FCC Web Documents citing 1.54

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300946A7.pdf
  • 7,356 $31,561 2,016 901.83 20.94 Blaine 12,859 4,159 $29,394 975 928.43 13.85 Bryan 37,815 14,422 $28,618 2,986 908.8 41.61 Caddo 30,229 10,957 $28,972 2,091 1278.33 23.65 Canadian 98,701 31,484 $50,062 8,043 899.71 109.70 Carter 47,125 17,992 $30,750 4,327 823.79 57.21 Cherokee 44,671 16,175 $28,019 2,946 751.04 59.48 Choctaw 15,297 6,220 $24,406 1,223 773.93 19.77 Cimarron 2,833 1,257 $27,311 322 1835.04 1.54 Cleveland 224,898 79,186 $45,799 18,711 536.11 419.50 Coal 5,743 2,373 $24,474 408 518.22 11.08 Comanche 112,429 39,808 $34,645 6,038 1069.35 105.14 Cotton 6,589 2,614 $29,156 445 636.64 10.35 Craig 15,078 5,620 $32,520 1,381 761.03 19.81 Creek 68,708 25,289 $35,288 5,379 955.53 71.91 Custer 25,208 10,136 $30,422 2,451 986.51 25.55 Delaware 39,146 14,838 $29,686 2,818 740.65 52.85 Dewey 4,568 1,962 $31,531
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.txt
  • 2.78 1.11 1.07 2.78 2.10 1.80 3.62 2.94 2.56 Denmark 0.98 0.98 0.93 1.82 1.82 1.67 2.22 2.22 1.91 Finland 1.81 1.42 1.43 1.81 1.42 1.43 4.20 2.81 3.28 France 0.71 0.70 0.61 1.73 1.71 1.50 2.55 2.52 2.23 Germany 1.00 0.99 1.01 1.71 1.69 1.72 2.61 2.58 2.63 Greece n/a 1.81 n/a n/a 1.81 n/a n/a 2.59 n/a Italy 1.54 1.51 1.00 2.52 2.47 1.60 n/a n/a 2.30 Ireland n/a 2.20 1.00 n/a 4.15 1.60 n/a 5.18 2.26 Luxembourg n/a 2.01 2.25 n/a 2.01 2.25 n/a 2.01 2.25 Netherlands 2.00 1.17 1.00 2.00 1.60 1.41 2.52 2.06 1.70 Portugal n/a 1.20 0.99 n/a 2.37 1.63 n/a 18.00 2.58 Spain 1.51 1.49 0.99 1.51 1.49 1.59 4.22 4.17 3.07 Sweden 1.68
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A7.txt
  • Estonia 27.74 29.87 32.10 34.29 Finland 55.01 54.90 55.59 55.39 France 55.80 56.36 57.50 56.97 Germany 49.35 53.84 54.98 56.68 Ghana 0.37 0.44 0.58 0.75 Greece 49.32 50.87 51.61 52.22 Grenada 24.23 24.34 Not Available 26.28 Guatemala 2.72 3.13 4.08 4.08 Hong Kong, China 53.25 54.69 56.54 55.77 Hungary 21.12 26.06 30.42 33.59 Iceland 55.48 57.61 61.69 64.65 India 1.29 1.54 1.86 2.20 Indonesia 1.69 2.13 2.47 2.70 Ireland 36.53 39.48 41.14 43.47 Israel 41.77 44.09 44.98 47.11 Italy 43.33 44.01 44.68 45.07 Jamaica 11.56 14.17 Not Available 16.57 Japan 48.80 48.92 47.86 50.26 Kenya 0.79 0.82 0.81 0.92 Korea 41.47 43.04 44.40 43.27 Kyrgyz Republic 7.92 7.47 7.56 7.64 Latvia 27.85 29.55 30.16 30.16 Luxembourg 56.50 59.16 66.87 69.17 Malaysia
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A1.txt
  • At least 24 other companies offer fixed wireless services in approximately 33 different counties. These companies are small, independent MDS licensees offering Internet access at up to 11 Mbps downstream to a limited number of residential and small business customers in one to five markets apiece (generally smaller towns and cities). For example, LMA Systems offers two-way Internet access at 1.54 Mbps downstream and 768 kbps upstream in Wilkes-Barre and Sunbury, PA. and has plans to enter additional markets. Oxford Telecom offers two-way MDS-based Internet access in Portland, ME. Some MDS carriers - including QuadraVision in Carson City and Reno, NV and American Rural TV in La Junta, CO - offer fixed wireless Internet access on a one-way basis and use
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A2.txt
  • At least 24 other companies offer fixed wireless services in approximately 33 different counties. These companies are small, independent MDS licensees offering Internet access at up to 11 Mbps downstream to a limited number of residential and small business customers in one to five markets apiece (generally smaller towns and cities). For example, LMA Systems offers two-way Internet access at 1.54 Mbps downstream and 768 kbps upstream in Wilkes-Barre and Sunbury, PA. and has plans to enter additional markets. Oxford Telecom offers two-way MDS-based Internet access in Portland, ME. Some MDS carriers - including QuadraVision in Carson City and Reno, NV and American Rural TV in La Junta, CO - offer fixed wireless Internet access on a one-way basis and use
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A2.txt
  • reports regression results on the net surplus of the ``moderately'' popular seller (i.e., Seller #3). Observations = 24 F(3, 20) = 2.22 Prob > F = 0.1174 R2 = .2497 Root MSE = 425.22 Seller #3 Net Surplus Coefficient (t-value) (95% Confidence. Interval) Low/High -13.62 (-.06) -457 429 High/High -481.25 (-2.26) -924 -37 Period -9.21 (-.12) -171 152 Constant 811.40 (1.54) -286 1909 Table 20: Seller #3 Net Surplus Regression (CAP MFN Treatment) The statistical insignificance of the coefficient on the dummy variable ``Low/High'' indicates that Seller #3 earns the same net surplus operating in a market that includes a two ``moderately-sized'' cable operators (i.e., market shares of 27% and 24%) and several smaller buyers than as in a market that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.txt
  • July 30 Letter (``As far as we know today, the source of the violation is a modification on the CPU board. We added an extra track of 3,4 volt power supply. Unfortunately this track became an antenna. Neutral and Line Disturbance tests remained ok, while the test of the Horizontal Polarization showed only a small violation on 229,4 MHz of -1.54 dB. The Vertical Polarization test however showed the bad results.''). July 10 Letter (``We believe that the modifications which are the reason, that some of our organs were violating FCC rules, have been done between July and October 2002. The modifications have been built in limited numbers of organs. Some of them have been shipped to the US and probably
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • seven measurements), and across both the channel offsets and receivers (statistics computed on 35 measurements). Table 7-2. D/U Ratio With SFU as Desired Signal Source Relative to That With Baseline Generator (ATSC997) D/U Ratio Relative to Baseline (dB) Channel Offset A3 D3 I1 J1 M1 N1 O1 G4 Mean (dB) (Excluding G4) Standard Deviation (dB) (Excluding G4) N-6 -1.37 -0.01 -1.54 -1.42 -1.39 -1.96 -1.29 -6.29 -1.28 0.60 N-4 -1.15 -0.11 -1.00 -1.44 -1.16 -1.51 -1.03 -5.16 -1.06 0.46 N-3 -1.03 -0.88 -0.98 -0.57 -1.10 -1.50 -1.06 -5.70 -1.02 0.28 N-2 -1.21 -0.56 -0.96 -1.63 -1.14 -1.42 -0.90 -4.82 -1.12 0.35 N+2 -1.28 -1.50 -1.27 -1.44 -0.75 -1.30 -1.12 -4.49 -1.24 0.25 Mean -1.21 -0.61 -1.15 -1.30 -1.11 -1.54 -1.08 -5.29
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 2.55 2.67 2.72 Children'sProgramming "Children'sProgramming" 1.70 1.91 2.15 1.94 GMoviesorTV-Y/TV-Y7TV 3.18 3.28 3.04 2.94 Eitheroftheabove 4.88 5.19 5.19 4.88 FamilyProgramming NetworksTargetingFamilies 11.46 10.89 10.69 10.74 TY-GProgramming 11.35 12.18 11.93 10.94 Arts,Educational,orDocumentaryProgramming 8.32 7.46 7.05 7.62 Eitherofthetwoabove 19.67 19.64 18.98 18.56 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming 4.84 4.60 4.89 5.52 NC-17MoviesorTV-MA-S/TV-MA-LTV 0.75 0.48 0.63 0.83 ViolentProgramming "ViolentProgramming" 1.52 1.71 1.94 1.63 TV-PG-VTelevision 1.43 1.45 1.54 1.41 TV-14-VTelevision 1.37 1.40 1.56 1.51 TV-MA-VTelevision 0.15 0.16 0.23 0.22 Anyofthethreeabove 2.95 3.01 3.33 3.14 Anyofthelasttwoabove 1.52 1.56 1.79 1.73 ReligiousProgramming NetworksShowingPrimarilyReligiousProgramming 1.64 1.56 1.49 1.40 "ReligiousProgramming" 3.31 3.15 2.92 2.79 OverallTargeting AverageTVContentRating(wherenotedforTV) 3.71 3.75 3.84 3.93 AverageMPAARating(wherenotedformovies) 3.99 3.93 3.98 3.95 Observations 61,31464,56067,53071,984 Notes:Reportedinthetableisthepercentageofquarter-hoursofprogrammingbyprogramtypeandyear. ItistheanalogofTable6splitoutbyyear.Averageisoverthesamenetworksandtimeperiodsdescribed inthenotestoTable6.Source:Authorcalculations.39 Table11: ProgramAvailabilitybyProgramTypeandTime 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2006 Variable 2003 2004 2005 2006 NewsProgramming AnyNews 47.79 46.11
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (-2.17) 0.020 (0.67) -0.000009 (-1.67) 0.035 104 With Demographics: Format 101 Count 11.711 (1.10) 0.268* (4.96) 11.8832 (0.50) 2.130 (0.64) 0.001146 (1.93) 0.763 104 Format 101 HHI -0.154 (1.76) -0.001 (1.39) -0.1049 (-0.54) 0.006 (0.22) -0.000007 (-1.37) 0.132 104 Format 20 Count 6.131 (0.83) 0.086* (2.30) 12.1382 (0.74) -0.831 (-0.36) 0.000475 (1.16) 0.452 104 Format 20 HHI -0.245* (2.36) -0.001 (1.54) -0.1909 (-0.82) 0.033 (1.03) -0.000008 (-1.37) 0.204 104 Format 11 Count -0.003 (0.00) 0.025 (1.42) -4.0104 (-0.51) -1.296 (-1.19) 0.000246 (1.27) 0.294 104 Format 11 HHI -0.221* (2.13) -0.001 (1.46) -0.4641* (-2.00) 0.014 (0.44) -0.000008 (-1.46) 0.056 104 HHI Stations Percent of Stations with Cross-Owned Newspaper Percent of Stations with Cross-Owned TV Station Number of Commercial Stations Owned Nationally by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • .06 Notes: Absolute values of t-statistics in parentheses (using heteroscedastic-consistent standard errors corrected for clustering by television station); ***p<.01, **p<.05 and *p<.10 49 Table 17: Editorial Endorsements and Political Slant of Cross-owned Stations Independent variables Difference in Candidate Speaking Time Difference in Candidate Coverage Difference in Partisan Issue Coverage Difference in Poll Coverage Cross-owned newspaper -3.3 (0.98) -3.8 (1.08) -8.3 (1.54) -9.2* (1.68) -10.8 (0.91) -11.2 (0.93) -3.1 (1.15) -2.9 (1.05) Cross-owned radio 3.4 (0.99) 1.9 (0.51) 9.8 (1.01) 7.5 (0.77) -25.4* (1.74) -25.8* (1.80) -9.5 (1.36) -9.6 (1.35) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 2.5 (0.47) 5.1 (0.86) 6.0 (0.51) 10.4 (0.87) 41.2* (1.95) 42.1* (1.94) 6.9 (0.93) 6.7 (0.87) Endorsement in 2004 (1=Kerry, Bush=-1) 6.3* (1.90) 5.5* (1.77) 5.1 (0.83) 4.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.txt
  • 1 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 2 Total 10513822 94 11120 12991 34 11174 24 21 Table11:OwnershipbyRaceandGender(FCCData) YearPlatformNumberofFemaleMinority%Female%Minority stations owned owned owned owned 2002Radio 13,662 407 377 2.98 2.76 TV 1,739 27 20 1.55 1.15 2003Radio 13,696 382 391 2.79 2.85 TV 1,749 28 16 1.60 0.91 2004Radio 13,696 393 372 2.87 2.72 TV 1,758 27 17 1.54 0.97 2005Radio 14,015 384 379 2.74 2.70 TV 1,778 27 17 1.52 0.96 22
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1852A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1852A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 09-1852 August 24, 2009 NOTICE OF EFFECTIVE DATE OF NEW FORBEARANCE PROCEDURAL RULES WC Docket No. 07-267 On June 26, 2009, the Commission adopted the Forbearance Procedures Order, which promulgated rules for the consideration of forbearance petitions under section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Those rules, except for new rule 1.54 (``Petitions for forbearance must be complete as filed''), which requires approval by the Office of Management and Budget, become effective 30 days after publication of notice of the order in the Federal Register. The Federal Register published a summary of the Forbearance Procedures Order on August 6, 2009. Accordingly, the following rules adopted in the Forbearance Procedures Order will take
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.txt
  • of Businesses 02/28/13 3060-1131 Implementation of the NET 911 Improvement Act of 2008: Location Information from Owners and Controllers of 911 and E911 Capabilities 12/31/12 3060-1133 FCC 308 and Secs. 73.3545 and 73.3580 01/31/13 3060-1135 Revisions to Rules Authorizing the Operation of Low Power Auxiliary Stations (including Wireless Microphones) 08/31/13 3060-1136 Spectrum Dashboard Customer Feedback 08/31/13 3060-1138 Secs. 1.49 and 1.54 04/30/13 3060-1139 Residential Fixed Broadband Services Testing and Measurement 04/30/11 3060-1140 Requests for Waiver of Various Petitioners to Allow the Establishment of 700 MHz Interoperable Public Safety Wireless Broadband Networks 11/30/13 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1741 � � kd� kd kd kd" * @ I J T a j k u � � � - � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-357A1.txt
  • companies, and foundations/endowments (2.29%); (2) foreign-organized banks, insurance companies, and foundations/endowments (5.72%) (Canada); (3) U.S.-organized pension funds (63.63%); (6) foreign-organized pension funds (28.16%) (Canada, Netherlands). See id. at 3. Federal Communications Commission DA 10-357 10 may be foreign, we calculate that foreign citizens hold indirectly up to an additional 0.003 percent foreign equity interest (10% x 0.2% x 15.4%) and 1.54 percent foreign voting interest (10% x 100% x 15.4%) in Mobsat US.59 Because the Petitioners have not provided information for the record as to the citizenship of GE's foreign shareholders, we treat these small equity and voting interests as non-WTO investment. 18. Foreign Equity and Voting Interests Held By Other Foreign Investors: The remaining shares of MobSat Group are held
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-357A1_Rcd.pdf
  • companies, and foundations/endowments (2.29%); (2) foreign-organized banks, insurance companies, and foundations/endowments (5.72%) (Canada); (3) U.S.-organized pension funds (63.63%); (6) foreign-organized pension funds (28.16%) (Canada, Netherlands). See id. at 3. 2049 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-357 may be foreign, we calculate that foreign citizens hold indirectly up to an additional 0.003 percent foreign equity interest (10% x 0.2% x 15.4%) and 1.54 percent foreign voting interest (10% x 100% x 15.4%) in Mobsat US.59 Because the Petitioners have not provided information for the record as to the citizenship of GE's foreign shareholders, we treat these small equity and voting interests as non-WTO investment. 18. Foreign Equity and Voting Interests Held By Other Foreign Investors: The remaining shares of MobSat Group are held
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-427A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules, the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) submitted projections of demand and administrative expenses for the second quarter of 2010. Accordingly, the projected demand and expenses are as follows: ($ millions) Program Demand Projected Program Support Admin. Expenses Application Of Interest Income Application of True-Ups & Adjustments Total Program Collection (Revenue Requirement) Schools and Libraries 543.58 18.92 (3.54) 1.54 560.50 Rural Health Care 52.38 2.82 (0.33) 0.12 54.99 High-Cost 1,119.57 7.85 (0.14) 51.35 1,178.63 Low Income 358.22 1.48 (0.02) 26.57 386.25 TOTAL 2,073.75 31.07 (4.03) 79.58 2,180.37 USAC Projections of Industry Revenues USAC submitted projected collected end-user telecommunications revenues for April through June 2010 based on information contained in the Second Quarter 2010 Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet (FCC Form 499-Q).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1375A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1375A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1375A1.txt
  • (MB 2010). See Second Report and Order at �� 23-24. Stay Request at 3-4. Second Report and Order at � 32. Stay Request at 4. Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 758 F.2d 669, 674 (D.C. Cir. 1985). Id. Washington Gas, 758 F.2d at 674. Stay Request at 5. Second Report and Order at � 29. 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(k), 1.54(j). 47 C.F.R. � 1.43. 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1375 � � � � � 0 0 X Jtm X Jtm
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2027A1.txt
  • operators (MVNOs) it provides services to, but also to the entire class of other potential MVNOs that lack their own facilities and seek Lifeline support. The Wireline Competition Bureau sought comment on Telispire's petition. Two commenters opposed the petition for forbearance, raising questions about whether Telispire was entitled to seek such forbearance under section 10(c) of the Act and section 1.54 of the Commission's rules and arguing that the petition did not meet the statutory criteria for forbearance. On November 14, 2011, Telispire submitted a request to withdraw its petition for forbearance and requested that the Commission dismiss its petition without prejudice. We grant the request to dismiss the petition and do not address the merits of Telispire's forbearance request or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
