FCC Web Documents citing 1.91

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-377A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-377A1.pdf
  • his amateur radio authorization. Consequently, we will commence a hearing proceeding before an administrative law judge to provide Mr. Titus with an opportunity to demonstrate why his above-captioned license should not be revoked. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules, David L. Titus is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio Station KB7ILD SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED in a proceeding before an administrative law judge, at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order, upon the following issues: (a) to determine the effect of David L. Titus' felony conviction(s)
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4675A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4675A1.pdf
  • we hereby designate the matter for hearing before a Commission administrative law judge to provide Mr. Keeney with an opportunity to demonstrate why his license should not be revoked. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules, Lonnie L. Keeney is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio License KB9RFO should not be revoked. Lonnie L. Keeney shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and provide evidence upon the following issues: (a) to determine the effect of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4676A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4676A1.pdf
  • felony convictions on his qualifications to be and to remain a Commission licensee; and (b) to determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing issue, whether Robert D. Landis is qualified to be and to remain a Commission licensee and whether his Amateur Radio License N6FRV should be revoked. The OSC ordered Mr. Landis, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's Rules, to file a written notice of appearance within 30 days of the OSC's release, August 31, 2006. The OSC further required the notice of appearance to state that Mr. Landis would appear on the hearing date and present evidence on the specified issues. In addition, the OSC informed Mr. Landis that, if he failed to so
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1370A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1370A1.pdf
  • of the Commission's rules, in an amount not to exceed $325,000; Sections 73.1350(a), 73.1560(b) and (d), and 73.1745(a) of the Commission's rules, in an amount not to exceed $325,000; and Section 11.35(a) of the Commission's rules, in an amount not to exceed $325,000; for any such violations that occurred or continued within the applicable statute of limitations. Pursuant to Section 1.91(c) and Section 1.221(c) of the Commission's rules, the Hearing Designation Order ordered Mr. Hammond, to file a written notice of appearance stating that he would appear on the specified hearing date and present evidence on the designated issues. In addition, the Hearing Designation Order informed Mr. Hammond that if he failed to file a written notice of appearance, the Station's
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.pdf
  • XRLTG-VIPJAMM should be revoked on some or all of the bases outlined herein and whether a Forfeiture Order in an amount not to exceed one hundred and twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($112,500) should be issued. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 312(a) and (c) of the Act, and authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.111, 0.311, 1.91(a) and 2.939(b) of the Rules, Shenzhen Tangreat Technology Co., Ltd. is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why its equipment authorization, FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM, SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. Shenzhen SHALL APPEAR before an Administrative Law Judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and give evidence upon the following issues: To determine whether the device
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.pdf
  • Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau and the 800 MHz Transition Administrator will provide for relocation of PCSI in accordance with the rebanding rules. Should we determine that PCSI is an unqualified licensee, however, PCSI's relocated licenses will be subject to revocation. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 312(a) and 312(c) of the Act, and section 1.91 of the Commission's Rules, that Preferred Acquisitions, Inc., its principals, and by extension its ultimate owner Preferred Communication Systems, Inc., and its principals, shall SHOW CAUSE why the referenced licenses SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED in a consolidated hearing proceeding. These entities shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent Order
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.pdf
  • issues, whether Buzz Telecom Corporation, Business Options, Inc., US Bell Corporation, Link Technologies, AVATAR, and/or their principals Kurtis J. Kintzel and/or Keanan Kintzel should be ordered to henceforth cease, desist and otherwise refrain from providing interstate common carrier services of any kind without prior written application to and consent from the Commission. 25. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard, Buzz Telecom Corporation, Business Options, Inc., US Bell Corporation, Link Technologies, AVATAR, and/or their principals Kurtis J. Kintzel and/or Keanan Kintzel, SHALL FILE with the Commission within 20 calendar days of the mailing of this Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.txt
  • EU interconnection rates Ecu-cents per minute at peak rates for 1997 and 1998, Euro for 1999 Local Single Transit Double Transit 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 Country Austria 7.61 1.80 1.82 7.61 1.80 1.82 8.41 2.37 2.40 Belgium 2.78 1.11 1.07 2.78 2.10 1.80 3.62 2.94 2.56 Denmark 0.98 0.98 0.93 1.82 1.82 1.67 2.22 2.22 1.91 Finland 1.81 1.42 1.43 1.81 1.42 1.43 4.20 2.81 3.28 France 0.71 0.70 0.61 1.73 1.71 1.50 2.55 2.52 2.23 Germany 1.00 0.99 1.01 1.71 1.69 1.72 2.61 2.58 2.63 Greece n/a 1.81 n/a n/a 1.81 n/a n/a 2.59 n/a Italy 1.54 1.51 1.00 2.52 2.47 1.60 n/a n/a 2.30 Ireland n/a 2.20 1.00 n/a 4.15 1.60 n/a 5.18 2.26
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-929A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-929A1.txt
  • 1997. Greco's petition was not filed until March 3, 1999. Clearly, Greco's Petition was untimely with respect to the Police Department's application. Greco argues, however, that licensing errors may be brought to the attention of the Commission after the thirty-day reconsideration period. Citing Section 312(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (Communications Act) and as implemented by Section 1.91 of the Commission's Rules, Greco states that the Commission may revoke any station license at any time the Commission ``learns that it issued a license in error.'' Greco therefore concludes that the Commission should exercise this authority and revoke the Police Department's license and subsequent assignment to Bergen. Although we believe that the Police Department's application should have been returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1489A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1489A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1489A1.txt
  • notwithstanding the resolution of the foregoing issues, to determine whether an Order of Forfeiture should be issued against Mr. Brewer for having willfully and/or repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, on March 11, 2000. The OSC set the maximum forfeiture amount at $11,000. The OSC, at ¶ 21, ordered Mr. Brewer, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. The OSC explained that if Mr. Brewer failed to file a timely written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his captioned station licenses would be deemed waived, and the proceeding thereafter would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1868A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1868A1.txt
  • the frequencies assigned from 151.250 MHz and 159.450 MHz to 153.740 MHz and 155.070 MHz and to reduce the ERP from 300 W to 50 W on Chandler's authorization for Station WPQB602. V. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 312 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 312, and Section 1.91 of Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.91, that the Request to Set Aside or Revoke filed by APCO and FCCA on January 26, 2001, IS DENIED. IT IS PROPOSED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 316(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 316, and Section 1.87 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.87, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1266A1.txt
  • it is licensed for too many channels in the State of Kentucky is similarly misplaced and ``not germane to the issue under consideration.'' Moreover, Davis contends that, despite the District's assertions to the contrary, frequencies in the Public Safety Pool are and have been available to the District. Davis concludes that the Commission should initiate a proceeding, pursuant to Section 1.91 of the Commission's Rules, to revoke the District's authorization to operate Station WPPE838 on the subject frequency pair on the basis that the District is ineligible to hold the authorization for an Industrial/Business Pool frequency channel. On July 6, 2001, the District filed an Opposition to Request for Initiation of Revocation Proceeding and Alternative Request for Waiver Nunc Pro Tunc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-989A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-989A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-989A1.txt
  • 2. See FCC File No. 0000206766 (filed Aug. 7, 2000). Id, Attachment at 1. Id. Id. Arrangement at 2. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.113(a), 1.117. 47 U.S.C. § 316(a)(1). Id. Absent such modification, we believe that we would have to pursue revocation procedures in order to effect compliance with the Arrangement's provisions. See 47 U.S.C. § 312(a); 47 C.F.R. § 1.91. 47 C.F.R. § 1.87(a). The address for FCC locations should be used only for documents filed by United States Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail. Hand-delivered or messenger-delivered documents for the Commission's Secretary are accepted only at our new location at 236 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E., Suite 110, Washington, D.C. 20002. Other messenger-delivered documents, including documents sent by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3513A1.txt
  • notwithstanding the resolution of the designated issues, to determine whether the Commission should impose a monetary forfeiture against RMI for having willfully and repeatedly violated numerous statutory and regulatory provisions administered by the Commission. In accordance with Section 1.80 of the Commission's rules, the OSC set the maximum forfeiture amount at $300,000. 4. The OSC ordered RMI, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, within thirty days of its receipt of the OSC (i.e., by December 26, 2002), to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard. The OSC admonished RMI that, if it failed to so file a written notice of appearance, its right to a hearing on the matter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3738A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3738A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3738A1.txt
  • and to remain a Commission licensee and whether his captioned license should be revoked. For this reason, we are designating the matter for hearing before a Commission administrative law judge. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules, Roger Thomas Scaggs is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio Advanced Class License W5EBC SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. Roger Thomas Scaggs shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and provide evidence upon the following issues: (a) to determine the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3738A1_Erratum.doc
  • and to remain a Commission licensee and whether his captioned license should be revoked. For this reason, we are designating the matter for hearing before a Commission administrative law judge. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules, Roger Thomas Scaggs is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio Advanced Class License W5EBC SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. Roger Thomas Scaggs shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and provide evidence upon the following issues: (a) to determine the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1068A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1068A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1068A1.txt
  • on his qualifications to be and to remain a Commission licensee; and (b) to determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing issue, whether Roger Thomas Scaggs is qualified to be and to remain a Commission licensee and whether his Amateur Radio Advanced Class License W5EBC be should revoked. The OSC ordered Mr. Scaggs, pursuant to section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, within thirty days of the date of release of the OSC (i.e., by December 22, 2003), in person or by his attorney, to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. The OSC provided that the notice of appearance state that Mr. Scaggs would appear on the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1417A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1417A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1417A1.txt
  • Broken Bow, McCook, and Maxwell, Nebraska: Community Present Proposed Broken Bow, Nebraska 252C3 237C3 Maxwell, Nebraska ---- 253C1 McCook, Nebraska 230C2, 241C1, 253C1, 230C2, 241C1, 271C1, 271C1, 280C2, 287C1 280C2, 287C1 The Proposed Coordinates for Channel 253C1 at Maxwell, Nebraska are 41-04-44 NL and 100- 31-28 WL, at center city coordinates with no site restriction. 02 WL, at a site 1.91 km (1.2 miles) east of Broken Bow. 6. Petitioner states that the proposed 60 dBu contour for Channel 253C1 at Maxwell will provide service to 47,699 persons located in an area of 9,163 square kilometers, and that the existing facilities of Station KRKU(FM) at McCook, Nebraska, provide service to 19,623 persons in an area of 7,126 square kilometers. Petitioner represents
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1704A1.txt
  • Korea. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 0.111(a)(17). 47 C.F.R. § 95.631. Order to Show Cause, 19 FCC Rcd 2564 (2004) (``OSC''). 47 C.F.R. § 2.939(b) states: ``Revocation of an equipment authorization shall be made in the same manner as revocation of radio station licenses.'' Revocation of radio station licenses is governed by sections 1.91 and 1.92 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.91, 1.92. Consequently, we will refer to those rules herein. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.91(c). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.92(c). That rule provides that, whenever a hearing is waived, the presiding administrative law judge shall, at the earliest practicable date, issue an order reciting the events or circumstances constituting a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2130A1.txt
  • Broken Bow, McCook, and Maxwell, Nebraska: Community Present Proposed Broken Bow, Nebraska 252C3 237C2 Maxwell, Nebraska ---- 253C1 McCook, Nebraska 230C2, 241C1, 253C1, 230C2, 241C1, 271C1, 271C1, 280C2, 287C1 280C2, 287C1 The Proposed Coordinates for Channel 253C1 at Maxwell, Nebraska are 41-04-44 NL and 100- 31-28 WL, at center city coordinates with no site restriction. 02 WL, at a site 1.91 km (1.2 miles) east of Broken Bow. 10. The Commission's authority to institute rule making proceedings, showings required, cut-off procedures, and filing requirements are contained in the attached Appendix and are incorporated by reference herein. In particular, we note that a showing of continuing interest, as set forth in paragraph 2 of the Appendix, is required before a channel will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.txt
  • Taiwan. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 0.111(a)(17). 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Order to Show Cause, 20 FCC Rcd 1668 (2005) (``OSC''). 47 C.F.R. § 2.939(b) states: ``Revocation of an equipment authorization shall be made in the same manner as revocation of radio station licenses.'' Revocation of radio station licenses is governed by sections 1.91 and 1.92 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.91, 1.92. Consequently, we will refer to those rules herein. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.91(c). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.92(c). This rule provides that, whenever a hearing is waived, the Presiding Administrative Law Judge shall, at the earliest practicable date, issue an order reciting the events or circumstances constituting a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1889A1.txt
  • license for Station K216EQ, and requested dismissal of its above-captioned construction permit application. Section 1.92(a)(1) of the Commission's rules provides that the failure to file the requisite notice of appearance constitutes a waiver of the right to a hearing with regard to the issues specified in the OSC. Having failed to file a timely written appearance as prescribed by section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, KCI waived its right to a hearing on the specified issues. However, in light of KCI's surrender of its license for Station K216EQ and the Media Bureau's subsequent cancellation of that license, revocation of that license has become moot. Consequently, in accordance with section 1.92(d) of the Commission's rules, we dismiss the hearing proceeding. Moreover, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2015A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2015A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2015A1.txt
  • we hereby designate the matter for hearing before a Commission administrative law judge to provide Mr. Cox with an opportunity to demonstrate why his license should not be revoked. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules, David Edward Cox is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio Advanced Class License W5OER SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. David Edward Cox shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and provide evidence upon the following issues: (a) to determine the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1570A1.txt
