FCC Web Documents citing 1.601

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2011 09 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
  • Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households as of June 30, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2009 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.56 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2009 22 18 Table 12 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Resi dential Fixed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.57 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of June 30, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.58 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2010 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000388.doc
  • operation." Finally, a waiver of one or more portions of the Commission's rules does not excuse an applicant from compliance with the Commission's other requirements. 5. On March 29, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e) of the Commission's rules to permit Paradyne Corporation to register its Hotwire(c) MVL modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.601 standard. On July 30, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules to permit Northern Telecom Inc. (``Nortel'') to register its 1-Meg Modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.413 standard. In the former proceeding, we formulated and applied, and in the latter elaborated on and applied, a two-part test to determine the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • Planned Systems Annual Estimated Total Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per SystemYear Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,667 0.030
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per System Year Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956 Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959 Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963 Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965 Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970 Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976 Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983 Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • kbps 64 kbps Investment Cost Investment New Circuits Circuits as per Usable Cost per System 11/ Year Techology ($ Million)as Planned 12/Planned 12/ Planned Circuit 13/Minute 14/ Trans-Atlantic Operational TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $50 45 40 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 43 49 44 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 51 88 79 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50 69 62 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70 720 648 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197 4,000 3,200 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180 4,246 3,821 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360 7,560 6,048 10,285 0.117 PTAT-1 1989 Fiber Optic 400 17,010 17,010 4,063 0.046 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406 15,120 15,120 4,640 0.053 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300 22,680 15,120 3,428 0.039
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
  • Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households as of June 30, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2009 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.56 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2009 22 18 Table 12 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Resi dential Fixed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.57 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of June 30, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.58 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2010 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • Planned Systems Annual Estimated Total Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per SystemYear Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,667 0.030
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per System Year Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956 Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959 Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963 Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965 Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970 Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976 Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983 Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • kbps 64 kbps Investment Cost Investment New Circuits Circuits as per Usable Cost per System 11/ Year Techology ($ Million)as Planned 12/Planned 12/ Planned Circuit 13/Minute 14/ Trans-Atlantic Operational TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $50 45 40 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 43 49 44 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 51 88 79 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50 69 62 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70 720 648 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197 4,000 3,200 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180 4,246 3,821 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360 7,560 6,048 10,285 0.117 PTAT-1 1989 Fiber Optic 400 17,010 17,010 4,063 0.046 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406 15,120 15,120 4,640 0.053 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300 22,680 15,120 3,428 0.039
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
  • Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households as of June 30, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2009 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.56 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2009 22 18 Table 12 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Resi dential Fixed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.57 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of June 30, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.58 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2010 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.60 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2010 54 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000388.doc
  • operation." Finally, a waiver of one or more portions of the Commission's rules does not excuse an applicant from compliance with the Commission's other requirements. 5. On March 29, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e) of the Commission's rules to permit Paradyne Corporation to register its Hotwire(c) MVL modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.601 standard. On July 30, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules to permit Northern Telecom Inc. (``Nortel'') to register its 1-Meg Modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.413 standard. In the former proceeding, we formulated and applied, and in the latter elaborated on and applied, a two-part test to determine the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • Planned Systems Annual Estimated Total Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per SystemYear Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,667 0.030
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per System Year Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956 Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959 Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963 Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965 Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970 Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976 Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983 Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • kbps 64 kbps Investment Cost Investment New Circuits Circuits as per Usable Cost per System 11/ Year Techology ($ Million)as Planned 12/Planned 12/ Planned Circuit 13/Minute 14/ Trans-Atlantic Operational TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $50 45 40 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 43 49 44 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 51 88 79 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50 69 62 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70 720 648 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197 4,000 3,200 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180 4,246 3,821 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360 7,560 6,048 10,285 0.117 PTAT-1 1989 Fiber Optic 400 17,010 17,010 4,063 0.046 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406 15,120 15,120 4,640 0.053 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300 22,680 15,120 3,428 0.039
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
  • Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households as of June 30, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2009 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.56 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2009 22 18 Table 12 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Resi dential Fixed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.57 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of June 30, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.58 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2010 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.60 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2010 54 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000388.doc
  • operation." Finally, a waiver of one or more portions of the Commission's rules does not excuse an applicant from compliance with the Commission's other requirements. 5. On March 29, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e) of the Commission's rules to permit Paradyne Corporation to register its Hotwire(c) MVL modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.601 standard. On July 30, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules to permit Northern Telecom Inc. (``Nortel'') to register its 1-Meg Modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.413 standard. In the former proceeding, we formulated and applied, and in the latter elaborated on and applied, a two-part test to determine the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • Planned Systems Annual Estimated Total Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per SystemYear Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,667 0.030