  • 0.94 2008 140 $46.03 0.64 $33.46 0.75 $30.41 0.85 137 $33.72 1.14 $33.56 1.01 Second operator subgroup (incumbents) 2009 70 $43.10 0.86 $36.34 0.74 $35.38 0.82 70 $30.87 1.10 $34.77 1.08 2008 70 $45.87 0.61 $36.27 0.75 $33.54 0.98 70 $34.34 1.25 $38.07 1.13 Second operator subgroup (rivals) 2009 70 $45.84 2.37 $19.69 2.41 $15.97 1.59 67 $40.25 4.06 $9.36 1.54 2008 70 $46.76 2.33 $20.18 2.38 $15.63 1.55 67 $30.68 2.75 $11.36 2.19 DBS subgroup 2009 207 $44.47 1.01 $33.79 0.89 $32.28 0.90 207 $23.21 0.85 $29.27 0.91 2008 207 $43.74 0.62 $31.04 0.52 $29.05 0.51 207 $22.86 0.80 $28.78 0.83 Wireless MVPD subgroup 2009 31 $54.25 0.92 $33.87 0.48 $29.16 0.52 31 $35.54 1.59 $40.56 1.31 2008 31 $53.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • Contour Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.002 (0.21) 0.014 (0.17) 0.014 (1.73) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.001 (0.03) 0.027 (1.43) 0.029 (1.59) Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.39) 0.017 (1.39) 0.004 (0.49) 0.007 (0.77) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.015 (0.53) 0.002 (0.12) 0.008 (0.53) Contour/Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.006 (0.27) 0.021 (1.44) 0.022 (1.54) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.004 (0.12) 0.024 (1.02) 0.028 (1.23) * - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 95 percent level of confidence. ** - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 99 percent level of confidence. The coefficient on the number of LPFM stations is reported. Other coefficients are not reported. t-statistics are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-346A1.txt
  • CenturyLink filed a petition pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, requesting that the Commission forbear from ``dominant carrier regulation and the Computer Inquiry tariffing requirement with respect to its packet-switched and optical transmission services'' for those services subject to the regulations. Specifically, CenturyLink seeks forbearance from 47 U.S.C. �� 203, 204(a)(3); 47 C.F.R. �� 1.54(a)(1), (e)(1), 61.31-61-59, 63.71, 63.03 and requirements from related Commission Orders. CenturyLink states that, because of recent mergers, its enterprise broadband services are subject to different regulations depending on which CenturyLink affiliate - Qwest, Embarq, or CenturyTel - previously provided (or didn't provide) those services. Interested parties may file comments on or oppositions to CenturyLink's Petition on or before April 5,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-396A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules, the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) submitted projections of demand and administrative expenses for the second quarter of 2012. Accordingly, the projected demand and expenses are as follows: ($ millions) Program Demand Projected Program Support Admin. Expenses Application Of Interest Income Application of Periodic True-Ups & Prior Period Adjustment Total Program Collection Schools and Libraries 584.99 18.19 (1.54) 10.64 612.28 Rural Health Care 35.74 3.51 (2.21) (0.22) 36.82 High-Cost 1,125.00 4.98 (3.10) 5.97 1,132.85 Low Income 622.01 2.15 (0.17) (6.12) 617.87 TOTAL 2,367.74 28.83 (7.02) 10.27 2,399.82 USAC Projections of Industry Revenues USAC submitted projected collected end-user telecommunications revenues for April through June 2012 based on information contained in the Second Quarter 2012 Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet (FCC Form
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-451A1.txt
  • (CenturyLink Petition). Petition of CenturyLink for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. �160(c) from Dominant Carrier and Certain Computer Inquiry Requirements on Enterprise Broadband Services, WC Docket No. 12-60, Protective Order, DA 12-454 (rel. Mar. 22, 2012) (Protective Order). 47 U.S.C. � 160. CenturyLink Petition at 1, 9-10. Specifically, CenturyLink seeks forbearance from 47 U.S.C. �� 203, 204(a)(3); 47 C.F.R. �� 1.54(a)(1), (e)(1), 61.31-61-59, 63.71, 63.03 and requirements from related Commission Orders. Pleading Cycle Established for Comments on CenturyLink Petition for Forbearance from Dominant Carrier and Certain Computer Inquiry Requirements on Enterprise Broadband Services, WC Docket 12-60, Public Notice, DA 12-346 (rel. March 6, 2012). COMPTEL Motion for Extension of Time, WC Docket No. 12-60 (filed Mar. 13, 2012) (COMPTEL Motion). NASUCA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.txt
  • 4,992 2,574 1.70 2.17 3.43 5.05 6 18 16 16 16Venezuela 1,913 2,412 0 4,325 1,700 0.79 1.31 1.49 2.14 1 19 n.a. n.a. n.a.Denmark 1,267 234 2,520 4,021 542 0.46 2.89 5.82 7.00 6 20 23 29 29Argentina 779 3,150 30 3,959 1,128 0.24 0.46 0.76 1.34 6 21 28 27 23Colombia 1,391 2,273 24 3,688 1,313 0.61 1.26 1.54 3.11 7 22 15 17 17Taiwan 1,647 1,837 48 3,532 4,580 0.87 0.71 1.64 2.32 7 23 n.a. 21 18India 1,453 1,986 23 3,462 734 0.72 1.44 1.77 2.50 1 24 17 18 12Italy 2,650 709 92 3,451 1,765 3.31 2.60 2.09 2.34 9 25 26 28 27Russia 1,528 1,484 40 3,052 439 1.00 1.53 2.38 3.53 7 26 22
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 0.57 0.00 0.87 0.65 3.69 2,747 2,865 5,680 Global Crossing 0.05 0.00 0.61 0.41 2.15 575 1,583 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681 26,235 Verizon 0.20 0.00 0.44 0.21 1.54 58,300 131,143 190,087 Price Caps 0.07 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.42 186,646 342,940 530,987 NECA 1.00 1.40 1.59 1.43 8.62 16,085 17,824 17,354 All Price Caps and NECA 0.15� 0.07� 0.48� 0.24� 1.71� 202,731 360,764 548,341 Source: Access tariff filings. 2/ Non-traffic sensitive charges include charges assessed on a per-month, per-unit basis. Prior to 07/01/94 these charges were included in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • per Minute 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Percent Change 1997 to 2002 Australia $1.32 $1.25 $1.09 $1.01 $0.68 $0.30 $0.42 $0.55 $0.51 $0.38 $0.27 -10.3% Brazil 1.13 1.06 0.97 0.96 0.78 0.73 0.67 0.57 0.45 0.25 0.22 -69.2 Canada 0.39 0.41 0.36 0.34 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.26 0.19 0.19 -37.6 China 2.02 1.80 1.54 1.47 1.28 1.14 0.90 0.73 0.48 0.29 0.24 -79.0 Colombia 1.15 1.07 1.01 1.00 0.84 0.89 0.77 0.65 0.43 0.26 0.21 -77.0 Dominican Republic 0.97 0.98 0.83 0.84 0.70 0.57 0.45 0.27 0.25 0.20 0.15 -73.9 Egypt 1.33 1.35 1.27 1.25 1.04 1.03 0.97 0.81 0.70 0.44 0.28 -73.3 El Salvador 1.19 1.24 1.20 1.23 1.17 1.08 0.81 0.69 0.60
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255869A1.txt
  • Stillman (2003). 17 TABLE 2 SECOND SPECIFICATION: DBS PENETRATION AND STRATIFIED QUALITY-ADJUSTED CABLE PRICE THE FULL MODEL REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND GOODNESS OF FIT STATISTICS (t-statistics in parentheses) Variable Estimated Coefficient t Statistic PLUSTENDROP -1.12 (0.32) NEG10TO10 0.91 (0.58) PLUS10RISE 14.21** (2.10) LPREM 0.06 (0.30) CABINT 0.15 (0.51) CABREGSPORT -0.36 (1.37) CABFOREIGN 0.19 (0.75) CABHIDEF -0.51* (1.82) LNOVERAIR -0.19 (0.83) LNLAT -1.54** (2.29) LPOVERTY -0.22** (2.15) LMULTDWELL -0.15 (1.30) DBSOVERAIR 0.41* (1.74) Constant 4.89* (1.88) Observations 525 F-Statistic 2.05** Hansen J Statistic 6.97* ** - significant at 95% confidence level, * - significant at 90% confidence level First Stage Diagnostics F-Statistic Centered R2 Partial R2 Shea Partial R2 F-Statistic of Excluded Instruments PLUSTENDROP 2.05*** 0.11 0.06 0.04 3.21** NEG10TO10 10.87*** 0.32 0.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • Revenues per Minute 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Percent Change 1998 to 2003 Australia $1.25 $1.09 $1.01 $0.68 $0.30 $0.42 $0.55 $0.51 $0.38 $0.27 $0.25 -39.9% Brazil 1.06 0.97 0.96 0.78 0.73 0.67 0.57 0.45 0.25 0.22 0.14 -78.8 Canada 0.41 0.36 0.34 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.26 0.19 0.19 0.16 -48.4 China 1.80 1.54 1.47 1.28 1.14 0.90 0.73 0.48 0.29 0.24 0.18 -80.5 Colombia 1.07 1.01 1.00 0.84 0.89 0.77 0.65 0.43 0.26 0.21 0.11 -85.2 Dominican Republic 0.98 0.83 0.84 0.70 0.57 0.45 0.27 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.16 -64.7 Egypt 1.35 1.27 1.25 1.04 1.03 0.97 0.81 0.70 0.44 0.28 0.21 -78.8 El Salvador 1.24 1.20 1.23 1.17 1.08 0.81 0.69 0.60
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.txt
  • 40,504 Operating Data Customer Lines (thousands) 2 2,321 - - 15,522 52,356 Number of Employees 6,373 40,400 2,400 41,000 162,700 Selected Financial Data Revenues $27,428 $71,283 Costs and Expenses 27,731 58,166 Interest Expense 1,248 2,561 Other Income and Adjustments 1 1,130 (328) Income Taxes 591 2,397 Net Income (Loss) (1,012) 7,831 Earnings per Share (0.71) 2.83 Dividends per Share 2.00 1.54 Average Shares Outstanding (millions) 904 2,831 Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 22,628 74,124 Total Assets 41,321 165,958 Long-Term Debt 15,916 35,674 Shareholders' Equity 13,521 37,560 Operating Data Customer Lines (thousands) 2 7,700 52,9674 Number of Employees 59,900 210,000 1 Includes extraordinary items and cumulative net effect of changes in accounting principles. 2 Network (switched) access lines. 3 The per-share
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 1.13 140 Louisiana 1,387,322 154,053 548,411 6.25 7.00 7.62 167 1.60 198 Maine 446,308 35,703 160,985 6.23 6.43 7.13 50 0.48 59 Maryland 1,832,011 345,209 1,027,670 5.65 5.65 5.65 217 2.08 257 Massachusetts 2,035,084 285,472 1,067,862 6.22 6.43 6.68 259 2.49 308 Michigan 2,527,940 197,379 1,583,070 5.48 5.56 5.97 293 2.80 347 Minnesota 1,581,339 144,846 682,315 5.30 5.22 6.20 160 1.54 190 Mississippi 814,970 54,933 296,356 6.25 7.00 7.61 93 0.89 110 Missouri 1,953,586 190,534 772,852 5.51 5.57 6.30 200 1.92 237 Montana 346,833 21,857 141,523 6.25 7.00 9.20 43 0.42 52 Nebraska 455,686 28,678 266,720 5.34 5.26 6.20 51 0.49 60 Nevada 796,389 105,710 396,494 4.60 4.59 5.47 76 0.73 90 New Hampshire 491,737 55,863 161,847 6.22 6.43 6.86 54
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • 1.13 140 Louisiana 1,387,322 154,053 548,411 6.25 7.00 7.62 167 1.60 198 Maine 446,308 35,703 160,985 6.23 6.43 7.13 50 0.48 59 Maryland 1,832,011 345,209 1,027,670 5.65 5.65 5.65 217 2.08 257 Massachusetts 2,035,084 285,472 1,067,862 6.22 6.43 6.68 259 2.49 308 Michigan 2,527,940 197,379 1,583,070 5.48 5.56 5.97 293 2.80 347 Minnesota 1,581,339 144,846 682,315 5.30 5.22 6.20 160 1.54 190 Mississippi 814,970 54,933 296,356 6.25 7.00 7.61 93 0.89 110 Missouri 1,953,586 190,534 772,852 5.51 5.57 6.30 200 1.92 237 Montana 346,833 21,857 141,523 6.25 7.00 9.20 43 0.42 52 Nebraska 455,686 28,678 266,720 5.34 5.26 6.20 51 0.49 60 Nevada 796,389 105,710 396,494 4.60 4.59 5.47 76 0.73 90 New Hampshire 491,737 55,863 161,847 6.22 6.43 6.86 54
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 9.94 10.00 9.96 13.42 13.50 13.46 Maryland 7.52 8.25 7.52 0.84 3.50 3.50 0.42 1.75 1.75 7.94 10.00 9.27 8.78 13.50 12.77 Massachusetts 8.20 8.25 8.20 6.00 8.45 8.45 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.95 10.00 9.95 15.95 18.45 18.40 Michigan 7.10 8.25 7.29 0.00 3.50 1.98 0.00 1.75 0.99 7.10 10.00 8.28 7.10 13.50 10.27 Minnesota 6.78 8.25 7.22 0.00 1.76 1.54 0.00 0.88 0.77 6.78 9.13 7.99 6.78 10.89 9.53 Mississippi 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.37 0.00 1.75 1.69 8.25 10.00 9.94 8.25 13.50 13.31 Missouri 6.75 8.25 7.34 0.00 3.50 0.84 0.00 1.75 0.42 6.75 10.00 7.76 6.75 13.50 8.61 Montana 8.24 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 3.00 0.00 1.75 1.50 8.24 10.00 9.75 8.24 13.50 12.75 Nebraska 6.51 8.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 4.99 New York 2.06 -4.62 7.00 -7.98 North Carolina -0.41 -3.16 2.84 25.11 North Dakota 2.50 -4.00 6.77 2.12 Northern Mariana Islands -16.96 8.29 -23.31 0.00 Ohio -0.32 -3.37 3.16 6.17 Oklahoma -5.30 -5.50 0.21 12.10 Oregon 0.96 -3.80 4.95 -7.72 Pennsylvania 2.82 -4.11 7.23 38.82 Puerto Rico -8.77 -3.65 -5.31 -28.31 Rhode Island -1.04 -7.74 7.26 0.00 South Carolina 1.54 -2.54 4.18 -4.90 South Dakota 4.90 -6.06 11.66 28.10 Tennessee 0.36 -2.60 3.04 -9.42 Texas -6.69 -5.60 -1.16 4.67 Utah -3.62 -2.22 -1.43 -4.52 Vermont 6.73 -1.77 8.66 17.01 Virgin Islands -0.83 0.46 -1.28 -7.72 Virginia 6.21 -3.66 10.24 32.56 Washington 1.93 -2.54 4.58 -2.44 West Virginia 0.34 -2.54 2.95 -28.04 Wisconsin -2.33 -4.06 1.81 20.78 Wyoming 1.67 -2.85 4.65
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
  • 91.2% 91.2% 1.6% -0.1% Maine 1987 3.50 83.1% 90.5% 91.7% 7.4% * 1.3% 94.3% 93.7% 96.4% -0.6% 2.7%* Maryland 1987 3.50 87.0% 85.9% 90.5% -1.1% 4.6% 96.2% 95.3% 94.6% -0.9% -0.7% Massachusetts 1990 8.45 88.2% 91.7% 93.9% 3.5% 2.2% 95.7% 95.9% 96.9% 0.2% 1.0% Michigan 1989 1.98 80.9% 86.0% 87.6% 5.1% * 1.6% 93.3% 94.9% 94.0% 1.6% -0.8% Minnesota 1988 1.54 85.2% 91.7% 94.3% 6.5% * 2.6% 95.9% 97.4% 97.8% 1.5% 0.4% Mississippi 1991 3.37 71.3% 76.6% 83.6% 5.3% 7.1% 81.9% 89.4% 91.5% 7.5% * 2.1% Missouri 1987 0.84 82.5% 95.2% 81.4% 12.7% * -13.8%# 92.2% 97.5% 93.5% 5.3% * -4.0%# Montana 1987 3.00 79.6% 86.3% 88.1% 6.7% * 1.8% 90.3% 94.1% 93.7% 3.8% * -0.4% Nebraska 1998 3.48 90.7% 92.8%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • - Continued 51711031 5171109 7-19 Year 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003* 2004** Representative Monthly Charge *** $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77$13.64$14.49$14.38$14.54$14.53 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 **** **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 3.97 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62 24.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2003 2004 1 2005 2 Representative Monthly Charge 3,4 $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64 $14.49 $14.38 $14.54 $14.57 $14.75 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 5.81 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 4.14 4.19 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Dakota * 44,325 0.15 7 10 13 16 Tennessee 475,312 NA 1.48 70 95 125 158 Texas 2,320,273 NA 7.24 340 465 609 770 Utah 288,009 NA 0.90 42 58 76 96 Vermont * 37,486 0.13 6 8 11 14 Virginia 994,588 NA 3.10 146 199 261 330 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 494,375 NA 1.54 72 99 130 164 West Virginia * 75,064 0.26 12 17 22 28 Wisconsin 626,809 NA 1.96 92 126 165 208 Wyoming * 33,421 0.12 5 7 10 12 Total 3/ 32,033,915 NA 100.00% $4,718 $6,454 $8,438 $10,671 NA - Not Applicable. * Data withheld to maintain firms confidentiality or CLECs have less than 100,000 lines in state. 1/ Industry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • Dakota * 44,325 0.15 7 10 13 16 Tennessee 475,312 NA 1.48 70 95 125 158 Texas 2,320,273 NA 7.24 340 465 609 770 Utah 288,009 NA 0.90 42 58 76 96 Vermont * 37,486 0.13 6 8 11 14 Virginia 994,588 NA 3.10 146 199 261 330 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 494,375 NA 1.54 72 99 130 164 West Virginia * 75,064 0.26 12 17 22 28 Wisconsin 626,809 NA 1.96 92 126 165 208 Wyoming * 33,421 0.12 5 7 10 12 Total 3/ 32,033,915 NA 100.00% $4,718 $6,454 $8,438 $10,671 NA - Not Applicable. * Data withheld to maintain firms confidentiality or CLECs have less than 100,000 lines in state. 1/ Industry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 6.50 10.00 9.90 6.50 13.50 13.40 Maryland 7.42 8.25 7.42 0.84 3.50 3.50 0.42 1.75 1.75 7.84 10.00 9.17 8.68 13.50 12.67 Massachusetts 8.13 8.25 8.13 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.88 10.00 9.88 13.38 13.50 13.38 Michigan 7.09 8.25 7.29 0.00 3.50 1.99 0.00 1.75 0.99 7.09 10.00 8.28 7.09 13.50 10.27 Minnesota 6.65 8.25 7.15 0.00 3.50 1.54 0.00 1.75 0.77 6.65 10.00 7.92 6.65 13.50 9.46 Mississippi 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.35 0.00 1.75 1.67 8.25 10.00 9.92 8.25 13.50 13.27 Missouri 6.50 8.25 8.04 0.00 1.16 0.77 0.00 0.58 0.39 6.50 8.83 8.43 6.50 9.99 9.20 Montana 8.23 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 2.93 0.00 1.75 1.47 8.23 10.00 9.70 8.23 13.50 12.64 Nebraska 6.17 8.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • C CAL-ORE TELEPHONE CO. 9.54 0.00 9.54 12.37 542313 C DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.32 0.40 0.91 0.18 542315 C GLOBAL VALLEY NETWORKS 12.82 3.20 9.32 0.00 542318 C FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.04 -0.03 14.08 41.80 542319 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.-CA (GTE) -5.99 -2.27 -3.80 0.00 542321 C HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY -4.94 -1.26 -3.72 -19.73 542322 C HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY -1.54 -0.76 -0.79 -7.20 542323 C WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.55 -8.64 13.35 17.99 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 10.57 1.64 8.78 14.41 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 4.80 0.05 4.75 5.02 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE -2.47 -3.85 1.44 -19.75 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 4.36 1.01 3.32 3.31 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -5.07 0.75 -5.78 -12.19 542343