  • we hereby designate the matter for hearing before a Commission administrative law judge to provide Mr. Landis with an opportunity to demonstrate why his license should not be revoked. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules, Robert D. Landis is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio Advanced Class License N6FRV SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. Robert D. Landis shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and provide evidence upon the following issues: (a) to determine the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1619A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1619A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1619A1.txt
  • Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Section 1.41 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.41, the Informal Request filed by Ferrari Equipment Company on April 27, 2004, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 312 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 312, and Section 1.91 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.91, the Petition for Revocation of License filed by Ferrari Equipment Company on August 24, 2004, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Section 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.45, the Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2463A1.txt
  • felony convictions on his qualifications to be and to remain a Commission licensee; and (b) to determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing issue, whether David Edward Cox is qualified to be and to remain a Commission licensee and whether his Amateur Radio License W5OER should be revoked. The OSC ordered Mr. Cox, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, within thirty (30) days of the date of release of the OSC (i.e., by October 30, 2005), in person or by his attorney, to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. The OSC required that the notice of appearance state that Mr. Cox would appear on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3327A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3327A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3327A1.txt
  • Petition does not provide a basis for denying the above-captioned PA Communications application. We therefore deny the Informal Complaint insofar as it seeks revocation of licenses, and we also deny the Petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 312 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 312, and Sections 1.41 and 1.91 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.41, 1.91, the Informal Complaint, Motion for Revocation of Licenses, and Request for Investigation filed by Ralph Addington d/b/a Arcom Communications on December 1, 2003, IS DENIED IN PART as set forth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 229,940 Notes:Reportedinthetableistheaverageratingamonghouseholdswithaccesstoaprogram.Thisis alsousedasoneofourmeasuresofProgramQuality.Averageisoverthesamenetworksandtimeperiods describedinthenotestoTable6.ItiscalculatedbytakingtheaverageratinginTable8anddividingby theaverageavailabilityinTable7.SeeSection5.1formoredetails.Source:Authorcalculations. 38 Table10: ProgramProductionbyProgrammingTypeandTime 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2006 Variable 2003 2004 2005 2006 NewsProgramming AnyNews 4.29 3.99 4.07 4.22 NetworkNews 0.60 0.51 0.49 0.46 LocalNews 3.69 3.47 3.58 3.76 PublicAffairsProgramming 2.37 2.13 1.88 1.59 MinorityProgramming NetworksTargetingBlackAudiences 3.26 3.61 3.45 3.23 TargetingLatinoAudiences OnNetworksTargetingLatinoAudiences 7.11 8.07 8.35 8.87 Spanish-LanguageProgramming 2.94 3.01 3.41 4.09 NetworksTargetingOtherDiverseAudiences 2.65 2.55 2.67 2.72 Children'sProgramming "Children'sProgramming" 1.70 1.91 2.15 1.94 GMoviesorTV-Y/TV-Y7TV 3.18 3.28 3.04 2.94 Eitheroftheabove 4.88 5.19 5.19 4.88 FamilyProgramming NetworksTargetingFamilies 11.46 10.89 10.69 10.74 TY-GProgramming 11.35 12.18 11.93 10.94 Arts,Educational,orDocumentaryProgramming 8.32 7.46 7.05 7.62 Eitherofthetwoabove 19.67 19.64 18.98 18.56 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming 4.84 4.60 4.89 5.52 NC-17MoviesorTV-MA-S/TV-MA-LTV 0.75 0.48 0.63 0.83 ViolentProgramming "ViolentProgramming" 1.52 1.71 1.94 1.63 TV-PG-VTelevision 1.43 1.45 1.54 1.41 TV-14-VTelevision 1.37 1.40 1.56 1.51
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • Evening 3% 0% 0% 45% 169 1% 0% 0% 19% 114 Percent Sports, Evening 12% 0% 0% 93% 169 4% 0% 0% 93% 114 Average Block, Advertisements, AM Drive 1.36 1.09 0 5.58 165 1.33 1.00 0 5.58 100 Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, AM Drive 2.18 1.31 0 17.63 165 2.04 1.34 0 15.17 100 Average Block, Music, AM Drive 1.91 2.05 0 8.44 165 2.49 2.69 0 8.44 100 Average Block, News, AM Drive 0.73 0.58 0 3.10 165 0.62 0.50 0 3.67 100 Average Block, Sports, AM Drive 0.64 0.00 0 7.29 165 0.16 0.00 0 2.00 100 Average Block, Advertisements, Evening 1.18 1.04 0 7.50 169 1.07 0.77 0 7.50 114 Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, Evening 0.82 0.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • by television station); ***p<.01, **p<.05 and *p<.10 47 Table 15: Difference in Partisan Issue Coverage (Democratic coverage less Republican coverage, in seconds) Independent variables (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Local station ownership Cross-owned newspaper -2.9 (0.33) -17.9 (1.49) -9.3 (0.77) -6.2 (0.53) -6.6 (0.56) Cross-owned radio station -10.3 (0.86) -17.0 (1.34) -27.1* (1.87) -27.0* (1.89) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 44.5* (1.91) 37.4* (1.71) 41.8* (1.96) 42.2* (1.90) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) -1.9*** (3.05) -1.9** (2.38) -1.9** (2.25) Network owned and operated 43.9*** (2.83) 44.1** (2.00) 44.4** (1.92) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC 16.3 (0.82) -4.4 (0.15) CBS 19.6 (1.12) -1.5 (0.05) FOX 5.6 (0.30) 5.5 (0.28) NBC 4.1 (0.21) -17.0 (0.55) Other control variables Time
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.txt
  • RadioStations 3.06 76.84 3.58 0.14 1.87 515120 TVStations 3.66 53.98 2.96 0.00 3.65 511110 NewspaperPublishers 1.48 87.68 2.29 0.94 3.04 52 FinanceandInsurance 2.71 85.31 1.52 0.34 2.27 53 RealEstate,Rental,Leasing 2.18 86.35 0.95 0.24 3.24 54 Prof.,ScientiÖc,Tech.Svcs. 2.66 89.79 1.51 0.45 4.12 55 Mgmt.ofCompanies 0.83 58.59 0.63 0.23 1.69 56 Admin.Support,Waste Mgmt.,RemediationSvc. 5.23 88.62 3.21 0.60 2.48 61 EducationalServices 2.19 55.90 1.91 0.40 3.24 62 HealthCare&SocialAssist. 3.58 74.30 3.58 0.38 7.96 71 Arts,Entertainment,Recreation 1.63 72.64 1.78 0.26 1.58 81 OtherServices(exceptpublic) 4.92 85.66 2.19 0.43 7.85 AllNon-FarmBusinesses 3.58 84.96 1.69 0.44 5.78 18 Table9:ConcentrationRatiosbyIndustry NAICSName C4 C8 C20 C50 22 Utilities 46.6761.7878.4789.73 42 WholesaleTrade 26.3435.8147.8959.15 44 RetailTradeI 27.6733.5939.6145.57 45 RetailTradeII 36.5144.1450.3856.59 48 Transportation&WarehousingI 34.3444.5457.8469.32 49 Transportation&WarehousingII33.3540.9752.2563.82 51 Information 46.0957.8670.8480.43 515112 RadioStations 47.0 55.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-377A1.txt
  • his amateur radio authorization. Consequently, we will commence a hearing proceeding before an administrative law judge to provide Mr. Titus with an opportunity to demonstrate why his above-captioned license should not be revoked. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules, David L. Titus is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio Station KB7ILD SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED in a proceeding before an administrative law judge, at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order, upon the following issues: (a) to determine the effect of David L. Titus' felony conviction(s)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4010A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4010A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4010A1.txt
  • the date of this letter. FCC San Juan Resident Field Agent 762 Federal Building Hato Rey, PR, 00918 Robert G. Nelson Chief, Satellite Division International Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6-A665 Washington, DC 20554 We issue this show cause order pursuant to Sections 312(c) and 9(c)(3) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 312(c), 159(c)(3), Sections 1.91 and 1.1164(f) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.91, 1.1164(f), and Sections 0.51(c), 0.51(d), and 0.261(a)(15) of the Commission's Rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R.§§ 0.51(c), 0.51(d), 0.261(a)(15). Sincerely, Robert G. Nelson Chief, Satellite Division International Bureau cc: Keller and Heckman, LLC 1001 G Street, N.W., Suite 500 West Washington, DC 20001 Section 23.49 requires licensees to provide
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4675A1.txt
  • we hereby designate the matter for hearing before a Commission administrative law judge to provide Mr. Keeney with an opportunity to demonstrate why his license should not be revoked. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules, Lonnie L. Keeney is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio License KB9RFO should not be revoked. Lonnie L. Keeney shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and provide evidence upon the following issues: (a) to determine the effect of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4676A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4676A1.txt
  • felony convictions on his qualifications to be and to remain a Commission licensee; and (b) to determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing issue, whether Robert D. Landis is qualified to be and to remain a Commission licensee and whether his Amateur Radio License N6FRV should be revoked. The OSC ordered Mr. Landis, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's Rules, to file a written notice of appearance within 30 days of the OSC's release, August 31, 2006. The OSC further required the notice of appearance to state that Mr. Landis would appear on the hearing date and present evidence on the specified issues. In addition, the OSC informed Mr. Landis that, if he failed to so
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1370A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules, in an amount not to exceed $325,000; Sections 73.1350(a), 73.1560(b) and (d), and 73.1745(a) of the Commission's rules, in an amount not to exceed $325,000; and Section 11.35(a) of the Commission's rules, in an amount not to exceed $325,000; for any such violations that occurred or continued within the applicable statute of limitations. Pursuant to Section 1.91(c) and Section 1.221(c) of the Commission's rules, the Hearing Designation Order ordered Mr. Hammond, to file a written notice of appearance stating that he would appear on the specified hearing date and present evidence on the designated issues. In addition, the Hearing Designation Order informed Mr. Hammond that if he failed to file a written notice of appearance, the Station's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.txt
  • County has no significantly viewed in-state stations. On average, households in Hempstead County receive 2.56 in-state, full-power Arkansas stations over the air and 3.59 in-state stations including full-power stations, translators, low-power stations, and Class A stations. There are no significantly viewed stations in Hempstead County. On average, households in Howard County receive 1.19 in-state, full-power stations over the air and 1.91 in-state stations including full-power stations, translators, low-power stations, and Class A stations. Howard County has no significantly viewed in-state stations. On average, households in Lafayette County receive 2.75 in-state, full-power stations over -the air and 2.76 in-state stations including full-power stations, translators, low-power stations, and Class A stations. There are no significantly viewed stations in Lafayette County. On average, households
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.txt
  • XRLTG-VIPJAMM should be revoked on some or all of the bases outlined herein and whether a Forfeiture Order in an amount not to exceed one hundred and twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($112,500) should be issued. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 312(a) and (c) of the Act, and authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.111, 0.311, 1.91(a) and 2.939(b) of the Rules, Shenzhen Tangreat Technology Co., Ltd. is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why its equipment authorization, FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM, SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. Shenzhen SHALL APPEAR before an Administrative Law Judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and give evidence upon the following issues: To determine whether the device
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/02 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. 1/ This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.txt
  • FOR 50% SURVIVAL PROBABILITY OVER 5 AND 10 YEARS Weibull No Unobserved Heterogeneity 5 Years Weibull No Unobserved Heterogeneity 10 Years Weibull Unobserved Heterogeneity 5 Years Weibull Unobserved Heterogeneity 10 Years Year Subscribers (in millions) Year Subscribers (in millions) Year Subscribers (in millions) Year Subscribers (in millions) 1 0 1 0.85 1 1.29 1 4.10 2 0 2 1.27 2 1.91 2 6.08 3 0 3 1.71 3 2.59 3 8.22 4 0 4 2.18 4 3.30 4 10.49 5 0 5 2.75 5 4.16 5 13.22 6 3.39 6 16.27 7 4.09 7 19.64 8 4.73 8 22.74 9 5.52 9 26.52 10 5.85 10 28.09 21 TABLE 5 SUBSCRIBER PROFILES FOR 70% SURVIVAL PROBABILITY OVER 5 AND 10 YEARS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255869A1.txt
  • (2.15) LMULTDWELL -0.15 (1.30) DBSOVERAIR 0.41* (1.74) Constant 4.89* (1.88) Observations 525 F-Statistic 2.05** Hansen J Statistic 6.97* ** - significant at 95% confidence level, * - significant at 90% confidence level First Stage Diagnostics F-Statistic Centered R2 Partial R2 Shea Partial R2 F-Statistic of Excluded Instruments PLUSTENDROP 2.05*** 0.11 0.06 0.04 3.21** NEG10TO10 10.87*** 0.32 0.05 0.03 3.87*** PLUS10RISE 1.91** 0.06 0.02 0.01 2.03* *** - significant at 99% confidence level, ** - significant at 95% confidence level, * - significant at 90% confidence level The F-statistic and partial R-squared for the first stage indicate that the first stage regression has a reasonably high explanatory power for the endogenous variable.28 The Hansen J statistic, an overidentification test of all instruments,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • -13.22 -35.30 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -0.96 -1.86 0.92 -2.47 250301 A FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF LAMAR COUNTY, LLC 14.22 0.92 13.18 105.58 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA 2.07 -0.05 2.12 -5.51 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 0.87 -0.64 1.52 -6.05 250305 C MON-CRE TEL. COOP. INC. 1.26 0.88 0.37 -1.18 250306 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF ALABAMA, LLC 36.59 -1.91 39.24 2,668.71 250307 C MOUNDVILLE TEL. CO. 0.21 -1.24 1.47 -2.55 250308 C NEW HOPE TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 8.19 -6.67 15.93 23.70 250311 A OAKMAN TEL. CO., INC. 20.14 5.88 13.47 66.56 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 4.10 -0.60 4.73 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 1.64 -3.59 5.43 3.86 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 0.87 -3.27 4.28 0.87
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • -13.22 -35.30 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -0.96 -1.86 0.92 -2.47 250301 A FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF LAMAR COUNTY, LLC 14.22 0.92 13.18 105.58 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA 2.07 -0.05 2.12 -5.51 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 0.87 -0.64 1.52 -6.05 250305 C MON-CRE TEL. COOP. INC. 1.26 0.88 0.37 -1.18 250306 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF ALABAMA, LLC 36.59 -1.91 39.24 2,668.71 250307 C MOUNDVILLE TEL. CO. 0.21 -1.24 1.47 -2.55 250308 C NEW HOPE TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 8.19 -6.67 15.93 23.70 250311 A OAKMAN TEL. CO., INC. 20.14 5.88 13.47 66.56 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 4.10 -0.60 4.73 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 1.64 -3.59 5.43 3.86 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 0.87 -3.27 4.28 0.87
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 # 06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Minute* Minute Minute* Access Access per Switched Carrier Common Line per Terminating Common Line Rates in Effect Interstate Charges
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 641 1,032 1,096 1,109 981 794 579 2003 616 1,001 1,097 1,156 981 773 572 2004 642 1,028 1,045 1,178 1,040 815 579 1980 2.27% 1.97% 1.89% 1.84% 1.82% 1981 2.43 2.04 1.89 1.96 2.09 1982 2.34 2.07 1.87 2.06 2.12 1983 2.32 2.23 1.87 2.07 2.05 1984 2.17 2.02 1.92 1.94 1.93 2.15% 2.39% 1985 2.35 1.92 1.81 1.86 1.91 2.10 2.29 1986 2.42 2.03 1.75 1.80 1.95 2.28 2.59 1987 2.65 2.08 1.86 1.91 2.03 2.12 2.68 1988 2.55 2.07 1.87 2.01 2.11 2.28 2.53 1989 2.39 2.18 1.80 1.99 1.98 2.30 2.26 1990 2.60 2.15 1.92 2.03 2.02 2.28 2.43 1991 2.81 2.15 1.88 2.11 2.01 2.16 2.38 1992 2.72 2.19 1.88 2.01 2.06 2.20 2.37 1993 2.93
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • -1.55 -2.18 0.64 -9.92 482248 C NORTHERN TEL. COOP INC.- MT 3.09 2.37 0.70 1.09 482249 C CENTURYTEL OF MONTANA, INC. -8.47 -2.55 -6.08 -82.21 482250 C PROJECT TEL. CO. -0.13 -2.72 2.66 -1.88 482251 C RANGE TEL. COOP INC.-MT -5.23 -2.80 -2.51 -15.66 482252 A RONAN TEL. CO. 24.40 1.01 23.15 INFINITE 482254 C SOUTHERN MONTANA TEL. CO. 0.15 -1.91 2.11 -2.25 482255 C 3-RIVERS TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. -2.54 0.66 -3.18 -12.73 482257 C TRIANGLE TEL. COOPERATIVE ASSN. INC. 7.04 0.82 6.17 9.93 483308 C BLACKFOOT TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. - CFT -4.06 0.65 -4.68 -10.98 483310 C CENTRAL MONTANA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 8.32 1.78 6.43 10.69 484322 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF MT DBA FRONTIER COMM OF MT -4.28 -0.70 -3.61