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per System Year Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956 Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959 Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963 Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965 Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970 Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976 Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983 Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • kbps 64 kbps Investment Cost Investment New Circuits Circuits as per Usable Cost per System 11/ Year Techology ($ Million)as Planned 12/Planned 12/ Planned Circuit 13/Minute 14/ Trans-Atlantic Operational TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $50 45 40 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 43 49 44 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 51 88 79 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50 69 62 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70 720 648 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197 4,000 3,200 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180 4,246 3,821 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360 7,560 6,048 10,285 0.117 PTAT-1 1989 Fiber Optic 400 17,010 17,010 4,063 0.046 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406 15,120 15,120 4,640 0.053 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300 22,680 15,120 3,428 0.039
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
  • Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households as of June 30, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2009 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.56 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2009 22 18 Table 12 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Resi dential Fixed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.57 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of June 30, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.58 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2010 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.60 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2010 54 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000388.doc
  • operation." Finally, a waiver of one or more portions of the Commission's rules does not excuse an applicant from compliance with the Commission's other requirements. 5. On March 29, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e) of the Commission's rules to permit Paradyne Corporation to register its Hotwire(c) MVL modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.601 standard. On July 30, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules to permit Northern Telecom Inc. (``Nortel'') to register its 1-Meg Modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.413 standard. In the former proceeding, we formulated and applied, and in the latter elaborated on and applied, a two-part test to determine the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • Planned Systems Annual Estimated Total Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per SystemYear Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,667 0.030
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per System Year Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956 Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959 Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963 Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965 Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970 Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976 Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983 Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • kbps 64 kbps Investment Cost Investment New Circuits Circuits as per Usable Cost per System 11/ Year Techology ($ Million)as Planned 12/Planned 12/ Planned Circuit 13/Minute 14/ Trans-Atlantic Operational TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $50 45 40 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 43 49 44 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 51 88 79 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50 69 62 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70 720 648 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197 4,000 3,200 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180 4,246 3,821 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360 7,560 6,048 10,285 0.117 PTAT-1 1989 Fiber Optic 400 17,010 17,010 4,063 0.046 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406 15,120 15,120 4,640 0.053 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300 22,680 15,120 3,428 0.039
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
  • Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households as of June 30, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2009 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.56 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2009 22 18 Table 12 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Resi dential Fixed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.57 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of June 30, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.58 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2010 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.60 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2010 54 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000388.doc
  • operation." Finally, a waiver of one or more portions of the Commission's rules does not excuse an applicant from compliance with the Commission's other requirements. 5. On March 29, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e) of the Commission's rules to permit Paradyne Corporation to register its Hotwire(c) MVL modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.601 standard. On July 30, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules to permit Northern Telecom Inc. (``Nortel'') to register its 1-Meg Modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.413 standard. In the former proceeding, we formulated and applied, and in the latter elaborated on and applied, a two-part test to determine the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • Planned Systems Annual Estimated Total Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per SystemYear Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,667 0.030
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per System Year Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956 Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959 Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963 Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965 Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970 Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976 Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983 Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • kbps 64 kbps Investment Cost Investment New Circuits Circuits as per Usable Cost per System 11/ Year Techology ($ Million)as Planned 12/Planned 12/ Planned Circuit 13/Minute 14/ Trans-Atlantic Operational TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $50 45 40 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 43 49 44 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 51 88 79 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50 69 62 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70 720 648 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197 4,000 3,200 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180 4,246 3,821 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360 7,560 6,048 10,285 0.117 PTAT-1 1989 Fiber Optic 400 17,010 17,010 4,063 0.046 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406 15,120 15,120 4,640 0.053 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300 22,680 15,120 3,428 0.039
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
  • Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households as of June 30, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2009 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.56 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2009 22 18 Table 12 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Resi dential Fixed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.57 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of June 30, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.58 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2010 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.60 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2010 54 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000388.doc
  • operation." Finally, a waiver of one or more portions of the Commission's rules does not excuse an applicant from compliance with the Commission's other requirements. 5. On March 29, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e) of the Commission's rules to permit Paradyne Corporation to register its Hotwire(c) MVL modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.601 standard. On July 30, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules to permit Northern Telecom Inc. (``Nortel'') to register its 1-Meg Modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.413 standard. In the former proceeding, we formulated and applied, and in the latter elaborated on and applied, a two-part test to determine the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • Planned Systems Annual Estimated Total Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per SystemYear Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,667 0.030
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per System Year Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956 Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959 Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963 Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965 Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970 Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976 Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983 Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • kbps 64 kbps Investment Cost Investment New Circuits Circuits as per Usable Cost per System 11/ Year Techology ($ Million)as Planned 12/Planned 12/ Planned Circuit 13/Minute 14/ Trans-Atlantic Operational TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $50 45 40 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 43 49 44 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 51 88 79 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50 69 62 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70 720 648 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197 4,000 3,200 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180 4,246 3,821 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360 7,560 6,048 10,285 0.117 PTAT-1 1989 Fiber Optic 400 17,010 17,010 4,063 0.046 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406 15,120 15,120 4,640 0.053 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300 22,680 15,120 3,428 0.039
