FCC Web Documents citing 1.93

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-360A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-360A1.pdf
  • 689-690/774.30625, 733-734/774.58125, 805-806/775.03125, 849-850/775.30625, and 885-886/775.53125 MHz. Waiver Request at 1. Id. at 2. Id. Id. See Renewal Request at 1. Id at 2. See September 7, 2010 PSHSB Policy Division, Interim Waiver Relief and Special Temporary Authority, 25 FCC Rcd 12740 (PSHSB PD 2010) (September 7 Interim Relief Grant). 47 U.S.C. � 309(f), as codified in 47 C.F.R. � 1.93(a). Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 February 25, 2011 ^ _ � > �%���PNG �` �` b``D� 4 �&)�@�-�@�@�7 H >��O��� p j�� �2�=��k��� �"_� - J��, �Nt�Rb �7�P���U�ZS '��wp��ˈ jP�T{.|�87w]�g��yA�Ҩ-��=T#�O> �#W p����U�^S� �t�''�TxNt�l ۦ��X6`T{������:�r�� �A�R\ )]h]e�M8�I̟`�?K^��� ?C��A�UU �3ꡟ=��A � \�+�_ �e�P�g� �ك�� �_ą {�.� �"��{Z��HV9�iъ���� s+ �~ �p��,�� �tm�y� ݤ*>0�F��lŢ.|�� /�b���=^''"TxM[�D\Њl��-I�@� � �-'��I�<~@� �p^v�}��+d�� '� �@����7�l:] �WN 9�� _#p��
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.pdf
  • December 24, 2003 order, BOI also faced possible sanctions of $115,533.52 for failure to make required universal service contributions, $10,000 for failure to file required Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets, and $10,000 for failure to make required TRS contributions. Prior to final disposition of the hearing, however, the Enforcement Bureau and BOI entered into a consent decree (``Consent Decree''), pursuant to Section 1.93(b) of the Commission's rules. 5. The terms of the Consent Decree specifically applied to all entities owned, directed, or controlled by the Kintzel brothers, and was intended to ensure their future compliance with Sections 214, 254, and 258 of the Act and related Commission rules. The Consent Decree contemplated a voluntary contribution to the United States Treasury in the total
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A2.txt
  • of programming networks is greater than the cable operator's channel capacity. Result 14: Seller losses are not more common under the CAP MFN treatment than under the CAP No MFN treatment. A Chi-square test comparing the proportion of sellers that incur losses in the CAP No MFN and CAP MFN treatments under each concentration treatment yielded test statistic values of 1.93 (Low/High), 2.59 (High/High), 0.255 (High/Low). None of these test statistics exceed the critical values associated with standard levels of significance. The above tests do not differentiate among sellers. However, this lack of differentiation may hide effects that can only be observed when such differentiation is present. Tables 14 and 15 report, for the CAP No MFN and the CAP MFN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1420A1.txt
  • and 73.207 of our rules, contrary to Family's suggestion that Hall's proposal would require a tower of 500 meters height above average terrain (``HAAT''). Our analysis showed that the Hall proposed tower site would have been 383.7 meters above mean sea level (``AMSL''), and that at that site, a tower with a HAAT of 178.5 meters and adjusted power of 1.93 kilowatts would comply with our rules and would cover 100% of Keeseville with a 70dBu signal. Hall indicated its willingness to construct a tower of this height and we accepted its submission. The coordinates for Channel 231A at Keeseville are 44-31-45 NL and 73-32-00 WL. This site was suggested in an amendment filed by Addison Broadcasting Company, Inc., licensee of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-437A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-437A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-437A2.txt
  • ) ) ) EB Docket No. 03-85 File No. EB-02-TC-151 NAL/Acct. No. 200332170002 FRN: 0007179054 CONSENT ORDER Issued: February 18, 2004 Released: February 20, 2004 This is a ruling on Joint Request for Adoption of Consent Decree and Termination of Proceeding, filed on February 17, 2004, by the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Business Options, Inc. (``BOI'') in accordance with �� 1.93 and 1.94 of the Commission's rules [47 C.F.R. �� 1.93, 1.94]. This proceeding was set for hearing by Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, 18 F.C.C. Rcd 6881, released April 7, 2003 (``OSC''). Issues were specified to determine whether BOI had made misrepresentations or engaged in lack of candor (Issue a); to determine whether BOI had
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 22 1.39 TLF 19 1.20 UNI 37 2.34 Total 1,583100.00 Source:Authorcalculations.Note:IND1-IND9(PBS1-PBS6)are"virtualnetworks"consistingofthefirst,second, etc.Independent(Public)televisionstationofferedineachNielsenDMA.SeeSection4.1formoredetails.AZA =AztecaAmerica,ION=The"i"network,TBN=TrinityBroadcastingNetwork,TEL=Telemundo,TLF= Telefutura,andUNI=Univision 34 Table6: ProgramProductionbyProgrammingType 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2006 AllBroadcast Cable Variable Networks NetworksNetworks NewsProgramming AnyNews 4.14 11.79 2.96 NetworkNews 0.51 2.63 0.18 LocalNews 3.63 9.16 2.78 PublicAffairsProgramming 1.98 3.40 1.76 MinorityProgramming NetworksTargetingBlackAudiences 3.39 0.00 3.91 TargetingLatinoAudiences OnNetworksTargetingLatinoAudiences 8.13 15.17 7.05 Spanish-LanguageProgramming 3.39 5.54 3.05 NetworksTargetingOtherDiverseAudiences 2.65 0.00 3.06 Children'sProgramming "Children'sProgramming" 1.93 0.84 2.10 GMoviesorTV-Y/TV-Y7TV 3.11 1.06 3.42 Eitheroftheabove 5.03 1.90 5.52 FamilyProgramming NetworksTargetingFamilies 10.93 0.00 12.61 TY-GProgramming 11.59 17.05 10.75 Arts,Educational,orDocumentaryProgramming 7.60 6.46 7.77 Eitherofthetwoabove 19.18 23.50 18.52 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming 4.98 0.00 5.75 NC-17MoviesorTV-MA-S/TV-MA-LTV 0.67 0.39 0.72 ViolentProgramming "ViolentProgramming" 1.70 0.53 1.88 TV-PG-VTelevision 1.46 2.31 1.33 TV-14-VTelevision 1.47 2.07 1.37 TV-MA-VTelevision 0.19 0.12 0.20 Anyofthethreeabove 3.11 4.50 2.90 Anyofthelasttwoabove 1.65 2.18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • 104 Format 20 HHI -0.203 (1.94) -0.001 (1.79) -0.3479 (-1.52) 0.025 (0.80) -0.000008 (-1.42) 0.074 104 Format 11 Count -0.441 (0.13) 0.040* (2.47) -4.0090 (-0.53) -1.588 (-1.53) 0.000417* (2.31) 0.209 104 Format 11 HHI -0.219* (2.23) -0.001 (1.55) -0.4659* (-2.17) 0.020 (0.67) -0.000009 (-1.67) 0.035 104 With Demographics: Format 101 Count 11.711 (1.10) 0.268* (4.96) 11.8832 (0.50) 2.130 (0.64) 0.001146 (1.93) 0.763 104 Format 101 HHI -0.154 (1.76) -0.001 (1.39) -0.1049 (-0.54) 0.006 (0.22) -0.000007 (-1.37) 0.132 104 Format 20 Count 6.131 (0.83) 0.086* (2.30) 12.1382 (0.74) -0.831 (-0.36) 0.000475 (1.16) 0.452 104 Format 20 HHI -0.245* (2.36) -0.001 (1.54) -0.1909 (-0.82) 0.033 (1.03) -0.000008 (-1.37) 0.204 104 Format 11 Count -0.003 (0.00) 0.025 (1.42) -4.0104 (-0.51) -1.296 (-1.19) 0.000246 (1.27)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • errors corrected for clustering by television station). ***p<.01, **p<.05, and *p<.10. 51 Table 19: DMA Political Preferences and Slant of Cross-Owned Stations Difference in Candidate Speaking Time Difference in Candidate Coverage Difference in Partisan Issue Coverage Difference in Poll Coverage Kerry vote percentage in DMA 0.1 (1.45) 0.1 (1.06) 0.7*** (2.79) 0.7** (2.38) 0.9* (1.72) 0.7 (1.30) 0.3* (1.80) 0.3* (1.93) Cross-owned newspaper -3.6 (0.77) -3.9 (0.77) -3.8 (0.52) -4.4 (0.58) -9.5 (0.80) -12.0 (0.97) -1.7 (0.83) -1.3 (0.68) Cross-owned radio 0.4 (0.15) 0.0 (0.01) 10.0 (1.39) 10.0 (1.37) -19.3 (1.03) -20.0 (1.07) -3.7 (0.85) -3.4 (0.80) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 2.7 (0.42) 4.2 (0.61) -1.0 (0.09) 0.6 (0.06) 36.0 (1.49) 39.6* (1.73) 0.5 (0.11) -0.6 (0.15) Other control variables Ownership
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.txt
  • CA 1,430,600 100.00% 31 17.94 22.22 11 9 Number of Broadcast Stations Licensed to State Household-weighted Number of Stations Carried by DBS DMA DMA Rank State Segment No. of HHs in State Segment % DMA HHs in State Segment Measured by Nielsen Full-Power Stations Only All Full- and Low-Power Stations DISH Network DIRECTV SALISBURY 143 DE 80,500 49.88% 2 1 1.93 0 1 MD 80,900 50.12% 8 4.54 5.67 2 5 SALT LAKE CITY 32 ID 7,600 0.79% 0 0.15 12.54 0 0 NV 21,000 2.17% 1 0.81 10.8 0 0 UT 902,500 93.38% 22 10.67 20.48 15 15 WY 35,400 3.66% 0 0.6 3.78 0 0 SAN ANGELO 196 TX 55,900 100.00% 11 4.07 9.64 4 0 SAN ANTONIO 37
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-360A1.txt
  • 689-690/774.30625, 733-734/774.58125, 805-806/775.03125, 849-850/775.30625, and 885-886/775.53125 MHz. Waiver Request at 1. Id. at 2. Id. Id. See Renewal Request at 1. Id at 2. See September 7, 2010 PSHSB Policy Division, Interim Waiver Relief and Special Temporary Authority, 25 FCC Rcd 12740 (PSHSB PD 2010) (September 7 Interim Relief Grant). 47 U.S.C. � 309(f), as codified in 47 C.F.R. � 1.93(a). Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 February 25, 2011 ^ _ � > �%���PNG �` �` b``D� 4 �&)�@�-�@�@�7 H >��O��� p j�� �2�=��k��� �"_� - J��, �Nt�Rb �7�P���U�ZS '��wp��ˈ jP�T{.|�87w]�g��yA�Ҩ-��=T#�O> �#W p����U�^S� �t�''�TxNt�l ۦ��X6`T{������:�r�� �A�R\ )]h]e�M8�I̟`�?K^��� ?C��A�UU �3ꡟ=��A � \�+�_ �e�P�g� �ك�� �_ą {�.� �"��{Z��HV9�iъ���� s+ �~ �p��,�� �tm�y� ݤ*>0�F��lŢ.|�� /�b���=^''"TxM[�D\Њl��-I�@� � �-'��I�<~@� �p^v�}��+d�� '� �@����7�l:] �WN 9�� _#p��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-121A2_Rcd.pdf
  • 17 27,792 4,927 0.26 617.20 7,404.97 318.09 0.12 419.01 0.21 682.88 23.16 AZ 33,786 217 127 15 8 83,207 35,477 12.56 862.11 41,186.13 3,920.39 3.90 43.61 0.32 1,533.47 28.48 CA 21,025 414 246 52 30 45,234 32,742 30.33 1,323.64 31,340.15 3,329.01 6.59 26.20 0.98 981.29 4.93 CO 11,313 218 151 58 14 17,398 20,072 0.00 892.85 16,336.71 1,581.69 0.00 135.68 1.93 837.63 83.70 CT 206 25 16 4 4 1,298 19 0.00 15.39 62.37 10.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.98 0.00 DE 22211 52 1 0.00 0.00 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 FL 2,177 98 75 41 24 9,952 2,194 15.43 146.31 2,234.18 222.39 1.96 11.51 0.00 52.36 6.37 GA 5,270 384 261 118 21 40,894 3,295 1.67 453.39 5,506.28