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • -1.55 -2.18 0.64 -9.92 482248 C NORTHERN TEL. COOP INC.- MT 3.09 2.37 0.70 1.09 482249 C CENTURYTEL OF MONTANA, INC. -8.47 -2.55 -6.08 -82.21 482250 C PROJECT TEL. CO. -0.13 -2.72 2.66 -1.88 482251 C RANGE TEL. COOP INC.-MT -5.23 -2.80 -2.51 -15.66 482252 A RONAN TEL. CO. 24.40 1.01 23.15 INFINITE 482254 C SOUTHERN MONTANA TEL. CO. 0.15 -1.91 2.11 -2.25 482255 C 3-RIVERS TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. -2.54 0.66 -3.18 -12.73 482257 C TRIANGLE TEL. COOPERATIVE ASSN. INC. 7.04 0.82 6.17 9.93 483308 C BLACKFOOT TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. - CFT -4.06 0.65 -4.68 -10.98 483310 C CENTRAL MONTANA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 8.32 1.78 6.43 10.69 484322 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF MT DBA FRONTIER COMM OF MT -4.28 -0.70 -3.61
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 Source: Access tariff filings. 4 Although the charges took effect on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271555A1.txt
  • services that exceed 200 kbps in at least one direction (and I'll talk more about that low hurdle in a minute), almost 60 percent of all new high-speed lines were mobile broadband wireless lines. Also, with respect to two-way services, mobile wireless broadband connections showed the largest percentage increase: from a mere 83,503 units at the end of 2005, to 1.91 million by mid-2006 - an eye-popping 2,187 percent in just six months! In fact, between June 2005 and June 2006, mobile wireless's share of total broadband lines rose from one percent to 17 percent. In addition, the Wireless Competition Report, which the Commission released in September, discusses the proliferation of next generation wireless networks. As reflected in green, advanced broadband
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273742A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273742A1.txt
  • this time last year, we had roughly 65 million high-speed "lines" in service. I put "lines" in quotes because the numbers for wireless services are particularly encouraging. Almost 60 percent of all new high-speed lines were mobile broadband wireless "lines." Mobile wireless broadband connections showed the largest percentage increase: from a mere 83,503 units at the end of 2005, to 1.91 million by mid-2006 ­ an astonishing 2,187 percent increase just six months! In fact, between June 2005 and June 2006, mobile wireless's share of total broadband lines skyrocketed from one percent to 17 percent. In addition, the Wireless Competition Report, which the Commission released in September, discusses the proliferation of next generation wireless networks. The bottom line on this is:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Association, Universal Service Fund 2006 Submission of 2005 Study Results (September 29, 2006) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2004 to 2005 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA 0.71 -3.53 4.40 -9.22 ALASKA -1.36 -6.16 5.12 -6.43 AMERICAN SAMOA -7.66 0.77 -8.37 -100.00 ARIZONA -3.49 -6.12 2.80 -22.84 ARKANSAS -2.44 -4.27 1.91 2.72 CALIFORNIA 4.49 -3.17 7.90 -19.54 COLORADO -1.60 -5.08 3.66 5.80 CONNECTICUT -9.87 -6.42 -3.68 0.00 DELAWARE 6.43 -2.86 9.57 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 10.44 -3.08 13.94 0.00 FLORIDA 1.75 -4.65 6.71 14.08 GEORGIA -2.28 -4.23 2.04 -9.08 GUAM -14.00 -3.00 -11.34 -71.88 HAWAII -3.37 -4.94 1.65 6.27 IDAHO 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • Association, Universal Service Fund 2006 Submission of 2005 Study Results (September 29, 2006) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2004 to 2005 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA 0.71 -3.53 4.40 -9.22 ALASKA -1.36 -6.16 5.12 -6.43 AMERICAN SAMOA -7.66 0.77 -8.37 -100.00 ARIZONA -3.49 -6.12 2.80 -22.84 ARKANSAS -2.44 -4.27 1.91 2.72 CALIFORNIA 4.49 -3.17 7.90 -19.54 COLORADO -1.60 -5.08 3.66 5.80 CONNECTICUT -9.87 -6.42 -3.68 0.00 DELAWARE 6.43 -2.86 9.57 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 10.44 -3.08 13.94 0.00 FLORIDA 1.75 -4.65 6.71 14.08 GEORGIA -2.28 -4.23 2.04 -9.08 GUAM -14.00 -3.00 -11.34 -71.88 HAWAII -3.37 -4.94 1.65 6.27 IDAHO 0.09 -2.85 3.02 4.21 ILLINOIS -1.60 -5.17 3.77 -2.17 INDIANA 2.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Although the charges took effect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 Source: Access tariff filings.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • revision. State City (As of October 15, 2007) Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities - Continued Table 1.5 Standard Rate in Cities with Subsidy Plan Subsidy-Plan Rate Benefit (a) (b) (a) - (b) Representative Monthly Charge 1 $15.62 $8.70 $6.92 Federal and State Subscriber Line Charges 5.74 0.02 5.72 Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 4.26 1.91 2.35 Total Monthly Charge 2 $25.62 $10.63 $14.99 Basic Connection Charge $39.81 $12.33 $27.48 Taxes 3.41 0.86 2.56 Total Connection Charge 2 $43.22 $13.19 $30.04 1 All standard rates reflect flat-rate service. Subsidy plan rates reflect flat-rate subsidized service where available and subsidized measured/message service with 100 calls elsewhere. 2 Averages are for the 95 cities with subsidized monthly rates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • -0.28 NEBRASKA -8.03 -5.93 -2.23 4.22 NEVADA 1.99 -5.16 7.54 -14.57 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.53 -6.44 9.59 14.06 NEW JERSEY -5.22 -9.49 4.71 0.00 NEW MEXICO -4.90 -4.35 -0.58 -2.23 NEW YORK -4.91 -10.23 5.92 -10.57 NORTH CAROLINA -3.32 -5.55 2.36 -8.27 NORTH DAKOTA 1.03 -4.09 5.34 5.06 NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS -10.62 -8.10 -2.74 0.00 OHIO -3.33 -7.69 4.73 -2.89 OKLAHOMA 1.91 -6.00 8.41 6.97 OREGON -6.12 -6.57 0.48 8.40 PENNSYLVANIA -0.58 -6.14 5.92 4.50 PUERTO RICO -2.88 -7.78 5.31 152.96 RHODE ISLAND -2.97 -11.64 9.81 0.00 SOUTH CAROLINA -0.12 -5.26 5.43 15.81 SOUTH DAKOTA -3.56 -7.78 4.57 5.78 TENNESSEE -1.13 -5.36 4.47 14.58 TEXAS 1.52 -5.82 7.79 0.97 UTAH -10.16 -4.38 -6.04 -10.28 VERMONT 0.98 -3.14 4.25 -10.24 VIRGIN ISLANDS -4.48
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • -0.28 NEBRASKA -8.03 -5.93 -2.23 4.22 NEVADA 1.99 -5.16 7.54 -14.57 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.53 -6.44 9.59 14.06 NEW JERSEY -5.22 -9.49 4.71 0.00 NEW MEXICO -4.90 -4.35 -0.58 -2.23 NEW YORK -4.91 -10.23 5.92 -10.57 NORTH CAROLINA -3.32 -5.55 2.36 -8.27 NORTH DAKOTA 1.03 -4.09 5.34 5.06 NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS -10.62 -8.10 -2.74 0.00 OHIO -3.33 -7.69 4.73 -2.89 OKLAHOMA 1.91 -6.00 8.41 6.97 OREGON -6.12 -6.57 0.48 8.40 PENNSYLVANIA -0.58 -6.14 5.92 4.50 PUERTO RICO -2.88 -7.78 5.31 152.96 RHODE ISLAND -2.97 -11.64 9.81 0.00 SOUTH CAROLINA -0.12 -5.26 5.43 15.81 SOUTH DAKOTA -3.56 -7.78 4.57 5.78 TENNESSEE -1.13 -5.36 4.47 14.58 TEXAS 1.52 -5.82 7.79 0.97 UTAH -10.16 -4.38 -6.04 -10.28 VERMONT 0.98 -3.14 4.25 -10.24 VIRGIN ISLANDS -4.48
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A8.pdf
  • Line Change Change Change Change State Began March 2007 March 1984March 1997March 2007 March 1984March 1997March 2007 Alabama 1995 5.22 77.4% 78.0% 83.3% 0.6% 5.4% 89.0% 91.3% 91.2% 2.2% 0.0% Alaska 1994 5.25 61.5% 74.1% 88.8% 12.6% * 14.7% 85.9% 94.3% 96.1% 8.4% * 1.8% Arizona 1987 3.91 73.6% 82.4% 86.9% 8.9% 4.4% 90.0% 90.3% 94.3% 0.3% 4.0% Arkansas 1986 1.91 78.3% 78.8% 79.4% 0.5% 0.6% 87.2% 88.7% 90.6% 1.5% 1.9% California 1985 3.86 82.9% 87.7% 93.2% 4.7% * 5.5% 92.6% 94.0% 96.2% 1.4% 2.2% Colorado 1986 5.20 86.9% 88.0% 86.9% 1.2% -1.1% 94.6% 96.5% 95.8% 1.9% -0.7% Connecticut 1993 1.77 80.5% 85.9% 87.1% 5.4% 1.3% 94.7% 95.6% 95.4% 1.0% -0.2% Delaware 1998 0.00 87.3% 94.4% 94.5% 7.1% 0.1% 95.5% 95.2%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/0006/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/0006/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/0112/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/0206/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/0206/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/0306/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/0406/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/0506/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/0606/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/0706/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 9.02 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 5.54 -2.89 8.68 19.94 250305 C MON-CRE TEL. COOP. INC. 2.92 -1.98 5.00 2.56 250306 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF ALABAMA, LLC 9.19 -1.05 10.35 0.00 250307 C MOUNDVILLE TEL. CO. -6.67 -5.73 -1.00 -13.66 250308 C NEW HOPE TEL. COOP., INC.-AL -6.85 -2.30 -4.66 -18.71 250311 A OAKMAN TEL. CO., INC. -8.16 -6.38 -1.91 -33.82 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 7.06 -1.48 8.67 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. -0.46 -4.00 3.69 -4.74 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 14.25 -6.33 21.97 32.68 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. -0.62 -0.16 -0.46 -3.20 250317 C ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. -8.18 -5.29 -3.06 -25.81 250318 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF THE SOUTH, LLC 10.37 1.35 8.90 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 9.02 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 5.54 -2.89 8.68 19.94 250305 C MON-CRE TEL. COOP. INC. 2.92 -1.98 5.00 2.56 250306 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF ALABAMA, LLC 9.19 -1.05 10.35 0.00 250307 C MOUNDVILLE TEL. CO. -6.67 -5.73 -1.00 -13.66 250308 C NEW HOPE TEL. COOP., INC.-AL -6.85 -2.30 -4.66 -18.71 250311 A OAKMAN TEL. CO., INC. -8.16 -6.38 -1.91 -33.82 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 7.06 -1.48 8.67 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. -0.46 -4.00 3.69 -4.74 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 14.25 -6.33 21.97 32.68 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. -0.62 -0.16 -0.46 -3.20 250317 C ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. -8.18 -5.29 -3.06 -25.81 250318 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF THE SOUTH, LLC 10.37 1.35 8.90 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 4.20 Indiana 3,035 1,587 4,621 1.93 Iowa 1,392 735 2,127 0.89 Kansas 1,371 718 2,089 0.87 Kentucky 2,000 1,058 3,058 1.28 Louisiana 2,265 1,160 3,426 1.43 Maine 659 344 1,004 0.42 Maryland 3,284 1,779 5,063 2.12 Massachusetts 3,598 1,849 5,447 2.28 Michigan 4,813 2,316 7,129 2.98 Minnesota 2,607 1,288 3,895 1.63 Mississippi 1,293 728 2,021 0.85 Missouri 2,984 1,569 4,552 1.91 Montana 463 275 738 0.31 Nebraska 865 455 1,320 0.55 Nevada 1,373 756 2,129 0.89 New Hampshire 693 395 1,088 0.46 New Jersey 5,059 2,714 7,773 3.25 New Mexico 928 526 1,454 0.61 New York 10,443 5,241 15,684 6.56 North Carolina 4,568 2,461 7,028 2.94 North Dakota 333 179 512 0.21 N. Mariana Islands 13 9 22 0.01 Ohio 5,718
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 4.20 Indiana 3,035 1,587 4,621 1.93 Iowa 1,392 735 2,127 0.89 Kansas 1,371 718 2,089 0.87 Kentucky 2,000 1,058 3,058 1.28 Louisiana 2,265 1,160 3,426 1.43 Maine 659 344 1,004 0.42 Maryland 3,284 1,779 5,063 2.12 Massachusetts 3,598 1,849 5,447 2.28 Michigan 4,813 2,316 7,129 2.98 Minnesota 2,607 1,288 3,895 1.63 Mississippi 1,293 728 2,021 0.85 Missouri 2,984 1,569 4,552 1.91 Montana 463 275 738 0.31 Nebraska 865 455 1,320 0.55 Nevada 1,373 756 2,129 0.89 New Hampshire 693 395 1,088 0.46 New Jersey 5,059 2,714 7,773 3.25 New Mexico 928 526 1,454 0.61 New York 10,443 5,241 15,684 6.56 North Carolina 4,568 2,461 7,028 2.94 North Dakota 333 179 512 0.21 N. Mariana Islands 13 9 22 0.01 Ohio 5,718
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 195,365 579.21 14,024,140 1.465 GRAND TOTAL 25,904,705,424 61,218,068 423.15 956,970,867 100 Note: AT&T did not report 2009 cost data. Source: National Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund 2010 Submission of 2009 Study Results (September 30, 2010) 3 - 31 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2008 to 2009 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -1.91 -6.63 5.06 10.18 ALASKA -3.63 -7.97 4.71 -6.48 AMERICAN SAMOA -8.03 -1.16 -6.95 0.00 ARIZONA -1.63 -11.12 10.67 1.67 ARKANSAS -1.09 -5.73 4.92 -4.27 CALIFORNIA 3.83 -10.35 15.82 -6.31 COLORADO -4.97 -11.39 7.25 -10.35 CONNECTICUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DELAWARE 5.86 -10.49 18.26 INFINITE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 3.54 -7.86 12.38 0.00 FLORIDA -4.41 -12.82 9.65 22.43 GEORGIA -5.22 -5.56 0.36
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312921A1.txt
  • ý`¸ð 1Ö)ül``‹ÛŽçpÚ* Q ‰ïÝ[F-²'-ð×P×mŒM›LtmEÿ ß ëŽ YI¬Fý¯ˆÜz!ý ¬ÿ Žë!xk{,uª‡½Aƒ0kf{t!NøŒ0µ Õþ ?ý%>`ï9ÇÊKãŒm-d(c)&¦ë"%³9uÇ-8•ñ CÏA𨠧$ï``tmÞåô„½föi³f�¦ºÌJÔÀ¨`# ÝP ݲö¼[" (R)¤6ÆíT = ¦uQ²ì%ÏÞ+�Ÿ#EìU3g; g"VD º }Žù‡˜ ß ë(c)ÙzD ­í ÛÙŸá"!œ¡�h ë ˹�æÄ`æ'ñ‹ G ˆ}ŒâÓ'ªªb/a¥*k¾ú ìH\„ ¿*ÙiŠ> > aA ñ-þ <›z 7 'q-üØʼnϦ7ñˆs' �qÈ ñXÃ- ½+‚Ëš%Ø-= ">³œ-²RúÛªtmEñ-ß!9h•\Š¿¬˜œY] µÆj¼v¡."V‡øî Ÿ`øÒ\xmËG•† G�¥Ÿ}6NŒÎTBø°3&Ôä``ïR{ 1 9­ k _Ìs�É<œ-¢Ë¿˜sSÑ` ``ÇÄNâ``ÿ„ܹ:¦HÝâåÜ‹¨Q§2t¾ ¦ Êg\¹z�ø'ùHêÄòÉõåܾÄÞVu¡S_ àÿªÍ+Áa... ü)Z|ñ +Á`%spÑß ôâ Èç.Šf¯´uô¥ cÄVeªh¢<¯ T¨FŽI"2žæ?Ei - �v@MÎ{KwÌ£-†œ 1.91·pbLrt3ü ÷wóê Œ¿‡ ·F-a ç E``oнÃwô� ``zL†}øwìõǼW„-œ¨ '±oô"¸... �¯‡c± ÌeÅŒ`îŒß�¾±Eß]ŽY �¡ Æ|K¿ æÕ·�B¹ÆüjuK¡~})î$Õ]¦Œ²''s!ó‡Ôš¿ {(c)ëÔsV²,Á`ÿækàMØGåÁd(c)§§§è�(R)\a� sŠìA µ\‡Ù"`ØG Û6 I^``|_1 Ï ›EMØ´-Ï0``~bóèWaµ�}¼Éi½O'')¥ {``kaßÞ2ôƯÊþE Ǽ%ãPLaìOâ{bë"'ZöF ÏŸBS›ôMe þ÷±+þ)ÇêFXu o Y ƒÙ›G¢YçfÐ6ï öò Î ƒü× a#¼|AìHŒ(qãÊ â Õi ­Ž é Ëp ¦gF$óhÄX"Ž é`Ún ¡ ßk ­‹†ß×ǪÕîè"o@_| ‡0 í
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-314A1.txt
  • 13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in connection with the potential forfeiture liability noted above, this document constitutes notice, pursuant to Section 503(b)(3)(A) of the Act. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard and to avail themselves of the right to present evidence at a hearing in these proceedings, pursuant to §§ 1.91(c) and 1.221(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§1.91(c) and 1.221(c), licensees Ronald Brasher, Patricia Brasher, David Brasher, D.L. Brasher, Carolyn S. Lutz, Jim Sumpter, Norma Sumpter, Melissa Sumpter, Jennifer Hill, DLB Enterprises, Inc. and Metroplex Two-Way Radio Service, in person or by their attorneys, shall each file, within 30 days after receipt of this Order, a written appearance stating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-44A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-44A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-44A1.txt
  • WSTX-FM were available for review during the April 13, 2000, inspection. Family apparently violated Section 73.3526 by failing to maintain public inspection files for WSTX(AM) and WSTX-FM and make the files available for review. We will add an issue to determine whether Family willfully or repeatedly violated Section 73.3526. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 1.91(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.91(a), and Sections 312(a) and 312(c) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 312(a) and 312(c), Family Broadcasting, Inc. IS DIRECTED TO SHOW CAUSE why the licenses for WSTX(AM) and WSTX-FM, Christiansted, U.S. Virgin Islands, should not be REVOKED, at a hearing before an FCC Administrative Law Judge, at a time and place to be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.txt
  • EFFECTIVE COMPETITION WITH NONCOMPETITIVE GROUP WIRELINE OVERBUILD DBS OVERBUILD OVERBUILD† LEC LOW PENETRATION MUNICIPAL NONCOMPETITIVE GROUP 2000 Monthly Charge $33.74 $33.23 $33.65 $32.21 $31.56 $22.56 $34.11 Standard Error 0.83 1.22 .91 0.29 0.60 1.55 0.66 % Difference†† 1.1% 2.6% 1.4% 5.9%* 8.1%* 51.2%* -- Number of Channels 56.5 38.6 53.4 66.3 45.9 50.3 54.8 Standard Error 1.79 3.84 2.14 0.61 1.91 3.03 0.92 % Difference†† -3.0% 42.0%* 2.6% -17.3%* 19.4%* 8.9% -- Charge per Channel 0.62 0.96 0.68 0.49 0.74 0.46 0.66 Standard Error 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.01 % Difference†† 6.5% -31.3%* -2.9% 34.7%* -10.8%* 43.5%* -- 1999 Monthly Charge $31.49 $32.90 $31.73 $30.40 $30.17 $21.54 $32.25 Standard Error 0.70 1.22 0.79 0.23 0.60 1.56 0.35 % Difference††
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-74A1.txt
  • D. Brewer for having willfully and/or repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act on March 11, 2000, in an amount not to exceed $11,000. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 503(b)(3)(A) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(3)(A), that, in connection with the potential forfeiture liability noted above, this document constitutes notice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.91(c), that, to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard and to present evidence at the hearing in this proceeding on the matter of his captioned Amateur radio station and GMRS licenses, Leslie D. Brewer, in person or by his attorney, shall file, within 15 calendar days after receipt of this Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-173A1.txt
  • to Section 312(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, both the burden of proceeding and the burden of proof shall be upon the Enforcement Bureau as to issues (a) through (r) inclusive. 48. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard, the principal or principals of the Publix Companies, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, SHALL FILE with the Commission within 30 days of the mailing of this Show Cause Order a WRITTEN APPEARANCE stating that a principal or other legal representative from the Publix Companies will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the matters specified in the Show Cause Order. If the Publix Companies fail to file a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-310A1.txt
  • the TWE Interest has been estimated at over $10 billion, which will make it the largest Commission-required divestiture by a factor of three. Trust Term Letter at 3-4 (citing analyst valuations of TWE Interest and comparing value of TWE Interest to value of assets required to divested in connection with the SBC-Ameritech ($3.27 billion), Vodafone-Bell Atlantic ($3 billion), Bell Atlantic-GTE (1.91 billion), and WorldCom-MCI (1.75 billion) mergers). The TWE Interest consists of a ``diverse collection of assets'' including cable facilities, programming networks, a broadcast network, and the Warner Bros. movie and programming studios. Trust Term Letter at 4. The partnership structure itself is complicated, and the TWE Interest carries no right to participate in the management or operation of TWE. Trust
