circuit internally. D. None of these. 9B25 (B) The most common acid used in lead-acid batteries is: A. Muric Acid. B. Sulphuric Acid. C. Nitric Acid. D. Phosphoric Acid. 9B26 (C) The approximate voltage of a fully charged lead-acid battery cell is: A. 12.6. B. 6.3. C. 2.1. D. 1.27. 9B27 (C) The common type dry cell battery contains: A. Lead and lead sponge. B. Lead and zinc. C. Carbon and zinc. D. Zinc and lead. 9B28 (B) Energy stored in a lead-acid battery is: A. Kinetic. B. Chemical. C. Dynamic. D. Piezoelectric. 9B29 (D) A fully charged lead-acid battery rated at 500 amp-hours could power a: A.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/GMDSS-GOC-2006.doc
  • alert may be printed out. c) The Distress information contained in the alert will be sent to the data directory. d) All of the above Key Topic #098 Answer Key: A: c) B: d) C: c) D: c) E: d) F: d). KEY TOPIC #099: BATTERIES: 099A- What is the normal voltage of a single lead acid battery cell? a) 2.1 volts b) 1.5 volts c) 2.5 volts d) 1.2 volts 099B- What is the normal specific gravity of a fully charged lead acid battery cell? a) 1.375 b) 1.180 c) 1.280 d) 1.210 099C- What instrument is used for measuring the electrolyte of a lead acid battery? a) Hygrometer b) Hydrometer c) ph Meter d) Manometer 099D- What will cause
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/element3.doc
  • filtered. D. When you need more attenuation at a certain frequency that is too close to the cut-off frequency for a constant-k filter. Answer Key: 3-46F1: B 3-46F2: C 3-46F3: D 3-46F4: A 3-46F5: C 3-46F6: D Key Topic 47: Filters 3-47F1 A good crystal band-pass filter for a single-sideband phone would be? A. 5 KHz. C. 500 Hz. B. 2.1 KHz. D. 15 KHz. 3-47F2 Which statement is true regarding the filter output characteristics shown in Figure 3F16? A. C is a low pass curve and B is a band pass curve. B. B is a high pass curve and D is a low pass curve. C. A is a high pass curve and B is a low pass curve.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2002
  • and Other Auction Procedures [178]pdf - [179]Word Attachment A: [180]pdf - [181]xls 11/22/2002 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 02-3229) NewComm Wireless Services, Inc., ClearComm, L.P. , and TEM Puerto Rico, Inc. Seek FCC Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses [182]pdf - [183]text - [184]Word 11/22/2002 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (FCC 02-305) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 Ghz Bands [185]pdf - [186]Word 11/19/2002 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 02-3198) Michael de Leon Hawthorne, Trustee, Seeks Further Extension of Wireless Assets Trust [187]pdf - [188]text - [189]Word 11/15/2002 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING AND ORDER (FCC 02-302) Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding Dedicated Short-Range Communication Services in the 5.850-5.925 GHz Band (5.9 GHz Band) [190]pdf - [191]text - [192]Word 11/15/2002
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2003
  • Data Service Spectrum Auction [148]pdf - [149]Word Attachment A: [150]pdf Attachment B: [151]pdf 11/25/2003 PUBLIC NOTICE Erratum to WTB Announces it is Prepared to Grant Upper and Lower Paging Band Licenses upon Full and Timely Payment; Auction Event No. 48 [152]pdf - [153]Word 11/25/2003 REPORT AND ORDER (FCC 03-251) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands [154]pdf - [155]Word Statement of Chairman Powell: [156]pdf - [157]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [158]pdf - [159]Word Statement of Commissioner Martin: [160]pdf - [161]Word Statement of Commissioner Adelstein: [162]pdf - [163]Word 11/24/2003 ERRATUM (DA 03-3780) Promoting Efficient Use of Spectrum Through Elimination of Barriers to the Development of Secondary Markets [164]pdf - [165]Word 11/24/2003 NEWS RELEASE FCC's Wireless
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2004
  • Commissioner Adelstein: [314]pdf - [315]Word 9/27/2004 ORDER (DA 04-3062) Telephone Number Portability; Emergency Motion for Stay of the CMRS LNP Deadline [316]pdf - [317]Word 9/24/2004 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (FCC 04-218) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands, Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands [318]pdf - [319]Word Statement of Chairman Powell: [320]pdf - [321]Word Statement of Commissioner Abernathy: [322]pdf - [323]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [324]pdf - [325]Word Statement of Commissioner Adelstein: [326]pdf - [327]Word 9/24/2004 LETTER (DA 04-3065) Letter Denying Tracy Broadcasting Corporation's Request in Auction 37 [328]pdf - [329]Word 9/23/2004 LETTER (DA 04-3058) Ideas for Business, Inc. - Request for
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2005
  • [351]xls Attachment B: [352]pdf - [353]Word 8/23/2005 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 05-2316) Auction of Automated Maritime Telecommunications System Licenses Closes; Winning Bidders Announced for Auction No. 61 [354]pdf - [355]Word Attachment A: [356]pdf Attachment B: [357]pdf Attachment C: [358]pdf Attachment D: [359]pdf - [360]Word 8/15/2005 ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION (FCC 05-149) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands [361]pdf - [362]Word Statement of Chairman Martin: [363]pdf - [364]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [365]pdf - [366]Word Statement of Commissioner Adelstein: [367]pdf - [368]Word 8/11/2005 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER (DA 05-2274) Petition for Waiver of Section 64.402 of the Commission's Rules [369]pdf - [370]Word 8/11/2005 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 05-2272) Ex Parte Status of Application for FCC Consent to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2006
  • and Order [584]pdf - [585]Word [586]See FCC 06-52 6/16/2006 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (DA 06-1285) WSS, LLC Request for Waiver of Section 1.2109 of the Commission's Rules [587]pdf - [588]Word 6/15/2006 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 06-1279) WTB Opens Filing Window for the Proposal to Develop and Manage the Clearinghouse that will Administer the Relocation Cost Sharing Plan for Licensees in the 2.1 GHz Bands [589]pdf - [590]Word 6/14/2006 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 06-1245) America Movil, S.A.DE C.V., Verizon Communications, Inc., and Subsidiaries of Telecommunicaciones De Puerto Rico, Inc. Seek FCC Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations and Request a Declaratory Ruling on Foreign Ownership [591]pdf - [592]Word 6/14/2006 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 06-1272) Licensees of Broadband Radio Service Channels 1 and/or 2/2A
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2007
  • Commissioner Michael J. Copps: [105]pdf - [106]Word Statement of Commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein: [107]pdf - [108]Word Statement of Commissioner Robert M. McDowell: [109]pdf - [110]Word 11/16/2007 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 07-4665) WTB Provides Instructions for Electronic Filing of Cellular Coverage Certifications [111]pdf - [112]Word 11/15/2007 ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION (DA 07-4619) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands [113]pdf - [114]Word 11/15/2007 NEWS RELEASE FCC Consents with Conditions to AT&T Acquisition of Dobson Communications Licenses and Authorizations [115]pdf - [116]Word Statement of Commissioner Robert M. McDowell: [117]pdf - [118]Word 11/15/2007 NEWS RELEASE FCC Waives Portions of its "Designated Entity" Eligibility Rules for the Upper 700 MHz D Block License [119]pdf - [120]Word 11/15/2007 ORDER (FCC 07-197)
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2008
  • Leases, and Authorizations, and Request a Declaratory Ruling on Foreign Ownership [394]pdf - [395]Word 6/24/2008 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 08-1477) Sprint Nextel Corporation and Clearwire Corporation Seek FCC Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations [396]pdf - [397]Word [398]Related Releases 6/20/2008 NEWS RELEASE FCC Seeks Comment on Proposed Rule Changes for Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) Spectrum in the 1.9 and 2.1 GHz Bands [399]pdf - [400]Word 6/20/2008 FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (FCC 08-158) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 2155-2175 MHz/Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz AND 2175-2180 MHz Bands [401]pdf - [402]Word 6/18/2008 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 08-1436) Auction of Cellular Unserved Service Area License Closes; Winning Bidder Announced for
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/2004broadbandforum/comments/AndrewKreig.pdf
  • for new rules that permitted high-speed Internet and other data services to be routinely offered over MDS/ITFS spectrum. However, the rules ultimately adopted by the Commission proved to be overly-regulatory and became an obstacle to fast deployment of MDS/ITFS broadband service. Excessive costs and application processing delays became the norm. Moreover, threats of reallocation hung over the spectrum at both 2.1 GHz and 2.5 GHz for years, deterring investment along the way. Still, many MDS/ITFS operators have persevered. As WCA recently reported in response to the Commission's Advanced Wireless Services Notice of Inquiry, MDS/ITFS operators are delivering wireless broadband to underserved areas throughout the country, despite the burdens imposed on them by the Commission's existing rules. These include: WATCH TV in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/2004broadbandforum/comments/KotzEssein.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit AnalysisofaCampus-wideWirelessNetwork DavidKotz DepartmentofComputerScience DartmouthCollege Hanover,NH,USA03755 dfk@cs.dartmouth.edu KobbyEssien DepartmentofComputerScience DartmouthCollege Hanover,NH,USA03755 Kobby.Essien@alum.dartmouth.org ABSTRACT Understandingusagepatternsinwirelesslocal-areanetworks(WLANs) iscriticalforthosewhodevelop,deploy,andmanageWLANtech- nology,aswellasthosewhodevelopsystemsandapplicationsoft- wareforwirelessnetworks.Thispaperpresentsresultsfromthe largestandmostcomprehensivetraceofnetworkactivityinalarge, productionwirelessLAN.Forelevenweekswetracedtheactivity ofnearlytwothousandusersdrawnfromageneralcampuspopu- lation,usingacampus-widenetworkof476accesspointsspread over161buildings.OurstudyexpandsonthosedonebyTangand Baker,withasignificantlylargerandbroaderpopulation. Wefoundthatresidentialtrafficdominatedallothertraffic,par- ticularlyinresidencespopulatedbynewerstudents;studentsare increasinglychoosingawirelesslaptopastheirprimarycomputer. Althoughwebprotocolswerethesinglelargestcomponentoftraf- ficvolume,networkbackupandfilesharingcontributedanun- expectedlylargeamounttothetraffic.Althoughtherewassome roamingwithinanetworksession,weweresurprisedbythenum- berofsituationsinwhichcardsroamedexcessively,unabletosettle ononeaccesspoint.Cross-subnetroamswereanespecialproblem, becausetheybrokeIPconnections,indicatingtheneedforsolutions thatavoidoraccommodatesuchroams. CategoriesandSubjectDescriptors C.2.1[Computer-CommunicationNetworks]:NetworkArchi- tectureandDesign-Wirelesscommunication ;C.2.2[Computer-CommunicationNetworks]:NetworkProto- cols ;C.2.3[Computer-CommunicationNetworks]:NetworkOpera- tions-Networkmanagement,Networkmonitoring ;C.2.5[Computer-CommunicationNetworks]:LocalandWide- AreaNetworks GeneralTerms Measurement Keywords 802.11,LAN,Usagecharacterization,networkanalysis Important ThispaperisarevisionoftheMOBICOM'02paperbythesame title.TheonlydifferenceisthecorrectionofFigures27�28andthe associatedtext.Citethisversionasfollows: DartmouthCollegeComputerScienceTechnicalReportTR2002�432. Copyright2002bytheauthors;MOBICOMversioncopyright2002ACM. 1.INTRODUCTION Wirelesslocal-areanetworks(WLANs)areincreasinglycom- mon,particularlyonuniversityandcorporatecampuses.Forexam- ple,acontemporarysurveyof392academicinstitutions[4]found thatnearlyallplantoinstallawirelessnetwork,abouthalfalready havealimiteddeployment,andafew(7%)havea"comprehensive" deployment.AlthoughtechnologysuchasIEEE802.11bisbroadly deployedandusageisincreasingdramatically,littleisknownabout howthesenetworksareused.Aclearunderstandingofusagepat- ternsinrealWLANsiscriticalinformationforthosewhodevelop, deploy,andmanageWLANtechnology,andthosewhodevelop systemsandapplicationsoftwareforwirelessnetworks. Thispaperpresentsresultsfromthelargestandmostcomprehen- sivetraceofnetworkactivityinalarge,productionwirelessLAN. DartmouthCollegehas11Mbps802.11bcoveragefornearlyev- erybuildingoncampus,includingalladministrative,academic,and residentialbuildings,andmostathleticfacilities.Wecollectedex- tensivetraceinformationfromtheentirenetworkthroughoutthe Falltermof2001. OurworksignificantlyexpandsupontheWaveLANstudyby TangandBaker[13],whichtraced74computer-scienceusersin onebuildingfor12weeks.Ourstudytracesnearlytwothousand usersdrawnfromageneralcampuspopulation,across161build- ingsforoneacademicterm(11weeks).Italsoexpandsuponthe MetricomstudybyTangandBaker[14]whichtracedametropolitan- areanetworkforsevenweeks.Althoughthattracecoversawide geographicalareaandalmost25,000users,ourtraceincludesde- tailedinformationabouttheamountandnatureofthenetworktraf- fic.Thesize,populationdiversity,anddetailofourdatacollection offersextensiveinsightintowirelessnetworkusage.Althoughev- eryenvironmentisdifferent,ourstudyhascharacteristicscommon tobothresidentialandenterprisedeployments. Wenextdescribetheenvironmentofourstudy,thecampusof DartmouthCollege,andthendetailourtracingmethodologyin Section3.InSection4wepresentanddiscussthemostinterest- ingcharacteristicsofthedata.Section5comparesourresultswith thoseofearlierstudies,andSection6concludes. 2.THETESTENVIRONMENT TheDartmouthCollegecampusiscompact,withover161build- ingson200acres,includingadministrative,academic,residential, andathleticbuildings.Everybuildingiswiredtothecampusback- bonenetwork.Everyoffice,dormroom,andlecturehall,andin someplaceseveryseatinalecturehall,haswiredEthernet.In2001
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/2004broadbandforum/comments/ReThinkResearchAssoc.pdf
  • CTIA, the body representing the cellular industry, put forward a compromise on the 800MHz swap, which sought to find a middle ground between Nextel's proposals and objections from Verizon Wireless but in fact was generally hostile to the smaller operator. It suggested that Nextel pay $3bn for a trust fund for public safety licensees and in return get spectrum at 2.1GHz instead of 1.9GHz. Nextel has already said it will not accept bands at 2.1GHz. Nextel has been campaigning to swap the bands that affect public safety (16MHz of spec- trum in the 700MHz, 800MHz and 900MHz bands) for an equivalent amount of new space in the 800MHz and 1.9GHz spectrum for cellphones, for a charge of around $850m. The ad-
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/2004broadbandforum/comments/transcript_051904.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/2004broadbandforum/comments/transcript_051904.pdf
  • base stations and handsets and everything. So the capital that was willing to invest needed a whole bunch of other things to come into place. So the basic message here today is, given what my experience in 1999, and what we've heard today, whether it's the broadband services through the 24 gigahertz line-of-site stuff or it's 2.5 or 3.6 or 2.1 or 1.9. The technologies and the capabilities are all there for this to take off. Not only that, it's with complimentary services on the low power, unlicensed devices which really seed the market and the appetite for broadband. So the last thing that happened to me, as from a personal experience, I think in 2000 -- sometime in between '99
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/da051650PublicUse.pdf
  • Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 1 Wireless Priority Service for National Security / Emergency Preparedness: Algorithms for Public Use Reservation and Network Performance Prepared for: DynCorp 15000 Conference Center Drive Chantilly, VA Prepared by: Nyquetek Inc 8397 Piping Rock Millersville, MD August 30, 2002 Version 0.9 2 Table of Contents 1. Summary.....................................................................................................................5 1.1 Purpose................................................................................................................9 1.2 Scope...................................................................................................................9 1.3 Organization of Paper.........................................................................................9 2. Problem Description.................................................................................................11 2.1 Severe Congestion............................................................................................12 2.2 NS/EP Leadership and Key Staff Traffic..........................................................12 2.3 Network Architecture........................................................................................14 2.4 WPS Queuing Features.....................................................................................16 3. Public Use Reservation Algorithms..........................................................................17 3.1 PURQ-AC Performance....................................................................................21 3.2 Public Use Reservation by Channel Allocation (PURCA)...............................24 3.3 Public Use Reservation by Preference and Limitation (PURPL).....................24 3.4 Public Use Reservation by Departure Allocation (PURDA)............................25 3.5 Public Use Reservation with Queuing (PURQ)................................................26 3.6 Public Use Reservation
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/fcc00-348.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/fcc00-348.pdf
  • Rcd at 17,711 and 17,715. PSWAC Final Report at 317-318. Shared systems also offer a high level of built-in interoperability. Id. See, e.g., PSWAC Final Report at 2. Pennsylvania Comments at 5, see also NYSTEC Comments at 22-23; PSWN Reply Comments at 8. Third Notice, 14 FCC Rcd 231 � 176. See PSWAC Final Report at 2-4, 19 (Key Finding 2.1.7), 22-23 (Key Recommendation 2.2.3). We are adopting a definition of ``state'' that includes United States territories and possessions. See 47 C.F.R. � 90.7, as amended (Appendix F). States will use FCC Form 601 for this application. We also believe that by allowing each state to elect whether to take the designated spectrum, we address Arizona and APCO concerns and avoid
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/avatar-migratory-bird-report10104.pdf
  • Church St. West Chester, Pennsylvania 19382 EDM International, Inc. 4001 Automation Way Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Pandion Systems, Inc 5200 NW 43rd Street Suite 102-314 Gainesville, Florida 32606 September 30, 2004 Notice Of Inquiry Comment Review i September 2004 Final TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM................................................................................1-1 1.2 OBJECTIVES...................................................................................................................1-2 1.3 GENERAL CAVEATS....................................................................................................1-2 2.TECHNICAL APPROACH ..................................................................................................2-1 2.1 COMMENT REVIEW PROCESS...................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Review and Selection Process...............................................................................2-1 2.2 STUDY/CITATION REVIEW PROCESS......................................................................2-1 3. BIRD COLLISIONS WITH TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS............................3-1 3.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW..................................................................................................3-1 3.2 REPRESENTATIVE STUDIES AND INCIDENTAL MORTALITY REPORTS .......3-4 3.2.1 Study Duration and Survey Methods.......................................................3-11 3.2.2 Survey Biases...........................................................................................3-11 3.2.3 Mass Mortalities vs. "Trickle Kills"........................................................3-13 3.2.4 Declining Mortality..................................................................................3-15 3.3 NOTICE OF INQUIRY COMMENT REVIEW AND SPECIFIC FACTORS AFFECTING BIRD COLLISIONS......................................................................................3-16 3.3.1
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/fc000289.pdf
  • by 2003 over 66 percent of all wireless subscribers will use SMS to send and receive messages, get information, make data inquiries, and schedule reservations.374 SMS is particularly popular in Europe. By April 1999, customers in the European Union were transmitting one billion short messages per month.375 Sonera (Finland) reports that by year-end 1999 more than 60 percent of its 2.1 million subscribers were using SMS and averaged 21 messages per month.376 367 Id. at 26. 368 Id. at 28. 369 Id. at 29. 370 Id. at 30. 371 Andrew M. Seybold, Short Messaging Service (SMS), MOTHERING MAGAZINE, June 25, 1999, available in 1999 WL 16633524. GSM networks permit messages of 160 characters, CDMA permits 256 characters, and iDEN allows 140
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/fcc00289.doc
  • by 2003 over 66 percent of all wireless subscribers will use SMS to send and receive messages, get information, make data inquiries, and schedule reservations. SMS is particularly popular in Europe. By April 1999, customers in the European Union were transmitting one billion short messages per month. Sonera (Finland) reports that by year-end 1999 more than 60 percent of its 2.1 million subscribers were using SMS and averaged 21 messages per month. Internet Access A number of U.S. operators are currently offering mobile Internet access at rates of 9.6 kbps to 19.2 kbps. The services vary in terms of what content can be accessed, how content is accessed, and the costs associated with accessing content. This subsection begins with a discussion
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/brsebs/releases/fcc97360.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/brsebs/releases/fcc97360.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/brsebs/releases/fcc97360.txt
  • channels. Id. We also have agreed that the 20 hours per channel per week ITFS programming standard for licensees leasing excess capacity helps to insure that ITFS licenses are not secured merely to realize financial gain from wireless cable operators. Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, & Cable Television Relay Service, Order on Reconsideration, 6 FCC Rcd 6764, 6773-74 (1991) ("Wireless Cable Reconsideration Order"). See Amendment of Part 74 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the Instructional Television Fixed Service, Notice of Proposed
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=filing_comments&id=aws
  • release a document informing the public of the date comments are due and what specific information it is seeking comments about. AWS Proceedings Docket No. 00-258 allocates spectrum below 3 GHz for Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation ("3G") systems. [36]View filed comments Docket No. 02-353 establishes services rules for the 90 MHz of AWS spectrum in the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz bands. [37]View filed comments Docket No. 04-356 focuses on establishing service rules for the 20 MHz of AWS spectrum at 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz, and 2175-2180 MHz. [38]View filed comments File Comments: [39]Electronic Comment File Submission You will need a proceeding docket no. [40]Return to Top Arrow Return To Top Last reviewed/updated on 11/2/2009 [41]FCC Home [42]Search
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_bandplan&id=ebs_brs
  • by the prior band plan. The BRS/EBS R&O & FNPRM also expands the original MDS-ITFS band by adding to it five megahertz of additional spectrum from below 2500 MHz, which increases the total size of the band to 194 megahertz. This will provide room for the future relocation of MDS Channels 1 and 2, which are presently located in the 2.1 GHz band. The new band plan will enable BRS and EBS providers to use the 2495-2690 MHz spectrum in a more technologically and economically efficient manner. The new, more flexible rules will facilitate the growth of new and innovative wireless technologies and services, including wireless broadband services that have the potential to compete with cable and DSL broadband providers and
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_home&id=aws
  • Related Services [40]Cellular [41]Broadband PCS [42]BRS & EBS Band Plan Band(s) 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz; additional F and G blocks proposed Proceedings Docket No. 00-258 allocates spectrum below 3 GHz for Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation ("3G") systems. [43]View filed comments Docket No. 02-353 establishes services rules for the 90 MHz of AWS spectrum in the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz bands. [44]View filed comments Docket No. 04-356 focuses on establishing service rules for the 20 MHz of AWS spectrum at 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz, and 2175-2180 MHz. [45]View filed comments [46]Filing Comments Auctions [47]#66: AWS-1 8/9/2006 - 9/18/2006 [48]Return to Top Arrow Return To Top Last reviewed/updated on 3/29/2005 [49]FCC Home [50]Search [51]RSS [52]Updates [53]E-Filing [54]Initiatives [55]Consumers
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_releases&id=aws
  • [19]Broadband PCS [20]Cellular [21]BRS & EBS [22]800 MHz Band Reconfiguration [23]Spectrum Policy Task Force [24]Wireless Broadband Access Task Force [25]NTIA 3G Page [26]Skip Navigation [27]FCC > [28]WTB > [29]Services > [30]AWS Spectrum Home > Releases [31]FCC Site Map Releases 2008 6/20/2008 NEWS RELEASE FCC Seeks Comment on Proposed Rule Changes for Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) Spectrum in the 1.9 and 2.1 GHz Bands The FCC released a Further Notice that proposes public access to free, nationwide, high-speed wireless broadband Internet services using a portion of the winning bidder's network in the 2.1 AWS spectrum. [32]pdf - [33]Word 6/20/2008 FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (FCC 08-158) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 2155-2175 MHz/Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_releases&id=aws&page=N
  • PCS [21]Cellular [22]BRS & EBS [23]800 MHz Band Reconfiguration [24]Spectrum Policy Task Force [25]Wireless Broadband Access Task Force [26]NTIA 3G Page [27]Skip Navigation [28]FCC > [29]WTB > [30]Services > [31]AWS Spectrum Home > Releases [32]FCC Site Map Releases News Releases 6/20/2008 NEWS RELEASE FCC Seeks Comment on Proposed Rule Changes for Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) Spectrum in the 1.9 and 2.1 GHz Bands The FCC released a Further Notice that proposes public access to free, nationwide, high-speed wireless broadband Internet services using a portion of the winning bidder's network in the 2.1 AWS spectrum. [33]pdf - [34]Word 3/21/2008 NEWS RELEASE FCC Modifies PCS and AWS Power Limit Rules to Facilitate Broadband Wireless Technologies The FCC modified the rules governing Broadband PCS
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_releases&id=aws&page=O
  • Services and Advanced Wireless Services to permit use of a power spectral density model when measuring and calculating emissions and power limits. [33]pdf - [34]Word 12/12/2007 ORDER (DA 07-4977) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 2155-2175 MHz Band [35]pdf - [36]Word 11/15/2007 ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION (DA 07-4619) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands [37]pdf - [38]Word 10/26/2006 ORDER (DA 06-2120) AST Telecom, LLC/Public Service Wireless Services, Inc./Cavalier Wireless, LLC Granted all three of the Applicants' waiver requests [39]pdf - [40]Word 4/25/2006 REPORT AND ORDER (FCC 06-52) Implementation of the Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act and Modernization of the Commission's Competitive Bidding Rules and Procedures, Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_releases&id=aws&page=RM
  • Access Task Force [26]NTIA 3G Page [27]Skip Navigation [28]FCC > [29]WTB > [30]Services > [31]AWS Spectrum Home > Releases [32]FCC Site Map Releases Rulemakings 9/24/2004 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (FCC 04-218) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands, Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands [33]pdf - [34]Word Statement of Chairman Powell: [35]pdf - [36]Word Statement of Commissioner Abernathy: [37]pdf - [38]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [39]pdf - [40]Word Statement of Commissioner Adelstein: [41]pdf - [42]Word 7/7/2003 FOURTH NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (FCC 03-134) Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_releases&id=aws&ry=2002
  • Related Sites [20]Broadband PCS [21]Cellular [22]BRS & EBS [23]800 MHz Band Reconfiguration [24]Spectrum Policy Task Force [25]Wireless Broadband Access Task Force [26]NTIA 3G Page [27]Skip Navigation [28]FCC > [29]WTB > [30]Services > [31]AWS Spectrum Home > Releases [32]FCC Site Map Releases 2002 11/22/2002 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (FCC 02-305) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 Ghz Bands [33]pdf - [34]Word 11/15/2002 SECOND REPORT AND ORDER (FCC 02-304) Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems Identifed and allocated spectrum to support new advanced wireless services [35]pdf - [36]Word 7/22/2002 REPORT
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_releases&id=aws&ry=2003
  • Navigation Related Sites [20]Broadband PCS [21]Cellular [22]BRS & EBS [23]800 MHz Band Reconfiguration [24]Spectrum Policy Task Force [25]Wireless Broadband Access Task Force [26]NTIA 3G Page [27]Skip Navigation [28]FCC > [29]WTB > [30]Services > [31]AWS Spectrum Home > Releases [32]FCC Site Map Releases 2003 11/25/2003 REPORT AND ORDER (FCC 03-251) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands In this Report and Order, we adopt service rules for Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) in the 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz bands, including provisions for application, licensing, operating and technical rules, and for competitive bidding [33]pdf - [34]Word Statement of Chairman Powell: [35]pdf - [36]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [37]pdf - [38]Word Statement of Commissioner Martin: [39]pdf - [40]Word
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_releases&id=aws&ry=2004
  • to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, Including Third Generation Wireless Systems [43]pdf - [44]Word Statement of Chairman Powell: [45]pdf - [46]Word 9/24/2004 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (FCC 04-218) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands, Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands [47]pdf - [48]Word Statement of Chairman Powell: [49]pdf - [50]Word Statement of Commissioner Abernathy: [51]pdf - [52]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [53]pdf - [54]Word Statement of Commissioner Adelstein: [55]pdf - [56]Word 9/22/2004 SIXTH REPORT AND ORDER, THIRD MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, AND FIFTH MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (FCC 04-219) Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_releases&id=aws&ry=2005
  • 9/29/2005 EIGHTH REPORT AND ORDER (FCC 05-172) Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems [33]pdf - [34]Word 8/15/2005 ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION (FCC 05-149) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands The FCC advanced its efforts to make spectrum available for an array of innovative wireless services and technologies, including voice, data, video, and other wireless broadband services offered over Third Generation ("3G") mobile networks. [35]pdf - [36]Word Statement of Chairman Martin: [37]pdf - [38]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [39]pdf - [40]Word Statement of Commissioner Adelstein: [41]pdf - [42]Word
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_releases&id=aws&ry=2007
  • Broadband Access Task Force [26]NTIA 3G Page [27]Skip Navigation [28]FCC > [29]WTB > [30]Services > [31]AWS Spectrum Home > Releases [32]FCC Site Map Releases 2007 12/12/2007 ORDER (DA 07-4977) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 2155-2175 MHz Band [33]pdf - [34]Word 11/15/2007 ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION (DA 07-4619) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands [35]pdf - [36]Word 9/19/2007 NEWS RELEASE FCC Seeks Comment on Service Rules for the 2155-2175 MHz Advanced Wireless Services Band [37]pdf - [38]Word 9/19/2007 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING (FCC 07-164) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 2155-2175 MHz Band [39]pdf - [40]Word Statement of Chairman Kevin J. Martin: [41]pdf - [42]Word Statement of Commissioner Michael
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_releases&id=aws&ry=2008
  • [20]Broadband PCS [21]Cellular [22]BRS & EBS [23]800 MHz Band Reconfiguration [24]Spectrum Policy Task Force [25]Wireless Broadband Access Task Force [26]NTIA 3G Page [27]Skip Navigation [28]FCC > [29]WTB > [30]Services > [31]AWS Spectrum Home > Releases [32]FCC Site Map Releases 2008 6/20/2008 NEWS RELEASE FCC Seeks Comment on Proposed Rule Changes for Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) Spectrum in the 1.9 and 2.1 GHz Bands The FCC released a Further Notice that proposes public access to free, nationwide, high-speed wireless broadband Internet services using a portion of the winning bidder's network in the 2.1 AWS spectrum. [33]pdf - [34]Word 6/20/2008 FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (FCC 08-158) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 2155-2175 MHz/Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/siting/fact2.pdf
  • that is occupied as a workplace or residence and where either workers or the general public may have access. The term "power" in column 2 of Table 1 refers to total operating power of the transmitting operation in question in terms of effective radiated power (ERP), equivalent isotopically radiated power (EIRP), or peak envelope power (PEP), as defined in � 2.1 of this chapter. For the case of the Cellular Radiotelephone Service, subpart H of part 22 of this chapter; the Personal Communications Service, part 24 of this chapter and covered Specialized Mobile Radio Service operations, part 90 of this chapter, the phrase "total power of all channels" in column 2 of Table 1 means the sum of the ERP or
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/about/2012_05_11-SKE-Public_Access_Files_for_the_Unlicensed_Wireless_Microphone_Registrations_v1_3.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/about/2012_05_11-SKE-Public_Access_Files_for_the_Unlicensed_Wireless_Microphone_Registrations_v1_3.pdf
  • File Number varchar(14) 4 Comment Date mm/dd/yyyy 5 Description varchar(255) 6 Status Code char(1) 7 Status Date mm/dd/yyyy Sample Record RD|123456789|0004567890|I|NE|2|UM|Y|Y|Y|Y|2|4|34|Thomas|R|Miller|Sr.|Chi ef, IT Department|03/22/2012|03/22/2012|03/28/2012|03/28/2013|03/29/2012 CH|123456789|0004567890|R|1|36|1|S|1|3 CH|123456789|0004567890|R|1|36|1|O|2|Subway South Co|3 CH|123456789|0004567890|R|1|36|1|O|3|Motorola Inc|11 CH|123456789|0004567890|R|2|38|2|S|1||4 CH|123456789|0004567890|R|2|38|2|O|2|North Hollywood Cab Co|3 CH|123456789|0004567890|O|1|06|3|S|1|15 CH|123456789|0004567890|O|1|06|3|O|2|City South Communications Co|2 CH|123456789|0004567890|O|2|19|4|S|1|14 CH|123456789|0004567890|O|2|19|4|O|2|North Broadcast Co|3 CH|123456789|0004567890|O|2|19|4|O|3|West End Marketing Inc|13 VN|123456789|0004567890|NYC Golf Resort|O|Golf Tournament at Resort|1212 White Plains Rd|New York|Bronx|NY|10451|D L1|123456789|0004567890|1|40|51|00.1|N|073|51|58.1|W L1|123456789|0004567890|2|40|51|01.1|N|073|51|57.1|W L1|123456789|0004567890|3|40|51|02.1|N|073|51|56.1|W EV|123456789|0004567890|R|1|04/29/2012|05/12/2012|09:00AM|05:00PM|Y||||| |Y EV|123456789|0004567890|R|2|04/30/2012|05/11/2012|03:00PM|10:00PM||Y|Y|Y |Y|Y| A4|123456789|0004567890|W|Waiver Request|03/22/2012|wav.doc|A C1|123456789|0004567890|03/28/2012|Reviewed and Approved for Grant. MLB|A|03/28/2012 - E M X Y � � � � � kd5 kd� S T U \ e z { | � � � � � � � � � ` � � � (c) � � (R) � � � � � � � � � � �
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/ebf/special_cond_code21.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/ebf/special_cond_code21.txt
  • system is 5 watts.||||| 1006|LP|Frequency 155.475 is authorized on a secondary non-interference basis to Canadian RCMP stations.||||| 1007|LP|The authorization has been granted with the understanding that if interference is caused (either by U.S. or Canada), the license is subject to cancellation.||||| 1008|PG|Operation of a fixed transmitter on the Canadian side of Line 'A' or Line 'C', as defined in Section 2.1 of the Commission's Rules, is not permitted without obtaining prior Commission approval by filing the appropriate FCC application.|||||P 1009|AL|This authorization is conditioned on the licensee notifying the Commission Page 7 special_cond_code21.txt of each transmitter site located within 120 km (75 miles) of the U.S.-Mexican border. Specifically, for each site within the border area, the licensee must file an application t|o
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=nadcon
  • Convert to NAD83 using [66]Method #2 below Do Not Convert Baker Island Howland Island Jarvis Island Johnston Island Kingman Reef Midway Island Northern Mariana Islands Palmyra Island (Atoll of Palmyra) Wake Island Do not convert to NAD83; coordinates remain in local datum Return to Top Arrow [67]Return to Top NADCON Software Conversion must be done using Version 2.0 or Version 2.1 of the NADCON software. Interactive NADCON software is available at [68]http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/TOOLS/Nadcon/Nadcon.html. The following chart summarizes the input parameters of the NADCON software. All other latitude/longitude combinations are "out of bounds" (i.e. too far offshore) and cannot be converted using the NADCON software because NAD83 is not applicable to these sites. Latitude (degrees) Longitude (degrees) Location min latitude max latitude min
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/weeklypn.htm?job=nadcon
  • Convert to NAD83 using [66]Method #2 below Do Not Convert Baker Island Howland Island Jarvis Island Johnston Island Kingman Reef Midway Island Northern Mariana Islands Palmyra Island (Atoll of Palmyra) Wake Island Do not convert to NAD83; coordinates remain in local datum Return to Top Arrow [67]Return to Top NADCON Software Conversion must be done using Version 2.0 or Version 2.1 of the NADCON software. Interactive NADCON software is available at [68]http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/TOOLS/Nadcon/Nadcon.html. The following chart summarizes the input parameters of the NADCON software. All other latitude/longitude combinations are "out of bounds" (i.e. too far offshore) and cannot be converted using the NADCON software because NAD83 is not applicable to these sites. Latitude (degrees) Longitude (degrees) Location min latitude max latitude min
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-304247A1.pdf
  • RM WMR299 101-42-21.0 W 0004579806 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC PHILLIP 01/20/2011 06345.49000 43-58-15.1 N SD RM WMR299 101-42-21.0 W 0004579806 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC PHILLIP 01/20/2011 06375.14000 43-58-15.1 N SD RM WMR299 101-42-21.0 W 0004579806 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC PHILLIP 01/20/2011 06625.00000 43-58-15.1 N HI RM WLK718 157-49-51.0 W 0004579829 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHONOLULU 01/20/2011 10572.50000 21-17-02.1 N HI RM WLV641 157-56-29.2 W 0004579858 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCAIEA 01/20/2011 10875.00000 21-22-56.8 N Page 21 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI RM WLS628 157-54-37.0 W 0004580059 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCAMP H M SMITH 01/20/2011 06004.50000
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-305045A1.pdf
  • N OK AM KNKN511 098-59-03.3 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPUTNAM 03/03/2011 35-52-09.0 N OK AM KNKN511 099-19-39.2 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSharon 03/03/2011 36-14-09.0 N OK AM KNKN511 098-19-23.5 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWATONGA 03/03/2011 35-50-35.6 N OK AM KNKN511 098-35-41.1 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWATONGA 03/03/2011 35-51-23.5 N OK AM KNKN511 098-43-02.1 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWEATHERFORD 03/03/2011 35-30-36.0 N OK AM KNKN511 098-43-03.0 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWEATHERFORD 03/03/2011 35-30-39.0 N MI AM KNKN711 083-30-39.9 W 0004400919 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC AKRON 03/01/2011 43-33-54.3 N MI AM KNKN711 083-02-29.8 W 0004400919 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BAD AXE 03/01/2011 43-47-00.1 N MI AM KNKN711 083-21-59.2 W
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-305322A1.pdf
  • City of Granite Falls 03/16/2011 00122.80000 44-45-08.0 N MN NE 094-22-54.9 W 0004654755 Hutchinson, City of Hutchinson 03/16/2011 00122.80000 44-51-35.9 N MN NE 093-19-00.8 W 0004654822 Faribault, City of Faribault 03/16/2011 00122.80000 44-19-59.9 N AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CO MD WGR736 105-05-02.1 W 0004657058 EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION Lakewood 03/18/2011 00948.50000 39-39-22.9 N IL NE 111-55-22.2 W 0004650275 EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION Tx Tower City 03/14/2011 00950.00000 11-22-33.3 N Page 1 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IN NE 000-53-45.0 W 0004650281 EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION Crawfordsville 03/14/2011
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-305453A1.pdf
  • 03/22/2011 19475.00000 39-59-19.0 N Page 43 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City KY MD WPNB393 087-07-33.0 W 0004661639 BIG RIVERS ELECTRIC CORPORATIONCENTRAL CITY 03/23/2011 00934.17500 37-22-01.0 N IL MD WNTH421 087-37-54.0 W 0004662802 WGN Continental Broadcasting CompanyCHICAGO 03/23/2011 21820.00000 41-53-01.8 N IL MD WPNJ494 087-37-02.1 W 0004662835 WGN Continental Broadcasting CompanyCHICAGO 03/23/2011 21820.00000 41-51-59.1 N IL MD WQGW743 087-37-30.6 W 0004662957 Towerstream Corp. Chicago 03/23/2011 23070.00000 41-53-49.3 N NC MD WED845 077-04-41.8 W 0004663486 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMAULANDER 03/24/2011 06865.00000 36-15-19.5 N NC MD WED846 077-04-07.0 W 0004663502 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMWILLIAMSTON 03/24/2011 06705.00000 35-50-28.0 N DC MD WQHG580 077-02-14.9 W 0004663740 JOHNS
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-305717A1.pdf
  • 42-30-39.3 N Page 13 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY MD WMS263 077-38-05.3 W 0004681445 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC DANSVILLE 04/06/2011 02174.80000 42-30-39.3 N NY MD WMS264 077-41-25.1 W 0004681465 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HORNELL 04/06/2011 02124.80000 42-21-02.1 N WY MD WQKK442 104-31-00.6 W 0004681512 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Sundance 04/06/2011 05955.08000 44-20-19.6 N WY MD WQKK442 104-31-00.6 W 0004681512 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Sundance 04/06/2011 06024.27000 44-20-19.6 N WY MD WQKK442 104-31-00.6 W 0004681512 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Sundance 04/06/2011 06715.62500 44-20-19.6 N UT MD WQKK428 113-52-59.8 W 0004681517 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-305954A1.pdf
  • Transport Management, Inc. ST. PAUL 04/15/2011 11305.00000 44-54-49.7 N MN MD WQJV387 093-11-17.5 W 0004692737 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. ST. PAUL 04/15/2011 23485.00000 44-54-49.7 N MN MD WQJV625 093-11-21.5 W 0004692753 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 04/15/2011 10775.00000 44-58-00.1 N MN MD WQJV625 093-11-21.5 W 0004692753 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 04/15/2011 10815.00000 44-58-00.1 N VA MD WQHH286 077-30-02.1 W 0004692807 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/15/2011 22610.00000 37-34-44.4 N VA MD WQHH286 077-30-02.1 W 0004692807 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/15/2011 22635.00000 37-34-44.4 N VA MD WQHH286 077-30-02.1 W 0004692807 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/15/2011 23235.00000 37-34-44.4 N VA MD WQLZ467 077-29-46.7 W 0004692812 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/15/2011 21410.00000 37-33-36.7 N VA MD WQHF373 077-31-22.4
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-306296A1.pdf
  • PCS, LLC JUNE LAKE 04/29/2011 06645.00000 37-44-52.5 N GA NE 081-57-48.0 W 0004702584 TOWER CLOUD, INC. Green's Cut 04/25/2011 10815.00000 33-11-50.2 N GA NE 081-57-48.0 W 0004702584 TOWER CLOUD, INC. Green's Cut 04/25/2011 10855.00000 33-11-50.2 N GA NE 082-00-32.4 W 0004702587 TOWER CLOUD, INC. WAYNESBORO 04/25/2011 11345.00000 33-05-56.5 N GA NE 082-24-25.8 W 0004702595 TOWER CLOUD, INC. Appling 04/25/2011 10775.00000 33-37-02.1 N GA NE 082-16-04.5 W 0004702600 TOWER CLOUD, INC. Appling 04/25/2011 10855.00000 33-37-16.9 N NV NE 115-13-22.8 W 0004702748 MetroPCS AWS, LLC Las Vegas 04/25/2011 11445.00000 36-02-00.1 N NV NE 115-30-01.6 W 0004702753 MetroPCS AWS, LLC Las Vegas 04/25/2011 10955.00000 35-57-55.2 N Page 14 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-306419A1.pdf
  • 112-02-37.0 W 0004712480 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation RICHFIELD 05/02/2011 11305.00000 38-46-21.0 N UT MD WQHZ280 112-13-54.8 W 0004712482 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation Fillmore 05/02/2011 10562.50000 38-51-55.9 N UT MD WQHZ280 112-13-54.8 W 0004712482 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation Fillmore 05/02/2011 10735.00000 38-51-55.9 N UT MD WQHZ280 112-13-54.8 W 0004712482 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation Fillmore 05/02/2011 10815.00000 38-51-55.9 N VT MD WPNB402 073-11-02.1 W 0004712530 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC COLCHESTER 05/02/2011 05945.20000 44-30-30.1 N VT MD WPNB402 073-11-02.1 W 0004712530 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC COLCHESTER 05/02/2011 06063.80000 44-30-30.1 N VT MD WPNB402 073-11-02.1 W 0004712530 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC COLCHESTER 05/02/2011 06765.00000 44-30-30.1 N VT MD WPNB402 073-11-02.1 W 0004712530 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC COLCHESTER 05/02/2011 10735.00000 44-30-30.1 N
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-306653A1.pdf
  • INC GROVETON 05/11/2011 06765.00000 31-02-03.0 N TX NE 095-08-36.9 W 0004724263 The Boeing Company Houston 05/11/2011 17765.00000 29-36-24.6 N TX NE 095-08-36.9 W 0004724263 The Boeing Company Houston 05/11/2011 17815.00000 29-36-24.6 N TX NE 095-08-36.9 W 0004724263 The Boeing Company Houston 05/11/2011 17865.00000 29-36-24.6 N TX NE 095-08-36.9 W 0004724263 The Boeing Company Houston 05/11/2011 17915.00000 29-36-24.6 N TX NE 095-06-02.1 W 0004724264 The Boeing Company Pasadena 05/11/2011 19325.00000 29-35-28.6 N TX NE 095-06-02.1 W 0004724264 The Boeing Company Pasadena 05/11/2011 19375.00000 29-35-28.6 N TX NE 095-06-02.1 W 0004724264 The Boeing Company Pasadena 05/11/2011 19425.00000 29-35-28.6 N TX NE 095-06-02.1 W 0004724264 The Boeing Company Pasadena 05/11/2011 19475.00000 29-35-28.6 N ID NE 112-13-15.0 W 0004724350 PacifiCorp Idaho Falls 05/11/2011 06625.00000 43-33-16.8
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-306919A1.pdf
  • Corporation DURANGO 05/23/2011 37-21-47.0 N CO MD KNKN420 107-40-22.2 W 0004737497 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation Ouray 05/23/2011 38-02-30.0 N CO MD KNKN420 107-46-34.8 W 0004737497 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation Ridgway 05/23/2011 38-10-54.0 N IN MD KNKN604 087-19-22.2 W 0004738284 INDIANA RSA #1 LIMITED PARTNERSHFair Oaks 05/23/2011 41-00-31.7 N SD MD KNKN304 099-11-11.5 W 0004739650 Cellular Inc. Network Corporation Burke 05/23/2011 43-22-02.1 N ID MD KNKQ387 114-19-18.4 W 0004739670 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Hailey 05/23/2011 43-30-12.3 N MD MD KNKN938 079-15-43.4 W 0004741630 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Accident 05/25/2011 39-40-53.6 N MD MD KNKN938 079-21-55.2 W 0004741630 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Deep Creek 05/25/2011 39-34-05.2 N MD MD KNKN938 079-18-45.1 W 0004741630 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Grantsville 05/25/2011 39-42-20.6
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-307787A1.pdf
  • MD WMM368 084-51-06.0 W 0004771497 Cellco Partnership GLENCOE 06/17/2011 06093.45000 38-43-25.0 N KY MD WMM368 084-51-06.0 W 0004771497 Cellco Partnership GLENCOE 06/17/2011 11325.00000 38-43-25.0 N ME MD WPNL469 068-00-09.0 W 0004771563 MAINE RSA #1, INC. VAN BUREN 06/17/2011 06256.54000 47-08-45.0 N ME MD WPNL469 068-00-09.0 W 0004771563 MAINE RSA #1, INC. VAN BUREN 06/17/2011 06585.00000 47-08-45.0 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0004771575 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 06/17/2011 05945.20000 46-44-22.2 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0004771575 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 06/17/2011 06004.50000 46-44-22.2 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0004771575 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 06/17/2011 06785.00000 46-44-22.2 N ME MD WMR984 067-56-02.1 W 0004771575 MAINE RSA #1, INC. PRESQUE ISLE 06/17/2011 10552.50000 46-44-22.2 N
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-308228A1.pdf
  • 44-56-30.3 N WV MD WML682 081-36-12.2 W 0004782164 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCHARLESTON 06/27/2011 11235.00000 38-26-36.4 N WV MD WML682 081-36-12.2 W 0004782164 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCHARLESTON 06/27/2011 11285.00000 38-26-36.4 N NJ MD WQMK387 073-55-21.0 W 0004782195 Goosetown Network Services, LLC ALPINE 06/27/2011 11245.00000 40-57-39.0 N HI MD WLK718 157-49-51.0 W 0004782267 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHONOLULU 06/27/2011 19615.00000 21-17-02.1 N Page 8 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI MD WLK717 157-50-21.0 W 0004782282 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHONOLULU 06/27/2011 18055.00000 21-17-47.0 N WV MD WMW949 080-31-08.2 W 0004782565 HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPASBURY 06/27/2011 06345.49000 37-47-34.4 N WV MD
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2002
  • and Other Auction Procedures [178]pdf - [179]Word Attachment A: [180]pdf - [181]xls 11/22/2002 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 02-3229) NewComm Wireless Services, Inc., ClearComm, L.P. , and TEM Puerto Rico, Inc. Seek FCC Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses [182]pdf - [183]text - [184]Word 11/22/2002 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (FCC 02-305) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 Ghz Bands [185]pdf - [186]Word 11/19/2002 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 02-3198) Michael de Leon Hawthorne, Trustee, Seeks Further Extension of Wireless Assets Trust [187]pdf - [188]text - [189]Word 11/15/2002 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING AND ORDER (FCC 02-302) Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding Dedicated Short-Range Communication Services in the 5.850-5.925 GHz Band (5.9 GHz Band) [190]pdf - [191]text - [192]Word 11/15/2002
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2003
  • Data Service Spectrum Auction [148]pdf - [149]Word Attachment A: [150]pdf Attachment B: [151]pdf 11/25/2003 PUBLIC NOTICE Erratum to WTB Announces it is Prepared to Grant Upper and Lower Paging Band Licenses upon Full and Timely Payment; Auction Event No. 48 [152]pdf - [153]Word 11/25/2003 REPORT AND ORDER (FCC 03-251) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands [154]pdf - [155]Word Statement of Chairman Powell: [156]pdf - [157]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [158]pdf - [159]Word Statement of Commissioner Martin: [160]pdf - [161]Word Statement of Commissioner Adelstein: [162]pdf - [163]Word 11/24/2003 ERRATUM (DA 03-3780) Promoting Efficient Use of Spectrum Through Elimination of Barriers to the Development of Secondary Markets [164]pdf - [165]Word 11/24/2003 NEWS RELEASE FCC's Wireless
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2004
  • Commissioner Adelstein: [314]pdf - [315]Word 9/27/2004 ORDER (DA 04-3062) Telephone Number Portability; Emergency Motion for Stay of the CMRS LNP Deadline [316]pdf - [317]Word 9/24/2004 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (FCC 04-218) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands, Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands [318]pdf - [319]Word Statement of Chairman Powell: [320]pdf - [321]Word Statement of Commissioner Abernathy: [322]pdf - [323]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [324]pdf - [325]Word Statement of Commissioner Adelstein: [326]pdf - [327]Word 9/24/2004 LETTER (DA 04-3065) Letter Denying Tracy Broadcasting Corporation's Request in Auction 37 [328]pdf - [329]Word 9/23/2004 LETTER (DA 04-3058) Ideas for Business, Inc. - Request for
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2005
  • [351]xls Attachment B: [352]pdf - [353]Word 8/23/2005 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 05-2316) Auction of Automated Maritime Telecommunications System Licenses Closes; Winning Bidders Announced for Auction No. 61 [354]pdf - [355]Word Attachment A: [356]pdf Attachment B: [357]pdf Attachment C: [358]pdf Attachment D: [359]pdf - [360]Word 8/15/2005 ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION (FCC 05-149) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands [361]pdf - [362]Word Statement of Chairman Martin: [363]pdf - [364]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [365]pdf - [366]Word Statement of Commissioner Adelstein: [367]pdf - [368]Word 8/11/2005 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER (DA 05-2274) Petition for Waiver of Section 64.402 of the Commission's Rules [369]pdf - [370]Word 8/11/2005 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 05-2272) Ex Parte Status of Application for FCC Consent to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2006
  • and Order [584]pdf - [585]Word [586]See FCC 06-52 6/16/2006 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (DA 06-1285) WSS, LLC Request for Waiver of Section 1.2109 of the Commission's Rules [587]pdf - [588]Word 6/15/2006 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 06-1279) WTB Opens Filing Window for the Proposal to Develop and Manage the Clearinghouse that will Administer the Relocation Cost Sharing Plan for Licensees in the 2.1 GHz Bands [589]pdf - [590]Word 6/14/2006 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 06-1245) America Movil, S.A.DE C.V., Verizon Communications, Inc., and Subsidiaries of Telecommunicaciones De Puerto Rico, Inc. Seek FCC Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations and Request a Declaratory Ruling on Foreign Ownership [591]pdf - [592]Word 6/14/2006 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 06-1272) Licensees of Broadband Radio Service Channels 1 and/or 2/2A
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2007
  • Commissioner Michael J. Copps: [105]pdf - [106]Word Statement of Commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein: [107]pdf - [108]Word Statement of Commissioner Robert M. McDowell: [109]pdf - [110]Word 11/16/2007 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 07-4665) WTB Provides Instructions for Electronic Filing of Cellular Coverage Certifications [111]pdf - [112]Word 11/15/2007 ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION (DA 07-4619) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands [113]pdf - [114]Word 11/15/2007 NEWS RELEASE FCC Consents with Conditions to AT&T Acquisition of Dobson Communications Licenses and Authorizations [115]pdf - [116]Word Statement of Commissioner Robert M. McDowell: [117]pdf - [118]Word 11/15/2007 NEWS RELEASE FCC Waives Portions of its "Designated Entity" Eligibility Rules for the Upper 700 MHz D Block License [119]pdf - [120]Word 11/15/2007 ORDER (FCC 07-197)
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2008
  • Leases, and Authorizations, and Request a Declaratory Ruling on Foreign Ownership [394]pdf - [395]Word 6/24/2008 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 08-1477) Sprint Nextel Corporation and Clearwire Corporation Seek FCC Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations [396]pdf - [397]Word [398]Related Releases 6/20/2008 NEWS RELEASE FCC Seeks Comment on Proposed Rule Changes for Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) Spectrum in the 1.9 and 2.1 GHz Bands [399]pdf - [400]Word 6/20/2008 FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (FCC 08-158) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 2155-2175 MHz/Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz AND 2175-2180 MHz Bands [401]pdf - [402]Word 6/18/2008 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 08-1436) Auction of Cellular Unserved Service Area License Closes; Winning Bidder Announced for
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=releases_page&y=2002&m=11&t=Notice
  • [34]FCC > [35]WTB Home > [36]Releases > Releases [37]FCC Site Map WTB Notices November 2002 2002 Notices: [38]January | [39]February | [40]March | [41]April | [42]May | [43]June | [44]July | [45]August | [46]September | [47]October | November | [48]December 11/22/2002 WTB Notices (FCC 02-305) In the Matter of Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands Proposed service rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands FCC-02-305A1: [49]pdf - [50]word - [51]txt 11/15/2002 WTB Notices (FCC 02-302) Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding Dedicated Short-Range Communication Services in the 5.850-5.925 GHz Band (5.9 GHz Band) Propose service rules to govern the licensing and use of the 5.850-5.925 GHz Band
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=releases_page&y=2004&m=11&t=Order
  • Stations WLK382, WNTC500, WNTC664 and WNTD797, Clayton, OK Denied the Waiver Requests. Denied the Reinstatement Request. Dismissed the Renewal Applications. G... DA-04-3648A1: [100]pdf - [101]word - [102]txt 11/19/2004 WTB Orders (DA 04-3664) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands/Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands Extended the Comment Dates and Reply Comment Dates in this proceeding DA-04-3664A1: [103]pdf - [104]word - [105]txt 11/18/2004 WTB Orders (DA 04-3617) Federal-State Joint Board On Universal Service/Sprint Corporation/Application for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Alabama, et al Granted the Petitions of Sprint Corporation (Sprint) to be designated as an eligible telecommunicati... DA-04-3617A1:
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=releases_page&y=2004&m=9&t=Notice
  • 2004 2004 Notices: [38]January | [39]February | [40]March | [41]April | [42]May | [43]June | [44]July | [45]August | September | [46]October | [47]November | [48]December 09/24/2004 WTB Notices (FCC 04-218) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands, Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands Seek comment on service rules for licensed fixed and mobile services, including advanced wireless se... FCC-04-218A1: [49]pdf - [50]word - [51]txt FCC-04-218A2: [52]pdf - [53]word - [54]txt FCC-04-218A3: [55]pdf - [56]word - [57]txt FCC-04-218A4: [58]pdf - [59]word - [60]txt FCC-04-218A5: [61]pdf - [62]word - [63]txt WTB Notices, September - 2004 has 1 Records. Last reviewed/updated on 07/17/2012 Wireless
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=releases_page&y=2005&m=1&t=Order
  • Erratum correcting Supplemental Order and Order on Reconsideration, FCC 04-294, released Dece... DOC-256170A1: [90]pdf - [91]word - [92]txt FCC-04-294A1_Erratum: - [93]word FCC-04-294A2_Erratum: - [94]word FCC-04-294A3_Erratum: - [95]word 01/19/2005 WTB Orders (DA 05-130) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz Bands/Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands Extended the reply comment deadline for Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 04-218, released Septembe... DA-05-130A1: [96]pdf - [97]word - [98]txt 01/14/2005 WTB Orders (DA 05-82) Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 MHz Band Denied the Motion for Partial Stay of Decision Pending Appellate Review DA-05-82A1: [99]pdf - [100]word - [101]txt 01/12/2005 WTB Orders (FCC 05-5) HISPANIC INFORMATION
