FCC Web Documents citing 1.593

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2011 09 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.txt
  • slightly more difference, but not any conclusive evidence that WLS-TV's data skews the results since the November 2006 and February 2007 data audience are close to or within the expected interval when the standard error of the WLS-TV survey average is considered. Based on WLS-TV's data, we can estimate that its station's total share of viewing hours is actually between 1.593 percent and 7.797 percent had all households been used to determine the audience share. (In statistical terms, with 67 percent probability, we expect the actual value to lie in the range, or confidence interval, one standard error below to one standard error above the reported sample audience statistics. For 95 percent probability, the interval would be calculated using two standard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.txt
  • slightly more difference, but not any conclusive evidence that WLS-TV's data skews the results since the November 2006 and February 2007 data audience are close to or within the expected interval when the standard error of the WLS-TV survey average is considered. Based on WLS-TV's data, we can estimate that its station's total share of viewing hours is actually between 1.593 percent and 7.797 percent had all households been used to determine the audience share. (In statistical terms, with 67 percent probability, we expect the actual value to lie in the range, or confidence interval, one standard error below to one standard error above the reported sample audience statistics. For 95 percent probability, the interval would be calculated using two standard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.txt
  • slightly more difference, but not any conclusive evidence that WLS-TV's data skews the results since the November 2006 and February 2007 data audience are close to or within the expected interval when the standard error of the WLS-TV survey average is considered. Based on WLS-TV's data, we can estimate that its station's total share of viewing hours is actually between 1.593 percent and 7.797 percent had all households been used to determine the audience share. (In statistical terms, with 67 percent probability, we expect the actual value to lie in the range, or confidence interval, one standard error below to one standard error above the reported sample audience statistics. For 95 percent probability, the interval would be calculated using two standard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.txt
  • slightly more difference, but not any conclusive evidence that WLS-TV's data skews the results since the November 2006 and February 2007 data audience are close to or within the expected interval when the standard error of the WLS-TV survey average is considered. Based on WLS-TV's data, we can estimate that its station's total share of viewing hours is actually between 1.593 percent and 7.797 percent had all households been used to determine the audience share. (In statistical terms, with 67 percent probability, we expect the actual value to lie in the range, or confidence interval, one standard error below to one standard error above the reported sample audience statistics. For 95 percent probability, the interval would be calculated using two standard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.txt
  • slightly more difference, but not any conclusive evidence that WLS-TV's data skews the results since the November 2006 and February 2007 data audience are close to or within the expected interval when the standard error of the WLS-TV survey average is considered. Based on WLS-TV's data, we can estimate that its station's total share of viewing hours is actually between 1.593 percent and 7.797 percent had all households been used to determine the audience share. (In statistical terms, with 67 percent probability, we expect the actual value to lie in the range, or confidence interval, one standard error below to one standard error above the reported sample audience statistics. For 95 percent probability, the interval would be calculated using two standard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.txt
  • slightly more difference, but not any conclusive evidence that WLS-TV's data skews the results since the November 2006 and February 2007 data audience are close to or within the expected interval when the standard error of the WLS-TV survey average is considered. Based on WLS-TV's data, we can estimate that its station's total share of viewing hours is actually between 1.593 percent and 7.797 percent had all households been used to determine the audience share. (In statistical terms, with 67 percent probability, we expect the actual value to lie in the range, or confidence interval, one standard error below to one standard error above the reported sample audience statistics. For 95 percent probability, the interval would be calculated using two standard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.txt
  • slightly more difference, but not any conclusive evidence that WLS-TV's data skews the results since the November 2006 and February 2007 data audience are close to or within the expected interval when the standard error of the WLS-TV survey average is considered. Based on WLS-TV's data, we can estimate that its station's total share of viewing hours is actually between 1.593 percent and 7.797 percent had all households been used to determine the audience share. (In statistical terms, with 67 percent probability, we expect the actual value to lie in the range, or confidence interval, one standard error below to one standard error above the reported sample audience statistics. For 95 percent probability, the interval would be calculated using two standard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.txt
  • slightly more difference, but not any conclusive evidence that WLS-TV's data skews the results since the November 2006 and February 2007 data audience are close to or within the expected interval when the standard error of the WLS-TV survey average is considered. Based on WLS-TV's data, we can estimate that its station's total share of viewing hours is actually between 1.593 percent and 7.797 percent had all households been used to determine the audience share. (In statistical terms, with 67 percent probability, we expect the actual value to lie in the range, or confidence interval, one standard error below to one standard error above the reported sample audience statistics. For 95 percent probability, the interval would be calculated using two standard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.txt
  • slightly more difference, but not any conclusive evidence that WLS-TV's data skews the results since the November 2006 and February 2007 data audience are close to or within the expected interval when the standard error of the WLS-TV survey average is considered. Based on WLS-TV's data, we can estimate that its station's total share of viewing hours is actually between 1.593 percent and 7.797 percent had all households been used to determine the audience share. (In statistical terms, with 67 percent probability, we expect the actual value to lie in the range, or confidence interval, one standard error below to one standard error above the reported sample audience statistics. For 95 percent probability, the interval would be calculated using two standard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.txt
  • slightly more difference, but not any conclusive evidence that WLS-TV's data skews the results since the November 2006 and February 2007 data audience are close to or within the expected interval when the standard error of the WLS-TV survey average is considered. Based on WLS-TV's data, we can estimate that its station's total share of viewing hours is actually between 1.593 percent and 7.797 percent had all households been used to determine the audience share. (In statistical terms, with 67 percent probability, we expect the actual value to lie in the range, or confidence interval, one standard error below to one standard error above the reported sample audience statistics. For 95 percent probability, the interval would be calculated using two standard