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-319A1.txt
  • found the licensee's repeated failure to respond to staff inquiries dilatory and warranting of designation); In re Revocation of the License of Shedd-Agard Broadcasting, Inc. (KLSU), 41 FCC 2d 93 (I.D. 1973). IV. Ordering Clauses 15. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Sections 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4) and 312(c) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4) and 312(c), and Section 1.91 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.91, RMI is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why its license for broadcast station WMGA(AM), Moultrie, Georgia, SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. RMI shall appear before an Administrative Law Judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent Administrative Law Judge order and give evidence upon the following issues: To determine
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-32A1.txt
  • raises extremely serious questions as to whether Peninsula has the character qualifications to continue as a licensee, regardless of whether it ultimately prevails in court on the appeal of our May 2001 MO&O. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Sections 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4) and 312(c) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4) and 312(c), and section 1.91 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.91, Peninsula Communications, Inc. is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why its licenses for broadcast stations KGTL, Homer; KXBA(FM), Nikiski; KWVV-FM, Homer; KPEN-FM, Soldotna; and its licenses for FM translator stations K292ED, Kachemak City; K295DU, Homer; K285EG and K272DG, Seward, all in Alaska, SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. In the event the D.C. Circuit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 6.00abcde 2 - 203601Elct Man-8.0 dB and 5.5 dB Loop 2.24 6.00 1.89 6.00 1.96 6.00 2.33 6.00 2.15 6.00 2 - 203800Elct Man-2 Digital ISDN 1.50 6.00 2.24 6.00 1.49 6.00 1.77 6.00 2.03 6.00 2 - 203900Elct Man-2 Digital xDSL 1.85 6.00 2.00 6.00 1.85 6.00 2.07 6.00 2.50 6.00 2 - 204000Elct Man-4 Digital 1.544 mbpd HDSL 1.91 6.00 1.84 6.00 1.93 6.00 1.97 6.00 1.86 6.00 2 - 204001Elct Man-4 Digital DS3 Loop 1.74 6.00 6.00 2.53 6.00 2.80 6.00 5.02 6.00abcde 2 - 204003Elct Man- UNE Dark Fiber 6.00 37.29 6.00 8.91 6.00 1.07 6.00 6.00abcde 2 - 204004Elct Man- UNE EELs - Voice Grade 2.03 6.00 1.99 6.00 1.28 6.00 1.66 6.00 1.51 6.00 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data Acknowledgement Message Completeness F.12.2.1 EDI/Region (%) 100.00% 99.62% 99.97% 99.94% 100.00% F.12.2.2 TAG/Region (%) 99.99% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% General - Database Updates Average Database Update Interval F.13.1.1 LIDB/FL (hours) 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.82 1.82 1.56 1.55 1.91 1.91 F.13.1.2 Directory Listings/FL (hours) 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 F.13.1.3 Directory Assistance/FL (hours) 4.08 4.05 5.90 5.90 3.69 3.66 4.59 4.59 3.60 3.59 % Update Accuracy F.13.2.1 LIDB/FL (%) 100.00% 93.48% 99.36% 99.48% 99.93% F.13.2.2 Directory Listings/FL (%) 99.79% 99.35% 99.18% 99.66% 99.76% F.13.2.3 Directory Assistance/FL (%) 97.87% 99.19% 98.10% 98.56% 99.38% % NXXs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.txt
  • §§ 1.108, 1.117. We also note that, should information be brought to our attention at some later date suggesting that the parties to a lease implemented pursuant to this proposed forbearance option had not complied with the requirements and conditions we adopt for such action, the Commission may initiate a formal or informal investigation. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.80, 1.89, 1.91, 1.92. See Craig O. McCaw, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 5836, 5880-5881 ¶ 76 (1994), aff'd sub nom. SBC Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 56 F.3d 1484 (D.C. Cir. 1995), recon. in part, 10 FCC Rcd 11786 (1995). See generally Policy Statement. We note that this proposal encompasses only services covered by the Report and Order and services that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1_Erratum.doc
  • §§ 1.108, 1.117. We also note that, should information be brought to our attention at some later date suggesting that the parties to a lease implemented pursuant to this proposed forbearance option had not complied with the requirements and conditions we adopt for such action, the Commission may initiate a formal or informal investigation. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.80, 1.89, 1.91, 1.92. See Craig O. McCaw, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 5836, 5880-5881 ¶ 76 (1994), aff'd sub nom. SBC Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 56 F.3d 1484 (D.C. Cir. 1995), recon. in part, 10 FCC Rcd 11786 (1995). See generally Policy Statement. We note that this proposal encompasses only services covered by the Report and Order and services that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd 10927 (2000); 14 FCC Rcd 8331 (1999); 12 FCC Rcd 22756 (1997); and 12 FCC Rcd 3239 (1997). ATTACHMENT 4 Competitive Group, by Strata Element Wireline Overbuild DBS Overbuild LEC Low Penetration Municipal July 2002 BST $16.37 $17.05 $12.33 $16.59 $14.35 Standard error † 1.22 1.12 0.46 0.79 1.60 CPST $18.00 $17.23 $22.08 $17.89 $10.34 Standard error 1.77 1.91 0.65 1.10 2.33 Programming total $34.37 $34.28 $34.41 $34.48 $24.69 Standard error 1.29 1.32 0.54 0.60 1.35 Equipment $3.24 $2.77 $4.07 $2.08 $0.79 Standard error 0.33 0.35 0.18 0.24 0.42 Programming & equipment $37.61 $37.05 $38.48 $36.56 $25.48 Standard error 1.45 1.59 0.62 0.70 1.52 Channels 60.9 53.9 67.6 53.4 50.4 Standard error 2.7 3.2 1.0 1.8 3.6 Rate per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-158A1.txt
  • as to whether the license renewal application of WPBI for KKFO(AM) should be denied. This proceeding is intended to encompass all authorizations and applications held or filed by Zawila, AES, CVES, FCB, LB, and WPBI. ORDERING CLAUSES 113. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and 312(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.91(a) of the Rules, William L. Zawila, Avenal Educational Services, Inc., Central Valley Educational Services, Inc., and H.L. Charles d/b/a Ford City Broadcasting ARE DIRECTED TO SHOW CAUSE why the construction permits for KNGS(FM), Coalinga, California; KAAX(FM), Avenal, California; KAJP(FM), Firebaugh, California; and KZPE(FM), Ford City, California, should not be REVOKED and all authority to operate said stations TERMINATED, at a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-68A1.txt
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau, shall be a party to the designated hearing. Both the burden of proceeding and the burden of proof shall be upon the Enforcement Bureau as to issues (a) through (f) inclusive. 38. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard, the principal or principals of Business Options, Inc., pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, SHALL FILE with the Commission within 30 days of the mailing of this Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing a WRITTEN APPEARANCE stating that a principal or other legal representative from Business Options, Inc. will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the matters specified in the Show Cause Order. If
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-68A1_Erratum.doc
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau, shall be a party to the designated hearing. Both the burden of proceeding and the burden of proof shall be upon the Enforcement Bureau as to issues (a) through (f) inclusive. 38. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard, the principal or principals of Business Options, Inc., pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, SHALL FILE with the Commission within 30 days of the mailing of this Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing a WRITTEN APPEARANCE stating that a principal or other legal representative from Business Options, Inc. will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the matters specified in the Show Cause Order. If
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-75A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-75A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-75A1.txt
  • to the designated hearing. Both the burden of proceeding and the burden of proof shall be upon the Enforcement Bureau as to issues (a) through (c) inclusive. 29. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard, the principal or principals of NOS Communications, Inc., Affinity Network Incorporated, and NOSVA Limited Partnership, pursuant to section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, SHALL FILE with the Commission within 30 days of the mailing of this Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing a WRITTEN APPEARANCE stating that a principal or other legal representative from NOS Communications, Inc., Affinity Network Incorporated, and NOSVA Limited Partnership will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the matters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-79A1.txt
  • NPRM, 17 FCC Rcd at 5630 ¶ 5. We do not expand the language of Section 1.937 to prohibit applications repeating renewal applications that were dismissed without prejudice, as this would bar a licensee whose renewal application was dismissed as late-filed, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.949(a), from seeking a new license to replace the expired license. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.91, 1.92. 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-79 Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-79 �@ˆþÿ D L T [ a b c d G H 0 G H 0 l‹ ­
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03D-02A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03D-02A1.txt
  • to Section 503(b)(3)(A) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), whether an Order of Forfeiture, in an amount not to exceed $82,500, shall be issued against any or each of the parties for having willfully and/or repeatedly violated Section 310(d) of the Act. (HDO at para. 12.) In addition, pursuant to Section 312(d) of the Act and Section 1.91(d) of the Commission's Rules, the HDO assigned to the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") the burden of proceeding with the introduction of evidence and the burden of proof on Issues (a) through (e). Pursuant to Section 309(e) of the Act and Section 1.254 of the Rules, the burden of proceeding with the introduction of evidence and the burden of proof on Issue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.txt
  • should information be brought to our attention at some later date suggesting that the parties to a spectrum lease implemented pursuant to this proposed forbearance option had not complied with the requirements and conditions we adopt for such action, the Commission could initiate a formal or informal investigation. Further Notice at ¶ 268 n.461; see 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.80, 1.89, 1.91, 1.92. Further Notice at ¶¶ 263-265. All parties commenting on the forbearance proposal supported the Commission's general approach. See, e.g., Blooston Rural Carriers Comments at 11-12; Cantor Fitzgerald Telecom Comments at 2; CTIA Comments at 2-4; Nextel Communications Comments at 6-9; Nextel Partners Reply Comments at 8; PCIA Comments at 5; RTG Comments at 2-5; SBC Comments at 7-10; Spectrum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.txt
  • either through assignment or transfer or through an application for a new facility. The allegations at issue here involve Hammond's truthfulness and reliability. Under these circumstances, we find it appropriate to prohibit Hammond's acquisition of additional licenses pending the outcome of the hearing. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 312(a) and 312(c) of the Act, and section 1.91 of the Commission's rules, that Terry Keith Hammond SHOW CAUSE why the license for Station KBKH(FM), Shamrock, Texas, SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. He shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent Order and provide evidence upon the following issues: 1. To determine the effect of Terry Keith Hammond's felony conviction
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-128A1.txt
  • Section 312 of the Act to determine whether CRS and Timothy M. Doty's licenses should be revoked because they lack the requisite character to be or remain Commission licensees. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a) of the Commission's rules, CRS and Timothy M. Doty are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why their respective captioned authorizations SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. CRS, by an officer representative, and Mr. Doty shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and provide evidence upon the following issues: to determine
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.txt
  • Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau and the 800 MHz Transition Administrator will provide for relocation of PCSI in accordance with the rebanding rules. Should we determine that PCSI is an unqualified licensee, however, PCSI's relocated licenses will be subject to revocation. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 312(a) and 312(c) of the Act, and section 1.91 of the Commission's Rules, that Preferred Acquisitions, Inc., its principals, and by extension its ultimate owner Preferred Communication Systems, Inc., and its principals, shall SHOW CAUSE why the referenced licenses SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED in a consolidated hearing proceeding. These entities shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.txt
  • issues, whether Buzz Telecom Corporation, Business Options, Inc., US Bell Corporation, Link Technologies, AVATAR, and/or their principals Kurtis J. Kintzel and/or Keanan Kintzel should be ordered to henceforth cease, desist and otherwise refrain from providing interstate common carrier services of any kind without prior written application to and consent from the Commission. 25. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard, Buzz Telecom Corporation, Business Options, Inc., US Bell Corporation, Link Technologies, AVATAR, and/or their principals Kurtis J. Kintzel and/or Keanan Kintzel, SHALL FILE with the Commission within 20 calendar days of the mailing of this Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-10A1.txt
  • n.12 and cases cited therein. See Peninsula Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 55 Fed. Appx. 1 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (per curiam). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(b)(1). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(n). We reject A-O's claim that the staff was without authority to order A-O to cease broadcasting without either convening a hearing under 47 C.F.R. § 1.91 or determining that a hearing was waived pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.92. Where the facts demonstrate that a station has failed to transmit broadcast signals for a consecutive 12-month period, Section 312(g) results in automatic cancellation, without requirement of a hearing. See 47 U.S.C. § 307(c); 5 U.S.C. § 558(c); 47 C.F.R. § 1.62. See Miami MDS Co., 14
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-147A1.txt
  • concerns about Floyd's propensity to deal truthfully with the Commission. Under the circumstances presented here, appropriate issues will be designated relating to the disposition of the applications and Floyd's character qualifications to be and remain a Commission licensee. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.91(a) of the Commission's Rules, Eddie Floyd is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his license for FM Translator Station K273AF, Carson City, NV, SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED in a proceeding before an administrative law judge, at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order, upon the following issues: To determine whether Eddie Floyd misrepresented material facts to,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • 0.0809 -0.352 (2.95) (1.99) (1.71) (0.98) (0.82) (1.17) (-0.75) (1.02) (1.63) (0.16) (0.85) (-1.06) Census_Blocs_uc -0.215* -0.279* -0.319 -0.406 0.0452 -0.0284 0.00157 -0. 247 -0.162 -0.164 -0.271 -0.241 (-2.23) (-2.29) (-0.83) (-0.80) (0.28) (-0.19) (0.01) (-0.90) (-1.01) ( -0.94) (-1.39) (-0.50) Census_Blocs_ua 0.163 -0.0922 -0.701 -0.0939 -0.173 0.344 0.0371 0.314 - 0.0927 -0.276 0.539** 0.930 (1.45) (-0.34) (-1.24) (-0.10) (-0.47) (1.91) (0.19) (0.57) (-0.58) (-0 .84) (3.22) (1.03) Constant 10.58*** 9.068*** 4.426*** 2.460* 7.735*** 7.748*** 4.921*** 7.261*** 7 .234*** 6.602*** 5.275*** 5.705*** (37.30) (23.73) (5.48) (2.26) (14.24) (17.77) (7.72) (7.26) (17.65) (12 .92) (14.24) (4.18) N 717 717 717 717 717 716 716 717 717 717 717 717 pseudo R2 0.5931 0.4839 0.3042 0.2747 0.4440 0.3142 0.3718 0.3920 0.5194 0.3818 0.4570
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98076.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98076.wp
  • notice of appearance or to appear at the hearing waives their right to a hearing. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.92 (stating in pertinent part, "[a]fter issuance of an order to show cause . . . calling upon a person to appear at a hearing before the Commission, the (1) fail[ure] to file a timely written appearance as prescribed in § 1.91(c) indicating that he will appear at a hearing and present evidence on the matters specified in the order" constitutes a waiver of such hearing). 33 Order, CC Docket No. 97-144, FCC 97M-125 (rel. July 17, 1997). 7 requirements of the Commission.26 Furthermore, the Commission sought to develop record evidence pertaining to Long Distance Services, Inc.'s failure to file tariffs covering
