FCC Web Documents citing 1.95

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2441A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2441A1.pdf
  • the main radiation lobe of the transmitting antenna will be a term of the station authorization. At the time of the inspection on May 29 and June 2, 2008, Media Logic was found operating radio station WQHV648 from a location inconsistent with the station's authorized coordinates. The distance separating the point of operation from that of the license was approximately 1.95 miles (approximately 1 minute and 38 seconds of latitude and 35 seconds of longitude). In its Response, Media Logic does not dispute the facts recited in the NAL. Instead it argues that the coordinates provided to the Commission were based upon coordinates given to Media Logic by the owner of the building in which the STL was constructed. Media Logic
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.txt
  • of wideband interoperability channels. Under the NPSTC proposal, licensees would be allowed to aggregate wideband channels from 50 kilohertz wideband ``building blocks'' to form 1.25 megahertz broadband channels and these 1.25 kHz channels can be aggregated to form channels up to 3.75 kHz wide and centered at 770/800 MHz. The broadband channels would be surrounded by .975 megahertz guard bands (1.95 megahertz total). These broadband channels, NPSTC states, would be located between the 767-773/797-803 MHz bands. NPSTC also suggests retaining six 50 kilohertz channels for wideband interoperability. If adopted, NPSTC envisions that licensees would have a number of options for utilizing the spectrum. These options are reflected in Appendix B, infra. A licensee would have the ``flexibility'' to either aggregate up
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.pdf
  • the Commission's rules on numerous occasions. Accordingly, an issue will be specified to determine whether the Kintzel brothers have executed changes in a subscriber's selection of a provider of telephone exchange or telephone toll service, in willful and repeated violation of Section 258 of the Act, as amended, and Section 64.1120 of the Commission's rules. C. Sanctions 17. Under Section 1.95 of the Commission's rules, the violation of a consent order subjects the consenting party to the entire range of sanctions that ``could have been imposed'' in the proceeding that led to the consent order if the issues in that proceeding had been decided against the consenting party, as well as additional sanctions for the consent violations. The Commission carries the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • To test this theory, the measurement 7-8 was repeated twice, once with the waveform shifted 0.5 MHz downward and once with the waveform shifted 0.5 MHz upward. The measured D/U ratios relative to the baseline were as follows: Frequency shift = -0.5 MHz D/U relative to baseline = -5.97 dB Frequency shift = +0.5 MHz D/U relative to baseline = +1.95 dB The results suggest that this receiver had a narrowband susceptibility between the upper edge of the DVB- H waveform, when it was centered on the channel, and the upper edge of the channel. The tests conducted with a 1-MHz wide interferer (Figure 7-1) happen to have been performed with the same receiver. Those tests do reveal a rapidly increasing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • 0.49 0.44 0.60 0.10 + Percent News, Evening 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 -0.01 - Percent Sports, Evening 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.14 0.19 0.14 0.02 + Average Block, Advertisements, AM Drive 1.36 1.71 1.27 1.37 1.01 1.63 -0.07 - Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, AM Drive 2.18 2.73 2.36 1.54 2.64 0.63 -2.11 - Average Block, Music, AM Drive 1.91 1.95 1.94 1.84 1.65 3.06 1.11 + Average Block, News, AM Drive 0.73 0.57 0.84 0.63 0.74 0.88 0.30 + Average Block, Sports, AM Drive 0.64 0.64 0.65 0.61 0.75 0.61 -0.02 - Average Block, Advertisements, Evening 1.18 1.27 1.10 1.15 1.55 1.06 -0.22 - Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, Evening 0.82 0.73 0.87 0.81 0.90 0.13 -0.60 - Average Block, Music,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • Cross-owned radio station -432.3*** (2.70) -361.8** (2.27) -172.1* (1.87) -41.8 (1.11) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 150.6 (0.67) 233.4 (1.18) 117.4 (0.86) -37.6 (0.66) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 22.0*** (2.81) 12.8** (2.36) -2.9 (1.05) Network owned and operated -332.6* (1.84) -281.3** (2.13) 37.7 (0.60) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC -244.5 (1.34) -33.2 (0.29) CBS -350.6* (1.95) -52.6 (0.47) FOX 411.1** (2.18) 72.4 (1.30) NBC -351.3* (1.90) -49.3 (0.43) Other control variables Time and length of broadcast fixed effects No No No No Yes DMA and date fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Adjusted R-squared .10 .17 .24 .65 .86 Notes: Absolute values of t-statistics in parentheses (using heteroscedastic-consistent standard errors corrected for clustering by television
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2441A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2441A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2441A1.txt
  • the main radiation lobe of the transmitting antenna will be a term of the station authorization. At the time of the inspection on May 29 and June 2, 2008, Media Logic was found operating radio station WQHV648 from a location inconsistent with the station's authorized coordinates. The distance separating the point of operation from that of the license was approximately 1.95 miles (approximately 1 minute and 38 seconds of latitude and 35 seconds of longitude). In its Response, Media Logic does not dispute the facts recited in the NAL. Instead it argues that the coordinates provided to the Commission were based upon coordinates given to Media Logic by the owner of the building in which the STL was constructed. Media Logic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1067A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1067A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1067A1.txt
  • Ka-band space stations that are operating less than two degrees away from SPACEWAY 6's proposed 90.9º W.L. orbital location. Intelsat License LLC's (Intelsat's) Galaxy 28 satellite is operating at the 89.0( W.L. orbital location (i.e., 1.9 degrees from Hughes' proposed orbital location). New DBSD Satellite Services Group's (New DBSD's) DBSD-G1 satellite is operating at the 92.85º W.L. orbital location (i.e., 1.95 degrees from Hughes' proposed orbital location). Before we will grant Hughes' request concerning SPACEWAY 6 service in the United States from the 90.9( W.L. orbital location, we must ensure that it would not cause harmful interference to either of these two adjacent space stations. 18. Hughes analyzed the interference potential of operations using SPACEWAY 6 to operations of other satellites
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1067A1_Rcd.pdf
  • C.F.R. § 25.158. EchoStar Satellite, LLC, Order, DA 05-1955 (rel. July 6, 2005) (denying an application that would conflict with a previously licensed space station). 41Intelsat is authorized to operate Galaxy 28 (Call Sign S2160) in the 29.5-30.0 GHz and 19.7-20.2 GHz bands. (continued...) 8526 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1067 satellite is operating at the 92.85º W.L. orbital location (i.e., 1.95 degrees from Hughes' proposed orbital location).42Before we will grant Hughes' request concerning SPACEWAY 6 service in the United States from the 90.9 W.L. orbital location, we must ensure that it would not cause harmful interference to either of these two adjacent space stations. 18. Hughes analyzed the interference potential of operations using SPACEWAY 6 to operations of other satellites as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A2.txt
  • currently deployed systems; noting a) that the radio interfaces of the mobile broadband systems defined in ITU Recommendations ITU-R M.1457, ITU-R M.1801, and ITU-R M.[IMT.RSPEC] are expected to evolve within the framework of ITU-R beyond those initially specified, to provide enhanced services and services beyond those envisaged in their initial implementations; recognizing a) that since WARC-92, the ITU has identified 1.95 GHz of spectrum for IMT applications either on a global, regional or country specific basis; b) that the bands referred to in recognizing a) can be used to deploy IMT as well as other BWA systems; c) that it is important to ensure compatibility with existing services and to ensure that those services are not unduly constrained, especially with regard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A2_Rcd.pdf
