FCC Web Documents citing 1.741

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • $26.52 0.872 107 $26.92 0.856 CableCARD, existing customer 108 $16.58 1.242 108 $14.99 1.392 CableCARD, new customer 108 $15.87 1.513 108 $13.67 1.619 2nd cable operator subgroup (incumbents) Unwired residence 54 $43.13 0.671 54 $43.86 0.724 Pre-wired residence 54 $30.08 0.893 54 $30.24 0.881 Service reconnection 53 $26.45 1.092 53 $27.01 1.070 CableCARD, existing customer 54 $20.25 1.547 54 $17.92 1.741 CableCARD, new customer 54 $19.20 1.920 54 $16.25 2.069 2nd cable operator subgroup (rivals) Unwired residence 49 $40.46 3.090 49 $40.40 3.106 Pre-wired residence 54 $36.06 3.043 54 $35.91 3.038 Service reconnection 54 $26.70 1.256 54 $26.66 1.246 CableCARD, existing customer 54 $5.83 1.815 54 $6.39 1.974 CableCARD, new customer 54 $6.11 1.927 54 $6.11 1.927 DBS subgroup Unwired residence
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-192A1.txt
  • that do not own a mobile phone network or license and resell wireless airtime from a licenses carriers' mobile switching center Table 10: U.S. Mobile Telephone Operators' Holdings in Foreign Mobile Operators Operator Country Subscribers (Brand name) Venture Ownership (%) SBC France 9.319 million Cegetel (owns 80% of cellular company Societe Francaise de Radiotelephone) 15 (through JV with Vivendi) Denmark 1.741 million Tele Danmark 41.6 Belgium 3.062 million (Proximus) Belgacom 17.5 (controls 24.36% through investment in Tele Danmark, which owns 16.5% of Belgacom) South Africa 3.619 million (Vodacom) Telkom SA(owns 50% of Vodacom) 18 Canada 2.22 million (Bell Mobility) Bell Canada 20 Mexico 9.775 million (Telcel) Telmex 8.5 Taiwan 605,000 TransAsia Tele-communications 19.4 Brazil 1.450 million Algar Telecom Leste S.A. 25
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp
  • Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 97-298, at 51 (rel. Aug. 19, 1997). 3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). 4. Northside Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Thomas, 849 F.2d 1516, 1519 (D.C. Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1078 (1989). 5. See 47 C.F.R. 1.49, 1.741-1.749. 6. See id. at 1.49. 7. Item (g) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). 8. See 47 C.F.R. 1.743. 9. We are increasing the page limit for initial
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.txt
  • Services in Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 20543, at ¶ 51 (1997). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Northside Sanitary Landfill, Inc., v. Thomas, 849 F.2d 1516, 1519 (D.C. Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1078 (1989). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (g) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. The Commission expects that parties will include all substantive arguments
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1996/fcc96469.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1996/fcc96469.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1996/fcc96469.wp
  • policies contained herein will become effective.[12]^(10) By the Commission. News Media contact: Mindy J. Ginsburg (202) 418-1500. FCC Common Carrier Bureau contact: David Ellen (202) 418-1580. - FCC - __________________________________________________________________ 1. See also Comment Sought on Standard Protective Order to be Used in Connection With Section 271 Applications, DA 96-1751 (rel. Oct. 23, 1996). 2. ^2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.49, 1.741-1.749. 3. ^3 See id. at 1.49. 4. ^4 Item (g) is obviously the core item of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). 5. ^5 See 47 C.F.R. 1.743. 6. ^6 See id. at 1.1200(a),
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp
  • Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 97-298, at 51 (rel. Aug. 19, 1997). 3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). 4. Northside Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Thomas, 849 F.2d 1516, 1519 (D.C. Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1078 (1989). 5. See 47 C.F.R. 1.49, 1.741-1.749. 6. See id. at 1.49. 7. Item (g) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). 8. See 47 C.F.R. 1.743. 9. We are increasing the page limit for initial
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.txt
  • Services in Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 20543, at ¶ 51 (1997). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Northside Sanitary Landfill, Inc., v. Thomas, 849 F.2d 1516, 1519 (D.C. Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1078 (1989). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (g) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. The Commission expects that parties will include all substantive arguments
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010734.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010734.txt
  • 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at § 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f02.pdf
  • 0.024.413.2 $358,926 0.0 5.2 4.413.477.0 17,048,735 0.123.1 0.764.811.3 Saudi Arabia $43,267,88066.814.8 0.9 7.8 9.7 $711,30923.942.7 0.030.2 3.2 $825,39589.2 0.1 1.7 9.0 0.0 151,299,62621.014.1 1.645.717.6 Syria $6,953,25433.618.3 1.015.831.4 $1,645,01731.2 0.0 0.068.8 0.0 $12,247 6.5 2.389.9 1.3 0.0 20,661,65018.417.9 1.223.639.0 United Arab Emirates $37,304,49558.217.4 0.813.310.2 $853,80421.245.2 0.133.5 0.0 $588,88145.515.8 0.138.6 0.0 149,991,32645.614.2 1.124.115.1 Yemen $23,431,59046.639.1 0.412.1 1.8 $409,02525.314.9 0.059.8 0.0 $108,19753.5 3.5 1.741.3 0.0 41,935,06625.839.3 0.730.5 3.7 Middle East $302,026,98260.415.8 0.816.0 7.0 $11,675,43241.221.2 0.033.9 3.7 $4,314,01958.2 4.2 3.624.5 9.5 1,276,174,99637.320.2 1.927.912.7 - Switched Services Market Shares Page 2 - 2002 Annual Section 43.61 International Traffic Data for All U.S. Points: All Settlement Arrangements Table E: Market Shares Message Telephone Service Billing Types Covered: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 11, 12, 14, 15 Carrier
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 7.0 13.7 0.172DC Florida 516.4 275.9 240.5 166.1 190.2 125.8 27.5 34.3 187.7 2.442 FL Georgia 150.0 342.0 (192.1) (245.7) 77.4 48.8 11.8 15.3 75.9 1.467GA Hawaii 60.9 50.6 10.3 7.9 54.8 31.2 9.1 13.7 54.0 0.772 HI Idaho 409.7 391.7 18.1 11.5 14.3 7.7 3.3 3.2 14.2 0.076 ID Illinois 388.8 145.1 243.8 215.9 141.0 78.8 37.9 21.0 137.8 1.741 IL Indiana 115.7 65.5 50.2 35.7 55.0 34.1 10.5 9.8 54.4 0.603 IN Iowa 235.1 205.8 29.4 16.9 15.3 7.7 3.3 4.3 15.2 0.106 IA Kansas 82.0 2.3 79.7 67.0 (1.5) (0.8) (0.2) (0.4) (1.4) (0.032)KS Kentucky (9.9) 47.7 (57.6) (70.0) 37.9 24.8 5.8 6.9 37.5 0.399KY Louisiana 291.2 16.0 275.3 260.5 25.4 17.6 3.4 4.1 25.1 0.355 LA Maine
• http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/030929/RiveraReport.doc
  • 305 146 133 273 573 1,042 20.2% 24.2% 22% 85 225 26 (19) 97 381 842 19.6% 23.5% (A.) (B.) Pretax R.O.E. Pretax R.O.E. at a 10 x cash flow at an 8 x cash flow multip1e multip1e (purchase price: $5,000M (purchase price: $4,000M debt: 1,500M debt: 1,500M equity: 3,500M) equity: 2,500M) Bank loan: 16% 285 625 726 941 1,277 1.741 2,342 20% 23.3% 3 x initial cash flow (3 x $500M - $l,500M) 18% 255 565 636 827 1,145 1,597 2,192 19.7% 22.8% 20% 225 505 546 713 1,013 1,453 2,042 19.3% 22.3% 22% 195 445 456 599 881 1,309 1,892 18.9% 21.9% ( We are pleased to report that meetings have been held with FCC staff and that substantial