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=releases_page&y=2005&m=8&t=Order
  • - [54]txt FCC-05-160A2: [55]pdf - [56]word - [57]txt FCC-05-160A3: [58]pdf - [59]word - [60]txt 08/26/2005 WTB Orders (DA 05-2360) Aloha Partners Dismissed as moot, the Request for Expedited Ruling. Denied the Request for Extension of Time to Fi... DA-05-2360A1: [61]pdf - [62]word - [63]txt 08/15/2005 WTB Orders (FCC 05-149) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands The FCC advanced its efforts to make spectrum available for an array of innovative wireless services... FCC-05-149A1: [64]pdf - [65]word - [66]txt FCC-05-149A2: [67]pdf - [68]word - [69]txt FCC-05-149A3: [70]pdf - [71]word - [72]txt FCC-05-149A4: [73]pdf - [74]word - [75]txt 08/11/2005 WTB Orders (DA 05-2274) Petition for Waiver of Section 64.402 of the Commission's Rules Granted the Petition
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=releases_page&y=2006&m=10&t=Public_Notice
  • of License Authorization Applications, Transfer of Control of Licensee Applications, De Facto Transfer Lease Applications and Spectrum Manager Lease Notifications, Designated Entity Reportable ELIGIBILITY EVENT APPLICATIONS, AND DESIGNATED ENTITY ANNUAL REPORTS ACTION DOC-267753A1: [173]pdf - [174]txt 10/04/2006 WTB Public Notices (DA 06-1984) WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU FINDS CTIA AND PCIA QUALIFIED TO ADMINISTER THE RELOCATION COST-SHARING PLAN FOR LICENSEES IN THE 2.1 GHZ BANDS DA-06-1984A1: [175]pdf - [176]word - [177]txt WTB Public Notices, October - 2006 has 50 Records. Return to Top Arrow [178]Return to Top Last reviewed/updated on 07/16/2012 Wireless Index Categories [179]Oct-2006 News Releases [180]Oct-2006 Notices [181]Oct-2006 Orders *** Oct-2006 Public Notices [182]Oct-2006 Reports View by Year: [183]2012 [184]2011 [185]FCC Home [186]Search [187]RSS [188]Updates [189]E-Filing [190]Initiatives [191]Consumers [192]Find People [193]Licensing,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=releases_page&y=2006&m=6&t=Public_Notice
  • Manager Lease Notifications Action DOC-266026A1: [111]pdf - [112]txt 06/16/2006 WTB Public Notices Antenna Structure Registration Service Information DOC-265974A1: [113]pdf 06/16/2006 WTB Public Notices Antenna Structure Registration Service Information DOC-265977A1: [114]pdf 06/15/2006 WTB Public Notices (DA 06-1279) WTB opens Filing window for proposals to develop and manage the clearinghouse that will administer the relocation cost sharing plan for licensees in the 2.1 GHZ bands DA-06-1279A1: [115]pdf - [116]word - [117]txt 06/14/2006 WTB Public Notices (DA 06-1245) AMERICA MOVIL, S.A. DE C.V., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES OF TELECOMMUNICACIONES DE PUERTO RICO, INC. SEEK FCC CONSENT TO TRANSFER CONTROL OF LICENSES AND AUTHORIZATIONS AND REQUEST A DECLARATORY RULING ON FOREIGN OWNERSHIP Pleading Cycle Established, Petitions to Deny Due: July 14, 2006, Oppositions Due:
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=releases_page&y=2007&m=11&t=Order
  • Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations Consented to the applications filed in connection with the proposed acquisition of Dobson Communicat... FCC-07-196A1: [67]pdf - [68]word - [69]txt FCC-07-196A2: [70]pdf - [71]word - [72]txt FCC-07-196A3: [73]pdf - [74]word - [75]txt FCC-07-196A4: [76]pdf - [77]word - [78]txt 11/15/2007 WTB Orders (DA 07-4619) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services In the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands Denied the Petition for Reconsideration for M2Z Networks, Inc. Dismissed the Petition for Reconside... DA-07-4619A1: [79]pdf - [80]word - [81]txt 11/15/2007 WTB Orders (FCC 07-197) Waiver of Section 1.2110(b)(3)(iv)(A) of the Commission's Rules For the Upper 700 MHz Band D Block License The Commission waives one of its designated entity eligibility rules for the Upper 700 MHz Band
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=releases_page&y=2008&m=6&t=News_Release
  • Home > [36]Releases > Releases [37]FCC Site Map WTB News Releases June 2008 2008 News Releases: [38]January | [39]February | [40]March | [41]April | [42]May | June | [43]July | [44]August | [45]September | [46]October | [47]November | [48]December 06/20/2008 WTB News Releases FCC SEEKS COMMENT ON PROPOSED RULE CHANGES FOR ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICES (AWS) SPECTRUM IN THE 1.9 AND 2.1 GHz BANDS The FCC released a Further Notice that proposes public access to free, nationwide, high-speed wirele... DOC-283120A1: [49]pdf - [50]word - [51]txt WTB News Releases, June - 2008 has 1 Records. Last reviewed/updated on 07/16/2012 Wireless Index Categories *** Jun-2008 News Releases [52]Jun-2008 Notices [53]Jun-2008 Orders [54]Jun-2008 Public Notices [55]Jun-2008 Reports View by Year: [56]2012 [57]2011 [58]FCC Home [59]Search
• http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3G_appendices.doc http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3G_appendices.pdf
  • Nation-wide, there are over 2500 licenses for MDS in the band. Licenses are granted on an area-wide basis, utilizing Basic Trading Areas. Formerly, MDS licensees used their channels to provide a multichannel video programming service, so-called "wireless cable." Approximately one million homes currently receive multichannel video programming service from MDS/ITFS-based wireless cable systems. However, the MDS frequencies, located in the 2.1 and 2.5-2.7 GHz bands, also are suited for the high-speed, high-capacity delivery of broadband access to data, voice and Internet service. The primary current and future uses of MDS will be to deliver this access. Rather than being hardwired like the local telephone companies and local cable systems, MDS uses microwave frequencies. Like broadcast television, MDS is transmitted from a
• http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3G_interim_report.doc http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3G_interim_report.pdf
  • satellite-based networks, and the terminals may be designed for mobile or fixed use. Key features of 3G or IMT-2000 systems are: high degree of commonality of design worldwide; compatibility of services within IMT-2000 and with fixed networks; high quality; use of small pocket-terminal with worldwide roaming capability; capability for multimedia applications, and a wide range of services and terminals. Table 2.1, shown below, describes some of the key service attributes and capabilities expected of IMT-2000 or 3G systems. Table 2.1: IMT-2000 Systems/Capabilities Capabilities to support circuit and packet data at high bit rates: - 144 kb/s or higher in high mobility (vehicular) traffic - 384 kb/s or higher for pedestrian traffic - 2 Mb/s or higher for indoor traffic Interoperability and
• http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreport.doc http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreport.pdf
  • mobile or fixed use. Key features of 3G or IMT-2000 systems are: high degree of commonality of design worldwide; compatibility of services within IMT-2000 and with fixed networks; high quality; use of small pocket-terminal with worldwide roaming capability; capability for multimedia applications, and a wide range of services (paging, voice telephony, digital data, audio and visual communications) and terminals. Table 2.1 describes some of the key service attributes and capabilities expected of IMT-2000 or 3G systems: Table 2.1: IMT-2000 Systems/Capabilities Capabilities to support circuit and packet data at high bit rates: - 144 kb/s or higher in high mobility (vehicular) traffic - 384 kb/s or higher for pedestrian traffic - 2 Mb/s or higher for indoor traffic Interoperability and roaming among
• http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreportappendices.doc http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreportappendices.pdf
  • Nation-wide, there are over 2500 licenses for MDS in the band. Licenses are granted on an area-wide basis, utilizing Basic Trading Areas. Formerly, MDS licensees used their channels to provide a multichannel video programming service, so-called "wireless cable." Approximately one million homes currently receive multichannel video programming service from MDS/ITFS-based wireless cable systems. However, the MDS frequencies, located in the 2.1 and 2.5-2.7 GHz bands, also are suited for the high-speed, high-capacity delivery of broadband access to data, voice and Internet service. The primary current and future uses of MDS will be to deliver this access. Rather than being hardwired like the local telephone companies and local cable systems, MDS uses microwave frequencies. Like broadcast television, MDS is transmitted from a
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001880.doc
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Resue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. ��87.193-87.199. Harmful Interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. ��2.1 & 76.613(a). See Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 F.C.C.2d 117 (1985). 47 C.F.R. 76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.615(a). See 47 C.F.R. �76.12. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. ��76.605(a)(11) & 76.610-76.617. 47 C.F.R. �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.txt
  • unilateral anticompetitive conduct by the merged entity or coordinated anticompetitive conduct of multiple market participants.''); Bell Atlantic-NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 19985 � 121 (``Market performance can also be adversely affected if a merger increases the potential for coordinated interaction by firms remaining in the post merger market.''); see also 1992 Horizontal Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. 41552, 41558 � 2.1 (``Lessening of Competition Through Coordinated Interaction''). See 1999 Competition Report, 15 FCC Rcd at 986 � 16, 1053 �168, 1094 Tbl. C-4 (ten largest MVPDs serve almost 75% of the nation's MVPD subscribers), 15 FCC Rcd at 1053-54 � 168 (noting that MVPDs may coordinate their purchasing decisions). See WorldCom-MCI Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 18025 � 121 (``As the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/broadban.pdf
  • 91 Villagenet Inc. Enters National DSL Market, available at 92 Covad Introduces New Services to Help Power the Next-generation Internet, available at 93 These fixed wireless providers have licenses operate at specific parts (or bands) of the spectrum. The following list details the various types of fixed wireless companies and their bands of operation: Multichannel Multipoint Distribution System (2.1-2.7 GHz); Local Multipoint Distribution Service (28-31 GHz); Teligent (24 GHz); and Winstar (38 GHz). 94 See,e.g., Salomon Report at 21; Winstar To Provide Boston Properties With Advanced Broadband Telecommunications Services, July 8, 1999, available at ; . According to some industry estimates, ILECs are failing to meet the data needs of 750,000 multi-dwelling units in the United States-needs that could
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/broadbandtoday.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/broadbandtoday.pdf
  • at > Villagenet Inc. Enters National DSL Market, available at Covad Introduces New Services to Help Power the Next-generation Internet, available at These fixed wireless providers have licenses operate at specific parts (or bands) of the spectrum. The following list details the various types of fixed wireless companies and their bands of operation: Multichannel Multipoint Distribution System (2.1-2.7 GHz); Local Multipoint Distribution Service (28-31 GHz); Teligent (24 GHz); and Winstar (38 GHz). See,e.g., Salomon Report at 21; Winstar To Provide Boston Properties With Advanced Broadband Telecommunications Services, July 8, 1999, available at ; . According to some industry estimates, ILECs are failing to meet the data needs of 750,000 multi-dwelling units in the United States-needs that could be
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc00214.doc
  • data requirements. The remaining 44 lacked sufficient information to be included in the Survey. As of July 1, 1999, operators serving the 725 CUIDs included in the analysis served 13.1 million subscribers, or approximately 20% of the 66.7 million cable subscribers nationwide. Two hundred seventy-nine of the usable questionnaires were submitted by competitive cable operators. These 279 respondents served approximately 2.1 million subscribers, or 3% of all cable subscribers. Of these, 129 respondents report facing direct competition in their geographic area, with 42 meeting the overbuild test and 87 meeting the LEC test. Of the remaining respondents in the competitive group, 145 served fewer than 30% of the households in their service area (thereby meeting the low penetration test) and 5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
  • has continued over the past year. Audience share statistics for Monday through Sunday, 24 hours a day, show that non-premium cable audience shares rose 7.8 percent from an average 42.2 share from July 1998 through June 1999, to an average 45.5 share between July 1999 and June 2000. Monday through Sunday, 24 hours a day, broadcast television audience shares decreased 2.1 percent from an average 60.9 share from July 1998 through June 1999, to an average 59.6 share between July 1999 and June 2000. Cable Networks. In 1999, the number of basic cable networks increased from 139 to 147, a 5.8 percent increase. The number of premium networks increased 139 percent in 1999 from 18 at the end of 1998 to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.txt
  • 30-31 (Ameritech believes that price discounts granted to large MSOs, for example, is more widespread than the complaints filed or the Commission's rulings); and Bellsouth Comments at 14-15 (steep discounts granted only to large MSOs is a barrier to entry in MVPD markets). 648DirecTV/USSB is the fifth largest MVPD with 3.5 million subscribers; Primestar is the seventh largest MVPD with 2.1 million subscribers; and Echostar is the eleventh largest MVPD with 1.2 million subscribers. 649See App. C, Tbl. C-1. 92 152. As explained in the 1997 Report, the 1992 Cable Act directs the Commission to place limits on the concentration of ownership of cable systems at the national level.644 This direction reflects concerns that such concentration could have anticompetitive effects on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Comments/96149.html
  • No. 96-149, FCC 96-308 [ [1]Text Format | [2]Wordperfect Format ] __________________________________________________________________ Reply Comments, August 30, 1996 19 out of a total of 28 reply comments were filed electronically with the FCC for this proceeding and are provided here in one 482 KB zip file ( [3]96149rpl.zip ) for easy downloading. This zip file contains 25 WordPerfect files that occupy 2.1 MB when unzipped . See the [4]Table below for the names of the parties who submitted disks and their associated files. Update! The reply-comment statistics cited above, as well as the associated file table and zip file were updated on 9/12/96 to account for the 6 additional files that have been provided to the FCC by the following parties: BellSouth
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/News_Releases/2000/nrcc0002.pdf
  • competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC), wireless, subscriber line charge (SLC), non-SLC access, and toll using information from the Telecommunications Industry Revenue report. Other revenue, including international-to- international revenue and revenue reported by carriers that filed TRS worksheets but not USF worksheets, is divided the same way. Figures 1 and 2 show industry-wide and end-user telecommunication revenue by these categories.18 Table 2.1 shows industry-wide and end-user revenue as well as carrier's carrier revenue. 17 On July 14, 1999, the Commission amended its rules so that contributors to the universal service support mechanisms and to the TRS Fund need only file one consolidated form -- the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet -- rather than filing both the Universal Service Worksheet and the TRS Worksheet. 1998
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.wp
  • Tohono O'odham Utility Authority (January 26, 1999), San Carlos Telecommunications, Inc. (February 12, 1999) and Fort Mojave Telecommunications, Inc. (February 17, 1999). First Report and Order 12 FCC Rcd at 8963. . See Monitoring Report, June 1999, CC Docket No. 98-202, (rel. Jul. 12, 1999). Section 2, Low-Income Support, contained information about the Lifeline and Link Up support mechanisms. Table 2.1 Lifeline Monthly Support by State or Jurisdiction provides information about the amount of support in each state's programs. See also National Exchange Carrier Association, Federal Universal Service Programs Fund Size Projections & Contribution Base for the Third Quarter 1999, appendix 5. (filed April 30, 1999). 47 C.F.R. � 54.409(a). See Universal Service Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 8973. See, e.g.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99235.doc
  • which as of January 1, 2000 is $5.50 per line per month. Beginning on January 1, 2001, increase the nominal cap on primary residential and single line business Subscriber Line Charges according to the following schedule: On January 1, 2001, to $6.25; On July 1, 2002, to $6.75; On July 1, 2003, to $7.00 per line. Minimum Charge. See paragraph 2.1.5.6.2. Lifeline. Increase minimum federal Lifeline support effective January 1, 2000, and coincident with changes in nominal SLC caps thereafter, so that all of the Subscriber Line Charge continues to be waived for Lifeline customers, with carriers reimbursed from the Universal Service Fund. In subsequent years, increase minimum federal Lifeline support in the same amount as increases in the primary residential
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99379.doc
  • Common Carrier Bureau, Industry Analysis Division, August 1999, (Local Competition Report) at 1; Trends in Telephone Service, Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, September 1999, (Telephone Trends) at 9-1. The competitors include competitive access providers (CAPs), CLECs, local resellers, shared tenant, private carriers and other local carriers. Local Competition Report at 11-19. Local Competition Report at Table 2.1. Merrill Lynch, Telecom Services - Local, September 8, 1999, Table 8. Bernstein Research, MCI World.com, March 1999 at 75-76; Merrill Lynch, Telecom Services - Local, September 8, 1999 at 8. CIBC Oppenheimer estimates CLECs had a 5.5 percent share of business lines in 1998, up from a 3% share in 1997. CIBC Oppenheimer Equity Research, Telecom Strategy and Handbook, February
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97159.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97159.txt
  • FCC 97-159 AT&T estimates that the input price differential was 2.54 percent per year from 1985 to 1994, using BLS data rather than the data in the Christensen Study sponsored by USTA.158 AT&T also estimates that the input price differential between 1985 and 1995 was 2.35 percent.159 Ad Hoc claims that the input price differential from 1984 to 1993 is 2.1 percent based on USTA's data, or 3.4 percent based on USTA's data corrected for certain errors alleged by Ad Hoc.160 Sprint compares its price indices for capital, labor, and materials to its economy-wide input price index, and finds that the five-year moving averages for the period from 1985 to 1993 range from 0.84 percent to 1.64 percent.161 98. On the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97228.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97228.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97228.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97228.wp
  • may be drawn about the feasibility of full scale competitive entry); AT&T May 1 Comments at 8 (responding to SBC's claims and asserting that "Congress did not vote down any 'metric' amendments to the facilities-based provider requirement that became law . . ."). 39. SBC Brief in Support at 10 (citing SBC Application, Appendix - Volume II, Tab 3, at 2.1.1 & 4); see also Bell Atlantic Apr. 28 Comments at 9 n.4. According to Bell Atlantic, "SBC has an approved agreement with a competitor that is offering service to residential subscribers under an effective tariff (and that is legally obligated to provide service upon demand), and this should be adequate to apply under Track A." Id. 40. SBC Reply Comments
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97298.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97298.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97298.wp
  • calls than would blockage on a smaller trunk group. In addition, without more information, the Commission cannot determine the magnitude of the reported blockage. Because Ameritech's data only show the percentage of trunk groups in which more than 2 percent of the calls were blocked during the busy hour, the Commission cannot ascertain whether these trunk groups blocked closer to 2.1 percent of the calls or 50 percent of the calls during the system busy hour. 605 234.Moreover, Ameritech acknowledges that its reports of the frequency with which call blocking in a particular trunk group exceeds 2 percent do not indicate the actual percentage or number of calls that are not completed. Therefore, there is no evidence in the record 606
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98082.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98082.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98082.wp
  • Plan (NANP), a telephone number functions like an address: every number is associated with an individual switch operated by a particular local telephone company in a specific Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-82 39 See AIN PROGRAM, NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM, LOCAL NUMBER PORTABILITY: AIN AND NS/EP IMPLICATIONS, �� 2.0-2.5 (July 1996) [hereinafter LOCAL NUMBER PORTABILITY REPORT]. 40 See id. at � 2.1. 41 See id. 42 See id. 43 See id. at �� 2.3, 5. 44 See In re Telephone Number Portability, Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd. 12281, 12287-88 (1997) (Second Report and Order). 45 NORTH AMERICAN NUMBERING COUNCIL, LOCAL NUMBER PORTABILITY ADMINISTRATION SELECTION WORKING GROUP REPORT [hereinafter NANC RECOMMENDATION] App. D (Architecture & Administrative Plan for Local Number Portability),
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98225.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98225.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98225.wp
  • AT&T, MCI, and Sprint have a combined 82.7 percent market share of residential direct dial toll minutes. 1998 Long Distance Market Shares Report at Table 4.3. GTE provides the following estimates of market shares based on retail long distance revenues of "residence and low-volume business facilities-based carriers": AT&T (66.8 percent); Sprint (12.7 percent); MCI (12.3 percent); Frontier (2.3 percent); LCI (2.1 percent); WorldCom (1.9 percent); Qwest (0.1 percent). GTE Mar. 13 Comments, Schmalensee and Taylor Aff. at Ex. 12, citing Frost & Sullivan. Frost & Sullivan define "low-volume business customers" as those that spend less than $4,170 per month for long distance service. The Applicants state that they cannot comment in detail on the findings or methodologies of the Frost &
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
  • Portability, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 8352, 8362, 8499 (1996) (First Number Portability Order); BellSouth Varner Aff. at para. 182. See, e.g., SGAT � XI.C & Attach. G at para. D; Second BellSouth Louisiana Application App. B, Vol. 4, Tab 30, Agreement Between BellSouth and AT&T (AT&T Agreement), Attach. 8 at para. 2.1. 859 Under DID, the carrier that originally served the called customer re-routes the telephone calls over a dedicated facility to the acquiring carrier's switch. First Number Portability Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8362, 8499; BellSouth Varner Aff. para. 182. See, e.g., SGAT � XI.C & Attach. G at para. E. 157 when changing local service providers hampers the development of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.txt
  • residential customers with existing telephone service purchased over two million additional telephone lines for their homes between 1996 and 1997. Trends in Telephone Service, Federal Communications Commission, Sept. 1999, at Table 20.4 (Trends in Telephone Service). The number of cellular telephone subscribers increased by nearly 14 million subscribers between December 1997 and December 1998. Trends in Telephone Service at Table 2.1. Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Report, 14 FCC Rcd 2398, 2419-20, 2428, 2445-46, paras. 42, 56, 90 (1999) (706 Report) (Report finds that there is currently rapid demand for broadband services
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99246.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99246.txt
  • 13. But see USTA comments at 6 (noting that the NANC concluded the NANPA should address such claims). See Pennsylvania Numbering Order at 19039, � 49. See id. See ``Number Resource Optimization Working Group Modified Report to the North American Numbering Council on Number Optimization Methods'' at � 3.1 (dated October 21, 1998) (hereinafter NANC Report). NANC Report at � 2.1. Id. See Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment On North American Numbering Council Report Concerning Telephone Number Pooling And Other Optimization Measures, Public Notice, NSD File No. L-98-134, DA 98-2265, at 4 (rel. Nov. 6, 1998) (NANC Report Public Notice). See MCI WorldCom comments at 16. See Id. at 17. See NANC Report Public Notice at 3. According to the Department,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99279.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99279.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99279.txt
  • Docket No. 97-121, Att. at 2-3 (filed Apr. 6, 1999). SBC estimated 830,000 resold lines. Id. These updated figures represent a 23 percent increase in provision of unbundled loops and a 28 percent increase in resale since the merger application. SBC/Ameritech July 26 Reply Comments at 13. Local Competition, Federal Communications Commission, Common Carrier Bureau, Industry Analysis Div., at Table 2.1 (Aug. 1999) (``Local Competition Report''). See id. at 1, 12. Id. at 1. See AT&T Oct. 15 Petition at 11 (citing a recent study by the Consumer Federation of America, Stonewalling Local Competition: The Baby Bell Strategy to Subvert the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1998) at 20, for the proposition that local competition affects little more than one percent of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000033.doc
  • complete the check no earlier than 4 seconds after the subscriber hangs up; (3) make an off-hook stutter dial tone check after an unanswered incoming call no more than once; (4) perform no off-hook stutter dial tone checks after an unanswered incoming call if the visual message indicator is already lit; (5) take the line off-hook for no more than 2.1 seconds per stutter dial tone check; (6) synchronize off-hook checks when multiple stutter dial tone detection and visual signalling devices are attached to the same line so that only one check is made per calling event for a single line; (7) do not block dial tone to a subscriber attempting to initiate a call as an off-hook stutter dial tone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001133.doc
  • complete the check no earlier than 4 seconds after the subscriber hangs up; (3) make an off-hook stutter dial tone check after an unanswered incoming call no more than once; (4) perform no off-hook stutter dial tone checks after an unanswered incoming call if the visual message indicator is already lit; (5) take the line off-hook for no more than 2.1 seconds per stutter dial tone check; (6) synchronize off-hook checks when multiple stutter dial tone detection and visual signalling devices are attached to the same line so that only one check is made per calling event for a single line; (7) do not block dial tone to a subscriber attempting to initiate a call as an off-hook stutter dial tone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001801.doc
  • complete the check no earlier than 4 seconds after the subscriber hangs up; (3) make an off-hook stutter dial tone check after an unanswered incoming call no more than once; (4) perform no off-hook stutter dial tone checks after an unanswered incoming call if the visual message indicator is already lit; (5) take the line off-hook for no more than 2.1 seconds per stutter dial tone check; (6) synchronize off-hook checks when multiple stutter dial tone detection and visual signalling devices are attached to the same line so that only one check is made per calling event for a single line; (7) do not block dial tone to a subscriber attempting to initiate a call as an off-hook stutter dial tone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001966.doc
  • complete the check no earlier than 4 seconds after the subscriber hangs up; (3) make an off-hook stutter dial tone check after an unanswered incoming call no more than once; (4) perform no off-hook stutter dial tone checks after an unanswered incoming call if the visual message indicator is already lit; (5) take the line off-hook for no more than 2.1 seconds per stutter dial tone check; (6) synchronize off-hook checks when multiple stutter dial tone detection and visual signalling devices are attached to the same line so that only one check is made per calling event for a single line; (7) do not block dial tone to a subscriber attempting to initiate a call as an off-hook stutter dial tone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002174.doc
  • complete the check no earlier than 4 seconds after the subscriber hangs up; (3) make an off-hook stutter dial tone check after an unanswered incoming call no more than once; (4) perform no off-hook stutter dial tone checks after an unanswered incoming call if the visual message indicator is already lit; (5) take the line off-hook for no more than 2.1 seconds per stutter dial tone check; (6) synchronize off-hook checks when multiple stutter dial tone detection and visual signalling devices are attached to the same line so that only one check is made per calling event for a single line; (7) do not block dial tone to a subscriber attempting to initiate a call as an off-hook stutter dial tone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00034.doc
  • deployed such fix beginning in September 1992. NYT Brief at 4-5. Even though this software fix eventually failed and NYT's network again permitted secondary dialtone to occur, we find that NYT's failure to correct the secondary dialtone problem on its first attempt does not constitute unjust or unreasonable conduct. NYT Brief at 3. NYNEX FCC Tariff No. 1 at � 2.1.3(A). See NYT Brief at 4 (citing AT&T v. New York City Human Resources Admin., 833 F.Supp. 962, 974 (S.D.N.Y. 1993), Gentile v. Garden City Alarm Co., Inc., 541 N.Y.S.2d 505 (App. Div. 1989)). We note that while there does not appear to be any consensus in Commission, state, or federal cases, NYT's proffered definition of "willful misconduct" is similar to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00114.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00114.pdf
  • in a given state, and mobile telephony providers with less than 10,000 mobile telephony subscribers in a given state. See infra Section IV.B. Exempting Smaller Entities. See, e.g., TRA Comments at 5-6 (noting the importance of collecting data from incumbent LECs); U S WEST Comments at 1. See FCC, Common Carrier Bureau, Industry Analysis Division, Local Competition: August 1999, tbl. 2.1 (rel. Aug. 1999) (``Even under the most expansive definition of local service competition . . . the ILECs retain 96% of local service revenues.''). Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Third Report and Order and Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 99-238, CC Docket No. 96-98, � 13 (rel. Nov. 5, 1999) (UNE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • Reform Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15999-00, 16005. Access Charge Reform Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 16005. The CCL charge already has been eliminated for Ameritech, Bell Atlantic, PacTel, Southwestern Bell Telephone, U S WEST, Aliant, SNET and Cincinnati Bell. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14320-24. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14324-26. Modified Proposal at � 2.1.2.1. Modified Proposal at � 2.1.2.2.1. See Appendix C, Chart 1 for a comparison of the SLC and PICC caps under our current rules and as proposed by CALLS. Although the CALLS Proposal describes this cost review proceeding to be limited to primary residential and single-line business lines, CALLS subsequently clarified its submission to include all residential lines as part of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00237.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00237.txt
  • day-to-day management and oversight of the tariffed services. We find nothing inappropriate about the BOCs' selection of an entity that is not a common carrier to perform certain tariff-related functions on their behalf. Issue 6: Whether DSMI gave proper notice before discontinuing service to Beehive. Beehive alleges that DSMI violated the tariff because DSMI terminated Beehive's service without notice. Section 2.1.8(A) of the tariff requires 30 days' written notice prior to terminating a Resp Org's access to the SMS/800 database system. DSMI states that it provided written notice on three separate occasions, with its last letter dated March 22, 1994, and Beehive doesn't dispute receipt of these letters. More than 30 days later, on April 26, 1994, Beehive's service was suspended.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00306.pdf
  • FCC Rcd 750 (1991). 12 See 47 C.F.R. � 43.43(e). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION APPENDIX Schedule of Annual Percentages of Depreciation for PAGE 1 VERIZON HAWAII INC. Effective January 1, 2000 Average Future Remaining Remaining Net Accumulated Life Rate Category Description Life Salvage Depreciation Rate ----------------------------------- -------------- ------------ -------------------- ----------------- (years) (%) (%) (%) A B C D=(100%-B-C)/A 2112 MOTOR VEHICLES 2.1 10 89.4 0.3 2115 GARAGE WORK EQ 6.1 0 56.2 7.2 2116 OTHER WORK EQ 5.8 0 62.3 6.5 2121 BUILDINGS 29.0 -3 19.1 2.9 2122 FURNITURE 6.9 0 74.2 3.7 2123.1 OFFICE SUPPORT EQ 5.2 0 35.5 12.4 2123.2 COMPANY COMMUN EQ 3.9 0 76.1 6.1 2124 GEN PURPOSE COMPUTERS 2.0 0 94.5 2.8 2212 DIGITAL ELECTRONIC SW 7.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.txt
  • the same time and manner as SWBT does for its own advanced services separate affiliate. In particular, SWBT provisioned line shared loops to competing carriers 3.44 and 3.55 days in September and October 2000 respectively. By contrast, SWBT took about one day longer to provision the same type of line shared loops to its separate affiliate. Moreover, SWBT missed only 2.1 and 1.8 percent of the installation due dates for line shared loops provided to competing carriers during the same months. We also find that SWBT installs the high frequency portion of the loop at an acceptable level of quality. Although SWBT has not performed as well in the maintenance and repair of line shared loops as it has for stand-alone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • Massachusetts II Reply at 38. See Massachusetts Department Massachusetts I Comments at 338-39. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 4126, para. 339; SWBT Texas Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 1851, para. 333. Using the carrier-to-carrier numbers provided with the application, the four month (September through December 2000) average for competitive LECs was 12.1 percent, compared to 2.1 percent for Verizon's retail ``special services'' provisioning. See PR-4-01 (Provisioning of POTS/Special Services - Missed Appointments). Specifically, the competitive LEC missed appointment rates for September through December 2000 were 10.71 percent, 2.76 percent, 15.21 percent, and 21.25 percent, respectively. Verizon's performance for its own retail special services for the same period was 2.78 percent, 1.90 percent, 1.43 percent, and 2.04
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • the impact of BellSouth's policy on its competitors is minimal. BellSouth's policy complies with checklist item 2. Although not a factor in our decision here, we note that BellSouth is working on a maintenance process that addresses this situation, which gives us confidence that BellSouth will continue to comply with checklist item 2 in the future.345 340 See generally Florida/Tennessee A.2.1.1.1.1 � A.2.1.1.2.2 (Order Completion Interval, Residence); Florida/Tennessee B.2.1.3.1.1 � B.2.1.3.2.4 (Order Completion Interval, Loop + Port Combinations); Florida/Tennessee A.3.1 (% Missed Repair Appointments); A.3.3 and B.3.3 (Maintenance Average Duration); A.3.4 and B.3.4 (% Repeat Troubles within 30 Days); and A.3.5 and B.3.5 (% Out of Service More than 24 Hours); see generally Appendix D. 341 AT&T Comments at 20-21; AT&T
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/Tariffs/combined/tt120199.pdf
  • features for Government Emergency Telecommunications Service; Alternate Carrier Routing and Calling Party Number Overlay. 12/1/1999 -FCC- Page 2 of 9 PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG: 1999-12-01 DOMINANT CARRIER #PAGESNTC61.38 PUSPETN-DUE 61.49 #DISK#CD EFFDATE ISSUED FILING#TRANS# FCC# S.P.# 11/30/1999 CEH 1 15 12/15/1999 12/7/1999 SPRINT LOCAL TELEPHONE COMPANIES 1 95 1 S Y N O P S I S Proposes revisions to Section 2.1.8 to clarify that the telephone company may, upon 30 days written notice, refuse to accept additional applications or complete pending orders for service, or may discontinue a customers service. CARRIER #PAGESNTC61.38 PUSPETN-DUE 61.49 #DISK#CD EFFDATE ISSUED FILING#TRANS# FCC# S.P.# 11/30/1999 CEH 1 15 12/15/1999 12/7/1999 TXU COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE COMPANY1 2 1 S Y N O P S I S DSL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/infra98.pdf
  • which typically consists of a company's operations within a state. The state- by-state data are available from the Commission's ARMIS web page at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/armis/db/ on the World Wide Web. The information summarized in this report is organized into two sets of tables: Tables 1.1 through 1.10 show switching system data and gross plant expenditures covering all types of plant. Tables 2.1 through 2.10 show transmission system data. Each set of tables contain segments for each of the five regional Bell operating companies (corresponding to the seven original regional BOCs), one for the companies owned by GTE, and two that summarize data for the BOCs and all reporting companies. The data summarized for each holding company reflect the aggregate of data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/infra99.pdf
  • level, which typically consists of a company's operations within a state. The state-by-state data are available from the Commission's ARMIS web page at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/armis/db/ on the World Wide Web. The information summarized in this report is organized into two sets of tables: Tables 1.1 through 1.9 show switching system data and gross plant expenditures covering all types of plant. Tables 2.1 through 2.9 show transmission system data. Each set of tables contains one table for each of the regional Bell operating companies, one for the companies owned by GTE, and two that summarize data for all the BOCs and all reporting companies. The data summarized for each holding company reflect the aggregate of data filed for individual states or study areas
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd0801.pdf
  • Direction) 1/ Other includes medium and large business, institutional, and government customers. Number of Providers Zero 44.0% 30.1% 25.0% One 24.5 25.8 24.5 Two 14.2 16.7 18.6 Three 8.1 9.3 10.7 Four 4.4 6.0 6.2 Five 2.6 4.2 4.1 Six 1.5 3.1 3.0 Seven 0.6 2.2 2.3 Eight 0.2 1.2 2.0 Nine 0.0 0.6 1.6 Ten or More 0.0 0.9 2.1 * Data for June 2000 have been revised. December 1999 June 2000* December 2000 Table 8 Percentage of Zip Codes with High-Speed Lines in Service High-Speed Providers by Zip Code Number of Reporting Providers 7 or more 4 to 6 1 to 3 (As of December 31, 2000) Alabama 29% 62% 5% 4% 0% 0% Alaska 78 22 0 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1208_tables.doc
  • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other Wireline 95.5 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cable Modem 15.0 12.8 12.5 20.9 17.5 10.9 6.6 2.9 0.8 0.1 0.1 FTTP 76.4 18.0 2.5 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Satellite 1.0 95.1 3.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fixed Wireless 52.4 39.5 5.3 2.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Power Line 99.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Other 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.2 0.2 0.6 4.3 14.2 22.1 23.8 18.6 12.2 3.6 0.3 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. See Technical Notes at the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0609_tables.doc
  • 1.0 94.1 4.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fixed Wireless 51.3 40.1 5.4 2.4 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Power Line 99.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Other 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.1 0.1 0.5 3.2 10.8 21.1 23.1 20.9 17.8 2.1 0.4 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2009 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Table 12 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households by Technology as of June 30, 2009 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0610_tables.doc
  • 4.1 7.5 6.4 18.9 30.6 29.2 5.7 1.6 0.0 92.5 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.3 37.6 * 5.3 0.9 * 0.1 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.4 10.4 57.8 11.7 3.9 3.3 4.5 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 0.3 1.9 2.2 0.3 1.6 6.9 5.9 26.0 56.3 0.8 97.8 100.0 FTTP 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.2 2.3 5.1 2.1 81.2 7.6 99.9 100.0 Satellite * * 83.7 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 100.0 Fixed Wireless 6.8 3.6 10.4 14.4 25.2 29.8 16.4 3.0 0.6 0.2 89.6 100.0 Mobile Wireless * * 22.3 23.4 36.9 11.0 2.4 4.0 * * 77.7 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 * * 100.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0611_tables.doc
  • 26,744 * 2,882 4,706 * 0 79,655 92,86 7 Power Line and Other 0 0 0 * * * * 0 0 0 6 6 Total 9,059 7,369 16,427 27,162 32,032 29,872 14,504 14,625 34,984 2,162 155,340 171,767 Percentages aDSL 2.7 2.8 5.5 5.0 15.5 27.9 30.9 11.4 3.6 0.3 94.5 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.3 41.6 * 5.1 2.1 * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 15.4 45.3 27.5 2.8 1.1 1.0 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 0.2 1.8 2.0 0.1 1.7 4.6 6.1 14.9 67.5 3.1 98.0 100.0 FTTP 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.8 3.8 2.3 77.0 14.0 99.9 100.0 Satellite 33.0 53.4 86.4 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.6 100.0 Fixed Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias1209_tables.doc
  • 768 kbps 46,067 150 22 46,240 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 3,318 43 175 3,536 At least 1.5 mbps 6 757 1,104 1,866 Total 49,391 950 1,301 51,642 Percentages Less than 768 kbps 89.2 0.3 0.0 89.5 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 6.4 0.1 0.3 6.8 At least 1.5 mbps 0.0 1.5 2.1 3.6 Total 95.6 1.8 2.5 100.0 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. Table 5 Connections and Percentage Residential by Speed Tier as of December 31, 2009 (In thousands) Download Speed Upload Speed Customer Class Greater than 200 kbps and less than 768 kbps At least 768 kbps and less than
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias1210_tables.doc
  • 6 Total 8,039 11,242 19,280 18,076 35,796 24,793 17,117 20,847 31,734 1,23 7 149,599 168,879 Percentages aDSL 2.9 3.3 6.2 5.4 16.4 29.7 31.3 8.4 2.6 0.1 93.8 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.6 34.8 20.6 6.1 1.1 * * 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.3 10.1 56.3 15.5 2.4 3.5 5.0 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 0.3 1.8 2.1 0.1 1.9 5.1 6.5 23.5 59.7 1.2 97.9 100.0 FTTP * * 0.1 0.3 1.1 2.4 4.7 2.2 77.1 12.2 99.9 100.0 Satellite * * 82.8 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.2 100.0 Fixed Wireless 6.5 2.8 9.3 12.8 25.9 31.0 16.7 2.2 1.8 0.4 90.7 100.0 Mobile Wireless 7.7 10.5 18.2 19.1 34.9 14.5 4.6 8.8 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom0202.pdf
  • Some previously published data have been revised. 2/ Lines acquired from other carriers as UNE loops or under resale arrangements. 3/ Lines provided over CLEC-owned "last-mile" facilities. Lines Provided to Other Carriers Total UNEs and Resold Lines Dec 1997 9 159,008 157,132 133 1,876 1.2% Jun 1998 8 161,810 159,118 244 2,692 1.7 Dec 1998 7 164,614 161,191 361 3,423 2.1 Jun 1999 7 167,177 162,909 685 4,268 2.6 Dec 1999 168 187,294 181,308 1,493 5,987 3.2 Jun 2000 159 188,171 179,762 3,312 8,409 4.5 Dec 2000 166 188,346 177,684 5,274 10,662 5.7 Jun 2001 156 186,825 174,486 7,922 12,340 6.6 1/ Some previously published data have been revised. Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers 1/ (End-User Switched Access Lines in Thousands)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom0501.pdf
  • 12,747 8,443 66.2 4,304 33.8 87 16,397 10,649 64.9 5,748 35.1 1/ Lines acquired from other carriers as UNE loops or under resale arrangements. 2/ Lines provided over CLEC-owned "last-mile" facilities. Lines Provided to Other Carriers Total December 1997 9 159,008 157,132 133 1,876 1.2% June 1998 8 161,810 159,118 244 2,692 1.7 December 1998 7 164,614 161,191 361 3,423 2.1 June 1999 7 167,177 162,909 685 4,268 2.6 December 1999 168 187,431 181,308 1,474 6,123 3.3 June 2000 160 187,784 178,865 3,257 8,919 4.7 December 2000 170 189,512 177,421 6,822 5,269 12,091 6.4 5,662 1/ Data for December 1997 through June 1999 are from Common Carrier Bureau voluntary surveys. Data starting with December 1999 are from FCC Form 477 filings.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom0603.pdf
  • 112 24,766 18.8 55.4 6,396 25.8 Note: Figures may not add to totals due to rounding. 2 Lines provided over CLEC-owned "last-mile" facilities. Provided to Other Carriers ILECs Total End-User Total Date 1 Reporting Lines Lines UNEs Dec 1997 9 159,008 157,132 133 1,876 1.2% Jun 1998 8 161,810 159,118 244 2,692 1.7 Dec 1998 7 164,614 161,191 361 3,423 2.1 Jun 1999 7 167,177 162,909 685 4,268 2.6 Dec 1999 168 187,294 181,308 1,493 5,987 3.2 Jun 2000 159 188,171 179,762 3,312 8,409 4.5 Dec 2000 166 188,304 177,642 5,274 10,662 5.7 Jun 2001 156 187,208 174,861 7,923 12,347 6.6 Dec 2001 164 185,517 172,044 9,460 13,474 7.3 Jun 2002 166 182,487 167,472 11,540 15,015 8.2 Dec 2002 174 179,971
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom0604.pdf
  • element. December 1999 8.2 million lines Via UNEs 23.9% Via Resale 42.9% CLEC- Owned 33.2% December 2003 29.6 million lines CLEC- Owned 23.5% Via UNEs 60.6% Via Resale 16.0% ILECs Total End-User Date 1 Reporting Lines Lines Dec 1997 9 159,008 157,132 133 1,876 1.2% Jun 1998 8 161,810 159,118 244 2,692 1.7 Dec 1998 7 164,614 161,191 361 3,423 2.1 Jun 1999 7 167,177 162,909 685 4,268 2.6 Dec 1999 168 187,294 181,308 1,493 5,987 3.2 Jun 2000 159 188,171 179,762 3,312 8,409 4.5 Dec 2000 166 188,346 177,684 5,274 10,662 5.7 Jun 2001 156 186,825 174,486 7,922 12,340 6.6 Dec 2001 164 185,517 172,044 9,460 13,474 7.3 Jun 2002 166 182,487 167,472 11,540 15,015 8.2 Dec 2002 174 179,971
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom0702.pdf
  • 94 19,653 21.6 47.5 6,072 30.9 Note: Figures may not add to totals due to rounding. 2/ Lines provided over CLEC-owned "last-mile" facilities. Lines Provided to Other Carriers ILECs Total End-User Total Date 1/Reporting Lines Lines UNEs Dec 1997 9 159,008 157,132 133 1,876 1.2% Jun 1998 8 161,810 159,118 244 2,692 1.7 Dec 1998 7 164,614 161,191 361 3,423 2.1 Jun 1999 7 167,177 162,909 685 4,268 2.6 Dec 1999 168 187,294 181,308 1,493 5,987 3.2 Jun 2000 159 188,171 179,762 3,312 8,409 4.5 Dec 2000 166 188,346 177,684 5,274 10,662 5.7 Jun 2001 156 186,825 174,486 7,922 12,340 6.6 Dec 2001 164 186,111 172,629 9,461 13,482 7.2 Note: Figures may not add to totals due to rounding. Percent Total
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom0705.pdf
  • 2 December 1999 8.2 million lines Via UNEs 23.9% Via Resale 42.9% CLEC- Owned 33.2% December 2004 32.9 million lines CLEC- Owned 25.9% Via UNEs 57.7% Via Resale 16.5% ILECs Total End-User Date 1 Reporting Lines Lines Dec 1997 9 159,008 157,132 133 1,876 1.2% Jun 1998 8 161,810 159,118 244 2,692 1.7 Dec 1998 7 164,614 161,191 361 3,423 2.1 Jun 1999 7 167,177 162,909 685 4,268 2.6 Dec 1999 168 187,294 181,308 1,493 5,987 3.2 Jun 2000 159 188,171 179,762 3,312 8,409 4.5 Dec 2000 166 188,304 177,642 5,274 10,662 5.7 Jun 2001 156 187,201 174,861 7,922 12,340 6.6 Dec 2001 164 185,517 172,044 9,460 13,474 7.3 Jun 2002 166 182,487 167,472 11,540 15,015 8.2 Dec 2002 174 181,756
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom0800.pdf
  • Carriers with both ILEC and CLEC operations in the same state provide separate reports. Number of Reporting Local Exchange Carriers: Year-End 1999 Date* ILECs Reporting Total Lines Reported Lines Resold End-User Lines Dec-97 9 159,008 1,743 1.1% 0.1% 157,132 98.8% Jun-98 8 161,810 2,448 1.5 0.2 159,118 98.3 Dec-98 7 164,614 3,062 1.9 0.2 161,191 97.9 Jun-99 7 167,177 3,583 2.1 0.4 162,909 97.4 Dec-99 168 187,431 4,649 2.6 0.8 181,308 96.7 Date CLECs Reporting Total End- User Lines Reported Dec-99 81 8,318 65.8% 34.2% Percent Percent 685 1,474 361 Table 3 Reporting Competitive Local Exchange Carriers: Lines in Thousands Table 2 Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers: Lines in Thousands Percent UNE Loops Leased 133 244 *Data for December 97 through
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom1200.pdf
  • End-User Lines Reported CLECs ReportingTotal End- User Lines 81 8,318 65.8% 34.2% 76 12,747 8,443 66.2 4,304 33.8 1/ Lines acquired from other carriers as UNE loops or under resale arrangements. Lines Provided to Other Carriers Total December 1997 9 159,008 157,132 133 1,876 1.2% June 1998 8 161,810 159,118 244 2,692 1.7 December 1998 7 164,614 161,191 361 3,423 2.1 June 1999 7 167,177 162,909 685 4,268 2.6 December 1999 168 187,431 181,308 1,474 6,123 3.3 June 2000 160 187,784 178,865 3,257 8,919 4.7 5,471 2,847 Table 4 Acquired Lines 1/ Percent CLEC Owned Lines Percent 1/ Data for December 1997 through June 1999 are from Common Carrier Bureau voluntary surveys. Data for December 1999 and June 2000 are from
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom1202.pdf
  • 96 21,645 20.7 50.5 6,236 28.8 Note: Figures may not add to totals due to rounding. 2 Lines provided over CLEC-owned "last-mile" facilities. Provided to Other Carriers ILECs Total End-User Total Date 1 Reporting Lines Lines UNEs Dec 1997 9 159,008 157,132 133 1,876 1.2% Jun 1998 8 161,810 159,118 244 2,692 1.7 Dec 1998 7 164,614 161,191 361 3,423 2.1 Jun 1999 7 167,177 162,909 685 4,268 2.6 Dec 1999 168 187,294 181,308 1,493 5,987 3.2 Jun 2000 159 188,171 179,762 3,312 8,409 4.5 Dec 2000 166 188,346 177,684 5,274 10,662 5.7 Jun 2001 156 186,825 174,486 7,922 12,340 6.6 Dec 2001 164 185,517 172,044 9,460 13,474 7.3 Jun 2002 166 182,487 167,472 11,540 15,015 8.2 Notes: Figures may not
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom1203.pdf
  • add to totals due to rounding. Some previously published data for December 2002 have been revised. 2 Lines provided over CLEC-owned "last-mile" facilities. Provided to Other Carriers ILECs Total End-User Total Date 1 Reporting Lines Lines UNEs Dec 1997 9 159,008 157,132 133 1,876 1.2% Jun 1998 8 161,810 159,118 244 2,692 1.7 Dec 1998 7 164,614 161,191 361 3,423 2.1 Jun 1999 7 167,177 162,909 685 4,268 2.6 Dec 1999 168 187,294 181,308 1,493 5,987 3.2 Jun 2000 159 188,171 179,762 3,312 8,409 4.5 Dec 2000 166 188,346 177,684 5,274 10,662 5.7 Jun 2001 156 186,825 174,486 7,922 12,340 6.6 Dec 2001 164 185,517 172,044 9,460 13,474 7.3 Jun 2002 166 182,487 167,472 11,540 15,015 8.2 Dec 2002 174 179,971
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom1204.pdf
  • 2 December 1999 8.2 million lines Via UNEs 23.9% Via Resale 42.9% CLEC- Owned 33.2% June 2004 32.0 million lines CLEC- Owned 23.4% Via UNEs 60.5% Via Resale 16.1% ILECs Total End-User Date 1 Reporting Lines Lines Dec 1997 9 159,008 157,132 133 1,876 1.2% Jun 1998 8 161,810 159,118 244 2,692 1.7 Dec 1998 7 164,614 161,191 361 3,423 2.1 Jun 1999 7 167,177 162,909 685 4,268 2.6 Dec 1999 168 187,294 181,308 1,493 5,987 3.2 Jun 2000 159 188,171 179,762 3,312 8,409 4.5 Dec 2000 166 188,304 177,642 5,274 10,662 5.7 Jun 2001 156 187,201 174,861 7,922 12,340 6.6 Dec 2001 164 185,517 172,044 9,460 13,474 7.3 Jun 2002 166 182,487 167,472 11,540 15,015 8.2 Dec 2002 174 181,756
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcomp98.pdf
  • Street, N.W., Room 575. Copies may be purchased by calling International Transcription Services, Inc. (ITS) at (202) 857-3800. The report can be downloaded [file name LCOMP98.PDF or LCOMP98.ZIP] from the FCC-State Link internet site at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/stats on the World Wide Web. LOCAL COMPETITION TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................1 I. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW...................................3 II.NEW ENTRANT SHARE OF THE NATIONWIDE MARKET.................8 Chart 2.1Fiber Miles............................................11 Chart 2.2Percentage Growth in Fiber Systems..........................11 Table 2.1Local Service Market.....................................12 Table 2.2Total Telecommunications Revenue...........................13 Table 2.3Revenue for Services Provided to Other Carriers for Resale Reported by Carriers that Contribute to Universal Service Support Mechanisms..14 Table 2.4Revenue for Services Provided to End Users Reported by Carriers that Contribute to Universal Service Support Mechanisms.............15 Table 2.5Telecommunications Revenue: All Carriers.....................16 III.NEW ENTRANT
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcomp99-1.pdf
  • may be purchased by calling International Transcription Services, Inc. (ITS) at (202) 857-3800. The report can be downloaded [file name LCOMP99-1.PDF or LCOMP99-1.ZIP] from the FCC-State Link internet site at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/stats on the World Wide Web. LOCAL COMPETITION: AUGUST 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW...............................................................1 I. PRELIMINARY STATISTICAL ANALYSES OF LOCAL COMPETITION..............3 II. NEW ENTRANT SHARE OF THE NATIONWIDE MARKET......................11 Chart 2.1Fiber Miles...................................................15 Chart 2.2Percentage Growth in Fiber Mileage..................................15 Table 2.1Local Service Market............................................16 Table 2.2Total Telecommunications Revenue..................................17 Table 2.3Revenue for Services Provided to Other Carriers for Resale Reported by Carriers that Contribute to Universal Service Support Mechanisms...........18 Table 2.4Revenue for Services Provided to End Users Reported by Carriers that Contribute to Universal Service Support Mechanisms......................19 Table 2.5Telecommunications Revenue: All Carriers.............................20 III.NEW ENTRANT
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt101.pdf
  • 20.7 10.3 12.3 14.5 15.6 MCI WorldCom 4.5 % 5.5 7.6 17 Table 10 Herfindahl-Hirschman Indices (HHIs) for Toll Services 1 (Dollar Amounts Shown in Billions) Revenues ($ billions) Long Distance Carriers Only Carrier's Carrier Services: Operator Services $0.7 $0.3 $0.3 5,807 3,422 2,771 Ordinary Long Distance and Other Switched 6.9 8.4 9.4 1,702 2,271 1,692 Private Line 1.2 1.9 2.1 3,111 2,275 1,589 Other Toll Revenues 2 1.8 1.7 2.3 All Toll Revenues Provided for Resale 10.6 12.3 14.0 1,270 1,675 1,225 End-User Services: Prepaid Card 0.9 1.2 1.3 1,725 1,526 1,098 Operator 9.2 8.9 6.5 3,859 3,537 2,688 Ordinary Long Distance and Other Switched 52.5 56.1 59.6 3,387 3,225 3,260 Private Line 8.2 8.5 9.7 3,450 3,904 3,427 Other
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt103.pdf
  • (HHIs) for Toll Services1 (Dollar Amounts Shown in Billions) Revenues HHI 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Long Distance Carriers Only Carrier's Carrier Services: Operator Services 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.1 5,807 3,422 2,771 4,366 6,859 Ordinary Long Distance and Other Switched 6.9 8.4 9.4 13.9 12.0 1,702 2,271 1,692 1,218 1,015 Private Line 1.2 1.9 2.1 5.2 4.7 3,111 2,275 1,589 3,469 2,403 Other Toll Revenues 2 1.8 1.7 2.3 0.5 0.4 All Toll Revenues Provided for Resale 10.6 12.3 14.0 20.3 18.1 1,270 1,675 1,225 1,359 1,044 End-User Services: Prepaid Card 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.2 0.9 1,725 1,526 1,098 1,105 1,176 Operator Services 9.2 8.9 6.5 8.0 7.0 3,859 3,537 2,688 3,580 2,999 Ordinary Long
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh3q98.pdf
  • Street, N.W., Room 222. Copies may be purchased by calling International Transcription Services, Inc. (ITS) at (202) 857-3800. The report can be downloaded [file name: MKSH4Q98.ZIP] from the FCC- State Link internet site at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/stats on the World Wide Web. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTERSTATE CALLING MINUTES.................................... 1 TABLE 1.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes......................... 2 2. PRESUBSCRIBED LINES............................................ 4 TABLE 2.1 Presubscribed Telephone Lines by Carrier.................... 5 TABLE 2.2 Market Share of Presubscribed Lines........................ 9 TABLE 2.3 Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs) Share of Presubscribed Lines in Their Own Service Areas From Year-End 1989 to 1996.... 10 TABLE 2.4 Distribution of ILECs By Number of Areas in Which They Provide Both Local and Long Distance Service...................... 10 3. TOLL REVENUES................................................. 11
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh4q98.pdf
  • Street, N.W., Room 222. Copies may be purchased by calling International Transcription Services, Inc. (ITS) at (202) 857-3800. The report can be downloaded [file name: MKSH4Q98.ZIP] from the FCC- State Link internet site at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/stats on the World Wide Web. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTERSTATE CALLING MINUTES.................................... 1 TABLE 1.1 Interstate Switched Access Minutes......................... 2 2. PRESUBSCRIBED LINES............................................ 4 TABLE 2.1 Presubscribed Telephone Lines by Carrier.................... 5 TABLE 2.2 Market Share of Presubscribed Lines........................ 9 TABLE 2.3 Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs) Share of Presubscribed Lines in Their Own Service Areas From Year-End 1989 to 1996.... 10 TABLE 2.4 Distribution of ILECs By Number of Areas in Which They Provide Both Local and Long Distance Service...................... 10 3. TOLL REVENUES................................................. 11
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris00.pdf
  • 9,207 7,910 7,342 7,275 6,482 6,714 6,607 6,714 6,670 12,392 12,323 12,746 10,966 11,435 12,337 13,209 13,467 58,970 57,079 56,941 49,682 50,311 50,353 50,785 51,016 * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 4 65 Alabama 4.1 Montana 2.5 Alaska 3.4 Nebraska 2.2 Arizona 2.7 Nevada 3.6 Arkansas 3.6 New Hampshire 2.7 California 1.1 New Jersey 2.3 Colorado 2.1 New Mexico 3.6 Connecticut 2.6 New York 1.4 Delaware 2.8 North Carolina 2.0 District Of Columbia 4.6 North Dakota 1.9 Florida 1.7 Ohio 1.9 Georgia 3.3 Oklahoma 3.5 Hawaii 3.1 Oregon 3.0 Idaho 2.6 Pennsylvania 1.4 Illinois 2.4 Rhode Island 3.3 Indiana 3.1 South Carolina 3.6 Iowa 2.8 South Dakota 4.0 Kansas 3.0 Tennessee 2.9 Kentucky 3.5 Texas 1.8 Louisiana
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris01.pdf