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • * 1.53 * (76) (54) (116) Contour Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55 1.93 (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.txt
  • 71; PacTel Comments at 69; U S West Reply at 30; Citizens Utilities Comments at 30; NECA Comments at 3-4; Alabama Commission Comments at 9; California Commission Comments at 6; Illinois Commission Comments at 12; Sprint Comments at 21; TCI Comments at 14, Reply at 11. 195 PacTel Comments at 69; California Commission Comments at 6. CPUC Docket No. R.93-04- 003/1.93-04-002, Consensus Costing Principles/Basic Network Functions; OANAD Cost Methodology Workshops, Filed Aug. 23, 1995 by California Telecommunications Coalition. Texas, also, has adopted flat-rates for these facilities. Texas Commission Comments at 15. 196 AT&T Comments at 60; MCI Comments at 84; Ameritech Reply at 29; U S West Reply at 30; Texas Commission Comments at 15. 197 TCI Comments at 14, Reply
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 1.90 34.0 Iowa 1,888 2,039 2,163 2,268 520 1,921 2,441 0.91 29.3 Kansas 1,829 2,017 2,165 2,304 501 2,086 2,588 0.96 41.5 Kentucky 2,353 2,629 2,861 3,060 711 2,715 3,426 1.28 45.6 Louisiana 2,703 2,946 3,192 3,432 698 3,215 3,913 1.46 44.7 Maine 869 976 996 1,105 243 951 1,195 0.44 37.5 Maryland 3,767 4,234 4,625 4,911 917 4,259 5,176 1.93 37.4 Massachusetts 4,988 5,455 6,010 6,338 1,206 5,355 6,561 2.44 31.5 Michigan 6,444 7,246 7,983 8,523 1,721 7,809 9,530 3.55 47.9 Minnesota 3,064 3,461 3,864 4,115 950 3,667 4,617 1.72 50.7 Mississippi 1,584 1,734 1,877 2,017 395 1,888 2,283 0.85 44.1 Missouri 3,623 4,017 4,389 4,613 1,145 4,298 5,442 2.03 50.2 Montana 640 709 756 780 187 709 897 0.33
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244194A1.txt
  • Commission's rules, and had willfully and repeatedly failed to file Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets in a timely manner in violation of sections 54.711 of the Commission's rules. 7. On January 28, 2004, pursuant to section 1.94(a) of the Commission's Rules, the Bureau informed the presiding officer of the initiation of the negotiations that lead to this Consent Decree. Pursuant to section 1.93(b) of the Commission's rules, the Bureau negotiated this Consent Decree to secure future compliance with sections 214, 254, and 258 of the Act and related Commission rules in exchange for prompt disposition of the issues raised in the Order to Show Cause, other than the issues already adjudicated by the presiding officer. II. AGREEMENT 8. The Parties agree and acknowledge
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 0.67 0.49 0.31 0.20 -77.5 Philippines 1.52 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.31 0.26 -73.4 Poland 1.10 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.26 -65.2 Russia 1.99 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 0.43 0.27 0.24 -79.6 Saudi Arabia 1.34 1.41 1.25 1.20 1.05 1.08 1.00 0.88 0.75 0.53 0.30 -72.6 Sierra Leone 1.93 1.94 1.78 1.80 1.22 1.07 0.47 0.75 0.61 0.83 0.43 -60.0 Singapore 1.48 1.38 1.19 1.08 0.85 0.56 0.56 0.58 0.52 0.44 0.55 -0.7 South Africa 1.32 1.07 0.94 0.95 0.69 0.78 0.68 0.57 0.64 0.34 0.46 -41.1 Spain 1.11 1.10 1.07 1.08 0.94 0.79 0.72 0.63 0.55 0.36 0.24 -69.9 Switzerland 1.08 1.03 1.01 0.88 0.62 0.46 0.49 0.43
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 3,984,705 99.9 1.00 Michigan 5,962,539 96.2 1.04 Minnesota 2,848,843 70.9 1.41 Mississippi 1,376,962 92.9 1.08 Missouri 3,386,695 80.5 1.24 Montana 523,879 66.7 1.50 Nebraska 850,404 78.2 1.28 Nevada 1,314,168 95.5 1.05 New Hampshire 784,265 92.7 1.08 New Jersey 6,327,653 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 967,109 84.8 1.18 New York 11,999,917 96.5 1.04 North Carolina 4,841,751 89.7 1.11 North Dakota 365,028 51.9 1.93 N. Mariana Islands 24,047 0.0 NA Ohio 6,659,105 95.0 1.05 Oklahoma 1,826,796 80.8 1.24 Oregon 2,003,956 91.3 1.10 Pennsylvania 7,672,419 95.6 1.05 Puerto Rico 1,242,555 100.0 1.00 Rhode Island 549,546 100.0 1.00 South Carolina 2,254,077 72.3 1.38 South Dakota 370,327 60.3 1.66 Tennessee 3,206,045 85.7 1.17 Texas 12,039,565 92.5 1.08 Utah 1,091,107 91.2 1.10 Vermont 414,474 84.5 1.18 Virginia 4,468,649
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • 3,984,705 99.9 1.00 Michigan 5,962,539 96.2 1.04 Minnesota 2,848,843 70.9 1.41 Mississippi 1,376,962 92.9 1.08 Missouri 3,386,695 80.5 1.24 Montana 523,879 66.7 1.50 Nebraska 850,404 78.2 1.28 Nevada 1,314,168 95.5 1.05 New Hampshire 784,265 92.7 1.08 New Jersey 6,327,653 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 967,109 84.8 1.18 New York 11,999,917 96.5 1.04 North Carolina 4,841,751 89.7 1.11 North Dakota 365,028 51.9 1.93 N. Mariana Islands 24,047 0.0 NA Ohio 6,659,105 95.0 1.05 Oklahoma 1,826,796 80.8 1.24 Oregon 2,003,956 91.3 1.10 Pennsylvania 7,672,419 95.6 1.05 Puerto Rico 1,242,555 100.0 1.00 Rhode Island 549,546 100.0 1.00 South Carolina 2,254,077 72.3 1.38 South Dakota 370,327 60.3 1.66 Tennessee 3,206,045 85.7 1.17 Texas 12,039,565 92.5 1.08 Utah 1,091,107 91.2 1.10 Vermont 414,474 84.5 1.18 Virginia 4,468,649
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 2.82 -4.11 7.23 38.82 Puerto Rico -8.77 -3.65 -5.31 -28.31 Rhode Island -1.04 -7.74 7.26 0.00 South Carolina 1.54 -2.54 4.18 -4.90 South Dakota 4.90 -6.06 11.66 28.10 Tennessee 0.36 -2.60 3.04 -9.42 Texas -6.69 -5.60 -1.16 4.67 Utah -3.62 -2.22 -1.43 -4.52 Vermont 6.73 -1.77 8.66 17.01 Virgin Islands -0.83 0.46 -1.28 -7.72 Virginia 6.21 -3.66 10.24 32.56 Washington 1.93 -2.54 4.58 -2.44 West Virginia 0.34 -2.54 2.95 -28.04 Wisconsin -2.33 -4.06 1.81 20.78 Wyoming 1.67 -2.85 4.65 -6.87 Industry -0.33 -3.87 3.68 3.28 * Percentage changes from 2004 to 2005. Source: Calculated from National Exchange Carrier Association data. Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year*
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 972 851 952 934 987 936 2003 956 967 875 932 917 1002 941 2004 990 1000 923 988 946 1031 971 1980 1.94% 1.94% 1.95% 1.89% 2.09% 1.78% 1981 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.04 2.14 1.90 1982 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.01 2.09 2.16 1983 2.11 2.11 2.15 2.01 2.28 1.95 1984 1.98 1.98 1.97% 2.01 1.92 2.06 1.89 1985 1.94 1.93 1.98 2.01 1.85 1.97 1.93 1986 1.97 1.95 2.16 1.89 1.96 2.12 1.87 1987 2.04 2.01 2.32 2.02 2.02 2.17 1.95 1988 2.07 2.04 2.31 1.99 2.01 2.21 2.03 1989 2.04 2.02 2.19 2.02 2.04 2.18 1.87 1990 2.09 2.07 2.24 2.08 2.11 2.28 1.88 1991 2.09 2.04 2.42 2.01 2.15 2.20 1.95 1992 2.09 2.06 2.29 2.04 2.07 2.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 3,779,199 99.9 1.00 Michigan 5,688,091 96.2 1.04 Minnesota 2,703,043 70.1 1.43 Mississippi 1,328,966 92.8 1.08 Missouri 3,247,315 80.0 1.25 Montana 506,462 66.0 1.52 Nebraska 815,003 77.7 1.29 Nevada 1,267,684 95.4 1.05 New Hampshire 754,305 92.6 1.08 New Jersey 5,983,090 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 940,723 84.6 1.18 New York 11,284,257 96.5 1.04 North Carolina 4,596,547 89.6 1.12 North Dakota 347,899 51.7 1.93 N. Mariana Islands 24,480 0.0 NA Ohio 6,372,077 94.9 1.05 Oklahoma 1,732,719 80.2 1.25 Oregon 1,933,674 90.8 1.10 Pennsylvania 7,345,084 95.5 1.05 Puerto Rico 1,180,127 100.0 1.00 Rhode Island 491,107 100.0 1.00 South Carolina 2,174,893 71.9 1.39 South Dakota 348,183 58.6 1.71 Tennessee 3,085,923 85.4 1.17 Texas 11,590,562 92.3 1.08 Utah 1,056,543 91.2 1.10 Vermont 407,202 84.3 1.19 Virginia 4,290,319
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • 3,779,199 99.9 1.00 Michigan 5,688,091 96.2 1.04 Minnesota 2,703,043 70.1 1.43 Mississippi 1,328,966 92.8 1.08 Missouri 3,247,315 80.0 1.25 Montana 506,462 66.0 1.52 Nebraska 815,003 77.7 1.29 Nevada 1,267,684 95.4 1.05 New Hampshire 754,305 92.6 1.08 New Jersey 5,983,090 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 940,723 84.6 1.18 New York 11,284,257 96.5 1.04 North Carolina 4,596,547 89.6 1.12 North Dakota 347,899 51.7 1.93 N. Mariana Islands 24,480 0.0 NA Ohio 6,372,077 94.9 1.05 Oklahoma 1,732,719 80.2 1.25 Oregon 1,933,674 90.8 1.10 Pennsylvania 7,345,084 95.5 1.05 Puerto Rico 1,180,127 100.0 1.00 Rhode Island 491,107 100.0 1.00 South Carolina 2,174,893 71.9 1.39 South Dakota 348,183 58.6 1.71 Tennessee 3,085,923 85.4 1.17 Texas 11,590,562 92.3 1.08 Utah 1,056,543 91.2 1.10 Vermont 407,202 84.3 1.19 Virginia 4,290,319
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • Payments By State or Jurisdiction - ILECs and CETC s (Dollars) 2005 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 3 - 27 Alabama $0.58 $0.01 $0.00 $1.39 ($0.00) $0.54 $0.61 $0.18 $3.31 Alaska 7.35 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 6.99 0.00 2.04 16.44 American Samoa 5.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.62 0.00 2.27 17.95 Arizona 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.50 0.26 1.93 Arkansas 3.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.88 0.75 0.39 6.05 California 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.13 0.02 0.38 Colorado 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.00) 0.58 0.63 0.14 2.40 Connecticut 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.08 Delaware 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04 Dist. of Columbia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 524 1,313 2,630 3,811 6,441 2.16 Massachusetts 1,892 3,704 5,595 836 531 1,366 2,728 4,234 6,962 2.34 Michigan 2,338 4,955 7,293 888 908 1,796 3,225 5,864 9,089 3.05 Minnesota 1,294 2,358 3,652 577 401 977 1,871 2,759 4,629 1.55 Mississippi 726 1,539 2,265 318 251 569 1,044 1,789 2,834 0.95 Missouri 1,559 2,858 4,417 689 644 1,333 2,248 3,502 5,750 1.93 Montana 284 411 695 122 95 217 406 506 912 0.31 Nebraska 453 879 1,332 222 195 417 675 1,074 1,749 0.59 Nevada 794 1,128 1,922 326 159 485 1,120 1,287 2,407 0.81 New Hampshire 434 740 1,173 181 120 301 615 859 1,474 0.49 New Jersey 2,994 5,374 8,368 1,276 849 2,125 4,270 6,222 10,493 3.52 New Mexico 541