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 101.1 103.2 101.1 7-20 Year 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004* 2005** Representative Monthly Charge ***$12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77$13.64$14.49$14.38$14.54$14.57$14.75 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 5.81 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 **** **** **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 4.41 4.19 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • but are subject to rate-of-return regulation. 1 - 5 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier (In Cents per Minute) 1 Rates Effective from 7/1/06-06/30/07 Year 2005 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access Local Minute 2 OriginatingTerminatingSwitching ALLTEL (KY & NE) 0.00� 0.00� 0.55� 0.31� 1.75� 596 938 2,083 BellSouth 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.33 1.54 20,492 66,617 57,115 CenturyTel 5 0.16 0.00 0.51 0.31 1.86 409 1,488 1,897 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.37 1.94 651 2,097 2,750 Citizens 0.15 0.00 0.50 0.45 2.10 1,304 4,744 6,049 Hawaiian Telecom 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.15 1.99 365 1,071 1,525 Iowa Telecom 0.00 0.00 1.55 0.66 4.53 297 349 647 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.16 1.72 14,059 26,119
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272591A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272591A1.pdf
  • right. So the first two pages are commentary, but the budget itself, the projected disbursements are on the third page of that report, if we can turn to that. So first we start out with NANP admin and that's based on a fixed contract that there is with the admin. So there's nothing to be a surprise there. Of that 1.54 million, 85,000 will be paid by Canada and the Caribbean countries. That leaves the cost to be covered at 1.365 million for NANP admin. The next number is pooling. Right now it's highlighted because that is not a final number yet. We're just estimating right now. That 4.1 million is based on -- right now pooling can bill 296,000 maximum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 952,775 76,278 428,319 5.50 5.37 6.04 99 1.04 120 Oregon 1,068,365 90,793 364,865 6.50 6.87 7.81 125 1.32 152 Pennsylvania 3,997,749 454,802 1,522,594 5.99 5.98 6.65 441 4.66 535 Puerto Rico 793,756 0 217,239 6.25 0.00 9.20 84 0.88 101 Rhode Island 209,307 18,550 107,163 6.40 6.40 6.40 26 0.27 31 South Carolina 1,280,498 63,074 458,718 6.46 6.72 7.55 146 1.54 177 South Dakota 142,090 5,715 106,557 6.46 6.43 7.63 21 0.22 26 Tennessee 1,836,933 129,636 583,256 6.38 6.61 7.05 200 2.12 243 Texas 5,445,861 712,218 2,793,989 5.56 5.61 6.21 619 6.54 751 Utah 562,978 60,050 268,646 6.32 6.32 6.56 68 0.72 83 Vermont 228,633 16,326 92,605 6.42 6.40 6.85 26 0.28 32 Virginia 2,117,694 225,999 1,195,243 6.20 6.27 6.75 271
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • 952,775 76,278 428,319 5.50 5.37 6.04 99 1.04 120 Oregon 1,068,365 90,793 364,865 6.50 6.87 7.81 125 1.32 152 Pennsylvania 3,997,749 454,802 1,522,594 5.99 5.98 6.65 441 4.66 535 Puerto Rico 793,756 0 217,239 6.25 0.00 9.20 84 0.88 101 Rhode Island 209,307 18,550 107,163 6.40 6.40 6.40 26 0.27 31 South Carolina 1,280,498 63,074 458,718 6.46 6.72 7.55 146 1.54 177 South Dakota 142,090 5,715 106,557 6.46 6.43 7.63 21 0.22 26 Tennessee 1,836,933 129,636 583,256 6.38 6.61 7.05 200 2.12 243 Texas 5,445,861 712,218 2,793,989 5.56 5.61 6.21 619 6.54 751 Utah 562,978 60,050 268,646 6.32 6.32 6.56 68 0.72 83 Vermont 228,633 16,326 92,605 6.42 6.40 6.85 26 0.28 32 Virginia 2,117,694 225,999 1,195,243 6.20 6.27 6.75 271
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 1.63 -4.86 6.83 4.00 613001A C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. -15.97 -29.21 18.70 INFINITE 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. -19.37 0.95 -20.13 -68.43 613003 C BRISTOL BAY TELEPHONE COOP. INC. 15.18 -3.93 19.90 32.22 613004 C BUSH-TELL INC. 13.22 -4.81 18.93 26.69 613005 A CIRCLE UTILITIES 7.61 -13.73 24.73 35.52 613006 C COPPER VALLEY TEL. COOP. INC. 7.43 -1.54 9.11 9.29 613007 C CORDOVA TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. 77.08 -4.19 84.83 227.16 613008 C ACS OF FAIRBANKS, INC. -6.10 -4.22 -1.96 -40.56 613010 C ACS - NORTHLAND GLACIER STATE -2.77 -0.80 -1.99 -9.72 613011 C INTERIOR TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -3.23 2.17 -5.28 -8.50 613011A C INTERIOR TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -0.32 0.14 -0.47 -9.03 613012 C ACS - ALASKA JUNEAU -14.90
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 101.5 7-20 Year 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005* 2006** Representative Monthly Charge ***$12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77$13.64$14.49$14.38$14.54$14.57$14.60$15.03 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 5.82 5.98 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 **** **** **** **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 4.41 4.15 4.26 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • terminating foreign billed traffic. 6 - 6 Table 6.5 Top Providers of Pure Resale International MTS in 2006 Percent Number of Number of U.S. Carrier of Total Messages Minutes Revenues IMTS (Millions) (Millions) ($ Millions) Resale Revenues Acceris Management and Acquisition LLC 15 152 $18 0.30% Qwest Communications International, Inc. 2 23 7 0.12 Deutsche TeleKom AG 31 394 94 1.54 Sprint Nextel Corporation 139 205 24 0.40 Verizon Communications, Inc. 9 69 12 0.21 Locus Telecommunications, Inc 3 16 8 0.14 Reliance Communications International, Inc 37 155 8 0.14 Global Crossing 8 77 10 0.16 Americatel, Inc. 4 18 8 0.14 Computer Tel, Inc. 3 19 10 0.16 Startec Global Communications Corporation 6 59 14 0.22 Dollar Phone Corp. 58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 1 2007 2 Representative Monthly Charge 3,4 $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77$13.64$14.49$14.38$14.54$14.57$14.66 $15.03 $15.62 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 5.82 5.97 5.74 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 4.14 4.15 4.26 4.26 Total Monthly Charge $17.70$18.18$18.11$19.05$19.24$19.77$19.72$19.95$19.81$20.01$19.95$19.88$19.76$19.93$20.78$22.62$24.07$24.52$24.52$24.64 $25.26 $25.62 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 1.36 -1.23 2.62 0.18 351107 A BALDWIN-NASHVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 0.86 -3.27 4.27 2.98 351108 A BARNES CITY COOP. TEL. CO. -3.45 -8.52 5.54 -0.47 351110 C BERNARD TEL. CO., INC. -4.77 -2.73 -2.09 -9.45 351112 A BREDA TEL. CORPORATION 6.07 4.09 1.91 4.10 351113 A BROOKLYN MUTUAL TEL. CO. -1.25 -4.11 2.98 -1.20 351114 A THE BURT TEL. CO. 1.54 -1.63 3.22 2.03 351115 A BUTLER-BREMER MUT. TEL. CO. -8.25 -8.17 -0.09 -23.24 351118 A CASCADE COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY 2.57 2.62 -0.05 -15.90 351119 A CASEY MUTUAL TEL. CO. -2.78 -8.25 5.96 3.67 351121 A CENTER JUNCTION TEL. CO., INC. -3.04 -8.05 5.45 -0.27 351125 A CENTRAL SCOTT TEL. 1.81 -2.21 4.11 35.37 351126 A CENTURYTEL OF CHESTER, INC. 0.33 -4.55
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • 1.36 -1.23 2.62 0.18 351107 A BALDWIN-NASHVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 0.86 -3.27 4.27 2.98 351108 A BARNES CITY COOP. TEL. CO. -3.45 -8.52 5.54 -0.47 351110 C BERNARD TEL. CO., INC. -4.77 -2.73 -2.09 -9.45 351112 A BREDA TEL. CORPORATION 6.07 4.09 1.91 4.10 351113 A BROOKLYN MUTUAL TEL. CO. -1.25 -4.11 2.98 -1.20 351114 A THE BURT TEL. CO. 1.54 -1.63 3.22 2.03 351115 A BUTLER-BREMER MUT. TEL. CO. -8.25 -8.17 -0.09 -23.24 351118 A CASCADE COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY 2.57 2.62 -0.05 -15.90 351119 A CASEY MUTUAL TEL. CO. -2.78 -8.25 5.96 3.67 351121 A CENTER JUNCTION TEL. CO., INC. -3.04 -8.05 5.45 -0.27 351125 A CENTRAL SCOTT TEL. 1.81 -2.21 4.11 35.37 351126 A CENTURYTEL OF CHESTER, INC. 0.33 -4.55
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • Representative Monthly Charge 3,4 $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64 $14.49 $14.38 $14.54 $14.57 $14.66 $15.03 $15.62 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 5.82 5.97 5.74 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 4.14 4.15 4.26 4.26 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292562A1.txt
  • new Appendix B. The new Appendix B contains the rules as published in the Federal Register. Paragraph 35 of Appendix C is corrected to read as follows: Description of Projected Reporting, Record Keeping and other Compliance Requirements ``35. The rules adopted in this Order require that petitions for forbearance must be complete as filed as set forth in new section 1.54 ``Petitions for forbearance must be complete as filed.'' Section 1.54 requires that petitions for forbearance must identify the requested relief, including each provision, rule, or requirement from which forbearance is sought; each carrier, or group of carriers, for which forbearance is sought; each service for which forbearance is sought; each geographic location, zone, or area for which forbearance is sought;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295259A1.pdf
  • sharing of ideas and "tool-kits" Help bring scale to innovative and successful local efforts -Large-scale public/private partnerships that deliver comprehensive solutions to non-adopters via existing channels to reach them -A tax deduction for employers who pay for devices and connectivity for low-income, non-adopter employees -Developing digital literacy standards and enhancing digital literacy support Adoption and Utilization 28 Accessibility Guiding Principles 1.54 million Americans have some sort of disability, including speech, hearing, vision, mobility, and cognitive disabilities 2.Preliminary FCC survey data suggests that of those with disabilities, only 42% have adopted broadband 3.People with disabilities face the same barriers to adoption that other Americans face (affordability, relevance, skills) 4.In addition, people with disabilities face their own unique barriers: -High cost of assistive
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50 6.87 7.75 105 1.26 129 Pennsylvania 3,541,398 323,320 1,395,758 5.99 5.97 6.64 389 4.65 478 Puerto Rico 609,130 0 180,370 6.25 0.00 9.20 66 0.78 81 Rhode Island 169,971 12,682 87,885 6.40 6.39 6.39 21 0.25 26 South Carolina 1,094,256 50,957 440,569 6.46 6.72 7.52 129 1.54 158 South Dakota 113,849 4,086 99,585 6.46 6.43 7.60 18 0.22 22 Tennessee 1,592,877 93,740 592,873 6.38 6.61 7.29 181 2.17 223 Texas 4,794,610 565,052 2,697,160 5.55 5.61 6.21 559 6.68 686 Utah 497,009 44,318 266,065 6.32 6.32 6.56 62 0.74 76 Vermont 206,660 12,680 82,462 6.41 6.39 6.83 24 0.28 29 Virginia 1,899,654 159,626 1,127,202 6.18 6.23 6.73 244
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 782,989 60,228 394,585 5.49 5.36 6.01 84 1.00 103 Oregon 870,517 65,895 342,050 6.50 6.87 7.75 105 1.26 129 Pennsylvania 3,541,398 323,320 1,395,758 5.99 5.97 6.64 389 4.65 478 Puerto Rico 609,130 0 180,370 6.25 0.00 9.20 66 0.78 81 Rhode Island 169,971 12,682 87,885 6.40 6.39 6.39 21 0.25 26 South Carolina 1,094,256 50,957 440,569 6.46 6.72 7.52 129 1.54 158 South Dakota 113,849 4,086 99,585 6.46 6.43 7.60 18 0.22 22 Tennessee 1,592,877 93,740 592,873 6.38 6.61 7.29 181 2.17 223 Texas 4,794,610 565,052 2,697,160 5.55 5.61 6.21 559 6.68 686 Utah 497,009 44,318 266,065 6.32 6.32 6.56 62 0.74 76 Vermont 206,660 12,680 82,462 6.41 6.39 6.83 24 0.28 29 Virginia 1,899,654 159,626 1,127,202 6.18 6.23 6.73 244
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.txt
  • Nevada 5.53 8.25 6.30 0.00 3.50 1.86 0.00 1.75 0.93 5.53 10.00 7.23 5.53 13.50 9.09 New Hampshire 8.14 8.25 8.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.14 8.25 8.16 8.14 8.25 8.16 New Jersey 7.07 8.25 8.03 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 7.07 10.00 9.77 7.07 13.50 13.25 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.08 0.00 1.75 1.54 8.25 10.00 9.79 8.25 13.50 12.87 New York 5.93 8.25 8.03 0.00 3.50 3.11 0.00 1.75 1.56 5.93 10.00 9.59 5.93 13.50 12.70 North Carolina 7.43 8.25 7.89 3.50 3.50 3.49 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.18 10.00 9.63 12.68 13.50 13.13 North Dakota 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 1.78 0.00 1.75 0.89 8.25 10.00 9.14 8.25 13.50 10.92 N. Marianna Islands
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • IDAHO TOTAL 19.19 -6.02 26.83 -3.81 472213 C ALBION TEL. CO. D/B/A ATC COMMUNICATIONS 1.41 0.83 0.57 -3.18 472215 C CAMBRIDGE TEL. CO.,INC.-ID 5.72 -0.44 6.19 6.81 472218 C CUSTER TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 11.34 1.09 10.14 13.21 472220 C FILER MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 8.30 -0.30 8.62 15.75 472221 C FARMERS MUTUAL TEL CO LTD. - ID -6.69 -5.23 -1.54 0.00 472222 C FREMONT TELCOM CO. -4.50 1.27 -5.70 -16.02 472223 C CENTURYTEL OF THE GEM STATE, INC.-ID 3.18 -2.87 6.23 3.75 472225 C CENTURYTEL OF IDAHO, INC. -6.26 -3.16 -3.20 -17.11 472226 C MIDVALE TEL. EXCH. INC. -7.85 -2.09 -5.89 -14.55 472227 A MUD LAKE TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE ASSN. INC. -23.89 -10.91 -14.57 -53.42 472230 C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300946A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300946A7.txt
  • 7,356 $31,561 2,016 901.83 20.94 Blaine 12,859 4,159 $29,394 975 928.43 13.85 Bryan 37,815 14,422 $28,618 2,986 908.8 41.61 Caddo 30,229 10,957 $28,972 2,091 1278.33 23.65 Canadian 98,701 31,484 $50,062 8,043 899.71 109.70 Carter 47,125 17,992 $30,750 4,327 823.79 57.21 Cherokee 44,671 16,175 $28,019 2,946 751.04 59.48 Choctaw 15,297 6,220 $24,406 1,223 773.93 19.77 Cimarron 2,833 1,257 $27,311 322 1835.04 1.54 Cleveland 224,898 79,186 $45,799 18,711 536.11 419.50 Coal 5,743 2,373 $24,474 408 518.22 11.08 Comanche 112,429 39,808 $34,645 6,038 1069.35 105.14 Cotton 6,589 2,614 $29,156 445 636.64 10.35 Craig 15,078 5,620 $32,520 1,381 761.03 19.81 Creek 68,708 25,289 $35,288 5,379 955.53 71.91 Custer 25,208 10,136 $30,422 2,451 986.51 25.55 Delaware 39,146 14,838 $29,686 2,818 740.65 52.85 Dewey 4,568 1,962 $31,531
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • Nevada 5.53 8.25 6.30 0.00 3.50 1.86 0.00 1.75 0.93 5.53 10.00 7.23 5.53 13.50 9.09 New Hampshire 8.14 8.25 8.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.14 8.25 8.16 8.14 8.25 8.16 New Jersey 7.07 8.25 8.03 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 7.07 10.00 9.77 7.07 13.50 13.25 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.08 0.00 1.75 1.54 8.25 10.00 9.79 8.25 13.50 12.87 New York 5.93 8.25 8.03 0.00 3.50 3.11 0.00 1.75 1.56 5.93 10.00 9.59 5.93 13.50 12.70 North Carolina 7.43 8.25 7.89 3.50 3.50 3.49 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.18 10.00 9.63 12.68 13.50 13.13 North Dakota 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 1.78 0.00 1.75 0.89 8.25 10.00 9.14 8.25 13.50 10.92 N. Marianna Islands
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 SOUTH CAROLINA 1.42 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 0.43 0.20 4.36 SOUTH DAKOTA 5.67 0.24 0.01 0.26 0.00 5.59 0.04 1.86 13.67 TENNESSEE 0.38 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.23 0.13 1.52 TEXAS 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.25 0.11 1.59 UTAH 0.41 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.16 0.27 1.48 VERMONT 0.67 0.09 0.00 1.54 0.00 1.50 0.42 0.66 4.87 VIRGIN ISLANDS 5.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.26 0.00 0.00 19.24 VIRGINIA 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.91 0.06 1.18 WASHINGTON 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.51 0.13 1.79 WEST VIRGINIA 0.20 0.01 0.00 1.61 0.00 0.17 1.47 0.19 3.64 WISCONSIN 0.71 0.06 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 1.62 0.00 0.41 2.80 WYOMING 3.49 0.04