  • 7,275 6,482 6,714 6,607 6,714 6,643 6,522 12,392 12,323 12,746 10,966 11,435 12,337 13,209 13,459 13,203 58,970 57,079 56,941 49,682 50,311 50,353 50,785 51,016 49,633 * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 4 66 Alabama 4.1 Montana 2.5 Alaska 3.4 Nebraska 2.2 Arizona 2.7 Nevada 3.6 Arkansas 3.6 New Hampshire 2.7 California 1.1 New Jersey 2.3 Colorado 2.1 New Mexico 3.6 Connecticut 2.6 New York 1.4 Delaware 2.8 North Carolina 2.0 District Of Columbia 4.6 North Dakota 1.9 Florida 1.7 Ohio 1.9 Georgia 3.3 Oklahoma 3.5 Hawaii 3.1 Oregon 3.0 Idaho 2.6 Pennsylvania 1.4 Illinois 2.4 Rhode Island 3.3 Indiana 3.1 South Carolina 3.6 Iowa 2.8 South Dakota 4.0 Kansas 3.0 Tennessee 2.9 Kentucky 3.5 Texas 1.8 Louisiana
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris02.pdf
  • 6,482 6,714 6,607 6,714 6,643 10,746 10,395 12,323 12,746 10,966 11,435 12,337 13,209 13,459 22,296 22,648 57,079 56,941 49,682 50,311 50,353 50,785 51,016 78,054 78,265 * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 4 58 Alabama 4.2 Montana 2.5 Alaska 3.4 Nebraska 2.2 Arizona 2.7 Nevada 3.6 Arkansas 3.6 New Hampshire 2.7 California 1.1 New Jersey 2.3 Colorado 2.1 New Mexico 3.6 Connecticut 2.6 New York 1.4 Delaware 2.8 North Carolina 2.0 District Of Columbia 4.7 North Dakota 1.9 Florida 1.7 Ohio 1.9 Georgia 3.3 Oklahoma 3.6 Hawaii 3.1 Oregon 3.1 Idaho 2.6 Pennsylvania 1.4 Illinois 2.4 Rhode Island 3.3 Indiana 3.1 South Carolina 3.6 Iowa 2.8 South Dakota 4.0 Kansas 3.0 Tennessee 2.9 Kentucky 3.5 Texas 1.8 Louisiana
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris03.pdf
  • 6,714 6,643 10,746 10,395 10,426 12,323 12,746 10,966 11,435 12,337 13,209 13,459 22,296 22,648 21,654 57,079 56,941 49,682 50,311 50,353 50,785 51,016 78,054 78,265 78,310 * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 4 58 Alabama 4.2 Montana 2.5 Alaska 3.4 Nebraska 2.2 Arizona 2.7 Nevada 3.6 Arkansas 3.6 New Hampshire 2.7 California 1.1 New Jersey 2.3 Colorado 2.1 New Mexico 3.6 Connecticut 2.6 New York 1.4 Delaware 2.8 North Carolina 2.0 District Of Columbia 4.7 North Dakota 1.9 Florida 1.7 Ohio 1.9 Georgia 3.3 Oklahoma 3.6 Hawaii 3.1 Oregon 3.1 Idaho 2.6 Pennsylvania 1.4 Illinois 2.4 Rhode Island 3.3 Indiana 3.1 South Carolina 3.6 Iowa 2.8 South Dakota 4.0 Kansas 3.0 Tennessee 2.9 Kentucky 3.5 Texas 1.8 Louisiana
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris04.pdf
  • 6,643 10,746 10,395 10,426 10,298 12,746 10,966 11,435 12,337 13,209 13,459 22,296 22,648 21,654 21,750 56,941 49,682 50,311 50,353 50,785 51,016 78,054 78,265 78,310 77,149 * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 4 58 Alabama 4.2 Montana 2.5 Alaska 3.4 Nebraska 2.2 Arizona 2.7 Nevada 3.6 Arkansas 3.6 New Hampshire 2.7 California 1.1 New Jersey 2.3 Colorado 2.1 New Mexico 3.6 Connecticut 2.6 New York 1.4 Delaware 2.8 North Carolina 2.0 District Of Columbia 4.7 North Dakota 1.9 Florida 1.7 Ohio 1.9 Georgia 3.3 Oklahoma 3.5 Hawaii 3.1 Oregon 3.1 Idaho 2.6 Pennsylvania 1.4 Illinois 2.4 Rhode Island 3.3 Indiana 3.1 South Carolina 3.6 Iowa 2.8 South Dakota 4.0 Kansas 3.0 Tennessee 2.9 Kentucky 3.5 Texas 1.8 Louisiana
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/quarterly_roll-upsasof110110.pdf
  • 1/ 2/ Regional Bell Operating Companies 6/ $6,642.7 $17,621.4 $3,446.9 Other Incumbent Local Exchange 1,556.1 1,791.9 348.7 Carriers (ILECs) Total ILECs 8,198.8 19,413.3 3,795.5 Competitive Access Providers (CAPs) 1,195.1 2,884.1 844.0 and Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) Local Resellers 70.3 279.9 53.6 Private Service Providers 0.7 * * Shared-Tenant Service Providers 0.8 9.9 3.1 Other Local Service Providers 67.2 16.8 2.1 Total Local Competitors 1,334.1 3,190.9 903.0 Fixed Local Service Providers 9,532.9 22,604.3 4,698.5 Payphone Service Providers 26.1 100.7 8.3 Wireless Telephony Including Cellular, 1,570.8 17,352.9 2,505.3 Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers Paging & Messaging Service Providers 85.4 355.9 47.8 Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) Dispatch * 48.8 3.9 Wireless Data and Other Mobile Service 1.0 67.5 28.8 Providers
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • Residential Customers for a 10-Minute Night/Weekend Call..............39 Table 1.24 AT&T Basic Schedule Residential Rates for 10-minute Interstate InterLATA Calls, 1927-2001............................................40 Table 1.25 Average Long Distance Bills for Price-Sensitive Residential Callers....................................................41 Table 1.26 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll Service Calls..............................................................42 C. Additional Sources of Information on Local and Toll Rates..............................................43 II. Expenditures on Telephone Service.........................................................................44 A. Residential Expenditures..................................................................................................44 Table 2.1 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Household Location.........................................................................46 Table 2.2 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Race and National Origin.................................................................47 Table 2.3 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Household Income...........................................................................48 Table 2.4 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Age of the Head of the Household....................................................49 Table 2.5 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Size of the Household.......................................................................50 Table 2.6 Household Telecommunications Expenditures by Type of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • and Sprint for Residential Customers for a 10-Minute Day, Evening, and Night Call Table 1.22 AT&T Basic Schedule Residential Rates for 10-minute Interstate InterLATA Calls, 1927-2002 Table 1.23 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll Service Calls II. Expenditures on Telephone Service .........................................................II-1 A. Residential Expenditures..................................................................II-1 B. Business Expenditures.....................................................................II-2 C. Additional Sources of Information on Expenditures for Telephone Service......II-2 Table 2.1 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Household Location Table 2.2 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Race and National Origin Table 2.3 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Household Income Table 2.4 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Age of the Head of the Household Table 2.5 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Size of the Household Table 2.6 Household Telecommunications Expenditures by Type of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2003) Table 1.14 Historical Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15) ii Table 1.15 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll Service Calls II. Expenditures on Telephone Service......................................................II-1 A. Residential Expenditures..................................................................II-2 B. Business Expenditures.....................................................................II-2 C. Additional Sources of Information on Expenditures for Telephone Service......II-2 Table 2.1 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Household Location Table 2.2 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Race and National Origin Table 2.3 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Household Income Table 2.4 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Age of the Head of the Household Table 2.5 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Size of the Household Table 2.6 Average Annual Household Telecommunications Expenditures by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2004) Table 1.14 Historical Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15) ii Table 1.15 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll Service Calls II. Expenditures on Telephone Service......................................................II-1 A. Residential Expenditures..................................................................II-2 B. Business Expenditures.....................................................................II-2 C. Additional Sources of Information on Expenditures for Telephone Service......II-2 Table 2.1 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Household Location Table 2.2 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Race and National Origin Table 2.3 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Household Income Table 2.4 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Age of the Head of the Household Table 2.5 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Size of the Household Table 2.6 Average Annual Household Telecommunications Expenditures by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • of RUS Borrowers by State, 1996...................37 Table 1.22 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers, 1994-1996.....................38 Table 1.23 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by the Number of Lines Served, 1996..........38 Table 1.24 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by the Number of Exchanges Served, 1996.....38 C. Additional Sources of Information on Local Rates...................39 II. Toll Rates.....................................................40 A. Residential Rates............................................40 Table 2.1 Residential Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, MCI, and Sprint for a 10-minute Day Call............42 Table 2.2 Residential Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, MCI, and Sprint for a 10-minute Evening Call.........43 Table 2.3 Residential Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, MCI, and Sprint for a 10-minute Night Call...........44 Table 2.4 Average Charge per Billed Minute for Price-sensitive Residential Callers.................45 Table 2.5 AT&T
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • of RUS Borrowers by State, 1997.................37 Table 1.22 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers, 1994-1997....................38 Table 1.23 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by the Number of Lines Served, 1997........39 Table 1.24 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by the Number of Exchanges Served, 1997....40 C. Additional Sources of Information on Local Rates.................41 II. Toll Rates.................................................42 A. Residential Rates........................................42 Table 2.1 Residential Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, MCI, and Sprint for a 10-minute Day Call...........44 Table 2.2 Residential Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, MCI, and Sprint for a 10-minute Evening Call........45 Table 2.3 Residential Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, MCI, and Sprint for a 10-minute Night Call..........46 Table 2.4 Average Charge per Billed Minute for Price-sensitive Residential Callers................47 Table 2.5 AT&T
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 1995/1996 SOCC). We estimate that 5% of interstate toll revenue and intrastate-interlata toll revenue are 3 payments to carriers for telecommunication services for resale. -1- 1. Industry-Wide Summaries Table 1 provides estimates of interstate and intrastate total billed telephone revenue by states for all telecommunications carriers. Table 2 provides estimates of interstate and intrastate retail revenue.1 2. Preview of Data 2.1 Nation-Wide Data Nation-wide telephone revenue for 1995 is estimated primarily using data from the December 1996 Telecommunications Industry Revenue: TRS Fund Worksheet Data (TRS). The 1996 TRS has nation-wide data on revenues for local exchange, wireless, access and toll. Figure 1 has telecommunication revenue for 1995 by category. Alaska, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands and Micronesia are excluded from the analyses.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • 0.0 0.0 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 285,423 4,102 593,074 285,423 4,102 593,074 100.0 0.0 0.0 FLORIDA 7,114,917 232,955 2,779,199 7,230,425 236,7372,824,318 59.3 39.1 1.6 GEORGIA 2,674,779 116,942 1,292,308 2,977,856 130,1931,438,738 83.8 0.6 15.7 HAWAII 454,717 19,649 183,279 454,939 19,659 183,369 0.0 100.0 0.0 IDAHO 445,342 20,036 153,752 492,026 22,136 169,869 71.7 21.7 6.6 ILLINOIS 4,704,322 282,070 2,642,253 4,816,423 288,7922,705,216 85.6 12.3 2.1 INDIANA 2,221,241 84,297 933,285 2,319,914 88,042 974,744 62.4 33.5 4.1 IOWA 932,997 38,574 348,539 1,129,719 46,707 422,028 65.1 21.0 14.0 KANSAS 880,791 74,289 317,968 1,043,585 88,020 376,737 84.0 8.6 7.4 KENTUCKY 1,227,474 49,239 353,193 1,409,765 56,551 405,645 56.9 34.7 8.4 LOUISIANA 1,584,986 46,553 567,966 1,706,756 50,130 611,601 92.9 0.0 7.1 MAINE 414,650 37,152 146,734 493,938 44,256 174,792 83.9 0.0 16.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-98.pdf
  • competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC), wireless, subscriber line charge (SLC), non-SLC access, and toll using information from the Telecommunications Industry Revenue report. Other revenue, including international-to- international revenue and revenue reported by carriers that filed TRS worksheets but not USF worksheets, is divided the same way. Figures 1 and 2 show industry-wide and end-user telecommunication revenue by these categories.18 Table 2.1 shows industry-wide and end-user revenue as well as carrier's carrier revenue. 17 On July 14, 1999, the Commission amended its rules so that contributors to the universal service support mechanisms and to the TRS Fund need only file one consolidated form -- the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet -- rather than filing both the Universal Service Worksheet and the TRS Worksheet. 1998
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0300.pdf
  • Florida 85.5 92.2 6.7 * Georgia 88.9 91.8 2.9 Hawaii 94.6 93.6 -1.0 Idaho 89.5 93.6 4.1 * Illinois 95.0 93.0 -2.0 Indiana 90.3 95.7 5.4 * Iowa 95.4 96.7 1.3 Kansas 94.9 94.6 -0.3 Kentucky 86.9 93.9 7.0 * Louisiana 88.9 90.8 1.9 Maine 90.7 98.5 7.8 * Maryland 96.3 96.3 0.0 Massachusetts 94.3 94.1 -0.2 Michigan 93.8 95.9 2.1 * Minnesota 96.4 97.8 1.5 Mississippi 82.4 88.8 6.4 * Missouri 92.1 95.7 3.6 * Montana 92.8 95.1 2.3 Nebraska 94.0 97.8 3.8 * Nevada 89.4 95.5 6.1 * New Hampshire 95.0 98.1 3.2 * New Jersey 94.1 94.6 0.5 New Mexico 85.3 92.2 6.9 * New York 90.8 96.3 5.5 * North Carolina 89.3 93.3 4.0 * North Dakota
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0302.pdf
  • Month (March, July, November) Percent with Telephone N83M84J84N84M85J85N85M86J86N86M87J87N87M88J88N88M89J89N89M90J90N90M91J91N91M92J92N92M93J93N93M94J94N94M95J95N95M96J96N96M97J97N97M98J98N98M99J99N99M00J00N00M01J01N01M02 In Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 7 Table 2 Telephone Penetration by State (Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State Alabama 87.9% 92.0% 4.1% Alaska 83.8 96.4 12.6 * Arizona 88.8 95.9 7.2 * Arkansas 88.2 93.4 5.3 * California 91.7 97.2 5.5 * Colorado 94.4 96.3 1.9 Connecticut 95.5 97.6 2.1 Delaware 95.0 97.4 2.4 District of Columbia 94.7 94.0 -0.7 Florida 85.5 94.6 9.1 * Georgia 88.9 95.1 6.2 * Hawaii 94.6 97.0 2.4 Idaho 89.5 95.3 5.8 * Illinois 95.0 94.1 -0.9 Indiana 90.3 94.6 4.3 * Iowa 95.4 97.1 1.7 Kansas 94.9 95.7 0.8 Kentucky 86.9 95.7 8.8 * Louisiana 88.9 91.5 2.6 Maine 90.7 98.0 7.3 *
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0303.pdf
  • (March, July, November) Percent with Telephone N83M84J84N84M85J85N85M86J86N86M87J87N87M88J88N88M89J89N89M90J90N90M91J91N91M92J92N92M93J93N93M94J94N94M95J95N95M96J96N96M97J97N97M98J98N98M99J99N99M00J00N00M01J01N01M02J02N02M03 In Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 7 Table 2 Telephone Penetration by State (Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State Alabama 87.9% 90.5% 2.6% Alaska 83.8 96.8 13.0 * Arizona 88.8 95.6 6.8 * Arkansas 88.2 93.0 4.8 * California 91.7 97.2 5.5 * Colorado 94.4 97.0 2.6 * Connecticut 95.5 97.6 2.1 Delaware 95.0 96.9 1.9 District of Columbia 94.7 95.1 0.4 Florida 85.5 95.0 9.5 * Georgia 88.9 95.2 6.3 * Hawaii 94.6 98.0 3.4 * Idaho 89.5 94.8 5.3 * Illinois 95.0 92.4 -2.6 Indiana 90.3 93.8 3.5 * Iowa 95.4 97.0 1.6 Kansas 94.9 96.3 1.4 Kentucky 86.9 94.0 7.1 * Louisiana 88.9 93.4 4.5 * Maine 90.7 98.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0305.pdf
  • 93.5 -2.8 Massachusetts 94.3 93.9 -0.4 Michigan 93.8 91.5 -2.3 Minnesota 96.4 95.6 -0.8 Mississippi 82.4 86.7 4.3 * Missouri 92.1 92.1 0.0 Montana 92.8 93.3 0.5 Nebraska 94.0 94.5 0.5 Nevada 89.4 90.0 0.6 New Hampshire 95.0 94.4 -0.5 New Jersey 94.1 93.9 -0.2 New Mexico 85.3 92.2 6.9 * New York 90.8 91.3 0.5 North Carolina 89.3 91.4 2.1 * North Dakota 95.1 95.2 0.1 Ohio 92.2 93.3 1.1 Oklahoma 91.5 90.3 -1.2 Oregon 91.2 94.5 3.3 * Pennsylvania 95.1 94.3 -0.8 Rhode Island 93.3 93.9 0.6 South Carolina 81.8 93.2 11.4 * South Dakota 92.7 94.7 2.0 Tennessee 87.6 90.5 2.9 Texas 89.0 90.2 1.2 Utah 90.3 96.9 6.6 * Vermont 92.7 96.7 4.0 * Virginia 93.1 91.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0700.pdf
  • with Telephone N83M84J84N84M85J85N85M86J86N86M87J87N87M88J88N88M89J89N89M90J90N90M91J91N91M92J92N92M93J93N93M94J94N94M95J95N95M96J96N96M97J97N97M98J98N98M99J99N99M00J00 In Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 7 Table 2 Telephone Penetration by State (Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State November 1983 July 2000 Change Alabama 87.9% 92.3% 4.4% * Alaska 83.8 91.9 8.1 * Arizona 88.8 93.8 5.1 * Arkansas 88.2 89.1 0.9 California 91.7 95.8 4.1 * Colorado 94.4 96.4 2.0 Connecticut 95.5 97.6 2.1 Delaware 95.0 96.2 1.2 District of Columbia 94.7 95.3 0.6 Florida 85.5 92.1 6.6 * Georgia 88.9 90.6 1.7 Hawaii 94.6 93.5 -1.1 Idaho 89.5 93.3 3.8 * Illinois 95.0 92.1 -2.9 ** Indiana 90.3 93.3 3.0 Iowa 95.4 95.3 -0.1 Kansas 94.9 96.6 1.7 Kentucky 86.9 93.7 6.8 * Louisiana 88.9 92.7 3.8 * Maine 90.7 97.9 7.2 *
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0702.pdf
  • 95.0 91.2 -3.8 Indiana 90.3 92.5 2.2 Iowa 95.4 96.5 1.1 Kansas 94.9 95.6 0.7 Kentucky 86.9 94.6 7.7 * Louisiana 88.9 92.7 3.8 * Maine 90.7 97.4 6.7 * Maryland 96.3 96.1 -0.2 Massachusetts 94.3 97.4 3.1 * Michigan 93.8 95.1 1.3 Minnesota 96.4 98.0 1.7 Mississippi 82.4 91.8 9.4 * Missouri 92.1 95.8 3.7 * Montana 92.8 94.9 2.1 Nebraska 94.0 95.3 1.3 Nevada 89.4 94.9 5.5 * New Hampshire 95.0 96.9 2.0 New Jersey 94.1 94.9 0.8 New Mexico 85.3 92.3 7.0 * New York 90.8 95.7 4.9 * North Carolina 89.3 94.4 5.1 * North Dakota 95.1 93.3 -1.8 Ohio 92.2 95.2 3.0 * Oklahoma 91.5 93.1 1.6 Oregon 91.2 97.4 6.2 * Pennsylvania 95.1 98.2 3.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0703.pdf
  • 94.0 95.9 1.9 Nevada 89.4 94.3 4.9 * New Hampshire 95.0 98.0 3.1 * New Jersey 94.1 96.6 2.5 * New Mexico 85.3 90.4 5.0 * New York 90.8 95.4 4.5 * North Carolina 89.3 92.9 3.6 * North Dakota 95.1 93.7 -1.4 Ohio 92.2 96.4 4.2 * Oklahoma 91.5 90.8 -0.7 Oregon 91.2 96.9 5.7 * Pennsylvania 95.1 97.2 2.1 * Rhode Island 93.3 96.3 3.0 South Carolina 81.8 94.4 12.6 * South Dakota 92.7 92.9 0.2 Tennessee 87.6 94.2 6.6 * Texas 89.0 93.1 4.2 * Utah 90.3 96.9 6.6 * Vermont 92.7 97.7 5.0 * Virginia 93.1 96.0 2.9 Washington 92.5 96.8 4.4 * West Virginia 88.1 94.7 6.6 * Wisconsin 94.8 96.3 1.5 Wyoming 89.7 93.8 4.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0799.pdf
  • Percent with Telephone N83M84J84N84M85J85N85M86J86N86M87J87N87M88J88N88M89J89N89M90J90N90M91J91N91M92J92N92M93J93N93M94J94N94M95J95N95M96J96N96M97J97N97M98J98N98M99J99 In Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 6 Table 2 Telephone Penetration by State (Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State November 1983 July 1999 Change Alabama 87.9% 92.6% 4.7% * Alaska 83.8 94.6 10.8 * Arizona 88.8 92.4 3.7 Arkansas 88.2 90.5 2.3 California 91.7 96.5 4.8 * Colorado 94.4 97.2 2.8 Connecticut 95.5 97.6 2.1 Delaware 95.0 94.4 -0.6 District of Columbia 94.7 92.7 -2.0 Florida 85.5 93.3 7.8 * Georgia 88.9 91.2 2.3 Hawaii 94.6 97.4 2.8 * Idaho 89.5 95.1 5.6 * Illinois 95.0 91.7 -3.3 ** Indiana 90.3 93.7 3.4 Iowa 95.4 96.3 0.9 Kansas 94.9 92.1 -2.8 ** Kentucky 86.9 93.3 6.4 * Louisiana 88.9 92.2 3.3 Maine 90.7 96.9 6.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1100.pdf
  • * Georgia 86.2 91.1 4.9 * Hawaii 93.5 94.7 1.2 Idaho 90.7 93.9 3.2 * Illinois 94.2 91.5 -2.6 # Indiana 91.6 94.5 2.9 * Iowa 96.2 96.2 0.0 Kansas 94.3 94.8 0.5 Kentucky 88.1 93.3 5.2 * Louisiana 89.7 92.6 2.9 * Maine 93.4 97.9 4.4 * Maryland 95.7 95.0 -0.7 Massachusetts 95.9 94.6 -1.3 # Michigan 92.8 95.0 2.1 * Minnesota 95.8 97.4 1.6 * Mississippi 82.4 89.2 6.8 * Missouri 91.5 95.8 4.3 * Montana 91.0 94.6 3.6 * Nebraska 95.7 97.3 1.7 * Nevada 90.4 94.0 3.6 * New Hampshire 94.3 97.7 3.3 * New Jersey 94.8 94.6 -0.2 New Mexico 82.0 91.2 9.2 * New York 91.8 95.1 3.3 * North Carolina 88.3 93.9 5.6 *
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1104.pdf
  • 94.8 0.4 Kentucky 88.1 91.4 3.3 * Louisiana 89.7 90.9 1.3 Maine 93.4 96.6 3.2 * Maryland 95.7 93.4 -2.3 # Massachusetts 95.9 96.4 0.5 Michigan 92.8 93.7 0.9 Minnesota 95.8 97.1 1.3 Mississippi 82.4 89.6 7.2 * Missouri 91.5 93.7 2.2 * Montana 91.0 93.5 2.5 * Nebraska 95.7 95.7 0.0 Nevada 90.4 92.2 1.8 New Hampshire 94.3 96.4 2.1 * New Jersey 94.8 95.1 0.3 New Mexico 82.0 91.4 9.4 * New York 91.8 94.5 2.7 * North Carolina 88.3 93.3 5.0 * North Dakota 94.6 95.0 0.3 Ohio 92.4 94.9 2.5 * Oklahoma 90.3 91.0 0.7 Oregon 90.6 95.5 4.9 * Pennsylvania 94.9 95.6 0.7 Rhode Island 93.6 95.3 1.7 South Carolina 83.7 93.4 9.8 * South Dakota
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1196.pdf
  • Florida 88.7 93.1 4.4 * Georgia 86.2 89.7 3.5 * Hawaii 93.5 94.8 1.3 Idaho 90.7 92.9 2.2 Illinois 94.2 93.0 -1.2 Indiana 91.6 93.7 2.2 * Iowa 96.2 96.6 0.4 Kansas 94.3 93.9 -0.4 Kentucky 88.1 92.3 4.2 * Louisiana 89.7 91.1 1.4 Maine 93.4 96.5 3.1 * Maryland 95.7 96.7 1.0 Massachusetts 95.9 95.7 -0.2 Michigan 92.8 95.0 2.1 * Minnesota 95.8 97.1 1.3 Mississippi 82.4 87.5 5.2 * Missouri 91.5 95.3 3.9 * Montana 91.0 94.3 3.3 * Nebraska 95.7 96.0 0.3 Nevada 90.4 93.5 3.1 * New Hampshire 94.3 96.1 1.8 New Jersey 94.8 93.6 -1.2 New Mexico 82.0 86.2 4.2 * New York 91.8 93.4 1.7 * North Carolina 88.3 93.5 5.2 * North Dakota 94.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1197.pdf
  • 1.1 Mississippi 82.4 89.2 6.8 * Missouri 91.5 95.0 3.6 * Montana 91.0 93.7 2.7 Nebraska 95.7 97.1 1.4 Nevada 90.4 94.1 3.8 * New Hampshire 94.3 96.5 2.2 New Jersey 94.8 94.9 0.1 New Mexico 82.0 88.1 6.1 * New York 91.8 94.2 2.4 * North Carolina 88.3 93.1 4.8 * North Dakota 94.6 95.8 1.2 Ohio 92.4 94.6 2.1 * Oklahoma 90.3 91.4 1.2 Oregon 90.6 95.6 5.0 * Pennsylvania 94.9 97.1 2.3 * Rhode Island 93.6 94.5 0.8 South Carolina 83.7 92.5 8.9 * South Dakota 93.2 93.9 0.7 Tennessee 88.5 94.5 6.0 * Texas 88.4 91.3 2.9 * Utah 92.5 96.9 4.4 * Vermont 92.3 95.1 2.8 Virginia 93.1 94.5 1.5 Washington 93.0 95.9 2.9 * West
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1198.pdf
  • * Georgia 86.2 91.4 5.3 * Hawaii 93.5 95.4 1.9 * Idaho 90.7 93.3 2.6 * Illinois 94.2 92.7 -1.4 ** Indiana 91.6 94.4 2.8 * Iowa 96.2 96.7 0.5 Kansas 94.3 94.3 0.0 Kentucky 88.1 93.3 5.2 * Louisiana 89.7 92.3 2.6 * Maine 93.4 96.9 3.5 * Maryland 95.7 96.5 0.8 Massachusetts 95.9 94.5 -1.4 Michigan 92.8 95.0 2.1 * Minnesota 95.8 97.8 2.0 * Mississippi 82.4 89.5 7.1 * Missouri 91.5 94.6 3.1 * Montana 91.0 94.1 3.1 * Nebraska 95.7 96.2 0.5 Nevada 90.4 92.3 2.0 New Hampshire 94.3 95.5 1.2 New Jersey 94.8 94.5 -0.3 New Mexico 82.0 88.2 6.2 * New York 91.8 94.8 3.0 * North Carolina 88.3 93.1 4.8 * North Dakota 94.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/telrev-98.pdf
  • originating or terminating calls 23a Provided as unbundled network elements or other 18.3 18.3 70.1 70.1 512.8 512.8 contract arrangement 23b Provided under state or federal access tariff 7.6 0.1 7.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 58.0 49.2 107.2 8,495.1 9,441.117,936.2 Total per-minute access charges 25.9 0.1 26.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 128.1 49.2 177.3 9,007.9 9,441.118,449.0 24Local private line & special access 2.1 * 2.1 10.9 38.4 49.3 1,157.7 4,697.0 5,854.8 25Pay telephone compensation from toll carriers 0.6 0.6 1.2 1.7 1.3 3.0 204.2 221.7 425.9 26Other local telecommunications service revenues 3.9 3.9 4.2 10.9 15.2 351.6 81.2 432.8 27Universal service support receipts 5.9 1.2 7.1 385.1 1,020.9 1,406.1 Total fixed local service provided for resale 33.9 1.2 35.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 167.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/telrev02.pdf
  • Share of Universal Service Contributions 1/ By Principal Type of Contributor Using Traditional Carrier Categories 2/ FCC Form 499-Q November 2003 Q3 Q1 Service Provider Category 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Projected Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) 11.7% 14.4% 14.3% 16.2% 18.3% 19.9% 19.3% 19.8% Including CLEC Affiliates. Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs) 2.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.8 3.6 3.9 Other Than RBOCs Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) Local Resellers and Other Local Carriers Other Than RBOCs 0.8 1.3 2.6 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.2 3.3 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.2 27.0 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/telrev03.pdf
  • country. 33 Table 12 Share of Universal Service Contributions 1/ By Principal Type of Contributor Using Traditional Carrier Categories 2/ Preliminary 1/ Q1 Service Provider Category 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) 11.7%14.4% 14.3% 16.2% 18.3% 19.9% 19.9% 22.6% 22.7% Including CLEC Affiliates. Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs) 2.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.8 3.2 3.8 3.8 Other Than RBOCs Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) Local Resellers and Other Local Carriers Other Than RBOCs 0.8 1.3 2.6 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.5 3.9 4.3 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.6 30.3 30.9 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • can also be downloaded [file names: TREND100.ZIP, TREND100.PDF] from the FCC-State Link internet site at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/stats on the World Wide Web. i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................1-1 ACCESS CHARGES.................................................................................................................1-1 TABLE 1.1 INTERSTATE PER-LINE ACCESS CHARGES..............................................................1-3 TABLE 1.2 INTERSTATE PER-MINUTE ACCESS CHARGES........................................................1-4 TABLE 1.3 INTERSTATE PER-LINE ACCESS CHARGES BY CARRIER..........................................1-5 TABLE 1.4 INTERSTATE PER-MINUTE ACCESS CHARGES BY CARRIER....................................1-6 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE...................................................................................2-1 TABLE 2.1 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SUBSCRIBERS....................................................................2-3 TABLE 2.2 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE: INDUSTRY SURVEY RESULTS...........................2-4 COMPLAINTS...........................................................................................................................3-1 TABLE 3.1 WRITTEN COMPLAINTS PROCESSED.......................................................................3-3 TABLE 3.2 COMPLAINT INDICES FOR IXCS SERVED 20 OR MORE COMPLAINTS......................3-4 TABLE 3.3 COMPLAINT INDICES FOR LECS SERVED 20 OR MORE COMPLAINTS.....................3-6 TABLE 3.4 BILLING AGENTS SERVED MORE THAN 20 COMPLAINTS.......................................3-6 TABLE 3.5 SLAMMING COMPLAINTS: INDICES FOR IXCS SERVED 40 OR MORE.....................3-7 TABLE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • the World Wide Web. TRENDS IN TELEPHONE SERVICE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.................................................1 - 1 ACCESS CHARGES...............................................1 - 1 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges........................1 - 3 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges......................1 - 4 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier................1 - 5 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier..............1 - 6 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE...................................2 - 1 Table 2.1 Cellular Telephone Subscribers..........................2 - 3 Table 2.2 Cellular Telephone Service: Survey Results.................2 - 4 COMPLAINTS...................................................3 - 1 Table 3.1 Written Complaints Processed January 1, 1998 Through June 30, 1998............................................3 - 3 Table 3.2 Companies Served 40 or More Slamming Complaints..........3 - 4 Table 3.3 Companies Served 20 or More Cramming Complaints..........3 - 5 CONSUMER EXPENDITURES.......................................4 - 1 Table 4.1 Telephone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Inc. at (202) 857-3800. The report can also be downloaded [file names: TREND200.ZIP, TREND200.PDF] from the FCC-State Link Internet site at . i Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................1-1 Access Charges............................................................................................1-3 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges..........................................................................1-5 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges......................................................................1-6 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier..........................................................1-7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier......................................................1-8 Advanced Telecommunications....................................................................2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Lines.....................................................................................................2-3 Table 2.2 Advanced Services Lines..........................................................................................2-3 Table 2.3 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines......................................................2-3 Table 2.4 High-Speed Lines by Technology..............................................................................2-4 Consumer Expenditures...............................................................................3-1 Table 3.1 Household Expenditures for Telephone Service.........................................................3-3 Chart 3.1 Monthly Telephone Service Expenditures..................................................................3-3 Table 3.2 Average Monthly Household Telecommunications Expenditures for Local Exchange and Long Distance Carriers.................................................................3-4 Earnings.......................................................................................................4-1 Table 4.1 Interstate Rate of Return Summary............................................................................4-3 Employment and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • response to 202-418-0520 FCC/IAD Mail Stop 1600 F Washington, DC 20554 TRENDS IN TELEPHONE SERVICE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION......................................................... 1 ACCESS CHARGES....................................................... 1 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges............................... 3 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges............................. 4 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier...................... 5 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier.................... 6 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE.......................................... 7 Table 2.1 Cellular Telephone Subscribers.................................. 8 Table 2.2 Cellular Telephone Service: Survey Results........................ 9 COMPLAINTS........................................................... 10 Table 3.1 Carriers Served with More Than 50 Complaints in 1997.............. 12 Table 3.2 Local Exchange Carriers Served with More Than 50 Complaints in 1997...................................................... 13 Table 3.3 Billing Agents Served with More Than 50 Complaints in 1997......... 13 Table 3.4 Other Companies Served with More
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • the World Wide Web. TRENDS IN TELEPHONE SERVICE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.................................................1 - 1 ACCESS CHARGES...............................................1 - 1 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges........................1 - 3 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges......................1 - 4 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier................1 - 5 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier..............1 - 6 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE...................................2 - 1 Table 2.1 Cellular Telephone Subscribers..........................2 - 3 Table 2.2 Cellular Telephone Service: Survey Results.................2 - 4 COMPLAINTS...................................................3 - 1 Table 3.1 Written Complaints Processed January 1, 1998 Through June 30, 1998............................................3 - 3 Table 3.2 Companies Served 40 or More Slamming Complaints..........3 - 4 Table 3.3 Companies Served 20 or More Cramming Complaints..........3 - 5 CONSUMER EXPENDITURES.......................................4 - 1 Table 4.1 Telephone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • equipment, call (202) 418-0484 Fax this response to Or Mail this response to 202-418-0520 FCC/IATD Mail Stop 1600 F Washington, DC 20554 i Table of Contents Introduction..........................................................................................................1-1 Access Charges.....................................................................................................1-3 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges.......................................................................1-5 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges...................................................................1-6 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier......................................................1-7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier.................................................1-8 Advanced Telecommunications..........................................................................2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Lines..................................................................................................2-3 Table 2.2 Advanced Services Lines.......................................................................................2-3 Table 2.3 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines...............................................2-4 Table 2.4 Residential and Small Business Advanced Services Lines...................................2-4 Table 2.5 High-Speed Lines by Technology.........................................................................2-5 Consumer Expenditures......................................................................................3-1 Table 3.1 Household Expenditures for Telephone Service...................................................3-3 Chart 3.1 Monthly Telephone Service Expenditures.............................................................3-3 Table 3.2 Average Monthly Household Telecommunications To Local and Long Distance Providers..................................................................3-4 Earnings................................................................................................................4-1 Table 4.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • facimile (202) 863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@ aol.com. The report can also be downloaded from the FCC-State Link Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/stats. i Table of Contents Introduction..........................................................................................................1-1 Access Charges.....................................................................................................1-3 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges.......................................................................1-5 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges...................................................................1-6 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier......................................................1-7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier.................................................1-8 Advanced Telecommunications..........................................................................2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Lines..................................................................................................2-3 Chart 2.1 High-Speed Lines...................................................................................................2-3 Chart 2.2 High-Speed Lines by Technology.........................................................................2-3 Table 2.2 Advanced Services Lines.......................................................................................2-4 Chart 2.3 Advanced Services Lines.......................................................................................2-4 Chart 2.4 Advanced Services Lines by Technology..............................................................2-4 Table 2.3 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines...............................................2-5 Chart 2.5 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines...............................................2-5 Chart 2.6 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines by Technology......................2-5 Table 2.4 Residential and Small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • at 800-378-3160, facimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. The report can also be downloaded from the FCC-State Link Internet site at: www.fcc.gov/wcb/trends.html. i Table of Contents Introduction..........................................................................................................1-1 Access Charges.....................................................................................................1-1 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges.......................................................................1-3 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges...................................................................1-4 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier......................................................1-5 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier.................................................1-6 Advanced Telecommunications..........................................................................2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Lines..................................................................................................2-3 Chart 2.1 Total High-Speed Lines.........................................................................................2-3 Chart 2.2 High-Speed Lines by Technology.........................................................................2-3 Table 2.2 Advanced Services Lines.......................................................................................2-4 Chart 2.3 Advanced Services Lines.......................................................................................2-4 Chart 2.4 Advanced Services Lines by Technology..............................................................2-4 Table 2.3 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines...............................................2-5 Chart 2.5 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines...............................................2-5 Chart 2.6 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines by Technology......................2-5 Table 2.4 Residential and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • Inc. at (202) 857-3800. The report can also be downloaded [file names: TREND101.ZIP, TREND101.PDF] from the FCC-State Link Internet site at . i Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................1-1 Access Charges............................................................................................1-3 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges..........................................................................1-5 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges......................................................................1-6 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier..........................................................1-7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier......................................................1-8 Advanced Telecommunications....................................................................2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Lines.....................................................................................................2-3 Table 2.2 Advanced Services Lines..........................................................................................2-3 Table 2.3 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines......................................................2-3 Table 2.4 High-Speed Lines by Technology..............................................................................2-4 Consumer Expenditures...............................................................................3-1 Table 3.1 Household Expenditures for Telephone Service.........................................................3-3 Chart 3.1 Monthly Telephone Service Expenditures..................................................................3-3 Table 3.2 Average Monthly Household Telecommunications Expenditures by Type of Provider.........................................................................................................3-4 Earnings.......................................................................................................4-1 Table 4.1 Interstate Rate-of-Return Summary...........................................................................4-3 Employment and Labor Productivity...........................................................5-1 Table 5.1 Annual
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • facimile (202) 863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@ aol.com. The report can also be downloaded from the FCC-State Link Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/stats. i Table of Contents Introduction..........................................................................................................1-1 Access Charges.....................................................................................................1-3 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges.......................................................................1-5 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges...................................................................1-6 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier......................................................1-7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier.................................................1-8 Advanced Telecommunications..........................................................................2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Lines..................................................................................................2-3 Table 2.2 Advanced Services Lines.......................................................................................2-3 Table 2.3 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines...............................................2-4 Table 2.4 Residential and Small Business Advanced Services Lines...................................2-4 Table 2.5 High-Speed Lines by Technology as of December 31, 2002................................2-5 Table 2.6 High-Speed Lines by State....................................................................................2-6 Consumer Expenditures......................................................................................3-1 Table 3.1 Household Expenditures for Telephone Service...................................................3-3 Chart 3.1 Monthly Telephone Service Expenditures.............................................................3-3 Table 3.2 Average Monthly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-95.pdf
  • Total Carrier in Revenue Revenue Revenue Category Local Exchange Service ** 0.0% ** 0.0% ** 0.0% 0.0% Local Private Line Service $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Cellular, PCS, Paging & Other Mobile ** 0.0 ** 0.0 ** 0.0 30.0 Alternative Access and Other $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Total Local Revenues $7.7 4.2 $3.3 1.0 $10.9 2.1 30.0 Interstate Access $0.0 0.0 $10.2 3.1 $10.2 2.0 100.0 Intrastate Access $5.9 3.2 $0.0 0.0 $5.9 1.2 0.0 Total Access Revenues $5.9 3.2 $10.2 3.1 $16.1 3.2 63.4 Operator Service, Pay Telephone & Card $157.8 86.1 $289.0 88.3 $446.8 87.5 64.7 Non-Operator Switched Toll Service $7.5 4.1 $12.9 3.9 $20.3 4.0 63.3 Long Distance Private Line Service $0.0 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-96.pdf
  • Interstate Access $0.0 0.0 $3.8 0.7 $3.8 0.6 100.0 Intrastate Access $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Total Access Revenues $0.0 0.0 $3.8 0.7 $3.8 0.6 100.0 Operator Service, Pay Telephone & Card $3.9 10.0 $16.5 2.9 $20.4 3.4 81.1 Non-Operator Switched Toll Service $8.8 22.7 $39.0 6.9 $47.8 7.9 81.6 Long Distance Private Line Service $3.5 8.9 $12.1 2.1 $15.5 2.6 77.7 All Other Long Distance $19.3 50.0 $485.2 86.3 $504.5 83.9 96.2 Total Toll Revenues $35.4 91.6 $552.8 98.3 $588.2 97.9 94.0 Total Carrier Revenue $38.7 100.0 $562.4 100.0 $601.0 100.0 93.6 Figures may not add due to rounding and amounts that have been withheld to preserve confidentiality of individual carrier data. ** Denotes amounts that have been
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-97.pdf
  • 73.3 117.3 13.3 179.0 24.9 203.9 205.8 40.5 246.3 Private Carriers 0.8 2.0 22.5 25.3 14.7 4.9 67.5 22.4 64.7 87.1 112.3 249.2 361.5 Shared Tenent Services Providers 0.2 29.9 * 56.9 37.9 48.9 86.8 87.0 114.0 201.0 Other Local Exchange Carriers 21.1 0.1 12.1 33.3 81.0 * 41.7 81.6 41.1 122.7 156.1 119.0 275.0 Local Service Providers Other 924.8 2.1 83.5 1,010.4 830.4 124.4 465.6 876.3 544.1 1,420.4 2,430.9 577.2 3,008.0 Than ILECs and Pay Telephone Providers Local Service Providers 28,016.4 232.4 612.6 28,861.4 68,213.3 484.5 10,377.5 68,682.5 10,392.9 79,075.4 107,936.8 9,121.3 117,058.2 Wireless Telephony including Cellular, 33.4 2,064.2 199.8 2,297.4 38.2 26,570.7 897.4 25,643.7 1,862.6 27,506.3 29,803.7 4,287.2 34,090.8 Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR - Telephony Carriers Paging
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationdec2000.pdf
  • % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 5,363 35.2 299 2.0 940 6.2 489 3.2 297 1.9 7,869 51.6 15,257 Alaska 819 18.8 19 0.4 84 1.9 42 1.0 19 0.4 3,382 77.5 4,365 Arizona 8,715 53.1 194 1.2 566 3.4 481 2.9 325 2.0 6,139 37.4 16,420 Arkansas 2,374 27.4 601 6.9 260 3.0 181 2.1 83 1.0 5,161 59.6 8,660 California 56,588 41.7 5,678 4.2 3,153 2.3 3,768 2.8 1,845 1.4 64,570 47.6 135,602 Colorado 8,865 50.2 174 1.0 349 2.0 598 3.4 308 1.7 7,353 41.7 17,647 Connecticut 5,275 43.5 898 7.4 330 2.7 233 1.9 251 2.1 5,150 42.4 12,139 Delaware 1,418 36.4 91 2.3 69 1.8 53 1.4 38 1.0 2,224 57.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationdec2001.pdf
  • 6.0 153 1.3 207 1.8 91 0.8 7,139 61.3 11,639 California 58,005 39.7 7,640 5.2 1,333 0.9 4,073 2.8 2,115 1.4 73,062 50.0 146,228 Colorado 9,472 50.6 76 0.4 295 1.6 832 4.4 273 1.5 7,773 41.5 18,722 Connecticut 5,549 38.7 884 6.2 122 0.9 318 2.2 177 1.2 7,278 50.8 14,328 Delaware 1,701 38.2 33 0.7 74 1.7 92 2.1 56 1.3 2,500 56.1 4,458 District of Columbia 2,916 56.0 61 1.2 406 7.8 224 4.3 35 0.7 1,561 30.0 5,204 Florida 28,914 45.7 2,954 4.7 920 1.5 2,605 4.1 927 1.5 26,892 42.5 63,212 Georgia 14,715 43.6 2,114 6.3 811 2.4 1,245 3.7 378 1.1 14,484 42.9 33,748 Guam 61 43.6 3 2.1 2 1.4 2 1.4 1 0.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationdec2002.pdf
  • 3.1 961 1.5 27,573 44.0 62,596 Georgia 13,989 39.8 3,189 9.1 304 0.9 976 2.8 357 1.0 16,292 46.4 35,107 Guam Not shown to protect carrier confidentiality 80 Hawaii 2,359 54.0 77 1.8 15 0.3 112 2.6 52 1.2 1,752 40.1 4,367 Idaho 2,175 37.9 15 0.3 55 1.0 135 2.3 76 1.3 3,289 57.2 5,745 Illinois 21,694 37.6 1,199 2.1 847 1.5 1,179 2.0 679 1.2 32,118 55.6 57,716 Indiana 8,485 32.7 453 1.7 398 1.5 449 1.7 298 1.1 15,841 61.1 25,925 Iowa 4,428 27.0 120 0.7 209 1.3 248 1.5 134 0.8 11,252 68.6 16,392 Kansas 3,588 23.8 991 6.6 78 0.5 211 1.4 160 1.1 10,065 66.7 15,093 Kentucky 6,029 32.3 703 3.8 175 0.9 354 1.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationdec2003.pdf
  • 49.6 871 4.6 208 1.1 588 3.1 165 0.9 7,818 40.9 19,133 Arkansas 3,606 25.2 898 6.3 103 0.7 237 1.7 453 3.2 9,015 63.0 14,311 California 62,551 41.8 8,485 5.7 598 0.4 3,753 2.5 2,088 1.4 71,991 48.2 149,467 Colorado 9,635 50.1 210 1.1 141 0.7 577 3.0 242 1.3 8,435 43.8 19,240 Connecticut 6,229 42.3 431 2.9 312 2.1 271 1.8 252 1.7 7,229 49.1 14,724 Delaware 1,688 46.7 66 1.8 75 2.1 82 2.3 18 0.5 1,689 46.7 3,618 District of Columbia 3,274 63.5 151 2.9 153 3.0 129 2.5 20 0.4 1,431 27.7 5,158 Florida 30,066 45.9 2,823 4.3 500 0.8 2,276 3.5 893 1.4 28,982 44.2 65,540 Georgia 15,814 42.8 2,076 5.6 294 0.8 1,445 3.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationjun2001.pdf
  • 1.8 1 0.9 2 1.8 1 0.9 48 43.6 110 Hawaii 2,278 49.0 109 2.3 10 0.2 132 2.8 70 1.5 2,049 44.1 4,648 Idaho 2,080 36.4 23 0.4 43 0.8 116 2.0 97 1.7 3,360 58.8 5,718 Illinois 20,019 38.1 2,995 5.7 1,695 3.2 1,255 2.4 764 1.5 25,845 49.2 52,572 Indiana 8,211 33.7 681 2.8 560 2.3 519 2.1 431 1.8 13,991 57.4 24,394 Iowa 3,980 24.7 140 0.9 205 1.3 267 1.7 492 3.1 11,010 68.4 16,095 Kansas 3,389 23.3 1,075 7.4 257 1.8 265 1.8 228 1.6 9,308 64.1 14,521 Kentucky 5,139 33.1 615 4.0 150 1.0 368 2.4 320 2.1 8,938 57.6 15,530 Louisiana 6,319 37.1 1,489 8.7 153 0.9 600 3.5 261 1.5 8,205 48.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationjun2003.pdf
  • 24.6 776 5.6 105 0.8 234 1.7 452 3.2 8,918 64.1 13,910 California 61,564 40.9 7,616 5.1 915 0.6 3,682 2.4 2,176 1.4 74,538 49.5 150,491 Colorado 9,672 50.6 62 0.3 198 1.0 661 3.5 235 1.2 8,282 43.3 19,111 Connecticut 6,137 40.0 677 4.4 281 1.8 272 1.8 363 2.4 7,612 49.6 15,341 Delaware 1,688 46.7 29 0.8 75 2.1 70 1.9 17 0.5 1,737 48.0 3,615 District of Columbia 3,252 63.4 14 0.3 167 3.3 127 2.5 26 0.5 1,543 30.1 5,130 Florida 28,921 45.2 3,401 5.3 469 0.7 2,186 3.4 985 1.5 28,023 43.8 63,984 Georgia 14,398 39.5 3,063 8.4 271 0.7 1,035 2.8 390 1.1 17,323 47.5 36,480 Guam Not shown to protect carrier confidentiality Hawaii 2,490
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationjun2004.pdf
  • numbers in NXXs that have not yet been assigned to carriers. 2 Unduplicated total. Note: Figures may not add due to rounding. 13 Table 4 Telephone Number Utilization by State as of June 30, 2004 Assigned Intermediate Reserved Aging Administrative Available1 Total State/jurisdiction 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 7,515 38.0 415 2.1 216 1.1 644 3.3 259 1.3 10,708 54.2 19,756 Alaska 1,085 24.2 6 0.1 15 0.3 58 1.3 18 0.4 3,303 73.6 4,486 Arizona 10,274 53.5 391 2.0 201 1.0 589 3.1 174 0.9 7,579 39.5 19,209 Arkansas 3,801 27.4 769 5.5 89 0.6 283 2.0 446 3.2 8,470 61.1 13,858 California 64,497 43.7 7,563 5.1 758 0.5 3,418 2.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-96.pdf
  • $640,568100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 78,468,44845.025.926.2 0.3 2.6 Belgium $84,981,48261.321.112.9 4.1 0.6 $12,973,51748.128.917.2 5.8 0.0 $2,428,36766.925.5 2.3 0.0 5.3 156,690,80745.726.319.8 6.7 1.5 Cyprus $8,653,92663.423.110.3 0.0 3.2 $3,220,36954.932.113.0 0.0 0.0 $607,35457.935.3 6.8 0.0 0.0 13,638,36254.328.213.9 0.0 3.6 Denmark $43,009,23157.722.511.1 7.9 0.8 $7,370,74149.925.517.4 7.2 0.0 $986,36135.854.010.2 0.0 0.0 88,916,02842.323.620.611.8 1.8 Finland $22,523,77570.816.9 9.2 2.2 0.9 $4,512,42650.923.622.3 3.1 0.0 $255,67151.020.414.5 0.014.1 43,682,36350.124.119.4 4.3 2.1 France $274,284,44462.121.310.8 5.1 0.7 $40,499,39245.332.414.8 6.3 1.2 $5,378,68167.824.9 7.4 0.0 0.0 645,781,05142.429.315.310.2 2.9 Germany $509,982,48169.221.4 7.7 1.3 0.5 $39,083,06549.632.511.3 5.5 1.1 $17,556,44276.121.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 1,094,777,71550.131.511.5 5.3 1.5 Gibraltar $834,08579.817.0 2.9 0.0 0.2 $145,77799.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 $71,302100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 839,78876.519.5 3.6 0.0 0.4 Greece $90,151,06866.822.4 7.9 0.9 2.1 $19,305,85258.834.5 6.6 0.0 0.0 $7,769,64179.615.7 4.7 0.0 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-97.pdf
  • 120,799,14245.115.012.922.5 4.4 Equatorial Guinea $1,578,85829.3 0.0 3.1 2.265.5 $2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 1,893,717 0.1 0.0 1.5 1.097.4 Ethiopia $27,913,28856.533.3 7.3 2.0 0.9 $1,688,51045.248.3 6.4 0.0 0.0 $1,086,44290.3 9.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 22,953,06949.137.0 9.4 3.3 1.2 Gabon $2,282,87966.023.6 6.4 0.0 4.0 $473,61071.928.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 $290,768 2.697.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,407,36161.626.7 6.6 0.0 5.1 Gambia, The $8,059,12243.247.7 6.9 0.0 2.1 $430,25756.920.722.4 0.0 0.0 $612,26994.5 3.8 1.7 0.0 0.0 11,183,14027.659.9 9.9 0.1 2.5 Ghana $39,922,46254.332.5 5.5 1.5 6.2 $2,620,51150.917.531.5 0.0 0.0 $2,476,43294.9 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 55,510,00836.030.2 7.9 2.323.6 Guinea $6,908,67659.030.1 0.6 0.110.2 $525,46868.731.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 $3,971,704100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8,546,98644.239.8 0.5 0.115.5 Guinea-Bissau $1,819,79562.6 7.9 3.4 0.225.8 $37100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0 814,88015.611.1 4.5 0.468.4 - Switched
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-98.pdf
  • 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other Minutes 1 2 3 4 Other Andorra $165,32437.6 4.410.821.625.5 $848 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $5,567100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 385,29420.8 8.6 7.819.043.7 Austria $39,813,44164.6 0.822.611.5 0.5 $3,700,48445.3 0.027.624.2 2.9 $307,19396.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 3.6 102,113,63144.9 2.328.322.5 2.0 Belgium $70,985,42059.9 0.423.413.3 2.9 $6,508,72050.5 0.030.716.7 2.1 $1,662,64369.7 0.016.2 0.213.9 156,393,16341.5 1.828.016.812.0 Cyprus $8,822,85956.3 0.726.312.4 4.4 $2,112,03161.3 0.025.010.4 3.3 $322,76076.5 0.013.2 8.6 1.7 15,657,68051.3 1.420.515.611.1 Denmark $36,270,24164.0 1.522.3 7.3 4.8 $2,869,38337.8 0.035.216.011.0 $1,115,23957.3 0.036.8 4.8 1.1 102,361,57041.4 6.930.2 9.511.9 Finland $16,259,03442.8 2.642.610.3 1.6 $2,328,58342.2 0.038.518.3 1.0 $735,38894.0 0.0 5.1 0.5 0.4 46,134,63935.0 9.033.118.1 4.8 France $283,361,26859.4 0.626.210.0 3.7 $31,325,39739.1 0.036.713.011.2 $8,338,13975.3 0.012.2 4.4 8.1 846,290,43042.3 2.429.415.010.9 Germany
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f00.pdf
  • 115,258 0.2 2.812.3 8.476.3 Congo $1,377,24270.1 7.218.0 1.1 3.6 $151,34249.929.3 0.0 0.020.8 $343,40246.553.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,439,92565.2 7.212.4 1.214.0 Cote d'Ivoire $8,514,33760.825.4 1.1 4.8 7.9 $927,61631.856.1 0.0 0.012.1 $2,329,64790.7 9.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 11,369,47839.636.6 0.5 5.317.9 Djibouti $737,90742.510.3 4.438.5 4.2 $79,97682.1 0.0 0.0 0.017.9 $173,270100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,443,99730.5 7.2 1.145.216.1 Egypt $66,162,06535.550.9 2.7 8.6 2.2 $4,906,81635.054.2 0.0 8.7 2.1 $2,582,49162.3 2.0 0.035.8 0.0 102,206,08426.062.7 0.8 6.5 3.8 Equatorial Guinea $98,87551.4 0.114.023.411.1 $121,52699.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 $8,882100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 328,21082.5 0.0 1.1 7.5 8.9 Ethiopia $17,875,09540.632.718.0 5.5 3.2 $2,271,60337.623.3 0.0 3.435.7 $8,578,61596.4 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 19,811,91233.728.7 7.3 8.322.1 Gabon $1,667,35566.626.7 2.6 3.0 1.2 $187,97814.183.5 0.0 0.0 2.3 $1,182,60439.260.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,767,62238.047.6 2.3 4.8 7.3 Gambia,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f01.pdf
  • $1,526,552 0.022.316.427.034.3 $137,138 0.091.7 4.6 3.7 0.0 55,025,412 0.038.025.927.6 8.5 Venezuela $71,059,130 0.049.525.521.1 3.9 $8,268,949 0.020.020.941.617.6 $166,171 0.057.312.929.8 0.0 281,840,053 0.028.930.633.1 7.3 South America $797,382,411 2.352.913.626.1 5.0 $93,151,282 0.022.019.246.212.6 $6,296,056 0.046.128.924.7 0.3 3,192,746,377 6.431.817.833.410.6 Afghanistan $261,702 0.0 0.010.0 0.090.0 $16,504 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 411,415 0.0 0.111.6 0.088.3 Bangladesh $33,528,314 0.026.929.420.523.1 $1,536,631 0.011.513.328.646.6 $909,436 0.095.7 2.1 2.2 0.0 144,934,015 0.018.326.127.727.8 Bhutan $67,160 0.0 2.928.761.2 7.2 $4,353 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $13 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 162,253 0.0 1.248.932.717.2 Brunei $1,161,933 0.067.710.311.410.5 $43,468 0.031.9 2.154.112.0 $90,181 0.099.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 2,850,326 0.039.822.117.420.8 Burma $12,513,898 0.0 8.517.372.6 1.5 $78,380 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $23,856 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.091.7 11,203,280 0.0 9.641.544.4 4.5 Cambodia $13,118,173 0.026.611.256.9 5.3 $1,409,962 0.028.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f02.pdf
  • 7.7 1.924.5 7.8 $321,98458.316.8 0.024.9 0.0 $350,54477.5 0.420.8 1.4 0.0 37,296,46351.112.3 2.324.8 9.5 Denmark $13,207,53237.722.1 0.833.5 5.9 $1,984,08115.543.6 0.037.7 3.2 $549,525 3.8 0.510.2 0.085.6 106,191,82325.130.7 1.932.7 9.6 Finland $12,611,03847.117.5 1.429.5 4.6 $989,86039.127.2 0.033.5 0.1 $73,60342.3 2.248.4 6.2 0.9 66,543,56730.923.0 2.832.810.5 France $141,490,38152.616.8 0.621.5 8.5 $8,623,29050.2 9.8 0.237.3 2.4 $9,015,36033.9 0.2 1.9 9.155.0 982,168,72435.211.8 2.037.213.8 Germany $301,376,64563.615.6 0.517.7 2.6 $16,772,53346.824.7 0.026.4 2.1 $19,786,899 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.098.9 1,920,484,00638.824.7 1.326.5 8.6 Gibraltar $651,08587.1 6.3 0.3 5.3 1.0 $20,006100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $57625.2 0.074.8 0.0 0.0 1,434,68448.525.6 1.519.4 5.1 Greece $47,357,52462.2 8.5 1.623.5 4.2 $2,289,76746.1 9.0 0.044.9 0.0 $706,66947.2 5.111.726.010.0 220,467,17240.610.2 5.431.012.9 Greenland $91,845 1.2 5.7 1.152.639.5 $0 $213 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 421,813 0.5 5.6 0.961.032.0 Iceland $3,155,33559.1 3.3 0.734.4 2.5 $648,89140.725.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f99.pdf
  • 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 195,230 1.217.720.113.347.6 Austria $49,393,43145.838.7 9.3 1.6 4.5 $2,484,80850.927.816.4 0.0 4.9 $1,437,87299.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 134,403,60028.633.417.1 7.413.4 Belgium $76,019,97649.734.010.9 0.5 5.0 $4,412,48057.630.510.6 0.0 1.3 $763,19719.975.6 4.4 0.0 0.0 179,985,31933.925.911.1 2.726.4 Cyprus $11,531,61550.427.912.9 0.5 8.2 $1,577,25043.422.910.5 0.023.2 $39,12022.940.037.1 0.0 0.0 22,880,48131.716.624.4 1.625.7 Denmark $32,113,95550.430.211.2 1.0 7.2 $2,217,94534.942.016.4 0.0 6.7 $450,20942.557.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 89,076,52830.332.713.2 7.216.6 Finland $19,457,33354.632.410.1 0.8 2.1 $1,935,50643.535.820.1 0.2 0.4 $3,111,937 2.7 2.0 0.395.0 0.0 49,027,58240.328.119.7 4.9 7.0 France $204,684,69648.230.412.8 1.6 7.1 $16,921,18356.516.422.2 0.0 4.8 $11,573,38568.4 9.9 1.720.0 0.0 803,344,64732.417.218.7 3.528.1 Germany $543,995,47261.723.2 8.2 1.5 5.3 $27,350,74049.226.813.9 0.9 9.1 $27,156,67616.1 4.4 2.377.2 0.0 1,798,880,77739.325.511.9 7.815.5 Gibraltar $833,11480.8 0.611.8 1.7 5.1 $137,67398.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 $86,256100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3,368,15985.0 0.2 7.9 1.7 5.2 Greece $112,854,98741.748.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/crepor03.pdf