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • 524 1,313 2,630 3,811 6,441 2.16 Massachusetts 1,892 3,704 5,595 836 531 1,366 2,728 4,234 6,962 2.34 Michigan 2,338 4,955 7,293 888 908 1,796 3,225 5,864 9,089 3.05 Minnesota 1,294 2,358 3,652 577 401 977 1,871 2,759 4,629 1.55 Mississippi 726 1,539 2,265 318 251 569 1,044 1,789 2,834 0.95 Missouri 1,559 2,858 4,417 689 644 1,333 2,248 3,502 5,750 1.93 Montana 284 411 695 122 95 217 406 506 912 0.31 Nebraska 453 879 1,332 222 195 417 675 1,074 1,749 0.59 Nevada 794 1,128 1,922 326 159 485 1,120 1,287 2,407 0.81 New Hampshire 434 740 1,173 181 120 301 615 859 1,474 0.49 New Jersey 2,994 5,374 8,368 1,276 849 2,125 4,270 6,222 10,493 3.52 New Mexico 541
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • -6.70 5.03 0.00 345070 C ILLINOIS BELL TEL. CO. -1.94 -5.19 3.42 0.00 TOTAL INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 320742 C BLOOMINGDALE HOME TEL. CO., INC. 39.26 -2.20 42.39 71.20 320744 A CAMDEN TEL. CO., INC.-IN 8.01 -2.62 10.92 37.70 320747 C CENTURYTEL OF CENTRAL INDIANA, INC. 2.52 -3.57 6.31 7.07 320750 A FRONTIER COMM. OF INDIANA, INC. -2.91 -4.75 1.93 -54.22 320751 A CITIZENS TEL. CORP.-WARREN 2.14 -1.91 4.12 7.07 320753 C CLAY CTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. D/B/A CCRTC 15.79 -2.99 19.36 INFINITE 320756 A CRAIGVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 2.15 -2.26 4.51 9.04 320759 C DAVIESS-MARTIN CTY. RURAL TEL. DBA RTC COMM. 12.92 -4.90 18.74 35.15 320771 A GEETINGSVILLE TEL. CO., INC. -9.18 -25.77 22.35 68.58 320772 C VERIZON
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 524 1,313 2,630 3,811 6,441 2.16 Massachusetts 1,892 3,704 5,595 836 531 1,366 2,728 4,234 6,962 2.34 Michigan 2,338 4,955 7,293 888 908 1,796 3,225 5,864 9,089 3.05 Minnesota 1,294 2,358 3,652 577 401 977 1,871 2,759 4,629 1.55 Mississippi 726 1,539 2,265 318 251 569 1,044 1,789 2,834 0.95 Missouri 1,559 2,858 4,417 689 644 1,333 2,248 3,502 5,750 1.93 Montana 284 411 695 122 95 217 406 506 912 0.31 Nebraska 453 879 1,332 222 195 417 675 1,074 1,749 0.59 Nevada 794 1,128 1,922 326 159 485 1,120 1,287 2,407 0.81 New Hampshire 434 740 1,173 181 120 301 615 859 1,474 0.49 New Jersey 2,994 5,374 8,368 1,276 849 2,125 4,270 6,222 10,493 3.52 New Mexico 541
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 1,000 923 988 946 1,031 971 2005 1,048 1,055 966 1,035 1,000 1,085 1,047 2006 1,087 1,091 1,038 1,051 998 1,167 1,081 1980 1.94% 1.94% 1.95% 1.89% 2.09% 1.78% 1981 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.04 2.14 1.90 1982 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.01 2.09 2.16 1983 2.11 2.11 2.15 2.01 2.28 1.95 1984 1.98 1.98 1.97% 2.01 1.92 2.06 1.89 1985 1.94 1.93 1.98 2.01 1.85 1.97 1.93 1986 1.97 1.95 2.16 1.89 1.96 2.12 1.87 1987 2.04 2.01 2.32 2.02 2.02 2.17 1.95 1988 2.07 2.04 2.31 1.99 2.01 2.21 2.03 1989 2.04 2.02 2.19 2.02 2.04 2.18 1.87 1990 2.09 2.07 2.24 2.08 2.11 2.28 1.88 1991 2.09 2.04 2.42 2.01 2.15 2.20 1.95 1992 2.09 2.06 2.29 2.04 2.07 2.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 3.23 166 233 312 393 Oklahoma 361,715 1.21 62 87 117 148 Oregon 305,519 1.02 53 74 99 125 Pennsylvania 1,572,224 5.27 270 380 509 642 Puerto Rico * 0.57 29 41 55 70 Rhode Island 275,526 0.92 47 67 89 113 South Carolina 329,943 1.11 57 80 107 135 South Dakota 135,275 0.45 23 33 44 55 Tennessee 575,957 1.93 99 139 186 235 Texas 1,905,521 6.39 328 461 617 778 Utah 281,796 0.94 48 68 91 115 Vermont 49,094 0.16 8 12 16 20 Virginia 1,046,894 3.51 180 253 339 428 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 506,360 1.70 87 122 164 207 West Virginia 117,009 0.39 20 28 38 48 Wisconsin 611,912 2.05 105 148
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • 3.23 166 233 312 393 Oklahoma 361,715 1.21 62 87 117 148 Oregon 305,519 1.02 53 74 99 125 Pennsylvania 1,572,224 5.27 270 380 509 642 Puerto Rico * 0.57 29 41 55 70 Rhode Island 275,526 0.92 47 67 89 113 South Carolina 329,943 1.11 57 80 107 135 South Dakota 135,275 0.45 23 33 44 55 Tennessee 575,957 1.93 99 139 186 235 Texas 1,905,521 6.39 328 461 617 778 Utah 281,796 0.94 48 68 91 115 Vermont 49,094 0.16 8 12 16 20 Virginia 1,046,894 3.51 180 253 339 428 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 506,360 1.70 87 122 164 207 West Virginia 117,009 0.39 20 28 38 48 Wisconsin 611,912 2.05 105 148
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • 1.80 472230 C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -10.07 -4.21 -6.12 -36.72 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. 1.81 -3.99 6.03 13.13 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. -1.42 -2.17 0.76 -2.71 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 13.02 8.69 3.99 13.39 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID -1.04 3.03 -3.96 -4.26 472416 C VERIZON NORTHWEST INC.-ID -0.46 -1.93 1.50 -27.28 472423 C INLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 9.71 -0.24 9.98 13.44 474427 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF ID DBA FRONTIER COMM OF ID -5.16 -1.24 -3.97 -25.49 475103 C QWEST CORPORATION - ID -31.83 -3.56 -29.32 0.00 475162 C QWEST CORPORATION - IDAHO -18.12 -2.88 -15.69 0.00 TOTAL ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 340976 A ADAMS TEL. COOP.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • not estimated. % of Nation Access Minutes % of Nation 1 - 56 Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll: 2007 Access MinutesAllocation for Percentage Allocation 1/ Alabama 5,698,953 1.64% $536 $727 Alaska NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA Arizona 6,573,247 1.89 618 839 Arkansas 3,433,745 0.99 323 438 California 35,521,754 10.24 3,342 4,531 Colorado 6,695,486 1.93 630 854 Connecticut 5,453,119 1.57 513 696 Delaware 1,486,993 0.43 140 190 District of Columbia 1,857,457 0.54 175 237 Florida 24,812,200 7.15 2,335 3,165 Georgia 11,756,601 3.39 1,106 1,500 Guam NA NA NA NA Hawaii 1,593,603 0.46 150 203 Idaho 2,050,283 0.59 193 262 Illinois 14,860,540 4.28 1,398 1,896 Indiana 6,967,684 2.01 656 889 Iowa 4,199,971 1.21 395 536 Kansas
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • not estimated. % of Nation Access Minutes % of Nation 1 - 56 Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll: 2007 Access MinutesAllocation for Percentage Allocation 1/ Alabama 5,698,953 1.64% $536 $727 Alaska NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA Arizona 6,573,247 1.89 618 839 Arkansas 3,433,745 0.99 323 438 California 35,521,754 10.24 3,342 4,531 Colorado 6,695,486 1.93 630 854 Connecticut 5,453,119 1.57 513 696 Delaware 1,486,993 0.43 140 190 District of Columbia 1,857,457 0.54 175 237 Florida 24,812,200 7.15 2,335 3,165 Georgia 11,756,601 3.39 1,106 1,500 Guam NA NA NA NA Hawaii 1,593,603 0.46 150 203 Idaho 2,050,283 0.59 193 262 Illinois 14,860,540 4.28 1,398 1,896 Indiana 6,967,684 2.01 656 889 Iowa 4,199,971 1.21 395 536 Kansas
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -2.93 -2.66 -100.00 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -6.65 -1.22 -5.49 -70.47 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 7.30 -6.26 14.47 0.00 COLORADO TOTAL 3.20 -7.36 11.40 0.87 461835 C SUNFLOWER TELEPHONE CO.,INC. - CO -0.43 -3.98 3.69 -2.12 462178 C AGATE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE ASSOC. 16.40 0.72 15.56 18.91 462181 C BIJOU TEL COOPERATIVE ASSOC. INC -1.93 -2.35 0.43 -6.35 462182 C BLANCA TELEPHONE CO. 0.40 -11.07 12.90 4.02 462184 C DELTA COUNTY TELE-COMM INC. 4.30 -2.97 7.49 70.97 462185 C CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE, INC. 1.06 -4.15 5.43 1.05 462186 C EASTERN SLOPE RURAL TEL ASSN INC -1.39 -3.50 2.19 -5.02 462187 C THE EL PASO COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 10.02 -4.91 15.70 88.69 462188 C FARMERS TEL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 541 22 0.32 NetworkIP, LLC 86 581 70 1.01 Auris, LLC 6 63 8 0.11 Gold Line Telemanagement, Inc 72 751 24 0.35 NECC Telecom, Inc. 15 158 31 0.44 Hawaiian Telcom Services Company, Inc 44 143 24 0.34 United States Cellular Corporation 37 348 50 0.72 Citizens Communications Company 36 665 14 0.20 Progress International, LLC 1,459 6,921 134 1.93 Redes Modernas de la Frontera SA de CV 10 100 13 0.18 Telscape Communications, Inc. 79 949 129 1.85 Lunex Telecom, Inc. 865 2,254 198 2.85 Cincinnati Bell, Inc. 591 6,466 465 6.69 Cavalier Telephone Corporation 189 775 41 0.58 Communication Technology, Inc. 32 93 8 0.11 VoIP Tel, L.P 10 344 48 0.69 Alltel Communications, Inc. 7 77 12
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 20,136 8,970 29,105 12.18 Colorado 2,548 1,450 3,998 1.67 Connecticut 1,945 1,080 3,024 1.27 Delaware 496 298 794 0.33 District of Columbia 769 374 1,143 0.48 Florida 9,849 5,407 15,256 6.39 Georgia 4,821 2,658 7,480 3.13 Guam 62 43 104 0.04 Hawaii 652 403 1,055 0.44 Idaho 700 404 1,103 0.46 Illinois 6,675 3,356 10,032 4.20 Indiana 3,035 1,587 4,621 1.93 Iowa 1,392 735 2,127 0.89 Kansas 1,371 718 2,089 0.87 Kentucky 2,000 1,058 3,058 1.28 Louisiana 2,265 1,160 3,426 1.43 Maine 659 344 1,004 0.42 Maryland 3,284 1,779 5,063 2.12 Massachusetts 3,598 1,849 5,447 2.28 Michigan 4,813 2,316 7,129 2.98 Minnesota 2,607 1,288 3,895 1.63 Mississippi 1,293 728 2,021 0.85 Missouri 2,984 1,569 4,552 1.91 Montana 463 275 738 0.31
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 20,136 8,970 29,105 12.18 Colorado 2,548 1,450 3,998 1.67 Connecticut 1,945 1,080 3,024 1.27 Delaware 496 298 794 0.33 District of Columbia 769 374 1,143 0.48 Florida 9,849 5,407 15,256 6.39 Georgia 4,821 2,658 7,480 3.13 Guam 62 43 104 0.04 Hawaii 652 403 1,055 0.44 Idaho 700 404 1,103 0.46 Illinois 6,675 3,356 10,032 4.20 Indiana 3,035 1,587 4,621 1.93 Iowa 1,392 735 2,127 0.89 Kansas 1,371 718 2,089 0.87 Kentucky 2,000 1,058 3,058 1.28 Louisiana 2,265 1,160 3,426 1.43 Maine 659 344 1,004 0.42 Maryland 3,284 1,779 5,063 2.12 Massachusetts 3,598 1,849 5,447 2.28 Michigan 4,813 2,316 7,129 2.98 Minnesota 2,607 1,288 3,895 1.63 Mississippi 1,293 728 2,021 0.85 Missouri 2,984 1,569 4,552 1.91 Montana 463 275 738 0.31