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • order mix. The calculations we make, and the resulting differences that we find for non-dispatch UNE-P orders (measured in days), are summarized in the Table below. Estimated Difference in Average Completed Intervals for Non-dispatch UNE-P Orders June July August BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff Carrier to carrier metrics data 1.25 3.20 -1.95* 0.99 2.55 -1.56* 1.07 1.91 -0.84* Using properly "W" coded CLEC orders 1.25 1.13 0.12 0.99 1.31 -0.32 1.07 2.36 -1.29 Adjustment to CLEC data for difference in standard intervals +0.53 +0.04 -0.62 CLEC data revised for alleged biases 1.25 1.68 -0.43* 0.99 1.35 -0.36* 1.07 1.74 -0.67* The top line in the table is the Average Completed Interval data reported in the Carrier to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • Rate MR-2-01-2200 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.2 0.19 0.18 0.14 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.09 0.12 0.19 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.2 0.19 0.23 0.1 0.19 0.51 0.32 0.38 MR-4 ­ Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2200 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total 5.25 5.2 5.04 4.31 a,b MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 4.57 1.91 4.39 8.28 2.96 2.72 c,d,e MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 3.61 NA 4.61 NA 3.89 NA MR-4-04-2200 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 100 100 97.83 100 a,b MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 100 100 100 100 100 100 c,d,e MR-4-04-2217 % Cleared (all troubles)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011489.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011489.html
  • notwithstanding the resolution of the foregoing issues, to determine whether an Order of Forfeiture should be issued against Mr. Brewer for having willfully and/or repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, on March 11, 2000. The OSC set the maximum forfeiture amount at $11,000. The OSC, at ¶ 21, ordered Mr. Brewer, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. The OSC explained that if Mr. Brewer failed to file a timely written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his captioned station licenses would be deemed waived, and the proceeding thereafter would
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01044.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01044.html
  • WSTX-FM were available for review during the April 13, 2000, inspection. Family apparently violated Section 73.3526 by failing to maintain public inspection files for WSTX(AM) and WSTX-FM and make the files available for review. We will add an issue to determine whether Family willfully or repeatedly violated Section 73.3526. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 1.91(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.91(a), and Sections 312(a) and 312(c) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 312(a) and 312(c), Family Broadcasting, Inc. IS DIRECTED TO SHOW CAUSE why the licenses for WSTX(AM) and WSTX-FM, Christiansted, U.S. Virgin Islands, should not be REVOKED, at a hearing before an FCC Administrative Law Judge, at a time and place to be
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01074.html
  • Brewer for having willfully and/or repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act on March 11, 2000, in an amount not to exceed $11,000. 20. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 503(b)(3)(A) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(3)(A), that, in connection with the potential forfeiture liability noted above, this document constitutes notice. 21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.91(c), that, to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard and to present evidence at the hearing in this proceeding on the matter of his captioned Amateur radio station and GMRS licenses, Leslie D. Brewer, in person or by his attorney, shall file, within 15 calendar days after receipt of this Order, a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-173A1.html
  • Section 312(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, both the burden of proceeding and the burden of proof shall be upon the Enforcement Bureau as to issues (a) through (r) inclusive. 1. 48. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard, the principal or principals of the Publix Companies, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, SHALL FILE with the Commission within 30 days of the mailing of this Show Cause Order a WRITTEN APPEARANCE stating that a principal or other legal representative from the Publix Companies will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the matters specified in the Show Cause Order. If the Publix Companies fail to file a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-319A1.html
  • (Commission found the licensee's repeated failure to respond to staff inquiries dilatory and warranting of designation); In re Revocation of the License of Shedd-Agard Broadcasting, Inc. (KLSU), 41 FCC 2d 93 (I.D. 1973). IV. Ordering Clauses 15. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Sections 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4) and 312(c) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4) and 312(c), and Section 1.91 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.91, RMI is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why its license for broadcast station WMGA(AM), Moultrie, Georgia, SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. RMI shall appear before an Administrative Law Judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent Administrative Law Judge order and give evidence upon the following issues: (a) To determine
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-32A1.html
  • defiance raises extremely serious questions as to whether Peninsula has the character qualifications to continue as a licensee, regardless of whether it ultimately prevails in court on the appeal of our May 2001 MO&O. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Sections 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4) and 312(c) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4) and 312(c), and section 1.91 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.91, Peninsula Communications, Inc. is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why its licenses for broadcast stations KGTL, Homer; KXBA(FM), Nikiski; KWVV-FM, Homer; KPEN-FM, Soldotna; and its licenses for FM translator stations K292ED, Kachemak City; K295DU, Homer; K285EG and K272DG, Seward, all in Alaska, SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. In the event the D.C. Circuit reinstates
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3513A1.html
  • notwithstanding the resolution of the designated issues, to determine whether the Commission should impose a monetary forfeiture against RMI for having willfully and repeatedly violated numerous statutory and regulatory provisions administered by the Commission.6 In accordance with Section 1.80 of the Commission's rules,7 the OSC set the maximum forfeiture amount at $300,000.8 4. The OSC ordered RMI, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules,9 within thirty days of its receipt of the OSC (i.e., by December 26, 2002), to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard.10 The OSC admonished RMI that, if it failed to so file a written notice of appearance, its right to a hearing on the matter
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-68A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau, shall be a party to the designated hearing. Both the burden of proceeding and the burden of proof shall be upon the Enforcement Bureau as to issues (a) through (f) inclusive. 1. 38. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard, the principal or principals of Business Options, Inc., pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, SHALL FILE with the Commission within 30 days of the mailing of this Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing a WRITTEN APPEARANCE stating that a principal or other legal representative from Business Options, Inc. will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the matters specified in the Show Cause Order. If
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-75A1.html
  • to the designated hearing. Both the burden of proceeding and the burden of proof shall be upon the Enforcement Bureau as to issues (a) through (c) inclusive. 29. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard, the principal or principals of NOS Communications, Inc., Affinity Network Incorporated, and NOSVA Limited Partnership, pursuant to section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, SHALL FILE with the Commission within 30 days of the mailing of this Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing a WRITTEN APPEARANCE stating that a principal or other legal representative from NOS Communications, Inc., Affinity Network Incorporated, and NOSVA Limited Partnership will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the matters
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1068A1.html
  • his qualifications to be and to remain a Commission licensee; and (b) to determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing issue, whether Roger Thomas Scaggs is qualified to be and to remain a Commission licensee and whether his Amateur Radio Advanced Class License W5EBC be should revoked. 3. The OSC ordered Mr. Scaggs, pursuant to section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules,3 within thirty days of the date of release of the OSC (i.e., by December 22, 2003), in person or by his attorney, to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard.4 The OSC provided that the notice of appearance state that Mr. Scaggs would appear on the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1704A1.html
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 0.111(a)(17). 2 47 C.F.R. 95.631. 3 Order to Show Cause, 19 FCC Rcd 2564 (2004) (``OSC''). 4 47 C.F.R. 2.939(b) states: ``Revocation of an equipment authorization shall be made in the same manner as revocation of radio station licenses.'' Revocation of radio station licenses is governed by sections 1.91 and 1.92 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.91, 1.92. Consequently, we will refer to those rules herein. 5 See 47 C.F.R. 1.91(c). 6 See also 47 C.F.R. 1.92(c). That rule provides that, whenever a hearing is waived, the presiding administrative law judge shall, at the earliest practicable date, issue an order reciting the events or circumstances constituting a waiver
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1014A1.html
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 0.111(a)(17). 2 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). 3 Order to Show Cause, 20 FCC Rcd 1668 (2005) (``OSC''). 4 47 C.F.R. 2.939(b) states: ``Revocation of an equipment authorization shall be made in the same manner as revocation of radio station licenses.'' Revocation of radio station licenses is governed by sections 1.91 and 1.92 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.91, 1.92. Consequently, we will refer to those rules herein. 5 See 47 C.F.R. 1.91(c). 6 See also 47 C.F.R. 1.92(c). This rule provides that, whenever a hearing is waived, the Presiding Administrative Law Judge shall, at the earliest practicable date, issue an order reciting the events or circumstances constituting a waiver
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1889A1.html
  • for Station K216EQ, and requested dismissal of its above-captioned construction permit application. 10. Section 1.92(a)(1) of the Commission's rules provides that the failure to file the requisite notice of appearance constitutes a waiver of the right to a hearing with regard to the issues specified in the OSC.27 Having failed to file a timely written appearance as prescribed by section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, KCI waived its right to a hearing on the specified issues.28 However, in light of KCI's surrender of its license for Station K216EQ and the Media Bureau's subsequent cancellation of that license, revocation of that license has become moot. Consequently, in accordance with section 1.92(d) of the Commission's rules, we dismiss the hearing proceeding. Moreover, in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2015A1.html
  • hereby designate the matter for hearing before a Commission administrative law judge to provide Mr. Cox with an opportunity to demonstrate why his license should not be revoked. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,12 and authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules,13 David Edward Cox is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio Advanced Class License W5OER SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. David Edward Cox shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and provide evidence upon the following issues: (a) to determine the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1570A1.html
  • hereby designate the matter for hearing before a Commission administrative law judge to provide Mr. Landis with an opportunity to demonstrate why his license should not be revoked. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules, Robert D. Landis is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio Advanced Class License N6FRV SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. Robert D. Landis shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and provide evidence upon the following issues: (a) to determine the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2463A1.html
  • convictions on his qualifications to be and to remain a Commission licensee; and (b) to determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing issue, whether David Edward Cox is qualified to be and to remain a Commission licensee and whether his Amateur Radio License W5OER should be revoked. 3. The OSC ordered Mr. Cox, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, within thirty (30) days of the date of release of the OSC (i.e., by October 30, 2005), in person or by his attorney, to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. The OSC required that the notice of appearance state that Mr. Cox would appear on
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-124A1.html
  • assignment or transfer or through an application for a new facility. The allegations at issue here involve Hammond's truthfulness and reliability. Under these circumstances, we find it appropriate to prohibit Hammond's acquisition of additional licenses pending the outcome of the hearing. III. ORDERING CLAUSES 27. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 312(a) and 312(c) of the Act, and section 1.91 of the Commission's rules, that Terry Keith Hammond SHOW CAUSE why the license for Station KBKH(FM), Shamrock, Texas, SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. He shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent Order and provide evidence upon the following issues: 1. To determine the effect of Terry Keith Hammond's felony conviction
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-128A1.html
  • 312 of the Act to determine whether CRS and Timothy M. Doty's licenses should be revoked because they lack the requisite character to be or remain Commission licensees. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 15. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a) of the Commission's rules, CRS and Timothy M. Doty are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why their respective captioned authorizations SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. CRS, by an officer representative, and Mr. Doty shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and provide evidence upon the following issues: 1. to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-377A1.html
  • amateur radio authorization. Consequently, we will commence a hearing proceeding before an administrative law judge to provide Mr. Titus with an opportunity to demonstrate why his above-captioned license should not be revoked. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. ACCORDINGLY, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules, David L. Titus is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio Station KB7ILD SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED in a proceeding before an administrative law judge, at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order, upon the following issues: (a) to determine the effect of David L. Titus' felony conviction(s)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4675A1.html
  • hereby designate the matter for hearing before a Commission administrative law judge to provide Mr. Keeney with an opportunity to demonstrate why his license should not be revoked. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules, Lonnie L. Keeney is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio License KB9RFO should not be revoked. Lonnie L. Keeney shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and provide evidence upon the following issues: (a) to determine the effect of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4676A1.html
  • convictions on his qualifications to be and to remain a Commission licensee; and (b) to determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing issue, whether Robert D. Landis is qualified to be and to remain a Commission licensee and whether his Amateur Radio License N6FRV should be revoked. 3. The OSC ordered Mr. Landis, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's Rules, to file a written notice of appearance within 30 days of the OSC's release, August 31, 2006. The OSC further required the notice of appearance to state that Mr. Landis would appear on the hearing date and present evidence on the specified issues. In addition, the OSC informed Mr. Landis that, if he failed to so
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-125A1.html
  • Safety and Homeland Security Bureau and the 800 MHz Transition Administrator will provide for relocation of PCSI in accordance with the rebanding rules. Should we determine that PCSI is an unqualified licensee, however, PCSI's relocated licenses will be subject to revocation. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 59. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 312(a) and 312(c) of the Act, and section 1.91 of the Commission's Rules, that Preferred Acquisitions, Inc., its principals, and by extension its ultimate owner Preferred Communication Systems, Inc., and its principals, shall SHOW CAUSE why the referenced licenses SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED in a consolidated hearing proceeding. These entities shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent Order
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-165A1.html