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 SOUTH CAROLINA 1.42 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 0.43 0.20 4.36 SOUTH DAKOTA 5.67 0.24 0.01 0.26 0.00 5.59 0.04 1.86 13.67 TENNESSEE 0.38 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.23 0.13 1.52 TEXAS 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.25 0.11 1.59 UTAH 0.41 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.16 0.27 1.48 VERMONT 0.67 0.09 0.00 1.54 0.00 1.50 0.42 0.66 4.87 VIRGIN ISLANDS 5.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.26 0.00 0.00 19.24 VIRGINIA 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.91 0.06 1.18 WASHINGTON 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.51 0.13 1.79 WEST VIRGINIA 0.20 0.01 0.00 1.61 0.00 0.17 1.47 0.19 3.64 WISCONSIN 0.71 0.06 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 1.62 0.00 0.41 2.80 WYOMING 3.49 0.04
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-289A1.txt
  • Feb. 18, 2000, at 7. 152Id. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 E-19 Table E-1: MMDS Internet Access Offerings Company Location Direction Maximum Downstream Speed Alaska Wireless Cable Fairbanks, AK Two-way N/A Cache Valley AIRNET Cache Valley, UT Two-way 5 Mbps IJNT.net, Inc. Salt Lake City, UT Beaumont, TX One-way 10 Mbps Nucentrix Broadband Networks, Inc. Austin, TX Sherman, TX Two-way 1.54 Mbps Sioux Valley Wireless Sioux Falls, SD Two-way 4 Mbps SkyLynx Communications Fresno, CA Sarasota, FL Two-way (in conjunction with unlicensed) 11 Mbps Phoenix, AZ Two-way 2 Mbps Sprint Detroit, MI San Francisco, CA Two-way (trial) 2 Mbps U.S. Interactive dba AccelerNet Houston, TX One-way 10 Mbps Wireless First Traverse City, MI Two-way N/A WorldCom Baton Rouge, LA Jackson, MI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • 10.7-12.7 GHz band in Region 2 and the 10.7-12.75 GHz band in Regions 1 and 3 for downlinks and one gigahertz within the 12.75-13.25 GHz, 13.75-14.5, and 17.3-17.8 GHz (Regions 1 and 3 only) bands for uplinks. Inter-satellite links are proposed in optical frequency bands. H-LINK proposes to offer a wide variety of two-way, broadband services at data rates from 1.54 Mbps up to 155 Mbps, backbone infrastructure and Virtual Private Network. Hughes File No.: SAT-LOA-19990108-00003 Hughes has filed an application for authority to launch and operate a global Ku-band broadband satellite system called HughesNET (H-Net). The proposed system consists of a seventy NGSO satellite constellation operating at an altitude of 1490 kilometers. The constellation consists of ten planes, with seven
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-134A1.txt
  • 10.7-12.7 GHz band in Region 2 and the 10.7-12.75 GHz band in Regions 1 and 3 for downlinks and one gigahertz within the 12.75-13.25 GHz, 13.75-14.5, and 17.3-17.8 GHz (Regions 1 and 3 only) bands for uplinks. Inter-satellite links are proposed in optical frequency bands. H-LINK proposes to offer a wide variety of two-way, broadband services at data rates from 1.54 Mbps up to 155 Mbps, and to offer backbone infrastructure and a virtual private network. Hughes File No.: SAT-LOA-19990108-00003 Hughes has also filed an application for authority to launch and operate a global Ku-band broadband satellite system called HughesNET (H-Net). The proposed system consists of a seventy NGSO satellite constellation operating at an altitude of 1490 kilometers. The constellation consists
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-192A1.txt
  • using MDS spectrum in approximately 28 different counties. These companies are generally small, independent MDS licensees offering Internet access at speeds of up to 11 Mbps downstream to a limited number of residential and small business customers in one to three markets apiece. These markets are generally smaller towns and cities. For example, LMA Systems offers two-way Internet access at 1.54 Mbps downstream and 768 kbps upstream in Wilkes-Barre and Sunbury, PA. In addition, Alaska Wireless offers two-way MDS-based Internet access in Fairbanks, AK. Some MDS carriers - including QuadraVision in Carson City and Reno, NV and American Rural TV in La Junta, CO - offer fixed wireless Internet access on a one-way basis and use a telephone line for the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • Completed - Total Dispatch 9.70 15.19 7.53 8.44 6.59 8.50 5.01 6.50 1b,2a,3b,4b,1n,2n, 3n,4n PR-4-02 Average Delay Days - Total 7.67 6.96 9.67 8.37 8.19 8.17 5.56 9.22 PR-4-04 % Missed Appointment - Verizon - Dispatch 19.56 4.44 5.34 0.50 5.52 1.84 5.06 0.46 PR-4-05 % Missed Appointment - Verizon - No Dispatch 0.15 8.33 0.17 50.00 0.38 0.00 0.14 1.54 1b,2a,3a,4n PR-6-01 % Install. Troubles Reported within 30 Days 4.28 9.40 1.63 12.84 1.95 12.57 1.90 11.01 PR-8-01 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 1.01 9.09 1.07 10.10 1.09 15.48 1.33 7.32 PR-8-02 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0.60 0.76 0.69 0.96 0.77 1.19 0.83 0.91 1n,2n,3n,4n UNE xDSL Loops PR-2-01 Av. Interval
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-389A1.txt
  • Databook 2001, July 2001, at 36. TABLE C-3 2001 Concentration in the National Market for Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 16.44 2 Time Warner 14.35 3 DirecTV 11.32 4 Comcast 9.53 Top 4 51.64 5 Charter 7.35 6 Cox 6.98 7 EchoStar 6.87 8 Adelphia 6.51 Top 8 79.35 9 Cablevision 3.40 10 Insight 1.54 Top 10 84.29 Top 25 89.70 Top 50 91.38 HHI 905(3) Notes: MSO subscriber totals as of June 2001, and reported in Top Cable System Operators as of June 2001, Kagan World Media, Cable TV Investor, August 29, 2001, at 12-13. There is no double counting of subscribers. If a cable operator is partially owned by more than one MSO,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-218A1.txt
  • total of 438 MHz. MVDDS has been allocated 500 MHz for, inter alia, delivery of video and data. MMDS has access to thirteen channels of 6 MHz each, and it has been noted that MMDS systems have not had sufficient channel capacity to compete with most cable systems. In contrast, a 0.4 MHz bandwidth digital 1DS-1 channel can typically handle 1.54 megabits per second and carry twenty-four voice circuits, and a 10 MHz channel can handle 44.7 megabits per second and carry 672 voice circuits. These examples demonstrate that typical video use needs significantly more spectrum than typical voice or data use for each channel. When the Commission opens spectrum for video use, we anticipate that spectrum to require much more
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 2 - 204001Elct Man-4 Digital DS3 Loop 1.74 6.00 6.00 2.53 6.00 2.80 6.00 5.02 6.00abcde 2 - 204003Elct Man- UNE Dark Fiber 6.00 37.29 6.00 8.91 6.00 1.07 6.00 6.00abcde 2 - 204004Elct Man- UNE EELs - Voice Grade 2.03 6.00 1.99 6.00 1.28 6.00 1.66 6.00 1.51 6.00 2 - 204005Elct Man- UNE EELs - DS1 1.74 6.00 1.54 6.00 1.65 6.00 1.67 6.00 1.85 6.00 2 - 204006Elct Man- UNE EELs - DS3 3.09 6.00 0.98 6.00 6.00 2.60 6.00 2.17 6.00abcde 2 - 204701Elct Man-UNE Dedicated Trnsprt DS1 3.00 6.00 3.90 6.00 5.19 6.00 3.61 6.00 8.92 6.00 2 - 204702Elct Man-UNE Dedicated Trnsprt DS3 3.39 6.00 2.73 6.00 3.72 6.00 2.92 6.00 2.96 6.00 2 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data B.2.1.3.1.3Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Switch Based Orders/FL (days) 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 B.2.1.3.1.4Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 1.20 1.54 1.18 1.61 1.23 1.55 1.23 1.90 1.38 B.2.1.3.2.1Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.00 5.06 11.41 4.20 10.61 5.36 11.32 3.37 11.16 3.33 1,4,5 B.2.1.3.2.2Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (days) 3.38 0.44 7.04 7.00 3.10 4.11 2.67 6.50 3.89 1,2,3,4 B.2.1.3.2.4Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 4.98 1.00 8.77 7.00 3.81 6.00 4.27 6.50 5.95 1,2,3,4 B.2.1.4.1.1Combo Other/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.txt
  • to describe bandwidth segments in the microwave bands capable of carrying the same amount of data as fiber optic cable. The capacity and loading requirements specified in our rules in Section 101.141 (a) (3) show that in such microwave bands as the 6 GHz or 11 GHz, the bandwidth segments of 0.4 to 40 MHz have a typical utilization of 1.54 to 134.1 Mbits/sec or the equivalent of 1 DS-1 to 3 DS-3 lines. In fiber optics, and in these higher 70/80/90 GHz microwave bands, greater bandwidth segments than 40 MHz are afforded (5,000 MHz is possible here), and the typical utilization is one or more OC-3 signals (155.52 Mbits/sec per OC-3 signal). Because of the similarity in data carrying capacity
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.pdf
  • he laid out the concept of ``new rules for new wires.'' I believe that the Commission should freeze the service capacity level that must be made available on new or upgraded facilities to the service capacity level provided by the ILEC prior to the new investment in a hybrid facility. For example, under this approach competitors receiving access capacity at 1.54 mbs per second using pre-existing ILEC facilities would be able to continue to receive such access capacity at the same bit rate under newly deployed hybrid facilities. I believe that incumbents should be given the proper incentives to push fiber deeper into their networks and closer to the American consumer. And such an approach actually facilitates the deployment of electronic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A5.pdf
  • he laid out the concept of "new rules for new wires." I believe that the Commission should freeze the service capacity level that must be made available on new or upgraded facilities to the service capacity level provided by the ILEC prior to the new investment in a hybrid facility. For example, under this approach competitors receiving access capacity at 1.54 mbs per second using pre-existing ILEC facilities would be able to continue to receive such access capacity at the same bit rate under newly deployed hybrid facilities. I believe that incumbents should be given the proper incentives to push fiber deeper into their networks and closer to the American consumer. And such an approach actually facilitates the deployment of electronic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-219A1.txt
  • a reasonable increase in the value of R2, which represents the fraction of the variation in the data that is explained by the regression. The next specification adds age raised to the third power to the previous specification and yields the following results: Regression Specification 3 Independent Variable Coefficient Robust Standard Error t-Statistic Constant 0.1080096 0.0563045 1.92 Age 0.0283781 0.0183821 1.54 Age2 0.0009049 0.0015611 0.58 Age3 -0.0000393 0.0000367 -1.07 R2 = 0.435 This result generates an estimate of the penetration rate of 26.76% for a network five years after launch. The result also yields coefficients that ensure that no network, regardless of its age, has a penetration rate above 100%. The increase in the value of R2 is much less pronounced
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-77A1.txt
  • company, and Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P. (Harbinger Special Fund), a Delaware limited partnership (together, the ``Harbinger Funds'') hold collectively 5.97 percent of the equity and 18.63 percent of the voting interest of SkyTerra. Harbinger Master Fund Cayman holds 4.43 percent of the equity interests and 13.83 percent of the voting interests in SkyTerra. Harbinger Special Fund holds 1.54 percent of the equity interests and 4.80 percent of the voting interests in SkyTerra. Harbinger Master Fund Cayman is controlled by Harbinger Capital Partners Offshore Fund I, Ltd. (Offshore Fund), a Cayman Islands exempted corporation. The investment principals, officers and directors of Harbinger Master Fund Cayman and Offshore Fund are citizens of the United States, Ireland and the United Kingdom.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-56A1.txt
  • 15 U.S.C. 79 et seq.; 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(j), 160, 201, 225, and 303. 2. Section 1.49 is amended by adding paragraph (f)(1)(iv) to read as follows: � 1.49 Specifications as to pleadings and documents. (f)(1) (iv) Petition for forbearance proceedings. Subpart A [Amended] 3. Add undesignated center heading below �1.52 to read as follows: Forbearance Proceedings 4. Add new ��1.54 through 1.59 as follows: � 1.54 Petitions for forbearance must be complete as filed. (a) Description of relief sought. Petitions for forbearance must identify the requested relief, including: (1) Each statutory provision, rule, or requirement from which forbearance is sought. (2) Each carrier, or group of carriers, for which forbearance is sought. (3) Each service for which forbearance is sought.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-355A1.txt
  • traversing the local loop, directing the voiceband signals through a pair of "asymmetrical" refers to the asymmetry between the maximum upstream and downstream transmission rates. Actual downstream transmission speed decreases, however, in relation to the distance and the number of line impairments between the user and the serving central office. Thus, ADSL subscribers will generally experience downstream data rates from 1.54 to 6.14 Mbps, and upstream data rates from 176 to 640 kbps. 136 These xDSL technologies do not use the frequencies immediately above the voiceband, preserving them as a "buffer" zone to ensure the integrity of voiceband traffic. ADSL technologies, including the relatively new Universal ADSL Working Group (UAWG) "G.Lite" standard, as well as Rate-Adaptive DSL and Multiple Virtual Lines
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/broadbandtoday.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/broadbandtoday.pdf
  • and downstream packets of information. Cable companies thus can operate as "pipeline" or "conduit" services, or become full-service providers combining both Internet access and other value-added services. TABLE 1: Transfer Rate For A 10-Megabyte File Modem Speed/ Type Transfer Time 14.4-Kbps* Telephone Modem 1.5 hours 28.8-Kbps Telephone Modem 46 minutes 56-Kbps Telephone Modem 24 minutes 128-Kbps ISDN Modem 10 minutes 1.54-Mbps T-1 Connection 52 seconds 4-Mbps Cable Modem 20 seconds 10-Mbps Cable Modem 8 seconds *kbps (kilobits per second) & Mbps (Megabits per second) Source: http://www.cablemodems.com/whatis.html Not Without Problems Despite the expanded capacity, technical problems for providing advanced services over cable HFC networks remain. Return path transmission interference results from noise generated at the connection points between the trunk-distribution line connection
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.txt
  • meas ATTACHMENT A-5b SBC/AMERITECH MEASUREMENT LIST (CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA) ATTACHMENT A-6 YEAR 1 CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 4.16 $ 0.35 California $ 79.01 $ 6.58 Connecticut $ 9.56 $ 0.80 Illinois $ 30.41 $ 2.53 Indiana $ 9.71 $ 0.81 Kansas $ 5.89 $ 0.49 Michigan $ 23.55 $ 1.96 Missouri $ 10.87 $ 0.91 Nevada $ 1.54 $ 0.13 Ohio $ 17.81 $ 1.48 Oklahoma $ 7.05 $ 0.59 Texas $ 40.99 $ 3.41 Wisconsin $ 9.45 $ 0.79 $250.00 $ 20.83 ATTACHMENT A-6 (cont'd) YEAR 2 CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 6.24 $ 0.52 California $ 118.51 $ 9.88 Connecticut $ 14.34 $ 1.20 Illinois $ 45.62 $ 3.80 Indiana $ 14.57 $ 1.21
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99355.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99355.txt
  • second (Mbps) ``downstream,'' and transmitting up to 1 Mbps ``upstream.'' The nomenclature ``asymmetrical'' refers to the asymmetry between the maximum upstream and downstream transmission rates. Actual downstream transmission speed decreases, however, in relation to the distance and the number of line impairments between the user and the serving central office. Thus, ADSL subscribers will generally experience downstream data rates from 1.54 to 6.14 Mbps, and upstream data rates from 176 to 640 kbps. These xDSL technologies do not use the frequencies immediately above the voiceband, preserving them as a ``buffer'' zone to ensure the integrity of voiceband traffic. ADSL technologies, including the relatively new Universal ADSL Working Group (UAWG) ``G.Lite'' standard, as well as Rate-Adaptive DSL and Multiple Virtual Lines (MVL)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00290.pdf