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • MONON TEL CO -10.89 -10.08 -0.90 -15.74 320792 A MULBERRY COOP TEL CO -6.45 -4.23 -2.31 0.00 320796 A NEW LISBON TEL CO -1.03 -6.66 6.03 -25.17 320797 C NEW PARIS TEL INC -12.47 -6.28 -6.61 -100.00 320800 C NORTHWESTERN INDIANA 7.90 -10.12 20.04 445.54 320801 C CENTURYTEL OF ODON 0.00 -1.86 1.89 -12.48 320807 C PERRY-SPENCER RURAL -2.54 -4.38 1.93 -14.93 320809 A COMM CORP OF S. IN 7.93 -6.93 15.97 48.28 320813 C PULASKI-WHITE RURAL -10.62 -5.65 -5.27 -29.00 320815 C ROCHESTER TEL CO 6.38 -8.62 16.41 30.80 320816 A S & W TEL CO 14.08 -4.21 19.09 60.66 320818 C SMITHVILLE COMM. 24.43 -4.73 30.60 61.54 320819 C SE INDIANA RURAL 7.60 -3.07 11.01 10.61 320825 C SUNMAN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • as compared to Verizon's retail service. Three PR 6 submetrics measuring installation quality for resale services show some statistically significant disparities between Verizon's provisioning performance for itself and for competitors in September and December 2000. In September 2000, the percentage of installation troubles reported within 30 days for 2-wire xDSL services (PR 6-01) was 6.90 percent for competing carriers versus 1.93 percent for VADI, a difference of 4.97 percent; these data, however, were based on 29 competing carrier orders. Due to the low volume of competitors' orders, a handful of trouble reports can cause seemingly large variations in the monthly trouble reports. See, e.g., Letter from Dee May, Executive Director Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • Man-8.0 dB and 5.5 dB Loop 2.24 6.00 1.89 6.00 1.96 6.00 2.33 6.00 2.15 6.00 2 - 203800Elct Man-2 Digital ISDN 1.50 6.00 2.24 6.00 1.49 6.00 1.77 6.00 2.03 6.00 2 - 203900Elct Man-2 Digital xDSL 1.85 6.00 2.00 6.00 1.85 6.00 2.07 6.00 2.50 6.00 2 - 204000Elct Man-4 Digital 1.544 mbpd HDSL 1.91 6.00 1.84 6.00 1.93 6.00 1.97 6.00 1.86 6.00 2 - 204001Elct Man-4 Digital DS3 Loop 1.74 6.00 6.00 2.53 6.00 2.80 6.00 5.02 6.00abcde 2 - 204003Elct Man- UNE Dark Fiber 6.00 37.29 6.00 8.91 6.00 1.07 6.00 6.00abcde 2 - 204004Elct Man- UNE EELs - Voice Grade 2.03 6.00 1.99 6.00 1.28 6.00 1.66 6.00 1.51 6.00 2 - 204005Elct Man- UNE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-216A1.txt
  • poor). Based on the results, NRRI computed a grade-point average (``GPA'') the same way it is done by high schools and colleges. The resulting GPAs for all industries were clumped together at the low end of possible values, ranging from a high of 2.09 for water to a low of 1.66 for cable, with an average for all utilities of 1.93. Cellular service received a grade point average of 1.78, second to last. In addition, cellular service received fewer A's, B's, and C's, and more D's and F's, than the average of all industries. In interpreting the GPAs computed by NRRI, it is noteworthy that the utilities with the four highest GPAs - in order, water, electric, natural gas, and local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05M-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05M-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05M-12A1.txt
  • 0004-3412-51 CONSENT ORDER Adopted: March 14, 2005 Released: March 15, 2005 This is a ruling on a Joint Request for Adoption of Consent Decree and Termination of Proceeding, filed March 9, 2005, by the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Publix Network Corporation, Customer Attendants, LLC, Revenue Controls Corporation, SignTel, Inc., and Focus Group, LLC, (the ``Publix Companies'') in accordance with sections 1.93 and 1.94 of the Commission's rules [47 C.F.R. �� 1.93, 1.94]. This proceeding was set for hearing by the Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing (``OSC''), 17 FCC Rcd 11487 (2002), released June 19, 2002. Issues were specified to determine whether: (1) the Commission should revoke the operating authority of the Publix Companies; (2) the Publix
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.txt
  • 0.08 Non-Recurring Cable TV Installation Charges Unwired home $45.94 $45.98 $45.47 $44.55 $44.05 $45.94 $44.59 $49.42 $40.93 Standard error 0.76 0.64 1.95 2.62 1.58 5.53 1.15 1.76 3.96 Prior year (1/1/04) $45.34 $45.34 $45.36 $44.92 $44.78 $45.30 $45.27 $47.19 $39.21 Pre-wired home $32.22 $32.23 $32.14 $30.46 $30.07 $31.58 $33.17 $33.37 $33.89 Standard error 0.67 0.57 1.64 1.90 1.20 3.87 1.02 1.93 3.78 Prior year (1/1/04) $31.61 $31.53 $32.38 $31.30 $31.40 $31.04 $33.93 $31.83 $32.00 Service reconnection $28.81 $28.80 $28.85 $24.73 $24.41 $25.60 $29.75 $35.53 $26 .85 Standard error 0.62 0.54 1.44 1.57 1.32 2.27 0.97 1.82 2.83 Prior year (1/1/04) $28.36 $28.27 $29.25 $24.98 $25.09 $24.67 $30.39 $36.10 $25.23 CableCARD, current subscriber $18.86 $18.87 $18.71 $18.12 $22.45 $5.98 $19.22 $20.63 $6.33
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.txt
  • December 24, 2003 order, BOI also faced possible sanctions of $115,533.52 for failure to make required universal service contributions, $10,000 for failure to file required Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets, and $10,000 for failure to make required TRS contributions. Prior to final disposition of the hearing, however, the Enforcement Bureau and BOI entered into a consent decree (``Consent Decree''), pursuant to Section 1.93(b) of the Commission's rules. 5. The terms of the Consent Decree specifically applied to all entities owned, directed, or controlled by the Kintzel brothers, and was intended to ensure their future compliance with Sections 214, 254, and 258 of the Act and related Commission rules. The Consent Decree contemplated a voluntary contribution to the United States Treasury in the total
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.txt
  • 30.19 100.00 Grand 9,589 3,893 $17,356 $32,387 $38,540 14.2 2.60 105.75 28.11 Kane 6,577 2,432 $15,455 $34,247 $45,337 10 1.65 60.93 68.83 Millard 12,082 3,755 $13,408 $36,178 $46,823 12.7 1.83 56.98 75.85 Piute 1,404 492 $12,697 $29,625 $36,139 16.7 1.85 64.94 100.00 Rich 2,205 734 $16,267 $39,766 $53,159 9 2.14 71.39 100.00 San Juan 15,055 4,292 $10,229 $28,137 $38,827 28.1 1.93 54.88 82.90 Uintah 29,885 9,628 $13,571 $34,518 $57,769 10.1 6.68 215.04 53.09 Wayne 2,589 933 $15,392 $32,000 $40,524 13 1.05 37.91 100.00 Virginia Amelia 12,808 4,764 $18,858 $40,252 $49,180 9.6 35.90 1335.11 100.00 Appomattox 14,501 5,641 $18,086 $36,507 $43,529 13 43.46 1690.40 100.00 Bath 4,544 1,848 $23,092 $35,013 $42,446 9.6 8.54 347.46 100.00 Bedford city 6,312 2,525 $15,423 $28,792 $36,559
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • NA 25 NA b,c MR-3-03-2341 % CPE/TOK/FOK - Missed Appointment 13.73 0 14 0 8.57 NA 0 0 a,b,d MR-3-04-2341 % Missed Repair Appointment - No Double Dispatch 20 NA 21.43 0 b MR-3-05-2341 % Missed Repair Appointment - Double Dispatch 20 NA 33.33 NA MR-4 � Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2341 Mean Time To Repair � Total 9.49 NA 7.61 1.93 8.62 7.1 9.72 NA 15.42 NA b,c MR-4-02-2341 Mean Time To Repair � Loop Trouble 12.38 NA 8.48 NA 9.19 13.13 17.76 NA 12.1 NA c MR-4-03-2341 Mean Time To Repair � Central Office Trouble 5.87 NA 4.65 1.93 6.52 1.08 3.02 NA 18.75 NA b,c MR-4-04-2341 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 94.44 NA 95.45 100 93.94 100
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DOC-244194A1.html
  • Commission's rules,21 and had willfully and repeatedly failed to file Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets in a timely manner in violation of sections 54.711 of the Commission's rules.22 7. On January 28, 2004, pursuant to section 1.94(a) of the Commission's Rules,23 the Bureau informed the presiding officer of the initiation of the negotiations that lead to this Consent Decree. Pursuant to section 1.93(b) of the Commission's rules,24 the Bureau negotiated this Consent Decree to secure future compliance with sections 214, 254, and 258 of the Act25 and related Commission rules in exchange for prompt disposition of the issues raised in the Order to Show Cause, other than the issues already adjudicated by the presiding officer. II. AGREEMENT 8. The Parties agree and acknowledge
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/FCC-05M-12A1.html
  • Hearing CONSENT ORDER Adopted: March 14, 2005 Released: March 15, 2005 This is a ruling on a Joint Request for Adoption of Consent Decree and Termination of Proceeding, filed March 9, 2005, by the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Publix Network Corporation, Customer Attendants, LLC, Revenue Controls Corporation, SignTel, Inc., and Focus Group, LLC, (the ``Publix Companies'') in accordance with sections 1.93 and 1.94 of the Commission's rules [47 C.F.R. 1.93, 1.94].1 This proceeding was set for hearing by the Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing (``OSC''), 17 FCC Rcd 11487 (2002), released June 19, 2002. Issues were specified to determine whether: (1) the Commission should revoke the operating authority of the Publix Companies; (2) the Publix Companies
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-165A1.html
  • December 24, 2003 order, BOI also faced possible sanctions of $115,533.52 for failure to make required universal service contributions, $10,000 for failure to file required Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets, and $10,000 for failure to make required TRS contributions. Prior to final disposition of the hearing, however, the Enforcement Bureau and BOI entered into a consent decree ("Consent Decree"), pursuant to Section 1.93(b) of the Commission's rules. 5. The terms of the Consent Decree specifically applied to all entities owned, directed, or controlled by the Kintzel brothers, and was intended to ensure their future compliance with Sections 214, 254, and 258 of the Act and related Commission rules. The Consent Decree contemplated a voluntary contribution to the United States Treasury in the total