  • issues, whether Buzz Telecom Corporation, Business Options, Inc., US Bell Corporation, Link Technologies, AVATAR, and/or their principals Kurtis J. Kintzel and/or Keanan Kintzel should be ordered to henceforth cease, desist and otherwise refrain from providing interstate common carrier services of any kind without prior written application to and consent from the Commission. 25. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard, Buzz Telecom Corporation, Business Options, Inc., US Bell Corporation, Link Technologies, AVATAR, and/or their principals Kurtis J. Kintzel and/or Keanan Kintzel, SHALL FILE with the Commission within 20 calendar days of the mailing of this Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1370A1.html
  • the Commission's rules, in an amount not to exceed $325,000; Sections 73.1350(a), 73.1560(b) and (d), and 73.1745(a) of the Commission's rules, in an amount not to exceed $325,000; and Section 11.35(a) of the Commission's rules, in an amount not to exceed $325,000; for any such violations that occurred or continued within the applicable statute of limitations. 6. Pursuant to Section 1.91(c) and Section 1.221(c) of the Commission's rules, the Hearing Designation Order ordered Mr. Hammond, to file a written notice of appearance stating that he would appear on the specified hearing date and present evidence on the designated issues. In addition, the Hearing Designation Order informed Mr. Hammond that if he failed to file a written notice of appearance, the Station's
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
  • Co., Ltd. ) File No.: EB-10-SE-164 Grantee of Equipment Authorization, ) FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM FRN: 0019109180 ) ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING Adopted: February 9, 2011 Released: February 9, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Order to Show Cause, we commence a hearing proceeding pursuant to sections 1.91 and 2.939 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") regarding the device manufactured and marketed under FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM with the brand name "TxTStopper(TM)". The TxTStopper(TM) device was marketed in the United States and apparently has the capability to block, jam, or otherwise interfere with the operation of authorized wireless communications, in violation of sections 302(b) and 333 of the Communications
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00314.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00314.txt
  • 13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in connection with the potential forfeiture liability noted above, this document constitutes notice, pursuant to Section 503(b)(3)(A) of the Act. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard and to avail themselves of the right to present evidence at a hearing in these proceedings, pursuant to §§ 1.91(c) and 1.221(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§1.91(c) and 1.221(c), licensees Ronald Brasher, Patricia Brasher, David Brasher, D.L. Brasher, Carolyn S. Lutz, Jim Sumpter, Norma Sumpter, Melissa Sumpter, Jennifer Hill, DLB Enterprises, Inc. and Metroplex Two-Way Radio Service, in person or by their attorneys, shall each file, within 30 days after receipt of this Order, a written appearance stating
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98076.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98076.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98076.wp
  • notice of appearance or to appear at the hearing waives their right to a hearing. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.92 (stating in pertinent part, "[a]fter issuance of an order to show cause . . . calling upon a person to appear at a hearing before the Commission, the (1) fail[ure] to file a timely written appearance as prescribed in § 1.91(c) indicating that he will appear at a hearing and present evidence on the matters specified in the order" constitutes a waiver of such hearing). 33 Order, CC Docket No. 97-144, FCC 97M-125 (rel. July 17, 1997). 7 requirements of the Commission.26 Furthermore, the Commission sought to develop record evidence pertaining to Long Distance Services, Inc.'s failure to file tariffs covering
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • order mix. The calculations we make, and the resulting differences that we find for non-dispatch UNE-P orders (measured in days), are summarized in the Table below. Estimated Difference in Average Completed Intervals for Non-dispatch UNE-P Orders June July August BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff Carrier to carrier metrics data 1.25 3.20 -1.95* 0.99 2.55 -1.56* 1.07 1.91 -0.84* Using properly "W" coded CLEC orders 1.25 1.13 0.12 0.99 1.31 -0.32 1.07 2.36 -1.29 Adjustment to CLEC data for difference in standard intervals +0.53 +0.04 -0.62 CLEC data revised for alleged biases 1.25 1.68 -0.43* 0.99 1.35 -0.36* 1.07 1.74 -0.67* The top line in the table is the Average Completed Interval data reported in the Carrier to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data Acknowledgement Message Completeness F.12.2.1 EDI/Region (%) 100.00% 99.62% 99.97% 99.94% 100.00% F.12.2.2 TAG/Region (%) 99.99% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% General - Database Updates Average Database Update Interval F.13.1.1 LIDB/FL (hours) 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.82 1.82 1.56 1.55 1.91 1.91 F.13.1.2 Directory Listings/FL (hours) 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 F.13.1.3 Directory Assistance/FL (hours) 4.08 4.05 5.90 5.90 3.69 3.66 4.59 4.59 3.60 3.59 % Update Accuracy F.13.2.1 LIDB/FL (%) 100.00% 93.48% 99.36% 99.48% 99.93% F.13.2.2 Directory Listings/FL (%) 99.79% 99.35% 99.18% 99.66% 99.76% F.13.2.3 Directory Assistance/FL (%) 97.87% 99.19% 98.10% 98.56% 99.38% % NXXs
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 2.85 1.69 1.35 2.98 1.77 1.48 3.11 1.85 1.53 1982 1.05 $0.65 $0.61 1.42 $0.89 $0.84 1.80 $1.12 $1.05 2.33 1.46 1.39 2.45 1.45 1.44 2.62 1.65 1.54 2.69 1.69 1.60 2.76 1.73 1.63 3.09 1.93 1.82 1983 1.05 0.92 0.89 1.42 1.26 1.19 1.80 1.39 1.30 2.33 1.61 1.59 2.45 1.70 1.68 2.62 1.81 1.72 2.69 1.86 1.80 2.76 1.91 1.82 3.09 2.13 1.99 1984 0.99 0.90 0.97 1.36 1.21 1.31 1.67 1.55 1.65 2.21 2.05 2.09 2.32 2.19 2.23 2.43 2.25 2.33 2.50 2.40 2.43 2.57 2.47 2.49 2.89 2.73 2.69 1985 1.18 1.10 1.12 1.55 1.44 1.32 1.80 1.71 1.45 2.08 1.98 2.05 2.19 2.09 2.13 2.31 2.14 2.25 2.38 2.32 2.30 2.44 2.40 2.36 2.65 2.59 2.56
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 35.52 47.30 55.00 57.81 57.81 State City Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities - Continued (As of October 15) Table 1.5 Standard Rate in Cities with Subsidy Plan Subsidy-Plan Rate Benefit (a) (b) (a) - (b) Representative Monthly Charge $14.55 $8.05 Federal and State Subscriber Line Charges 5.64 0.16 Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 3.14 1.91 Total Monthly Charge 1 $23.33 $10.12 $13.21 Basic Connection Charge $39.57 $11.92 Taxes 2.82 0.75 Total Connection Charge 1 $42.39 $12.67 $29.73 1Averages are for the 95 cities with subsidized monthly rates and connection assistance plans. Table 1.6 Comparison of Standard Local Telephone Rates to Lifeline and LinkUp Rates (As of October 15, 2002) Lifeline and LinkUp Rates in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 589 950 1,018 1,007 909 720 511 2001 629 1,001 1,035 1,072 926 746 551 2002 641 1,032 1,096 1,109 981 794 579 1980 2.27% 1.97% 1.89% 1.84% 1.82% 1981 2.43 2.04 1.89 1.96 2.09 1982 2.34 2.07 1.87 2.06 2.12 1983 2.32 2.23 1.87 2.07 2.05 1984 2.17 2.02 1.92 1.94 1.93 2.15% 2.39% 1985 2.35 1.92 1.81 1.86 1.91 2.10 2.29 1986 2.42 2.03 1.75 1.80 1.95 2.28 2.59 1987 2.65 2.08 1.86 1.91 2.03 2.12 2.68 1988 2.55 2.07 1.87 2.01 2.11 2.28 2.53 1989 2.39 2.18 1.80 1.99 1.98 2.30 2.26 1990 2.60 2.15 1.92 2.03 2.02 2.28 2.43 1991 2.81 2.15 1.88 2.11 2.01 2.16 2.38 1992 2.72 2.19 1.88 2.01 2.06 2.20 2.37 1993 2.93
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 629 1,001 1,035 1,072 926 746 551 2002 641 1,032 1,096 1,109 981 794 579 2003 616 1,001 1,097 1,156 981 773 572 1980 2.27% 1.97% 1.89% 1.84% 1.82% 1981 2.43 2.04 1.89 1.96 2.09 1982 2.34 2.07 1.87 2.06 2.12 1983 2.32 2.23 1.87 2.07 2.05 1984 2.17 2.02 1.92 1.94 1.93 2.15% 2.39% 1985 2.35 1.92 1.81 1.86 1.91 2.10 2.29 1986 2.42 2.03 1.75 1.80 1.95 2.28 2.59 1987 2.65 2.08 1.86 1.91 2.03 2.12 2.68 1988 2.55 2.07 1.87 2.01 2.11 2.28 2.53 1989 2.39 2.18 1.80 1.99 1.98 2.30 2.26 1990 2.60 2.15 1.92 2.03 2.02 2.28 2.43 1991 2.81 2.15 1.88 2.11 2.01 2.16 2.38 1992 2.72 2.19 1.88 2.01 2.06 2.20 2.37 1993 2.93
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 17.23 17.57 17.38 17.08 Subscriber Line Charges 3.54 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.55 3.55 3.54 Extra for Touch-tone 2.48 2.39 1.87 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 Tax including 911 charges 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.00 Total monthly charge 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.71 Additional local five-minute call 0.093 0.093 0.091 0.093 0.094 0.092 0.091 Inside wiring maintenance 1.78 1.91 2.05 2.03 2.08 2.26 2.39 Rotary connection charge 71.05 71.36 72.75 72.55 71.41 69.88 67.87 Extra for Touch-tone 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 Tax 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.18 Total charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.32 Additional charge if drop line and connection block are needed 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 Some
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • - GTID) 49,469 31,230 18,240 47,085 38.74 0 0 27Verizon Northwest Inc. (Oregon - GTOR) 107,461 63,849 43,612 137,619 31.69 0 0 28Verizon Northwest Inc. (Washington - COWA) 20,373 11,362 9,012 22,494 40.06 0 0 29Verizon Northwest Inc. (Washington - GTWA) 181,206 99,460 81,746 240,202 34.03 0 0 30Verizon Northwest, Inc. (West Coast CA - GNCA) 2,174 2,095 78 4,094 1.91 0 0 31Verizon South Inc. (Alabama - GTAL) 40,473 29,898 10,575 44,031 24.02 0 0 32Verizon South Inc. (Kentucky - COKY) 24,934 17,315 7,619 24,617 30.95 0 0 33Verizon South Inc. (Kentucky - GTKY) 93,548 61,769 31,778 116,793 27.21 0 0 34Verizon South Inc. (North Carolina - GTNC) 58,428 36,829 21,599 71,802 30.08 0 0 35Verizon South Inc. (North Carolina
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • 32.47 29.06 23.61 22 Verizon North/Contel South (GTMI + GLMI = GAMI) 15.11 16.64 17.49 16.45 15.75 13.17 15.33 23 Verizon North/Verizon South (GTIL + GLIL = GAIL) 22.82 21.54 23.67 23.90 22.35 23.07 21.59 24 Verizon Northwest Inc. (Oregon - GTOR) 26.40 26.10 31.69 30.95 31.56 27.03 28.23 25 Verizon Northwest Inc. (West Coast CA - GNCA) (14.17) (5.17) 1.91 (8.35) (9.93) (6.85) (25.83) 26 Verizon Northwest Inc. (Washington - COWA) 37.26 31.57 40.06 39.49 39.17 30.41 31.85 27 Verizon Northwest Inc. (Washington - GTWA) 30.24 28.97 34.03 33.26 32.91 27.33 24.41 28 Verizon Northwest Inc. (Idaho - GTID) 28.19 33.01 38.74 34.17 32.24 30.89 30.52 29 Verizon South Inc. (North Carolina - GTNC) 16.82 23.45 30.08 26.44 24.85 27.92
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 4.11 INDIANA 1,550 2,353 3,903 1.96 IOWA 827 1,089 1,917 0.96 KANSAS 821 1,036 1,857 0.93 KENTUCKY 1,188 1,540 2,729 1.37 LOUISIANA 1,129 1,680 2,809 1.41 MAINE 424 461 886 0.45 MARYLAND 1,779 2,091 3,869 1.94 MASSACHUSETTS 2,457 2,670 5,127 2.58 MICHIGAN 2,265 4,320 6,586 3.31 MINNESOTA 1,373 1,769 3,142 1.58 MISSISSIPPI 727 918 1,645 0.83 MISSOURI 1,684 2,110 3,794 1.91 MONTANA 307 338 646 0.32 NEBRASKA 553 785 1,338 0.67 NEVADA 2,075 1,151 3,226 1.62 NEW HAMPSHIRE 580 425 1,005 0.51 NEW JERSEY 3,618 3,541 7,159 3.60 NEW MEXICO 595 557 1,152 0.58 NEW YORK 6,860 8,732 15,592 7.84 NORTH CAROLINA 2,332 3,373 5,705 2.87 NORTH DAKOTA 236 267 503 0.25 OHIO 3,081 5,306 8,387 4.21 OKLAHOMA 938 1,101 2,039
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • (0.07) NORTH DAKOTA 11,317 2.40 1,094 0.23 10,223 2.16 OHIO 5,138 0.07 14,267 0.18 (9,129) (0.12) OKLAHOMA 17,182 0.77 4,821 0.21 12,361 0.55 OREGON 8,152 0.36 6,100 0.27 2,052 0.09 PENNSYLVANIA 10,012 0.11 18,531 0.20 (8,519) (0.09) RHODE ISLAND 0 0.00 2,004 0.27 (2,004) (0.27) SOUTH CAROLINA 15,650 0.64 5,848 0.24 9,802 0.40 SOUTH DAKOTA 10,288 2.17 1,251 0.26 9,037 1.91 TENNESSEE 11,659 0.31 8,471 0.22 3,189 0.08 TEXAS 19,429 0.14 24,144 0.18 (4,715) (0.03) UTAH 4,547 0.37 3,132 0.26 1,415 0.12 VERMONT 4,880 1.07 1,350 0.30 3,530 0.77 VIRGINIA 5,419 0.11 13,066 0.26 (7,646) (0.15) WASHINGTON 7,570 0.19 9,406 0.24 (1,836) (0.05) WEST VIRGINIA 3,245 0.29 2,605 0.23 641 0.06 WISCONSIN 25,433 0.67 6,800 0.18 18,633 0.49 WYOMING 4,134 1.26
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • DIST. OF COLUMBIA 0 0.00 4,483 0.41 (4,483) (0.41) FLORIDA 11,301 0.09 54,865 0.44 (43,564) (0.35) GEORGIA 41,660 0.73 26,689 0.47 14,971 0.26 HAWAII 0 0.00 3,374 0.40 (3,374) (0.40) IDAHO 19,506 2.39 4,203 0.51 15,303 1.87 ILLINOIS 5,717 0.06 35,882 0.37 (30,165) (0.31) INDIANA 2,923 0.07 15,279 0.37 (12,356) (0.30) IOWA 5,682 0.30 8,032 0.42 (2,350) (0.12) KANSAS 36,263 1.91 8,078 0.42 28,185 1.48 KENTUCKY 14,146 0.57 10,299 0.42 3,847 0.16 LOUISIANA 41,626 1.42 11,191 0.38 30,435 1.04 MAINE 5,142 0.53 3,711 0.38 1,432 0.15 MARYLAND 0 0.00 18,190 0.43 (18,190) (0.43) MASSACHUSETTS 7 0.00 22,936 0.43 (22,930) (0.43) MICHIGAN 13,982 0.19 23,016 0.31 (9,034) (0.12) MINNESOTA 8,924 0.26 14,258 0.41 (5,333) (0.15) MISSISSIPPI 18,339 1.16 6,764 0.43 11,575 0.73
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • USF Loops 1/ Table A-3 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues: 1999 (Dollars in Millions) 1 6 Revenues Interstate for Total Allocation Revenues Alabama $1,142 1.73%$1,093 $4 $1,172 $59.59 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 1,061 1.61 1,016 4 1,089 55.39 Arkansas 581 0.88 556 2 596 30.31 California 6,703 10.18 6,419 22 6,881 349.85 Colorado 1,254 1.91 1,201 4 1,288 65.47 Connecticut 739 1.12 707 2 758 38.55 Delaware 173 0.26 165 1 177 9.01 District of Columbia 374 0.57 358 1 384 19.54 Florida 4,067 6.18 3,894 13 4,175 212.27 Georgia 2,449 3.72 2,345 8 2,514 127.81 Hawaii 320 0.49 306 1 328 16.68 Idaho 256 0.39 245 1 262 13.34 Illinois 3,131 4.76 2,998 10
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Non-Traffic Sensitive Per Switched Minute 2/ Traffic Sensitive Per Switched Minute Minute 1/ Carrier Common Line Per Terminating Access Minute 1/ Carrier Common Line Per Originating Access 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • 0.95 8.5 KANSAS 1,879 0.94 2,083 0.94 10.9 KENTUCKY 2,761 1.39 3,044 1.37 10.3 LOUISIANA 2,842 1.43 3,108 1.40 9.4 MAINE 896 0.45 1,009 0.45 12.7 MARYLAND 3,918 1.97 4,422 1.99 12.9 MASSACHUSETTS 5,190 2.61 5,711 2.57 10.0 MICHIGAN 6,652 3.34 7,511 3.38 12.9 MINNESOTA 3,180 1.60 3,592 1.62 13.0 MISSISSIPPI 1,665 0.84 1,827 0.82 9.7 MISSOURI 3,838 1.93 4,246 1.91 10.6 MONTANA 654 0.33 724 0.33 10.8 NEBRASKA 1,353 0.68 1,495 0.67 10.5 NEVADA 1,157 0.58 1,370 0.62 18.5 NEW HAMPSHIRE 1,019 0.51 1,158 0.52 13.7 NEW JERSEY 7,249 3.64 8,125 3.66 12.1 NEW MEXICO 1,167 0.59 1,319 0.59 13.0 NEW YORK 15,780 7.92 16,938 7.62 7.3 NORTH CAROLINA 5,772 2.90 6,382 2.87 10.6 NORTH DAKOTA 509 0.26 633 0.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/014/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. 1/ This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 Source: Access tariff filings. 4 Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. 1 This
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Minute 2 Traffic Sensitive per Switched Minute
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/02 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. 1/ This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Minute 2 Traffic Sensitive per Switched Minute Non-Traffic Minute 1 Carrier Common Line per Terminating Access Minute 1 Carrier Common Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 0.79 0.72 0.14 0.13 India 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 Israel 24/ 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 Italy 2.15 2.14 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 Jamaica 1.75 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 24/ 1.76 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 Korea, Rep. 2.36 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 25/ 0.89 0.79 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.48 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.29 3.56 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 Netherlands 1.45 1.56 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • 0.46 56 Maryland 2,073,605 463,275 1,232,091 4.67 6.07 6.11 240 2.22 273 Massachusetts 2,239,130 448,391 1,305,423 4.67 6.40 8.02 286 2.64 324 Michigan 3,438,605 519,669 1,859,744 4.63 5.54 6.30 366 3.39 416 Minnesota 1,812,266 208,226 979,404 4.46 5.64 6.29 185 1.71 210 Mississippi 884,147 136,158 341,793 4.60 6.96 7.72 92 0.85 104 Missouri 2,102,761 361,675 809,272 4.57 5.80 6.85 207 1.91 235 Montana 360,013 28,056 162,347 4.31 7.00 8.15 37 0.34 42 Nebraska 567,175 54,602 313,174 4.54 6.14 7.18 62 0.57 70 Nevada 740,530 184,464 406,162 4.14 5.13 5.93 77 0.71 87 New Hampshire 510,848 94,012 207,060 4.59 6.40 7.88 55 0.51 62 New Jersey 3,160,492 1,378,591 2,179,089 4.67 6.18 6.25 443 4.09 502 New Mexico 608,961 75,266 294,582 4.62 7.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • Total High Cost Support Alabama $0.51 $1.42 $0.26 $0.72 $0.09 $0.22 $3.23 Alaska 8.00 0.00 3.19 0.00 0.92 2.52 14.62 American Samoa 0.00 0.00 2.16 0.00 0.20 4.15 6.51 Arizona 0.72 0.00 0.09 0.52 0.07 0.33 1.73 Arkansas 2.90 0.00 0.84 0.34 0.62 0.44 5.14 California 0.12 0.00 0.05 0.11 0.01 0.02 0.30 Colorado 0.92 0.00 0.37 0.44 0.06 0.13 1.91 Connecticut 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.06 Delaware 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.05 Dist. of Columbia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Florida 0.10 0.00 0.04 0.45 0.02 0.03 0.64 Georgia 0.92 0.00 0.30 0.22 0.12 0.22 1.78 Guam 0.00 0.00 2.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.94 Hawaii 0.23 0.00 0.01 0.26 0.28 0.21 0.99 Idaho 2.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • 8.45 983,491 2.04 Vermont 102,049 1,692,192 16.58 1,113,995 10.92 578,197 5.67 Virgin Islands 19,459 834,949 42.91 683,306 35.12 151,643 7.79 Virginia 1,144,915 18,812,132 16.43 15,156,142 13.24 3,655,990 3.19 Washington 1,004,770 18,535,506 18.45 13,965,712 13.90 4,569,794 4.55 West Virginia 286,367 5,646,336 19.72 3,608,578 12.60 2,037,758 7.12 Wisconsin 879,476 24,986,284 28.41 20,589,744 23.41 4,396,539 5.00 Wyoming 89,940 1,126,356 12.52 954,374 10.61 171,982 1.91 Totals 47,913,141 $2,084,261,688 $43.50 $1,733,237,770 $36.17 $351,023,918 $7.33 Source: Raw funding data provided by the Universal Service Administrative Company, rollups performed by Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, FCC. Activity through May 29, 2003. Because of the appeals process, funding commitments and disbursements have been made after the end of the program year. Also, disbursements may continue beyond