  • currently deployed systems; noting a) that the radio interfaces of the mobile broadband systems defined in ITU Recommendations ITU-R M.1457, ITU-R M.1801, and ITU-R M.[IMT.RSPEC] are expected to evolve within the framework of ITU-R beyond those initially specified, to provide enhanced services and services beyond those envisaged in their initial implementations; recognizing a) that since WARC-92, the ITU has identified 1.95 GHz of spectrum for IMT applications either on a global, regional or country specific basis; b) that the bands referred to in recognizing a) can be used to deploy IMT as well as other BWA systems; c) that it is important to ensure compatibility with existing services and to ensure that those services are not unduly constrained, especially with regard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1.txt
  • (3) (4) Regressors Pop (100,000) 0.026 (0.011)** [0.005]** 0.024 (0.011)** [0.007]** --- --- Log(Pop) --- --- 0.062 (0.416) [0.339] 0.032 (0.451) [0.300] PopDen (100 per km) 0.198 (0.035)** [0.043]** 0.195 (0.042)** [0.059]** --- --- Log(PopDen) --- --- 1.545 (0.389)** [0.702]** 1.567 (0.435)** [0.982] GDP ($1000s per capita) 0.254 (0.140)* [0.105]** 0.193 (0.150) [0.165] --- --- Log(GDP) --- --- 15.27 (2.78)** [1.95]** 14.78 (2.79)** [3.08]** Educ --- 0.184 (0.136) [0.309] --- -0.019 (0.111) [0.224] Country F.E. Yes Yes Yes Yes Year F.E. Yes Yes Yes Yes R-squared 0.87 0.87 0.89 0.90 N 266 250 266 250 See 47 U.S.C. § 1303(b). In this report we use the term ``broadband'' synonymously with ``advanced telecommunications capability.'' See generally Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1_Rcd.pdf
  • (3) (4) Regressors Pop (100,000) 0.026 (0.011)** [0.005]** 0.024 (0.011)** [0.007]** --- --- Log(Pop) --- --- 0.062 (0.416) [0.339] 0.032 (0.451) [0.300] PopDen (100 per km) 0.198 (0.035)** [0.043]** 0.195 (0.042)** [0.059]** --- --- Log(PopDen) --- --- 1.545 (0.389)** [0.702]** 1.567 (0.435)** [0.982] GDP ($1000s per capita) 0.254 (0.140)* [0.105]** 0.193 (0.150) [0.165] --- --- Log(GDP) --- --- 15.27 (2.78)** [1.95]** 14.78 (2.79)** [3.08]** Educ --- 0.184 (0.136) [0.309] --- -0.019 (0.111) [0.224] Country F.E. Yes Yes Yes Yes Year F.E. Yes Yes Yes Yes R-squared 0.87 0.87 0.89 0.90 N 266 250 266 250 10Standard errors clustered at the region level are denoted by ( · ), and standard errors clustered at the country level are denoted by [ ·
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-121A2_Rcd.pdf
  • Groups with Unserved Blocks Total Number of Tracts with Unserved Blocks Tota l Number of Counties with Unserved Blocks Number of CMAs with Unserved Blocks Total Population of Unserved Blocks Total Area (square miles) of Unserved Blocks PA 20,068 631 304 54 23 142,856 6,509 3.00 1,549.39 12,416.26 435.36 1.36 17.45 7.50 1,465.55 94.99 RI 42221 44 1 0.00 0.00 1.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SC 1,383 155 104 40 15 13,091 934 0.00 124.81 1,503.11 49.01 0.01 0.72 0.00 305.01 0.98 SD 1,302 46 31 26 7 5,146 5,174 0.00 195.42 2,699.11 394.03 0.04 2.55 0.00 207.43 0.87 TN 5,801 323 214 79 14 37,709 2,062 0.02 377.20 3,308.25 350.85 0.49 5.91 0.00 219.38 23.22 TX 34,162 463
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55 1.93 (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/02 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 Source: Industry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222413A1.txt
  • A CA LP Requested Facility: Ch No:26 N Latitude: 39-18-47; W Longitude: 119-52-59 ERP (Average): 4 kW; HAAT: 874 meters; Antenna: DA Facility ID: 8378 Call Sign: KFWU-DT File No: BDSTA-20020305ABO City: FORT BRAGG State: CA Grant Date: 04/01/2002 Licensee Name: PAPPAS TELECASTING OF CONCORD, A CALIFORNIA L.P. Requested Facility: Ch No:15 N Latitude: 39-41-38; W Longitude: 123-39-43 ERP (Average): 1.95 kW; HAAT: 733 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 43328 Call Sign: KRGV-DT File No: BDSTA-20020307ACJ City: WESLACO State: TX Grant Date: 03/19/2002 Licensee Name: MOBILE VIDEO TAPES, INC. Requested Facility: Ch No:13 N Latitude: 26-6-2; W Longitude: 97-50-21 ERP (Average): 5.7 kW; HAAT: 445 meters; Antenna: DA Facility ID: 21161 Call Sign: KSNB-DT File No: BDSTA-20020307ACK City: SUPERIOR State: NE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239660A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239660A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239660A2.txt
  • around 60%. Cable operators played a significant role in spurring broadband growth in Japan in the earlier years. In 2000, for instance, Jupiter had 141,000 cable modem subscribers, well ahead of the DSL numbers. Since the, however, growth in cable modem access has been far slower. From 2001 to 2002, for instance, cable modem subscribers grew from 1.3 million to 1.95 million. One factor may be that cable networks pass only one third of Japanese households, compared to the four-fifths coverage of DSL. Japanese cable companies, such as J-Com, however, drove competition by offering higher bandwidths of 8 mbps downstream and 2 mbps upstream-speeds which are now matched or exceeded by the leading DSL providers. Fiber optic cable services, which offer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242368A1.txt
  • MHz 400KG1F PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 3M00G1F PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 4M40G1F PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 13M2G1F PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 29M0G1F SITE ID: REMOTE 2 (1.8M. VSAT), CONUS, (50 UNITS) LOCATION: PRODELIN CORPORATION /1.8 x 1.95m RET 2A 1.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 1184KU1.8 52.40 dBW PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 400KG1F 61.20 dBW PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 3M00G1F 62.80 dBW PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 4M40G1F Page 2 of 8 65.10 dBW PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245057A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245057A1.txt
  • MHz 400KG1F PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 3M00G1F PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 4M40G1F PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 13M2G1F PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 29M0G1F SITE ID: REMOTE 2 (1.8M. VSAT), CONUS, (50 UNITS) LOCATION: PRODELIN CORPORATION /1.8 x 1.95m RET 2A 1.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 1184KU1.8 52.40 dBW PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 400KG1F 61.20 dBW PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 3M00G1F 62.80 dBW PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 4M40G1F 65.10 dBW PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO W/ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 7M40G1F 67.60
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 441 1,236 2,602 3,471 6,073 2.09 Massachusetts 1,947 3,643 5,591 898 494 1,392 2,846 4,137 6,983 2.40 Michigan 2,355 5,185 7,540 940 872 1,811 3,295 6,057 9,352 3.21 Minnesota 1,304 2,391 3,695 612 374 986 1,916 2,766 4,682 1.61 Mississippi 702 1,467 2,169 314 193 507 1,016 1,660 2,676 0.92 Missouri 1,558 2,849 4,407 738 531 1,269 2,296 3,380 5,676 1.95 Montana 289 412 701 126 84 210 414 497 911 0.31 Nebraska 466 931 1,397 234 168 401 699 1,099 1,799 0.62 Nevada 799 1,007 1,807 337 124 461 1,136 1,131 2,267 0.78 New Hampshire 430 651 1,081 189 103 292 618 754 1,373 0.47 New Jersey 2,990 4,931 7,921 1,348 784 2,132 4,339 5,715 10,054 3.45 New Mexico 536
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • - Washington WA 280 262 18 6.43 Verizon - NW - Contel - Washington WA (1,357) (1,247) (110) 8.11 Verizon - NW - Washington WA 488 560 (72) (14.75) Qwest - Washington WA (20,223) (19,870) (353) 1.75 Sprint - United Tel. Co. of the NW - Washington WA (124) (93) (30) 24.19 Verizon - West Virginia WV 9,795 9,986 (191) (1.95) Verizon - North - Wisconsin WI (2,765) (2,750) (14) 0.51 SBC - Ameritech - Wisconsin Bell WI 63,128 63,178 (50) (0.08) Qwest - Wyoming WY 1,290 1,326 (35) (2.71) 11 - 22 Table 11.11 Taxes (Federal, State, and Other) ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate All Reporting Local Exchange Companies $9,251,419 $4,625,090