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-437A2.html
  • Show Cause and Notice ) NAL/Acct. No. 200332170002 of ) FRN: 0007179054 Opportunity for Hearing ) CONSENT ORDER Issued: February 18, 2004 Released: February 20, 2004 This is a ruling on Joint Request for Adoption of Consent Decree and Termination of Proceeding, filed on February 17, 2004, by the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Business Options, Inc. (``BOI'') in accordance with 1.93 and 1.94 of the Commission's rules [47 C.F.R. 1.93, 1.94].1 This proceeding was set for hearing by Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, 18 F.C.C. Rcd 6881, released April 7, 2003 (``OSC''). Issues were specified to determine whether BOI had made misrepresentations or engaged in lack of candor (Issue a); to determine whether BOI had changed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-c.pdf
  • Sports 2.9 2.1 1.0 3.0 2.7 1.0 Talk 6.0 6.1 1.7 7.0 8.0 2.2 Talk/Classic AOR 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 Talk/Full Service 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Talk/Jazz 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 Unknown 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34 Table 2 Per-Market Averages 1. All 244 Markets 1993 1997 Stations 21.39 24.55 Black-Targeted 1.52 1.93 Black-Owned 0.65 0.55 Hispanic-Targeted 0.68 1.07 Hispanic-Owned 0.19 0.28 AQH Listening 16.80 15.78 Formats 11.48 14.88 Owners 18.65 14.92 HHI 1269.83 2091.66 Population (000) 685.18 707.74 Black Population 84.32 Hispanic Population 69.54 2. 73 Markets with Black Listening Data in both Years 1993 1997 Stations 25.33 28.01 Black-Targeted 3.53 4.26 Black-Owned 1.60 1.36 Non-Black AQH Listening 16.71 15.67 Black AQH
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/antenna/index.htm?job=uls_transaction&page=daily
  • KB [126]Mon (07-10-12) 3.93 KB [127]Tue (07-11-12) 9.23 KB [128]Wed (07-12-12) 11.4 KB [129]Thu (07-13-12) 10.89 KB [130]Fri (07-14-12) 10.51 KB [131]Sat (07-15-12) 5.31 KB BRS & EBS (Formerly known as MDS/ITFS) Application Records [132]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [133]Mon (07-10-12) 1.74 KB [134]Tue (07-11-12) 4.33 KB [135]Wed (07-12-12) 6.14 KB [136]Thu (07-13-12) 2.75 KB [137]Fri (07-14-12) 6.82 KB [138]Sat (07-15-12) 1.93 KB License Records [139]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [140]Mon (07-10-12) 5.48 KB [141]Tue (07-11-12) 6.21 KB [142]Wed (07-12-12) 16.47 KB [143]Thu (07-13-12) 9.25 KB [144]Fri (07-14-12) 11.84 KB [145]Sat (07-15-12) 2.05 KB Cellular - 47 CFR Part 22 Application Records [146]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [147]Mon (07-10-12) 22.55 KB [148]Tue (07-11-12) 33.04 KB [149]Wed (07-12-12) 34.23 KB [150]Thu (07-13-12) 50.56 KB [151]Fri
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=64
  • = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=64M on, 20 Mar 2006 01:00:01 EST Summary Permits: Auction No. 64 will offer 11 construction permits for full power television stations. Qualified Bidders: 25 Rounds Completed: 22 Bidding Days: 4 Results for Round 22 Gross Revenue: $26,717,000.00 - Dollar Change: 443000.00 - % Change: 1.69 Net Revenue: $23,367,850.00 - Dollar Change: 443000.00 - % Change: 1.93 New Bids: 1 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 0 Permits with PWBs*: 10 FCC Held Permits: 1 Eligible Bidders: 8 (of 25 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=64M on, 20 Mar 2006 02:15:01 EST Summary Permits: Auction No. 64 will offer 11 construction permits for full power television stations. Qualified Bidders: 25
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=79
  • 3 Permits with PWBs*: 83 FCC Held Permits: 39 Eligible Bidders: 59 (of 77 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=79T ue, 08 Sep 2009 21:05:02 GMT Summary Permits: 122 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 77 Rounds Completed: 13 Bidding Days: 4 Results for Round 13 Gross Revenue: $5,032,100.00 - Dollar Change: $95,500.00 - % Change: 1.93 Net Revenue: $4,111,430.00 - Dollar Change: $97,765.00 - % Change: 2.44 New Bids: 21 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 2 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 3 Permits with PWBs*: 82 FCC Held Permits: 40 Eligible Bidders: 67 (of 77 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=79F ri, 04 Sep 2009 15:05:02 GMT Summary Permits: 122 construction permits for FM
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=93
  • Bidders: 72 (of 109 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=93M on, 02 Apr 2012 19:05:01 GMT Summary Permits: 119 FM Broadcast construction permits Qualified Bidders: 109 Rounds Completed: 20 Bidding Days: 5 Results for Round 20 Gross Revenue: $4,003,650.00 - Dollar Change: $79,800.00 - % Change: 2.03 Net Revenue: $3,394,802.50 - Dollar Change: $64,415.00 - % Change: 1.93 New Bids: 25 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 3 Permits with PWBs*: 93 FCC Held Permits: 26 Eligible Bidders: 71 (of 109 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=93M on, 02 Apr 2012 21:05:01 GMT Summary Permits: 119 FM Broadcast construction permits Qualified Bidders: 109 Rounds Completed: 13 Bidding Days: 4 Results for
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?&job=transaction&page=daily
  • KB [149]Mon (07-10-12) 3.93 KB [150]Tue (07-11-12) 9.23 KB [151]Wed (07-12-12) 11.4 KB [152]Thu (07-13-12) 10.89 KB [153]Fri (07-14-12) 10.51 KB [154]Sat (07-15-12) 5.31 KB BRS & EBS (Formerly known as MDS/ITFS) Application Records [155]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [156]Mon (07-10-12) 1.74 KB [157]Tue (07-11-12) 4.33 KB [158]Wed (07-12-12) 6.14 KB [159]Thu (07-13-12) 2.75 KB [160]Fri (07-14-12) 6.82 KB [161]Sat (07-15-12) 1.93 KB License Records [162]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [163]Mon (07-10-12) 5.48 KB [164]Tue (07-11-12) 6.21 KB [165]Wed (07-12-12) 16.47 KB [166]Thu (07-13-12) 9.25 KB [167]Fri (07-14-12) 11.84 KB [168]Sat (07-15-12) 2.05 KB Cellular - 47 CFR Part 22 Application Records [169]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [170]Mon (07-10-12) 22.55 KB [171]Tue (07-11-12) 33.04 KB [172]Wed (07-12-12) 34.23 KB [173]Thu (07-13-12) 50.56 KB [174]Fri
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=transaction&page=daily
  • KB [149]Mon (07-10-12) 3.93 KB [150]Tue (07-11-12) 9.23 KB [151]Wed (07-12-12) 11.4 KB [152]Thu (07-13-12) 10.89 KB [153]Fri (07-14-12) 10.51 KB [154]Sat (07-15-12) 5.31 KB BRS & EBS (Formerly known as MDS/ITFS) Application Records [155]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [156]Mon (07-10-12) 1.74 KB [157]Tue (07-11-12) 4.33 KB [158]Wed (07-12-12) 6.14 KB [159]Thu (07-13-12) 2.75 KB [160]Fri (07-14-12) 6.82 KB [161]Sat (07-15-12) 1.93 KB License Records [162]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [163]Mon (07-10-12) 5.48 KB [164]Tue (07-11-12) 6.21 KB [165]Wed (07-12-12) 16.47 KB [166]Thu (07-13-12) 9.25 KB [167]Fri (07-14-12) 11.84 KB [168]Sat (07-15-12) 2.05 KB Cellular - 47 CFR Part 22 Application Records [169]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [170]Mon (07-10-12) 22.55 KB [171]Tue (07-11-12) 33.04 KB [172]Wed (07-12-12) 34.23 KB [173]Thu (07-13-12) 50.56 KB [174]Fri
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/weeklypn.htm?job=transaction&page=daily
  • KB [149]Mon (07-10-12) 3.93 KB [150]Tue (07-11-12) 9.23 KB [151]Wed (07-12-12) 11.4 KB [152]Thu (07-13-12) 10.89 KB [153]Fri (07-14-12) 10.51 KB [154]Sat (07-15-12) 5.31 KB BRS & EBS (Formerly known as MDS/ITFS) Application Records [155]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [156]Mon (07-10-12) 1.74 KB [157]Tue (07-11-12) 4.33 KB [158]Wed (07-12-12) 6.14 KB [159]Thu (07-13-12) 2.75 KB [160]Fri (07-14-12) 6.82 KB [161]Sat (07-15-12) 1.93 KB License Records [162]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [163]Mon (07-17-12) 7.2 KB [164]Tue (07-11-12) 6.21 KB [165]Wed (07-12-12) 16.47 KB [166]Thu (07-13-12) 9.25 KB [167]Fri (07-14-12) 11.84 KB [168]Sat (07-15-12) 2.05 KB Cellular - 47 CFR Part 22 Application Records [169]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [170]Mon (07-10-12) 22.55 KB [171]Tue (07-11-12) 33.04 KB [172]Wed (07-12-12) 34.23 KB [173]Thu (07-13-12) 50.56 KB [174]Fri
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • as compared to Verizon's retail service. Three PR 6 submetrics measuring installation quality for resale services show some statistically significant disparities between Verizon's provisioning performance for itself and for competitors in September and December 2000. In September 2000, the percentage of installation troubles reported within 30 days for 2-wire xDSL services (PR 6-01) was 6.90 percent for competing carriers versus 1.93 percent for VADI, a difference of 4.97 percent; these data, however, were based on 29 competing carrier orders. Due to the low volume of competitors' orders, a handful of trouble reports can cause seemingly large variations in the monthly trouble reports. See, e.g., Letter from Dee May, Executive Director Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • $2.43 $0.84 $1.08 $2.45 $0.97 $1.16 $2.58 $1.08 $1.28 $2.71 $1.15 $1.32 1981 0.73 1.05 1.80 2.38 1.41 1.07 2.64 1.57 1.16 2.83 1.68 1.25 2.85 1.69 1.35 2.98 1.77 1.48 3.11 1.85 1.53 1982 1.05 $0.65 $0.61 1.42 $0.89 $0.84 1.80 $1.12 $1.05 2.33 1.46 1.39 2.45 1.45 1.44 2.62 1.65 1.54 2.69 1.69 1.60 2.76 1.73 1.63 3.09 1.93 1.82 1983 1.05 0.92 0.89 1.42 1.26 1.19 1.80 1.39 1.30 2.33 1.61 1.59 2.45 1.70 1.68 2.62 1.81 1.72 2.69 1.86 1.80 2.76 1.91 1.82 3.09 2.13 1.99 1984 0.99 0.90 0.97 1.36 1.21 1.31 1.67 1.55 1.65 2.21 2.05 2.09 2.32 2.19 2.23 2.43 2.25 2.33 2.50 2.40 2.43 2.57 2.47 2.49 2.89 2.73 2.69 1985 1.18 1.10
