FCC Web Documents citing 1.774

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2617A1.doc
  • Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: November 20, 2000 VERIZON, PACIFIC BELL, AMERITECH, AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL FILE PRICING FLEXIBILITY PETITIONS PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CCB/CPD FILE NO. 00-24 CCB/CPD FILE NO. 00-23 CCB/CPD FILE NO. 00-25 CCB/CPD FILE NO. 00-26 COMMENTS: December 4, 2000 REPLY COMMENTS: December 14, 2000 or may call (202) 418-7700. In accordance with Section 1.774(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c), comments and oppositions in response to the petitions shall be filed no later than December 4, 2000. Pursuant to Section 1.774(e)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(2)(i), interested parties may file comments electronically through the Commission's ETFS. Parties electing to file comments through a method other than ETFS must file
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2618A1.doc
  • ) ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 00-23 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: November 20, 2000 Released: November 20, 2000 By the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division: On November 17, 2000, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (Pacific Bell) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services throughout numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Pacific Bell filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Pacific Bell wire centers, and (2) Pacific Bell disaggregated revenue data for special access and dedicated transport services
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2619A1.doc
  • Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 00-24 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: November 20, 2000 Released: November 20, 2000 By the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division: On November 17, 2000, Verizon filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services throughout numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) Verizon disaggregated revenue data for special access and dedicated transport services shown on an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2623A1.doc
  • ) ) ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 00-25 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: November 20, 2000 Released: November 20, 2000 By the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division: On November 17, 2000, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services throughout numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SWBT filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in SWBT wire centers, and (2) SWBT disaggregated revenue data for special access and dedicated transport services shown on an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2624A1.doc
  • ) ) ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 00-26 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: November 20, 2000 Released: November 20, 2000 By the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division: On November 17, 2000, the Ameritech Operating Companies (Ameritech) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services throughout numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Ameritech filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Ameritech wire centers, and (2) Ameritech disaggregated revenue data for special access and dedicated transport services shown on an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2793A1.txt
  • parties can calculate revenue by service type collectively attributable to the wire centers on which BellSouth relies for its competitive showing in each MSA. 19. We have reviewed BellSouth's revenue allocation methodology and the data provided by BellSouth in both the public and confidential versions of its petition and find that BellSouth has met the requirements stated in the Section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. Furthermore, we note that the Commission's rules do not require that BellSouth report revenue data at the wire center level. We, however, caution future filers of pricing flexibility petitions that lack of data aggregated at the wire center level could provide a potential problem if the Commission were to determine that one of the wire centers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2856A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2856A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2856A1.txt
  • Ø Ø FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12th STREET, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 DA 00-2856 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: December 20, 2000 VERIZON FILES PRICING FLEXIBILITY PETITION PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CCB/CPD FILE NO. 00-28 COMMENTS: January 2, 2001 REPLY COMMENTS: January 12, 2001 or may call (202) 418-7700. In accordance with section 1.774(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c), comments and oppositions in response to the petitions shall be filed no later than January 2, 2001. Pursuant to section 1.774(e)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(2)(i), interested parties may file comments electronically through the Commission's ETFS. Parties electing to file comments through a method other than ETFS must file
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2857A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2857A1.txt
  • Transport Services ) ) ) ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 00-28 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: December 20, 2000 Released: December 20, 2000 By the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: On December 18, 2000, Verizon filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services located in four Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) Verizon disaggregated revenue data for special access and dedicated transport services shown on an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1279A1.doc
  • Sprint's revenue allocation methods, as described in its petition, together with the data provided in the public and confidential versions of its petitions, we conclude that Sprint has met its burden of demonstrating that it has satisfied the applicable triggers for the services and MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, that the petition filed by the Sprint Telephone Companies IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau APPENDIX A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.txt
  • that it has provided precisely the same level of detail as did BellSouth, and should be given the same relief. 12. We have reviewed Frontier's revenue allocation methodology, as described in its petition, and the data provided by Frontier in both the public and confidential versions of its petition and find that Frontier has met the requirements stated in Section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. Furthermore, we note that the Commission's rules do not require that Frontier report revenue data at the wire center level. We again caution future filers of pricing flexibility petitions, however, that lack of data disaggregated to the wire center level could pose a problem if the Commission were to determine that one of the wire centers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2368A1.txt
  • Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: October 12, 2001 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR QWEST CORPORATION PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD FILE NO. 01-18 COMMENTS: October 25, 2001 REPLY COMMENTS: November 5, 2001 On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation (Qwest) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. In accordance with Section 1.774(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c), comments and oppositions shall be filed no later than October 25, 2001, 15 days after the petition was filed. Pursuant to Section 1.774(e)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(2)(i),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2382A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 01-18 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: October 12, 2001 Released: October 15, 2001 By the Deputy Chief, Competitive Pricing Division: 1. On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation (Qwest) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services throughout numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Qwest filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Qwest wire centers, and (2) Qwest disaggregated revenue data for special access and dedicated transport services shown on an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2664A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2664A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 01-22 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: November 20, 2001 Released: November 20, 2001 By the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division: 1. On November 16, 2001, Sprint local telephone companies (Sprint) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for five Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Sprint filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Sprint wire centers, and (2) Sprint disaggregated revenue data for special access and dedicated transport services shown on an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2665A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2665A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2665A1.txt
  • http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: November 20, 2001 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR SPRINT PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD FILE NO. 01-22 COMMENTS: December 3, 2001 REPLY COMMENTS: December 13, 2001 On November 16, 2001, Sprint local telephone companies (Sprint) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than December 3, 2001, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2788A1.txt
  • December 3, 2001 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD FILE NO. 01-27 COMMENTS: December 14, 2001 REPLY COMMENTS: December 24, 2001 On November 29, 2001, Verizon telephone companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than December 14, 2001, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2789A1.txt
  • ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 01-27 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: December 3, 2001 Released: December 3, 2001 By the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division: 1. On November 29, 2001, Verizon telephone companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2837A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2837A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2837A1.txt
  • WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 DA 01-2837 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov Released: December 6, 2001 QWEST WITHDRAWS PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD File No. 01-18 On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation (Qwest) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. The Commission established a pleading cycle for the petition, and received comments from interested parties and reply comments from Qwest. On December 4, 2001, Qwest filed a request to withdraw its petition. Based on the request to withdraw, Qwest's petition for pricing flexibility is dismissed without prejudice and this proceeding is terminated.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-290A1.txt
  • Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12th STREET, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 DA 01-290 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: February 6, 2001 SPRINT FILES PRICING FLEXIBILITY PETITION PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CCB/CPD FILE NO. 01-04 COMMENTS: February 16, 2001 REPLY COMMENTS: February 26, 2001 or may call (202) 418-7700. In accordance with section 1.774(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c), comments and oppositions in response to the petition shall be filed no later than February 16, 2001. Pursuant to section 1.774(e)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(2)(i), interested parties may file comments electronically through the Commission's ETFS. Parties electing to file comments through a method other than ETFS must file
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-291A1.txt