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Minute* Access Traffic Sensitive per Switched Carrier Common Line per Terminating per Originating Minute* Common Line Rates in Effect Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Non-Traffic Sensitive Total Charge per Carrier Access Although
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • Carolina 1,110 1.73 1,090 7 1,236 71 South Dakota 142 0.22 139 1 158 9 Tennessee 1,433 2.23 1,408 8 1,595 91 Texas 5,312 8.27 5,217 31 5,913 338 Utah 424 0.66 416 2 472 27 Vermont 161 0.25 158 1 179 10 Virginia 1,565 2.44 1,537 9 1,742 100 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 1,225 1.91 1,203 7 1,363 78 West Virginia 438 0.68 430 3 487 28 Wisconsin 1,186 1.85 1,165 7 1,321 76 Wyoming 134 0.21 131 1 149 9 Total 1/ $64,236 100.00% $63,306 $378 $71,759 $4,110 NA - Not Applicable. Note: Incumbent local exchange revenues exclude SLC. Figures may not add due to rounding. 1/ Totals in the last four columns include
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -1.60 1.98 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Total -0.91 -2.44 1.57 0.00 575020 C VERIZON WASHINGTON, DC INC. -0.91 -2.44 1.57 0.00 FLORIDA Total -4.19 -2.36 -1.87 -15.68 210291 C GTC, INC. 7.92 -0.56 8.53 22.49 210318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH-FL 1.01 -0.65 1.67 -34.32 210328 C VERIZON FLORIDA INC. -5.29 -2.31 -3.05 0.00 210329 C GTC, INC. 10.92 1.91 8.84 113.63 210330 C SMART CITY TELECOMMUNICATIONS LLC DBA SM.CITY -13.47 -10.45 -3.37 -19.68 210331 C ITS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. -5.09 0.31 -5.38 -18.63 210335 C NORTHEAST FLORIDA TEL. CO., INC. 9.21 -2.32 11.80 26.85 210336 C ALLTEL FLORIDA, INC. -5.25 -1.16 -4.14 -100.00 210338 C QUINCY TEL. CO.-FL DIV. -4.18 0.39 -4.55 -28.85 210339 C GTC, INC. 0.87 0.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. From
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/0006/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/0012/31/00 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. The average rates reported here do not include the average revenue per minute from
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 10.30 34.95 Rhode Island -4.25 2.59 -6.66 0.00 South Carolina 3.79 3.62 0.17 1.23 South Dakota 2.74 2.72 0.02 32.34 Tennessee 3.41 2.33 1.05 8.07 Texas 3.92 4.42 -0.48 4.17 Utah -2.41 3.36 -5.58 12.49 Vermont -1.74 3.58 -5.14 2.81 Virgin Islands 5.04 6.32 -1.20 2.39 Virginia 3.98 4.11 -0.12 -8.11 Washington 1.44 2.36 -0.90 -1.76 West Virginia 4.76 2.79 1.91 19.03 Wisconsin 0.07 2.54 -2.40 15.61 Wyoming -0.98 2.48 -3.37 -6.70 Industry Total 3.03 2.86 0.17 5.14 * Percentage changes from 2000 to 2001 3 - 24 Jurisdiction 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Alabama 609,062,745 631,828,641 662,073,026 668,647,749 686,660,612 Alaska 138,268,783 140,494,745 152,545,647 159,510,611 180,793,714 American Samoa 0 0 3,043,804 3,074,550 2,903,858 Arizona 706,764,207 786,337,269 834,038,873 848,586,754 882,909,510 Arkansas 443,288,187
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • Delaware 178 0.26 170 1 186 10 District of Columbia 379 0.56 362 1 397 22 Florida 4,150 6.09 3,961 13 4,344 240 Georgia 2,536 3.72 2,421 8 2,655 147 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 286 0.42 273 1 300 17 Idaho 273 0.40 260 1 285 16 Illinois 3,285 4.82 3,136 10 3,439 190 Indiana 1,300 1.91 1,241 4 1,362 75 Iowa 469 0.69 448 1 491 27 Kansas 631 0.93 602 2 660 37 Kentucky 991 1.45 946 3 1,037 57 Louisiana 1,253 1.84 1,196 4 1,312 73 Maine 285 0.42 272 1 299 17 Maryland 1,412 2.07 1,348 4 1,479 82 Massachusetts 1,500 2.20 1,432 5 1,571 87 Michigan 2,120 3.11 2,024 7 2,220 123
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • India 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.85 Israel 10/ 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 2.15 2.14 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20 Jamaica 1.75 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 Japan 10/ 1.76 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.26 Korea, Rep. 2.36 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 Mexico 11/ 0.89 0.791 0.75 0.715 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.29 3.56 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.75 Netherlands 1.45 1.56 1.29 0.69
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 0.13 India 2.25 2.25 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.85 0.85 Israel 10/ 2.40 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 2.14 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 Jamaica 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 0.38 Japan 10/ 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.27 Korea, Rep. 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 Mexico 11/ 0.79 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.56 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.76 0.77 0.76 Netherlands 1.56 1.29 0.69
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 1.58 1.26 1.67 1.06 0.95 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM BERMUDA INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.34 1.02 0.94 1.22 0.94 0.85 ALL OTHER* 1.44 1.19 1.09 1.29 1.19 1.05 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM BRAZIL INTERNATIONAL DIAL 2.00 1.49 1.24 1.78 1.33 1.10 ALL OTHER* 2.84 2.14 1.77 1.79 1.59 1.29 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM CHILE INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.91 1.44 1.27 1.70 1.28 1.13 ALL OTHER* 2.96 2.39 2.03 1.48 1.09 0.94 5PM-2AM 2AM-11AM 11AM-5PM 5PM-2AM 2AM-11AM 11AM-5PM CHINA, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF INTERNATIONAL DIAL 2.63 2.28 1.86 2.44 2.03 1.66 ALL OTHER* 6.54 4.67 4.01 2.29 2.19 1.99 4PM-MIDN 7AM-4PM MIDN-7AM 4PM-MIDN 7AM-4PM MIDN-7AM COLOMBIA INTERNATIONAL DIAL 2.07 1.44 1.23 1.84 1.28 1.12 ALL OTHER* 3.14 2.51 1.86 1.84
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 1.31 EL SALVADOR 1.74 1.42SPAIN (INCLUDING BALEARIC 1.62 1.10 FRANCE 1.33 0.86 ISLANDS, CANARY ISLANDS, GERMANY, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF 1.25 0.82 CEUTA AND MELILLA) (INCLUDING FORMER GERMAN SWEDEN 1.31 0.86 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC) SWITZERLAND 1.41 0.88 GREECE 1.95 1.30TAIWAN 1.99 1.21 GUAM 2.19 1.07THAILAND 2.01 1.27 GUATEMALA 1.76 1.41TRINIDAD & TOBAGO, REPUBLIC OF 1.62 1.28 HAITI 1.75 1.49TURKEY 1.84 1.31 HONDURAS 1.91 1.41UNITED KINGDOM (INCLUDING THE 1.09 0.79 HONG KONG 1.84 1.20 CHANNEL ISLANDS, ENGLAND, INDIA 2.64 2.15 ISLE OF MAN, NORTHERN IRELAND, IRELAND 1.35 0.89 SCOTLAND AND WALES) ISRAEL 1.97 1.32VENEZUELA 1.35 1.02 CLASS OF SERVICE AT&T CARD LEC CARD COMMERCIAL CREDIT CARD CUSTOMER DIALED CALLING CARD STATION: CUSTOMER DIALED/AUTOMATED $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 CUSTOMER DIALED AND OPERATOR ASSISTED $4.50 $5.50 $6.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 2.90 1.01 1.93 2.18 4.18 1.31 2.51 0.87 1.67 1.94 3.69 1.16 2.21 0.78 1.48 1985 19/ 2.33 4.43 1.40 2.66 0.93 1.77 2.07 3.97 1.24 2.38 0.83 1.59 1.83 3.48 1.10 2.09 0.73 1.39 1986 20/ 1.99 3.79 1.19 2.27 0.88 1.67 1.79 3.44 1.07 2.06 0.79 1.51 1.55 2.95 0.93 1.77 0.68 1.30 1987 21/ 1.58 3.08 0.98 1.91 0.74 1.45 1.50 2.95 0.93 1.83 0.71 1.39 1.23 2.38 0.76 1.48 0.58 1.12 1988 22/ 1.40 2.75 0.91 1.79 0.70 1.38 1.34 2.64 0.87 1.72 0.67 1.32 1.11 2.16 0.72 1.40 0.56 1.08 1989 23/ 1.25 2.50 0.84 1.68 0.67 1.33 1.20 2.40 0.80 1.61 0.63 1.26 1.11 2.21 0.74 1.48 0.60 1.20 1990 24/ 1.25 2.49 0.75 1.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • UTILITIES DATA CORP. CO. REVENUES 5,194 17,154 1/ 53,223 31,566 23,123 1,542 COSTS & EXPENSES 4,305 12,961 1/ 45,736 24,938 17,219 1,364 INTEREST EXPENSE 264 611 427 1,335 837 112 OTHER INCOME & ADJUSTMENTS 2/ 347 2,055 2,410 (352) 684 13 INCOME TAXES 447 2,031 3,072 2,008 2,224 22 NET INCOME 525 3,606 6,398 2,933 3,527 57 EARNINGS PER SHARE 1.91 3.27 3.59 1.89 1.79 0.22 DIVIDENDS PER SHARE 1.18 1.22 1.32 1.54 0.73 0 AVG. SHARES OUTSTANDING (MIL.) 274 1,102 1,800 1,578 1,970 259 TOTAL ASSETS 9,374 30,299 59,550 55,144 39,410 5,293 PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP. (NET) 4,828 14,305 26,903 36,816 23,940 4,049 LONG-TERM DEBT 3,492 5,557 5,556 17,646 8,715 1,900 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 3,271 10,897 25,522 13,025 16,110 1,793 OPERATING
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 2.20 1.90 1.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 0.14 0.13 India 2.25 2.25 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 1.08 Israel 2.40 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 Italy 2.14 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 Jamaica 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.80 Japan 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.28 Korea, Rep. 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico $.791/0.25 $.75/0.25$.715/0.25 $.68/0.25 $.58/0.25 $.53/0.28$.485/0.32$.395/.395 $.37/.37 $.19/.19 $.19/.19 Netherlands 1.56 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.92 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000929.doc
  • 1997. Greco's petition was not filed until March 3, 1999. Clearly, Greco's Petition was untimely with respect to the Police Department's application. Greco argues, however, that licensing errors may be brought to the attention of the Commission after the thirty-day reconsideration period. Citing Section 312(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (Communications Act) and as implemented by Section 1.91 of the Commission's Rules, Greco states that the Commission may revoke any station license at any time the Commission ``learns that it issued a license in error.'' Greco therefore concludes that the Commission should exercise this authority and revoke the Police Department's license and subsequent assignment to Bergen. Although we believe that the Police Department's application should have been returned
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • Rate MR-2-01-2200 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.2 0.19 0.18 0.14 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.09 0.12 0.19 MR-2-05-2200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.2 0.19 0.23 0.1 0.19 0.51 0.32 0.38 MR-4 ­ Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2200 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total 5.25 5.2 5.04 4.31 a,b MR-4-01-2216 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - Non DS0 & DS0 4.57 1.91 4.39 8.28 2.96 2.72 c,d,e MR-4-01-2217 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total - DS1 & DS3 3.61 NA 4.61 NA 3.89 NA MR-4-04-2200 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 100 100 97.83 100 a,b MR-4-04-2216 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours - Non DS0 & DS0 100 100 100 100 100 100 c,d,e MR-4-04-2217 % Cleared (all troubles)
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011489.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011489.html
  • notwithstanding the resolution of the foregoing issues, to determine whether an Order of Forfeiture should be issued against Mr. Brewer for having willfully and/or repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, on March 11, 2000. The OSC set the maximum forfeiture amount at $11,000. The OSC, at ¶ 21, ordered Mr. Brewer, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. The OSC explained that if Mr. Brewer failed to file a timely written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his captioned station licenses would be deemed waived, and the proceeding thereafter would
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01044.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01044.html
  • WSTX-FM were available for review during the April 13, 2000, inspection. Family apparently violated Section 73.3526 by failing to maintain public inspection files for WSTX(AM) and WSTX-FM and make the files available for review. We will add an issue to determine whether Family willfully or repeatedly violated Section 73.3526. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 1.91(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.91(a), and Sections 312(a) and 312(c) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 312(a) and 312(c), Family Broadcasting, Inc. IS DIRECTED TO SHOW CAUSE why the licenses for WSTX(AM) and WSTX-FM, Christiansted, U.S. Virgin Islands, should not be REVOKED, at a hearing before an FCC Administrative Law Judge, at a time and place to be
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01074.html
  • Brewer for having willfully and/or repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act on March 11, 2000, in an amount not to exceed $11,000. 20. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 503(b)(3)(A) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(3)(A), that, in connection with the potential forfeiture liability noted above, this document constitutes notice. 21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.91(c), that, to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard and to present evidence at the hearing in this proceeding on the matter of his captioned Amateur radio station and GMRS licenses, Leslie D. Brewer, in person or by his attorney, shall file, within 15 calendar days after receipt of this Order, a
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-173A1.html
  • Section 312(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, both the burden of proceeding and the burden of proof shall be upon the Enforcement Bureau as to issues (a) through (r) inclusive. 1. 48. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard, the principal or principals of the Publix Companies, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, SHALL FILE with the Commission within 30 days of the mailing of this Show Cause Order a WRITTEN APPEARANCE stating that a principal or other legal representative from the Publix Companies will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the matters specified in the Show Cause Order. If the Publix Companies fail to file a
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-319A1.html
  • (Commission found the licensee's repeated failure to respond to staff inquiries dilatory and warranting of designation); In re Revocation of the License of Shedd-Agard Broadcasting, Inc. (KLSU), 41 FCC 2d 93 (I.D. 1973). IV. Ordering Clauses 15. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Sections 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4) and 312(c) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4) and 312(c), and Section 1.91 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.91, RMI is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why its license for broadcast station WMGA(AM), Moultrie, Georgia, SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. RMI shall appear before an Administrative Law Judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent Administrative Law Judge order and give evidence upon the following issues: (a) To determine
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-32A1.html
  • defiance raises extremely serious questions as to whether Peninsula has the character qualifications to continue as a licensee, regardless of whether it ultimately prevails in court on the appeal of our May 2001 MO&O. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Sections 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4) and 312(c) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4) and 312(c), and section 1.91 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.91, Peninsula Communications, Inc. is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why its licenses for broadcast stations KGTL, Homer; KXBA(FM), Nikiski; KWVV-FM, Homer; KPEN-FM, Soldotna; and its licenses for FM translator stations K292ED, Kachemak City; K295DU, Homer; K285EG and K272DG, Seward, all in Alaska, SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. In the event the D.C. Circuit reinstates
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3513A1.html
  • notwithstanding the resolution of the designated issues, to determine whether the Commission should impose a monetary forfeiture against RMI for having willfully and repeatedly violated numerous statutory and regulatory provisions administered by the Commission.6 In accordance with Section 1.80 of the Commission's rules,7 the OSC set the maximum forfeiture amount at $300,000.8 4. The OSC ordered RMI, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules,9 within thirty days of its receipt of the OSC (i.e., by December 26, 2002), to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard.10 The OSC admonished RMI that, if it failed to so file a written notice of appearance, its right to a hearing on the matter
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-68A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau, shall be a party to the designated hearing. Both the burden of proceeding and the burden of proof shall be upon the Enforcement Bureau as to issues (a) through (f) inclusive. 1. 38. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard, the principal or principals of Business Options, Inc., pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, SHALL FILE with the Commission within 30 days of the mailing of this Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing a WRITTEN APPEARANCE stating that a principal or other legal representative from Business Options, Inc. will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the matters specified in the Show Cause Order. If
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-75A1.html
  • to the designated hearing. Both the burden of proceeding and the burden of proof shall be upon the Enforcement Bureau as to issues (a) through (c) inclusive. 29. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard, the principal or principals of NOS Communications, Inc., Affinity Network Incorporated, and NOSVA Limited Partnership, pursuant to section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, SHALL FILE with the Commission within 30 days of the mailing of this Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing a WRITTEN APPEARANCE stating that a principal or other legal representative from NOS Communications, Inc., Affinity Network Incorporated, and NOSVA Limited Partnership will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the matters