  • 0.0 238,021,299 42.8 5.1 23.1 19.9 9.1 Cyprus $5,878,313 68.9 1.9 15.0 11.3 2.9 $288,424 41.8 0.0 37.8 18.7 1.6 $58,206 54.6 0.0 45.4 0.0 0.0 28,345,029 32.9 3.2 34.5 22.3 7.1 Denmark $16,572,844 49.3 2.8 28.1 15.5 4.3 $1,440,655 17.9 18.8 34.6 27.9 0.8 $1,633,327 1.1 98.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 116,207,159 24.2 11.5 37.0 21.5 5.8 Finland $10,939,759 52.1 2.1 23.5 18.8 3.5 $686,855 23.5 0.0 48.1 28.2 0.1 $337,999 0.5 99.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 94,720,074 49.2 3.1 24.8 18.6 4.4 France $170,742,277 60.8 3.6 15.6 16.9 3.1 $9,303,786 41.4 0.5 37.2 19.7 1.2 $17,047,721 12.6 85.9 1.4 0.0 0.0 1,040,128,443 35.1 6.5 32.4 17.8 8.2 Germany $465,210,832 62.0 0.9 13.7 22.3 1.1 $16,282,952 42.1 1.2 23.2 33.1 0.5 $23,855,267
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • offshore U.S. points. Table 19. Shares of End-user Revenue 1995 (Dollar amounts shown in millions) U.S. Billed Service Revenue Estimated Facilities-based & Pure Resale All International End-user Facilities Resale Revenue 1/ 2/ Share Share Share Share International MTS AT&T $8,425 59.5% $0 0.0%$8,425 52.9% MCI 3,968 28.0 52 3.0 4,020 25.3 Sprint 1,289 9.1 68 3.9 1,357 8.5 WorldCom 291 2.1 188 10.7 479 3.0 Total 4 largest 13,973 98.7 308 17.6 14,281 89.7 13,097 89.7% Other Carriers 187 1.3 1,446 82.4 1,633 10.3 1,501 10.3 Total all carriers 14,160100.0 1,754100.0 15,914100.0 14,599100.0 1/Carriers do not report 43.61 traffic data separately for service sold to other carriers vs. service sold to end-users. Estimates are made by using two assumptions: that toll
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • offshore U.S. points. Table 19. Shares of End-user Revenue (Continued) 1995 (Dollar amounts shown in millions) U.S. Billed Service Revenues Estimated Facilities-based & Pure Resale All International End-user Facilities-Resale Revenue 1/ 2/ Share Share Share Share International MTS AT&T $8,425 59.5% $0 0.0%$8,425 52.9% MCI 3,968 28.0 52 3.0 4,020 25.3 Sprint 1,289 9.1 68 3.9 1,357 8.5 WorldCom 291 2.1 188 10.7 479 3.0 Total 4 largest 13,973 98.7 308 17.6 14,281 89.7 13,097 89.7% Other Carriers 187 1.3 1,446 82.4 1,633 10.3 1,501 10.3 Total all carriers 14,160100.0 1,754100.0 15,914100.0 14,599100.0 1/The data in this table were taken from Section 43.61 Traffic Data reports. The figures are world totals for international message telephone service and, unlike data in Table
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 25.4 34.2 30.6 33.0 35.1 42.8 38.6 6.8 Guatemala 12.6 12.0 13.1 18.5 14.0 12.8 14.3 11.8 15.4 17.9 18.7 5.9 Haiti 6.6 7.1 6.3 6.4 5.5 6.9 10.4 7.1 5.0 7.1 6.8 -0.1 Hong Kong 60.5 67.2 74.7 82.8 89.9 101.0 102.4 96.3 78.4 50.5 103.7 -4.3 India 32.2 37.5 47.9 60.1 57.3 52.0 51.8 50.1 49.7 58.5 44.2 -2.1 Israel 37.0 40.6 46.4 48.1 53.2 59.3 70.4 78.9 121.6 171.4 237.4 29.1 Italy 70.7 76.9 83.3 118.0 99.1 101.4 104.0 114.4 117.8 134.0 201.1 10.5 Jamaica 25.9 30.1 33.5 42.4 38.4 36.1 44.3 50.1 49.9 51.9 54.2 6.9 Japan 172.0 226.6 261.7 281.8 291.5 308.8 322.5 346.5 342.9 336.4 309.1 1.5 Korea, Republic of 42.0 53.3 78.1 96.3 102.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 91.9 98.0 102.1 81.7 118.1 98.0 125.6 4.3 Taiwan 82.4 88.7 93.9 108.5 112.2 139.1 152.9 121.8 167.0 170.5 162.6 4.2 Thailand 15.8 18.9 22.6 26.3 29.7 26.3 32.2 23.5 25.6 30.2 32.4 2.7 Turkey 16.0 16.8 17.8 21.1 25.9 25.0 28.4 27.0 25.9 24.6 30.3 1.4 United Kingdom 501.6 546.7 590.0 690.7 737.7 945.51,175.21,119.11,001.91,351.71,370.0 6.4 Viet Nam 0.4 1.0 2.1 3.1 5.2 4.1 4.5 7.4 4.5 5.0 4.7 1.5 Total for Countries Shown Above 4,564.34,903.45,418.66,060.87,219.97,880.88,865.79,550.211,520.612,049.812,153.4 9.8% Total for Other Countries 805.5 882.7 966.3 989.71,073.21,289.31,332.81,214.81,367.61,428.21,523.4 3.4 Total for All Countries 5,369.75,786.06,384.97,050.68,293.29,170.010,198.510,765.012,888.213,478.013,676.8 9.0 Total for 5 Largest Routes 58.5%58.5%58.3%59.7%62.6%62.1%62.0%63.2%65.3%66.3%61.9% Canada, India Mexico, Philippines 50.4%50.5%50.7%52.3%55.9%55.8%56.2%58.0%60.9%61.4%54.4% and UK as Percent of Total Other Countries Shown 34.6%34.2%34.2%33.7%31.2%30.2%30.7%30.7%28.5%28.0%34.5% Above as Percent of Total Countries not Shown
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/m96-indx.pdf
  • Total Operating ................................................................................. Table 6.9 Income - Net ....................................................................................................... Table 6.5 Investment - Average Net ................................................................................... Table 6.6 Investment - Gross .............................................................................................. Table 6.3 Investment - Other .............................................................................................. Table 6.14 Investment - Plant ............................................................................................... Table 6.13 Investment - Reserves ......................................................................................... Table 6.4 Lifeline and Link-Up - Availability - Lines ........................................................ Table 2.9 Lifeline and Link-Up - Certification Dates ......................................................... Table 2.1 Lifeline and Link-Up - Eligibility ....................................................................... Table 2.4 Lifeline Assistance by State ................................................................................ Table 2.3 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - History ............................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - History ......................................................... Table 2.5 Lines - Presubscribed .......................................................................................... Table 4.19 Line Usage per Day ............................................................................................ Table 4.7 Link-Up Assistance by State ............................................................................... Table 2.2 Link-Up Assistance - Payments - History ...........................................................
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 12250, para.78 (amending sections 54.405 and 54.411 of the Commission's rules). 2 - 5 The FCC monitors subscriber participation and telephone usage to determine program benefits and costs.21 Historical tables for subscribership and carrier payments by state can be downloaded from the Monitoring Report's Low-Income Support section of the FCC-State Link web site, . Table 2.1 reports Lifeline monthly support by state or jurisdiction as of December 31, 2002. The table shows both federal and state support, and indicates the additional contribution from the federal program to reduce local rates where states have authorized statewide or carrier specific intrastate local rate reductions. The Table indicates a "minimum," "maximum" and "average" support provided by carriers. Table 2.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 8.3 13.3 0.7 1980 9.2 12.5 4.6 1981 9.3 8.9 11.7 1982 6.2 3.8 7.2 1983 3.9 3.8 3.6 1984 3.7 3.9 9.2 1985 3.2 3.8 4.7 1986 2.2 1.1 2.7 1987 3.0 4.4 -1.3 1988 3.4 4.4 1.3 1989 3.8 4.6 -0.3 1990 3.9 6.1 -0.4 1991 3.6 3.1 3.5 1992 2.4 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.4 2.7 1.8 1994 2.1 2.7 0.7 1995 2.2 2.5 1.2 1996 1.9 3.3 2.1 1997 1.9 1.7 0.2 1998 1.2 1.6 0.3* 1999 1.4 2.7 0.4 2000 2.1 3.4 -2.3 2001 2.4 1.6 1.3 2002 1.1 2.4 0.2 * The CPI telephone service index was revised in December of 1997. Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of Economic Analysis. Chart 7.2 Table 7.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-9.pdf
  • Average Repair Interval (hours) 3.0 2.4 4.0 3.4 3.2 8.1 3.3 14.6 4.7 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 93.0 99.4 99.0 99.5 98.6 98.6 98.5 98.7 97.8 Residence 97.1 99.5 99.1 99.6 98.7 98.6 98.7 98.9 98.2 Business 88.9 98.6 98.3 98.9 98.0 97.8 96.7 96.8 94.9 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.3 0.6 2.1 1.4 1.6 1.1 1.3 0.6 1.6 Residence 1.0 0.5 2.1 1.2 1.6 1.0 1.2 0.4 1.5 Business 1.6 1.4 2.6 2.7 1.8 1.8 2.4 1.7 2.5 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 18.4 13.6 18.6 23.5 19.8 23.8 21.6 14.3 15.1 Residence 20.0 13.6 18.9 25.9 21.0 25.1 22.9 15.4 15.2 Business 10.6 13.5 17.1 12.1 13.2 18.9 15.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
  • .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State ...........................................................Table 2.7 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by Study Area ................................................ Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.5 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.6 Lifeline Monthly Support - by State ....................................................................... Table 2.1 Lines - Total .................................................................................. Table 8.4 Line Usage per Day .......................................................................... Table 8.5 LinkUp Assistance - Beneficiaries - by State ...................................................... Table 2.9 LinkUp Assistance - Beneficiaries - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State ...................Table 2.10 LinkUp Assistance - Payments - by State ........................................................... Table 2.11 LinkUp Assistance - Payments - by Study Area ................................................. Table 2.12 Local Switching Support
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-2.pdf
  • usage to determine program benefits and costs.22 Historical tables for subscribership and carrier payments by state can be downloaded from the Monitoring Report's Low-Income Support section of the FCC-State Link website, www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/stats.html. Table numbers in this section have been revised to reflect a new format. Therefore, this format and the table numbers are different from prior year Monitoring Reports. Table 2.1 reports Lifeline subscriber and Link Up beneficiary data for years 1987 through 2003. Table 2.2 and Chart 2.1 report annual low-income support payments for years 1988 through 2003. Table 2.3 reports Lifeline monthly support by state or jurisdiction for both federal and state support as of November 2003, and indicates the additional contribution from the federal program to reduce local
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • took effect on July 1, some companies made subsequent adjustments to their tariffs, which did not take effect until August 11. 1953 - 2003 1993 - 2003 CPI All Items 3.9 % 2.4 % CPI All Services 4.9 3.2 CPI Telephone Services ** 1.7 0.3 CPI Major Categories: - Food & Beverages * 2.5 - Housing * 2.7 - Apparel 2.1 -1.0 - Transportation 3.6 1.9 - Medical Care 5.9 4.0 - Recreation * 1.7 - Other Goods & Services * 4.5 CPI Public Transportation 5.2 2.3 CPI Utility Natural Gas Service 5.1 4.6 CPI Electricity 3.3 1.0 CPI Sewer & Water Maintenance 5.6 3.3 CPI Postage 4.8 2.8 *** Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Chart 7.1 The CPI telephone service
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 20.5 13.8 10.1 15.6 Average Repair Interval (hours) 4.6 12.3 2.7 21.0 24.0 11.4 4.5 3.4 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 97.4 98.4 99.9 96.5 76.7 98.8 97.1 97.7 Residence 97.7 98.3 99.9 96.7 77.6 98.7 97.5 97.7 Business 95.2 75.9 99.8 95.8 71.1 98.0 94.2 97.7 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.9 3.6 2.1 5.5 4.8 1.9 1.6 2.0 Residence 1.9 3.3 4.5 5.2 5.0 1.8 1.4 2.0 Business 2.7 4.6 1.8 7.6 3.8 2.7 2.7 2.0 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 24.8 15.3 58.1 16.1 28.0 9.8 17.1 16.4 Residence 25.9 15.7 37.6 16.3 28.1 10.1 17.3 16.9 Business 16.9 13.8 20.1 14.3 27.7 7.6 15.7 13.3 Initial Trouble Reports per
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-intro.pdf
  • Area ..............................Table 3.27 Interstate Common Line Support Payment Projections by State or Jurisdiction ..... Table 3.10 Interstate Common Line Support Payment Projections by Study Area .................. Table 3.26 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Monthly Support - by State ....................................................................... Table 2.3 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries ................................................... Table 2.1 Link Up Assistance - Beneficiaries - by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-0.pdf
  • Study Areas ................................................... Table 3.16 Income - Net ....................................................................................................... Table 6.5 Investment - Average Net ................................................................................... Table 6.6 Investment - Gross .............................................................................................. Table 6.3 Investment - Other .............................................................................................. Table 6.14 Investment - Plant ............................................................................................... Table 6.13 Investment - Reserves ......................................................................................... Table 6.4 Lifeline and Link-Up - Availability - Lines ........................................................ Table 2.11 Lifeline and Link-Up - Certification Dates ......................................................... Table 2.1 Lifeline and Link-Up - Eligibility ....................................................................... Table 2.4 Lifeline Assistance by State ................................................................................ Table 2.3 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - History by State .............................................. Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - History by Study Area .................................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - History by State ........................................... Table 2.5 Lines - Presubscribed .......................................................................................... Table 4.19 Line Usage per Day ............................................................................................
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-1.pdf
  • Florida 88.7 93.1 4.4 * Georgia 86.2 89.7 3.5 * Hawaii 93.5 94.8 1.3 Idaho 90.7 92.9 2.2 Illinois 94.2 93.0 -1.2 Indiana 91.6 93.7 2.2 * Iowa 96.2 96.6 0.4 Kansas 94.3 93.9 -0.4 Kentucky 88.1 92.3 4.2 * Louisiana 89.7 91.1 1.4 Maine 93.4 96.5 3.1 * Maryland 95.7 96.7 1.0 Massachusetts 95.9 95.7 -0.2 Michigan 92.8 95.0 2.1 * Minnesota 95.8 97.1 1.3 Mississippi 82.4 87.5 5.2 * Missouri 91.5 95.3 3.9 * Montana 91.0 94.3 3.3 * Nebraska 95.7 96.0 0.3 Nevada 90.4 93.5 3.1 * New Hampshire 94.3 96.1 1.8 New Jersey 94.8 93.6 -1.2 New Mexico 82.0 86.2 4.2 * New York 91.8 93.4 1.7 * North Carolina 88.3 93.5 5.2 * North Dakota 94.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-2.pdf
  • in monthly charges or a reduction in service connection and installation charges. After state programs are certified by the FCC, local exchange carriers are reimbursed through the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) for program expenses. These expenses are not funded by federal tax dollars. The FCC is monitoring subscriber participation and telephone usage to determine program benefits and costs. Table 2.1 lists the entities that have been certified by the 4 FCC and the dates of their certification. 5 Tables 2.2, 2.3, and 2.5 through 2.10 were filed by NECA in CC Docket No. 87-339 on May 16, 1997. 75 Lifeline certification rules, in both Plans 2 and 3, require participating entities to verify subscriber eligibility annually. In general, local exchange
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-4.pdf
  • 3.0 48.5 TOTAL 1986 168.5 14.6 183.1 1987FIRST QUARTER 48.0 3.2 51.2 SECOND QUARTER 49.3 3.1 52.5 THIRD QUARTER 52.1 2.9 55.0 FOURTH QUARTER 54.4 2.6 57.0 TOTAL 1987 203.9 11.9 215.7 1988FIRST QUARTER 56.6 2.4 59.0 SECOND QUARTER 57.3 2.3 59.6 THIRD QUARTER 59.8 2.3 62.1 FOURTH QUARTER 61.8 2.2 64.0 TOTAL 1988 235.4 9.2 244.6 1989FIRST QUARTER 64.1 2.1 66.2 SECOND QUARTER 66.5 2.0 68.5 THIRD QUARTER 67.7 2.0 69.7 FOURTH QUARTER 70.7 1.9 72.6 TOTAL 1989 269.1 8.0 277.1 1990FIRST QUARTER 72.9 1.9 74.7 SECOND QUARTER 74.0 1.8 75.8 THIRD QUARTER 76.1 1.8 77.9 FOURTH QUARTER 77.4 1.6 79.1 TOTAL 1990 300.4 7.1 307.4 1991FIRST QUARTER 77.7 1.5 79.2 SECOND QUARTER 80.4 1.5 81.9 THIRD QUARTER 81.2 1.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
  • 9.4 8.9 11.7 1982 6.2 3.8 7.2 1983 4.3 3.8 3.6 1984 3.7 3.9 9.2 1985 3.6 3.8 4.7 1986 2.5 1.1 2.7 1987 3.1 4.4 -1.3 1988 3.6 4.4 1.3 1989 4.2 4.6 -0.3 1990 4.3 6.1 -0.4 1991 4.0 3.1 3.5 1992 2.8 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.6 2.7 1.8 1994 2.3 2.7 0.7 1995 2.5 2.5 1.2 1996 2.1 3.0 1.5 1997* 2.5 3.6 * The 1997 CPI changes are measured April through April. -5 0 5 10 15 Percent Change from Prior Year 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 CPI All Items CPI Telephone Services CPI All Items and CPI Telephone Services (Annual Rates of Change) 580 Table 5.3 Annual Changes in Price Indices
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-0.pdf
  • Link-Up Assistance by State - Monthly, 1998 ...............................Table 2.2 Lifeline and Link-Up Assistance by Study Area - Monthly, 1998 .....................Table 2.3 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - History by State .............................................. Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - History by Study Area ....................................Table 2.7 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - History by State ...........................................Table 2.5 Lifeline Monthly Support by State ..................................................................... Table 2.1 Line Usage per Day ............................................................................................ Table 8.7 Link-Up Assistance - Payments - History by State .............................................Table 2.9 Link-Up Assistance - Payments - History by Study Area ...................................Table 2.10 Link-Up Assistance - Subscribers - History by State ..........................................Table 2.8 Local Exchange Carrier Study Areas - Changes ................................................. Table 3.25 Local, Mobile and Toll Service Revenue by Type of Service Provider .............Table
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-1.pdf
  • 900.8 48.9 949.7 631.5 2.2 286.2 555.4 364.5 919.9 1,869.7 54.5 1,924.2 1.9 1.9 73.3 117.3 13.3 179.0 24.9 203.9 205.8 40.5 246.3 0.8 2.0 22.5 25.3 14.7 4.9 67.5 22.4 64.7 87.1 112.3 249.2 361.5 0.2 29.9 * 56.9 37.9 48.9 86.8 87.0 114.0 201.0 21.1 0.1 12.1 33.3 81.0 * 41.7 81.6 41.1 122.7 156.1 119.0 275.0 924.8 2.1 83.5 1,010.4 830.4 124.4 465.6 876.3 544.1 1,420.4 2,430.9 577.2 3,008.0 28,016.4 232.4 612.628,861.4 68,213.3 484.5 10,377.5 68,682.5 10,392.9 79,075.4 107,936.8 9,121.3117,058.2 33.4 2,064.2 199.8 2,297.4 38.2 26,570.7 897.4 25,643.7 1,862.6 27,506.3 29,803.7 4,287.2 34,090.8 426.7 0.1 426.8 4.3 2,352.5 6.5 2,072.3 291.1 2,363.4 2,790.1 1,446.7 4,236.8 11.3 3.2 14.5 178.4 20.1 49.6 148.9 198.5 214.9 38.2 253.1 33.4 2,502.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-2.pdf
  • regardless of whether states provide their own Lifeline support, and up to an additional $1.75 from the federal program if the state provides additional support for all qualifying low-income Lifeline subscribers in the state as well. The portion of the final $1.75 that can be recovered is equal to one-half of a state funded amount up to $3.50 (see Table 2.1). The federal portion of the program is funded by the federal universal service support mechanisms which include contributions from all interstate telecommunications carriers and providers of interstate telecommunications, including payphone aggregators and private network operators that offer service to others for a fee on a non-common carrier basis. These carriers and service providers may pass on the expenses of these
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • Charges CPI PPI CPI PPI 1978 1.4% 3.1% -0.8% 0.0% 1.3% 0.1% 1979 1.7 1.6 -0.7 -0.9 0.1 -0.7 1980 7.0 7.1 3.4 5.5 -0.6 2.3 1981 12.6 15.6 14.6 15.9 6.2 8.0 1982 10.8 9.0 2.6 3.9 4.2 1.7 1983 3.1 0.2 1.5 0.0 7.4 3.9 1984 17.2 10.4 -4.3 -5.1 3.6 3.8 1985 8.9 12.4 -3.7 -3.0 0.6 2.1 1986 7.1 8.9 -9.4 -10.0 0.3 -3.5 1987 3.3 2.6 -12.4 -11.8 -3.0 -3.0 1988 4.5 4.6 -4.2 -2.1 -4.2 -3.7 1989 0.6 1.9 -1.3 -1.7 -2.6 0.5 1990 1.0 1.5 -3.7 -0.1 -2.2 -2.2 1991 5.1 2.1 1.3 -1.3 -1.5 -2.6 1992 0.5 -0.2 -1.3 1.0 -2.4 1.3 1993 1.0 0.8 6.5 3.8 0.2 -1.1 1994 -0.3 0.7 5.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-8.pdf
  • 3.0 48.5 TOTAL 1986 168.5 14.6 183.1 1987FIRST QUARTER 48.0 3.2 51.2 SECOND QUARTER 49.3 3.1 52.5 THIRD QUARTER 52.1 2.9 55.0 FOURTH QUARTER 54.4 2.6 57.0 TOTAL 1987 203.9 11.9 215.7 1988FIRST QUARTER 56.6 2.4 59.0 SECOND QUARTER 57.3 2.3 59.6 THIRD QUARTER 59.8 2.3 62.1 FOURTH QUARTER 61.8 2.2 64.0 TOTAL 1988 235.4 9.2 244.6 1989FIRST QUARTER 64.1 2.1 66.2 SECOND QUARTER 66.5 2.0 68.5 THIRD QUARTER 67.7 2.0 69.7 FOURTH QUARTER 70.7 1.9 72.6 TOTAL 1989 269.1 8.0 277.1 1990FIRST QUARTER 72.9 1.9 74.7 SECOND QUARTER 74.0 1.8 75.8 THIRD QUARTER 76.1 1.8 77.9 FOURTH QUARTER 77.4 1.6 79.1 TOTAL 1990 300.4 7.1 307.4 1991FIRST QUARTER 77.7 1.5 79.2 SECOND QUARTER 80.4 1.5 81.9 THIRD QUARTER 81.2 1.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
  • 33.3 21.9 32.8 NA Average Repair Interval (hours) 27.4 6.6 3.1 16.0 6.4 3.5 8.7 12.0 3.1 ACCESS SERVICES PROVIDED TO CARRIERS -- SPECIAL ACCESS Percent Installation Commitments Met 81.5 92.7 90.7 88.7 96.7 88.4 69.5 92.9 95.2 Average Installation Interval (days) 17.3 15.3 12.6 21.8 23.0 NA 14.8 12.1 1.8 Average Repair Interval (hours) 4.0 2.2 3.0 8.2 3.7 2.1 6.3 8.1 3.0 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 98.6 99.7 98.7 97.6 99.1 99.2 97.3 98.1 98.9 Residence 99.1 99.7 98.8 98.5 99.2 99.3 97.8 98.5 99.1 Business 96.7 99.4 98.3 95.7 98.9 98.6 94.6 95.9 97.9 Average Installation Interval (days) 3.0 1.6 NA 6.7 2.7 1.4 1.9 3.1 2.9 Residence 2.6 1.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-0.pdf
  • 11.6 Investment - Gross ..................................................................................................Table 11.3 Investment - Other ..................................................................................................Table 11.14 Investment - Plant ...................................................................................................Table 11.13 Investment - Reserves .............................................................................................Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link-Up Assistance by State - Monthly, 1998 ......................................Table 2.2 Lifeline and Link-Up Assistance by Study Area - Monthly, 1998 .............................Table 2.3 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - History by State .................................................Table 2.5 Lifeline Monthly Support by State ...........................................................................Table 2.1 Local Exchange Carrier Study Areas - Changes ......................................................Table 3.25 Local Switching Support - Payment History ...........................................................Table 3.6 Local Switching Support - Payment Projections - by Study Area ............................Table 3.17 Long Term Support - Payment History ...................................................................Table 3.5 Long Term Support - Payment Projections - by Study Area ...................................Table 3.16 Loops by State .......................................................................................................Table 3.12 Loops by Study Area ..............................................................................................Table 3.22
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-2.pdf
  • program to assure that all Lifeline customers would receive $3.50 in federal support without a state matching requirement, beginning January 1, 1998.8 In states that participate by reducing intrastate rates, through an equivalent reduction in the portion of intrastate local rates paid by the end-user, Lifeline customers receive an additional $1.75 in federal support above the $3.50 level (see Table 2.1). The federal Lifeline program provides funding from the interstate jurisdiction of up to $7.00 per low-income subscriber per month consisting of a baseline amount of $3.50, an additional $1.75 per subscriber per month if the state commission authorizes a reduction in local rates equal to that amount, and up to an additional $1.75 from the federal program if the state
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 11.8 1982 6.2 3.8 7.2 1983 4.3 3.8 3.6 1984 3.7 3.9 9.2 1985 3.6 3.8 4.7 1986 2.5 1.1 2.7 1987 3.1 4.4 -1.3 1988 3.6 4.4 1.3 1989 4.2 4.6 -0.3 1990 4.3 6.1 -0.4 1991 4.0 3.1 3.5 1992 2.8 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.6 2.7 1.8 1994 2.3 2.7 0.7 1995 2.5 2.5 1.2 1996 1.9 3.3 2.1 1997 1.9 1.7 0.2 1998 1.0 1.6 0.3* Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of Economic Analysis * The CPI telephone service index was revised in December of 1997. CHART 7.2 -5 0 5 10 15 Percent Change from Prior Year 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 CPI All Items CPI Telephone Services CPI
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-9.pdf
  • -- Installation, Maintenance, & Customer Complaints -- 1996 Company Ameritech Bell Atlantic BellSouth NYNEX Pacific SBC US West GTE Sprint ACCESS SERVICES PROVIDED TO CARRIERS -- SWITCHED ACCESS Percent Installation Commitments Met 61.1 88.1 98.3 78.5 92.8 88.9 85.8 97.0 96.8 Average Installation Interval (days) 54.2 29.0 24.9 58.2 37.9 30.2 18.8 32.2 4.3 Average Repair Interval (hours) 28.0 9.3 2.1 59.5 21.5 3.6 8.1 13.4 3.8 ACCESS SERVICES PROVIDED TO CARRIERS -- SPECIAL ACCESS Percent Installation Commitments Met 87.9 92.4 89.2 77.5 93.6 80.9 83.8 92.3 97.0 Average Installation Interval (days) 18.4 14.6 13.2 29.3 22.6 0.0 14.2 11.5 6.2 Average Repair Interval (hours) 3.7 2.5 3.3 10.7 4.7 2.1 5.1 8.9 3.1 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-0.pdf
  • Link-Up Assistance by State - Monthly, 1998 ...............................Table 2.2 Lifeline and Link-Up Assistance by Study Area - Monthly, 1998 .....................Table 2.3 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - History by State .............................................. Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - History by Study Area ....................................Table 2.7 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - History by State ...........................................Table 2.5 Lifeline Monthly Support by State ..................................................................... Table 2.1 Line Usage per Day ............................................................................................ Table 8.7 Link-Up Assistance - Payments - History by State .............................................Table 2.9 Link-Up Assistance - Payments - History by Study Area ...................................Table 2.10 Link-Up Assistance - Subscribers - History by State ..........................................Table 2.8 Local Exchange Carrier Study Areas - Changes ................................................. Table 3.25 Local, Mobile and Toll Service Revenue by Type of Service Provider .............Table
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-1.pdf
  • or terminating calls 23a Provided as unbundled network elements or other 18.3 18.3 70.1 70.1 512.8 512.8 contract arrangement 23b Provided under state or federal access tariff 7.6 0.1 7.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 58.0 49.2 107.2 8,495.1 9,441.117,936.2 Total per minute access charges 25.9 0.1 26.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 128.1 49.2 177.3 9,007.9 9,441.118,449.0 24Local private line & special access 2.1 * 2.1 10.9 38.4 49.3 1,157.7 4,697.0 5,854.8 25Pay telephone compensation from toll carriers 0.6 0.6 1.2 1.7 1.3 3.0 204.2 221.7 425.9 26Other local telecommunications service revenues 3.9 3.9 4.2 10.9 15.2 351.6 81.2 432.8 27Universal service support receipts 5.9 1.2 7.1 385.1 1,020.9 1,406.1 Total fixed local service provided for resale 33.9 1.2 35.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 167.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-2.pdf
  • Lifeline program to assure that all Lifeline customers would receive $3.50 in federal support without a matching requirement, beginning January 1, 1998.8 In states that participate by reducing intrastate rates, through an equivalent reduction in the portion of intrastate local rates paid by the end-user, Lifeline customers receive an additional $1.75 in federal support above the $3.50 level (see Table 2.1). The federal Lifeline program provides funding from the interstate jurisdiction of up to $7.00 per low-income subscriber per month consisting of a baseline amount of $3.50, an additional $1.75 per subscriber per month if the state commission authorizes a reduction in local rates equal to that amount, and up to an additional $1.75 from the federal program if the state
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-4.pdf
  • 3) Operating Expenses 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.8 3.6 4) USAC Administrative Expenses 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.4 5) Non-recurring (outside contractors) 1.1 2.4 0.6 0.4 1.1 0.6 6.2 6) NECA Contract (operations component) 2.9 3.9 3.0 3.5 7.1 5.1 25.5 7) Total Administrative Expenses (3)+(4)+(5)+(6) 4.6 7.2 4.4 4.8 8.9 6.8 36.7 8) Fund Outlays 2/ 2.1 2.9 5.9 11.5 104.4 274.7 401.4 9) Change in Fund Balance (1)+(2)-(8) 200.1 317.1 323.8 330.9 238.2 (43.2)1,366.8 10)Balance at end of quarter 200.1 517.1 840.91,171.91,410.01,366.8 Notes: 1/Fund collections include contributions from carriers and transfers from the Rural Health Care fund. The Rural Health Care fund was overfunded in 1998. The Commission directed that the surplus be refunded to carriers.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-6.pdf
  • * Georgia 86.2 91.4 5.3 * Hawaii 93.5 95.4 1.9 * Idaho 90.7 93.3 2.6 * Illinois 94.2 92.7 -1.4 ** Indiana 91.6 94.4 2.8 * Iowa 96.2 96.7 0.5 Kansas 94.3 94.3 0.0 Kentucky 88.1 93.3 5.2 * Louisiana 89.7 92.3 2.6 * Maine 93.4 96.9 3.5 * Maryland 95.7 96.5 0.8 Massachusetts 95.9 94.5 -1.4 Michigan 92.8 95.0 2.1 * Minnesota 95.8 97.8 2.0 * Mississippi 82.4 89.5 7.1 * Missouri 91.5 94.6 3.1 * Montana 91.0 94.1 3.1 * Nebraska 95.7 96.2 0.5 Nevada 90.4 92.3 2.0 New Hampshire 94.3 95.5 1.2 New Jersey 94.8 94.5 -0.3 New Mexico 82.0 88.2 6.2 * New York 91.8 94.8 3.0 * North Carolina 88.3 93.1 4.8 * North Dakota 94.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 11.8 1982 6.2 3.8 7.2 1983 4.3 3.8 3.6 1984 3.7 3.9 9.2 1985 3.6 3.8 4.7 1986 2.5 1.1 2.7 1987 3.1 4.4 -1.3 1988 3.6 4.4 1.3 1989 4.2 4.6 -0.3 1990 4.3 6.1 -0.4 1991 4.0 3.1 3.5 1992 2.8 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.6 2.7 1.8 1994 2.3 2.7 0.7 1995 2.5 2.5 1.2 1996 1.9 3.3 2.1 1997 1.9 1.7 0.2 1998 1.0** 1.6 0.3* Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of Economic Analysis * The CPI telephone service index was revised in December of 1997. ** Preliminary. CHART 7.2 -5 0 5 10 15 Percent Change from Prior Year 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 CPI All Items CPI Telephone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-8.pdf
  • 3.0 48.5 TOTAL 1986 168.5 14.6 183.1 1987FIRST QUARTER 48.0 3.2 51.2 SECOND QUARTER 49.3 3.1 52.5 THIRD QUARTER 52.1 2.9 55.0 FOURTH QUARTER 54.4 2.6 57.0 TOTAL 1987 203.9 11.9 215.7 1988FIRST QUARTER 56.6 2.4 59.0 SECOND QUARTER 57.3 2.3 59.6 THIRD QUARTER 59.8 2.3 62.1 FOURTH QUARTER 61.8 2.2 64.0 TOTAL 1988 235.4 9.2 244.6 1989FIRST QUARTER 64.1 2.1 66.2 SECOND QUARTER 66.5 2.0 68.5 THIRD QUARTER 67.7 2.0 69.7 FOURTH QUARTER 70.7 1.9 72.6 TOTAL 1989 269.1 8.0 277.1 1990FIRST QUARTER 72.9 1.9 74.7 SECOND QUARTER 74.0 1.8 75.8 THIRD QUARTER 76.1 1.8 77.9 FOURTH QUARTER 77.4 1.6 79.1 TOTAL 1990 300.4 7.1 307.4 1991FIRST QUARTER 77.7 1.5 79.2 SECOND QUARTER 80.4 1.5 81.9 THIRD QUARTER 81.2 1.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • - Average Net .......................................................................................Table 11.6 Investment - Gross ..................................................................................................Table 11.3 Investment - Other ..................................................................................................Table 11.13 Investment - Plant ...................................................................................................Table 11.12 Investment - Reserves .............................................................................................Table 11.4 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State ...........................................................Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by Study Area ................................................ Table 2.7 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................Table 2.5 Lifeline Monthly Support by State .........................................................................Table 2.1 Lines - Total ..................................................................................Table 8.4 Line Usage per Day ..........................................................................Table 8.5 Link Up Assistance - Payments - by State ........................................................ Table 2.9 Link Up Assistance - Payments - by Study Area ................................................Table 2.10 Link Up Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................Table 2.8 Local Switching Support - Payment History ..........................................................Table 3.8 3 Index of Tables and Charts Local Switching Support
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • Gross ..................................................................................................Table 11.3 Investment - Other ..................................................................................................Table 11.13 Investment - Plant ...................................................................................................Table 11.12 Investment - Reserves .............................................................................................Table 11.4 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State ...........................................................Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by Study Area ................................................ Table 2.7 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................Table 2.5 3 Index of Tables and Charts Lifeline Monthly Support - by State .......................................................................Table 2.1 Lines - Total ..................................................................................Table 8.4 Line Usage per Day ..........................................................................Table 8.5 LinkUp Assistance - Payments - by State ...........................................................Table 2.9 LinkUp Assistance - Payments - by Study Area .................................................Table 2.10 LinkUp Assistance - Subscribers - by State .........................................................Table 2.8 Local Switching Support - Payment History .......................................................... Table 3.6 Local Switching Support - Payment Projections - by Jurisdiction ......................... Table 3.10
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • Table 11.12 Investment - Reserves ............................................................................................. Table 11.4 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State ...........................................................Table 2.7 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by Study Area ................................................ Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.5 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.6 Lifeline Monthly Support - by State ....................................................................... Table 2.1 Lines - Total .................................................................................. Table 8.4 Line Usage per Day .......................................................................... Table 8.5 LinkUp Assistance - Participants - by State .........................................................Table 2.9 LinkUp Assistance - Participants - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.10 LinkUp Assistance - Payments - by State ........................................................... Table 2.11 LinkUp Assistance - Payments - by Study Area ................................................. Table 2.12 Local Switching Support
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual00.pdf
  • 98.0 97.7 96 97 98 99 100 Years Percent of Commitments Met 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Composite Verizon Bell South SBC Qwest Sprint Percent Installation Commitments Met Chart 5 Average Installation Interval -- Local Services (Using Company Provided Composites) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 BellSouth 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.3 1.3 Qwest 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.0 SBC Ameritech 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 SBC Pacific 1.9 2.8 2.2 1.5 1.8 SBC Southwestern 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 Verizon GTE 2.6 2.8 3.0 1.4 1.0 Verizon North 2.0 (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 Sprint 2.5 2.6 3.5 4.5 3.9 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years Interval in Days 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Composite
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual01.pdf
  • -- Residential Services (Using Company Provided Composites) Percent Installation Commitments Met 96.0 97.0 98.0 99.0 100.0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Composite Verizon BellSouth SBC Qwest Sprint 11 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 BellSouth 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.2 Qwest 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.6 SBC Ameritech 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 SBC Pacific 1.9 2.8 2.2 1.5 1.8 1.3 SBC Southwestern 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.0 Verizon GTE 2.6 2.8 3.0 1.4 1.0 0.8 Verizon North 2.0 (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.1 Sprint 2.5 2.6 3.5 4.5 3.9 3.2 Chart 5 Average Installation Interval -- Local Services (Using Company
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual02.pdf
  • lines in 2002. In 2002, the level of customer dissatisfaction with residential repairs declined for all but one reporting holding company, and the level of customer dissatisfaction with residential installations declined for two out of the four reporting holding companies. Average residential installation intervals for individual operating entities ranged from a low of 0.5 business days to a high of 2.1 business days in 2002, as compared to a low of 0.6 business days and a high of 3.2 business days in 2001. The report is available for reference in the FCC's Reference Information Center, Courtyard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W. Copies may be purchased by calling Qualex International at (202) 863-2893. The report can be downloaded from the FCC-State Link
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual03.pdf
  • Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted BOC/Sprint Composite* Weighted Verizon Avg BellSouth Weighted SBC Avg. Qwest 13 ARMIS 43-05 Report 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 BellSouth 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 Qwest 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.4 SBC Ameritech 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.5 SBC Pacific 2.2 1.5 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.5 SBC Southwestern 0.7 0.8 0.8 2.2 1.8 1.9 SBC SNET 5.4 2.1 2.2 1.8 1.0 1.0 Verizon GTE 3.0 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.1 Sprint 3.5 4.5 3.9 3.2 1.5 1.4 Weighted BOC/Sprint Composite*
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual98.pdf
  • -- Installation, Maintenance, & Customer Complaints -- 1996 Company Ameritech Bell Atlantic BellSouth NYNEX Pacific SBC US West GTE Sprint ACCESS SERVICES PROVIDED TO CARRIERS -- SWITCHED ACCESS Percent Installation Commitments Met 61.1 88.1 98.3 78.5 92.8 88.9 85.8 97.0 96.8 Average Installation Interval (days) 54.2 29.0 24.9 58.2 37.9 30.2 18.8 32.2 4.3 Average Repair Interval (hours) 28.0 9.3 2.1 59.5 21.5 3.6 8.1 13.4 3.8 ACCESS SERVICES PROVIDED TO CARRIERS -- SPECIAL ACCESS Percent Installation Commitments Met 87.9 92.4 89.2 77.5 93.6 80.9 83.8 92.3 97.0 Average Installation Interval (days) 18.4 14.6 13.2 29.3 22.6 0.0 14.2 11.5 6.2 Average Repair Interval (hours) 3.7 2.5 3.3 10.7 4.7 2.1 5.1 8.9 3.1 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • . . 9 Table 1.6 - Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Part 2. Telephone Carriers Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission for the Year Ended December 31, 2000, Whose Reports Were Used in the Statistical Tabulations in Parts 1 and 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Table 1.6 - Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Part 2. Telephone Carriers Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission for the Year Ended December 31, 2001, Whose Reports Were Used in the Statistical Tabulations in Parts 1 and 2. . . . . . . . . . . 13 Table 2.2 - Outside Plant Statistics of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers as of December 31, 2001. . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • All Long Distance Toll Providers, Excl. Incumbent LECs. . . . . . 8 Table 1.6 - Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Part 2. Telephone Carriers Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission for the Year Ende December 31, 2002, Whose Reports Were Used in the Statistical Tabulations in Parts 1 and 2. . . . . . . . . . 13 Table 2.2 - Outside Plant Statistics of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers as of December 31, 2002. . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Table 1.5 - Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Part 2. Telephone Carriers Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission for the Year Ende December 31, 2003, Whose Reports Were Used in the Statistical Tabulations in Parts 1 and 2. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Table 2.2 - Outside Plant Statistics of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers as of December 31, 2003. . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 PART 2. TELEPHONE CARRIERS TABLE 2.1-LIST OF TELEPHONE CARRIERS BY OPERATING REVENUES REPORTING TO THE COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, WHOSE REPORTS WERE USED IN THE STATISTICAL TABULATIONS IN PARTS 1 AND 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 PART 2. TELEPHONE CARRIERS TABLE 2.1-LIST OF TELEPHONE CARRIERS BY OPERATING REVENUES REPORTING TO THE COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, WHOSE REPORTS WERE USED IN THE STATISTICAL TABULATIONS IN PARTS 1 AND 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 PART 2. TELEPHONE CARRIERS TABLE 2.1-LIST OF TELEPHONE CARRIERS REPORTING TO THE COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, WHOSE REPORTS WERE USED IN THE STATISTICAL TABULATIONS IN PARTS 1 AND 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 PART 2. TELEPHONE CARRIERS TABLE 2.1-LIST OF TELEPHONE CARRIERS REPORTING TO THE COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, WHOSE REPORTS WERE USED IN THE STATISTICAL TABULATIONS IN PARTS 1 AND 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Part 2. Telephone Carriers Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission for the Year Ended December 31, 1999, Whose Reports Were Used in the Statistical Tabulations in Parts 1 and 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • Telecommunications Relay Service Worksheet, and FCC Form 457, Universal Service Worksheet. Revenues for carriers not subject to section 43.21 or ARMIS reports are estimated by FCC staff based on carriers' filings of FCC Forms 431, 457, and 499-A. Notes for Table 1.4 - 1.6. Statistics of Communications Common Carriers 10 Part 2 Telephone Carriers Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Table 2.1 - List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission for the Year Ended December 31, 2002, Whose Reports Were Used in the Statistical Tabulations in Parts 1 and 2 (Dollar Amounts Shown in Thousands) Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers Total Total State/Area Name of Company Headquarters* Operating Access of Carrier's Revenues Lines # Operation BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. Atlanta, Ga. $17,196,12841,430,3799 Southeastern
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc00idx.pdf
  • . . 9 Table 1.6 - Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Part 2. Telephone Carriers Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission for the Year Ended December 31, 2000, Whose Reports Were Used in the Statistical Tabulations in Parts 1 and 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc01idx.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Table 1.6 - Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Part 2. Telephone Carriers Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission for the Year Ended December 31, 2001, Whose Reports Were Used in the Statistical Tabulations in Parts 1 and 2. . . . . . . . . . . 13 Table 2.2 - Outside Plant Statistics of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers as of December 31, 2001. . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc02idx.pdf
  • All Long Distance Toll Providers, Excl. Incumbent LECs. . . . . . 8 Table 1.6 - Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Part 2. Telephone Carriers Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission for the Year Ende December 31, 2002, Whose Reports Were Used in the Statistical Tabulations in Parts 1 and 2. . . . . . . . . . 13 Table 2.2 - Outside Plant Statistics of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers as of December 31, 2002. . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc03idx.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Table 1.5 - Shares of Total Toll Service Revenues - All Long Distance Toll Providers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Part 2. Telephone Carriers Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission for the Year Ende December 31, 2003, Whose Reports Were Used in the Statistical Tabulations in Parts 1 and 2. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Table 2.2 - Outside Plant Statistics of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers as of December 31, 2003. . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc04idx.pdf
  • Provider. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Part 2. Telephone Carriers Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission for the Year Ende December 31, 2004, Whose Reports Were Used in the Statistical Tabulations in Parts 1 and 2. . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Table 2.2 - Outside Plant Statistics of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers as of December 31, 2004. . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc05idx.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Part 2. Telephone Carriers 20052006 Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission Whose Reports Were Used in this Statistical Tabulation. . . 13 105 Table 2.2 - Outside Plant Statistics of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc06_07idx.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Part 2. Telephone Carriers 20062007 Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission Whose Reports Were Used in this Statistical Tabulation. . . 13 105 Table 2.2 - Outside Plant Statistics of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc93idx.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 PART 2. TELEPHONE CARRIERS TABLE 2.1-LIST OF TELEPHONE CARRIERS BY OPERATING REVENUES REPORTING TO THE COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993, WHOSE REPORTS WERE USED IN THE STATISTICAL TABULATIONS IN PARTS 1 AND 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 TABLE 2.2-OUTSIDE PLANT STATISTICS OF REPORTING LOCAL EXCHANGE COMPANIES AS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc94idx.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 PART 2. TELEPHONE CARRIERS TABLE 2.1-LIST OF TELEPHONE CARRIERS BY OPERATING REVENUES REPORTING TO THE COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, WHOSE REPORTS WERE USED IN THE STATISTICAL TABULATIONS IN PARTS 1 AND 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 TABLE 2.2-OUTSIDE PLANT STATISTICS OF REPORTING LOCAL EXCHANGE COMPANIES AS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc95idx.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 PART 2. TELEPHONE CARRIERS TABLE 2.1-LIST OF TELEPHONE CARRIERS BY OPERATING REVENUES REPORTING TO THE COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, WHOSE REPORTS WERE USED IN THE STATISTICAL TABULATIONS IN PARTS 1 AND 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 TABLE 2.2-OUTSIDE PLANT STATISTICS OF REPORTING LOCAL EXCHANGE COMPANIES AS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc96idx.pdf
  • . . 9 TABLE 1.8-MARKET SHARES OF PRESUBSCRIBED LINES BY STATE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 PART 2. TELEPHONE CARRIERS TABLE 2.1-LIST OF TELEPHONE CARRIERS BY OPERATING REVENUES REPORTING TO THE COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, WHOSE REPORTS WERE USED IN THE STATISTICAL TABULATIONS IN PARTS 1 AND 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 TABLE 2.2-OUTSIDE PLANT STATISTICS OF REPORTING LOCAL EXCHANGE COMPANIES AS OF
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc97idx.pdf
  • . . 9 TABLE 1.8-MARKET SHARES OF PRESUBSCRIBED LINES BY STATE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 PART 2. TELEPHONE CARRIERS TABLE 2.1-LIST OF TELEPHONE CARRIERS REPORTING TO THE COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, WHOSE REPORTS WERE USED IN THE STATISTICAL TABULATIONS IN PARTS 1 AND 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc98idx.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 PART 2. TELEPHONE CARRIERS TABLE 2.1-LIST OF TELEPHONE CARRIERS REPORTING TO THE COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, WHOSE REPORTS WERE USED IN THE STATISTICAL TABULATIONS IN PARTS 1 AND 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc99idx.pdf
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Part 2. Telephone Carriers Table 2.1 -List of Telephone Carriers Reporting to the Commission for the Year Ended December 31, 1999, Whose Reports Were Used in the Statistical Tabulations in Parts 1 and 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/scard97.pdf
  • (6) US Teleconnect 2.22 242 109 (3) VarTec Telecom, Inc. 0.23 108 470 (6) Winstar Gateway Network 29.12 990 34 (8) WKP Communications 66 WorldCom, Inc. 0.22 979 4,485 (6) Weighted Ratio 0.39 All other companies served with more than 50 complaints (cont'd) (1) United States Telephone Asso- ciation, Holding Company Report 1997. (2) Statistics of Communications Common Carriers. Table 2.1. (3) Carrier's revenue was not pub- licly reported. Carriers with more than $109 million in telecommu- nications revenue in 1996 were re- quired to publicly report their rev- enue. To calculate a ratio, $109 million was assumed if the carrier had more than 100 complaints. As a result, the carrier's reported com- plaint ratio will be lower than its true
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/staterev.doc
  • wireless), competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC), wireless, subscriber line charge (SLC), non-SLC access, and toll using information from the Telecommunications Industry Revenue report. Other revenue, including international-to-international revenue and revenue reported by carriers that filed TRS worksheets but not USF worksheets, is divided the same way. Figures 1 and 2 show industry-wide and end-user telecommunication revenue by these categories. Table 2.1 shows industry-wide and end-user revenue as well as carrier's carrier revenue. Information from the SOCC is used to allocate nationwide revenue for local exchange service (excluding wireless), access revenue and toll revenue to each state. Information from access filings to the Commission is used to allocate SLC revenue. Nationwide CLEC revenue is allocated using data on CLEC numbering codes, numbers
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/tccsc98.pdf
  • (FL)*** 67 53.6 Least Cost Routing (CA)** 171 171.0 Local Long Distance** 44 44.0 Long Distance Direct, Inc.** 96 96.0 Page 3 Complaint indices for carriers served more than 40 slamming complaints from Jan. 1 to June 30, 1998 Sorted Alphabetically Complaints per million Company Complaints dollars* MCI Worldcom 1,055 0.1 Minimum Rate Pricing** 404 404.0 North American Telephone*** 40 2.1 One Step Billing, Inc.** 74 74.0 Pantel Communications** 53 53.0 QAI, Inc.*** 51 5.8 Sprint Communication 595 0.1 Telec, Inc.** 133 133.0 The Furst Group*** 103 2.5 US Long Distance, Inc. 101 0.8 US Republic Communications*** 80 9.1 Vista Group International*** 214 171.2 Notes: * Because the complaint statistics report a six month period, we used half the company's annual
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/in-region_applications/ameritech_mi/amercom.html
  • provided here in a single zip file: [10]amerrpl.zip (945 KB, 18 files, 1.71 MB unzipped). See the [11]Reply Comments Table below for the names of the parties who submitted disks and their associated files. Comments 20 comments were filed electronically with the FCC for this proceeding and are provided here in a single* zip file: [12]amercom.zip (560 KB, 27 files, 2.1 MB unzipped). See the [13]Comments Table below for the names of the parties who submitted disks and their associated files. * AT&T's and The Department of Justice comments are only available separately via links in the table below. To download a zip file: click on the highlighted file name above, then use your browser's normal save function to save the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/in-region_applications/sbc/sbcbrief.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/in-region_applications/sbc/sbcbrief.wp
  • this requirement - but actually furnishes service to customers exclusively over that network. Brooks Fiber OCC Comments at 2. Brooks Fiber's General and Local Exchange Tariffs, on file with and approved by the OCC, state that Brooks Fiber will provide telephone exchange service using its own fiber optic cable and switching facilities. See App. Vol. II, Tab 3, at �� 2.1.1 & 4. Brooks Fiber's local network in Tulsa includes 221 route miles of fiber and a Lucent 5ESS central office switch. Brooks Fiber OCC Comments at 2; see Wheeler Aff. � 14. In Oklahoma City, Brooks Fiber owns and operates a 44-mile network and a second Lucent 5ESS switch. Brooks Fiber OCC Comments at 2; see Wheeler Aff. � 7.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
  • 41 50.0 183.0 11664 544 11453 533 1.3 0.5 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 12 57 1000.0 610.0 43525 908 41216 868 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MONTGOMERY 20 16 50.0 226.0 12730 369 12234 365 0.5 0.2 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 26 14 50.0 183.0 12881 376 12595 372 4.0 2.9 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 32 51 284.8 545.0 28418 538 28011 535 3.2 2.1 99.8 AL MONTGOMERY 45 46 50.0 308.0 11831 366 11666 365 1.9 1.1 100.0 AL MOUNT CHEAHA 7 56 1000.0 610.0 41663 2006 38089 1739 0.3 0.1 99.6 AL OPELIKA 66 31 50.0 207.0 10492 469 9990 460 0.0 0.0 100.0 AL OZARK 34 33 50.0 142.0 8785 229 8749 228 0.7 0.1 100.0 AL SELMA 8 55 1000.0 515.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1996/fcc96317.pdf
  • 25 24 56.3 352.0 17395 692 16731 676 0.7 0.3 100.0 AL HUNTSVILLE 31 29 56.4 546.0 22523 820 21667 798 2.6 2.8 99.7 AL HUNTSVILLE 48 27 60.5 579.0 23851 856 22563 819 1.8 1.7 100.0 AL HUNTSVILLE 54 34 141.6 515.0 20515 743 19681 725 2.0 1.2 99.8 AL LOUISVILLE 43 42 334.8 275.0 14970 270 15003 270 2.1 0.5 99.6 DIGITAL TELEVISION EXISTING NTSC SERVICE ------------------------------------------ DTV/ DURING TRANSITION CURRENT SERVICE NEW INTERFERENCE NTSC NTSC DTV DTV ANTENNA ----------------- --------------- ----------------------- AREA STATE AND CITY CHAN CHAN POWER HAAT AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE MATCH (kW) (m) (Sq km) (thous) (Sq km) (thous) (% NL Area) (% NL Pop) (%) B-6 AL MOBILE 5 47 3917.7 581.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00163.doc
  • transmitted spectrum may be significantly modified by the frequency response of the antenna such that even the carrier frequency, where employed, may not represent the center frequency. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.205. Spurious emissions are defined as emissions outside of the necessary bandwidth, the level of which may be reduced without affecting the transmission of information. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See, for example, comments of Time Domain at 36-37, Rosemount Measurement at 1, 2 and 8, Interval at 12, LLNL at 4, and the UWBWG at 10, and the reply comments of M/A-COM at 1 and Interval at 11 and 16. MSSI, however, promotes a system that employed pulse and/or spectral shaping to avoid operation within the TV broadcast and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00430.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00430.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00430.txt
  • permissive changes. 731 & 159... 495 ECC Federal Communications Commission, Equipment Approval Services, P.O. Box 358315, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5315 * * * * * PART 2 - FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS The authority citation for Part 2 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336, unless otherwise noted. Section 2.1 is proposed to be amended by adding the following definition: � 2.1 Terms and definition. * * * * * (c) * * * Software defined radio. A radio that includes a transmitter in which the operating parameters of the transmitter, including the frequency range, modulation type and maximum radiated or conducted output power can be altered by making a
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00455.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00455.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00455.txt
  • Report No. 148 (MMB November 29, 2000). The Commission will conduct random audits on a select number of applications prior to or after a license has been issued in reliance on a certification. See 47 C.F.R. �� 74.990, 74.991, 79.992; Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands, 6 FCC Rcd 6792, 6801-06 (1991). The rules provide that an MDS operator may be licensed on ITFS frequencies in areas where at least eight other ITFS channels remain available in the community for future ITFS use. In addition, no more than eight ITFS channels per community may be licensed to MDS operators. To be licensed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.txt
  • � 42. Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at � 10. See 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(3)(D). Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at � 10. See 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(3)(A), (D). An ``out-of-band emission'' is an ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies immediately outside the necessary bandwidth which results from the modulation process, but excluding spurious emissions.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). A ``spurious emission'' is an ``[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' Id. � 2.1(c). The objective of most of the Commission's traditional
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.txt