  • buildings over the network. Local telecommunications providers offer redundant support to this network rather than supplying the institutional network itself.183 138. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts will soon create another option for public entities in Waltham. The Massachusetts Community Network initiative has contracted with a provider to allow public entities across the state to purchase high-speed Internet access (at T1 rates, 1.54 Mbps) off a single contract.184 While Waltham has the option of using this network once it is operational, it will not need to do so because of its own facilities.185 182 An open video system (OVS) is an alternative regulatory treatment of multichannel video program distributor service established by the 1996 Act. 47 U.S.C. �571 (a)(3) - (4). An OVS
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • 10.7-12.7 GHz band in Region 2 and the 10.7-12.75 GHz band in Regions 1 and 3 for downlinks and one gigahertz within the 12.75-13.25 GHz, 13.75-14.5, and 17.3-17.8 GHz (Regions 1 and 3 only) bands for uplinks. Inter-satellite links are proposed in optical frequency bands. H-LINK proposes to offer a wide variety of two-way, broadband services at data rates from 1.54 Mbps up to 155 Mbps, backbone infrastructure and Virtual Private Network. Hughes File No.: SAT-LOA-19990108-00003 Hughes has filed an application for authority to launch and operate a global Ku-band broadband satellite system called HughesNET (H-Net). The proposed system consists of a seventy NGSO satellite constellation operating at an altitude of 1490 kilometers. The constellation consists of ten planes, with seven
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.txt
  • ATTACHMENT A-5b SBC/AMERITECH MEASUREMENT LIST (CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA) ATTACHMENT A-6 YEAR 1 CIPP CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 4.16 $ 0.35 California $ 79.01 $ 6.58 Connecticut $ 9.56 $ 0.80 Illinois $ 30.41 $ 2.53 Indiana $ 9.71 $ 0.81 Kansas $ 5.89 $ 0.49 Michigan $ 23.55 $ 1.96 Missouri $ 10.87 $ 0.91 Nevada $ 1.54 $ 0.13 Ohio $ 17.81 $ 1.48 Oklahoma $ 7.05 $ 0.59 Texas $ 40.99 $ 3.41 Wisconsin $ 9.45 $ 0.79 $250.00 $ 20.83 ATTACHMENT A-6 (cont'd) YEAR 2 CIPP CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 6.24 $ 0.52 California $ 118.51 $ 9.88 Connecticut $ 14.34 $ 1.20 Illinois $ 45.62 $ 3.80 Indiana $ 14.57 $
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc00289.pdf
  • Feb. 18, 2000, at 7. 152Id. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 E-19 Table E-1: MMDS Internet Access Offerings Company Location Direction Maximum Downstream Speed Alaska Wireless Cable Fairbanks, AK Two-way N/A Cache Valley AIRNET Cache Valley, UT Two-way 5 Mbps IJNT.net, Inc. Salt Lake City, UT Beaumont, TX One-way 10 Mbps Nucentrix Broadband Networks, Inc. Austin, TX Sherman, TX Two-way 1.54 Mbps Sioux Valley Wireless Sioux Falls, SD Two-way 4 Mbps SkyLynx Communications Fresno, CA Sarasota, FL Two-way (in conjunction with unlicensed) 11 Mbps Phoenix, AZ Two-way 2 Mbps Sprint Detroit, MI San Francisco, CA Two-way (trial) 2 Mbps U.S. Interactive dba AccelerNet Houston, TX One-way 10 Mbps Wireless First Traverse City, MI Two-way N/A WorldCom Baton Rouge, LA Jackson, MI
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • 73.67 NA 68.59 NA MR-4-08- 3345 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 24.86NA 25.39 NA 27.56 NA MR-5 � Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01- 3345 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 55.52NA 57.53 NA 56.83 NA Special Services - Maintenance MR-2 � Trouble Report Rate MR-2-01- 3200 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.24 1.45 0.24 1.49 0.2 1.62 0.21 1.8 0.21 1.54 MR-2-05- 3200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.29 1.94 0.31 2.66 0.27 2.63 2.57 2.94 MR-4 � Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01- 3200 Mean Time To Repair � Total 6.9 7.23 7.76 7.45 MR-4-01- 3216 Mean Time To Repair � Total - Non DS0 & DS0 6.52NA 5.77 NA 6.45 2.25 MR-4-01- 3217 Mean Time To Repair � Total - DS1
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Hundt/spreh739.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Hundt/spreh739.txt
  • May of this year the FCC released its Universal Service Order, which allocates up to $400 million a year to the estimated 12,000 eligible health care providers. This is the single greatest government commitment ever made to the development of telehealth. The FCC decided that eligible providers will be able to choose telecommunications services of any transmission speed up to 1.54 Mbps (equivalent to a T-1, at rates comparable to those paid in urban areas. This support will apply to any type of telecommunications technology, including telephone, wireless, and satellite services. In addition, universal service funds will cover a limited amount of toll-free access to the nearest Internet service provider. Health care providers who do not now have local access to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3544A1.html
  • July 30 Letter (``As far as we know today, the source of the violation is a modification on the CPU board. We added an extra track of 3,4 volt power supply. Unfortunately this track became an antenna. Neutral and Line Disturbance tests remained ok, while the test of the Horizontal Polarization showed only a small violation on 229,4 MHz of -1.54 dB. The Vertical Polarization test however showed the bad results.''). 12 July 10 Letter (``We believe that the modifications which are the reason, that some of our organs were violating FCC rules, have been done between July and October 2002. The modifications have been built in limited numbers of organs. Some of them have been shipped to the US and
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • GHz band in Region 2 and the 10.7-12.75 GHz band in Regions 1 and 3 for downlinks and one gigahertz within the 12.75-13.25 GHz, 13.75-14.5, and 17.3- 17.8 GHz (Regions 1 and 3 only) bands for uplinks. Inter-satellite links are proposed in optical frequency bands. H-LINK proposes to offer a wide variety of two-way, broadband services at data rates from 1.54 Mbps up to 155 Mbps, backbone infrastructure and Virtual Private Network. Hughes File No.: SAT-LOA-19990108-00003 Hughes has filed an application for authority to launch and operate a global Ku-band broadband satellite system called HughesNET (H-Net). The proposed system consists of a seventy NGSO satellite constellation operating at an altitude of 1490 kilometers. The constellation consists of ten planes, with seven
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc000289.pdf
  • Feb. 18, 2000, at 7. 152Id. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 E-19 Table E-1: MMDS Internet Access Offerings Company Location Direction Maximum Downstream Speed Alaska Wireless Cable Fairbanks, AK Two-way N/A Cache Valley AIRNET Cache Valley, UT Two-way 5 Mbps IJNT.net, Inc. Salt Lake City, UT Beaumont, TX One-way 10 Mbps Nucentrix Broadband Networks, Inc. Austin, TX Sherman, TX Two-way 1.54 Mbps Sioux Valley Wireless Sioux Falls, SD Two-way 4 Mbps SkyLynx Communications Fresno, CA Sarasota, FL Two-way (in conjunction with unlicensed) 11 Mbps Phoenix, AZ Two-way 2 Mbps Sprint Detroit, MI San Francisco, CA Two-way (trial) 2 Mbps U.S. Interactive dba AccelerNet Houston, TX One-way 10 Mbps Wireless First Traverse City, MI Two-way N/A WorldCom Baton Rouge, LA Jackson, MI
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=glossary
  • 1.0 as bidders drop eligibility. The eligibility ratio is a very informative predictor of an auction. A healthy eligibility ratio at the start of an auction is approximately 3 to 1, which basically means that there are three bidders for every license being auctioned. Examples of eligibility ratios for past auctions: PCS C Block auction 6.72 to 1, WCS auction 1.54 to 1. [106]Return to Top F Term Definition FCC Account Number A ten digit number, assigned to bidders by the FCC upon filing of the short-form application, used to identify and track applicants and bidders. See entry for: [107]Form 175 FCC-Held Licenses A license is listed as "FCC held" because either no bid has yet been placed on the license,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/fc000289.pdf
  • Feb. 18, 2000, at 7. 152Id. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 E-19 Table E-1: MMDS Internet Access Offerings Company Location Direction Maximum Downstream Speed Alaska Wireless Cable Fairbanks, AK Two-way N/A Cache Valley AIRNET Cache Valley, UT Two-way 5 Mbps IJNT.net, Inc. Salt Lake City, UT Beaumont, TX One-way 10 Mbps Nucentrix Broadband Networks, Inc. Austin, TX Sherman, TX Two-way 1.54 Mbps Sioux Valley Wireless Sioux Falls, SD Two-way 4 Mbps SkyLynx Communications Fresno, CA Sarasota, FL Two-way (in conjunction with unlicensed) 11 Mbps Phoenix, AZ Two-way 2 Mbps Sprint Detroit, MI San Francisco, CA Two-way (trial) 2 Mbps U.S. Interactive dba AccelerNet Houston, TX One-way 10 Mbps Wireless First Traverse City, MI Two-way N/A WorldCom Baton Rouge, LA Jackson, MI
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/fcc00289.doc
  • Teligent, with 25 percent of its fixed wireless traffic transmitted using PTMP. Table E-1: MMDS Internet Access Offerings Company Location Direction Maximum Downstream Speed Alaska Wireless Cable Fairbanks, AK Two-way N/A Cache Valley AIRNET Cache Valley, UT Two-way 5 Mbps IJNT.net, Inc. Salt Lake City, UT Beaumont, TX One-way 10 Mbps Nucentrix Broadband Networks, Inc. Austin, TX Sherman, TX Two-way 1.54 Mbps Sioux Valley Wireless Sioux Falls, SD Two-way 4 Mbps SkyLynx Communications Fresno, CA Sarasota, FL Two-way (in conjunction with unlicensed) 11 Mbps Sprint Phoenix, AZ Two-way 2 Mbps Detroit, MI San Francisco, CA Two-way (trial) 2 Mbps U.S. Interactive dba AccelerNet Houston, TX One-way 10 Mbps Wireless First Traverse City, MI Two-way N/A WorldCom Baton Rouge, LA Jackson, MI
• http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3G_appendices.doc http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3G_appendices.pdf
  • outlying areas where the delivery of traditional land-based cable television service is impractical. However, AWS is focusing primarily on businesses and, to a lesser extent, individuals as potential customers for its high-speed Internet access service. LMA Systems, Inc. (``LMA'') is offering high-speed Internet access in three mid-Atlantic markets: Sunbury, PA; Wilkes-Barre, PA; and Lynchburg, VA. LMA offers two-way access at 1.54 Mbps downstream and 768 kbps upstream, and is currently focusing on business customers. World Wide Wireless Communications, Inc. (``WWWC'') currently offers high-speed Internet access in Concord, CA and in several cities outside the United States. WWWC plans to launch service in several additional U.S. cities: San Marcos, Ukiah, and San Diego, CA; South Bend, IN; Hot Springs, AR; Hilo, HI;
• http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreport.doc http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreport.pdf
  • At least 24 other companies offer fixed wireless services in approximately 33 different counties. These companies are small, independent MDS licensees offering Internet access at up to 11 Mbps downstream to a limited number of residential and small business customers in one to five markets apiece (generally smaller towns and cities). For example, LMA Systems offers two-way Internet access at 1.54 Mbps downstream and 768 kbps upstream in Wilkes-Barre and Sunbury, PA. and has plans to enter additional markets. Oxford Telecom offers two-way MDS-based Internet access in Portland, ME. Some MDS carriers - including QuadraVision in Carson City and Reno, NV and American Rural TV in La Junta, CO - offer fixed wireless Internet access on a one-way basis and use
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/broadban.pdf
  • and downstream packets of information. Cable companies thus can operate as "pipeline" or "conduit" services, or become full-service providers combining both Internet access and other value-added services. TABLE 1: TRANSFER RATE FOR A 10-MEGABYTE FILE Modem Speed/ Type Transfer Time 14.4-Kbps* Telephone Modem 1.5 hours 28.8-Kbps Telephone Modem 46 minutes 56-Kbps Telephone Modem 24 minutes 128-Kbps ISDN Modem 10 minutes 1.54-Mbps T-1 Connection 52 seconds 4-Mbps Cable Modem 20 seconds 10-Mbps Cable Modem 8 seconds *kbps (kilobits per second) & Mbps (Megabits per second) Source: http://www.cablemodems.com/whatis.html Not Without Problems Despite the expanded capacity, technical problems for providing advanced services over cable HFC networks remain. Return path transmission interference results from noise generated at the connection points between the trunk-distribution line connection
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/broadbandtoday.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/broadbandtoday.pdf
  • and downstream packets of information. Cable companies thus can operate as "pipeline" or "conduit" services, or become full-service providers combining both Internet access and other value-added services. TABLE 1: Transfer Rate For A 10-Megabyte File Modem Speed/ Type Transfer Time 14.4-Kbps* Telephone Modem 1.5 hours 28.8-Kbps Telephone Modem 46 minutes 56-Kbps Telephone Modem 24 minutes 128-Kbps ISDN Modem 10 minutes 1.54-Mbps T-1 Connection 52 seconds 4-Mbps Cable Modem 20 seconds 10-Mbps Cable Modem 8 seconds *kbps (kilobits per second) & Mbps (Megabits per second) Source: http://www.cablemodems.com/whatis.html Not Without Problems Despite the expanded capacity, technical problems for providing advanced services over cable HFC networks remain. Return path transmission interference results from noise generated at the connection points between the trunk-distribution line connection
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99379.doc
  • slow modems (i.e., 28-56 Kbps). The residential market is beginning to see high-speed services via coaxial cable, ILEC's xDSL, and satellites. Consumers may purchase xDSL service from an ILEC in their area or from a CLEC that has chosen to serve the residential market. Asymmetric digital subscriber line service (ADSL) is well suited to residential use and can provide end-users 1.54 Mbps downstream.. Cable, which reaches primarily residential markets, may provide high speed Internet service. Under certain conditions, a cable modem can offer the residential and small business customers much faster service: downstream speeds between 1.5 and 3 Mbps with a maximum upstream speed of 2 Mbps. Internet services offered by geostationary satellites, e.g., Hughes DirecPC, promise downstream speeds up to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.txt
  • meas ATTACHMENT A-5b SBC/AMERITECH MEASUREMENT LIST (CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA) ATTACHMENT A-6 YEAR 1 CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 4.16 $ 0.35 California $ 79.01 $ 6.58 Connecticut $ 9.56 $ 0.80 Illinois $ 30.41 $ 2.53 Indiana $ 9.71 $ 0.81 Kansas $ 5.89 $ 0.49 Michigan $ 23.55 $ 1.96 Missouri $ 10.87 $ 0.91 Nevada $ 1.54 $ 0.13 Ohio $ 17.81 $ 1.48 Oklahoma $ 7.05 $ 0.59 Texas $ 40.99 $ 3.41 Wisconsin $ 9.45 $ 0.79 $250.00 $ 20.83 ATTACHMENT A-6 (cont'd) YEAR 2 CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 6.24 $ 0.52 California $ 118.51 $ 9.88 Connecticut $ 14.34 $ 1.20 Illinois $ 45.62 $ 3.80 Indiana $ 14.57 $ 1.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99355.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99355.txt
  • second (Mbps) ``downstream,'' and transmitting up to 1 Mbps ``upstream.'' The nomenclature ``asymmetrical'' refers to the asymmetry between the maximum upstream and downstream transmission rates. Actual downstream transmission speed decreases, however, in relation to the distance and the number of line impairments between the user and the serving central office. Thus, ADSL subscribers will generally experience downstream data rates from 1.54 to 6.14 Mbps, and upstream data rates from 176 to 640 kbps. These xDSL technologies do not use the frequencies immediately above the voiceband, preserving them as a ``buffer'' zone to ensure the integrity of voiceband traffic. ADSL technologies, including the relatively new Universal ADSL Working Group (UAWG) ``G.Lite'' standard, as well as Rate-Adaptive DSL and Multiple Virtual Lines (MVL)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00290.pdf