  • ) CCB/CPD File No. 01-04 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 8, 2001 Released: February 8, 2001 By the Acting Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: On February 1, 2001, the Sprint local telephone companies (Sprint) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services located in seven Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Sprint filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Sprint wire centers; and (2) Sprint disaggregated revenue data for special access and dedicated transport services shown on an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3003A1.txt
  • COMPANY CCB/CPD FILE NO. 01-35 COMMENTS: January 3, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: January 14, 2002 On December 19, 2001, Ameritech Operating Companies (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin), Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Southern New England Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (collectively referred to as ``Petitioners'') filed petitions for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than January 3, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3009A1.txt
  • Division: 1. On December 19, 2001, Ameritech Operating Companies (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin), Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and Southern New England Telephone Company (collectively referred to as ``Petitioners'') filed petitions seeking pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services in a number of Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in their service territories pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. In support of their petitions for pricing flexibility, Petitioners filed two categories of information for which they seek confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in the Petitioners' wire centers, and (2) Petitioners' access services revenues disaggregated at the MSA level, which the Petitioners consider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-663A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-663A1.txt
  • using transport that is owned by a party other than the LEC. Further, AT&T again complains that Verizon submitted data aggregated by MSA, not wire center. We have reviewed Verizon's revenue allocation methodology and the data provided by Verizon in both the public and confidential versions of its petition and find that Verizon has met the requirements stated in Section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. As we concluded in the BellSouth Petition Order, the Commission's rules do not require that Verizon report revenue data at the wire center level. We, however, repeat the caution stated in the BellSouth Petition Order directed to future filers of pricing flexibility petitions that lack of data aggregated at the wire center level could provide a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.txt
  • same as that used to provide demand data for its annual price cap filings with the Commission. After reviewing SBC's revenue allocation methods, as described in the petitions and its March 6 ex parte letter, together with the data provided in the public and confidential versions of its petitions and ex parte letter, we find that SBC has satisfied Section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. As we stated in the BellSouth Pricing Flexibility Order, the rules do not require SBC to report revenue data at the wire center level. We again caution future filers of pricing flexibility petitions, however, that lack of data disaggregated to the wire center level could pose a problem if the Commission were to determine that one
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-731A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR FRONTIER PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD FILE NO. 01-07 COMMENTS: April 4, 2001 REPLY COMMENTS: April 16, 2001 On March 20, 2001, Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc. (Frontier) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. In accordance with Section 1.774(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c), comments and oppositions shall be filed no later than April 4, 2001, 15 days after the petition was filed. Pursuant to Section 1.774(e)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(2)(i),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-735A1.txt
  • Common Carrier Bureau: On March 20, 2001, Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc. (Frontier) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in the Rochester, New York Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) in its service territory in accordance with the Commission's directive in CC Docket No. 96-262 and pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. 2. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Frontier filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) the identities of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Frontier's wire centers; and (2) Frontier disaggregated revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1925A1.txt
  • 02-1925 Released: August 6, 2002 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR BELLSOUTH PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 02-24 COMMENTS: August 19, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: August 29, 2002 On August 2, 2002, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than August 19, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1926A1.txt
  • ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 02-24 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: August 6, 2002 Released: August 6, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On August 2, 2002, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, BellSouth filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in BellSouth wire centers, and (2) data on BellSouth's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1A1.txt
  • 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov Released: January 2, 2002 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR QWEST CORPORATION PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD FILE NO. 02-01 COMMENTS: January 15, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: January 25, 2002 On December 31, 2001, Qwest Corporation (Qwest) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than January, 15, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. § 1.744(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-214A1.txt
  • 2002 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES FILED BY PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY CCB/CPD FILE NO. 02-03 COMMENTS: February 11, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: February 21, 2002 On January 25, 2002, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (Petitioner) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than February 11, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-215A1.txt
  • ) CCB/CPD File No. 02-03 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: January 29, 2002 Released: January 29, 2002 By the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division: 1. On January 25, 2002, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (Petitioner) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services in the Los Angeles/Long Beach Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) in its service territory pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Petitioner filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Petitioner's wire centers, and (2) Petitioner's access services revenues disaggregated at the MSA level, which Petitioner considers to be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2667A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2667A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2667A1.txt
  • Released: October 15, 2002 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 02-29 COMMENTS: October 24, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: November 4, 2002 On October 9, 2002, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than October 24, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2668A1.txt
  • ) ) WCB/Pricing 02-29 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: October 15, 2002 Released: October 15, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On October 9, 2002, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 02-01 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: January 2, 2002 Released: January 2, 2002 By the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division: 1. On December 31, 2001, Qwest Corporation (Qwest) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services in a number of Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Qwest filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Qwest wire centers, and (2) Qwest disaggregated revenue data for special access and dedicated transport services shown on an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3073A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3073A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3073A1.txt
  • 20554 DA 02-3073 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov Released: November 7, 2002 VERIZON WITHDRAWS PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/PPD File No. 02-29 On October 9, 2002, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. The Commission established a pleading cycle for the petition. On November 4, 2002, Verizon filed a request to withdraw its petition. Based on the request to withdraw, Verizon's petition for pricing flexibility is dismissed without prejudice and this proceeding is terminated. As required by the Protective Order in this proceeding, reviewing parties
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.txt
  • Sprint's revenue allocation methods, as described in its petition, together with the data provided in the public and confidential versions of its petitions, we conclude that Sprint has met its burden of demonstrating that it has satisfied the applicable triggers for the services and MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291(j) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291(j), and the Pricing Flexibility Order, that the petition filed by the Sprint local telephone companies IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau APPENDIX
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3228A1.txt
  • the pricing flexibility that it sought. No party has challenged BellSouth's method of identifying revenue associated with the services at issue. After reviewing BellSouth's verification method, as described in the petition, together with the data provided in the public and confidential versions of its petition and in its reply, we find that BellSouth has met the applicable triggers in section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. Based upon a review of the information submitted, we conclude that BellSouth has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable triggers for each of the various services and MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3499A1.txt
  • Released: December 19, 2002 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 02-33 COMMENTS: December 30, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: January 10, 2003 On December 13, 2002, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than December 30, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3500A1.txt
  • ) ) WCB/Pricing 02-33 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: December 18, 2002 Released: December 19, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On December 13, 2002, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-706A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-706A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-706A1.txt
  • center level, incumbent LECs run the risk that their petitions may be denied in whole or in part. Although Verizon here aggregated its data at the MSA level, it had the opportunity through notice and comment to recalculate its data to meet its evidentiary requirements. Accordingly, its petition is granted. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, that the petition filed by Verizon IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau APPENDIX A SERVICES QUALIFYING
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.txt
  • facility revenue. None of the commenters takes issue with SBC's methods of allocating revenues associated with SONET services and non-recurring charges. After reviewing SBC's verification method, as described in the petitions, together with the data provided in the public and confidential versions of its petitions and ex parte letter, we find that SBC has met the applicable triggers in section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. Although some parties have challenged whether SBC met the triggers in each of its regions, we believe that SBC has adequately addressed those challenges. Specifically, AT&T challenged two wire centers in the Pacific Bell region. With respect to the first wire center, Pacific Bell agrees that AT&T is not a collocator with alternative transport. There are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.txt