  • Wi-LAN filed an application for equipment certification for its Wideband Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (W-OFDM) transmitter under the rules for direct sequence spread spectrum systems. The Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") denied that application on the basis that Wi-LAN's W-OFDM device did not meet the definition of a direct sequence spread spectrum system as set forth in Section 2.1 of the rules. Section 2.1 of our rules defines a spread spectrum system as, "[A]n information bearing communications system in which . . . the bandwidth is deliberately widened by means of a spreading function over that which would be needed to transmit the information alone." As stated above, Section 2.1 provides for only two specific types of spread spectrum
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1996/fcc96326.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1996/fcc96326.txt
  • residence and where either workers or the general public may have access. The term "power" in column 2 of Table 1 Federal Communications Commission FCC 96-326 _________________________________________ 90 refers to total operating power of the transmitting operation in question in terms of effective radiated power (ERP), equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP), or peak envelope power (PEP), as defined in � 2.1 of this chapter. For the case of the Cellular Radiotelephone Service, subpart H of part 22 of this chapter; the Personal Communications Service, part 24 of this chapter and covered Specialized Mobile Radio Service operations, part 90 of this chapter, the phrase "total power of all channels" in column 2 of Table 1 means the sum of the ERP or
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
  • 0.0 0.0 100.0 AKSITKA 13 2 1.0 33.0 6622 9 1132 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 ALANNISTON 40 58 253.2 350.0 21331 1124 17127 616 0.2 0.0 99.3 ALBESSEMER 17 18 178.0 675.0 32514 1313 28727 1131 2.5 0.3 100.0 ALBIRMINGHAM 6 50 1000.0 420.0 37237 1647 34243 1547 0.0 0.0 99.4 ALBIRMINGHAM 10 53 1000.0 404.0 32562 1543 28403 1428 2.1 2.3 99.9 ALBIRMINGHAM 13 52 998.4 408.0 33339 1570 29111 1465 0.0 0.0 100.0 ALBIRMINGHAM 42 30 159.2 421.0 26381 1330 23781 1253 0.3 0.3 99.9 ALBIRMINGHAM 68 36 50.0 314.0 14449 1016 13255 977 0.0 0.0 99.5 ALDEMOPOLIS 41 19 50.0 333.0 15153 121 15040 121 0.4 0.4 100.0 ALDOTHAN 4 36 1000.0 573.0 48620 784 44475 765 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
  • mounted antennas" means antennas mounted in or on a building structure that is occupied as a workplace or residence. The term "power" in column 2 of Table 1 refers to total operating power of the transmitting operation in question in terms of effective radiated power (ERP), equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP), or peak envelope power (PEP), as defined in � 2.1 of this chapter. For the case of the Cellular Radiotelephone Service, subpart H of part 22 of this chapter; the Personal Communications Service, part 24 of this chapter and the Specialized Mobile Radio Service, part 90 of this chapter, the phrase "total power of all channels" in column 2 of Table 1 means the sum of the ERP or EIRP
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
  • 41 50.0 183.0 11664 544 11453 533 1.3 0.5 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 12 57 1000.0 610.0 43525 908 41216 868 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MONTGOMERY 20 16 50.0 226.0 12730 369 12234 365 0.5 0.2 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 26 14 50.0 183.0 12881 376 12595 372 4.0 2.9 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 32 51 284.8 545.0 28418 538 28011 535 3.2 2.1 99.8 AL MONTGOMERY 45 46 50.0 308.0 11831 366 11666 365 1.9 1.1 100.0 AL MOUNT CHEAHA 7 56 1000.0 610.0 41663 2006 38089 1739 0.3 0.1 99.6 AL OPELIKA 66 31 50.0 207.0 10492 469 9990 460 0.0 0.0 100.0 AL OZARK 34 33 50.0 142.0 8785 229 8749 228 0.7 0.1 100.0 AL SELMA 8 55 1000.0 515.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
  • column6thatstatesthat2300-2305MHzbecamenon-Federalgovernmentexclusivespectrum inAugust1995. (1997);MemorandumOpinionandOrderandThirdNoticeofProposedRuleMakingandOrder,FCC98-309, 13FCCRcd23949(1998);recon.pending. 67SeeLetterfromActingAssociateAdministrator,OfficeofSpectrumManagement,NTIA,U.S. DepartmentofCommerce,toChief,OfficeofEngineeringandTechnology,FCC,datedJune10,1998. 68ThetextoffootnoteG101readsasfollows:"Intheband2200-2290MHz,spaceoperations(space-to- Earth)and(space-to-space),andearthexploration-satellite(space-to-Earth)and(space-to-space)services,maybe accommodatedonaco-equalbasiswithfixed,mobileandspaceresearchservice." 69FootnoteS5.392readsasfollows:"Administrationsareurgedtotakeallpracticablemeasurestoensure thatspace-to-spacetransmissionsbetweentwoormorenon-geostationarysatellites,inthespaceresearch,space operationsandEarthexploration-satelliteservicesinthebands2025-2110MHzand2200-2290MHz,shallnot imposeanyconstraintsonEarth-to-space,space-to-Earthandotherspace-to-spacetransmissionsofthoseservices andinthosebandsbetweengeostationaryandnon-geostationarysatellites."(TheadoptionoffootnoteS5.392is non-substantiveinnaturebecauseitmerelysetsupthegroundrulesbetweenvariousFederalgovernment operations.) 70InthelastsentenceoffootnoteUS303,ITURadioRegulation"2557"isupdatedto"S21.16." Accordingly,footnoteUS303nowreadsasfollows:"Intheband2285-2290MHz,non-Federalgovernment spacestationsinthespaceresearch,spaceoperationsandearthexploration-satelliteservicesmaybeauthorizedto transmittotheTrackingandDataRelaySatelliteSystemsubjecttosuchconditionsasmaybeappliedonacase- by-casebasis.SuchtransmissionsshallnotcauseharmfulinterferencetoauthorizedFederalgovernment stations.ThepowerfluxdensityattheEarth'ssurfacefromsuchnon-Federalgovernmentstationsshallnot exceed-144to-154dBW/m2/4kHz,dependingonangleofarrival,inaccordancewithITURadioRegulation S21.16." 15 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 37.Inordertomoreclearlyshowexistingfixed-satelliteserviceallocations,thefixed- satelliteservice(space-to-Earth)allocationinthe2500-2655MHzbandandtheexistingfixed- satelliteservice(Earth-to-space)allocationinthe2655-2690MHzbandaremovedoutfrom footnoteNG102upintotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable.FootnoteNG102isrevisedto removethesenowduplicativeFSSallocationsandtoupdatetheregulatorystatusofseveral Pacificislands."71Alsointhe2655-2690MHzband,typographicalerrorsinfootnoteNG47are corrected.72 ChangestotheUnitedStatesTableintheFrequencyRangefrom3GHzto30GHz(SHF): 38.WenotethattheCommissionhasproposedtore-allocatethe3650-3700MHz Governmenttransferbandtothenon-Federalgovernmentfixedservice.73Atthistime,wemake onlynon-substantiverevisionstothe3650-3700MHzband,e.g.,theInternationalTableis updated.Additionally,inpreparationforthere-allocationofthe3650-3700MHzmixed-use band,wearemakingthefollowingnon-substantiverevisions:(1)thenon-Federalgovernment bandat3600-3700MHzissubdividedintotwosegments,3600-3650MHzand3650-3700MHz; 71TheUnitedStateshadadministeredtheUnitedNationsTrustTerritoryofthePacificIslandssinceJuly 1947.Thisareawaslaterseparatedintofourseparatepoliticaljurisdictions.Ofthesejurisdictions,the CommissionmaintainsregulatoryauthorityonlyintheCommonwealthoftheNorthernMarianaIslands.In addition,underSection131oftheCompactsofFreeAssociationwiththeFederatedStatesofMicronesiaandthe RepublicoftheMarshallIslands,theFCCcontinuestohavejurisdictionoverearthstationsownedandoperated byU.S.CommonCarriersinthoseareas.SeeNTIAManual,AnnexL,entitledFreelyAssociatedStates. FootnoteNG102isrevisedtoreadasfollows:"Useofthefixed-satelliteserviceinthebands2500-2655MHz (space-to-Earth)and2655-2690MHz(Earth-to-space)islimitedasfollows: (a)ForcommoncarrieruseinAlaska,forintra-Alaskaserviceonly,andinthemid-andwesternPacificareas, includingAmericanSamoa,Guam,theNorthernMarianaIslands,andHawaii,andundertheCompactsofFree AssociationwiththeFederatedStatesofMicronesiaandtheRepublicoftheMarshallIslands; (b)ForeducationaluseinthecontiguousUnitedStates,Alaska,andthemid-andwesternPacificareas, includingAmericanSamoa,Guam,theNorthernMarianaIslands,andHawaii. Suchuseissubjecttoagreementwithadministrationshavingservicesoperatinginaccordancewiththe Table,whichmaybeaffected.Intheband2500-2655MHz,unlesssuchagreementincludestheuseofhigher values,thepowerfluxdensityattheEarth'ssurfaceproducedbyemissionsfromaspacestationinthisservice shallnotexceedthevaluessetforthinPart25oftheRulesforthisfrequencyband." 72FootnoteNG47,asadopted,readasfollows:"InAlaska,frequenciesbetweentheband2655-2690MHz arenotavailableforassignmenttoterrestrialstations."SeeAmendmentsofParts1,2and21ofthe Commission'sRulesGoverningUseoftheFrequenciesinthe2.1and2.5GHzBands,PRDocketNo.92-80, ReportandOrder,FCC93-31,8FCCRcd1444(1993).Notethat"within"wasinadvertentlychangedto "between."Cf.with47C.F.R.�2.106,footnoteNG47(1992Edition).Moreover,intheCodeofFederal Regulations,thecommaafterAlaskawasinadvertentlydropped.Accordingly,wetakethisopportunitytorevise footnoteNG47toreadasfollows:"InAlaska,frequencieswithintheband2655-2690MHzarenotavailablefor assignmenttoterrestrialstations." 73SeeAmendmentoftheCommission'sRuleswithRegardtothe3650-3700MHzGovernmentTransfer Band,ETDocketNo.98-237,NoticeofProposedRuleMakingandOrder,FCC98-337,64FR2462(1/14/99), 14FCCRcd1295(1999). 16 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 (2)theFederalgovernmentbandsat3500-3600MHzand3600-3700MHzarerevisedasthe 3500-3650MHzand3650-3700MHzbands;and(3)anoteisaddedtocolumn6toexplainthat the3650-3700MHzbandbecamemixed-usespectruminJanuary1999,thusalertingthepublic totheimpendingre-allocationoftheband. 39.ThePresidenthasre-claimedthe4635-4685MHznon-Federalgovernmentexclusive bandandhassubstitutedthe4940-4990MHznon-Federalgovernmentexclusivebandinits place.74TheCommissionhaspreviouslyre-allocatedthe4660-4685MHzsegmenttotheGeneral WirelessCommunicationsService("GWCS").75Accordingly,weareherebyreturningthe4660- 4685MHzsegmenttoitsformerstatus.76Furthermore,inpreparationforthere-allocationofthe 4940-4990MHznon-Federalgovernmentexclusiveband,the4800-4990MHzbandissubdivided intotwosegments,4800-4940MHzand4940-4990MHz.Anoteisaddedtocolumn6to explainthatthe4940-4990MHzbecamenon-FederalgovernmentexclusivespectruminMarch 1999,thusalertingthepublictotheimpendingre-allocationoftheband.FootnoteUS257,which dealswith4950-4990MHz,isrevisedbycorrectingtypographicalerrorsconcerningthe descriptionoftheOwensValleyRadioObservatory.77 40.AtWRC-95,the5725-5850MHzbandwassubdividedintotwosegments,5725-5830 MHzand5830-5850MHz,andthefootnoteallocationfortheamateur-satelliteservice(space-to- Earth)inthe5830-5850MHzband--internationalfootnote808--wastransferredtothebody oftheInternationalTable,andfootnote808wassuppressed.SincetheUnitedStatesTable currentlycontainsthisfootnoteallocation,wearemakingaconformingchangetotheNon- FederalGovernmentTable,i.e.,intheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,the5650-5850MHzband issubdividedintotwosegments,5650-5830MHzand5830-5850MHz,theamateur-satellite service(space-to-Earth)isadded,andfootnote808isdeleted. 41.Inthe9200-9500MHzband,theFederalGovernmentTableiscorrectedtoindicate thattheradiolocationserviceisallocatedonasecondary--notprimary--basis.78 74SeeLetterfromtheAssistantSecretaryforCommunicationsandInformation,U.S.Departmentof Commerce,toChairman,FederalCommunicationsCommission,datedMarch30,1999. 75SeeAllocationofSpectrumBelow5GHzTransferredfromFederalGovernmentUse,ETDocketNo.94- 32,FirstReportandOrderandSecondNoticeofProposedRuleMaking,FCC95-47,60FR13102(3/10/95),10 FCCRcd4769(1995). 76Priortotherescindedre-allocation,the4500-4800MHzbandwasallocatedtotheFederalgovernment fixedandmobileservicesonaco-primarybasisandtothenon-Federalgovernmentfixed-satelliteservice(space- to-Earth)onaprimarybasis.Non-Federalgovernmentuseofthisfixed-satelliteserviceallocationwaslimitedto internationalinter-continentalsystemsandwassubjecttocase-by-caseelectromagneticanalysis. 77Specifically,thephrases"Pine,California"iscorrectedto"BigPine,California"and"Bigone"is correctedto"one." 78SeeNTIAManualatp.4-73. 17 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 42.Inthe12.2-12.7GHzband,theFederalandNon-FederalGovernmentTablesare correctedbyremovingfootnotereference843.79WeobservethattheDirectBroadcastSatellite ("DBS")servicehasbeenavailabletothepublicforseveralyearsandthuswefindthatfootnotes NG13980andNG14081arenolongerneeded.Accordingly,footnotesNG139andNG140are removedfromthelistofnon-FederalgovernmentfootnotesandreferencetofootnotesNG139 andNG140isremovedfromthe12.2-12.7GHzbandandfromthe17.3-17.7GHzand17.7-17.8 GHzbands,respectively. 43.Inthe14-14.2GHzband,theFederalandNon-FederalGovernmentTablesare correctedbyaddingfootnotereferenceUS292.82ExpiredfootnoteG119isremovedfromthelist
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00353.doc
  • Secretary Appendix: Final Rules Parts 2 and 87 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations are amended as follows: PART 2 -- FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS 1. The authority citation for Part 2 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. Sections 154, 302a, 303, and 336, unless otherwise noted. 2. Section 2.1(c) is amended by revising the definition for the inter-satellite service. � 2.1 Terms and definitions. * * * * * (c) * * * Inter-Satellite Service. A radiocommunication service providing links between artificial satellites. (RR) * * * 3. Section 2.106 is amended as follows: a. Pages 74 and 75 of the Table of Frequency Allocations are revised. b. Footnote
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00363.doc
  • support wireless Internet access with data rates surpassing digital subscriber line ("DSL") services, such as cable modems into remote, rural areas of the country. See Rural Carriers comments at 4. See The 4.9 GHz Band Transferred from Federal Government Use, WT Docket No. 00-32, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 15 FCC Rcd 4778 (2000) ("4.9 GHz Notice"). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). A mobile station is defined as station in the mobile service intended to be used while in motion or during halts at unspecified points. See also 47 U.S.C. � 3(23) (defining land station), � 3(27) (defining mobile service), and � 3(28) (defining mobile station). , infra. See Motorola comments at 3. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). Id. See Notice
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • a single actual DBS customer was or could have been adversely impacted by the interference DBS proponents claimed to have been created at the Oxon Hill, MD tests. Decision. We conclude that MVDDS can operate in the 12.2-12.7 GHz band under the existing primary allocation, which requires that a Fixed Service not cause harmful interference to the co-primary BSS. Section 2.1 of our rules defines ``harmful interference'' as ``interference which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service.....'' In some instances, spectrum sharing may result in services causing interference or degradation to or occasional outages of other services. Spectrum management decisions often address this issue by specifying
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.txt
  • would be to use some of the 2 GHz MSS spectrum for relocation. Paragraph 38 seeks comment on using the 2150-2160 MHz MDS band for relocation purposes. Any of these alternatives would facilitate the relocation of displaced incumbents, including small entities. Finally, the Commission has already received extensive comments on issues related to the possible reallocation of the 2150-2160 MHz (2.1 GHz) spectrum for advanced wireless purposes. Comments filed by the multipoint distribution/instructional television fixed services industry and several equipment manufacturers argue that the 2.1 GHz band is necessary for the continued roll-out of fixed wireless services across the country. Other commenters support the use of 2.1 GHz for advanced wireless services. We are considering both alternatives, and are attempting to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01264.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01264.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01264.txt
  • & Electronic or Paper 159... 495 ECC Federal Communications Commission, Equipment Approval Services, P.O. Box 358315, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5315 * * * * * PART 2 - FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS The authority citation for Part 2 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336, unless otherwise noted. Section 2.1 is amended by adding the following definition: � 2.1 Terms and definition. * * * * * (c) * * * Software defined radio. A radio that includes a transmitter in which the operating parameters of frequency range, modulation type or maximum output power (either radiated or conducted) can be altered by making a change in software without making any
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01382.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01382.txt
  • C.F.R. � 25.142. 15 A feeder link is a radio link from a fixed Earth station to a satellite (uplink) or from a satellite to a fixed Earth station (downlink). These links are used for data backhaul, satellite control functions, and to connect satellite systems to other networks, such as the public switched telephone network (PSTN). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. 16 Since the 1995 World Radiocommunication Conference, the United States has performed studies on sharing between space and terrestrial services and feeder links near 1.4 GHz for Non-Geostationary Orbiting Mobile Satellite Service (Little LEO) systems with service links below 1 GHz. See WRC 97 Final Acts, Resolution 127, note (d). 17 See Amendments to Part 90 of the Commission's Rules
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2000/da000705.doc
  • connected to the public utility power line, the voltage conducted back onto the AC power line must be measured, in order to demonstrate compliance with the limit specified in this Section. See ANSI C63.4-1992 for the proper set up and procedures. Section 15.247(a): Describe how the EUT meets the definition of a frequency hopping spread spectrum system, found in Section 2.1, based on the technical description. Carrier Frequency Separation The EUT must have its hopping function enabled. Use the following spectrum analyzer settings: Span = wide enough to capture the peaks of two adjacent channels Resolution (or IF) Bandwidth (RBW) ( 1% of the span Video (or Average) Bandwidth (VBW) ( RBW Sweep = auto Detector function = peak Trace =
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2001/d012072a.pdf
  • 0.16-0.20Source: Viterbi GSM 200 kHz 13.3 15.2 (13.3*8/7) 0.08 effective reuse = 7 PHS 300 kHz 32 12.8 (32*8/20) 0.04 effective reuse = 20 With Adaptive Antennas PHS 300 kHz 32 64 (32*8/4) 0.21 effective reuse = 4, DDI Pocket GSM 200 kHz 13.3 53.2 (13.3*8/2) 0.27 effective reuse = 2, AC/OEM Trials IntelliWave FWA 300 kHz 128 640 (128*2*2.5) 2.1 effective reuse = 1/2.5, Various Operators ! Adaptive antenna gains are significant ! Adaptive antenna benefits vary with air interface and adaptive antenna type (more on this later) 14 A Word About Reuse ! When talking about spectral efficiency, "reuse" means feasible reuse of traffic resources ! Traffic resource examples " AMPS (FDMA): 30 kHz carrier " DAMPS/IS-136 (TDMA/FDMA): 30
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00369.doc
  • 3700-4200, 5925-6425 and 6425-7125 MHz and 10.7-11.7, 12.7-13.25, 17.7-19.7, and 27.5-29.5 GHz. The Fixed-Satellite Service is a radiocommunication service between earth stations at given positions, when one or more satellites are used; the FSS also may include feeder links for other space radiocommunication services. The terrestrial fixed service (FS) is a radiocommunication service between fixed points. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See FWCC Petitions at 2-4. FWCC alleges that satellite earth station operators receive preferential access to shared spectrum because: (1) the Commission licenses earth stations for the entire allocated band and with no loading requirements, while point-to-point terrestrial operations are limited to frequencies actually needed and are subject to stringent spectrum efficiency requirements, and (2) the Commission licenses earth stations
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99313.doc
  • Unclassified, and Sensitive Information obtained while a Principal Manager of the Company. Such responsibility shall not terminate by virtue of leaving a position of Principal Manager. The Company shall advise the departing Principal Manager of such responsibility, but failure of the Company to so advise shall not relieve the Principal Manager of such responsibility. ARTICLE II - FACILITIES AND RECORDS 2.1 Except to the extent and under conditions concurred in by the DoD, the DoJ and the FBI in writing: (1) all Domestic Telecommunications Infrastructure owned directly or indirectly by the Parent Corporation will be owned and controlled by the Company and shall at all times be located in the United States, and (2) all telecommunications of U.S. Joint Venture Subscribers
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99344.doc
  • switch. (v) "U.S. MET" means a MET that is put into service in the United States by a party that is authorized to distribute or otherwise provide TMI's mobile satellite services in the United States. (w) "Wire Communication" has the meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. � 2510(l). ARTICLE II NON-OBJECTION BY DoJ AND FBI TO GRANT OF LICENSE TO TMI 2.1 Non-Objection. (a) Upon the execution of this Agreement and adoption by TMI of the Implementation Plan, the DoJ and the FBI shall: (i) immediately notify the FCC that, provided the FCC approves this Agreement and adopts the Condition to FCC Licenses, the DoJ and the FBI have no objection to grant of TMI's pending license application in FCC File No.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/fcc00302.doc
  • the phrases ``if technically feasible'' and ``unless technically infeasible.'' Notice, 14 FCC Rcd at 4905-06 (Appendix D, Sec. 25.143(b)(2)(iv)). 47 C.F.R. � 100.53 (b). See Reduced Domestic Satellite Orbital Spacing at 4/6 GHz, FCC/OST R83-2 4-5 (May 1983) (view of a satellite below five degrees is not reliable due to atmospheric effects). Globalstar Comments at 4. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See, e.g., Consolidated Comments and Petition to Deny of Iridium at 9 (filed May 5, 1998); Comments of Aeronautical Radio, Inc. at 4-5 (filed May 4, 1998); Comments of Celsat at 7 (filed May 4, 1998); Comments of Constellation at 20 (filed May 4, 1998); Consolidated Comments of ICO at 17-18 (filed May 4, 1998). ARINC Comments at 3. See
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/MB/Orders/2002/fcc02113r.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/MB/Orders/2002/fcc02113r.txt
  • holder of a non-attributable interest in a broadcast licensee to have the right to nominate a member of the licensee's board of directors, but may not have the right to designate or elect a director.24 In other words, NBC contends, the licensee entity must have the ability to reject the nominees of the non-attributable interest holder. NBC notes that Section 2.1(b) of the Stockholder Agreement provides that if the rules eventually permit it, then NBC shall have the right to appoint members of Paxson's board. Only in this clause is NBC assured that its nominees will be elected to Paxson's board. NBC states that it has never invoked Section 2.1(b). The three persons that served on Paxson's board did so only
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1997/fcc97360.pdf
  • channels. Id. We also have agreed that the 20 hours per channel per week ITFS programming standard for licensees leasing excess capacity helps to insure that ITFS licenses are not secured merely to realize financial gain from wireless cable operators. Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, & Cable Television Relay Service, Order on Reconsideration , 6 FCC Rcd 6764, 6773-74 (1991) ("Wireless Cable Reconsideration Order"). See Amendment of Part 74 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the Instructional Television Fixed Service, Notice of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
  • restrains prices charged to buyers). 120 See 1992 Merger Guidelines � 1.3. 121 See, e.g. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. at 363 ("[A] significant increase in the concentration . . . must be enjoined in the absence of evidence clearly showing that the merger is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects."). See also 1992 Horizontal Guidelines at 41558 �� 2.1, 2.2; New York v. Kraft General Foods, 926 F. Supp. 321, 359 (S.D.N.Y. 1995); Amendment of Parts 20 and 24 of the Commission's Rules -- Broadband PCS Competitive Bidding and the Commercial Mobile Radio Service Spectrum Cap, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 7824 (1996). Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-329 30 cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation.122
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98231.pdf
  • channels. Id. We also have agreed that the 20 hours per channel per week ITFS programming standard for licensees leasing excess capacity helps to insure that ITFS licenses are not secured merely to realize financial gain from wireless cable operators. Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting: Private Operational-Fixed Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service, & Cable Television Relay Service, Order on Reconsideration, 6 FCC Rcd 6764, 6773-74 (1991) ("Wireless Cable Reconsideration Order"). See Amendment of Part 74 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the Instructional Television Fixed Service, Notice of Proposed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
  • 41 50.0 183.0 11664 544 11453 533 1.3 0.5 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 12 57 1000.0 610.0 43525 908 41216 868 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MONTGOMERY 20 16 50.0 226.0 12730 369 12234 365 0.5 0.2 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 26 14 50.0 183.0 12881 376 12595 372 4.0 2.9 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 32 51 284.8 545.0 28418 538 28011 535 3.2 2.1 99.8 AL MONTGOMERY 45 46 50.0 308.0 11831 366 11666 365 1.9 1.1 100.0 AL MOUNT CHEAHA 7 56 1000.0 610.0 41663 2006 38089 1739 0.3 0.1 99.6 AL OPELIKA 66 31 50.0 207.0 10492 469 9990 460 0.0 0.0 100.0 AL OZARK 34 33 50.0 142.0 8785 229 8749 228 0.7 0.1 100.0 AL SELMA 8 55 1000.0 515.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da000574.doc
  • full-time service from at least five licensed aural services. 5. Comparatively, San Joaquin advises that the allotment of a Class A channel at the proposed Easton reference point would result in the provision of a 70 dBu signal to 82% of the Fresno Urbanized Area. Further, San Joaquin asserts that as Easton (pop. 1,877), is a small, unincorporated suburb located 2.1 miles south of the Fresno city boundaries, absent a Tuck analysis, cited supra, the Easton proposal is not entitled to a first local service preference. In support of its assertion San Joaquin provided the following information to establish that Easton is not an autonomous community, but rather is dependent upon Fresno for many essential services. Among its assertions San Joaquin
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da001960.doc
  • served by allotting Channel 238A to Burnsville, West Virginia, as that community's first local aural transmission service. Channel 238A can be allotted to Burnsville in compliance with the minimum distance separations requirements of Section 73.207(a) and the principal community coverage requirements of Sections 73.315(a) of the Commission's Rules. The site proposed by Hershey for Channel 238A at Burnsville is located 2.1 kilometers northeast of the center city site for Burnsville in order to protect the license and application for Channel 238C (Station WQHY) at Prestonburg, Kentucky. 4. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i), 5(c)(1), 303(g) and (r) and 307(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.61, 0.204(b) and 0.283 of the Commission's Rules, IT
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da002362.doc
  • 225A is available for allotment to Butte Falls, it is not necessary to comparatively consider this proposal with that of Logan for an allotment at Hornbrook, CA. Therefore, we will allot the alternate channel, as proposed. Channel 225A can be allotted to Butte Falls in compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a site restriction of 3.4 kilometers (2.1 miles) northwest to avoid a short-spacing to Stations KLAD-FM, Channel 223C, Klamath Falls, Oregon, and Station KKNU, Channel 226C, Springfield, Oregon. 4. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i), 5(c)(1), 303(g) and (r) and 307(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.61, 0.204(b) and 0.283 of the Commission's Rules, IT IS ORDERED, That effective
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00019.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00019.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00019.txt
  • i.e., clock, personal and portable, we find that the area where such receivers could potentially experience degradation from interference is small, generally 1 km or less from an LPFM antenna site. This interference analysis is shown in the following table: LPFM Potential Interference Radius Receiver Category Desired Signal Level -45 dBm -55 dBm -65 dBm Clock 0.3 km 0.7 km 2.1 km Portable 1.0 km 0.9 km 1.0 km Personal 0.4 km 0.5 km 0.5 km Further, we believe that this analysis provides a conservative estimate of actual interference potential of LPFM given NAB's performance criteria and the fact that NAB's sample included some of the poorer performing radios among the four studies. In addition, as pointed out by Rappaport and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/Radio_Cutoffs/pnmm9217.doc
  • V Haat: 57 M BPED -981230MA NEW Flagler Beach FL Broadcasting for the Challenged, Inc. REQ: 91.100 MHz; Channel No. 216A H Erp: KW; H Haat: M V Erp: 2. KW; V Haat: 15 M BPED -990104MP NEW Palm Coast FL Central Florida Educational Foundation, Inc. REQ: 91.100 MHz; Channel No. 216A H Erp: KW; H Haat: M V Erp: 2.1 KW; V Haat: 53 M BPED -990105MB NEW Imlay City MI Michigan Community Radio REQ: 89.100 MHz; Channel No. 206A H Erp: 6. KW; H Haat: 74 M V Erp: 6. KW; V Haat: 74 M - 2 - BPED -990510MA NEW Speaker Twp. MI Speaker Radio REQ: 89.700 MHz; Channel No. 209A H Erp: .175 KW; H Haat: 37
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.wp
  • prior to commencing their operations. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106, international footnote S5.396 (formerly 751B). The Amateur Radio Service is a radiocommunication service for the purpose of self-training, intercommunication 12 and technical investigations carried out by amateurs, that is, by duly authorized persons interested in radio technique solely with a personal aim and without pecuniary interest. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. During the reallocation process, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration ("NTIA") 13 recommended the following constraints: (1) the 2300-2310 MHz band must not be used for airborne or space-to-Earth links; (2) commercial operations at 2300-2310 MHz must be limited to less than one watt of power; (3) unwanted emission levels of commercial applications on any frequency below 2300 MHz must
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Agenda/2002/ag021107.html
  • OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY TITLE: Amendment of Part 2 of the Commissions Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems (ET Docket No. 00-258). SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Second Report and Order that would allocate spectrum in the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz bands that can be used to provide advanced wireless services (AWS), such as those services commonly identified as 3G or IMT-2000. 5 WIRELESS TELE-COMMUNICATIONS TITLE: Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands. SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking concerning service rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp35.pdf
  • - EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS..................................9 3. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN.......................................................................14 3.1 Treatment Variables.......................................................................................................................14 3.2 Experiment Institution...................................................................................................................17 3.3 Performance Measures...................................................................................................................22 4.0 EXPERIMENT RESULTS.........................................................................26 4.1 Economic Efficiency........................................................................................................................27 4.2 Buyer's Bargaining Power.............................................................................................................28 4.3 Buyer Surplus..................................................................................................................................34 4.4 Seller Profits and Losses.................................................................................................................36 4.5 Regression Analysis � CAP MFN Treatment Data......................................................................40 5.0 CONCLUDING COMMENTS....................................................................49 APPENDIX A: ECONOMIC THEORY................................................................53 A.1 Traditional Oligopsony/Oligopoly Theory....................................................................................53 A.2 Some Solutions Based on Cooperative Game Theory..................................................................54 A.2.1 The "Nash Bargaining" Solution..............................................................................................56 A.2.2 The "Shapley Value" Solution..................................................................................................56 A.2.3 The "Core" Solution..................................................................................................................57 A.3 Illustration of the Cooperative Solutions for a Symmetric Bargaining Game...........................58 A.4 Cooperative Solutions in the Non-Symmetric Bargaining Game...............................................60 A.5 Altering the Bargaining Game.......................................................................................................64 A.5.1 No Capacity Constraints...........................................................................................................64 A.5.2 Avoidability and Unavoidability of Costs.................................................................................66 A.6 Some Caveats in Interpreting the Cooperative Solutions............................................................68 ii A.7 Testing the Theoretical
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210101-1.pdf
  • people with disabili- ties by fostering the development, adaptation, and broad use of innovations in communication technology. Now in its second year, the company has invested over $500,000 on this program. 3 See United States Architecture and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, Telecommunications Access Advisory Committee, ACCESS TO TELECOMMJ- NICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND CUSTOMER PREMISES EQUIPMENT BY INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES, Final Report ll2.1 (January 1997). 4 Examples of recent Ameritech Pioneers activities include: The Cabins in the Woods. Working with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, the Pioneers have funded and built three cabins, which are fully accessible to people with physical disabilities, so that they can enjoy some time in a natural setting. Sports Jamboree for the Physically Challenged. Each year Ameritech
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Factsheets/tribal_lands_fact_sheet.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Factsheets/tribal_lands_fact_sheet.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Factsheets/tribal_lands_fact_sheet.txt
  • authorities, an additional reduction in a qualified subscriber's local phone bill of up to $3.50 per month in certain states. Thus, the maximum, federal lifeline assistance support per month for any subscriber is $7.00. These two programs amount to approximately $550 million a year. - $500 million for Lifeline; $50 million for Link Up. 5.3 million Americans receive Lifeline service; 2.1 million Americans receive Link Up service. These programs are part of the Universal Service Fund, and funding is assessed on carriers' interstate and international end-user telecommunications revenues. CHANGES TO CURRENT PROGRAMS The order increases the discount off the local phone bill that eligible low-income consumers on tribal lands can receive under the current federal Lifeline program by $25. Under the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99333.doc
  • Rules and Policies for Local Multipoint Distribution Service and for Fixed Satellite Services, 11 FCC Rcd. 19005 (1996). See DEMS MO&O, supra at 5. Radionavigation is a service used to determine the position, velocity and/or other characteristics of an object, through the use of propagation properties of radio waves for purposes of navigation (e.g., obstruction warning). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. See Reallocation Order, supra, 12 FCC Rcd 3471. See 47 C.F.R. � 101. See Reallocation Order, supra at 3480-81 (Appendix A). See 47 C.F.R. � 2. Reallocation Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 3473, � 6 (footnote omitted): On March 5, 1997, [the Commission] received a . . . letter from NTIA [National Telecommunications and Information Administration] making the [24 GHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00063.doc
  • Service (Other Than Broadcast), File No. 0314-EX-PL-1999, filed Dec. 1, 1999. Global Frontiers Petition for Rulemaking at 10-11. 47 C.F.R. � 26.101(a). 47 C.F.R. � 26.209(a). Table of Frequency Allocations, 47 C.F.R. � 2.106, international footnote S5.442. The aeronautical mobile service is defined as a mobile service between aeronautical stations and aircraft stations, or between aircraft stations. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c). Footnote S5.442 also limits the sub-band 4825-4835 MHz to the mobile, except aeronautical mobile, service. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.105(c)(2) (setting forth restrictions for secondary services). Per international footnote S5.443, in Argentina, Australia, and Canada, the allocation of the sub-bands 4825-4835 MHz and 4950-4990 MHz to the radio astronomy service is on a primary basis. Table of Frequency Allocations, 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.wp
  • at 13; NPSTC Comments at 10. 56 See California Comments at para. 41. 57 See Ericsson Comments at 4; California Comments at paras. 5, and 19. 58 See e.g. Comments of NPSTC at 10; FLEWUG Comments at 9. 59 See, e.g., National Plan Report and Order, 3 FCC Rcd at 907; PSWAC Final Report at 18. 60 See key finding 2.1.1 of the PSWAC Final Report at 18. 15 3. Types of Communications 22. In order to successfully perform their missions in the modern world, public safety entities must rely on a forward-looking spectrum policy that promotes beneficial technological advances into their communications systems.51 When the Commission last allocated spectrum for public safety in 1987 it acknowledged the need for both
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da991200.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da991200.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da991200.txt
  • colloquially referred to as the WTO Basic Telecom Agreement, though they are not technically contained in a stand-alone agreement. See Bell Atlantic-NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT-MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. at 41,558 �� 2.1, 2.2 (``Guidelines''). See Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (Revised, April 8, 1997) (``1997 Revised Guidelines''). Application at Exhibit 3. AirTouch Communications, AirTouch Factbook: Mid-Year 1998, at 2-3. AirTouch also holds minority investment interests in Globalstar, a satellite-based mobile phone system; in QUALCOMM, a U.S.-based telecommunications equipment manufacturer; and in IDC,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da991677.doc
  • Order, 12 FCC Rcd. at 20,001, 20,007, �� 29, 36; BT-MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd. at 15,367, � 33. See Bell Atlantic-NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT-MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd. at 15,368, � 35. Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. at 41,558 �� 2.1, 2.2 (``Guidelines''). See Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (Revised, April 8, 1997) (``1997 Revised Guidelines''). Transfer Application, Exhibit 1, at 10. See In re Application of 360� Communications Company and ALLTEL Corporation, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 98-2637, at � 14 (WTB, rel. Dec. 30, 1998). Transfer Application, Exhibit 1,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992417.doc
  • from a recent inspection and survey of the facilities. With respect to Station WMM450 the latitude coordinates were changed by one second, the ground elevation was changed by 2.8 meters and the overall antenna structure height was increased by 1.2 meters. With respect to Station WML366, the ground elevation was changed by 0.6 meters and antenna structure height increased by 2.1 meters. The antenna center line height did not change at either station. . Effective January 8, 1998, the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch granted modified authorizations for Stations WMM450 and WML366 with secondary status condition on the licenses. Prior to this time, Stations WMM450 and WML366 were authorized to operate on a primary basis. On February 9, 1998, 360� Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da993009.doc
  • produce competitive telecommunications markets. See AT&T Corporation, et al. v. Iowa Utils. Bd., 119 S. Ct. 721, 724 (1999). See Bell Atlantic-NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT-MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission 57 Fed. Reg. at 41,558 �� 2.1, 2.2 (``Guidelines''). See Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (Revised, April 8, 1997) (``1997 Revised Guidelines''). 47 C.F.R. � 20.6. 47 C.F.R. � 22.942. At the time these applications were field, Vodafone and CommNet had ownership interests in the two cellular licensees in the Wichita, Kansas MSA. Vodafone AirTouch controls the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.wp
  • shares retained by PRTA will be transferred to a newly created government instrumentality organized as a subsidiary of the Government Development Bank of Puerto Rico. Id. at 13 n.13. For convenience, we refer to this future entity as "PRTA." 24 Id. at 4. 25 Id. at 4 n.5; GTE Holdings, February 5, 1999 Letter at 2; see Shareholders Agreement, � 2.1 (filed as an Attachment to the GTE Holdings, February 5, 1999 Letter). GTE Holdings states that it intends to name the chief executive officer of PRTC. Radio License Applications at 4. GTE Holdings' power is, however, limited by provisions requiring unanimous consent of the directors named by PRTA or approval by PRTA for certain major actions or actions directly affecting
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000721.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000721.txt
  • These include but may extend beyond factors relating to cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. See also, Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997). These include, in this case, mobile voice services, mobile data services, and messaging services. Applications at 9. These markets are cellular service areas, as follows: Phoenix, Tucson, Tucson unserved, Albuquerque and Arizona-2. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 22.942. Applications at 9. DOJ also requires that the Applicants divest these licenses
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000730.pdf
  • These include but may extend beyond factors relating to cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. See also Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997). 83 With respect to the provision of commercial communications services, VoiceStream, through its subsidiaries, also holds local multipoint distribution service ("LMDS") and specialized mobile radio ("SMR") licenses. See Public Interest Statement at 2. No competitive issues are raised with respect to these licenses, however, because Aerial does not hold
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000925.doc
  • These include but may extend beyond factors relating to cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. See also Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997) (``Merger Guidelines''). The petitions of Mobile Phone and TeleTouch and the comments of Metrocall address only Applicants' request for a waiver of the narrowband PCS ownership restriction. Public Interest Statement at 11, 19. Paging Network To Miss Interest Payments, Dow Jones News Service, Jan. 27, 2000. The Strategis Group,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001765.doc
  • at � 30, n. 82 (citing Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35); Bell Atlantic/Vodafone AirTouch Order, 2000 WL 332670, at � 25, n. 49 (same). See also, Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997). Public Interest Statement at 2. See Geotek Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 802-803, �� 26-27. Pittencrieff Communications, Inc., Transferor, and Nextel Communications, Inc., Transferee, For Consent to Transfer Control of Pittencrieff Communications, Inc. and its Subsidiaries, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 8935, 8946, 8948, 8953, �� 24,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001907.doc
  • 2. See also 47 C.F.R. � 19.61 (1958). 47 C.F.R. � 19.61(a) (1958). Id. See also Revision of Operating Rules for Class D Stations in the Citizens Radio Service, First Report and Order, Docket No. 20210, 54 FCC 2d 841 (1975) (maintaining prohibition against communication with an amateur radio station, an unlicensed station, or foreign stations). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. The international Radio Regulations provide that stations in the Fixed and Mobile services, except aeronautical mobile, may be licensed in the the frequency segment segment 26.96-27.41 MHz in ITU Regions 1 and 3. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. Comments of NAB at 1-2. ``Illegal transmissions'' as the term is used by NAB, refers to CB
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da002223.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da002223.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da002223.txt
  • These include but may extend beyond factors relating to cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. See also, Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997) (``DOJ Horizontal Merger Guidelines''). See, generally, Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions with Respect to Commercial Mobile Services, Fifth Report, FCC 00-289, 2000 WL 1166196 (F.C.C.) (Aug. 18, 2000). 47 C.F.R. � 22.942. 47 C.F.R. � 20.6. For example, in the Houma-Thibodaux, Louisiana cellular market, SBC owns
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da002239.doc
  • identification of market participants and analysis of market structure, market concentration, and potential entry. These include but may extend beyond factors relating to cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20014 � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15368 � 35. See also Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4. For example, the Commission has granted the following microwave licenses in the Gulf: Union Oil Company of California, WPQS652, File No. 0000108919 (Sept. 21, 2000); Coastal Product Service, WPQS632, File No. 0000117254 (Sept. 21, 2000); Petroleum Communications, Inc., WPQR754, File No. 0000163392 (Sept. 6, 2000); Vastar Resources, Inc., WPON831, File No. 0000055157 (Apr. 21, 2000). See Opposition at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da002443.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da002443.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da002443.txt
  • These include but may extend beyond factors relating to cost reductions, productivity enhancements, or improved incentives for innovation. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35). See also, Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997). With respect to the provision of commercial communications services, TeleCorp, through its subsidiaries also holds LMDS licenses. See Public Interest Statement at 5. TeleCorp, through other affiliates, also recently obtained 39 GHz licenses. See The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Announces the Grant of 1961 License to Operate in the 39
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00053.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00053.txt
  • colloquially referred to as the WTO Basic Telecom Agreement, though they are not technically contained in a stand-alone agreement. See Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20,014, � 49; BT/MCI Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,368, � 35. Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. at 41,558 �� 2.1, 2.2. See Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (Revised, April 8, 1997). VoiceStream/Omnipoint Public Interest Statement at 1. We do not further discuss competitive issues regarding these LMDS licenses because Omnipoint is neither a local exchange carrier nor a multi-channel video programming distributor (cable operator). See generally �� 20.6(d) and 22.942(d).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00188.doc
  • not be limited to, call records for specific ground stations including abnormal terminations and information regarding channel usage. Records of such information must be retained for at least 30 days. Harmful interference. Harmful interference, for the purpose of this condition, is defined as the serious degradation, obstruction, or repeated interruption of cellular service. See definition of "harmful interference" in section 2.1 of the Commission's rules (47 C.F.R. � 2.1). Any cellular licensee providing cellular service to airborne terminals must immediately take action to resolve any instance of harmful interference, where factual evidence (e.g., time of incident and channel coincide) shows that the instance is likely to have occurred as a result of the operation of ground stations or airborne terminals under
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00264.doc
  • 47 U.S.C. � 305; 47 U.S.C. �� 901-904 (NTIA Organization Act). Section 305 of the Act grants NTIA exclusive authority over "radio stations belonging to and operated by the United States" and requires these stations to use frequencies assigned by NTIA. See also Federal Spectrum Management Processes Report, Public Safety Wireless Network, at 3-8 (September 1998). See NTIA Manual �� 2.1-2.3 (Telecommunications Policy). ``Telecommunications policies are made by the Congress, by the Court, by the President, and the [NTIA] with respect to the agencies and establishments of the Federal Government . . .'' Id. at � 2.2. In this connection, we observed that there may be benefits to providing for the adoption of a single, "blanket" authorization that would confer NTIA's
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2001/fcc01256.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2001/fcc01256.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2001/fcc01256.txt
  • examine a number of actions we might take to remove unnecessary regulatory barriers to the development of more robust secondary markets in radio spectrum usage rights. Notice of Proposed Rule Making, supra n.18, at � 1. In the Matter of Amendment of Parts 21, 43, 74, 78, and 94 of the Commission's Rules Governing Use of the Frequencies in the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz Bands Affecting Private Operational Fixed Microwave Service, Multipoint Distribution Service, Instructional Television Fixed Service & Cable Television Relay Service, 10 FCC Rcd 7074 (1995). See Declaratory Ruling and Order, supra n.14; and Public Notice, supra n.15. See Two-Way Order, supra n.16, 13 FCC Rcd at 19173. For a more complete description of the evolution of the flexible
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8062.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8062.wp
  • Op. 0000000262 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC MCWILLIE OK RO WSI661 06/11/1998 00454.47500 36-33-03.1 N 098-22-53.2 W 0000000263 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. THOMAS OK RO WSI675 06/11/1998 00454.50000 35-44-38.1 N 098-45-01.3 W 0000000264 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC MEDFORD OK RO WSI676 06/11/1998 00454.50000 36-47-49.1 N 097-42-00.1 W 0000000264 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC POND CREEK OK RO WSI676 06/11/1998 00454.50000 36-40-06.1 N 097-48-02.1 W 0000000265 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. DRUMMOND OK RO WSI677 06/11/1998 00454.60000 36-17-53.1 N 098-02-17.2 W 0000000265 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. LAHOMA OK RO WSI677 06/11/1998 00454.60000 36-23-33.1 N 098-01-58.2 W 0000000266 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. MOORELAND OK RO WSI680 06/11/1998 00454.45000 36-26-15.1 N 099-12-26.3 W 0000000266 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. WOODWARD OK RO WSI680 06/11/1998 00454.45000 36-23-20.1 N 099-20-37.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8065.pdf
  • 0000000420 WESTLINK OF NEW MEXICO LICENSEE CORP. BLOOMFIELD NM RO KKH476 06/19/1998 00152.84000 36-25-05.0 N 107-50-38.2 W 0000000420 WESTLINK OF NEW MEXICO LICENSEE CORP. BLOOMFIELD NM RO KKH476 06/19/1998 00152.84000 36-25-05.0 N 107-50-38.2 W 0000000421 WESTLINK OF NEW MEXICO LIC. CORPALBUQUERQUE NM RO KNKC30206/19/1998 00152.84000 35-07-53.1 N 106-35-23.0 W 0000000421 WESTLINK OF NEW MEXICO LIC. CORPALBUQUERQUE NM RO KNKC30206/19/1998 00454.45000 35-13-02.1 N 106-27-08.0 W 0000000421 WESTLINK OF NEW MEXICO LIC. CORPESPANOLA NM RO KNKC30206/19/1998 00152.84000 35-59-30.0 N 106-04-04.0 W 0000000421 WESTLINK OF NEW MEXICO LIC. CORPLAS VEGAS NM RO KNKC30206/19/1998 00152.84000 35-36-22.1 N 105-15-54.0 W 0000000421 WESTLINK OF NEW MEXICO LIC. CORPLOS ALAMOS NM RO KNKC30206/19/1998 00152.84000 35-52-47.0 N 106-18-05.0 W 0000000421 WESTLINK OF NEW MEXICO LIC. CORPSANTA FE NM RO
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8087.pdf
  • N 083-10-35.7 W CD - Paging and Radiotelephone File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) Latitude Longitude Area Op. 0000001193 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.MIDLAND MI RM KNKO29406/30/1998 00931.33750 43-37-09.0 N 084-12-57.9 W 0000001193 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.MIDLAND MI RM KNKO29406/30/1998 00931.33750 43-38-06.0 N 084-15-35.9 W 0000001193 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.MILAN MI RM KNKO29406/30/1998 00931.33750 42-02-02.1 N 083-41-06.7 W 0000001193 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.MILFORD MI RM KNKO29406/30/1998 00931.33750 42-33-38.1 N 083-34-16.7 W 0000001193 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.MILFORD MI RM KNKO29406/30/1998 00931.33750 42-39-38.1 N 083-32-11.7 W 0000001193 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.MT. CLEMENS MI RM KNKO29406/30/1998 00931.33750 42-32-39.1 N 082-54-08.7 W 0000001193 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.MT. PLEASANT MI RM KNKO29406/30/1998 00931.33750 43-33-38.1 N 084-46-18.0 W 0000001193 AMERITECH MOBILE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8103.pdf
  • ANGELES, INC SADDLE PEAK CA MD KNKE86205/19/1998 00931.46250 34-04-35.0 N 118-39-30.3 W 0000001505 PAGING NETWORK OF LOS ANGELES, INC SADDLE PEAK CA MD KNKE86205/19/1998 00931.68750 34-04-35.0 N 118-39-30.3 W 0000001505 PAGING NETWORK OF LOS ANGELES, INC SADDLE PEAK CA MD KNKE86205/19/1998 00931.78750 34-04-35.0 N 118-39-30.3 W 0000001505 PAGING NETWORK OF LOS ANGELES, INC SAN BERNARDINOCA MD KNKE86205/19/1998 00931.18750 34-11-26.0 N 117-06-02.1 W 0000001505 PAGING NETWORK OF LOS ANGELES, INC SAN BERNARDINOCA MD KNKE86205/19/1998 00931.31250 34-11-26.0 N 117-06-02.1 W 0000001505 PAGING NETWORK OF LOS ANGELES, INC SAN BERNARDINOCA MD KNKE86205/19/1998 00931.38750 34-11-26.0 N 117-06-02.1 W 0000001505 PAGING NETWORK OF LOS ANGELES, INC SAN BERNARDINOCA MD KNKE86205/19/1998 00931.78750 34-11-26.0 N 117-06-02.1 W 0000001505 PAGING NETWORK OF LOS ANGELES, INC SAN CLEMENTE CA MD
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8152.pdf
  • GTE CALIFORNIA INC 00158.10000 GTE CALIFORNIA INC 00459.02500 BOWLING 41-22-32.0 N RIDGECREST 35-36-50.8 N TRONA 35-45-56.8 N VICTORVILLE 34-36-36.9 N VICTORVILLE 34-36-36.9 N VICTORVILLE 34-36-36.9 N OXNARD 34-1 l-32.0 N BARSTOW 34-54-04.9 N BARSTOW 35-14-18.9 N OH 083-38-35.0 W CA 117-40-04.2 W CA 117-22-14.2 W CA 117-17-17.1 w CA 117-l 7-l 7.1 w CA 117-17-17.1 w CA 119-10-50.3 w CA 117-02-02.1 W CA 116-44-42.1 W MD RO RO RO RO RO RO RO RO Page 1 I CD - Paging and Radiotelephone File Number Applicant Name Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) City Latitude Purpose Area Op. RO KNKJ267 RO KNKJ267 RO KNKJ267 RO KNKJ267 RO KNKJ267 RQ In KNKJ267 RO KNKJ267 RO KNKJ267 RO KNKJ267 RO KNKJ267 RO KNKJ267 RO
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9060.pdf
  • N 088-09-06.0 W 0000005497 AMERICAN MOBILPHONE PAGING, INC.PASCAGOULA MS RO KNKI93703/02/1999 00158.10000 30-26-54.7 N 088-33-05.0 W 0000005498 TELE-SERV SPOKANE WA RO WQZ51303/02/1999 00454.30000 47-37-12.6 N 116-59-24.6 W 0000005499 TELE-SERV SPOKANE WA RO WQZ59403/02/1999 00454.25000 47-41-40.6 N 117-20-04.7 W 0000005501 ACTION COMMUNICATION, INC. GILLETTE WY RO KNKD76203/02/1999 00454.30000 44-17-01.9 N 105-31-02.9 W 0000005512 CONTACT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. MESA AZ RO KNKG44003/03/1999 00931.71250 33-26-02.1 N 111-50-31.5 W 0000005512 CONTACT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PHOENIX AZ RO KNKG44003/03/1999 00072.54000 33-20-00.1 N 112-03-47.5 W 0000005512 CONTACT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PHOENIX AZ RO KNKG44003/03/1999 00931.71250 33-20-00.1 N 112-03-47.5 W 0000005512 CONTACT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PHOENIX AZ RO KNKG44003/03/1999 00931.71250 33-35-39.1 N 112-05-14.5 W Page 12 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9066.pdf
  • ANGELES, INC SADDLE PEAK CA RO KNKE86203/01/1999 00931.68750 34-04-35.0 N 118-39-30.3 W 0000005221 PAGING NETWORK OF LOS ANGELES, INC SADDLE PEAK CA RO KNKE86203/01/1999 00931.78750 34-04-35.0 N 118-39-30.3 W 0000005221 PAGING NETWORK OF LOS ANGELES, INC SADDLE PEAK CA RO KNKE86203/01/1999 00931.31250 34-04-35.0 N 119-39-30.4 W 0000005221 PAGING NETWORK OF LOS ANGELES, INC SAN BERNARDINOCA RO KNKE86203/01/1999 00931.18750 34-11-26.0 N 117-06-02.1 W 0000005221 PAGING NETWORK OF LOS ANGELES, INC SAN BERNARDINOCA RO KNKE86203/01/1999 00931.18750 34-11-26.0 N 117-06-02.1 W 0000005221 PAGING NETWORK OF LOS ANGELES, INC SAN BERNARDINOCA RO KNKE86203/01/1999 00931.31250 34-11-26.0 N 117-06-02.1 W 0000005221 PAGING NETWORK OF LOS ANGELES, INC SAN BERNARDINOCA RO KNKE86203/01/1999 00931.31250 34-11-26.0 N 117-06-02.1 W 0000005221 PAGING NETWORK OF LOS ANGELES, INC SAN BERNARDINOCA RO KNKE86203/01/1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9078.pdf
  • CD - Paging and Radiotelephone File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) Latitude Longitude Area Op. 0000009305 RING 10 INC. BARTLETT NE RM KNKO45603/30/1999 00454.40000 41-52-57.0 N 098-33-04.2 W 0000009305 RING 10 INC. BARTLETT NE RM KNKO45603/30/1999 00454.60000 41-52-57.0 N 098-33-04.2 W 0000009316 SPECTRUM COMMUNICATIONS, INC ANACONDA MT RM KKB496 03/30/1999 00152.24000 46-06-02.7 N 112-57-02.1 W 0000009316 SPECTRUM COMMUNICATIONS, INC BUTTE MT RM KKB496 03/30/1999 00152.24000 45-46-18.7 N 112-29-45.0 W 0000009316 SPECTRUM COMMUNICATIONS, INC BUTTE MT RM KKB496 03/30/1999 00152.24000 45-59-57.7 N 112-30-58.0 W 0000009316 SPECTRUM COMMUNICATIONS, INC BUTTE MT RM KKB496 03/30/1999 00152.24000 45-59-57.7 N 112-30-58.0 W 0000009316 SPECTRUM COMMUNICATIONS, INC BUTTE MT RM KKB496 03/30/1999 00152.24000 46-00-46.7 N 112-32-12.0 W 0000009325 TREASURE STATE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9081.pdf
  • OH RM KNKL98303/17/1999 00454.45000 39-30-46.1 N 084-45-38.8 W 0000008018 PAGE PLUS INCORPORATED SPRINGFIELD OH RM KNKL98303/17/1999 00454.45000 39-56-09.2 N 083-48-43.7 W 0000008018 PAGE PLUS INCORPORATED TAYLOR MILL KY RM KNKL98303/17/1999 00454.45000 39-01-49.2 N 084-30-21.7 W 0000008018 PAGE PLUS INCORPORATED WASH. COURT HOUSE OH RM KNKL98303/17/1999 00454.45000 39-30-53.2 N 083-24-39.7 W 0000008018 PAGE PLUS INCORPORATED WEST HARRISON IN RM KNKL98303/17/1999 00454.45000 39-15-02.1 N 084-50-09.8 W 0000008019 PAGE PLUS INCORPORATED WEST CHESTER OH RM KNKM98003/17/1999 00152.57000 39-20-50.2 N 084-23-21.7 W 0000008020 PAGE PLUS INCORPORATED GREENHILLS OH RM KNKO43903/17/1999 00454.62500 39-16-24.2 N 084-31-36.8 W 0000008021 PAGE PLUS INCORPORATED DAYTON OH RM KNKM38803/17/1999 00454.45000 39-43-16.2 N 084-14-59.7 W 0000008022 PAGE PLUS INCORPORATED GREENHILLS OH RM KNKO95103/17/1999 00454.17500 39-16-24.2 N 084-31-36.8 W 0000008023 PAGE PLUS INCORPORATED