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • 441 1,236 2,602 3,471 6,073 2.09 Massachusetts 1,947 3,643 5,591 898 494 1,392 2,846 4,137 6,983 2.40 Michigan 2,355 5,185 7,540 940 872 1,811 3,295 6,057 9,352 3.21 Minnesota 1,304 2,391 3,695 612 374 986 1,916 2,766 4,682 1.61 Mississippi 702 1,467 2,169 314 193 507 1,016 1,660 2,676 0.92 Missouri 1,558 2,849 4,407 738 531 1,269 2,296 3,380 5,676 1.95 Montana 289 412 701 126 84 210 414 497 911 0.31 Nebraska 466 931 1,397 234 168 401 699 1,099 1,799 0.62 Nevada 799 1,007 1,807 337 124 461 1,136 1,131 2,267 0.78 New Hampshire 430 651 1,081 189 103 292 618 754 1,373 0.47 New Jersey 2,990 4,931 7,921 1,348 784 2,132 4,339 5,715 10,054 3.45 New Mexico 536
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 341058 C MONTROSE MUTUAL TEL. CO. -12.94 0.24 -13.14 -87.82 341060 C MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TEL. CO. 28.83 -6.03 37.09 0.00 341061 C FRONTIER COMM. OF MT. PULASKI, INC. -61.93 -3.85 -60.40 -100.00 341062 A NEW WINDSOR TEL. CO. 11.95 -2.27 14.54 61.42 341065 C ODIN TEL. EXCHANGE, INC. -15.07 -0.61 -14.55 -33.07 341065A C ODIN TEL. EXCHANGE, INC. -1.63 -3.50 1.95 -14.34 341066 C ONEIDA TEL. EXCHANGE -8.73 -4.82 -4.10 -49.41 341067 C FRONTIER COMM. OF ORION, INC. -29.77 -4.35 -26.57 0.00 341073 C FRONTIER COMM.-PRAIRIE, INC. -21.30 -1.42 -20.16 -100.00 341075 A REYNOLDS TEL. CO. 12.27 -1.70 14.21 57.17 341079 C FRONTIER COMM.-SCHUYLER, INC. -16.79 -2.27 -14.86 -100.00 341086 A TONICA TEL. CO. 12.65 -1.03 13.82 55.31 341087 A VIOLA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 # 06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 864 2001 914 927 825 897 914 924 914 2002 957 972 851 952 934 987 936 2003 956 967 875 932 917 1002 941 2004 990 1000 923 988 946 1031 971 1980 1.94% 1.94% 1.95% 1.89% 2.09% 1.78% 1981 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.04 2.14 1.90 1982 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.01 2.09 2.16 1983 2.11 2.11 2.15 2.01 2.28 1.95 1984 1.98 1.98 1.97% 2.01 1.92 2.06 1.89 1985 1.94 1.93 1.98 2.01 1.85 1.97 1.93 1986 1.97 1.95 2.16 1.89 1.96 2.12 1.87 1987 2.04 2.01 2.32 2.02 2.02 2.17 1.95 1988 2.07 2.04 2.31 1.99 2.01 2.21 2.03 1989 2.04 2.02 2.19 2.02 2.04 2.18 1.87 1990 2.09 2.07 2.24 2.08 2.11 2.28 1.88 1991 2.09 2.04 2.42
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Carolina 984 1.62 897 6 1,050 74 South Dakota 127 0.21 115 1 135 10 Tennessee 1,331 2.19 1,213 8 1,420 100 Texas 5,142 8.48 4,686 30 5,484 387 Utah 364 0.60 332 2 388 27 Vermont 145 0.24 133 1 155 11 Virginia 1,476 2.43 1,345 9 1,574 111 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 1,180 1.95 1,076 7 1,259 89 West Virginia 438 0.72 399 3 467 33 Wisconsin 998 1.64 909 6 1,064 75 Wyoming 122 0.20 111 1 130 9 Total $60,657 100.00% $55,467 $357 $64,915 $4,591 NA - Not Applicable. Note: Incumbent local exchange revenues exclude SLC. Figures may not add due to rounding. 1/ Totals in the last four columns include revenues
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • Carolina 984 1.62 897 6 1,050 74 South Dakota 127 0.21 115 1 135 10 Tennessee 1,331 2.19 1,213 8 1,420 100 Texas 5,142 8.48 4,686 30 5,484 387 Utah 364 0.60 332 2 388 27 Vermont 145 0.24 133 1 155 11 Virginia 1,476 2.43 1,345 9 1,574 111 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 1,180 1.95 1,076 7 1,259 89 West Virginia 438 0.72 399 3 467 33 Wisconsin 998 1.64 909 6 1,064 75 Wyoming 122 0.20 111 1 130 9 Total $60,657 100.00% $55,467 $357 $64,915 $4,591 NA - Not Applicable. Note: Incumbent local exchange revenues exclude SLC. Figures may not add due to rounding. 1/ Totals in the last four columns include revenues
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 1.06 -7.44 -51.22 ARIZONA TOTAL -3.62 -6.12 2.66 14.29 452169 C SAN CARLOS APACHE TELECOMM. UTILITY, INC. 0.75 1.03 -0.27 -1.64 452171 C ARIZONA TEL. CO. -2.30 -7.04 5.11 -0.26 452172 C CITIZENS UTIL RURAL CO INC DBA FRONTIER 7.12 -0.94 8.14 47.38 452173 C TOHONO O'ODHAM UTILITY AUTHORITY 28.54 -1.09 29.96 55.79 452174 C SOUTHWESTERN TEL. CO. -6.27 -8.06 1.95 -13.85 452175 C CENTURYTEL OF SOUTHWEST, INC.-AZ 4.58 1.47 3.07 1.79 452176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-AZ 8.75 -0.77 9.59 11.12 452179 C GILA RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 2.49 -7.60 10.92 6.53 452191 C ACCIPITER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 20.95 4.19 16.09 21.89 452200 C FORT MOJAVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 13.04 10.35 2.44 11.02 452226 C MIDVALE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, INC.-ARIZONA 37.62 21.19 13.56 43.10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 6.50 10.00 9.89 6.50 13.50 13.18 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.41 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 6.50 10.00 9.16 6.50 13.50 12.65 Montana 8.24 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.94 0.00 1.75 1.47 8.24 10.00 9.71 8.24 13.50 12.65 Nebraska 6.10 8.25 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.43 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.10 10.00 8.79 6.10 13.50 12.22 Nevada 5.54 8.25 6.17 0.00 3.50 1.95 0.00 1.75 0.97 5.54 10.00 7.14 5.54 13.50 9.09 New Hampshire 8.15 8.25 8.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.15 8.25 8.16 8.15 8.25 8.16 New Jersey 7.08 8.25 8.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.08 8.25 8.02 7.08 8.25 8.02 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.33 0.00 1.75 1.66 8.25 10.00 9.91 8.25 13.50 13.24
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 6.50 10.00 9.89 6.50 13.50 13.18 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.41 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 6.50 10.00 9.16 6.50 13.50 12.65 Montana 8.24 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.94 0.00 1.75 1.47 8.24 10.00 9.71 8.24 13.50 12.65 Nebraska 6.10 8.25 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.43 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.10 10.00 8.79 6.10 13.50 12.22 Nevada 5.54 8.25 6.17 0.00 3.50 1.95 0.00 1.75 0.97 5.54 10.00 7.14 5.54 13.50 9.09 New Hampshire 8.15 8.25 8.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.15 8.25 8.16 8.15 8.25 8.16 New Jersey 7.08 8.25 8.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.08 8.25 8.02 7.08 8.25 8.02 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.33 0.00 1.75 1.66 8.25 10.00 9.91 8.25 13.50 13.24
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • CENTURYTEL OF NW ARKANSAS, LLC-SILOAM SPRINGS -1.83 -5.00 3.33 -2.08 401144 C CENTURYTEL OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, LLC -1.72 -7.85 6.65 3.19 401144A C CENTURYTEL OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, LLC 34.69 -3.38 39.40 0.00 401691 C WINDSTREAM ARKANSAS, INC. (ALLTEL) -2.92 -3.94 1.06 -59.42 401692 C ARKANSAS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.58 -2.61 8.41 0.00 401697 C CENTRAL ARKANSAS TEL. COOP INC. -4.55 -2.65 -1.95 -10.51 401698 C CLEVELAND CTY TEL. CO. -0.01 -4.63 4.85 3.69 401699 C DECATUR TELEPHONE CO INC- ARKANSAS 11.10 -4.34 16.13 388.53 401702 C SOUTH ARKANSAS TEL. CO.,INC. 4.69 -3.48 8.46 9.05 401704 A>CLAVACA TELEPHONE-AR 101.96 -3.38 109.03 1,306.61 401705 C CENTURYTEL OF ARKANSAS, INC. 0.46 -3.31 3.90 0.87 401709 C MADISON COUNTY TEL. CO. INC. 3.76 -1.71 5.56 12.84
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283153A1.pdf
  • tower, and from 5 to 25 feet from the fence, using a calibrated RFR meter. The agents employed a spatial averaging measurement technique, where measurements in four quadrants are averaged to give a representative reading for each location. Public and occupational RFR MPE levels were exceeded throughout this area of approximately 1100 square feet, ranging from 0.9 mW/cm 2 to 1.95 mW/cm 2 (90 to 195% of the occupational MPE limits, and 450 to 975% of the public MPE limits). The agents informed the KNUQ(FM) Chief Engineer that KNUQ(FM) had exceeded the RFR limits in the area of concern. On May 13, 2008, Honolulu agents conducted a follow-up inspection at the KNUQ(FM) transmitter site. Again, the agents employed a personal RF
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 936 2003 956 967 875 932 917 1,002 941 2004 990 1,000 923 988 946 1,031 971 2005 1,048 1,055 966 1,035 1,000 1,085 1,047 2006 1,087 1,091 1,038 1,051 998 1,167 1,081 1980 1.94% 1.94% 1.95% 1.89% 2.09% 1.78% 1981 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.04 2.14 1.90 1982 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.01 2.09 2.16 1983 2.11 2.11 2.15 2.01 2.28 1.95 1984 1.98 1.98 1.97% 2.01 1.92 2.06 1.89 1985 1.94 1.93 1.98 2.01 1.85 1.97 1.93 1986 1.97 1.95 2.16 1.89 1.96 2.12 1.87 1987 2.04 2.01 2.32 2.02 2.02 2.17 1.95 1988 2.07 2.04 2.31 1.99 2.01 2.21 2.03 1989 2.04 2.02 2.19 2.02 2.04 2.18 1.87 1990 2.09 2.07 2.24 2.08 2.11 2.28 1.88 1991 2.09 2.04 2.42