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • $0.77 $1.00 $2.43 $0.84 $1.08 $2.45 $0.97 $1.16 $2.58 $1.08 $1.28 $2.71 $1.15 $1.32 19810.73 1.05 1.80 2.38 1.41 1.07 2.64 1.57 1.16 2.83 1.68 1.25 2.85 1.69 1.35 2.98 1.77 1.48 3.11 1.85 1.53 19821.05 $0.65 $0.61 1.42 $0.89 $0.84 1.80 $1.12 $1.05 2.33 1.46 1.39 2.45 1.45 1.44 2.62 1.65 1.54 2.69 1.69 1.60 2.76 1.73 1.63 3.09 1.93 1.82 19831.05 0.92 0.89 1.42 1.26 1.19 1.80 1.39 1.30 2.33 1.61 1.59 2.45 1.70 1.68 2.62 1.81 1.72 2.69 1.86 1.80 2.76 1.91 1.82 3.09 2.13 1.99 19840.99 0.90 0.97 1.36 1.21 1.31 1.67 1.55 1.65 2.21 2.05 2.09 2.32 2.19 2.23 2.43 2.25 2.33 2.50 2.40 2.43 2.57 2.47 2.49 2.89 2.73 2.69 19851.18 1.10 1.12 1.55 1.44
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 889 790 856 884 891 864 2001 914 927 825 897 914 924 914 2002 957 972 851 952 934 987 936 1980 1.94% 1.94% 1.95% 1.89% 2.09% 1.78% 1981 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.04 2.14 1.90 1982 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.01 2.09 2.16 1983 2.11 2.11 2.15 2.01 2.28 1.95 1984 1.98 1.98 1.97% 2.01 1.92 2.06 1.89 1985 1.94 1.93 1.98 2.01 1.85 1.97 1.93 1986 1.97 1.95 2.16 1.89 1.96 2.12 1.87 1987 2.04 2.01 2.32 2.02 2.02 2.17 1.95 1988 2.07 2.04 2.31 1.99 2.01 2.21 2.03 1989 2.04 2.02 2.19 2.02 2.04 2.18 1.87 1990 2.09 2.07 2.24 2.08 2.11 2.28 1.88 1991 2.09 2.04 2.42 2.01 2.15 2.20 1.95 1992 2.09 2.06 2.29 2.04 2.07 2.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 927 825 897 914 924 914 2002 957 972 851 952 934 987 936 2003 956 967 875 932 917 1,002 941 1980 1.94% 1.94% 1.95% 1.89% 2.09% 1.78% 1981 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.04 2.14 1.90 1982 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.01 2.09 2.16 1983 2.11 2.11 2.15 2.01 2.28 1.95 1984 1.98 1.98 1.97% 2.01 1.92 2.06 1.89 1985 1.94 1.93 1.98 2.01 1.85 1.97 1.93 1986 1.97 1.95 2.16 1.89 1.96 2.12 1.87 1987 2.04 2.01 2.32 2.02 2.02 2.17 1.95 1988 2.07 2.04 2.31 1.99 2.01 2.21 2.03 1989 2.04 2.02 2.19 2.02 2.04 2.18 1.87 1990 2.09 2.07 2.24 2.08 2.11 2.28 1.88 1991 2.09 2.04 2.42 2.01 2.15 2.20 1.95 1992 2.09 2.06 2.29 2.04 2.07 2.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • in the sample offering measured service n.a. 76 77 79 82 85 86 86 87 88 Monthly cost including 50 five-minute daytime calls n.a. 8.57 8.47 8.48 8.52 8.94 9.32 9.63 9.61 9.82 Federal and state SLCs n.a. 2.69 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.51 Taxes and 911 charges n.a. 1.25 1.21 1.37 1.50 1.60 1.67 1.82 1.86 1.93 Total for rotary service n.a.12.5112.3513.3813.57 14.1014.5415.0015.0215.25 51st five-minute call n.a.0.0920.0900.0900.090 0.0880.0880.0890.0880.088 Lowest cost inside wiring maintenance plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.41 1.52 Monthly charge for optional extended area service n.a. n.a. 0.96 0.98 1.01 1.02 0.88 0.93 0.94 0.97 Basic connection charge 45.6344.0442.9442.7143.06 42.0041.5241.3841.2640.91 Taxes 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.24 2.32 2.19 2.18 2.21 2.27 2.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 3.772.451.50 3.97 2.58 1.58 4.17 2.71 1.66 June 28, 1981 1.130.730.45 1.631.050.65 2.771.801.10 3.672.381.46 4.072.64 1.62 4.362.83 1.74 4.392.851.75 4.60 2.98 1.84 4.80 3.11 1.92 April 2, 1982 1.761.050.70 2.381.420.95 3.001.801.20 3.902.331.56 4.092.45 1.63 4.372.62 1.74 4.492.691.79 4.60 2.76 1.84 5.15 3.09 2.06 May 25, 1984 1.650.990.66 2.271.360.90 2.791.671.11 3.692.211.47 3.872.32 1.54 4.062.43 1.62 4.182.501.67 4.29 2.57 1.71 4.83 2.89 1.93 April 26, 1985 2.091.250.83 2.711.621.08 3.211.921.28 3.692.211.47 3.872.32 1.54 4.062.43 1.62 4.182.501.67 4.29 2.57 1.71 4.83 2.89 1.93 June 1, 1985 1.981.180.79 2.591.551.03 3.001.801.20 3.482.081.39 3.662.19 1.46 3.852.31 1.54 3.972.381.58 4.07 2.44 1.62 4.43 2.65 1.77 June 1, 1986 1.751.050.77 2.261.350.99 2.571.541.13 2.961.771.30 3.141.88 1.38 3.331.99 1.46 3.442.061.51 3.54 2.12 1.55 3.80 2.28 1.67 July 11, 1986 1.751.050.77 2.261.350.99 2.571.541.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 3.772.451.50 3.97 2.58 1.58 4.17 2.71 1.66 June 28, 1981 1.130.730.45 1.631.050.65 2.771.801.10 3.672.381.46 4.072.64 1.62 4.362.83 1.74 4.392.851.75 4.60 2.98 1.84 4.80 3.11 1.92 April 2, 1982 1.761.050.70 2.381.420.95 3.001.801.20 3.902.331.56 4.092.45 1.63 4.372.62 1.74 4.492.691.79 4.60 2.76 1.84 5.15 3.09 2.06 May 25, 1984 1.650.990.66 2.271.360.90 2.791.671.11 3.692.211.47 3.872.32 1.54 4.062.43 1.62 4.182.501.67 4.29 2.57 1.71 4.83 2.89 1.93 April 26, 1985 2.091.250.83 2.711.621.08 3.211.921.28 3.692.211.47 3.872.32 1.54 4.062.43 1.62 4.182.501.67 4.29 2.57 1.71 4.83 2.89 1.93 June 1, 1985 1.981.180.79 2.591.551.03 3.001.801.20 3.482.081.39 3.662.19 1.46 3.852.31 1.54 3.972.381.58 4.07 2.44 1.62 4.43 2.65 1.77 June 1, 1986 1.751.050.77 2.261.350.99 2.571.541.13 2.961.771.30 3.141.88 1.38 3.331.99 1.46 3.442.061.51 3.54 2.12 1.55 3.80 2.28 1.67 July 11, 1986 1.751.050.77 2.261.350.99 2.571.541.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 328 CONNECTICUT 382 386 1.53 377.06 95.35 282 DELAWARE 79 79 0.32 77.44 24.29 53 DC 148 148 0.59 144.78 21.00 124 FLORIDA 1,398 1,420 5.64 1,385.90 455.69 930 GEORGIA 651 766 3.04 748.10 218.27 530 HAWAII 128 128 0.51 124.79 32.92 92 IDAHO 124 134 0.53 130.67 29.15 102 ILLINOIS 1,009 1,036 4.11 1,011.30 325.08 686 INDIANA 464 486 1.93 474.01 152.49 322 IOWA 204 244 0.97 238.07 68.92 169 KANSAS 201 239 0.95 233.40 69.28 164 KENTUCKY 277 362 1.44 353.17 97.33 256 LOUISIANA 312 336 1.33 327.66 108.86 219 MAINE 121 145 0.57 141.22 32.00 109 MARYLAND 468 469 1.86 457.45 156.73 301 MASSACHUSETTS 782 783 3.11 763.93 192.28 572 MICHIGAN 671 694 2.76 677.54 263.49 414 MINNESOTA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • 589 921 1,510 0.80 CALIFORNIA 6,946 15,562 22,508 11.90 COLORADO 1,386 1,716 3,101 1.64 CONNECTICUT 1,145 1,542 2,687 1.42 DELAWARE 280 234 513 0.27 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 410 447 857 0.45 FLORIDA 4,657 6,727 11,384 6.02 GEORGIA 2,361 3,417 5,778 3.05 HAWAII 297 459 757 0.40 IDAHO 365 390 755 0.40 ILLINOIS 3,029 5,158 8,188 4.33 INDIANA 1,310 2,335 3,646 1.93 IOWA 699 1,009 1,709 0.90 KANSAS 697 1,027 1,723 0.91 KENTUCKY 989 1,547 2,536 1.34 LOUISIANA 971 1,745 2,715 1.44 MAINE 349 481 830 0.44 MARYLAND 1,603 2,253 3,856 2.04 MASSACHUSETTS 1,898 3,003 4,901 2.59 MICHIGAN 1,972 4,588 6,559 3.47 MINNESOTA 1,198 1,839 3,037 1.61 MISSISSIPPI 592 989 1,580 0.84 MISSOURI 1,342 2,126 3,468 1.83 MONTANA 265 340 605 0.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 225 520 1,081 1,360 2,441 0.91 Kansas 813 1,274 2,086 298 203 501 1,111 1,477 2,588 0.96 Kentucky 1,011 1,704 2,715 406 305 711 1,416 2,010 3,426 1.28 Louisiana 1,115 2,100 3,215 405 293 698 1,519 2,393 3,913 1.46 Maine 362 590 951 157 86 243 519 675 1,195 0.44 Maryland 1,762 2,498 4,259 577 340 917 2,339 2,837 5,176 1.93 Massachusetts 2,169 3,186 5,355 834 372 1,206 3,003 3,558 6,561 2.44 Michigan 2,295 5,514 7,809 847 874 1,721 3,142 6,388 9,530 3.55 Minnesota 1,450 2,217 3,667 552 397 950 2,002 2,615 4,617 1.72 Mississippi 682 1,206 1,888 254 140 395 937 1,346 2,283 0.85 Missouri 1,560 2,738 4,298 618 527 1,145 2,178 3,265 5,442 2.03 Montana 303 407 709 116
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • 0.97 2,104 0.95 8.5 KANSAS 1,879 0.94 2,083 0.94 10.9 KENTUCKY 2,761 1.39 3,044 1.37 10.3 LOUISIANA 2,842 1.43 3,108 1.40 9.4 MAINE 896 0.45 1,009 0.45 12.7 MARYLAND 3,918 1.97 4,422 1.99 12.9 MASSACHUSETTS 5,190 2.61 5,711 2.57 10.0 MICHIGAN 6,652 3.34 7,511 3.38 12.9 MINNESOTA 3,180 1.60 3,592 1.62 13.0 MISSISSIPPI 1,665 0.84 1,827 0.82 9.7 MISSOURI 3,838 1.93 4,246 1.91 10.6 MONTANA 654 0.33 724 0.33 10.8 NEBRASKA 1,353 0.68 1,495 0.67 10.5 NEVADA 1,157 0.58 1,370 0.62 18.5 NEW HAMPSHIRE 1,019 0.51 1,158 0.52 13.7 NEW JERSEY 7,249 3.64 8,125 3.66 12.1 NEW MEXICO 1,167 0.59 1,319 0.59 13.0 NEW YORK 15,780 7.92 16,938 7.62 7.3 NORTH CAROLINA 5,772 2.90 6,382 2.87 10.6 NORTH DAKOTA 509 0.26
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 1.90 34.0 Iowa 1,888 2,039 2,163 2,268 520 1,921 2,441 0.91 29.3 Kansas 1,829 2,017 2,165 2,304 501 2,086 2,588 0.96 41.5 Kentucky 2,353 2,629 2,861 3,060 711 2,715 3,426 1.28 45.6 Louisiana 2,703 2,946 3,192 3,432 698 3,215 3,913 1.46 44.7 Maine 869 976 996 1,105 243 951 1,195 0.44 37.5 Maryland 3,767 4,234 4,625 4,911 917 4,259 5,176 1.93 37.4 Massachusetts 4,988 5,455 6,010 6,338 1,206 5,355 6,561 2.44 31.5 Michigan 6,444 7,246 7,983 8,523 1,721 7,809 9,530 3.55 47.9 Minnesota 3,064 3,461 3,864 4,115 950 3,667 4,617 1.72 50.7 Mississippi 1,584 1,734 1,877 2,017 395 1,888 2,283 0.85 44.1 Missouri 3,623 4,017 4,389 4,613 1,145 4,298 5,442 2.03 50.2 Montana 640 709 756 780 187 709 897 0.33
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 1.03 1.03 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.67 Philippines 1.48 1.92 1.52 1.52 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 Poland 1.02 1.07 1.07 1.10 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 Russia 16/ 2.11 2.03 1.97 1.99 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 Saudi Arabia 1.22 1.34 1.37 1.34 1.41 1.25 1.20 1.05 1.08 1.00 0.88 Sierra Leone 2.49 2.11 1.93 1.93 1.94 1.78 1.80 1.22 1.07 0.47 0.75 Singapore 1.44 1.51 1.51 1.48 1.38 1.19 1.08 0.85 0.56 0.56 0.58 South Africa 1.07 1.13 1.11 1.32 1.07 0.94 0.95 0.69 0.78 0.68 0.57 Spain 1.06 1.07 1.10 1.11 1.10 1.07 1.08 0.94 0.79 0.72 0.63 Switzerland 0.61 1.12 1.10 1.08 1.03 1.01 0.88 0.62 0.46 0.49 0.43 Taiwan 1.37 1.38
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 0.67 0.49 0.31 0.20 -77.5 Philippines 1.52 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.31 0.26 -73.4 Poland 1.10 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.26 -65.2 Russia 1.99 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 0.43 0.27 0.24 -79.6 Saudi Arabia 1.34 1.41 1.25 1.20 1.05 1.08 1.00 0.88 0.75 0.53 0.30 -72.6 Sierra Leone 1.93 1.94 1.78 1.80 1.22 1.07 0.47 0.75 0.61 0.83 0.43 -60.0 Singapore 1.48 1.38 1.19 1.08 0.85 0.56 0.56 0.58 0.52 0.44 0.55 -0.7 South Africa 1.32 1.07 0.94 0.95 0.69 0.78 0.68 0.57 0.64 0.34 0.46 -41.1 Spain 1.11 1.10 1.07 1.08 0.94 0.79 0.72 0.63 0.55 0.36 0.24 -69.9 Switzerland 1.08 1.03 1.01 0.88 0.62 0.46 0.49 0.43