  • which it requests pricing flexibility relief. Each collocated competitor upon which Qwest relies in its petition was served with notice pursuant to the pricing flexibility rules. We received no comments or oppositions in response to Qwest's petition. Based on our determination that Qwest's evidence is sufficient, we grant its petition. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, that the petition filed by Qwest IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Pleading Cycle Established for Qwest Petition for Pricing Flexibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1024A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1024A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1024A1.txt
  • (4) calculating the percentage of such revenue earned in the collocated wire centers against the total revenues earned in the MSA. After reviewing Verizon's verification method, as described in the petition, together with the data provided in the public and confidential versions of its petition and in its reply, we find that Verizon has met the applicable triggers in section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. Based upon a review of the information submitted, we conclude that Verizon has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for each of the various services and MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1721A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1721A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1721A1.txt
  • revenue attributable to channel terminations between an end user's premises and SBC end offices for each wire center within the MSA. After reviewing SBC's verification method, as described in the petition, together with the data provided in the public and confidential versions of its petition and in its reply, we find that SBC has met the applicable triggers in section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. Based upon a review of the information submitted, we conclude that SBC has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for each of the various services and MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1889A1.txt
  • revenues for the services at issue for the Honolulu, Hawaii MSA. After reviewing Verizon's verification method, as described in its petition, and the information contained in its public and confidential versions of its petition, we find that, if the eight wire centers had been included in its prior petition, Verizon still would have met the Phase II triggers in section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. 2. Year 2001 Data Similarly, Verizon chose the revenue-based alternative to demonstrate that it currently qualifies for pricing flexibility for the Honolulu, Hawaii MSA, including the previously omitted eight wire centers. Verizon used year 2001 data for the purpose of verifying that it currently qualifies for pricing flexibility. Just as it did with respect to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-346A1.txt
  • FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES FILED BY THE AMERITECH OPERATING COMPANIES, NEVADA BELL, PACIFIC BELL, SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND, AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANIES WCB/PPD 03-08 COMMENTS: February 14, 2003 REPLY COMMENTS: February 24, 2003 On January 30, 2003, SBC local telephone companies (SBC) filed petitions for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than February 14, 2003, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-348A1.txt
  • ) ) WCB/PPD 03-08 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 3, 2003 Released: February 3, 2003 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 30, 2003, SBC local telephone companies (SBC) filed five separate petitions seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SBC filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in SBC wire centers, and (2) data on SBC's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-604A1.txt
  • 03-604 Released: February 27, 2003 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 03-10 COMMENTS: March 13, 2003 REPLY COMMENTS: March 24, 2003 On February 26, 2003, Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than March 13, 2003, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-605A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 03-10 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 27, 2003 Released: February 27, 2003 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 26, 2003, Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1338A1.txt
  • earned in each MSA; (3) calculating end user channel termination revenue, together with all other special access and dedicated transport revenue, that was attributable to each collocated wire center within the MSA; and (4) calculating the percentage of such revenue earned in the collocated wire centers against the total revenues earned in the MSA. Finally, Verizon stated pursuant to section 1.774(e)(ii) of the Commission's rules that it provided the required notice to the relevant collocators on which this application is based. Verizon also stated that it inspected all of the relevant wire centers for collocators and the presence of operational non-Verizon collocation transport facilities. After reviewing Verizon's verification method, as described in the petition, together with the data provided in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-138A1.txt
  • 04-138 Released: January 22, 2004 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-01 COMMENTS: February 2, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: February 12, 2004 On January 16, 2004, Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 2, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-139A1.txt
  • Services ) ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-01 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: January 22, 2004 Released: January 22, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 16, 2004, Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1643A1.txt
  • earned in each MSA; (3) calculating end user channel termination revenue, together with all other special access and dedicated transport revenue, that was attributable to each collocated wire center within the MSA; and (4) calculating the percentage of such revenue earned in the collocated wire centers against the total revenues earned in the MSA. Finally, SBC stated pursuant to section 1.774(e)(ii) of the Commission's rules that it provided the required notice to the relevant collocators on which these applications are based. After reviewing SBC's verification method, as described in the petitions, together with the data provided in the public and confidential versions of the petitions, we find that SBC has met the applicable triggers in section 1.774 of the Commission's rules.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-411A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-411A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-411A1.txt
  • FOR AMERITECH PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-09 COMMENTS: March 1, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: March 11, 2004 On February 13, 2004, Ameritech Illinois, Ameritech Indiana, Ameritech Michigan, Ameritech Ohio, and Ameritech Wisconsin (Ameritech) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 1, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-412A1.txt
  • 2004 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR NEVADA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-10 COMMENTS: March 1, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: March 11, 2004 On February 13, 2004, Nevada Bell Telephone Company (NBTC) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 1, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-413A1.txt
  • 2004 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-11 COMMENTS: March 1, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: March 11, 2004 On February 13, 2004, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (PBTC) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 1, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-414A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-12 COMMENTS: March 1, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: March 11, 2004 On February 13, 2004, Southern New England Telephone Company (SNET) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 1, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-415A1.txt
  • 2004 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-13 COMMENTS: March 1, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: March 11, 2004 On February 13, 2004, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 1, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-423A1.txt
  • PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2004 Released: February 19, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 13, 2004, Ameritech Illinois, Ameritech Indiana, Ameritech Michigan, Ameritech Ohio, and Ameritech Wisconsin (Ameritech) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Ameritech filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Ameritech wire centers, and (2) data on Ameritech's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-424A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-10 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2004 Released: February 19, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 13, 2004, Nevada Bell Telephone Company (NBTC) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, NBTC filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in NBTC wire centers, and (2) data on NBTC's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-425A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-11 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2004 Released: February 19, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 13, 2004, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (PBTC) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, PBTC filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in PBTC wire centers, and (2) data on PBTC's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-426A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-426A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-12 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2004 Released: February 19, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 13, 2004, Southern New England Telephone Company (SNET) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SNET filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in SNET wire centers, and (2) data on SNET's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-427A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-13 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2004 Released: February 19, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 13, 2004, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SWBT filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in SWBT wire centers, and (2) data on SWBT's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1505A1.txt
  • ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: May 25, 2005 Released: May 25, 2005 By the Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. On January 28, 2005, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking Phase II pricing flexibility for special access end user channel termination services in the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. As detailed below, the Commission established the parameters for granting pricing flexibility for special access services in its Pricing Flexibility Order. In doing so, the Commission recognized the importance of granting pricing flexibility to incumbent local exchange carriers (LECs) as competition develops in the market for interstate access services ``to ensure that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.txt
  • earned in each MSA; (3) calculating end user channel termination revenue, together with all other special access and dedicated transport revenue, that was attributable to each collocated wire center within the MSA; and (4) calculating the percentage of such revenue earned in the collocated wire centers against the total revenues earned in the MSA. Finally, SBC stated, pursuant to section 1.774(e)(ii) of the Commission's rules, that it provided the required notice to the relevant collocators on which these applications are based. After reviewing SBC's verification method, as described in the petitions and its April 25 Ex Parte Letter, together with the data provided in the public and confidential versions of the petitions, we find that SBC has met the applicable triggers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-307A1.txt