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 444 1,248 2,597 3,647 6,245 2.10 Massachusetts 1,911 3,794 5,705 909 497 1,407 2,820 4,292 7,112 2.39 Michigan 2,271 4,917 7,188 907 829 1,737 3,178 5,747 8,925 3.00 Minnesota 1,293 2,447 3,740 597 374 970 1,890 2,821 4,711 1.58 Mississippi 715 1,581 2,296 291 228 519 1,006 1,809 2,815 0.95 Missouri 1,550 2,979 4,529 680 600 1,280 2,230 3,579 5,808 1.95 Montana 272 440 712 121 87 209 393 528 921 0.31 Nebraska 454 894 1,348 228 170 398 682 1,064 1,746 0.59 Nevada 791 1,216 2,007 333 157 489 1,124 1,373 2,496 0.84 New Hampshire 406 716 1,123 183 112 295 589 829 1,418 0.48 New Jersey 2,725 4,882 7,606 1,239 708 1,948 3,964 5,590 9,554 3.21 New Mexico 543
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • 444 1,248 2,597 3,647 6,245 2.10 Massachusetts 1,911 3,794 5,705 909 497 1,407 2,820 4,292 7,112 2.39 Michigan 2,271 4,917 7,188 907 829 1,737 3,178 5,747 8,925 3.00 Minnesota 1,293 2,447 3,740 597 374 970 1,890 2,821 4,711 1.58 Mississippi 715 1,581 2,296 291 228 519 1,006 1,809 2,815 0.95 Missouri 1,550 2,979 4,529 680 600 1,280 2,230 3,579 5,808 1.95 Montana 272 440 712 121 87 209 393 528 921 0.31 Nebraska 454 894 1,348 228 170 398 682 1,064 1,746 0.59 Nevada 791 1,216 2,007 333 157 489 1,124 1,373 2,496 0.84 New Hampshire 406 716 1,123 183 112 295 589 829 1,418 0.48 New Jersey 2,725 4,882 7,606 1,239 708 1,948 3,964 5,590 9,554 3.21 New Mexico 543
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • -6.05 -31.46 452172 C CITIZENS UTIL RURAL CO INC DBA FRONTIER -4.49 -3.65 -0.87 -88.63 452173 C TOHONO O'ODHAM UTILITY AUTHORITY 2.66 4.02 -1.31 -0.91 452174 C SOUTHWESTERN TEL. CO. 0.78 -2.74 3.62 2.92 452176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-AZ -2.65 -6.44 4.05 -2.18 452179 C GILA RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 26.38 1.01 25.12 42.14 452191 C ACCIPITER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.48 -1.95 -0.53 -2.69 452200 C FORT MOJAVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 17.80 1.44 16.12 27.98 452226 C MIDVALE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, INC.-ARIZONA 3.38 4.55 -1.12 1.63 452302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. - AZ 4.42 -5.56 10.57 67.79 453334 C TABLE TOP TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -4.37 -2.68 -1.74 -9.28 Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Unseparated High Cost Loop
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/0006/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/0006/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/0112/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/0206/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/0206/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 4,611 8,424 14,517 22,941 7.66 Utah 625 1,121 1,746 315 155 471 941 1,276 2,217 0.74 Vermont 203 339 542 102 47 149 305 386 691 0.23 Virgin Islands 88 76 164 40 11 51 129 87 215 0.07 Virginia 2,353 4,208 6,561 1,173 590 1,763 3,526 4,798 8,324 2.78 Washington 1,644 3,005 4,649 755 423 1,178 2,399 3,428 5,827 1.95 West Virginia 525 881 1,406 251 137 388 776 1,018 1,794 0.60 Wisconsin 1,344 2,593 3,937 619 392 1,012 1,963 2,986 4,949 1.65 Wyoming 176 281 456 96 41 137 272 322 594 0.20 Total $81,236 $158,380 $239,616 $37,270 $22,566 $59,836 $118,506 $180,947 $299,452 100.00% Note: Figures may not add due to rounding. 1 - 40 Table 1.14 2007 Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 4,611 8,424 14,517 22,941 7.66 Utah 625 1,121 1,746 315 155 471 941 1,276 2,217 0.74 Vermont 203 339 542 102 47 149 305 386 691 0.23 Virgin Islands 88 76 164 40 11 51 129 87 215 0.07 Virginia 2,353 4,208 6,561 1,173 590 1,763 3,526 4,798 8,324 2.78 Washington 1,644 3,005 4,649 755 423 1,178 2,399 3,428 5,827 1.95 West Virginia 525 881 1,406 251 137 388 776 1,018 1,794 0.60 Wisconsin 1,344 2,593 3,937 619 392 1,012 1,963 2,986 4,949 1.65 Wyoming 176 281 456 96 41 137 272 322 594 0.20 Total $81,236 $158,380 $239,616 $37,270 $22,566 $59,836 $118,506 $180,947 $299,452 100.00% Note: Figures may not add due to rounding. 1 - 40 Table 1.14 2007 Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -3.20 250317 C ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. -8.18 -5.29 -3.06 -25.81 250318 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF THE SOUTH, LLC 10.37 1.35 8.90 0.00 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. 0.42 -3.47 4.04 -15.24 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL -4.83 -5.83 1.07 0.00 259788 C CENTURYTEL OF ALABAMA, LLC (SOUTHERN) -3.71 -6.67 3.17 -26.88 259789 C CENTURYTEL OF ALABAMA, LLC (NORTHERN) 1.95 -4.84 7.13 0.00 ALASKA TOTAL 0.98 -8.75 10.66 8.57 610989 C ADAK EAGLE ENTERPRISES, LLC DBA ADAK TEL UTIL 35.17 3.68 30.36 36.92 613000 C ACS OF ANCHORAGE, INC. -4.79 -14.70 11.62 INFINITE 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 13.25 1.26 11.84 17.85 613001A C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. -7.83 -0.47 -7.40 -100.00 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 0 131 162 374 0.46 Florida 914 423 1 1,978 2,091 5,407 6.66 Georgia 423 182 1 1,019 1,034 2,658 3.27 Guam 8 4 0 9 21 43 0.05 Hawaii 64 18 0 140 181 403 0.50 Idaho 69 19 0 141 175 404 0.50 Illinois 478 259 1 1,331 1,288 3,356 4.13 Indiana 287 88 0 604 607 1,587 1.95 Iowa 112 48 0 281 293 735 0.90 Kansas 97 66 0 291 265 718 0.88 Kentucky 177 77 0 418 385 1,058 1.30 Louisiana 196 77 0 488 400 1,160 1.43 Maine 58 33 0 122 131 344 0.42 Maryland 277 134 0 641 727 1,779 2.19 Massachusetts 282 250 0 704 613 1,849 2.28 Michigan 365 226 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 0 131 162 374 0.46 Florida 914 423 1 1,978 2,091 5,407 6.66 Georgia 423 182 1 1,019 1,034 2,658 3.27 Guam 8 4 0 9 21 43 0.05 Hawaii 64 18 0 140 181 403 0.50 Idaho 69 19 0 141 175 404 0.50 Illinois 478 259 1 1,331 1,288 3,356 4.13 Indiana 287 88 0 604 607 1,587 1.95 Iowa 112 48 0 281 293 735 0.90 Kansas 97 66 0 291 265 718 0.88 Kentucky 177 77 0 418 385 1,058 1.30 Louisiana 196 77 0 488 400 1,160 1.43 Maine 58 33 0 122 131 344 0.42 Maryland 277 134 0 641 727 1,779 2.19 Massachusetts 282 250 0 704 613 1,849 2.28 Michigan 365 226 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 0.98 0.31 0.19 2.05 GUAM 1.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.57 0.00 0.00 9.20 HAWAII 4.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.97 0.23 0.23 6.59 IDAHO 2.41 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.64 1.68 0.73 6.49 ILLINOIS 0.26 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.16 0.14 1.00 INDIANA 0.52 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.42 0.19 1.80 IOWA 1.25 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.95 0.57 0.88 4.81 KANSAS 5.91 0.10 0.21 0.00 0.00 3.20 0.32 0.70 10.45 KENTUCKY 1.22 0.08 0.00 0.59 0.00 1.13 0.68 0.19 3.88 LOUISIANA 2.54 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.38 0.17 4.34 MAINE 0.42 0.03 0.00 0.18 0.00 1.22 0.00 0.60 2.46 MARYLAND 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.11 MASSACHUSETTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • day to update the billing systems for 13.99, 12.84, 15.29, and 11.99 percent of resale orders; and 9.94, 8.38, 10.66, and 5.38 percent of UNE orders. See OR 4-08 (percent SOP to bill completion > 1 business day). Also, in the same time period, Verizon took more than four business days to update its billing systems for only 1.56, 1.07, 1.95, and 0.38 percent of resale orders; and 4.06, 3.61, 2.35, and 0.23 percent of UNE orders. See OR 4-07 (percent SOP to Bill Completion >= 5 business days). See Massachusetts Department Massachusetts I Comments at 147. See id. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 4051, para. 184. See Verizon Massachusetts I McLean/Wierzbicki Decl. at para. 74.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • (>= 10 Lines) 10.21 9.44 9.93 14.50 10.59 11.83 10.49 7.50 1a,2a,3a,4a,2n,3n PR-2-01 Avg. Int. Completed - Total No Dispatch - Business 1.06 1.57 1.07 2.56 0.99 1.44 0.72 1.57 PR-2-03 Avg. Int. Completed - Dispatch (1-5 Lines) - Bus. 5.72 5.90 6.07 5.75 5.28 5.25 3.66 4.71 1n PR-2-01 Avg. Int. Completed - Total No Dispatch - Residence 0.70 1.95 0.86 1.72 0.78 1.56 0.74 1.36 PR-2-03 Avg. Int. Completed - Dispatch (1-5 Lines) - Res. 7.25 6.97 7.99 6.78 8.84 9.46 7.58 8.93 3n PR-4-02 Average Delay Days - Total 6.10 9.10 6.20 8.34 6.10 7.54 6.13 5.28 3n PR-4-04 % Missed Appointment - Verizon - Dispatch 14.58 9.10 13.91 8.38 14.54 7.80 12.86 0.00 PR-4-05 % Missed Appointment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.txt