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9101.pdf
  • W 0000011095 PORTA-PHONE PAGING LICENSEE CORP COCOA FL RO KUC869 03/31/1999 00152.24000 28-21-15.0 N 080-48-56.2 W 0000011095 PORTA-PHONE PAGING LICENSEE CORP INDIALANTIC FL RO KUC869 03/31/1999 00072.26000 28-05-54.0 N 080-34-07.1 W 0000011095 PORTA-PHONE PAGING LICENSEE CORP INDIALANTIC FL RO KUC869 03/31/1999 00152.24000 28-05-54.0 N 080-34-07.1 W 0000011095 PORTA-PHONE PAGING LICENSEE CORP PALM BAY FL RO KUC869 03/31/1999 00152.24000 28-01-52.0 N 080-36-02.1 W 0000011095 PORTA-PHONE PAGING LICENSEE CORP TITUSVILLE FL RO KUC869 03/31/1999 00152.24000 28-38-00.9 N 080-49-29.1 W 0000011096 PORTA-PHONE PAGING LICENSEE CORP. BAINBRIDGE GA RO KWT95503/31/1999 00158.70000 30-54-36.6 N 084-33-44.6 W 0000011096 PORTA-PHONE PAGING LICENSEE CORP. CAIRO GA RO KWT95503/31/1999 00158.70000 30-53-42.6 N 084-12-55.6 W Page 8 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9152.pdf
  • MOBILFONE KALISPELL MT RM KNKJ48305/28/1999 00152.66000 48-00-47.8 N 114-21-58.4 W 0000015699 RICHON INC. DBA MOBILFONE KALISPELL MT RM KNKJ48305/28/1999 00075.70000 48-10-33.8 N 114-20-56.4 W 0000015701 EUCLID TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INCEUCLID OH RM KQC880 06/03/1999 00152.21000 41-35-25.1 N 081-32-56.4 W 0000015701 EUCLID TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INCMAYFIELD HIEGHTSOH RM KQC880 06/03/1999 00152.21000 41-31-12.1 N 081-28-18.4 W 0000015701 EUCLID TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INCSEVEN HILLS OH RM KQC880 06/03/1999 00152.21000 41-22-02.1 N 081-39-40.4 W 0000015884 SCHUYLKILL MOBILE FONE INC W. HENFIELD TWSP.PA RO KGC229 06/30/1998 00152.57000 40-03-22.0 N 076-24-44.0 W CL - Cellular File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) Latitude Longitude Area Op. 0000015709 MICHIGAN RSA #9 L.P. (d/b/a CENTURYTEL WIRELESS, INC.) Montgomery MI MD KNKQ30306/21/1999 41-48-10.0 N 084-53-05.0 W 0000015720 Century Cellunet of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9158.pdf
  • Latitude Longitude Area Op. 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. SYOSSET NY RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00931.93750 40-49-19.3 N 073-28-48.4 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. TITUSVILLE FL RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00931.93750 28-35-47.9 N 080-49-09.1 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. TOLEDO OH RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00931.93750 41-39-01.1 N 083-32-05.7 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. TOLEDO OH RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00931.93750 41-39-01.1 N 083-32-05.7 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. TOLEDO OH RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00931.93750 41-39-02.1 N 083-32-04.7 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. TUCSON AZ RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00931.93750 32-13-20.2 N 110-58-16.3 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. TUCSON AZ RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00931.93750 32-14-56.2 N 111-07-01.3 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. VENTURA CA RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00928.88750 34-18-10.0 N 119-13-44.3 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. VENTURA CA RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00928.88750 34-18-10.0 N 119-13-44.3 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. VENTURA CA RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00931.93750 34-18-10.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9161.pdf
  • 081-35-48.4 W 0000016290 SKYTEL CORP. BRIDGEPORT CT RM KNKS22103/29/1999 00931.93750 41-10-42.3 N 073-11-16.4 W 0000016290 SKYTEL CORP. BRYAN TX RM KNKS22103/29/1999 00931.93750 30-39-37.7 N 096-25-01.8 W 0000016290 SKYTEL CORP. CASTLE ROCK CO RM KNKS22103/29/1999 00931.93750 39-16-37.9 N 104-48-26.9 W 0000016290 SKYTEL CORP. CEDAR RAPIDS IA RM KNKS22103/29/1999 00931.93750 41-57-09.0 N 091-41-00.6 W 0000016290 SKYTEL CORP. COLUMBIA MO RM KNKS22103/29/1999 00931.93750 38-58-02.1 N 092-19-25.6 W Page 8 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) Latitude Longitude Area Op. 0000016290 SKYTEL CORP. EAST EDDINGTON ME RM KNKS22103/29/1999 00931.93750 44-45-36.2 N 068-33-57.1 W 0000016290 SKYTEL CORP. FAYETTEVILLE AR RM KNKS22103/29/1999 00931.93750 36-01-08.2 N 094-13-12.7 W 0000016290 SKYTEL CORP. FRENCH LICK IN RM KNKS22103/29/1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9186.pdf
  • CO. WASHINGTON IA RO KNKC96506/29/1998 00454.47500 41-23-13.0 N 091-42-01.6 W 0000017204 WABASH TELEPHONE COOPERATIVEDAHLGREN IL RO KNKI63307/01/1998 00152.84000 38-11-45.1 N 088-40-51.2 W 0000017204 WABASH TELEPHONE COOPERATIVEMT. VERNON IL RO KNKI63307/01/1998 00152.84000 38-19-55.1 N 088-54-35.2 W 0000017205 WABASH TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. CISNE IL RO KNKM71907/01/1998 00152.54000 38-30-58.1 N 088-26-11.1 W 0000017206 WABASH TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. EFFINGHAM IL RO KPD773 07/01/1998 00152.84000 39-07-02.1 N 088-32-05.1 W 0000017206 WABASH TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. GEFF IL RO KPD773 07/01/1998 00152.84000 38-24-14.1 N 088-22-04.1 W 0000017206 WABASH TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. GEFF IL RO KPD773 07/01/1998 00152.84000 38-24-14.1 N 088-22-04.1 W Page 2 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) Latitude Longitude Area Op. 0000017206 WABASH TELEPHONE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9217.pdf
  • may be filed no later than 10 days after the original objection is filed. Responses to the opposition may be filed no later than 5 days after the time for filing an opposition has expired. A Apppplliiccaanntt FFiillee N Nuum mbbeerr C CoooorrddiinnaatteessD Daattee R Reecc''dd BellSouth Mobility Inc. A0093771 31-22-55 / 89-22-39.9 8/26/99 BellSouth Mobility Inc. A0093509 30-5-41.8 / 90-38-2.1 8/24/99 SBA Towers, Inc. A0093695 35-43-38.6/ 79-13-13.7 8/26/99 SNET Cellular Inc. A0093298 41-49-25.2/ 71-27-58 8/23/99 Unisite A0094047 40-56-5.0 / 75-0-22 7/15/99 Unisite A0094048 40-14-58 / 74-20-29 7/15/99 Unisite A0094049 40-55-25 / 74-51-54 7/15/99 -FCC-
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9244.pdf
  • 0000027017 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC. CELLULAR ONE ASHKUM IL RO KNKN32809/21/1999 40-52-55.1 N 088-00-16.2 W 0000027017 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC. CELLULAR ONE ASHKUM IL RO KNKN32809/21/1999 40-52-55.1 N 088-00-16.2 W 0000027017 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC. CELLULAR ONE ASHKUM IL RO KNKN32809/21/1999 40-52-55.1 N 088-00-16.2 W 0000027017 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC. CELLULAR ONE Chatsworth IL RO KNKN32809/21/1999 40-45-02.1 N 088-19-48.0 W 0000027017 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC. CELLULAR ONE DWIGHT IL RO KNKN32809/21/1999 41-03-57.0 N 088-24-00.0 W 0000027017 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC. CELLULAR ONE DWIGHT IL RO KNKN32809/21/1999 41-03-57.0 N 088-24-00.0 W 0000027017 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC. CELLULAR ONE DWIGHT IL RO KNKN32809/21/1999 41-03-57.0 N 088-24-00.0 W 0000027017 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC. CELLULAR ONE EARLVILLE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9250.pdf
  • N IL RM KNKH915 087-38-25.1 W 0000010561 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.CHICAGO 03/29/1999 00931.33750 41-52-56.1 N IL RM KNKH915 087-37-16.1 W 0000010561 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.CHICAGO 03/29/1999 00931.33750 41-53-32.1 N IL RM KNKH915 087-40-00.1 W 0000010561 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.CHICAGO 03/29/1999 00931.33750 41-55-23.1 N IL RM KNKH915 087-38-44.1 W 0000010561 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.CHICAGO 03/29/1999 00931.33750 41-57-17.1 N IL RM KNKH915 087-47-02.1 W 0000010561 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.CHICAGO RIDGE 03/29/1999 00931.33750 41-42-31.1 N IL RM KNKH915 088-45-16.3 W 0000010561 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.DE KALB 03/29/1999 00931.33750 41-52-33.1 N IL RM KNKH915 088-00-44.2 W 0000010561 AMERITECH MOBILE SERVICES, INC.DOWNERS GROVE 03/29/1999 00931.33750 41-50-04.1 N Page 15 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9261.pdf
  • HILO 1 g-42-02.0 N HILO 1 g-43-07.0 N LANAI CITY 20-50-33.6 N LANAI CITY 20-50-33.6 N HILO 1 g-43-06.0 N HILO 1 g-43-06.0 N STATEN ISLAND 40-35-49.3 N MANHATTAN 40-45-43.3 N BROOKLYN 40-40-40.3 N IL RO 088-08-25.2 W IL RO 088-08-25.2 W IL RO 088-05-57.2 W FL RO 081-57-06.2 W FL RO 082-01-35.3 W co RO 105-14-14.9 w HI RO 157-44-02.1 W HI RO 157-42-I 5.1 W HI RO 157-42-15.1 W HI RO 155-04-51 .o w HI RO 155-04-51 .o w HI RO 155-04-39.0 w HI RO 156-53-55.9 W HI RO 156-53-55.9 W HI RO 155-27-l 3.0 W HI RO 155-27-13.0 W NY RO 074-06-55.5 W NY RO 073-58-44.4 W NY RO 073-53-57.4 w Page 32 MW - Microwave Public Safety
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9311.pdf
  • CA AM WPNH824 115-59-10.9 W 9902357 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AIRTOUCH CELLULAR Cactus City 10/01/1999 06795.00000 33-39-18.0 N CA AM WPNH824 115-59-10.9 W 9902357 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AIRTOUCH CELLULAR Cactus City 10/01/1999 06855.00000 33-39-18.0 N CA AM WPNH824 115-59-10.9 W 9902357 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AIRTOUCH CELLULAR Cactus City 10/01/1999 10616.87500 33-39-18.0 N CA AM KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 9902405 GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATION RUNNING SPRINGS 10/05/1999 06197.20000 34-11-26.0 N CA AM KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 9902405 GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATION RUNNING SPRINGS 10/05/1999 06197.24000 34-11-26.0 N CA AM KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 9902405 GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATION RUNNING SPRINGS 10/05/1999 06226.89000 34-11-26.0 N CA AM KNL86 117-06-02.1 W 9902405 GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATION RUNNING SPRINGS 10/05/1999 06256.54000 34-11-26.0 N CA AM KNL86 117-06-02.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9320.pdf
  • 12/13/1999 02163.60000 42-16-53.1 N IL AM WLN820 089-09-22.4 W 0000037855 ROCKFORD MSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ROCKFORD 12/13/1999 06286.19000 42-16-53.1 N IL AM WLN820 089-09-22.4 W 0000037855 ROCKFORD MSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ROCKFORD 12/13/1999 06404.79000 42-16-53.1 N IL AM WLN820 089-09-22.4 W 0000037855 ROCKFORD MSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ROCKFORD 12/13/1999 06745.00000 42-16-53.1 N MO AM 094-35-02.4 W 0000042124 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 12/13/1999 19320.00000 39-06-02.1 N MO AM 094-35-02.4 W 0000042124 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 12/13/1999 19360.00000 39-06-02.1 N MO AM 094-35-02.4 W 0000042124 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 12/13/1999 22425.00000 39-06-02.1 N MO AM 094-35-02.4 W 0000042124 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 12/13/1999 22625.00000 39-06-02.1 N MO AM 094-35-02.4 W 0000042124 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 12/13/1999 22675.00000 39-06-02.1 N MO AM 094-35-02.4 W 0000042124 BACKLINK LLC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9328.pdf
  • ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANAHEIM 12/20/1999 18787.50000 33-48-43.1 N CA MD WLW352 117-53-58.2 W 0000060322 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANAHEIM 12/20/1999 19405.00000 33-48-43.1 N CA MD WMN823 117-55-22.2 W 0000060326 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANAHEIM 12/20/1999 10637.50000 33-49-15.1 N CA MD WMN823 117-55-22.2 W 0000060326 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANAHEIM 12/20/1999 17845.00000 33-49-15.1 N CA MD WMW750 117-02-02.1 W 0000060327 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BARSTOW 12/20/1999 10616.25000 34-54-03.9 N CA MD WMW750 117-02-02.1 W 0000060327 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BARSTOW 12/20/1999 10628.12500 34-54-03.9 N NV MD WPNL634 114-34-43.0 W 0000060329 GCC License L.L.C. PIOCHE 12/20/1999 06169.37500 37-53-37.9 N NV MD WPNL634 114-34-43.0 W 0000060329 GCC License L.L.C. PIOCHE 12/20/1999 06397.99500 37-53-37.9 N CA MD WLU203 117-03-01.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0003.pdf
  • PUBLIC SERVICE COMEREDOSIA 12/27/1999 06725.00000 39-49-13.1 N IL RO KSE41 090-33-58.4 W 0000062760 CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMEREDOSIA 12/27/1999 06755.00000 39-49-13.1 N Page 24 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL RO KSE49 087-39-35.0 W 0000062761 CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY HUTSONVILLE 12/27/1999 06745.00000 39-08-02.1 N IL RO KSI34 090-24-06.4 W 0000062762 CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY ROODHOUSE 12/27/1999 06585.00000 39-29-11.1 N IL RO KSI34 090-24-06.4 W 0000062762 CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY ROODHOUSE 12/27/1999 06595.00000 39-29-11.1 N IL RO KSI35 090-19-16.4 W 0000062763 CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY JERSEYVILLE 12/27/1999 06745.00000 39-07-24.1 N IL RO KSI35 090-19-16.4 W 0000062763 CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0015.pdf
  • 084-04-55.0 W 0000069288 NEW PAR LIMA 01/13/2000 06850.00000 40-50-58.0 N OH MD WLT571 084-04-55.0 W 0000069288 NEW PAR LIMA 01/13/2000 10558.75000 40-50-58.0 N TN MD WMQ436 083-09-22.6 W 0000069301 TENNESSEE RSA #4 SUB 2, INC. JIMTOWN 01/13/2000 02112.00000 35-58-03.4 N TN MD WMQ436 083-09-22.6 W 0000069301 TENNESSEE RSA #4 SUB 2, INC. JIMTOWN 01/13/2000 02128.00000 35-58-03.4 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0000069364 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 01/13/2000 02165.20000 46-01-33.2 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0000069364 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 01/13/2000 02168.40000 46-01-33.2 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0000069364 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 01/13/2000 06795.00000 46-01-33.2 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0000069364 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 01/13/2000 10618.12500 46-01-33.2 N
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0052.pdf
  • WinStar Wireless Fiber Corp. North Falmouth 02/24/2000 17880.00000 41-39-07.3 N MA NE 070-29-15.1 W 0000085156 WinStar Wireless Fiber Corp. Sandwich 02/24/2000 19440.00000 41-43-55.4 N TX NE 096-51-32.3 W 0000085173 KATLINK LLC DALLAS 02/24/2000 21225.00000 32-49-20.7 N TX NE 096-51-37.1 W 0000085174 KATLINK LLC DALLAS 02/24/2000 21575.00000 32-49-20.8 N MO NE 092-31-30.7 W 0000085197 Missouri RSA 11, Inc. California 02/24/2000 06835.00000 38-37-02.1 N MO NE 092-14-58.0 W 0000085200 Missouri RSA 11, Inc. Jefferson City 02/24/2000 06815.00000 38-35-37.0 N IL NE 088-58-15.3 W 0000085203 HLD Cellular Corporation MARION 02/24/2000 06738.12500 37-44-38.2 N IL NE 089-28-25.3 W 0000085211 HLD Cellular Corporation GORHAM 02/24/2000 06527.07500 37-41-04.2 N MA NE 071-02-59.0 W 0000085591 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc. BOSTON 02/25/2000 17825.00000 42-18-57.0 N MI NE 083-25-46.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0060.pdf
  • 108-45-30.5 W 0000089775 U S WEST Communications, Inc. POWELL 03/06/2000 06345.49000 44-45-19.8 N WY NE 108-45-30.5 W 0000089775 U S WEST Communications, Inc. POWELL 03/06/2000 06404.79000 44-45-19.8 N WA NE 120-54-51.0 W 0000089887 AT&T Wireless Services of Oregon, Inc.WISHRAM 03/06/2000 06286.19000 45-40-47.0 N WA NE 120-54-51.0 W 0000089887 AT&T Wireless Services of Oregon, Inc.WISHRAM 03/06/2000 06815.00000 45-40-47.0 N PA NE 075-09-02.1 W 0000089891 BACKLINK LLC PHILADELPHIA 03/06/2000 17920.00000 39-56-50.0 N PA NE 075-10-25.0 W 0000089892 BACKLINK LLC PHILADELPHIA 03/06/2000 19480.00000 39-53-28.5 N OR NE 121-05-32.0 W 0000089916 AT&T Wireless Services of Oregon, Inc.THE DALLES 03/06/2000 06034.15000 45-37-23.0 N OR NE 123-17-58.4 W 0000089926 AT&T Wireless Services of Oregon, Inc.DALLAS 03/06/2000 06785.62500 44-53-47.4 N OR NE 123-07-25.0 W 0000089937 AT&T Wireless Services
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0077.pdf
  • Power NEWARK 03/13/2000 06795.00000 40-01-47.2 N OH RM KQH66 082-22-20.5 W 0000097075 Ohio Power Company DBA American Electric Power NEWARK 03/13/2000 06815.00000 40-01-47.2 N OH RM KQH66 082-22-20.5 W 0000097075 Ohio Power Company DBA American Electric Power NEWARK 03/13/2000 06865.00000 40-01-47.2 N TX RM WNTB699 098-26-54.1 W 0000097097 Lower Colorado River Authority LLANO 03/22/2000 02136.40000 30-44-08.6 N IA RM WAH759 096-24-02.1 W 0000097791 NORTHWEST IOWA POWER COOPERATIVE HAWARDEN 10/01/1999 01855.00000 43-04-00.9 N IA RM WAH759 096-24-02.1 W 0000097791 NORTHWEST IOWA POWER COOPERATIVE HAWARDEN 10/01/1999 01965.00000 43-04-00.9 N IA RM WAH759 096-24-02.1 W 0000097791 NORTHWEST IOWA POWER COOPERATIVE HAWARDEN 10/01/1999 01975.00000 43-04-00.9 N IA RM WAH759 096-24-02.1 W 0000097791 NORTHWEST IOWA POWER COOPERATIVE HAWARDEN 10/01/1999 02144.40000 43-04-00.9 N MO RM WDC67 092-08-04.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0085.pdf
  • - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA NE 071-48-07.8 W 0000040597 BACKLINK, LLC Worcester 10/07/1999 22625.00000 42-15-51.0 N AZ NE 112-29-03.9 W 0000075297 Southwestco Wireless Limited PartnershipAshfork 01/24/2000 06636.25000 35-13-00.3 N MI NE 083-11-12.7 W 0000092878 Pathnet Inc. Wyandotte 03/28/2000 06197.24000 42-11-02.1 N MI NE 083-11-12.7 W 0000092878 Pathnet Inc. Wyandotte 03/28/2000 06197.24000 42-11-02.1 N MI NE 083-11-12.7 W 0000092878 Pathnet Inc. Wyandotte 03/28/2000 06256.54000 42-11-02.1 N MI NE 083-11-12.7 W 0000092878 Pathnet Inc. Wyandotte 03/28/2000 06256.54000 42-11-02.1 N MI NE 083-11-12.7 W 0000092878 Pathnet Inc. Wyandotte 03/28/2000 06286.19000 42-11-02.1 N MI NE 083-11-12.7 W 0000092878 Pathnet Inc. Wyandotte 03/28/2000 06315.84000 42-11-02.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0121.pdf
  • 087-52-47.7 W 0000080657 BACKLINK LLC Deerfield 05/05/2000 21725.00000 42-09-43.6 N IL AM 087-51-23.8 W 0000080658 BACKLINK LLC Northbrook 05/05/2000 19560.00000 42-08-24.3 N IL AM 087-51-23.8 W 0000080658 BACKLINK LLC Northbrook 05/05/2000 21225.00000 42-08-24.3 N IL AM 087-51-45.4 W 0000080659 BACKLINK LLC Northbrook 05/05/2000 19640.00000 42-08-20.9 N IL AM 087-51-45.4 W 0000080659 BACKLINK LLC Northbrook 05/05/2000 21625.00000 42-08-20.9 N PA AM 075-09-02.1 W 0000089891 BACKLINK LLC PHILADELPHIA 05/03/2000 17920.00000 39-56-50.0 N PA AM 075-10-25.0 W 0000089892 BACKLINK LLC PHILADELPHIA 05/03/2000 19480.00000 39-53-28.5 N CA AM WLT564 117-30-03.2 W 0000094439 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LYTLE CREEK 05/03/2000 02121.60000 34-12-49.0 N CA AM WLT564 117-30-03.2 W 0000094439 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LYTLE CREEK 05/03/2000 02128.00000 34-12-49.0 N Page 5 CF - Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0128.pdf
  • Inc. OFFSHORE 05/09/2000 00959.15000 29-19-37.2 N GM NE 088-24-33.0 W 0000125799 Vastar Resources Inc. Offshore 05/09/2000 00955.55000 29-14-27.0 N GM NE 093-08-55.5 W 0000125800 Vastar Resources Inc. Offshore 05/09/2000 00958.35000 29-35-34.8 N MS NE 088-58-04.0 W 0000125965 Mississippi Power Company BEAUMONT 05/09/2000 00932.25625 31-15-27.0 N MS NE 088-58-04.0 W 0000125965 Mississippi Power Company BEAUMONT 05/09/2000 00941.25625 31-15-27.0 N AZ NE 114-43-02.1 W 0000126009 Bose Corporation San Luis 05/09/2000 23125.00000 32-27-56.7 N MS NE 089-05-44.0 W 0000126081 Mississippi Power Company GULFPORT 05/09/2000 00932.35625 30-24-49.0 N MS NE 089-05-44.0 W 0000126081 Mississippi Power Company GULFPORT 05/09/2000 00941.35625 30-24-49.0 N CO NE 104-12-19.8 W 0000126598 Colorado Interstate Gas Co. (Wiggins) Wiggins 05/10/2000 06813.75000 40-13-44.9 N CO NE 104-12-19.8 W 0000126598 Colorado Interstate Gas Co.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0137.pdf
  • 0000130031 BACKLINK LLC Phoenix 05/15/2000 21225.00000 33-33-43.8 N AZ NE 112-06-55.0 W 0000130032 BACKLINK LLC Phoenix 05/15/2000 21425.00000 33-33-45.6 N AZ NE 112-07-37.3 W 0000130033 BACKLINK LLC Phoenix 05/15/2000 21625.00000 33-34-39.5 N CA NE 122-23-50.9 W 0000130034 BACKLINK LLC San Francisco 05/15/2000 17880.00000 37-47-21.9 N CA NE 122-23-21.9 W 0000130035 BACKLINK LLC San Francisco 05/15/2000 19440.00000 37-47-21.3 N CA NE 117-10-02.1 W 0000130037 BACKLINK LLC SAN DIEGO 05/15/2000 19640.00000 32-43-01.9 N PR NE 067-08-50.7 W 0000130062 LAMBDA OPERATIONS CORP AGUADA 05/15/2000 06034.15000 18-19-14.8 N PR NE 067-08-50.7 W 0000130062 LAMBDA OPERATIONS CORP AGUADA 05/15/2000 06063.80000 18-19-14.8 N MA NE 071-03-53.6 W 0000130152 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. Boston 05/15/2000 17920.00000 42-20-33.8 N MA NE 071-03-53.6 W 0000130152 Teligent License Company II,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0142.pdf
  • LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 21425.00000 32-54-06.2 N TX AM 096-46-08.8 W 0000100865 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 17840.00000 32-54-52.2 N Page 13 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX AM 096-46-08.8 W 0000100865 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 21275.00000 32-54-52.2 N TX AM 096-46-02.1 W 0000100866 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 17880.00000 32-54-49.9 N TX AM 096-46-02.1 W 0000100866 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 21575.00000 32-54-49.9 N TX AM 096-46-10.9 W 0000100867 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 18040.00000 32-54-53.4 N TX AM 096-46-10.9 W 0000100867 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 21725.00000 32-54-53.4 N TX AM 096-46-04.0 W 0000100868 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 17880.00000 32-55-21.1 N TX AM 096-46-04.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0194.pdf
  • COMPANY AUGUSTA 07/17/2000 00941.28125 39-21-02.4 N WV NE 078-45-16.1 W 0000189495 HAMPSHIRE GAS COMPANY KIRBY 07/17/2000 00932.25625 39-11-54.4 N WV NE 078-45-16.1 W 0000189495 HAMPSHIRE GAS COMPANY KIRBY 07/17/2000 00941.25625 39-11-54.4 N CA NE 118-15-46.0 W 0000189961 KTLA Inc Los Angeles 07/17/2000 22225.00000 34-03-01.0 N CA NE 118-18-57.0 W 0000189977 KTLA Inc Los Angeles 07/17/2000 23425.00000 34-05-48.0 N FL NE 080-02-02.1 W 0000190006 WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS CORPSINGER ISLAND 07/17/2000 18142.00000 - 18580.00000 26-47-07.2 N CA NE 119-10-00.4 W 0000190027 Kern County Superintendent of Schools Bakersfield 07/17/2000 06152.75000 35-22-29.9 N CA NE 119-45-46.5 W 0000190028 Kern County Superintendent of Schools Mckittrick 07/17/2000 06063.80000 35-17-30.9 N CA NE 119-45-46.5 W 0000190028 Kern County Superintendent of Schools Mckittrick 07/17/2000 06404.79000 35-17-30.9 N CA NE 120-21-06.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0200.pdf
  • N MO MD WPQN490 090-11-33.1 W 0000193355 KATLINK LLC ST. LOUIS 07/25/2000 21475.00000 38-37-42.2 N MO MD WPQN490 090-11-33.1 W 0000193355 KATLINK LLC ST. LOUIS 07/25/2000 21625.00000 38-37-42.2 N MO MD WPQN489 090-11-21.2 W 0000193356 KATLINK LLC ST LOUIS 07/25/2000 22825.00000 38-37-40.5 N MO MD WPQN487 090-11-36.7 W 0000193357 KATLINK LLC ST. LOUIS 07/25/2000 22675.00000 38-37-53.8 N MO MD WPQN488 090-11-02.1 W 0000193358 KATLINK LLC ST. LOUIS 07/25/2000 22525.00000 38-37-50.6 N WA MD WPON995 122-21-28.4 W 0000193444 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 07/25/2000 17920.00000 47-37-04.5 N Page 11 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WA MD WPON995 122-21-28.4 W 0000193444 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0211.pdf
  • 0000204140 KATLINK LLC SAN DIEGO 08/11/2000 21725.00000 32-45-50.0 N PA MD WPOM702 075-20-38.6 W 0000204146 BACKLINK LLC NORRISTOWN 08/11/2000 19640.00000 40-06-56.9 N PA MD WPOM702 075-20-38.6 W 0000204146 BACKLINK LLC NORRISTOWN 08/11/2000 21425.00000 40-06-56.9 N PA MD WPOM703 075-20-16.5 W 0000204147 BACKLINK LLC BRIDGEPORT 08/11/2000 22625.00000 40-06-26.3 N MO MD WPOM912 094-35-02.4 W 0000204150 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 08/11/2000 19320.00000 39-06-02.1 N MO MD WPOM912 094-35-02.4 W 0000204150 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 08/11/2000 19360.00000 39-06-02.1 N MO MD WPOM912 094-35-02.4 W 0000204150 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 08/11/2000 19440.00000 39-06-02.1 N MO MD WPOM912 094-35-02.4 W 0000204150 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 08/11/2000 22425.00000 39-06-02.1 N MO MD WPOM912 094-35-02.4 W 0000204150 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 08/11/2000 22625.00000 39-06-02.1 N MO MD WPOM912
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0216.pdf
  • 0000205556 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. PHOENIX 08/15/2000 11365.00000 33-30-32.1 N CA NE 118-26-27.5 W 0000205557 BACKLINK LLC Los Angeles 08/15/2000 18000.00000 34-02-29.0 N CA NE 118-24-40.4 W 0000205558 BACKLINK LLC Los Angeles 08/15/2000 17840.00000 34-03-33.9 N CA NE 118-26-32.5 W 0000205559 BACKLINK LLC Los Angeles 08/15/2000 17960.00000 34-02-52.5 N CA NE 118-23-33.9 W 0000205560 BACKLINK LLC Beverly Hills 08/15/2000 17880.00000 34-04-02.1 N AZ NE 112-04-11.5 W 0000205562 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. PHOENIX 08/15/2000 10715.00000 33-27-33.1 N AZ NE 112-01-40.5 W 0000205564 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. PHOENIX 08/15/2000 11215.00000 33-30-31.6 N AZ NE 112-04-32.5 W 0000205567 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. PHOENIX 08/15/2000 11605.00000 33-27-00.1 N CA NE 118-21-40.4 W 0000205569 BACKLINK LLC North Hollywood 08/15/2000 18040.00000 34-08-41.5 N CA NE 118-22-05.4 W
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0228.pdf
  • RM KNKN389 090-34-04.5 W 0000212805 IOWA RSA 5 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Long Grove 08/31/2000 41-43-11.1 N IA RM KNKN389 090-34-04.5 W 0000212805 IOWA RSA 5 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Long Grove 08/31/2000 41-43-11.1 N IA RM KNKN389 090-34-04.5 W 0000212805 IOWA RSA 5 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Long Grove 08/31/2000 41-43-11.1 N IA RM KNKN389 090-56-48.5 W 0000212805 IOWA RSA 5 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Lowden 08/31/2000 41-53-02.1 N Page 63 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IA RM KNKN389 090-39-29.5 W 0000212805 IOWA RSA 5 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MAQUOKETA 08/31/2000 42-02-52.1 N IA RM KNKN389 091-16-04.6 W 0000212805 IOWA RSA 5 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Mechanicsville 08/31/2000 41-53-39.0 N IA RM KNKN389 091-13-15.6 W 0000212805 IOWA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0236.pdf
  • 21775.00000 39-48-34.5 N DE MD WPOM737 075-32-40.3 W 0000215620 BACKLINK LLC WILMINGTON 09/07/2000 21775.00000 39-48-34.5 N CA MD WPOS938 117-08-56.0 W 0000215629 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SAN MARCOS 09/07/2000 17925.00000 33-08-25.1 N CA MD WMR584 117-16-57.1 W 0000215630 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC VISTA 09/07/2000 10642.50000 33-11-14.1 N CA MD WPNC967 117-03-36.1 W 0000215631 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC ESCONDIDO 09/07/2000 10623.12500 33-08-02.1 N DE MD WPOM733 075-32-36.4 W 0000215634 BACKLINK LLC WILMINGTON 09/07/2000 21575.00000 39-48-41.7 N Page 17 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Call Sign Longitude Receipt Date File Number Applicant Name Latitude DE MD 075-32-36.4 W 0000215634 WILMINGTON 09/07/2000 39-48-41.7 N DE WPOM735 075-32-35.8 W 0000215635 BACKLINK LLC WILMINGTON 09/07/2000 21375.00000 39-48-40.1 N DE MD WPOM735
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0239.pdf
  • Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC LA MESA 09/12/2000 10552.50000 32-46-07.4 N CA MD WLU305 117-01-52.2 W 0000217403 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC LA MESA 09/12/2000 10563.12500 32-46-07.4 N CA MD WLU305 117-01-52.2 W 0000217403 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC LA MESA 09/12/2000 10577.50000 32-46-07.4 N UT MD WPON843 113-52-56.9 W 0000217412 WWC License L.L.C. Saint George 09/12/2000 06600.62500 37-09-17.9 N CA MD WLU306 117-07-02.1 W 0000217418 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SAN DIEGO 09/12/2000 10617.50000 32-47-26.2 N CA MD WLN641 117-10-22.1 W 0000217419 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SAN DIEGO 09/12/2000 19425.00000 32-49-11.2 N CA MD WLN641 117-10-22.1 W 0000217419 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SAN DIEGO 09/12/2000 19445.00000 32-49-11.2 N CA MD WLN641 117-10-22.1 W 0000217419 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SAN DIEGO 09/12/2000 19485.00000 32-49-11.2 N
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0252.pdf
  • N Page 21 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City ME MD WMR346 068-27-08.1 W 0000229246 BANGOR CELLULAR TELEPHONE, L.P.DAVIDSON 09/28/2000 02171.60000 45-58-48.1 N ME MD WMR346 068-27-08.1 W 0000229246 BANGOR CELLULAR TELEPHONE, L.P.DAVIDSON 09/28/2000 10553.12500 45-58-48.1 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0000229251 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 09/28/2000 02168.40000 46-01-33.2 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0000229251 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 09/28/2000 06795.00000 46-01-33.2 N ME MD WMS772 068-15-02.1 W 0000229251 MAINE RSA #1, INC. ISLAND FALLS 09/28/2000 10618.12500 46-01-33.2 N CA MD WLT563 117-20-48.2 W 0000229303 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP COLTON 09/28/2000 05945.20000 34-02-15.0 N
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0265.pdf
  • N CA NE 117-18-13.2 W 0000238000 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC SAN BERNARDINO 10/12/2000 10725.00000 34-06-18.0 N CA NE 118-35-28.0 W 0000238001 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC BAKERSFIELD 10/12/2000 17865.00000 35-27-10.4 N CA NE 118-35-28.0 W 0000238001 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC BAKERSFIELD 10/12/2000 19385.00000 35-27-10.4 N CA NE 118-47-54.5 W 0000238004 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC EDISON 10/12/2000 19425.00000 35-18-39.3 N CA NE 122-17-02.1 W 0000238057 BACKLINK LLC Emeryville 10/12/2000 17760.00000 37-49-49.9 N CA NE 122-17-02.1 W 0000238057 BACKLINK LLC Emeryville 10/12/2000 17800.00000 37-49-49.9 N Page 38 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 122-17-02.1 W 0000238057 BACKLINK LLC Emeryville 10/12/2000 17840.00000 37-49-49.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc00289.pdf
  • by 2003 over 66 percent of all wireless subscribers will use SMS to send and receive messages, get information, make data inquiries, and schedule reservations.374 SMS is particularly popular in Europe. By April 1999, customers in the European Union were transmitting one billion short messages per month.375 Sonera (Finland) reports that by year-end 1999 more than 60 percent of its 2.1 million subscribers were using SMS and averaged 21 messages per month.376 367 Id. at 26. 368 Id. at 28. 369 Id. at 29. 370 Id. at 30. 371 Andrew M. Seybold, Short Messaging Service (SMS), MOTHERING MAGAZINE, June 25, 1999, available in 1999 WL 16633524. GSM networks permit messages of 160 characters, CDMA permits 256 characters, and iDEN allows 140
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc98091.pdf
  • through their existing broadband PCS, cellular, and SMR licenses. Third, customers can switch providers at low cost.264 Analysts note that the monthly churn265 in paging is higher than other segments of the wireless industry partially due to a lower up front investment. Churn in the paging industry was 2.8 percent at year-end 1996 compared to 1.5 percent for SMR and 2.1 percent for cellular.266 Fourth, as noted above, in response to competition, paging carriers have begun to transform themselves from "paging" carriers to "messaging" carriers. Finally, as noted in the Second Report, paging prices are quite low compared to other CMRS services.267 While there 260First Report, at 8867-68; Second Report, at 11305. 261Second Report, at 11305. 262Id. 263PageMart signed an agreement
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd021122.html
  • WCB [45]DA-02-3212A1.doc [46]DA-02-3212A1.pdf [47]DA-02-3212A1.txt BUFFALO SCHOOL DISTRICT 877, BUFFALO, MN. Dismissed Request for Waiver because it was untimely filed. (Dkt No. 96-45, 97-21). Action by: Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 11/21/2002 by ORDER. (DA No. 02-3211). WCB [48]DA-02-3211A1.doc [49]DA-02-3211A1.pdf [50]DA-02-3211A1.txt IN THE MATTER OF SERVICE RULES FOR ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICES IN THE 1.7 GHZ AND 2.1 GHZ BANDS. Proposed service rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands. (Dkt No. 02-353). Action by: the Commission. Comments Due: 02/07/2003. Reply Comments Due: 03/14/2003. Adopted: 11/07/2002 by NPRM. (FCC No. 02-305). WTB [51]FCC-02-305A1.doc [52]FCC-02-305A1.pdf [53]FCC-02-305A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED NOVEMBER 21, 2002, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 225: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- NEWS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2003/dd031126.html
  • Office of Homeland Security, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 11/25/2003 by ORDER. (DA No. 03-3789). EB [131]DA-03-3789A1.doc [132]DA-03-3789A1.pdf [133]DA-03-3789A1.txt REORGANIZATION OF THE WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU. Adopted the reorganization to reflect current and emerging changes in technology. Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 11/13/2003 by ORDER. (FCC No. 03-291). WTB [134]FCC-03-291A1.doc [135]FCC-03-291A1.pdf [136]FCC-03-291A1.txt SERVICE RULES FOR ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICES IN THE 1.7 GHZ AND 2.1 GHZ BANDS. Adopted service rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz bands, including provisions for application, licensing, operating and technical rules, and for competitive bidding. (Dkt No. 02-353). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 10/16/2003 by R&O. (FCC No. 03-251). WTB [137]FCC-03-251A1.doc [138]FCC-03-251A2.doc [139]FCC-03-251A3.doc [140]FCC-03-251A4.doc [141]FCC-03-251A5.doc [142]FCC-03-251A1.pdf [143]FCC-03-251A2.pdf [144]FCC-03-251A3.pdf [145]FCC-03-251A4.pdf [146]FCC-03-251A5.pdf [147]FCC-03-251A1.txt [148]FCC-03-251A2.txt [149]FCC-03-251A3.txt [150]FCC-03-251A4.txt [151]FCC-03-251A5.txt References
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd040924.html
  • requested service areas in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia. (Dkt No. 96-45). Action by: Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 09/24/2004 by ORDER. (DA No. 04-3046). WCB [76]DA-04-3046A1.doc [77]DA-04-3046A1.pdf [78]DA-04-3046A1.txt SERVICE RULES FOR ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICES IN THE 1915-1920 MHZ, 1995-2000 MHZ, 2020-2025 MHZ AND 2175-2180 MHZ BANDS, SERVICE RULES FOR ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICES IN THE 1.7 GHZ AND 2.1 GHZ BANDS. Seek comment on service rules for licensed fixed and mobile services, including advanced wireless services (AWS), in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz bands. (Dkt No. 02-353 , 04-356). Action by: the Commission. Comments Due: 11/23/2004. Reply Comments Due: 01/07/2005. Adopted: 09/09/2004 by NPRM. (FCC No. 04-218). WTB [79]FCC-04-218A1.doc [80]FCC-04-218A2.doc [81]FCC-04-218A3.doc [82]FCC-04-218A4.doc [83]FCC-04-218A5.doc [84]FCC-04-218A1.pdf
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd041122.html
  • LATA Boundaries to Provide Extended Area Service in the State of Louisiana. Action by: Chief, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 11/19/2004 by MO&O. (DA No. 04-3662). WCB [79]DA-04-3662A1.doc [80]DA-04-3662A1.pdf [81]DA-04-3662A1.txt SERVICE RULES FOR ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICES IN THE 1915-1920 MHZ, 1995-2000 MHZ, 2020-2025 MHZ AND 2175-2180 MHZ BANDS/SERVICE RULES FOR ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICES IN THE 1.7 GHZ AND 2.1 GHZ BANDS. Extended the Comment Dates and Reply Comment Dates in this proceeding. (Dkt No. 02-353 , 04-356). Action by: Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. Comments Due: 12/08/2004. Reply Comments Due: 01/24/2005. Adopted: 11/19/2004 by ORDER. (DA No. 04-3664). WTB [82]DA-04-3664A1.doc [83]DA-04-3664A1.pdf [84]DA-04-3664A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254481A1.doc 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254481A1.pdf 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254481A1.txt 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254471A1.doc 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254471A1.pdf 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254471A1.txt 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254429A2.txt 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254429A1.pdf 9.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050121.html
  • COOPERATIVE, INC. AGAINST GE MEDIA, INC., LICENSEE OF TELEVISION STATION WFXB. (DA No. 05-133). MB. Contact: Steven Broeckaert at (202) 418-1075, TTY: (202) 418-7172 [49]DA-05-133A1.doc [50]DA-05-133A1.pdf [51]DA-05-133A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SERVICE RULES FOR ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICES IN THE 1915-1920 MHZ, 1995-2000 MHZ, 2020-2025 MHZ AND 2175-2180 MHZ BANDS/SERVICE RULES FOR ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICES IN THE 1.7 GHZ AND 2.1 GHZ BANDS. Extended the reply comment deadline for Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 04-218, released September 24, 2004. (Dkt No. 02-353 , 04-356). Action by: Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. Reply Comments Due: 02/08/2005. Adopted: 01/19/2005 by ORDER. (DA No. 05-130). WTB [52]DA-05-130A1.doc [53]DA-05-130A1.pdf [54]DA-05-130A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256206A1.doc 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256206A1.pdf 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256206A2.pdf 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256206A1.txt 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256206A2.txt 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256210A1.doc 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256210A1.pdf 8.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050816.html
  • INTERIM RELIEF, ET AL. Affirmed the Order on Reconsideraton. Exempted the U.S.-Philippines route from the International Settlements Policy in accordance with the ISP Reform Order. by Order. (Dkt No. 96-261 , 02-324). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 08/09/2005 by Order on Reconsideration. (FCC No. 05-154). IB [23]FCC-05-154A1.doc [24]FCC-05-154A1.pdf [25]FCC-05-154A1.txt SERVICE RULES FOR ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICES IN THE 1.7 GHZ AND 2.1 GHZ BANDS. The FCC advanced its efforts to make spectrum available for an array of innovative wireless services and technologies, including voice, data, video, and other wireless broadband services offered over Third Generation ("3G") mobile networks. (Dkt No. 02-353). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 08/05/2005 by Order on Reconsideration. (FCC No. 05-149). WTB [26]FCC-05-149A1.doc [27]FCC-05-149A2.doc [28]FCC-05-149A3.doc [29]FCC-05-149A4.doc [30]FCC-05-149A1.pdf [31]FCC-05-149A2.pdf [32]FCC-05-149A3.pdf
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2006/dd060615.html
  • OMD. Contact: Helen Abraham @ (202) 418-0310 [11]DOC-265952A1.pdf [12]DOC-265952A1.txt Released: 06/15/2006. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS AND POST-REPLY COMMENT PERIOD FILING IN PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSURE PROCEEDINGS (2 OF 3). OMD. Contact: Helen Abraham @ (202) 418-0310 [13]DOC-265953A1.pdf [14]DOC-265953A1.txt Released: 06/15/2006. WTB OPENS FILING WINDOW FOR PROPOSALS TO DEVELOP AND MANAGE THE CLEARINGHOUSE THAT WILL ADMINISTER THE RELOCATION COST SHARING PLAN FOR LICENSEES IN THE 2.1 GHZ BANDS. (DA No. 06-1279). (Dkt No 00-258 , 02-353). WTB. Contact: Mary Woytek at (202) 418-2487 [15]DA-06-1279A1.doc [16]DA-06-1279A1.pdf [17]DA-06-1279A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- VOX SYSTEMS. Issued an Official Citation to VOX Systems for apparent violation of the TCPA and the Commission's rules regarding unsolicited fax advertising. Action by: Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2006/dd061004.html
  • FILING. WTB [25]DOC-267736A1.pdf [26]DOC-267736A1.txt Report No: 2674 Released: 10/04/2006. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SITE BASED LICENSES TERMINATION PENDING PUBLIC NOTICE. WTB [27]DOC-267743A1.pdf [28]DOC-267743A1.txt Report No: 2673 Released: 10/04/2006. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU MARKET BASED LICENSES TERMINATION PENDING PUBLIC NOTICE. WTB [29]DOC-267742A1.pdf [30]DOC-267742A1.txt Released: 10/04/2006. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU FINDS CTIA AND PCIA QUALIFIED TO ADMINISTER THE RELOCATION COST-SHARING PLAN FOR LICENSEES IN THE 2.1 GHZ BANDS. (DA No. 06-1984). (Dkt No 00-258 , 02-353). WTB. Contact: Mary Woytek at (202) 418-2487 [31]DA-06-1984A1.doc [32]DA-06-1984A1.pdf [33]DA-06-1984A1.txt Report No: 2672 Released: 10/04/2006. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE AUTHORIZATION APPLICATIONS, TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF LICENSEE APPLICATIONS, AND DE FACTO TRANSFER LEASE APPLICATIONS, AND DESIGNATED ENTITY REPORTABLE ELIGIBILITY EVENT APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING. WTB [34]DOC-267752A1.pdf [35]DOC-267752A1.txt Report No:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd071115.html
  • on one frequency pair in the New York area interleaved between channels allocated for assignment under Part 22 of our rules for paging and radiotelephone services. Action by: Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau. Adopted: 11/15/2007 by ORDER. (DA No. 07-4640). PSHSB [30]DA-07-4640A1.doc [31]DA-07-4640A1.pdf [32]DA-07-4640A1.txt SERVICE RULES FOR ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICES IN THE 1.7 GHZ AND 2.1 GHZ BANDS. Denied the Petition for Reconsideration for M2Z Networks, Inc. Dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration for Society of Broadcast Engineers, Incorporated. (Dkt No. 02-353). Action by: Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. Adopted: 11/14/2007 by Order on Reconsideration. (DA No. 07-4619). WTB [33]DA-07-4619A1.doc [34]DA-07-4619A1.pdf [35]DA-07-4619A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED NOVEMBER 14, 2007, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 219: -----------------------------------------------------------------------
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080623.html
  • by: Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 06/20/2008 by MO&O. (DA No. 08-1467). MB [28]DA-08-1467A1.doc [29]DA-08-1467A1.pdf [30]DA-08-1467A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED JUNE 20, 2008, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 120: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- NEWS RELEASES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- FCC SEEKS COMMENT ON PROPOSED RULE CHANGES FOR ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICES (AWS) SPECTRUM IN THE 1.9 AND 2.1 GHZ BANDS. The FCC released a Further Notice that proposes public access to free, nationwide, high-speed wireless broadband Internet services using a portion of the winning bidder's network in the 2.1 AWS spectrum. News Release. (Dkt No 04-356, 07-195). News Media Contact: Chelsea Fallon at (202) 418-7991 or Matthew Nodine at (202) 418-1646 WTB. Contact Peter Daronco at (202) 418-7235,
• http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/041004/CTree.pdf
  • Closed Spectrum in 2000 In the 2000 compromise for Auction No. 35, the Closed Entrepreneurs' Block gave up 58%of the 2000 Closed licenses re-auctioned (converted to Open) MH z PO Ps (in billions ) 4.0 1.7 2.3 1.0 1.0 Auction No. 35 C & F Reauction Entrepreneurs lose 58% Before 2000 Change After 2000 Change 2000 2000 2000 2005 2005 2.1 NextWave Retained Spectrum Auction No. 58 2003 / 2004 Portion Reauction C & F Block 10.1 1995 Auctions No. 5 & 11 C & F Closed Auctions Open Licenses Closed Licenses Auction No. 58 Rules Council Tree Communications 5 Closed Licenses Critical to DE Success Closed licenses account for 82%of the dollar value total DE licenses �clearly the single and
• http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/041004/DavidHonig100604-opp.pdf
  • 12/ Part 1 Fifth Report & Order, 15 FCC Rcd 15322. 13/ See, e.g., Amendment of Parts 20 & 24 of the Commission's Rules � Broadband PCS Competitive Bidding and the Commercial Mobile Radio Service Spectrum Cap, Report & Order, 11 FCC Rcd 7824, 7859-60 (1996). 14/ See, e.g., Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, Report & Order, FCC 03-251 � 68 (rel. Nov. 25, 2003). \\\DC - 90334/9755 - 1969144 v1 bankruptcy proceedings in the future."!15/ Smaller carriers in particular, have a need to rely on the Commission's pronouncements. The CTIA Petition does not adequately address why, in view of the Commission's very clear guidance on eligibility for future C and F
• http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/041004/T-MobileAuctionReplyComments.pdf
  • not justified in light of the fact that bidding credits are more effective at fulfilling the goals and mandates of Section 309(j). 16 C/F Block Sixth R&O at � 22. 17 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(3). 18 See, e.g., American Women in Radio and Television Comments at 3. 19 See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, 18 FCC Rcd 25162, � 148 (2003); C/F Block Sixth R&O at � 22 n. 67. 8 III. AT A MINIMUM, THE LICENSES RETURNED BY NEXTWAVE SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO OPEN BIDDING. Regardless of whether the Commission ultimately decides to retain closed bidding rules for some of the licenses being auctioned in Auction No. 58, the Commission must
• http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/041004/T-MobilePetitionComments.pdf
  • a better policy tool for promoting service to underserved market niches through the fostering of secondary markets and creative leasing solutions. Like opportunities in unlicensed spectrum allocations, secondary markets and spectrum leasing "allow an entrepreneur wishing to serve a niche area the ability to find a market 16 See Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, 18 FCC Rcd 25162, 25219-20, � 148 (2003); C/F Block Sixth R&O at 16278 � 22 n. 67. 17 See Summary of All Bidders in Auction No. 56 Table announcing winning bidders, at http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/charts/56bidder.xls. 18 See Summary of All Bidders in Auction No. 53 Chart announcing winning bidders, at http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/charts/53market.xls. 19 See Declaration of Simon J. Wilkie, 20
• http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/102808/eligible-entities-report-102808.pdf
  • 1.1 A. Current Standards for Qualifying and Deriving Benefits from the Appx. 1.1 Designated Entity Program in Wireless Auctions B. Commission Experience with New Entrant Criteria in FM and Appx. 1.2 TV Auctions C. Impact of Designated Entity and New Entrant Licensing Appx. 1.2 Programs on Minority and Female Ownership iii Appendix 2: Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Businesses (SDBs) Appx. 2.1 A. Application and Means of Satisfaction of Strict Scrutiny Appx. 2.1 B. Steps the Commission has taken, and has yet to take, to Arrive Appx. 2.2 at a Sustainable SDB Definition C. How Applicants Can Demonstrate Social and Economic Appx. 2.3 Disadvantage D. Eligibility Credits based upon Primary Racial Populations Appx. 2.6 Served * * * * * 1 EXECUTIVE
• http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/adopted-recommendations/eligible-entities-report-102808.pdf
  • 1.1 A. Current Standards for Qualifying and Deriving Benefits from the Appx. 1.1 Designated Entity Program in Wireless Auctions B. Commission Experience with New Entrant Criteria in FM and Appx. 1.2 TV Auctions C. Impact of Designated Entity and New Entrant Licensing Appx. 1.2 Programs on Minority and Female Ownership iii Appendix 2: Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Businesses (SDBs) Appx. 2.1 A. Application and Means of Satisfaction of Strict Scrutiny Appx. 2.1 B. Steps the Commission has taken, and has yet to take, to Arrive Appx. 2.2 at a Sustainable SDB Definition C. How Applicants Can Demonstrate Social and Economic Appx. 2.3 Disadvantage D. Eligibility Credits based upon Primary Racial Populations Appx. 2.6 Served * * * * * 1 EXECUTIVE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Martin/Statements/2002/stkjm219.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Martin/Statements/2002/stkjm219.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Martin/Statements/2002/stkjm219.txt
  • Order at 68. See also Order at 53, 72, 76 and 85. [112][13] I approve only the auctions, eligibility and broadcast carriage sections of the Order at V.B.5, V.B.2.b and V.B.1.d respectively. [113][14] Fox Television Stations v. FCC, 280 F.3d 1027, 1042 (D.C. Cir. 2002); United States Telephone Association v. FCC, 188 F.3d 521 (D.C. Cir. 1999). [114][15] 47 C.F.R. 2.1. [115][16] See note 1, supra. [116][17] Order at 68. [117][18] Order at 19. [118][19] See note 3, above. [119][20] Order at 72: In adopting these EPFD limits, we find that an increase of 10% over current DBS unavailability is the appropriate starting point for our analysis but need not be a strict limit. (emphasis supplied). See also 79 and 84,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp208.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp208.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp208.txt
  • difficult proceeding for the Commission, but we believe the Commission has arrived at a policy that appropriately balances the competing interests while allowing an important new service to move forward. We look forward to an auction for these licenses in the near future and the provision of the corresponding new services to the American people. _______________________ [4][1] See 47 C.F.R. 2.1 (harmful interference is defined as interference which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service.. . . ) References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp208.txt 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp208.pdf 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp208.html#_ftn1 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp208.html#_ftnref1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp211.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp211.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp211.txt
  • area operation. See 47 CFR 1.929(d)(1). [26][6] A similar argument applies to DBS interference complaints that arise more than a year after the MVDDS service is installed. Any interference issues should be detected and repaired in a reasonable time and providing all parties a year to get it right strikes a reasonable balance of the interests. [27][7] See 47 C.F.R. 2.1 (harmful interference is defined as interference which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service.. .. ) Harmful interference has never been defined on a service specific basis. Therefore the dissents criticism of our failure to do so here also rings hollow. Prior to initiation of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/2001/stgt124.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/2001/stgt124.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/2001/stgt124.txt
  • prices charged to buyers). See Merger Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. at 41556-41557 � 1.3. See, e.g. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. at 363 (``[A] significant increase in the concentration . . . must be enjoined in the absence of evidence clearly showing that the merger is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects.''). See also Merger Guidelines at 41558 �� 2.1, 2.2; New York v. Kraft General Foods, 926 F. Supp. 321, 359 (S.D.N.Y. 1995); Amendment of Parts 20 and 24 of the Commission's Rules -- Broadband PCS Competitive Bidding and the Commercial Mobile Radio Service Spectrum Cap, WT Docket No. 96-59, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 7824 (1996). See Merger Guidelines Section 4; see, e.g., FTC v. University Health,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.txt
  • where such receivers could potentially experience degradation from interference is small, generally 1 km or less. This interference analysis is shown in the following table: LPFM Potential Interference Radius Based on NAB Tests Receiver Category Desired Signal Level -45 dBm (Close to Station) -55 dBm (~Principle Community) -65 dBm (~Protected Service) Clock 0.3 km (0.2 mi.) 0.7 km (0.4 mi.) 2.1 km (1.3 mi.) Portable 1.0 km (0.6 mi.) 0.9 km (0.6 mi.) 1.0 km (0.6 mi.) Personal 0.4 km (0.3 mi.) 0.5 km (0.3 mi.) 0.5 km (0.3 mi.) The above Table shows the approximate radius around an LPFM station where interference could potentially occur to a 3rd adjacent channel full service station with different types of radios, based on
• http://www.fcc.gov/bureaus/pshs/docs/maine_comop.pdf
  • Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit i Submitted by State Office of Information Technology and Maine Emergency Management Agency VERSION 3.1 March 19, 2007 STATE OF MAINE Concept of Operations Plan (CONOPS) FOR INCIDENT COMMUNICATIONS INTEROPERABILITY ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 SECTION 1 � GENERAL 1 1.1. Purpose 1 1.2. Background 1 1.3. Definitions 2 1.4. Assumptions 3 SECTION 2 � OPERATIONS 3 2.1. Employment 3 2.2. Implementation 4 SECTION 3 � TRAINING 4 3.1. General 4 3.2. Training Requirements 4 3.3. Training Support 4 4 SECTION 4 � Use of the Six CONOPS Frequencies 4 SECTION 5 � SUMMARY 6 1 INTRODUCTION Two-way radio voice communications are critical to the effective management of first responders and the coordination of their duties as well
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2002/DOC-238048A1.html
  • frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. 87.193-87.199. 6 Harmful Interference includes any interference that "endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services." See 47 C.F.R. 2.1 & 76.613(a). 7 Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channeling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 F.C.C.2d 117, para. 14 (1985). 8 47 C.F.R. 76.605(a)(12). 9 47 C.F.R. 76.611(a). 10 47 C.F.R. 76.1804(g). 11 47 C.F.R. 76.614. 12 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2002/DOC-238274A1.html
  • frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. 87.193-87.199. 2 Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. 2.1 & 76.613(a). 3 Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 F.C.C.2d 117, para. 14 (1985) [hereinafter MO&O]. 4 47 C.F.R. 76.605(a)(12). 5 47 C.F.R. 76.611(a). 6 47 C.F.R. 76.615(b)(7). 7 47 C.F.R. 76.614.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2002/DOC-238978A1.html
  • frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. 87.193-87.199. 3 Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. 2.1 & 76.613(a). 4 Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 F.C.C.2d 117, para. 14 (1985) [hereinafter MO&O]. 5 47 C.F.R. 76.605(a)(12). 6 47 C.F.R. 76.611(a). 7 47 C.F.R. 76.615(b)(7). 8 47 C.F.R. 76.614.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-267053A1.html
  • Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. SS 87.193-87.199. Section 76.613(a) states that "[h]armful interference is any emission, radiation or induction which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with this chapter." See 47 C.F.R. SS2.1 & 76.613(a). 47 C.F.R. S76.611(a)(1). We note that, although the rule violation cited here is Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules, a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture is being issued in this case because the leaks exceeded the CLI limit of 64 set forth in Section 76.611 of the Rules. 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-267703A1.html
  • Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. SS 87.193-87.199. Section 76.613(a) states that "[h]armful interference is any emission, radiation or induction which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with this chapter." See 47 C.F.R. SS2.1 & 76.613(a). 47 C.F.R. S76.611(a)(1). 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S1.80. 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(2)(D). 47 U.S.C. S 503(b), 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80, 76.605(a)(12). See 47 C.F.R. S 1.1914. (...continued from previous page) Federal Communications Commission 5 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267703A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267703A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269176A1.html
  • Class U.S. Mail and Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested to SJT Enterprises, PO Box 753, Bartonsville, PA 18321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION G. Michael Moffitt District Director Chicago District Office Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5). 47 U.S.C. S 302(b). 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). 47 U.S.C. SS 401, 501, 503, 510. 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269802A1.html
  • and Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested to M.J. Electronics at its address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Daniel W. Noel District Director New York District Office Northeast Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5). 47 U.S.C. S 302(b). 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(a)(1). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). 47 U.S.C. SS 401, 501, 503, 510. 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-280705A1.html
  • during the inspection but found the EAS equipment non-operational. He was unable to produce any evidence, EAS logs, or printouts to demonstrate that the EAS had been operational at any point during the past year. He also stated the printer for the EAS had been broken for a year. Inspection of the transmitter site revealed station WMER-AM was operating at 2.1 kW at night, instead of the required 0.101 kW. Mr. Glass confirmed that the station had been using the same STL since the station began operations, but was not able to provide a current license for the STL. The only license found expired June 1, 2004. A search of the FCC licensee database did not reveal a current license for
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-281513A1.html
  • Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. S:S: 87.193-87.199. 76.613(a) states that "[h]armful interference is any emission, radiation or induction which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating in accordance with this chapter." See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1 & 76.613(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 76.611(a)(1). 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S:1.80. 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E). 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80, 76.605(a)(12). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1914. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission 6 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281513A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281513A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01018.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01018.html
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. ��87.193-87.199. Harmful Interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. ��2.1 & 76.613(a). Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 F.C.C.2d 117, para. 14 (1985) [hereinafter MO&O]. 47 C.F.R. �76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. �76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. �76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. �76.614. 47 C.F.R. �76.613(b). 47 C.F.R.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01173.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01173.html