  • 2005 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS SERVICES WCB/Pricing 05-11 COMMENTS: February 14, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: February 24, 2005 On January 28, 2005, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access end user channel termination services located in the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Area pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 14, 2005. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3179A1.txt
  • 2005 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR SPRINT PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 05-35 COMMENTS: December 22, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: January 3, 2006 On December 7, 2005, the Sprint Local Telephone Companies (Sprint) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access and dedicated transport services in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than December 22, 2005. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3188A1.txt
  • Flexibility for ) Special Access and ) Dedicated Transport Services ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: December 15, 2005 Released: December 15, 2005 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On December 7, 2005, the Sprint Local Telephone Companies (Sprint) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services located in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Sprint filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Sprint wire centers, and (2) data on Sprint's special access and dedicated transport service revenues
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-325A1.txt
  • Flexibility for ) Special Access Services ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 7, 2005 Released: February 7, 2005 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 28, 2005, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access end user channel termination services located in the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access revenues earned in the subject
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-488A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-488A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-488A1.txt
  • of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company - WCB/Pricing 05-16 COMMENTS: March 7, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: March 17, 2005 On February 18, 2005, Ameritech Operating Companies (Ameritech), Southern New England Telephone Company (SNET), and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) (collectively SBC) filed petitions for pricing flexibility for certain dedicated transport and special access services in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petitions are available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 7, 2005. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-499A1.txt
  • ORDER Adopted: February 25, 2005 Released: February 25, 2005 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 18, 2005, the Ameritech Operating Companies (Ameritech), Southern New England Telephone Company (SNET), and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) (collectively SBC) filed petitions seeking pricing flexibility for certain dedicated transport and special access services in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SBC filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in SBC wire centers, and (2) data on SBC's special access revenues earned in the relevant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-740A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-740A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-740A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-740 Released: March 21, 2005 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR BELLSOUTH PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SWITCHED ACCESS SERVICES WC Docket No. 05-148 COMMENTS: April 1, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: April 11, 2005 On March 17, 2005, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for switched access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In its petition, BellSouth states that it meets the criteria necessary to obtain Phase I pricing flexibility relief in thirty-four (34) Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and two (2) non-MSA areas. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-741A1.txt
  • for ) WC Docket No. 05-148 Pricing Flexibility for ) Switched Access Services ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: March 21, 2005 Released: March 21, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On March 17, 2005, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for switched access services located in multiple Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, BellSouth filed three categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in BellSouth wire centers; (2) customer class location information at the wire center level; and (3)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.txt
  • each of the collocating carriers upon which it relied, including, for each collocator, the information about that party on which AT&T relied in its petitions. After reviewing AT&T's verification method, as described in the petitions, together with the data provided in the public and confidential versions of the petitions, we find that AT&T has met the applicable triggers in section 1.774 and Part 69 Subpart H of the Commission's rules. The method used by AT&T to capture and assign revenues to particular services and wire centers is consistent with the method the Wireline Competition Bureau has approved in prior pricing flexibility applications. Based upon a review of the information submitted, and having considered the opposition received, we conclude that AT&T has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-127A1.txt
  • of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company - WCB/Pricing 06-09 COMMENTS: February 3, 2006 REPLY COMMENTS: February 13, 2006 On January 19, 2006, Ameritech Illinois, Ameritech Indiana, Ameritech Michigan, Ameritech Ohio, and Ameritech Wisconsin (Ameritech), and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed petitions for pricing flexibility for certain special access and dedicated transport services in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petitions are available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 3, 2006. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-128A1.txt
  • PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: January 23, 2006 Released: January 23, 2006 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 19, 2006, Ameritech Illinois, Ameritech Indiana, Ameritech Michigan, Ameritech Ohio, and Ameritech Wisconsin (Ameritech), and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed petitions seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services located in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of their petitions for pricing flexibility, Ameritech and SWBT identify and request confidential treatment for two categories of information included in their petitions: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific Ameritech and SWBT wire centers, and (2) data displaying Ameritech or SWBT's access service revenues disaggregated at the MSA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.txt
  • total base period revenues generated by services at issue in the relevant MSA in wire centers with collocation, and whether this percentage met the applicable trigger. After reviewing Sprint's verification method as described in the petition and the data provided in the public and confidential versions of the petition, we find that Sprint has met the applicable triggers in section 1.774 and Part 69, Subpart H of the Commission's rules. The method used by Sprint to capture and assign revenues to particular services and wire centers is consistent with the method the Wireline Competition Bureau has approved in prior Sprint pricing flexibility applications. Based upon a review of the information submitted, and having received no opposition to the petitions, we conclude
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1282A1.txt
  • packet technology, specifically OPT-E-MAN service, similar to the pricing flexibility relief that it has for other special access services. We thus grant a waiver enabling AT&T to exercise Phase I pricing flexibility for packet-based services in those MSAs where it already has qualified for Phase I or II pricing flexibility for its special access services. That is, we waive sections 1.774, 69.709, 69.711, and 69.727 of the Commission's pricing flexibility rules for these packet-based services. Where AT&T has not yet qualified for pricing flexibility, it may include such advanced services in any future pricing flexibility petitions, but it must support such petitions with data regarding its advanced services and must satisfy the competitive showings set forth in the Commission's rules. We
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1367A1.txt
  • the Specific MSAs ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: March 21, 2007 Released: March 21, 2007 By the Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 12, 2007, Ameritech Indiana and Ameritech Ohio (Ameritech) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services located in the Kokomo, IN and Youngstown-Warren, OH Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Ameritech identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific Ameritech wire centers; and (2) data displaying Ameritech access service revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1800A1.txt
  • that rely on packet technology, similar to the pricing flexibility relief that it has for other special access services. We thus grant a waiver enabling Qwest to exercise Phase I pricing flexibility for packet-based services in those MSAs where it already has qualified for Phase I or II pricing flexibility for its special access services. That is, we waive sections 1.774, 69.709, 69.711, and 69.727 of the Commission's pricing flexibility rules for these packet-based services. Where Qwest has not yet qualified for pricing flexibility, it may include such advanced services in any future pricing flexibility petitions, but it must support such petitions with data regarding its advanced services and must satisfy the competitive showings set forth in the Commission's rules. We
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.txt
  • Adopted: May 18, 2007 Released: May 18, 2007 By the Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On January 12, 2007, Ameritech Indiana and Ameritech Ohio (Ameritech) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services located in the Youngstown-Warren, OH Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and channel termination services in the Kokomo, IN MSA pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. We received one opposition to Ameritech's petition. As detailed below, the Commission established the parameters for granting pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services and channel termination services in its Pricing Flexibility Order. In doing so, the Commission recognized the importance of granting pricing flexibility to incumbent local exchange carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2112A1.txt
  • WCB/Pricing No. 07-13 COMMENTS: June 7, 2007 REPLY COMMENTS: June 18, 2007 On April 30, 2007, the Embarq Local Operating Companies (Embarq) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access and dedicated transport services in the Lima, OH and Mansfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and certain channel termination services in the Lima, OH MSA pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than June 7, 2007. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-278A1.txt
  • DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 07-07 COMMENTS: February 13, 2007 REPLY COMMENTS: February 23, 2007 On January 12, 2007, Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated (Ameritech Indiana) and The Ohio Bell Telephone Company (Ameritech Ohio) (collectively Ameritech) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access and dedicated transport services in the Kokomo, IN and Youngstown-Warren, OH MSAs pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 13, 2007. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.txt