  • the demand for cable service increases. However, the number of satellite channels variable had no significant effect on the demand for cable service since the estimated coefficient for this variable was not significantly different from zero. The demand equation also produced price and income elasticities of demand for cable. The estimated price elasticity of cable according to this equation is 1.95, which indicates that the demand for cable services is somewhat price elastic. This means that a one percent increase in the price of cable services, for example, would result in a slightly less than two percent decrease in the demand for those services. Since our measure of cable price elasticity is greater than one, the equation also suggests that cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
  • 0.12 0.17 0.49 Programming and equipment $31.45 $34.25 $32.55 $32.57 $23.40 Standard error 1.07 0.85 0.46 0.50 1.29 Number of channels 52.68 46.50 62.41 49.52 50.81 Standard error 2.35 2.58 0.95 1.66 3.06 Rate per channel † $0.578 $0.761 $0.483 $0.674 $0.437 Standard error 0.03 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.03 No. of satellite channels 39.82 34.63 47.08 38.08 40.44 Standard error 1.95 2.17 0.83 1.48 2.81 Rate per satellite channel $0.777 $1.13 $0.645 $0.906 $0.558 Standard error 0.04 0.12 0.02 0.04 0.04 July 1, 1999 Programming total $27.23 $29.63 $27.71 $29.24 $20.55 Standard error 0.94 0.66 0.41 0.45 1.14 Number of channels 50.62 42.63 59.77 47.03 49.94 Standard error 2.45 2.30 0.93 1.53 2.91 Rate per channel † $0.578 $0.777 $0.477 $0.672
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-284A1.txt
  • combined DBS provider of $52.85. This represents a price-cost markup of 18.1% and an increase of 7.28 % over current EchoStar prices. Mr. Sidak then uses the Bertrand model to calculate an alternative estimate of the loss in consumer surplus. Under this alternative scenario, Mr. Sidak first assumes own price elasticities of demand of -3.0 for EchoStar and DirecTV and -1.95 for cable. He then derives estimates of the cross elasticity of demand between EchoStar and DirecTV. These estimates are based on the relationship between the diversion ratio and market shares. For market share data, Sidak uses the FCC's 2001 Video Competition Report. For comparative price and estimates of marginal cost, Sidak relies on Morgan Stanley Dean Witter's estimate of average
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • LECs from May through July was 9.74%. In the nine months prior to April 2002, before the improvement processes were implemented, the repeat report rate averaged 12.80%. Pacific Bell states that this comparative performance reflects a reduction in competitive LECs' repeat reports of about 25%. Pacific Bell Motta Aff. at para 32. 459 Pacific Bell's performance disparity for August was 1.95 %. 460 See PM 21-2195401 (Average Time to Restore). 461 XO comments at 19. Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-330 74 Bell nevertheless missed the standard for this metric.462 As stated above, however, the record reflects improved performance, and parity in two of the last three months. Given this evidence, and recognizing that Pacific Bell is providing voice-grade loops of a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.txt
  • 0.38 0.38 0.25 0.72 0.25 0.56 0.66 Prior year (1/1/04) $6.92 $6.92 $6.94 $6.94 $7.29 $5.97 $7.19 $6.40 $7.75 CableCARD $1.09 $1.04 $1.63 $1.93 $1.45 $3.25 $1.61 $1.09 $1.64 Standard error 0.07 0.07 0.13 0.18 0.09 0.41 0.04 0.20 0.08 Non-Recurring Cable TV Installation Charges Unwired home $45.94 $45.98 $45.47 $44.55 $44.05 $45.94 $44.59 $49.42 $40.93 Standard error 0.76 0.64 1.95 2.62 1.58 5.53 1.15 1.76 3.96 Prior year (1/1/04) $45.34 $45.34 $45.36 $44.92 $44.78 $45.30 $45.27 $47.19 $39.21 Pre-wired home $32.22 $32.23 $32.14 $30.46 $30.07 $31.58 $33.17 $33.37 $33.89 Standard error 0.67 0.57 1.64 1.90 1.20 3.87 1.02 1.93 3.78 Prior year (1/1/04) $31.61 $31.53 $32.38 $31.30 $31.40 $31.04 $33.93 $31.83 $32.00 Service reconnection $28.81 $28.80 $28.85 $24.73 $24.41 $25.60
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.txt
  • of wideband interoperability channels. Under the NPSTC proposal, licensees would be allowed to aggregate wideband channels from 50 kilohertz wideband ``building blocks'' to form 1.25 megahertz broadband channels and these 1.25 kHz channels can be aggregated to form channels up to 3.75 kHz wide and centered at 770/800 MHz. The broadband channels would be surrounded by .975 megahertz guard bands (1.95 megahertz total). These broadband channels, NPSTC states, would be located between the 767-773/797-803 MHz bands. NPSTC also suggests retaining six 50 kilohertz channels for wideband interoperability. If adopted, NPSTC envisions that licensees would have a number of options for utilizing the spectrum. These options are reflected in Appendix B, infra. A licensee would have the ``flexibility'' to either aggregate up
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules on numerous occasions. Accordingly, an issue will be specified to determine whether the Kintzel brothers have executed changes in a subscriber's selection of a provider of telephone exchange or telephone toll service, in willful and repeated violation of Section 258 of the Act, as amended, and Section 64.1120 of the Commission's rules. C. Sanctions 17. Under Section 1.95 of the Commission's rules, the violation of a consent order subjects the consenting party to the entire range of sanctions that ``could have been imposed'' in the proceeding that led to the consent order if the issues in that proceeding had been decided against the consenting party, as well as additional sanctions for the consent violations. The Commission carries the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • 0.197*** 0.321 (4.75) (3.07) (2.03) (2.23) (1.05) (2.73) (3.18) (0.12) (3.08) (3.00) ( 4.47) (1.96) Land_Area_uc 0.0226 0.0142 -0.0659 0.0955 -0.214 -0.0018 0.0815 0.153 -0 .0904 -0.114 -0.128 -0.269 (0.33) (0.12) (-0.23) (0.29) (-1.45) (-0.01) (0.53) (0.65) (-1.06) (-0. 87) (-0.91) (-0.77) Land_Area_ua -0.107 0.108 0.524 -0.0237 0.140 -0.242 0.0972 0.190 -0.110 0.263 -0.413** -0.476 (-1.59) (0.51) (1.12) (-0.04) (0.56) (-1.95) (0.38) (0.50) (-0.84) (0.9 7) (-3.12) (-0.79) Percent_Water 0.905** -0.0899 -0.825 -1.349 0.167 -0.260 0.654 1.685* 0.375 -0.762 -0 .166 0.131 (3.00) (-0.21) (-0.73) (-0.94) (0.20) (-0.59) (0.84) (2.08) (0.76) (-1. 19) (-0.21) (0.07) Census_Blocs_nu 0.178** 0.192* 0.301 0.232 0.0850 0.126 -0.107 0.192 0.1 40 0.0200 0.0809 -0.352 (2.95) (1.99) (1.71) (0.98) (0.82) (1.17) (-0.75) (1.02) (1.63) (0.16) (0.85) (-1.06)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • adjustment for the differences in order mix. The calculations we make, and the resulting differences that we find for non-dispatch UNE-P orders (measured in days), are summarized in the Table below. Estimated Difference in Average Completed Intervals for Non-dispatch UNE-P Orders June July August BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff Carrier to carrier metrics data 1.25 3.20 -1.95* 0.99 2.55 -1.56* 1.07 1.91 -0.84* Using properly "W" coded CLEC orders 1.25 1.13 0.12 0.99 1.31 -0.32 1.07 2.36 -1.29 Adjustment to CLEC data for difference in standard intervals +0.53 +0.04 -0.62 CLEC data revised for alleged biases 1.25 1.68 -0.43* 0.99 1.35 -0.36* 1.07 1.74 -0.67* The top line in the table is the Average Completed Interval data
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • PR-4-08-2100 % Missed Appt. ­ Customer ­ Late Order Conf. 0 0 PR-6 - Installation Quality PR-6-01-2100 % Installation Troubles reported within 30 Days 2.59 3.37 2.31 1.06 1.98 2.14 2.27 0.64 1.87 3.55 PR-6-02-2100 % Installation Troubles reported within 7 Days 1.47 2.02 1.41 0.71 PR-6-03-2100 % Inst. Troubles reported w/ in 30 Days - FOK/TOK/CPE 2.28 0.9 2.19 1.95 1.88 0.46 0.64 1.55 PR-8 - Open Orders in a Hold Status PR-8-01-2100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0.02 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0 0 PR-8-02-2100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0 0 POTS ­ Business PR-2 - Average Completed Interval
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-165A1.html
  • the Commission's rules on numerous occasions. Accordingly, an issue will be specified to determine whether the Kintzel brothers have executed changes in a subscriber's selection of a provider of telephone exchange or telephone toll service, in willful and repeated violation of Section 258 of the Act, as amended, and Section 64.1120 of the Commission's rules. C. Sanctions 17. Under Section 1.95 of the Commission's rules, the violation of a consent order subjects the consenting party to the entire range of sanctions that "could have been imposed" in the proceeding that led to the consent order if the issues in that proceeding had been decided against the consenting party, as well as additional sanctions for the consent violations. The Commission carries the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2441A1.html