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • Carolina 2,558,242 1.00 1.34 1.08 212 249 South Dakota 348,106 0.14 0.38 0.20 39 46 Tennessee 2,800,512 1.09 0.53 0.95 187 219 Texas 17,115,318 6.67 7.51 6.88 1,351 1,587 Utah 785,028 0.31 0.46 0.34 67 79 Vermont 400,793 0.16 0.17 0.16 31 37 Virginia 7,782,112 3.03 3.99 3.27 642 754 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 4,962,469 1.93 2.69 2.12 417 490 West Virginia 1,173,976 0.46 0.73 0.53 103 121 Wisconsin 3,768,355 1.47 1.07 1.37 269 316 Wyoming 247,974 0.10 0.11 0.10 20 23 Total 3/ 256,515,129 100.00% 100.00%100.00%$19,698 $23,130 NA - Not Applicable. Note: LEC is an abbreviation for local exchange carrier. Figures may not add due to rounding. 1/ Access minutes are in thousands and include
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 0.59 0.45 0.38 0.68 4.71 Kentucky 0.81 0.12 0.19 0.61 0.16 0.18 2.07 Louisiana 1.65 0.00 0.55 0.34 0.09 0.22 2.85 Maine 0.78 0.52 0.58 0.03 0.18 0.74 2.83 Maryland 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.10 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 Michigan 0.35 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.11 0.63 Minnesota 0.68 0.00 0.37 0.11 0.24 0.52 1.93 Mississippi 1.34 6.71 0.35 0.96 0.13 0.24 9.73 Missouri 1.07 0.00 0.25 0.36 0.19 0.17 2.04 Montana 4.31 1.64 1.56 0.10 0.62 1.31 9.54 Nebraska 0.96 0.00 0.35 0.22 0.36 0.93 2.81 Nevada 0.43 0.00 0.06 0.55 0.07 0.43 1.53 New Hampshire 0.10 0.00 0.15 0.34 0.05 0.47 1.10 New Jersey 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.05 New Mexico
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-2.pdf
  • 13.22 13.17 New Mexico 7.92 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 3.31 0.00 1.75 1.65 7.92 10.00 9.89 7.92 13.50 13.20 New York 6.17 8.25 8.09 0.00 3.50 3.30 0.00 1.75 1.65 6.17 10.00 9.74 6.17 13.50 13.04 North Carolina 7.83 8.25 8.09 3.50 3.50 3.49 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.58 10.00 9.83 13.08 13.50 13.33 North Dakota 5.25 8.25 8.00 0.00 3.50 1.93 0.00 1.75 0.96 5.25 10.00 8.96 5.25 13.50 10.89 N. Marianna Islands 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 Ohio 7.09 8.25 7.40 0.00 3.50 2.42 0.00 1.75 1.21 7.09 10.00 8.61 7.09 13.50 11.03 Oklahoma 7.02 8.25 7.26 0.00 1.16 0.43 0.00 0.58 0.21 7.02 8.83 7.47 7.02 9.99 7.90 Oregon
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • Number of Study Areas: 1,435 Number of Reporting Areas:1,458 Source: National Exchange Carrier Association 3 - 170 Table 3.31 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 2001 to 2002 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name ALABAMA Total 2.84 -3.18 6.22 -5.63 250282 C BLOUNTSVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 2.23 -3.78 6.24 4.55 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.93 -8.32 6.97 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.69 0.82 -2.49 -14.54 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 15.01 5.30 9.22 52.90 250286 A>CNATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 9.07 -0.22 9.31 18.77 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.78 0.31 3.46 1.09 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 6.09 -2.78 9.12 13.86 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -6.49 -0.06 -6.43
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
  • 360.4 240.8 419.2 169.4 190.7 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 5,524.8 765.3 1,070.2 4,397.2 305.5 1,169.5 4,042.8 3,395.8 3,599.8 For Scheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 182 37 15 5 13 144 239 24 39 Events per Hundred Switches 12.9 2.6 0.9 0.4 1.6 9.6 14.3 0.5 2.4 Events per Million Access Lines 9.92 1.93 0.74 0.31 0.73 10.44 16.70 1.47 5.94 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 3.4 3.3 2.9 7.3 4.9 3.5 3.7 11.0 18.6 Avg. Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 23.8 27.1 32.5 22.2 20.2 11.9 7.2 7.9 7.1 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 77.7 80.7 97.6 220.5 67.5 47.7 45.6 54.8 56.8 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 770.3 155.8
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • WEST, INC. - AZ 3.24 3.24 0.00 0.00 TOTAL: ARKANSAS 4.90 5.57 -0.63 -8.54 401691 C ALLTEL ARKANSAS, INC. 3.47 3.76 -0.27 -1.68 401692 C ARKANSAS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.19 6.46 -4.00 -22.96 401697 C CENTRAL ARKANSAS TEL. COOP INC. 19.54 6.57 12.17 47.16 401698 C CLEVELAND CTY TEL. CO. 6.25 5.72 0.49 3.86 401699 C DECATUR TELEPHONE CO INC- ARKANSAS 1.93 6.11 -3.94 -100.00 401702 C SOUTH ARKANSAS TEL. CO.,INC. 11.40 7.62 3.51 15.80 401704 A LAVACA TELEPHONE-AR 5.21 7.10 -1.77 0.00 401705 C CENTURYTEL OF ARKANSAS, INC. 2.75 3.88 -1.09 1.00 401709 C MADISON COUNTY TEL. CO. INC. 4.85 3.84 0.97 2.67 401710 A MAGAZINE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.92 10.37 9.56 77.98 401711 C CENTURYTEL OF MOUNTAIN HOME, INC. 14.55 7.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 2000 (Dollars in Millions) CLEC Allocation InterstateInterstateIntrastateIntrastate Lines Percentage End-User Total End-User Total Dec 00 1/ RevenuesRevenuesRevenuesRevenues Alabama 104,933 NA 0.71% $16 $28 $33 $48 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 165,597 NA 1.11 26 45 52 76 Arkansas * 56,400 0.45 10 18 21 31 California 1,498,146 NA 10.07 232 407 474 692 Colorado 286,955 NA 1.93 44 78 91 133 Connecticut 154,349 NA 1.04 24 42 49 71 Delaware * 23,100 0.18 4 7 9 13 District of Columbia 94,850 NA 0.64 15 26 30 44 Florida 718,157 NA 4.83 111 195 227 332 Georgia 462,392 NA 3.11 72 126 146 214 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii * 33,000 0.26 6 11
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 456.8 5.532TN Texas 2,825.8 24.47 2,801.4 724.8 2,076.5 959.4 289.4 827.6 2,076.3 0.204TX Utah 265.7 6.64 259.1 36.4 222.6 96.7 38.9 85.2 220.8 1.894UT Vermont 82.7 1.18 81.5 12.9 68.6 27.9 19.9 20.9 68.6 VT Virginia 1,170.4 21.47 1,148.9 313.3 835.6 395.0 123.7 315.7 834.4 1.131VA Washington 940.7 16.75 923.9 235.5 688.4 317.3 108.5 258.4 684.1 4.234WA West Virginia 217.6 1.93 215.7 46.7 169.0 95.4 31.1 42.2 168.7 0.279WV Wisconsin 475.8 0.51 475.3 91.0 384.3 169.1 71.0 144.2 384.2 0.185WI Wyoming 76.0 6.27 69.7 6.5 63.2 25.1 15.2 22.6 62.8 0.402WY Puerto Rico 388.7 388.7 89.1 299.6 213.0 78.2 8.5 299.6 PR Unclassified 132 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Table 2.13 - Revenues of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers for the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • Spain 10/ 2.28 2.15 2.06 1.80 1.78 1.44 0.64 0.48 0.26 0.27 0.25 0.26 0.25 Switzerland 1.59 1.16 1.11 0.84 0.91 0.52 0.51 0.34 0.28 0.27 0.25 0.26 0.25 Taiwan 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.14 0.45 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Thailand 2.30 2.00 1.75 1.60 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.20 0.90 0.60 0.48 0.38 0.38 Turkey 2.00 2.00 1.93 1.66 1.78 1.63 1.16 0.82 0.76 0.66 0.41 0.38 0.38 United Kingdom 10/ 1.06 0.97 0.74 0.61 0.49 0.37 0.36 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 Vietnam n.a. n.a. 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 1.58 1.27 1.28 1.27 Fisher Ideal Rate Index 78.7 73.1 65.5 60.5 53.1 47.3 41.4 34.1 28.9 23.1 20.7 19.9 20.0 % changes from
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • 2.06 1.80 1.78 1.44 0.64 0.48 0.26 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.27 Switzerland 9/ 1.16 1.11 0.84 0.91 0.52 0.51 0.34 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.27 Taiwan 9/ 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.14 0.45 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Thailand 9/ 2.00 1.75 1.60 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.20 0.90 0.60 0.48 0.38 0.38 0.38 Turkey 9/ 2.00 1.93 1.66 1.78 1.63 1.16 0.82 0.76 0.66 0.41 0.38 0.38 0.38 United Kingdom 8/ 9/ 0.97 0.74 0.61 0.49 0.37 0.36 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 Vietnam 11/ n.a. 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 1.58 1.28 1.28 Fisher Ideal Rate Index 73.1 65.5 60.5 53.1 47.3 41.4 34.1 28.9 23.1 20.8 19.6 19.2 19.4 % changes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • 0.77 0.76 0.56 0.56 Singapore 0.85 0.86 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.85 0.52 South Africa 1.80 1.50 1.20 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.70 0.60 Spain 2.06 1.80 1.78 1.44 0.64 0.48 0.26 Switzerland 1.11 0.84 0.91 0.52 0.51 0.34 Taiwan 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.14 0.45 0.30 0.30 0.30 Thailand 1.75 1.60 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.20 0.90 0.60 0.48 Turkey 1.93 1.66 1.78 1.63 1.16 0.82 0.76 0.66 0.41 0.38 United Kingdom 0.74 0.61 Viet Nam 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 1.58 1.27 1.28 See notes at the end of this table. December 31 159 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Notes for Tables 3.7 through 3.12 Note: Some previously published data have been revised. "*" signifies an amount greater
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • RATES FOR LONG DISTANCE MESSAGE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE UNITED STATES-OVERSEAS COUNTRY CLASSES OF SERVICE INITIAL MINUTE EACH ADDITIONAL MINUTE ALL DAYS STANDARD DISCOUNT ECONOMY STANDARD DISCOUNT ECONOMY 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM ARGENTINA INTERNATIONAL DIAL $2.22 $1.47 $1.22 $1.97 $1.30 $1.09 ALL OTHER* 3.60 2.75 2.24 1.97 1.30 1.14 2PM-8PM 8PM-3AM 3AM-2PM 2PM-8PM 8PM-3AM 3AM-2PM AUSTRALIA (INCLUDING TASMANIA) INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.93 1.26 1.10 1.71 1.12 0.99 ALL OTHER* 3.19 2.57 1.79 1.48 1.29 1.19 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM AUSTRIA INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.59 1.18 1.07 1.44 1.07 0.98 ALL OTHER* 2.08 1.54 1.32 1.46 1.09 0.99 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM BAHAMAS INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.28 0.92 0.84 1.14 0.84 0.76 ALL OTHER* 1.30 1.09 0.99 1.19 1.05 0.99 7AM-1PM