  • Statistical ) Areas and Phase I and Phase II Pricing ) Flexibility for Channel Termination Services ) in the Lima, Ohio Metropolitan Statistical Area ) Adopted: September 5, 2007 Released: September 5, 2007 By the Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On April 30, 2007, the Embarq local operating companies (Embarq) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules for: (1) certain special access and dedicated transport services in the Lima, OH and Mansfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs); and (2) certain channel termination services in the Lima, OH MSA. We issued a public notice seeking comments on May 18, 2007, but received no comments. As detailed below, the Commission established
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5031A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5031A1.txt
  • November 27, 2007, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC (CBT) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access, dedicated transport, end-user channel termination services, and Point of Presence (POP) channel termination services in the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IND Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and certain special access, dedicated transport and POP channel termination services in the Hamilton-Middleton, Ohio MSA, pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, CBT identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific CBT wire centers; and (2) data displaying CBT access service revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5032A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5032A1.txt
  • 2007, the Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC (Cincinnati Bell) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access, dedicated transport, end-user channel termination services, and Point of Presence (POP) channel termination services in the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IND Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and certain special access, dedicated transport and POP channel termination services in the Hamilton-Middleton, Ohio MSA, pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than January 7, 2008. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-656A1.txt
  • proceeding to consider whether the public interest would be served by modifications to rule sections 42.4, and 51.333, and the repeal of Part 64, Subpart A. Eliminate regulations. WCB staff recommends that the Commission eliminate rule sections 1.5000-1.5007. APPENDIX I: RULE PART ANALYSIS PART 1, SUBPART E - COMPLAINTS, APPLICATIONS, TARIFFS, AND REPORTS INVOLVING COMMON CARRIERS Description Sections 1.771 to 1.774 of Part 1 set out essential information about tariff filings and petitions for pricing flexibility. Detailed tariff filing requirements are provided in Part 61 of the Commission's rules. Sections 1.785 to 1.795 of Part 1 apply to financial and accounting reports and requests filed by carriers and affiliates. Section 1.815 requires common carrier licensees or permittees with 16 or more
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.txt
  • the Matter of ) ) Petition of Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. for Phase I ) WCB/Pricing File No. 08-01 Pricing Flexibility Pursuant to Section 69.709 of ) the Commission's Rules ) ) Adopted: May 14, 2008 Released: May 14, 2008 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On November 16, 2007, Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. (Hawaiian) filed a petition pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules for Phase I pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between Hawaiian's end offices and end-user customer premises, provided within Hawaiian's state-wide study area but outside of the Honolulu Metropolitan Statistical Area (the Hawaii Non-MSA area). On January 3, 2008, the Commission issued a public notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.txt
  • Flexibility for Channel ) Terminations in the Albany, GA; Athens, GA; ) Alexandria LA; Anderson, SC; Charleston-North ) Charleston, SC; and Florence, SC Metropolitan ) Statistical Areas ) Adopted: May 16, 2008 Released: May 16, 2008 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On January 25, 2008, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition for pricing flexibility pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules seeking: (1) Phase I relief for certain special access and dedicated transport services other than end user channel terminations in the Albany, GA, Athens, GA, Macon-Warner Robins, GA, Alexandria, LA, Pascagoula, MS, Anderson, SC, and Florence, SC Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA); (2) Phase II relief for certain dedicated transport and special access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1548A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR WINDSTREAM KENTUCKY EAST, LLC PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 69.727 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES WCB/Pricing No. 08-17 COMMENTS: July 15, 2008 REPLY COMMENTS: July 25, 2008 On June 13, 2008, Windstream Kentucky East, LLC (Windstream) filed a petition for pricing flexibility in the Lexington, Kentucky and Ashland, Kentucky Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Specifically, Windstream seeks Phase I relief for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between its end offices and end user ``customer premises,'' in the Ashland, Kentucky MSA. Windstream also requests Phase II relief for dedicated transport and special access services,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1549A1.txt
  • Commission's Rules for the ) Lexington, Kentucky MSA and ) Ashland, Kentucky MSA ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: June 30, 2008 Released: June 30, 2008 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On June 13, 2008, Windstream Kentucky East, LLC (Windstream) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the Lexington, Kentucky and Ashland, Kentucky Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Windstream identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific Windstream wire centers; and (2) data displaying Windstream's wire center-level revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-19A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-19A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-19A1.txt
  • the state of Hawaii outside of the Honolulu Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). Specifically, Hawaiian seeks Phase I pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations, between Hawaiian's end offices and end-user customer premises (Qualifying DT/SA Services), provided within Hawaiian's state-wide study area but outside of the Honolulu MSA (the Hawaii Non-MSA Area), pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 4, 2008. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-20A1.txt
  • Policy Division: 1. On November 16, 2007, Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. (Hawaiian) filed a petition for Phase I pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between Hawaiian's end offices and end-user customer premises (Qualifying DT/SA Services), provided within Hawaiian's state-wide study area but outside of the Honolulu MSA (the Hawaiian Non-MSA Area), pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Hawaiian identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific Hawaiian wire centers; and (2) data displaying Hawaiian access service revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.txt
  • of the Commission's Rules for the ) Lexington, Kentucky MSA and ) Ashland, Kentucky MSA ) Adopted: October 6, 2008 Released: October 6, 2008 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On June 13, 2008, Windstream Kentucky East, LLC (Windstream) filed a petition for pricing flexibility in the Lexington, Kentucky and Ashland, Kentucky Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. Specifically, Windstream seeks Phase I relief for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between its end offices and end user ``customer premises,'' in the Ashland, Kentucky MSA. Windstream also requests Phase II relief for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between its end offices
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-269A1.txt
  • DUE: February 15, 2008 REPLY COMMENTS DUE: February 25, 2008 On January 25, 2008, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access and dedicated transport services in the Albany, GA, Athens, GA, Macon-Warner Robins, GA, Alexandria, LA, Pascagoula, MS, Anderson, SC, Florence, SC, and Charleston-North Charleston, SC Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 15, 2008. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-270A1.txt
  • Released: January 31, 2008 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 25, 2008, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in the Albany, GA, Athens, GA, Macon-Warner Robin, GA, Alexandria, LA, Pascagoula, MS, Anderson, SC, Florence, SC, and Charleston-North Charleston, SC Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, BellSouth identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific BellSouth wire centers; and (2) data displaying BellSouth access service revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.txt
  • ) Pricing Flexibility for Special Access, ) Dedicated Transport Services and POP ) Channel Terminations in the Hamilton- ) Middletown, Ohio Metropolitan Statistical Area ) Adopted: March 13, 2008 Released: March 13, 2008 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On November 27, 2007, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC (Cincinnati Bell) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules for: (1) certain special access, dedicated transport and end-user channel termination services, and POP channel termination services in the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA); and (2) certain special access, dedicated transport, and POP channel termination services in the Hamilton-Middletown, OH MSA. On December 18, 2007, the Commission issued a public notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.txt
  • In their Petition, the ACS LECs specifically seek: (1) Phase I and Phase II pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises; and (2) Phase I and Phase II relief for channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises (end-user channel terminations), pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. On February 16, 2010, the Commission issued a public notice seeking comment on the Petition. As described below, we conclude that the ACS LECs have met the applicable requirements for each of the various services in the MSAs for which they request relief. To recover the costs of providing interstate access services,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.txt
  • Auctions Customer Survey 05/31/13 3060-0758 Secs. 5.55, 5.61, 5.75, 5.85, and 5.93, Experimental Radio Service Regulations, ET Docket No. 96-256 04/30/13 3060-0760 Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262 09/30/11 3060-0761 Sec. 79.1 07/31/12 3060-0763 FCC Report 43-06 04/30/12 3060-0767 Secs. 1.2110, 1.2111, and 1.2112, Auction Forms and License Transfer Disclosure Requirements 04/30/11 3060-0768 28 GHz Band 12/31/11 3060-0770 Secs. 1.774, 61.49, 61.55, 61.58, 69.4, 69.707, 69.713, and 69.729, FCC 99-206 (New Services) 11/30/11 3060-0773 Sec. 2.803 12/31/12 3060-0774 Parts 36 and 54, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service 04/30/11 3060-0775 Sec. 64.1903 04/30/13 3060-0779 Secs. 90.20(a)(1)(iii), 90.769, 90.767, 09.763(b)(l)(i)(a), 90.763(b)(l)(i)(B), 90.771(b), and 90.743 11/30/13 3060-0782 Petition for Limited Modification of LATA Boundaries to Provide Expanded Local Calling Service (ELCS) at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-254A1.txt
  • Non-MSA area, and the Fairbanks MSA. Specifically, the ACS LECs seek: (1) Phase II pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises (Qualifying DT/SA Services), and (2) Phase II relief for channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises (end-user channel terminations), pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 3, 2010. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(2)(i). The ETFS provides
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-255A1.txt
  • Non-MSA area, and the Fairbanks MSA. Specifically, the ACS LECs seek: (1) Phase II pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises (Qualifying DT/SA Services), and (2) Phase II relief for channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises (end-user channel terminations), pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. In support of their petition for pricing flexibility, the ASC LECs identify and request confidential treatment for two categories of information included in their petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific ACS LEC wire centers; and (2) data displaying ACS LECs' access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.txt