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1068A1.html
  • his qualifications to be and to remain a Commission licensee; and (b) to determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing issue, whether Roger Thomas Scaggs is qualified to be and to remain a Commission licensee and whether his Amateur Radio Advanced Class License W5EBC be should revoked. 3. The OSC ordered Mr. Scaggs, pursuant to section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules,3 within thirty days of the date of release of the OSC (i.e., by December 22, 2003), in person or by his attorney, to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard.4 The OSC provided that the notice of appearance state that Mr. Scaggs would appear on the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1704A1.html
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 0.111(a)(17). 2 47 C.F.R. 95.631. 3 Order to Show Cause, 19 FCC Rcd 2564 (2004) (``OSC''). 4 47 C.F.R. 2.939(b) states: ``Revocation of an equipment authorization shall be made in the same manner as revocation of radio station licenses.'' Revocation of radio station licenses is governed by sections 1.91 and 1.92 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.91, 1.92. Consequently, we will refer to those rules herein. 5 See 47 C.F.R. 1.91(c). 6 See also 47 C.F.R. 1.92(c). That rule provides that, whenever a hearing is waived, the presiding administrative law judge shall, at the earliest practicable date, issue an order reciting the events or circumstances constituting a waiver
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1014A1.html
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 0.111(a)(17). 2 47 C.F.R. 15.205(a). 3 Order to Show Cause, 20 FCC Rcd 1668 (2005) (``OSC''). 4 47 C.F.R. 2.939(b) states: ``Revocation of an equipment authorization shall be made in the same manner as revocation of radio station licenses.'' Revocation of radio station licenses is governed by sections 1.91 and 1.92 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.91, 1.92. Consequently, we will refer to those rules herein. 5 See 47 C.F.R. 1.91(c). 6 See also 47 C.F.R. 1.92(c). This rule provides that, whenever a hearing is waived, the Presiding Administrative Law Judge shall, at the earliest practicable date, issue an order reciting the events or circumstances constituting a waiver
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1889A1.html
  • for Station K216EQ, and requested dismissal of its above-captioned construction permit application. 10. Section 1.92(a)(1) of the Commission's rules provides that the failure to file the requisite notice of appearance constitutes a waiver of the right to a hearing with regard to the issues specified in the OSC.27 Having failed to file a timely written appearance as prescribed by section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, KCI waived its right to a hearing on the specified issues.28 However, in light of KCI's surrender of its license for Station K216EQ and the Media Bureau's subsequent cancellation of that license, revocation of that license has become moot. Consequently, in accordance with section 1.92(d) of the Commission's rules, we dismiss the hearing proceeding. Moreover, in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2015A1.html
  • hereby designate the matter for hearing before a Commission administrative law judge to provide Mr. Cox with an opportunity to demonstrate why his license should not be revoked. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,12 and authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules,13 David Edward Cox is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio Advanced Class License W5OER SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. David Edward Cox shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and provide evidence upon the following issues: (a) to determine the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1570A1.html
  • hereby designate the matter for hearing before a Commission administrative law judge to provide Mr. Landis with an opportunity to demonstrate why his license should not be revoked. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules, Robert D. Landis is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio Advanced Class License N6FRV SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. Robert D. Landis shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and provide evidence upon the following issues: (a) to determine the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2463A1.html
  • convictions on his qualifications to be and to remain a Commission licensee; and (b) to determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing issue, whether David Edward Cox is qualified to be and to remain a Commission licensee and whether his Amateur Radio License W5OER should be revoked. 3. The OSC ordered Mr. Cox, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, within thirty (30) days of the date of release of the OSC (i.e., by October 30, 2005), in person or by his attorney, to file a written notice of appearance in order to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. The OSC required that the notice of appearance state that Mr. Cox would appear on
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-124A1.html
  • assignment or transfer or through an application for a new facility. The allegations at issue here involve Hammond's truthfulness and reliability. Under these circumstances, we find it appropriate to prohibit Hammond's acquisition of additional licenses pending the outcome of the hearing. III. ORDERING CLAUSES 27. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 312(a) and 312(c) of the Act, and section 1.91 of the Commission's rules, that Terry Keith Hammond SHOW CAUSE why the license for Station KBKH(FM), Shamrock, Texas, SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. He shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent Order and provide evidence upon the following issues: 1. To determine the effect of Terry Keith Hammond's felony conviction
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-128A1.html
  • 312 of the Act to determine whether CRS and Timothy M. Doty's licenses should be revoked because they lack the requisite character to be or remain Commission licensees. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 15. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a) of the Commission's rules, CRS and Timothy M. Doty are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why their respective captioned authorizations SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. CRS, by an officer representative, and Mr. Doty shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and provide evidence upon the following issues: 1. to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-377A1.html
  • amateur radio authorization. Consequently, we will commence a hearing proceeding before an administrative law judge to provide Mr. Titus with an opportunity to demonstrate why his above-captioned license should not be revoked. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. ACCORDINGLY, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules, David L. Titus is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio Station KB7ILD SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED in a proceeding before an administrative law judge, at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order, upon the following issues: (a) to determine the effect of David L. Titus' felony conviction(s)
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4675A1.html
  • hereby designate the matter for hearing before a Commission administrative law judge to provide Mr. Keeney with an opportunity to demonstrate why his license should not be revoked. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the Commission's rules, Lonnie L. Keeney is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his authorization for Amateur Radio License KB9RFO should not be revoked. Lonnie L. Keeney shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and provide evidence upon the following issues: (a) to determine the effect of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4676A1.html
  • convictions on his qualifications to be and to remain a Commission licensee; and (b) to determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing issue, whether Robert D. Landis is qualified to be and to remain a Commission licensee and whether his Amateur Radio License N6FRV should be revoked. 3. The OSC ordered Mr. Landis, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's Rules, to file a written notice of appearance within 30 days of the OSC's release, August 31, 2006. The OSC further required the notice of appearance to state that Mr. Landis would appear on the hearing date and present evidence on the specified issues. In addition, the OSC informed Mr. Landis that, if he failed to so
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-125A1.html
  • Safety and Homeland Security Bureau and the 800 MHz Transition Administrator will provide for relocation of PCSI in accordance with the rebanding rules. Should we determine that PCSI is an unqualified licensee, however, PCSI's relocated licenses will be subject to revocation. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 59. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 312(a) and 312(c) of the Act, and section 1.91 of the Commission's Rules, that Preferred Acquisitions, Inc., its principals, and by extension its ultimate owner Preferred Communication Systems, Inc., and its principals, shall SHOW CAUSE why the referenced licenses SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED in a consolidated hearing proceeding. These entities shall appear before an administrative law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent Order
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-165A1.html
  • issues, whether Buzz Telecom Corporation, Business Options, Inc., US Bell Corporation, Link Technologies, AVATAR, and/or their principals Kurtis J. Kintzel and/or Keanan Kintzel should be ordered to henceforth cease, desist and otherwise refrain from providing interstate common carrier services of any kind without prior written application to and consent from the Commission. 25. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of the Commission's rules, that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard, Buzz Telecom Corporation, Business Options, Inc., US Bell Corporation, Link Technologies, AVATAR, and/or their principals Kurtis J. Kintzel and/or Keanan Kintzel, SHALL FILE with the Commission within 20 calendar days of the mailing of this Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing a
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
  • Co., Ltd. ) File No.: EB-10-SE-164 Grantee of Equipment Authorization, ) FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM FRN: 0019109180 ) ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING Adopted: February 9, 2011 Released: February 9, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Order to Show Cause, we commence a hearing proceeding pursuant to sections 1.91 and 2.939 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") regarding the device manufactured and marketed under FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM with the brand name "TxTStopper(TM)". The TxTStopper(TM) device was marketed in the United States and apparently has the capability to block, jam, or otherwise interfere with the operation of authorized wireless communications, in violation of sections 302(b) and 333 of the Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00314.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00314.txt
  • 13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in connection with the potential forfeiture liability noted above, this document constitutes notice, pursuant to Section 503(b)(3)(A) of the Act. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard and to avail themselves of the right to present evidence at a hearing in these proceedings, pursuant to §§ 1.91(c) and 1.221(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§1.91(c) and 1.221(c), licensees Ronald Brasher, Patricia Brasher, David Brasher, D.L. Brasher, Carolyn S. Lutz, Jim Sumpter, Norma Sumpter, Melissa Sumpter, Jennifer Hill, DLB Enterprises, Inc. and Metroplex Two-Way Radio Service, in person or by their attorneys, shall each file, within 30 days after receipt of this Order, a written appearance stating
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-32A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-32A1.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-32A1.txt
  • raises extremely serious questions as to whether Peninsula has the character qualifications to continue as a licensee, regardless of whether it ultimately prevails in court on the appeal of our May 2001 MO&O. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Sections 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4) and 312(c) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4) and 312(c), and section 1.91 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.91, Peninsula Communications, Inc. is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why its licenses for broadcast stations KGTL, Homer; KXBA(FM), Nikiski; KWVV-FM, Homer; KPEN-FM, Soldotna; and its licenses for FM translator stations K292ED, Kachemak City; K295DU, Homer; K285EG and K272DG, Seward, all in Alaska, SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED. In the event the D.C. Circuit
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-10A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-10A1.pdf
  • n.12 and cases cited therein. See Peninsula Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 55 Fed. Appx. 1 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (per curiam). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(b)(1). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(n). We reject A-O's claim that the staff was without authority to order A-O to cease broadcasting without either convening a hearing under 47 C.F.R. § 1.91 or determining that a hearing was waived pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.92. Where the facts demonstrate that a station has failed to transmit broadcast signals for a consecutive 12-month period, Section 312(g) results in automatic cancellation, without requirement of a hearing. See 47 U.S.C. § 307(c); 5 U.S.C. § 558(c); 47 C.F.R. § 1.62. See Miami MDS Co., 14
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-10-147A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-10-147A1.pdf
  • concerns about Floyd's propensity to deal truthfully with the Commission. Under the circumstances presented here, appropriate issues will be designated relating to the disposition of the applications and Floyd's character qualifications to be and remain a Commission licensee. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.91(a) of the Commission's Rules, Eddie Floyd is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his license for FM Translator Station K273AF, Carson City, NV, SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED in a proceeding before an administrative law judge, at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order, upon the following issues: To determine whether Eddie Floyd misrepresented material facts to,
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/fmbc.pdf
  • 106 29 54 100.00 31 44 01 106 27 53 9.59 26 55 00 105 39 46 1.87 29 32 52 104 23 35 9.30 COAHUI LA GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES POWER (LAT) (LON) 0 29 18 17 100 55 42 3.52 29 19 10 100 56 35 0.87 29 ia io io0 55 31 3.00 26 54 54 101 25 33 1.91 26 54 20 101 24 52 10.11 28 42 35 100 31 05 0.89 28 41 55 100 30 47 0.96 28 41 58 100 31 56 10.12 28 42 25 100 31 02 1.89 28 41 10 100 33 02 10.00 27 50 46 101 07 30 4.00 25 24 43 101 00 19 2.90 25 24 21 101
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/76print.html
  • part, or denial of the request, or may issue a ruling on the complaint or dispute, issue an order to show cause, or initiate a forfeiture proceeding. " Notes 1 through 4 to 76.7: " Note 1: After issuance of an order to show cause pursuant to this section, the rules of procedure in Title 47, part 1, subpart A, 1.91-1.95 of this chapter shall apply. Note 2: Nothing in this section is intended to prevent the Commission from initiating show cause or forfeiture proceedings on its own motion; Provided, however, that show cause proceedings and forfeiture proceedings pursuant to 1.80(g) of this chapter will not be initiated by such motion until the affected parties are given an opportunity to respond
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part76.pdf
  • the grant, in whole or in part, or denial of the request, or may issue a ruling on the complaint or dispute, issue an order to show cause, or initiate a forfeiture proceeding. Note 1 to §76.7: After issuance of an order to show cause pursuant to this section, the rules of procedure in Title 47, part 1, subpart A, §§1.91­1.95 of this chapter shall apply. Note 2 to §76.7: Nothing in this section is intended to prevent the Commission from initiating show cause or forfeiture proceedings on its own motion; Provided, however, that show cause proceedings and forfeiture proceedings pursuant to §1.80(g) of this chapter will not be initiated by such motion until the affected parties are given an opportunity
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • $ 22.41 $ 26.89 $ 31.38 $ 35.86 $ 40.34 $ On-Line 80.0% 28.45 $ 35.56 $ 42.67 $ 49.78 $ 56.90 $ 64.01 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 35.46 $ 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/oppwp35.pdf
  • Interval) Low/High -48.75 (-2.22) -94.51 -2.98 High/High -59.50 (-2.93) -101.90-17.07 Period -5.46 (-.81) -19.55 8.62 Constant -70.71 (-1.46) -171.80 30.46 Table 18: Seller #1 Net Surplus Regression (CAP MFN Treatment) Observations = 24 F(3, 20) = 1.90 Prob > F = 0.1622 R2 = .3054 Root MSE = 19.382 Seller #2 Net Surplus Coefficient (t-value) (95% Confidence. Interval) Low/High -21.25 (-1.91) -44.41 1.91 High/High -26.25 (-2.36) -49.45 -3.04 Period -2.55 (-.57) -11.95 6.85 Constant -98.71 (-2.79) -172.35-24.74 Table 19: Seller #2 Net Surplus Regression (CAP MFN Treatment) 47 In Tables 18 and 19, the negative regression coefficients indicate that Sellers #1 and #2 lose money in all treatments. The statistical significance of and sign on the coefficient on the dummy variable