  • the main radiation lobe of the transmitting antenna will be a term of the station authorization. At the time of the inspection on May 29 and June 2, 2008, Media Logic was found operating radio station WQHV648 from a location inconsistent with the station's authorized coordinates. The distance separating the point of operation from that of the license was approximately 1.95 miles (approximately 1 minute and 38 seconds of latitude and 35 seconds of longitude). 7. In its Response, Media Logic does not dispute the facts recited in the NAL. Instead it argues that the coordinates provided to the Commission were based upon coordinates given to Media Logic by the owner of the building in which the STL was constructed. Media
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • adjustment for the differences in order mix. The calculations we make, and the resulting differences that we find for non-dispatch UNE-P orders (measured in days), are summarized in the Table below. Estimated Difference in Average Completed Intervals for Non-dispatch UNE-P Orders June July August BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff Carrier to carrier metrics data 1.25 3.20 -1.95* 0.99 2.55 -1.56* 1.07 1.91 -0.84* Using properly "W" coded CLEC orders 1.25 1.13 0.12 0.99 1.31 -0.32 1.07 2.36 -1.29 Adjustment to CLEC data for difference in standard intervals +0.53 +0.04 -0.62 CLEC data revised for alleged biases 1.25 1.68 -0.43* 0.99 1.35 -0.36* 1.07 1.74 -0.67* The top line in the table is the Average Completed Interval data
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • day to update the billing systems for 13.99, 12.84, 15.29, and 11.99 percent of resale orders; and 9.94, 8.38, 10.66, and 5.38 percent of UNE orders. See OR 4-08 (percent SOP to bill completion > 1 business day). Also, in the same time period, Verizon took more than four business days to update its billing systems for only 1.56, 1.07, 1.95, and 0.38 percent of resale orders; and 4.06, 3.61, 2.35, and 0.23 percent of UNE orders. See OR 4-07 (percent SOP to Bill Completion >= 5 business days). See Massachusetts Department Massachusetts I Comments at 147. See id. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 4051, para. 184. See Verizon Massachusetts I McLean/Wierzbicki Decl. at para. 74.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • $69.00 $3.95 Alaska Anchorage Anchorage 31.87 53.00 2.00 Arizona Tucson Qwest 43.41 60.03 3.95 Arkansas Pine Bluff SBC 43.31 28.24 0.07 93.43 4.00 Arkansas West Memphis SBC 56.08 26.44 0.07 94.55 4.00 California Anaheim SBC 14.44 0.06 65.62 2.75 California Bakersfield SBC 14.44 0.06 65.62 2.75 California Fresno SBC 15.02 0.06 65.62 2.75 California Long Beach Verizon 26.71 0.08 92.51 1.95 California Los Angeles SBC 16.52 0.06 72.18 2.75 California Oakland SBC 15.52 0.06 70.54 2.75 California Salinas SBC 16.01 0.06 69.55 2.75 California San Bernadino Verizon 26.35 0.08 91.25 1.95 California San Diego SBC 14.44 0.06 65.62 2.75 California San Francisco SBC 15.52 0.06 70.54 2.75 California San Jose SBC 15.16 0.06 65.62 2.75 Colorado Boulder Qwest 46.98 26.74 0.14
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • $69.00 $5.00 Alaska Anchorage Anchorage 34.71 65.70 2.00 Arizona Tucson Qwest 44.31 55.65 5.75 Arkansas Pine Bluff SBC 44.69 29.39 0.07 93.43 6.00 Arkansas West Memphis SBC 57.43 27.61 0.07 94.55 6.00 California Anaheim SBC 14.89 0.06 66.05 2.75 California Bakersfield SBC 14.89 0.06 66.05 2.75 California Fresno SBC 15.48 0.06 66.05 2.75 California Long Beach Verizon 28.28 0.08 92.69 1.95 California Los Angeles SBC 16.38 0.06 72.77 2.75 California Oakland SBC 16.01 0.06 71.09 2.75 California Salinas SBC 16.50 0.06 66.05 2.75 California San Bernadino Verizon 28.54 0.08 91.42 1.95 California San Diego SBC 14.89 0.06 66.05 2.75 California San Francisco SBC 17.12 0.06 66.05 2.75 California San Jose SBC 15.64 0.06 66.05 2.75 Colorado Boulder Qwest 47.74 28.80 0.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • $69.00 $5.00 Alaska Anchorage Anchorage 35.68 65.70 2.00 Arizona Tucson Qwest 43.27 47.30 6.25 Arkansas Pine Bluff SBC 45.95 30.61 0.07 93.43 6.50 Arkansas West Memphis SBC 59.04 28.85 0.07 94.55 6.50 California Anaheim SBC 17.00 0.01 72.92 3.25 California Bakersfield SBC 17.00 0.01 72.92 3.25 California Fresno SBC 17.57 0.01 72.92 3.25 California Long Beach Verizon 27.75 0.08 93.30 1.95 California Los Angeles SBC 16.99 0.01 72.92 3.25 California Oakland SBC 17.00 0.01 72.92 3.25 California Salinas SBC 17.66 0.01 72.92 3.25 California San Bernadino Verizon 27.73 0.08 92.03 1.95 California San Diego SBC 17.00 0.01 72.92 3.25 California San Francisco SBC 17.00 0.01 72.92 3.25 California San Jose SBC 17.00 0.01 72.92 3.25 Colorado Boulder Qwest 51.53 31.41 0.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 822 2000 877 889 790 856 884 891 864 2001 914 927 825 897 914 924 914 2002 957 972 851 952 934 987 936 2003 956 967 875 932 917 1,002 941 1980 1.94% 1.94% 1.95% 1.89% 2.09% 1.78% 1981 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.04 2.14 1.90 1982 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.01 2.09 2.16 1983 2.11 2.11 2.15 2.01 2.28 1.95 1984 1.98 1.98 1.97% 2.01 1.92 2.06 1.89 1985 1.94 1.93 1.98 2.01 1.85 1.97 1.93 1986 1.97 1.95 2.16 1.89 1.96 2.12 1.87 1987 2.04 2.01 2.32 2.02 2.02 2.17 1.95 1988 2.07 2.04 2.31 1.99 2.01 2.21 2.03 1989 2.04 2.02 2.19 2.02 2.04 2.18 1.87 1990 2.09 2.07 2.24 2.08 2.11 2.28 1.88 1991 2.09 2.04 2.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Ameritech 15.67 0.0560 60.64 2.99 Indiana Indianapolis Ameritech 18.82 12.53 0.2100 47.00 1.50 Indiana Terre Haute GTE 22.98 60.06 1.50 Iowa Fort Dodge Vista Telephone 14.06 9.82 1.25 Kentucky Louisville BellSouth 24.63 17.27 0.0618 42.00 2.00 Louisiana Baton Rouge BellSouth 19.57 13.23 0.0618 42.23 2.55 Louisiana New Orleans BellSouth 18.78 12.64 0.0600 42.23 2.55 Maine Portland Bell Atlantic 19.12 47.44 1.95 Maryland Baltimore Bell Atlantic 24.98 13.96 0.0850 48.00 1.25 Massachusetts Boston Bell Atlantic 23.07 15.24 0.0900 38.92 1.95 Massachusetts Hyannis Bell Atlantic 23.07 15.24 0.0900 38.92 1.95 Massachusetts Springfield Bell Atlantic 23.07 15.24 0.0900 38.92 1.95 Michigan Detroit Ameritech 19.42 16.21 0.0620 44.52 2.99 Michigan Grand Rapids Ameritech 17.95 15.65 0.0620 44.52 2.99 Michigan Saginaw Ameritech 20.05 17.73 0.0620 44.52
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • Colorado Colorado Springs US West 20.36 14.97 0.1100 36.40 2.99 Colorado Denver US West 21.40 15.86 0.1130 37.56 2.99 Connecticut Ansonia SNET 18.64 13.61 0.1750 47.70 1.35 Connecticut Norwalk SNET 17.55 13.61 0.1750 47.70 1.35 District of ColumbiaWashington Bell Atlantic 20.10 9.39 0.0649 30.76 1.25 Florida Miami BellSouth 16.85 13.62 0.1040 40.00 3.95 Florida Tampa GTE 19.23 18.04 0.1000 59.13 1.95 Florida West Palm BeachBellSouth 15.60 12.64 0.1020 40.00 3.95 Georgia Albany BellSouth 21.34 14.61 0.1200 42.50 3.95 Georgia Atlanta BellSouth 24.92 16.75 0.1219 42.50 3.95 Hawaii Honolulu GTE 22.40 50.74 2.50 Illinois Chicago Ameritech 8.98 0.0520 60.56 0.00 Illinois Decatur Ameritech 14.90 0.0520 60.64 0.00 Illinois Rock Island Ameritech 15.58 0.0560 60.64 2.99 Indiana Indianapolis Ameritech 18.82 12.53 0.2100 47.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 2,616,465 1.69 325 WEST VIRGINIA 445,775 533,756 0.34 66 WISCONSIN 2,475,661 3,040,396 1.96 377 WYOMING 57,640 69,408 0.04 9 Total 144,402,717 155,084,804 100.00 $19,235 -17 Table 11 Interstate Toll interstate min (Origin & Termin) interstate min (origin & Termin) interstate % of nation Interstate Toll Socc, 2.6 Adjusted (thousands) (thousands) (millions) (millions) ALABAMA 5,304,259 5,796,023 1.31 $767 ARIZONA 8,080,617 8,617,432 1.95 1,140 ARKANSAS 2,755,995 3,596,483 0.81 476 CALIFORNIA 41,161,982 41,798,519 9.46 5,531 COLORADO 8,247,711 8,618,083 1.95 1,140 CONNECTICUT 7,484,361 7,558,328 1.71 1,000 DELAWARE 1,648,284 1,648,284 0.37 218 DC 2,700,824 2,700,824 0.61 357 FLORIDA 27,558,119 27,985,872 6.33 3,703 GEORGIA 12,153,306 14,304,393 3.24 1,893 HAWAII 1,788,003 1,788,003 0.40 237 IDAHO 2,091,166 2,259,597 0.51 299 ILLINOIS 17,572,620 18,036,204 4.08 2,387 INDIANA 7,448,979 7,790,107 1.76