  • 1999 and ending in the year 2009. All listed rules are in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations. PART 1-PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE SUBPART E - COMPLAINTS, APPLICATIONS, TARIFFS, AND REPORTS INVOLVING COMMON CARRIERS Brief Description: The rules in Part 1, Subpart E, prescribe the procedures, format, and content of complaints, applications, tariffs, and reports involving common carriers. Section 1.774 sets forth procedures for petitions for pricing flexibility. This rule establishes the content of such petitions and sets forth the procedures for opposing such petitions and for requesting confidentiality. The rule also establishes the time period after which various petitions will be deemed granted if the Commission has not denied the petition. Need: Section 1.774 was adopted to establish procedures
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.txt
  • 50.296 116.145 114.666 111.191 0.501 0.537 0.566 91.363 92.174 103.861 34.522 36.494 38.549 0.263 0.273 0.267 761.912 780.39 797.844 0.351 0.343 0.353 0.289 0.238 0.276 16.179 16.677 17.658 3,478.123,297.093,423.65 0.415 0.405 0.392 907.599 962.412 996.621 4.306 4.565 4.72 0.564 0.552 0.576 1.29 0.874 1.025 1.734 1.655 1.672 0.979 0.966 1.008 20.935 20.799 21.197 798.101 856.786 925.016 51.513 55.335 58.597 1.918 1.774 1.848 8.621 8.835 8.754 259.342 266.149 273.178 0.579 0.588 0.6 135.172 126.098 157.416 16.587 16.476 16.582 7.852 8.102 8.377 5.863 5.936 6.54 635.21 640.938 749.263 0.446 0.452 0.45 5.017 5.063 5.065 12.775 13.341 15.019 424.333 449.555 472.674 5.349 5.703 5.959 25.444 29.224 33.024 0.877 0.868 0.872 1.582 1.617 1.652 7.31 7.527 7.9 236.325 243.953 249.474 76.734 72.682 85.491 9.944 9.457
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1000A1.txt
  • pricing flexibility for special access services in the San Francisco/Oakland, California and the San Antonio, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). On January 26, 2012, Windstream Nebraska, Inc., Windstream Sugar Land, Inc., and Valor Communications of Texas, LP (collectively Windstream) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access services in the Houston, Texas, Lincoln, Nebraska, and Tulsa, Oklahoma MSAs. Section 1.774 of the Commission's rules states that ``[a] petition for pricing flexibility pertaining to special access and dedicated transport services shall be deemed granted unless the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, denies the petition no later than 90 days after the close of the pleading cycle.'' The pleading cycles for Pac Bell's, SWBT's, and Windstream's petitions all closed on March 27, 2012.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-140A1.txt
  • 6, 2012 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY UNDER SECTION 69.727 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES WCB/Pricing File No. 12-04 COMMENTS: March 7, 2012 REPLY COMMENTS: March 27, 2012 On January 20, 2012, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (PBTC) filed a petition for pricing flexibility in the San Francisco/Oakland Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Specifically, PBTC seeks Phase II relief for channel terminations between its end offices and end user ``customer premises'' in the San Francisco/Oakland MSA. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-141A1.txt
  • 2012 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY UNDER SECTION 69.727 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES WCB/Pricing File No. 12-05 COMMENTS: March 7, 2012 REPLY COMMENTS: March 27, 2012 On January 20, 2012, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed a petition for pricing flexibility in the San Antonio, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Specifically, SWBT seeks Phase II relief for channel terminations between its end offices and end user ``customer premises'' in the San Antonio, Texas MSA. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-142A1.txt
  • ) WCB/Pricing File No. 12-04 Commission's Rules for the ) San Francisco/Oakland California MSA ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 6, 2012 Released: February 6, 2012 By the Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 20, 2012, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (PBTC) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the San Francisco/Oakland California Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, PBTC identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific PBTC wire centers; and (2) data displaying PBTC's wire center-level revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-143A1.txt
  • ) WCB/Pricing File No. 12-05 Commission's Rules for the ) San Antonio, Texas MSA ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 6, 2012 Released: February 6, 2012 By the Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 20, 2012, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the San Antonio, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SWBT identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific SWBT wire centers; and (2) data displaying SWBT's wire center-level revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-149A1.txt
  • THE COMMISSION'S RULES WCB/Pricing File No. 12-06 COMMENTS: March 7, 2012 REPLY COMMENTS: March 27, 2012 On January 26, 2012, Windstream Nebraska, Inc., Windstream Sugarland, Inc., and Valor Telecommunications of Texas, LP d/b/a Windstream Communications Southwest (collectively Windstream) filed a petition for pricing flexibility in the Lincoln, Nebraska; Houston, Texas; and Tulsa, Oklahoma Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Specifically, Windstream seeks Phase I relief for dedicated transport, special access, and channel terminations between its end offices and end user ``customer premises'' in the Lincoln, Nebraska; and Tulsa, Oklahoma MSAs. Windstream also requests Phase II relief for dedicated transport, special access, and channel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-150A1.txt
  • February 6, 2012 Released: February 6, 2012 By the Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 26, 2012, Windstream Nebraska, Inc., Windstream Sugarland, Inc., and Valor Telecommunication of Texas, LP d/b/a Windstream Communications South (collectively, Windstream) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the Lincoln, Nebraska, Inc.; Houston, Texas; and Tulsa, Oklahoma Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Windstream identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific Windstream wire centers; and (2) data displaying Windstream's wire center-level revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207893A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207893A1.txt
  • Contact: Gayle Radley Teicher at (202) 418-1515. PN 11/20/00; DA 00-2617 Verizon, Pacific Bell, Ameritech, and Southwestern Bell File Pricing Flexibility Petitions Pleading Cycle Established. On November 17, 2000, Verizon, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Ameritech Operating Companies, and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company filed petitions seeking pricing flexibility in the provision of dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774. Comments due December 4; replies due December 14. Contact: Joi Roberson Nolen at (202) 418-1520. CC 95-155; PN 11/29/00; DA 00-2688 Comments Sought on Petitions for Emergency Relief Regarding Release of the 855 Toll Free Code. On November 9 and November 14, 2000, the Toll Free Number Coalition (TFNC) and the Toll
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208652A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208652A1.txt
  • AT&T Petition for Preemption Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. Section 252(E)(5). Comments due December 29; replies due January 10. Contact: Janice M. Myles (202) 418-1577. PN 12/20/00; DA 00-2856 Verizon Files Pricing Flexibility Petition Pleading Cycle Established. On December 18, 2000, Verizon filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the provision of dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774. Comments due January 2; replies due January 12. Contact: Joi Roberson Nolen at (202) 418-1520 PN 12/20/00; DA 00-2866 Common Carrier Bureau Grants Motion for Limited Extension of Time for Filing Comments and Reply Comments on Issues Relating to CLEC Access Charge Reform. The Commission extends the above caption proceeding comment period
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209983A1.txt
  • Cycle Established. Comments due February 16; replies due March 2. Contact: Alan Thomas at (202) 418-2320, TTY at (202) 418-0484. PN 02/06/01; DA 01-290 Sprint Files Pricing Flexibility Petition Pleading Cycle Established. On February 1, 2001, the Sprint local telephone companies filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the provision of dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774. Comments due February 16; replies due February 26. Contact: Joi Roberson Nolen at (202) 418-1520. INTERNATIONAL BUREAU IB 00-203; NPRM 10/24/00 (adopted 10/13/00); FCC 00-369 FWCC Request for Declaratory Ruling on Partial-Band Licensing of Earth Stations in the Fixed-Satellite Service that Share Terrestrial Spectrum. The Commission seeks comment on this adopted notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210260A1.txt
  • Cycle Established. Comments due February 16*; replies due March 2. Contact: Alan Thomas at (202) 418-2320, TTY at (202) 418-0484. PN 02/06/01; DA 01-290 Sprint Files Pricing Flexibility Petition Pleading Cycle Established. On February 1, 2001, the Sprint local telephone companies filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the provision of dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774. Comments due February 16*; replies due February 26. Contact: Joi Roberson Nolen at (202) 418-1520. CC 96-98; PN 02/09/01; DA 01-341 Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment on the Florida PSC Petition for Expedited Decision for the Release of a New Area Code to Provide Relief for the 561Numbering Plan Area. The Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210459A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210459A1.txt
  • Cycle Established. Comments due February 16*; replies due March 2. Contact: Alan Thomas at (202) 418-2320, TTY at (202) 418-0484. PN 02/06/01; DA 01-290 Sprint Files Pricing Flexibility Petition Pleading Cycle Established. On February 1, 2001, the Sprint local telephone companies filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the provision of dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774. Comments due February 16*; replies due February 26. Contact: Joi Roberson Nolen at (202) 418-1520. CC 96-98; PN 02/09/01; DA 01-341 Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment on the Florida PSC Petition for Expedited Decision for the Release of a New Area Code to Provide Relief for the 561Numbering Plan Area. The Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211601A1.txt
  • May 8. Contact: Janice M. Myles at (202) 418-1577. PN 03/22/2001; DA 01-731 Pleading Cycle Established for Frontier Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On March 20, 2001, Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc. filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 eq seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due: April 4; replies due April 16. Contact: Shannon Lipp at (202) 418-1520. PN 03/23/01; DA 01-742 Telergy, Inc. and Affiliated Companies Seek Commission Determination of "Exempt Telecommunications Company" Status Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act. Pleading Cycle Established. On March 7,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211840A1.txt
  • May 8. Contact: Janice M. Myles at (202) 418-1577. PN 03/22/2001; DA 01-731 Pleading Cycle Established for Frontier Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On March 20, 2001, Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc. filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due: April 4*; replies due April 16. Contact: Shannon Lipp at (202) 418-1520. PN 03/23/01; DA 01-742 Telergy, Inc. and Affiliated Companies Seek Commission Determination of "Exempt Telecommunications Company" Status Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act. Pleading Cycle Established. On March 7,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211967A1.txt