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
  • Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households as of June 30, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2009 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.56 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2009 22 18 Table 12 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Resi dential Fixed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.57 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of June 30, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.58 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2010 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.60 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2010 54 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000388.doc
  • operation." Finally, a waiver of one or more portions of the Commission's rules does not excuse an applicant from compliance with the Commission's other requirements. 5. On March 29, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e) of the Commission's rules to permit Paradyne Corporation to register its Hotwire(c) MVL modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.601 standard. On July 30, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules to permit Northern Telecom Inc. (``Nortel'') to register its 1-Meg Modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.413 standard. In the former proceeding, we formulated and applied, and in the latter elaborated on and applied, a two-part test to determine the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • Planned Systems Annual Estimated Total Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per SystemYear Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,667 0.030
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per System Year Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956 Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959 Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963 Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965 Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970 Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976 Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983 Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • kbps 64 kbps Investment Cost Investment New Circuits Circuits as per Usable Cost per System 11/ Year Techology ($ Million)as Planned 12/Planned 12/ Planned Circuit 13/Minute 14/ Trans-Atlantic Operational TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $50 45 40 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 43 49 44 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 51 88 79 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50 69 62 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70 720 648 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197 4,000 3,200 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180 4,246 3,821 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360 7,560 6,048 10,285 0.117 PTAT-1 1989 Fiber Optic 400 17,010 17,010 4,063 0.046 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406 15,120 15,120 4,640 0.053 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300 22,680 15,120 3,428 0.039
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
  • Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households as of June 30, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2009 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.56 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2009 22 18 Table 12 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Resi dential Fixed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.57 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of June 30, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.58 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2010 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.60 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2010 54 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000388.doc
  • operation." Finally, a waiver of one or more portions of the Commission's rules does not excuse an applicant from compliance with the Commission's other requirements. 5. On March 29, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e) of the Commission's rules to permit Paradyne Corporation to register its Hotwire(c) MVL modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.601 standard. On July 30, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules to permit Northern Telecom Inc. (``Nortel'') to register its 1-Meg Modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.413 standard. In the former proceeding, we formulated and applied, and in the latter elaborated on and applied, a two-part test to determine the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • Planned Systems Annual Estimated Total Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per SystemYear Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,667 0.030
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per System Year Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956 Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959 Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963 Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965 Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970 Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976 Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983 Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • kbps 64 kbps Investment Cost Investment New Circuits Circuits as per Usable Cost per System 11/ Year Techology ($ Million)as Planned 12/Planned 12/ Planned Circuit 13/Minute 14/ Trans-Atlantic Operational TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $50 45 40 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 43 49 44 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 51 88 79 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50 69 62 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70 720 648 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197 4,000 3,200 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180 4,246 3,821 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360 7,560 6,048 10,285 0.117 PTAT-1 1989 Fiber Optic 400 17,010 17,010 4,063 0.046 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406 15,120 15,120 4,640 0.053 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300 22,680 15,120 3,428 0.039
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
  • Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households as of June 30, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2009 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.56 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2009 22 18 Table 12 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Resi dential Fixed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.57 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of June 30, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.58 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2010 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
  • over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.60 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2010 54 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fi xed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • we recognize that some minimal interference may develop as new services are introduced, we believe that it is in the public's best interest to encourage the timely deployment of advanced services. We understand, however, that these advanced services will operate well above the voice grade spectrum, and therefore should not interfere with existing analog voice and analog modem services. 167 T1.601 defines the technical standards for the provision of BRI ISDN service. T1.413 defines the technical standards for the provision ADSL service. TR28 defines the technical standards for the provision HDSL service. We recognize that TR.28 is not a Committee T1 approved standard. TR.28's universal deployment, however, results in its status as a de facto standard. See Letter from Jeffrey Blumenfeld,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000388.doc
  • operation." Finally, a waiver of one or more portions of the Commission's rules does not excuse an applicant from compliance with the Commission's other requirements. 5. On March 29, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e) of the Commission's rules to permit Paradyne Corporation to register its Hotwire(c) MVL modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.601 standard. On July 30, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules to permit Northern Telecom Inc. (``Nortel'') to register its 1-Meg Modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.413 standard. In the former proceeding, we formulated and applied, and in the latter elaborated on and applied, a two-part test to determine the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • Planned Systems Annual Estimated Total Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per SystemYear Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,667 0.030
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • Usable Investment Cost Investment Cost 64 kbps 64 kbps per Usable Ckt Cost per System Year Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956 Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959 Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963 Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965 Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970 Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976 Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983 Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • kbps 64 kbps Investment Cost Investment New Circuits Circuits as per Usable Cost per System 11/ Year Techology ($ Million)as Planned 12/Planned 12/ Planned Circuit 13/Minute 14/ Trans-Atlantic Operational TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $50 45 40 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 43 49 44 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 51 88 79 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50 69 62 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70 720 648 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197 4,000 3,200 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180 4,246 3,821 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360 7,560 6,048 10,285 0.117 PTAT-1 1989 Fiber Optic 400 17,010 17,010 4,063 0.046 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406 15,120 15,120 4,640 0.053 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300 22,680 15,120 3,428 0.039