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 0.16 15,864 1.43 -14,111 -1.27 Florida 62,628 0.46 186,959 1.38 -124,331 -0.92 Georgia 86,080 1.38 89,223 1.43 -3,142 -0.05 Hawaii 3,367 0.39 10,626 1.23 -7,260 -0.84 Idaho 37,720 4.29 13,878 1.58 23,842 2.71 Illinois 36,116 0.36 121,871 1.22 -85,755 -0.86 Indiana 32,111 0.73 50,547 1.14 -18,436 -0.42 Iowa 31,154 1.55 26,818 1.33 4,336 0.22 Kansas 68,080 3.30 27,735 1.34 40,344 1.95 Kentucky 33,249 1.26 34,494 1.31 -1,246 -0.05 Louisiana 74,023 2.39 38,035 1.23 35,988 1.16 Maine 38,089 3.68 12,346 1.19 25,743 2.49 Maryland 2,765 0.06 60,114 1.30 -57,349 -1.24 Massachusetts 16,437 0.30 74,010 1.34 -57,573 -1.05 Michigan 51,648 0.66 78,312 1.00 -26,663 -0.34 Minnesota 51,955 1.41 49,480 1.34 2,475 0.07 Mississippi 134,565 7.90 23,275 1.37 111,289 6.53 Missouri 67,950 1.56 53,236
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/0006/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 SOURCE: INDUSTRY ANALYSIS DIVISION, MONITORING REPORT AND ACCESS TARIFF FILINGS. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 SOURCE: FEDERAL-STATE JOINT BOARD MONITORING REPORT, MAY 1997, FILINGS MADE EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1997, JANUARY 1, 1998, AND JULY 1, 1998, AND ARMIS 43-01 REPORTS FILED AT THE COMMISSION. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/014/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/02 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 Source: Industry
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 0.85 0.65 0.60 0.60 Canada 24/ 0.42 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 China 3.43 3.72 3.48 3.37 2.93 2.91 2.67 2.13 1.69 1.40 1.01 0.95 Colombia 1.85 1.75 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.65 0.60 Dominican Republic 24/ 1.45 1.42 1.39 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 Egypt 1.95 1.90 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.90 El Salvador 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.10 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.60 France 24/ 1.58 1.71 1.43 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.19 Germany 1.58 1.71 1.43 1.10 0.83 0.51 0.39 0.23 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.19 Greece 2.15 2.32 2.19 1.66 1.55 1.41 1.26
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 1.40 5.39 8.02 270424 C CENTURYTEL OF SOUTHEAST LA, INC. -4.09 1.52 -5.52 -16.62 270425 C CAMERON TEL. CO.-LA 6.20 0.97 5.18 7.01 270426 C CAMPTI-PLEASANT HILL TEL. CO. 32.55 1.03 31.20 58.00 270427 C CENTURYTEL OF CHATHAM, LLC -14.36 6.96 -19.93 -19.60 270428 A DELCAMBRE TEL. CO. 18.93 6.73 11.43 668.11 270429 C EAST ASCENSION TELEPHONE COMPANY, LLC 10.72 1.95 8.61 21.38 270430 C ELIZABETH TEL. CO., INC. 11.19 0.72 10.39 13.78 270431 C CENTURYTEL OF NORTHWEST LA, INC. -2.16 1.44 -3.55 -7.75 270432 A>CKAPLAN TEL. CO. 1.79 4.20 -2.32 -6.43 270433 C LAFOURCHE TELEPHONE COMPANY, L.L.C. 1.81 2.11 -0.29 -4.77 270434 C CENTURYTEL OF EVANGELINE, LLC 0.00 0.38 -0.38 -2.80 270435 C NORTHEAST LOUISIANA TEL. CO., INC. 1.19 2.27
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 1.57 0.00 Florida -4.19 -2.36 -1.87 -15.68 Georgia 0.29 -3.79 4.23 -11.62 Guam -11.11 -2.02 -9.27 -100.00 Hawaii 0.95 -2.10 3.12 53.42 Idaho 0.73 -2.72 3.55 2.96 Illinois -5.08 -0.30 -4.80 -3.32 Indiana 0.96 -2.07 3.10 14.05 Iowa 0.56 -2.62 3.27 13.46 Kansas -3.79 -5.64 1.96 11.56 Kentucky 4.85 -2.10 7.10 -4.31 Louisiana 2.03 -2.92 5.10 1.39 Maine -2.77 -0.84 -1.95 -19.34 Maryland 0.51 -2.45 3.03 4.64 Massachusetts -0.59 -5.01 4.66 -6.68 Michigan -4.36 2.11 -6.34 0.64 Minnesota 0.44 -4.76 5.46 -5.28 Mississippi 2.99 -2.25 5.37 2.94 Missouri -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 Montana 1.29 -2.20 3.56 1.08 Nebraska -0.92 -4.70 3.97 9.03 Nevada 0.07 -0.21 0.28 -7.60 New Hampshire -5.90 -4.97 -0.98 5.90 New Jersey -0.97 -4.26 3.44 0.00 New Mexico
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
  • 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 *The weighted average national charges are calculated from the charges of price cap companies and companies in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool and excludes companies filing under rate of return or optional incentive rules. The carriers covered comprise approximately 95% of the industry total. Weights for calculating nationwide averages are based on company minutes of use
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. These average rates are
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 SOURCE: INDUSTRY ANALYSIS DIVISION, TRENDS IN TELEPHONE SERVICE AND ACCESS TARIFF FILINGS. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/0006/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/0012/31/00 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • ALBANS TEL. CO. 5.01 4.75 0.25 -3.49 100015 A COMMUNITY SERVICE TEL. CO. 5.63 7.35 -1.61 0.00 100019 A OXFORD COUNTY TEL. & TELE. CO. 6.84 8.03 -1.10 -42.29 100020 A PINE TREE TEL. & TELE. CO. 6.02 3.41 2.53 0.00 100022 A SACO RIVER TEL. & TELE. CO. 14.38 7.87 6.03 0.00 100024 C SOMERSET TEL. CO. 4.94 2.93 1.95 5.58 100025 C STANDISH TEL. CO. 16.19 4.22 11.49 78.61 100027 C UNION RIVER TEL. CO. -4.44 7.59 -11.19 -13.46 100029 C UNITY TEL. CO., INC. 0.53 7.03 -6.07 -18.17 100031 C WARREN TEL. CO. 5.50 6.06 -0.53 -4.03 100034 C WEST PENOBSCOT TEL. & TEL. CO. -2.40 5.76 -7.72 -52.90 103313 C NORTHLAND TEL. CO. OF MAINE 8.61 5.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 908,590 2,274,699 3.88 5.80 6.47 469 4.56 518 Puerto Rico 1,191,082 0 92,442 3.50 0.00 6.00 57 0.55 63 Rhode Island 387,377 45,931 176,553 3.93 6.23 7.30 37 0.36 41 South Carolina 1,548,046 169,262 602,455 3.83 6.51 7.57 139 1.35 153 South Dakota 246,755 13,683 160,128 3.77 6.14 7.32 26 0.26 29 Tennessee 2,194,278 304,300 802,839 3.88 6.51 7.72 200 1.95 221 Texas 6,467,793 1,276,639 3,271,793 3.90 6.15 6.87 666 6.48 735 Utah 675,254 130,003 400,216 3.91 6.16 8.19 81 0.78 89 Vermont 255,328 21,555 114,730 3.86 6.23 7.10 23 0.23 26 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Virginia 2,714,575 503,579 1,478,897 3.91 6.25 6.76 285 2.77 315 Washington 2,283,603 407,168 1,082,749 3.89 6.13 7.91 240
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • Canada 10/ 0.42 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 China 3.43 3.72 3.48 3.37 2.93 2.91 2.67 2.13 1.69 1.40 1.01 0.72 0.70 Colombia 1.85 1.75 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.65 0.55 0.38 Dominican Republic 10/ 1.45 1.42 1.39 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Egypt 1.95 1.90 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.70 0.46 El Salvador 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.10 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.48 0.38 France 10/ 1.58 1.71 1.43 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 Germany 1.58 1.71 1.43 1.10 0.83 0.51 0.39 0.23 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 Greece 2.15 2.32 2.19
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 2,108.6 0.354TX Utah 280.6 6.23 274.4 35.5 238.9 83.9 37.3 108.7 229.9 9.016UT Vermont 88.1 1.09 87.0 12.0 75.0 29.5 16.4 29.1 75.0 VT Virginia 1,241.1 (31.40) 1,272.5 324.2 948.3 406.0 111.0 430.7 947.7 0.591VA Washington 966.6 18.71 947.9 208.0 739.9 301.7 102.0 317.7 721.4 18.575WA West Virginia 243.3 2.26 241.1 50.9 190.1 103.8 26.0 60.1 190.0 0.179WV Wisconsin 431.0 1.95 429.1 65.8 363.3 141.6 54.3 167.4 363.3 0.001WI Wyoming 83.1 7.25 75.8 7.7 68.2 24.8 13.6 27.9 66.3 1.849WY Puerto Rico 365.5 365.5 93.0 272.6 169.0 84.8 18.7 272.6 PR 104 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Table 2.10 - Revenues of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers for the Year Ended December 31, 2001 -- Continued Toll Network Service Revenues (Dollar
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 1.08 1.52 0.99 0.89 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 5.6-AT&T RATES FOR LONG DISTANCE MESSAGE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE UNITED STATES-OVERSEAS--CONTINUED COUNTRY CLASSES OF SERVICE INITIAL MINUTE EACH ADDITIONAL MINUTE ALL DAYS STANDARD DISCOUNT ECONOMY STANDARD DISCOUNT ECONOMY 5PM-11PM 10AM-5PM 11PM-10AM 5PM-11PM 10AM-5PM 11PM-10AM TAIWAN, REPUBLIC OF CHINA INTERNATIONAL DIAL 2.17 1.29 1.11 1.94 1.14 1.00 ALL OTHER* 4.02 3.21 2.68 1.95 1.32 1.08 5PM-2AM 2AM-11AM 11AM-5PM 5PM-2AM 2AM-11AM 11AM-5PM THAILAND INTERNATIONAL DIAL 2.32 1.29 1.16 2.06 1.16 1.05 ALL OTHER* 4.49 3.38 2.69 2.09 1.43 1.12 4PM-10PM 7AM-4PM 10PM-7AM 4PM-10PM 7AM-4PM 10PM-7AM TRINIDAD & TOBAGO, DEMOCRATIC INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.70 1.40 1.17 1.55 1.24 1.06 REPUBLIC OF ALL OTHER* 2.27 1.71 1.37 1.64 1.26 1.08 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM TURKEY