  • May 8. Contact: Janice M. Myles at (202) 418-1577. PN 03/22/2001; DA 01-731 Pleading Cycle Established for Frontier Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On March 20, 2001, Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc. filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due: April 4*; replies due April 16. Contact: Shannon Lipp at (202) 418-1520. CC 98-141, 98-184; PN 03/26/01; DA 01-764 Pleading Cycle Established for Comments on Worldnet Telecommunications, Inc. Ex Parte Letter Concerning Bell Atlantic/GTE Merger Conditions. On February 12, 2001, WorldNew Telecommunications,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217000A1.txt
  • due November 13; replies due November 29. Contact: Christine Newcomb or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). PN 10/12/01; DA 01-2368 Pleading Cycle Established for Qwest Corp. Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Section 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due October 25; replies due November 5. Contact: Julie Saulnier at (202) 418-1530 (voice). CC 96-45; PN 10/12/01; FCC 01J-2 Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Seeks Comment on Review of Lifeline and Link-Up Service for All Low-Income Consumers. The Joint Board seeks
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217195A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217195A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217195A1.txt
  • due November 13; replies due November 29. Contact: Christine Newcomb or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). PN 10/12/01; DA 01-2368 Pleading Cycle Established for Qwest Corp. Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Section 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due October 25*; replies due November 5. Contact: Julie Saulnier at (202) 418-1530 (voice). CC 96-45; PN 10/12/01; FCC 01J-2 Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Seeks Comment on Review of Lifeline and Link-Up Service for All Low-Income Consumers. The Joint Board seeks
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217358A1.txt
  • due November 13; replies due November 29. Contact: Christine Newcomb or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). PN 10/12/01; DA 01-2368 Pleading Cycle Established for Qwest Corp. Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Section 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due October 25*; replies due November 5. Contact: Julie Saulnier at (202) 418-1530 (voice). CC 96-45; PN 10/12/01; FCC 01J-2 Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Seeks Comment on Review of Lifeline and Link-Up Service for All Low-Income Consumers. The Joint Board seeks
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217970A1.txt
  • Rulemaking is published the Federal Register; replies due 21 days after the comment date. CCB/CPD 01-22; PN 11/20/01; DA 01-2665 Pleading Cycle Established for Sprint Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On November 16, 2001, Sprint local telephone companies filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due December 3; replies due December 13. Contact: Julie Saulnier, at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 11/21/2001; DA 01-2724 Comments Sought on Verizon's Revised Cost Allocation Manual. The Commission seeks comment on the above-captioned proceeding. Comments due December 21; reply due January 7, 2002.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218052A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218052A1.txt
  • Rulemaking is published the Federal Register; replies due 21 days after the comment date. CCB/CPD 01-22; PN 11/20/01; DA 01-2665 Pleading Cycle Established for Sprint Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On November 16, 2001, Sprint local telephone companies filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due December 3; replies due December 13. Contact: Julie Saulnier, at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 11/21/2001; DA 01-2724 Comments Sought on Verizon's Revised Cost Allocation Manual. The Commission seeks comment on the above-captioned proceeding. Comments due December 21; reply due January 7, 2002.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218299A1.txt
  • Rulemaking is published the Federal Register; replies due 21 days after the comment date. CCB/CPD 01-22; PN 11/20/01; DA 01-2665 Pleading Cycle Established for Sprint Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On November 16, 2001, Sprint local telephone companies filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due December 3*; replies due December 13. Contact: Julie Saulnier, at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 11/21/2001; DA 01-2724 Comments Sought on Verizon's Revised Cost Allocation Manual. The Commission seeks comment on the above-captioned proceeding. Comments due December 21; reply due January 7, 2002.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218429A1.txt
  • 2001; replies due January 14, 2002. Contact: Paul Moon at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 12/03/01; DA 01-2788 Pleading Cycle Established for Verizon Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On November 29, 2001, Verizon telephone companies filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to section 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due December 14*; replies due December 24. Contact: Shannon Lipp at (202) 418-1520 (voice). CC 01-314; PN 12/03/01; DA No. 01-2814 Commission Seeks Comment on Application Filed by NEVD Holdings, LLC (``NEVD'') for Transfer of Control to Conversent Holdings, Inc. On October 18,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219390A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219390A1.txt
  • days after publication in the Federal Register; replies due 105 days after publication in the Federal Register. PN 01/02/02; DA 02-1 Pleading Cycle Established for Qwest Corporation Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On December 31, 2001, Qwest Corporation filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq.of the Commission's rules47 C.F.R. § 1/774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due January 15*; replies due January 25. Contact: Julie Saulnier at (202) 418-1530 (voice). CC 96-98; PN 01/10/02; DA 02-42 Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment on the New York State Public Service Commission's Request for Delegated Authority for Jurisdiction Over Area Code Changes Pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219668A1.txt
  • William Kehoe or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). CCB/CPD 02-03; PN 01/29/02; DA 02-214 Pleading Cycle Established for Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services Filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Company. On January 25, 2002, Pacific Bell Telephone Company filed a petition for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due February 11; replies due February 21. Contact: Calvin Osborne at (202) 418-1530 (voice). INTERNATIONAL BUREAU PN 01/09/02; DA 02-39 Eliska Wireless Ventures License Subsidiary I, L.L.C., Eliska Wireless Investors I, L.P., Powertel, Inc., and Sonera Holding, B.V. Seek FCC Consent to Transfer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219825A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219825A1.txt
  • William Kehoe or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). CCB/CPD 02-03; PN 01/29/02; DA 02-214 Pleading Cycle Established for Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services Filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Company. On January 25, 2002, Pacific Bell Telephone Company filed a petition for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due February 11; replies due February 21. Contact: Calvin Osborne at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 01/31/02; DA 02-237 Comments Invited on Broadwing Local Services, Inc. Application to Discontinue Domestic Telecommunications Services. On January 8, 2002, Broadwing Local Services, Inc. filed an application with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220080A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220080A1.txt
  • William Kehoe or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). CCB/CPD 02-03; PN 01/29/02; DA 02-214 Pleading Cycle Established for Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services Filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Company. On January 25, 2002, Pacific Bell Telephone Company filed a petition for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due February 11*; replies due February 21. Contact: Calvin Osborne at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 02/04/02; DA 02-258 Ambient Corporation Seeks Commission Determination of "Exempt Telecommunications Company" Status under the Public Utility Holding Company Act. On January 14, 2002, Ambient Corporation filed an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-287A1.txt
  • that showing. BellSouth Opposition at 4. Verizon Opposition at 1, 3-4. In addition, Verizon asserts that there is no justification for such a change and any change would have to be prospective and could not be applied to carriers with petitions pending. Verizon Opposition at 4. Bureau Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 24596-97, paras. 18-21; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.774. See Bureau Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 24597, para. 19. 47 C.F.R. § 69.725. See Bureau Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 24597, para. 19. The confidentiality of any revenue data at the wire center level, see Verizon Opposition at 1-2, can be preserved through protective orders. See BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.'s Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-76A1.txt
  • Commission: introduction In this order, we grant in part and deny in part a petition of BellSouth seeking pricing flexibility for various switched access services in ten metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) within its region. As detailed below, the Commission established the parameters for granting pricing flexibility in the Access Reform Fifth Report and Order and codified those parameters at section 1.774 of its rules. Applying the tests set forth in that order, we grant BellSouth's petition for eight of the requested MSAs and deny it with respect to two MSAs. II. BACKGROUND To recover the costs of providing interstate access services, price cap LECs charge interexchange carriers (IXCs) and end users for access services in accordance with our Part 69 access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • investigation, suspension, or rejection of a new or revised tariff made on 15 days or less notice shall be served on petitioners personally or via facsimile. Replies to petitions seeking investigation, suspension, or rejection of a new or revised tariff made on more than 15 days notice may be served upon petitioner personally, by mail or via facsimile. 51. Section 1.774 is revised by amending paragraphs (e)(2)(ii) and (f) to read as follows: § 1.774 Pricing flexibility. * * * * * (e)(2)(ii) Any interested party electing to file an opposition or comment in response to a pricing flexibility petition through a method other than ETFS must file an original and four copies of each opposition or comment with the Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-158A1.txt
  • in the petition about that party's collocation arrangements, even if the price cap LEC has sought confidential treatment of that information, certify in its petition that it has done so, and provide to the Commission a copy of the information it provides to those parties. Access Charge Reform, 14 FCC Rcd 14221, 14311 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order); 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(1)(ii). The price cap LEC may provide data to the party in redacted form, revealing only that information that relates to that party. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(1)(ii)(B). See Alascom Application for Review at 4-6. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 15 FCC Rcd 8746, 8751-52 (2000) (wire-center line count data). See News Corporation, General Motors Corporation, and Hughes Electronics
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-171A1.txt
  • for advanced services that rely on packet technology similar to the pricing flexibility relief that it has for other special access services. We thus grant a waiver enabling Verizon to exercise Phase I pricing flexibility for these services where it already has qualified for Phase I or II pricing flexibility for its special access services. That is, we waive sections 1.774, 69.709, 69.711, and 69.727 of the Commission's pricing flexibility rules for these packet-based services. Where Verizon has not yet qualified for pricing flexibility, it may include these advanced services in any future pricing flexibility petitions, but it must support such petitions with data regarding its advanced services and must satisfy the competitive showings set forth in our rules. However, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.txt