  • buildings over the network. Local telecommunications providers offer redundant support to this network rather than supplying the institutional network itself.183 138. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts will soon create another option for public entities in Waltham. The Massachusetts Community Network initiative has contracted with a provider to allow public entities across the state to purchase high-speed Internet access (at T1 rates, 1.54 Mbps) off a single contract.184 While Waltham has the option of using this network once it is operational, it will not need to do so because of its own facilities.185 182 An open video system (OVS) is an alternative regulatory treatment of multichannel video program distributor service established by the 1996 Act. 47 U.S.C. �571 (a)(3) - (4). An OVS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data B.2.1.3.1.3Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Switch Based Orders/FL (days) 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 B.2.1.3.1.4Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 1.20 1.54 1.18 1.61 1.23 1.55 1.23 1.90 1.38 B.2.1.3.2.1Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.00 5.06 11.41 4.20 10.61 5.36 11.32 3.37 11.16 3.33 1,4,5 B.2.1.3.2.2Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (days) 3.38 0.44 7.04 7.00 3.10 4.11 2.67 6.50 3.89 1,2,3,4 B.2.1.3.2.4Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 4.98 1.00 8.77 7.00 3.81 6.00 4.27 6.50 5.95 1,2,3,4 B.2.1.4.1.1Combo Other/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/Tariffs/Dominant/d102297.pdf
  • S Y N O P S I S 97-317 PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG: 10/22/97 Proposes to enhance its Exchange Access Frame Relay Service (XA-FRS) with new higher speed connections; clarifies the Exchange Access Switched Multi-megabit Data Service (XASMDS) tariff material to show that the Subscriber Network Interface (SNI) associated with a 1.5 Mbps facility will accommodate either a 1.17 or a 1.54 Mbps rate, and includes other corrections. ENG 20 15 10/21/97BELL ATLANTIC 1007 1 PETN-DUE PUS PGS NTC #CDs #DISK TRANS# CARRIER ISSUED FCC# --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EFFDATE 11/5/97 FILING# 1 61.3861.49 Y S.P. # S Y N O P S I S 10/28/97 Proposes to modify rates for certain services provided under Service Provision Option 1. SCF 3 14 10/17/97BT NORTH AMERICA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris04.pdf
  • 91.2% 91.2% 1.6% -0.1% Maine 1987 3.50 83.1% 90.5% 91.7% 7.4% * 1.3% 94.3% 93.7% 96.4% -0.6% 2.7%* Maryland 1987 3.50 87.0% 85.9% 90.5% -1.1% 4.6% 96.2% 95.3% 94.6% -0.9% -0.7% Massachusetts 1990 8.45 88.2% 91.7% 93.9% 3.5% 2.2% 95.7% 95.9% 96.9% 0.2% 1.0% Michigan 1989 1.98 80.9% 86.0% 87.6% 5.1% * 1.6% 93.3% 94.9% 94.0% 1.6% -0.8% Minnesota 1988 1.54 85.2% 91.7% 94.3% 6.5% * 2.6% 95.9% 97.4% 97.8% 1.5% 0.4% Mississippi 1991 3.37 71.3% 76.6% 83.6% 5.3% 7.1% 81.9% 89.4% 91.5% 7.5% * 2.1% Missouri 1987 0.84 82.5% 95.2% 81.4% 12.7% * -13.8%# 92.2% 97.5% 93.5% 5.3% * -4.0%# Montana 1987 3.00 79.6% 86.3% 88.1% 6.7% * 1.8% 90.3% 94.1% 93.7% 3.8% * -0.4% Nebraska 1998 3.48 90.7% 92.8%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64 $14.05 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.03 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.06 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 2.70 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 $21.84 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Representative Monthly Charge *$12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64 $14.49 $14.55 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.64 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.04 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.14 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $23.38 Basic Connection Charge 45.63
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • offering. 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 1 2003 2 Representative Monthly Charge 3,4 $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77 $13.64 $14.49 $14.38 $14.57 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.91 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.28 Total Monthly Charge $17.70$18.18$18.11$19.05$19.24$19.77$19.72$19.95$19.81$20.01$19.95$19.88$19.76$19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $24.07 $24.75 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 1 2004 2 Representative Monthly Charge 3,4 $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77 $13.64 $14.49 $14.38 $14.54 $14.53 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 3.97 Total Monthly Charge $17.70$18.18$18.11$19.05$19.24$19.77$19.72$19.95$19.81$20.01$19.95$19.88$19.76$19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $24.07 $24.52 $24.31 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • of October 15 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Unlimited local calling 12.5812.4412.3212.3012.39 13.1013.1213.2213.2813.62 Federal and state SLCs 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 Taxes and 911 charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 1.85 2.00 2.03 2.17 2.24 2.34 Total for rotary service 16.1316.6616.5717.5317.79 18.6618.7018.9419.0719.49 Additional monthly charge for touch-tone service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.47 1.17 1.08 1.04 0.74 0.49 (including tax) Total for touch-tone service 17.7018.1818.1119.0519.26 19.8319.7819.9819.8119.98 Lowest generally available monthly rate 5.96 5.81 5.67 5.67 5.68 6.18 6.22 6.43 6.47 6.68 Federal and state SLCs 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 Taxes and 911 charges 0.84 0.94 0.91 1.03 1.15 1.28 1.31 1.45 1.50 1.56 Total for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Plan $1.62 $1.99 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-1997 (as of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.82 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.12 Taxes and 911 Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.92 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.06 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-1998 (as of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71 $13.67$13.77 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.55 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 Other 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.85 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.31 Additional Connection Charge for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • 73 (4) 68 117 0.21 122 3 125 OHIO 2,130 75 2,205 2,556 4.51 2,673 63 2,737 OKLAHOMA 510 16 525 594 1.05 622 15 636 OREGON 529 13 542 589 1.04 616 15 631 PENNSYLVANIA 1,832 138 1,970 2,081 3.67 2,176 52 2,228 RHODE ISLAND 192 25 217 217 0.38 227 5 232 SOUTH CAROLINA 607 41 648 872 1.54 912 22 933 SOUTH DAKOTA 84 (5) 79 118 0.21 123 3 126 TENNESSEE 986 69 1,055 1,203 2.12 1,258 30 1,288 TEXAS 3,310 124 3,434 3,646 6.43 3,814 90 3,904 UTAH 277 22 299 312 0.55 327 8 335 VERMONT 114 13 127 151 0.27 158 4 161 VIRGINIA 1,283 105 1,388 1,426 2.52 1,492 35 1,527 WASHINGTON 866
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • 1997 Basic Rev.Misc. Rev.Basic and Basic and AllocationIntrastate Interstate Intrastate Interstate SOCC, 2.13SOCC 2.13Misc. Rev. Misc Rev. PercentageLocal Exch.Local Exch.Local Exch.Local Exch. (Millions)(Millions) (Millions)SOCC Adjusted End User End User Industry Industry (Millions) (Millions)(Millions) (Millions) (Millions) ALABAMA $861 $31 $892 $977 1.68 $987 $2 $1,026 $17 ALASKA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ARIZONA 844 (4) 841 895 1.54 904 2 939 16 ARKANSAS 348 8 356 476 0.82 480 1 499 8 CALIFORNIA 5,725 231 5,956 6,047 10.38 6,108 14 6,348 107 COLORADO 907 136 1,043 1,090 1.87 1,101 3 1,144 19 CONNECTICUT 640 186 825 834 1.43 842 2 875 15 DELAWARE 145 4 149 149 0.26 151 0 157 3 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 295 75 370
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 156 Hawaii 288,425 NA 0.36 142 17 157 18 Idaho 271,436 NA 0.34 133 16 148 17 Illinois 3,922,482 NA 4.92 1,925 225 2,137 241 Indiana 1,318,975 NA 1.66 647 76 719 81 Iowa 774,773 NA 0.97 380 44 422 48 Kansas 669,472 NA 0.84 329 38 365 41 Kentucky 911,700 NA 1.14 447 52 497 56 Louisiana 1,227,106 NA 1.54 602 70 669 75 Maine 187,003 NA 0.23 92 11 102 11 Maryland 1,473,494 NA 1.85 723 84 803 91 Massachusetts 1,892,014 NA 2.37 929 108 1,031 116 Michigan 3,512,813 NA 4.41 1,724 201 1,914 216 Minnesota 1,550,411 NA 1.95 761 89 845 95 Mississippi 673,355 NA 0.84 330 39 367 41 Missouri 1,855,452 NA 2.33 911 106 1,011 114
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 2 QAI, Inc. 139 37.5 3.71 2 Minimum Rate Pricing 415 112.0 3.71 4 RSL COM USA, Inc. 498 183.6 2.71 1 Quest Communications 43 17.5 2.46 2 Equal Net Corporation 41 17.5 2.34 2 OPTICOM 171 81.0 2.11 2 Flat Rate Long Distance 70 37.5 1.87 2 American Network Exchange, Inc. 59 37.5 1.57 2 I-Link Communication 27 17.5 1.54 2 Long Distance International, Inc. 52 37.5 1.39 2 Matrix Telecom 33 37.5 0.88 2 Frontier Communications Services 427 538.8 0.79 1 ILD Teleservices Inc. 64 81.0 0.79 2 NOS Communications, Inc. 109 138.4 0.79 1 Cleartel Communications 27 37.5 0.72 2 Excel Communications 629 1,218.7 0.52 1 Qwest Communications 831 1,664.2 0.50 1 Lifeline 40 81.0 0.49 2 US
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • Urban Areas (as of October 15, 1986-1998) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.77 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.55 Additional Monthly Charge forTouch-tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 Taxes and 911 Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.85 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.31 Additional
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • international points. 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Representative Monthly Charge 1/ $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.75 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 Taxes and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.45 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.87 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • both international and domestic services. TABLE 13.1 AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL RATES FOR LOCAL SERVICE IN URBAN AREAS (as of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.82 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.12 Taxes and 911 Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.92 Basic Connection Charge $45.63$44.04$42.94$43.06$43.06$42.00$41.50$41.38$41.28$40.91$41.11$41.06 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • - 2 Table 14.1 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas (as of October 15, 1986-1998) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.77 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.55 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 Other Mandatory Payments 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.85 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.31 Additional Connection
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 0.57 0.00 0.87 0.65 3.69 2,747 2,865 5,680 Global Crossing 0.05 0.00 0.61 0.41 2.15 575 1,583 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681 26,235 Verizon 0.20 0.00 0.44 0.21 1.54 58,300 131,143 190,087 Price Caps 0.07 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.42 186,646 342,940 530,987 NECA 1.00 1.50 1.12 1.43 7.75 16,085 17,824 17,354 All Price Caps and NECA 0.15� 0.07� 0.47� 0.24� 1.69� 202,731 360,764 548,341 Source: Access tariff filings. 1/ This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Representative Monthly Charge 1 $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64 $14.49 $14.55 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.64 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.04 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.14 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $23.38 Basic Connection Charge $45.63
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 0.01 0.00 0.53 0.73 2.55 454 1,524 1,978 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.31 1.69 769 2,175 2,944 Citizens 0.04 0.00 0.57 0.41 1.99 2,133 4,129 6,264 Iowa Telecom 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.61 3.60 274 429 704 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.16 1.61 16,077 29,870 46,146 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.24 1.35 57,523 62,245 118,294 Sprint 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.14 1.54 4,656 17,943 21,559 Valor 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.38 2.34 306 994 1,301 Verizon 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.20 1.32 36,547 102,421 139,757 Price-cap Carriers 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.22 1.41 139,121 283,585 401,476 NECA 0.00 0.00 1.26 0.71 4.03 * * 18,994 All Price-cap Carriers and NECA 0.00� 0.00� 0.50� 0.25� 1.53� * * 420,470 * NECA no longer files information regarding
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 0.57 0.00 0.87 0.65 3.69 2,747 2,865 5,680 Global Crossing 0.05 0.00 0.61 0.41 2.15 575 1,583 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681 26,235 Verizon 0.20 0.00 0.44 0.21 1.54 58,300 131,143 190,087 Price Caps 0.07 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.42 186,646 342,940 530,987 NECA 1.00 1.40 1.59 1.43 8.62 16,085 17,824 17,354 All Price Caps and NECA 0.15� 0.07� 0.48� 0.24� 1.71� 202,731 360,764 548,341 Source: Access tariff filings. 2/ Non-traffic sensitive charges include charges assessed on a per-month, per-unit basis. Prior to 07/01/94 these charges were included in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Representative Monthly Charge 1 $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64 $14.49 $14.55 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.64 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.04 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.14 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $23.38 Basic Connection Charge $45.63
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • International Points Billed Revenues per Minute 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Australia $1.43 $1.37 $1.35 $1.32 $1.25 $1.09 $1.01 $0.68 $0.30 $0.42 $0.55 Brazil 1.19 1.16 1.16 1.13 1.06 0.97 0.96 0.78 0.73 0.67 0.57 Canada 9/ 0.53 0.43 0.41 0.39 0.41 0.36 0.34 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.28 China 1.69 1.79 1.76 2.02 1.80 1.54 1.47 1.28 1.14 0.90 0.73 Colombia 1.13 1.15 1.17 1.15 1.07 1.01 1.00 0.84 0.89 0.77 0.65 Dominican Republic 1.02 1.07 0.99 0.97 0.98 0.83 0.84 0.70 0.57 0.45 0.30 Egypt 1.28 1.31 1.34 1.33 1.35 1.27 1.25 1.04 1.03 0.97 0.81 El Salvador 1.07 1.13 1.15 1.19 1.24 1.20 1.23 1.17 1.08 0.81 0.69 France 1.08 1.08 1.06 1.04
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • per Minute 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Percent Change 1997 to 2002 Australia $1.32 $1.25 $1.09 $1.01 $0.68 $0.30 $0.42 $0.55 $0.51 $0.38 $0.27 -10.3% Brazil 1.13 1.06 0.97 0.96 0.78 0.73 0.67 0.57 0.45 0.25 0.22 -69.2 Canada 0.39 0.41 0.36 0.34 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.26 0.19 0.19 -37.6 China 2.02 1.80 1.54 1.47 1.28 1.14 0.90 0.73 0.48 0.29 0.24 -79.0 Colombia 1.15 1.07 1.01 1.00 0.84 0.89 0.77 0.65 0.43 0.26 0.21 -77.0 Dominican Republic 0.97 0.98 0.83 0.84 0.70 0.57 0.45 0.27 0.25 0.20 0.15 -73.9 Egypt 1.33 1.35 1.27 1.25 1.04 1.03 0.97 0.81 0.70 0.44 0.28 -73.3 El Salvador 1.19 1.24 1.20 1.23 1.17 1.08 0.81 0.69 0.60
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • 3,095,149 93.4 1.07 Arkansas 1,509,333 68.9 1.45 California 23,385,691 98.4 1.02 Colorado 2,948,466 95.5 1.05 Connecticut 2,406,704 99.0 1.01 Delaware 589,979 100.0 1.00 District of Columbia 919,587 100.0 1.00 Florida 11,317,933 98.3 1.02 Georgia 5,148,317 89.0 1.12 Guam 74,006 0.0 NA Hawaii 721,233 99.9 1.00 Idaho 762,986 90.8 1.10 Illinois 8,012,870 95.0 1.05 Indiana 3,803,634 95.4 1.05 Iowa 1,704,785 64.9 1.54 Kansas 1,666,630 84.1 1.19 Kentucky 2,206,741 88.7 1.13 Louisiana 2,575,040 92.5 1.08 Maine 883,970 82.8 1.21 Maryland 3,940,615 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 4,410,394 99.9 1.00 Michigan 6,149,365 96.2 1.04 Minnesota 3,136,277 73.1 1.37 Mississippi 1,443,215 93.3 1.07 Missouri 3,630,138 91.1 1.10 Montana 553,795 68.0 1.47 Nebraska 955,957 79.3 1.26 Nevada 1,349,473 95.5 1.05 New Hampshire 855,403 93.1 1.07 New Jersey 6,923,410