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 1.58 1.32SAUDI ARABIA 2.10 1.65 ECUADOR 1.85 1.52SINGAPORE, REPUBLIC OF 1.65 1.09 EGYPT, ARAB REPUBLIC OF 2.17 1.75SOUTH AFRICA, REPUBLIC OF 1.75 1.31 EL SALVADOR 1.74 1.42SPAIN (INCLUDING BALEARIC 1.62 1.10 FRANCE 1.33 0.86 ISLANDS, CANARY ISLANDS, GERMANY, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF 1.25 0.82 CEUTA AND MELILLA) (INCLUDING FORMER GERMAN SWEDEN 1.31 0.86 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC) SWITZERLAND 1.41 0.88 GREECE 1.95 1.30TAIWAN 1.99 1.21 GUAM 2.19 1.07THAILAND 2.01 1.27 GUATEMALA 1.76 1.41TRINIDAD & TOBAGO, REPUBLIC OF 1.62 1.28 HAITI 1.75 1.49TURKEY 1.84 1.31 HONDURAS 1.91 1.41UNITED KINGDOM (INCLUDING THE 1.09 0.79 HONG KONG 1.84 1.20 CHANNEL ISLANDS, ENGLAND, INDIA 2.64 2.15 ISLE OF MAN, NORTHERN IRELAND, IRELAND 1.35 0.89 SCOTLAND AND WALES) ISRAEL 1.97 1.32VENEZUELA 1.35 1.02 CLASS OF SERVICE AT&T
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 6.45 2.65 4.90 1.50 2.75 2.25 4.25 1.75 3.25 1.10 2.10 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 0.60 1.10 1965 6/ 3.00 5.50 2.30 4.30 1.50 2.75 2.10 3.85 1.50 2.75 1.10 2.10 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 0.60 1.10 1966 3.00 5.50 2.30 4.30 1.50 2.75 2.10 3.85 1.50 2.75 1.10 2.10 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 0.60 1.10 1967 7/ 2.65 4.90 1.95 3.70 1.50 2.75 2.10 3.85 1.40 2.65 1.10 2.10 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 0.60 1.10 1968 8/ 2.60 4.85 1.95 3.70 1.50 2.75 2.00 3.75 1.40 2.65 1.10 2.10 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 0.60 1.10 1969 2.60 4.85 1.95 3.70 1.50 2.75 2.00 3.75 1.40 2.65 1.10 2.10 0.80 1.55 0.60 1.10 0.60 1.10 1970 9/ 2.25 4.50 1.35 2.60
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 2.02 3.32 59.1 UT VERMONT 64.0 38.2 25.8 18.4 7.4 0.83 0.30 0.54 1.67 5.7 VT VIRGINIA 20.9 6.6 14.3 10.0 4.3 0.43 0.13 0.15 0.71 3.6 VA WASHINGTON 374.5 229.1 145.4 97.6 47.8 5.82 0.88 2.73 9.43 38.4WA WEST VIRGINIA 247.0 166.6 80.4 69.5 10.8 (2.09) (1.58) (0.61) (4.28) 15.1WV WISCONSIN 40.8 18.7 22.2 12.2 10.0 1.19 0.36 0.40 1.95 8.0 WI WYOMING 120.3 87.6 32.7 21.5 11.2 0.28 0.13 0.18 0.60 10.6WY PUERTO RICO 4.3 5.2 (0.9) (0.9) (0.1) (1.00) (0.34) (0.21) (1.56) 1.5 PR UNCLASSIFIED SEE NOTES FOLLOWING TABLE 2.20 170 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 2.14 - TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES OF REPORTING LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 ( DOLLAR AMOUNTS SHOWN
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • (0.21) (0.07) 0.19 (0.10) 8.5 LA Maine 40.7 11.0 29.8 22.0 7.8 0.86 0.06 0.27 1.19 6.6ME Maryland 233.4 113.5 119.9 70.4 49.5 7.24 6.60 5.98 19.82 29.7MD Massachusetts 182.8 104.3 78.5 27.1 51.4 6.32 2.87 5.97 15.16 36.3MA Michigan 272.4 217.0 55.4 37.1 18.3 (0.55) (0.16) 0.21 (0.49) 18.8 MI Minnesota 106.8 67.4 39.4 27.9 11.4 1.14 0.29 0.52 1.95 9.5MN Mississippi 60.2 29.8 30.3 22.7 7.7 0.27 0.11 0.13 0.51 7.2MS Missouri 364.3 273.2 91.1 78.3 12.7 (0.86) (0.32) 0.08 (1.10) 13.8MO Montana 8.3 10.5 (2.2) (2.2) 0.0 (1.07) (0.42) (0.46) (1.95) 2.0MT Nebraska 129.9 62.8 67.2 48.4 18.8 5.49 3.14 5.14 13.77 5.0NE Nevada 120.3 70.9 49.4 39.6 9.8 0.03 0.15 0.05 0.23 9.5NV New Hampshire 27.9 13.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da992709.doc
  • Haat: 361 M V Erp: 64. KW; V Haat: 361 M FM126 BPH -950512ME NEW Ettrick VA Richmond Broadcasting, Inc. REQ: 93.100 MHz; Channel No. 226A H Erp: 5.2 KW; H Haat: 106 M V Erp: 5.2 KW; V Haat: 106 M FM127 BPH -970605ME NEW Goochland VA Hubert N. Hoffman, Jr. REQ: 100.500 MHz; Channel No. 263A H Erp: 1.95 KW; H Haat: 176 M V Erp: 1.95 KW; V Haat: 176 M FM128 BPH -970513MF NEW Frederiksted VI David A. Rawley, Jr. REQ: 101.700 MHz; Channel No. 269B1 H Erp: 25.0 KW; H Haat: 13 M V Erp: 25.0 KW; V Haat: 13 M FM129 BPH -970716MC NEW Cle Elum WA Michael F. & Bridget T. Andler REQ: 93.700
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • PR-4-08-2100 % Missed Appt. ­ Customer ­ Late Order Conf. 0 0 PR-6 - Installation Quality PR-6-01-2100 % Installation Troubles reported within 30 Days 2.59 3.37 2.31 1.06 1.98 2.14 2.27 0.64 1.87 3.55 PR-6-02-2100 % Installation Troubles reported within 7 Days 1.47 2.02 1.41 0.71 PR-6-03-2100 % Inst. Troubles reported w/ in 30 Days - FOK/TOK/CPE 2.28 0.9 2.19 1.95 1.88 0.46 0.64 1.55 PR-8 - Open Orders in a Hold Status PR-8-01-2100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0.02 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0 0 PR-8-02-2100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0 0 POTS ­ Business PR-2 - Average Completed Interval
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-283153A1.html
  • tower, and from 5 to 25 feet from the fence, using a calibrated RFR meter. The agents employed a spatial averaging measurement technique, where measurements in four quadrants are averaged to give a representative reading for each location. Public and occupational RFR MPE levels were exceeded throughout this area of approximately 1100 square feet, ranging from 0.9 mW/cm 2 to 1.95 mW/cm 2 (90 to 195% of the occupational MPE limits, and 450 to 975% of the public MPE limits). The agents informed the KNUQ(FM) Chief Engineer that KNUQ(FM) had exceeded the RFR limits in the area of concern. 7. On May 13, 2008, Honolulu agents conducted a follow-up inspection at the KNUQ(FM) transmitter site. Again, the agents employed a personal
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-287061A1.html
  • the main radiation lobe of the transmitting antenna will be a term of the station authorization. At the time of the inspection on May 29 and June 2, 2008, Media Logic was found operating radio station WQHV648 from a location inconsistent with the station's authorized coordinates. The distance separating the point of operation from that of the license was approximately 1.95 miles (approximately 1 minute and 38 seconds of latitude and 35 seconds of longitude). Media Logic's owner acknowledged that station WQHV648 had been operating from the location observed by the Denver agent for a period of over eight months, therefore, the violation was willful. The violation occurred for more than one day, therefore it was repeated. 6. Based on the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-165A1.html
  • the Commission's rules on numerous occasions. Accordingly, an issue will be specified to determine whether the Kintzel brothers have executed changes in a subscriber's selection of a provider of telephone exchange or telephone toll service, in willful and repeated violation of Section 258 of the Act, as amended, and Section 64.1120 of the Commission's rules. C. Sanctions 17. Under Section 1.95 of the Commission's rules, the violation of a consent order subjects the consenting party to the entire range of sanctions that "could have been imposed" in the proceeding that led to the consent order if the issues in that proceeding had been decided against the consenting party, as well as additional sanctions for the consent violations. The Commission carries the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55 1.93 (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55 1.93 (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-2 89 Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/genmot_atta022502.pdf
  • and "uncabled" areas, respectively), he does not include in his analysis that New EchoStar has committed to price its product uniformly throughout the nation. 83. Second, Mr. Sidak assumes that the elasticity of demand for DBS service is -2.5 for uncabled areas and -2.75 for cabled areas. The only basis he provides for these numbers is that the FCC cites -1.95 as the own-price elasticity of demand for cable television and it is "reasonable to use a higher (in absolute value terms) own-price elasticity for DBS service, because DBS is a new product whose demand is likely to be more price-sensitive than the demand for the product of the entrenched monopolist."100 In other words, there does not appear to be any
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/nab4_petition020402.pdf
  • Communications, the average revenue per unit (ARPU) for DirecTV in the third quarter of 2001 was $46.76.39 For the own-price elasticity of demand for DBS service, I use as a midpoint the own-price elasticity of demand for cable television service of ­2.5. According to the FCC's February 2001 Cable Pricing Report,40 the own-price elasticity of demand for cable television is ­1.95.41 It is reasonable to use a higher (in absolute value terms) own-price elasticity for DBS service, because DBS is a new product whose demand is likely to be more price-sensitive than the demand for the product of the entrenched monopolist. Using the pre-merger price of $46.76 and an own-price elasticity of demand for DBS service in areas not passed by