  • (3) that the wire centers in which competitors have collocated account for a sufficient percentage of the incumbent's base period revenues generated by the services at issue within the relevant MSA or non-MSA area to satisfy the trigger we have adopted with respect to the pricing flexibility sought by the incumbent LEC. We codify these requirements in a new Section 1.774 of our rules, as set forth in Appendix B to this Order. 173. Currently, the Commission's new service rules require price cap LECs to determine the appropriate price cap basket and service band for their new services in the context of a subsequent annual access tariff filing, and to incorporate those new services into those baskets in that annual access
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • (3) that the wire centers in which competitors have collocated account for a sufficient percentage of the incumbent's base period revenues generated by the services at issue within the relevant MSA or non-MSA area to satisfy the trigger we have adopted with respect to the pricing flexibility sought by the incumbent LEC. We codify these requirements in a new Section 1.774 of our rules, as set forth in Appendix B to this Order. 173. Currently, the Commission's new service rules require price cap LECs to determine the appropriate price cap basket and service band for their new services in the context of a subsequent annual access tariff filing, and to incorporate those new services into those baskets in that annual access
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 10.612 4.505 3.478 3.150 2.784 6.243 N 100 100 51 51 R-squared .3690 .2552 .3794 .1386 47 Table 12: Who Benefits Whom, by Age? Young Listening Middle Aged Listening Older Listening coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.464 1.032 14.862 0.935 11.378 1.379 Young Population 0.682 3.111 2.112 2.818 -6.345 4.156 Middle Aged Population -0.890 1.328 -2.514 1.203 1.478 1.774 Older Population 2.005 1.244 4.468 1.127 3.318 1.662 Northeast 0.292 0.307 0.682 0.278 1.729 0.410 North Central -0.579 0.310 0.280 0.281 1.124 0.414 South 0.119 0.292 0.053 0.264 -0.512 0.390 Percent Driving 6.627 2.456 3.908 2.224 5.337 3.280 Percent Black 3.902 0.984 2.806 0.892 3.767 1.315 Percent Hispanic 4.346 0.779 3.335 0.705 4.295 1.040 N 162 162 162 R-squared .3533
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • (3) that the wire centers in which competitors have collocated account for a sufficient percentage of the incumbent's base period revenues generated by the services at issue within the relevant MSA or non-MSA area to satisfy the trigger we have adopted with respect to the pricing flexibility sought by the incumbent LEC. We codify these requirements in a new Section 1.774 of our rules, as set forth in Appendix B to this Order. 173. Currently, the Commission's new service rules require price cap LECs to determine the appropriate price cap basket and service band for their new services in the context of a subsequent annual access tariff filing, and to incorporate those new services into those baskets in that annual access
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002006.doc
  • ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 00-20 CCB/CPD File No. 00-21 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: August 31, 2000 Released: August 31, 2000 By the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division: On August 24, 2000 BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services throughout numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. On August 28, 2000 BellSouth filed a similar petition seeking pricing flexibility for switched access services throughout numerous MSAs in its service territory. In support of its petitions for pricing flexibility, BellSouth filed four categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002793.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002793.txt
  • parties can calculate revenue by service type collectively attributable to the wire centers on which BellSouth relies for its competitive showing in each MSA. 19. We have reviewed BellSouth's revenue allocation methodology and the data provided by BellSouth in both the public and confidential versions of its petition and find that BellSouth has met the requirements stated in the Section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. Furthermore, we note that the Commission's rules do not require that BellSouth report revenue data at the wire center level. We, however, caution future filers of pricing flexibility petitions that lack of data aggregated at the wire center level could provide a potential problem if the Commission were to determine that one of the wire centers
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001967.doc
  • media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: August 25, 2000 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC DOCKET NO. 96-262 AND CC DOCKET NO. 94-1 COMMENTS: September 8, 2000 REPLY COMMENTS: September 18, 2000 On August 24, 2000, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774. In accordance with Section 1.774(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c), comments and oppositions shall be filed no later than September 8, 2000, 15 days after the petition was filed. Pursuant to Section 1.774(e)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(2)(i), interested parties may file comments electronically through the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001978.doc
  • STREET, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 DA 00-1978 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: August 30, 2000 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CCB/CPD FILE NO. 00-21 COMMENTS: September 12, 2000 REPLY COMMENTS: September 22, 2000 On August 28, 2000, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for switched access services pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774. In accordance with Section 1.774(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c), comments and oppositions shall be filed no later than September 12, 2000, 15 days after the petition was filed. Pursuant to Section 1.774(e)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(2)(i), interested parties may file comments electronically through the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001988.doc
  • 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: August 30, 2000 ERRATUM TO PUBLIC NOTICE CONCERNING BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY CCB/CPD FILE NO. 00-20 This Erratum corrects the Public Notice released on August 25, 2000 concerning BellSouthTelecommunications, Inc.'s (BellSouth) August 24, 2000 petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services that it filed pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774. Filings related to BellSouth's August 24, 2000 pricing flexibility petition including oppositions, comments, and replies should reference CCB/CPD File No. 00-20. Filings related to BellSouth's petition for pricing flexibility should not reference CC Docket Nos. 96-262 and 94-1. For further information, contact Joi Roberson Nolen, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002034.doc
  • SW. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 DA 00-2034 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: September 5, 2000 REVISED PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CCB/CPD FILE NO. 00-21 COMMENTS: September 18, 2000 REPLY COMMENTS: September 28, 2000 On September 1, 2000, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed an amended petition for pricing flexibility for switched services pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774. This petition amends Attachment 3, Exhibit E, Parts 1 and 5 and Attachment 5, Exhibits A-E, Part 1 of BellSouth's August 28, 2000 submission, which were corrupted when filed through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS) and cannot be viewed through ETFS. All other files submitted with BellSouth's August 28, 2000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002059.doc
  • S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 DA 00-2059 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: September 8, 2000 AMERITECH FILES PRICING FLEXIBILITY PETITION AND REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL CCB/CPD FILE NO. 00-22 On September 6, 2000, the Ameritech Operating Companies (Ameritech) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774. On September 7, 2000, Ameritech filed a request to withdraw and/or dismiss without prejudice its petition for pricing flexibility filed on September 6, 2000. No pleading cycle has been established for Ameritech's pricing flexibility petition. For further information, contact Joi Roberson Nolen, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418-1520. - FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002617.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002617.txt
  • Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: November 20, 2000 VERIZON, PACIFIC BELL, AMERITECH, AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL FILE PRICING FLEXIBILITY PETITIONS PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CCB/CPD FILE NO. 00-24 CCB/CPD FILE NO. 00-23 CCB/CPD FILE NO. 00-25 CCB/CPD FILE NO. 00-26 COMMENTS: December 4, 2000 REPLY COMMENTS: December 14, 2000 or may call (202) 418-7700. In accordance with Section 1.774(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c), comments and oppositions in response to the petitions shall be filed no later than December 4, 2000. Pursuant to Section 1.774(e)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(2)(i), interested parties may file comments electronically through the Commission's ETFS. Parties electing to file comments through a method other than ETFS must file
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002856.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002856.txt
  • l l FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12th STREET, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 DA 00-2856 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: December 20, 2000 VERIZON FILES PRICING FLEXIBILITY PETITION PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CCB/CPD FILE NO. 00-28 COMMENTS: January 2, 2001 REPLY COMMENTS: January 12, 2001 or may call (202) 418-7700. In accordance with section 1.774(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(c), comments and oppositions in response to the petitions shall be filed no later than January 2, 2001. Pursuant to section 1.774(e)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(2)(i), interested parties may file comments electronically through the Commission's ETFS. Parties electing to file comments through a method other than ETFS must file
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op000911.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op000911.html
  • the definition of "study area" as set forth in Part 36 of the Commission's rules. Comments due September 13; replies due September 25. Contact Adrian Wright at (202) 418-0854. PN 8/30/00; DA 00-1978 Pleading Cycle Established CCB/CPD Filed No. 00-21. On August 28, 2000, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. filed a petition for pricing flexibility for switched access services pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's rules. Comments due September 12; replies due September 22. Contact: Joi Roberson Nolen at (202) 418-1520. PN 8/29/00; DA 00-1982 Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment on the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy Petition for Delegation of Additional Authority to Implement Number Conservation Measures in Massachusetts. On September 28, 1998, the Federal Communications Commission released the Pennsylvania
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 10.612 4.505 3.478 3.150 2.784 6.243 N 100 100 51 51 R-squared .3690 .2552 .3794 .1386 47 Table 12: Who Benefits Whom, by Age? Young Listening Middle Aged Listening Older Listening coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.464 1.032 14.862 0.935 11.378 1.379 Young Population 0.682 3.111 2.112 2.818 -6.345 4.156 Middle Aged Population -0.890 1.328 -2.514 1.203 1.478 1.774 Older Population 2.005 1.244 4.468 1.127 3.318 1.662 Northeast 0.292 0.307 0.682 0.278 1.729 0.410 North Central -0.579 0.310 0.280 0.281 1.124 0.414 South 0.119 0.292 0.053 0.264 -0.512 0.390 Percent Driving 6.627 2.456 3.908 2.224 5.337 3.280 Percent Black 3.902 0.984 2.806 0.892 3.767 1.315 Percent Hispanic 4.346 0.779 3.335 0.705 4.295 1.040 N 162 162 162 R-squared .3533