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.09 10.81 10.21 Minnesota 6.75 7.75 7.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.75 7.75 7.05 6.75 7.75 7.05 Mississippi 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.39 0.00 1.75 1.69 6.75 9.50 9.44 6.75 13.00 12.83 Missouri 7.02 7.75 7.11 0.00 1.14 1.00 0.00 0.57 0.50 7.02 8.32 7.61 7.02 9.46 8.61 Montana 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.09 0.00 1.75 1.54 7.75 9.50 9.29 7.75 13.00 12.38 Nebraska 6.61 7.75 7.08 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.61 9.50 8.82 6.61 13.00 12.30 Nevada 5.25 7.75 6.39 0.00 3.50 3.03 0.00 1.75 1.51 5.25 9.50 7.91 5.25 13.00 10.94 New Hampshire 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 New Jersey 7.42 7.75 7.74
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • South Carolina 5.78 -0.89 6.73 11.29 South Dakota 1.21 -4.28 5.74 14.71 Tennessee 3.74 -2.56 6.46 10.41 Texas 2.80 -1.76 4.65 -13.06 Utah 4.49 -3.34 8.11 58.34 Vermont 5.29 0.03 5.27 -3.50 Virgin Islands -9.48 1.16 -10.52 -22.03 Virginia 3.33 -1.70 5.12 43.76 Washington -1.28 -2.26 1.00 -10.81 West Virginia 1.30 -0.42 1.73 -9.85 Wisconsin 3.45 0.50 2.94 17.94 Wyoming -1.54 0.77 -2.30 1.42 Industry 2.47 -1.55 4.07 4.38 * Percentage changes from 2002 to 2003. 3 - 29 Jurisdiction 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Alabama 662,073,026 668,647,749 687,816,460 677,514,950 724,073,746 Alaska 152,506,664 159,465,673 176,042,390 177,633,372 183,387,830 American Samoa 3,043,804 3,074,550 3,144,341 2,691,847 3,437,359 Arizona 834,038,873 848,586,754 882,723,236 975,543,328 1,007,140,779 Arkansas 499,653,535 504,516,460 529,901,976 570,775,414 599,796,487 California 4,189,430,995 4,084,698,690 4,124,098,569 4,067,559,269
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • Table 7.5 Producer Price Indices - Continued 7 - 18 Year 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Representative Monthly Charge *$12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77$13.64$14.49$14.55 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.64 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.04 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.14 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62 23.38 Basic Connection Charge 45.63
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • Kentucky 1,929,395 0.84 0.46 0.74 122 146 Louisiana 2,620,120 1.14 0.81 1.05 173 207 Maine 1,526,222 0.66 0.24 0.56 91 109 Maryland 4,632,410 2.01 1.53 1.89 310 371 Massachusetts 8,089,003 3.51 1.24 2.94 482 578 Michigan 6,378,524 2.77 4.70 3.25 533 639 Minnesota 2,419,785 1.05 1.33 1.12 183 220 Mississippi 1,197,964 0.52 0.22 0.45 73 88 Missouri 2,863,876 1.24 2.45 1.54 253 303 Montana 627,176 0.27 0.52 0.33 55 66 Nebraska 946,016 0.41 0.93 0.54 89 106 Nevada 523,469 0.23 0.21 0.22 37 44 New Hampshire 1,345,297 0.58 0.35 0.53 86 103 New Jersey 11,186,451 4.85 3.12 4.42 724 868 New Mexico 634,924 0.28 0.71 0.38 63 76 New York 20,459,492 8.87 4.43 7.76 1,273 1,525 North Carolina 6,112,492 2.65 3.18
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 7.08 -0.11 7.20 10.39 613016 C MUKLUK TEL. COMPANY, INC. -0.76 10.69 -10.34 -7.95 613016A C MUKLUK TEL. COMPANY, INC. -21.79 -2.18 -20.04 -100.00 613017 C ALASKA TELEPHONE COMPANY 16.46 -1.70 18.47 43.06 613017A C ALASKA TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.70 -2.97 3.78 -1.65 613018 C NUSHAGAK ELECTRIC & TELEPHONE COOP., INC. -5.97 -9.20 3.56 -6.58 613019 C OTZ TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. -1.54 -3.47 2.00 -4.17 613020 C ACS - NORTHLAND SITKA 5.12 -1.67 6.90 9.93 613022 C ACS - ALASKA GREATLAND 9.67 -4.80 15.19 0.00 613023 C UNITED UTILITIES INC. -0.71 2.52 -3.16 -9.02 613023A C UNITED UTILITIES INC. 10.64 1.88 8.60 34.84 613025 C YUKON TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 6.28 4.83 1.38 3.62 613026 A NORTH COUNTRY TELEPHONE COMPANY -7.93 -8.78 0.93
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 51711031 (June 1995 = 100) Table 7.5 7-19 Year 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002* 2003** Representative Monthly Charge ***$12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77$13.64$14.49$14.38$14.57 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.91 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.28 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62 24.07 24.75 Basic
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 27.4 1,564.6 240.5 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 31,553.1 16,525.2 0.0 1,581.4 67,142.1 2,558.8 6,640.0 15,000.3 For Scheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 0 0 0 4 3 0 12 0 Events per Hundred Switches 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 1.6 0.0 0.9 0.0 Events per Million Access Lines 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.90 3.09 0.00 1.54 0.00 Average Outage Duration in Minutes NA NA NA 18.5 40.0 NA 23.9 NA Avg. Lines Affected per Event in Thousands NA NA NA 3.1 1.5 NA 17.5 NA Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands NA NA NA 48.8 55.4 NA 125.1 NA Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 0.0 0.0 0.0 141.6 171.2 0.0 193.0 0.0 % Common Trunk
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • after release 7 - 17 TABLE 7.7 AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL RATES FOR LOCAL SERVICE IN URBAN AREAS (as of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.82 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.12 Taxes and 911 Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.92 Basic Connection Charge $45.63$44.04$42.94$43.06$43.06$42.00$41.50$41.38$41.28$40.91$41.11$41.06 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 18 Table 7.7 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-1998 (as of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71 $13.67$13.77 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.55 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 Other Mandatory Payments 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.85 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.31 Additional Connection
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.75 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 Taxes 911 and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.45 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.87 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 7.11 3.86 3.12 25.01 351259 A NORTHERN IOWA TEL. CO. 14.36 2.08 12.03 77.15 351260 A NORTHWEST IOWA TEL. CO., INC. 16.99 14.57 2.11 0.00 351261 A NORTHWEST TEL. COOP. 25.44 11.87 12.13 89.57 351262 A NORWAY RURAL TEL. CO. 9.10 1.60 7.38 60.00 351263 A OGDEN TEL. CO.-IA 5.29 4.87 0.40 0.00 351264 A OLIN TEL. CO., INC. 13.40 1.54 11.68 75.81 351265 A ONSLOW COOP. TEL. ASSN. 8.94 2.53 6.25 27.44 351266 A ORAN MUTUAL TEL. CO. 18.11 6.09 11.32 68.42 351269 A PALO COOP. TEL. ASSN. 17.72 6.81 10.22 77.03 351270 A PALMER MUTUAL TEL. CO. 16.30 2.88 13.04 81.13 351271 A PANORA COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 6.68 6.22 0.43 0.00 351273 A PEOPLES TEL. CO.-IA 3.09 -0.44
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • Mexico 1,009,203 87.6 1.14 New York 13,230,572 96.7 1.03 North Carolina 5,213,187 90.1 1.11 North Dakota 397,442 57.5 1.74 N. Mariana Islands 20,990 0.0 NA Ohio 7,001,888 95.1 1.05 Oklahoma 2,110,393 85.4 1.17 Oregon 2,206,230 91.9 1.09 Pennsylvania 8,385,348 95.3 1.05 Puerto Rico 1,331,851 100.0 1.00 Rhode Island 660,645 100.0 1.00 South Carolina 2,387,770 72.4 1.38 South Dakota 428,561 64.9 1.54 Tennessee 3,473,138 86.8 1.15 Texas 13,423,873 94.3 1.06 Utah 1,213,348 95.0 1.05 Vermont 425,849 84.6 1.18 Virgin Islands 68,283 0.0 NA Virginia 4,842,685 97.5 1.03 Washington 3,829,104 92.9 1.08 West Virginia 1,040,178 83.7 1.19 Wisconsin 3,507,890 76.1 1.31 Wyoming 310,803 83.2 1.20 Total 2/ 188,497,257 93.2% 1.07 NA - Not Applicable. 1/ USF loops, a measure of access lines, are
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual00.pdf
  • of Customers Dissatisfied Installations:Residential 12.84 7.29 16.43 9.69 6.75 5.52 4.86 4.88 Small Business 8.25 16.37 12.60 9.63 9.63 11.89 9.30 8.47 Large Business 6.51 NA 20.75 13.59 12.58 9.09 7.33 1.30 Repairs:Residential 18.76 7.88 26.53 16.63 9.57 14.60 15.52 12.02 Small Business 10.40 12.18 18.69 8.80 7.22 11.47 13.51 10.62 Large Business 6.45 NA 37.81 10.53 12.92 9.50 9.17 1.54 Business Office: Residential 11.75 2.97 12.20 10.01 7.06 8.72 7.11 8.09 Small Business 12.03 6.70 21.17 9.19 8.59 11.72 11.95 11.79 Large Business NA NA 27.41 12.43 8.63 8.49 10.82 0.81 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications Table 1(e):Company Comparision -- 2000 Customer Perception Surveys Company BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern North
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual03.pdf
  • 27.4 1,564.6 240.5 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 31,553.1 16,525.2 0.0 1,581.4 67,142.1 2,558.8 6,640.0 15,000.3 For Scheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 0 0 0 4 3 0 12 0 Events per Hundred Switches 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 1.6 0.0 0.9 0.0 Events per Million Access Lines 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.90 3.09 0.00 1.54 0.00 Average Outage Duration in Minutes NA NA NA 18.5 40.0 NA 23.9 NA Avg. Lines Affected per Event in Thousands NA NA NA 3.1 1.5 NA 17.5 NA Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands NA NA NA 48.8 55.4 NA 125.1 NA Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 0.0 0.0 0.0 141.6 171.2 0.0 193.0 0.0 % Trunk Grps.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • (thousands) 4/ 1,097 1,100 4/ 17,600 4/ 61,250 8,300 Number of Employees 13,000 10,700 67,000 220,090 84,100 Selected Verizon Financial Communications WorldCom Data Inc. Inc. Revenues $64,707 $39,090 Costs & Expenses 47,949 30,937 Interest Expense 3,490 970 Other Income and Adjustments 2/ 5,538 (5) Income Taxes 7,009 3,025 Net Income 11,797 4,153 Earnings per Share 4.34 1.46 Dividends per Share 1.54 0 Average Shares Outstanding (millions) 2,713 2,868 Total Assets 164,735 98,903 Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 69,504 37,423 Long-Term Debt 42,491 17,696 Shareholders' Equity 34,578 55,409 Operating Data Customer Lines (thousands) 4/ 63,000 - Number of Employees 260,000 86,100 Source: Company annual reports to shareholders and annual reports Form 10-K. 1/ Operating revenues and costs for AT&T include $13.518
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • Revenues $1,811 $19,695 $45,908 $26,071 $67,190 Costs and Expenses 5,282 18,875 35,020 26,733 55,658 Interest Expense 253 1,442 1,599 1,181 3,369 Other Income and Adjustments 2/ 124 (3,401) 2,050 (182) (5,598) Income Taxes 0 0 4,097 (624) 2,176 Net Income (3,600) (4,023) 7,242 (1,401) 389 Earnings per Share (4.51) (2.42) 2.15 (0.16) 0.14 Dividends per Share 0 0 1.02 0.50 1.54 Average Shares Outstanding (millions) 620 1,661 3,366 887 2,710 Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 2,683 29,977 49,827 28,977 74,419 Total Assets 4,755 73,781 96,322 45,793 170,795 Long-Term Debt 28 20,197 17,133 16,501 45,657 Shareholders' Equity 27 36,655 32,491 12,616 32,539 Operating Data Customer Lines (thousands) 98 4/ 18,000 4/ 59,532 8,200 4/ 61,000 Number of Employees 8,500 61,000 192,550
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • $992 $15,385 $43,138 $26,634 $67,625 Costs and Expenses 2,905 34,282 34,515 24,534 52,628 Interest Expense 64 1,789 1,382 1,406 3,237 Other Income and Adjustments 2/ 2,551 (20,282) 1,426 (103) (6,063) Income Taxes 0 (2,500) 2,984 (39) 1,618 Net Income (Loss) 574 (38,468) 5,653 630 4,079 Earnings per Share n.m. (22.87) 1.70 1.36 1.49 Dividends per Share n.m. 0 1.08 0.50 1.54 Average Shares Outstanding (millions) n.m. 1,682 3,330 892 2,745 Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 1,203 18,995 48,490 28,745 74,496 Total Assets 2,000 29,345 95,057 45,293 167,468 Long-Term Debt 705 19,754 18,536 18,405 44,791 Shareholders' Equity 776 (2,830) 33,199 12,294 32,616 Operating Data Customer Lines (thousands) - 3/ 16,500 3/ 57,083 8,100 3/ 60,276 Number of Employees 3,700 47,000 175,980
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • business as MCI, and it Other Income and Adjustments1 (6,063) 21,900 adopted fresh-start reporting as of year's end Income Taxes 1,618 407 As the company emerged from bankruptcy on Net Income (Loss) 4,079 22,211 April 20, 2004, it merged with and into MCI, Inc., Earnings per Share 1.49 n.a. and WorldCom as a separate entity ceased to Dividends per Share 1.54 n.a. exist. Average Shares Outstanding (millions) 2,745 n.a. Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 74,496 11,758 Total Assets 167,468 27,367 Long-Term Debt 44,791 7,117 Shareholders' Equity 32,616 8,472 Operating Data Customer Lines (thousands)2 60,276 - Number of Employees 229,500 56,600 n.a. - not available. 1 Includes extraordinary items and cumulative net effect of changes in accounting principle 2 Network (switched)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • (1.10) 50.9 FL GEORGIA 196.2 72.6 123.7 111.9 11.7 (0.49) 0.19 (0.36) (0.66) 12.4 GA HAWAII 110.6 62.5 48.2 42.6 5.6 0.48 (0.10) 0.27 0.65 4.9 HI IDAHO 5.7 9.5 (3.8) (3.7) (0.1) (1.99) (1.23) (0.64) (3.85) 3.8 ID ILLINOIS 388.1 199.7 188.4 155.9 32.5 (0.92) 0.87 0.76 0.71 31.8 IL INDIANA 257.5 124.4 133.1 118.3 14.8 1.14 (0.12) 0.51 1.54 13.3 IN IOWA 25.2 23.5 1.8 2.5 (0.8) (2.49) (2.10) (2.07) (6.65) 5.9 IA KANSAS 54.2 32.5 21.7 15.9 5.9 0.11 0.07 0.09 0.26 5.6 KS KENTUCKY 105.3 44.3 61.1 54.5 6.6 0.47 (0.45) 0.12 0.14 6.4 KY LOUISIANA 143.9 37.4 106.5 100.9 5.6 (0.33) (0.01) (0.10) (0.44) 6.0 LA MAINE 23.0 3.4 19.5 15.1 4.4 0.20 (0.06) 0.00 0.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 0.66 1.26 1.96 3.76 1.27 2.44 0.78 1.50 1979 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.64 3.14 1.07 2.04 0.66 1.26 1.96 3.76 1.27 2.44 0.78 1.50 1980 15/ 1.97 3.77 1.28 2.45 0.79 1.51 1.74 3.34 1.13 2.17 0.70 1.34 2.07 3.97 1.35 2.58 0.83 1.59 1981 16/ 2.29 4.39 1.49 2.85 0.92 1.76 2.01 3.86 1.31 2.51 0.80 1.54 2.40 4.60 1.56 2.99 0.96 1.84 1982 17/ 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.14 4.09 1.28 2.45 0.86 1.64 2.40 4.60 1.44 2.76 0.96 1.84 1983 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.14 4.09 1.28 2.45 0.86 1.64 2.40 4.60 1.44 2.76 0.96 1.84 1984 18/ 2.18 4.18 1.31 2.51 0.87 1.67 2.02 3.87 1.21 2.32 0.81 1.55 2.24
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • LONG DISTANCE MESSAGE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE UNITED STATES-OVERSEAS DIAL STATION DIAL STATION COUNTRY STANDARD ECONOMY COUNTRY STANDARD ECONOMY ARGENTINA $2.17 $1.49ITALY $1.69 $1.20 AUSTRALIA 1.70 1.17JAMAICA 1.79 1.47 AUSTRIA 1.62 1.16JAPAN (INCLUDING OKINAWA) 1.63 1.18 BAHAMAS 1.29 1.04KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 2.04 1.43 BELGIUM 1.74 1.11NETHERLANDS 1.48 0.96 BERMUDA 1.40 1.16PAKISTAN 4.64 3.05 BRAZIL 2.07 1.51PANAMA, REPUBLIC OF 1.97 1.51 CHILE 1.96 1.54PERU 2.24 1.57 CHINA, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF 2.92 2.26PHILIPPINES 2.44 1.64 COLOMBIA 2.09 1.53POLAND, REPUBLIC OF 1.77 1.42 COSTA RICA 1.85 1.38PORTUGAL (INCLUDING AZORES 1.85 1.20 DENMARK 1.64 1.08 AND MADEIRA ISLANDS) DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 1.78 1.49SAUDI ARABIA 2.36 1.85 ECUADOR 2.08 1.71SINGAPORE, REPUBLIC OF 1.85 1.22 EGYPT, ARAB REPUBLIC OF 2.44 1.97SOUTH AFRICA, REPUBLIC OF 1.97 1.48 EL SALVADOR 1.96 1.59SPAIN
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • COSTS & EXPENSES 4,305 12,961 1/ 45,736 24,938 17,219 1,364 INTEREST EXPENSE 264 611 427 1,335 837 112 OTHER INCOME & ADJUSTMENTS 2/ 347 2,055 2,410 (352) 684 13 INCOME TAXES 447 2,031 3,072 2,008 2,224 22 NET INCOME 525 3,606 6,398 2,933 3,527 57 EARNINGS PER SHARE 1.91 3.27 3.59 1.89 1.79 0.22 DIVIDENDS PER SHARE 1.18 1.22 1.32 1.54 0.73 0 AVG. SHARES OUTSTANDING (MIL.) 274 1,102 1,800 1,578 1,970 259 TOTAL ASSETS 9,374 30,299 59,550 55,144 39,410 5,293 PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP. (NET) 4,828 14,305 26,903 36,816 23,940 4,049 LONG-TERM DEBT 3,492 5,557 5,556 17,646 8,715 1,900 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 3,271 10,897 25,522 13,025 16,110 1,793 OPERATING DATA: CUSTOMER LINES (THOUS.) 1,890 20,968 - 41,600 24,025 952 NUMBER OF