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 1.00 1.92 2.29 4.39 1.49 2.85 0.92 1.76 1.92 3.67 1.25 2.39 0.77 1.47 1982 17/ 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1983 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1984 18/ 2.53 4.83 1.52 2.90 1.01 1.93 2.18 4.18 1.31 2.51 0.87 1.67 1.94 3.69 1.16 2.21 0.78 1.48 1985 19/ 2.33 4.43 1.40 2.66 0.93 1.77 2.07 3.97 1.24 2.38 0.83 1.59 1.83 3.48 1.10 2.09 0.73 1.39 1986 20/ 1.99 3.79 1.19 2.27 0.88 1.67 1.79 3.44 1.07 2.06 0.79 1.51 1.55 2.95 0.93 1.77 0.68 1.30 1987 21/ 1.58 3.08 0.98 1.91 0.74 1.45
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 1.00 1.92 2.29 4.39 1.49 2.85 0.92 1.76 1.92 3.67 1.25 2.39 0.77 1.47 1982 17/ 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1983 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1984 18/ 2.53 4.83 1.52 2.90 1.01 1.93 2.18 4.18 1.31 2.51 0.87 1.67 1.94 3.69 1.16 2.21 0.78 1.48 1985 19/ 2.33 4.43 1.40 2.66 0.93 1.77 2.07 3.97 1.24 2.38 0.83 1.59 1.83 3.48 1.10 2.09 0.73 1.39 1986 20/ 1.99 3.79 1.19 2.27 0.88 1.67 1.79 3.44 1.07 2.06 0.79 1.51 1.55 2.95 0.93 1.77 0.68 1.30 1987 21/ 1.58 3.08 0.98 1.91 0.74 1.45
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 2.59 1.74 COLOMBIA 2.22 1.62 POLAND, REPUBLIC OF 1.88 1.51 COSTA RICA 1.96 1.46 PORTUGAL (INCLUDING AZORES 1.96 1.27 DENMARK 1.74 1.14 AND MADEIRA ISLANDS) DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 1.89 1.58 SAUDI ARABIA 2.50 1.96 ECUADOR 2.20 1.81 SINGAPORE, REPUBLIC OF 1.96 1.29 EGYPT, ARAB REPUBLIC OF 2.59 2.09 SOUTH AFRICA, REPUBLIC OF 2.09 1.57 EL SALVADOR 2.08 1.69 SPAIN (INCLUDING BALEARIC 1.93 1.31 FRANCE 1.59 1.02 ISLANDS, CANARY ISLANDS, GERMANY, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF 1.48 0.98 CEUTA AND MELILLA) (INCLUDING FORMER GERMAN SWEDEN 1.57 1.02 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC) SWITZERLAND 1.67 1.04 GREECE 2.32 1.56 TAIWAN 2.37 1.44 GUATEMALA 2.10 1.67 THAILAND 2.40 1.51 HAITI 2.09 1.77 TRINIDAD & TOBAGO, REPUBLIC OF 1.93 1.52 HONDURAS 2.28 1.67 TURKEY 2.19 1.57 HONG KONG 2.19 1.43 UNITED
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • Toll Telephone Rates (Five and Ten Minute Calls) Between NEW YORK CITY, NY and SAN FRANCISCO and LOS ANGELES, CA CHICAGO, IL PHILADELPHIA, PA Day Evening Night/Weekend Day Evening Night/Weekend Day Evening Night/Weekend Dec 31 Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten 1984 AT&T 2.53 4.83 1.52 2.90 1.01 1.93 2.18 4.18 1.31 2.51 0.87 1.67 1.94 3.69 1.16 2.21 0.78 1.48 MCI 2.31 4.47 1.40 2.73 0.94 1.82 1.97 3.84 1.23 2.40 0.82 1.60 1.68 3.33 1.04 2.05 0.68 1.34 Sprint 2.39 4.61 1.39 2.69 0.94 1.81 2.06 3.98 1.26 2.43 0.83 1.61 1.80 3.49 1.08 2.09 0.71 1.36 1985 AT&T 2.33 4.43 1.40 2.66 0.93 1.77 2.07 3.97
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • 2.06 1.80 1.78 1.44 0.64 0.48 0.26 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.27 Switzerland 10/ 1.16 1.11 0.84 0.91 0.52 0.51 0.34 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.27 Taiwan 10/ 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.14 0.45 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Thailand 10/ 2.00 1.75 1.60 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.20 0.90 0.60 0.48 0.38 0.38 0.38 Turkey 10/ 2.00 1.93 1.66 1.78 1.63 1.16 0.82 0.76 0.66 0.41 0.38 0.38 0.38 United Kingdom 8/ 10/ 0.97 0.74 0.61 0.49 0.37 0.36 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 Vietnam n.a. 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 1.58 1.28 1.28 Fisher Ideal Rate Index 73.1 65.5 60.5 53.1 47.3 41.4 34.1 28.9 23.1 20.8 19.6 19.2 19.4 % changes from
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp35.pdf
  • programming networks is greater than the cable operator's channel capacity. Result 14: Seller losses are not more common under the CAP MFN treatment than under the CAP No MFN treatment . A Chi-square test comparing the proportion of sellers that incur losses in the CAP No MFN and CAP MFN treatments under each concentration treatment yielded test statistic values of 1.93 (Low/High), 2.59 (High/High), 0.255 (High/Low). None of these test statistics exceed the critical values associated with standard levels of significance.60 The above tests do not differentiate among sellers. However, this lack of differentiation may hide effects that can only be observed when such differentiation is present. Tables 14 and 15 report, for the CAP No MFN and the CAP MFN
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • NA 25 NA b,c MR-3-03-2341 % CPE/TOK/FOK - Missed Appointment 13.73 0 14 0 8.57 NA 0 0 a,b,d MR-3-04-2341 % Missed Repair Appointment - No Double Dispatch 20 NA 21.43 0 b MR-3-05-2341 % Missed Repair Appointment - Double Dispatch 20 NA 33.33 NA MR-4 � Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2341 Mean Time To Repair � Total 9.49 NA 7.61 1.93 8.62 7.1 9.72 NA 15.42 NA b,c MR-4-02-2341 Mean Time To Repair � Loop Trouble 12.38 NA 8.48 NA 9.19 13.13 17.76 NA 12.1 NA c MR-4-03-2341 Mean Time To Repair � Central Office Trouble 5.87 NA 4.65 1.93 6.52 1.08 3.02 NA 18.75 NA b,c MR-4-04-2341 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 94.44 NA 95.45 100 93.94 100
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DOC-244194A1.html
  • Commission's rules,21 and had willfully and repeatedly failed to file Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets in a timely manner in violation of sections 54.711 of the Commission's rules.22 7. On January 28, 2004, pursuant to section 1.94(a) of the Commission's Rules,23 the Bureau informed the presiding officer of the initiation of the negotiations that lead to this Consent Decree. Pursuant to section 1.93(b) of the Commission's rules,24 the Bureau negotiated this Consent Decree to secure future compliance with sections 214, 254, and 258 of the Act25 and related Commission rules in exchange for prompt disposition of the issues raised in the Order to Show Cause, other than the issues already adjudicated by the presiding officer. II. AGREEMENT 8. The Parties agree and acknowledge
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/FCC-05M-12A1.html
  • Hearing CONSENT ORDER Adopted: March 14, 2005 Released: March 15, 2005 This is a ruling on a Joint Request for Adoption of Consent Decree and Termination of Proceeding, filed March 9, 2005, by the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Publix Network Corporation, Customer Attendants, LLC, Revenue Controls Corporation, SignTel, Inc., and Focus Group, LLC, (the ``Publix Companies'') in accordance with sections 1.93 and 1.94 of the Commission's rules [47 C.F.R. 1.93, 1.94].1 This proceeding was set for hearing by the Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing (``OSC''), 17 FCC Rcd 11487 (2002), released June 19, 2002. Issues were specified to determine whether: (1) the Commission should revoke the operating authority of the Publix Companies; (2) the Publix Companies
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-165A1.html
  • December 24, 2003 order, BOI also faced possible sanctions of $115,533.52 for failure to make required universal service contributions, $10,000 for failure to file required Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets, and $10,000 for failure to make required TRS contributions. Prior to final disposition of the hearing, however, the Enforcement Bureau and BOI entered into a consent decree ("Consent Decree"), pursuant to Section 1.93(b) of the Commission's rules. 5. The terms of the Consent Decree specifically applied to all entities owned, directed, or controlled by the Kintzel brothers, and was intended to ensure their future compliance with Sections 214, 254, and 258 of the Act and related Commission rules. The Consent Decree contemplated a voluntary contribution to the United States Treasury in the total
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-437A2.html
  • Show Cause and Notice ) NAL/Acct. No. 200332170002 of ) FRN: 0007179054 Opportunity for Hearing ) CONSENT ORDER Issued: February 18, 2004 Released: February 20, 2004 This is a ruling on Joint Request for Adoption of Consent Decree and Termination of Proceeding, filed on February 17, 2004, by the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Business Options, Inc. (``BOI'') in accordance with 1.93 and 1.94 of the Commission's rules [47 C.F.R. 1.93, 1.94].1 This proceeding was set for hearing by Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, 18 F.C.C. Rcd 6881, released April 7, 2003 (``OSC''). Issues were specified to determine whether BOI had made misrepresentations or engaged in lack of candor (Issue a); to determine whether BOI had changed
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • * 1.53 * (76) (54) (116) Contour Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55 1.93 (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • * 1.53 * (76) (54) (116) Contour Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55 1.93 (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-2 89 Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-c.pdf
  • Sports 2.9 2.1 1.0 3.0 2.7 1.0 Talk 6.0 6.1 1.7 7.0 8.0 2.2 Talk/Classic AOR 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 Talk/Full Service 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Talk/Jazz 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 Unknown 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34 Table 2 Per-Market Averages 1. All 244 Markets 1993 1997 Stations 21.39 24.55 Black-Targeted 1.52 1.93 Black-Owned 0.65 0.55 Hispanic-Targeted 0.68 1.07 Hispanic-Owned 0.19 0.28 AQH Listening 16.80 15.78 Formats 11.48 14.88 Owners 18.65 14.92 HHI 1269.83 2091.66 Population (000) 685.18 707.74 Black Population 84.32 Hispanic Population 69.54 2. 73 Markets with Black Listening Data in both Years 1993 1997 Stations 25.33 28.01 Black-Targeted 3.53 4.26 Black-Owned 1.60 1.36 Non-Black AQH Listening 16.71 15.67 Black AQH