  • Joanne Suppa) at 1, � 3; Complaint at 3, � 10; Answer at 2, � 4; COMSAT Brief at 3, 4. In fact, with regard to Standard-A service to and from the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean regions, the parties' contract provided solely for the sale of INMARSAT space segment. January 16, 2001 Letter at Attachment B, Attachment 1 at � 2.1; Answer at 3, � 5; COMSAT Brief at 4; IDB Supplemental Brief at 4. See January 16, 2001 Letter at Exhibit A. Id. at Exhibit A, � 1.8. Id. at Exhibit A, Annex A, � 1.1. Id. at Exhibit A, � 2.3. Id. at Exhibit A, � 1.3. See February 2, 2001 Letter at 1. COMSAT Brief at 4, 7,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-937A1.html
  • frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. 87.193-87.199. 4 Harmful Interference includes any interference that "endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services." See 47 C.F.R. 2.1 & 76.613(a). 5 Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 F.C.C.2d 117, para. 14 (1985) [hereinafter MO&O]. 6 47 C.F.R. 76.605(a)(12). 7 47 C.F.R. 76.611(a). 8 47 C.F.R. 76.1804(g). 9 47 C.F.R. 76.614.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-105A1.html
  • Complaint, Exhibit F (MCImetro/Bell Atlantic Interconnection Agreement 1997). 31 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, 25. 32 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, 26. 33 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, 27. 34 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, 27. 35 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, 28. 36 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Complaint, Exhibit I (Second Starpower-Verizon Virginia Agreement) at 5, 2.1. 37 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 6, 29. The parties did not include a complete copy of the Second Starpower- Verizon Virginia Agreement as an exhibit to any of their pleadings. Rather than referencing multiple exhibits when discussing the agreement, we hereafter cite exclusively to the parties' joint stipulations regarding the agreement's terms. 38 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 7,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-156A1.html
  • between both networks, which prevented [AACR] from fulfilling its international correspondent undertakings, and offering its services to customers owning a TRICOM line''). 50 Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 7, 1.19 (``calls originating in our network and intended for TRICOM were being blocked by limitations on the capacity attributable solely to TRICOM''). See Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 8, 2.1 (AACR was forced to ``request from international companies with whom [it] hold[s] correspondent relations to abstain from sending [AACR] calls intended for TRICOM network [sic], due to the inability to complete them . . .''). 51 Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 18, 2.3; Supp. Joint Submission at 2, 7 (stipulating that .68 centavos Dominicanos is equal to 4.2 cents
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-300A1.html
  • 76.616. These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. 87.193-87.199. 5 Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. 2.1 & 76.613(a). 6 Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, para. 14 (1985) (hereinafter MO&O). 7 47 C.F.R. 76.605(a)(12). 8 47 C.F.R. 76.611(a). 9 47 C.F.R. 76.615(b)(7). 10 47 C.F.R.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3408A1.html
  • 76.616. These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. 87.193-87.199. 4 Harmful interference includes any interference that ``endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services.'' See 47 C.F.R. 2.1 & 76.613(a). 5 Memorandum Opinion and Order, Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and restrictions and to require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, para. 14 (1985) (hereinafter MO&O). 6 47 C.F.R. 76.605(a)(12). 7 47 C.F.R. 76.611(a). 8 47 C.F.R. 76.1804(g). 9 47 C.F.R.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-106A1.html
  • Z-Tel's ``disavowal,'' but upon the totality of Z-Tel's statements and omissions during the proceeding. See Liability Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 7580, 29 n.67. 52 Petition at 4-5, 17-20. 53 Letter dated December 7, 2001 from Christopher M. Heimann, counsel to Pacific, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC, File No. EB-01-MD-017 (``Heimann Letter'') Ex. 1 (Pacific Agreement) at Attachment 6, 2.1. 54 Heimann Letter Ex. 1 (Pacific Agreement) at Attachment 6, 7.4.1 (providing that the shared transport UNE may be used for intraLATA toll ``if requested by [Z-Tel] in connection with LSNE option `C' under Section 6.5.3 above.'') 55 Heimann Letter Ex. 1 (Pacific Agreement) at Attachment 6, 6.5.3. 56 Petition at 5. Accord Petition at 17-20. 57 With regard to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1014A1.html
  • 17, 2005. 8 Public Notice, FCC Clarifies Equipment Certification Procedures for ``Learned Mode'' or ``Trainable'' Transmitters, 17 FCC Rcd 21423 (OET 2002). 9 Section 15.3(o) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.3(o), defines an intentional radiator as ``A device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 10 47 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J. 11 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' 12 47 C.F.R. 2.939(a)(2). 13 47 C.F.R. 2.939(a)(4). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.pdf 2.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1029A1.html
  • Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 Letter from Houda Nounou, Assistant General Counsel, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., to Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (March 16, 2005). 2 You also indicated that Wal-Mart has returned its inventory of 54 units to the supplier and permanently discontinued marketing this product. 3 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 4 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1029A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1029A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1030A1.html
  • advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1Additionally, in response to a Letter of Inquiry, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. identified GPS Outfitters as its supplier of Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antennas. See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Citation, DA 05-1029 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., released April 8, 2005). 2 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 3 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1030A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1030A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1031A1.html
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1031A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1031A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1033A1.html
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1033A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1033A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1034A1.html
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1034A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1034A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1035A1.html
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1035A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1035A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1036A1.html
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1036A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1036A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1037A1.html
  • and the Commission's rules. The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1037A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1037A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1107A1.html
  • this citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission _________________________ 1 Letter from Bob Baker, Vice President, Dallas Avionics, Inc., to Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (March 30,2005). 2 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 3 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1107A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1107A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1155A1.html
  • Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Ming-Hang Ho, Gilsson Technologies (March 7, 2005). 2 See Letter from Ming-Hang Ho, Gilsson Technologies, to Thomas Fitz-Gibbon and Yasin Ozer, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (March 26, 2005) (``Response''). 3 You also indicated that Gilsson has permanently removed the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas from its website. 4 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' 5 Response at 2. 6 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1155A1.pdf
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-191A1.html
  • C.F.R. 15.205(a). 3 Public Notice, FCC Clarifies Equipment Certification Procedures for ``Learned Mode'' or ``Trainable'' Transmitters, DA 02-2850 (October 28, 2002). 4 Section 15.3 (o), of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 15.3(o), defines an intentional radiator as ``A device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 5 47 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J 6 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of- band emissions.'' 7 The OET Laboratory determined that the LRT-1 was capable of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2998A1.html
  • amplified signal through another antenna. These devices are commonly used to deliver a strong GPS signal indoors for testing, calibrating, or experimenting with GPS receivers in a controlled environment. 3 See Letter from Robert G. Kirk to Neal McNeil (March 2, 2005). 4 Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. 2.1 defines spurious emissions as ``Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.'' The re-radiators and repeaters purposely transmit RF energy on these restricted frequencies.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-337A1.html
  • This Consent Decree cannot be modified without the advance written consent of both Parties. 25. This Consent Decree may be signed in counterparts. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Perfect Fit Industries, Inc.: ________________________________ Louis R. Morris President and Chief Executive Officer ________________________________ Date _________________________ 1 47 U.S.C. 302a(b). 2 47 C.F.R. 2.1 et seq. and 15.1 et seq. 3 47 U.S.C. 154(i). 4 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. 5 47 U.S.C. 302a(b). 6 47 C.F.R. 2.1 et seq. and 15.1 et seq. 7 Perfect Fit Industries, Inc., 19 FCC Rcd 19889 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., 2004). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-337A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-337A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-472A1.html
  • 47 C.F.R. 0.459. 3 Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. Application for Review (filed October 22, 2004). On November 15, 2004, PFI filed a Supplement to its Application for Review. Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. Supplement to Application for Review (filed November 15, 2004). 4 Perfect Fit Industries, Inc., DA 05-337 (Enf. Bur., February 10, 2005). 5 47 U.S.C. 302a(b). 6 47 C.F.R. 2.1 et seq. and 15.1 et seq. 7 Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. Motion to Withdraw Application for Review (filed February 10, 2005). PFI included the November 15, 2004 Supplement to its Application for Review within the scope of its Motion to Withdraw. 8 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-472A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-472A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1442A1.html
  • Systems, Inc., 1F No. 21 Yanfa, 2^nd Road, SBIP, Hsinchu City, Taiwan. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Joseph P. Casey Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(a). 47 C.F.R. S 15.247(d). A wireless access point is a transmitter/receiver used to provide wireless internet access. Industry Canada is a regulatory agency of the Canadian Government. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to AboCom Systems, Inc. (March
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1555A1.html
  • 22. This Consent Decree cannot be modified without the advance written consent of both Parties. 23. This Cnsent Decree may be signed in counterparts. For the Enforcement Bureau: ________________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date For Applied Wireless Identifications Group, Inc.: ________________________________ Larry Kellam Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S 2.1 et seq. and S 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S 154(i). 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S 2.1 et seq. and S 15.1 et seq. Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1555 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1555 3 References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1555A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1555A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2019A1.html
  • Communications Commission See Letter from Kathryn Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to LightObject d/b/a Actionbuy Trading Co. (March 20, 2006). See Letter from Kachun Wong to Neal McNeil, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (April 24, 2006). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The 1.2 GHz wireless camera purposely transmits RF energy on restricted frequencies.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2452A1.html
  • requirements of this Consent Decree shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the Effective Date. 23. This Consent Decree may be signed in counterparts. For: Boston Scientific Corporation ___________________________ William F. McConnell, Jr. Senior Vice President, Administration Date: ___________________________ For: Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission ____________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau Date: __________________________ 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S 2.1 et seq. and S 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S 154(i). 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S 2.1 et seq. and S 15.101 et seq. Respironics, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation, Order, ET Docket No. 05-331, DA 06-2316 (OET, released November 16, 2006). See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-489A1.html
  • Debarment, File No. EB-06-IH-0853 Dear Mr. Tsao: The Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'' or ``Commission'') has received notice of the conviction of Premio, Inc., f/k/a Premio Computers, Inc. (``Premio'') for conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. 1, and for mail fraud and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341 and 2.1 Consequently, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. 54.521, this letter constitutes official notice of Premio's suspension from the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism (``E-rate program''). In addition, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') hereby notifies Premio that we are commencing debarment proceedings against it.2 I. Notice of Suspension Pursuant to section 54.521(a)(4) of the Commission's rules,3 Premio's conviction requires the Bureau to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-30A1.html
  • Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4388 P 5 (1991); Callais Cablevision, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd 1359, 1362 P 9 (2001). See 47 U.S.C. S 503(b); 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(f). See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7591 P 4 (2002). See supra note 11 and accompanying text. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1 defines "spurious emissions" as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." See GPS Networking, Inc., RM-11002, 20 FCC Rcd 12256, 12258 (2005). It
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1673A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1673 1
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1674A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1674 1
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1675A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1675 1
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1676A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1676 1
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1754A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1754 2
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1756A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1756 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1757A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1757 4
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1758A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1758 4
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1763A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1763 4
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1764A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1764 2
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1766A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1766 4
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1767A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1767 4
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1784A1.html
  • Spectrum Enf. Div. 2006). 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(a). A wireless access point is a transmitter/receiver used to provide wireless internet access. 47 C.F.R. S 15.247(d). Industry Canada is a regulatory agency of the Canadian government. AboCom received a grant of equipment authorization for the wireless access point under FCC ID MQ4ARM94 on April 22, 2004. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as an "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to AboCom Systems, Inc.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2150A1.html
  • 10, 2006) ("Response") at 4, P 10, Exhibit 1, Application of Salsgiver Telecom, Inc. for approval to offer, render, furnish or supply telecommunication services as a Competitive Access Provider to the Public in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Order, Docket No. A-311373, Feb. 7, 2006 ("Salsgiver CAP Authorization Order") at 2-6. CAP Tariff, "Application of Tariff" and "Service Offered" and Sections 2.1.1., 3.1, Pages 4, 8 and 25 of 28. Complaint at 1-2, P 3; Response at 2, P 3. Section 224(a)(1) of the Act defines "utility," in pertinent part, as "a local exchange carrier ... who owns or controls poles, ducts, conduits, or rights-of-way used, in whole or in part, for any wire communications." 47 U.S.C. S 224(a)(1). 47 U.S.C. S
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-299A1.html
  • use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. 47 C.F.R. S 2.801 defines a radiofrequency device as "any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radiofrequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means." Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Citation (Compliance and Inf. Bur., Compliance Div., Inv. Group, February 13, 1997). The citation was issued pursuant to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-304A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-307A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-308A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-309A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-310A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-311A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-312A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-313A1.html
  • a radar "scrambler." An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." Rocky Mountain Radar, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 07-299 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., rel. January 31, 2007). See
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3266A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3266 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3270A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3270 2
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3392A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3392 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3393A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3393 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3483A1.html
  • Rcd at 1335. An "unintentional radiator" is defined by Section 15.3(z) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(z), as: [a] device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy for use within the device, or that sends radio frequency signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction. Section 2.1(c) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1(c), defines a spurious emission as "[e]mission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information." RMR, 22 FCC Rcd at 1337-8. Id. at 1338. Id. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b)(3). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3483 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3974A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission See Letter from Kathryn Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Surveillance-Video.com (March 13, 2007). See Letter from Reuben Weinstein, President, Surveillance-Video.com to Jacqueline Johnson, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (April 16, 2007). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The 1.2 GHz wireless camera purposely transmits RF energy on restricted frequencies.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4017A1.html
  • LLC ("Rally") is a Washington-state company that specializes in communications investments. Rally is the secured and only lender of Telesphere. On September 20, 2006, Rally completed an accelerated conversion of Telephere debt to equity, acquiring a majority stock ownership of 64.9 percent in Telesphere and effectively obtaining control of Telesphere. Shortly thereafter on October 4, 2006, Rally acquired an additional 2.1 percent interest, increasing the company's stock ownership in Telesphere to 67 percent. 7. On October 12, 2006, Rally and Telesphere filed a joint domestic and international section 214 application to the Commission for approval of the transfers of control. The applicants stated that the acquisition of corporate control was necessary to improve immediately the financial position of Telesphere. Subsequently on
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4721A1.html
  • is anything but punitive. We therefore direct NPTC, within 60 days, to amend the Pole Attachment Agreement to limit the penalty for unauthorized attachments to compensatory damages, in accordance with Mile Hi Cable Partners. 1. Salsgiver's Other Facial Challenges to the Pole Attachment Agreement Are Denied. 29. Salsgiver's remaining claims are denied. Contrary to Salsgiver's allegations, we find that sections 2.1, 5.2.1, 5.3, 6.1, 6.4, 6.7, 9.1, 9.2, and 9.5 of the Pole Attachment Agreement are not facially unlawful. As to its claims regarding sections 2.6, 3.2, 5.11, 5.5.4, 6.2, 6.6, and 6.16 of the Pole Attachment Agreement, Salsgiver has failed to meet its burden of proving the facts necessary to show that those provisions would be unlawful, as applied. Salsgiver
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-472A1.html
  • "Carrier does not transmit messages pursuant to this Tariff, but its services may be used for that purpose." We conclude, based on an examination of the Tariff as a whole, that DQE CNS does, in fact, offer to transmit information of the user's choosing through its CAP Tariff, and thus qualifies as a "telecommunications carrier" under the Act. 15. Section 2.1.A of the CAP Tariff states: "This Tariff contains the regulations and rates applicable to intrastate telecommunications services provided by Carrier [DQE CNS] to business customers for the origination and termination of telecommunications between points within the State." Section 1 defines "Telecommunications" as the "transmission of voice communications or, subject to the transmission capabilities of the service, the transmission of data,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-486A1.html
  • [that] details services, equipment and pricing offered by the telephone company (a common carrier) to all potential customers") (emphasis added). See CAP Tariff Section 1, 3^rd Revised page 1; Switched Access Tariff, Original Title Page. Similar language describing the carrier's undertaking to offer service in accordance with the terms of its tariffs is contained in Fibertech's IXC Tariff at Section 2.1.1, Original page 1, and its IXC Reseller Tariff at Section 2.1.1, Original page 1. See Response at 13, P 40; NPTC May 25 Letter at 1-4. Fibertech May 5 Letter at 1. Chiaino Declaration at 2, PP 2-3. See, e.g., NPTC May 25 Letter at 1-4; Response at 6-8, 12-13 PP 13, 16-17, 40; NPTC Dec. 15 Letter at 1,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4874A1.html
  • Rules defines "marketing" as the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The GPS intercept device (which operates in the 1575.42 MHz band) and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-14A1.html
  • Initial Brief on Damages at 20-22; Defendants' Reply Brief on Damages at 6-10. See, e.g., Damages Joint Statement at 12; Damages Reply at 26-27; Defendants' Initial Brief on Damages at 17-19, 25 and Att. 5; Defendants' Reply Brief on Damages at 9, Attachment B (directing Debit Card Providers to maintain call information). See, e.g., Liability Answer at Attachment B-11, part 2.1. Defendants' Initial Brief on Damages at 20-22 (citing C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc., Hearing Designation Order, 16 FCC Rcd 8801, 8808 at P 21 (Enf. Bur. 2001); New Valley Corp. v. Pacific Bell, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 5128, 5134 at P 14 (2000); Hi-Tech Furnace Systems, Inc. v. FCC, 224 F.3d 781, 787
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1019A1.html
  • Date of the Consent Decree. 24. This Consent Decree cannot be modified without the advance written consent of both Parties. 25. This Consent Decree may be signed in counterparts. For the Enforcement Bureau: ____________________________ Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau __________________________ Date For Rajant Corporation: ___________________________ Robert Schena Chief Executive Officer ___________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.101 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 C.F.R. S: S: 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 et seq. and S: 15.101 et seq. Letter from Kathryn Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau to Robert Schena, Chief Executive Officer, Rajant Corporation (September 4, 2007). Letter from Patricia J. Paoletta, Esq., Counsel
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1196A1.html
  • Rules defines "marketing" as the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The GPS Jammer (which operates in the 1450 MHz to 1600 MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1202A1.html
  • radio frequency energy by radiation or induction." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(o). Section 2.803(e)(4) of the Rules defines "marketing" as the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.807(d). 47 U.S.C. S:S: 154 (i), 154 (j) and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-155A1.html
  • Rules defines "marketing" as the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The GPS Blocker (which operates in the 1450 MHz to 1600 MHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1685A1.html
  • Rules defines "marketing" as the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." Your response indicates that the 1.3 GHz device is shipped with a
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2051A1.html
  • Sincerely, Kathryn S. Berthot Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau www.ebay.com. Section 2.803(e)(4) of the Rules defines "marketing" as the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "Emission on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." Furthermore, section 2.803(g) of the Rules provides that radio frequency devices that
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1697A1.html
  • the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). 47 U.S.C. S: 333. Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The GPS-JM2 GPS Jammer (which operates in the 1450 MHz to 1600
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-670A1.html
  • facsimile), each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument. ________________________________ Kathryn S. Berthot Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau ________________________________ Date ________________________________ D. Bruce Sewell Senior Vice President and General Counsel Intel Corporation ________________________________ Date 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1 et seq., 15.1 et seq., and 68.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1 et seq., 15.1 et seq., and 68.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b); 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1 et seq., 15.1 et seq. and 68.1 et seq. 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-09-2623A1.html
  • C.F.R. S:15.3(o). See 47 C.F.R. S: 15.201. A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1031 - 2.1060. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]missions on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The video transmitters listed in your response intentionally transmit radio frequency energy
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1164A1.html
  • Id. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(g). 47 C.F.R. S: 15.201(b). Section 15.3(o) of the Rules defines an "intentional radiator" as a "device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(o). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). Id. Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]mission[s] on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The subject transmitters intentionally transmit radio frequency energy on restricted frequencies within
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1165A1.html
  • Operation of Low Power Auxiliary Stations in the 698-806 Band, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 25 FCC Rcd 643 (2010). Effective June 12, 2010, operation of wireless microphones in the 700 MHz frequency band is prohibited. 47 C.F.R. S: 74.851(g). Section 15.205(a) allows intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions in the restricted frequency bands. Section 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "[e]mission[s] on a frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions." The subject wireless microphones intentionally transmit radio frequency energy on restricted frequencies
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1538A1.html
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including for use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. S:S:87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that "endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services." See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1, 76.613(a). Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, P: 14 (1985). 47 C.F.R. S:76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. S:76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. S:76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. S:76.614. 47 C.F.R. S:76.613(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 76.1706.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1539A1.html
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including for use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. S:S:87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that "endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services." See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1, 76.613(a). Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, P: 14 (1985). 47 C.F.R. S:76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. S:76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. S:76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. S:76.614. 47 C.F.R. S:76.613(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 76.1706.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1540A1.html
  • These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including for use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V and 47 C.F.R. S:S:87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that "endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services." See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1, 76.613(a). Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, P: 14 (1985). 47 C.F.R. S:76.605(a)(12). 47 C.F.R. S:76.611(a). 47 C.F.R. S:76.615(b)(7). 47 C.F.R. S:76.614. 47 C.F.R. S:76.613(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 76.1706.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1651A1.html
  • S:76.616. These frequencies are critical for Search and Rescue Operations, including use by Emergency Locator Transmitters on planes and Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons on boats. See generally 47 C.F.R. Part 80, Subpart V; 47 C.F.R. S:S: 87.193-87.199. Harmful interference includes any interference that "endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services." See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1, 76.613(a). See Amendment of Part 76 of the Commission's Rules to Add Frequency Channelling Requirements and Restrictions and to Require Monitoring for Signal Leakage from Cable Television Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 21006, 101 FCC 2d 117, P: 14 (1985). See 47 C.F.R. S:76.605(a)(12). See 47 C.F.R. S: 76.615(b)(7). See 47 C.F.R. S: 76.611(a). See 47 C.F.R. S:
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/FCC-12-19A1.html
  • G, Interconnection Agreement-Texas between Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and UTEX Communications Corp. at 17; Answer at 7, para. 8; Answer Legal Analysis at 14. 47 U.S.C. S:S: 251, 252. See, e.g., Stipulated Facts at 6, para. 17; Complaint at Ex. G. See, e.g., Complaint Exhibit G, Interconnection Agreement-Texas between Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and UTEX Communications Corp. at 378, S: 2.1.1. See, e.g., Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 6-7; Stipulated Facts at 2-4. See, e.g., Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 7-8; Stipulated Facts at 2-4. The parties identify a caveat to the facts stated in paragraph 3 above, but that caveat is not relevant here. Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 4-7. See, e.g., Supplemental Stipulated Facts at 7-8; Stipulated Facts at 2-6. See, e.g.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc0034.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc0034.txt
  • deployed such fix beginning in September 1992. NYT Brief at 4-5. Even though this software fix eventually failed and NYT's network again permitted secondary dialtone to occur, we find that NYT's failure to correct the secondary dialtone problem on its first attempt does not constitute unjust or unreasonable conduct. NYT Brief at 3. NYNEX FCC Tariff No. 1 at � 2.1.3(A). See NYT Brief at 4 (citing AT&T v. New York City Human Resources Admin., 833 F.Supp. 962, 974 (S.D.N.Y. 1993), Gentile v. Garden City Alarm Co., Inc., 541 N.Y.S.2d 505 (App. Div. 1989)). We note that while there does not appear to be any consensus in Commission, state, or federal cases, NYT's proffered definition of "willful misconduct" is similar to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1272A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1272A1.pdf
  • than to the existence of opposition to a use.''); see also Indiana Forest Alliance, Inc v. United States Forest Service, 325 F.3d 851, 858 (7th Cir. 2003) (establishing ``a two-step approach to determining whether an agency has acted arbitrarily or capriciously in deciding not to prepare an EIS in the face of scientific controversy'' (emphasis added)). See EA at Sections 2.1-2.4.5. The Site Selection Criteria applied by S-R were: 1. Ground electrical conductivity necessary for optimal AM transmission; 2. Expansion of signal coverage into underserved regions and important commuter routes; 3. Topographic or building obstructions (to avoid sources of signal interference); 4. Protection of co-channel stations from interference; 5. Compliance with local zoning restrictions; 6. Population density considerations (attempting to locate
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-892A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-892A1.pdf
  • fixed operations are in higher frequency bands allocated to the BAS. Cable Television Relay Service (CARS) stations, which are licensed by the FCC's Media Bureau, are not within the scope of this public notice. See 47 C.F.R. � 27.1133 (Protection of Part 74 and Part 78 operations). See also Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 25,162, 25,211-25,212 �� 129-130 (2003). See 47 C.F.R. � 25.254(a)(3). DOD uplink Earth stations at 11 sites have primary access to the 2025-2110 MHz band to support military space operations (also known as tracking, telemetry, and commanding) on a co-equal basis with stations in the incumbent Television BAS,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-2058A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-2058A1.pdf
  • comment on whether any of these figures are de minimis under Commission policy and would thus not trigger FM Priorities (1) or (2) for purposes of comparison with other mutually exclusive proposals. 8. A staff engineering analysis has determined that Channel 287C2 can be allotted to Williams, in conformity with the Commission's Rules, provided there is a site restriction of 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) northeast at reference coordinates 35-15-57 NL and 112-10-47 WL. Channel 228C2 can be allotted at Ehrenberg at a site 18.8 kilometers (17.9 miles) northeast of the community at coordinates 33-48-00 NL and 114-19-12 WL. Channel 281C can be allotted at First Mesa at a site 16.8 kilometers (105 miles) south of the community at coordinates 35-41-09 NL
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-504A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-504A1.pdf
  • Street, S.E. and Shorts School River Road in Snohomish. The EA notes that this location is \'93the FCC, FAA and locally permitted transmitter location for KRKO-AM.\'94}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar\s21\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i {\*\xmlopen\xmlns2{\factoidname place}}{\*\xmlopen\xmlns2{\factoidname State}}Id.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 {\*\xmlclose}{\*\xmlclose} at Section 2.1.1. }}}{ \rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 The area is described as \'93rural\'94 and \'93made up predominantly of large undeveloped parcels devoted almost exclusively to agricultural use.\'94}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar\s21\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i {\*\xmlopen\xmlns2{\factoidname place}}{\*\xmlopen\xmlns2{\factoidname State}}Id.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 {\*\xmlclose}{\*\xmlclose} at Sections 2.1.2 &
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • Jackson, TN 292 Urban Oldies 3.4 10 3 WUVS-LP Muskegon, MI 237 Urban Contemporary 3.3 8 4 KCSA-LP San Angelo, TX 289 Oldies 2.9 9 5 KBOL-LP Waterloo-Cedar Falls 251 Urban Adult Contemporary 2.6 11 6 WRES-LP Asheville 159 Urban Contemporary 2.5 11 7 WSBL-LP South Bend 179 Spanish Variety 2.2 12 8 WGVV-LP Quad Cities (Davnprt-RI-Moline) 147 Urban Contemporary 2.1 13 9 WGAG-LP Bluefield, WV 284 Oldies 2.0 13 10 WIGV-LP Providence-Warwick-Pawtucket 41 Contemporary Christian 1.6 18 Top Ten for TSL TSL 1 WPJI-LP Clarksville-Hopkinsville, TN-KY 201 Religious 2115.0 1 2 WIGV-LP Providence-Warwick-Pawtucket 41 Contemporary Christian 1860.0 1 3 WFBM-LP Sunbury-Selinsgrove-Lewisbrg, PA 221 Southern Gospel 1170.0 1 4 KSKQ-LP Medford-Ashland, OR 208 Variety 1140.0 3 5 WSBL-LP South Bend 179
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-325A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-325A1.pdf
  • The Petitioner contends that Westfield is home to schools, a library, and a museum and historical society. It states that the community has also an established business development corporation and is home to several local businesses. 3. Channel 265A can be allotted to Westfield consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Rules with a site restriction 3.4 kilometers (2.1 miles) west of the community. The reference coordinates are 42-18-51 NL and 79-37-04 WL. The allotment of Channel 265A at Westfield is located 320 kilometers (199 miles) from the Canadian border. Therefore, Canadian concurrence has been requested and approved by the Canadian government. 4. The Petitioner's proposal warrants consideration. Therefore, we will solicit comments on the proposed amendment to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-54A6.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-54A6.pdf
  • and Qualcomm, Inc. comments at 5. Sources of undesired RF energy can include intentional radiators, e.g., transmitters, unintentional radiators, e.g., receivers, computers and other devices that use RF energy internally but do not radiate that energy as part of their operating functions, and incidental radiators that unintentionally generate and emit RF energy. This is the definition of interference in Section 2.1 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. Task Force Report, at pp. 11-15. For example, channel coding, data coding, and error correction coding can be applied to digital signals to improve transmission reliability and performance in the presence of noise or interference. Task Force Report, at pp. 26-27. Task Force Report at pp. 27-30. The Task Force identified several long
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-7A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-7A1.pdf
  • nonetheless guided by the Interim Policy. Accordingly, the staff presumed that the relevant geographic market in which to assess the competitive effects of the proposed sale was the Arbitron ``Metro.'' WEHM(FM) was licensed to Southampton, which was located in the Nassau-Suffolk Metro, defined by Nassau and Suffolk Counties in New York. Post-transaction, BIA data indicated that AAA would have a 2.1 percent advertising revenue share in the Nassau-Suffolk Metro. The largest in-metro group owner, Cox Radio, Inc., owned three stations, garnering a 29.5 percent advertising revenue share, according to BIA. Together, the AAA and Cox stations accounted for a 31.6 percent advertising revenue share, which is well below the ``50/70'' screen for flagging radio transactions. 15. Main Street had asserted that
• http://www.fcc.gov/headlines2008.html
  • Regional Workshop and Roundtable. News Release: [1050]Word | [1051]Acrobat 6/23/08 FCC Grants Formal Complaint Regarding Verizon Customer Retention Practices. Order: [1052]Word | [1053]Acrobat Martin Statement: [1054]Word | [1055]Acrobat Copps Statement: [1056]Word | [1057]Acrobat McDowell Statement: [1058]Word | [1059]Acrobat Erratum: [1060]Word | [1061]Acrobat 6/20/08 FCC Seeks Comment on Proposed Rule Changes for Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) Spectrum in the 1.9 and 2.1 GHz Bands. News Release: [1062]Word | [1063]Acrobat FNPRM: [1064]Word | [1065]Acrobat 6/19/08 Commissioner Tate Honored By Cable In The Classroom. [1066]Word | [1067]Acrobat 6/17/08 Rules Amended to Require Telemarketers to Honor Do-Not-Call List Registrations Indefinitely. News Release: [1068]Word | [1069]Acrobat Order: [1070]Word | [1071]Acrobat Martin Statement: [1072]Word | [1073]Acrobat Copps Statement: [1074]Word | [1075]Acrobat Adelstein Statement: [1076]Word | [1077]Acrobat Tate
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-bc/can-dtv.pdf
  • calculations, use the following formula: 63 F(50,90) = F(50,50) + [F(50,50) � F(50,10)] For F(90,90) calculations, add 7.1 dB in the UHF band or 6.1 dB in the VHF bands, to the F(50,90) values. For F(10,10) calculations, subtract the above from the F(50,10) values. Where the letter of understanding calls for use of the Longley-Rice model, it will be version 2.1 unless otherwise agreed by exchange of correspondence. 4. Separation Tables 4.1 Class Definitions These class definitions were developed for Canadian domestic use and are applied to US DTV allotments only to permit the use of the distance separations in an efficient manner. DTV Allotments Class VL � DTV allotments replacing low VHF band NTSC, protected coverage 89 km Class VU
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-nb/220fin.pdf
  • time at the request of either Administration. 1.3 Within 120 km of the United States-Canada border the frequencies shall be used as specified in Sections 2, 3 and 4. 1.4 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Arrangement, beyond 120 km from the United States-Canada border each country shall have full use of the 220-222 MHz band. 2. General Sharing Arrangements 2.1 Except as indicated below in Section 3, the frequency band covered by this Arrangement is to be shared along the border as indicated in Annex A, Table 1. 2.2 In addition to the channeling allotments set forth in Annex A, both Administrations agree that, to the extent possible, the following channels will be available for implementation of the following services:
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-nb/24-38fin.pdf
  • the United States of America (U.S.) and the Department of Industry of Canada, herein referred to as the Administrations, concerns the sharing between Canadian and U.S. broadband wireless systems in the 24.25-24.45 GHz, 25.05-25.25 GHz, and 38.6-40.0 GHz bands.1 1.2 This Arrangement is subject to review at any time at the request of either Administration. 2. Use of the Bands 2.1 The 24.25�24.45 GHz and 25.05�25.25 GHz (collectively, 24 GHz) bands are designated for point-to-multipoint digital communication systems in the U.S. and for broadband wireless applications, including point-to-point and point-to-multipoint systems, in Canada. The bands are licensed by service areas as indicated in Appendix A. 2.2 The 38.6�40.0 GHz (38 GHz) band is designated for point-to-point, point-to-multipoint and mobile systems in
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-nb/lmdsagre.pdf
  • 31.3 GHz bands.1 1.2 The responsible coordinating agency for the U.S. is NTIA for the 27.35 � 27.5 GHz band and the FCC for all other bands covered by this Arrangement. The responsible coordinating agency for Canada is Industry Canada. 1.3This Arrangement is subject to review at any time at the request of either Administration. 2. Use of the Bands 2.1 In Canada, the 27.35 - 28.35 GHz (27 GHz) band is designated for LMCS. In the U.S., the 27.35 - 27.5 GHz portion of the band is designated for Federal Government fixed and mobile systems and inter-satellite service and the 27.5 - 28.35 GHz portion is designated for LMDS. 2.2 The 29.1 - 29.25 GHz (29 GHz) band is designated
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-nb/mds2way.pdf
  • (TIAS) 5205; CAN: Canada Treaty Series (CTS) 1962 No. 15. Agreement Revision Technical Annex to the Agreement of October 24, 1962 (TIAS 5205/CTS 1962 No. 15) Effected by Exchange of Notes at Ottawa, Canada, June 16 and 24, 1965. Entered into force June 24, 1965. USA:TIAS 5833/CAN: CTS 1962 No. 15, as amended June 24, 1965. 2 2. General Principles 2.1 The bands 2150-2162 MHz and 2500-2690 MHz are to be shared on an equal basis along the border and, to the extent possible, both Administrations shall have full use of these frequencies or sub-bands within their respective countries. 2.2 Coordination shall be carried out by the licensees for their respective service areas on both sides of the border. 2.3 Licensees
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-nb/wcsagree.pdf
  • nor its terrestrial repeater applications. 1.2 This Arrangement will be applied provisionally until superceded by a replacement for the Agreement Concerning the Coordination and Use of Radio Frequencies Above Thirty Megacycles per Second, with Annex, as amended2 or other relevant agreements. 1.3 This Arrangement is subject to review at any time at the request of either Administration. 2. General Principles 2.1 The bands 2305-2320 MHz and 2345-2360 MHz are to be shared on an equal basis along the border and, to the extent possible, both Administrations shall have full use of these frequencies or sub-bands for the provision of WCS within their respective countries. 2.2 Coordination shall be carried out by the WCS licensees for their respective service areas on both
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/am.pdf
  • which Fs not exceeded for more than period of observation. Characteristic field strength (E,) The field strength,at a reference distance of 1 km in a direction, of the groundvave signal propagated along perfectly ground for L kV station power, taking into account lossesia a real symbols .. ::.hertz kilohertz watt kllowat t millivolt/meter microvolt/meter mllllsiemens/meter kilometer CHAPTER 2 Groundwave prooagation 2.1 Ground conductivity 2.1.1 The maps of ground conductivity for Mexico and the U.S.A. are contained fn Appendix 1. 2.1.2 Either Administration may modify its ground conductivity map at any time by notifying changesco the other Administration. 2.1.3 Yo assignment in the Plan shallat any time be required to be modified as a result or'the incorporation of these changes. 2.2 Field
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/usmexdars.pdf
  • coordination request to have been approved. 1.3.5 The Administrations will be responsible for the coordination of DARS Repeaters and terrestrial systems. To facilitate this coordination, Administrations may allow the operators of these facilities to develop mutual arrangements to address potential interference. Any operator-to-operator arrangement must be approved by both Administrations prior to operation. 2. Transition Arrangement for Existing Terrestrial Systems. 2.1 Each Administration is provided time as set forth in Sections 2.2.1- 2.2.5 to make the necessary technical adjustments to its existing terrestrial systems so that such systems can be operated in the same frequency band as the systems of the other Administration. 2.2 The existing terrestrial systems shall be adjusted so that the pfd values specified in Appendix I shall
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-nb/usmexdars.pdf
  • coordination request to have been approved. 1.3.5 The Administrations will be responsible for the coordination of DARS Repeaters and terrestrial systems. To facilitate this coordination, Administrations may allow the operators of these facilities to develop mutual arrangements to address potential interference. Any operator-to-operator arrangement must be approved by both Administrations prior to operation. 2. Transition Arrangement for Existing Terrestrial Systems. 2.1 Each Administration is provided time as set forth in Sections 2.2.1- 2.2.5 to make the necessary technical adjustments to its existing terrestrial systems so that such systems can be operated in the same frequency band as the systems of the other Administration. 2.2 The existing terrestrial systems shall be adjusted so that the pfd values specified in Appendix I shall
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 118.1 98.0 125.6 156.4 9.7 Taiwan 88.7 93.9 108.5 112.2 139.1 152.9 121.8 167.0 170.5 162.6 194.2 6.1 Thailand 18.9 22.6 26.3 29.7 26.3 32.2 23.5 25.6 30.2 32.4 37.1 5.4 Turkey 16.8 17.8 21.1 25.9 25.0 28.4 27.0 25.9 24.6 30.3 34.3 3.6 United Kingdom 546.7 590.0 690.7 737.7 945.5 1,175.2 1,119.1 1,001.9 1,351.7 1,370.0 1,597.3 7.2 Vietnam 1.0 2.1 3.1 5.2 4.1 4.5 7.4 4.5 5.0 4.7 4.1 -5.0 Total for Countries Shown Above 4,903.4 5,418.6 6,060.8 7,219.9 7,880.8 8,865.7 9,550.211,520.612,049.812,153.4 13,809.1 8.9% Total for Other Countries 882.7 966.3 989.7 1,073.2 1,289.3 1,332.8 1,214.8 1,367.6 1,428.2 1,523.4 1,864.9 7.1 Total for All Countries 5,786.0 6,384.9 7,050.6 8,293.2 9,170.010,198.510,765.012,888.213,478.013,676.8 15,674.0 8.7 Total for 5 Largest Routes 58.5% 58.3% 59.7% 62.6%
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files05/CREPOR05.pdf
  • 5.645.2 28.9 $43,693 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 20,070,225 25.5 0.0 1.837.3 35.5 Cote d'Ivoire $4,889,284 74.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 22.9 $522,075 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $797 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 27,537,838 52.4 0.0 3.5 0.0 44.2 Djibouti $1,495,497 6.5 1.021.5 4.7 66.3 $63,979 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 6,728,884 5.2 0.813.9 8.1 71.9 Egypt $56,571,109 2.1 0.015.248.4 34.2 $1,721,212 0.0 0.0 2.314.7 83.0 $30,450 0.0 0.093.2 0.6 6.2 585,545,510 1.9 0.010.457.3 30.3 Equatorial Guinea $944,438 21.6 0.018.6 8.2 51.7 $11,876 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $128 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 4,373,091 25.6 0.021.316.7 36.5 Ethiopia $24,179,127 5.6 0.019.321.9 53.2 $775,365 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 98.5 $602 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 99.8 124,434,261 4.6 0.016.029.4 49.9 Gabon $2,130,707
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files06/CREPOR06.PDF
  • 0.221.9 2.129.5 46.3 Algeria $7,190,918 0.024.9 1.718.9 54.4 $561,771 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $27,977 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 76,845,009 0.016.5 1.617.8 64.1 Angola $6,702,223 0.023.6 6.1 7.9 62.4 $142,872 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $22,706 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 26,262,698 0.014.910.016.6 58.5 Benin $2,187,003 0.0 6.1 7.243.2 43.5 $92,925 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 95.2 $128 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 27,092,126 0.0 2.1 8.648.6 40.7 Botswana $5,664,507 0.876.5 0.0 4.1 18.5 $101,935 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 94.1 $48 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 33,593,992 0.571.6 0.0 5.3 22.6 Burkina $3,199,797 0.017.1 8.546.1 28.3 $206,928 0.0 0.0 0.010.3 89.7 $1,803 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 21,276,558 0.011.7 7.951.2 29.3 Burundi $372,892 0.016.613.836.6 33.1 $108,780 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $501 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 6,566,244 0.010.8 4.727.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files07/CREPOR07.PDF
  • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 85,532,194 0.0 22.0 2.6 29.8 45.6 Kuwait $13,698,850 0.1 22.8 2.0 17.2 57.9 $315,445 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 89.2 $19,653 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 124,067,925 0.2 22.1 3.2 27.2 47.3 Lebanon $34,010,536 0.0 13.5 20.3 42.7 23.4 $328,507 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.6 53.4 $129,697 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 303,461,389 0.0 6.3 22.9 52.9 17.9 Oman $7,284,232 2.1 40.0 0.1 23.1 34.8 $63,886 0.0 27.3 0.0 16.3 56.4 $48,430 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 51,730,022 4.9 33.8 0.1 24.5 36.7 Qatar $6,296,032 0.8 30.7 3.7 22.7 42.1 $282,553 0.0 14.7 0.0 25.4 59.9 $112,511 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 39,671,525 2.1 24.5 3.9 43.5 26.0 Saudi Arabia $40,450,631 0.0 38.3 0.6 18.0 43.1 $1,409,125 0.0 17.6 0.0 14.9 67.5 $77,004
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files08/CREPOR08.PDF
  • Venezuela $30,596,177 0.0 0.3 1.4 11.8 86.5 $1,392,694 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.8 60.2 $1,310,440 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 406,932,633 0.0 0.3 4.3 28.9 66.4 South America $624,259,291 17.1 0.0 1.2 11.1 70.6 $23,515,221 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.1 79.9 $60,839,826 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 8,980,997,459 17.5 0.0 2.6 17.6 62.2 Afghanistan $25,911,784 0.0 0.1 1.5 36.8 61.6 $2,643,014 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 97.9 $65,013 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 148,223,698 0.0 0.1 1.4 35.4 63.2 Bangladesh $13,639,391 0.0 0.1 0.9 21.9 77.1 $929,219 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 99.8 $447,913 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 457,994,093 0.0 0.1 0.8 16.8 82.3 Bhutan $325,300 0.0 0.1 1.1 46.7 52.1 $1,234 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $6,683 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 2,384,428 0.0 0.1 1.0 45.6 53.3 Brunei
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_4/wrc03_iwg4_draft_minutes_5_30_02.pdf
  • Hanson FCC Representatives Present: Ed Jacobs, Paul Locke, Ron Netro 1. Approval of Minutes of last meeting: Minutes approved without change. 2. Discussion of Draft Proposals Four documents were presented at this meeting, Documents IWG-4/28 Rev. 1, 30 Rev. 1, 31 and 32. The following is a summary of the specific topics raised in discussing these documents and their disposition. 2.1 IWG-4/32 - High Altitude Platform Stations - WRC-03 Agenda item 1.13 A new contribution was introduced, which represents a cooperative effort among the authors of previous contributions on this agenda item and, therefore, replaces documents IWG-4/19, 22, 23 and 26. This document outlines a proposal to identify a specific 300 MHz band for use by HAPS systems and specifies limits
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • Adult Standards/MOR 3.5 8 2WLCD-LP Jackson, TN 292 Urban Oldies 3.4 10 3WUVS-LP Muskegon, MI 237 Urban Contemporary 3.3 8 4KCSA-LP San Angelo, TX 289 Oldies 2.9 9 5KBOL-LP Waterloo-Cedar Falls 251 Urban Adult Contemporary 2.6 11 6WRES-LP Asheville 159 Urban Contemporary 2.5 11 7WSBL-LP South Bend 179 Spanish Variety 2.2 12 8WGVV-LP Quad Cities (Davnprt-RI- Moline) 147 Urban Contemporary 2.1 13 9WGAG-LP Bluefield, WV 284 Oldies 2.0 13 10WIGV-LP Providence-Warwick-Pawtucket41 Contemporary Christian 1.6 18 Top Ten for TSL TSL 1WPJI-LP Clarksville-Hopkinsville, TN- KY 201 Religious 2115.0 1 2WIGV-LP Providence-Warwick-Pawtucket41 Contemporary Christian1860.0 1 3WFBM-LP Sunbury-Selinsgrove-Lewisbrg, PA 221 Southern Gospel 1170.0 1 4KSKQ-LP Medford-Ashland, OR 208 Variety 1140.0 3 5WSBL-LP South Bend 179 Spanish Variety 1050.0 1 6WBYJ-LP Greensboro-WS-High Point 45 Southern
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1998/bellso.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1998/bellso.wp
  • of Communications Common Carriers 21 (1997). Although its operations are generally rural, as of 1993 "GTE control[led] local exchange service in the entire state of Hawaii as well as in large portions of the Tampa and Los Angeles markets." United States v. Western Electric Co., 993 F.2d at 1579. Other non-BOC carriers, such as Southern New England Telephone with about 2.1 million access lines in Connecticut, are also not covered by 274. 1996 FCC Statistics of Communications Common Carriers 21 (1997). From this selectivity--which BellSouth labels underinclusiveness--BellSouth would have us draw an inference of punitive purpose. But the differential treatment of the BOCs and non-BOCs is neither suggestive of punitive purpose nor particularly suspicious. Because the BOCs' facilities are generally less
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1998/rockymtn.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1998/rockymtn.wp
  • radio signals usu[ally] in the form of pulses of an ultrahigh frequency and observing and analyzing the minute signals reflected from the object and received at or near the point of transmission in such a way that range, bearing, and other characteristics of the object may be determined. Webster's Third New International Dictionary at 1871 (1993). See also 47 C.F.R. 2.1(c) (defining radar as a "radiodetermination system based on the comparison of reference signals with radio signals reflected, or retrainsmitted [sic], from the position to be determined"). 2. FCC rules define radio frequency (RF) energy as "[e]lectromagnetic energy at any frequency in the radio spectrum between 9 kHz and 3,000,000 MHZ." 47 C.F.R. 15.3(u). 3. FCC rules define an intentional radiator
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-1466.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-1466.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-1466.pdf
  • and promising technology: satellite telecommunications networks. Prior to the Commission's Report and Order, the band of spectrum from 17.7 to 19.7 (known as the "18 GHz band") was allocated to two broad groups of telecommunications users. Terrestrial fixed services (also known as "FS") operate by connecting one fixed location with one or more other fixed locations. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1(c) (2000). They serve many functions, including remote monitoring of gas and petroleum pipelines, public safety communications, railroad communications, public utilities, and high speed Internet access. See Br. for Respondents at 3; Br. for Intervenors at 1-2. The FCC estimates that approximately 179,000 terrestrial FS links operate in the 18 GHz band, and this number will grow as services move up