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • Costs & Expenses 4,777 1/ 51,532 24,679 18,787 987 1,079 Interest Expense 280 1,651 1,263 1,030 62 87 Other Income & Adjustments 2/ 86 (501) (473) 81 (20) 288 Income Taxes 547 3,257 2,557 2,040 33 65 Net Income 784 3/ 5,450 4,202 3,448 29 144 Earnings per Share 2.50 1.77 2.71 1.82 0.20 0.55 Dividends per Share 1.24 0.88 1.54 0.76 0.20 0 Avg. Shares Outstanding (Mil.) 313 3,082 1,553 1,898 144 262 Total Assets 10,774 169,406 62,614 43,453 6,508 5,772 Property, Plant & Equipment (Net) 5,735 39,618 39,299 24,631 2,501 2,889 Long-Term Debt 3,750 21,591 18,463 9,113 2,136 2,107 Shareholders' Equity 4,206 78,927 15,880 14,815 2,133 1,920 Operating Data Customer Lines (Thous.) 2,433 - 43,000 44,852 1,055 997 Number
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • $992 $15,385 $43,138 $26,634 $67,625 Costs and Expenses 2,905 34,282 34,515 24,534 52,628 Interest Expense 64 1,789 1,382 1,406 3,237 Other Income and Adjustments 2/ 2,551 (20,282) 1,426 (103) (6,063) Income Taxes 0 (2,500) 2,984 (39) 1,618 Net Income (Loss) 574 (38,468) 5,653 630 4,079 Earnings per Share n.m. (22.87) 1.70 1.36 1.49 Dividends per Share n.m. 0 1.08 0.50 1.54 Average Shares Outstanding (millions) n.m. 1,682 3,330 892 2,745 Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 1,203 18,995 48,490 28,745 74,496 Total Assets 2,000 29,345 95,057 45,293 167,468 Long-Term Debt 705 19,754 18,536 18,405 44,791 Shareholders' Equity 776 (2,830) 33,199 12,294 32,616 Operating Data Customer Lines (thousands) - 4/ 16,500 4/ 57,083 8,100 4/ 60,276 Number of Employees 3,700 47,000 175,980
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • 10.7-12.7 GHz band in Region 2 and the 10.7-12.75 GHz band in Regions 1 and 3 for downlinks and one gigahertz within the 12.75-13.25 GHz, 13.75-14.5, and 17.3-17.8 GHz (Regions 1 and 3 only) bands for uplinks. Inter-satellite links are proposed in optical frequency bands. H-LINK proposes to offer a wide variety of two-way, broadband services at data rates from 1.54 Mbps up to 155 Mbps, backbone infrastructure and Virtual Private Network. Hughes File No.: SAT-LOA-19990108-00003 Hughes has filed an application for authority to launch and operate a global Ku-band broadband satellite system called HughesNET (H-Net). The proposed system consists of a seventy NGSO satellite constellation operating at an altitude of 1490 kilometers. The constellation consists of ten planes, with seven
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9060.pdf
  • the 10.7-12.7 GHz (Region 2) and 10.70-12.75 GHz (Regions 1 and 3) bands for space-to-Earth transmissions and one gigahertz within the 12.75-13.25 GHz, 13.75-14.5 GHz, and 17.3-17.8 GHz (Regions 1 and 3 only) bands for Earth-to-space transmissions. Inter-satellite links are proposed in optical frequency bands. Hughes proposes to offer a wide variety of two-way, broadband services at data rates from 1.54 Mbps up to 155 Mbps, backbone infrastructure and Virtual Private Network. S2363 SAT-LOA-19990108-00003 HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS INC. Launch and Operating Authority Hughes Communications Inc. has filed an application for authority to launch and operate a global Ku-band broadband satellite system called HughesNET (H-Net). The proposed system consists of a seventy NGSO satellite constellation operating at an altitude of 1490 kilometers. The
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/1997/pnmc7012.html
  • centers, not-for-profit hospitals, local health departments, rural health clinics, and consortia of these entities. Eligible health care providers must also be located in rural areas. Which telecommunications services will be supported for eligible health care providers? Public and non-profit rural health care providers are eligible for support for any telecommunications services employing transmission speeds of less than or equal to 1.54 Mbps. 1.54 Mbps is equivalent to a T-1, so, for example, an eligible health care provider could choose a T-1, a quarter T-1, an ISDN line, or a satellite connection at supported rates. The 1996 Act requires that universal service funds be available on a technology neutral and telecommunications provider neutral basis. In addition, any public or non-profit health care
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.txt
  • ATTACHMENT A-5b SBC/AMERITECH MEASUREMENT LIST (CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA) ATTACHMENT A-6 YEAR 1 CIPP CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 4.16 $ 0.35 California $ 79.01 $ 6.58 Connecticut $ 9.56 $ 0.80 Illinois $ 30.41 $ 2.53 Indiana $ 9.71 $ 0.81 Kansas $ 5.89 $ 0.49 Michigan $ 23.55 $ 1.96 Missouri $ 10.87 $ 0.91 Nevada $ 1.54 $ 0.13 Ohio $ 17.81 $ 1.48 Oklahoma $ 7.05 $ 0.59 Texas $ 40.99 $ 3.41 Wisconsin $ 9.45 $ 0.79 $250.00 $ 20.83 ATTACHMENT A-6 (cont'd) YEAR 2 CIPP CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 6.24 $ 0.52 California $ 118.51 $ 9.88 Connecticut $ 14.34 $ 1.20 Illinois $ 45.62 $ 3.80 Indiana $ 14.57 $
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp35.pdf
  • Period variable took on the values of 5 through 8 in the regression model. 47 Observations = 24 F(3, 20) = 2.22 Prob > F = 0.1174 R2 = .2497 Root MSE = 425.22 Seller #3 Net Surplus Coefficient (t-value) (95% Confidence. Interval) Low/High -13.62 (-.06) -457 429 High/High -481.25 (-2.26) -924 -37 Period -9.21 (-.12) -171 152 Constant 811.40 (1.54) -286 1909 Table 20: Seller #3 Net Surplus Regression (CAP MFN Treatment) The statistical insignificance of the coefficient on the dummy variable "Low/High" indicates that Seller #3 earns the same net surplus operating in a market that includes a two "moderately-sized" cable operators (i.e., market shares of 27% and 24%) and several smaller buyers than as in a market that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OSEC/library/legislative_histories/43.pdf
  • With respect to the International Telephone & Telegraph Cor- poration, you will find information on page xiv, under the heading "International Telephone & Telegraph Corporation." The 30 largest holders in whose names stood 887,505 shares accounted for 13.87 percent of the total voting securities. The largest holder was the Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, which held 98,275 shares or 1.54 percent of the voting power. The only directors included among the 30 largest stockholders were Clarence H. Mackay and Edward J. Berwind, who held 1.22 and 0.76 percent, respectively. No general officer of the company was included among the 30 largest holders. The outstanding stock was held in average amounts of 56.14 shares by 98,169 parties. At the stockholders' meeting
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc00289.pdf
  • Feb. 18, 2000, at 7. 152Id. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 E-19 Table E-1: MMDS Internet Access Offerings Company Location Direction Maximum Downstream Speed Alaska Wireless Cable Fairbanks, AK Two-way N/A Cache Valley AIRNET Cache Valley, UT Two-way 5 Mbps IJNT.net, Inc. Salt Lake City, UT Beaumont, TX One-way 10 Mbps Nucentrix Broadband Networks, Inc. Austin, TX Sherman, TX Two-way 1.54 Mbps Sioux Valley Wireless Sioux Falls, SD Two-way 4 Mbps SkyLynx Communications Fresno, CA Sarasota, FL Two-way (in conjunction with unlicensed) 11 Mbps Phoenix, AZ Two-way 2 Mbps Sprint Detroit, MI San Francisco, CA Two-way (trial) 2 Mbps U.S. Interactive dba AccelerNet Houston, TX One-way 10 Mbps Wireless First Traverse City, MI Two-way N/A WorldCom Baton Rouge, LA Jackson, MI
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • 73.67 NA 68.59 NA MR-4-08- 3345 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 24.86NA 25.39 NA 27.56 NA MR-5 � Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01- 3345 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 55.52NA 57.53 NA 56.83 NA Special Services - Maintenance MR-2 � Trouble Report Rate MR-2-01- 3200 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.24 1.45 0.24 1.49 0.2 1.62 0.21 1.8 0.21 1.54 MR-2-05- 3200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.29 1.94 0.31 2.66 0.27 2.63 2.57 2.94 MR-4 � Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01- 3200 Mean Time To Repair � Total 6.9 7.23 7.76 7.45 MR-4-01- 3216 Mean Time To Repair � Total - Non DS0 & DS0 6.52NA 5.77 NA 6.45 2.25 MR-4-01- 3217 Mean Time To Repair � Total - DS1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Hundt/spreh739.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Hundt/spreh739.txt
  • May of this year the FCC released its Universal Service Order, which allocates up to $400 million a year to the estimated 12,000 eligible health care providers. This is the single greatest government commitment ever made to the development of telehealth. The FCC decided that eligible providers will be able to choose telecommunications services of any transmission speed up to 1.54 Mbps (equivalent to a T-1, at rates comparable to those paid in urban areas. This support will apply to any type of telecommunications technology, including telephone, wireless, and satellite services. In addition, universal service funds will cover a limited amount of toll-free access to the nearest Internet service provider. Health care providers who do not now have local access to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3544A1.html
  • July 30 Letter (``As far as we know today, the source of the violation is a modification on the CPU board. We added an extra track of 3,4 volt power supply. Unfortunately this track became an antenna. Neutral and Line Disturbance tests remained ok, while the test of the Horizontal Polarization showed only a small violation on 229,4 MHz of -1.54 dB. The Vertical Polarization test however showed the bad results.''). 12 July 10 Letter (``We believe that the modifications which are the reason, that some of our organs were violating FCC rules, have been done between July and October 2002. The modifications have been built in limited numbers of organs. Some of them have been shipped to the US and
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • Contour Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.002 (0.21) 0.014 (0.17) 0.014 (1.73) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.001 (0.03) 0.027 (1.43) 0.029 (1.59) Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.39) 0.017 (1.39) 0.004 (0.49) 0.007 (0.77) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.015 (0.53) 0.002 (0.12) 0.008 (0.53) Contour/Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.006 (0.27) 0.021 (1.44) 0.022 (1.54) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.004 (0.12) 0.024 (1.02) 0.028 (1.23) * - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 95 percent level of confidence. ** - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 99 percent level of confidence. The coefficient on the number of LPFM stations is reported. Other coefficients are not reported. t-statistics are
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/circuit.pdf
  • 30% 12% 21 18 18 7India 1,418 802 1 2,221 190 1.77 2.50 3.43 4% 47% 17% 21% 22 24 25 1Belgium 1,350 809 44 2,203 721 1.67 1.53 3.80 50% 38% 44% -26% 23 19 23 1Ireland 1,437 620 67 2,124 853 2.32 2.79 4.28 11% 34% 18% -9% 24 n.a. n.a. 7Malaysia 572 1,544 1 2,117 1,714 0.37 1.54 2.24 33% 453% 199% 652% 25 22 24 7China 1,501 422 4 1,927 1,073 3.56 4.27 19.59 16% 40% 21% 73% 26 28 28 3Israel 1,082 843 1 1,926 266 1.28 1.77 4.48 26% 74% 43% -9% 27 23 20 6Colombia 1,137 739 9 1,885 376 1.54 3.11 4.56 -3% 95% 20% -17% 28 27 19 9Russia 1,266 533 22
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport.pdf
  • 4,992 2,574 1.70 2.17 3.43 5.05 6 18 16 16 16Venezuela 1,913 2,412 0 4,325 1,700 0.79 1.31 1.49 2.14 1 19 n.a. n.a. n.a.Denmark 1,267 234 2,520 4,021 542 0.46 2.89 5.82 7.00 6 20 23 29 29Argentina 779 3,150 30 3,959 1,128 0.24 0.46 0.76 1.34 6 21 28 27 23Colombia 1,391 2,273 24 3,688 1,313 0.61 1.26 1.54 3.11 7 22 15 17 17Taiwan 1,647 1,837 48 3,532 4,580 0.87 0.71 1.64 2.32 7 23 n.a. 21 18India 1,453 1,986 23 3,462 734 0.72 1.44 1.77 2.50 1 24 17 18 12Italy 2,650 709 92 3,451 1,765 3.31 2.60 2.09 2.34 9 25 26 28 27Russia 1,528 1,484 40 3,052 439 1.00 1.53 2.38 3.53 7 26 22
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • Revenues per Minute 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Percent Change 1998 to 2003 Australia $1.25 $1.09 $1.01 $0.68 $0.30 $0.42 $0.55 $0.51 $0.38 $0.27 $0.25 -39.9% Brazil 1.06 0.97 0.96 0.78 0.73 0.67 0.57 0.45 0.25 0.22 0.14 -78.8 Canada 0.41 0.36 0.34 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.26 0.19 0.19 0.16 -48.4 China 1.80 1.54 1.47 1.28 1.14 0.90 0.73 0.48 0.29 0.24 0.18 -80.5 Colombia 1.07 1.01 1.00 0.84 0.89 0.77 0.65 0.43 0.26 0.21 0.11 -85.2 Dominican Republic 0.98 0.83 0.84 0.70 0.57 0.45 0.27 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.16 -64.7 Egypt 1.35 1.27 1.25 1.04 1.03 0.97 0.81 0.70 0.44 0.28 0.21 -78.8 El Salvador 1.24 1.20 1.23 1.17 1.08 0.81 0.69 0.60
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • Contour Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.002 (0.21) 0.014 (0.17) 0.014 (1.73) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.001 (0.03) 0.027 (1.43) 0.029 (1.59) Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.39) 0.017 (1.39) 0.004 (0.49) 0.007 (0.77) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.015 (0.53) 0.002 (0.12) 0.008 (0.53) Contour/Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.006 (0.27) 0.021 (1.44) 0.022 (1.54) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.004 (0.12) 0.024 (1.02) 0.028 (1.23) * -estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 95 percent level of confidence. ** -estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 99 percent level of confidence. The coefficient on the number of LPFM stations is reported. Other coefficients are not reported. t-statistics are in parentheses
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • $ 0.29 $ 2.27 Incremental Cost of Upgrade/Homes Passed (PPPOE) $ 0.19 $ 0.06 $ 0.09 $ 0.07 $ 0.06 $ 0.48 Boston, Massachusetts Market # of Subscribers (b) 125,000 36,070 46,478 59,890 77,171 344,609 Incremental Cost of Upgrade/Homes Passed (L2TP) $ 9.99 $ 2.74 $ 3.35 $ 4.10 $ 5.02 $ 25.20 Incremental Cost of Upgrade/Homes Passed (PPPOE) $ 1.54 $ 0.42 $ 0.52 $ 0.63 $ 0.78 $ 3.89 Portland, Oregon Market # of Subscribers (b) 200,000 57,712 74,365 95,823 72,100 500,000 Incremental Cost of Upgrade/Homes Passed (L2TP) $ 28.45 $ 7.80 $ 9.55 $ 11.69 $ 8.35 $ 65.83 Incremental Cost of Upgrade/Homes Passed (PPPOE) $ 3.90 $ 1.07 $ 1.31 $ 1.60 $ 1.14 $ 9.01 (a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/forbearance/forbearance-rules.pdf
  • be filed as a separate pleading and shall be identified in the caption of such pleading as a petition for forbearance under 47 U.S.C. 160(c). Any request which is not in compliance with this rule is deemed not to constitute a petition pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 160(c), and is not subject to the deadline set forth therein. 47 C.F.R. � 1.54 Petitions for forbearance must be complete as filed. (a) Description of relief sought. Petitions for forbearance must identify the requested relief, including: (1) Each statutory provision, rule, or requirement from which forbearance is sought. (2) Each carrier, or group of carriers, for which forbearance is sought. (3) Each service for which forbearance is sought. (4) Each geographic location, zone, or
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/forbearance/timeline.html
  • petitions. As with any general timeline, it necessarily oversimplifies the process. Most of the dates and time ranges in the timeline are approximate, and the circumstances of individual petitions may require different time frames for particular parts of the process. Prefiling In the Forbearance Procedures Order, the Commission adopted a complete as filed rule, which is codified at 47 C.F.R. 1.54. That rule sets forth requirements a forbearance petition must meet in order to be considered on its merits. A party planning to file a forbearance petition also may wish to contact the Commission staff prior to filing. Day 0: A Forbearance Petition Is Filed In addition to specifying requirements for the contents of forbearance petitions, the complete as filed rule