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2002/00-511.pdf
  • 1001 (1983). The decree did nothing, however, to increase competition in the persistently monopolistic local markets, which were thought to be the root of natural monopoly in the telecommunications industry. See S. Benjamin, D. Lichtman, & H. Shelanski, Telecom- munications Law and Policy 682 (2001) (hereinafter Ben- jamin et al.); P. Huber, M. Kellogg, & J. Thorne, Federal Telecommunications Law �2.1.1, pp. 84�85 (2d ed. 1999) (hereinafter Huber et al.); W. Baumol & J. Sidak, Toward Competition in Local Telephony 7�10 (1994); S. Breyer, Regulation and Its Reform 291�292, 314 (1982). These markets were addressed by provisions of the Telecommu- Cite as: 535 U. S. ____ (2002) 3 Opinion of the Court nications Act of 1996 (1996 Act or Act), Pub
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2005/03-1431-011405.pdf
  • Inga undertook a series of transactions designed to move his business from Tariff No. 2 to a more lucrative contract tariff. First, his companies - each of which operated under CSTP II, a type of plan offered under Tariff No. 2 - transferred all nine of their plans to a new entity, Combined Companies, Incorporated (CCI). As required by Section 2.1.8 of Tariff No. 2, CCI expressly agreed to assume all obligations of the transferor companies. The transfer also stipulated that CCI would pass 80 percent of its profits on to the transferor companies. Second, CCI attempted to negotiate a contract tariff with AT&T. Third, as temporary cover until this envisioned contract tariff became a reality, or as a permanent alternative
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/contracts/pre-award/RFQ11000022.pdf
  • Network Frame Relay Service to Private Line Service & Network Based IP-VPNs Networx Request for Quote RFQ11000022 August 30, 2011 WAN Networx Transition RFQ11000022 ___________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 29 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Title..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Background ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Acquisition Selected .......................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Fair Opportunity Exception............................................................................................. 3 2 SPECIFIC TASKS AND/OR SERVICES.......................................................................... 4 2.1 Network Based IP-VPN Service (NBIPVPN) ................................................................. 4 2.2 Private Line Service (PLS) ............................................................................................... 4 3 SERVICE REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................ 5 3.1 Network Based IP-VPN Service ...................................................................................... 5 3.1.1 Network Based IP-VPN Service Requirements .......................................................... 5 3.1.2 Network-Based IP VPN CLINs .................................................................................. 5 3.2 Private Line Service (PLS) ............................................................................................... 6 3.2.1 PLS Requirements ...................................................................................................... 6 3.2.2 PLS CLINs: ................................................................................................................. 6 4 AGENCY
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/contracts/pre-award/RevisedSOW-110729.pdf
  • the ability to load FCC public safety licensees into a systems database to allow for geographical identification (Geo Mapping), selection and alerting during emergency response situations. Federal Communications Commission FCC-SOL11000004 Page 3 of 8 2.0 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE The period of performance for this contract is from August 12, 2011 through August 12, 2012, with two (2) additional option years. 2.1 Place of Performance: The vendor must provide semi-annual computer based training and one (1) onsite classroom training at mutually agreed dates after contract award on the use of the system for up to 25 FCC employees at the FCC location below: FCC Headquarters 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554 Equipment, software and hardware will be housed and maintained by
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to this system of records. 2.2 Have there been any changes to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ccd.pdf
  • the appropriate records schedule consistent with NARA guidelines. If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 2.2 Have there been any changes to the location of the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? 14 Yes No Please
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-core-financial.pdf
  • and disposal schedule with OMD-PERM's Records Management Officer. If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 2.2 Have there been any changes to the location of the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? Yes No Please explain
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-criminal-investigative-files.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the Criminal Investigative Files information system, and to the personally identifiable
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-crisis.pdf
  • Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 13 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: FCC/PSHSB-1, "Emergency Contacts (EmCon)," SORN has not been assigned a Security Classification, although this information is labelled as "For Offical Use Only." 2.2 Have
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-dqc.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the Data Quality Comments information system and to the PII that
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ecfs.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) information system, and to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-email.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the Inter-Office and Remote Access Internet E-mail information center and to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-experimental-radio.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the Experimental Radio Station License Files information system and to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-faca.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the Federal Advisory Committee Membership File (FACA) information system and to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-financial.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: , 2.2 Have there been any changes to the location of the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? Yes No 12
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-foia.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: FCC/OMD-17, "Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)," SORN has not been assigned a Security Classification. 2.2 Have there been any changes to the location of
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-general-investigative-files.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the General Investigative Files information system and to the personally identifiable
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ils.pdf
  • Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 12 If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center has not assigned a security classification to the Integrated Library System (ILS) Records information system and to the personally
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-investigations-hearings.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center has not assigned a security classification to the Investigations and Hearings information system and to the personally identifiable information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-labor-employee-relations.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the Labor and Employee Relations Case Files information system, and to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-lmts.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 2.2 Have there been any changes to the location of the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? Yes No 15 Please
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pams.pdf
  • Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: [TBD] If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 2.2 Have there been any changes to the location of the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? Yes No Please explain
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pay-leave-garnish.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the Pay, Leave, and Garnishment Records information system, and to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-personal-security-files.pdf
  • Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 14 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: Most personally identifiable information (PII) in this information system that is covered by FCC/OMD-16, "Personal Security Files," SORN is not classified; however, in some
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-physical-access.pdf
  • Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 13 If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: FCC/OMD-24, "Personal Security Files," SORN has not received a security classification. 2.2 Have there been any changes to the location of the information covered
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-reasonable-accommodation-requests.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the Reasonable Accommodations Requests information system and to the PII that
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-remedy.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the Remedy Ticket System (Service Center) information system, and to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-rmis.pdf
  • retention and disposal schedule with OMD-PERM's Records Officer. If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 2.2 Have there been any changes to the location of the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? Yes No Please explain
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-small-business-contacts.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the Small Business Contacts List information system and to the personally
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-telephone-call-details.pdf
  • Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 15 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the Telephone Call Detail information center and to the personally identifiable
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-transit.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: FCC/OMD-7, "FCC Employee Transit Benefit and Parking Permit Programs," SORN does not have a security classification. 2.2 Have there been any changes to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-uls.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center has not assigned a security classification to the ULS's information systems and to the personally identifiable information that it
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-violators.pdf
  • records retention and disposition schedule for this SORN. If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the Violators File information system and to the personally identifiable information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pshsb-coop-plan.pdf
  • Records Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: If this is a new System of Records Notice (SORN), please skip to Section 3.0 Development, Management, and Deployment and/or Sharing of the Information: Section 2.0 System of Records Notice (SORN) Update: If a System of Records Notice (SORN) currently covers the information, please provide information to update and/or revise the SORN: 2.1 Have there been any changes to the Security Classification for the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN) from what was originally determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has assigned the following security classification to the COOP information system and the PII that it collects, uses,
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
  • 35.2 33.1 74.3 70.7 77.2 66.7 64.9 Independents 20.2 19.0 11.0 10.7 10.2 19.8 15.0 8.1 7.8 7.4 21.9 24.2 17.8 27.0 28.4 Local 14.4 13.3na na na 11.3 9.3na na na 18.1 22.2na na na Distant and Superstations 5.8 5.7na na na 8.5 5.6na na na 3.8 2.0na na na Public 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.1 3.8 5.1 5.0 6.3 6.7 Cable 13.5 25.7 33.0 46.6 49.7 24.5 39.3 45.0 54.9 57.4-- -- -- -- -- Basic 7.7 20.0 27.5 38.1 41.1 14.2 29.9 37.8 44.9 47.3-- -- -- -- -- Pay 5.8 5.7 5.5 5.5 5.4 10.4 9.3 7.2 6.4 6.2-- -- -- -- -- Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • forth more product variety, readily suggests population as an instrument for stations and formats. Columns 1 through 4 show how stations and formats vary with population, 12 Of course, a listening share that increases with population is sufficient, but not necessary, to show that 16 with and without controls. With controls, an additional million persons in the market brings forth 2.1 stations and 1.2 formats. The last two columns of table 3 show how AQH listening varies with stations and formats, including controls, using population as an instrument for stations and formats. The respective effects of stations and formats remain significant and are roughly double their OLS counterparts in table 2. This is a striking - although not a surprising -
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-c.pdf
  • Benefits Whom in Differentiated Product Markets. NBER working paper 7391. 33 Table 1: Stations and Listening, by Race and Format, 1997 101 Markets with Black Listening 54 Markets with Hisp. Listening Percent of Stations Percent of Listening Percent of Stations Percent of Listening Format Non-Black Black Non-Hisp. Hispanic Adult Contemp. (AC) 5.9 6.7 2.0 5.0 5.4 3.4 AC/Contemp. Hit Radio 2.1 2.9 0.8 2.3 2.9 1.5 Adult Contemp./New Rock 0.6 1.1 0.3 1.1 1.5 0.6 AC/Soft Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Album Oriented Rock (AOR) 5.3 6.0 0.7 4.5 4.9 2.4 AOR/Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 AOR/Classic Rock 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Album Oriented Rock/New Rock 3.0 3.7 0.5 3.1 3.3 1.9 Album
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs-best/NSTACreport07.pdf
  • COMMITTEE NSTAC Report to the President on Emergency Communications and Interoperability January 16, 2007 President's National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee Emergency Communications and Interoperability i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................ES�1 1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background and Charge..........................................................................................1 1.2 Approach.................................................................................................................3 1.3 Scope of the NSTAC Review.................................................................................3 1.4 Report Organization................................................................................................5 2.0 EXPANSION OF NATIONAL SECURITY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PRIORITY SERVICES AND DEPLOYABLE CAPABILITIES.............................................7 2.1 Deployable Communications Capabilities..............................................................8 2.2 Telecommunications Service Priority Enhancement for Wireless .......................... Networks...............................................................................................................13 3.0 INPUTS TO THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY........17 3.1 Expansion of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Policy to ................ Support Emergency Communications..................................................................18 3.2 Critical National Emergency Communications Strategy Elements......................21 3.3 Emergency Communications in the Converged Environment.............................25 4.0 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................33 APPENDIX A: THE NSTAC LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT ON EMERGENCY
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs-psap/etns060404.pdf
  • NENA wishes to express its appreciation to the above team members for their work in developing the operational standards listed in this 9-1-1 Center Operations Committee standards document. NENA Minimum Standards for Emergency Telephone Notification Systems NENA 56-003 June 12, 2004, Original 4 Minimum Standards for Emergency Telephone Notification Systems TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Overview 6 2.0 Introduction 8 2.1 Purpose of Document 8 2.2 Reason to Implement 8 2.3 Benefits 8 2.4 Technical Impacts Summary 9 2.5 Document Terminology 9 2.6 Reason for Reissue 9 2.7 Costs Factors 9 2.8 Cost Recovery Considerations 10 2.9 Acronyms/Abbreviations 10 3.0 Existing Notification Alternatives 11 Broadcast Announcements and EAS 11 Door to Door Notification 11 Other Communication Devices 12 Sirens 12 Weather
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs-psap/nena-aid062505.pdf
  • Formuziewich MTS Communications, CA Sandy Hutchcroft Dubuque, IA Tracy Lorenson E-Comm, BC, Canada Wendi Lively Spartanburg, SC Barry Luke Orange County, FL Carlos Noriega Miami Beach, FL Rob Robinson Rowan County, NC R. Craig Whittington Guilford County, NC NENA Mutual Aid Standard/Model Recommendation NENA 53-002 June 25, 2005 Page 4 of 19 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW..............................................................................................................................5 2 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................6 2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE........................................................................................................................................6 2.2 REASON TO IMPLEMENT...................................................................................................................................6 2.3 BENEFITS.........................................................................................................................................................6 2.4 TECHNICAL IMPACTS SUMMARY......................................................................................................................6 2.5 DOCUMENT TERMINOLOGY..............................................................................................................................6 2.6 REASON FOR REISSUE......................................................................................................................................6 2.7 COST FACTORS.................................................................................................................................................6 2.8 COST RECOVERY CONSIDERATIONS.................................................................................................................7 2.9 ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS...........................................................................................................................7 3 MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS......................................................................................................................8 3.1 PARTIES...........................................................................................................................................................8 3.2 AUTHORITY......................................................................................................................................................8 3.3 DEFINITIONS....................................................................................................................................................8 3.4 ASSISTANCE TO BE RENDERED.........................................................................................................................8 3.5 CONDITION(S) FOR IMPLEMENTATION..............................................................................................................8 3.6 REQUEST FOR IMPLEMENTATION......................................................................................................................8 3.7 IMPLEMENTATION............................................................................................................................................8 3.8 DEMOBILIZATION.............................................................................................................................................9 3.9 COMPENSATION...............................................................................................................................................9 3.10 INSURANCE......................................................................................................................................................9
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs-psap/nenaplan060705.pdf
  • Chuck Freeman Pinellas County, FL Sandi Hutchcroft Dubuque, IA Dick Nelson Marion County, FL Susan Pettingill Orange County, FL Benjamin Robinett St. Charles County, MO Fran Self Palm Bay, FL Julie Thruman Rochelle, IL NENA Communications Center/PSAP Disaster and Contingency Plans Model Recommendation NENA 53-001 June 7, 2005 Page 4 of 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW..............................................................................................................................5 2. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................6 2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE........................................................................................................................................6 2.2 REASON TO IMPLEMENT...................................................................................................................................6 2.3 BENEFITS.........................................................................................................................................................6 2.4 TECHNICAL IMPACTS SUMMARY......................................................................................................................6 2.5 DOCUMENT TERMINOLOGY..............................................................................................................................6 2.6 REASON FOR REISSUE......................................................................................................................................7 2.7 COST FACTORS.................................................................................................................................................7 2.8 COST RECOVERY CONSIDERATIONS.................................................................................................................7 2.9 ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS...........................................................................................................................7 3. DISASTER AND CONTINGENCY PLANS...................................................................................................7 3.1 STAFFING.........................................................................................................................................................7 3.2 IT SECURITY....................................................................................................................................................8 3.3 REDUNDANT SYSTEMS.....................................................................................................................................8 3.4 RATIONALE FOR EVACUATION.........................................................................................................................9 3.5 EVACUATION PROCEDURES............................................................................................................................10 3.5 RETURN TO NORMAL OPERATIONS................................................................................................................11 4. REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................................12 5. EXHIBITS........................................................................................................................................................13 NENA Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs-psap/resource032707.pdf
  • Central Dispatch, MI Steve Makkay , Sr St. Charles, MO Monica Million City of Grand Junction Police Department, CO John Struemer Hamilton County, TN Gordon Vanauken L.R. Kimball and Assoc. Alan Wells St. Francis Joint Communications, MO NENA Resources Analysis Operations Information Document NENA 53-502 March 27, 2007 Page 4 of 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW...............................................................................................................................5 2 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................5 2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF DOCUMENT...............................................................................................................5 2.2 REASON TO IMPLEMENT...................................................................................................................................5 2.3 REASON FOR REISSUE......................................................................................................................................5 2.4 RECOMMENDATION FOR STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT WORK...........................................................................5 2.5 COST FACTORS.................................................................................................................................................5 2.6 ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS...........................................................................................................................6 3 RESOURCE ANALYSIS COMPONENTS.....................................................................................................6 3.1 NETWORK........................................................................................................................................................6 3.2 PSAP EQUIPMENT............................................................................................................................................6 3.3 INFRASTRUCTURE............................................................................................................................................7 3.4 HUMAN RESOURCES........................................................................................................................................8 3.5 ADMINISTRATIVE.............................................................................................................................................8 3.6 SUPPORT SERVICES..........................................................................................................................................8 3.7 FIELD USERS....................................................................................................................................................8 4 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................................9 NENA Resources Analysis Operations Information Document NENA 53-502 March 27, 2007 Page
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/plans/University_of_Washington_Emergency_Response_Management_Plan_4-2009.pdf
  • Usage 1.12 Plan Content and Format 1.12 Tabs and Pages (Figure 3) 1.14 Table 1 - Crosscheck Matrix 1.15 E EM ME ER RG GE EN NC CY Y R REESSPPO ON NS SE E M MAANNAAG GE EM ME EN NTT P PLLAANN Table of Contents April 2009 Page Section 2 UW Campus EOC Organization, Position Responsibilities and Assignments 2.1 Emergency Operations Center Functions/Units (Figure 4) 2.2 Table 2-A � UW EOC Management Functions 2.3 Table 2-B � UW EOC Operations Functions 2.4 Table 2-C � UW EOC Planning Functions 2.7 Table 2-D � UW EOC Logistics Functions 2.8 Table 2-E � UW EOC Finance Functions 2.10 Section 3 Checklists 1 UW Emergency Policy Council (President's Cabinet) 3.1 2 EOC
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/plans/WISCONSIN_EMS_Comms_Plan_10-2006.pdf
  • 3 SECTION 1 � COMMUNICATION SYSTEM COMPONENTS 1.0 Introduction � System Components 6 1.1 Public Access to EMS after Discovery of a Medical Emergency 6 1.2 Dispatch and Coordination of Response 7 1.3 Medical Control Communications 7 1.4 Interagency Communications 7 1.5 Education for Users 8 SECTION 2 - STATE EMS COMMUNICATIONS PLAN 2.0 Administrative Overview � State Authority 9 2.1 Public Access to the EMS System after Discovery of a Medical Emergency 10 2.2 Dispatch and Coordination of Response 10 2.3 Medical Control Communications 10 2.4 Interagency Communications Local Regional ALS Intercept and Air Medical Back-Up Communications Telephone Interconnection 2.5 Ambulance Licensure and Frequency Coordination 12 2.6 Frequencies and tones for EMS Communications 12 EMS B (155.340) 13 EMS A
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/plans/santalouisacaemergplan.pdf
  • political subdivisions within the county area." (Section 8559). Each operational area is a special purpose organization, created to prepare for and coordinate the response to emergencies within a county area. Operational areas coordinate inter jurisdictional emergency operations and mutual aid. OAs also have an expanded role based on recent legislation (CCR, Title 19, Sec 2409) (State Emergency Plan, page 8). 2.1 Cities in the OA are shown below, with the title of the position responsible for the development of emergency services, civil defense, and disaster activities. The day-to-day emergency services/civil defense coordinators for the jurisdictions are listed in a separate Resource Directory. City of ----------- Fire Chief City of ----------- Police Chief City of ----------- Fire Chief City of ----------- Fire
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/plans/valleycommctr.pdf
  • RECORDS/TAPE REQUESTS.................................................................................224 CONTINUITY OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS.......................................................................225 MEDIA ACCESS TO 800 MHZ RADIO SYSTEM.....................................................................226 PUBLIC ACCESS TO 800 MHZ RADIO SYSTEM....................................................................228 VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES POLICY NUMBER: 100 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE/CHAIN OF COMMAND/AUTHORITY Date Originated: 01/15/83 Date Revised: 07/11/06 1.0 PURPOSE/REFERENCES: To establish the Organizational Structure, the Chain of Command and appropriate authority. RCW 39.34.030(3)(b) CALEA Standards: 1.1.1 - 1.1.6, 2.1.2 - 2.1.4, 2.2.4, 2.4.1 2.0 POLICY: Valley Communications Center was formed pursuant to RCW 39.34.030(3)(b), which provided responsibility and authority for emergency service communications and all related incidental functions for communicating and dispatching services between the public and the participating public safety agencies. The Director shall administer Valley Communications Center in it's day-to-day operations consistent with adopted policies. Valley Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/outage/nors_manual.pdf
  • 8bit Network Outage Reporting System User Manual Version 6 April 9, 2009 ii Table of Contents 1 Logging Onto the Network Outage Reporting System .................................1 1.1 Accessing the Network Outage Reporting System............................................1 1.2 Security Banner..................................................................................................1 1.3 NORS Login Screen...........................................................................................2 1.3.1 Screen for New Users with New Notifications...........................................4 1.3.2 Screen for Password Request......................................................................5 1.3.3 Password Expiration...................................................................................6 2 User Main Menu Screen..................................................................................6 2.1 Find a Report......................................................................................................8 2.2 Report Notification.............................................................................................8 2.3 Update/Resubmit/Withdraw a Report..............................................................10 2.3.1 Screen for Updating Notifications, Initial Reports and Drafts, and Filing Final Reports.............................................................................................11 2.3.2 Filing a Final Report.................................................................................11 2.3.3 Withdrawing a Report...............................................................................12 2.4 Upload XML File.............................................................................................13 2.5 Request to Reopen a Report.............................................................................13 2.6 Reports Overdue...............................................................................................13 2.7 Report List........................................................................................................14 2.8 Modify Password..............................................................................................15 2.9 Modify Profile..................................................................................................16 2.10 Modify Company ID........................................................................................16 2.11 Deactivate
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/techtopics/techtopics4.html
  • ^4 Portable Operating System Interface is the collective name of a family of IEEE standards that define the application programming interface (API) for software compatible with variants of the Unix operating system. The family of POSIX standards is formally designated as IEEE 1003 and the international standard name is ISO/IEC 9945. See [75]http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/posix/. ^5 See [76]http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-264A1.doc. ^6 47 C.F.R. Section 2.1. For the FCC order adopting this definition, see Facilitating Opportunities for Flexible, Efficient, and Reliable Spectrum Use Employing Cognitive Radio Technologies, ET Docket No. 03-108, Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 5486 (2005), also available at [77]http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.doc. ^7 See [78]http://www.sdrforum.org/. ^8 See [79]http://www.sdrforum.org/uploads/news_162003public_safety_sig_03_25_ 04.doc. ^9 See [80]http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuradio/. Linux is a free Unix-type operating system originally created by Linus Torvalds with
• http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/presentations/2003/021203/featuredetection.pdf
  • -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 x 10-7 Frequency (MHz) -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 x 10-7 Frequency (MHz) Power Spectr al D ens ity ( dBW /Hz) Power Spectr al D ens ity ( dBW /Hz) 31 �2003 The MITRE Corporation Spectrum of M-ary PSK Signal in Noise after Squaring 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3 x 10-7 Frequency (MHz) Power Spectr al D ens ity ( dBW /Hz) SNR > 10 dB 32 �2003 The MITRE Corporation Feature Detector Design Process I Using mathematical model of waveform, derive expression for cyclic correlation function � Account for modulation, filtering and equalization, statistics of data sequence � Example
• http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/presentations/2004/011504/wtb.pdf
  • better visual representation of licensing data and easier determination of incumbents' location �Integrating MDS/ITFS into ULS�Facilitates rulemaking currently underway �More of our Applications are Electronic and Customer Friendly (e.g., Form 605)-Provides increased accessibility to users of assistive devices 2003 Accomplishments: Modernization Efforts Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Preview of 2004 Policy Goals �Resolution of 800 MHz Public Safety Proceeding �Wireless Broadband in 2.1 and 2.5 GHz R&O (MDS/ITFS) �Wireless Broadband Above 5 GHz NPRM �More Streamlining and Harmonization of Service Rules �NRIC VII on E911 Technical Issues �Air-Ground Telecommunications Services R&O �Rural Services R&O �Secondary Markets Second R&O �Ninth Annual CMRS Competition Report �Nationwide NEPA/Tower Siting Programmatic Agreement R&O �Wireless Infrastructure Policy/Tower Sitings �Continue Spectrum Audits and Auctions �Public Workshops and Forums (Public/Private
• http://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/IPWGFinalReport.doc http://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/IPWGFinalReport.pdf
  • more administrations without prejudice to other administrations. These definitions of interference, which are decades old, are also found in the international radio regulations. The terms permissible interference and accepted interference are used in the international coordination of frequency assignments between administrations. The Commission's service rules for a number of radio services include the definition of harmful interference given in � 2.1(c). The terms interference and harmful interference also are found in the Communications Act of 1934 as Amended: � Sec. 302 [47 U.S.C. 302(a)] Devices which interfere with radio reception. ``(a) The Commission may, consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity, make reasonable regulations, (1) governing the interference potential of devices which in their operation are capable of emitting radio
• http://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/presentation-111303.pdf
  • Rural NOI Rural NPRM Report & Order Secondary Markets FNPRM 2ndReport & Order Unlicensed NOI NPRM Report & Order(s) Receiver Specifications NOI Constructive Record TBD Interference Temperature NOI Constructive Record TBD 18 The Road Ahead The Road Ahead Full-Speed Implementation �No Slowing Down! �Cognitive Radio Technologies Proceeding �Transitioning to Newer Policy Models & Improving Access �Band-by-band, service-by-service �Wireless Broadband in 2.1 & 2.5 GHz R&O �Wireless Broadband above 5 GHz NPRM �Streamlining and Harmonization of Antiquated Service Rules �Consideration and Application of Task Force Principles and Concepts, Plus Other Innovative Approaches �Spectrum Audits and Auctions 19 Other Activities Other Activities Outreach and Feedback �Public Workshops, Forums, and Showcase Events �Chairman and Commissioner Speeches �Public Comments on Report �International Exchanges �FCC University
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol_response082800.pdf
  • ongoing consumer research has suggested that many consumers � while still valuing categorization of channels � might not welcome the confusion of a channel numbering system unique to AOLTV and different from that on all the other TV sets throughout their household. AOL anticipates, however, offering an alphabetical listing as a future subscriber option. 3.2 In your response to question 2.1(a) of the Commission Document and Information Request No.2, you state that AOL is entering into agreements with video programming networks (your "ITV partners") for the creation of interactive content for the AOLTV service. Will a video programming network that is not an ITV "partner" be required to negotiate a contract with AOLTV in order for its interactive services to be
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • Drop Drop TAP TAP ISP B ISP C Technical Feasibility and Capital Cost Emy Tseng (MIT) Kamal I. Latham (Harvard University) Armand Ciccarelli (MIT) Hao Chen (MIT) Submitted for STP-308 Prof. Lee McKnight (MIT) Prof. Jean Camp (Harvard University) May 8, 2000 Open Access Cable Network 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................7 SECTION 2. U.S. PUBLIC POLICY DEBATE............................................................................................................8 SECTION 2.1. OPEN ACCESS..........................................................................................................................................8 SECTION 2.2. THE FCC.................................................................................................................................................8 SECTION 2.3. PRO-OPEN ACCESS GROUPS......................................................................................................................9 SECTION 2.4. THE CABLE INDUSTRY: A TRADITIONAL OPPONENT TO OPEN ACCESS.......................................................9 SECTION 2.5. CURRENT STATUS OF THE POLICY DEBATE..............................................................................................10 SECTION 2.6. RECENT ACTIVITY..................................................................................................................................12 SECTION 3. OPEN ACCESS CABLE NETWORK ARCHITECTURES.................................................................13 SECTION 3.1. HYBRID FIBER-COAX CABLE NETWORK..................................................................................................13 SECTION 3.2. OPEN ACCESS TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS....................................................................................................14 SECTION 3.3. POINT TO POINT PROTOCOL OVER
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw_nar071700.pdf
  • documents and information. In accordance with the instructions set forth in the letter to us from To-Quyen Troung, Associate Chief, Cable Services Bureau, dated June 9, 2000, and the Protective Order adopted by the Cable Services Bureau on April 6, 2000, the parties are filing the documents which accompany these narrative responses under separate cover letter. * * * AOL-TV 2.1 Please explain AOL-TV's business plan for offering its services to multichannel video programming distributor ("MVPD") subscribers. On June 19, 2000, AOL announced the launch of AOLTV, a new interactive service designed to enhance the television viewing experience and make the TV more entertaining and useful for consumers. It should be understood that AOLTV is not a programming service that is
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/arch-nextel/nextel_reply040201.pdf
  • licenses. While this section has analyzed the competitive effects in a hypothetical dispatch market and shown there are no competitive concerns for dispatch customers, the analysis does not affect my earlier conclusion that the appropriate relevant market includes all CMRS spectrum. All CMRS spectrum can be used to provide dispatch (and interconnect, data, 42 Baumann and Siwek Affidavit, Table EI 2.1 43 In the upper 200 channels, the overlay license winner has the right to relocate the incumbent licensees or to let them remain and protect them from interference. In the lower 80 and 150 general category channels, the auction winner must protect the incumbents and does not have relocation rights. 17 etc.) just like the spectrum Nextel, Southern and Motorola
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/att_reply080202.pdf
  • favor cable ownership limits more stringent than the 30 percent ownership limit reversed by the court of appeals, explains: "[a] study such as this can be useful only if the model used in the study reflects the real world situation and the behavior of the experimental participants can reasonably be expected to mirror that of real marketplace participants." SBC at 2.1 There is a consensus that the model used in this study does not do that, and it would therefore be irrational � and, under Time Warner II, unlawful � to rely upon the Working Paper as support for speech- restricting cable ownership limits. As SBC notes, "the Working Paper fails to reflect the real world and, as a result, is
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/bellsouth_exhibit1.pdf
  • Notice & Request for Comments Docket No. 011109273-1273-01 National Telecommunications and Information Administration U. S. Department of Commerce by Professor Robert G. Harris* on behalf of BellSouth Corporation December 19, 2001 *Qualifications of Professor Harris are presented in Appendix A. Exhibit 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS � Title Responds to NTIA Questions: Page 1 Toward a National Broadband Policy 1 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Defining Broadband Access Broadband and Digital Convergence Broadband and Wireless Networks Next Generation Broadband Implications of Broadband Definition B & J 3 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Primary Policy Goals & Objectives Promoting Intermodal Competition Technology Neutrality Policies Facilities-Based Competition Widespread Deployment of Broadband Access Eliminating Regulatory Obstacles A & D 10 4 4.1 4.2 4.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/oppwp35.pdf
  • - EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS.....................................9 3. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN...........................................................................14 3.1 Treatment Variables..............................................................................................................14 3.2 Experiment Institution..........................................................................................................17 3.3 Performance Measures..........................................................................................................22 4.0 EXPERIMENT RESULTS..........................................................................26 4.1 Economic Efficiency..............................................................................................................27 4.2 Buyer�s Bargaining Power....................................................................................................28 4.3 Buyer Surplus........................................................................................................................34 4.4 Seller Profits and Losses........................................................................................................36 4.5 Regression Analysis � CAP MFN Treatment Data...............................................................40 5.0 CONCLUDING COMMENTS.....................................................................50 APPENDIX A: ECONOMIC THEORY................................................................54 A.1 Traditional Oligopsony/Oligopoly Theory............................................................................54 A.2 Some Solutions Based on Cooperative Game Theory...........................................................55 A.2.1 The �Nash Bargaining� Solution......................................................................................57 A.2.2 The �Shapley Value� Solution..........................................................................................57 A.2.3 The �Core� Solution........................................................................................................58 A.3 Illustration of the Cooperative Solutions for a Symmetric Bargaining Game.....................59 A.4 Cooperative Solutions in the Non-Symmetric Bargaining Game.........................................61 A.5 Altering the Bargaining Game..............................................................................................65 A.5.1 No Capacity Constraints..................................................................................................65 A.5.2 Avoidability and Unavoidability of Costs.........................................................................67 A.6 Some Caveats in Interpreting the Cooperative Solutions.....................................................69 ii A.7 Testing the Theoretical
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/cablevision-bresnan.html
  • larger transaction whereby Cablevision will acquire control of Bresnan. Cablevision, a Delaware corporation, is majority-owned by a group comprised of Charles F. Dolan and his family. Cablevision is a facilities-based provider of bundled video, voice, and broadband Internet services in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut. It provides basic video service to approximately 3.1 million subscribers, voice service to approximately 2.1 million residential and small business customers, and broadband service to approximately 2.6 million customers. Bresnan is a cable provider serving 300,000 subscribers in 148 communities in Colorado, Utah, Montana, and Wyoming. Bresnan also provides voice service to 126,000 subscribers and broadband service to 220,000 subscribers. Comments or petitions to deny must be filed no later than September 13, 2010. Replies
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/comsat-telenor/fcc01-369.pdf
  • to the singular as well as the plural forms of such terms and to the masculine as well as to the feminine and neuter genders of such term. Whenever the words "include," "includes," "including" or "such as" are used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words "without limitation." ARTICLE 2: INFORMATION STORAGE AND ACCESS 2.1 Implementation Plan. Certain of the rights and obligations of the Parties are set forth in further detail in an Implementation Plan, which is executed by Telenor and is incorporated in and constitutes an integral part of this Agreement. Telenor shall comply with the Implementation Plan, subject to possible modifications in accordance with Article 9 of this Agreement. The Implementation Plan
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/pegasusbrief_020402.pdf
  • this steady decline. Nor will other potential technologies, such as Ka-band satellite, MMDS, LMDS, or MVDDS compete significantly with DBS in rural and other uncabled areas in the near future. See Rusch Aff., �� 50-54. 40 See, e.g., GTE/Bell Atlantic Order, supra, at 14,104 � 142 n.334. 41 DEPT. OF JUSTICE AND FEDERAL TRADE COMM'N HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES �� 0.1, 2.1, and 2.2 (1992) ("Guidelines"). 22 enables a firm to increase price or otherwise compete less aggressively independently of how rivals behave. Such effects can occur where the products of the merging firms are sufficiently similar that there is considerable rivalry between them and they are closer substitutes for one another than are other products.42 Because EchoStar and DIRECTV are closer
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nbc-telemundo/exhibit6.pdf
  • letter of transmittal for use in exchanging such Company Stockholder's Certificates (as defined in Section 2.2(a)) for the cash and/or certificates representing whole shares (subject to Section 2.2(d)) of Parent Common Stock to be delivered to such Company Stockholder pursuant to this Agreement. Each Company Stockholder shall deliver a notice to the Parent within the time period specified in Section 2.1(f)(i) of this Agreement and Section 2.5 of the Stockholders' Agreement of (x) the number of shares of Company Common Stock or Company Preferred Stock as to which such holder desires to make a Cash Election (as defined below); (y) the names to whom the Cash Consideration (as defined below) shall be paid (including the relevant wire instruction numbers) and/or (z)
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/da010947.doc
  • Communications, Inc. and VoiceStream Wireless Holding Corporation, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 10,089, � 30, n.82 (WTB/IB 2000); In re Applications of Vodafone AirTouch PLC and Bell Atlantic Corporation, 15 FCC Rcd. 16,507, � 25, n.49 (WTB/IB 2000); Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997) (``Revised Horizontal Merger Guidelines''). See 47 C.F.R. � 20.6. As part of all applications for assignment or transfer of control of CMRS licenses, the assignee or transferee must certify that grant of the application would not cause the assignee or transferee to be in violation of the spectrum aggregation
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/nextel_exparte030801.pdf
  • licenses. While this section has analyzed the competitive effects in a hypothetical dispatch market and shown there are no competitive concerns for dispatch customers, the analysis does not affect my earlier conclusion that the appropriate relevant market includes all CMRS spectrum. All CMRS spectrum can be used to provide dispatch (and interconnect, data, 42 Baumann and Siwek Affidavit, Table EI 2.1 43 In the upper 200 channels, the overlay license winner has the right to relocate the incumbent licensees or to let them remain and protect them from interference. In the lower 80 and 150 general category channels, the auction winner must protect the incumbents and does not have relocation rights. 17 I . etc.) just like the spectrum Nextel, Southern
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/nextel_exparte032901.pdf
  • licenses. While this section has analyzed the competitive effects in a hypothetical dispatch market and shown there are no competitive concerns for dispatch customers, the analysis does not affect my earlier conclusion that the appropriate relevant market includes all CMRS spectrum. All CMRS spectrum can be used to provide dispatch (and interconnect, data, 42 Baumann and Siwek Affidavit, Table El 2.1 43 In the upper 200 channels, the overlay license winner has the right to relocate the incumbent licensees or to let them remain and protect them from interference. In the lower 80 and 150 general category channels, the auction winner must protect the incumbents and does not have relocation rights. 17 I ' etc.) just like the spectrum Nextel, Southern
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-pacific/appli_att2exh4.pdf
  • licenses. While this section has analyzed the competitive effects in a hypothetical dispatch market and shown there are no competitive concerns for dispatch customers, the analysis does not affect my earlier conclusion that the appropriate relevant market includes all CMRS spectrum. All CMRS spectrum can be used to provide dispatch (and interconnect, data, 42 Baumann and Siwek Affidavit, Table EI 2.1 43 In the upper 200 channels, the overlay license winner has the right to relocate the incumbent licensees or to let them remain and protect them from interference. In the lower 80 and 150 general category channels, the auction winner must protect the incumbents and does not have relocation rights. 18 etc.) just like the spectrum Nextel, Southern and Motorola
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-pacific/da012685.pdf
  • and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 10,089, � 30, n. 82 (WTB/IB 2000) (and cases cited therein); Applications of Vodafone AirTouch Plc and Bell Atlantic Corporation, 2000 WL 332670, � 25, n. 49 (WTB/IB 2000) (and cases cited therein). See also Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997). 26 Public Interest Statement at 2-3. 27 Id. at 5, quoting In the Matter of Implementation of Section 6002(b) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions With Respect to Commercial Mobile Services, FCC 01-192 (rel. July 17, 2001) ("Sixth CMRS
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-pacific/da012765.pdf
  • 15 FCC RCd 10,089, � 30 n. 82 (WTB/IB 2000) (and cases cited therein); In re Applications of Vodafone AirTouch Plc and Bell Atlantic Corporation, 2000 WL 332670, � 25, n. 49 (WTB/IB 2000) (and cases cited therein). See also, Horizontal Merger Guidelines Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552, �� 2.1, 2.2, 4 (dated Apr. 2, 1992, as revised, Apr. 8, 1997). 27 Public Interest Statement at 12-14. Federal Communications Commission 5 MHz and 900 MHz licenses,28 and Nextel intends to integrate this spectrum into its iDEN network.29 Consistent with our prior decisions,30 we will examine the competitive effects of this transaction with respect to two product markets: trunked dispatch and
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/order_da_91_143.pdf
  • I MIA I 50 'Tot Res' De! 36/691 I N/A I N/A I I I' I I 51 'Net Ea Inv 36/69 I I N/A I N/A I FCC Report 43-04 -Report Definition -Form FCC REPORT 43-04 ARMIS ACCESS REPORT November 1990 Rev. Page 4 of 90 ApproV'ed by OMB 3060-0395 Expires 10/31/92 xxxxxxxxxxxx VERSION SUBMISSION X TABLE I PAGE 2.1 OF 30.3 COMPANY : STUDY AREA: PERIOD: COSA: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx From mmm yyyy To mmm yyyy xxx x TABLE I -SEPARATIONS AND ACCESS TABLE (Dollars in Thousands) I I Subject tol I I Conunon Line I I Category I Separations I State I Interstatel Pay IInside Wirel BFP I Row I la) I Ibl I Icl I Idl I Ie)
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/broadband/chron_list.html
  • Order: [470]Word | [471]PDF 09/23/2005 FCC Requires Certain Broadband and VoIP Providers to Accommodate Wiretaps. Order: [472]PDF News Release (08/05/2005): [473]Word | [474]PDF Martin Statement: [475]Word | [476]PDF Abernathy Statement: [477]Word | [478]PDF Copps Statement: [479]Word | [480]PDF Adelstein Statement: [481]Word | [482]PDF 08/15/2005 ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION (FCC 05-149). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1.7 GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands The FCC advanced its efforts to make spectrum available for an array of innovative wireless services and technologies, including voice, data, video, and other wireless broadband services offered over Third Generation ("3G") mobile networks. Order: [483]Word | [484]PDF Martin Statement: [485]Word | [486]PDF Copps Statement: [487]Word | [488]PDF Adelstein Statement: [489]Word | [490]PDF 07/07/2005 FCC Releases Data on
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/Nanc/toreport.doc
  • technical standards, network interface standards and technical specifications. This report describes the process the T&O Task Force used to satisfy this requirement. 1.3 The LNPA T&O Task Force interpreted this responsibility to include maintaining and updating these standards going forward and establishing a long term compliance process for Service Providers (SP) and Number Portability Administration Centers (NPACs). 2. MISSION STATEMENT 2.1 In support of the LNPA T&O Task Force responsibilities the following mission statement was developed: Develop initial and future NPAC SMS technical and operational requirements, identify pertinent industry standards, and recommend an oversight process to insure compliance. 3. TASK FORCE COMPOSITION 3.1 The LNPA T&O Task Force membership consists of representatives from the following companies and regulatory bodies: Company/Association Name
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/Nanc/wknggrp.doc
  • Future Role section (see Section 7) describes seven (7) areas relating to LNP implementation and ongoing operation where the Working Group believes there is a continued need for national oversight. Each area is described and a recommendation made concerning future oversight activities. Certain of these are critical issues that require early NANC attention. 2. INTRODUCTION - LNPA SELECTION WORKING GROUP 2.1 Background 2.1.1 On July 2, 1996, the FCC ordered all local exchange carriers (LECs) to begin the phased deployment of a long-term service provider local number portability (LNP) method in the 100 largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) no later than October 1, 1997, and to complete deployment in those MSAs by December 31, 19981. A separate schedule was established for
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/ppd/depreciation/documents/fcc00306.pdf
  • FCC Rcd 750 (1991). 12 See 47 C.F.R. � 43.43(e). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION APPENDIX Schedule of Annual Percentages of Depreciation for PAGE 1 VERIZON HAWAII INC. Effective January 1, 2000 Average Future Remaining Remaining Net Accumulated Life Rate Category Description Life Salvage Depreciation Rate ----------------------------------- -------------- ------------ -------------------- ----------------- (years) (%) (%) (%) A B C D=(100%-B-C)/A 2112 MOTOR VEHICLES 2.1 10 89.4 0.3 2115 GARAGE WORK EQ 6.1 0 56.2 7.2 2116 OTHER WORK EQ 5.8 0 62.3 6.5 2121 BUILDINGS 29.0 -3 19.1 2.9 2122 FURNITURE 6.9 0 74.2 3.7 2123.1 OFFICE SUPPORT EQ 5.2 0 35.5 12.4 2123.2 COMPANY COMMUN EQ 3.9 0 76.1 6.1 2124 GEN PURPOSE COMPUTERS 2.0 0 94.5 2.8 2212 DIGITAL ELECTRONIC SW 7.0